31.08.2013 Views

AIAS newsletter Autumn 2012 TW.indd

AIAS newsletter Autumn 2012 TW.indd

AIAS newsletter Autumn 2012 TW.indd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>AIAS</strong><br />

Amsterdam Institute for<br />

Advanced labour Studies<br />

www.uva-aias.net<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong><br />

<strong>Autumn</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

Newsletter<br />

New management <strong>AIAS</strong><br />

Interview with Prof. Edelman<br />

Georgetown University, Washington, DC<br />

New working paper series: ‘Labour markets<br />

and industrial relations in the Netherlands’


<strong>AIAS</strong><br />

What can we offer you?<br />

CONTENTS<br />

What can we offer you? 2<br />

Editorial word 3<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> conference 4<br />

Focus on... Peter Edelman 6<br />

Events 7<br />

Working Papers 12<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> Series (Labour markets & industrial relations in the Netherlands) 13<br />

GINI Papers 14<br />

Newsletters 22<br />

Publications Academic 27<br />

Publications Professional 31<br />

Focus on... Research 34<br />

Data 36<br />

Research 37<br />

Overview research projects j<br />

38<br />

Onderwijs/Teaching 42<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> 44<br />

People at <strong>AIAS</strong> 45<br />

Call for Papers 44<br />

Announcements 46<br />

Amsterdam Institute<br />

for Advanced labour Studies<br />

UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> is an institute for multidisciplinary research and teaching at the University of Amsterdam. Founded in 1998, it<br />

brings together the University’s expertise in labour studies from the Faculties of Law, Social and Behavioural Sciences,<br />

Economics and Business, and Medicine.<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong>’ mission is to strengthen its position as a leading academic centre in the fi eld of labour studies in the Netherlands and abroad, fostering<br />

its acclaim as an attractive partner for international cooperation in research and teaching. Our threefold task is to perform and facilitate<br />

research aimed at developing, empirically testing and applying theories that can explain the working of labour markets, labour relations and<br />

organisations, and social and labour policies in an internationally comparative perspective. We maintain and further develop multidisciplinary<br />

teaching programmes concerning these issues and provide expertise to society by supplying analytical tools, results and data to enlighten policy<br />

making in the fi eld of labour and to contribute to the intellectual and public debate on labour, employment and social policies.<br />

Research<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> research focuses on the analysis of<br />

labour markets, social security and governance.<br />

It combines various disciplinary approaches<br />

along three perspectives: Societal<br />

regulations & coordination of markets, Individual<br />

transactions in markets and Societal<br />

and individual effects. Some of our research<br />

programmes we are involved in:<br />

● GINI Growing Inequalities’ Impacts<br />

● Equalsoc network of Excellence (Economic<br />

Changes, Quality of Life and<br />

Social Cohesion)<br />

● Solidarity in the 21 st Century<br />

● AMCIS Amsterdam Centre for Inequality<br />

Studies<br />

● Flex Work Research Centre<br />

● WageIndicator<br />

Teaching<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> offers various forms of education:<br />

● The course cycle ‘Arbeidsvraagstukken en Beleid’<br />

consisting of four courses (in Dutch):<br />

A. HRM in Beeld<br />

B. Arbeidsmarkt in Ontwikkeling<br />

C. Ongelijkheid en de Verzorgingsstaat<br />

D. Trends in Arbeidsverhoudingen<br />

● Various in-company courses<br />

● Together with the Graduate School<br />

of Social Sciences and the Faculty of<br />

Social and Behavioural Sciences, <strong>AIAS</strong><br />

organizes the Master in Comparative<br />

Organisation Labour Studies<br />

● PhD Laboratory, which aims at providing<br />

a stimulating and structured environment<br />

for the support of external<br />

PhD students, specifi cally teaching<br />

staff of the University of Applied<br />

Sciences.<br />

Social involvement<br />

Annually <strong>AIAS</strong> organizes conferences<br />

about ongoing research and current trends.<br />

Furthermore, several (lunch) seminars and<br />

workshops take place during the year, offering<br />

interesting opportunities for the exchange<br />

and deliberation of research on labour<br />

issues from all over the world. <strong>AIAS</strong><br />

has a major collection of academic socioeconomic<br />

data in the fi eld of labour relations,<br />

labour organizations, employment<br />

and working conditions in the Netherlands<br />

and abroad. <strong>AIAS</strong> and its staff contribute to<br />

society on many subjects, for different audiences<br />

and in varying formats (articles, books,<br />

reports, interviews, presentations etc...). The<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> Working Paper, the ‘Labour markets<br />

and industrial relations in the Netherlands’<br />

and the GINI Discussion Paper series also<br />

addresses a great variety of topics.<br />

COLOPHON<br />

This is a publication of the Amsterdam Institute for<br />

Advanced labour Studies, Plantage Muidergracht 12,<br />

1018 TV Amsterdam, The Netherlands<br />

Subscriptions / address changes<br />

aias@uva.nl or +31 20 525 4199<br />

(Final) editing<br />

Angelique Lieberton, Jan Cremers and Paul de Beer.<br />

Design / photo’s<br />

Creative Es & Angelique Lieberton<br />

Cover photo: ©Jordi Huisman<br />

Other photos: ©S. Stevenson, J. Cremers, <strong>AIAS</strong> and ©J. Huisman<br />

Print run / edition<br />

Print run: 2300 / © <strong>Autumn</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>AIAS</strong><br />

Printer: GVO drukkers & vormgevers B.V. | Ponsen & Looijen


Editorial<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> is moving on!<br />

In April this year Maarten Keune and I have taken over the management<br />

of <strong>AIAS</strong> from Wiemer Salverda, who has reached the age of 65. Maarten<br />

and I hope to be able to continue the successful research and educational<br />

programmes that <strong>AIAS</strong> is renowned for both within and outside of academia.<br />

As an interdisciplinary institute, in which the<br />

faculties of Law, Social and Behavioural Sciences,<br />

Economics and Business and Medicine<br />

cooperate, <strong>AIAS</strong> studies quite varied<br />

societal phenomena and problems, using<br />

insights from various scientifi c disciplines.<br />

As usual, this Newsletter, which is published<br />

twice a year, gives an overview of completed,<br />

ongoing and new research programmes.<br />

One example of this is the cross-national<br />

GINI project, which is co-ordinated by<br />

Wiemer Salverda. This research project,<br />

funded by the European Union under the<br />

7th Framework Programme, focuses on the<br />

societal impact of growing income inequalities<br />

in 29 countries. This Newsletter gives an<br />

overview of a number of discussion papers<br />

that have been published recently as part<br />

of the GINI project. <strong>AIAS</strong> researchers also<br />

contribute regularly to international research<br />

programmes co-ordinated by scientifi c institutes<br />

abroad. Often, this takes the form of<br />

a country study, which is incorporated in<br />

an overall report or book. To make these<br />

country reports available for a larger audience,<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> has just started a new working<br />

paper series, ‘Labour markets and industrial<br />

relations in the Netherlands’, in which these<br />

reports on the Netherlands are collected.<br />

Besides research, <strong>AIAS</strong> is also involved in<br />

interdisciplinary educational programmes.<br />

On the one hand, several <strong>AIAS</strong> staff members<br />

participate in the regular education<br />

of the faculties. On the other hand, <strong>AIAS</strong><br />

has its own post-academic educational<br />

programme for professionals. In 2011 we<br />

started with a cycle of four short courses<br />

or ‘leergangen’, which focus on HRM, labour<br />

market developments, inequality and soli-<br />

darity, and industrial relations, respectively.<br />

These courses are followed by professionals<br />

from companies, trade unions, the government,<br />

etc. <strong>AIAS</strong> also organizes a PhD lab<br />

for so-called external PhD candidates, who<br />

are guided in the writing of their fi rst scientifi<br />

c paper. Next year, we will start a professional<br />

course for trainers of works councils.<br />

Apart from research and education, <strong>AIAS</strong><br />

organizes seminars and conferences. The<br />

highlight of each year is the <strong>AIAS</strong> annual<br />

conference, which was organized on September<br />

26 and was attended by over one<br />

hundred participants. This Newsletter gives<br />

an impression of the conference and also<br />

includes an interview with one of the keynote<br />

speakers, Professor Peter Edelman of<br />

Georgetown University, Washington, DC.<br />

In 2013, <strong>AIAS</strong> will also organize the 10 th<br />

European Conference of the International<br />

Labour and Employment Relations Association<br />

(ILERA). The call for papers for<br />

this conference can be found in this issue.<br />

Last but not least, I would like to draw attention<br />

to the bi-weekly lunch seminars on<br />

Thursday, which give both <strong>AIAS</strong> staff and<br />

researchers from other universities the opportunity<br />

to present and discuss recent research.<br />

I would like to thank Wiemer Salverda very<br />

much for the way that he has led <strong>AIAS</strong><br />

in the past decade. Maarten Keune and<br />

I hope that <strong>AIAS</strong> will continue to be an<br />

outstanding institute for interdisciplinary<br />

research and education in the next decade!<br />

Paul de Beer<br />

Editor <strong>AIAS</strong> <strong>newsletter</strong> & Co-director <strong>AIAS</strong><br />

P.T.deBeer@uva.nl<br />

Prof Paul de Beer Prof Maarten Keune<br />

3


4<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> CONFERENCE<br />

26 September <strong>2012</strong>, Amsterdam<br />

Never waste a good crisis!<br />

On September 26, <strong>2012</strong>, the annual <strong>AIAS</strong> conference took place in Amsterdam. As <strong>AIAS</strong> co-director Paul de Beer<br />

explained in his introductory remarks, the <strong>AIAS</strong> conference brings together scholars and practitioners from a variety<br />

of disciplines and backgrounds around one common theme. This year’s theme was “Never Waste a Good Crisis:<br />

Structural Labour Market Reform in Times of Austerity.”<br />

As Paul de Beer explained, the 2008 crisis has<br />

rendered visible the structural weaknesses of<br />

European labour markets, while tilting the political<br />

scales in many European countries towards<br />

fi scal conservatism. This begs the question how<br />

we can solve widespread unemployment in the<br />

face of persistent budget austerity. The three<br />

speakers of the day combined insights from the<br />

fi elds of economics, sociology and law to offer<br />

some preliminary answers to that important<br />

question. Prof. Sweder van Wijnbergen, Prof.<br />

Evelien Tonkens and Prof. Evert Verhulp (all<br />

University of Amsterdam) served as discussants.<br />

Dr. Stefano Scarpetta of the OECD presented<br />

an impressive collection of data on active<br />

labour market policies in OECD countries<br />

before, during and after the crisis. Dr.Scarpetta<br />

showed the disparities in this crisis: only have<br />

some countries been affected more than others<br />

(compare Spain with the Netherlands, for<br />

instance), socio-economic groups within those<br />

economies have also experienced the crisis in<br />

different ways. What immediately stood out<br />

from Dr. Scarpetta’s data, for instance, was<br />

the disproportionate effect of the crisis on<br />

young workers and the low-skilled. The sobering<br />

conclusion of these observations was that<br />

a single strategy to restructure labour markets<br />

across the OECD would be ineffective. Still,<br />

the speaker noted, some policy responses had<br />

proven to be better than others. Dr. Scarpetta<br />

was particularly sceptical of the deregulation of<br />

permanent employment contracts in countries<br />

like Spain and Italy: “not the type of fl exibility<br />

we’re hoping for”, he said. Rather, the most<br />

resilient labour markets did not dismantle, but<br />

combined traditional institutions like collective<br />

bargaining with fl exible employment practices.<br />

Dr. Scarpetta’s fi ndings tied in well with the<br />

second presentation of the day, by Prof.<br />

Giuliano Bonoli of the Swiss Graduate School<br />

of Public Administration, who focused on the<br />

effects of the crisis on low-skilled workers.<br />

While Dr. Scarpetta’s research had found no<br />

correlation between government spending on<br />

active labour market policies and actual labour<br />

market performance, Prof. Bonoli gave the<br />

audience a number of possible explanations.<br />

Low-skilled workers, Prof. Bonoli explained,<br />

face specifi c challenges in unemployment that<br />

may not be adequately targeted by active labour<br />

market policies. Consider, for instance, the<br />

problem of a double selection bias, whereby<br />

the more qualifi ed workers are more likely to<br />

participate in job training and are more likely to<br />

succeed at it. According to Prof. Bonoli, lowskilled<br />

workers also have to rely much more<br />

on informal channels to learn about jobs than<br />

high-skilled workers, thus creating a problem of<br />

labour market matching. Prof. Bonoli therefore<br />

suggested the idea of a “service Keynesianism”:<br />

using government stimulus to create highquality<br />

service jobs for the low-skilled.<br />

According to Prof. Bonoli, one of the causes<br />

for unemployment among the low-skilled is<br />

their displacement from low-skilled jobs by employment-starved<br />

medium-skilled workers. This<br />

broader theme of a downwardly mobile middle<br />

class also resonated in the presentation on poverty<br />

in the United States by Prof. Peter Edelman<br />

of the Georgetown Law Center. Prof.<br />

Edelman explained how a stunning 46 million<br />

Americans currently live below the poverty line.<br />

Although programmes to alleviate poverty in<br />

the United States do exist – from food stamps<br />

to earned income tax credits –Prof. Edelman<br />

pointed out how social stigma has long prevented<br />

an adequate response to rising poverty<br />

Prof Paul de Beer<br />

Prof Sweder van Wijnbergen is interviewing dr Scarpetta<br />

(Photo by Jan Cremers, © <strong>AIAS</strong>)<br />

Prof. Peter Edelmann


levels. In particular, the distinction between the<br />

“deserving poor” (veterans, elderly) and the<br />

“undeserving poor” (single mothers, people of<br />

colour) has stymied much of public policy in<br />

this area. I found Prof. Edelman’s cautionary<br />

tale highly relevant for our European societies<br />

as well: as our policymakers are currently (re-)<br />

considering which socio-economic groups are<br />

“deserving” of public resources, which normative<br />

underpinnings inform our social policies?<br />

Our concluding panel of the day had the diffi<br />

cult task to tackle this complex political issue.<br />

Composed of four representatives of political<br />

party think tanks (Mr. Arjan Vliegenthart<br />

from the Scientifi c Bureau of the Dutch Socialist<br />

Party, Mr. Frans Becker of the Wiardi Beckman<br />

Foundation, Mr. Raymond Gradus of the<br />

Scientifi c Institute of the Christian Democrats<br />

Party, and Mr. Raymond Brood of Mercer<br />

Marsh Benefi ts Benelux), the panel was asked<br />

for specifi c policy recommendations to improve<br />

labour markets in the Netherlands. The<br />

panellists were not generous with specifi c policy<br />

recommendation, despite the gentle urgings<br />

of the discussion leader (what did the panellists<br />

think of a comeback of the old Melkertbanen?).<br />

Nonetheless, their more general suggestions,<br />

from a new social pact between government<br />

and social partners to a more facilitating role for<br />

the government in job creation, gave the audience<br />

members plenty of room for discussion<br />

during the reception afterwards. Looking back<br />

at a very successful day, I encourage everyone<br />

who was unable to attend to watch the videos<br />

of all conference presentations, which will be<br />

made available through the <strong>AIAS</strong> website.<br />

Natascha van der Zwan<br />

N.A.J.vanderZwan@uva.nl<br />

Photos by Sean Stevenson, © <strong>AIAS</strong><br />

Debate with representatives of some political parties<br />

Prof.<br />

Giuliano Bonoli<br />

Prof.<br />

Evelien Tonkens<br />

is interviewing<br />

Prof. Bonoli<br />

Prof.<br />

Evert Verhulp<br />

Dr. Stefano<br />

Scarpetta<br />

5


6<br />

To start off, what are the sources of<br />

poverty in the US?<br />

People are poor for all kinds of reasons.<br />

Certainly the strongest reason for poverty is<br />

low wage work. About 61% of the income<br />

of people who are classifi ed as poor comes<br />

from work. So the fact that people have<br />

only intermittent work, part-time work, or<br />

low wage work, that’s the major reason. A<br />

quarter of the jobs in the US, even if you<br />

have them full time all through the year, pay<br />

less than the poverty line for a family of<br />

four. There’s a large number of households<br />

where there’s only one adult, most often a<br />

woman, so they don’t get by. If you have<br />

two people in the household that both have<br />

a job, even if it pays in that bottom quarter,<br />

then they’re not going be rich, but they’re<br />

alright. Then, somebody loses their job and<br />

they, as we say, put more water in the soup.<br />

How do public programmes help poor<br />

people in the US<br />

There’s a big difference in our public policy<br />

between the people who work and those<br />

that, for whichever reason, have no work. A<br />

person, say a single mum, who has a minimum<br />

wage job earns about 15.000 dollars<br />

annually (the poverty line for a family of<br />

three is about 19.000 dollars). She gets the<br />

earned income tax credit of about $5500<br />

and she gets child tax credit for about<br />

$1500. So she gets almost a fi fty per cent addition<br />

to her income from those two things.<br />

Pretty good.<br />

The poor who do not work, however, are<br />

increasingly seen as undeserving. The number<br />

of people who receive unemployment<br />

FOCUS ON...<br />

PROF. PETER EDELMANN<br />

On the 26 th of September, the <strong>AIAS</strong> annual conference took place in<br />

Amsterdam. Peter Edelman, professor at the Georgetown University Law<br />

Center, gave a speech called Why is it so hard to end poverty in the US.<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> PhD candidate Janna Besamusca interviewed Prof. Edelman about his<br />

experiences in fi ghting poverty that Edelman relates in his recent book ‘So rich<br />

so poor’, among others as legislative assistant to Robert Kennedy and assistant<br />

secretary for planning and evaluation in the Clinton administration.<br />

benefi ts, or what we call welfare, went from<br />

14 million when President Clinton took offi<br />

ce, down to 3.9 million before the recession<br />

started. If you earned too little, if you<br />

haven’t worked long enough, if you have a<br />

part-time job, you’re not eligible. So if for<br />

whatever reason someone has no unemployment<br />

insurance and no other income,<br />

all she’s going to get is food stamps. You<br />

have a legal right to food stamps. Used to<br />

be you had a legal right to welfare. Payments<br />

were very low, but at least you had a legal<br />

right to cash assistance. That isn’t there anymore,<br />

so states are free to help you or not,<br />

even if you’re eligible.<br />

In your book you mention President<br />

Obama’s health care reform helps fi ght<br />

poverty. Exactly how historic is the reform?<br />

The reform has two components. In the<br />

old system, you only qualifi ed for Medicaid<br />

as an adult of working age if you received<br />

cash assistance or were disabled. So there<br />

were almost no low-wage workers who were<br />

entitled. Some 16 million people who aren’t<br />

currently eligible for Medicaid will be entitled<br />

now.<br />

People who have incomes above the Medicaid<br />

level (132% of the poverty line) will be<br />

able to buy insurance at something called an<br />

exchange and they’ll have a subsidy for their<br />

premium on a fl ying scale up to four times<br />

the poverty line. About half of the newly<br />

insured people, another 16 million, will get<br />

in through the exchange. There are also a<br />

lot of people who currently have very expensive<br />

insurances, because they’re buying<br />

it themselves, who will shift to the exchange<br />

and be much better off. So 32 million of<br />

the 47 million currently uninsured are going<br />

to get health coverage. We’re reaching about<br />

two thirds, that’s a big thing.<br />

You also mention the retreat of unions<br />

from the private sector as a cause of<br />

working poverty. How detrimental has<br />

the lack of unionization in the private<br />

sector been on wage development?<br />

Clearly there is a trend towards low-wage<br />

work that includes countries that have a<br />

very high amount of unionism. But it’s even<br />

more diffi cult to organize those low wage<br />

workers in the US, because legal protection<br />

for organizing is very weak. A lot of low<br />

wage workers work in very big companies,<br />

like Walmart. And the point is that Walmart<br />

could be organized and people would still<br />

go doing their shopping there and just pay<br />

a little bit more. The future of unionism is<br />

most promising for some category of low<br />

wage workers, particularly in the services<br />

sectors. I also think it’s a question of discovering<br />

some way of representation that may<br />

be different from only the classic organizing<br />

of the workplace in doing collective agreements<br />

about the wage. It may well be that<br />

they attract people<br />

when they become<br />

more of a community<br />

based organization<br />

and people join<br />

them for reasons<br />

other than simply the<br />

wage and the fringe<br />

benefi ts.


EVENTS<br />

Jan Cremers<br />

Keynote speech on free<br />

movement of workers<br />

Cremers gave a keynote speech during the 36 th meeting of the Committee for<br />

interregional cooperation of the German-Polish governmental Commission for<br />

regional and cross-border cooperation.<br />

The German and Polish Ministries of Labour and regional authorities have established a permanent<br />

forum that exchanges views on social-economic and political aspects of labour migration<br />

and European policies. In a meeting on 19 April <strong>2012</strong> in Schwerin the members of the<br />

committee assessed the experiences with free movement of labour after the removal of the<br />

labour market restrictions (as of 1 May 2011). Jan Cremers was asked to deliver one of the<br />

keynotes speeches. He sketched out the existing framework for the free movement of workers<br />

and the pending questions that still have to be solved. He also stressed the necessity to fi nd<br />

joint solutions between social partners and governmental bodies in the fi eld of compliance<br />

with and respect for working conditions, equal treatment and the avoidance of distortion of<br />

competition<br />

In the fi nal memorandum that was signed at the end of the meeting the participants stated that<br />

the creation of decent work and “Equal pay at the place where the work is pursued” have to<br />

be guiding principles in the development of a competitive market economy.<br />

Jan Cremers<br />

Contribution to a panel<br />

at the International<br />

Conference of Europeanist<br />

Jan Cremers contributed to a panel EU free movement mid-crisis and post-<br />

Lisbon: What scope for a rights-based European labour geography? during the<br />

19th Conference of Europeanists in Boston on 22 March <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

In his contribution In search of cheap labour in Europe he reported on research related to<br />

the cross border provision of services with posted workers, an integral part of the economic<br />

freedoms in the EU internal market. The EU Posting of Workers Directive (Directive 96/71/<br />

EC), established in the mid-1990s, tried to settle posting rules that could guarantee the rights<br />

of posted workers within the territory where the work was pursued. The fi nal paper consists<br />

of an analysis of the theory and practice of the functioning of the posting rules in 12 European<br />

countries. The focus was on the practical experiences of compliance authorities, labour<br />

inspectors and other controlling bodies. The paper will be published in the autumn in Policy<br />

Studies, Routledge.<br />

Academic Medical<br />

Centre, 9 May 2013<br />

Conference<br />

“Healthy<br />

and Active at<br />

work”<br />

On May 9 th the research programme<br />

Preventative Occupational Health<br />

Care held its closing conference at<br />

the Academic Medical Centre in<br />

Amsterdam<br />

Objective of this research programme is to increase<br />

knowledge in the area of occupational<br />

health care and prevention. The theme of the<br />

conference was healthy and active at work;<br />

with a focus on sustainable employability and<br />

prevention at the workplace. Invited guest<br />

speakers were prof. Knottnerus (WRR) and dr.<br />

Rinnooy Kan (SER). Several workshops were<br />

organised for presenting, discussing and demonstrating<br />

research outcomes. At <strong>AIAS</strong> the research<br />

project de human resources van werknemers<br />

met een chronische aandoening: maak er gebruik van<br />

was conducted by dr. Haafkens, dr. Kopnina<br />

and Claire Hogenhout (MSc candidate). In this<br />

project the role of HRM and line management<br />

in facilitating job retention of chronically ill<br />

employees was assessed. Within this project a<br />

training programme for HR-professionals and<br />

student on the topic of prevention and sustainable<br />

employability of chronically ill employees<br />

was developed. A pilot of the programme was<br />

held within the minor HRM at The Hague<br />

University of Applied Sciences. Parts of the<br />

programme are (ad hoc) implemented in the<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> HRM course. (see page 42).<br />

See for all workshop documents www.gezondactiefenbetrokken.nl,<br />

for the research programmewww.instituutgak.nl/deelprogrammas/preventieve_gezondheidszorg.php.<br />

7


8<br />

Kea Tijdens<br />

Presentation<br />

on the<br />

WISCO<br />

database<br />

On Wednesday 19 September <strong>2012</strong><br />

Kea Tijdens, research coordinator at<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong>, gave a presentation called "The<br />

WISCO database of occupations for the<br />

WageIndicator web-survey" for the ESCO<br />

Maintenance Committee in Brussels. ESCO<br />

stands for European Skills, Competences<br />

and Occupations taxonomy.<br />

ESCO is a Europe 2020 initiative. Its main<br />

aim is to build a multilingual classifi cation<br />

of European Skills/Competences, qualifi cations<br />

and Occupations. ESCO organises concepts<br />

that are relevant in the European labour<br />

market and in the education/training sector.<br />

It will be available free of charge to all stakeholders,<br />

and is predominantly developped for<br />

the public employment services in Europe. In<br />

the presentation, the WISCO database of occupations<br />

was detailed and the related research<br />

agenda was presented. For more information<br />

on the database, please contact Kea Tijdens at<br />

K.G.Tijdens@uva.nl<br />

Els Sol<br />

Paul de Beer<br />

EVENTS<br />

Presentation on the<br />

employer of the future<br />

On the annual 'science day' of the Netherlands General Employers<br />

Association (Algemene Werkgeversvereniging Nederland, AWVN) on 5<br />

September <strong>2012</strong>, Paul de Beer gave a presentation on the employer of the<br />

future.<br />

He contended that the ideal future employer should adapt to the employee of the future. However,<br />

he criticized the usual picture of the future employee as being increasingly autonomous<br />

and independent and thus becoming more similar to self-employed workers. According to De<br />

Beer, for many low-skilled employees, being autonomous and independent may not be an attractive<br />

prospect but rather a threat. Moreover, in the knowledge-based economy of the future,<br />

the ideal company is not a loose network of independent workers, who are primarily interested<br />

in their own career, but rather a community that is based on the mutual commitment between<br />

employer and employees.<br />

Jan Cremers<br />

Presentation Collective<br />

Bargaining Newsletter<br />

During the annual meeting of the Trade Union related Research Institutes Jan<br />

Cremers has presented the work <strong>AIAS</strong> is doing on behalf of the ETUI for the<br />

monthly production of the Collective Bargaining Newsletter.<br />

In his presentation he stressed the fact that the Newsletter is a slim and lean instrument that aims<br />

to inform and alert on (ongoing) negotiations, compliance issues and related industrial disputes.<br />

Go to our website to see his presentation (PDF) www.uva-aias.net/uploaded_fi les/regular/<br />

pptJCremersETUIParis1.pdf. See for more information on the Collective Bargaining Newsletter<br />

page 22 of this <strong>newsletter</strong> or see our website www.uva-aias.net/96#collective_barg.<br />

Workshop Pilot Parlement en Wetenschap<br />

Op donderdag 26 januari j.l. vond in het kader van een Pilot Parlement en Wetenschap in het gebouw van de Tweede<br />

Kamer een workshop plaats van de Vaste commissie voor Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid.<br />

De pilot is een initiatief van de Tweede Kamer en onder meer de KNAW. Het doel daarvan is de parlementaire kennisvraag en het wetenschappelijk<br />

kennisaanbod beter op elkaar aan te sluiten. Onderwerp van de betreffende workshop was het re-integratiebeleid en de effectiviteit<br />

daarvan. Els Sol heeft een presentatie gehouden, waarin ze benadrukte dat de politiek bij het kiezen van de juiste invalshoek door het stellen<br />

van de juiste vragen aan wetenschappers in de toekomst meer op basis van empirie en minder op basis van vooringenomen standpunten het<br />

re-integratievraagstuk zou kunnen aanpakken. Ter illustratie maakte ze gebruik van het boek ‘Fit or Unfi t: naar expliete re-integratietheorieën’,<br />

waarin de belangrijkste werkzame mechanismen bij dienstverlening gericht op werkhervatting zijn geëxpliciteerd.


EVENTS<br />

Wiemer Salverda<br />

Adjustments in the Public Sector in<br />

Europe<br />

The International Labour Organisation ILO, with the<br />

fi nancial support of the European Commission, organised<br />

a one-year internationally comparative research project<br />

that examined the situation of the public sector in the<br />

Financial Crisis.<br />

Thirteen national experts contributed each on their own country.<br />

Wiemer Salverda did for the Netherlands. He drew a close comparison<br />

to the Dutch recession of the early 1980s. This was deep by international<br />

standards as Dutch disposable household income fell by<br />

at least 8 per cent. Public-sector adjustment meant that wages were<br />

frozen, and cut in the wake of the Wassenaar Accord. The public<br />

wage bill fell over the 1980s and has remained at a lower level since.<br />

The same policy targeted health care wages – in spite of the fact that<br />

employers and unions were private negotiating partners. The unions<br />

appealed to the ILO because of a violation of free collective bargaining<br />

– they won in the end. As a result, different rules were introduced<br />

in the 1990s. At the same time wage negotiations for the civil service<br />

and the educational sector were decentralised. It led the author to<br />

conclude that wage cuts are no longer a constructive policy option for<br />

public-sector adjustment in the Netherlands. It was nicely illustrated<br />

Frank Tros<br />

Presented on ‘Flexicurity in Europe’<br />

Frank Tros has given a presentation at the 16 th World<br />

Congress of the International Labour and Employment<br />

Relations Association (ILERA) that was organised last July<br />

in Philadelphia.<br />

In the paper ‘Flexicurity in Europe: can it survive a double crisis?’ Frank<br />

Tros argues that since the fi nancial crisis, the economic and political<br />

conditions in Europe have become less favourable regarding the implementation<br />

of the policy-concept of ‘fl exicurity’. Furthermore, the<br />

paper examines the fact that the concept in itself seems in crisis since<br />

it meets more and more criticism of academics and because of disappointing<br />

outcomes of policies that are labelled as ‘fl exicurity’. Frank<br />

Tros concludes that the concept is currently ‘not dead’, but risks further<br />

erosion if the governments and the social partners in Europa will not<br />

follow two of the most important original principles of the fl exicurity<br />

by the agreement of the municipalities in 2011 to a wage rise in 2011,<br />

in the face of opposition by the government which aims to endorse<br />

a nominal freeze.<br />

Other countries in the project were the three Baltic States, Croatia,<br />

Germany, Greece, France, Hungary, Ireland, Portugal, Romania,<br />

Spain, Sweden, and the UK. Contributions were made by, inter alia,<br />

Jérôme Gautié, Gerhard Bosch, Philip O’Connell, Dominique Anxo<br />

and Damian Grimshaw. Daniel Vaughan-Whitehead coordinated the<br />

project; Jill Rubery contributed a special, cross-country chapter on<br />

gender. The public and the private sector differ radically in the presence<br />

of women – for example, two thirds of the Dutch public work<br />

force are female while in the private sector two thirds are male.<br />

The project results were presented at a concluding conference in<br />

Brussels on 20–21 June <strong>2012</strong>, and discussed by several Ministers of<br />

Labour and by public-sector and private-sector social-partner representatives<br />

(see http://www.ilo.org/brussels/WCMS_181854/<br />

lang--en/index.htm). The full results will soon be published by<br />

Edward Elgar.<br />

concept: (i) the view that investments in social and employment policies<br />

are an economic production function and (ii) integration of the<br />

policy areas of labour market policies, welfare arrangements and HRMpolicies.<br />

After the presentation, there was an interesting discussion about the<br />

question whether the fl exicurity concept can be blamed for the disappointing<br />

outcomes and whether there are alternative approaches that<br />

can bring employers as well as trade unions to the bargaining tables.<br />

From 20-22 June 2013, the European ILERA Conference will be held<br />

in Amsterdam. See the backcover or www.ilera-europe2013.eu.<br />

9


10<br />

Kea Tijdens & Maarten van Klaveren<br />

EVENTS<br />

Presented at the AELF in South Korea<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> is a member of the Asian-European-Labour Forum (AELF). A few years ago<br />

the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES, Shanghai Offi ce) initiated the AELF to bring<br />

together labour research institutes, labour training institutes and think tanks<br />

closely linked to trade unions, as to exchange views on labour policy issues.<br />

The Forum is an annual event which is hosted<br />

by the participating institutions in a rotational<br />

arrangement. The 1 st AELF was organised by<br />

the Hans-Böckler-Stiftung (HBS) in Düsseldorf<br />

(Germany) in 2009, while the 2 nd Forum<br />

was hosted by the Institute of Workers and<br />

Trade Unions (IWTU) of the Vietnam General<br />

Congress of Labour (VGCL) in Ha Long,<br />

Vietnam, in 2010. The 3 rd AELF was hosted<br />

in 2011 in Oslo, by FAFO (Norway). AELF<br />

no. 4 again took place in Asia, from 7-9 May<br />

<strong>2012</strong> in Seoul (South Korea). This meeting<br />

was co-hosted by the Research Centers of the<br />

two South Korean union confederations, the<br />

Federation of Korean Trade Unions (FKTU)<br />

and the Korean Confederation of Trade<br />

Unions (KCTU). It was attended by 40 participants<br />

from over 20 institutes, from seven<br />

Asian countries (China, India, Indonesia,<br />

Pakistan, South Korea, Thailand, and Vetnam),<br />

fi ve European countries (France, Germany,<br />

Italy, Norway, and the Netherlands),<br />

and some international organisations.<br />

Actually, a number of participants is deliver-<br />

Robbert van het Kaar<br />

Presented for union<br />

offi cials<br />

On 10 Februari <strong>2012</strong> Robbert van het Kaar delivered a<br />

lecture for union offi cials of the largest Dutch trade union<br />

federation (FNV Bondgenoten) on corporate governance<br />

and industrial relations.<br />

Dutch legislation contains relatively strong union rights with<br />

regard to corporate governance issues, including the so-called<br />

right of inquiry (enquêterecht), but unions make hardly us of<br />

these rights. When they do, they appaear relatively successful.<br />

Recent noteworthy cases include Meavita and PCM.<br />

ing contributions to a reader that also is being<br />

shaped by introductions and debates in the<br />

AELF meetings. Its focus is on the interplay<br />

of minimum wages, collective bargaining and<br />

economic development in the participating<br />

countries. Of course, against this backdrop<br />

the current worldwide crisis was topical in<br />

the Seoul meeting, that was entitled “Income<br />

Inequality and Economic Crisis: Solution<br />

Strategies and Policy Issues”. Various<br />

speakers approached this theme from the<br />

angle of inequalities, drawing attention to in<br />

particular the worldwide growth of precarious<br />

work and youth unemployment. Frank<br />

Hoffer (ILO) focused on “Income Inequalities<br />

in the Age of Financial Globalisation”;<br />

Andrew Watt and Bela Galgoczi, of the<br />

Brussels-based European Trade Union Institute<br />

(ETUI), on “Fiscal Crisis and Income<br />

Inequalities in Europe”, while Prof. Alakh<br />

Sharma (Institute for Human Development,<br />

India) lectured on “Globalisation, Labour<br />

Market Flexibility and Inequality in India”.<br />

These and other contributions gave rise to<br />

lively debates.<br />

On the second day of the Seoul AELF,<br />

Maarten van Klaveren and Kea Tijdens<br />

(<strong>AIAS</strong>) presented their paper “Wage-setting<br />

and inequality in the Netherlands”. Based<br />

on various pieces of <strong>AIAS</strong> research, including<br />

the RSF low-wage research project on<br />

research based on the WageIndicator websurvey,<br />

they discussed the relations between<br />

wages and unemployment in the crisis, and<br />

wages and income inequality – both projected<br />

against changes in the structure of the Dutch<br />

economy, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)<br />

fl ows infl uencing this economy, and current<br />

economic policies as debated in the Netherlands.<br />

In the closing session, when debating<br />

future plans, representatives of the China Institute<br />

of Industrial Relations (CIIR) in Beijing<br />

promised to do their utmost to organise<br />

the 5th AELF in their home town. If so, it is<br />

most likely that the <strong>AIAS</strong> in 2014 will host the<br />

6th Forum meeting in Amsterdam.<br />

Expert meeting<br />

Brussels<br />

On 1 June <strong>2012</strong> Robbert van het Kaar took part in an<br />

expert meeting in Brussels on Industrial Relations in<br />

Europe, organized bij DG Employment of the European<br />

Commission.<br />

The main subject of the meeting was industrial relations in<br />

the public sector after the outbreak of the crisis. Van het Kaar<br />

delivered the comments on a second subject: the role of the<br />

social partners in occupational pension schemes. For more<br />

information, please contact R.H.vanhetKaar@uva.nl.


EVENTS<br />

Maarten Keune<br />

Transnational industrial<br />

relations as multi-level<br />

governance: presentation<br />

at IREC/ESA RN17<br />

Maarten Keune presented a paper, co-authored with Paul Marginson, at the<br />

joint conference of the Industrial Relations in Europe Conference (IREC)<br />

and the European Sociological Association’s Research Network on Work,<br />

Employment and Industrial Relations (RN 17) in Lisbon, 5-7 September <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

The paper argues that processes of transnationalisation of industrial relations have been<br />

redrawing and increasing the complexity of the industrial relations map, adding new levels,<br />

actors and institutions, and creating new horizontal and vertical relationships and interdependencies.<br />

To capture these changes it proposes a multi-governance perspective, enriched<br />

by due attention to power relations. It then applies this perspective to analyse the evolution<br />

of European social dialogue (ESD), showing that the conventional reading of ESD moving<br />

from dependency to autonomy is a false one: negotiated regulation emanating from the<br />

ESD rests on two-directional relations, between the European and national levels involving<br />

autonomy and dependency at the same time. It also involves differing forms of horizontal<br />

interdependency between private actors and the public authorities. To show its wider applicability<br />

the paper also briefl y relate this approach also to International Framework Agreements<br />

and European Works Council agreements. The paper will be published in the near future in<br />

the 50th anniversary issue of the British Journal of Industrial Relations.<br />

Maarten Keune<br />

A presentation at SASE<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.<br />

The paper shows that in recent years, there is a marked increase<br />

in various types of atypical jobs , including fi xed-term contracts,<br />

temporary agency work, (dependent) self-employment, and (marginal)<br />

part-time contracts. Such jobs emerge in particular in certain<br />

sub-sectors and professions of the service sector. Although there<br />

is broad variation across countries, atypical jobs often have lower<br />

levels of job security, less access to social security, lower wages and<br />

worse working conditions, and less training opportunities. Such<br />

characteristics can turn atypical jobs into precarious jobs. The paper<br />

then discusses trade union strategies towards precarious jobs,<br />

drawing on a comparative research project covering seven EU<br />

countries. It outlines the various approaches taken by unions in the<br />

Nuria Ramos<br />

Lecture on<br />

‘EU Gender<br />

Equality Law’<br />

Nuria Ramos gave the lecture at the<br />

summer course on Europe Labour Law at<br />

the Academy of European Law, ERA.<br />

The summer course was held from 25-29 June<br />

<strong>2012</strong> at the ERA conference centre in Trier,<br />

Germany. This fi ve-day course provides a thorough<br />

introduction to European labour law:<br />

• Free movement of workers<br />

• Applicable law to employment contracts<br />

• Posting of workers<br />

• Transfer of undertakings<br />

• Information and consultation rights<br />

• Equality and non-discrimination<br />

• Part-time, fi xed-term and temporary<br />

agency work<br />

• Working time<br />

Participants we’re able to deepen their<br />

knowledge through case-studies and workshops.<br />

Maarten Keune presented a paper at the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics (SASE) at MIT, 28-30 June<br />

seven countries, ranging from organising to exclusion, from collective<br />

bargaining to attempts to infl uence legislation, and from providing<br />

services to mobilisation. On the one hand it fi nds common<br />

trends including a move from excluding precarious workers towards<br />

inclusion and from rejecting atypical jobs towards improving their<br />

quality. On the other hand, it fi nds national diversity on the extent to<br />

which mobilisation, bargaining, attempts to infl uence legislation and<br />

other strategies are used, and shows how this is linked to national<br />

differences in legislation, government policy, industrial relations systems<br />

and labour market conditions. The paper is an outcome of<br />

the BARSORI project, the reports of which can be accessed at:<br />

www.uva-aias.net/355.<br />

11


12<br />

WP 122, Aug. <strong>2012</strong><br />

Skill-based<br />

inequality in<br />

job quality<br />

WORKING PAPERS<br />

Haya Stier Haya Stier and Meir Yaish<br />

This study focuses on skill-based<br />

inequality in job quality and the role<br />

of social institutions in structuring the<br />

relation of skills to job attributes.<br />

Four F measures of<br />

job jo quality are examined:<br />

in job security, job<br />

achievement, a<br />

job content<br />

te and fl exibility, and<br />

th their variation across<br />

wworkers<br />

with differ-<br />

eent<br />

level of skills and<br />

across countries. The<br />

study is based on the<br />

2005 ISSP module on work orientations and<br />

encompasses 27 countries. Obtained through<br />

multilevel modeling, the fi ndings show that<br />

low-skilled workers are disadvantaged in all<br />

aspects of job quality. However, skill inequality<br />

in the quality of employment depends on<br />

countries’ characteristics, with declining skillbased<br />

inequality in countries at higher levels<br />

of technological development and widening<br />

skill disparities in times of technological<br />

growth and when unemployment is high.<br />

Forthcoming<br />

Working<br />

Papers<br />

WP 117: An individual level perspective to the concept<br />

of fl exicurity Antonio Firinu<br />

WP 105: This time is different ?! The depth of the<br />

Financial Crisis and its effects in the Netherlands<br />

Wiemer Salverda<br />

WP 104: Integrate to integrate. Explaining institutional<br />

change in the public employment service – the<br />

one shop offi ce Marieke Beentjes, Jelle Visser<br />

and Marloes de Graaf-Zijl.<br />

All working papers can be downloaded for free at the website: www.uva-aias.net<br />

Go to the sections publications • working papers<br />

WP 121, Aug. <strong>2012</strong><br />

Occupational segregation<br />

and gender inequality in<br />

job quality<br />

We examine gender differences in perceived quality of employment<br />

(achievement, content, job insecurity, job fl exibility, and physical and emotional<br />

conditions).<br />

We W ask whether women’s occupations provide better conditions in areas<br />

that th facilitate their dual role in society, such as fl exible working schedule,<br />

aas<br />

a tradeoff for low monetary rewards. Specifi cally, we examine how<br />

cclosely<br />

women’s concentration in broader occupational categories, em-<br />

bbedded<br />

in particular national contexts, is associated with gender differ-<br />

eences<br />

in job quality.<br />

UUtilizing<br />

the 2005 ISSP modules on work orientation, we fi nd that wom-<br />

een<br />

lag behind men on most dimensions of job quality. This result runs<br />

counter to the hypothe hypothesis that women’s occupations compensate for their low wages and limited<br />

opportunities for promotion by providing better employment conditions. Just as important,<br />

however, the gender gap is found to narrow in most job quality dimensions as women’s relative<br />

share in occupations grows. The implications of these results are discussed.<br />

WP 120, Aug. <strong>2012</strong><br />

The impact of attitudes and<br />

work preferences on Dutch<br />

mothers’ employment patterns<br />

Justine Ruitenberg and Paul de Beer<br />

In the last decades, preference theory has gained signifi cance in the academic<br />

literature on the determinants of female employment patterns.<br />

Mostly, M within these studies gender and work attitudes and work preferences<br />

e (the number of hours a woman prefers to work) are treated as one<br />

concept. c However, in this article it is argued that relatively variable work<br />

preferences p act as a mediating factor between more stable gender and work<br />

attitudes a and actual labour market behaviour. With a path analysis of a representative<br />

re survey among 940 Dutch mothers, the study demonstrates that<br />

the th effect of gender and work attitudes on mothers’ labour market behaviour<br />

io is largely mediated by the variable work preference, which infl uence<br />

on actual labour partic participation appears much larger than the infl uence of objective background<br />

characteristics. Next, the analysis supports the claim that more or less stable gender and work<br />

attitudes have a balancing effect on otherwise more fl exible work preferences.


<strong>AIAS</strong> SERIES<br />

These papers can be downloaded for free at the website: www.uva-aias.net<br />

Go to the sections publications • NL Industrial Relations series<br />

Labour markets & industrial relations in<br />

the Netherlands<br />

This series aims to publish reports prepared by <strong>AIAS</strong> staff concerning the Dutch labour market and the industrial<br />

relations in the country.<br />

2011-1 - reprint<br />

Collective bargaining<br />

in the Dutch metal<br />

and electrical<br />

engineering industry<br />

Maarten van Klaveren and Kea Tijdens<br />

The current collective labour agreement covering the<br />

Dutch metal and electrical engineering industry dates<br />

as of 1985, when the earlier agreement was divided in<br />

an agreement for fi rms with 31 or more employees (the<br />

‘large metal industry’) and for smaller fi rms (the ‘small<br />

metal industry’).<br />

We W concentrate on the fi rst one, called in Dutch<br />

CCAO<br />

Metaal/Elektrotechnische industrie, currently<br />

ccovering<br />

about 150,000 employees. In the 1980s,<br />

th this agreement remained the wage leader in the<br />

DDutch<br />

industrial relations like its predecessor had<br />

bbeen<br />

before, but in the 1990s the collective agree-<br />

ment gradually los lost its leadership; the collective agreement for banking,<br />

soon to be split up in agreements for the various large banks,<br />

took over. Most recently, while wage increases remained slightly<br />

higher in the CAO Metaal/Elektrotechnische industrie, the small metal<br />

industry contained more innovative elements. Major explanations<br />

may be found in the heavy international competition to which large<br />

parts of ‘large metal’ were exposed, in the fact that small metal fi rms<br />

seem more inclined to negotiate integrative elements, in particular<br />

concerning training, with the trade unions, and a remarkably successful<br />

strike mobilisation of the union membership in small fi rms.<br />

2005-1 - reprint<br />

Quality standards<br />

of work in the<br />

Netherlands<br />

Kea Tijdens<br />

The project GendA – Network on Feminist Labour<br />

Research, based at the Institute of Political Science<br />

at the University of Marburg (www.gendanetz.de),<br />

is commissioning seven expert reports by scientists<br />

from various EU countries, to examine tendencies of<br />

increasingly atypical and precarious labour in Europe<br />

within a gender context.<br />

One O of these six expert reports is intended as a<br />

close c investigation of the undermining and re-formation<br />

m of quality standards of work, in connection<br />

with w women’s integration into the labour market in<br />

the th Netherlands. This expert report for the Netherlands<br />

e concentrates on the following points:<br />

• Political and academic discourse in the Netherlands on quality<br />

standards of work; which normality standards exist here, how are<br />

they changing, which quality standards are subject to particular<br />

criticism?<br />

• Overview of the development of increasingly atypical (and/or<br />

precarious) working conditions (particularly regarding type, extent<br />

and areas). Can a connection be observed between women’s<br />

integration into the labour market and the process of increasing<br />

atypicalness? What are the consequences of the de-standardisation<br />

tendency for gender relations? What opportunities and risks<br />

are emerging for women?<br />

• Analysis of quality defi cits – taking EU guidelines into account<br />

– and formulation of quality demands from a gender-democratic<br />

perspective; what infl uence does the EU have on national discourses<br />

and regulations related to the quality of work?<br />

• Open questions and gaps in existing research<br />

• Individuals and research groups working on this subject<br />

• Most important literature.<br />

13


14<br />

Discussion Papers GINI<br />

GINI PAPERS<br />

All GINI Discussion Papers can be downloaded for free<br />

www.gini-research.org<br />

The Associates and Core Team members of the GINI project will produce an impressive series of<br />

up to 120 Discussion Papers. These papers will analyse important aspects of inequality. Mostly<br />

this will be done in a cross-country perspective, but some issues of prime importance where<br />

comparable data are missing may be studied in depth at the national level. The results will serve as input into the<br />

overarching Analysis Reports in four areas (analysis of inequality drivers, social impacts, political and cultural impacts,<br />

and policy effects) on the one hand and where applicable into the Country Reports that will be produced in the<br />

next stage of the project. Recently, the fi rst four Discussion Papers have been published on the GINI website and are<br />

available for downloading.<br />

DP53, July <strong>2012</strong><br />

The Redistributive Capacity of Services in<br />

the EU<br />

Gerlinde Verbist and Manos Matsaganis<br />

Welfare W states provide social benefi ts<br />

in<br />

cash and in kind. Cash benefi ts are<br />

in income transfers, such as retirement<br />

ppensions,<br />

family and unemployment<br />

bbenefi<br />

ts and social assistance.<br />

Benefi B ts in kind are commodities directly transferred<br />

fe to recipients at zero or below-market<br />

prices (Barr <strong>2012</strong>).<br />

In Europe, benefi ts in kind are usually services, such as health, education,<br />

child care and care for the elderly. For example, hospital care<br />

in most countries is provided either free of charge or at near-zero<br />

prices (at the point of use). User fees are even rarer in the case of<br />

DP51, July <strong>2012</strong><br />

In-Work Poverty<br />

primary and secondary education: enrolment is compulsory up to a<br />

certain age, while tuition is provided free of charge to all children<br />

attending publicly funded schools, irrespective of family income.<br />

Moreover, child care is often heavily subsidised; kindergartens are<br />

run by the state (most commonly local governments) or government-supervised<br />

private organisations, while user fees, where applicable,<br />

are usually income-related (in the sense that higher-income<br />

families pay higher fees, while lower-income ones pay less or are<br />

fully exempted). Elderly care may also be available on similar terms;<br />

besides, several countries have developed long-term care insurance<br />

schemes, to cater for the future needs of an ageing population.<br />

Ive Marx and Brian Nolan<br />

While W in-work poverty is not a new problem, the degree of attention it is receiving in Europe is more<br />

recent, re refl ecting at least two concurrent sources of concern (Andreβ and Lohmann 2008; OECD 2008;<br />

EEuropean<br />

Foundation 2010; Fraser et al. 2011; Crettaz 2011; European Commission 2011).<br />

Deindustrialisation, D<br />

intensifying international trade and skill-biased technological change are said to be threatening if<br />

not n effectively eroding the (potential) earnings and living standards of some workers in advanced economies. Yet at the<br />

same s time, policy at EU level and in many countries has become focused on increasing the number of people relying on<br />

earnings, e and particularly on drawing into the labour market those with the weakest education and work history profi les.<br />

The Europe 2020 targ target of boosting employment rates to 75 per cent of the population aged 20 to 64 shows this drive to be undiminished.<br />

Sharply increased unemployment in some countries following on from the onset of the economic crisis has only served to increase the emphasis<br />

on getting people into jobs. In light of these trends, there would appear to be legitimate concern that larger sections of the workforce<br />

are being expected to rely on jobs that do not generate suffi cient income to escape poverty.


GINI PAPERS<br />

DP50, July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Child Poverty as a Government Priority<br />

Natascha Van Mechelen and Jonathan Bradshaw<br />

In this paper Tackling child poverty is high on the Euro-<br />

‘Child ‘C Poverty as pean Union’s political agenda. It was a prior-<br />

a Government ity in the March 2006 European Council, a<br />

Priority: P Child focus of many of the National Reports on<br />

Benefi B t Packages Social Protection and Social Inclusion 2006for<br />

fo Working<br />

2008, and the main work of the EU experts<br />

Families, F 1992- on the National Action Plans in 2007. An<br />

2009” 2 the focus infl uential report by the Social Protection<br />

is on the tth the h ch chil child hil<br />

ild benefi be ben b t package for Committee (2008) refl ected much of this<br />

working families and its contribution effort and contained detailed comparative<br />

to tackling in-work child poverty. analysis of child poverty using the new<br />

European Statistics on Income and Living<br />

Conditions (EU-SILC) 2005. The report<br />

DP49, July <strong>2012</strong><br />

drew attention to the fact that in the majority<br />

of the EU member states, children are at<br />

a higher risk of poverty than the population<br />

as a whole. More recent analyses of the EU-<br />

SILC (Tarki, 2010; Atkinson and Marlier,<br />

2010; Tarki, 2011) confi rmed this fi nding.<br />

As a part of its 10-year economic plan, the<br />

June 2010 European Council set the target<br />

to reduce poverty and social exclusion in the<br />

EU by 20 million (European Council, 2010).<br />

If this objective is to be achieved, parents<br />

and their children will need to be a key focus<br />

of anti-poverty policies.<br />

The Fiscalization of Child Benefi ts in<br />

OECD Countries<br />

Tommy Ferrarini, Kenneth Nelson and Helena Höög<br />

Welfare W states time (Kamerman and Kahn, 1981; MacNi-<br />

have h been subject col, 1992; Wennemo, 1994; Gauthier, 1996).<br />

to a subtle and In the immediate Post-War period many<br />

a sometimes countries either complemented or replaced<br />

unrecognized<br />

u<br />

various types of income-tested child ben-<br />

transformation:<br />

tr<br />

efi ts with universal ones, introducing a shift<br />

the th fi scalization of in the distributive profi le of the system.<br />

social s benefi ts. However, far from all welfare states relied<br />

only on the principle of universalism in the<br />

This change of national policy is notable design of child benefi ts. Child tax benefi ts<br />

in the area of family policy, where vari- and fi scal policy has often been used as an<br />

ous forms of child tax benefi ts have been alternative or complement to social policy<br />

introduced. The composition and level legislation. During the era of welfare state<br />

of child benefi ts varies therefore not only stagnation and decline since the mid-1970s<br />

across countries, but also over historical some countries have relocated parts of the<br />

child benefi t package from social policy to<br />

the income tax system. During this process<br />

of fi scalization, elements of income-testing<br />

have once again been introduced to child<br />

benefi ts, thus, adding stronger elements<br />

of vertical redistribution between socioeconomic<br />

groups. The change of scenery<br />

involves not only a shift in the relative emphasis<br />

of social and fi scal policies in the redistributive<br />

budgets of the European countries,<br />

but also a greater degree of selectivity<br />

and low-income targeting is introduced to<br />

the provision of child benefi ts.<br />

15


16<br />

DP48, July <strong>2012</strong> DP46, May <strong>2012</strong><br />

Public<br />

Opinion<br />

on Income<br />

Inequality<br />

in 20<br />

Democracies<br />

Robert Andersen and Meir Yaish<br />

Utilizing U<br />

International<br />

In<br />

Social S Survey<br />

Program P (ISSP)<br />

data, d we explore<br />

the th relationship<br />

between b economic<br />

inequality—both in<br />

at<br />

the in indi individual-level di divi vidu idu<br />

al l-lev<br />

level<br />

and the nationallevel—and<br />

attitudes toward income<br />

inequality in 20 capitalist societies.<br />

Our fi ndings suggest that experience of<br />

economic inequality has an enduring effect<br />

on attitudes. Specifi cally, respondents’ own<br />

social class and their father’s social class are<br />

both signifi cantly related to attitudes, with<br />

working class individuals tending to be<br />

more egalitarian in their views than others.<br />

Still, our fi ndings also suggest that attitudes<br />

are unrelated to experience of social mobility<br />

per se. Tests for random effects of class<br />

origin and destination further demonstrate<br />

that class has a similar effect across societies.<br />

In terms of contextual infl uences, we<br />

demonstrate that as income inequality rises,<br />

people of all classes tend to have less egalitarian<br />

views. In contrast to suggestions of<br />

previous research, however, we fi nd no evidence<br />

that economic development or equality<br />

of opportunity infl uence public opinion<br />

on what is considered fair income differences.<br />

GINI PAPERS<br />

Analysing Intergenerational<br />

Infl uences on Income<br />

Poverty and Economic<br />

Vulnerability with EU-SILC<br />

Brian Nolan<br />

The T EU-SILC 2005 wave includes a special module on intergenerational<br />

g transmission of poverty.<br />

In addition to the standard data relating to income and material deprivation,<br />

ri information relating to parental background and childhood<br />

circumstances c<br />

was collected for all household members aged over 24<br />

and a less than 66 at the end of the income reference period. In principle,<br />

c the module provides an unprecedented opportunity to apply a<br />

welfare w regime perspective to a comparative European analysis of the<br />

relationship relationship between ppoverty<br />

and social exclusion and parental characteristics and childhood<br />

economic circumstances. In this paper we seek to exploit such potential. In pursuing this<br />

objective, it is necessary to take into account some of the limitations of the data. We do by<br />

restricting our attention to a set of countries where data issues seem less extreme. Finally,<br />

we compare fi ndings from one dimensional and multidimensional approaches to poverty<br />

and social exclusion in order to provide an assessment of the extent to which our analysis of<br />

welfare regime variation provides a coherent account of the intergenerational transmission<br />

of disadvantage.<br />

DP44, May <strong>2012</strong><br />

Immigration and Inequality<br />

in Europe<br />

Tommaso Frattini<br />

This T paper aims at assessing the effect of immigration on<br />

native n income inequality in Western Europe.<br />

I use different regional indicators of income inequality, which allow<br />

distinguishing d<br />

between dispersion at the top and at the bottom of the<br />

income in distribution, and correlate them to regional annual infl ows of<br />

im immigrants over the period 2004-2008. Results indicate that immigra-<br />

ti tion is associated with a decrease of income inequality at the bottom of<br />

the distribution distribution. How However, IV estimates do not show any causal effect of immigration on<br />

income dispersion.


GINI PAPERS<br />

DP42, July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Home-Ownership, Housing<br />

Regimes and Income<br />

Inequalities in Western<br />

Europe<br />

Michelle Norris and Nessa Winston<br />

This T article compares the structural features of homeownership<br />

o systems in EU15 countries (home-ownership rates,<br />

mortgages m and public subsidisation of this tenure) with data<br />

on o inequalities in outcomes (variations in home-ownership<br />

access, a risks and standards between income groups).<br />

Its It purpose is to assess the relevance of the debate on the convergence<br />

and a divergence of housing systems which has dominated the compara-<br />

tive housing literature literature. The article concludes that, depending on the level of analysis adopted<br />

and the particular variables selected for examination, elements of both convergence and<br />

divergence are evident in Western European home-ownership systems. The comparative<br />

housing literature has also largely failed to capture the key inter-country cleavages in homeownership<br />

systems that are between the Northern and Southern EU15 countries. These<br />

shortcomings are related to methodological and conceptual problems in this literature.<br />

DP40, July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Multidimensional Poverty<br />

Measurement in Europe<br />

Christopher, T. Whelan, Brian Nolan and Bertrand Maître<br />

As A awareness of the limitations of relying solely on income<br />

to t measure poverty and social exclusion has become more<br />

widespread, w attention has been increasingly focused on multidimensional<br />

d approaches.<br />

To T date efforts to measure multidimensional poverty and social exclusion<br />

in rich countries have been predominantly ad hoc and have relied on data<br />

that th are far from ideal. Here we apply the approach recently developed by<br />

Alkire A and Foster, characterized by a range of desirable axiomatic properties<br />

but mostly discussed so far in a development context, to European countries, exploiting<br />

the potential of harmonized microdata on deprivation newly available for the European Union.<br />

The analysis seeks to overcome the limitations of the union and intersection approaches<br />

that have characterized many earlier studies. Multidimensional poverty is characterized and<br />

decomposed in terms of the contribution of different deprivation dimensions, and an account<br />

of cross-national and socio-economic variation in risk levels is presented that is in line with<br />

theoretical expectations. Multilevel analysis of multi-dimensional poverty provides the basis<br />

for assessment of the role of macro and micro characteristics and their interaction in relation<br />

to levels and patterns of multidimensional poverty and social exclusion.<br />

DP39 March <strong>2012</strong><br />

Socioeconomic<br />

Gradient in<br />

Health<br />

Maite Blázquez, Elena Cottini and<br />

Ainhoa Herrarte<br />

In this paper we<br />

use u the Spanish<br />

Living L Conditions<br />

Survey S (2005-<br />

2008) 2 to investigate<br />

whether w there is<br />

a socioeconomic<br />

gradient g in health<br />

when whhen alt alternative lternati tivve<br />

mmeasures<br />

of<br />

socioeconomic status, apart from<br />

income, are considered.<br />

In particular we construct a material deprivation<br />

index that refl ects some minimum<br />

standards of quality of life, and we analyze<br />

its impact on self-reported health. To<br />

address this issue, we use a deprivation index<br />

that incorporates comparison effects<br />

with societal peers and we estimate health<br />

equations using a random effects model.<br />

Furthermore, the model is extended to include<br />

a Mundlak term that corrects for the<br />

potential correlation between the error term<br />

and the regressors. Our results reveal that<br />

the relationship between health and income<br />

operates through comparison information<br />

with respect to societal peers. In contrast,<br />

material deprivation in terms of fi nancial<br />

diffi culties, basic necessities and housing<br />

conditions exerts a direct effect on individual<br />

health.<br />

17


18<br />

DP38, May <strong>2012</strong><br />

GINI PAPERS<br />

Inequality and Happiness: A Survey<br />

Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell and Xavier Ramos<br />

In recent years there has been an accumulation of empirical evidence suggesting that individuals dislike<br />

inequality (Alesina and Giuliano, 2011 and Dawes et al., 2007).<br />

The literature has built upon estimating the degree of this dislike as well as its causes. The use of self-reported measures<br />

of satisfaction or well-being as a proxy for utility has been one of the empirical strategies used to this end. In this survey<br />

we review the papers that estimate or examine the relationship between inequality and self-reported happiness, and<br />

fi nd that inequality reduces happiness in Western societies. The evidence for non-Western societies is more mixed and<br />

less reliable. Notwithstanding that, trust in the institutions seems to play an important role in shaping the relationship<br />

between income inequality and subjective wellbeing. We conclude with suggestions for further research.<br />

DP37, March <strong>2012</strong><br />

Understanding Material<br />

Deprivation in Europe<br />

Christopher T. Whelan and Bertrand Maître<br />

In this paper, taking advantage of the inclusion of a special<br />

module on material deprivation in EU-SILC 2009, we<br />

provide a comparative analysis of patterns of deprivation.<br />

Our analysis identifi es six relatively distinct dimensions of deprivation<br />

with generally satisfactory overall levels of reliability and mean levels<br />

of reliability across counties. Multi-level analysis based on 28 European<br />

countries reveals systematic variation across countries in the relative<br />

importance of with and between country variation. The basic deprivation dimension is the<br />

sole dimension to display a graduated pattern of variation a across countries. It also reveals<br />

the highest correlations with national and household income, the remaining deprivation<br />

dimensions and economic stress. It comes closest to capturing an underlying dimension of<br />

generalized deprivation that can provide the basis for a comparative European analysis of<br />

exclusion from customary standards of living. A multilevel analysis revealed that a range of<br />

household and household reference person socio-economic factors were related to basic<br />

deprivation and controlling for contextual differences in such factors allowed us to account<br />

for substantial proportions of both within and between country variance. The addition<br />

of macro-economic factors relating to average levels of disposable income and income inequality<br />

contributed relatively little further in the way of explanatory power. Further analysis<br />

revealed the existence of a set of signifi cant interactions between micro socio-economic<br />

attributes and country level gross national disposable income per capita. The impact of<br />

socio-economic differentiation was signifi cantly greater where average income levels were<br />

lower. Or, in other words, the impact of the latter was greater for more disadvantaged socioeconomic<br />

groups. Our analysis supports the suggestion that an emphasis on the primary<br />

role of income inequality to the neglect of differences in absolute levels of income may be<br />

misleading in important respects.


GINI PAPERS<br />

DP36, March <strong>2012</strong><br />

Material Deprivation, Economic Stress and<br />

Reference Groups in Europe<br />

Christopher T. Whelan and Bertrand Maître<br />

In this paper we<br />

take advantage of<br />

the recent<br />

availability of data<br />

from the special<br />

module on material<br />

deprivation in the<br />

2009 European<br />

Union Statistics on Income and<br />

Living Conditions (EU-SILC) to<br />

develop a more comprehensive<br />

understanding of the relationship<br />

between material deprivation and<br />

economic stress.<br />

DP33, March <strong>2012</strong><br />

In particular, we focus on the moderating<br />

role played by cross-national differences in<br />

levels of income and income inequality such<br />

that the consequences of material deprivation<br />

for subjective economic stress are conditional<br />

on the value of macro-economic<br />

attributes. In an analysis focused on households<br />

clustered within countries, these questions<br />

can be most appropriately addressed<br />

by a multilevel analysis that allows us to explore<br />

the manner in which material deprivation<br />

measured at the household level interacts<br />

with national attributes in infl uencing<br />

household levels of economic stress. Evi-<br />

dence for such moderation is provided by<br />

a signifi cant statistical interaction between<br />

deprivation and country attributes. In this<br />

paper we undertake such an analysis and<br />

consider the implications of our fi ndings<br />

for competing perspectives on the nature of<br />

reference groups in Europe.<br />

Income Inequality and Solidarity in Europe<br />

Marii Paskov and Caroline Dewilde<br />

This paper studies<br />

the relationship<br />

between income<br />

inequality, a<br />

macro-level<br />

characteristic, and<br />

solidarity of<br />

Europeans.<br />

To this aim, solidarity is defi ned as the<br />

‘willingness to contribute to the welfare of<br />

other people’. We rely on a theoretical idea<br />

according to which feelings of solidarity are<br />

derived from both affective and calculating<br />

considerations, and we test competing hypotheses<br />

relating the extent of income inequality<br />

to both motivations for solidarity.<br />

Using data from the 1999 European Values<br />

Study (EVS), we apply multilevel analysis<br />

for 26 European countries. Controlling for<br />

household income and for other relevant<br />

macro-level characteristics which possibly<br />

infl uence feelings of solidarity of Europe-<br />

ans in different countries, we fi nd evidence<br />

that in more unequal countries people are<br />

less willing to take action to improve the living<br />

conditions of their fellow-countrymen.<br />

This is true for respondents living in both<br />

low- and high-income households. Following<br />

from our expectations derived from the<br />

literature, this fi nding furthermore suggests<br />

that, at least when measured in terms of<br />

‘willingness to contribute to the welfare of<br />

other people’, feelings of solidarity seem to<br />

be infl uenced more strongly by affective,<br />

rather than by calculating considerations.<br />

19


20<br />

DP32, March <strong>2012</strong><br />

Income Inequality and<br />

Access to Housing in Europe<br />

Caroline Dewilde and Bram Lancee<br />

This paper analyses the relation between income inequality<br />

and access to housing for low- income households.<br />

Three arguments are developed, explaining how inequality might affect<br />

housing affordability, quality and quantity. First, it is the absolute<br />

level of resources, not their relative distribution, which affects access to<br />

housing. Second, inequality affects access to housing in different ways,<br />

due to rising aspirations and status competition. Third, the effect of<br />

inequality is mediated by housing market pressures. Multilevel-models for 28 countries indicate<br />

that: 1) there is no relation between inequality and housing affordability – the level of<br />

resources matters, rather than their distribution; 2) there exists a positive relation between<br />

inequality and crowding for owners; 3) higher levels of income inequality are associated<br />

with lower housing quality for owners and renters. Although there is a relation between<br />

inequality and access to housing, it is complex and not mediated by our indicator of house<br />

price-changes.<br />

DP28, January <strong>2012</strong><br />

The impact of indirect<br />

taxes and imputed rent on<br />

inequality<br />

Francesco Figari and Alari Paulus<br />

This paper examines the redistributive impact of imputed<br />

rent (private and public) and indirect taxes (value added tax<br />

and excises), comparing this with the effects of cash<br />

transfers and direct taxes in fi ve EU countries.<br />

The extended income concept, taking into account both imputed rent<br />

and indirect taxes, provides a more reliable picture of inequality differences<br />

across countries.<br />

Our results show that indirect taxes have a regressive effect with respect to income in all<br />

countries considered but always smaller in magnitude than other tax-benefi t instruments.<br />

Imputed rent reduces overall inequality in particular where the prevalence of individuals<br />

living in own accommodation is high even among the poorest (Greece) and where the contribution<br />

of the public imputed rent is large (the UK).<br />

GINI PAPERS<br />

DP25, December 2011<br />

Is the<br />

‘Neighbour’s’<br />

Lawn<br />

Greener?<br />

Lina Salanauskaite and Gerlinde<br />

Verbist<br />

To what extent can<br />

a country’s<br />

effectiveness in<br />

reducing child<br />

poverty be<br />

attributed to the<br />

size of family cash<br />

transfers (i.e. both<br />

benefi ts and tax instruments) or to<br />

their design?<br />

In this paper, we aim at disentangling the<br />

importance of each of these two factors, focusing<br />

on the family support system in Lithuania<br />

and comparing it with four other new<br />

member states. Despite increased susceptibility<br />

to poverty in Lithuania, single parent<br />

families have less state support than large<br />

families. This contrasts with other former<br />

communist countries, such as Estonia, Hungary,<br />

Slovenia or the Czech Republic, who<br />

protect both large and single parent families<br />

much better. The question is whether<br />

their family transfer systems would achieve<br />

similar results in Lithuania. We employ the<br />

EUROMOD microsimulation tax-benefi t<br />

model to swap family policies across countries<br />

and test whether size or design have<br />

greater effects on child poverty reduction in<br />

Lithuania.


GINI PAPERS<br />

DP27, February <strong>2012</strong><br />

Recent Trends in Minimum<br />

Income Protection for<br />

Europe’s Elderly<br />

Tim Goedemé<br />

In Europe, the elderly stand out for their heavy reliance on<br />

welfare state arrangements for securing their living standard.<br />

In spite of relatively high elderly at-risk-of-poverty rates in many EU<br />

member states, the past two decades have witnessed a tendency to restrengthen<br />

the link between past contributions and pension benefi ts,<br />

and to rely more strongly on private pensions. At the same time, public<br />

pension replacement rates are projected to decrease in a large number<br />

of European countries. In this context, minimum income protection for Europe’s elderly is<br />

likely to become even more important for alleviating elderly poverty than is the case today.<br />

Yet, minimum income protection schemes targeted at the elderly have remained largely undocumented<br />

in the international literature. Therefore, this chapter reviews existing minimum<br />

income policies for the elderly in Europe and develops a typology based on entitlement and<br />

eligibility criteria. Building on data from a project involving national experts from 25 EU<br />

member states, it is shown that in the 2000s welfare erosion of elderly persons’ non-contributory<br />

minimum income guarantees has been limited. Moreover, a substantial number of<br />

countries has pursued a deliberate policy of increases in minimum income benefi ts for the<br />

elderly. Nonetheless, only in a few countries benefi ts are adequate for lifting elderly persons<br />

above the poverty line. At the same time, differences between EU member states in terms<br />

of mode of access and benefi t levels remain large.<br />

DP24, May <strong>2012</strong><br />

On gender gaps and selffulfi<br />

lling expectations<br />

Juan J. Dolado, Cecilia García-Peñalosa and Sara de la Rica<br />

DP26, December 2011<br />

Endogenous<br />

Skill Biased<br />

Technical<br />

Change<br />

Francesco Bogliacino and Matteo<br />

Lucchese<br />

In this article we use<br />

the unifi cation of<br />

Germany in 1990 to<br />

test the hypothesis<br />

that an increase in<br />

the supply of a<br />

production factor<br />

generates skill<br />

biased technical change.<br />

We test for this mechanism in the context<br />

of the model presented by Acemoglu and<br />

Autor (2011) that allows endogenous assignment<br />

of skills to tasks in the economy.<br />

We use cohorts of workers from comparable<br />

countries as a control group. After discussing<br />

the possible confounding factors,<br />

we conclude that this effect is absent. The<br />

differential pattern among the countries<br />

seems to be determined by labor market<br />

fl exibilization and tax reform.<br />

This paper presents a model of self-fulfi lling expectations by fi rms and households which generates<br />

multiplicity of equilibria in pay and housework time allocation for ex-ante identical spouses.<br />

Multiplicity arises from statistical discrimination exerted by fi rms in the provision of paid-for training to workers, rather<br />

than from incentive problems in the labor market. Employers´ beliefs about differences in spouses´ reactions to housework<br />

shocks lead to symmetric (ungendered) and asymmetric (gendered) equilibria. We fi nd that: (i) the ungendered<br />

equilibrium tends to prevail as aggregate productivity in the economy increases (regardless of the generosity of family<br />

aid policies), (ii) the ungendered equilibrium could yield higher welfare under some scenarios, and (iii) gender-neutral<br />

job subsidies are more effective that gender-targeted ones in removing the gendered equilibrium.<br />

21


22<br />

NEWSLETTERS<br />

All (complete) <strong>newsletter</strong> can be downloaded for free<br />

www.uva-aias.net/96<br />

Collective Bargaining Newsletter<br />

February - August <strong>2012</strong><br />

Jan Cremers and Janna Besamusca<br />

The monthly Collective Bargaining Newsletter is produced by<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> researchers Jan Cremers (editor) and Janna Besamusca<br />

in cooperation with the ETUI. As from July <strong>2012</strong> on the<br />

Newsletter includes under the heading Focus additional<br />

links to records that provide background information. The<br />

<strong>newsletter</strong> can be found on the <strong>AIAS</strong> and ETUI websites.<br />

February <strong>2012</strong><br />

DENMARK<br />

New two-year agreement for manufacturing<br />

After a marathon bargaining round over the<br />

weekend of 11 and 12 February, the trade<br />

unions, led by the eight making up Co-Industri<br />

and including 3F, Dansk Metal and HK/<br />

Privat, concluded an agreement for 240,000<br />

manufacturing workers and 6,000 enterprises,<br />

the latter represented by Dansk Industri.<br />

The recommended minimum wage increase<br />

is €18 per hour effective 1 March, and the<br />

same amount again on 1 March 2013. A pay<br />

supplement of 1.4% each year is available for<br />

performing diffi cult work, and apprentices,<br />

trainees and interns will get a 2.25% pay hike<br />

in each year. Exact wage increases will now<br />

be negotiated at local levels and inside company<br />

agreements. Improvements were also<br />

achieved concerning training (accumulation<br />

of training rights, new possibility for training<br />

during short-time), precarious workers<br />

(new measure against social dumping), senior<br />

workers, and dismissed workers (severance<br />

pay). (February 22, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

FINLAND/HUNGARY<br />

Unions fi ght cuts at Nokia Siemens<br />

The Finnish-German telecom equipment<br />

maker, Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN), said<br />

on 7 February a previously announced global<br />

restructuring plan would entail 2,900 job cuts<br />

in Germany and 1,200 in Finland. The German<br />

IG Metall union and NSN works council<br />

have organised constant protests against<br />

the announced cuts. On 1 February, protests<br />

started in Munich with about 2,000 participants<br />

attracting signifi cant media attention.<br />

The Finnish unions will start a round of negotiations<br />

inside the company between the<br />

management and shop stewards from the<br />

trade unions inside NSN which include Finnish<br />

Metalworkers’ Union, Trade Union Pro,<br />

Union of Professional Engineers in Finland<br />

(UIL) and Tekniikan Akateemisten Liitto<br />

(TEK), signatories of the collective agreement<br />

with the company. Secondly, they will<br />

start tripartite negotiations between the management,<br />

involved unions and the Ministry<br />

of Employment and Economy on alternative<br />

jobs. (February 9, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

Besides job cuts at Nokia Siemens in Finland<br />

and Germany (see message under heading<br />

Finland), Nokia has announced to lay<br />

off 2,300 workers at its plant in Komarom<br />

in north-western Hungary. According to<br />

the cell phone giant, assembly would be replaced<br />

to Asia from Komarom, which currently<br />

employs around 4,400. The 2,300 jobs<br />

will be axed in two or three steps by the end<br />

of <strong>2012</strong>, Nokia told its workers, adding that<br />

most of the losses would be blue-collar,<br />

manufacturing positions. The move hurts the<br />

labour market in Hungary as well as in Slovakia,<br />

from where about a third of Komarom<br />

workers have commuted. (February 27, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

March <strong>2012</strong><br />

GERMANY<br />

Latest news: Breakthrough after all-night negotiations<br />

in the public sector<br />

German interior Minister Hans-Peter Frie-<br />

drich, who led the talks with the public service<br />

union Verdi, announced in Potsdam<br />

shortly before 7 a.m. on Saturday 31 March<br />

that the negotiators had reached an agreement.<br />

Verdi, representing 2 million publicsector<br />

workers, had been seeking a 6.5% rise<br />

for one year after years of accepting modest<br />

pay deals and had rejected an earlier offer<br />

of 3.3%. If the deal is approved by the<br />

union membership (members have a fi nal say<br />

in a consultation between 11 and 25 April)<br />

public-sector workers will receive a 3.5% pay<br />

increase retroactive to March 1. They will<br />

receive a further 1.4% in January 2013 and<br />

another 1.4% pay rise in August 2013. The<br />

position of apprentices has been strengthened;<br />

after their qualifi cation and a successful<br />

fi rst year of service they will receive a permanent<br />

contract. Apprentices pay increases on 1<br />

March <strong>2012</strong> with €50 and on 1 August 2013<br />

with €40. The collective bargaining committee<br />

of the union approved the deal later on<br />

that Saturday. (March 31, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

LITHUANIA<br />

Government to re-classify Carlsberg breweries as an<br />

‘essential’ service<br />

In an attempt to keep its workers from striking,<br />

Carlsberg has convinced the Lithuanian<br />

government to re-classify its activity as ‘essential<br />

services’. Workers in essential services,<br />

previously limited to activities like emergency<br />

services and water, are banned from striking<br />

by law. (March 8, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

April <strong>2012</strong><br />

FRANCE<br />

Caterpillar agreement converts precarious labour in<br />

permanent jobs<br />

The annual negotiations at Caterpillar that<br />

started in December 2011 were fi nalised on<br />

with an agreement mid-April. Next to a pay<br />

rise of 2% for all (except for the management),<br />

the agreement consists of an extra<br />

payment based on merit (for approximately<br />

80% of the workforce), increase of the minimum<br />

wage (with 3.4%) to €1,515 and an extension<br />

of the pay structure. Furthermore 80<br />

precarious labour contracts will convert in


NEWSLETTERS<br />

<strong>2012</strong> into permanent contracts. The agreement<br />

applies for the Grenoble and Echirolles<br />

plants with in total 2,400 workers and is valid<br />

for one year. (April 19, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

THE NETHERLANDS<br />

Cleaners end strike after 105 days<br />

The cleaners’ strike, lasting a total of 105 days,<br />

was ended after trade union members voted<br />

in favour of a new collective agreement. During<br />

the longest strike the country has seen<br />

since 1933, cleaners organised Marches of<br />

Respect, protests and media campaigns. The<br />

new collective agreement includes a 4.85%<br />

wage increase over two years, more training<br />

and job security, frequent workload tests and<br />

a pilot programme for a better sick leave arrangement.<br />

The lack of sick pay during the<br />

fi rst two days of illness was one of the core<br />

issues in the cleaners campaign Schoon Genoeg.<br />

(April 17, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

May <strong>2012</strong><br />

AUSTRIA<br />

Austrian Airlines dispute might go to court<br />

The dispute at Austrian Airlines created by<br />

the management decisions to opt out from<br />

the existing collective agreement and to<br />

transfer the workforce to the cheaper agreement<br />

of subsidiary Tyrolean enters a new<br />

stage. The planned reform will come into<br />

effect on 1 July unless executive board and<br />

works council fi nd an alternative solution in<br />

the coming weeks. Protest of the workforce<br />

has led to cancellation of fl ights. The trade<br />

union vida is considering juridical steps to<br />

declare the transfer null and void. Other demands<br />

are the respect for the existing agreements<br />

and the right for individual employees<br />

to oppose the planned company transfer.<br />

(May 18, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

GERMANY<br />

Agreement for the metal sector concluded<br />

After a period of warning strikes the partners<br />

in bargaining in the metal sector have<br />

concluded an agreement that includes a 4.3%<br />

wage raise for the sector’s 3.6 million workers.<br />

The deal between IG Metall union and<br />

employers in southern Baden-Wuerttemberg<br />

state — home to carmakers Daimler and<br />

Porsche — includes the wage raise, secures<br />

the position of apprentices and somewhat<br />

limits the use of temporary workers. The<br />

metal industry association president Martin<br />

Kannengiesser said the deal with a 13-month<br />

duration, initially reached for the state’s<br />

800,000 metal workers, will be applied to all<br />

of Germany. (May 21, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

NORWAY<br />

State sector negotiations become a battle<br />

The negotiations in the state sector have<br />

turned into a battle on wage compensation<br />

after mediation failed. It is the fi rst time in<br />

28 years that civil servants at state level go<br />

on strike. A demonstration is announced for<br />

30 May in Oslo, with other meetings planned<br />

all over the country. Government and union<br />

negotiators are arguing over the size of raises<br />

won by workers within industries that negotiate<br />

their wage agreement fi rst, when annual<br />

talks get underway in the late winter and<br />

early spring. The union demands are in line<br />

with the wage development in several other<br />

branches. Negotiations were held on the hiring<br />

in of workers, on inconvenient working<br />

hours and work in evenings and on weekends.<br />

(May 24, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

June <strong>2012</strong><br />

FRANCE<br />

Minimum wage increased<br />

For the fi rst time in 6 years the French minimum<br />

wage (SMIC) will increase. The socialist<br />

government has announced a (limited)<br />

rise to 0.6% above the infl ation rate. The rise<br />

amounts 2% to €9.40 an hour from 1 July<br />

<strong>2012</strong>, of which 1.4% is accounted for by infl<br />

ation. It is the fi rst time the minimum wage,<br />

which affects one in six workers, will be<br />

raised above infl ation since a 0.3% boost in<br />

2006, before former president Sarkozy froze<br />

it in real terms. (June 27, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

SPAIN<br />

Coal miners’ strike escalates<br />

Coal miners in the northern of Spain went<br />

on strike, staging protests in northern cities<br />

and Madrid. The actions started in response<br />

to a government announcement that state aid<br />

to the sector will be reduced by 64%. Trade<br />

unions CCOO and UGT have announced<br />

their support for the miners’ strike that enjoyed<br />

100% participation. Smaller actions<br />

involving blockades of mayor roads in the<br />

north were not authorised by the unions. The<br />

unions argue that the large scale retraction of<br />

public subsidies will kill the mining sector,<br />

which has already lost over 40,000 jobs in the<br />

last 20 years. Getting increasingly desperate,<br />

the miners have started to march on Madrid,<br />

vowing to walk the near 400 kilometre distance<br />

and hoping to be joined by more and<br />

more protesters along the way. Despite controversial<br />

actions and some clashes with the<br />

police, left wing parties, local and regional<br />

governments and trade union confederations<br />

across Europe have come out in support of<br />

the miners. (June 26, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

TURKEY<br />

Prominent union leaders arrested and offi ces raided<br />

On 25 June police raided the offi ces of education<br />

union Eğitim Sen and the Confederation<br />

of Public Employees (KESK). The<br />

police also searched the houses of prominent<br />

union leaders, confi scating documents<br />

regarding their union work. Union leaders<br />

were detained in over 20 cities, including<br />

KESK President Lami Ozgen; the General<br />

Secretary of the Health and Social Services<br />

Union (SES), Mehmet Siddik Akin; the General<br />

Secretary of the All Municipality and<br />

Local Administrations workers’ union (Tüm<br />

Bel Sen), İzzet Alpergin; and the President<br />

of the Agriculture, Forest, Livestock Service<br />

Workers’ Union (Tarım Orkam Sen), Metin<br />

Vuranok. Trade unions across Europe have<br />

condemned the attack on the unionists. (June<br />

25, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

July <strong>2012</strong><br />

BELGIUM<br />

Average wage €3,100 in 2010<br />

Detailed fi gures over the period 1999-2010<br />

published by the Economy Ministry (in<br />

French and Dutch) show that the average<br />

Belgian employee earned €3,100 before tax a<br />

23


24<br />

month in 2010. The statistics include gender,<br />

education, sector and skills related data. On<br />

average wages rose in 2010 by 2.51% (2.8%<br />

for women, 2.48% for men). The earnings of<br />

highly educated workers rose more quickly<br />

than those of the low-skilled. The highest<br />

wages are paid in the fi nancial sector and by<br />

utilities like water, gas and electricity whilst<br />

the lowest wages occur in the hospitality industry,<br />

in pubs, restaurants, hotels and cafes.<br />

(July 12, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

August <strong>2012</strong><br />

IRELAND<br />

HSE in confl ict with hospital consultants, home helps<br />

and staff<br />

Unions have reacted outraged at proposals<br />

by the Health Service Executive (HSE)<br />

to increase working time by two hours per<br />

week and pay over hours at fl at pay rates in<br />

order to address the health service’s defi cit.<br />

Trade union SIPTU stated that the proposals<br />

violate the Croke Park agreement and that<br />

it will begin to ballot its members for industrial<br />

action. Earlier this month, the Croke<br />

Park implementation body denied a request<br />

from the hospital consultants’ association<br />

for an extended time frame for negotiations<br />

with the HSE. The HSE said earlier that if<br />

the issues failed to be resolved between the<br />

two parties shortly, it will refer the confl ict<br />

to the Labour Court. The HSE wishes to address<br />

a lower entry pay and the elimination<br />

of the so-called historic leave, under which<br />

several hundred consultants are entitled to a<br />

fi nal year off as a compensation for past over<br />

time. Also home helps are in confl ict with the<br />

HSE, whom they accuse of not implementing<br />

a 2009 agreement. Focus on the Croke<br />

Park agreement: www.impact.ie/Croke-<br />

Park-Agreement.htm (August 14, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

SWITZERLAND<br />

Creative campaigning leads to social plan<br />

Merck Serono employees in Geneva accepted<br />

a Memorandum of Understanding that<br />

was reached in bargaining between worker<br />

representatives, trade union UNIA, and management<br />

of the pharmaceuticals giant, under<br />

NEWSLETTERS<br />

the mediation of Geneva authorities. Workers<br />

had renewed strike action in early August<br />

as the company refused to improve the social<br />

plan, in one of the largest industrial action<br />

campaigns in recent history (also in the June<br />

Newsletter). The decision to close the sites<br />

in Geneva and Coisins was not reversed, but<br />

gains were won enabling early retirement of<br />

older employees, on good terms. Minimum<br />

redundancy payments were increased. A<br />

special fund was created for compensation<br />

for temporary workers and subcontractors.<br />

Workers are released from work for one<br />

month to look for another job. Also achieved<br />

was the commitment from Merck Serono to<br />

support the creation of a biotechnology institute,<br />

under certain conditions. (August 13,<br />

<strong>2012</strong>)<br />

UNITED KINGDOM<br />

Blacklisting causes national scandal<br />

Growing political concern has been voiced<br />

over blacklisting, a practice of mainly construction<br />

companies to place workers who<br />

have been active for unions on a blacklist<br />

of workers never to hire. A list of union<br />

activists was circulated by the Consulting<br />

Association (that also fi led MP’s and academics<br />

like Charles Woolfson) to fi rms who<br />

subscribed to it. The list, fi rst revealed after<br />

a raid in 2009, contained 3000 names of<br />

‘troublesome workers’. In recent week, the<br />

Trade Union Congress passed a motion defi<br />

ning blacklisting as corporate bullying and<br />

demanding political action. A number of<br />

blacklisted workers, aided by the GMB, have<br />

launched a £600 million law suit for tort of<br />

illegal conspiracy against one of the biggest<br />

fi rms using the covert black list database, Sir<br />

Robert McAlpine. Opposition raised again<br />

as it became clear that the director of one<br />

of the fi rms using blacklisting was awarded<br />

a seat on the board of the Health and Safety<br />

Executive. Focus on the practice of blacklisting:<br />

www.hazards.org/blacklistblog/<br />

(August 28, <strong>2012</strong>).


NEWSLETTERS<br />

WageIndicator Gazette<br />

Keep yourself posted and read the WageIndicator Newsletter!<br />

www.wageindicator.org/main/WageIndicatorgazette/<strong>2012</strong><br />

March <strong>2012</strong><br />

Women journalists sick and tired of gender pay gap<br />

Female journalists are paid less, receive fewer<br />

benefi ts and are more often without a fi xed<br />

contract than their male colleagues. They<br />

know it and it makes them less satisfi ed<br />

with their wage, working environment and<br />

– indeed – their colleagues, then men. Yet it<br />

seems hard to remedy these situations of factual<br />

discrimination in terms of working conditions.<br />

This fi nding is in line with the persistent<br />

pay gap typical for all gender relations<br />

of the working population, whatever their<br />

occupation, branch of industry, or region of<br />

the world they work in. It is however telling<br />

that this structural deprivation persists even<br />

amongst that part of the workforce that is<br />

supposedly well informed and assertive when<br />

it comes to getting things done.<br />

Male wages exceed female wages in all 16<br />

studied countries, from the EU, the former<br />

Soviet Union and in Central and Latin America.<br />

The only asset women broadly share<br />

seems to be that they, less then their male colleagues,<br />

work in shifts or at irregular hours,<br />

on Saturdays, Sundays, or in the evenings, or<br />

do telework. But their more regular working<br />

week apparently does not compensate<br />

enough to make them feel as satisfi ed with<br />

their jobs as the men they work with on an<br />

equal footing.<br />

These are the main fi ndings of the report<br />

Gender Pay Gap in Journalism, March <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

It is based on the international dataset of<br />

wages per occupation, compiled through the<br />

Wage Indicator Salary Surveys from 2009 till<br />

2011. During this period nearly 2,000 journalists<br />

across the globe completed the questionnaire.<br />

The Gender Pay Gap in Journalism report<br />

has been made in cooperation with the International<br />

Federation of Journalists.<br />

Pay gap freeze around the globe<br />

Solution: facilitate childrearing tasks<br />

Frozen in Time, gender pay gap unchanged<br />

for 10 years, March <strong>2012</strong>, is the apt title of a<br />

report covering trends in gender pay relations,<br />

since the beginning of the millenium. In search<br />

for an explanation of this big pay gap freeze<br />

across the globe, researchers from the University<br />

of Amsterdam found Wage Indicator data<br />

most helpful. Other than the aggregate data<br />

provided by national statistical offi ces and international<br />

public sources, the Wage Indicator<br />

data allows for a breakdown of labour market<br />

behaviour of working individuals in motivating<br />

and/or inhibiting factors.<br />

Individual´s motives and possibilities to participate<br />

in the labour market may and do vary<br />

per occupation, industry, composition of<br />

the household, education, fi rm size etc. Taking<br />

these variables into account researchers<br />

analyze that in most countries child rearing<br />

is much more detrimental to women´s wages<br />

than to men´s wages, thereby contributing to<br />

the gender pay gap. This conclusion is followed<br />

up by the obvious implication of what<br />

might be one of the strongest factors perpetuating<br />

the traditional gender pay gap well<br />

into the 21rst century.<br />

The researchers´ observe that: any policies to<br />

facilitate childrearing tasks for both men and<br />

women will decrease the gender pay gap.<br />

The report ´Frozen in Time´ has been compiled<br />

for the ITUC, the International Trade<br />

Union Federation, and is published at the occasion<br />

of Women´s Day March 8.<br />

June <strong>2012</strong><br />

Minimum Wage Comparison, Asian Countries Series<br />

In at least 7 Asian countries there is a formal<br />

minimum wage system in place: they all pay<br />

attention to it, one way or the other.<br />

These 7 countries were compared in terms of<br />

• number and types of minimum wage<br />

rates<br />

• minimum wage coverage<br />

• special provisions for certain groups<br />

• sectors or groups excluded from this<br />

type of protection.<br />

Types of minima<br />

The countries compared, i.e. Cambodia,<br />

China, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Sri Lanka<br />

and Vietnam differ in occurrence and types<br />

of minimum wage. There can be a uniform<br />

national minimum wage, and at the other extreme<br />

there can be different rates at the district<br />

or city level even. Also the legal base for<br />

minimum wages varies considerably: India,<br />

Indonesia, Pakistan and Sri Lanka have special<br />

minimum wage laws. Cambodia, China<br />

and Vietnam make do with legal provisions<br />

and/or a labour code. Also, the setting of<br />

minimum wages differs a great deal. In some<br />

countries minimum wages are set tripartite by<br />

representatives from workers, employers, and<br />

the government, while in others they are set by<br />

executive decree or legislative actions.<br />

Rates per region, occupation, industry, skills<br />

Thus in most countries more than one single<br />

minimum wages exist. A handful of criteria<br />

are used to set the levels. In India and Pakistan<br />

minimum wage rates are determined regionally,<br />

by states or provinces. Similar determination<br />

is followed by Indonesia and Vietnam. In<br />

Indonesia the geographical criterion is leading:<br />

each region is given the power to frame<br />

their own minimum wages. In addition to the<br />

geographic criterion India, Indonesia, Pakistan<br />

and Sri Lanka also determine minimum wage<br />

rates at the occupation level. Only Sri Lanka<br />

and Vietnam determine minimum wage rates<br />

at industry level. All countries, except Cambodia<br />

and Indonesia, determine minimum wage<br />

rates at the sector level too. India and Pakistan<br />

in addition may determine their minimum<br />

wage rates according to skills required. Use of<br />

multiple criteria helps to decentralise the institution<br />

and make it relevant to specifi c target<br />

groups. But very complex systems may arise in<br />

the process – and they do. And on top there<br />

25


26<br />

are special provisions, as well as exceptions to<br />

the national rule.<br />

Special groups<br />

China does not have special minimum<br />

wage provisions for any specifi c categories<br />

of labour. India and Pakistan are the only<br />

countries included in this study with special<br />

minimum wage provisions and laws for specifi<br />

c groups like domestic workers, trainees,<br />

youth and piece-rate workers. Cambodia<br />

has specifi c minimum wage rates only for<br />

piece-rate workers. Indonesia has special<br />

minimum wage rates for contract labour,<br />

piece-rate workers and for workers on probation.<br />

Sri Lanka is the only country which<br />

has considered separate minimum wage rate<br />

for disabled workers. It also has special minimum<br />

wage provisions for domestic trainees<br />

and piece-rate workers. Vietnam has specifi c<br />

minimum wage rates for employees on probation,<br />

trainees/apprentices and workers<br />

who have received some vocational training.<br />

Unprotected workers<br />

Though all 7 countries have some form<br />

of minimum wage, its applicability across<br />

the labour market is not complete. There<br />

are some loopholes in the system of each<br />

country, except China. In Cambodia public<br />

servants and domestic workers are excluded<br />

from minimum wage protection. This leaves<br />

the most vulnerable section of society unprotected.<br />

In India disabled persons are not<br />

covered. In Indonesia the entrepreneurial<br />

class is prohibited from paying less than the<br />

minimum wage. But if a private company is<br />

not in a position to pay minimum wage, it is<br />

exempted by law. In Pakistan public servants<br />

and unskilled workers are excluded from<br />

minimum wage protection. And in Vietnam<br />

too, like in Cambodia and Pakistan, public<br />

servants are excluded. Only in China, there<br />

are no exceptions made for special groups.<br />

NEWSLETTERS<br />

CLR-News<br />

Jan Cremers<br />

The quarterly CLR-News (ISSN 1997-1745) acts since the start in 1993 as an<br />

organ of information and debate on labour and employment in construction.<br />

From 2001 on the issues of CLR-News are available as PDF fi le on www.clrnews.org<br />

under publications or at www.uva-aias.net under publications.<br />

CLR-News C 1-<strong>2012</strong><br />

The T road to cross border justice<br />

‘Since ‘S the implementation of the internal market and the development of the<br />

Community C acquis, trade unions and the workers they represent in Europe are<br />

confronted c with the question how to defend workers’ rights that can be derived<br />

from fr European Union (EU) law, especially in a cross-border context. Although<br />

in theory it is often claimed that foreign workers have access to justice and<br />

redress to local courts like any other worker, the practice is rather patchy (…) In practice, workers<br />

are often unable to exercise these rights due to the inadequacy of existing means of redress<br />

in mass claim situations and to a lack of cross-border cooperation. On top of that, the costs of<br />

legal proceedings are sometimes higher than the compensation they can receive. Redress is the<br />

result of an uncertain path by the route of individual lawsuits that can take years in an unknown<br />

constituency and jurisdiction’.<br />

In this issue of the Journal Jan Cremers (<strong>AIAS</strong>) describes the latest developments in the EU<br />

related to the cross-border enforcement of workers’ rights. The notion of collective redress is<br />

introduced with a short explanation of the position of the trade unions. The article ends with an<br />

overview of challenges and questions that ask for further research. Martin Bulla (guest at <strong>AIAS</strong>)<br />

has investigated whether collective redress can provide a possible way of improvement of judicial<br />

enforcement of posted workers’ rights vested in the Posting of Workers Directive (Directive<br />

96/71/EC). He describes the most signifi cant problems posted workers are facing, followed by<br />

an overview of basic types of redress procedures as well as differences in approaches to legal<br />

regulation in countries. The contribution of Jean-Luc Deshayes is dedicated to another aspect of<br />

transnational mobility. Based on examples from the trans-boundary basin of Longwy, his contribution<br />

is dedicated to the status of the frontier worker. Janna Besamusca and Jan Cremers (both<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong>) also contribute with a book review.<br />

CLR-News C 2-<strong>2012</strong><br />

Aging, A pensions and the crisis<br />

‘This ‘T issue is in fact an introductory and a showcase of the current pension<br />

debate d (…) you will fi nd in this issue some excerpts from the EFBWW-study<br />

oon<br />

pensions in the construction industry and the EFBWW conclusions based<br />

oon<br />

the study. But, before that, we have three contributions that deal with the<br />

EC’s White Paper. First of all, Josef Wöss from the Austrian Labour Chamber who has criticized<br />

in the past the assumptions applied by the EC. In the following short contribution I introduce<br />

the most important notions formulated in the White Paper together with the criticism of the<br />

ETUC. And, in the third contribution, the authors of the EFBWW-study, Ernst-Ludwig Laux<br />

and Joachim Reus, have resumed their comments on the EC proposal. Although it is an extended<br />

book review we have included Jörn Janssen’s contribution in the Discussion section. The radical<br />

ideas formulated by Friot gear directly in the pension debate’. With contributions from Jan Cremers<br />

(<strong>AIAS</strong>) and Lisa Berntsen (guest at <strong>AIAS</strong>).


PUBLICATIONS<br />

ACADEMIC<br />

Book<br />

Economy<br />

and Society<br />

in Europe, a<br />

relationship<br />

in Crisis<br />

Edited by a.o. Maarten Keune<br />

The book shows that while an<br />

economy is always ‘embedded’ in<br />

society, the relationship between the<br />

two is undergoing profound changes<br />

in Europe, resulting in widespread<br />

instability as made clear by the<br />

current crisis.<br />

The book analyses these<br />

changes, and in particular<br />

pressures of intensifying<br />

international competition,<br />

globalization and fi nance<br />

within Europe. Combining<br />

the perspectives of<br />

economic sociology, political economy and<br />

political science, the expert contributors offer<br />

an in-depth, multidisciplinary insight to<br />

the functioning of a number of institutional<br />

arenas around which European economies<br />

and societies are organized. Areas explored<br />

include the state and public policy at European<br />

national and regional level, the welfare<br />

state, industrial relations systems, education<br />

systems and the family.<br />

Publisher Edward Elger<br />

www.e-elger.com<br />

Pages 256<br />

ISBN 978-1-84980 -365-6<br />

Price ₤ 58.50<br />

Publications on scientifi c research for an academic audience<br />

Book<br />

A skill mismatch for migrant<br />

workers? Evidence from<br />

WageIndicator survey data<br />

Kea Tijdens and Maarten van Klaveren<br />

Kea Tijdens and Maarten van Klaveren contributed a chapter “A skill<br />

mismatch for migrant workers? Evidence from WageIndicator survey data” to<br />

the book “EU Labour Migration in Troubled Times — Skills Mismatch, Return<br />

and Poilcy Research”, edited by Bela Galgóczi, Janine Leschke and Andrew<br />

Watt (all at ETUI, European Trade Union Institute) and just published by<br />

Ashgate Publishing (www.ashgate.com).<br />

Overeducation occurs more often for migrants compared to domestic workers,<br />

and it occurs more often in the EU15 compared to the EU12. Thus, the<br />

characteristics of both migrants and national labour markets infl uence the<br />

incidence of overeducation. Using data for European countries from the<br />

global WageIndicator web-survey on work and wages, theoretically based<br />

assumptions were tested for explanations why migrants are more prone to<br />

be overqualifi ed. A lack of transparency of credentials – here defi ned arriving<br />

in the host country at an adult age – increases the incidence of overeducation. Employer<br />

discrimination is assumed to increase the incidence of overeducation. Indeed, fi rst and second<br />

generation migrants and ethnic minorities are prone to labour market discrimination<br />

and this in turn increases the likelihood of overqualifi cation. Finally, it is hypothesized that<br />

migrant workers with poorer language abilities – here defi ned as migrant workers born in<br />

a country with a native language or a lingua franca that does not match that of the host<br />

country – are more likely to report overeducation. This assumption is not supported by our<br />

results.<br />

Publisher Ashgate www.ashgate.com<br />

Published September <strong>2012</strong><br />

Pages 308<br />

ISBN 978-1-4094-3450-4<br />

Price ₤ 60<br />

27


28<br />

PUBLICATIONS<br />

Journal Structural Change and Economic Dynamics (Elsevier)<br />

Job Creation in Business Services<br />

Francesco Bogliacino, Matteo Lucchese and Mario Pianta<br />

The patterns and mechanisms of<br />

job creation in business services<br />

are investigated in this article by<br />

considering the role of innovation,<br />

demand, wages and the composition<br />

of employment by professional groups.<br />

Presentation<br />

on free<br />

movement<br />

published<br />

Jan Cremers<br />

A presentation Free movement of<br />

workers and rights that can be derived<br />

that was prepared by Jan Cremers<br />

for the 2011 annual meeting of the<br />

Network on Free Movement of Workers<br />

coordinated by the Centre for Migration<br />

Law of the Radboud University<br />

Nijmegen has been published in<br />

FMW4-<strong>2012</strong>, the Online Journal on<br />

free movement of workers within the<br />

European Union.<br />

According to the editorial ‘Cremers takes a<br />

careful look at the issue of which social benefi<br />

ts should accrue to which EU workers when<br />

they are exercising mobility rights outside their<br />

home Member State. In times of fi nancial instability<br />

in some Member States, this issue is<br />

central to guaranteeing security for EU workers<br />

and ensuring that they are in fact being treated<br />

equally as regards social and tax advantages with<br />

workers who are nationals of the host Member<br />

State’. http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.js<br />

p?catId=737&langId=en&pubId=6884<br />

A model is developed and an empirical test<br />

is carried out with parallel analyses on a<br />

group of selected business services, on other<br />

services and on manufacturing sectors,<br />

considering six major European countries<br />

over the period 1996-2007.<br />

Within technological activities a distinction<br />

is made between those supporting either<br />

technological competitiveness or cost competitiveness<br />

strategies. Demand variables<br />

allow identifying the special role of intermediate<br />

demand. Job creation in business<br />

services appears to be driven by efforts to<br />

expand technological competitiveness and<br />

by the fast growing intermediate demand<br />

coming from other industries; conversely,<br />

process innovation leads to job losses and<br />

wage growth has a negative effect that is<br />

lower than in other industries. Business<br />

services show an increasingly polarized employment<br />

structure.<br />

Go to the website for the article:<br />

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954349X12000471#FCANote<br />

Journal of European Social Policy<br />

Welfare regimes and<br />

higher education systems<br />

Paul de Beer and Nienke Willemse<br />

Three educational worlds of welfare? A comparative study of higher<br />

education systems across welfare states.<br />

In the article ‘Three educational worlds of welfare? A comparative study of higher education<br />

systems across welfare states’ in the Journal of European Social Policy <strong>AIAS</strong> researcher Paul<br />

de Beer and former UvA student Nienke Willemse analyse to what extent higher education<br />

policies fi t into the well-known welfare regime typology of Esping-Andersen. The article applies<br />

the central concepts of welfare state analysis of decommodifi cation and stratifi cation,<br />

as proposed by Esping-Andersen, to the fi eld of higher education. Next, it tests whether<br />

there are systematic differences in higher education policies across 19 developed western<br />

countries that are usually categorized in a social democratic, a liberal or a conservative welfare<br />

regime.<br />

The countries studied cluster in three groups that correspond roughly with the classical categorization.<br />

The countries in these clusters do not, however, meet all expectations regarding<br />

the level of decommodifi cation and stratifi cation. We conclude that including higher education<br />

in comparative welfare states analysis might result in a less clear-cut categorization of<br />

welfare regimes than when the analysis is restricted to social protection and labour market<br />

policies.


PUBLICATIONS<br />

European Journal of Training and Development<br />

Measuring work activities<br />

and skill requirements of<br />

occupations<br />

Kea Tijdens, Judith De Ruijter and Esther De Ruijter<br />

The purpose of this article is to evaluate a method for measuring work<br />

activities and skill requirements of 160 occupations in eight countries, used in<br />

EurOccupations, an EU-FP6 project. Additionally, it aims to explore how the<br />

internet can be used for measuring work activities and skill requirements.<br />

This paper aims to evaluate the measurement of work activities and skill requirements of<br />

occupations for international comparisons. Recent discussions have explored the potential<br />

for an International Standard Classifi cation of Skills and Competences (Markowitsch and<br />

Plaimauer, 2009), have detailed the various conceptions of competence in the EQF and the<br />

national systems of competence framework (Brockmann et al., 2009), and have investigated<br />

if there is suffi cient common ground for a shared European approach to underpin the European<br />

Qualifi cations Framework (Winterton, 2009). Whereas these articles approached the<br />

skills and competences concepts predominantly from the angle of education and training,<br />

this paper approaches the same topic from the angle of work and training.<br />

Please visit the website www.emeraldinsight.com for the article.<br />

Hoofdstuk<br />

Duitsland en de medezeggenschap in de<br />

(kleine) onderneming<br />

Jan Cremers<br />

Jan Cremers schreef een hoofdstuk getiteld Duitsland en de medezeggenschap in de (kleine) onderneming in het boek<br />

Medezeggenschap in kleine ondernemingen.<br />

In dit hoofdstuk wordt stilgestaan bij de<br />

ontwikeling van de medezeggenschap in<br />

Duitsland. In tegenstelling tot wat vaak<br />

gedacht wordt, is in Duitsland, net als in<br />

Nederland, de oprichting van een ondernemingsraad<br />

niet zo maar af te dwingen;<br />

zonder initiatief van werknemerszijde komt<br />

geen ondernemingsraad tot stand. Wel is het<br />

zo dat in een overgrote meerderheid van het<br />

Duitse grootbedrijf de medezeggenschap<br />

stevig verankerd is. Zodra gekeken wordt<br />

naar de categorie kleinere bedrijven neemt<br />

de naleving in Duitsland snel af. Dat is ech-<br />

ter in Nederland niet veel anders. Een van<br />

de centrale doelstellingen van de hervorming<br />

in 2001 van de medezeggenschapswetgeving<br />

(het Betriebsverfassungsgesetz) was<br />

het stimuleren van een betere verspreiding<br />

van de medezeggenschap in bepaalde segmenten<br />

van de arbeidsmarkt met een lage<br />

naleving (bouw, handel, diensten) en in zogenaamde<br />

‘medezeggenschapsvrije zones’<br />

waarbij in het bijzonder gedoeld werd op<br />

het MKB. De Duitse wetgever achtte het<br />

zowel vanuit politiek, als vanuit economisch<br />

opzicht noodzakelijk hier iets aan te doen.<br />

De wetgever ging er daarbij van uit dat medezeggenschap<br />

zeer tot voordeel strekt, dat<br />

de kosten ruim tegen de baten opwegen en<br />

dat het goed organiseren van de medezeggenschap<br />

(dus) profi jtelijk is voor het bedrijfsleven.<br />

In: Medezeggenschap in kleine ondernemingen<br />

(red. G. Bruinsma), uit de serie ORstrategie<br />

en beleid, thema 17, Vakmedianet,<br />

Alphen aan de Rijn, pagina 101-117.<br />

29


30<br />

PUBLICATIONS<br />

Book review<br />

Employers’ organizations and the effects<br />

of ‘voluntary’ abstention from collectively<br />

negotiated agreements<br />

Review by Jan Cremers, published in Transfer 18(3), August <strong>2012</strong>, p. 364-365<br />

‘Why do workers leave unions?’ was the title of an article in Transfer 17(4) in 2011. In it, the authors explored the<br />

reasons for workers leaving trade unions or staying on as trade union members.<br />

In the book ‘The paradox of employers’<br />

federations’, Martin Behrens of the Hans<br />

Böckler Foundation discusses a similar case<br />

applying to employers. His in-depth analysis<br />

of German employer organizations reveals<br />

a range of reasons for employers belonging<br />

to such organizations, while at the same<br />

time exposing the myth that employers act<br />

in conformity. Employer organizations have<br />

always been seen as an important building<br />

block of the regulatory frame anchoring<br />

the ‘Rhineland model’. In the long term an<br />

increase in ‘opt-out clauses’ and in companies<br />

making use thereof will undermine the<br />

principal function of employer organizations.<br />

Though their role will not disappear,<br />

the conclusion after reading this book is<br />

that there is a qualitative change, with new<br />

ways of adding value needing to be developed<br />

to maintain attractiveness.<br />

Martin Behrens. Das Paradox der Arbeitgeberverbände<br />

– Von der Schwierigkeit, durchsetzungsstarke<br />

Unternehmensinteressen kollektiv<br />

zu vertreten [The paradox of employers’<br />

Article<br />

Men care revisited<br />

By Marianne Grunell, published in Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, no 15, <strong>2012</strong>, p<br />

51-56<br />

I discuss the thesis of my Phd on<br />

men’s changing contribution to<br />

everyday care and the new social<br />

appeal made to them (2002).<br />

A decade later my conclusions<br />

on a major historical<br />

change are sceptical.<br />

The urgency of<br />

the matter has diminished<br />

at the authorities<br />

and in social organisations.<br />

Men themselves<br />

– in particular the focusgroup of fathers<br />

of young children – remain ambivalent.<br />

Although they say that they want to work<br />

less to care more, only a few work part-time.<br />

This small group of highly educated men,<br />

working in the social sector or at the authorities<br />

remains a priviledged group, with paid<br />

care arrangements and a pro-care culture.<br />

Much more widespread are full-time working<br />

fathers, who changed their careing attituede<br />

in their free time. Their choice fi ts well<br />

in the Dutch one-and-a-half-earning model,<br />

in which mothers work part-time and men<br />

full-time. The interests of both are served<br />

well in this model that will also dominate<br />

the coming years.<br />

federations – the diffi culty of collectively<br />

representing assertive company interests],<br />

Research series of the German Hans-Böckler-Foundation,<br />

Bd. 130, Edition Sigma:<br />

Berlin, 2011; 238 pp.<br />

In: Transfer 18(3), August <strong>2012</strong>, p. 364-365,<br />

http://trs.sagepub.com/content/current


PUBLICATIONS<br />

PROFESSIONAL<br />

Book<br />

New edition<br />

‘De juridische<br />

organisatie<br />

van de onderneming’<br />

A.F.M. Dorresteijn and R.H. van het<br />

Kaar<br />

On 9 September Kluwer published<br />

a new edition of ‘De Juridische<br />

organisatie van de onderneming’,<br />

a comprehensive book on Dutch<br />

company law, written by A.F.M.<br />

Dorresteijn en R.H. van het Kaar.<br />

After several years of<br />

standstill in Dutch company<br />

law, in <strong>2012</strong> major<br />

changes are about to take<br />

place. The book gives an<br />

up to date account of<br />

these recent changes. In<br />

several chapters the interaction<br />

between labour and company law is<br />

covered. Examples include the works council,<br />

employee board level representatives,<br />

the right of inquiry and restructuring.<br />

Publisher Uitgeverij Kluwer BV<br />

www.kluwer.nl<br />

Edition 11<br />

Pages 288<br />

ISBN 978-9-01310-291-8<br />

Price € 49<br />

Chapter<br />

Publications on applied research for a professional audience<br />

The Value of Workers in<br />

International CSR Policies<br />

Maarten Keune<br />

Maarten Keune contributed a chapter to a publication of the FNV titled<br />

The Value of Workers in International CSR Policies. His chapter is titled<br />

Globalization, Labour Relations and Transnational Agreements.<br />

It sketches a number of negative social consequences of globalization,<br />

including growing inequalities and insecurities, the loss of democratic<br />

control over the economy, and the growing power of capital at the expense<br />

of labour. These consequences have become more visible and are<br />

aggravating the present economic and fi nancial crisis. As part of this<br />

process, workers are confronted with production chains that are constantly<br />

subject to restructuring and that are more and more organized<br />

across borders, and with the increasing fi nancialization of the global<br />

economy. One of the responses of unions to these developments is<br />

that they negotiate a variety of agreements at the level of multinational companies or supply<br />

chains with employers interested in strengthening their (image of) corporate social responsibility.<br />

Such agreements can potentially play an important role in regulating transnational<br />

economic activities, improve labour relations in multinationals, as well as complement existing<br />

national legal frameworks that are not adjusted to the internationalization of economic<br />

activities. At the same time they suffer from a number of weaknesses, related to their voluntarist<br />

character and their limited scope and diffusion.<br />

To overcome these limitations, balance the power of global corporations and foster more<br />

socially responsible behaviour by multinationals, it is argued that changes are required to the<br />

governance of multinational companies, including a change from shareholder to stakeholder<br />

models, an increased sense of responsibility from company managers, socially responsible<br />

investing, limits on the political power of fi rms, strengthening the enforcement of labour<br />

law, the further inclusion of social and labour standards in trade agreements, and the further<br />

internationalization of the trade union movement. Government policy can play an important<br />

role in this respect and may codify voluntarist agreements. If transnational agreements<br />

are to become more general instruments to regulate the global economy, changes in these<br />

directions would be required. It is up to unions, governments and socially responsible companies<br />

to promote such changes.<br />

31


32<br />

Essay<br />

European Integration<br />

and labour relations:<br />

consequences for the<br />

Dutch model?<br />

Maarten Keune contributed an essay to the Dutch-language AWVN<br />

publication “Designers in Labour Relations”. His essay is titled “European<br />

Integration and labour relations: consequences for the Dutch model?”<br />

The T essay discusses the effects that European integration has had<br />

and may have in the future on Dutch labour relations. It is argued,<br />

among other things, that the Dutch social partners, used to have a<br />

strong infl uence in socio-economic matters at national level, have<br />

little leverage over EU policies, even though these policies limit<br />

their policy options. What is more, the growing role of the EU<br />

may well affect the traditional Dutch corporatist model in the long<br />

run. Also, it puts pressure on the encompassing Dutch system of<br />

sector collective agreements. Indeed, continuity of the Dutch model is by no means given<br />

and less so with the present direction of European integration.<br />

Article<br />

Re-employment servicing<br />

can be done better, by<br />

learning’ in “Social Issues<br />

Els Sol, Trudie Knijn and Monique Frings-Dresen<br />

Els Sol, programme leader of an interuniversity research programme on<br />

re-employment servicing (2007-<strong>2012</strong>) presents together with Trudie Knijn<br />

(Utrecht University) and Monique Frings-Dresen (AMC) main fi ndings of the<br />

programme in the article ‘Re-employment servicing can be done better, by<br />

learning’ in “Social Issues” (scientists and thinkers debate on social issues).<br />

The article shows that the re-employment into paid work can be better organized and that<br />

research can be a helper. In the domain of reemployment servicing there is a general lack<br />

amongst all actors involved of theoretical knowledge. Knowledge exists mainly in the head of<br />

the performers and is not laid down in theory. As a result the system does not learn quickly. In<br />

the research programme theory has been developed, which can help to better evaluate interventions.<br />

The researchers suggest that the reemployment services sector should be a learning<br />

sector, fueled by scientifi c research.<br />

PUBLICATIONS


PUBLICATIONS<br />

Zeggenschap<br />

January - August <strong>2012</strong><br />

Van de zijde van <strong>AIAS</strong> wordt regelmatig meegewerkt aan het kwartaalblad<br />

Zeggenschap over arbeidsverhoudingen. We vatten de bijdragen van <strong>AIAS</strong>medewerkers<br />

in de eerste helft van <strong>2012</strong> kort samen.<br />

Zeggenschap - Maart <strong>2012</strong> - 23e jaargang nummer 1<br />

Het eerste nummer van <strong>2012</strong> bevat, zoals gebruikelijk, een column van<br />

Paul de Beer, in dit nummer over de Nieuwe Vakbeweging met als titel<br />

‘Acht miljoen vakorganisaties’, en de Loonwijzer-rubriek van Kea Tijdens<br />

en Maarten van Klaveren, in deze uitgave gewijd aan ‘De lonen van<br />

schoonmakers’. Frank Tros schreef ‘Ontslagvergoedingen niet simpel te<br />

verruilen met scholing’ (zie de <strong>AIAS</strong>-Nieuwsbrief van voorjaar <strong>2012</strong>).<br />

In een bijdrage van Els Sol, getiteld ‘Zwakke punten in Wet werken naar vermogen’,<br />

wordt op basis van nieuw onderzoek uiteengezet wat de leidende<br />

ideeën zijn achter re-integratie en voor wie en in welke situaties re-integratie<br />

een geëigende strategie kan zijn. Hieraan is behoefte aangezien vanuit de<br />

economische wetenschap en in media veel kritiek is op ‘de ineffectiviteit’ van<br />

re-integratieondersteuning, overigens zonder dat daar overtuigend bewijs<br />

tegenover staat. Desondanks zou op basis van die kritiek in het inmiddels<br />

ingetrokken wetsvoorstel ‘Wet werken naar vermogen’(Wwnv) fl ink gekort<br />

worden in het budget voor re-integratie. Uit het onderzoek ‘Fit or Unfi t;<br />

naar expliciete re-integratie theorieën’ is bekend wat de werkzame mechanismen<br />

zijn van re-integratiedienstverlening. Nadruk ligt op het bewerkstelligen<br />

van gedragsveranderingen bij het individu, die kunnen variëren van<br />

een oppervlakkige gedragsverandering onder druk van omstandigheden tot<br />

een meer diepgaande in de zin van de manier waarop iemand in het leven<br />

staat. Zowel de uitkeringsgerechtigde als de maatschappij zijn er bij gebaat<br />

wanneer een dergelijke duurzame verbetering daadwerkelijk tot stand wordt<br />

gebracht. Dit brengt de zwakke punten van de Wwnw aan het licht; de wet<br />

zet in op instrumentele, fi nanciële prikkels als loondispensatie en individuele<br />

loonwaardebepalingen en verwaarloost de re-integratieondersteuning die is<br />

gericht op gedragsverandering. Het is effi ciënter voorafgaand aan een loonwaardebepaling<br />

door middel van re-integratiedienstverlening arbeidsvaardigheden<br />

aan te laten leren en gedragsverandering te bewerkstelligen en op<br />

die manier eerst de loonwaarde te verhogen. Het kabinet hanteert met de<br />

Wwnw een riskante strategie.<br />

In de rubriek het Internationaal Signalement bespreekt Marc van der<br />

Meer het boek van Jan Cremers ‘In search of cheap labour in Europe,<br />

working and living conditions of posted workers’. Volgens van der Meer<br />

voorziet het boek ‘in empirische bijdragen die de kloof tussen juridische<br />

bescherming en empirische uitwerking overbruggen. Van bijzondere<br />

kwaliteit zijn de twaalf landenstudies over België, Duitsland, Engeland,<br />

Frankrijk, Ierland, Italië, Nederland, Noorwegen, Roemenië, Spanje,<br />

Zweden en Zwitserland, die met minimale middelen in opdracht van de<br />

Europese Commissie zijn geschreven’.<br />

www.zeggenschap.info/<br />

Zeggenschap - Juni <strong>2012</strong> - 23e jaargang nummer 2<br />

In het tweede nummer van <strong>2012</strong> andermaal een column van Paul de<br />

Beer (‘De grote uitruil’ over het lenteakkoord en de pensioenproblematiek)<br />

en een Loonwijzer ‘Invloed crisis op mobiliteit’.<br />

Daarnaast een bijdrage van Lisa Berntsen (vanaf zomer <strong>2012</strong> gastonderzoeker<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong>) over de tewerkstelling van buitenlandse arbeidskrachten<br />

in de Eemshaven. Zij constateert dat de arbeidsrelaties bij<br />

grote bouwprojecten zoals in de Eemshaven zeer fl exibel zijn door<br />

de forse concurrentieslag die gevoerd wordt tussen binnen- en buitenlandse<br />

bedrijven over de hoofden van buitenlandse vakkrachten<br />

heen. Vakbonden en opdrachtgevers boven aan de keten hebben<br />

vaak weinig zicht en grip op de arbeidsomstandigheden vanwege de<br />

tijdelijke contracten. Hoewel Europa arbeidsmobiliteit bevordert en<br />

deze mensen de kans geeft een beter bestaan op te bouwen, biedt<br />

dezelfde wetgeving uit Europa tegelijkertijd weinig handvatten voor<br />

naleving en controle zodat dit ook op een eerlijke manier gebeurt.<br />

Jan Cremers rapporteert in een artikel over onderzoek naar de betekenis<br />

van de Olympische Spelen voor werknemers. Met collega’s<br />

van het European Institute for Construction Labour Research<br />

(CLR) heeft hij de ervaringen met de laatste zes Olympische Spelen<br />

(sinds Barcelona 1992) opgetekend. Gekeken is naar de betekenis<br />

van de OS vanuit sociaaleconomisch oogpunt, werkgelegenheid en<br />

langetermijnperspectief. In de analyse is aandacht besteed aan de<br />

feitelijke tewerkstelling, de mogelijkheid werklozen te scholen en<br />

stadsdelen die aan een opknapbeurt toe zijn te reanimeren. Tevens<br />

is gerapporteerd over de vakbondssamenwerking bij dergelijke grote<br />

projecten, die per defi nitie worden gekenmerkt door een aanwezigheid<br />

van grote aantallen buitenlandse werknemers. Zijn antwoord<br />

op de vraag wat nodig is bij dergelijke megaprojecten luidt: ‘Een<br />

strakke regie, een selectie van betrouwbare ondernemingen in de<br />

aanbesteding, degelijke afspraken vooraf tussen alle betrokken partijen<br />

die worden nageleefd en een goed pakket met arbeidsvoorwaarden<br />

lijken garant te staan voor degelijk werk en tijdige levering.<br />

Op die manier wordt het risico van vertragingen het meest beperkt.<br />

Dat leidt tot lagere supervisiekosten en minder arbeidsconfl icten<br />

met verlies aan productietijd. En in de voorbeelden die we hier hebben<br />

besproken uiteindelijk tot minder overschrijdingen en lagere<br />

totale bouwkosten’.<br />

33


34<br />

Interview with Maarten Berg<br />

FOCUS ON...<br />

RESEARCH<br />

A solidarity experiment in the Dapperbuurt<br />

Laboratory experiments are becoming increasingly popular among social scientists. By letting subjects play a game<br />

in an environment that is fully under control – the lab – it is possible to fi ne tune the conditions under which people<br />

interact. Thus, one can draw inferences about the causal relationship between these conditions and their behaviour.<br />

Students are the obvious group to select the participants for these experiments from. However, one may question<br />

whether the behaviour of university students really refl ects the behaviour of the population at large, especially if these<br />

students are used to participate in laboratory experiments. It is therefore of great interest to compare the behaviour<br />

of students with the behaviour of ‘ordinary’ people in the same experimental design. This was put to practice in the<br />

experiments that <strong>AIAS</strong> researcher Maarten Berg performed as part of the research programme ‘Solidarity in the 21st<br />

Century’.<br />

What kind of experiment did you perform?<br />

In the basic experiment, four participants<br />

had to answer individually ten multiple<br />

choice questions. The two participants who<br />

performed the best on this quiz were declared<br />

to be the winners. They were each<br />

rewarded with 20 euro’s that they were allowed<br />

to distribute over the four group<br />

members (including themselves). They were<br />

free to choose any possible distribution, e.g.<br />

keep all 20 euro’s to themselves, to distribute<br />

the sum equally (5-5-5-5), or to do something<br />

else. Because the participants actually<br />

earned real money with this ‘solidarity game’<br />

(and lost real money by sharing), sharing behaviour<br />

in this experiment is strong proof<br />

of the potential for solidarity. A problem<br />

of standard survey research (“How much<br />

would you be willing to share....?”) is that<br />

is very vulnerable to socially desirable statements.<br />

However, the main research focus<br />

was not the degree of solidarity, but rather<br />

the differences in solidarity between slightly<br />

different experimental conditions.<br />

Why did you choose the visitors of the<br />

Dapper market, a daily street market<br />

in Amsterdam, to participate in the experiments?<br />

The starting point of our project, ‘Solidarity<br />

in the 21st century’, was that solidarity in<br />

Dutch society might be endangered by societal<br />

developments, such as the aging population<br />

(creating a potential confl ict between<br />

generations) and increasing cultural diversity.<br />

The Dappermarket is a very diverse<br />

area of Amsterdam, and therefore very well<br />

suited to study some of our hypotheses. An<br />

additional benefi t was that Laurens Buijs, a<br />

sociologist from our team, did qualitative research<br />

in the Dappermarket area. This enabled<br />

us to compare and integrate our fi ndings,<br />

using very different methodologies.<br />

How did you convince people on the<br />

market to participate?<br />

Actually, this was very hard. We had to approach<br />

at least ten persons (and sometimes<br />

many more) to convince one person to<br />

participate. An additional complication was<br />

that we needed groups of exact four participants.<br />

This meant that occasionally we lost<br />

a potential participant, who was no longer<br />

willing to wait for the other participants to<br />

show up. With the great help of Laurens,<br />

Casper and others, we managed to do it after<br />

all.<br />

I think that a big problem was that people<br />

are so used to being approached (by people<br />

who want their money) that they did not<br />

realize that they would actually earn money<br />

with this experiment. After the experiment,<br />

participants were often grateful for receiving<br />

so much money for so little effort.<br />

What were the largest problems/obstacles<br />

that you were confronted with<br />

in performing the experiment in the<br />

Dapperbuurt?<br />

Besides having to approach the potential<br />

participants on the market, we had to create<br />

a lab in a community centre (‘buurthuis’)<br />

nearby. As the participants communicated<br />

with one another through computers,<br />

Casper had to create a network. We ran into<br />

all kinds of practical challenges, especially<br />

when participants did not fully understand<br />

the instructions or were far from fl uent in<br />

the Dutch language. Fortunately, for most<br />

participants this was not the case.<br />

Can you tell us the most remarkable<br />

differences between the outcomes of<br />

the experiment with the students and<br />

with the visitors of the Dapperbuurt?<br />

In the Dapperbuurt experiment we were especially<br />

interested in the characteristics of<br />

the participants (e.g. in terms of sex, age,<br />

cultural background, etc.) and the social<br />

distance between them. When we used students<br />

they were anonymous to one another<br />

(player 1, player 2, etc.). Our results showed<br />

that native participants share less money<br />

with Turkish or Moroccan people than with<br />

fellow natives.<br />

Another difference between the two studies<br />

was that the participants from the Dap-


FOCUS ON...<br />

permarket showed more solidarity than the<br />

students, who were more experienced with<br />

such experiments and might even be trained<br />

in the ‘homo economicus perspective’.<br />

What lessons do you think we can draw<br />

from this fi eld experiment for future<br />

experimental studies?<br />

The main problem of experimental research<br />

is its low ‘external validity’. The results cannot<br />

necessarily be generalized to the entire<br />

population. By conducting a fi eld experiment,<br />

the strengths of two methods are<br />

combined. This kind of research requires<br />

an additional effort, but it can be done and<br />

it is worth the trouble.<br />

Solidarity in the 21st Research project<br />

Century<br />

The research programme ‘Solidarity in the 21 st Century’ focuses on the effects<br />

of changes in the composition of the population; such as immigration and<br />

ageing. The research programme aims to analyze the effects of these changes<br />

on solidarity, both informal and formal. It examines what kind of motives,<br />

conditions and circumstances are benefi cial for the sustainment of solidarity<br />

between different groups in society. The apparent discrepancies between<br />

immigrants and natives on the one hand, and the elderly and the young on<br />

the other hand, seem to have a serious impact on the Dutch tolerance and<br />

solidarity. Members of the different groups are unable to relate to each other,<br />

and fear that one group will benefi t unequally from the other prevails. This<br />

is problematic because the tensions between the different groups in Dutch<br />

society are likely to grow.<br />

By a combination of different research methods - qualitative case-studies, statistical data<br />

analysis, economic experiments, media analysis - this research project will investigate the<br />

different conditions of and motives for solidarity. The focus of this research is on solidarity<br />

between immigrant and natives, and between the elderly and the young, simultaneously. The<br />

qualitative case-study research focuses on the micro level of the neighborhood; what kind of<br />

conditions (socioeconomic composition, public institutions, etc.) infl uence informal solidarity?<br />

The statistical data research (or survey research) tries to establish which circumstances on<br />

the macro level (such as ethnic diversity and age differentiation) affects both formal solidarity,<br />

in terms of support for the welfare state, and informal solidarity. The economic experiments<br />

will analyze which external factors determine the willingness to support others by controlling<br />

different conditions. The media analysis focuses on the infl uence of media imaging<br />

on the ways the different groups perceive each other. The aim of the research programme is<br />

to connect the different parts of research, which eventually will lead to a fi nal research paper<br />

on solidarity, next to the separate research papers based on the different research methods.<br />

The research is led by prof. dr. Paul de Beer and is subsidized by Foundation Institute Gak.<br />

For more information about the research programme or access to publications and proposals,<br />

see www.solidariteit.info or contact Merle Zwiers: m.d.zwiers@uva.nl.<br />

35


36<br />

Data section at <strong>AIAS</strong> website<br />

• Annual Social Reports Database<br />

In the Archives, the social annual reports from 1988 to the present are collected.<br />

Unfortunately, most series is not complete. Yet it is possible to build<br />

upon the reports collected a good picture of developments around staff and<br />

personnel in the organizations. The sample survey was complemented with<br />

other organizations over the years.<br />

• CLA partners<br />

In the Netherlands, about a thousand collective agreements cover about 80<br />

percent of the employed population. CLA’s are agreed between one or several<br />

employers or employers’ organizations and one or several other unions.<br />

In 2005 Kilian Schreuder has inventoried the signatory parties of all<br />

CLA’s which are entered in the DUCADAM dataset (N=3752) and<br />

collected them in a spreadsheet. This fi le is unique in the Netherlands<br />

• Collective Bargaining Newsletter<br />

See earlier in this <strong>newsletter</strong>.<br />

• DUCADAM database<br />

Database of Collective Agreements in the Netherlands. The database is<br />

based on the ‘FNV CAO-Database’ and contains detailed information<br />

on collective labour agreements concluded in the Netherlands.<br />

• Flex Work Research Centre<br />

(FWRC) is a joint initiative launched by ABU and the University of<br />

Amsterdam. <strong>AIAS</strong> and the Hugo Sinzheimer Institute manage<br />

this international website and provides information on research reports<br />

and articles relating to temporary employment in the broadest sense in fi ve<br />

languages (English, Dutch, French, German and Spanish).<br />

• IC<strong>TW</strong>SS database<br />

The IC<strong>TW</strong>SS database covers four key elements of modern political<br />

economies in advanced capitalist societies: trade unionism, wage setting,<br />

state intervention and social pacts. The database contains annual data for<br />

34 countries. It runs from 1960 till 2010.<br />

• Intermediair 'Best Employers' Dataset<br />

The Intermediair ‘Best Employers’ survey is an annual survey of Dutch<br />

employers concerning their HR policies, used for the Best Employers list in<br />

the Intermediair weekly. <strong>AIAS</strong> acts as an advisor for the questionnaire.<br />

DATA<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> has a major collection of academic socio-economic data in the fi eld of labour relations, labour organizations,<br />

employment and working conditions in the Netherlands and abroad.<br />

The DATA section of the <strong>AIAS</strong> website has recently been updated. It presents information about 13 data collections of <strong>AIAS</strong>, namely:<br />

• IT use of employees in the Netherlands<br />

The dataset is based on a surveys of secretaries in the Netherlands about<br />

their job content, and working conditions in 1993, 2000, and 2004.<br />

• Job content of secretaries in the Netherlands<br />

The dataset is based on comparable surveys of secretaries in the Netherlands<br />

about their job content, and working conditions in 1993, 2000, and<br />

2004.<br />

• Study Group Quality of Labour<br />

The reports and administration of this study group provides a portrait of<br />

an age of social scientifi c research and the debate in the fi eld of the quality<br />

of labour over a period of 20 years. The archive consists of eight document<br />

fi les. Among them reports of the study group meetings during the entire<br />

period of 1979-2002; information about 11 international seminars and<br />

the programme fi les of the study group including a Trend report Quality<br />

of Labour and the design-focussed research. The archive also contains some<br />

publications that have been supervised by the study group and some publications<br />

that are hard to obtain elsewhere.<br />

• Trade organisations<br />

The Trade organisations database consists of names, years of establishment,<br />

historical development, NACE industry-codes and other data of<br />

more than 1400 trade and employers organisations. For the years 1980,<br />

1991, 2001 and 2005,the mergers, separations and removals of these<br />

organisations have been investigated.<br />

• WageIndicator database<br />

The WageIndicator Survey is a continuous, multilingual, multi-country<br />

web-survey, conducted more than 60 countries since 2000. The web-survey<br />

generates cross sectional and longitudinal data which might provide data<br />

especially about wages, benefi ts, working hours, working conditions and<br />

industrial relations.<br />

• World Database of Occupations-WISC<br />

The EurOccupations micro data of the task frequency web-survey in eight<br />

EU countries; WISCO database with more than 1,700 occupational titles<br />

for 60 countries.<br />

For more information please see our website www.uva-aias.net/data or contact: prof. dr. Kea Tijdens (k.g.tijdens@uva.nl).


RESEARCH<br />

Research on new forms of<br />

transnational labour agreements<br />

With the on-going internationalization<br />

of the economy and the ever-growing<br />

importance of multinationals, more<br />

and more transnational labour norms<br />

are set through different types of<br />

transnational labour agreements.<br />

Such agreements include collective<br />

agreements, framework agreements,<br />

codes of conduct, and other joint<br />

texts produced by management,<br />

workers’ representatives and possible<br />

third parties like NGOs.<br />

Transnational labour agreements are<br />

made between private actors without<br />

direct involvement of public actors<br />

and aim to regulate and guide the<br />

behaviour of the parties involved, in<br />

particular where labour relations and<br />

working conditions are concerned.<br />

However, there is hardly any legal<br />

framework for such agreements that<br />

largely operate in a legal vacuum and<br />

have a mainly voluntary character. As<br />

a consequence, there is little clarity as<br />

to their legal status, their relationship<br />

to national and international law, and<br />

the possibilities for their enforcement.<br />

Also, their effective impact on labour<br />

relations and working conditions<br />

remains largely unclear.<br />

Although there already exists an extensive<br />

body of research with respect to the above<br />

mentioned issues, this research is focused on<br />

single and in scope limited elements of these<br />

issues. They include for instance theoretical<br />

considerations on how to deal with the lack<br />

of a legal framework and empirical research<br />

on the implementation of these agreements<br />

on (national) plant level. Consequently, this<br />

body of research leaves us with a shattered<br />

understanding of transnational agreements.<br />

In order to get a more overall understanding<br />

of transnational labour agreements, this<br />

research will examine them against the background<br />

of all three perspectives and builds<br />

on three basic ideas involved with transnational<br />

relations. The fi rst of these is the idea<br />

of global value chain governance which deals<br />

with the issue of authority and power that<br />

determine how fi nancial, material and human<br />

resources are allocated and fl ow within<br />

chains of fi rms. Secondly, we’ll take into<br />

account the idea of multi-level governance<br />

which refers to the increased interdependence<br />

between governance mechanisms at<br />

different levels on the one hand and to the<br />

growing interdependence between governmental<br />

and non-governmental (private) actors<br />

on the other hand. The third idea is that<br />

of hybrid structures which deals with the interaction<br />

between the outcomes of traditional<br />

authority as well as that of mechanisms of<br />

new governance. These outcomes include<br />

SOLIDAR-project fi nalized<br />

varies forms of hard law as well as soft law.<br />

More particularly, the fi rst idea (global value<br />

chains) focuses on the motives and reasons<br />

for actors to engage transnational industrial<br />

relations, it will also provide initial information<br />

about what might be expected from the<br />

concluded transnational agreement in terms<br />

of effectiveness. The second and third ideas<br />

(multi-level governance and hybrid structures<br />

respectively) than will provide complementary<br />

information in terms of autonomy and<br />

dependence of the actors involved and possible<br />

interactions of the varies forms of law<br />

involved with the regulation of specifi c rights<br />

within a chain of companies that are both of<br />

infl uence of the effectiveness of the transnational<br />

labour agreements in the sense that<br />

they either can play to each other’s strengths<br />

when they are complementary or down play<br />

each other when they strive for dominance.<br />

Together these three ideas provide a comprehensive<br />

insight in transnational agreements<br />

that helps us to further understand what the<br />

strengths and weaknesses are of transnational<br />

labour agreements, in particular with<br />

respect to their effectiveness in governing<br />

labour strategies end ensuring labour rights.<br />

The research will be conducted by Beryl ter<br />

Haar (post-doc at <strong>AIAS</strong>) and is supervised by<br />

Maarten Keune (<strong>AIAS</strong>) and Evert Verhulp<br />

(UvA). First results will be expected in 2013.<br />

For more information you can contact Beryl<br />

ter Haar B.P.terHaar@uva.nl.<br />

Early June <strong>2012</strong> a SOLIDAR-project was fi nalized that aims to intensify the cooperation and mutual learning of relevant actors<br />

– employers, unions, NGOs, think thank and workers – with the ultimate aim to combat precarious employment and to realise<br />

decent working conditions for all.<br />

The advisory committee chaired by Jan Cremers<br />

from <strong>AIAS</strong> and with representatives from<br />

the ILO, the Bertelsmann Foundation, the<br />

Dublin Foundation and the ETUI underlined<br />

the importance of the conclusions and recommendations<br />

of the fi nal report ‘Reframing<br />

industrial relations’ that can be downloaded<br />

here. <strong>AIAS</strong>-researcher Janna Besamusca.<br />

produced one of the pilot studies. See for<br />

the conclusion the fi nal report at: www.<br />

uva-aias.net/uploaded_files/regular/<br />

Booklet_DWIR_II_web.pdf<br />

37


38<br />

RESEARCH<br />

Project Title / Topic Commissioner<br />

Sorted by project name<br />

Activating States<br />

Fundamental shifts in the governance and content of<br />

unemployment insurance<br />

SIG Fund<br />

BARSORI Bargaining for social rights: reducing precariousness<br />

and labour market segmentation through collective<br />

bargaining and social dialogue<br />

EU DG Social dialogue<br />

CAWIE Collectively agreed wages in Europe European Commission<br />

Collective Bargaining <strong>newsletter</strong> This <strong>newsletter</strong> presents up-to-date information on<br />

collective bargaining developments across Europe<br />

since February 2008<br />

Decisions for life Aims to promote formal employment and equal opportunities<br />

at the labour market<br />

DUCADAM Dutch Collective Labour Agreements Database and<br />

Monitor<br />

ETUI-REHS<br />

Ministry of Foreign Affairs, joint<br />

with ITUC<br />

EU-DG ESA<br />

Earnings of self-employed Ministry of Social Affairs<br />

EIRO Coördination Dutch contribution in the European<br />

Industrial Relations Observatory (EIRO)<br />

Eurofound<br />

Employment in the Netherlands XpertHR<br />

Equalsoc Network of Excellence Economic change, social inequality and social cohesion<br />

in the knowledge economy<br />

EU FP6<br />

EurOccupations Building a publicly available occupations database in 8<br />

European countries<br />

EU FP6<br />

European Restructuring Monitor EUROFOUND<br />

Flexwork Research Center ABU<br />

Fitness check information and consultation<br />

directives: the Netherlands<br />

Commissioned to Deloitte by the EU. EU<br />

Formula Free movement and labour law - confl icts and impacts Research Council of Norway<br />

Free choice of pensions A broader choice of pensions can lead to a more effi<br />

cient execution.<br />

SIG Fund<br />

GINI Growing Inequalities’ Impacts EU FP7<br />

GUSTO Analysing, Comparing and evaluating the various societal<br />

models in a medium-to-long-term perspective<br />

EU FP7<br />

HEALTH at WORK Improving health and safety at work EU FP7<br />

HRM Chronically Ill II HRM policies for chronically ill workers SIG Fund<br />

The information and consultation directive<br />

in practice<br />

Commissioned to Warwick by Eurofound EU<br />

The impact of the ‘Great Recession’ on<br />

European Industrial Relations<br />

International reform monitor,<br />

Dutch correspondent<br />

This project studies the reactions of the industrial<br />

relations systems of three countries (Germany, Finland<br />

and Ireland) to the pressures emerging from the<br />

present economic crisis<br />

Website database on Social policies, labour market<br />

policies, industrial relations<br />

Bertelsmann Stiftung


PROJECTS<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> researchers Links Period<br />

Dr. Els Sol a.o. www.activatingstates.org/5 2006 - <strong>2012</strong><br />

Prof. Maarten Keune a.o. 2010 - 2011<br />

Maarten van Klaveren, Prof. Kea Tijdens,<br />

Prof. Maarten Keune<br />

2011 - <strong>2012</strong><br />

Jan Cremers, Janna Besamusca www.uva-aias.net/102#collective_barg 2008 - continued<br />

Prof. Kea Tijdens, Maarten van Klaveren a.o. www.wageindicator.org/main/projects/decisionsfor-life/decisions-for-life-2013-kick-off-meetingdecember-8-9<br />

2009 - 2011<br />

Prof. Kea Tijdens www1.fee.uva.nl/aias/ducadam/ 2000 - 2010*)<br />

Prof. Kea Tijdens<br />

Dr. Robbert van het Kaar and Dr. Marianne<br />

Grunell<br />

www.eiro.eurofound.ie/ 2005 - continued*)<br />

Dr. Robbert van het Kaar 2009 - continued<br />

Prof. Herman van de Werfhorst, Prof. Wiemer<br />

Salverda a.o.<br />

www.equalsoc.org 2005 - 2010*)<br />

Prof. Kea Tijdens www.euroccupations.org/main/ 2006 - 2009<br />

Dr. Robbert van het Kaar 2003 - continued<br />

Dr Marloes de Graaf-Zijl 2011 - 2011<br />

Dr. Robbert van het Kaar 2011 - 2011<br />

Prof. Jelle Visser www.jus.uio.no/ifp/english/research/projects/freemov/<br />

2008 - <strong>2012</strong><br />

Prof Wiemer Salverda, Prof. Paul de Beer, David<br />

Hollanders<br />

2011 - 2014<br />

Prof. Wiemer Salverda, Dr Marloes de Graaf-Zijl,<br />

Dr Virginia Maestri, Dr Francesco Bogliacino, Dr<br />

Bram Lancee<br />

www.gini-research.org 2010 - 2013<br />

Dr. Els Sol, Dr Maarten Keune http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/projects/398_en.html<br />

2008 - <strong>2012</strong><br />

Dr. Joke Haafkens www.abdn.ac.uk/haw/index.html 2008 - 2011<br />

Dr. Joke Haafkens 2007 - 2011<br />

Dr. Robbert van het Kaar 2011 - <strong>2012</strong><br />

Prof. Maarten Keune, Aidan Regan 2011 - <strong>2012</strong><br />

Prof. Wiemer Salverda a.o. www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/cps/rde/xchg/bst_<br />

engl/hs.xsl/prj_54224.htm<br />

2000 - 2010<br />

*) extended with own funding<br />

39


40<br />

Project Title / Topic Commissioner<br />

Sorted by project name<br />

Labour rights for women The project departs from the understanding that<br />

women’s labour rights are to a large extent insuffi -<br />

ciently protected in the national legislation of the 15<br />

target countries in the project<br />

Loonwijzer See Wageindicator<br />

Pathways to work research programme<br />

(RVO)<br />

This research programme aims to strengthen academic<br />

research into reintegration services in direct interaction<br />

with the reintegration fi eld<br />

Posting Free movement and the posting of workers in the EU<br />

/ Social Progress Clause<br />

SEEurope (Cremers) Coordination of research on workers participation in<br />

companies with a European Company Statute<br />

Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs<br />

SIG Fund<br />

European Trade Union Confederation<br />

(ETUC)<br />

ETUI<br />

SEEurope (vh Kaar) Member of SEEurope-netwerk ETUI<br />

SOLIDAR Making Industrial Relations Work for Decent Work -<br />

pilot studies<br />

Solidarity in the 21st century Solidarity in the 21st century: aging, immigration and<br />

solidarity<br />

EU DG Social dialogue/SOLI-<br />

DAR/WBS Europafonds<br />

SIG Fund<br />

Temp work research monitor Website database of publications on temp work ABU, joint with HSI<br />

WageIndicator Share and compare wage information. Contribute to a<br />

transparent labour market. Provide free, accurate wage<br />

data through salary checks on national websites. Collect<br />

wage data through web surveys<br />

WEBDATANET Web-based data-collection – methodological challenges,<br />

solutions and implementations<br />

WEB-Surveys Improving Web Survey Methodology for Social and<br />

Cultural Sciences<br />

WISUTIL Wageindicator support for bargaining in the utilities<br />

sector<br />

Woliweb The socio-economic determinants of citizens’ work<br />

life attitudes, preferences and perceptions, using data<br />

from the continuous web-based European WageIndicator<br />

Survey<br />

RESEARCH<br />

Ministry of Social Affairs, Foreign<br />

Affairs, commercial parties<br />

European Science Foundation<br />

ERASMUS Studio EUR<br />

EU DG Social dialogue<br />

EU FP


PROJECTS<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> researchers Links Period<br />

Prof. Kea Tijdens, Janna Besamusca and Maarten<br />

van Klaveren<br />

<strong>2012</strong> - 2016<br />

Dr. Els Sol and Dr. Marloes de Graaf-Zijl www.verbeteronderzoek.nl 2008 - <strong>2012</strong><br />

Jan Cremers a.o. 2010 - <strong>2012</strong><br />

Jan Cremers www.worker-participation.eu/European-Company 2009 - <strong>2012</strong><br />

Dr. Robbert van het Kaar www.worker-participation.eu/ continued<br />

Jan Cremers and Janna Besamusca www.solidar.org/Page_Generale.<br />

asp?DocID=28025&la=1&langue=EN<br />

2011 - <strong>2012</strong><br />

Prof. Paul de Beer, Dr Dorota Lepianka, Dr<br />

Maarten Berg, Drs. Laurens Buijs, Merle Zwiers<br />

www.solidariteit.info 2009 - 2013<br />

Dr. Els Sol and Dr. Marloes de Graaf-Zijl a.o. www.fl exworkresearch.org 2005 - continued<br />

Prof. Kea Tijdens, Maarten van Klaveren, Stephanie<br />

Steinmetz. Prof. Maarten Keune, Prof. Paul<br />

de Beer (Chairs foundation)<br />

www.wageindicator.org 2000 - continued<br />

Prof. Kea Tijdens and Dr. Stephanie Steinmetz www.cost.esf.org/domains_actions/isch/Actions/<br />

IS1004<br />

2011 - 2015<br />

Prof. Kea Tijdens and Dr. Stephanie Steinmetz 2010 - 2013<br />

Prof. Kea Tijdens, Maarten van Klaveren a.o. www.wageindicator.org/main/projects/wisutil 2010 - 2011<br />

Prof. Kea Tijdens www.wageindicator.org/main/projects/WOLIWEB 2004 - 2007<br />

*) extended with own funding<br />

41


42<br />

New to <strong>AIAS</strong><br />

Maarten Keune<br />

LEERGANGEN<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> leergangencyclus<br />

Arbeidsvraagstukken en Beleid<br />

Zeven dinsdagmiddagen<br />

Elke leergang bestaat uit zeven wekelijkse bijeenkomsten<br />

op dinsdagmiddag van 13.30 tot 17.00<br />

uur. De eerste zes bijeenkomsten zijn achtereenvolgend<br />

en de laatste bijeenkomst met een week<br />

ertussen.<br />

Voor wie<br />

De leergangen zijn bedoeld voor academici en<br />

HBO-ers die hun kennis over arbeidsvraagstukken<br />

en het beleid willen opfrissen, actualiseren en<br />

verdiepen. De leergang wil een kader scheppen<br />

voor mensen die de dagelijkse gebeurtenissen<br />

rond arbeid en beleid beter willen begrijpen.<br />

Alle leergangen in de cyclus<br />

A. HRM in Beeld (januari 2013)<br />

B. Arbeidsmarkt in Ontwikkeling<br />

(april 2013)<br />

C. Ongelijkheid en de Verzorgingsstaat<br />

(september 2013)<br />

D. Trends in Arbeidsverhoudingen<br />

(januari 2014)<br />

Inschrijving<br />

Per leergang kunnen maximaal vijfentwintig personen<br />

deelnemen. Bij meer dan vijfentwintig aanmeldingen<br />

zal deelname worden toegekend op<br />

volgorde van aanmelding.<br />

Leergang A. HRM in Beeld<br />

Programma<br />

Bijeenkomst 1 Introductie op het Thema HRM in Beeld<br />

(15/1/’13)<br />

Dr. Martha Meerman & Dr. Corine Boon<br />

Bijeenkomst 2 Werving, Selectie, Ontslag (22/1/’13)<br />

Prof dr. Annelies van Vianen & Prof. Dr. Evert Verhulp<br />

Bijeenkomst 3 Functioneren, Prestatie en Belonen (29 /1/’13)<br />

Dr. Kilian Wawoe & Dr. Joop Zinsmeister<br />

Bijeenkomst 4 Leren en Ontwikkelen (5/2/’13)<br />

Prof. Dr. Lideweij van der Sluis & Dr. Marianne van Woerkom<br />

Kosten<br />

De kosten voor de afzonderlijke leergangen bedragen<br />

€ 2290,- (B<strong>TW</strong>-vrij). Dit is inclusief consumpties,<br />

literatuur, afsluitende netwerkborrel. De<br />

leergang kan worden afgesloten met een certifi -<br />

caat, mits aan de opdracht van het schrijven van<br />

een notitie en de aanwezigheidsplicht is voldaan<br />

(zes van de zeven bijeenkomsten aanwezig).<br />

Bij inschrijving voor een tweede of derde leergang<br />

(door dezelfde persoon binnen één cyclus) ontvangt<br />

u 5% korting op de cursusprijs. Bij inschrijving<br />

van de vierde leergang (door dezelfde persoon),<br />

zodat de hele leergangencyclus gevolgd<br />

wordt, ontvangt u op de laatste leergang 10%<br />

korting.<br />

Cursusleider: dr Martha Meerman<br />

Bent U van mening dat het werk al voor de helft is uitgevoerd als de juiste man op de juiste plaats beschikbaar is?<br />

Bent u op zoek naar antwoorden op de meer omvattende vraagstukken die schuil gaan achter veel problemen die<br />

zich op de werkvloer voordoen? Wist U dat HRM meer is dan alleen het inzetten van HRM instrumenten? Wilt U<br />

wel weer eens bijgespijkerd worden om de nieuwe ontwikkelingen die zich in het HRM vak voordoen, te begrijpen?<br />

Dan raden wij u de leergang HRM in Beeld aan.<br />

Tijdens de leergang behandelen we de verschillende onderdelen van de zogeheten HRM cyclus: de werving en selectie van personeel, de beoordeling en het<br />

functioneren van werknemers, de vormgeving van een baan tot een loopbaan, de participatie en betrokkenheid van werknemers bij de organisatie en dat alles om<br />

de organisatie van het werk zo optimaal mogelijk te laten verlopen.<br />

Bijeenkomst 5 Balans tussen Arbeid en Privé (12/2/’13)<br />

Prof. Dr. Yvonne Benschop & Dr. Joke Haafkens<br />

Bijeenkomst 6 HR in de arbeidsorganisatie (19/2/’13)<br />

Prof. Dr. Aukje Nauta & Dr. Martha Meerman<br />

Bijeenkomst 7 Afsluitende bijeenkomst met netwerkborrel en<br />

certifi caatuitreiking (5/3/’13)<br />

Zie voor meer informatie en registratie<br />

www.uva-aias.net/leergangen


LEERGANGEN<br />

InCompany leergang<br />

Basiscursus trainer medezeggenschap<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> organiseert en verzorgt voor<br />

de Stichting Kwaliteitsregister<br />

Opleiders Medezeggenschap en<br />

de daarin vertegenwoordigde<br />

partijen, de beroepsvereniging<br />

(BVMP) en de branchevereniging<br />

(BVMZ), een leergang voor startende<br />

trainers mezeggenschap en overige<br />

geïnteresseerden.<br />

De basiscursus zal bestaan uit zesentwintig dagdelen<br />

opleiding. Daaronder valt:<br />

2-daagse bijeenkomsten<br />

Drie inhoudelijke kernconcepten:<br />

1. Strategie<br />

2. Sociaal beleid van de onderneming<br />

3. Organisatie van de achterban<br />

Cases<br />

De passieve, erkende en pro-actieve OR met een<br />

diversiteit aan leden<br />

1-daagse bijeenkomsten<br />

Onmisbare onderwerpen:<br />

1. Context en ontwikkelingen van de medezeggenschap<br />

2.Ontwikkelingen in arbeidsorganisaties en maatschappij<br />

3. Oude en nieuwe wet- en regelgeving<br />

Eindtermen<br />

● Inhoudelijk te refl ecteren op eigen vakgebied<br />

en de eigen rol daarin<br />

● Kennis op het vakgebied te verwerken en<br />

over te dragen<br />

● Gezamenlijke OR en de individuele leden van<br />

elk bijzonder OR toe te rusten om zijn (complexe)<br />

taak naar behoren te vervullen<br />

Inschrijving<br />

Per leergang zullen er circa tien personen deelnemen.<br />

Inschrijven is mogelijk via de <strong>AIAS</strong> website.<br />

Kosten<br />

De kosten voor de leergang bedragen € 5000,-<br />

(B<strong>TW</strong>-vrij). Dit is inclusief locatie, consumpties,<br />

en literatuur.<br />

Zie voor meer informatie en registratie<br />

www.uva-aias.net/341<br />

43


44<br />

Dr Robbert van het Kaar<br />

Independent member<br />

committee ‘improvement<br />

worker involvement’<br />

On 1 June <strong>2012</strong>, Dr. R.H. van het Kaar was appointed independed member of<br />

the newly established committee for the improvement of worker involvement<br />

(Commissie Bevordering Medzeggenschap, CBM).<br />

The CBM established by the Social and Economic Council (SER) and consists of representatives<br />

of employer and union federations and independent members.<br />

Beryl ter Haar<br />

Defence thesis on the Open<br />

Method of Coordination<br />

Our post-doc researcher Beryl ter<br />

Haar will defend her thesis Open<br />

Method of Coordination. An analysis<br />

of its meaning for the development of<br />

a social Europe.<br />

Since its introduction in 2000 as a general<br />

instrument to foster European integration<br />

the Open Method of Coordination (OMC)<br />

became one of the most important instruments<br />

for the integration of social policy<br />

issues. Being labelled as soft law, it has triggered<br />

a vivid debate about its effectiveness.<br />

In this thesis that is comprised by a collection<br />

of (mostly published) articles, Ter Haar<br />

contributes to this debate by providing an<br />

analysis of the legal nature of the OMC, the<br />

legal integration dynamics that are involved<br />

with the OMC, a quantitative analysis on<br />

the effectiveness of the normative guidance<br />

of the OMC and an analysis of how the<br />

OMC interacts with other EU integration<br />

instruments. The overall conclusion of the<br />

thesis is that from a mainly legal point of<br />

view the OMC can be more effective than<br />

is currently the situation due to political integration<br />

dynamics that do not fully use the<br />

integration magnitude that is created by the<br />

legal nature of the OMC, its dynamics and<br />

interaction capacity.<br />

Date 8 November <strong>2012</strong><br />

Time 16:15 hours<br />

Location Academiegebouw<br />

Rapenburg 67-73<br />

Leiden<br />

http://bezoekers.leidenuniv.nl/locaties/academiegebouw.html<br />

Books are available upon request with the<br />

writer (b.p.terhaar@uva.nl).<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong>


PEOPLE AT <strong>AIAS</strong><br />

Name Position Email<br />

Ballafkih, H.A. (Hafi d) PhD A.H.Ballafkih@hva.nl<br />

Beentjes, M. (Marieke) PhD M.R.Beentjes@uva.nl<br />

Beer, de P.T. (Paul) Professor by Special Appointment of industrial<br />

relations at Henri Polak Chair<br />

P.T.deBeer@uva.nl<br />

Berg, M.C. (Maarten) Postdoc M.C.Berg@uva.nl<br />

Benda, L. (Luc) Jr. researcher L.Benda@uva.nl<br />

Besamusca, J. (Janna) PhD J.Besamusca@uva.nl<br />

Bogliacino, F. (Francesco) Postdoc F.Bogliacino@uva.nl<br />

Braak, J.T. (Jacqueline) Project leader teaching J.T.Braak@uva.nl<br />

Buijs, L.J. (Laurens) PhD L.J.Buijs@uva.nl<br />

Cremers, J. (Jan) Guest researcher/Project manager J.Cremers@uva.nl<br />

Eshuis, W. (Wim) Researcher W.A.Eshuis@uva.nl<br />

Gielen, A.H.M. (Ad) Financial project leader A.H.M.Gielen@uva.nl<br />

Graaf-Zijl, de M. (Marloes) Researcher M.deGraaf-Zijl@uva.nl<br />

Griffi th-Rozenblad, A.D.E. (Anüska) Management assistant A.D.E.Griffi th@uva.nl<br />

Grunell, M. (Marianne) Researcher M.Grunell@uva.nl<br />

Haafkens, J.A. (Joke) Researcher J.A.Haafkens@uva.nl<br />

Haar, ter B.P. (Beryl) Researcher B.P.terHaar@uva.nl<br />

Haas, C.G. (Christina) Jr. Researcher C.G.Haas@uva.nl<br />

Heuvel, van den N.A. (Nick) Coordinator TLM network N.A.vandenHeuvel@uva.nl<br />

Hogenhout, C. (Claire) Jr. researcher C.Hogenhout@uva.nl<br />

Hollanders, D.A. (David) Postdoc D.A.Hollanders@uva.nl<br />

Kaandorp, C.S. (Casper) Programmer C.S.Kaandorp@uva.nl<br />

Kaar, van het R.H. (Robbert) Researcher R.H.vanhetKaar@uva.nl<br />

Keune, M.J. (Maarten) Professor of Social Security & Labour<br />

Relations<br />

M.J.Keune@uva.nl<br />

Klaveren, van M. (Maarten) Researcher M.vanKlaveren@uva.nl<br />

Koster, F. (Ferry) Researcher F.Koster@uva.nl<br />

Kuiper, S.H. (Sijbren) Researcher S.H.Kuiper@uva.nl<br />

Lancee, B. (Bram) Postdoc B.Lancee@uva.nl<br />

Lepianka, D.A. (Dorota) Postdoc D.A.Lepianka@uva.nl<br />

Lieberton, A. (Angelique) Offi ce manager A.Lieberton@uva.nl<br />

Maestri, V. (Virginia) Postdoc V.Maestri@uva.nl<br />

Meerman, M.G.M. (Martha) Lecturer/Coordinator <strong>AIAS</strong> courses M.G.M.Meerman@hva.nl<br />

Ooms, T.C. (Tahnee) Student assistant T.C.Ooms@uva.nl<br />

Paskov, M. (Marii) PhD M.Paskov@uva.nl<br />

Peters, J. (John) Guest Researcher jpeters@laurentian.ca<br />

Ramos Martin, N.E. (Nuria) Researcher/Lecturer N.E.RamosMartin@uva.nl<br />

Ruitenberg, J.F. (Justine) PhD jruitenberg@iwiweb.nl<br />

Salverda, W. (Wiemer) Director/Professor by Special Appointment in<br />

Labour Markets and Inequality<br />

W.Salverda@uva.nl<br />

Sol, C.C.A.M. (Els) Researcher C.C.A.M.Sol@uva.nl<br />

Steinmetz, S. (Stephanie) Researcher S.Steinmetz@uva.nl<br />

Swagerman, A.M.M. (Anna) Student assistant A.M.M.Swagerman@uva.nl<br />

Tijdens, K.G. (Kea) Research coordinator K.G.Tijdens@uva.nl<br />

Trappenburg, M.J. (Margo) Professor by Special Appointment Socio-Political<br />

Aspects of the Welfare State at Drees Chair<br />

M.J.Trappenburg@uva.nl<br />

Tros, F.H. (Frank) Researcher F.H.Tros@uva.nl<br />

Visser, J. (Jelle) Professor of Sociology Jelle.Visser@uva.nl<br />

Vries, de D.H. (Danny) Postdoc D.H..deVries@uva.nl<br />

Werfhorst, van de H.G. (Herman) Professor of Sociology H.G..vandeWerfhorst@uva.nl<br />

Zwan, van der N.A.J. (Natascha) Postdoc N.A.J.vanderZwan@uva.nl<br />

Zwiers (Merle) Student assistant M.D.Zwiers@uva.nl<br />

New<br />

Wim Eshuis<br />

Researcher<br />

Christina Haas<br />

Jr. Researcher<br />

Sijbren Kuiper<br />

Researcher<br />

Left <strong>AIAS</strong><br />

Daniëlla Brals<br />

Student Assistant GINI<br />

Antonio Firinu<br />

Guest researcher<br />

Jorn van der Horst<br />

Student Assistant<br />

Natalja Lux<br />

Intern<br />

Natascha Notten<br />

Researcher<br />

Aidan Regan<br />

Researcher<br />

Alex Schram<br />

Student Assistant<br />

Haya Stier<br />

Guest Researcher<br />

Timo van der Veen<br />

Student Assistant<br />

Matthijs Visser<br />

Coordinator Master HRM<br />

45


46<br />

CALL FOR PAPERS<br />

10 th European Conference<br />

of the International Labour and<br />

Employment Relations Association<br />

Amsterdam, The Netherlands<br />

20 - 22 June 2013<br />

Imagining new employment relations and new solidarities<br />

Over the last two decades employment and labour<br />

relations in Europe have undergone important<br />

changes. Manufacturing employment is decreasing<br />

and various types of service employment are<br />

rising, together with female participation levels.<br />

The standard employment relationship is losing its<br />

dominant position with the growing use of flexible<br />

and part-time contracts, temporary agency work<br />

and (dependent) self-employment. Segmentation<br />

between stronger and weaker groups is increasing.<br />

Social solidarity is under pressure in many<br />

countries as a consequence of the increasing<br />

diversity of populations and of the labour force.<br />

Collective bargaining is decentralizing but there<br />

are also attempts to transnationalise bargaining<br />

within multinationals or within certain sectors.<br />

Trade unions are slowly losing membership and<br />

power but worker involvement in social innovation<br />

is wanted more than ever. The role of the EU<br />

is getting more important and new forms of governance<br />

are being experimented with. Change is<br />

accelerating as a result of the crisis and austerity<br />

is leading to profound restructuring of the public<br />

sector, affecting employment conditions and service<br />

provision.<br />

Within this context, we want to foster a reflection<br />

and debate on the future of employment relations<br />

and new forms of solidarity. Such question include:<br />

What can or should employment relations<br />

look like in the future? What is the future of the<br />

public sector? Can or should growing segmentation<br />

and polarization be countered? What new<br />

types of governance support collaborative efforts<br />

to tackle today’s collective problems? What new<br />

types of solidarity can we foresee between group<br />

of workers or workers in different countries? What<br />

new types of cooperation or conflict can we foresee<br />

between workers and employers?<br />

www.ilera-europe2013.eu<br />

Abstract submission<br />

The organizing committee invites you to submit abstracts<br />

for the 10 th European ILERA Conference. Abstracts<br />

must be 350-500 words in length and can be<br />

submitted on the conference website as of 1 May <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

Papers presented at the Conference will be organised<br />

around five broad tracks (for more detailed descriptions,<br />

see conference website):<br />

Track 1: Industrial relations actors in changing labour<br />

market<br />

Track 2: Europeanisation of social and employment<br />

policies<br />

Track 3: Public sector restructuring: consequences<br />

for employment relations and public services<br />

Track 4: New forms of regulation and governance<br />

Track 5: HRM and Social Innovation<br />

Abstract submission deadline: 31 December <strong>2012</strong><br />

Acceptance decisions will be communicated by:<br />

1 February 2013<br />

Apart from regular sessions with paper presentations<br />

there will be interactive sessions with short presentations.<br />

Symposia<br />

We welcome proposals for special symposia. Symposia<br />

are self-contained sessions of one and a half hour.<br />

They can be on the general theme of the conference or<br />

on one of the track themes. See for details.the Conference<br />

website as of 1 May 2013.<br />

Conference Venue<br />

The conference will be held at the historic Oudemanhuispoort<br />

building of the University of Amsterdam,<br />

located in the city centre.<br />

Organising Committee<br />

The Conference is organized by a consortium of universities<br />

in the Netherlands in collaboration with the<br />

Dutch Labour and Employment Relations Association<br />

(DLERA).


CALL FOR PAPERS<br />

Conference on Regulating for Equitable<br />

and Job-Rich Growth<br />

Geneva, 3-5 July 2013<br />

The University of Amsterdam/<strong>AIAS</strong>, Kea Tijdens is collaborating with the International Labour Offi ce (ILO) for the Third<br />

Regulating Decent Work (RDW) Conference, on the theme of Regulating for Equitable and Job-Rich Growth, to be held<br />

at the International Labour Offi ce, Geneva, Switzerland on 3-5 July 2013.<br />

The Conference is organized by the International Labour Offi ce in collaboration with <strong>AIAS</strong>, the University of Melbourne<br />

Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law (CELRL), the University of Manchester Fairness at Work Research<br />

Centre (FaWRC) Research Group and the University of Duisburg-Essen Institut Arbeit und Qualifi kation (IAQ).<br />

Network participants and interested researchers are encouraged to submit an abstract by the closing date of 31<br />

January 2013. Limited RDW Fellowships are available to assist researchers in developing countries to participate in the<br />

Conference. The deadline for Fellowship applications is 31 December <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

The global fi nancial crisis continues to generate<br />

spiralling unemployment, precarious<br />

work, inequality, and pressure on collective<br />

bargaining, threatening economic and social<br />

stability in many parts of the world. Unease<br />

about the austerity agenda is accompanied<br />

by a growing recognition that the post-crisis<br />

world should not return to “business as<br />

usual.” Rather, more effective and balanced<br />

models should be adopted, which would integrate<br />

employment creation in growth policies<br />

and meet equally important objectives:<br />

equity, security, job quality. While emerging<br />

and developing economies have escaped the<br />

brunt of the recession, the debate continues<br />

on how to extend labour market institutions<br />

into the informal economy, with a focus on<br />

particularly vulnerable groups, such as domestic<br />

workers. The infl uence of multinational<br />

enterprises in these countries, meanwhile,<br />

sustains an ongoing refl ection on the<br />

role of non-state actors in regulating labour<br />

markets. At the global level, a striking feature<br />

of recent policy discourses is the use of<br />

legal indices to evaluate and compare labour<br />

law regimes. These indices are increasingly<br />

relied on both to underpin policy guidance<br />

and to justify legal reform. The 2013 RDW<br />

Conference will centre on the role of labour<br />

market regulation when job creation is the<br />

paramount objective. Papers are invited<br />

to address labour market regulation’s ideal<br />

post-crisis form, with a special focus on<br />

four thematic issues:<br />

a. comparing and evaluating labour regulation<br />

systems;<br />

b. regulating informal work;<br />

c. industrial and employment relations for<br />

inclusive growth;<br />

d. new patterns of segmentation and new<br />

challenges for promoting inclusive labour<br />

markets.<br />

For whom<br />

Researchers from all regions are welcome.<br />

In past years, the Conference has attracted<br />

researchers from a range of fi elds that include<br />

law, economics, industrial relations,<br />

development studies and geography.<br />

Conference tracks<br />

Track 1: Comparing and evaluating labour regulation<br />

systems: theory, methodology and new evidence<br />

Coordinators: Sandrine Cazes, Sangheon<br />

Lee, Deirdre McCann<br />

Track 2: Regulating informal work<br />

Coordinators: Colin Fenwick, John Howe<br />

Track 3: Industrial and employment relations for<br />

inclusive growth<br />

Coordinators: Kea Tijdens, Susan Hayter,<br />

Chang-Hee Lee<br />

Track 4: New patterns of segmentation and new<br />

challenges for promoting inclusive labour markets<br />

Coordinators : Gerhard Bosch, Jill Rubery<br />

Submission of abstracts<br />

The organizing committee invites you to<br />

submit abstracts for the 2013 RDW<br />

Conference:<br />

• Abstracts should be in English.<br />

• Abstracts must have a maximum of 400<br />

words including references and appendices.<br />

• Abstracts can be submitted on the conference<br />

website, http://rdw.law.unimelb.edu.au/<br />

• The author(s) should indicate their preferred<br />

Conference track.<br />

• Deadline for abstract submission (general):<br />

31 January 2013.<br />

• Deadline for abstract submission (RDW<br />

fellowship applicants): 31 Dec. <strong>2012</strong><br />

The abstracts will be subject to a competitive<br />

review process. Guidelines for fi nal papers<br />

will be communicated to the authors<br />

of selected abstracts. It is expected that<br />

an edited volume will be produced, drawn<br />

from selected conference papers.<br />

See for all the information http://rdw.law.<br />

unimelb.edu.au<br />

47


<strong>AIAS</strong><br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> lunch<br />

seminars<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> organises fortnightly seminars on various<br />

subjects. Abstracts of the presentations will be put<br />

online and send to you, one week in advance.<br />

Day: Thursday, every fortnight<br />

Time: 12.15 – 13.15 hrs.<br />

Location: <strong>AIAS</strong>, 3rd fl oor, Plantage Muidergracht 12<br />

Amsterdam, the Netherlands<br />

Enrol: Please send an email to aias@uva.nl. A sandwich<br />

will then be provided.<br />

Please send us an email (aias@uva.nl) if you want to be put on the<br />

mailing list for the lunch/reading seminars. You will then receive an<br />

email about one week before the lunch seminar with all the information<br />

and the abstract.<br />

18 October<br />

Maarten van Klaveren and Kea Tijdens (<strong>AIAS</strong>)<br />

Multinational enterprises through the crisis: employment patterns in Europe<br />

1 November<br />

Maria Fleischmann (Erasmus University Rotterdam)<br />

tba<br />

15 November<br />

Luc Benda and Kea Tijdens (<strong>AIAS</strong>)<br />

tba<br />

29 November<br />

Antonio García-Muñoz Alhambra (Guest at <strong>AIAS</strong>)<br />

The European sectoral social dialogue<br />

13 December<br />

Beryl ter Haar (<strong>AIAS</strong>)<br />

The meaning of the open method of coordination for the development of<br />

a social Europe<br />

Please go to the website www.uva-aias.net /calendar for all<br />

the latest information on these lunch seminars.<br />

Amsterdam Institute<br />

for Advanced labour Studies<br />

UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM<br />

ANNOUNCEMENTS<br />

RESQ &<br />

Flexworkresearch<br />

Conference<br />

RESQ Conference (www.resqresearch.org) at the University of<br />

Amsterdam with amongst other topics an exchange of information<br />

on the state of the art in (reforms of) re-employment services<br />

in the members’ countries during lunch to lunch Wednesday 23 th<br />

– Thursday 24 th October 2013. More info and call for papers to<br />

follow later this year.<br />

Followed by<br />

Flexworkresearch (www.fl exworkresearch.org) Conference<br />

hosted by University of Amsterdam, Erasmus University and<br />

EuroCiett ‘Labour Market Policies in Europe: public – private cooperation<br />

2.0’, Thursday 24 th – Friday 25 th October 2013, to be<br />

held in Amsterdam, Vakbondsmuseum, The Netherlands. More<br />

info and call for papers to follow later this year.<br />

ILERA Europe 2013<br />

On 20 - 22 June 2013, the European Conference of the International<br />

Labour and Employment Relations Association takes place in<br />

Amsterdam at the Faculty of Law of the University of Amsterdam.<br />

See for the Call for Papers page 46 of this <strong>newsletter</strong> or<br />

www.ilera-europe2013.eu.<br />

Regulating Decent<br />

Work Conference<br />

<strong>AIAS</strong> is collaborating with the International Labour Offi ce for the<br />

3 rd Regulating Decent Work Conference, on the theme of Regulating<br />

for Equitable and Job-Rich Growth, to be held at the International<br />

Labour Offi ce, Geneva, Switzerland on 3-5 July 2013.<br />

See for the Call for Papers page 47 of this <strong>newsletter</strong> or<br />

http://rdw.law.unimelb.edu.au.<br />

UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!