AIAS newsletter Autumn 2012 TW.indd
AIAS newsletter Autumn 2012 TW.indd
AIAS newsletter Autumn 2012 TW.indd
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>AIAS</strong><br />
Amsterdam Institute for<br />
Advanced labour Studies<br />
www.uva-aias.net<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong><br />
<strong>Autumn</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
Newsletter<br />
New management <strong>AIAS</strong><br />
Interview with Prof. Edelman<br />
Georgetown University, Washington, DC<br />
New working paper series: ‘Labour markets<br />
and industrial relations in the Netherlands’
<strong>AIAS</strong><br />
What can we offer you?<br />
CONTENTS<br />
What can we offer you? 2<br />
Editorial word 3<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> conference 4<br />
Focus on... Peter Edelman 6<br />
Events 7<br />
Working Papers 12<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> Series (Labour markets & industrial relations in the Netherlands) 13<br />
GINI Papers 14<br />
Newsletters 22<br />
Publications Academic 27<br />
Publications Professional 31<br />
Focus on... Research 34<br />
Data 36<br />
Research 37<br />
Overview research projects j<br />
38<br />
Onderwijs/Teaching 42<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> 44<br />
People at <strong>AIAS</strong> 45<br />
Call for Papers 44<br />
Announcements 46<br />
Amsterdam Institute<br />
for Advanced labour Studies<br />
UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> is an institute for multidisciplinary research and teaching at the University of Amsterdam. Founded in 1998, it<br />
brings together the University’s expertise in labour studies from the Faculties of Law, Social and Behavioural Sciences,<br />
Economics and Business, and Medicine.<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong>’ mission is to strengthen its position as a leading academic centre in the fi eld of labour studies in the Netherlands and abroad, fostering<br />
its acclaim as an attractive partner for international cooperation in research and teaching. Our threefold task is to perform and facilitate<br />
research aimed at developing, empirically testing and applying theories that can explain the working of labour markets, labour relations and<br />
organisations, and social and labour policies in an internationally comparative perspective. We maintain and further develop multidisciplinary<br />
teaching programmes concerning these issues and provide expertise to society by supplying analytical tools, results and data to enlighten policy<br />
making in the fi eld of labour and to contribute to the intellectual and public debate on labour, employment and social policies.<br />
Research<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> research focuses on the analysis of<br />
labour markets, social security and governance.<br />
It combines various disciplinary approaches<br />
along three perspectives: Societal<br />
regulations & coordination of markets, Individual<br />
transactions in markets and Societal<br />
and individual effects. Some of our research<br />
programmes we are involved in:<br />
● GINI Growing Inequalities’ Impacts<br />
● Equalsoc network of Excellence (Economic<br />
Changes, Quality of Life and<br />
Social Cohesion)<br />
● Solidarity in the 21 st Century<br />
● AMCIS Amsterdam Centre for Inequality<br />
Studies<br />
● Flex Work Research Centre<br />
● WageIndicator<br />
Teaching<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> offers various forms of education:<br />
● The course cycle ‘Arbeidsvraagstukken en Beleid’<br />
consisting of four courses (in Dutch):<br />
A. HRM in Beeld<br />
B. Arbeidsmarkt in Ontwikkeling<br />
C. Ongelijkheid en de Verzorgingsstaat<br />
D. Trends in Arbeidsverhoudingen<br />
● Various in-company courses<br />
● Together with the Graduate School<br />
of Social Sciences and the Faculty of<br />
Social and Behavioural Sciences, <strong>AIAS</strong><br />
organizes the Master in Comparative<br />
Organisation Labour Studies<br />
● PhD Laboratory, which aims at providing<br />
a stimulating and structured environment<br />
for the support of external<br />
PhD students, specifi cally teaching<br />
staff of the University of Applied<br />
Sciences.<br />
Social involvement<br />
Annually <strong>AIAS</strong> organizes conferences<br />
about ongoing research and current trends.<br />
Furthermore, several (lunch) seminars and<br />
workshops take place during the year, offering<br />
interesting opportunities for the exchange<br />
and deliberation of research on labour<br />
issues from all over the world. <strong>AIAS</strong><br />
has a major collection of academic socioeconomic<br />
data in the fi eld of labour relations,<br />
labour organizations, employment<br />
and working conditions in the Netherlands<br />
and abroad. <strong>AIAS</strong> and its staff contribute to<br />
society on many subjects, for different audiences<br />
and in varying formats (articles, books,<br />
reports, interviews, presentations etc...). The<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> Working Paper, the ‘Labour markets<br />
and industrial relations in the Netherlands’<br />
and the GINI Discussion Paper series also<br />
addresses a great variety of topics.<br />
COLOPHON<br />
This is a publication of the Amsterdam Institute for<br />
Advanced labour Studies, Plantage Muidergracht 12,<br />
1018 TV Amsterdam, The Netherlands<br />
Subscriptions / address changes<br />
aias@uva.nl or +31 20 525 4199<br />
(Final) editing<br />
Angelique Lieberton, Jan Cremers and Paul de Beer.<br />
Design / photo’s<br />
Creative Es & Angelique Lieberton<br />
Cover photo: ©Jordi Huisman<br />
Other photos: ©S. Stevenson, J. Cremers, <strong>AIAS</strong> and ©J. Huisman<br />
Print run / edition<br />
Print run: 2300 / © <strong>Autumn</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>AIAS</strong><br />
Printer: GVO drukkers & vormgevers B.V. | Ponsen & Looijen
Editorial<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> is moving on!<br />
In April this year Maarten Keune and I have taken over the management<br />
of <strong>AIAS</strong> from Wiemer Salverda, who has reached the age of 65. Maarten<br />
and I hope to be able to continue the successful research and educational<br />
programmes that <strong>AIAS</strong> is renowned for both within and outside of academia.<br />
As an interdisciplinary institute, in which the<br />
faculties of Law, Social and Behavioural Sciences,<br />
Economics and Business and Medicine<br />
cooperate, <strong>AIAS</strong> studies quite varied<br />
societal phenomena and problems, using<br />
insights from various scientifi c disciplines.<br />
As usual, this Newsletter, which is published<br />
twice a year, gives an overview of completed,<br />
ongoing and new research programmes.<br />
One example of this is the cross-national<br />
GINI project, which is co-ordinated by<br />
Wiemer Salverda. This research project,<br />
funded by the European Union under the<br />
7th Framework Programme, focuses on the<br />
societal impact of growing income inequalities<br />
in 29 countries. This Newsletter gives an<br />
overview of a number of discussion papers<br />
that have been published recently as part<br />
of the GINI project. <strong>AIAS</strong> researchers also<br />
contribute regularly to international research<br />
programmes co-ordinated by scientifi c institutes<br />
abroad. Often, this takes the form of<br />
a country study, which is incorporated in<br />
an overall report or book. To make these<br />
country reports available for a larger audience,<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> has just started a new working<br />
paper series, ‘Labour markets and industrial<br />
relations in the Netherlands’, in which these<br />
reports on the Netherlands are collected.<br />
Besides research, <strong>AIAS</strong> is also involved in<br />
interdisciplinary educational programmes.<br />
On the one hand, several <strong>AIAS</strong> staff members<br />
participate in the regular education<br />
of the faculties. On the other hand, <strong>AIAS</strong><br />
has its own post-academic educational<br />
programme for professionals. In 2011 we<br />
started with a cycle of four short courses<br />
or ‘leergangen’, which focus on HRM, labour<br />
market developments, inequality and soli-<br />
darity, and industrial relations, respectively.<br />
These courses are followed by professionals<br />
from companies, trade unions, the government,<br />
etc. <strong>AIAS</strong> also organizes a PhD lab<br />
for so-called external PhD candidates, who<br />
are guided in the writing of their fi rst scientifi<br />
c paper. Next year, we will start a professional<br />
course for trainers of works councils.<br />
Apart from research and education, <strong>AIAS</strong><br />
organizes seminars and conferences. The<br />
highlight of each year is the <strong>AIAS</strong> annual<br />
conference, which was organized on September<br />
26 and was attended by over one<br />
hundred participants. This Newsletter gives<br />
an impression of the conference and also<br />
includes an interview with one of the keynote<br />
speakers, Professor Peter Edelman of<br />
Georgetown University, Washington, DC.<br />
In 2013, <strong>AIAS</strong> will also organize the 10 th<br />
European Conference of the International<br />
Labour and Employment Relations Association<br />
(ILERA). The call for papers for<br />
this conference can be found in this issue.<br />
Last but not least, I would like to draw attention<br />
to the bi-weekly lunch seminars on<br />
Thursday, which give both <strong>AIAS</strong> staff and<br />
researchers from other universities the opportunity<br />
to present and discuss recent research.<br />
I would like to thank Wiemer Salverda very<br />
much for the way that he has led <strong>AIAS</strong><br />
in the past decade. Maarten Keune and<br />
I hope that <strong>AIAS</strong> will continue to be an<br />
outstanding institute for interdisciplinary<br />
research and education in the next decade!<br />
Paul de Beer<br />
Editor <strong>AIAS</strong> <strong>newsletter</strong> & Co-director <strong>AIAS</strong><br />
P.T.deBeer@uva.nl<br />
Prof Paul de Beer Prof Maarten Keune<br />
3
4<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> CONFERENCE<br />
26 September <strong>2012</strong>, Amsterdam<br />
Never waste a good crisis!<br />
On September 26, <strong>2012</strong>, the annual <strong>AIAS</strong> conference took place in Amsterdam. As <strong>AIAS</strong> co-director Paul de Beer<br />
explained in his introductory remarks, the <strong>AIAS</strong> conference brings together scholars and practitioners from a variety<br />
of disciplines and backgrounds around one common theme. This year’s theme was “Never Waste a Good Crisis:<br />
Structural Labour Market Reform in Times of Austerity.”<br />
As Paul de Beer explained, the 2008 crisis has<br />
rendered visible the structural weaknesses of<br />
European labour markets, while tilting the political<br />
scales in many European countries towards<br />
fi scal conservatism. This begs the question how<br />
we can solve widespread unemployment in the<br />
face of persistent budget austerity. The three<br />
speakers of the day combined insights from the<br />
fi elds of economics, sociology and law to offer<br />
some preliminary answers to that important<br />
question. Prof. Sweder van Wijnbergen, Prof.<br />
Evelien Tonkens and Prof. Evert Verhulp (all<br />
University of Amsterdam) served as discussants.<br />
Dr. Stefano Scarpetta of the OECD presented<br />
an impressive collection of data on active<br />
labour market policies in OECD countries<br />
before, during and after the crisis. Dr.Scarpetta<br />
showed the disparities in this crisis: only have<br />
some countries been affected more than others<br />
(compare Spain with the Netherlands, for<br />
instance), socio-economic groups within those<br />
economies have also experienced the crisis in<br />
different ways. What immediately stood out<br />
from Dr. Scarpetta’s data, for instance, was<br />
the disproportionate effect of the crisis on<br />
young workers and the low-skilled. The sobering<br />
conclusion of these observations was that<br />
a single strategy to restructure labour markets<br />
across the OECD would be ineffective. Still,<br />
the speaker noted, some policy responses had<br />
proven to be better than others. Dr. Scarpetta<br />
was particularly sceptical of the deregulation of<br />
permanent employment contracts in countries<br />
like Spain and Italy: “not the type of fl exibility<br />
we’re hoping for”, he said. Rather, the most<br />
resilient labour markets did not dismantle, but<br />
combined traditional institutions like collective<br />
bargaining with fl exible employment practices.<br />
Dr. Scarpetta’s fi ndings tied in well with the<br />
second presentation of the day, by Prof.<br />
Giuliano Bonoli of the Swiss Graduate School<br />
of Public Administration, who focused on the<br />
effects of the crisis on low-skilled workers.<br />
While Dr. Scarpetta’s research had found no<br />
correlation between government spending on<br />
active labour market policies and actual labour<br />
market performance, Prof. Bonoli gave the<br />
audience a number of possible explanations.<br />
Low-skilled workers, Prof. Bonoli explained,<br />
face specifi c challenges in unemployment that<br />
may not be adequately targeted by active labour<br />
market policies. Consider, for instance, the<br />
problem of a double selection bias, whereby<br />
the more qualifi ed workers are more likely to<br />
participate in job training and are more likely to<br />
succeed at it. According to Prof. Bonoli, lowskilled<br />
workers also have to rely much more<br />
on informal channels to learn about jobs than<br />
high-skilled workers, thus creating a problem of<br />
labour market matching. Prof. Bonoli therefore<br />
suggested the idea of a “service Keynesianism”:<br />
using government stimulus to create highquality<br />
service jobs for the low-skilled.<br />
According to Prof. Bonoli, one of the causes<br />
for unemployment among the low-skilled is<br />
their displacement from low-skilled jobs by employment-starved<br />
medium-skilled workers. This<br />
broader theme of a downwardly mobile middle<br />
class also resonated in the presentation on poverty<br />
in the United States by Prof. Peter Edelman<br />
of the Georgetown Law Center. Prof.<br />
Edelman explained how a stunning 46 million<br />
Americans currently live below the poverty line.<br />
Although programmes to alleviate poverty in<br />
the United States do exist – from food stamps<br />
to earned income tax credits –Prof. Edelman<br />
pointed out how social stigma has long prevented<br />
an adequate response to rising poverty<br />
Prof Paul de Beer<br />
Prof Sweder van Wijnbergen is interviewing dr Scarpetta<br />
(Photo by Jan Cremers, © <strong>AIAS</strong>)<br />
Prof. Peter Edelmann
levels. In particular, the distinction between the<br />
“deserving poor” (veterans, elderly) and the<br />
“undeserving poor” (single mothers, people of<br />
colour) has stymied much of public policy in<br />
this area. I found Prof. Edelman’s cautionary<br />
tale highly relevant for our European societies<br />
as well: as our policymakers are currently (re-)<br />
considering which socio-economic groups are<br />
“deserving” of public resources, which normative<br />
underpinnings inform our social policies?<br />
Our concluding panel of the day had the diffi<br />
cult task to tackle this complex political issue.<br />
Composed of four representatives of political<br />
party think tanks (Mr. Arjan Vliegenthart<br />
from the Scientifi c Bureau of the Dutch Socialist<br />
Party, Mr. Frans Becker of the Wiardi Beckman<br />
Foundation, Mr. Raymond Gradus of the<br />
Scientifi c Institute of the Christian Democrats<br />
Party, and Mr. Raymond Brood of Mercer<br />
Marsh Benefi ts Benelux), the panel was asked<br />
for specifi c policy recommendations to improve<br />
labour markets in the Netherlands. The<br />
panellists were not generous with specifi c policy<br />
recommendation, despite the gentle urgings<br />
of the discussion leader (what did the panellists<br />
think of a comeback of the old Melkertbanen?).<br />
Nonetheless, their more general suggestions,<br />
from a new social pact between government<br />
and social partners to a more facilitating role for<br />
the government in job creation, gave the audience<br />
members plenty of room for discussion<br />
during the reception afterwards. Looking back<br />
at a very successful day, I encourage everyone<br />
who was unable to attend to watch the videos<br />
of all conference presentations, which will be<br />
made available through the <strong>AIAS</strong> website.<br />
Natascha van der Zwan<br />
N.A.J.vanderZwan@uva.nl<br />
Photos by Sean Stevenson, © <strong>AIAS</strong><br />
Debate with representatives of some political parties<br />
Prof.<br />
Giuliano Bonoli<br />
Prof.<br />
Evelien Tonkens<br />
is interviewing<br />
Prof. Bonoli<br />
Prof.<br />
Evert Verhulp<br />
Dr. Stefano<br />
Scarpetta<br />
5
6<br />
To start off, what are the sources of<br />
poverty in the US?<br />
People are poor for all kinds of reasons.<br />
Certainly the strongest reason for poverty is<br />
low wage work. About 61% of the income<br />
of people who are classifi ed as poor comes<br />
from work. So the fact that people have<br />
only intermittent work, part-time work, or<br />
low wage work, that’s the major reason. A<br />
quarter of the jobs in the US, even if you<br />
have them full time all through the year, pay<br />
less than the poverty line for a family of<br />
four. There’s a large number of households<br />
where there’s only one adult, most often a<br />
woman, so they don’t get by. If you have<br />
two people in the household that both have<br />
a job, even if it pays in that bottom quarter,<br />
then they’re not going be rich, but they’re<br />
alright. Then, somebody loses their job and<br />
they, as we say, put more water in the soup.<br />
How do public programmes help poor<br />
people in the US<br />
There’s a big difference in our public policy<br />
between the people who work and those<br />
that, for whichever reason, have no work. A<br />
person, say a single mum, who has a minimum<br />
wage job earns about 15.000 dollars<br />
annually (the poverty line for a family of<br />
three is about 19.000 dollars). She gets the<br />
earned income tax credit of about $5500<br />
and she gets child tax credit for about<br />
$1500. So she gets almost a fi fty per cent addition<br />
to her income from those two things.<br />
Pretty good.<br />
The poor who do not work, however, are<br />
increasingly seen as undeserving. The number<br />
of people who receive unemployment<br />
FOCUS ON...<br />
PROF. PETER EDELMANN<br />
On the 26 th of September, the <strong>AIAS</strong> annual conference took place in<br />
Amsterdam. Peter Edelman, professor at the Georgetown University Law<br />
Center, gave a speech called Why is it so hard to end poverty in the US.<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> PhD candidate Janna Besamusca interviewed Prof. Edelman about his<br />
experiences in fi ghting poverty that Edelman relates in his recent book ‘So rich<br />
so poor’, among others as legislative assistant to Robert Kennedy and assistant<br />
secretary for planning and evaluation in the Clinton administration.<br />
benefi ts, or what we call welfare, went from<br />
14 million when President Clinton took offi<br />
ce, down to 3.9 million before the recession<br />
started. If you earned too little, if you<br />
haven’t worked long enough, if you have a<br />
part-time job, you’re not eligible. So if for<br />
whatever reason someone has no unemployment<br />
insurance and no other income,<br />
all she’s going to get is food stamps. You<br />
have a legal right to food stamps. Used to<br />
be you had a legal right to welfare. Payments<br />
were very low, but at least you had a legal<br />
right to cash assistance. That isn’t there anymore,<br />
so states are free to help you or not,<br />
even if you’re eligible.<br />
In your book you mention President<br />
Obama’s health care reform helps fi ght<br />
poverty. Exactly how historic is the reform?<br />
The reform has two components. In the<br />
old system, you only qualifi ed for Medicaid<br />
as an adult of working age if you received<br />
cash assistance or were disabled. So there<br />
were almost no low-wage workers who were<br />
entitled. Some 16 million people who aren’t<br />
currently eligible for Medicaid will be entitled<br />
now.<br />
People who have incomes above the Medicaid<br />
level (132% of the poverty line) will be<br />
able to buy insurance at something called an<br />
exchange and they’ll have a subsidy for their<br />
premium on a fl ying scale up to four times<br />
the poverty line. About half of the newly<br />
insured people, another 16 million, will get<br />
in through the exchange. There are also a<br />
lot of people who currently have very expensive<br />
insurances, because they’re buying<br />
it themselves, who will shift to the exchange<br />
and be much better off. So 32 million of<br />
the 47 million currently uninsured are going<br />
to get health coverage. We’re reaching about<br />
two thirds, that’s a big thing.<br />
You also mention the retreat of unions<br />
from the private sector as a cause of<br />
working poverty. How detrimental has<br />
the lack of unionization in the private<br />
sector been on wage development?<br />
Clearly there is a trend towards low-wage<br />
work that includes countries that have a<br />
very high amount of unionism. But it’s even<br />
more diffi cult to organize those low wage<br />
workers in the US, because legal protection<br />
for organizing is very weak. A lot of low<br />
wage workers work in very big companies,<br />
like Walmart. And the point is that Walmart<br />
could be organized and people would still<br />
go doing their shopping there and just pay<br />
a little bit more. The future of unionism is<br />
most promising for some category of low<br />
wage workers, particularly in the services<br />
sectors. I also think it’s a question of discovering<br />
some way of representation that may<br />
be different from only the classic organizing<br />
of the workplace in doing collective agreements<br />
about the wage. It may well be that<br />
they attract people<br />
when they become<br />
more of a community<br />
based organization<br />
and people join<br />
them for reasons<br />
other than simply the<br />
wage and the fringe<br />
benefi ts.
EVENTS<br />
Jan Cremers<br />
Keynote speech on free<br />
movement of workers<br />
Cremers gave a keynote speech during the 36 th meeting of the Committee for<br />
interregional cooperation of the German-Polish governmental Commission for<br />
regional and cross-border cooperation.<br />
The German and Polish Ministries of Labour and regional authorities have established a permanent<br />
forum that exchanges views on social-economic and political aspects of labour migration<br />
and European policies. In a meeting on 19 April <strong>2012</strong> in Schwerin the members of the<br />
committee assessed the experiences with free movement of labour after the removal of the<br />
labour market restrictions (as of 1 May 2011). Jan Cremers was asked to deliver one of the<br />
keynotes speeches. He sketched out the existing framework for the free movement of workers<br />
and the pending questions that still have to be solved. He also stressed the necessity to fi nd<br />
joint solutions between social partners and governmental bodies in the fi eld of compliance<br />
with and respect for working conditions, equal treatment and the avoidance of distortion of<br />
competition<br />
In the fi nal memorandum that was signed at the end of the meeting the participants stated that<br />
the creation of decent work and “Equal pay at the place where the work is pursued” have to<br />
be guiding principles in the development of a competitive market economy.<br />
Jan Cremers<br />
Contribution to a panel<br />
at the International<br />
Conference of Europeanist<br />
Jan Cremers contributed to a panel EU free movement mid-crisis and post-<br />
Lisbon: What scope for a rights-based European labour geography? during the<br />
19th Conference of Europeanists in Boston on 22 March <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
In his contribution In search of cheap labour in Europe he reported on research related to<br />
the cross border provision of services with posted workers, an integral part of the economic<br />
freedoms in the EU internal market. The EU Posting of Workers Directive (Directive 96/71/<br />
EC), established in the mid-1990s, tried to settle posting rules that could guarantee the rights<br />
of posted workers within the territory where the work was pursued. The fi nal paper consists<br />
of an analysis of the theory and practice of the functioning of the posting rules in 12 European<br />
countries. The focus was on the practical experiences of compliance authorities, labour<br />
inspectors and other controlling bodies. The paper will be published in the autumn in Policy<br />
Studies, Routledge.<br />
Academic Medical<br />
Centre, 9 May 2013<br />
Conference<br />
“Healthy<br />
and Active at<br />
work”<br />
On May 9 th the research programme<br />
Preventative Occupational Health<br />
Care held its closing conference at<br />
the Academic Medical Centre in<br />
Amsterdam<br />
Objective of this research programme is to increase<br />
knowledge in the area of occupational<br />
health care and prevention. The theme of the<br />
conference was healthy and active at work;<br />
with a focus on sustainable employability and<br />
prevention at the workplace. Invited guest<br />
speakers were prof. Knottnerus (WRR) and dr.<br />
Rinnooy Kan (SER). Several workshops were<br />
organised for presenting, discussing and demonstrating<br />
research outcomes. At <strong>AIAS</strong> the research<br />
project de human resources van werknemers<br />
met een chronische aandoening: maak er gebruik van<br />
was conducted by dr. Haafkens, dr. Kopnina<br />
and Claire Hogenhout (MSc candidate). In this<br />
project the role of HRM and line management<br />
in facilitating job retention of chronically ill<br />
employees was assessed. Within this project a<br />
training programme for HR-professionals and<br />
student on the topic of prevention and sustainable<br />
employability of chronically ill employees<br />
was developed. A pilot of the programme was<br />
held within the minor HRM at The Hague<br />
University of Applied Sciences. Parts of the<br />
programme are (ad hoc) implemented in the<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> HRM course. (see page 42).<br />
See for all workshop documents www.gezondactiefenbetrokken.nl,<br />
for the research programmewww.instituutgak.nl/deelprogrammas/preventieve_gezondheidszorg.php.<br />
7
8<br />
Kea Tijdens<br />
Presentation<br />
on the<br />
WISCO<br />
database<br />
On Wednesday 19 September <strong>2012</strong><br />
Kea Tijdens, research coordinator at<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong>, gave a presentation called "The<br />
WISCO database of occupations for the<br />
WageIndicator web-survey" for the ESCO<br />
Maintenance Committee in Brussels. ESCO<br />
stands for European Skills, Competences<br />
and Occupations taxonomy.<br />
ESCO is a Europe 2020 initiative. Its main<br />
aim is to build a multilingual classifi cation<br />
of European Skills/Competences, qualifi cations<br />
and Occupations. ESCO organises concepts<br />
that are relevant in the European labour<br />
market and in the education/training sector.<br />
It will be available free of charge to all stakeholders,<br />
and is predominantly developped for<br />
the public employment services in Europe. In<br />
the presentation, the WISCO database of occupations<br />
was detailed and the related research<br />
agenda was presented. For more information<br />
on the database, please contact Kea Tijdens at<br />
K.G.Tijdens@uva.nl<br />
Els Sol<br />
Paul de Beer<br />
EVENTS<br />
Presentation on the<br />
employer of the future<br />
On the annual 'science day' of the Netherlands General Employers<br />
Association (Algemene Werkgeversvereniging Nederland, AWVN) on 5<br />
September <strong>2012</strong>, Paul de Beer gave a presentation on the employer of the<br />
future.<br />
He contended that the ideal future employer should adapt to the employee of the future. However,<br />
he criticized the usual picture of the future employee as being increasingly autonomous<br />
and independent and thus becoming more similar to self-employed workers. According to De<br />
Beer, for many low-skilled employees, being autonomous and independent may not be an attractive<br />
prospect but rather a threat. Moreover, in the knowledge-based economy of the future,<br />
the ideal company is not a loose network of independent workers, who are primarily interested<br />
in their own career, but rather a community that is based on the mutual commitment between<br />
employer and employees.<br />
Jan Cremers<br />
Presentation Collective<br />
Bargaining Newsletter<br />
During the annual meeting of the Trade Union related Research Institutes Jan<br />
Cremers has presented the work <strong>AIAS</strong> is doing on behalf of the ETUI for the<br />
monthly production of the Collective Bargaining Newsletter.<br />
In his presentation he stressed the fact that the Newsletter is a slim and lean instrument that aims<br />
to inform and alert on (ongoing) negotiations, compliance issues and related industrial disputes.<br />
Go to our website to see his presentation (PDF) www.uva-aias.net/uploaded_fi les/regular/<br />
pptJCremersETUIParis1.pdf. See for more information on the Collective Bargaining Newsletter<br />
page 22 of this <strong>newsletter</strong> or see our website www.uva-aias.net/96#collective_barg.<br />
Workshop Pilot Parlement en Wetenschap<br />
Op donderdag 26 januari j.l. vond in het kader van een Pilot Parlement en Wetenschap in het gebouw van de Tweede<br />
Kamer een workshop plaats van de Vaste commissie voor Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid.<br />
De pilot is een initiatief van de Tweede Kamer en onder meer de KNAW. Het doel daarvan is de parlementaire kennisvraag en het wetenschappelijk<br />
kennisaanbod beter op elkaar aan te sluiten. Onderwerp van de betreffende workshop was het re-integratiebeleid en de effectiviteit<br />
daarvan. Els Sol heeft een presentatie gehouden, waarin ze benadrukte dat de politiek bij het kiezen van de juiste invalshoek door het stellen<br />
van de juiste vragen aan wetenschappers in de toekomst meer op basis van empirie en minder op basis van vooringenomen standpunten het<br />
re-integratievraagstuk zou kunnen aanpakken. Ter illustratie maakte ze gebruik van het boek ‘Fit or Unfi t: naar expliete re-integratietheorieën’,<br />
waarin de belangrijkste werkzame mechanismen bij dienstverlening gericht op werkhervatting zijn geëxpliciteerd.
EVENTS<br />
Wiemer Salverda<br />
Adjustments in the Public Sector in<br />
Europe<br />
The International Labour Organisation ILO, with the<br />
fi nancial support of the European Commission, organised<br />
a one-year internationally comparative research project<br />
that examined the situation of the public sector in the<br />
Financial Crisis.<br />
Thirteen national experts contributed each on their own country.<br />
Wiemer Salverda did for the Netherlands. He drew a close comparison<br />
to the Dutch recession of the early 1980s. This was deep by international<br />
standards as Dutch disposable household income fell by<br />
at least 8 per cent. Public-sector adjustment meant that wages were<br />
frozen, and cut in the wake of the Wassenaar Accord. The public<br />
wage bill fell over the 1980s and has remained at a lower level since.<br />
The same policy targeted health care wages – in spite of the fact that<br />
employers and unions were private negotiating partners. The unions<br />
appealed to the ILO because of a violation of free collective bargaining<br />
– they won in the end. As a result, different rules were introduced<br />
in the 1990s. At the same time wage negotiations for the civil service<br />
and the educational sector were decentralised. It led the author to<br />
conclude that wage cuts are no longer a constructive policy option for<br />
public-sector adjustment in the Netherlands. It was nicely illustrated<br />
Frank Tros<br />
Presented on ‘Flexicurity in Europe’<br />
Frank Tros has given a presentation at the 16 th World<br />
Congress of the International Labour and Employment<br />
Relations Association (ILERA) that was organised last July<br />
in Philadelphia.<br />
In the paper ‘Flexicurity in Europe: can it survive a double crisis?’ Frank<br />
Tros argues that since the fi nancial crisis, the economic and political<br />
conditions in Europe have become less favourable regarding the implementation<br />
of the policy-concept of ‘fl exicurity’. Furthermore, the<br />
paper examines the fact that the concept in itself seems in crisis since<br />
it meets more and more criticism of academics and because of disappointing<br />
outcomes of policies that are labelled as ‘fl exicurity’. Frank<br />
Tros concludes that the concept is currently ‘not dead’, but risks further<br />
erosion if the governments and the social partners in Europa will not<br />
follow two of the most important original principles of the fl exicurity<br />
by the agreement of the municipalities in 2011 to a wage rise in 2011,<br />
in the face of opposition by the government which aims to endorse<br />
a nominal freeze.<br />
Other countries in the project were the three Baltic States, Croatia,<br />
Germany, Greece, France, Hungary, Ireland, Portugal, Romania,<br />
Spain, Sweden, and the UK. Contributions were made by, inter alia,<br />
Jérôme Gautié, Gerhard Bosch, Philip O’Connell, Dominique Anxo<br />
and Damian Grimshaw. Daniel Vaughan-Whitehead coordinated the<br />
project; Jill Rubery contributed a special, cross-country chapter on<br />
gender. The public and the private sector differ radically in the presence<br />
of women – for example, two thirds of the Dutch public work<br />
force are female while in the private sector two thirds are male.<br />
The project results were presented at a concluding conference in<br />
Brussels on 20–21 June <strong>2012</strong>, and discussed by several Ministers of<br />
Labour and by public-sector and private-sector social-partner representatives<br />
(see http://www.ilo.org/brussels/WCMS_181854/<br />
lang--en/index.htm). The full results will soon be published by<br />
Edward Elgar.<br />
concept: (i) the view that investments in social and employment policies<br />
are an economic production function and (ii) integration of the<br />
policy areas of labour market policies, welfare arrangements and HRMpolicies.<br />
After the presentation, there was an interesting discussion about the<br />
question whether the fl exicurity concept can be blamed for the disappointing<br />
outcomes and whether there are alternative approaches that<br />
can bring employers as well as trade unions to the bargaining tables.<br />
From 20-22 June 2013, the European ILERA Conference will be held<br />
in Amsterdam. See the backcover or www.ilera-europe2013.eu.<br />
9
10<br />
Kea Tijdens & Maarten van Klaveren<br />
EVENTS<br />
Presented at the AELF in South Korea<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> is a member of the Asian-European-Labour Forum (AELF). A few years ago<br />
the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES, Shanghai Offi ce) initiated the AELF to bring<br />
together labour research institutes, labour training institutes and think tanks<br />
closely linked to trade unions, as to exchange views on labour policy issues.<br />
The Forum is an annual event which is hosted<br />
by the participating institutions in a rotational<br />
arrangement. The 1 st AELF was organised by<br />
the Hans-Böckler-Stiftung (HBS) in Düsseldorf<br />
(Germany) in 2009, while the 2 nd Forum<br />
was hosted by the Institute of Workers and<br />
Trade Unions (IWTU) of the Vietnam General<br />
Congress of Labour (VGCL) in Ha Long,<br />
Vietnam, in 2010. The 3 rd AELF was hosted<br />
in 2011 in Oslo, by FAFO (Norway). AELF<br />
no. 4 again took place in Asia, from 7-9 May<br />
<strong>2012</strong> in Seoul (South Korea). This meeting<br />
was co-hosted by the Research Centers of the<br />
two South Korean union confederations, the<br />
Federation of Korean Trade Unions (FKTU)<br />
and the Korean Confederation of Trade<br />
Unions (KCTU). It was attended by 40 participants<br />
from over 20 institutes, from seven<br />
Asian countries (China, India, Indonesia,<br />
Pakistan, South Korea, Thailand, and Vetnam),<br />
fi ve European countries (France, Germany,<br />
Italy, Norway, and the Netherlands),<br />
and some international organisations.<br />
Actually, a number of participants is deliver-<br />
Robbert van het Kaar<br />
Presented for union<br />
offi cials<br />
On 10 Februari <strong>2012</strong> Robbert van het Kaar delivered a<br />
lecture for union offi cials of the largest Dutch trade union<br />
federation (FNV Bondgenoten) on corporate governance<br />
and industrial relations.<br />
Dutch legislation contains relatively strong union rights with<br />
regard to corporate governance issues, including the so-called<br />
right of inquiry (enquêterecht), but unions make hardly us of<br />
these rights. When they do, they appaear relatively successful.<br />
Recent noteworthy cases include Meavita and PCM.<br />
ing contributions to a reader that also is being<br />
shaped by introductions and debates in the<br />
AELF meetings. Its focus is on the interplay<br />
of minimum wages, collective bargaining and<br />
economic development in the participating<br />
countries. Of course, against this backdrop<br />
the current worldwide crisis was topical in<br />
the Seoul meeting, that was entitled “Income<br />
Inequality and Economic Crisis: Solution<br />
Strategies and Policy Issues”. Various<br />
speakers approached this theme from the<br />
angle of inequalities, drawing attention to in<br />
particular the worldwide growth of precarious<br />
work and youth unemployment. Frank<br />
Hoffer (ILO) focused on “Income Inequalities<br />
in the Age of Financial Globalisation”;<br />
Andrew Watt and Bela Galgoczi, of the<br />
Brussels-based European Trade Union Institute<br />
(ETUI), on “Fiscal Crisis and Income<br />
Inequalities in Europe”, while Prof. Alakh<br />
Sharma (Institute for Human Development,<br />
India) lectured on “Globalisation, Labour<br />
Market Flexibility and Inequality in India”.<br />
These and other contributions gave rise to<br />
lively debates.<br />
On the second day of the Seoul AELF,<br />
Maarten van Klaveren and Kea Tijdens<br />
(<strong>AIAS</strong>) presented their paper “Wage-setting<br />
and inequality in the Netherlands”. Based<br />
on various pieces of <strong>AIAS</strong> research, including<br />
the RSF low-wage research project on<br />
research based on the WageIndicator websurvey,<br />
they discussed the relations between<br />
wages and unemployment in the crisis, and<br />
wages and income inequality – both projected<br />
against changes in the structure of the Dutch<br />
economy, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)<br />
fl ows infl uencing this economy, and current<br />
economic policies as debated in the Netherlands.<br />
In the closing session, when debating<br />
future plans, representatives of the China Institute<br />
of Industrial Relations (CIIR) in Beijing<br />
promised to do their utmost to organise<br />
the 5th AELF in their home town. If so, it is<br />
most likely that the <strong>AIAS</strong> in 2014 will host the<br />
6th Forum meeting in Amsterdam.<br />
Expert meeting<br />
Brussels<br />
On 1 June <strong>2012</strong> Robbert van het Kaar took part in an<br />
expert meeting in Brussels on Industrial Relations in<br />
Europe, organized bij DG Employment of the European<br />
Commission.<br />
The main subject of the meeting was industrial relations in<br />
the public sector after the outbreak of the crisis. Van het Kaar<br />
delivered the comments on a second subject: the role of the<br />
social partners in occupational pension schemes. For more<br />
information, please contact R.H.vanhetKaar@uva.nl.
EVENTS<br />
Maarten Keune<br />
Transnational industrial<br />
relations as multi-level<br />
governance: presentation<br />
at IREC/ESA RN17<br />
Maarten Keune presented a paper, co-authored with Paul Marginson, at the<br />
joint conference of the Industrial Relations in Europe Conference (IREC)<br />
and the European Sociological Association’s Research Network on Work,<br />
Employment and Industrial Relations (RN 17) in Lisbon, 5-7 September <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
The paper argues that processes of transnationalisation of industrial relations have been<br />
redrawing and increasing the complexity of the industrial relations map, adding new levels,<br />
actors and institutions, and creating new horizontal and vertical relationships and interdependencies.<br />
To capture these changes it proposes a multi-governance perspective, enriched<br />
by due attention to power relations. It then applies this perspective to analyse the evolution<br />
of European social dialogue (ESD), showing that the conventional reading of ESD moving<br />
from dependency to autonomy is a false one: negotiated regulation emanating from the<br />
ESD rests on two-directional relations, between the European and national levels involving<br />
autonomy and dependency at the same time. It also involves differing forms of horizontal<br />
interdependency between private actors and the public authorities. To show its wider applicability<br />
the paper also briefl y relate this approach also to International Framework Agreements<br />
and European Works Council agreements. The paper will be published in the near future in<br />
the 50th anniversary issue of the British Journal of Industrial Relations.<br />
Maarten Keune<br />
A presentation at SASE<br />
<strong>2012</strong>.<br />
The paper shows that in recent years, there is a marked increase<br />
in various types of atypical jobs , including fi xed-term contracts,<br />
temporary agency work, (dependent) self-employment, and (marginal)<br />
part-time contracts. Such jobs emerge in particular in certain<br />
sub-sectors and professions of the service sector. Although there<br />
is broad variation across countries, atypical jobs often have lower<br />
levels of job security, less access to social security, lower wages and<br />
worse working conditions, and less training opportunities. Such<br />
characteristics can turn atypical jobs into precarious jobs. The paper<br />
then discusses trade union strategies towards precarious jobs,<br />
drawing on a comparative research project covering seven EU<br />
countries. It outlines the various approaches taken by unions in the<br />
Nuria Ramos<br />
Lecture on<br />
‘EU Gender<br />
Equality Law’<br />
Nuria Ramos gave the lecture at the<br />
summer course on Europe Labour Law at<br />
the Academy of European Law, ERA.<br />
The summer course was held from 25-29 June<br />
<strong>2012</strong> at the ERA conference centre in Trier,<br />
Germany. This fi ve-day course provides a thorough<br />
introduction to European labour law:<br />
• Free movement of workers<br />
• Applicable law to employment contracts<br />
• Posting of workers<br />
• Transfer of undertakings<br />
• Information and consultation rights<br />
• Equality and non-discrimination<br />
• Part-time, fi xed-term and temporary<br />
agency work<br />
• Working time<br />
Participants we’re able to deepen their<br />
knowledge through case-studies and workshops.<br />
Maarten Keune presented a paper at the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics (SASE) at MIT, 28-30 June<br />
seven countries, ranging from organising to exclusion, from collective<br />
bargaining to attempts to infl uence legislation, and from providing<br />
services to mobilisation. On the one hand it fi nds common<br />
trends including a move from excluding precarious workers towards<br />
inclusion and from rejecting atypical jobs towards improving their<br />
quality. On the other hand, it fi nds national diversity on the extent to<br />
which mobilisation, bargaining, attempts to infl uence legislation and<br />
other strategies are used, and shows how this is linked to national<br />
differences in legislation, government policy, industrial relations systems<br />
and labour market conditions. The paper is an outcome of<br />
the BARSORI project, the reports of which can be accessed at:<br />
www.uva-aias.net/355.<br />
11
12<br />
WP 122, Aug. <strong>2012</strong><br />
Skill-based<br />
inequality in<br />
job quality<br />
WORKING PAPERS<br />
Haya Stier Haya Stier and Meir Yaish<br />
This study focuses on skill-based<br />
inequality in job quality and the role<br />
of social institutions in structuring the<br />
relation of skills to job attributes.<br />
Four F measures of<br />
job jo quality are examined:<br />
in job security, job<br />
achievement, a<br />
job content<br />
te and fl exibility, and<br />
th their variation across<br />
wworkers<br />
with differ-<br />
eent<br />
level of skills and<br />
across countries. The<br />
study is based on the<br />
2005 ISSP module on work orientations and<br />
encompasses 27 countries. Obtained through<br />
multilevel modeling, the fi ndings show that<br />
low-skilled workers are disadvantaged in all<br />
aspects of job quality. However, skill inequality<br />
in the quality of employment depends on<br />
countries’ characteristics, with declining skillbased<br />
inequality in countries at higher levels<br />
of technological development and widening<br />
skill disparities in times of technological<br />
growth and when unemployment is high.<br />
Forthcoming<br />
Working<br />
Papers<br />
WP 117: An individual level perspective to the concept<br />
of fl exicurity Antonio Firinu<br />
WP 105: This time is different ?! The depth of the<br />
Financial Crisis and its effects in the Netherlands<br />
Wiemer Salverda<br />
WP 104: Integrate to integrate. Explaining institutional<br />
change in the public employment service – the<br />
one shop offi ce Marieke Beentjes, Jelle Visser<br />
and Marloes de Graaf-Zijl.<br />
All working papers can be downloaded for free at the website: www.uva-aias.net<br />
Go to the sections publications • working papers<br />
WP 121, Aug. <strong>2012</strong><br />
Occupational segregation<br />
and gender inequality in<br />
job quality<br />
We examine gender differences in perceived quality of employment<br />
(achievement, content, job insecurity, job fl exibility, and physical and emotional<br />
conditions).<br />
We W ask whether women’s occupations provide better conditions in areas<br />
that th facilitate their dual role in society, such as fl exible working schedule,<br />
aas<br />
a tradeoff for low monetary rewards. Specifi cally, we examine how<br />
cclosely<br />
women’s concentration in broader occupational categories, em-<br />
bbedded<br />
in particular national contexts, is associated with gender differ-<br />
eences<br />
in job quality.<br />
UUtilizing<br />
the 2005 ISSP modules on work orientation, we fi nd that wom-<br />
een<br />
lag behind men on most dimensions of job quality. This result runs<br />
counter to the hypothe hypothesis that women’s occupations compensate for their low wages and limited<br />
opportunities for promotion by providing better employment conditions. Just as important,<br />
however, the gender gap is found to narrow in most job quality dimensions as women’s relative<br />
share in occupations grows. The implications of these results are discussed.<br />
WP 120, Aug. <strong>2012</strong><br />
The impact of attitudes and<br />
work preferences on Dutch<br />
mothers’ employment patterns<br />
Justine Ruitenberg and Paul de Beer<br />
In the last decades, preference theory has gained signifi cance in the academic<br />
literature on the determinants of female employment patterns.<br />
Mostly, M within these studies gender and work attitudes and work preferences<br />
e (the number of hours a woman prefers to work) are treated as one<br />
concept. c However, in this article it is argued that relatively variable work<br />
preferences p act as a mediating factor between more stable gender and work<br />
attitudes a and actual labour market behaviour. With a path analysis of a representative<br />
re survey among 940 Dutch mothers, the study demonstrates that<br />
the th effect of gender and work attitudes on mothers’ labour market behaviour<br />
io is largely mediated by the variable work preference, which infl uence<br />
on actual labour partic participation appears much larger than the infl uence of objective background<br />
characteristics. Next, the analysis supports the claim that more or less stable gender and work<br />
attitudes have a balancing effect on otherwise more fl exible work preferences.
<strong>AIAS</strong> SERIES<br />
These papers can be downloaded for free at the website: www.uva-aias.net<br />
Go to the sections publications • NL Industrial Relations series<br />
Labour markets & industrial relations in<br />
the Netherlands<br />
This series aims to publish reports prepared by <strong>AIAS</strong> staff concerning the Dutch labour market and the industrial<br />
relations in the country.<br />
2011-1 - reprint<br />
Collective bargaining<br />
in the Dutch metal<br />
and electrical<br />
engineering industry<br />
Maarten van Klaveren and Kea Tijdens<br />
The current collective labour agreement covering the<br />
Dutch metal and electrical engineering industry dates<br />
as of 1985, when the earlier agreement was divided in<br />
an agreement for fi rms with 31 or more employees (the<br />
‘large metal industry’) and for smaller fi rms (the ‘small<br />
metal industry’).<br />
We W concentrate on the fi rst one, called in Dutch<br />
CCAO<br />
Metaal/Elektrotechnische industrie, currently<br />
ccovering<br />
about 150,000 employees. In the 1980s,<br />
th this agreement remained the wage leader in the<br />
DDutch<br />
industrial relations like its predecessor had<br />
bbeen<br />
before, but in the 1990s the collective agree-<br />
ment gradually los lost its leadership; the collective agreement for banking,<br />
soon to be split up in agreements for the various large banks,<br />
took over. Most recently, while wage increases remained slightly<br />
higher in the CAO Metaal/Elektrotechnische industrie, the small metal<br />
industry contained more innovative elements. Major explanations<br />
may be found in the heavy international competition to which large<br />
parts of ‘large metal’ were exposed, in the fact that small metal fi rms<br />
seem more inclined to negotiate integrative elements, in particular<br />
concerning training, with the trade unions, and a remarkably successful<br />
strike mobilisation of the union membership in small fi rms.<br />
2005-1 - reprint<br />
Quality standards<br />
of work in the<br />
Netherlands<br />
Kea Tijdens<br />
The project GendA – Network on Feminist Labour<br />
Research, based at the Institute of Political Science<br />
at the University of Marburg (www.gendanetz.de),<br />
is commissioning seven expert reports by scientists<br />
from various EU countries, to examine tendencies of<br />
increasingly atypical and precarious labour in Europe<br />
within a gender context.<br />
One O of these six expert reports is intended as a<br />
close c investigation of the undermining and re-formation<br />
m of quality standards of work, in connection<br />
with w women’s integration into the labour market in<br />
the th Netherlands. This expert report for the Netherlands<br />
e concentrates on the following points:<br />
• Political and academic discourse in the Netherlands on quality<br />
standards of work; which normality standards exist here, how are<br />
they changing, which quality standards are subject to particular<br />
criticism?<br />
• Overview of the development of increasingly atypical (and/or<br />
precarious) working conditions (particularly regarding type, extent<br />
and areas). Can a connection be observed between women’s<br />
integration into the labour market and the process of increasing<br />
atypicalness? What are the consequences of the de-standardisation<br />
tendency for gender relations? What opportunities and risks<br />
are emerging for women?<br />
• Analysis of quality defi cits – taking EU guidelines into account<br />
– and formulation of quality demands from a gender-democratic<br />
perspective; what infl uence does the EU have on national discourses<br />
and regulations related to the quality of work?<br />
• Open questions and gaps in existing research<br />
• Individuals and research groups working on this subject<br />
• Most important literature.<br />
13
14<br />
Discussion Papers GINI<br />
GINI PAPERS<br />
All GINI Discussion Papers can be downloaded for free<br />
www.gini-research.org<br />
The Associates and Core Team members of the GINI project will produce an impressive series of<br />
up to 120 Discussion Papers. These papers will analyse important aspects of inequality. Mostly<br />
this will be done in a cross-country perspective, but some issues of prime importance where<br />
comparable data are missing may be studied in depth at the national level. The results will serve as input into the<br />
overarching Analysis Reports in four areas (analysis of inequality drivers, social impacts, political and cultural impacts,<br />
and policy effects) on the one hand and where applicable into the Country Reports that will be produced in the<br />
next stage of the project. Recently, the fi rst four Discussion Papers have been published on the GINI website and are<br />
available for downloading.<br />
DP53, July <strong>2012</strong><br />
The Redistributive Capacity of Services in<br />
the EU<br />
Gerlinde Verbist and Manos Matsaganis<br />
Welfare W states provide social benefi ts<br />
in<br />
cash and in kind. Cash benefi ts are<br />
in income transfers, such as retirement<br />
ppensions,<br />
family and unemployment<br />
bbenefi<br />
ts and social assistance.<br />
Benefi B ts in kind are commodities directly transferred<br />
fe to recipients at zero or below-market<br />
prices (Barr <strong>2012</strong>).<br />
In Europe, benefi ts in kind are usually services, such as health, education,<br />
child care and care for the elderly. For example, hospital care<br />
in most countries is provided either free of charge or at near-zero<br />
prices (at the point of use). User fees are even rarer in the case of<br />
DP51, July <strong>2012</strong><br />
In-Work Poverty<br />
primary and secondary education: enrolment is compulsory up to a<br />
certain age, while tuition is provided free of charge to all children<br />
attending publicly funded schools, irrespective of family income.<br />
Moreover, child care is often heavily subsidised; kindergartens are<br />
run by the state (most commonly local governments) or government-supervised<br />
private organisations, while user fees, where applicable,<br />
are usually income-related (in the sense that higher-income<br />
families pay higher fees, while lower-income ones pay less or are<br />
fully exempted). Elderly care may also be available on similar terms;<br />
besides, several countries have developed long-term care insurance<br />
schemes, to cater for the future needs of an ageing population.<br />
Ive Marx and Brian Nolan<br />
While W in-work poverty is not a new problem, the degree of attention it is receiving in Europe is more<br />
recent, re refl ecting at least two concurrent sources of concern (Andreβ and Lohmann 2008; OECD 2008;<br />
EEuropean<br />
Foundation 2010; Fraser et al. 2011; Crettaz 2011; European Commission 2011).<br />
Deindustrialisation, D<br />
intensifying international trade and skill-biased technological change are said to be threatening if<br />
not n effectively eroding the (potential) earnings and living standards of some workers in advanced economies. Yet at the<br />
same s time, policy at EU level and in many countries has become focused on increasing the number of people relying on<br />
earnings, e and particularly on drawing into the labour market those with the weakest education and work history profi les.<br />
The Europe 2020 targ target of boosting employment rates to 75 per cent of the population aged 20 to 64 shows this drive to be undiminished.<br />
Sharply increased unemployment in some countries following on from the onset of the economic crisis has only served to increase the emphasis<br />
on getting people into jobs. In light of these trends, there would appear to be legitimate concern that larger sections of the workforce<br />
are being expected to rely on jobs that do not generate suffi cient income to escape poverty.
GINI PAPERS<br />
DP50, July <strong>2012</strong><br />
Child Poverty as a Government Priority<br />
Natascha Van Mechelen and Jonathan Bradshaw<br />
In this paper Tackling child poverty is high on the Euro-<br />
‘Child ‘C Poverty as pean Union’s political agenda. It was a prior-<br />
a Government ity in the March 2006 European Council, a<br />
Priority: P Child focus of many of the National Reports on<br />
Benefi B t Packages Social Protection and Social Inclusion 2006for<br />
fo Working<br />
2008, and the main work of the EU experts<br />
Families, F 1992- on the National Action Plans in 2007. An<br />
2009” 2 the focus infl uential report by the Social Protection<br />
is on the tth the h ch chil child hil<br />
ild benefi be ben b t package for Committee (2008) refl ected much of this<br />
working families and its contribution effort and contained detailed comparative<br />
to tackling in-work child poverty. analysis of child poverty using the new<br />
European Statistics on Income and Living<br />
Conditions (EU-SILC) 2005. The report<br />
DP49, July <strong>2012</strong><br />
drew attention to the fact that in the majority<br />
of the EU member states, children are at<br />
a higher risk of poverty than the population<br />
as a whole. More recent analyses of the EU-<br />
SILC (Tarki, 2010; Atkinson and Marlier,<br />
2010; Tarki, 2011) confi rmed this fi nding.<br />
As a part of its 10-year economic plan, the<br />
June 2010 European Council set the target<br />
to reduce poverty and social exclusion in the<br />
EU by 20 million (European Council, 2010).<br />
If this objective is to be achieved, parents<br />
and their children will need to be a key focus<br />
of anti-poverty policies.<br />
The Fiscalization of Child Benefi ts in<br />
OECD Countries<br />
Tommy Ferrarini, Kenneth Nelson and Helena Höög<br />
Welfare W states time (Kamerman and Kahn, 1981; MacNi-<br />
have h been subject col, 1992; Wennemo, 1994; Gauthier, 1996).<br />
to a subtle and In the immediate Post-War period many<br />
a sometimes countries either complemented or replaced<br />
unrecognized<br />
u<br />
various types of income-tested child ben-<br />
transformation:<br />
tr<br />
efi ts with universal ones, introducing a shift<br />
the th fi scalization of in the distributive profi le of the system.<br />
social s benefi ts. However, far from all welfare states relied<br />
only on the principle of universalism in the<br />
This change of national policy is notable design of child benefi ts. Child tax benefi ts<br />
in the area of family policy, where vari- and fi scal policy has often been used as an<br />
ous forms of child tax benefi ts have been alternative or complement to social policy<br />
introduced. The composition and level legislation. During the era of welfare state<br />
of child benefi ts varies therefore not only stagnation and decline since the mid-1970s<br />
across countries, but also over historical some countries have relocated parts of the<br />
child benefi t package from social policy to<br />
the income tax system. During this process<br />
of fi scalization, elements of income-testing<br />
have once again been introduced to child<br />
benefi ts, thus, adding stronger elements<br />
of vertical redistribution between socioeconomic<br />
groups. The change of scenery<br />
involves not only a shift in the relative emphasis<br />
of social and fi scal policies in the redistributive<br />
budgets of the European countries,<br />
but also a greater degree of selectivity<br />
and low-income targeting is introduced to<br />
the provision of child benefi ts.<br />
15
16<br />
DP48, July <strong>2012</strong> DP46, May <strong>2012</strong><br />
Public<br />
Opinion<br />
on Income<br />
Inequality<br />
in 20<br />
Democracies<br />
Robert Andersen and Meir Yaish<br />
Utilizing U<br />
International<br />
In<br />
Social S Survey<br />
Program P (ISSP)<br />
data, d we explore<br />
the th relationship<br />
between b economic<br />
inequality—both in<br />
at<br />
the in indi individual-level di divi vidu idu<br />
al l-lev<br />
level<br />
and the nationallevel—and<br />
attitudes toward income<br />
inequality in 20 capitalist societies.<br />
Our fi ndings suggest that experience of<br />
economic inequality has an enduring effect<br />
on attitudes. Specifi cally, respondents’ own<br />
social class and their father’s social class are<br />
both signifi cantly related to attitudes, with<br />
working class individuals tending to be<br />
more egalitarian in their views than others.<br />
Still, our fi ndings also suggest that attitudes<br />
are unrelated to experience of social mobility<br />
per se. Tests for random effects of class<br />
origin and destination further demonstrate<br />
that class has a similar effect across societies.<br />
In terms of contextual infl uences, we<br />
demonstrate that as income inequality rises,<br />
people of all classes tend to have less egalitarian<br />
views. In contrast to suggestions of<br />
previous research, however, we fi nd no evidence<br />
that economic development or equality<br />
of opportunity infl uence public opinion<br />
on what is considered fair income differences.<br />
GINI PAPERS<br />
Analysing Intergenerational<br />
Infl uences on Income<br />
Poverty and Economic<br />
Vulnerability with EU-SILC<br />
Brian Nolan<br />
The T EU-SILC 2005 wave includes a special module on intergenerational<br />
g transmission of poverty.<br />
In addition to the standard data relating to income and material deprivation,<br />
ri information relating to parental background and childhood<br />
circumstances c<br />
was collected for all household members aged over 24<br />
and a less than 66 at the end of the income reference period. In principle,<br />
c the module provides an unprecedented opportunity to apply a<br />
welfare w regime perspective to a comparative European analysis of the<br />
relationship relationship between ppoverty<br />
and social exclusion and parental characteristics and childhood<br />
economic circumstances. In this paper we seek to exploit such potential. In pursuing this<br />
objective, it is necessary to take into account some of the limitations of the data. We do by<br />
restricting our attention to a set of countries where data issues seem less extreme. Finally,<br />
we compare fi ndings from one dimensional and multidimensional approaches to poverty<br />
and social exclusion in order to provide an assessment of the extent to which our analysis of<br />
welfare regime variation provides a coherent account of the intergenerational transmission<br />
of disadvantage.<br />
DP44, May <strong>2012</strong><br />
Immigration and Inequality<br />
in Europe<br />
Tommaso Frattini<br />
This T paper aims at assessing the effect of immigration on<br />
native n income inequality in Western Europe.<br />
I use different regional indicators of income inequality, which allow<br />
distinguishing d<br />
between dispersion at the top and at the bottom of the<br />
income in distribution, and correlate them to regional annual infl ows of<br />
im immigrants over the period 2004-2008. Results indicate that immigra-<br />
ti tion is associated with a decrease of income inequality at the bottom of<br />
the distribution distribution. How However, IV estimates do not show any causal effect of immigration on<br />
income dispersion.
GINI PAPERS<br />
DP42, July <strong>2012</strong><br />
Home-Ownership, Housing<br />
Regimes and Income<br />
Inequalities in Western<br />
Europe<br />
Michelle Norris and Nessa Winston<br />
This T article compares the structural features of homeownership<br />
o systems in EU15 countries (home-ownership rates,<br />
mortgages m and public subsidisation of this tenure) with data<br />
on o inequalities in outcomes (variations in home-ownership<br />
access, a risks and standards between income groups).<br />
Its It purpose is to assess the relevance of the debate on the convergence<br />
and a divergence of housing systems which has dominated the compara-<br />
tive housing literature literature. The article concludes that, depending on the level of analysis adopted<br />
and the particular variables selected for examination, elements of both convergence and<br />
divergence are evident in Western European home-ownership systems. The comparative<br />
housing literature has also largely failed to capture the key inter-country cleavages in homeownership<br />
systems that are between the Northern and Southern EU15 countries. These<br />
shortcomings are related to methodological and conceptual problems in this literature.<br />
DP40, July <strong>2012</strong><br />
Multidimensional Poverty<br />
Measurement in Europe<br />
Christopher, T. Whelan, Brian Nolan and Bertrand Maître<br />
As A awareness of the limitations of relying solely on income<br />
to t measure poverty and social exclusion has become more<br />
widespread, w attention has been increasingly focused on multidimensional<br />
d approaches.<br />
To T date efforts to measure multidimensional poverty and social exclusion<br />
in rich countries have been predominantly ad hoc and have relied on data<br />
that th are far from ideal. Here we apply the approach recently developed by<br />
Alkire A and Foster, characterized by a range of desirable axiomatic properties<br />
but mostly discussed so far in a development context, to European countries, exploiting<br />
the potential of harmonized microdata on deprivation newly available for the European Union.<br />
The analysis seeks to overcome the limitations of the union and intersection approaches<br />
that have characterized many earlier studies. Multidimensional poverty is characterized and<br />
decomposed in terms of the contribution of different deprivation dimensions, and an account<br />
of cross-national and socio-economic variation in risk levels is presented that is in line with<br />
theoretical expectations. Multilevel analysis of multi-dimensional poverty provides the basis<br />
for assessment of the role of macro and micro characteristics and their interaction in relation<br />
to levels and patterns of multidimensional poverty and social exclusion.<br />
DP39 March <strong>2012</strong><br />
Socioeconomic<br />
Gradient in<br />
Health<br />
Maite Blázquez, Elena Cottini and<br />
Ainhoa Herrarte<br />
In this paper we<br />
use u the Spanish<br />
Living L Conditions<br />
Survey S (2005-<br />
2008) 2 to investigate<br />
whether w there is<br />
a socioeconomic<br />
gradient g in health<br />
when whhen alt alternative lternati tivve<br />
mmeasures<br />
of<br />
socioeconomic status, apart from<br />
income, are considered.<br />
In particular we construct a material deprivation<br />
index that refl ects some minimum<br />
standards of quality of life, and we analyze<br />
its impact on self-reported health. To<br />
address this issue, we use a deprivation index<br />
that incorporates comparison effects<br />
with societal peers and we estimate health<br />
equations using a random effects model.<br />
Furthermore, the model is extended to include<br />
a Mundlak term that corrects for the<br />
potential correlation between the error term<br />
and the regressors. Our results reveal that<br />
the relationship between health and income<br />
operates through comparison information<br />
with respect to societal peers. In contrast,<br />
material deprivation in terms of fi nancial<br />
diffi culties, basic necessities and housing<br />
conditions exerts a direct effect on individual<br />
health.<br />
17
18<br />
DP38, May <strong>2012</strong><br />
GINI PAPERS<br />
Inequality and Happiness: A Survey<br />
Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell and Xavier Ramos<br />
In recent years there has been an accumulation of empirical evidence suggesting that individuals dislike<br />
inequality (Alesina and Giuliano, 2011 and Dawes et al., 2007).<br />
The literature has built upon estimating the degree of this dislike as well as its causes. The use of self-reported measures<br />
of satisfaction or well-being as a proxy for utility has been one of the empirical strategies used to this end. In this survey<br />
we review the papers that estimate or examine the relationship between inequality and self-reported happiness, and<br />
fi nd that inequality reduces happiness in Western societies. The evidence for non-Western societies is more mixed and<br />
less reliable. Notwithstanding that, trust in the institutions seems to play an important role in shaping the relationship<br />
between income inequality and subjective wellbeing. We conclude with suggestions for further research.<br />
DP37, March <strong>2012</strong><br />
Understanding Material<br />
Deprivation in Europe<br />
Christopher T. Whelan and Bertrand Maître<br />
In this paper, taking advantage of the inclusion of a special<br />
module on material deprivation in EU-SILC 2009, we<br />
provide a comparative analysis of patterns of deprivation.<br />
Our analysis identifi es six relatively distinct dimensions of deprivation<br />
with generally satisfactory overall levels of reliability and mean levels<br />
of reliability across counties. Multi-level analysis based on 28 European<br />
countries reveals systematic variation across countries in the relative<br />
importance of with and between country variation. The basic deprivation dimension is the<br />
sole dimension to display a graduated pattern of variation a across countries. It also reveals<br />
the highest correlations with national and household income, the remaining deprivation<br />
dimensions and economic stress. It comes closest to capturing an underlying dimension of<br />
generalized deprivation that can provide the basis for a comparative European analysis of<br />
exclusion from customary standards of living. A multilevel analysis revealed that a range of<br />
household and household reference person socio-economic factors were related to basic<br />
deprivation and controlling for contextual differences in such factors allowed us to account<br />
for substantial proportions of both within and between country variance. The addition<br />
of macro-economic factors relating to average levels of disposable income and income inequality<br />
contributed relatively little further in the way of explanatory power. Further analysis<br />
revealed the existence of a set of signifi cant interactions between micro socio-economic<br />
attributes and country level gross national disposable income per capita. The impact of<br />
socio-economic differentiation was signifi cantly greater where average income levels were<br />
lower. Or, in other words, the impact of the latter was greater for more disadvantaged socioeconomic<br />
groups. Our analysis supports the suggestion that an emphasis on the primary<br />
role of income inequality to the neglect of differences in absolute levels of income may be<br />
misleading in important respects.
GINI PAPERS<br />
DP36, March <strong>2012</strong><br />
Material Deprivation, Economic Stress and<br />
Reference Groups in Europe<br />
Christopher T. Whelan and Bertrand Maître<br />
In this paper we<br />
take advantage of<br />
the recent<br />
availability of data<br />
from the special<br />
module on material<br />
deprivation in the<br />
2009 European<br />
Union Statistics on Income and<br />
Living Conditions (EU-SILC) to<br />
develop a more comprehensive<br />
understanding of the relationship<br />
between material deprivation and<br />
economic stress.<br />
DP33, March <strong>2012</strong><br />
In particular, we focus on the moderating<br />
role played by cross-national differences in<br />
levels of income and income inequality such<br />
that the consequences of material deprivation<br />
for subjective economic stress are conditional<br />
on the value of macro-economic<br />
attributes. In an analysis focused on households<br />
clustered within countries, these questions<br />
can be most appropriately addressed<br />
by a multilevel analysis that allows us to explore<br />
the manner in which material deprivation<br />
measured at the household level interacts<br />
with national attributes in infl uencing<br />
household levels of economic stress. Evi-<br />
dence for such moderation is provided by<br />
a signifi cant statistical interaction between<br />
deprivation and country attributes. In this<br />
paper we undertake such an analysis and<br />
consider the implications of our fi ndings<br />
for competing perspectives on the nature of<br />
reference groups in Europe.<br />
Income Inequality and Solidarity in Europe<br />
Marii Paskov and Caroline Dewilde<br />
This paper studies<br />
the relationship<br />
between income<br />
inequality, a<br />
macro-level<br />
characteristic, and<br />
solidarity of<br />
Europeans.<br />
To this aim, solidarity is defi ned as the<br />
‘willingness to contribute to the welfare of<br />
other people’. We rely on a theoretical idea<br />
according to which feelings of solidarity are<br />
derived from both affective and calculating<br />
considerations, and we test competing hypotheses<br />
relating the extent of income inequality<br />
to both motivations for solidarity.<br />
Using data from the 1999 European Values<br />
Study (EVS), we apply multilevel analysis<br />
for 26 European countries. Controlling for<br />
household income and for other relevant<br />
macro-level characteristics which possibly<br />
infl uence feelings of solidarity of Europe-<br />
ans in different countries, we fi nd evidence<br />
that in more unequal countries people are<br />
less willing to take action to improve the living<br />
conditions of their fellow-countrymen.<br />
This is true for respondents living in both<br />
low- and high-income households. Following<br />
from our expectations derived from the<br />
literature, this fi nding furthermore suggests<br />
that, at least when measured in terms of<br />
‘willingness to contribute to the welfare of<br />
other people’, feelings of solidarity seem to<br />
be infl uenced more strongly by affective,<br />
rather than by calculating considerations.<br />
19
20<br />
DP32, March <strong>2012</strong><br />
Income Inequality and<br />
Access to Housing in Europe<br />
Caroline Dewilde and Bram Lancee<br />
This paper analyses the relation between income inequality<br />
and access to housing for low- income households.<br />
Three arguments are developed, explaining how inequality might affect<br />
housing affordability, quality and quantity. First, it is the absolute<br />
level of resources, not their relative distribution, which affects access to<br />
housing. Second, inequality affects access to housing in different ways,<br />
due to rising aspirations and status competition. Third, the effect of<br />
inequality is mediated by housing market pressures. Multilevel-models for 28 countries indicate<br />
that: 1) there is no relation between inequality and housing affordability – the level of<br />
resources matters, rather than their distribution; 2) there exists a positive relation between<br />
inequality and crowding for owners; 3) higher levels of income inequality are associated<br />
with lower housing quality for owners and renters. Although there is a relation between<br />
inequality and access to housing, it is complex and not mediated by our indicator of house<br />
price-changes.<br />
DP28, January <strong>2012</strong><br />
The impact of indirect<br />
taxes and imputed rent on<br />
inequality<br />
Francesco Figari and Alari Paulus<br />
This paper examines the redistributive impact of imputed<br />
rent (private and public) and indirect taxes (value added tax<br />
and excises), comparing this with the effects of cash<br />
transfers and direct taxes in fi ve EU countries.<br />
The extended income concept, taking into account both imputed rent<br />
and indirect taxes, provides a more reliable picture of inequality differences<br />
across countries.<br />
Our results show that indirect taxes have a regressive effect with respect to income in all<br />
countries considered but always smaller in magnitude than other tax-benefi t instruments.<br />
Imputed rent reduces overall inequality in particular where the prevalence of individuals<br />
living in own accommodation is high even among the poorest (Greece) and where the contribution<br />
of the public imputed rent is large (the UK).<br />
GINI PAPERS<br />
DP25, December 2011<br />
Is the<br />
‘Neighbour’s’<br />
Lawn<br />
Greener?<br />
Lina Salanauskaite and Gerlinde<br />
Verbist<br />
To what extent can<br />
a country’s<br />
effectiveness in<br />
reducing child<br />
poverty be<br />
attributed to the<br />
size of family cash<br />
transfers (i.e. both<br />
benefi ts and tax instruments) or to<br />
their design?<br />
In this paper, we aim at disentangling the<br />
importance of each of these two factors, focusing<br />
on the family support system in Lithuania<br />
and comparing it with four other new<br />
member states. Despite increased susceptibility<br />
to poverty in Lithuania, single parent<br />
families have less state support than large<br />
families. This contrasts with other former<br />
communist countries, such as Estonia, Hungary,<br />
Slovenia or the Czech Republic, who<br />
protect both large and single parent families<br />
much better. The question is whether<br />
their family transfer systems would achieve<br />
similar results in Lithuania. We employ the<br />
EUROMOD microsimulation tax-benefi t<br />
model to swap family policies across countries<br />
and test whether size or design have<br />
greater effects on child poverty reduction in<br />
Lithuania.
GINI PAPERS<br />
DP27, February <strong>2012</strong><br />
Recent Trends in Minimum<br />
Income Protection for<br />
Europe’s Elderly<br />
Tim Goedemé<br />
In Europe, the elderly stand out for their heavy reliance on<br />
welfare state arrangements for securing their living standard.<br />
In spite of relatively high elderly at-risk-of-poverty rates in many EU<br />
member states, the past two decades have witnessed a tendency to restrengthen<br />
the link between past contributions and pension benefi ts,<br />
and to rely more strongly on private pensions. At the same time, public<br />
pension replacement rates are projected to decrease in a large number<br />
of European countries. In this context, minimum income protection for Europe’s elderly is<br />
likely to become even more important for alleviating elderly poverty than is the case today.<br />
Yet, minimum income protection schemes targeted at the elderly have remained largely undocumented<br />
in the international literature. Therefore, this chapter reviews existing minimum<br />
income policies for the elderly in Europe and develops a typology based on entitlement and<br />
eligibility criteria. Building on data from a project involving national experts from 25 EU<br />
member states, it is shown that in the 2000s welfare erosion of elderly persons’ non-contributory<br />
minimum income guarantees has been limited. Moreover, a substantial number of<br />
countries has pursued a deliberate policy of increases in minimum income benefi ts for the<br />
elderly. Nonetheless, only in a few countries benefi ts are adequate for lifting elderly persons<br />
above the poverty line. At the same time, differences between EU member states in terms<br />
of mode of access and benefi t levels remain large.<br />
DP24, May <strong>2012</strong><br />
On gender gaps and selffulfi<br />
lling expectations<br />
Juan J. Dolado, Cecilia García-Peñalosa and Sara de la Rica<br />
DP26, December 2011<br />
Endogenous<br />
Skill Biased<br />
Technical<br />
Change<br />
Francesco Bogliacino and Matteo<br />
Lucchese<br />
In this article we use<br />
the unifi cation of<br />
Germany in 1990 to<br />
test the hypothesis<br />
that an increase in<br />
the supply of a<br />
production factor<br />
generates skill<br />
biased technical change.<br />
We test for this mechanism in the context<br />
of the model presented by Acemoglu and<br />
Autor (2011) that allows endogenous assignment<br />
of skills to tasks in the economy.<br />
We use cohorts of workers from comparable<br />
countries as a control group. After discussing<br />
the possible confounding factors,<br />
we conclude that this effect is absent. The<br />
differential pattern among the countries<br />
seems to be determined by labor market<br />
fl exibilization and tax reform.<br />
This paper presents a model of self-fulfi lling expectations by fi rms and households which generates<br />
multiplicity of equilibria in pay and housework time allocation for ex-ante identical spouses.<br />
Multiplicity arises from statistical discrimination exerted by fi rms in the provision of paid-for training to workers, rather<br />
than from incentive problems in the labor market. Employers´ beliefs about differences in spouses´ reactions to housework<br />
shocks lead to symmetric (ungendered) and asymmetric (gendered) equilibria. We fi nd that: (i) the ungendered<br />
equilibrium tends to prevail as aggregate productivity in the economy increases (regardless of the generosity of family<br />
aid policies), (ii) the ungendered equilibrium could yield higher welfare under some scenarios, and (iii) gender-neutral<br />
job subsidies are more effective that gender-targeted ones in removing the gendered equilibrium.<br />
21
22<br />
NEWSLETTERS<br />
All (complete) <strong>newsletter</strong> can be downloaded for free<br />
www.uva-aias.net/96<br />
Collective Bargaining Newsletter<br />
February - August <strong>2012</strong><br />
Jan Cremers and Janna Besamusca<br />
The monthly Collective Bargaining Newsletter is produced by<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> researchers Jan Cremers (editor) and Janna Besamusca<br />
in cooperation with the ETUI. As from July <strong>2012</strong> on the<br />
Newsletter includes under the heading Focus additional<br />
links to records that provide background information. The<br />
<strong>newsletter</strong> can be found on the <strong>AIAS</strong> and ETUI websites.<br />
February <strong>2012</strong><br />
DENMARK<br />
New two-year agreement for manufacturing<br />
After a marathon bargaining round over the<br />
weekend of 11 and 12 February, the trade<br />
unions, led by the eight making up Co-Industri<br />
and including 3F, Dansk Metal and HK/<br />
Privat, concluded an agreement for 240,000<br />
manufacturing workers and 6,000 enterprises,<br />
the latter represented by Dansk Industri.<br />
The recommended minimum wage increase<br />
is €18 per hour effective 1 March, and the<br />
same amount again on 1 March 2013. A pay<br />
supplement of 1.4% each year is available for<br />
performing diffi cult work, and apprentices,<br />
trainees and interns will get a 2.25% pay hike<br />
in each year. Exact wage increases will now<br />
be negotiated at local levels and inside company<br />
agreements. Improvements were also<br />
achieved concerning training (accumulation<br />
of training rights, new possibility for training<br />
during short-time), precarious workers<br />
(new measure against social dumping), senior<br />
workers, and dismissed workers (severance<br />
pay). (February 22, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />
FINLAND/HUNGARY<br />
Unions fi ght cuts at Nokia Siemens<br />
The Finnish-German telecom equipment<br />
maker, Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN), said<br />
on 7 February a previously announced global<br />
restructuring plan would entail 2,900 job cuts<br />
in Germany and 1,200 in Finland. The German<br />
IG Metall union and NSN works council<br />
have organised constant protests against<br />
the announced cuts. On 1 February, protests<br />
started in Munich with about 2,000 participants<br />
attracting signifi cant media attention.<br />
The Finnish unions will start a round of negotiations<br />
inside the company between the<br />
management and shop stewards from the<br />
trade unions inside NSN which include Finnish<br />
Metalworkers’ Union, Trade Union Pro,<br />
Union of Professional Engineers in Finland<br />
(UIL) and Tekniikan Akateemisten Liitto<br />
(TEK), signatories of the collective agreement<br />
with the company. Secondly, they will<br />
start tripartite negotiations between the management,<br />
involved unions and the Ministry<br />
of Employment and Economy on alternative<br />
jobs. (February 9, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />
Besides job cuts at Nokia Siemens in Finland<br />
and Germany (see message under heading<br />
Finland), Nokia has announced to lay<br />
off 2,300 workers at its plant in Komarom<br />
in north-western Hungary. According to<br />
the cell phone giant, assembly would be replaced<br />
to Asia from Komarom, which currently<br />
employs around 4,400. The 2,300 jobs<br />
will be axed in two or three steps by the end<br />
of <strong>2012</strong>, Nokia told its workers, adding that<br />
most of the losses would be blue-collar,<br />
manufacturing positions. The move hurts the<br />
labour market in Hungary as well as in Slovakia,<br />
from where about a third of Komarom<br />
workers have commuted. (February 27, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />
March <strong>2012</strong><br />
GERMANY<br />
Latest news: Breakthrough after all-night negotiations<br />
in the public sector<br />
German interior Minister Hans-Peter Frie-<br />
drich, who led the talks with the public service<br />
union Verdi, announced in Potsdam<br />
shortly before 7 a.m. on Saturday 31 March<br />
that the negotiators had reached an agreement.<br />
Verdi, representing 2 million publicsector<br />
workers, had been seeking a 6.5% rise<br />
for one year after years of accepting modest<br />
pay deals and had rejected an earlier offer<br />
of 3.3%. If the deal is approved by the<br />
union membership (members have a fi nal say<br />
in a consultation between 11 and 25 April)<br />
public-sector workers will receive a 3.5% pay<br />
increase retroactive to March 1. They will<br />
receive a further 1.4% in January 2013 and<br />
another 1.4% pay rise in August 2013. The<br />
position of apprentices has been strengthened;<br />
after their qualifi cation and a successful<br />
fi rst year of service they will receive a permanent<br />
contract. Apprentices pay increases on 1<br />
March <strong>2012</strong> with €50 and on 1 August 2013<br />
with €40. The collective bargaining committee<br />
of the union approved the deal later on<br />
that Saturday. (March 31, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />
LITHUANIA<br />
Government to re-classify Carlsberg breweries as an<br />
‘essential’ service<br />
In an attempt to keep its workers from striking,<br />
Carlsberg has convinced the Lithuanian<br />
government to re-classify its activity as ‘essential<br />
services’. Workers in essential services,<br />
previously limited to activities like emergency<br />
services and water, are banned from striking<br />
by law. (March 8, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />
April <strong>2012</strong><br />
FRANCE<br />
Caterpillar agreement converts precarious labour in<br />
permanent jobs<br />
The annual negotiations at Caterpillar that<br />
started in December 2011 were fi nalised on<br />
with an agreement mid-April. Next to a pay<br />
rise of 2% for all (except for the management),<br />
the agreement consists of an extra<br />
payment based on merit (for approximately<br />
80% of the workforce), increase of the minimum<br />
wage (with 3.4%) to €1,515 and an extension<br />
of the pay structure. Furthermore 80<br />
precarious labour contracts will convert in
NEWSLETTERS<br />
<strong>2012</strong> into permanent contracts. The agreement<br />
applies for the Grenoble and Echirolles<br />
plants with in total 2,400 workers and is valid<br />
for one year. (April 19, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />
THE NETHERLANDS<br />
Cleaners end strike after 105 days<br />
The cleaners’ strike, lasting a total of 105 days,<br />
was ended after trade union members voted<br />
in favour of a new collective agreement. During<br />
the longest strike the country has seen<br />
since 1933, cleaners organised Marches of<br />
Respect, protests and media campaigns. The<br />
new collective agreement includes a 4.85%<br />
wage increase over two years, more training<br />
and job security, frequent workload tests and<br />
a pilot programme for a better sick leave arrangement.<br />
The lack of sick pay during the<br />
fi rst two days of illness was one of the core<br />
issues in the cleaners campaign Schoon Genoeg.<br />
(April 17, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />
May <strong>2012</strong><br />
AUSTRIA<br />
Austrian Airlines dispute might go to court<br />
The dispute at Austrian Airlines created by<br />
the management decisions to opt out from<br />
the existing collective agreement and to<br />
transfer the workforce to the cheaper agreement<br />
of subsidiary Tyrolean enters a new<br />
stage. The planned reform will come into<br />
effect on 1 July unless executive board and<br />
works council fi nd an alternative solution in<br />
the coming weeks. Protest of the workforce<br />
has led to cancellation of fl ights. The trade<br />
union vida is considering juridical steps to<br />
declare the transfer null and void. Other demands<br />
are the respect for the existing agreements<br />
and the right for individual employees<br />
to oppose the planned company transfer.<br />
(May 18, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />
GERMANY<br />
Agreement for the metal sector concluded<br />
After a period of warning strikes the partners<br />
in bargaining in the metal sector have<br />
concluded an agreement that includes a 4.3%<br />
wage raise for the sector’s 3.6 million workers.<br />
The deal between IG Metall union and<br />
employers in southern Baden-Wuerttemberg<br />
state — home to carmakers Daimler and<br />
Porsche — includes the wage raise, secures<br />
the position of apprentices and somewhat<br />
limits the use of temporary workers. The<br />
metal industry association president Martin<br />
Kannengiesser said the deal with a 13-month<br />
duration, initially reached for the state’s<br />
800,000 metal workers, will be applied to all<br />
of Germany. (May 21, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />
NORWAY<br />
State sector negotiations become a battle<br />
The negotiations in the state sector have<br />
turned into a battle on wage compensation<br />
after mediation failed. It is the fi rst time in<br />
28 years that civil servants at state level go<br />
on strike. A demonstration is announced for<br />
30 May in Oslo, with other meetings planned<br />
all over the country. Government and union<br />
negotiators are arguing over the size of raises<br />
won by workers within industries that negotiate<br />
their wage agreement fi rst, when annual<br />
talks get underway in the late winter and<br />
early spring. The union demands are in line<br />
with the wage development in several other<br />
branches. Negotiations were held on the hiring<br />
in of workers, on inconvenient working<br />
hours and work in evenings and on weekends.<br />
(May 24, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />
June <strong>2012</strong><br />
FRANCE<br />
Minimum wage increased<br />
For the fi rst time in 6 years the French minimum<br />
wage (SMIC) will increase. The socialist<br />
government has announced a (limited)<br />
rise to 0.6% above the infl ation rate. The rise<br />
amounts 2% to €9.40 an hour from 1 July<br />
<strong>2012</strong>, of which 1.4% is accounted for by infl<br />
ation. It is the fi rst time the minimum wage,<br />
which affects one in six workers, will be<br />
raised above infl ation since a 0.3% boost in<br />
2006, before former president Sarkozy froze<br />
it in real terms. (June 27, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />
SPAIN<br />
Coal miners’ strike escalates<br />
Coal miners in the northern of Spain went<br />
on strike, staging protests in northern cities<br />
and Madrid. The actions started in response<br />
to a government announcement that state aid<br />
to the sector will be reduced by 64%. Trade<br />
unions CCOO and UGT have announced<br />
their support for the miners’ strike that enjoyed<br />
100% participation. Smaller actions<br />
involving blockades of mayor roads in the<br />
north were not authorised by the unions. The<br />
unions argue that the large scale retraction of<br />
public subsidies will kill the mining sector,<br />
which has already lost over 40,000 jobs in the<br />
last 20 years. Getting increasingly desperate,<br />
the miners have started to march on Madrid,<br />
vowing to walk the near 400 kilometre distance<br />
and hoping to be joined by more and<br />
more protesters along the way. Despite controversial<br />
actions and some clashes with the<br />
police, left wing parties, local and regional<br />
governments and trade union confederations<br />
across Europe have come out in support of<br />
the miners. (June 26, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />
TURKEY<br />
Prominent union leaders arrested and offi ces raided<br />
On 25 June police raided the offi ces of education<br />
union Eğitim Sen and the Confederation<br />
of Public Employees (KESK). The<br />
police also searched the houses of prominent<br />
union leaders, confi scating documents<br />
regarding their union work. Union leaders<br />
were detained in over 20 cities, including<br />
KESK President Lami Ozgen; the General<br />
Secretary of the Health and Social Services<br />
Union (SES), Mehmet Siddik Akin; the General<br />
Secretary of the All Municipality and<br />
Local Administrations workers’ union (Tüm<br />
Bel Sen), İzzet Alpergin; and the President<br />
of the Agriculture, Forest, Livestock Service<br />
Workers’ Union (Tarım Orkam Sen), Metin<br />
Vuranok. Trade unions across Europe have<br />
condemned the attack on the unionists. (June<br />
25, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />
July <strong>2012</strong><br />
BELGIUM<br />
Average wage €3,100 in 2010<br />
Detailed fi gures over the period 1999-2010<br />
published by the Economy Ministry (in<br />
French and Dutch) show that the average<br />
Belgian employee earned €3,100 before tax a<br />
23
24<br />
month in 2010. The statistics include gender,<br />
education, sector and skills related data. On<br />
average wages rose in 2010 by 2.51% (2.8%<br />
for women, 2.48% for men). The earnings of<br />
highly educated workers rose more quickly<br />
than those of the low-skilled. The highest<br />
wages are paid in the fi nancial sector and by<br />
utilities like water, gas and electricity whilst<br />
the lowest wages occur in the hospitality industry,<br />
in pubs, restaurants, hotels and cafes.<br />
(July 12, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />
August <strong>2012</strong><br />
IRELAND<br />
HSE in confl ict with hospital consultants, home helps<br />
and staff<br />
Unions have reacted outraged at proposals<br />
by the Health Service Executive (HSE)<br />
to increase working time by two hours per<br />
week and pay over hours at fl at pay rates in<br />
order to address the health service’s defi cit.<br />
Trade union SIPTU stated that the proposals<br />
violate the Croke Park agreement and that<br />
it will begin to ballot its members for industrial<br />
action. Earlier this month, the Croke<br />
Park implementation body denied a request<br />
from the hospital consultants’ association<br />
for an extended time frame for negotiations<br />
with the HSE. The HSE said earlier that if<br />
the issues failed to be resolved between the<br />
two parties shortly, it will refer the confl ict<br />
to the Labour Court. The HSE wishes to address<br />
a lower entry pay and the elimination<br />
of the so-called historic leave, under which<br />
several hundred consultants are entitled to a<br />
fi nal year off as a compensation for past over<br />
time. Also home helps are in confl ict with the<br />
HSE, whom they accuse of not implementing<br />
a 2009 agreement. Focus on the Croke<br />
Park agreement: www.impact.ie/Croke-<br />
Park-Agreement.htm (August 14, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />
SWITZERLAND<br />
Creative campaigning leads to social plan<br />
Merck Serono employees in Geneva accepted<br />
a Memorandum of Understanding that<br />
was reached in bargaining between worker<br />
representatives, trade union UNIA, and management<br />
of the pharmaceuticals giant, under<br />
NEWSLETTERS<br />
the mediation of Geneva authorities. Workers<br />
had renewed strike action in early August<br />
as the company refused to improve the social<br />
plan, in one of the largest industrial action<br />
campaigns in recent history (also in the June<br />
Newsletter). The decision to close the sites<br />
in Geneva and Coisins was not reversed, but<br />
gains were won enabling early retirement of<br />
older employees, on good terms. Minimum<br />
redundancy payments were increased. A<br />
special fund was created for compensation<br />
for temporary workers and subcontractors.<br />
Workers are released from work for one<br />
month to look for another job. Also achieved<br />
was the commitment from Merck Serono to<br />
support the creation of a biotechnology institute,<br />
under certain conditions. (August 13,<br />
<strong>2012</strong>)<br />
UNITED KINGDOM<br />
Blacklisting causes national scandal<br />
Growing political concern has been voiced<br />
over blacklisting, a practice of mainly construction<br />
companies to place workers who<br />
have been active for unions on a blacklist<br />
of workers never to hire. A list of union<br />
activists was circulated by the Consulting<br />
Association (that also fi led MP’s and academics<br />
like Charles Woolfson) to fi rms who<br />
subscribed to it. The list, fi rst revealed after<br />
a raid in 2009, contained 3000 names of<br />
‘troublesome workers’. In recent week, the<br />
Trade Union Congress passed a motion defi<br />
ning blacklisting as corporate bullying and<br />
demanding political action. A number of<br />
blacklisted workers, aided by the GMB, have<br />
launched a £600 million law suit for tort of<br />
illegal conspiracy against one of the biggest<br />
fi rms using the covert black list database, Sir<br />
Robert McAlpine. Opposition raised again<br />
as it became clear that the director of one<br />
of the fi rms using blacklisting was awarded<br />
a seat on the board of the Health and Safety<br />
Executive. Focus on the practice of blacklisting:<br />
www.hazards.org/blacklistblog/<br />
(August 28, <strong>2012</strong>).
NEWSLETTERS<br />
WageIndicator Gazette<br />
Keep yourself posted and read the WageIndicator Newsletter!<br />
www.wageindicator.org/main/WageIndicatorgazette/<strong>2012</strong><br />
March <strong>2012</strong><br />
Women journalists sick and tired of gender pay gap<br />
Female journalists are paid less, receive fewer<br />
benefi ts and are more often without a fi xed<br />
contract than their male colleagues. They<br />
know it and it makes them less satisfi ed<br />
with their wage, working environment and<br />
– indeed – their colleagues, then men. Yet it<br />
seems hard to remedy these situations of factual<br />
discrimination in terms of working conditions.<br />
This fi nding is in line with the persistent<br />
pay gap typical for all gender relations<br />
of the working population, whatever their<br />
occupation, branch of industry, or region of<br />
the world they work in. It is however telling<br />
that this structural deprivation persists even<br />
amongst that part of the workforce that is<br />
supposedly well informed and assertive when<br />
it comes to getting things done.<br />
Male wages exceed female wages in all 16<br />
studied countries, from the EU, the former<br />
Soviet Union and in Central and Latin America.<br />
The only asset women broadly share<br />
seems to be that they, less then their male colleagues,<br />
work in shifts or at irregular hours,<br />
on Saturdays, Sundays, or in the evenings, or<br />
do telework. But their more regular working<br />
week apparently does not compensate<br />
enough to make them feel as satisfi ed with<br />
their jobs as the men they work with on an<br />
equal footing.<br />
These are the main fi ndings of the report<br />
Gender Pay Gap in Journalism, March <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
It is based on the international dataset of<br />
wages per occupation, compiled through the<br />
Wage Indicator Salary Surveys from 2009 till<br />
2011. During this period nearly 2,000 journalists<br />
across the globe completed the questionnaire.<br />
The Gender Pay Gap in Journalism report<br />
has been made in cooperation with the International<br />
Federation of Journalists.<br />
Pay gap freeze around the globe<br />
Solution: facilitate childrearing tasks<br />
Frozen in Time, gender pay gap unchanged<br />
for 10 years, March <strong>2012</strong>, is the apt title of a<br />
report covering trends in gender pay relations,<br />
since the beginning of the millenium. In search<br />
for an explanation of this big pay gap freeze<br />
across the globe, researchers from the University<br />
of Amsterdam found Wage Indicator data<br />
most helpful. Other than the aggregate data<br />
provided by national statistical offi ces and international<br />
public sources, the Wage Indicator<br />
data allows for a breakdown of labour market<br />
behaviour of working individuals in motivating<br />
and/or inhibiting factors.<br />
Individual´s motives and possibilities to participate<br />
in the labour market may and do vary<br />
per occupation, industry, composition of<br />
the household, education, fi rm size etc. Taking<br />
these variables into account researchers<br />
analyze that in most countries child rearing<br />
is much more detrimental to women´s wages<br />
than to men´s wages, thereby contributing to<br />
the gender pay gap. This conclusion is followed<br />
up by the obvious implication of what<br />
might be one of the strongest factors perpetuating<br />
the traditional gender pay gap well<br />
into the 21rst century.<br />
The researchers´ observe that: any policies to<br />
facilitate childrearing tasks for both men and<br />
women will decrease the gender pay gap.<br />
The report ´Frozen in Time´ has been compiled<br />
for the ITUC, the International Trade<br />
Union Federation, and is published at the occasion<br />
of Women´s Day March 8.<br />
June <strong>2012</strong><br />
Minimum Wage Comparison, Asian Countries Series<br />
In at least 7 Asian countries there is a formal<br />
minimum wage system in place: they all pay<br />
attention to it, one way or the other.<br />
These 7 countries were compared in terms of<br />
• number and types of minimum wage<br />
rates<br />
• minimum wage coverage<br />
• special provisions for certain groups<br />
• sectors or groups excluded from this<br />
type of protection.<br />
Types of minima<br />
The countries compared, i.e. Cambodia,<br />
China, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Sri Lanka<br />
and Vietnam differ in occurrence and types<br />
of minimum wage. There can be a uniform<br />
national minimum wage, and at the other extreme<br />
there can be different rates at the district<br />
or city level even. Also the legal base for<br />
minimum wages varies considerably: India,<br />
Indonesia, Pakistan and Sri Lanka have special<br />
minimum wage laws. Cambodia, China<br />
and Vietnam make do with legal provisions<br />
and/or a labour code. Also, the setting of<br />
minimum wages differs a great deal. In some<br />
countries minimum wages are set tripartite by<br />
representatives from workers, employers, and<br />
the government, while in others they are set by<br />
executive decree or legislative actions.<br />
Rates per region, occupation, industry, skills<br />
Thus in most countries more than one single<br />
minimum wages exist. A handful of criteria<br />
are used to set the levels. In India and Pakistan<br />
minimum wage rates are determined regionally,<br />
by states or provinces. Similar determination<br />
is followed by Indonesia and Vietnam. In<br />
Indonesia the geographical criterion is leading:<br />
each region is given the power to frame<br />
their own minimum wages. In addition to the<br />
geographic criterion India, Indonesia, Pakistan<br />
and Sri Lanka also determine minimum wage<br />
rates at the occupation level. Only Sri Lanka<br />
and Vietnam determine minimum wage rates<br />
at industry level. All countries, except Cambodia<br />
and Indonesia, determine minimum wage<br />
rates at the sector level too. India and Pakistan<br />
in addition may determine their minimum<br />
wage rates according to skills required. Use of<br />
multiple criteria helps to decentralise the institution<br />
and make it relevant to specifi c target<br />
groups. But very complex systems may arise in<br />
the process – and they do. And on top there<br />
25
26<br />
are special provisions, as well as exceptions to<br />
the national rule.<br />
Special groups<br />
China does not have special minimum<br />
wage provisions for any specifi c categories<br />
of labour. India and Pakistan are the only<br />
countries included in this study with special<br />
minimum wage provisions and laws for specifi<br />
c groups like domestic workers, trainees,<br />
youth and piece-rate workers. Cambodia<br />
has specifi c minimum wage rates only for<br />
piece-rate workers. Indonesia has special<br />
minimum wage rates for contract labour,<br />
piece-rate workers and for workers on probation.<br />
Sri Lanka is the only country which<br />
has considered separate minimum wage rate<br />
for disabled workers. It also has special minimum<br />
wage provisions for domestic trainees<br />
and piece-rate workers. Vietnam has specifi c<br />
minimum wage rates for employees on probation,<br />
trainees/apprentices and workers<br />
who have received some vocational training.<br />
Unprotected workers<br />
Though all 7 countries have some form<br />
of minimum wage, its applicability across<br />
the labour market is not complete. There<br />
are some loopholes in the system of each<br />
country, except China. In Cambodia public<br />
servants and domestic workers are excluded<br />
from minimum wage protection. This leaves<br />
the most vulnerable section of society unprotected.<br />
In India disabled persons are not<br />
covered. In Indonesia the entrepreneurial<br />
class is prohibited from paying less than the<br />
minimum wage. But if a private company is<br />
not in a position to pay minimum wage, it is<br />
exempted by law. In Pakistan public servants<br />
and unskilled workers are excluded from<br />
minimum wage protection. And in Vietnam<br />
too, like in Cambodia and Pakistan, public<br />
servants are excluded. Only in China, there<br />
are no exceptions made for special groups.<br />
NEWSLETTERS<br />
CLR-News<br />
Jan Cremers<br />
The quarterly CLR-News (ISSN 1997-1745) acts since the start in 1993 as an<br />
organ of information and debate on labour and employment in construction.<br />
From 2001 on the issues of CLR-News are available as PDF fi le on www.clrnews.org<br />
under publications or at www.uva-aias.net under publications.<br />
CLR-News C 1-<strong>2012</strong><br />
The T road to cross border justice<br />
‘Since ‘S the implementation of the internal market and the development of the<br />
Community C acquis, trade unions and the workers they represent in Europe are<br />
confronted c with the question how to defend workers’ rights that can be derived<br />
from fr European Union (EU) law, especially in a cross-border context. Although<br />
in theory it is often claimed that foreign workers have access to justice and<br />
redress to local courts like any other worker, the practice is rather patchy (…) In practice, workers<br />
are often unable to exercise these rights due to the inadequacy of existing means of redress<br />
in mass claim situations and to a lack of cross-border cooperation. On top of that, the costs of<br />
legal proceedings are sometimes higher than the compensation they can receive. Redress is the<br />
result of an uncertain path by the route of individual lawsuits that can take years in an unknown<br />
constituency and jurisdiction’.<br />
In this issue of the Journal Jan Cremers (<strong>AIAS</strong>) describes the latest developments in the EU<br />
related to the cross-border enforcement of workers’ rights. The notion of collective redress is<br />
introduced with a short explanation of the position of the trade unions. The article ends with an<br />
overview of challenges and questions that ask for further research. Martin Bulla (guest at <strong>AIAS</strong>)<br />
has investigated whether collective redress can provide a possible way of improvement of judicial<br />
enforcement of posted workers’ rights vested in the Posting of Workers Directive (Directive<br />
96/71/EC). He describes the most signifi cant problems posted workers are facing, followed by<br />
an overview of basic types of redress procedures as well as differences in approaches to legal<br />
regulation in countries. The contribution of Jean-Luc Deshayes is dedicated to another aspect of<br />
transnational mobility. Based on examples from the trans-boundary basin of Longwy, his contribution<br />
is dedicated to the status of the frontier worker. Janna Besamusca and Jan Cremers (both<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong>) also contribute with a book review.<br />
CLR-News C 2-<strong>2012</strong><br />
Aging, A pensions and the crisis<br />
‘This ‘T issue is in fact an introductory and a showcase of the current pension<br />
debate d (…) you will fi nd in this issue some excerpts from the EFBWW-study<br />
oon<br />
pensions in the construction industry and the EFBWW conclusions based<br />
oon<br />
the study. But, before that, we have three contributions that deal with the<br />
EC’s White Paper. First of all, Josef Wöss from the Austrian Labour Chamber who has criticized<br />
in the past the assumptions applied by the EC. In the following short contribution I introduce<br />
the most important notions formulated in the White Paper together with the criticism of the<br />
ETUC. And, in the third contribution, the authors of the EFBWW-study, Ernst-Ludwig Laux<br />
and Joachim Reus, have resumed their comments on the EC proposal. Although it is an extended<br />
book review we have included Jörn Janssen’s contribution in the Discussion section. The radical<br />
ideas formulated by Friot gear directly in the pension debate’. With contributions from Jan Cremers<br />
(<strong>AIAS</strong>) and Lisa Berntsen (guest at <strong>AIAS</strong>).
PUBLICATIONS<br />
ACADEMIC<br />
Book<br />
Economy<br />
and Society<br />
in Europe, a<br />
relationship<br />
in Crisis<br />
Edited by a.o. Maarten Keune<br />
The book shows that while an<br />
economy is always ‘embedded’ in<br />
society, the relationship between the<br />
two is undergoing profound changes<br />
in Europe, resulting in widespread<br />
instability as made clear by the<br />
current crisis.<br />
The book analyses these<br />
changes, and in particular<br />
pressures of intensifying<br />
international competition,<br />
globalization and fi nance<br />
within Europe. Combining<br />
the perspectives of<br />
economic sociology, political economy and<br />
political science, the expert contributors offer<br />
an in-depth, multidisciplinary insight to<br />
the functioning of a number of institutional<br />
arenas around which European economies<br />
and societies are organized. Areas explored<br />
include the state and public policy at European<br />
national and regional level, the welfare<br />
state, industrial relations systems, education<br />
systems and the family.<br />
Publisher Edward Elger<br />
www.e-elger.com<br />
Pages 256<br />
ISBN 978-1-84980 -365-6<br />
Price ₤ 58.50<br />
Publications on scientifi c research for an academic audience<br />
Book<br />
A skill mismatch for migrant<br />
workers? Evidence from<br />
WageIndicator survey data<br />
Kea Tijdens and Maarten van Klaveren<br />
Kea Tijdens and Maarten van Klaveren contributed a chapter “A skill<br />
mismatch for migrant workers? Evidence from WageIndicator survey data” to<br />
the book “EU Labour Migration in Troubled Times — Skills Mismatch, Return<br />
and Poilcy Research”, edited by Bela Galgóczi, Janine Leschke and Andrew<br />
Watt (all at ETUI, European Trade Union Institute) and just published by<br />
Ashgate Publishing (www.ashgate.com).<br />
Overeducation occurs more often for migrants compared to domestic workers,<br />
and it occurs more often in the EU15 compared to the EU12. Thus, the<br />
characteristics of both migrants and national labour markets infl uence the<br />
incidence of overeducation. Using data for European countries from the<br />
global WageIndicator web-survey on work and wages, theoretically based<br />
assumptions were tested for explanations why migrants are more prone to<br />
be overqualifi ed. A lack of transparency of credentials – here defi ned arriving<br />
in the host country at an adult age – increases the incidence of overeducation. Employer<br />
discrimination is assumed to increase the incidence of overeducation. Indeed, fi rst and second<br />
generation migrants and ethnic minorities are prone to labour market discrimination<br />
and this in turn increases the likelihood of overqualifi cation. Finally, it is hypothesized that<br />
migrant workers with poorer language abilities – here defi ned as migrant workers born in<br />
a country with a native language or a lingua franca that does not match that of the host<br />
country – are more likely to report overeducation. This assumption is not supported by our<br />
results.<br />
Publisher Ashgate www.ashgate.com<br />
Published September <strong>2012</strong><br />
Pages 308<br />
ISBN 978-1-4094-3450-4<br />
Price ₤ 60<br />
27
28<br />
PUBLICATIONS<br />
Journal Structural Change and Economic Dynamics (Elsevier)<br />
Job Creation in Business Services<br />
Francesco Bogliacino, Matteo Lucchese and Mario Pianta<br />
The patterns and mechanisms of<br />
job creation in business services<br />
are investigated in this article by<br />
considering the role of innovation,<br />
demand, wages and the composition<br />
of employment by professional groups.<br />
Presentation<br />
on free<br />
movement<br />
published<br />
Jan Cremers<br />
A presentation Free movement of<br />
workers and rights that can be derived<br />
that was prepared by Jan Cremers<br />
for the 2011 annual meeting of the<br />
Network on Free Movement of Workers<br />
coordinated by the Centre for Migration<br />
Law of the Radboud University<br />
Nijmegen has been published in<br />
FMW4-<strong>2012</strong>, the Online Journal on<br />
free movement of workers within the<br />
European Union.<br />
According to the editorial ‘Cremers takes a<br />
careful look at the issue of which social benefi<br />
ts should accrue to which EU workers when<br />
they are exercising mobility rights outside their<br />
home Member State. In times of fi nancial instability<br />
in some Member States, this issue is<br />
central to guaranteeing security for EU workers<br />
and ensuring that they are in fact being treated<br />
equally as regards social and tax advantages with<br />
workers who are nationals of the host Member<br />
State’. http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.js<br />
p?catId=737&langId=en&pubId=6884<br />
A model is developed and an empirical test<br />
is carried out with parallel analyses on a<br />
group of selected business services, on other<br />
services and on manufacturing sectors,<br />
considering six major European countries<br />
over the period 1996-2007.<br />
Within technological activities a distinction<br />
is made between those supporting either<br />
technological competitiveness or cost competitiveness<br />
strategies. Demand variables<br />
allow identifying the special role of intermediate<br />
demand. Job creation in business<br />
services appears to be driven by efforts to<br />
expand technological competitiveness and<br />
by the fast growing intermediate demand<br />
coming from other industries; conversely,<br />
process innovation leads to job losses and<br />
wage growth has a negative effect that is<br />
lower than in other industries. Business<br />
services show an increasingly polarized employment<br />
structure.<br />
Go to the website for the article:<br />
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954349X12000471#FCANote<br />
Journal of European Social Policy<br />
Welfare regimes and<br />
higher education systems<br />
Paul de Beer and Nienke Willemse<br />
Three educational worlds of welfare? A comparative study of higher<br />
education systems across welfare states.<br />
In the article ‘Three educational worlds of welfare? A comparative study of higher education<br />
systems across welfare states’ in the Journal of European Social Policy <strong>AIAS</strong> researcher Paul<br />
de Beer and former UvA student Nienke Willemse analyse to what extent higher education<br />
policies fi t into the well-known welfare regime typology of Esping-Andersen. The article applies<br />
the central concepts of welfare state analysis of decommodifi cation and stratifi cation,<br />
as proposed by Esping-Andersen, to the fi eld of higher education. Next, it tests whether<br />
there are systematic differences in higher education policies across 19 developed western<br />
countries that are usually categorized in a social democratic, a liberal or a conservative welfare<br />
regime.<br />
The countries studied cluster in three groups that correspond roughly with the classical categorization.<br />
The countries in these clusters do not, however, meet all expectations regarding<br />
the level of decommodifi cation and stratifi cation. We conclude that including higher education<br />
in comparative welfare states analysis might result in a less clear-cut categorization of<br />
welfare regimes than when the analysis is restricted to social protection and labour market<br />
policies.
PUBLICATIONS<br />
European Journal of Training and Development<br />
Measuring work activities<br />
and skill requirements of<br />
occupations<br />
Kea Tijdens, Judith De Ruijter and Esther De Ruijter<br />
The purpose of this article is to evaluate a method for measuring work<br />
activities and skill requirements of 160 occupations in eight countries, used in<br />
EurOccupations, an EU-FP6 project. Additionally, it aims to explore how the<br />
internet can be used for measuring work activities and skill requirements.<br />
This paper aims to evaluate the measurement of work activities and skill requirements of<br />
occupations for international comparisons. Recent discussions have explored the potential<br />
for an International Standard Classifi cation of Skills and Competences (Markowitsch and<br />
Plaimauer, 2009), have detailed the various conceptions of competence in the EQF and the<br />
national systems of competence framework (Brockmann et al., 2009), and have investigated<br />
if there is suffi cient common ground for a shared European approach to underpin the European<br />
Qualifi cations Framework (Winterton, 2009). Whereas these articles approached the<br />
skills and competences concepts predominantly from the angle of education and training,<br />
this paper approaches the same topic from the angle of work and training.<br />
Please visit the website www.emeraldinsight.com for the article.<br />
Hoofdstuk<br />
Duitsland en de medezeggenschap in de<br />
(kleine) onderneming<br />
Jan Cremers<br />
Jan Cremers schreef een hoofdstuk getiteld Duitsland en de medezeggenschap in de (kleine) onderneming in het boek<br />
Medezeggenschap in kleine ondernemingen.<br />
In dit hoofdstuk wordt stilgestaan bij de<br />
ontwikeling van de medezeggenschap in<br />
Duitsland. In tegenstelling tot wat vaak<br />
gedacht wordt, is in Duitsland, net als in<br />
Nederland, de oprichting van een ondernemingsraad<br />
niet zo maar af te dwingen;<br />
zonder initiatief van werknemerszijde komt<br />
geen ondernemingsraad tot stand. Wel is het<br />
zo dat in een overgrote meerderheid van het<br />
Duitse grootbedrijf de medezeggenschap<br />
stevig verankerd is. Zodra gekeken wordt<br />
naar de categorie kleinere bedrijven neemt<br />
de naleving in Duitsland snel af. Dat is ech-<br />
ter in Nederland niet veel anders. Een van<br />
de centrale doelstellingen van de hervorming<br />
in 2001 van de medezeggenschapswetgeving<br />
(het Betriebsverfassungsgesetz) was<br />
het stimuleren van een betere verspreiding<br />
van de medezeggenschap in bepaalde segmenten<br />
van de arbeidsmarkt met een lage<br />
naleving (bouw, handel, diensten) en in zogenaamde<br />
‘medezeggenschapsvrije zones’<br />
waarbij in het bijzonder gedoeld werd op<br />
het MKB. De Duitse wetgever achtte het<br />
zowel vanuit politiek, als vanuit economisch<br />
opzicht noodzakelijk hier iets aan te doen.<br />
De wetgever ging er daarbij van uit dat medezeggenschap<br />
zeer tot voordeel strekt, dat<br />
de kosten ruim tegen de baten opwegen en<br />
dat het goed organiseren van de medezeggenschap<br />
(dus) profi jtelijk is voor het bedrijfsleven.<br />
In: Medezeggenschap in kleine ondernemingen<br />
(red. G. Bruinsma), uit de serie ORstrategie<br />
en beleid, thema 17, Vakmedianet,<br />
Alphen aan de Rijn, pagina 101-117.<br />
29
30<br />
PUBLICATIONS<br />
Book review<br />
Employers’ organizations and the effects<br />
of ‘voluntary’ abstention from collectively<br />
negotiated agreements<br />
Review by Jan Cremers, published in Transfer 18(3), August <strong>2012</strong>, p. 364-365<br />
‘Why do workers leave unions?’ was the title of an article in Transfer 17(4) in 2011. In it, the authors explored the<br />
reasons for workers leaving trade unions or staying on as trade union members.<br />
In the book ‘The paradox of employers’<br />
federations’, Martin Behrens of the Hans<br />
Böckler Foundation discusses a similar case<br />
applying to employers. His in-depth analysis<br />
of German employer organizations reveals<br />
a range of reasons for employers belonging<br />
to such organizations, while at the same<br />
time exposing the myth that employers act<br />
in conformity. Employer organizations have<br />
always been seen as an important building<br />
block of the regulatory frame anchoring<br />
the ‘Rhineland model’. In the long term an<br />
increase in ‘opt-out clauses’ and in companies<br />
making use thereof will undermine the<br />
principal function of employer organizations.<br />
Though their role will not disappear,<br />
the conclusion after reading this book is<br />
that there is a qualitative change, with new<br />
ways of adding value needing to be developed<br />
to maintain attractiveness.<br />
Martin Behrens. Das Paradox der Arbeitgeberverbände<br />
– Von der Schwierigkeit, durchsetzungsstarke<br />
Unternehmensinteressen kollektiv<br />
zu vertreten [The paradox of employers’<br />
Article<br />
Men care revisited<br />
By Marianne Grunell, published in Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, no 15, <strong>2012</strong>, p<br />
51-56<br />
I discuss the thesis of my Phd on<br />
men’s changing contribution to<br />
everyday care and the new social<br />
appeal made to them (2002).<br />
A decade later my conclusions<br />
on a major historical<br />
change are sceptical.<br />
The urgency of<br />
the matter has diminished<br />
at the authorities<br />
and in social organisations.<br />
Men themselves<br />
– in particular the focusgroup of fathers<br />
of young children – remain ambivalent.<br />
Although they say that they want to work<br />
less to care more, only a few work part-time.<br />
This small group of highly educated men,<br />
working in the social sector or at the authorities<br />
remains a priviledged group, with paid<br />
care arrangements and a pro-care culture.<br />
Much more widespread are full-time working<br />
fathers, who changed their careing attituede<br />
in their free time. Their choice fi ts well<br />
in the Dutch one-and-a-half-earning model,<br />
in which mothers work part-time and men<br />
full-time. The interests of both are served<br />
well in this model that will also dominate<br />
the coming years.<br />
federations – the diffi culty of collectively<br />
representing assertive company interests],<br />
Research series of the German Hans-Böckler-Foundation,<br />
Bd. 130, Edition Sigma:<br />
Berlin, 2011; 238 pp.<br />
In: Transfer 18(3), August <strong>2012</strong>, p. 364-365,<br />
http://trs.sagepub.com/content/current
PUBLICATIONS<br />
PROFESSIONAL<br />
Book<br />
New edition<br />
‘De juridische<br />
organisatie<br />
van de onderneming’<br />
A.F.M. Dorresteijn and R.H. van het<br />
Kaar<br />
On 9 September Kluwer published<br />
a new edition of ‘De Juridische<br />
organisatie van de onderneming’,<br />
a comprehensive book on Dutch<br />
company law, written by A.F.M.<br />
Dorresteijn en R.H. van het Kaar.<br />
After several years of<br />
standstill in Dutch company<br />
law, in <strong>2012</strong> major<br />
changes are about to take<br />
place. The book gives an<br />
up to date account of<br />
these recent changes. In<br />
several chapters the interaction<br />
between labour and company law is<br />
covered. Examples include the works council,<br />
employee board level representatives,<br />
the right of inquiry and restructuring.<br />
Publisher Uitgeverij Kluwer BV<br />
www.kluwer.nl<br />
Edition 11<br />
Pages 288<br />
ISBN 978-9-01310-291-8<br />
Price € 49<br />
Chapter<br />
Publications on applied research for a professional audience<br />
The Value of Workers in<br />
International CSR Policies<br />
Maarten Keune<br />
Maarten Keune contributed a chapter to a publication of the FNV titled<br />
The Value of Workers in International CSR Policies. His chapter is titled<br />
Globalization, Labour Relations and Transnational Agreements.<br />
It sketches a number of negative social consequences of globalization,<br />
including growing inequalities and insecurities, the loss of democratic<br />
control over the economy, and the growing power of capital at the expense<br />
of labour. These consequences have become more visible and are<br />
aggravating the present economic and fi nancial crisis. As part of this<br />
process, workers are confronted with production chains that are constantly<br />
subject to restructuring and that are more and more organized<br />
across borders, and with the increasing fi nancialization of the global<br />
economy. One of the responses of unions to these developments is<br />
that they negotiate a variety of agreements at the level of multinational companies or supply<br />
chains with employers interested in strengthening their (image of) corporate social responsibility.<br />
Such agreements can potentially play an important role in regulating transnational<br />
economic activities, improve labour relations in multinationals, as well as complement existing<br />
national legal frameworks that are not adjusted to the internationalization of economic<br />
activities. At the same time they suffer from a number of weaknesses, related to their voluntarist<br />
character and their limited scope and diffusion.<br />
To overcome these limitations, balance the power of global corporations and foster more<br />
socially responsible behaviour by multinationals, it is argued that changes are required to the<br />
governance of multinational companies, including a change from shareholder to stakeholder<br />
models, an increased sense of responsibility from company managers, socially responsible<br />
investing, limits on the political power of fi rms, strengthening the enforcement of labour<br />
law, the further inclusion of social and labour standards in trade agreements, and the further<br />
internationalization of the trade union movement. Government policy can play an important<br />
role in this respect and may codify voluntarist agreements. If transnational agreements<br />
are to become more general instruments to regulate the global economy, changes in these<br />
directions would be required. It is up to unions, governments and socially responsible companies<br />
to promote such changes.<br />
31
32<br />
Essay<br />
European Integration<br />
and labour relations:<br />
consequences for the<br />
Dutch model?<br />
Maarten Keune contributed an essay to the Dutch-language AWVN<br />
publication “Designers in Labour Relations”. His essay is titled “European<br />
Integration and labour relations: consequences for the Dutch model?”<br />
The T essay discusses the effects that European integration has had<br />
and may have in the future on Dutch labour relations. It is argued,<br />
among other things, that the Dutch social partners, used to have a<br />
strong infl uence in socio-economic matters at national level, have<br />
little leverage over EU policies, even though these policies limit<br />
their policy options. What is more, the growing role of the EU<br />
may well affect the traditional Dutch corporatist model in the long<br />
run. Also, it puts pressure on the encompassing Dutch system of<br />
sector collective agreements. Indeed, continuity of the Dutch model is by no means given<br />
and less so with the present direction of European integration.<br />
Article<br />
Re-employment servicing<br />
can be done better, by<br />
learning’ in “Social Issues<br />
Els Sol, Trudie Knijn and Monique Frings-Dresen<br />
Els Sol, programme leader of an interuniversity research programme on<br />
re-employment servicing (2007-<strong>2012</strong>) presents together with Trudie Knijn<br />
(Utrecht University) and Monique Frings-Dresen (AMC) main fi ndings of the<br />
programme in the article ‘Re-employment servicing can be done better, by<br />
learning’ in “Social Issues” (scientists and thinkers debate on social issues).<br />
The article shows that the re-employment into paid work can be better organized and that<br />
research can be a helper. In the domain of reemployment servicing there is a general lack<br />
amongst all actors involved of theoretical knowledge. Knowledge exists mainly in the head of<br />
the performers and is not laid down in theory. As a result the system does not learn quickly. In<br />
the research programme theory has been developed, which can help to better evaluate interventions.<br />
The researchers suggest that the reemployment services sector should be a learning<br />
sector, fueled by scientifi c research.<br />
PUBLICATIONS
PUBLICATIONS<br />
Zeggenschap<br />
January - August <strong>2012</strong><br />
Van de zijde van <strong>AIAS</strong> wordt regelmatig meegewerkt aan het kwartaalblad<br />
Zeggenschap over arbeidsverhoudingen. We vatten de bijdragen van <strong>AIAS</strong>medewerkers<br />
in de eerste helft van <strong>2012</strong> kort samen.<br />
Zeggenschap - Maart <strong>2012</strong> - 23e jaargang nummer 1<br />
Het eerste nummer van <strong>2012</strong> bevat, zoals gebruikelijk, een column van<br />
Paul de Beer, in dit nummer over de Nieuwe Vakbeweging met als titel<br />
‘Acht miljoen vakorganisaties’, en de Loonwijzer-rubriek van Kea Tijdens<br />
en Maarten van Klaveren, in deze uitgave gewijd aan ‘De lonen van<br />
schoonmakers’. Frank Tros schreef ‘Ontslagvergoedingen niet simpel te<br />
verruilen met scholing’ (zie de <strong>AIAS</strong>-Nieuwsbrief van voorjaar <strong>2012</strong>).<br />
In een bijdrage van Els Sol, getiteld ‘Zwakke punten in Wet werken naar vermogen’,<br />
wordt op basis van nieuw onderzoek uiteengezet wat de leidende<br />
ideeën zijn achter re-integratie en voor wie en in welke situaties re-integratie<br />
een geëigende strategie kan zijn. Hieraan is behoefte aangezien vanuit de<br />
economische wetenschap en in media veel kritiek is op ‘de ineffectiviteit’ van<br />
re-integratieondersteuning, overigens zonder dat daar overtuigend bewijs<br />
tegenover staat. Desondanks zou op basis van die kritiek in het inmiddels<br />
ingetrokken wetsvoorstel ‘Wet werken naar vermogen’(Wwnv) fl ink gekort<br />
worden in het budget voor re-integratie. Uit het onderzoek ‘Fit or Unfi t;<br />
naar expliciete re-integratie theorieën’ is bekend wat de werkzame mechanismen<br />
zijn van re-integratiedienstverlening. Nadruk ligt op het bewerkstelligen<br />
van gedragsveranderingen bij het individu, die kunnen variëren van<br />
een oppervlakkige gedragsverandering onder druk van omstandigheden tot<br />
een meer diepgaande in de zin van de manier waarop iemand in het leven<br />
staat. Zowel de uitkeringsgerechtigde als de maatschappij zijn er bij gebaat<br />
wanneer een dergelijke duurzame verbetering daadwerkelijk tot stand wordt<br />
gebracht. Dit brengt de zwakke punten van de Wwnw aan het licht; de wet<br />
zet in op instrumentele, fi nanciële prikkels als loondispensatie en individuele<br />
loonwaardebepalingen en verwaarloost de re-integratieondersteuning die is<br />
gericht op gedragsverandering. Het is effi ciënter voorafgaand aan een loonwaardebepaling<br />
door middel van re-integratiedienstverlening arbeidsvaardigheden<br />
aan te laten leren en gedragsverandering te bewerkstelligen en op<br />
die manier eerst de loonwaarde te verhogen. Het kabinet hanteert met de<br />
Wwnw een riskante strategie.<br />
In de rubriek het Internationaal Signalement bespreekt Marc van der<br />
Meer het boek van Jan Cremers ‘In search of cheap labour in Europe,<br />
working and living conditions of posted workers’. Volgens van der Meer<br />
voorziet het boek ‘in empirische bijdragen die de kloof tussen juridische<br />
bescherming en empirische uitwerking overbruggen. Van bijzondere<br />
kwaliteit zijn de twaalf landenstudies over België, Duitsland, Engeland,<br />
Frankrijk, Ierland, Italië, Nederland, Noorwegen, Roemenië, Spanje,<br />
Zweden en Zwitserland, die met minimale middelen in opdracht van de<br />
Europese Commissie zijn geschreven’.<br />
www.zeggenschap.info/<br />
Zeggenschap - Juni <strong>2012</strong> - 23e jaargang nummer 2<br />
In het tweede nummer van <strong>2012</strong> andermaal een column van Paul de<br />
Beer (‘De grote uitruil’ over het lenteakkoord en de pensioenproblematiek)<br />
en een Loonwijzer ‘Invloed crisis op mobiliteit’.<br />
Daarnaast een bijdrage van Lisa Berntsen (vanaf zomer <strong>2012</strong> gastonderzoeker<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong>) over de tewerkstelling van buitenlandse arbeidskrachten<br />
in de Eemshaven. Zij constateert dat de arbeidsrelaties bij<br />
grote bouwprojecten zoals in de Eemshaven zeer fl exibel zijn door<br />
de forse concurrentieslag die gevoerd wordt tussen binnen- en buitenlandse<br />
bedrijven over de hoofden van buitenlandse vakkrachten<br />
heen. Vakbonden en opdrachtgevers boven aan de keten hebben<br />
vaak weinig zicht en grip op de arbeidsomstandigheden vanwege de<br />
tijdelijke contracten. Hoewel Europa arbeidsmobiliteit bevordert en<br />
deze mensen de kans geeft een beter bestaan op te bouwen, biedt<br />
dezelfde wetgeving uit Europa tegelijkertijd weinig handvatten voor<br />
naleving en controle zodat dit ook op een eerlijke manier gebeurt.<br />
Jan Cremers rapporteert in een artikel over onderzoek naar de betekenis<br />
van de Olympische Spelen voor werknemers. Met collega’s<br />
van het European Institute for Construction Labour Research<br />
(CLR) heeft hij de ervaringen met de laatste zes Olympische Spelen<br />
(sinds Barcelona 1992) opgetekend. Gekeken is naar de betekenis<br />
van de OS vanuit sociaaleconomisch oogpunt, werkgelegenheid en<br />
langetermijnperspectief. In de analyse is aandacht besteed aan de<br />
feitelijke tewerkstelling, de mogelijkheid werklozen te scholen en<br />
stadsdelen die aan een opknapbeurt toe zijn te reanimeren. Tevens<br />
is gerapporteerd over de vakbondssamenwerking bij dergelijke grote<br />
projecten, die per defi nitie worden gekenmerkt door een aanwezigheid<br />
van grote aantallen buitenlandse werknemers. Zijn antwoord<br />
op de vraag wat nodig is bij dergelijke megaprojecten luidt: ‘Een<br />
strakke regie, een selectie van betrouwbare ondernemingen in de<br />
aanbesteding, degelijke afspraken vooraf tussen alle betrokken partijen<br />
die worden nageleefd en een goed pakket met arbeidsvoorwaarden<br />
lijken garant te staan voor degelijk werk en tijdige levering.<br />
Op die manier wordt het risico van vertragingen het meest beperkt.<br />
Dat leidt tot lagere supervisiekosten en minder arbeidsconfl icten<br />
met verlies aan productietijd. En in de voorbeelden die we hier hebben<br />
besproken uiteindelijk tot minder overschrijdingen en lagere<br />
totale bouwkosten’.<br />
33
34<br />
Interview with Maarten Berg<br />
FOCUS ON...<br />
RESEARCH<br />
A solidarity experiment in the Dapperbuurt<br />
Laboratory experiments are becoming increasingly popular among social scientists. By letting subjects play a game<br />
in an environment that is fully under control – the lab – it is possible to fi ne tune the conditions under which people<br />
interact. Thus, one can draw inferences about the causal relationship between these conditions and their behaviour.<br />
Students are the obvious group to select the participants for these experiments from. However, one may question<br />
whether the behaviour of university students really refl ects the behaviour of the population at large, especially if these<br />
students are used to participate in laboratory experiments. It is therefore of great interest to compare the behaviour<br />
of students with the behaviour of ‘ordinary’ people in the same experimental design. This was put to practice in the<br />
experiments that <strong>AIAS</strong> researcher Maarten Berg performed as part of the research programme ‘Solidarity in the 21st<br />
Century’.<br />
What kind of experiment did you perform?<br />
In the basic experiment, four participants<br />
had to answer individually ten multiple<br />
choice questions. The two participants who<br />
performed the best on this quiz were declared<br />
to be the winners. They were each<br />
rewarded with 20 euro’s that they were allowed<br />
to distribute over the four group<br />
members (including themselves). They were<br />
free to choose any possible distribution, e.g.<br />
keep all 20 euro’s to themselves, to distribute<br />
the sum equally (5-5-5-5), or to do something<br />
else. Because the participants actually<br />
earned real money with this ‘solidarity game’<br />
(and lost real money by sharing), sharing behaviour<br />
in this experiment is strong proof<br />
of the potential for solidarity. A problem<br />
of standard survey research (“How much<br />
would you be willing to share....?”) is that<br />
is very vulnerable to socially desirable statements.<br />
However, the main research focus<br />
was not the degree of solidarity, but rather<br />
the differences in solidarity between slightly<br />
different experimental conditions.<br />
Why did you choose the visitors of the<br />
Dapper market, a daily street market<br />
in Amsterdam, to participate in the experiments?<br />
The starting point of our project, ‘Solidarity<br />
in the 21st century’, was that solidarity in<br />
Dutch society might be endangered by societal<br />
developments, such as the aging population<br />
(creating a potential confl ict between<br />
generations) and increasing cultural diversity.<br />
The Dappermarket is a very diverse<br />
area of Amsterdam, and therefore very well<br />
suited to study some of our hypotheses. An<br />
additional benefi t was that Laurens Buijs, a<br />
sociologist from our team, did qualitative research<br />
in the Dappermarket area. This enabled<br />
us to compare and integrate our fi ndings,<br />
using very different methodologies.<br />
How did you convince people on the<br />
market to participate?<br />
Actually, this was very hard. We had to approach<br />
at least ten persons (and sometimes<br />
many more) to convince one person to<br />
participate. An additional complication was<br />
that we needed groups of exact four participants.<br />
This meant that occasionally we lost<br />
a potential participant, who was no longer<br />
willing to wait for the other participants to<br />
show up. With the great help of Laurens,<br />
Casper and others, we managed to do it after<br />
all.<br />
I think that a big problem was that people<br />
are so used to being approached (by people<br />
who want their money) that they did not<br />
realize that they would actually earn money<br />
with this experiment. After the experiment,<br />
participants were often grateful for receiving<br />
so much money for so little effort.<br />
What were the largest problems/obstacles<br />
that you were confronted with<br />
in performing the experiment in the<br />
Dapperbuurt?<br />
Besides having to approach the potential<br />
participants on the market, we had to create<br />
a lab in a community centre (‘buurthuis’)<br />
nearby. As the participants communicated<br />
with one another through computers,<br />
Casper had to create a network. We ran into<br />
all kinds of practical challenges, especially<br />
when participants did not fully understand<br />
the instructions or were far from fl uent in<br />
the Dutch language. Fortunately, for most<br />
participants this was not the case.<br />
Can you tell us the most remarkable<br />
differences between the outcomes of<br />
the experiment with the students and<br />
with the visitors of the Dapperbuurt?<br />
In the Dapperbuurt experiment we were especially<br />
interested in the characteristics of<br />
the participants (e.g. in terms of sex, age,<br />
cultural background, etc.) and the social<br />
distance between them. When we used students<br />
they were anonymous to one another<br />
(player 1, player 2, etc.). Our results showed<br />
that native participants share less money<br />
with Turkish or Moroccan people than with<br />
fellow natives.<br />
Another difference between the two studies<br />
was that the participants from the Dap-
FOCUS ON...<br />
permarket showed more solidarity than the<br />
students, who were more experienced with<br />
such experiments and might even be trained<br />
in the ‘homo economicus perspective’.<br />
What lessons do you think we can draw<br />
from this fi eld experiment for future<br />
experimental studies?<br />
The main problem of experimental research<br />
is its low ‘external validity’. The results cannot<br />
necessarily be generalized to the entire<br />
population. By conducting a fi eld experiment,<br />
the strengths of two methods are<br />
combined. This kind of research requires<br />
an additional effort, but it can be done and<br />
it is worth the trouble.<br />
Solidarity in the 21st Research project<br />
Century<br />
The research programme ‘Solidarity in the 21 st Century’ focuses on the effects<br />
of changes in the composition of the population; such as immigration and<br />
ageing. The research programme aims to analyze the effects of these changes<br />
on solidarity, both informal and formal. It examines what kind of motives,<br />
conditions and circumstances are benefi cial for the sustainment of solidarity<br />
between different groups in society. The apparent discrepancies between<br />
immigrants and natives on the one hand, and the elderly and the young on<br />
the other hand, seem to have a serious impact on the Dutch tolerance and<br />
solidarity. Members of the different groups are unable to relate to each other,<br />
and fear that one group will benefi t unequally from the other prevails. This<br />
is problematic because the tensions between the different groups in Dutch<br />
society are likely to grow.<br />
By a combination of different research methods - qualitative case-studies, statistical data<br />
analysis, economic experiments, media analysis - this research project will investigate the<br />
different conditions of and motives for solidarity. The focus of this research is on solidarity<br />
between immigrant and natives, and between the elderly and the young, simultaneously. The<br />
qualitative case-study research focuses on the micro level of the neighborhood; what kind of<br />
conditions (socioeconomic composition, public institutions, etc.) infl uence informal solidarity?<br />
The statistical data research (or survey research) tries to establish which circumstances on<br />
the macro level (such as ethnic diversity and age differentiation) affects both formal solidarity,<br />
in terms of support for the welfare state, and informal solidarity. The economic experiments<br />
will analyze which external factors determine the willingness to support others by controlling<br />
different conditions. The media analysis focuses on the infl uence of media imaging<br />
on the ways the different groups perceive each other. The aim of the research programme is<br />
to connect the different parts of research, which eventually will lead to a fi nal research paper<br />
on solidarity, next to the separate research papers based on the different research methods.<br />
The research is led by prof. dr. Paul de Beer and is subsidized by Foundation Institute Gak.<br />
For more information about the research programme or access to publications and proposals,<br />
see www.solidariteit.info or contact Merle Zwiers: m.d.zwiers@uva.nl.<br />
35
36<br />
Data section at <strong>AIAS</strong> website<br />
• Annual Social Reports Database<br />
In the Archives, the social annual reports from 1988 to the present are collected.<br />
Unfortunately, most series is not complete. Yet it is possible to build<br />
upon the reports collected a good picture of developments around staff and<br />
personnel in the organizations. The sample survey was complemented with<br />
other organizations over the years.<br />
• CLA partners<br />
In the Netherlands, about a thousand collective agreements cover about 80<br />
percent of the employed population. CLA’s are agreed between one or several<br />
employers or employers’ organizations and one or several other unions.<br />
In 2005 Kilian Schreuder has inventoried the signatory parties of all<br />
CLA’s which are entered in the DUCADAM dataset (N=3752) and<br />
collected them in a spreadsheet. This fi le is unique in the Netherlands<br />
• Collective Bargaining Newsletter<br />
See earlier in this <strong>newsletter</strong>.<br />
• DUCADAM database<br />
Database of Collective Agreements in the Netherlands. The database is<br />
based on the ‘FNV CAO-Database’ and contains detailed information<br />
on collective labour agreements concluded in the Netherlands.<br />
• Flex Work Research Centre<br />
(FWRC) is a joint initiative launched by ABU and the University of<br />
Amsterdam. <strong>AIAS</strong> and the Hugo Sinzheimer Institute manage<br />
this international website and provides information on research reports<br />
and articles relating to temporary employment in the broadest sense in fi ve<br />
languages (English, Dutch, French, German and Spanish).<br />
• IC<strong>TW</strong>SS database<br />
The IC<strong>TW</strong>SS database covers four key elements of modern political<br />
economies in advanced capitalist societies: trade unionism, wage setting,<br />
state intervention and social pacts. The database contains annual data for<br />
34 countries. It runs from 1960 till 2010.<br />
• Intermediair 'Best Employers' Dataset<br />
The Intermediair ‘Best Employers’ survey is an annual survey of Dutch<br />
employers concerning their HR policies, used for the Best Employers list in<br />
the Intermediair weekly. <strong>AIAS</strong> acts as an advisor for the questionnaire.<br />
DATA<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> has a major collection of academic socio-economic data in the fi eld of labour relations, labour organizations,<br />
employment and working conditions in the Netherlands and abroad.<br />
The DATA section of the <strong>AIAS</strong> website has recently been updated. It presents information about 13 data collections of <strong>AIAS</strong>, namely:<br />
• IT use of employees in the Netherlands<br />
The dataset is based on a surveys of secretaries in the Netherlands about<br />
their job content, and working conditions in 1993, 2000, and 2004.<br />
• Job content of secretaries in the Netherlands<br />
The dataset is based on comparable surveys of secretaries in the Netherlands<br />
about their job content, and working conditions in 1993, 2000, and<br />
2004.<br />
• Study Group Quality of Labour<br />
The reports and administration of this study group provides a portrait of<br />
an age of social scientifi c research and the debate in the fi eld of the quality<br />
of labour over a period of 20 years. The archive consists of eight document<br />
fi les. Among them reports of the study group meetings during the entire<br />
period of 1979-2002; information about 11 international seminars and<br />
the programme fi les of the study group including a Trend report Quality<br />
of Labour and the design-focussed research. The archive also contains some<br />
publications that have been supervised by the study group and some publications<br />
that are hard to obtain elsewhere.<br />
• Trade organisations<br />
The Trade organisations database consists of names, years of establishment,<br />
historical development, NACE industry-codes and other data of<br />
more than 1400 trade and employers organisations. For the years 1980,<br />
1991, 2001 and 2005,the mergers, separations and removals of these<br />
organisations have been investigated.<br />
• WageIndicator database<br />
The WageIndicator Survey is a continuous, multilingual, multi-country<br />
web-survey, conducted more than 60 countries since 2000. The web-survey<br />
generates cross sectional and longitudinal data which might provide data<br />
especially about wages, benefi ts, working hours, working conditions and<br />
industrial relations.<br />
• World Database of Occupations-WISC<br />
The EurOccupations micro data of the task frequency web-survey in eight<br />
EU countries; WISCO database with more than 1,700 occupational titles<br />
for 60 countries.<br />
For more information please see our website www.uva-aias.net/data or contact: prof. dr. Kea Tijdens (k.g.tijdens@uva.nl).
RESEARCH<br />
Research on new forms of<br />
transnational labour agreements<br />
With the on-going internationalization<br />
of the economy and the ever-growing<br />
importance of multinationals, more<br />
and more transnational labour norms<br />
are set through different types of<br />
transnational labour agreements.<br />
Such agreements include collective<br />
agreements, framework agreements,<br />
codes of conduct, and other joint<br />
texts produced by management,<br />
workers’ representatives and possible<br />
third parties like NGOs.<br />
Transnational labour agreements are<br />
made between private actors without<br />
direct involvement of public actors<br />
and aim to regulate and guide the<br />
behaviour of the parties involved, in<br />
particular where labour relations and<br />
working conditions are concerned.<br />
However, there is hardly any legal<br />
framework for such agreements that<br />
largely operate in a legal vacuum and<br />
have a mainly voluntary character. As<br />
a consequence, there is little clarity as<br />
to their legal status, their relationship<br />
to national and international law, and<br />
the possibilities for their enforcement.<br />
Also, their effective impact on labour<br />
relations and working conditions<br />
remains largely unclear.<br />
Although there already exists an extensive<br />
body of research with respect to the above<br />
mentioned issues, this research is focused on<br />
single and in scope limited elements of these<br />
issues. They include for instance theoretical<br />
considerations on how to deal with the lack<br />
of a legal framework and empirical research<br />
on the implementation of these agreements<br />
on (national) plant level. Consequently, this<br />
body of research leaves us with a shattered<br />
understanding of transnational agreements.<br />
In order to get a more overall understanding<br />
of transnational labour agreements, this<br />
research will examine them against the background<br />
of all three perspectives and builds<br />
on three basic ideas involved with transnational<br />
relations. The fi rst of these is the idea<br />
of global value chain governance which deals<br />
with the issue of authority and power that<br />
determine how fi nancial, material and human<br />
resources are allocated and fl ow within<br />
chains of fi rms. Secondly, we’ll take into<br />
account the idea of multi-level governance<br />
which refers to the increased interdependence<br />
between governance mechanisms at<br />
different levels on the one hand and to the<br />
growing interdependence between governmental<br />
and non-governmental (private) actors<br />
on the other hand. The third idea is that<br />
of hybrid structures which deals with the interaction<br />
between the outcomes of traditional<br />
authority as well as that of mechanisms of<br />
new governance. These outcomes include<br />
SOLIDAR-project fi nalized<br />
varies forms of hard law as well as soft law.<br />
More particularly, the fi rst idea (global value<br />
chains) focuses on the motives and reasons<br />
for actors to engage transnational industrial<br />
relations, it will also provide initial information<br />
about what might be expected from the<br />
concluded transnational agreement in terms<br />
of effectiveness. The second and third ideas<br />
(multi-level governance and hybrid structures<br />
respectively) than will provide complementary<br />
information in terms of autonomy and<br />
dependence of the actors involved and possible<br />
interactions of the varies forms of law<br />
involved with the regulation of specifi c rights<br />
within a chain of companies that are both of<br />
infl uence of the effectiveness of the transnational<br />
labour agreements in the sense that<br />
they either can play to each other’s strengths<br />
when they are complementary or down play<br />
each other when they strive for dominance.<br />
Together these three ideas provide a comprehensive<br />
insight in transnational agreements<br />
that helps us to further understand what the<br />
strengths and weaknesses are of transnational<br />
labour agreements, in particular with<br />
respect to their effectiveness in governing<br />
labour strategies end ensuring labour rights.<br />
The research will be conducted by Beryl ter<br />
Haar (post-doc at <strong>AIAS</strong>) and is supervised by<br />
Maarten Keune (<strong>AIAS</strong>) and Evert Verhulp<br />
(UvA). First results will be expected in 2013.<br />
For more information you can contact Beryl<br />
ter Haar B.P.terHaar@uva.nl.<br />
Early June <strong>2012</strong> a SOLIDAR-project was fi nalized that aims to intensify the cooperation and mutual learning of relevant actors<br />
– employers, unions, NGOs, think thank and workers – with the ultimate aim to combat precarious employment and to realise<br />
decent working conditions for all.<br />
The advisory committee chaired by Jan Cremers<br />
from <strong>AIAS</strong> and with representatives from<br />
the ILO, the Bertelsmann Foundation, the<br />
Dublin Foundation and the ETUI underlined<br />
the importance of the conclusions and recommendations<br />
of the fi nal report ‘Reframing<br />
industrial relations’ that can be downloaded<br />
here. <strong>AIAS</strong>-researcher Janna Besamusca.<br />
produced one of the pilot studies. See for<br />
the conclusion the fi nal report at: www.<br />
uva-aias.net/uploaded_files/regular/<br />
Booklet_DWIR_II_web.pdf<br />
37
38<br />
RESEARCH<br />
Project Title / Topic Commissioner<br />
Sorted by project name<br />
Activating States<br />
Fundamental shifts in the governance and content of<br />
unemployment insurance<br />
SIG Fund<br />
BARSORI Bargaining for social rights: reducing precariousness<br />
and labour market segmentation through collective<br />
bargaining and social dialogue<br />
EU DG Social dialogue<br />
CAWIE Collectively agreed wages in Europe European Commission<br />
Collective Bargaining <strong>newsletter</strong> This <strong>newsletter</strong> presents up-to-date information on<br />
collective bargaining developments across Europe<br />
since February 2008<br />
Decisions for life Aims to promote formal employment and equal opportunities<br />
at the labour market<br />
DUCADAM Dutch Collective Labour Agreements Database and<br />
Monitor<br />
ETUI-REHS<br />
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, joint<br />
with ITUC<br />
EU-DG ESA<br />
Earnings of self-employed Ministry of Social Affairs<br />
EIRO Coördination Dutch contribution in the European<br />
Industrial Relations Observatory (EIRO)<br />
Eurofound<br />
Employment in the Netherlands XpertHR<br />
Equalsoc Network of Excellence Economic change, social inequality and social cohesion<br />
in the knowledge economy<br />
EU FP6<br />
EurOccupations Building a publicly available occupations database in 8<br />
European countries<br />
EU FP6<br />
European Restructuring Monitor EUROFOUND<br />
Flexwork Research Center ABU<br />
Fitness check information and consultation<br />
directives: the Netherlands<br />
Commissioned to Deloitte by the EU. EU<br />
Formula Free movement and labour law - confl icts and impacts Research Council of Norway<br />
Free choice of pensions A broader choice of pensions can lead to a more effi<br />
cient execution.<br />
SIG Fund<br />
GINI Growing Inequalities’ Impacts EU FP7<br />
GUSTO Analysing, Comparing and evaluating the various societal<br />
models in a medium-to-long-term perspective<br />
EU FP7<br />
HEALTH at WORK Improving health and safety at work EU FP7<br />
HRM Chronically Ill II HRM policies for chronically ill workers SIG Fund<br />
The information and consultation directive<br />
in practice<br />
Commissioned to Warwick by Eurofound EU<br />
The impact of the ‘Great Recession’ on<br />
European Industrial Relations<br />
International reform monitor,<br />
Dutch correspondent<br />
This project studies the reactions of the industrial<br />
relations systems of three countries (Germany, Finland<br />
and Ireland) to the pressures emerging from the<br />
present economic crisis<br />
Website database on Social policies, labour market<br />
policies, industrial relations<br />
Bertelsmann Stiftung
PROJECTS<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> researchers Links Period<br />
Dr. Els Sol a.o. www.activatingstates.org/5 2006 - <strong>2012</strong><br />
Prof. Maarten Keune a.o. 2010 - 2011<br />
Maarten van Klaveren, Prof. Kea Tijdens,<br />
Prof. Maarten Keune<br />
2011 - <strong>2012</strong><br />
Jan Cremers, Janna Besamusca www.uva-aias.net/102#collective_barg 2008 - continued<br />
Prof. Kea Tijdens, Maarten van Klaveren a.o. www.wageindicator.org/main/projects/decisionsfor-life/decisions-for-life-2013-kick-off-meetingdecember-8-9<br />
2009 - 2011<br />
Prof. Kea Tijdens www1.fee.uva.nl/aias/ducadam/ 2000 - 2010*)<br />
Prof. Kea Tijdens<br />
Dr. Robbert van het Kaar and Dr. Marianne<br />
Grunell<br />
www.eiro.eurofound.ie/ 2005 - continued*)<br />
Dr. Robbert van het Kaar 2009 - continued<br />
Prof. Herman van de Werfhorst, Prof. Wiemer<br />
Salverda a.o.<br />
www.equalsoc.org 2005 - 2010*)<br />
Prof. Kea Tijdens www.euroccupations.org/main/ 2006 - 2009<br />
Dr. Robbert van het Kaar 2003 - continued<br />
Dr Marloes de Graaf-Zijl 2011 - 2011<br />
Dr. Robbert van het Kaar 2011 - 2011<br />
Prof. Jelle Visser www.jus.uio.no/ifp/english/research/projects/freemov/<br />
2008 - <strong>2012</strong><br />
Prof Wiemer Salverda, Prof. Paul de Beer, David<br />
Hollanders<br />
2011 - 2014<br />
Prof. Wiemer Salverda, Dr Marloes de Graaf-Zijl,<br />
Dr Virginia Maestri, Dr Francesco Bogliacino, Dr<br />
Bram Lancee<br />
www.gini-research.org 2010 - 2013<br />
Dr. Els Sol, Dr Maarten Keune http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/projects/398_en.html<br />
2008 - <strong>2012</strong><br />
Dr. Joke Haafkens www.abdn.ac.uk/haw/index.html 2008 - 2011<br />
Dr. Joke Haafkens 2007 - 2011<br />
Dr. Robbert van het Kaar 2011 - <strong>2012</strong><br />
Prof. Maarten Keune, Aidan Regan 2011 - <strong>2012</strong><br />
Prof. Wiemer Salverda a.o. www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/cps/rde/xchg/bst_<br />
engl/hs.xsl/prj_54224.htm<br />
2000 - 2010<br />
*) extended with own funding<br />
39
40<br />
Project Title / Topic Commissioner<br />
Sorted by project name<br />
Labour rights for women The project departs from the understanding that<br />
women’s labour rights are to a large extent insuffi -<br />
ciently protected in the national legislation of the 15<br />
target countries in the project<br />
Loonwijzer See Wageindicator<br />
Pathways to work research programme<br />
(RVO)<br />
This research programme aims to strengthen academic<br />
research into reintegration services in direct interaction<br />
with the reintegration fi eld<br />
Posting Free movement and the posting of workers in the EU<br />
/ Social Progress Clause<br />
SEEurope (Cremers) Coordination of research on workers participation in<br />
companies with a European Company Statute<br />
Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs<br />
SIG Fund<br />
European Trade Union Confederation<br />
(ETUC)<br />
ETUI<br />
SEEurope (vh Kaar) Member of SEEurope-netwerk ETUI<br />
SOLIDAR Making Industrial Relations Work for Decent Work -<br />
pilot studies<br />
Solidarity in the 21st century Solidarity in the 21st century: aging, immigration and<br />
solidarity<br />
EU DG Social dialogue/SOLI-<br />
DAR/WBS Europafonds<br />
SIG Fund<br />
Temp work research monitor Website database of publications on temp work ABU, joint with HSI<br />
WageIndicator Share and compare wage information. Contribute to a<br />
transparent labour market. Provide free, accurate wage<br />
data through salary checks on national websites. Collect<br />
wage data through web surveys<br />
WEBDATANET Web-based data-collection – methodological challenges,<br />
solutions and implementations<br />
WEB-Surveys Improving Web Survey Methodology for Social and<br />
Cultural Sciences<br />
WISUTIL Wageindicator support for bargaining in the utilities<br />
sector<br />
Woliweb The socio-economic determinants of citizens’ work<br />
life attitudes, preferences and perceptions, using data<br />
from the continuous web-based European WageIndicator<br />
Survey<br />
RESEARCH<br />
Ministry of Social Affairs, Foreign<br />
Affairs, commercial parties<br />
European Science Foundation<br />
ERASMUS Studio EUR<br />
EU DG Social dialogue<br />
EU FP
PROJECTS<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> researchers Links Period<br />
Prof. Kea Tijdens, Janna Besamusca and Maarten<br />
van Klaveren<br />
<strong>2012</strong> - 2016<br />
Dr. Els Sol and Dr. Marloes de Graaf-Zijl www.verbeteronderzoek.nl 2008 - <strong>2012</strong><br />
Jan Cremers a.o. 2010 - <strong>2012</strong><br />
Jan Cremers www.worker-participation.eu/European-Company 2009 - <strong>2012</strong><br />
Dr. Robbert van het Kaar www.worker-participation.eu/ continued<br />
Jan Cremers and Janna Besamusca www.solidar.org/Page_Generale.<br />
asp?DocID=28025&la=1&langue=EN<br />
2011 - <strong>2012</strong><br />
Prof. Paul de Beer, Dr Dorota Lepianka, Dr<br />
Maarten Berg, Drs. Laurens Buijs, Merle Zwiers<br />
www.solidariteit.info 2009 - 2013<br />
Dr. Els Sol and Dr. Marloes de Graaf-Zijl a.o. www.fl exworkresearch.org 2005 - continued<br />
Prof. Kea Tijdens, Maarten van Klaveren, Stephanie<br />
Steinmetz. Prof. Maarten Keune, Prof. Paul<br />
de Beer (Chairs foundation)<br />
www.wageindicator.org 2000 - continued<br />
Prof. Kea Tijdens and Dr. Stephanie Steinmetz www.cost.esf.org/domains_actions/isch/Actions/<br />
IS1004<br />
2011 - 2015<br />
Prof. Kea Tijdens and Dr. Stephanie Steinmetz 2010 - 2013<br />
Prof. Kea Tijdens, Maarten van Klaveren a.o. www.wageindicator.org/main/projects/wisutil 2010 - 2011<br />
Prof. Kea Tijdens www.wageindicator.org/main/projects/WOLIWEB 2004 - 2007<br />
*) extended with own funding<br />
41
42<br />
New to <strong>AIAS</strong><br />
Maarten Keune<br />
LEERGANGEN<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> leergangencyclus<br />
Arbeidsvraagstukken en Beleid<br />
Zeven dinsdagmiddagen<br />
Elke leergang bestaat uit zeven wekelijkse bijeenkomsten<br />
op dinsdagmiddag van 13.30 tot 17.00<br />
uur. De eerste zes bijeenkomsten zijn achtereenvolgend<br />
en de laatste bijeenkomst met een week<br />
ertussen.<br />
Voor wie<br />
De leergangen zijn bedoeld voor academici en<br />
HBO-ers die hun kennis over arbeidsvraagstukken<br />
en het beleid willen opfrissen, actualiseren en<br />
verdiepen. De leergang wil een kader scheppen<br />
voor mensen die de dagelijkse gebeurtenissen<br />
rond arbeid en beleid beter willen begrijpen.<br />
Alle leergangen in de cyclus<br />
A. HRM in Beeld (januari 2013)<br />
B. Arbeidsmarkt in Ontwikkeling<br />
(april 2013)<br />
C. Ongelijkheid en de Verzorgingsstaat<br />
(september 2013)<br />
D. Trends in Arbeidsverhoudingen<br />
(januari 2014)<br />
Inschrijving<br />
Per leergang kunnen maximaal vijfentwintig personen<br />
deelnemen. Bij meer dan vijfentwintig aanmeldingen<br />
zal deelname worden toegekend op<br />
volgorde van aanmelding.<br />
Leergang A. HRM in Beeld<br />
Programma<br />
Bijeenkomst 1 Introductie op het Thema HRM in Beeld<br />
(15/1/’13)<br />
Dr. Martha Meerman & Dr. Corine Boon<br />
Bijeenkomst 2 Werving, Selectie, Ontslag (22/1/’13)<br />
Prof dr. Annelies van Vianen & Prof. Dr. Evert Verhulp<br />
Bijeenkomst 3 Functioneren, Prestatie en Belonen (29 /1/’13)<br />
Dr. Kilian Wawoe & Dr. Joop Zinsmeister<br />
Bijeenkomst 4 Leren en Ontwikkelen (5/2/’13)<br />
Prof. Dr. Lideweij van der Sluis & Dr. Marianne van Woerkom<br />
Kosten<br />
De kosten voor de afzonderlijke leergangen bedragen<br />
€ 2290,- (B<strong>TW</strong>-vrij). Dit is inclusief consumpties,<br />
literatuur, afsluitende netwerkborrel. De<br />
leergang kan worden afgesloten met een certifi -<br />
caat, mits aan de opdracht van het schrijven van<br />
een notitie en de aanwezigheidsplicht is voldaan<br />
(zes van de zeven bijeenkomsten aanwezig).<br />
Bij inschrijving voor een tweede of derde leergang<br />
(door dezelfde persoon binnen één cyclus) ontvangt<br />
u 5% korting op de cursusprijs. Bij inschrijving<br />
van de vierde leergang (door dezelfde persoon),<br />
zodat de hele leergangencyclus gevolgd<br />
wordt, ontvangt u op de laatste leergang 10%<br />
korting.<br />
Cursusleider: dr Martha Meerman<br />
Bent U van mening dat het werk al voor de helft is uitgevoerd als de juiste man op de juiste plaats beschikbaar is?<br />
Bent u op zoek naar antwoorden op de meer omvattende vraagstukken die schuil gaan achter veel problemen die<br />
zich op de werkvloer voordoen? Wist U dat HRM meer is dan alleen het inzetten van HRM instrumenten? Wilt U<br />
wel weer eens bijgespijkerd worden om de nieuwe ontwikkelingen die zich in het HRM vak voordoen, te begrijpen?<br />
Dan raden wij u de leergang HRM in Beeld aan.<br />
Tijdens de leergang behandelen we de verschillende onderdelen van de zogeheten HRM cyclus: de werving en selectie van personeel, de beoordeling en het<br />
functioneren van werknemers, de vormgeving van een baan tot een loopbaan, de participatie en betrokkenheid van werknemers bij de organisatie en dat alles om<br />
de organisatie van het werk zo optimaal mogelijk te laten verlopen.<br />
Bijeenkomst 5 Balans tussen Arbeid en Privé (12/2/’13)<br />
Prof. Dr. Yvonne Benschop & Dr. Joke Haafkens<br />
Bijeenkomst 6 HR in de arbeidsorganisatie (19/2/’13)<br />
Prof. Dr. Aukje Nauta & Dr. Martha Meerman<br />
Bijeenkomst 7 Afsluitende bijeenkomst met netwerkborrel en<br />
certifi caatuitreiking (5/3/’13)<br />
Zie voor meer informatie en registratie<br />
www.uva-aias.net/leergangen
LEERGANGEN<br />
InCompany leergang<br />
Basiscursus trainer medezeggenschap<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> organiseert en verzorgt voor<br />
de Stichting Kwaliteitsregister<br />
Opleiders Medezeggenschap en<br />
de daarin vertegenwoordigde<br />
partijen, de beroepsvereniging<br />
(BVMP) en de branchevereniging<br />
(BVMZ), een leergang voor startende<br />
trainers mezeggenschap en overige<br />
geïnteresseerden.<br />
De basiscursus zal bestaan uit zesentwintig dagdelen<br />
opleiding. Daaronder valt:<br />
2-daagse bijeenkomsten<br />
Drie inhoudelijke kernconcepten:<br />
1. Strategie<br />
2. Sociaal beleid van de onderneming<br />
3. Organisatie van de achterban<br />
Cases<br />
De passieve, erkende en pro-actieve OR met een<br />
diversiteit aan leden<br />
1-daagse bijeenkomsten<br />
Onmisbare onderwerpen:<br />
1. Context en ontwikkelingen van de medezeggenschap<br />
2.Ontwikkelingen in arbeidsorganisaties en maatschappij<br />
3. Oude en nieuwe wet- en regelgeving<br />
Eindtermen<br />
● Inhoudelijk te refl ecteren op eigen vakgebied<br />
en de eigen rol daarin<br />
● Kennis op het vakgebied te verwerken en<br />
over te dragen<br />
● Gezamenlijke OR en de individuele leden van<br />
elk bijzonder OR toe te rusten om zijn (complexe)<br />
taak naar behoren te vervullen<br />
Inschrijving<br />
Per leergang zullen er circa tien personen deelnemen.<br />
Inschrijven is mogelijk via de <strong>AIAS</strong> website.<br />
Kosten<br />
De kosten voor de leergang bedragen € 5000,-<br />
(B<strong>TW</strong>-vrij). Dit is inclusief locatie, consumpties,<br />
en literatuur.<br />
Zie voor meer informatie en registratie<br />
www.uva-aias.net/341<br />
43
44<br />
Dr Robbert van het Kaar<br />
Independent member<br />
committee ‘improvement<br />
worker involvement’<br />
On 1 June <strong>2012</strong>, Dr. R.H. van het Kaar was appointed independed member of<br />
the newly established committee for the improvement of worker involvement<br />
(Commissie Bevordering Medzeggenschap, CBM).<br />
The CBM established by the Social and Economic Council (SER) and consists of representatives<br />
of employer and union federations and independent members.<br />
Beryl ter Haar<br />
Defence thesis on the Open<br />
Method of Coordination<br />
Our post-doc researcher Beryl ter<br />
Haar will defend her thesis Open<br />
Method of Coordination. An analysis<br />
of its meaning for the development of<br />
a social Europe.<br />
Since its introduction in 2000 as a general<br />
instrument to foster European integration<br />
the Open Method of Coordination (OMC)<br />
became one of the most important instruments<br />
for the integration of social policy<br />
issues. Being labelled as soft law, it has triggered<br />
a vivid debate about its effectiveness.<br />
In this thesis that is comprised by a collection<br />
of (mostly published) articles, Ter Haar<br />
contributes to this debate by providing an<br />
analysis of the legal nature of the OMC, the<br />
legal integration dynamics that are involved<br />
with the OMC, a quantitative analysis on<br />
the effectiveness of the normative guidance<br />
of the OMC and an analysis of how the<br />
OMC interacts with other EU integration<br />
instruments. The overall conclusion of the<br />
thesis is that from a mainly legal point of<br />
view the OMC can be more effective than<br />
is currently the situation due to political integration<br />
dynamics that do not fully use the<br />
integration magnitude that is created by the<br />
legal nature of the OMC, its dynamics and<br />
interaction capacity.<br />
Date 8 November <strong>2012</strong><br />
Time 16:15 hours<br />
Location Academiegebouw<br />
Rapenburg 67-73<br />
Leiden<br />
http://bezoekers.leidenuniv.nl/locaties/academiegebouw.html<br />
Books are available upon request with the<br />
writer (b.p.terhaar@uva.nl).<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong>
PEOPLE AT <strong>AIAS</strong><br />
Name Position Email<br />
Ballafkih, H.A. (Hafi d) PhD A.H.Ballafkih@hva.nl<br />
Beentjes, M. (Marieke) PhD M.R.Beentjes@uva.nl<br />
Beer, de P.T. (Paul) Professor by Special Appointment of industrial<br />
relations at Henri Polak Chair<br />
P.T.deBeer@uva.nl<br />
Berg, M.C. (Maarten) Postdoc M.C.Berg@uva.nl<br />
Benda, L. (Luc) Jr. researcher L.Benda@uva.nl<br />
Besamusca, J. (Janna) PhD J.Besamusca@uva.nl<br />
Bogliacino, F. (Francesco) Postdoc F.Bogliacino@uva.nl<br />
Braak, J.T. (Jacqueline) Project leader teaching J.T.Braak@uva.nl<br />
Buijs, L.J. (Laurens) PhD L.J.Buijs@uva.nl<br />
Cremers, J. (Jan) Guest researcher/Project manager J.Cremers@uva.nl<br />
Eshuis, W. (Wim) Researcher W.A.Eshuis@uva.nl<br />
Gielen, A.H.M. (Ad) Financial project leader A.H.M.Gielen@uva.nl<br />
Graaf-Zijl, de M. (Marloes) Researcher M.deGraaf-Zijl@uva.nl<br />
Griffi th-Rozenblad, A.D.E. (Anüska) Management assistant A.D.E.Griffi th@uva.nl<br />
Grunell, M. (Marianne) Researcher M.Grunell@uva.nl<br />
Haafkens, J.A. (Joke) Researcher J.A.Haafkens@uva.nl<br />
Haar, ter B.P. (Beryl) Researcher B.P.terHaar@uva.nl<br />
Haas, C.G. (Christina) Jr. Researcher C.G.Haas@uva.nl<br />
Heuvel, van den N.A. (Nick) Coordinator TLM network N.A.vandenHeuvel@uva.nl<br />
Hogenhout, C. (Claire) Jr. researcher C.Hogenhout@uva.nl<br />
Hollanders, D.A. (David) Postdoc D.A.Hollanders@uva.nl<br />
Kaandorp, C.S. (Casper) Programmer C.S.Kaandorp@uva.nl<br />
Kaar, van het R.H. (Robbert) Researcher R.H.vanhetKaar@uva.nl<br />
Keune, M.J. (Maarten) Professor of Social Security & Labour<br />
Relations<br />
M.J.Keune@uva.nl<br />
Klaveren, van M. (Maarten) Researcher M.vanKlaveren@uva.nl<br />
Koster, F. (Ferry) Researcher F.Koster@uva.nl<br />
Kuiper, S.H. (Sijbren) Researcher S.H.Kuiper@uva.nl<br />
Lancee, B. (Bram) Postdoc B.Lancee@uva.nl<br />
Lepianka, D.A. (Dorota) Postdoc D.A.Lepianka@uva.nl<br />
Lieberton, A. (Angelique) Offi ce manager A.Lieberton@uva.nl<br />
Maestri, V. (Virginia) Postdoc V.Maestri@uva.nl<br />
Meerman, M.G.M. (Martha) Lecturer/Coordinator <strong>AIAS</strong> courses M.G.M.Meerman@hva.nl<br />
Ooms, T.C. (Tahnee) Student assistant T.C.Ooms@uva.nl<br />
Paskov, M. (Marii) PhD M.Paskov@uva.nl<br />
Peters, J. (John) Guest Researcher jpeters@laurentian.ca<br />
Ramos Martin, N.E. (Nuria) Researcher/Lecturer N.E.RamosMartin@uva.nl<br />
Ruitenberg, J.F. (Justine) PhD jruitenberg@iwiweb.nl<br />
Salverda, W. (Wiemer) Director/Professor by Special Appointment in<br />
Labour Markets and Inequality<br />
W.Salverda@uva.nl<br />
Sol, C.C.A.M. (Els) Researcher C.C.A.M.Sol@uva.nl<br />
Steinmetz, S. (Stephanie) Researcher S.Steinmetz@uva.nl<br />
Swagerman, A.M.M. (Anna) Student assistant A.M.M.Swagerman@uva.nl<br />
Tijdens, K.G. (Kea) Research coordinator K.G.Tijdens@uva.nl<br />
Trappenburg, M.J. (Margo) Professor by Special Appointment Socio-Political<br />
Aspects of the Welfare State at Drees Chair<br />
M.J.Trappenburg@uva.nl<br />
Tros, F.H. (Frank) Researcher F.H.Tros@uva.nl<br />
Visser, J. (Jelle) Professor of Sociology Jelle.Visser@uva.nl<br />
Vries, de D.H. (Danny) Postdoc D.H..deVries@uva.nl<br />
Werfhorst, van de H.G. (Herman) Professor of Sociology H.G..vandeWerfhorst@uva.nl<br />
Zwan, van der N.A.J. (Natascha) Postdoc N.A.J.vanderZwan@uva.nl<br />
Zwiers (Merle) Student assistant M.D.Zwiers@uva.nl<br />
New<br />
Wim Eshuis<br />
Researcher<br />
Christina Haas<br />
Jr. Researcher<br />
Sijbren Kuiper<br />
Researcher<br />
Left <strong>AIAS</strong><br />
Daniëlla Brals<br />
Student Assistant GINI<br />
Antonio Firinu<br />
Guest researcher<br />
Jorn van der Horst<br />
Student Assistant<br />
Natalja Lux<br />
Intern<br />
Natascha Notten<br />
Researcher<br />
Aidan Regan<br />
Researcher<br />
Alex Schram<br />
Student Assistant<br />
Haya Stier<br />
Guest Researcher<br />
Timo van der Veen<br />
Student Assistant<br />
Matthijs Visser<br />
Coordinator Master HRM<br />
45
46<br />
CALL FOR PAPERS<br />
10 th European Conference<br />
of the International Labour and<br />
Employment Relations Association<br />
Amsterdam, The Netherlands<br />
20 - 22 June 2013<br />
Imagining new employment relations and new solidarities<br />
Over the last two decades employment and labour<br />
relations in Europe have undergone important<br />
changes. Manufacturing employment is decreasing<br />
and various types of service employment are<br />
rising, together with female participation levels.<br />
The standard employment relationship is losing its<br />
dominant position with the growing use of flexible<br />
and part-time contracts, temporary agency work<br />
and (dependent) self-employment. Segmentation<br />
between stronger and weaker groups is increasing.<br />
Social solidarity is under pressure in many<br />
countries as a consequence of the increasing<br />
diversity of populations and of the labour force.<br />
Collective bargaining is decentralizing but there<br />
are also attempts to transnationalise bargaining<br />
within multinationals or within certain sectors.<br />
Trade unions are slowly losing membership and<br />
power but worker involvement in social innovation<br />
is wanted more than ever. The role of the EU<br />
is getting more important and new forms of governance<br />
are being experimented with. Change is<br />
accelerating as a result of the crisis and austerity<br />
is leading to profound restructuring of the public<br />
sector, affecting employment conditions and service<br />
provision.<br />
Within this context, we want to foster a reflection<br />
and debate on the future of employment relations<br />
and new forms of solidarity. Such question include:<br />
What can or should employment relations<br />
look like in the future? What is the future of the<br />
public sector? Can or should growing segmentation<br />
and polarization be countered? What new<br />
types of governance support collaborative efforts<br />
to tackle today’s collective problems? What new<br />
types of solidarity can we foresee between group<br />
of workers or workers in different countries? What<br />
new types of cooperation or conflict can we foresee<br />
between workers and employers?<br />
www.ilera-europe2013.eu<br />
Abstract submission<br />
The organizing committee invites you to submit abstracts<br />
for the 10 th European ILERA Conference. Abstracts<br />
must be 350-500 words in length and can be<br />
submitted on the conference website as of 1 May <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
Papers presented at the Conference will be organised<br />
around five broad tracks (for more detailed descriptions,<br />
see conference website):<br />
Track 1: Industrial relations actors in changing labour<br />
market<br />
Track 2: Europeanisation of social and employment<br />
policies<br />
Track 3: Public sector restructuring: consequences<br />
for employment relations and public services<br />
Track 4: New forms of regulation and governance<br />
Track 5: HRM and Social Innovation<br />
Abstract submission deadline: 31 December <strong>2012</strong><br />
Acceptance decisions will be communicated by:<br />
1 February 2013<br />
Apart from regular sessions with paper presentations<br />
there will be interactive sessions with short presentations.<br />
Symposia<br />
We welcome proposals for special symposia. Symposia<br />
are self-contained sessions of one and a half hour.<br />
They can be on the general theme of the conference or<br />
on one of the track themes. See for details.the Conference<br />
website as of 1 May 2013.<br />
Conference Venue<br />
The conference will be held at the historic Oudemanhuispoort<br />
building of the University of Amsterdam,<br />
located in the city centre.<br />
Organising Committee<br />
The Conference is organized by a consortium of universities<br />
in the Netherlands in collaboration with the<br />
Dutch Labour and Employment Relations Association<br />
(DLERA).
CALL FOR PAPERS<br />
Conference on Regulating for Equitable<br />
and Job-Rich Growth<br />
Geneva, 3-5 July 2013<br />
The University of Amsterdam/<strong>AIAS</strong>, Kea Tijdens is collaborating with the International Labour Offi ce (ILO) for the Third<br />
Regulating Decent Work (RDW) Conference, on the theme of Regulating for Equitable and Job-Rich Growth, to be held<br />
at the International Labour Offi ce, Geneva, Switzerland on 3-5 July 2013.<br />
The Conference is organized by the International Labour Offi ce in collaboration with <strong>AIAS</strong>, the University of Melbourne<br />
Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law (CELRL), the University of Manchester Fairness at Work Research<br />
Centre (FaWRC) Research Group and the University of Duisburg-Essen Institut Arbeit und Qualifi kation (IAQ).<br />
Network participants and interested researchers are encouraged to submit an abstract by the closing date of 31<br />
January 2013. Limited RDW Fellowships are available to assist researchers in developing countries to participate in the<br />
Conference. The deadline for Fellowship applications is 31 December <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
The global fi nancial crisis continues to generate<br />
spiralling unemployment, precarious<br />
work, inequality, and pressure on collective<br />
bargaining, threatening economic and social<br />
stability in many parts of the world. Unease<br />
about the austerity agenda is accompanied<br />
by a growing recognition that the post-crisis<br />
world should not return to “business as<br />
usual.” Rather, more effective and balanced<br />
models should be adopted, which would integrate<br />
employment creation in growth policies<br />
and meet equally important objectives:<br />
equity, security, job quality. While emerging<br />
and developing economies have escaped the<br />
brunt of the recession, the debate continues<br />
on how to extend labour market institutions<br />
into the informal economy, with a focus on<br />
particularly vulnerable groups, such as domestic<br />
workers. The infl uence of multinational<br />
enterprises in these countries, meanwhile,<br />
sustains an ongoing refl ection on the<br />
role of non-state actors in regulating labour<br />
markets. At the global level, a striking feature<br />
of recent policy discourses is the use of<br />
legal indices to evaluate and compare labour<br />
law regimes. These indices are increasingly<br />
relied on both to underpin policy guidance<br />
and to justify legal reform. The 2013 RDW<br />
Conference will centre on the role of labour<br />
market regulation when job creation is the<br />
paramount objective. Papers are invited<br />
to address labour market regulation’s ideal<br />
post-crisis form, with a special focus on<br />
four thematic issues:<br />
a. comparing and evaluating labour regulation<br />
systems;<br />
b. regulating informal work;<br />
c. industrial and employment relations for<br />
inclusive growth;<br />
d. new patterns of segmentation and new<br />
challenges for promoting inclusive labour<br />
markets.<br />
For whom<br />
Researchers from all regions are welcome.<br />
In past years, the Conference has attracted<br />
researchers from a range of fi elds that include<br />
law, economics, industrial relations,<br />
development studies and geography.<br />
Conference tracks<br />
Track 1: Comparing and evaluating labour regulation<br />
systems: theory, methodology and new evidence<br />
Coordinators: Sandrine Cazes, Sangheon<br />
Lee, Deirdre McCann<br />
Track 2: Regulating informal work<br />
Coordinators: Colin Fenwick, John Howe<br />
Track 3: Industrial and employment relations for<br />
inclusive growth<br />
Coordinators: Kea Tijdens, Susan Hayter,<br />
Chang-Hee Lee<br />
Track 4: New patterns of segmentation and new<br />
challenges for promoting inclusive labour markets<br />
Coordinators : Gerhard Bosch, Jill Rubery<br />
Submission of abstracts<br />
The organizing committee invites you to<br />
submit abstracts for the 2013 RDW<br />
Conference:<br />
• Abstracts should be in English.<br />
• Abstracts must have a maximum of 400<br />
words including references and appendices.<br />
• Abstracts can be submitted on the conference<br />
website, http://rdw.law.unimelb.edu.au/<br />
• The author(s) should indicate their preferred<br />
Conference track.<br />
• Deadline for abstract submission (general):<br />
31 January 2013.<br />
• Deadline for abstract submission (RDW<br />
fellowship applicants): 31 Dec. <strong>2012</strong><br />
The abstracts will be subject to a competitive<br />
review process. Guidelines for fi nal papers<br />
will be communicated to the authors<br />
of selected abstracts. It is expected that<br />
an edited volume will be produced, drawn<br />
from selected conference papers.<br />
See for all the information http://rdw.law.<br />
unimelb.edu.au<br />
47
<strong>AIAS</strong><br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> lunch<br />
seminars<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> organises fortnightly seminars on various<br />
subjects. Abstracts of the presentations will be put<br />
online and send to you, one week in advance.<br />
Day: Thursday, every fortnight<br />
Time: 12.15 – 13.15 hrs.<br />
Location: <strong>AIAS</strong>, 3rd fl oor, Plantage Muidergracht 12<br />
Amsterdam, the Netherlands<br />
Enrol: Please send an email to aias@uva.nl. A sandwich<br />
will then be provided.<br />
Please send us an email (aias@uva.nl) if you want to be put on the<br />
mailing list for the lunch/reading seminars. You will then receive an<br />
email about one week before the lunch seminar with all the information<br />
and the abstract.<br />
18 October<br />
Maarten van Klaveren and Kea Tijdens (<strong>AIAS</strong>)<br />
Multinational enterprises through the crisis: employment patterns in Europe<br />
1 November<br />
Maria Fleischmann (Erasmus University Rotterdam)<br />
tba<br />
15 November<br />
Luc Benda and Kea Tijdens (<strong>AIAS</strong>)<br />
tba<br />
29 November<br />
Antonio García-Muñoz Alhambra (Guest at <strong>AIAS</strong>)<br />
The European sectoral social dialogue<br />
13 December<br />
Beryl ter Haar (<strong>AIAS</strong>)<br />
The meaning of the open method of coordination for the development of<br />
a social Europe<br />
Please go to the website www.uva-aias.net /calendar for all<br />
the latest information on these lunch seminars.<br />
Amsterdam Institute<br />
for Advanced labour Studies<br />
UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM<br />
ANNOUNCEMENTS<br />
RESQ &<br />
Flexworkresearch<br />
Conference<br />
RESQ Conference (www.resqresearch.org) at the University of<br />
Amsterdam with amongst other topics an exchange of information<br />
on the state of the art in (reforms of) re-employment services<br />
in the members’ countries during lunch to lunch Wednesday 23 th<br />
– Thursday 24 th October 2013. More info and call for papers to<br />
follow later this year.<br />
Followed by<br />
Flexworkresearch (www.fl exworkresearch.org) Conference<br />
hosted by University of Amsterdam, Erasmus University and<br />
EuroCiett ‘Labour Market Policies in Europe: public – private cooperation<br />
2.0’, Thursday 24 th – Friday 25 th October 2013, to be<br />
held in Amsterdam, Vakbondsmuseum, The Netherlands. More<br />
info and call for papers to follow later this year.<br />
ILERA Europe 2013<br />
On 20 - 22 June 2013, the European Conference of the International<br />
Labour and Employment Relations Association takes place in<br />
Amsterdam at the Faculty of Law of the University of Amsterdam.<br />
See for the Call for Papers page 46 of this <strong>newsletter</strong> or<br />
www.ilera-europe2013.eu.<br />
Regulating Decent<br />
Work Conference<br />
<strong>AIAS</strong> is collaborating with the International Labour Offi ce for the<br />
3 rd Regulating Decent Work Conference, on the theme of Regulating<br />
for Equitable and Job-Rich Growth, to be held at the International<br />
Labour Offi ce, Geneva, Switzerland on 3-5 July 2013.<br />
See for the Call for Papers page 47 of this <strong>newsletter</strong> or<br />
http://rdw.law.unimelb.edu.au.<br />
UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM