Views
4 years ago

Traffic Impact Analysis of New Baltimore Costco - Fauquier County

Traffic Impact Analysis of New Baltimore Costco - Fauquier County

N No Scale Signalized

N No Scale Signalized 600 Intersection LOS =C(D)[C] 15 29 Signalized Intersection LOS=E(E)[C] "Suggested Improvement" EB-1 Thru, WB-1 Thru NB-2 Left, SB-1 Left 600 [D](D)D Signalized Intersection LOS=C(C)[B] *[B](C)B Kelly Drive 15 29 *[C](D)B Unsignalized SITE Commerce Court Unsignalized Intersection "Suggested Improvement" Signalization Driving Range Cross Creek Site Driveway 600 Signalized Intersection LOS = B(C)[B] 600 [B](C)B [C](C)C Intersection Commerce SITE *[A](A)A 676 Figure 6 2012 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service Court *[F](F)F 676 "Suggested Improvement" Signalization WB - 1 Right [B](B)C 15 29 *[F](F)F Unsignalized Intersection Commerce Court *[F](F)F 15 29 Unsignalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection Signalized Intersection LOS=C(C)[B] 215 Signalized Intersection LOS = A(A)[A] 600 15 29 [B](A)A "Suggested Improvement" Signalization 676 Unsignalized Intersection *[A](B)B "Suggested Improvement" Signalization NB-1 Left EB-1Left Denotes stop sign control Denotes traffic signal control * Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) [Sat Peak Hour] 215 A Traffic Impact Analysis of New Baltimore Costco PHR+A Project # 15116-1-0 April 17, 2007 Page 12 [A](A)A [C](C)D

Table 3 New Baltimore Costco Levels of Service and Back of Queue (95%) Results 2012 Background Conditions Intersection Traffic Control Lane Group/ Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour Back of Back of Back of LOS LOS LOS Queue Queue Queue EB/L F 240 E 90 F 135 EB/T # 1 EB/T # 2 F 3000 B 1113 C 1775 EB/R B 155 B 255 B 113 EB LOS F B C WB/L E 33 F 373 E 113 Route 29 & Route 600 Signalized WB/T # 1 WB/T # 2 WB/R WB LOS B A B 913 25 F A F 3075 25 C A C 1710 40 NB/LT E 493 F 173 E 423 NB/R C 113 C 28 C 43 NB LOS D F D SB/LT D 65 D 118 D 130 SB/R C 63 D 388 C 118 SB LOS C D C Overall LOS E E C EB/LT EB/T # 1 F 155 E 88 E 110 EB/T # 2 EB/T # 3 C 1303 C 773 C 968 EB/R A 80 A 190 A 78 EB LOS C C C WB/L WB/T # 1 D 25 F 370 E 95 WB/T # 2 B 528 D 1668 C 945 Route 29 & Route 600 Signalized (Improvement) WB/T # 3 WB/R WB LOS A B 25 A D 25 A C 30 NB/L # 1 NB/L # 2 D 163 E 313 D 155 NB/T D 83 E 53 D 48 NB/R D 123 D 48 D 105 NB LOS D D D SB/L D 33 D 25 D 60 SB/T D 28 E 115 D 70 SB/R C 60 D 320 D 143 SB LOS D D D Overall LOS C D C EB/L B 25 C 25 C 25 Cross Creek Site- EB/T # 1 EB/T # 2 - - - - - - driveway & Route 29 Unsignalized WB/T # 1 WB/T # 2 - - - - - - WB/R - - - - - - SB/LR F 25 F 86 F 70 EB/T # 1 EB/T # 2 - - - - - - EB/R - - - - - - Route 29 & Commerce Court Unsignalized WB/T # 1 WB/T # 2 - - - - - - WB/L E 27 C 25 C 25 NB/L F 90 F 25 F 25 NB/R E 27 C 63 C 25 EB/T # 1 EB/T # 2 D 1878 A 663 B 1038 EB/R A 0 A - A - EB LOS C A B Route 29 & Commerce Court Signalized (Improvement) WB/T # 1 WB/T # 2 WB/L A A 30 493 A D 25 2023 A B 25 1015 WB LOS A D B NB/L C 40 D 98 C 25 NB/R D 50 C 40 C 25 NB LOS C C C Overall LOS C C B A Traffic Impact Analysis of New Baltimore Costco PHR+A Project # 15116-1-0 April 17, 2007 Page 13

Virginia department of transportation traffic - Fauquier County
guidelines for traffic impact analysis (zoning petitions)
Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com
Section 6.0 Traffic Impact Analysis - SWALCO
Iron Mountain Quarry Traffic Impact Analysis
Salinas Ag-Industrial Center Traffic Impact Analysis - City of Salinas
Traffic Impact Analysis for D-19 and the Porposed National ... - semcog
iv. environmental impact analysis b. transportation and traffic
Traffic Impact Study – The Greens South at ... - Loudoun County
new monaco traffic impact study peachland, bc - District of Peachland
Traffic Impact Study with comments from MOTI - Fraser Valley ...
APPENDIX 'C' Traffic Impact Assessment - Northumberland County
fiscal & economic impact analysis imperial county april 2011