Views
4 years ago

Traffic Impact Analysis of New Baltimore Costco - Fauquier County

Traffic Impact Analysis of New Baltimore Costco - Fauquier County

N No Scale 600

N No Scale 600 Signalized Intersection LOS=E(E)[D] *[B](B)B Kelly Drive *[F](F)F Unsignalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection 15 29 Driving Range SITE 600 Commerce Court *[A](A)A Figure 3 Existing Lane Geometry and Levels of Service *[E](F)F Commerce Court Unsignalized Intersection *[B](C)C 676 *[F](E)F 15 29 Unsignalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection 215 *[A](A)A Denotes stop sign control Denotes traffic signal control * Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) [Sat Peak Hour] A Traffic Impact Analysis of New Baltimore Costco PHR+A Project # 15116-1-0 April 17, 2007 Page 6

Table 1 New Baltimore Costco Levels of Service and Back of Queue (95%) Results Existing Conditions Intersection Traffic Control Lane Group/ Approach AM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour Back of LOS Queue EB/L F 208 E 83 D 93 EB/T # 1 EB/T # 2 EB/R B 138 A 228 A 88 EB LOS WB/L E 30 F 380 D 80 WB/T # 1 WB/T # 2 WB/R WB LOS A 25 A 25 A 35 NB/LT E 468 F 173 D 328 NB/R C 113 C 28 B 38 NB LOS SB/LT D 60 D 108 C 98 SB/R C 58 D 358 C 85 SB LOS EB/L B 25 C 25 C 25 EB/T # 1 EB/T # 2 WB/T # 1 WB/T # 2 WB/R - - - - - - SB/LR F 25 F 41 F 34 EB/T # 1 EB/T # 2 EB/R - - - - - - WB/T # 1 WB/T # 2 WB/L C 25 B 25 C 25 NB/L F 38 F 25 E 25 NB/R C 25 B 63 C 25 EB/T # 1 EB/T # 2 - - - - - - EB/R - - - - - - Route 29 & Route 676 Unsignalized WB/T # 1 WB/T # 2 - - - - - - WB/L C 25 B 25 C 25 NB/L F 25 E 25 F 25 NB/R - - - - - - Route 600 & Kelly Drive Unsignalized EB/TR WB/LT NB/LR - A B - 25 25 - A B - 25 25 - A B - 25 25 EB/LT A 25 A 25 A 25 Route 600 & Route 676 Unsignalized EB/R WB/LTR NB/LTR - A C - 25 37 - A C - 25 33 - A B - 25 25 SB/LTR B 25 C 51 B 25 Route 676 & Route 215 Unsignalized EB/LR NB/LT SB/TR B A - 40 25 - B A - 46 25 - B A - 25 25 - * Assumed 25 feet Vehicle Length EB = Eastbound, WB =Westbound, NB = Northbound, SB = Southbound L: Left, T:Thru, R: Right Minimum queue length is assumed to be 25 feet LOS Back of Queue LOS PM Peak Hour Back of Queue F 2900 B 1000 D 1658 F B D Route 29 & Route 600 Signalized B B 868 F F 2825 D D 1603 D F D C D C Overall LOS E E D Cross Creek Site- - - - - - - driveway & Route 29 Unsignalized - - - - - - - - - - - - Route 29 & Commerce Court Unsignalized - - - - - - A Traffic Impact Analysis of New Baltimore Costco PHR+A Project # 15116-1-0 April 17, 2007 Page 7

Virginia department of transportation traffic - Fauquier County
Section 6.0 Traffic Impact Analysis - SWALCO
Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com
guidelines for traffic impact analysis (zoning petitions)
Traffic Impact Analysis for D-19 and the Porposed National ... - semcog
APPENDIX 'C' Traffic Impact Assessment - Northumberland County
Iron Mountain Quarry Traffic Impact Analysis
new monaco traffic impact study peachland, bc - District of Peachland
Traffic Impact Study – The Greens South at ... - Loudoun County
Salinas Ag-Industrial Center Traffic Impact Analysis - City of Salinas
Traffic Impact Study with comments from MOTI - Fraser Valley ...
iv. environmental impact analysis b. transportation and traffic
fiscal & economic impact analysis imperial county april 2011