Views
4 years ago

NANOTECHNOLOGY IN THE FOOD CHAIN - Favv

NANOTECHNOLOGY IN THE FOOD CHAIN - Favv

62 Finally, chemical

62 Finally, chemical concentration is also an important parameter. Especially in the case of metal nanomaterials, a possible dissolution in the gastro-intestinal environment should be evaluated. In many cases, the assay of the actual concentration in different biological samples is crucial. The total concentration of a given element can be determined in tissues, food and feed by using: Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS). Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) Actually it is important to bear in mind that microscopic and chemical determination approaches are complementary to get all the information needed (what amount is present in my sample and under which precise form?). Evaluation of NPs intestinal toxicity When considering the particular aspects associated with nanomaterials in food and feed, as compared, for instance, to NPs in air or water, a key question to be addressed concerns their bioaccessibility, i.e. the proportion of the substance of interest that would be able to be absorbed across the intestinal epithelium. Then, beside a toxicity evaluation at the intestinal level, it is also important to consider the bioavailability of the NPs, i.e. the amount of material that will reach the bloodstream and target organs where it could also exert toxic effects. For the in vitro evaluation, Caco-2 cells are a human intestinal line, which mirrors the absorptive epithelium of the intestine (Koeneman et al., 2009; Oberdörster et al., 2005) and which is widely used in pharmaco-toxicology. The Nanomaterial Toxicity Screening Working Group, from the Risk Science Institute recommended the use of this line for in vitro testing of the ingestion of NPs (Oberdörster et al., 2005). Using this cell line, the studies should focus on: (i) the evaluation of the direct toxicity, i.e. necrosis, apoptosis or, with cultured cells, post-apoptotic necrosis using routine methods (MTT, neutral red, LDH release, …); (ii) the evaluation of the disruption in tight junctions, controlling the paracellular passage using established procedures (transepithelial electric resistance,

adiolabelled mannitol or fluorescent Lucifer yellow fluxes, confocal immunodetection of tight junctions proteins, …); (iii) the investigation of the transport of NPs through the intestinal monolayer (Koeneman et al., 2009). In particular, it should be taken into account that NPs would probably cross the intestinal epithelium via the M cells of the follicle associated epithelium. Our group has developed an in vitro model of this barrier (des Rieux et al., 2007). Furthermore, the intestinal hydrophilic mucus layer covering, physiologically, the epithelium would also play a key role in the adsorption of NPs on the epithelial cells and their transport across the intestinal barrier. In vitro models also exist to mimic this important aspect (Nollevaux et al., 2006); (iv) the assay of intestinal functions upon addition of NPs of different size, chemical composition, surface properties, …. In particular, effects on phase I & II biotransformations enzymes, phase III efflux pumps, … should be recorded. A particular attention should also be drawn to the development of acute or chronic inflammation by following the NFκB and MAPKinases activation, ILs, MCP-1, … secretion (Van de Walle et al., 2010); (v) the evaluation of transcriptomic (Sergent et al., 2010) and proteomic perturbations in such a culture system should also be taken into account; (vi) the effects of food constituents (nutrients, but also xenobiotics, phenolic compounds,…) known to affect some of these properties (Sergent et al., 2008). For the in vivo evaluation of oral exposure to NPs, the physical and chemical properties of the material should be characterized in the form delivered to the animal (mice or rats), as well as after the test - if possible (Oberdörster et al., 2005). The NPs should be characterized in a matrix as close as possible to the food product. After ingestion, the amount of nanomaterial eliminated via the faeces should be determined and compared to the amount of material retained. In case the nanomaterial would be significantly absorbed, histology assays are recommended (Oberdörster et al., 2005). In situ detection would be of high interest. This approach would bring more knowledge on the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) of NPs (Bouwmeester et al., 2007). 63

FOOD SAFETY OF THE SHORT SUPPLY CHAIN - Favv
Risk Analysis of Nanotechnology - MWFTR
Facts and figures 2009 - Favv
nanotechnology - Itene
Nanotechnology - Nanowerk
ICSTI Statement on Nanotechnology - Forfás
Introduction to Nanotechnology
Nanotechnology Demystified
Action Plan Nanotechnology 2020