to get the file - Fonds Gesundes Österreich

fgoe.org

to get the file - Fonds Gesundes Österreich

1.43

1.48

10. Lasting pos. changes in health behavior

10. Lasting pos. changes in health behavior

1.62 1.63 1.66 1.67 1.69

5. Indicator-based

7. Experience of applicants

6. Sufficient evidence of successful execution

11. Acceptance of project by target group

5. Indicator-based

11. Acceptance of project by target group

Average value

7. Experience of applicants

6. Sufficient evidence of successful execution

2. No promotion of projects not related to health

9. Change of processes and structures

1.76 1.77 1.80 1.98 2.01

9. Change of processes and structures

12. Acceptance of project by experts

8. Based on clear needs

Average value

Fig. 9 Assessment in Survey of the Correctness of the Criteria for Project Promotion and Funding

(n=144) (Average Value: 1.80; Standard Deviation: 0.39).

Mean values in the scales: 1 = Agree wholeheartedly 2= Agree 3= Undecided 4= Tend to disagree

5= Completely disagree

1.47

1.49

1.67

1,68

1.78

1.81

12. Acceptance of project by experts

8. Based on clear needs

2.92

1. No funding for projects with trad. health concept

4. Sustainability through mixed financing

2. No promotion of projects not related to health

Fig. 10 Assessment of the Importance of Project Promotion/Funding Criteria

All Respondents n=144 (Average Value: 1.88; Standard Deviation: 0.35)

Mean values in the scales: 1 = Agree wholeheartedly 2= Agree 3= Undecided 4= Tend to disagree

5= Completely disagree

1.88

1.93 1.95 1.96 1.99

2.08

3. No funding for projects of nat'l scope

2.79

3. No funding for projects of nat'l scope

1. No funding for projects with trad. health concept

4. Sustainability through mixed financing

21

More magazines by this user
Similar magazines