FREE LAW JOURNAL Volume 1, Number 2 (October 18, 2005)
FREE LAW JOURNAL Volume 1, Number 2 (October 18, 2005)
FREE LAW JOURNAL Volume 1, Number 2 (October 18, 2005)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong><br />
IN THIS ISSUE :<br />
<strong>Volume</strong> 1, <strong>Number</strong> 2 (<strong>October</strong> <strong>18</strong>, <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
ISSN 1712-9877<br />
EDITORIAL - LOUIS-PHILIPPE ROUILLARD (CANADA)<br />
HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND<br />
MONTENEGRO - DR. DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ (SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO)<br />
APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL<br />
CRIMINAL JUSTICE – DR. DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ (SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO)<br />
THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT BY DR. ANWAR FRANGI (LEBANON)<br />
INTRODUCTION A LA ‘CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE’ - DR. ANWAR FRANGI (LEBANON)<br />
A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI<br />
EGYEZMÉNYEKRE - ORSOLYA BOGDÁN (HUNGARY)<br />
A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA, KÜLÖNÖS<br />
TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE - ORSOLYA BOGDÁN (HUNGARY)<br />
EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> - DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI (POLAND)<br />
NE BIS IN IDEM IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT IN THE UNITED KINGDOM - DR MACIEJ<br />
ROGALSKI (POLAND)<br />
DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG<br />
NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN ZIVILGESETZBUCHES - DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR (TURKEY)<br />
THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong> PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL<br />
HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong> IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT - ALEXANDRU MOCANU (MOLDOVA)<br />
THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH <strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE<br />
<strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM<br />
DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL FULL EMANCIPATION - AGNIESZKA SZPAK<br />
(POLAND)<br />
THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES (OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF<br />
MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS BY<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII (MOLDOVA)<br />
<strong>FREE</strong> WORLD PUBLISHING Inc. @ http://www.FWPublishing.net<br />
4<br />
7<br />
21<br />
43<br />
61<br />
85<br />
105<br />
127<br />
157<br />
163<br />
<strong>18</strong>1<br />
193<br />
211
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
The Free Law Journal results of a merger with the Eastern European Law Journals. It builds<br />
upon this previous success and aims at providing the freedom of publishing juridical research<br />
from everywhere and on all subjects of law. Its goal is to promote respect of the rule of law and<br />
the fair application of justice by sharing juridical research in its pages.<br />
Academics, post-graduate students and practitioners of law are welcome to submit in the<br />
academic section their articles, notes, book reviews or comments on any legal subject, while<br />
undergraduate students are welcome to publish in our student section. The list of fields of law<br />
addressed in these pages is ever-expanding and non-restrictive, as needs and interests arise. If a<br />
field is not listed, the author simply needs to propose the article and the field believed of law<br />
applicable; we will insure to create and list it.<br />
We accept articles in English, French, Bosnian, Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Finnish, German,<br />
Greek, Hungarian, Icelandic, Innuktikut, Italian, Latin, Polish, Portugese (both Brazilian and<br />
European), Romanian, Russian, Serb (both Latin and Cyrillic), Slovenian,Spanish and Turkish.<br />
Articles not in English are provided with a synopsis to explain their content. Articles of<br />
exceptional quality, or requested to be, can be translated into English and/or French. All of this<br />
is the measure of freedom we provide.<br />
The material submitted for publication remains copyrighted to the author. If the author has<br />
interest in publishing elsewhere after having published in our pages, no permission to do so will<br />
be necessary. The author remains in full control of his or her writings. Articles of superior value<br />
will be considered for incorporation in collective works for publishing.<br />
We always accept submissions. To submit, please read the submission guidelines or ask us any<br />
question at : FLJ@FWPublishing.net .<br />
List of subject addressed (as it currently stands - subject to modifications as need arise)<br />
Administrative Law<br />
Admiralty law<br />
Antitrust law<br />
Alternative dispute resolution<br />
Anti-Terrorism<br />
Bankruptcy<br />
Business Law<br />
Canon Law<br />
Civil Law<br />
Common Law<br />
Comparative Law<br />
Constitutional Law<br />
Contract Law<br />
(Consuetudinary law)<br />
Obligations<br />
Quasi-contract<br />
Corporations law<br />
Criminal Law<br />
Organised Crime<br />
Criminal Procedure<br />
Cyber Crime Law<br />
Penal law<br />
Cyber law<br />
Election law<br />
Environmental law<br />
European Law<br />
Evidence Law<br />
Family law<br />
History of Law<br />
Human Rights Law<br />
Immigration Law<br />
Intellectual Property Law<br />
International trade law<br />
Patent<br />
Trademark Law<br />
International Humanitarian<br />
Rights Law<br />
Laws of Armed Conflicts<br />
Laws of war<br />
War Crimes Law (Belgium)<br />
International Law (Public)<br />
Diplomatic Relations<br />
Jus Gentium<br />
Treaties Law<br />
Labor law<br />
Law and economics<br />
Law and literature<br />
Medical Law<br />
Public Health Law<br />
Public Law<br />
Malpractice<br />
Mental health law<br />
Military law<br />
National Legal Systems -<br />
(Laws of any national legal<br />
system that is not of a<br />
precise category)<br />
Nationality and naturalisation<br />
Laws<br />
Natural law<br />
Philosophy of Law<br />
2<br />
Private International Law<br />
Private law<br />
Procedural law<br />
Property law (Public)<br />
International Law (See<br />
International Law (Public))<br />
Refugee Law<br />
Religious law<br />
Islamic Law (Sharia)<br />
Qur'an<br />
Sharia<br />
Jewish law (Halakha)<br />
Hebrew law (Mishpat Ivri)<br />
Talmud<br />
Taqlid<br />
Christian (other than Canon<br />
Law)<br />
Twelve Tables<br />
Roman Law<br />
Sacred text<br />
State of Emergencies Laws<br />
Space law<br />
Tax law<br />
Technology law<br />
Torts Law<br />
Quasi-delict<br />
Trusts and estates Law<br />
Liens<br />
Water law<br />
Zoning
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Free World Publishing is a partner of the Free European Collegium, provider of web-based, elearning<br />
education in matters related to the European Union.<br />
All material published are available for free on Free World Publishing Inc. web site at<br />
http://www.FWPublishing.net and can be used freely for research purposes, as long as the<br />
authors’ sources are acknowledged in keeping with national standards and laws regarding<br />
copyrights.<br />
All mail correspondence can be made with the editorial board at Karikas Frigyes u.11, 2/1, XIII<br />
kerulet, 1138 Budapest, Republic of Hungary, while electronic correspondence can be made<br />
through FLJ@FWPublishing.net .<br />
The views and opinions expressed in these pages are solely those of the authors and not<br />
necessarily those of the editors, Free World Publishing Inc. or that of the Free European<br />
Collegium Inc.<br />
Cited as (<strong>2005</strong>) 1(2) Free L. J.<br />
ISSN 1712-9877<br />
3
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Free Law Journal Submission Guidelines<br />
Important. The following is not meant to discourage from submitting; only to ensure quality. If<br />
your article conforms to your own national standard of writings, we accept all and any format as<br />
long as arguments are justified by footnotes or endnotes. Never hesitate to submit an article : if<br />
there is a need for improvement, we will inform you and we will always remain open for resubmissions.<br />
1. Academics, Post-Graduate Students and Practitioners of law are all welcomed to publish their<br />
book reviews, comments, notes and articles.<br />
2. All legal subjects are considered for publication, regardless of the legal tradition, national or<br />
international field of expertise. The only limit to the extend of our publishing would be content<br />
that is illegal in national legislation (i.e. enticement to hatred) or against international norms (i.e.<br />
promoting genocide).<br />
3. Articles are welcomed in English, French, Bosnian, Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Finnish,<br />
German, Greek, Hungarian, Icelandic, Innuktikut, Italian, Latin, Polish, Portugese (both<br />
Brazilian and European), Romanian, Russian, Serb (both Latin and Cyrillic), Slovenian as well<br />
as Spanish. Note that our staff is limited and therefore we use "Word Recognition<br />
Processors" to communicate in some languages. Nonetheless, this does not prevent<br />
understanding articles submitted in these language and we are not interested in measuring every<br />
word of your article : simply in publishing your writings. Therefore, we will review the general<br />
content, but leave with you the precise sense and meaning that you want to convey in your own<br />
language. If translation is desired by the author, we then submit it for translation to a translator.<br />
4. Their is no defined system of reference (footnotes or endnotes) demanded. As long as you<br />
justify your argument through references (author and work), we accept all writings respecting<br />
your own national standards. Exceptions : For Canadians, the Canadian Legal Guide to Citation<br />
is recommended but not mandatory. For Americans, referencing is expected to be in accordance<br />
with Harvard University's The Bluebook, A Uniform System of Citation. Any breach of<br />
copyrights is the sole responsibility of the author.<br />
5. The author retains the copyrights to his or her writings. As articles are unpaid for, ownership<br />
remains within your hands. We act as publishers and caretaker. Nothing prevents you from<br />
publishing elsewhere. You may even decide to have the article taken off this site if another<br />
publisher desires to buy the rights to your article.<br />
6. We reserve ourselves the right to edit the content or length of the article, if at all necessary.<br />
7. We do not discriminate in any way. Our aim is to bring under one roof perspectives from<br />
everywhere and everyone. Never hesitate to submit.<br />
8. If you desire information or desire to submit, do not hesitate to contact us at :<br />
FLJ@FWPublishing.net.<br />
4
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
EDITORIAL<br />
Welcome to the second issue of the Free Law Journal, a print and electronic journal aiming at<br />
promoting respect of the rule of law and the fair application of justice everywhere through the sharing<br />
of juridical research.<br />
The Free Law Journal’s first issue was a definitive success in terms of scope and reach, registering a<br />
very high volume of consultation on the web and orders of paper copies. This signals a definitive<br />
interest in getting to know the legal research produced everywhere and to share this knowledge.<br />
As such, this permits us to reach our first and foremost objective to promote the rule of law.<br />
Knowledge is definitely part of the application of this objective and we see a clear desire from people<br />
all over the world to gain access to this knowledge in order to foster the fair application of justice for<br />
all.<br />
Therefore, welcome to our second issue and we hope that our contributions to legal research and<br />
knowledge will expand through your witten contributions.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Louis-Philippe F. Rouillard<br />
Editor-in-Chief, Free World Publishing Inc.<br />
5
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
6
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY<br />
DEFENCE IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF<br />
SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO<br />
BY DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ*<br />
Introductory remarks<br />
All men in the world have the use of many natural, universal rights who<br />
names are human rights. These rights have general law protection. The<br />
attack to these rights many criminal codes has prescribed as criminal<br />
acts. Lack of any of general, basic elements of the definition of the<br />
criminal act in criminal code, of objective or subjective character,<br />
exempts that act (that is, the act committed by a person, with resulting<br />
consequences) from the character of criminal act 1 . It is regarded to the<br />
circumstances which an act of a man exempts from either social danger<br />
or illegality, or of both elements 2 .<br />
Namely, the exclusion of these elements exists when the act, which is<br />
otherwise regulated by law as a criminal act, is considered as excusable,<br />
according to some special provision. Provisions which allow this<br />
otherwise “forbidden” act in a specific case exclude illegality, so that<br />
there is no criminal act in that case.<br />
There are two bases for the exclusion of the criminal act in the criminal<br />
law of Serbia and Montenegro. They are:<br />
1) general bases (which are specifically provided by law and may be<br />
found in any criminal act or for any perpetrator) and<br />
* Dragan Jovašević PhD, Associate Professor, Faculty of Law in Nis, Serbia<br />
and Montenegro.<br />
1<br />
Ljubiša Jovanović, Dragan Jovašević, Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Nomos,<br />
Beograd, 2002.p.72<br />
2<br />
Borislav Petrović- Dragan Jovašević, Kazneno pravo Bosne i Hercegovine,<br />
Opći dio, Pravni fakultet, Sarajevo, <strong>2005</strong>. godine, p. 34-41<br />
7<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />
CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
2) special bases ( which are not specifically provided by law and could<br />
not be found in any criminal act or for any perpetrator) 3 .<br />
General bases 4 in the criminal law of the Republic of Serbia (according<br />
to the provisions of the General criminal law) are: 1) insignificant social<br />
danger (article 8. paragraph 2. Basic Criminal Code former Criminal<br />
code of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 5 from July 1976.), 2)<br />
necessary defence (article 9. paragraph 2. Basic Criminal Code) and 3)<br />
extreme necessity (article 10. paragraph 2. Basic Criminal Code).<br />
In the Criminal code of the Republic of Montenegro 6 from December<br />
2003. there is also a number of bases for the exclusion of the criminal<br />
act. They are: 1) an act of little significance (article 9. ), 2) necessary<br />
defence (article 10. ), 3) extreme necessity (article 11. ) and 4) force and<br />
threat (article 12. ).<br />
Special bases for the exclusion of the criminal act are not specifically<br />
provided by law. They present a creation of the law theory and court<br />
practice (but some of them are seen in the foreign legislations in specific<br />
cases). Specific bases usually include: 1) assent of the inflicted, 2) selfinfliction,<br />
3) performing the official duty, 4) superior’s order, 5) the<br />
right for disciplinary or corrective punishment and 6) allowed risk.<br />
According to the fact that these special bases are not specifically<br />
provided by law, their effect and applicability are of controversial<br />
matter 7 .<br />
3 Dragan Jovašević, Leksikon krivičnog prava, Službeni list , Beograd, 2002.p.<br />
376<br />
4 Bogdan Zlatarić- Mirjan Damaška ,Rječnik krivičnog prava i postupka,<br />
Informator, Zagreb,1960.p.193<br />
5 Dragan Jovašević, Komentar Krivičnog zakona SR Jugoslavije, Službeni<br />
glasnik, Beograd, 2002.p.26-29<br />
6 Službeni list Republike Crne Gore, Podgorica, No. 70/2003 ; Ljubiša Lazarević-<br />
Branko Vučković- Vesna Vučković, Komentar Krivičnog zakonika Republike<br />
Crne Gore, Obod, Cetinje, 2004.p.142<br />
7<br />
Zoran Stojanović, Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Službeni glasnik, Beograd,<br />
2000.p.148<br />
8<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />
CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
The notion of necessary defence<br />
According to provision article 9. paragraph 2. Basic Criminal Code<br />
(with aplication in Republic of Serbia) , and article 10. paragraph 2.<br />
Criminal code of the Republic of Montenegro , necessary defence is<br />
defence which is necessary for a perpetrator in order to protect himself<br />
or other person from an imminent illegal attack 8 . An act committed in<br />
necessary defence is excusable because the legislator himself considers<br />
that the perpetrator of such act is authorised for commission of that act 9 .<br />
From this definition 10 , it results that necessary defence, in the sense of<br />
institute of criminal law, has to fulfil two conditions-the existence of<br />
attack and protection from such attack. But not every attack gives the<br />
right for necessary defence, nor every protection from attack is<br />
necessary defence. Attack, as well as protection from attack, has to fulfil<br />
conditions cumulatively provided by law.<br />
Conditions for the existence of attack<br />
Attack is every act aimed towards violating or endangering legal<br />
property or legal interest of a person 11 . It is most often undertaken by<br />
action, and sometimes by inaction. In order for an act to be relevant<br />
with the view to institute of necessary defence, it has to fulfil certain<br />
conditions, which are: attack has to be undertaken by man; attack has to<br />
be aimed against any legal property or legal interest of a person; attack<br />
has to be illegal; and attack has to be real.<br />
This solution are providing many modern criminal codes as : article 19.<br />
of Criminal code of the Republic of Albania 12 , article 3 of the Criminal<br />
8 H.H. Jescheck, Lehrbuch des Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Berlin,1972.p.251<br />
9 Vojislav Đurđić- Dragan Jovašević - Ljubiša Zdravković, Nužna odbrana u<br />
krivičnom pravu, Niš, 2004.p. 42-53<br />
10 Dragan Jovašević, Tarik Hašimbegović, Osnovi isključenja krivičnog dela,<br />
Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd, 2001. p. 78-93<br />
11 Josip Šilović, Nužna odbrana, Zagreb, 1910.p.97<br />
12<br />
The Criminal code of the Republic of Albania, Offialia text, Tirana, 2000.<br />
9<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />
CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
code of the Republic of Osterrei 13 , article 13. of the Criminal code of<br />
the Republic of Belarus 14 , article 12. of the Criminal code of<br />
theRepublic of Bulgaria 15 , article 6. of the Criminal code of the<br />
Republic of Finland 16 , article 122-5 of Criminal code of the Republic of<br />
France 17 , article 22. of the Greek criminal law <strong>18</strong> , article 11. of Criminal<br />
code of the Republic of Slovenia 19 , article 9. of the Criminal code of the<br />
Republic of Macedonia 20 , article 29. of the Criminal code of the<br />
Republic of Croatia 21 , article 52. of the Criminal code of the Republic of<br />
Italy 22 , article 22. of the Criminal code of the Republic of Israel 23 , article<br />
20. of the Criminal code of the Peoples Republic of China 24 , articles 32.<br />
and 33. of the Criminal cdoe of the Federal Republic of Germany 25 ,<br />
article 37. of the Criminal code of the Russian federation 26 , article 33. of<br />
the Criminal code of the Swiss federation 27 , article 15. of the Republic<br />
of Ukraine 28 etc.<br />
1) Attack can only be undertaken by man.-If an act is not undertaken by<br />
13<br />
Otto Trifterer, Osterreischesches Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Wien, New<br />
York, 1994.<br />
14<br />
The Suprime Soviet of the BSSR, Criminal code of the Republic of Belarus,<br />
Official text, Minsk, 2001.<br />
15<br />
I. Nenov, Nakazatelno pravo, Obša čast, Sofia, 1993.<br />
16<br />
Finnish Penal code, Finnish Ministry of Justice, Helsinky, 1996.<br />
17<br />
G. Stefani, G. Levasseur, B. Bulock, Droit penal general, Paris, 1994.<br />
<strong>18</strong><br />
N.B.Lolis, G. Mangakis, The Greek penal code, London, 1973.<br />
19<br />
B.Penko, K. Strog, Kazenski zakonik z uvodnimi pojasnili, Ljubljana, 1999.<br />
20<br />
Gorgi Marjanovik, Krivično pravo, Opšt del, Skoplje, 1998.<br />
21<br />
Željko Horvatić, Miroslav Šeparović, Novo hrvatsko kazneno pravo, Zagreb,<br />
1997. ; Željko Horvatić, Petar Novoselec, Kazneno pravo, Opći dio, zagreb,<br />
2001.<br />
22<br />
Compendio di diritto penale, Parte generale e speciale, Simone, Napoli, 2004.<br />
23<br />
Laws of the State of the Israel, Special volume, Penal law, Jerusalem, 1977.<br />
24<br />
C.D. Pagle, Criminal law of the People’s Republic of China, Peking, 1997.<br />
25<br />
W.Gropp, Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1998. ;<br />
U: Ebert, Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Heidelberg, 1993.<br />
26<br />
J.I. Skuratov, V.M.Lebedov, Kommentarii k Ugolovnomu kodeksu v<br />
Rossijskoj federacii, Norma, Moskva, 1996.<br />
27<br />
Schweiserisches Strafgesetzbuch, Stand Am 1. April 1996., Bern, 1997.<br />
28<br />
M.I.Koržanskij, Popularnij kommentar Kriminolnogu kodeksu Ukrajini,<br />
NAUkova dumka, Kiev, 1997.<br />
10<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />
CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
man but by an animal or by a force of nature, then there is the existence<br />
of danger as an element of extreme necessity, but not as well necessary<br />
defence. However, if a person directed a force of nature (torrent,<br />
rockslide) in order to endanger other person or his legal property, or if<br />
an animal (a dangerous dog or a horse) is used as means for<br />
endangering protected property, than these cases are also considered as<br />
necessary defence. Attack could be undertaken by any person, no matter<br />
of the age, accountability or guilt. It could be undertaken by any action<br />
or inaction, as well as using any means which is suitable for violation or<br />
endangering some legal property 29 .<br />
Therefore, necessary defence is excusable in case of an actual attack<br />
(instantaneous or present), as well as in case of imminent attack.<br />
Whether the attack is imminent, is a question which is determined by<br />
court in each particular case, judging all the circumstances of the<br />
committed act and the perpetrator. The attack is imminent when there is<br />
a possibility (in time and place) of the close carrying out an attack 30 .<br />
But, it does not mean that necessary defence is excusable against future,<br />
undetermined in place and time, but indicated attacks. Measures of<br />
precaution and preventive protection against indicated or expected<br />
attacks are excusable only if they do not go over the limits of necessary<br />
measures for that specific moment.<br />
2) Attack has to be aimed against a person, his legal property or legal<br />
interest.-Attacked or endangered properties, in the sense of necessary<br />
defence, could be different. Most often, life and physical integrity is<br />
being attacked, but sometimes it can be property, honour, reputation,<br />
dignity, moral. The object of attack could be any legal property or legal<br />
interest. Law does not explicitly state which are those goods that can be<br />
the objects of attack in the sense of necessary defence. Attack can be<br />
aimed against any legal property of the attacked person, but also against<br />
any legal property of some other physical or legal person. In that way,<br />
29<br />
Petar Novoselec, Krivično pravo, Krivično delo i njegovi elementi, Osijek,<br />
1990.p.35-36<br />
30<br />
Toma Živanović, Krivično pravo Kraljevine Jugoslavije, Opšti deo, Beograd,<br />
1935.p.231<br />
11<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />
CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
attack can be aimed at violating the property of a corporation, facility or<br />
some other organization, but also against state security and its<br />
constitution.<br />
Therefore, necessary defence exists not only in case of protecting from<br />
the attack on a legal property, but also in case of protecting from the<br />
attack on any property of other person (physical or legal) if that person<br />
is not capable of protecting himself from such attack. There are theories<br />
in criminal law 31 , according to which some cases of protecting from the<br />
attack are not considered to be necessary defence, but called “necessary<br />
help”. In any case, the scope and necessity of defence depend in the first<br />
place on the nature of legal property which is attacked or endangered.<br />
3) Attack has to be illegal.-Attack is illegal when it is not based on some<br />
legal regulation and when it is not undertaken on the bases of some<br />
legal authorisation. Therefore, attack which is undertaken during<br />
exercising duty according to some legal authorisation, is not illegal and<br />
necessary defence in that case is not excusable. However, if an<br />
authorised person oversteps the limits of legal authorisation, then such<br />
situation is changed into illegal attack against which necessary defence<br />
is allowed. On the other hand, violation of necessary defence also<br />
changes into illegal attack, in which case the attacker has the right for<br />
defence (because in this case he is in the state of necessary defence).<br />
The right for necessary defence exists no matter if the attacker is<br />
conscious of illegality of his attack or not. Namely, it is enough that the<br />
attacked person objectively realises the attack. It is of no significance<br />
whether the attacker is guilty or not, as well as whether his act is<br />
punishable. Illegal attack could be undertaken by a child or by a<br />
mentally incompetent person. That means that necessary defence on<br />
necessary defence is not excusable. But, different situations in life can<br />
happen, when the attacked person anticipates the possibility of being<br />
attacked in certain place and time because of his relationship with some<br />
person. If in such situations anticipated attack is undertaken, it is<br />
31<br />
Vojislav Đurđić - Dragan Jovašević, Praktikum za krivično pravo, Knjiga<br />
prva, Opšti deo, Službeni glasnik, Beograd,2003.p.26-32<br />
12<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />
CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
considered as illegal.<br />
Even more controversial situation is when a person provokes attack.<br />
There is no dilemma if the attacked person had previously endangered<br />
someone’s integrity or property. The problem arises if such attack is<br />
manifested verbally or only with concluding acts which irritate, provoke<br />
or underestimate the attacker. Social component of the institute of<br />
necessary defence should be considered in such situations. Namely,<br />
necessary defence stands for protecting the rights from illegality, and<br />
because of that abuse of this institute is not excusable. If the attacked<br />
person had deliberately provoked the attack, so as to use it and violate<br />
the attacker or his property, than the attacked person has no right on<br />
necessary defence. Such cases are known as feign necessary defence 32 .<br />
4) Attack has to be real.-Namely, it has to exist really in the outside<br />
world. It means that it is necessary that the attack has already started or<br />
it is imminent. Whether an attack exists or not, is a factual question<br />
which is being solved by court in each specific case. Typical example of<br />
real attack is endangering life or making physical injuries to a person. If<br />
there is no real attack, but the attacked person had a wrong or<br />
incomplete impression or illusion of its existence, there is no basis for<br />
necessary defence. In such case there is putative, imaginable or<br />
ostensible necessary defence. This defence does not exclude the<br />
existence of a criminal act, but it could be a ground for exclusion of the<br />
guilt 33 .<br />
Therefore, putative necessary defence represents, in fact, the lack of<br />
conscience of the attacked person about some real circumstance of the<br />
attack. That is, in fact, wrong impression and conviction that the attack<br />
aimed at violation of some property is real. This mistake could be<br />
related to the conscience about the illegality of the attack (when there is<br />
legal mistake). In other words, putative necessary defence is reduced to<br />
32<br />
Ljubo Bavcon, Alenka Šelih, Kazensko pravo, Splošni del,<br />
Ljubljana,1987.p.151<br />
33<br />
Zoran Stojanović, Komentar Krivičnog zakona SR Jugoslavije, Službeni list,<br />
Beograd, 1999.p.22-24<br />
13<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />
CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
unavoidable mistake, in broader or narrower sense that the attacked<br />
person is in a condition of real and objectively needed necessary<br />
defence. When judging the existence of necessary defence or its<br />
violation, an act has to be seen on the whole, which means that it cannot<br />
be reduced and limited to only what had happened between the<br />
defendant and late (that is, the one who has suffered loss) immediately<br />
before the gun shot 34 .<br />
Conditions for the existence of defence<br />
Defence or protection from the attack is every action of the attacked<br />
person aimed at eliminating, preventing or protecting from the attack.<br />
By protection from the attack, the attacked person himself violates or<br />
endangers some legal property of the attacker. This violation or<br />
endangerment represents, in essence, formal characteristics of some<br />
criminal act from the federal or republic law (most often it is about a<br />
criminal act against life or physical integrity).<br />
Only in case when the attacked person, during the protection from<br />
attack, violates some property of the attacker, the existence of the<br />
institute of necessary defence is possible 35 . Necessary defence is not<br />
only the defence from the attack which endangers security of life of the<br />
attacked person, but every defence from present and illegal attack, if<br />
such defence was necessary for protection from the attack 36 .<br />
For the definition of needed defence, in the sense of penal law, it is<br />
absolutely necessary that the illegal attack is protected from by a<br />
punishable act towards the attacker. If such protection would not be<br />
considered as a punishable act, then it would be a situation beyond the<br />
area of penal law 37 .<br />
34 presuda Vrhovnog suda Srbije Kž. 474/91<br />
35 Gorgi Marjanovik, Krivično pravo, Opšt del, Prosvetno<br />
delo,Skopje,1998.p.<strong>18</strong>3<br />
36 presuda Vrhovnog suda Srbije Kž. 260/70<br />
37<br />
Đorđe Avakumović, Teorija kaznenog prava, Beograd, <strong>18</strong>87-<strong>18</strong>89,p.279<br />
14<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />
CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Defence, as an element of necessary defence, as well, has to fulfil<br />
certain conditions in order to be of criminal legal relevance. These<br />
conditions are: defence consists of protection from the attack; defence<br />
has to be aimed against the property of the attacker; defence has to be<br />
simultaneous with the attack, and defence has to be necessary for the<br />
protection from attack.<br />
1) Defence has to be consisted of protection from the attack.-If defence<br />
is not aimed at protection or prevention of attack, than it is not an<br />
element of necessary defence. Defence, in fact, depends on the existence<br />
of attack. The kind of defence has to be according to the attack.<br />
Attacked person is not obliged to retreat before the attacker. On the<br />
contrary, he is authorised to frustrate and disable the real illegal attack,<br />
in the aim of defence of legal property, by simultaneous legal attack on<br />
the attacker’s legal property 38 .<br />
2) Defence has to be aimed against the attacker and against any of his<br />
legal property or legal interest.-These properties could be various, like:<br />
life, body, estate, honour, reputation, human dignity, though most often<br />
situation is when life of the attacker is violated. But, there are situations<br />
in life, when it is about the violation or endangering legal property and<br />
the attacker, as well as some other person.<br />
Then, in relation to the property of the attacker, the attacked person acts<br />
in necessary defence, and in relation to the violation of property of some<br />
other person, he acts in extreme necessity (if all the conditions provided<br />
by law are fulfilled). That means that the attacked person, in order to<br />
protect his property, cannot put to extreme risk legal properties of other<br />
people. But, if the attacker had used properties of other person while<br />
committing an illegal attack as means of that attack, then, in case of<br />
violation those properties, there is necessary defence 39 .<br />
3) Defence has to be simultaneous with attack.-Defence is simultaneous<br />
38<br />
presuda Vrhovnog suda Srbije Kž. 1355/94<br />
39<br />
Draan Jovašević, Tarik Hašimbegović, Osnovi isključenja krivičnog dela,<br />
Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd, 2001.p.50<br />
15<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />
CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
if it was undertaken at time when attack has been imminent or when it<br />
began, but only up to the moment when it ceased. Attack is imminent<br />
when, from all the circumstances, it could be concluded that it was<br />
about to start, and when there was such danger that violation of legal<br />
property would occur in the next moment. The beginning of an act<br />
which could have direct consequences (death, physical injury, taking<br />
away, destroying or damaging property) is not crucial for beginning of<br />
the attack. Undertaken action which objectively represents imminent<br />
source of danger is essential.<br />
Whether an attack is imminent or not is a factual question which is<br />
being solved by court in each particular case. Only threat of imminent<br />
attack, without undertaking previous actions from which it can be<br />
concluded that the attack was imminent, could not be the reason for<br />
undertaking the act of defence. Defence of future attack is not excusable<br />
either, but still undertaking of some measures of precaution and some<br />
protective measures which start to work automatically in the moment<br />
when the attack starts (like various alarm systems connected with<br />
electrical circuit) is allowed.<br />
When the attack has started, defence could begin in the same moment.<br />
But, it often happens that the attacked person is not in position to react<br />
at the same time when the attack starts. In that case defence could be<br />
undertaken at any time during the attack. Continuity of defence has to<br />
coincide with the continuity of attack. When the attack has stopped, the<br />
right of the attacked on necessary defence stops, too. An attack was<br />
ended if legal property of the attacked person has been violated and<br />
when danger has been caused (as a kind of consequence in cases of<br />
criminal acts of endangering), and when the attacker has committed the<br />
action of attack, but due to accidental circumstances there was no<br />
violation of property of the attacked person.<br />
The right for necessary defence stops if the attack has finally and<br />
definitely ceased, but not in case when the attack was only temporarily<br />
ceased. Whether an attack has ceased or only temporarily ceased is a<br />
factual question which is being solved by court in each particular case.<br />
Attack has temporarily ceased if there is a possibility that it could be<br />
16<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />
CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
continued any moment.<br />
4) Defence has to be necessary for protection from attack.-It is the<br />
defence which exists in case when attack cannot be prevented from in<br />
any other way except for violating the attacker’s property. This means<br />
that violation of attacker’s property has to be necessary, unavoidable in<br />
order to protect from the attack, so the intensity of defence is<br />
correspondent to the intensity of the attack and the manner and means<br />
which were used by attacker. When judging this necessity of defence,<br />
the equivalence between intensity of attack and intensity of defence in<br />
each particular case should be taken into consideration. On the other<br />
hand, this proportion means that violation of the attacker’s property is<br />
proportional with value of the property of the attacked person which<br />
was saved in this way.<br />
Violation of necessary defence<br />
If an attacked person, during the protection from attack on his or<br />
someone else’s legal property, oversteps the limits of defence which is<br />
necessary for protection from that attack, there is violation or excerpt of<br />
necessary defence has prescribed in article 9. paragraph 3. Basic<br />
Criminal Code and article 10. paragraph 3. Criminal code of the<br />
Republic of Montenegro.<br />
This violation, according to intensity, exists when violated property of<br />
the attacker is of greater value then the property saved in this way.<br />
Another kind of violation of necessary defence, according to broadness,<br />
exists in case when the attacked person returns an attack which hasn’t<br />
even started or hasn’t been imminent, or if he/she continues violating<br />
the attacked property after the attack has finally and definitely stopped.<br />
In these cases court is authorised to mitigate the sentence for a<br />
perpetrator of criminal act in violation of necessary defence. In case<br />
when violation of necessary defence was due to strong irritation or<br />
freight of the attacked person, court is authorised to release a perpetrator<br />
of such criminal act from the legal sentence.<br />
17<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />
CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
BASIC LITERATURE<br />
Avakumović Djordje, Teorija kaznenog prava, Beograd, <strong>18</strong>87-<strong>18</strong>89.<br />
Babić Miloš, Krivični zakonik Republike Srpske, Banja Luka, 2001.<br />
Babić Miloš, Komentari krivičnih zakona u Bosni i Hercegovini,<br />
Sarajevo, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />
Bačić Franjo, Komentar Kaznenog zakonika Republike Hrvatske,<br />
Zagreb, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />
Bavcon Ljubo – Šelih Alenka, Kazensko pravo, Splošnij del, Ljubljana,<br />
1987.<br />
Compendio di diritto penale, Parte generale e speciale, Milano, 2004.<br />
Đurđić Vojislav – Jovašević Dragan, Međunarodno krivično pravo,<br />
Nomos, Beograd, 2003.<br />
Đurđić Vojislav – Jovašević Dragan, Praktikum za krivično pravo, Prva<br />
knjiga, Opšti deo, Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2003.<br />
Đurđić Vojislav – Jovašević Dragan – Zdravković Ljubiša, Nužna<br />
odbrana u krivičnom pravu, Niš, 2004.<br />
Ebert Udo, Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Heidelberg, 1993.<br />
Foregger Eugen- Serini Egmont, Strafecht, Gesetzbuch, Wien, 1989.<br />
Gropp Walter, Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Berlin, Heidelberg, New<br />
York, 1998.<br />
Horvatić Željko- Šeparović Miroslav, Novo hrvatsko kazneno pravo,<br />
Informator, Zagreb, 1997.<br />
Horvatić Željko – Novoselac Petar, Kazneno pravo, Opći dio, Zagreb,<br />
2001.<br />
Jescheck H.H., Lehrbuch des Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Berlin, 1972.<br />
Jovanović Ljubiša – Jovašević Dragan, Krivično pravo, Opšti deo,<br />
Nomos, Beograd, 2002.<br />
Jovašević Dragan , Leksikon krivičnog prava, Službeni list, Beograd,<br />
2002.<br />
Jovašević Dragan, Komentar Krivičnog zakona SR Jugoslavije,<br />
Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2002.<br />
Jovašević Dragan – Hašimbegović Tarik, Osnovi isključenja krivičnog<br />
dela, Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd, 2001.<br />
Kambovski Vlado, Krivičen zakonik so kratok objasnuvanja i registar<br />
na poini, Skoplje, 1996.<br />
Kambovski Vlado, Krivično pravo, Opšt del, Skoplje, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />
<strong>18</strong><br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />
CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Koržanskij M.I., Popularnij komentar Kriminolnogu kodeksu, Naukova<br />
dumka, Kiev, 1997.<br />
Lazarević Ljubiša, Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Savremena<br />
administracija, Beograd, 2003.<br />
Lazarević Ljubiša- Vučković Branko- Vučković Vesna, Komentar<br />
Krivič nogzakonika Republike Crne Gore, Cetinje, 2004.<br />
Lolis Nicholas – Mangakis Georgis, The Greek penal code, London,<br />
1973.<br />
Marjanovik Gorgi, Krivično pravo, opšt del, Skoplje, 1998.<br />
Nenov Ivan, Nakazateljno pravo, Obša čast, Paralaks, Norma, Sofija,<br />
1993.<br />
Novoselec Petar, Krivično pravo, Krivično djelo i njegovi elementi,<br />
Osijek, 1990.<br />
Pagle C.D., Criminal lae of the People's Republic of China, Peking,<br />
1997.<br />
Pavišić Berislav, Komentar Kaznenog zakonika Republike Hrvatske ,<br />
Rijeka, 2003.<br />
Petrović Borislav – Jovašević Dragan, Krivično (kazneno) pravo Bosne<br />
i Hercegovine, Opći dio, Sarajevo, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />
Roxin Claus, Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Band 1, Munchen, 1997.<br />
Schweiserisches Strafgesetzbuch, Stand Am 1. April 1996., Bern, 1997.<br />
Skuratov J.I.- Lebedov V.M., Kommentarii k Ugolovnomu kodeksu v<br />
Rossijskoj federacii, Norma, Moskva, 1996.<br />
Stefani G., Levasseur G., Bouloc B., Droit penal general, Pars, 1994.<br />
Stojanović Zoran, Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Službeni glasnik,<br />
Beograd, 2000.<br />
Stojanović Zoran , Komentar Krivičnog zakona SR Jugoslavije,<br />
Beograd, 1999.<br />
Šilović Josip, Nužna odbrana, Zagreb, 1910.<br />
Trifterer Otto, Ostereischisches Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Wien,<br />
Berlin, New York, 1994.<br />
Zlatarić Bogdan, Krivični zakonik u praktičnoj primjeni, Opći dio, Prvi<br />
svezak, Zagreb, 1958.<br />
Zlatarić Bogdan – Damaška Mirjan, Rječnik krivičnog prava i postupka,<br />
Zagreb, 1960.<br />
Živanović Toma, Krivično pravo Kraljevine Jugoslavije, Beograd,<br />
1935.<br />
19<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />
CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
20<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />
CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND<br />
BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF<br />
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE<br />
BY DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ*<br />
INTRODUCTORY REMARKS<br />
When the Roman Statute of permanent International Criminal Court<br />
came into force in the middle of 2002, international criminal law and<br />
international criminal justice – have finally been constituted. It is in the<br />
beginning on XXI century. It is a system of legal regulations contained<br />
within the documents of the international community and national<br />
criminal legislations which determine the concept and characteristics of<br />
international criminal offences, the system of criminal responsibility<br />
and punishments , as well as the bodies and procedures to pronounce<br />
penalties to perpetrators of the most serious crimes against humanity,<br />
peace and international security. This finally brings into life centuries<br />
long idea of establishing universal criminal justice, or justice superior to<br />
national ones, which would pronounce penalties for breaches of<br />
international rules of conduct of states and individuals.<br />
HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL<br />
CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> AND JUSTICE<br />
The appearance and development of international criminal law and<br />
international criminal justice in the recent history can be devided into<br />
three periods : 1) up to the First World War, 2) between the two World<br />
Wars and 3) after the Second World War to today 1 .<br />
* Dragan Jovašević PhD, Associate Professor, Faculty of Law in Nis,<br />
Serbia and Montenegro.<br />
1<br />
Đurđić V., Jovašević D., Medjunarodno krivično pravo,Nomos, Beograd,<br />
2003.p.25-35<br />
21<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
In the first period, the appearance and the development of the<br />
international criminal law was tightly connected with international laws<br />
of war – a special branch of the law that regulates relations between<br />
states, separately belligerents and establishes concrete legal rules of how<br />
a war is started and ended and procedure against civil people, war<br />
prisoners and wounded 2 .<br />
The sources of international criminal law of that time can be found in<br />
the significant codification documents of international laws of war such<br />
as : 1) the Paris Declaration of <strong>18</strong>56. (which provides the principles<br />
according to which goods of neutral countries can’t be seized in<br />
maritime conflicts and piracy is prohibited), 2) the Geneva Convention<br />
of <strong>18</strong>64.(which regulates the position and prohibition of the wounded in<br />
land conflicts), 3) the Petrograd Convention of <strong>18</strong>68. (which prohibits<br />
the usage of explosive grains that weigh less than 400 gr) and 4) the<br />
Hague Conventions of <strong>18</strong>99. and 1907. (which regulate the position and<br />
prohibition of the wounded and civilian in war). It is beginning of new<br />
branch of penal law in XIX century 3 .<br />
In the second period, the period between the two World Wars, following<br />
up the above mentioned legal sources, a number of important<br />
international legal documents were adopted : 1) the Geneva<br />
Conventions of 1919. (which regulate the position and prohibition of the<br />
wounded, sick men and war prisoner), 2) the Geneva Protocol of 1925.<br />
(which prohibits the usage of poison gas and bacteriological means), 3)<br />
the Paris or Briand-Kellog Pact of 1928. (which prohibition a war as<br />
instrument of international politics) and 4) the London Protocol of 1936.<br />
(which regulate the rules of submarine war) 4 .<br />
Besides these normative activities, that under the strong impression of<br />
the previous war, the issue of concrete individual criminal responsibility<br />
was raised for the first time in the international legal system. Pursuant to<br />
2<br />
Radojković M., Rat i medjunarodno pravo,Beograd, 1947.p.12-31<br />
3<br />
Schwarzenberger G. , The Law of the Armed Conflict,London, 1968.<br />
4<br />
More : Lopičić J., Ratni zločin protiv ratnih zarobljenika, Naša knjiga, Beograd,<br />
<strong>2005</strong>.p.13-42<br />
22<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
articles 227. and 230. of the Versailles Peace Treaty from 1919., the<br />
question of the criminal responsibility of German Emperor William II<br />
Hohenzollern, for ‘’a supreme offence against international morality and<br />
the sanctity of treaties has been raised’’. These articles also have<br />
stipulated the constitution of a special ad hoc tribunal to try the accused<br />
highest german state officials upon very serious charges for committing<br />
an act in violation of the laws and customs of war and high principles of<br />
humanity 5 . However, the justice was not served because the former<br />
german emperor was given asylum in the Netherlands which rejected<br />
the request for fih extradiction 6 .<br />
The third period of historical development of international criminal law<br />
is the period after Second World War. This period is marked by the<br />
most virgorous activity and development of this the most joungest<br />
branches of the modern penal law – international criminal law in<br />
therecent history. This is understandable keeping in mind that the world<br />
was faced with more informations about many millions of innocent<br />
victims and invaluable material damage. The knowlwdgw of<br />
individuals, organizations and countries that led to such tragical<br />
consequences had a significant impact on the final decision to raise the<br />
question of criminal responsibility in a proper manner 7 .<br />
Starting from principles of the protection of universal human values and<br />
general interests and then the principle that violations of international<br />
public law have to be sanctioned and that responsibility is not only<br />
historical, morarly and political question or a question of civil law, the<br />
international responsibility of states and the individual (and command)<br />
criminal responsibility have come to the forefront. The changed<br />
approach to the issue of responsibility was founded on the theory to<br />
application the principle of territory, universal values and protection 8 .<br />
In this period , the most important codification of international criminal<br />
5<br />
Lopičić J., Ratni zločin protiv civilnog stanovništva,Beograd, 1999.p.19-27<br />
6<br />
Perazić G., Medjunarodno ratno pravo, Beograd, 1986.p.16-19<br />
7<br />
Avramov S., Kreća M., Medjunarodno javno pravo,Beograd, 1981.p.14-23<br />
8<br />
Leon F., The Law of War, New York, 1972.p.56<br />
23<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
law included the famous Nuremberg Principles ( which were contain in<br />
the Nuremberg judgment from 1948.). Also, this judgment has definited<br />
of new international criminal offences. Pursuant to the United Nations<br />
Security Council Resolution from 1946. the Commission for the<br />
Codification of International law was founded with the purpose of<br />
establishing new principles of international criminal law and of drafting<br />
a new International criminal code.<br />
The draft Code of Crimes against Peace and Security of Mankind was<br />
published in 1954. and it was composed of thirteen articles with<br />
concrete international criminal offences 9 . The work was followed up by<br />
the United Nations International Law Commission which among other<br />
things, was the first to discuss the foundation of a special international<br />
criminal court. Such an approach was supported by the United Nations<br />
Security Council Resolution from 1968. by which the UN Convention<br />
on Unexpirability of International criminal offences ( genocide, was<br />
crimes , crimes against peace and crimes against humanity) was<br />
adapted. In the period from 1980. till July 1998.(Roma Statute), that<br />
Commission has kept on working, specially on the draft Statute of the<br />
permanent International criminal court 10 .<br />
ESTABLISMENT OF AD HOC MILITARY TRIBUNALS<br />
After the victory ver fascism, the question of individual criminal<br />
responsibility for committed crimes war raised again. The legal bases<br />
were the Declaration Concering Atrocities and conclusions of the<br />
Moscow Conference of the Allies from <strong>October</strong> 1943. and the London<br />
Agreement from August 1945. on the established of the International ad<br />
hoc Military Tribunal and on the punishment of war criminals. the<br />
constituent part of this legal document were the Agreement of the Allies<br />
to Try and Punish Major War Criminals of the European Axis and the<br />
Statute of the Military tribunal.<br />
9<br />
V. Vasilijević, Medjunarodni krivični sud, Beograd, 1961.p.34-52<br />
10<br />
Brownlie J., Basic Documents in International Law,Oxford, 2002<br />
24<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Military tribunal in Nuremberg tried the highest military and political<br />
officials of the Third Reich who were accused of initiating the<br />
aggressive war, suffering, atrocities, destructions, crimes against<br />
humanity and war crimes. The criminal trial has started on November<br />
20,1945. and lasted more than two hundred days and the Prosecution<br />
entered indictments against twenty one major war criminals. The<br />
verdicts were announced on <strong>October</strong> 1, 1946 : eleven sentences to death<br />
hanging , three sentences to life imprisonment, four sentences to longer<br />
terms and three acquittals. The verdicts of guilty were handed down on<br />
the leadership and the organizations of the SS, NSDAP, SD and the<br />
Gestapo and these organizations were declared criminal. This is s first<br />
judgment which the legal entities has proclaimed criminal responsibility<br />
because committing war crimes.<br />
The real jurisdiction of this international military tribunal was<br />
determined by article 6. of the Statute (in London Agreement) pursuant<br />
to which international criminal offences were classified into three<br />
categories : 1) crimes against peace, 2) war crimes and 3) crimes<br />
against humanity. The territorial jurisdiction of the tribunal included<br />
implicitly the prosecution of the Second World War war criminals<br />
‘’whose criminal offences do not have some specific geographical<br />
commitment, regardless the fact whether they will be accused<br />
individually or as members of an organization or a group or in both<br />
capacities’’.<br />
Second military ad hoc tribunal 11 was established in Tokyo pursuant to<br />
the Declaration of the military commander, american general Daghlas<br />
Macarthur of allies January 16. 1946. with the purpose of trying<br />
japanese war criminals for war crimes committed in the Far East. The<br />
process in Tokyo has started on April 29. 1946. and lasted till<br />
November 12. 1948. with the result that twenty eight persons were<br />
pronounced guilty for committing war crimes (specialy war crimes<br />
against war prisoners). During the proccedings four perons died, one<br />
was pronounced insane and the criminal proccedings against him was<br />
stayed. The Tokyo military tribunal passed the following sentences :<br />
11<br />
Josipović I., Haško implenetacijsko kazneno pravo,Zagreb, 2000. p.45-62<br />
25<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
seven dealth penalties, fourteen life imprisonment sentences and two<br />
persons were sentenced to prison with various terms 12 .<br />
In short, legal proccedings before ad hoc tribunals in Nuremberg and<br />
Tokyo contrinuted significantly to the afirmation of principles of<br />
individual criminal responsibility, command responsibility (in Tokyo<br />
judgement), system international criminal offences, and to the<br />
development of international criminal law and especially to the<br />
institutionalization of the idea of international criminal justice 13 . The<br />
end XX century give first permanent international (Roma) criminal<br />
court in Hague 14 .<br />
HAGUE TRIBUNAL (ICTY) FOR FORMER<br />
SFR YUGOSLAVIA<br />
The international tribunal for criminal procesution of persons<br />
responsible for serious violations of international humanitarian law<br />
committed in the teritory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991.<br />
(International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia – ICTY) is one<br />
of ad hoc tribunals established after strong indications of war crimes or<br />
crimes against humanity committed in war conflicts in the territory of<br />
the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY). This<br />
tribunal was established by the United Nations Security Council<br />
Resolution No. 827/93 from May 25,1993. and accordance with the<br />
previous acts issued by the same body – Resolution No. 780/92 from<br />
<strong>October</strong> 6. 1992 and Resolution No. 808/93 from February 22. 1993. In<br />
the material legal sense of meaning, this international ad hoc tribunal is<br />
authorized to investigate alleged war crimes belonging to the group of<br />
legal principles of the Nuremberg (1946.) and Tokyo (1948.)<br />
Tribunales Judgements and Code of the crimes against peace and safety<br />
of Mankind and to establish cempetenlty the individual responsibility<br />
12<br />
Perazić G., Međunarodno ratno pravo,Beograd, 1986. p.14-31<br />
13<br />
C.Van den Wyngaert, International criminal law, Kluwer, Hague, London,<br />
Boston, 2001.p.12-34<br />
14<br />
UN. Doc. A/Conf. <strong>18</strong>3/9, International Legal Materials, 1999.<br />
26<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
for concrete international criminal acts 15 .<br />
Similar ad hoc tribunales with similar jurisdiction, system international<br />
criminal offences and rules about criminal responsibility and<br />
punishments have established United Nations Security Council as : 1)<br />
International criminal tribunal for Rwanda which established of Security<br />
Council Resolution No.955/94 from November 8. 1994 16 , 2) Special<br />
court for Sierra Leone which established of Security Council<br />
Resolution No 1315/2000 from August 14, 2000 and 3) Iraqi special<br />
tribunal which established of the Statute of the Iraqi special tribunal<br />
from December 10. 2003 17 .<br />
The establishment of the Hague tribunal attracted large attention of the<br />
whole world, especially of expert circles in Serbia and Montenegro and<br />
abroad. The first remark is deal with statutory questions. Legal<br />
representatives and the accused raised most often the question of the<br />
legality of the establishment, existence and functioning of ad hoc<br />
tribunals <strong>18</strong> .<br />
The second remark is deal with the defense of the accused. Some legal<br />
representatives of the Defense have pointed out that they do not have<br />
the same effective abilities as the Prosecution, especially in the very<br />
important phase of evidence collection and finding witnesses 19 . Defense<br />
are significantly of the protected witness because the identity of the<br />
witness is not revealed till the trial and it is not possible to contact that<br />
group of persons till the very moment of having the main hearings 20 .<br />
Third remark is deal with the tribulal procedure and the trial in absentia.<br />
15<br />
Vasilijević V., Međunarodni krivični sud,Beograd, 1961.p. 64-68<br />
16<br />
Blakesley Ch., Definition and Triggering Mechanism, The International<br />
criminal court, AIDP,1997.<br />
17<br />
www. cpa-iraq.org/human _rights/statute.htm<br />
<strong>18</strong><br />
Josipović I., Haško implementacijsko kazneno pravo, Zagreb, 2000.p. 124-141<br />
19<br />
Đurđić V., Jovašević D., Međunarodno krivično pravo, Beograd, 2003. p. 33-<br />
34<br />
20<br />
More about remarks against Hague Tribunal in theory criminal law in Serbia<br />
and Montenegro : Stojanović Z., Međunarodno krivično pravo, Beograd, 2002.<br />
27<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Pursuant article 61. of the Statuet of Hague Criminal Tribunale (ICTY)<br />
there is a possibility to initiate proceedings against a person who<br />
currently can’t be accessed by the Tribunal in Hague under the<br />
condition that the indictment against the person has already been raised<br />
and the procedure of brining evidence has been initiated. Here again, the<br />
Hague Tribunal has wide authorities and a possibility to initiate the<br />
proceedings to rewiev and reconfirm the indictment, to declare<br />
internationally a wanted person and to make all countries collaboration.<br />
The participation of the Defense attorneys at this stage is not permitted<br />
and it is conditioned by the first appearance of the accused before the<br />
Tribual 21 . Up to that moment, the Defense attorneys may participate in<br />
the process only as spectators.<br />
REWIEV ON COLLABORATION BETWEEN SERBIA AND<br />
MONTENEGRO AND HAGUE TRIBUNAL<br />
The Dayton-Paris Peace Agreement that was signed in the end of 1995.<br />
(which finnished civil war in Bosnia and Herzegovina) established a<br />
whole range of obligations assigned to all signatories.Among other<br />
things, by singing the agreement the signatories undoubtedly<br />
acknowledged and accepted the existence and activity of the Hague<br />
Tribunal (ICTY) and have undertaken upon themselves the international<br />
legal obligation to collaboration with this Tribunale in Hague. As a<br />
signatory, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (today Serbia and<br />
Montenegro from February 4. 2003 22 .) similarly has undertaken this<br />
and other international obligations, keeping in mind that the same issue<br />
was regulated directly or indirectly by the internal legislation and<br />
numerous previously enacted international documents (as United<br />
Nations Security Council resolutions, conventions, agreements etc).<br />
The collaboration between a government in Belgrade and the Hague<br />
Tribunal evolved in several periods between from 1995. to <strong>2005</strong>. In the<br />
21<br />
Đurđić V., Jovašević D., Međunarodno krivično pravo, Beograd, 2003. p. 117-<br />
1<strong>18</strong><br />
22<br />
Official Gazette of Serbia and Montenegro No. 1/2003<br />
28<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
first period (1995.-2000), the relationship between the FR Yugoslavia<br />
and the Hague Tribunal was hampered with political antagonism,<br />
general lack of trust, politics of the international community that was<br />
expressed by making conditions and putting pressure. The official<br />
bodies of government in Belgrad ( competent organs of the Federal<br />
Republic of Yugoslavia or competent organs of the Republic of Serbia)<br />
at the time did not manage to harmonize their relations with other<br />
relevant key players of the international relations (in international<br />
community) above all the United States or their European allies.<br />
After the change power in FR Yugoslavia (after presidental elections in<br />
Octobar 2000.) aarived the second period in relationship and<br />
collaboration between FR Yugoslavia and Hague tribunal. This<br />
collaboration has have a many remarks and stoppages. From the point of<br />
view of internal law system, the legal situation was somewhat unclear<br />
and that led to delay in concrete forms of collaboration with the Hague<br />
Tribunal . First of all, this may be applied to the requests made by the<br />
Hague Tribunal to the FR Yugoslavia to extradite its citizens suspected<br />
of committing war crimes and crimes against humanity who are in the<br />
territory of our country. The dilemma about the collaboration with the<br />
Hague Tribunal appeared because of constitutional, political, legal and<br />
other reasons.<br />
Legal dilemmas appeared above all because of normative solutions of<br />
the Yugoslav Constitution (from 1992.) and Constitution of Republic of<br />
Serbia (from 1990.) and Code about Criminal Proceedings 23 (from 1976.<br />
with more novels) and especially because of the provision dealing with<br />
the extradition of Yugoslav citizens to foreign courts. In the legal<br />
vacuum, the Federal Government have tried to find legal form that<br />
would enable the protection of our national interest and to avoid the<br />
introduction of new sanctions of international community and fulfil the<br />
requests made by the Hague Tribunal. Till the federal law was enacted,<br />
the Federal Government as a temporary solution has adopted the<br />
Provision on the Collaboration Procedures with the International<br />
23<br />
Jekić Z., Krivično procesno pravo,Beograd, 1992.p.347-351 ; Đurđić V.,<br />
Krivično procesno pravo, Niš, 1998.p. 269-272<br />
29<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Criminal Tribunal 24 (2001.). According to this legal act, the rules<br />
dealing with the jurisdiction of the Hague Tribunal to undertake<br />
investigations in the FR Yugoslavia, the yielding of criminal<br />
proceedings led before Yugoslav courts, the appropriate application of<br />
the Code about Criminal Proceedings provisions, the issue of leagl<br />
assistance, the execution of the verdicts in the territory of the FR<br />
Yugoslavia etc. were established.<br />
The Federal Government of FR Yugoslavia has given priority to<br />
international law and direct application of the Statute of the Hague<br />
Tribunal, starting from the view that the Tribunal is as international<br />
institution and that the FR Yugoslavia has to respect all internationally<br />
undertaken obligations and norms of international public law and<br />
international criminal law. But, the Federal Constitution Court has<br />
passed the decision that this Provision does not comply with the<br />
Yugoslav Constitution and Code about Criminal Proceedings 25 . In its<br />
legal explanation, the Federal Constitution Court started from the<br />
opposite opinion in comparision to the Federal Government’s opinion,<br />
giving priority to the internal legal order.<br />
Starting from these facts, the government of the Republic of Serbia<br />
adopted a similar by law a special Provision on the Collaboration with<br />
the International Criminal Tribunal 26 (2002.). The enactment of the<br />
Republic act ‘’solved’’ the problem of collaboration with the Hague<br />
Tribunal for a very short period of time because internally there were<br />
still political disputes and no consensus in that respect. The adoption of<br />
the legal acts of a higher hierarchy was an imperative and more serious<br />
considerations started especially because of the international factor.<br />
Finally, the Federal Assembly of FR Yugoslavia adopted in 2002.the<br />
Code on the Collaboration of the FR Yugoslavia with the International<br />
Tribunal for criminal procesution of persons responsible for serious<br />
violations of international humanitarian law in territory of former<br />
24 Official Gazette of the FR Yugoslavia, No. 30/2001<br />
25 Official Gazette of FR Yugoslavia, No. 70/2001<br />
26<br />
Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 14/2002<br />
30<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Yugoslavia from 1991 27 . This Code is short legal act and it has 41<br />
articles in total, classified in seven chapters that cover : 1) general<br />
provisions, 2) the authorities of the Tribunal to conduct investigation in<br />
the territory of the FR Yugoslavia, 3) the yielding of cases led before<br />
local courts, 4) the extradition of the accused, 5) legal help to the<br />
Tribunal, 6) the execution of the verdicts made by the Tribunal in the<br />
territory of the FR Yugoslavia and 7) other provosions 28 .<br />
In material-legal sense f meaning, the nature of this Code iz lex<br />
specialis in this matter. In the general provisions, special emphasis has<br />
been given to the principle of priority of international obligations<br />
accepted by the FR Yugoslavia pursuant to international law, especially<br />
the provisons of the Statute of the Hague Tribunal (article 2. of this<br />
Code). On the other hand, the principle of the sovereignty of the FR<br />
Yugoslavia is also stressed in cases of potential collisions with the<br />
Hague Tribunal requests (article 4. of this Code) and the establishment<br />
of the Special National Council for Collaboration with the Hague<br />
Tribunal has been envisaged (article 7. of this Code). Other legal<br />
solutions under this Code in initial chapters are mainly well-known to<br />
experts and general public from the previous practice of the Hague<br />
Tribunal.<br />
In procedural-legal sense of meaning, the Code has regulated to a great<br />
extent and very precisely , the collaboration procedures of domestic<br />
citizens with the Hague Tribunal. The second chapter provisions<br />
(articles 9-11. of this Code) envisage concrete powers of the Hague<br />
Tribunal to undertake investigative activities in the FR Yugoslavia such<br />
as : the collection of informations, interviews with the suspects,<br />
accused, witnesses, sworn-in court experts, the performance of<br />
autopsies and exhumation of corpses, the collection of material<br />
evidence, review and coping of records etc. One limitation deals with<br />
an obligation to respect national sovereignty, security and legal order of<br />
the FR Yugoslavia (article 10. paragraph 3. of this Code). The next<br />
27<br />
Official Gazette of FR Yugoslavia, No.<strong>18</strong>/2002<br />
28<br />
More: Jovašević D., Medjunarodno krivično pravo – teorija,<br />
zakonodavstvo,praksa, Službeni list, Beograd, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />
31<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
chapter (articles 12-17. of this Code) regulates the yielding of criminal<br />
cases conducted before a local court which is in keeping with already<br />
known forms of international criminal court collaboration (legal<br />
assistance).<br />
The central place of the Code from 2002. has been given to the<br />
extradition procedure of the accused that is envisaged under the fourth<br />
chapter (articles <strong>18</strong>-31. of this Code). In compliance with article <strong>18</strong>. the<br />
extradition procedure is relevant, first of all, for the accused and there<br />
are no exceptions on that basis as for their privilegs and immunity, not<br />
even for the Heads of States. The decision on the extradition of the<br />
accused is passed by bodies of Republic of Serbia. The body that is<br />
really authorized to pass a decision on the extradition of a person is the<br />
court that receives from the Ministry of Justice of Republic of Serbia<br />
(former Federal Ministry of Justice , before February 4. 2003.), the case,<br />
that is the request for extradition, confirmed indictment and an orrder to<br />
perform the arrest. Pursuant to that, the authorized investigative judge<br />
determines obligatory detention for the person asked for in the<br />
extradition request and the accused always has to have a lawyer. The<br />
detention term may be also defined before the request is submitted and<br />
expecially in urgent and justifiable cases (the person is on the run or<br />
hiding etc). The Code offers other guarantees as well in relation to the<br />
perpetrator and the criminal offence, especially that the accused shall be<br />
released within 48 hours if the domestic competent court does not<br />
receive theextradition reguest with the confirmed indictment.<br />
The bodies of the Interior Ministry of Republic of Serbia have a<br />
significant role in this phase of the extradition procedure because they<br />
are authorized to arrest the accused (article 23. of this Code). This also<br />
applies to persons for whom formally-legally there is no order issued by<br />
an investigative judge. It is sufficient to be put on the wanted list a local<br />
body or the Hague Tribunal. The obligation of the police is to give the<br />
arrested person to further jurisdiction of the court, so that provosion is<br />
the same as in Code about Criminal Proceedings 29 . Other provisions in<br />
29<br />
More : Jovašević D., Zakonik o krivičnom postupku, Službeni list, Beograd,<br />
2004. In the Republic of Serbia in application is Code about od Criminal<br />
32<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
this chapter deal with the imprisonment appeal procedures and passing<br />
the final decision.<br />
Closing chapters (chapter five and chapter six) contain standard forms<br />
of international criminal legal assistance (articles 32-35). The last , seve<br />
chapter of this Code on the Collaboration of the FR Yugoslavia with the<br />
Hague Tribunal from 2002. includes other provisons and the most<br />
important is the one dealing with the voluntary surrender of persons<br />
(Article 36. of this Code) and guarantees given by domestic local<br />
bodies in relation to a request to be out on pre-trial release.<br />
THE THEORY NOTION OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL<br />
<strong>LAW</strong><br />
There is not a unanimous understanding of the notion and content of the<br />
international criminal law in theory. According to the oldest 19 th century<br />
view this notion includes a set of rules on special validity of national<br />
criminal legislation or the set of rules on application of national criminal<br />
law depending on where a crime was committed or depending on the<br />
nationality of its perpetrator. 30 A slightly broader view of this branch of<br />
law is the one, which in addition to the above said content includes also<br />
the rules regarding international legal aid in criminal matters (lodging<br />
information on perpetrators, validity of international courts decisions<br />
and other). Since they lack the international rules certain countries<br />
determine on their own the validity of their criminal laws referring to<br />
the acts committed abroad or to foreign citizens as crime perpetrators; in<br />
this way the international criminal law adequately to international<br />
private law used to be limited to the settlement of conflicts of criminal<br />
laws of various countries.<br />
Proceedings from 2001. Official Gazette of FR Yugoslavia, No. 70/2001 and<br />
68/2002 and Official Gazette of Republic of Serbia, No. 58/2004. In the Republic<br />
of Montenegro in application is Code about Criminal Proceedings from 2003.<br />
Official Gazette of Republic of Montenegro, No. 70/2003<br />
30<br />
Jescheck, H. H., Lehrbuch des Strafrechts, Allgemeiner Teil, 2. Auflage,<br />
Berlin, 1972, p. 127<br />
33<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
There is also a specific view of international criminal law, which<br />
defines this branch of law as a set of rules that determine the conditions<br />
and assumptions according to which the states must help each other in<br />
legal cases in order to insure the performance of their penal authority<br />
within the international community. 31 There are also some views in<br />
theory according to which the international criminal law is a discipline<br />
that determines the jurisdiction of criminal courts of a country in<br />
relation to the jurisdiction of foreign courts, then the application of<br />
material and criminal proceedings laws in relation to the place and<br />
perpetrators as well as the execution of foreign court decisions,<br />
especially criminal court decisions, and legal aid in criminal matters and<br />
extradition. 32<br />
There are also various interpretations of this notion in our domestic<br />
criminal law theory. For instance, the international criminal law is<br />
determined as a set of rules of international community of states or<br />
contracts between certain states by which the international criminal acts<br />
and penalties for their perpetrators are established in order to protect<br />
international relations (international peace and security of mankind). 33<br />
There is a similar opinion according to which the international criminal<br />
law is a set of rules and regulations contained in the documents of the<br />
international community and contracts concluded between certain<br />
countries by which the international criminal acts and penalties are<br />
established in order to preserve the international peace and security of<br />
mankind, as well as a set of rules which provide for the conditions for<br />
international legal aid referring to the application of penalties to the<br />
crime perpetrators. 34 In theory we can also find a definition of<br />
international criminal law as an entirety of criminal law norms referring<br />
to international relations. 35 There is also an interesting definition<br />
31<br />
Martens, Traite de droit international penal, Paris, <strong>18</strong>87, p.5<br />
32<br />
Zlatarić, B., Medjunarodno krivično pravo, Prvi deo, Rasprostranjenost<br />
represivne vlasti države, Zagreb, 1979, p. 15-<strong>18</strong><br />
33<br />
Čejović, B., Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Beograd, 2002, p. 51-52; Radovanović,<br />
M., Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Beograd, 1975. p. 10<br />
34<br />
Jovanović, Lj., Jovašević, D., Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Beograd, 2002, p. 24-<br />
25<br />
35<br />
B. Zlatarić, op. cit., p. 24<br />
34<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
according to which the international criminal law includes both the<br />
international legal aspects of criminal law and criminal law aspects of<br />
public international law. 36<br />
THE CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL<br />
<strong>LAW</strong><br />
According to such definitions of the notion of the international criminal<br />
law, it follows that it has the below mentioned characteristics:<br />
1) It consists of two set of rules. The first set is made of rules, which<br />
establish the international criminal offences. Here we can distinguish<br />
two kinds of criminal offences. The first kind covers the conduct<br />
breaching the international contracts, agreements or guarantees and in<br />
this way disturbing or endangering peace between nations and the<br />
security of mankind or breaching war rules and practices and<br />
maltreatment of war prisoners, the wounded, the sick, shipwrecked<br />
persons and civilians, or the conduct destroying biological, economic,<br />
cultural and other conditions necessary for the existence of a nation or<br />
national, racial, religious or ethnic group. The second kind includes all<br />
remaining international crimes breaching or endangering values<br />
protected by the international criminal law (offences related to<br />
narcotics, prostitution, pornography, piracy, hijacking, terrorism,<br />
hostage taking, and other) 37 .<br />
The second set consists of the rules by which the conflicts regarding<br />
spatial validity of criminal laws of various countries are settled and the<br />
rules regarding the international legal aid related to the extradition of<br />
crime perpetrators to countries on whose territories they committed<br />
crimes for pronouncing or execution of penalties.<br />
2) The source of these rules is in the international legal documents. Here<br />
36<br />
Stojanović, Z., Medjunarodno krivično pravo, Beograd, 2002, p. 3<br />
37<br />
Đurđić V., Jovašević D., Međunarodno krivično pravo, Beograd, 2003. godine,<br />
str.46<br />
35<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
we distinguish the universal documents of the international community<br />
which are therefore yielded within or under the wing of the UN, and<br />
then the documents of regional organizations (such as the Council of<br />
Europe) or the contracts concluded between two or more countries.<br />
3) These are the legal rules, which do not have statutory character, so<br />
unlike the national criminal law that is the statutory law, here we do not<br />
have a statutory law although one of the basic principles of the<br />
international criminal law is the principle of legality.<br />
4) The rules refer both to material and proceedings law. There are<br />
certain rules, which only partially determine certain issues or institutes<br />
of international criminal law, but there are also rules (Roman Statute of<br />
the permanent International Criminal Court –1998.) which completely<br />
establish the field of this branch of law.<br />
5) Some of the rules which have the international character are applied<br />
directly to concrete cases where crimes were committed and to their<br />
perpetrators through the practices of the International Court of Justice of<br />
the Hague for former SFR Yugoslavia (1993.)or the Court for Rwanda<br />
(1994.) or Sijerra Leone (2000.) or Iraqi Special tribunal (2003.) and<br />
some only in case and when certain countries incorporate them in their<br />
national criminal legislation after ratification (for instance, the<br />
Convention on the laundry, search, seizure or confiscation of illegally<br />
gained income or UN Convention against transnational organized<br />
crime).<br />
The notion of the international criminal law very often means a set of<br />
international documents, which is binding for the states, which accepted<br />
them to incorporate certain conducts qualified as crimes in their<br />
respective criminal legislations. According to such opinions, there are<br />
two kinds of international crimes – in narrow or broad sense. In narrow<br />
sense, these are the crimes contained in the sentences of Nuremberg<br />
(1946) and Tokyo (1948) courts: crimes against peace, crimes against<br />
humankind and war crimes. In a broader sense, it is any conduct, which<br />
the international community would like to suppress on the national<br />
level: crimes related to narcotics, trafficking in white slaves, weapons,<br />
36<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
nuclear substances, pornography and prostitution, hijacking, and<br />
similar. 38<br />
Therefore, the international criminal law, which referred to settling of<br />
conflicts of spatial validity of criminal laws and international legal aid,<br />
becomes the international criminal law, which refers to establishing of<br />
international crimes and penalties for their perpetrators. Considering the<br />
tendencies expressed during recent years in the field of international law<br />
in general, it can be assumed that the content of such an understood<br />
international criminal law will be extended further. After the Roman<br />
Statute of the permanent International Criminal Court came into force it<br />
can be said that the international criminal law is a system of legal rules<br />
determined by this Statute establishing international crimes, basic penal<br />
responsibility and penal system for the perpetrators as well as the<br />
proceedings before the international criminal court and the rules<br />
contained in the national criminal legislation determining basics and<br />
conditions for international criminal legal aid. 39<br />
But taking into account that in the majority of countries today there is a<br />
large number of the same or very similar crimes with the same type and<br />
range of prescribed penalties, that a great number of the institutes of<br />
criminal law in general refers to crimes, complicity, the system of<br />
criminal liability, and that the penal system which is unified to a great<br />
extent, the theory raised a question of unification of criminal legislation<br />
which would lead to the creation of such a criminal law which would be<br />
binding for all or at least the majority of countries and their citizens.<br />
This would in a specific manner bring about the idea of the international<br />
criminal law, which would be uniform and generally applied for the<br />
whole human and social community.<br />
This concept, however, could not be brought to life at this level of<br />
mankind development, first of all due to the differences in socioeconomic<br />
and political systems and legal system of certain countries<br />
(although there are certain shifts, for instance regarding the construction<br />
38<br />
Stojanović, Z., Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Beograd, 2001, p. 33<br />
39<br />
Jovašević, D., Leksikon krivičnog prava, Beograd, 2002, p. 275-276<br />
37<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
of criminal law of European union or European criminal law), and in<br />
addition to this due to the differences in opinions, degree of<br />
development, tradition, culture, criminal policy and other. This is why<br />
we talk less about a complex and thorough international criminal law<br />
and insist more that certain socially dangerous acts of the international<br />
character be established as punishable in all countries.<br />
Therefore, the unification of criminal legislation under present<br />
conditions of development of international community is not realistic.<br />
This however does not mean that the cooperation among countries<br />
cannot and should not be established which would include building of<br />
certain general principles and rules of criminal law. It should also take<br />
into account that the legislations of some countries (such as Germany,<br />
France or Great Britain) have considerable influence on the<br />
development of criminal legislations of other countries (there is a great<br />
influence of Anglo-Saxon precedent criminal law in the countries of<br />
former Commonwealth).<br />
THE SUBJECT OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong><br />
Regardless of what term we use to name this branch of law, it is<br />
obviously the branch of law, which aims to determine international<br />
criminal offences, the penal system for their perpetrators, the bases and<br />
conditions of penal responsibility and culpability, as well as the<br />
procedures to establish liability and pronounce and execute penalties by<br />
the competent judicial authorities. The subject of the international<br />
criminal law therefore includes two notions and institutes – the notions<br />
of material and procedural character. The notion of general and the<br />
notion of special part of criminal law are distinguished within the<br />
material notion and institutes.<br />
The subject of the general part of criminal law includes establishing of<br />
the notion and elements of international criminal offences, stages in<br />
their commitment, grounds excluding the existence of crime,<br />
commitment of crime by one person or types of complicity, grounds for<br />
criminal liability (state of mind and guilt) as well as the system of<br />
38<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
penalties and bases of excluding from criminal liability and right to<br />
punishment.<br />
The special part of criminal law determines the notion, features and<br />
characteristics of basic, qualified and privileged forms of international<br />
crimes and penalties for their perpetrators.<br />
The procedural part of international criminal law determines the system<br />
and organization of international criminal justice, architecture and<br />
course of proceedings (first instance proceedings and proceedings on<br />
appeal), place, role and status of certain proceedings subjects (parties<br />
and other participants) in conducting proceedings activities aimed at<br />
clearing and resolving criminal matter in whole in a legal and equitable<br />
manner.<br />
However, when we speak about the international criminal law (as a<br />
branch of positive law) it should be said that this term in addition to the<br />
above said includes also the science of international criminal law as a<br />
law of legal science which studies all above mentioned terms and<br />
institutes which actually represent the subject of regulation and<br />
establishing of the international criminal law as a set of legal rules of<br />
the international community. On one hand this study aims at providing<br />
as good an understanding and as regular application on concrete<br />
practical cases as possible, and on the other hand at providing for its<br />
further development and improvement in order to increase the efficiency<br />
of action.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Following two and a half century long historical development a new<br />
branch of penal law – the international criminal law – has finally grew<br />
up at the beginning of 21 st century. This branch of law has formally<br />
acquired ‘civil rights’ when the Roman Statute of the permanent<br />
International Criminal Court in the Hague came into force in the middle<br />
of 2003. It is namely the law which analogue to other branches of<br />
positive penal law determines the notion and elements of international<br />
39<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
criminal offences (aggression, crimes against humanity, genocide and<br />
war crimes), stages of their commitment, forms of complicity, notion<br />
and characteristics of penal responsibility, as well as a system of<br />
penalties (material law) and the notion and features of proceedings<br />
subjects: prosecution and courts, the course and architecture of criminal<br />
proceedings (procedural part).<br />
By pronouncing sentences and execution of penalties to perpetrators of<br />
international crimes within Nuremberg and Tokyo courts, as well as by<br />
ad hoc tribunals, the norms of the international criminal law came into<br />
life in court practice. This has created not only theoretical and legal but<br />
also practical bases for establishing and further implementation of the<br />
international criminal law and this paper presents its basic notions,<br />
features and characteristics. Further development of national criminal<br />
laws and unification of many general and basic institutes of criminal<br />
law create bases for final establishment of transnational criminal law,<br />
which would include all, or at least the majority of contemporary<br />
civilization by its implementation.<br />
BASIC LITERATURE:<br />
Avramov, S. Kreća, M., Medjunarodno javno pravo, Beograd, 1981.<br />
Babić M., Komentari krivičnih zakona u Bosni i Hercegovini, Sarajevo,<br />
<strong>2005</strong>.<br />
Bačić F., Komentar Kaznenog zakonika Republike Hrvatske, Zagreb,<br />
<strong>2005</strong>.<br />
Basic Documents , United Nations, ICTY, 1995.<br />
Bassiouni, M.C., Crimes against Humanity in International criminal<br />
Law, Dordecht, 1992.<br />
Brownlie J., Basic Documents in International Law, Oxford, 2002.<br />
Compendio di Diritto penale, Parte generale e speciale, Napoli, 2004.<br />
Čejović B., Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Beograd, 2002.<br />
Gattegno, P, Droit penal special, Paris, 2003.<br />
Geninet, B., L indispensable du droit penal, Paris, 2002.<br />
Djurdjić V., Krivično procesno pravo,Niš, 1998.<br />
Djurdjić, V. – Jovašević, D., Medjunarodno krivično pravo, Beograd,<br />
40<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
2003.<br />
Janković, B., Medjunarodno javno pravo, Sarajevo, 1960.<br />
Janković, B.,- Radivojević, Z., Medjunarodno javno pravo, Niš, 2002.<br />
Jekić Simić Z., Krivično procesno pravo, Beograd, 1992.<br />
Jescheck H.H., Lehrbuch des Strafrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, Berlin, 1972.<br />
Josipović I., Haško implementacijsko kazneno pravo, Zagreb, 2000.<br />
Jovanović, Lj. – Jovašević, D., Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Beograd,<br />
2002.<br />
Jovašević D., Leksikon krivičnog prava, Beograd, 2002.<br />
Jovašević D., Komentar Krivičnog zakona SR Jugoslavije, Beograd,<br />
2002.<br />
Jovašević D., Zakonik o krivičnom postupku, Beograd, 2004.<br />
Jovašević D., Medjunarodno krivično pravo – teorija, zakonodavstvo,<br />
praksa, Beograd, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />
Klotter, J.-Edwards, T., Criminal Law, Cinsinnati, 1998.<br />
Kambovski V., Megunarodno krivično pravo, Skoplje, 2003<br />
Koržanskij M.I., Popularnij komenar Kriminolnogu kodeksu, Kiev,<br />
1997.<br />
Lazarević Lj., Vučković B., Vučković V., Komentar Krivičnog zakonika<br />
Republike Crne Gore, Cetinje, 2004.<br />
Leon, F.,The Law of the War, New York, 1972.<br />
Lopičić J., Ratni zločin protiv civilnog stanovništva,Beograd, 1999.<br />
Lopičić J., Ratni zločin protiv ratnih zarobljenika, Beograd, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />
Martens, Traite de droit international penal, Paris, <strong>18</strong>87.<br />
Molan M., Criminal law, Textbook, Charlton, London,2003.<br />
Marjanović G., Krivično pravo, Opšt del, Skoplje, 1998.<br />
Nenov I., Nakazatelno pravo na Republika Blgaria, Obša čast, Knjiga<br />
vtora, Sofija, 1992.<br />
Perazić G., Medjunarodno ratno pravo, Beograd, 1986.<br />
Petrović B., Jovašević D., Krivično (kazneno) pravo Bosne i<br />
Hercegovine, Opći dio, Sarajevo, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />
Petrović B:, Jovašević D., Krivično (kazneno) pravo Bosne i<br />
Hercegovine, Posebni dio, Sarajevo, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />
Radojković M., Rat i medjunarodno pravo, Beograd, 1947.<br />
Radulović D., Medjunarodno krivično pravo, Podgorica, 1999.<br />
Schwarzenberger G., The Law of the Armed Conflict, London, 1968.<br />
Skuratov J.., Lebedov V.M., Kommentari k Ugolonomu kodeksu v<br />
41<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Rossijskoj federacii, Moskva, 1996.<br />
Spinelis D.D., Essays on criminal sciences, Atina Komotini,2001.<br />
Stojanović Z., Komentar Krivičnog zakona SR Jugoslavije, Beograd,<br />
1999.<br />
Stojanović Z., Medjunarodno krivično pravo, Beograd, 2002.<br />
Vasilijević V., Medjunarodni krivični sud, Beograd, 1961.<br />
Vučinić Z., Medjunarodno ratno i humanitarno pravo, Beograd, 1996.<br />
Zlatarić B.,Medjunarodno krivično pravo, Rasprostranjenost represivne<br />
vlasti države, Zagreb, 1979.<br />
Wyngaert C.V., International criminal law, Hague, London, Boston,<br />
2001.<br />
42<br />
DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED<br />
INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT<br />
BY DR. ANWAR FRANGI*<br />
There are three general types of conflict under positive international<br />
humanitarian law: (1) tension 1 , (2) disturbance 2 , and (3) armed conflict 3 .<br />
* LL.M. 1995, Harvard University Law School (Massachusetts, USA); LL.M.<br />
1992, American University Washington College of Law (Washington, D.C.);<br />
Doctorat en droit 1986, University of Poitiers Law School (France); D.E.A.<br />
1983, University of Poitiers Law School (France); LL.B. 1982, Lebanese<br />
University Law School (Lebanon). Dr. Frangi is full-time Senior Lecturer<br />
and Researcher at the Holy Spirit University of Kaslik (Lebanon), and<br />
professor of international law and philosophy of law at La Sagesse<br />
University Faculty of Law (Lebanon).<br />
1<br />
‘Internal tensions’ involve situations “which are not marked by acts of violence.”<br />
(See Commentaire des Protocoles additionnels du 8 juin 1977 aux<br />
Conventions de Genève du 12 août 1949, Comité international de la Croix-<br />
Rouge, Genève, 1986, p. 89). Under ‘internal tensions’ may be included massive<br />
arrests; a large number of ‘political’ detainees; probable existence of<br />
maltreatment or inhumane conditions of detention; suspension of fundamental<br />
judicial guarantees, because of either the proclamation of a state of exception, or<br />
a de facto situation; allegations of disappearances (See id. at 1379). Civil<br />
disobedience is deemed to be “tension” when it does not manifest acts of<br />
violence. Under ‘civil disobedience’ may be included, e.g., sit-in, draft card<br />
burning, peaceful strike. The origin of acts of violence may not change the<br />
characterization of the act, acts of violence being characterized as conflicts<br />
independently of the actor.<br />
2<br />
‘Internal disturbances’ involve situations in which there exists not a noninternational<br />
armed conflict as such, but a confrontation within the country,<br />
characterized by a certain seriousness or duration and which involves acts of<br />
violence. (See International Committee of the Red Cross, Conference of<br />
Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Development of International<br />
Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva, 24 May-12 June<br />
1971, Vol. V, “Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts,” p.<br />
79). Under ‘internal disturbances’ all acts of violence short of armed conflicts<br />
may be included, such as riots, violent strikes and protests, etc.<br />
3<br />
An ‘armed conflict’ is a collective act of violence indicating the existence of<br />
open hostilities between organized armed forces. There are two types of armed<br />
43<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
There is also a fourth general type of conflict not foreseen by positive<br />
international humanitarian law, namely, the intra-nationalized<br />
international conflict. 4<br />
1. Definition. The intra-nationalized international conflict involves a<br />
situation of international tension or disturbance or armed conflict which<br />
has degenerated into a non-international tension or disturbance or armed<br />
conflict.<br />
‘International tension’ involves situations of unfriendly acts short of<br />
violence; legal or illegal unfriendly acts short of violence, and which may<br />
be deemed as threat of peace. May be included under ‘international<br />
tension: (i) reprisals, such as refusing to fulfill treaty obligations; war-like<br />
operations without the intention of making war or massing troops along<br />
conflict according to positive international humanitarian law, an international,<br />
and a non-international, armed conflict. The ‘international armed conflict’ breaks<br />
down into two: (i) an armed conflict within the meaning of Common Article 2 to<br />
the Four Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, such as cases of declared war<br />
or of partial or total occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party, and<br />
(ii) an armed conflict within the meaning of article 1(4) of Protocol I of 1977,<br />
such as cases of people fighting against colonial domination and alien occupation<br />
and against racist régimes in the exercise of their right of self-determination.<br />
The ‘non-international armed conflict’ breaks down also into two: (i) that<br />
which is within the meaning of Common Article 3 to the Four Geneva<br />
Conventions of 1949, and (ii) that which is within the meaning of Article 1 of<br />
Protocol II of 1977. Thus, under the latter the non-international armed conflict<br />
covers situations in which an armed faction is opposed to another armed faction,<br />
and in which the government is not necessarily a party to the conflict; and under<br />
(i) the non-international armed conflict involves situations in which the<br />
government is opposed to national dissident armed forces, which are commonly<br />
known as “classical civil war.” These situations cover group’s acts of violence<br />
which tend either (a) to change the policy of the established government, (b) or to<br />
force a concession, or (c) to secede from the established government.<br />
4<br />
For a brief analysis of the Intra-Nationalized International Conflict, see A.T.<br />
Frangi, The Internationalized Non-International Armed Conflict in Lebanon,<br />
1975-1990: Introduction to Confligology, 22 CAP.U.L. REV. 965, 1037-1040<br />
(1993). See also L.-Ph. Rouillard, Les conflits armés à caractère noninternationaux‘internationalisés’,<br />
FLJ (1)(1) (Special Issue, August <strong>2005</strong>) at 104<br />
et s.<br />
44<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
international borders; putting pressure on the offending state by seizing or<br />
destroying property, holding territory or capturing of vessels; nuclear arms<br />
race; (ii) embargo; (iii) pacific blockade, such temporary suspension of the<br />
commerce of the offending state; (iv) retorsion, such as imposing similar<br />
restrictions upon the subjects of the offending state in retaliation of its<br />
wrongful acts, recalling ambassadors, termination of diplomatic relations,<br />
withdrawal of fiscal and tariff concessions; (v) competition for<br />
international political influence, and propaganda campaigns.<br />
‘International disturbance’ involves situations of acts of violence short of<br />
armed conflict, which are committed by individuals or subjects of<br />
international law or groups not subjects of international law, and which<br />
bear seriousness in terms of high number of victims or in terms of threat to<br />
international peace. May be included under ‘international disturbance, (i)<br />
political assassinations; (2) acts of terrorism; (3) sporadic international<br />
attacks.<br />
2. Characteristics. Five features characterize the intra-nationalized<br />
international conflict:<br />
a. It is a conflict of international character in origin.<br />
b. It is an international conflict degenerating into a noninternational<br />
conflict.<br />
c. It is a multidimensional conflict, it being concerned with<br />
various conflicts at the same time and not with one type of<br />
conflict at a time.<br />
d. It is a relational conflict, which means that it is concerned<br />
with the relation between the types of conflict. If<br />
humanitarian laws may be applicable to some conflicts,<br />
such as disturbances and armed conflicts, and may not be<br />
applicable to some conflicts, such as internal and<br />
international tensions, the generation of one conflict into<br />
another can, however, within a continuum of humanitarian<br />
and human rights norms. It is this relation between the<br />
types of conflict that justifies breaking the frontiers<br />
delineating conflicts.<br />
Not only is the intra-nationalized international conflict:<br />
45<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
- an international conflict in origin;<br />
- an international conflict degenerating into a noninternational<br />
conflict;<br />
- a multidimensional conflict, and<br />
- a relational conflict. It is also, and most<br />
importantly,<br />
e. A multi-legal and non-legal conflict, 5 since it can be<br />
extended to non-legal conflicts, meaning conflicts that do<br />
not fall formally within the provisions of Geneva Law,<br />
such as internal and international tensions, to which<br />
minimum humanitarian rules do not usually apply.<br />
3. Classification. In combining all types of conflict foreseen by<br />
positive international humanitarian laws, namely, tensions, disturbances,<br />
and armed conflicts, 9 possible conflicts covered by the intranationalized<br />
international conflict may be distinguished:<br />
1. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />
tension, such as the Cold War degenerating into (a) the Soviet’s<br />
Blockade of the Western-held sectors of West Berlin in 1948-<br />
1949; (b) the Berlin Crisis of 1961; (c) the Western powers’<br />
rearmament of West Germany, which became a member of<br />
NATO, and the Soviets’ establishment of the Warsaw Pact in<br />
May 1955; (d) the Martial Law in Poland 6 .<br />
5 On the Multi-Legal and Nonlegal Approach see A. T. Frangi, The<br />
Internationalized Noninternational Armed Conflict, 22 CAP.U.L. REV. 965,<br />
965-966 (1993); see also A.T. Frangi, Democracy of History: A Theory of<br />
Minority Group Law, a paper submitted to Harvard Law School on May 5, 1995,<br />
p. 37. Two activities divide the law, legal and illegal activities. Every activity<br />
that is not foreseen by the law is ‘non-legal.’ On the Multi-Legal and Non-legal<br />
Approach see A. T. Frangi, The Internationalized Non-International Armed<br />
Conflict, 22 CAP.U.L. REV. 965, 965-966 (1993); see also A.T. Frangi,<br />
Democracy of History: A Theory of Minority Group Law, a paper submitted to<br />
Harvard Law School on May 5, 1995, p. 37, of which only part was published in<br />
FLJ (1) (1) (July <strong>2005</strong>) at 7.<br />
6<br />
In 1981, under pressure from Moscow, the Polish government imposed<br />
martial law in an attempt to destroy the challenge to its authority presented by<br />
Solidarity, an independent labor union. In protest, the United States imposed<br />
economic sanctions on Poland.<br />
46<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
2. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />
disturbance, such as the Cold War degenerating into: (a) the<br />
Cuban missile crisis of 1962 7 ; (b) the Korean plane incident 8 .<br />
3. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />
armed conflict, such as the Cold War degenerating into the<br />
Korea War in the early 1950s.<br />
4. International disturbance degenerating into non-international<br />
tension, such as the September 11 th attacks 9 occurred in the<br />
territory of the United States, generating limitation of personal<br />
freedoms for security purposes in the United States.<br />
5. International disturbance degenerating into non-international<br />
disturbance, such as the attacks launched by the Palestinians<br />
against Israel from the territory of Lebanon, and which resulted<br />
into disturbances in Lebanon 10 .<br />
6. International disturbance degenerating into non-international<br />
armed conflict, such as the acts of terrorism launched by the<br />
Palestinians against the Israelis, which degenerated into noninternational<br />
armed conflicts between the Palestinians and the<br />
Phalangists in Lebanon between 1975-1990.<br />
7. International armed conflict degenerating into non-<br />
7 This crisis would be considered as a situation of disturbance and not a<br />
situation of tension, although it had not developed into a US-Soviet armed<br />
conflict, because there was an actual soviet’s secret installation of missiles in<br />
Cuba in 1062 that could be used to launch nuclear attacks on U.S. cities. This had<br />
sparked a confrontation that might have generated into an armed conflict between<br />
the two superpowers in the territory of Cuba.<br />
8 A Soviet fighter shot down a Korean Airlines 747 that had strayed over<br />
Soviet territory on a flight from Alaska to Seoul, South Korea. All persons aboard<br />
the plane died. The Soviets insisted that the plane had been engaged in espionage.<br />
9 An act of tension of high intensity may be characterized as a ‘disturbance,’ it<br />
being not only a threat to, but also a breach of, international peace.<br />
10<br />
After 1967, the Palestinians started to launch attacks from the Territory of<br />
Lebanon against Israel. This international disturbance divided Lebanon into two<br />
camps: one camp, mostly Christians, opposed the Palestinians’ freedom of<br />
actions against Israel from the Lebanese territory, and another camp, mostly<br />
Moslems, encouraged that freedom. In December-January 1968, this crisis<br />
developed into interior armed clashes between the Palestinians and the Lebanese<br />
army and security forces.<br />
47<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
international tension, such as the Arab-Israeli armed conflict<br />
degenerating into the troublesome issue of the Palestinians<br />
refugees in many Arab countries.<br />
8. International armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />
disturbance, such as the US-led coalition v. Iraq<br />
armed conflict which resulted into serious armed clashes<br />
between the Shiites and the Sunnites in Iraq, bringing the Iraqi<br />
factions to the brink of civil war in July <strong>2005</strong>.<br />
9. International armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />
armed conflict, such as Arab-Israel armed<br />
conflict degenerating into non-international armed conflicts in<br />
Lebanon or Jordan 11 .<br />
4. Modes. All the above 9 possible conflicts covered by the intranationalized<br />
international conflict may arise between two or more states,<br />
and may occur in the territory of the parties to the conflict or of a third<br />
state not a party to the conflict. Accordingly, 36 possible conflicts covered<br />
by the intra-nationalized international conflict may be distinguished. But<br />
since the application of international law and humanitarian laws would not<br />
be much different whether the conflict is international or multinational,<br />
these modes can be reduced to <strong>18</strong> as follows:<br />
1. Intra-nationalized International Conflict in the Territory of<br />
One of the Parties To the Conflict:<br />
1.1. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />
tension, such as the East-West antagonism degenerating into<br />
the U-2 incident of 1960 12 .<br />
1.2. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />
disturbance: US v. fundamentalists tension resulting into the<br />
September 11 th attacks occurred on the land of the United<br />
11<br />
In September 1970, King Hussein of Jordan fell on the Palestinians in his<br />
kingdom, killing thousands.<br />
12<br />
Since 1955, American high-altitude U-2 spy planes had been carrying out<br />
surveillance operations over Soviet territory. On May 1, 1960, the Soviets<br />
succeeded in downing a U-2 and capturing its pilot. Khrushchev used this U-2<br />
incident to break up the Paris summit meeting as it was about to convene in June.<br />
48<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
States.<br />
1.3. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />
armed conflict: US v. fundamentalists tension resulting<br />
ultimately into armed conflicts in Afghanistan after 2001.<br />
1.4. International disturbance degenerating into noninternational<br />
tension, such as the September 11 th attacks<br />
occurred in the territory of the United States, which generated<br />
dozens of retaliatory incidents throughout the United States,<br />
where Arab American communities have been “in a state of<br />
siege” since the time of the attacks 13 .<br />
1.5. International disturbance degenerating into noninternational<br />
disturbance, such as the September 11 th attacks<br />
occurred in the territory of the United States, which generated<br />
into violent attacks in the United States on Arab Americans 14 .<br />
1.6. International disturbance degenerating into noninternational<br />
armed conflict, such as the acts of terrorism<br />
launched by the Palestinians from the territory of Lebanon<br />
against the Israelis, which degenerated into non-international<br />
armed conflicts between the Palestinians and the Phalangists<br />
in Lebanon.<br />
1.7. International armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />
tension, such as US-Iraq armed conflict<br />
generating, inter alia, into anti-war demonstrations in the<br />
United States 15 .<br />
13<br />
See Stuart Millar, Violent Attacks on Arab Americans. Special Report:<br />
Terrorism in the US, The Guardian, September 14, 2001: “300 marchers – some<br />
waving American flags and chanting ‘USA!USA!’ – tried to march on a mosque<br />
in Briedgeview, a suburb to the south-west of the city. Three demonstrators were<br />
arrested as police sealed off the blocks around the closed mosque and turned the<br />
march away. One of the marchers, Colin Zaremba, 19, said: ‘I’m proud to be<br />
American and I hate Arabs and I always have.’ ”<br />
14<br />
See id: “In Chicago, a Molotov cocktail was thrown at an Arab American<br />
community center.” “Gunshots were fired at an Islamic center in a Dallas suburb<br />
yesterday”<br />
15<br />
See Matthew Engel, Anti-War Message Blunted: Globalization<br />
Demonstration Replaced by Peace Rally, The Guardian, <strong>October</strong> 1, 2001: “As<br />
the main body of protesters, about 8,000 of them, marched down Pennsylvania<br />
Avenue towards Capitol Hill on Saturday afternoon, they passed a hundred or so<br />
49<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
1.8. International armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />
disturbance: US-Afghanistan armed conflict<br />
degenerating into anti-American attacks launched by the<br />
Mujahedeens Front which groups Talibanis, and loyals to Ex-<br />
Prime Minister Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, and members of Al-<br />
Qaida in Afghanistan, against American soldiers on August<br />
21.<br />
1.9. International armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />
armed conflict, such as the Arab Israeli armed<br />
conflict which was at the origin of many Arab governments-<br />
Palestinians non-international armed conflicts, such in<br />
Jordan 16 . Also, the withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from<br />
Lebanon in the 1980s generated into various armed conflicts<br />
between Lebanese factions in Lebanon.<br />
2. Intra-Nationalized International Conflict in the Territory of a<br />
Third State:<br />
2.1. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />
tension, such as the Cold War generating into (a) the Martial<br />
Law imposed in Poland in 1981; (b) the Western Alliance<br />
(NATO) and Eastern Alliance (Warsaw Pact); (c) the Berlin<br />
Blockade in 1949.<br />
2.2. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />
disturbance, such as the Cold War resulting into (a) the Bay<br />
of Pigs conflict on Cuba’s Southern coast; (b) the East<br />
German Revolt in 1953.<br />
2.3. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />
armed conflict, such as the Cold War generating into (a) the<br />
overthrow of the government of Fulgencio Balista, the<br />
American-supported Cuban dictator, by the communism<br />
inspired Fidel Castro; (b) the American invasion of the<br />
counter-demonstrators carrying US flags and banners like “Welcome traitors,”<br />
“Seek Therapy,” and “Is It Halloween already?”<br />
16 During its 1948 War of Independence, Israel drove hundreds of thousands of<br />
Palestinians from their homes into neighboring countries.<br />
50<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Dominican Republic in 1965; (c) the American invasion of<br />
Grenada in 1983; (d) the long and unsuccessful military effort<br />
to prevent communist North Vietnam from bringing South<br />
Vietnam under its rule.<br />
2.4. International disturbance degenerating into noninternational<br />
tension, such as the September 11 th attacks<br />
generating rising tide of anti-Muslim anger in Australia 17 .<br />
2.5. International disturbance degenerating into noninternational<br />
disturbance, such as the September 11 th attacks<br />
generating violent attacks amid a rising tide of anti-Muslim<br />
anger across North America <strong>18</strong> .<br />
2.6. International disturbance degenerating into noninternational<br />
armed conflict, such as the troublesome issue<br />
of the Palestinians refugees which generated armed conflicts<br />
between Palestinians and various Lebanese factions between<br />
1975-1990 in Lebanon.<br />
2.7. International armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />
tension, such as the bombing campaign against<br />
Afghanistan in 2001, which generated protests in Pakistan,<br />
and Indonesia 19 .<br />
17<br />
See Stuart Millar, Violent Attacks on Arab Americans. Special Report:<br />
Terrorism in the US, The Guardian, September 14, 2001: “In Brisbane, Australia,<br />
a school bus packed with Muslim children was stoned.”<br />
<strong>18</strong><br />
See id: “In Montreal, Canada, a firebomb was thrown at a mosque.”<br />
19<br />
See Anti-US Protests Continue in Muslim Countries, The Guardian, <strong>October</strong><br />
15, 2001: “Muslim leaders called for a general strike to coincide with a visit by<br />
the US secretary of state, Colin Powell, who is seeking to build support for<br />
Operation Enduring Freedom. In response, thousands of shopkeepers across the<br />
country closed their stores today to protest against their government’s support for<br />
the US-led military strikes against Afghanistan…Nearly every store was reported<br />
closed in the border city of Quetta, and the entire business district was shuttered<br />
in the southern town of Jacobabad, the site of yesterday’s large anti-American<br />
demonstrations near Shahbaz air base, currently being used by US military<br />
personnel…In Jacobabad, about 500 people who had been detained over the<br />
weekend were released this morning after police said they had promised to<br />
‘peaceful’.”<br />
51<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
2.8. International armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />
disturbance, such as the bombing campaign<br />
against Afghanistan in 2001, which generated bombs attacks<br />
in Yemen 20 .<br />
2.9. International armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />
armed conflict, such as the bombing campaign<br />
against Afghanistan in 2001, which generated fighting<br />
between Muslims and Christians in Nigeria 21 .<br />
5. Applicability of the Law.<br />
5.1. Applicability of the Law to the Intra-Nationalization<br />
Approach.<br />
If intra-nationalization is stigmatized as legal it may need moral approval.<br />
No law may approve of intra-nationalizing international tensions or<br />
disturbances or armed conflicts. For it would be in violation of human<br />
rights norms: Intra-nationalization is intimately related to the wider<br />
“After a quiet weekend in the world’s most populous Muslim country, about 700<br />
anti-American protesters gathered outside the Indonesian parliament building in<br />
Jakarta (Indonesia) today. Police fired tear gas and water cannon into the crowd.”<br />
20 See id: “A bomb exploded today in a garbage container near Aden’s central<br />
post office, causing damage, witnesses said. Following the blast, police arrested<br />
two people after a chase and confiscated the vehicle, the witnesses said.<br />
Yesterday, another bomb exploded in a garbage container, this time during<br />
celebrations marking the beginning of the city’s 1967 revolt against British rule,<br />
witnesses said, adding that police had arrested at least six people in relation to the<br />
blast. Aden was the site of last year’s bombing of the USS Cole destroyer, which<br />
killed 17 sailors and injured 39. Osama bin Laden, whose family was originally<br />
from Yemen, is also accused of orchestrating the Cole attack.”<br />
21 See id: “A fourth day of fighting between Muslims and Christians erupted in<br />
the western Nigerian city of Kano today, after community leaders said 200<br />
protesters were killed over the weekend. The violence broke out on Friday in the<br />
wake of anti-America protests, and police have been ordered to shoot rioters on<br />
sight. The Nigerian president, Olusegun Obasanjo, today defended the use of<br />
police force against anyone found rioting in the town and said he was not<br />
concerned by reports that up to 200 people had been killed in the clashes.”<br />
52<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
problem not only of the effective limitation of the liberty of States, but also<br />
and particularly of jeopardizing their national security.<br />
If intra-nationalization is deemed illegal it is hard to say at what point<br />
along the continuum of all the situations listed above it becomes as such.<br />
Intra-nationalization is closely linked to the problem of interference, and<br />
both intra-nationalization and interference amount to violations of states’<br />
independence. However, where intra-nationalization is but illegal,<br />
interference may be either legal or illegal: A mere friendly advice to<br />
another state is legal interference, whereas a forcible interference or one<br />
that is backed by the threat of force is illegal. Tension and armed conflict<br />
are at opposite ends of the intra-nationalization spectrum. The intranationalized<br />
tension is necessarily less than forcible or backed by the threat<br />
of force, but more than mere friendly advice to the State in which the<br />
international tension is being intra-nationalized. Thus, intranationalization<br />
is not ‘legal interference’ on its face. It is not ‘illegal<br />
interference’ either. For international tension or disturbance or armed<br />
conflict lies at the root of intra-nationalization; this, however, does not<br />
hold true for interference. Also, intra-nationalization and interference are<br />
diametrically opposed; for interference may be deemed a method short of<br />
war for the settlement of disputes, which is not the case of intranationalization.<br />
5.2. Applicability of the Law to the Intra-nationalized<br />
International Conflict.<br />
The intra-nationalized international conflict could prove useful in<br />
applying (a) a continuum of legal system of protection in all situations<br />
of intra-nationalized international conflict, and (b) either a multi-legal<br />
system of protection, or one legal system of protection, in every<br />
situation thereof.<br />
a. Applicability of a continuum of legal system of protection in<br />
all situations of intra-nationalized international conflict.<br />
The intra-nationalized international conflict allows the application of a<br />
continuum of legal norms in all the situations of intra-nationalized<br />
conflict, from situations of international tension degenerating into non-<br />
53<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
international tensions at one end of the spectrum all the way through to<br />
situations of international armed conflict degenerating into a noninternational<br />
armed conflict.<br />
Two principles govern the intra-nationalized international conflicts:<br />
i. The principle of non intra-nationalization:<br />
Every nation, as subject of international law,<br />
has a right to the respect of integrity, both<br />
territorial and juridical, and of the attributes inseparable<br />
from its national personality.<br />
Thus, intra-nationalizing legal and/or non-legal international unfriendly<br />
acts short of violence that may pose risk to intra-nationalizing situations<br />
of national tensions or disturbances or armed conflicts, are forbidden;<br />
intra-nationalizing international state torture, be it territorial such as acts<br />
of terrorism or sporadic attacks or moral such as propaganda campaigns,<br />
and degrading or inhuman international treatment are forbidden; intranationalizing<br />
international pressure by seizing or destroying property,<br />
holding territory or capturing of vessels is forbidden.<br />
ii. The principle of national security:<br />
Every nation, as a subject of international law,<br />
has the right to national security.<br />
Thus, conducting war-like operations even without the intention of<br />
making war or massing troops along international borders, which may<br />
intra-nationalize a sense of national insecurity are forbidden; intranationalizing<br />
legal and/or non-legal international unfriendly acts short<br />
of violence that may pose risk to intra-nationalizing reprisals and<br />
hostage-takings are forbidden.<br />
These principles protect the existence of a continuum of legal norms<br />
that may justify the extension of basic humanitarian rules to non-legal<br />
activities such as international and internal tensions. In every situation<br />
of intra-nationalized of international conflict, however, there should be a<br />
specific legal system of protection that should apply to every aspect of<br />
the intra-nationalized international conflict in question.<br />
54<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
b. Applicability of a multi-legal system of protection, or one<br />
legal system of protection, in every situation involving an<br />
intra-nationalized international conflict.<br />
A multi-legal system of protection or one legal system of protection may<br />
clearly apply to every situation involving an intra-nationalized<br />
international conflict. The first situation of the intra-nationalized<br />
international conflict, namely, the international tension degenerating into<br />
non-international tension, may be subject to the application of the<br />
following laws: (i) international law may be applicable to the intranationalization<br />
per se, it being a violation of the sovereignty and security<br />
of the state; (ii) international law may be applicable to the international<br />
aspect of ‘the international tension degenerating into a non-international<br />
tension,’ i.e., the international tension, since it may be deemed, if of high<br />
intensity, as threat to peace within the provisions of Chapter VII of UN<br />
Charter, and (iii) basic international human rights provisions may be<br />
applicable to the non-international aspect of ‘the international tension<br />
degenerating into a non-international tension,’ i.e., the non-international<br />
tension, and which regulate issues of, inter alia, probable existence of<br />
maltreatment or inhumane conditions of detention; suspension of<br />
fundamental judicial guarantees, because of either the proclamation of a<br />
state of exception, or a de facto situation; allegations of disappearances.<br />
The second situation of the intra-nationalized international conflict,<br />
namely, the international tension degenerating into non-international<br />
disturbance, may be subject to the application of the following laws: (i)<br />
international law may be applicable to the intra-nationalization per se, it<br />
being a violation of the sovereignty and security of the state; (ii)<br />
international law may be applicable to the international aspect of ‘the<br />
international tension degenerating into a non-international disturbance’,<br />
since it may be deemed as threat to peace within the provisions of Chapter<br />
VII of UN Charter, and (iii) basic international human rights provisions<br />
may be applicable to the non-international aspect of ‘the international<br />
tension degenerating into a non-international disturbance,’ i.e., the noninternational<br />
disturbance, and which regulate issues of, inter alia, internal<br />
terrorist disturbance.<br />
55<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
The third situation of the intra-nationalized international conflict, namely,<br />
the international tension degenerating into non-international armed<br />
conflict, may be subject to the application of the following laws: (i)<br />
international law may be applicable to the intra-nationalization per se, it<br />
being a violation of the sovereignty and security of the state; (ii)<br />
international law may be applicable to the international aspect of ‘the<br />
international tension degenerating into a non-international disturbance,’<br />
i.e., the international tension, since it may be deemed as threat to peace<br />
within the provisions of Chapter VII of UN Charter, and (iii) Common<br />
Article 3 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions may be applicable to the noninternational<br />
aspect of the ‘international tension degenerating into noninternational<br />
armed conflict, i.e., the non-international armed conflict.<br />
The fourth situation of the intra-nationalized international conflict, namely,<br />
the international disturbance degenerating into non-international tension,<br />
may be subject to the application of the following laws: (i) international<br />
law may be applicable to the intra-nationalization per se, it being a<br />
violation of the sovereignty and security of the state; (ii) international law<br />
may be applicable to the international aspect of ‘the international<br />
disturbance degenerating into non-international tension,’ i.e., the<br />
international disturbance, since it may be deemed as threat to peace within<br />
the provisions of Chapter VII of UN Charter, and (iii) basic international<br />
human rights provisions may be applicable to the non-international aspect<br />
of ‘the international disturbance degenerating into a non-international<br />
tension,’ i.e., the non-international tension, and which regulate issues of,<br />
inter alia, probable existence of maltreatment or inhumane conditions of<br />
detention; suspension of fundamental judicial guarantees, because of<br />
either the proclamation of a state of exception, or a de facto situation,<br />
and allegations of disappearances.<br />
The fifth situation of the intra-nationalized international conflict, namely,<br />
the international disturbance degenerating into non-international<br />
disturbance, may be subject to the application of the following laws: (i)<br />
international law may be applicable to the intra-nationalization per se, it<br />
being a violation of the sovereignty and security of the state; (ii)<br />
international law may be applicable to the international aspect of ‘the<br />
international disturbance degenerating into non-international disturbance,’<br />
i.e., the international disturbance, since it may be deemed as threat to<br />
56<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
peace within the provisions of Chapter VII of UN Charter, and (iii) basic<br />
international human rights provisions may be applicable to the noninternational<br />
aspect of ‘the international disturbance degenerating into a<br />
non-international disturbance,’ i.e., the non-international disturbance, and<br />
which regulate issues of, inter alia, internal terrorist disturbance.<br />
The sixth situation of the intra-nationalized international conflict, namely,<br />
the international disturbance degenerating into non-international armed<br />
conflict, may be subject to the application of the following laws: (i)<br />
international law may be applicable to the intra-nationalization per se, it<br />
being a violation of the sovereignty and security of the state; (ii)<br />
international law may be applicable to the international aspect of ‘the<br />
international disturbance degenerating into a non-international armed<br />
conflict’, since it may be deemed as threat to peace within the provisions<br />
of Chapter VII of UN Charter, and (iii) Common Article 3 to the 1949<br />
Geneva Conventions may be applicable to the non-international aspect of<br />
the ‘international tension degenerating into non-international armed<br />
conflict, i.e., the non-international armed conflict.<br />
The seventh situation of the intra-nationalized international conflict,<br />
namely, the international armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />
tension, may be subject to the application of the following<br />
laws: (i) international law may be applicable to the intra-nationalization<br />
per se, it being a violation the sovereignty and security of the state; (ii)<br />
with regard to the international aspect of the ‘international armed conflict<br />
degenerating into non-international tension,’ i.e., the international armed<br />
conflict, international humanitarian law may be applicable, within the<br />
meaning of Common Article 2 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions in cases<br />
of declared war or of partial or total occupation of the territory of a High<br />
Contracting Party, and within the meaning of article 1(4) of Protocol I of<br />
1977, in cases of people fighting against colonial domination and alien<br />
occupation and against racist régimes in the exercise of their right of<br />
self-determination, and (iii) basic international human rights provisions<br />
may be applicable to the non-international aspect of ‘the international<br />
armed conflict degenerating into a non-international tension,’ i.e., the noninternational<br />
tension, and which regulate issues of, inter alia, probable<br />
existence of maltreatment or inhumane conditions of detention;<br />
suspension of fundamental judicial guarantees, because of either the<br />
57<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
proclamation of a state of exception, or a de facto situation, and<br />
allegations of disappearances.<br />
The eighth situation of the intra-nationalized international conflict,<br />
namely, the international armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />
disturbance, may be subject to the application of the<br />
following laws: (i) international law may be applicable to the intranationalization<br />
per se, it being a violation the sovereignty and security of<br />
the state; (ii) with regard to the international aspect of the ‘international<br />
armed conflict degenerating into non-international disturbance,’ i.e., the<br />
international armed conflict, international humanitarian law may be<br />
applicable, within the meaning of Common Article 2 to the 1949 Geneva<br />
Conventions in cases of declared war or of partial or total occupation of<br />
the territory of a High Contracting Party, and within the meaning of article<br />
1(4) of Protocol I of 1977, in cases of people fighting against colonial<br />
domination and alien occupation and against racist régimes in the<br />
exercise of their right of self-determination, and (iii) basic international<br />
human rights provisions may be applicable to the non-international aspect<br />
of ‘the international armed conflict degenerating into a non-international<br />
disturbance,’ i.e., the non-international disturbance, and which regulate<br />
issues of, inter alia, internal terrorist disturbance.<br />
The ninth situation of the intra-nationalized international conflict, namely,<br />
the international armed conflict degenerating into non-international armed<br />
conflict, may be subject to the application of the following laws: (i)<br />
international law may be applicable to the intra-nationalization per se, it<br />
being a violation the sovereignty and security of the state; (ii) with regard<br />
to the international aspect of the ‘international armed conflict degenerating<br />
into non-international armed conflict,’ i.e., the international armed conflict,<br />
international humanitarian law may be applicable, within the meaning of<br />
Common Article 2 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions in cases of declared<br />
war or of partial or total occupation of the territory of a High Contracting<br />
Party, and within the meaning of article 1(4) of Protocol I of 1977, in cases<br />
of people fighting against colonial domination and alien occupation and<br />
against racist régimes in the exercise of their right of self-determination,<br />
and (iii) Common Article 3 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions may be<br />
applicable to the non-international aspect of the ‘international tension<br />
58<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
degenerating into non-international armed conflict, i.e., the noninternational<br />
armed conflict.<br />
Conclusion:<br />
The intra-nationalized international conflict is an umbrella term for a<br />
variety of different legal and non-legal conflicts, thus brightening up<br />
shady activities, and shadowy political dimensions. The fact that nonlegal<br />
activities, such as international tension which does not fall<br />
formally within the provisions of humanitarian norms, degenerate into<br />
legal or illegal activities, makes it imperative to contain non-legal<br />
activities by applying to them humanitarian norms even though they do<br />
no fall formally within the circumstances of application set out therein,<br />
such as extending to internal tension the provisions of Common Article<br />
3 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions. Because international non-legal<br />
activities may degenerate easily into non-international illegal activities<br />
and thus adversely degenerate further into non-international<br />
disturbances and armed conflicts.<br />
This is why it is difficult to understand that what is being labeled as<br />
internationalization of non-international conflicts is actually the effect<br />
of intra-nationalization of international conflicts. For example,<br />
throughout the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union<br />
avoided direct confrontation in the world, and engaged in foreign<br />
policies or combat operations only to expand communism rule or to<br />
contain expansion of communism rule, i.e., to keep allies from defecting<br />
to the other side or to overthrow them after they had done so. Thus the<br />
Soviet Union sent troops to preserve communist rule in East Germany<br />
(1953), Hungary (1956), Czechoslovakia (1968), and Afghanistan<br />
(1979). For its part, the United States helped overthrow a left-wing<br />
government in Guatemala (1954), supported an unsuccessful invasion of<br />
Cuba (1961), invaded the Dominican Republic (1965) and Grenada<br />
(1983), and undertook a long (1964-1975) and unsuccessful effort to<br />
prevent communist North Vietnam from bringing South Vietnam under<br />
its rule.<br />
It is out of context to understand these conflicts as essentially noninternational<br />
conflicts then internationalized by the intervention of the<br />
United States and the Soviet Union. For they were intra-nationalization<br />
59<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
of the East-West mounting tensions. Thus, what has being stigmatized<br />
as internationalization has actually been a further development of intranationalizing<br />
international conflicts. Considering them as<br />
internationalized can indeed throw out of the law non-legal activities<br />
which influence the generation of non-international conflicts.<br />
60<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
INTRODUCTION A LA ‘CRÉOLOGIE<br />
CRIMINELLE’<br />
BY DR. ANWAR FRANGI*<br />
Maître de Conférences-Chercheur (Usek)<br />
TABLE DES MATIERES<br />
I. L’OBJET DE LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE<br />
A. LES THÉORIES « NON-STRUCTURELLES » DU<br />
CRIME<br />
1. Formulation des théories « non-structurelles » du crime<br />
a) La théorie du crime selon « ce qu’il est »<br />
b) La théorie du crime selon « ce qu’il exprime »<br />
2. Problèmes posés par les théories « non-structurelles » du<br />
crime<br />
a) Le problème de l’antériorité<br />
b) Le problème de la détermination<br />
B. LA THÉORIE «STRUCTURELLE » OU<br />
« CRÉOLOGIQUE» DU CRIME<br />
1. La théorie créologique du crime prise en soi<br />
2. La théorie créologique du crime prise en relation avec les<br />
autres théories criminologiques précédentes<br />
II. LA NÉCESSITÉ DE LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE<br />
A. LA NÉCESSITÉ INTER SE DE LA CRÉOLOGIE<br />
CRIMINELLE<br />
1. La nécessité Inter Se de la créologie criminelle dans l’ordre<br />
historique<br />
2. La nécessité Inter Se de la créologie criminelle dans l’ordre<br />
logique<br />
B. LA NÉCESSITÉ IN SE DE LA CRÉOLOGIE<br />
CRIMINELLE<br />
1. La nécessité In Se essentielle de la créologie criminelle<br />
2. La nécessité In Se formelle de la créologie criminelle<br />
61<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Toute science humaine ou exacte suppose un objet spécifique qui<br />
justifie sa création. Elle suppose aussi être nécessaire par rapport aux<br />
autres sciences, prête à affronter et résoudre les problèmes qu’elle pose<br />
ou ceux que les autres sciences soulèvent. L’on ne saurait ainsi évoquer<br />
la créologie criminelle comme science criminologique nouvelle sans<br />
que ces deux conditions soient remplies. Nous étudions donc dans ce<br />
qui suit, tout d’abord l’objet de la créologie criminelle (section I) et<br />
ensuite, sa nécessité (section II).<br />
I. L’OBJET DE LA CREOLOGIE CRIMINELLE<br />
Il existe deux théories générales relatives à l’étude criminologique du<br />
crime : une première théorie qui étudie le crime en tant que phénomène<br />
juridique, le considérant ou bien ‘dans’ ou bien ‘hors’ de son contexte<br />
humain et social ; et une seconde théorie qui étudie le crime en tant que<br />
phénomène ‘conventionnel’ ou ‘naturel’, par référence aux sentiments<br />
provoqués dans la société par l’acte ainsi qualifié. Ce sont les théories<br />
dites ‘non-structurelles’, qui étudient le crime en dehors de sa<br />
constitution.<br />
Il existe une troisième théorie générale relative à l’étude criminologique<br />
du crime. C’est la théorie ‘créologique’, qui étudie le crime dans sa<br />
constitution même.<br />
* LL.M. 1995, Faculté de Droit de l’Université Harvard (Massachusetts,<br />
USA); LL.M. 1992, Faculté de Droit de l’Université Américaine<br />
(Washington, D.C.); Doctorat en droit (nouveau régime) 1986, Faculté de<br />
Droit de l’Université de Poitiers (France); D.E.A. 1983, Faculté de Droit de<br />
l’Université de Poitiers (France); Licence de droit 1982, Faculté de Droit de<br />
l’Université libanaise (Liban). Dr Frangi est Maître de Conférences-<br />
Chercheur à l’Université Saint-Esprit de Kaslik (Liban), et professeur de<br />
droit international et de philosophie de droit à l’Institut supérieur pour<br />
l’étude du droit de l’Université La Sagesse (Liban). Le présent article forme,<br />
en substance, l’introduction de sa thèse de doctorat intitulée La création<br />
comme facteur criminogène : introduction à la ‘créologie criminelle’, soutenue<br />
le 2 juillet 1986 à la Faculté de Droit de l’Université de Poitiers. Il avait<br />
originairement formé le sujet-matière de son mémoire intitulé Introduction à<br />
la créologie criminelle, soutenu au mois d’octobre 1983, à la Faculté de Droit<br />
de l’Université de Poitiers, en vue de l’obtention du Diplôme d’Etudes<br />
Approfondies en Droit pénal.<br />
62<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
A. LES THEORIES NON-STRUTURELLES DU CRIME<br />
1. LA FORMULATION DES THEORIES NON-<br />
STRUCTURELLES DU CRIME<br />
Selon les théories non-structurelles, le crime est appréhendé dans deux<br />
sens : il est ou bien ‘ce qu’il est’ ou bien ‘ce qu’il exprime’ ; l’une et<br />
l’autre acception dépendant respectivement de la manière dont il est<br />
considéré ou expliqué.<br />
a) LA THEORIE DU CRIME SELON ‘CE QU’IL EST’<br />
En tant « qu’il est », le crime est conçu ou bien comme une<br />
‘entité légale’, ou bien comme une ‘entité réelle’.<br />
i. LE CRIME SELON ‘CE QU’IL EST<br />
JURIDIQUEMENT’<br />
Juridiquement, le crime est une entité purement formelle, ce qu’il<br />
recouvre étant uniquement soumis à une description juridique<br />
spécifique. Ainsi, l’homicide est un acte dont l’existence est attribué<br />
non pas à l’homme lui-même, cette existence n’étant en rien d’ailleurs<br />
différente de celle d’autres actes, mais à l’acte juridique, qui lui a<br />
permis d’être différente de l’existence d’autres actes. (v. Carrara cité par<br />
J. Pinatel, La définition criminologique du crime, le caractère<br />
scientifique de la criminologie, RSC, 1957, p. 194 ; D. Szabo,<br />
Criminologie, p. 34-35 ; E. Yamarellos et G. Kellens, Crime et<br />
criminologie, p. 129).<br />
Au départ, c’est avec l’acte juridique qu’une distinction de fait<br />
commence, et par conséquent, qu’une étiquette d’anormalité ou de<br />
normalité s’attache sur l’existence de tel ou tel acte commis. Mais en<br />
distinguant les faits, l’acte juridique crée désormais une nouvelle façon<br />
d’aborder la réalité humaine ; car après la promulgation de la loi, l’acte<br />
humain devenant crime, acquiert une réalité nouvelle, étant attribué<br />
chaque fois qu’il est commis à ce qu’il est devenu, et non pas à ce qu’il<br />
était avant la promulgation de la loi.<br />
63<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Le crime donc, selon la théorie juridique, est conçu comme une entité<br />
absolument relative, tout d’abord, à l’acte juridique, et par suite, à la<br />
réalité. Juridiquement, il l’est car d’une part, le crime est défini par<br />
l’acte juridique en ce qu’il ne peut y avoir de crime sans une législation<br />
(au sens large du terme); et car d’autre part, il est pris invariablement<br />
pour ses conséquences envisagées à l’avance par l’acte juridique. C’est<br />
ce à quoi amène effectivement l’acte qui détermine la nature de celui-ci,<br />
et non pas celui qui l’a amené à exister (l’homme). Et c’est<br />
l’accomplissement du crime qui qualifie juridiquement l’offenseur,<br />
celui-ci étant envisagé comme un être abstrait, pris uniquement selon<br />
son acte perpétré.<br />
Ensuite, réellement, il l’est car l’acte juridique imprime une telle<br />
influence dans la société qu’un tel acte humain qualifié<br />
crime juridiquement le sera tout de même réellement. L’acte juridique<br />
change l’ordre des actes humains ; on ne dira plus, par exemple, que<br />
l’homicide en tant qu’acte juridique, ressemble à l’homicide en tant<br />
qu’acte humain, mais que, tout au contraire, l’homicide en tant qu’acte<br />
humain, ressemble à l’homicide en tant qu’acte juridique.<br />
Mais, s’il en est ainsi, la notion de crime selon la théorie juridique<br />
résisterait à toute connaissance scientifique. Tout d’abord, la notion du<br />
« crime juridique » est variable à l’intérieur d’une législation donnée et<br />
à une époque donnée, tel fait étant ou non incriminé selon les<br />
circonstances. Ensuite, la notion de « crime juridique » est variable dans<br />
le temps et dans l’espace. Ainsi, des faits incriminés jadis ne le sont<br />
plus aujourd’hui, et des faits incriminés par une législation dans tel État<br />
ne le sont pas par une autre législation dans d’autres États. La variabilité<br />
de la réaction sociale face à l’avortement, par exemple, prouve que<br />
celui-ci possède une entité indépendante de celle que l’acte juridique lui<br />
a fournie. Car si l’avortement est qualifié de « crime » en fonction de<br />
l’évolution de la réaction sociale, cela prouve justement que<br />
l’avortement ne couvre pas une réalité « mystique », mais plutôt une<br />
réalité sociale, détachée de toute loi formelle.<br />
C’est ainsi qu’il paraît intéressant pour d’autres chercheurs<br />
criminologues d’envisager la réalité humaine et sociale que l’acte<br />
juridique couvre.<br />
64<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
ii. LE CRIME SELON « CE QU’ IL EST<br />
REELLEMENT »<br />
Selon la « théorie réelle » du crime, l’acte juridique apparaît comme un<br />
aspect du phénomène criminel. La nature de l’homme et les conditions<br />
sociales déterminent la perpétration du crime, non pas l’acte juridique.<br />
Si, en effet, le crime est une notion juridique, il n’en reste pas moins que<br />
le concept légal recouvre une réalité humaine et sociale qui, en tant que<br />
phénomène, est antérieure à l’acte juridique et le motive. Et une bonne<br />
connaissance du « droit » exige une connaissance bien poussée du<br />
« fait ». Il n’est pas rationnel, par exemple, de réprimer le proxénétisme<br />
sans avoir connaissance du monde de la prostitution. Et le suicide,<br />
l’avortement, sont des matières sur lesquelles se base tout choix<br />
juridique. (v. J. Pinatel, op. cit., p. 194).<br />
D’un autre côté, le phénomène humain et social devient non plus une<br />
entité fondue dans celle de l’acte juridique, mais une entité qui<br />
intervient invariablement dans l’accomplissement du crime. Ainsi,<br />
l’homme peut présenter des anomalies biologiques qui déterminent son<br />
penchant au crime 1 ; et il ne peut être détaché de son milieu qui oriente<br />
la formation de sa « personnalité criminelle ». 2<br />
1 Cesare Lombroso (<strong>18</strong>36-1909), le « père » de la criminologie, est connu<br />
notamment pour sa notion du criminel atavique. Le « criminel-né », comme l’a<br />
nommé plus tard Enrico Ferri, serait une résurgence de l’homme primitif, une<br />
espèce de Néanderthal attardé, « un homme anormal avant sa naissance ». Dans<br />
son livre intitulé « l’Uomo Delinquente » (<strong>18</strong>76), Lombroso dit que ce criminel<br />
peut être reconnu d’après des anomalies anatomiques (une capacité réduite du<br />
crâne, arcades sourcilières proéminentes, front fuyant, oreilles écartées…), des<br />
anomalies physiologiques (daltonisme, insensibilité à la douleur…), et des<br />
anomalies caractériels (égoïsme, frivolité…).<br />
Voulant apaiser les critiques, surtout adressées par Ferri, Lombroso tempère sa<br />
théorie. A la notion du « criminel-né », il ajoute les notions de « criminel par<br />
passion », de « criminel fou », de « criminel occasionnel » et de « criminel par<br />
habitude ». Discutant ces notions, Lombroso reconnaît la part que le<br />
conditionnement social peut jouer dans l’accomplissement du crime.<br />
Lombroso a même considéré que le « criminel-né » peut toujours éviter la<br />
65<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
courbure de sa destinée criminelle si le milieu social où il s’est développé n’est<br />
pas favorable au crime.<br />
Une variante de la recherche de Lombroso, entamée par Ernst Kretschmer<br />
(1921) et William Sheldon (1940), est l’investigation portant sur la relation<br />
entre la criminalité et la forme du corps. Cette recherche apparaît plus<br />
scientifique que celle menée par Lombroso. Alors que celui-ci n’avait<br />
considéré que les délinquants, Kretschmer et Sheldon ont comparé délinquants<br />
et non-délinquants. Ils ont, tout d’abord, classé les individus en fonction de leur<br />
forme anatomique, soit 4 catégories : (1) les pycniques (trapus, aux formes<br />
arrondies) ; (2) les dysplastiques (moins larges, bras mince, présentant un<br />
déséquilibre glandulaire) ; (3) les leptosomes (maigres, anguleux) ; et (4) les<br />
athlétomorphes (épaules larges, de type sportif). Ensuite, ils ont étudié ces<br />
individus en fonction de leur caractère. Ils ont montré, par exemple, que les<br />
pycniques sont des cyclothymiques, alternant l’excitation et la dépression, ou<br />
que les leptosomes sont des schizoïdes ou introvertis, etc. Enfin, en appliquant<br />
ces investigations aux délinquants, ils ont trouvé que (i) les pycniques, souvent<br />
sans récidive, commettent habituellement des attentats contre les biens ; (ii) les<br />
dysplastiques commettent souvent des infractions sexuelles ; (iii) les<br />
leptosomes sont souvent des voleurs agressifs, escrocs et récidivistes ; et (iv)<br />
les athlétomorphes commettent souvent des meurtres et des incendies.<br />
Autres recherches se sont alignées dans l’étude positiviste de Lombroso.<br />
Celle portant sur les anomalies chromosomiques retient le plus d’attention.<br />
Cette théorie essaie d’établir une corrélation entre le supplément Y dans le<br />
gonosome et la criminalité. Normalement, chaque cellule contient 46<br />
chromosomes, dont 2 gonosomes ou chromosomes sexuels (XY chez l’homme,<br />
XX chez la femme). Cependant, dans des rares cas, un chromosome peut être<br />
absent, ou il pourrait y avoir des chromosomes suppléments. Par exemple, la<br />
combinaison XXY se produit 1.3 par mille chez des bébés masculins, et celle<br />
XYY 1.0 par mille. Autres combinaisons, plus rares, se produisent encore<br />
comme par exemple, XYYY, XXYY et XXXYY.<br />
Dans une investigation menée par le groupe Price et al. en Ecosse, on a<br />
observé que les patients portant un supplément Y avaient une tendance (1)<br />
d’être des psychopathes ; (2) d’être condamnés à un âge plus tendre que<br />
d’autres psychopathes, et (3) de commettre plus de crime contre les biens que<br />
de crime contre la personne.<br />
La théorie des « aberrations chromosomiques » est intéressante, en ce sens<br />
qu’elle prétend pouvoir fonder la base génétique pour une disposition<br />
criminelle particulière. Cette théorie apparaît cependant insuffisante. Tout<br />
d’abord, elle n’essaie pas d’aborder une explication pouvant indiquer<br />
« comment » la différence génétique peut être traduite en une différence de<br />
66<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
C’est ainsi que la « théorie réelle » du crime croit résoudre le problème<br />
de la variation de la notion du crime dans le temps et dans l’espace, en<br />
insistant sur le « déterminisme ». Chaque homme qui présente des<br />
anomalies biologiques particulières (le criminel-né de Lombroso, les<br />
types de délinquants de Kretchmer et de Sheldon), ou qui vit dans un<br />
milieu criminogène, est voué à commettre un crime ; et ce, par rapport à<br />
n’importe quelle législation et à n’importe quelle époque donnée.<br />
Mais s’il en est ainsi, le crime en tant qu’un phénomène humain et<br />
social résisterait à toute connaissance scientifique.<br />
Il est sûr que la « nature » peut prédisposer à devenir délinquant<br />
l’homme qui présente une personnalité asociale; mais il est certain<br />
qu’elle ne peut déterminer son passage à l’acte délictueux. Les<br />
recherches scientifiques contemporaines affirment que les aberrations<br />
chromosomiques ne peuvent déterminer qu’une orientation seulement<br />
« possible », favorable à la genèse du crime. Un supplément de<br />
chromosome dans le gonosome (XYY) ne détermine pas la formation<br />
d’une « personnalité criminelle », mais au plus l’agressivité qui peut<br />
contribuer, au côté d’autres composantes, à influencer le passage à<br />
l’acte délictueux. (v. J. Léauté, Criminologie et pénologie, Les Cours<br />
de Droit (1981), pp. 282-293 ; Criminologie et science pénitentiaire, pp.<br />
453-457).<br />
Ensuite, il est reconnu aujourd’hui qu’il ne faut plus rechercher la<br />
connaissance du crime dans l’homme « pathologique ». Car<br />
comportement. Ensuite, la théorie est très étroite en ce sens que son explication<br />
porte sur une proportion minuscule de la population générale et délinquante.<br />
2<br />
Depuis Enrico Ferri (<strong>18</strong>56-1929), l’importance du milieu social dans la<br />
genèse du crime ne peut être ignorée. A la fin du 19<br />
67<br />
e siècle, Ferri disait que « le<br />
niveau de la criminalité est déterminé, chaque année, par les différentes<br />
conditions du milieu physique et social combinées avec les tendances<br />
héréditaires et les impulsions occasionnelles des individus ». Plusieurs enquêtes<br />
menées aux Etats-Unis ont confirmé les corrélations entre criminalité et milieu.<br />
Ainsi, une comparaison de 500 délinquants et de 500 non-délinquants a montré<br />
que 35% des délinquants contre 5% des non-délinquants avaient manqué<br />
d’affection maternelle (V. J. Pradel, Droit pénal général, éditions Cujas : Paris,<br />
1986, p. 47-48) .<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
l’accomplissement du crime, dans ce cas, est certainement une<br />
expression, parmi d’autres, de la personnalité pathologique de l’homme<br />
offenseur. La connaissance du crime doit être recherchée plutôt dans les<br />
perturbations psychiques qui sont considérées comme moins<br />
pathologiques qu’acquises ou « normales ». 3 C’est seulement à l’aide de<br />
cette recherche que nous pouvons reconnaître l’intérieur de l’homme<br />
criminel qui, loin d’être une « variété de l’espèce humaine », est<br />
« pourvu des mêmes idées, des mêmes sentiments que tout autre<br />
3<br />
Parmi les criminels qui présentent des « troubles psychiques », ceux atteints<br />
d’une maladie mentale dite « grave » (comme la psychose) ne sont pas tenus<br />
normalement responsables de leurs actes. Ils bénéficient d’un non lieu ou d’un<br />
acquittement. En revanche, les criminels atteints d’une maladie « moins<br />
grave » (comme la névrose) sont normalement tenus responsables de leurs<br />
actes, mais bénéficient toutefois des circonstances atténuantes, donc de la<br />
réduction de la peine, ou d’un traitement tendant à l’amélioration de leur état<br />
mental, à leur rééducation morale et à leur réadaptation sociale.<br />
Les délinquants dits « pathologiques », dont la maladie entraîne souvent leur<br />
irresponsabilité pénale, présentent des troubles psychiques ou neuropsychiques<br />
ayant aboli le discernement ou le contrôle de leurs actes. Ces troubles peuvent<br />
consister en une « maladie de l’intelligence » (crétinisme, idiotie, imbécillité),<br />
ou en une psychose paranoïde ou une schizophrénie, ou encore en crises<br />
d’épilepsie. Pour entraîner l’irresponsabilité pénale, un lien doit exister entre<br />
l’aliénation mentale (consistant en un trouble psychique « grave ») et<br />
l’infraction commise (par ex., le cas de « l’homicide volontaire » provoqué par<br />
la manie de la persécution).<br />
Les délinquants dits « normaux », dont la maladie entraîne souvent leur<br />
responsabilité pénale, sont ceux qui présentent moins des maladies perturbant<br />
le développement de leur intelligence ou leurs facultés de raisonnement, que<br />
des maladies perturbant leur « volonté » ; comme, par exemple, la<br />
psychasténie, la neurasthénie, l’hystérie, la kleptomanie (manie du vol), la<br />
pyromanie (manie du feu). Normalement, les troubles de la volonté entraînent<br />
des « circonstances atténuantes », donc abaissant la peine, lorsqu’un lien causal<br />
est établi entre la maladie et l’infraction commise (par ex., le cas du « vol »<br />
commis par le kleptomane).<br />
Toutefois, la distinction entre les maladies de l’intelligence, et celles de la<br />
volonté, est difficile à faire. On a du mal, en effet, à considérer des impulsions<br />
irrésistibles pouvant entraîner le « malade » à commettre des infractions<br />
particulières, sans considérer parallèlement un mal entraînant un dérèglement<br />
de son être psychique perturbant ses facultés de raisonnement.<br />
68<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
homme », toutefois en exagération par rapport à celui-ci. (v. E. Ferri,<br />
Sociologie criminelle, p.42 ; J. Pinatel, « La théorie de la personnalité<br />
criminelle », in Traité de Droit Pénal et de Droit Pénal, T.III, p.473 ; E.<br />
de Greeff, « La criminogenèse », rapport général au 1 er C.I.C., Actes,<br />
T.VI, p. 277).<br />
Aussi, l’explication du crime par le milieu social apparaît insuffisante.<br />
Deux individus qui présentent les mêmes aberrations chromosomiques,<br />
et qui vivent dans le même milieu criminogène, ne sont pas pour autant<br />
des criminels l’un et l’autre.<br />
Montrant que le crime selon « ce qu’il est », juridiquement ou<br />
réellement, contribue peu à connaître le crime, d’autres chercheurs<br />
criminologues proposent d’envisager plutôt un « crime absolu », qui<br />
résisterait au changement de l’espace-temps. (v. R. Garofalo,<br />
Criminologie, « Étude sur la nature du crime et la théorie de la<br />
pénalité », pp. 1-52). En effet, ces chercheurs prétendent que le<br />
problème posé par la théorie de « ce que le crime est », est mal posé. Il<br />
ne s’agit pas de rechercher si certains actes qualifiés « crimes » à une<br />
époque déterminée, ont toujours été comme tels dans le temps et dans<br />
l’espace. Il faut précisément analyser les sentiments provoqués dans la<br />
société par les actes ainsi qualifiés. Pour ce faire, ces chercheurs<br />
proposent de remplacer l’étude portant sur « ce que le crime est » par<br />
celle plus pratique portant sur « ce que le crime exprime ».<br />
a) LA THEORIE DU CRIME SELON « CE QU’ IL<br />
EXPRIME »<br />
En tant « qu’il exprime », le crime peut se prendre de deux acceptions :<br />
ou bien ce qu’il exprime est l’effet d’une « convention », ou bien l’effet<br />
de la « nature ».<br />
i. LE DELIT CONVENTIONNEL<br />
Selon Garofalo, le « délit conventionnel » est tout acte violant des<br />
sentiments évolutifs et contingents, tels que l’amour de la patrie, le<br />
69<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
sentiment religieux, la chasteté. Le « délit conventionnel » exprime<br />
donc tout ce qu’une communauté a entrevu en tant que possibilité de<br />
répression ; et ce, par référence aux sentiments provoqués dans cette<br />
communauté par l’acte ainsi qualifié.<br />
La théorie du « délit conventionnel » se distingue de la théorie juridique<br />
du crime. Tout d’abord, contrairement à celle-ci qui prend le crime hors<br />
de son contexte humain et social, la théorie du « délit conventionnel » le<br />
prend dans son contexte social, le délit étant ainsi qualifié par référence<br />
aux sentiments évolutifs qu’il provoque dans la société. Ensuite, alors<br />
que la variation de la notion de crime dans le temps et dans l’espace<br />
n’est pas compréhensible par référence à la théorie juridique, elle<br />
devient compréhensible par référence à la théorie du « délit<br />
conventionnel ». Et la notion de crime change dans le temps et dans<br />
l’espace parce que les sentiments provoqués par l’acte ainsi qualifié sont<br />
eux-mêmes évolutifs et contingents.<br />
La théorie du « délit conventionnel » se distingue également de la<br />
théorie réelle du crime. Contrairement à celle-ci qui prend le crime<br />
juridique dans son contexte humain et social et qui cherche à prouver<br />
qu’une anomalie biologique ou un milieu criminogène peut déterminer<br />
l’accomplissement de l’acte ainsi qualifié, la théorie du « délit<br />
conventionnel » prend le crime dans son contexte social, cherchant à<br />
prouver que l’acte est ainsi qualifié parce qu’il provoque dans la société<br />
des sentiments évolutifs particuliers.<br />
ii. LE DELIT NATUREL<br />
En revanche, le « délit naturel » exprime toute violation des<br />
« sentiments altruistes fondamentaux, c’est-à-dire, la pitié et la<br />
probité », que l’on trouve dans tout groupe social.<br />
Il ne s’agit pas donc, de rechercher si un acte normalement pris pour un<br />
crime, l’est ou ne l’est pas effectivement, ni de rassembler les « faits<br />
universellement haïs ». Il s’agit plutôt de voir les « sentiments blessés »<br />
par cet acte, « non pas la partie supérieure et la plus délicate de ces<br />
sentiments, mais la mesure moyenne dans laquelle ils sont procédés par<br />
70<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
une communauté et qui est indispensable pour l’adaptation de l’individu<br />
à la société ». (Garofalo, ibid., pp. 38-39).<br />
Ainsi, l’acte nuisible n’est plus considéré comme tel à cause de la loi<br />
mais à cause des « sentiments rudimentaires » blessés, ceux-ci seuls<br />
pouvant déterminer ce qui serait ou ne serait pas naturellement un<br />
crime.<br />
Cependant, il faut préciser la notion de « sentiment altruiste<br />
fondamental ». Il faut donc voir si Garofalo tout en proposant d’analyser<br />
les « sentiments altruistes fondamentaux » violés par le crime, n’établit<br />
pas par là, une « loi » qui prendrait une autre forme que la loi juridique.<br />
Et il faut voir d’ailleurs, si la définition des « sentiments altruistes<br />
fondamentaux » reviendrait exclusivement à la « pitié » et la « probité ».<br />
Car, il n’est pas évident que la pitié et la probité constituent à elles<br />
seules, les « sentiments altruistes fondamentaux ». D’autres sentiments<br />
relatifs à l’honneur, par exemple, ou à la pudeur, ou à la religion,<br />
peuvent aussi être attribués à la définition de ces « sentiments ».<br />
Ensuite, on peut se demander si les sentiments collectifs violés par le<br />
crime sont toujours les mêmes dans les différentes sociétés, et cela<br />
malgré la variation de la notion de l’acte ainsi qualifié. Car la question<br />
de l’avortement ou de la prostitution prouve qu’ils ne sont pas<br />
considérés par toute l’espèce humaine comme des « cruautés inutiles à<br />
la communauté », même s’ils l’étaient à une époque déterminée.<br />
Enfin, il faut se poser la question de savoir s’il est possible que d’autres<br />
délits, non attribués à la définition du « délit naturel », peuvent quand<br />
même exister par eux-mêmes. Car autres délits, relatifs à la politique,<br />
par exemple, ou à la presse, ne peuvent pas être constitués ni par la<br />
« pitié », ni par la « probité », ni par aucun autre sentiment, si tant est<br />
que Garofalo aurait accepté de ranger à côté de ceux-ci, l’honneur, la<br />
religion, ou la pudeur, etc. (v. J. Constant, Eléments de criminologie, pp.<br />
46-48).<br />
Ainsi, la théorie réelle du crime paraît insuffisante pour la connaissance<br />
du crime, et la théorie juridique de plus en plus irremplaçable.<br />
71<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
1. PROBLEMES POSES PAR LES THEORIES<br />
« NON-STRUCTURELLES » DU CRIME<br />
Nous constatons de ce qui précède, que l’acte criminel a été pris en<br />
dehors de sa « constitution », en rapport avec « l’acte juridique »,<br />
« l’homme », le « milieu social » ou les « sentiments violés ».<br />
Considérant le crime en dehors de sa « constitution », les chercheurs<br />
criminologues ont voulu montrer que le crime est « absolument relatif »<br />
ou bien à « l’acte juridique » (la théorie juridique du crime), ou bien à<br />
« l’homme » ou au « milieu social » (la théorie réelle du crime), ou bien<br />
aux « sentiments violés » (la théorie de Garofalo). Ainsi, selon la théorie<br />
juridique, un acte criminel qualifie juridiquement l’offenseur par le fait<br />
même qu’il est accompli. De même, selon la théorie réelle, des<br />
anomalies biologiques ou un milieu criminogène qualifient<br />
juridiquement l’offenseur, puisqu’ils déterminent l’accomplissement du<br />
crime. De plus, selon la théorie de Garofalo, un acte blessant les<br />
sentiments de pitié et de probité qualifie l’offenseur comme criminel par<br />
le fait même que cet acte est commis. (v. supra, « le délit naturel »).<br />
En voulant établir que le crime est un phénomène « déterminé », pour<br />
prouver que le crime peut être connu scientifiquement, les théories<br />
« non-structurelles » du crime sont prises dans un dilemme dont il faut<br />
sortir. Car l’expérience prouve, au contraire, que le crime est un<br />
phénomène « indéterminé ». L’homme qui commet un crime n’est plus<br />
« nécessairement » juridiquement qualifié « criminel » ; et l’homme qui<br />
présente des anomalies biologiques, ou qui évolue dans un milieu<br />
criminogène, n’est plus, non plus, nécessairement voué à<br />
l’accomplissement du crime. De même qu’un acte blessant les<br />
sentiments altruistes fondamentaux ne qualifie pas nécessairement son<br />
offenseur de « criminel ». (ibid.).<br />
Les théories « non-structurelles » du crime posent en général deux types<br />
de problèmes auxquels la « théorie créologique » apportera une<br />
solution :<br />
(1) le problème de l’antériorité et<br />
(2) le problème de la détermination.<br />
72<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
a) LE PROBLEME DE L’ANTERIORITE<br />
Au commencement, c’est l’entité juridique du crime qui a été<br />
envisagée ; ainsi la réalité humaine et sociale du crime se posait comme<br />
« absolument relative » à l’acte juridique. Dans un second temps, c’est<br />
l’entité humaine et sociale du crime qui a été envisagée ; ainsi l’entité<br />
juridique du crime se posait comme « absolument relative » au<br />
phénomène humain et social.<br />
Le problème de l’antériorité pose des difficultés au chercheur<br />
criminologue car si le phénomène humain et social est pris comme<br />
« absolument relatif » à l’acte juridique, le crime apparaît alors comme<br />
une entité purement formelle, et le phénomène humain et social que<br />
couvre le crime, ne serait qu’une réalité purement définie, donc<br />
inexistante en soi (v. supra., « le crime selon ce qu’il est<br />
juridiquement ») ; et ce qui est considéré comme postérieur, apparaît en<br />
effet comme une entité antérieure à l’acte juridique, et le motive.<br />
Et si le phénomène humain et social que le crime couvre, est antérieur à<br />
l’acte juridique qui ne fait que le proclamer comme crime, nous<br />
retombons dans le même problème qu’a soulevé l’antériorité du crime<br />
juridique. Car il faudra alors définir les critères sur lesquels se base la<br />
qualification comme crime d’un phénomène social, plutôt qu’un autre.<br />
(voir également les problèmes engendrés par le « délit naturel »).<br />
Le problème de l’antériorité, ainsi souvent soulevé par les chercheurs<br />
criminologues, est en effet mal posé.<br />
Le concept « d’antériorité » évoque nécessairement celui du temps ;<br />
concevoir un objet dans le temps c’est l’envisager antérieurement ou<br />
postérieurement par référence à un autre objet. Concevoir le crime<br />
comme une entité juridique, implique nécessairement sa variabilité, et<br />
en conséquence, sa relation avec l’entité sociale qu’elle couvre, puisque<br />
le changement de la qualification du crime apparaît en fonction de<br />
l’évolution sociale. De même, concevoir le crime comme une entité<br />
humaine et sociale implique nécessairement sa variabilité et, en<br />
conséquence, sa relation avec l’entité juridique qui la couvre, puisque<br />
73<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
c’est l’acte juridique qui qualifie cette entité, et qui change en fonction<br />
de l’Etat.<br />
C’est ainsi que d’autres chercheurs criminologues ont essayé de<br />
résoudre le « problème de l’antériorité » du crime d’une autre façon, en<br />
prouvant que l’entité juridique du crime est en « concordance » avec son<br />
entité humaine et sociale. En effet, la « théorie juridique » du crime<br />
« détermine » l’aspect criminel de l’acte dans ses « conséquences », car<br />
tout homme est « criminel » si son acte « concorde » avec la<br />
qualification juridique que lui impose la loi (ce raisonnement s’applique<br />
également, par analogie, à la théorie de Garofalo). Et la « théorie<br />
réelle » du crime « détermine » l’aspect criminel de l’acte dans l’homme<br />
ou le milieu social, car tout homme est « criminel » si son acte<br />
« concorde » avec la qualification psychologique, biologique, ou<br />
sociale, que lui impose son statut psychique, ou constitutionnel (v. la<br />
théorie du « criminel-né » ; la théorie des « aberrations<br />
chromosomiques »), ou social (v. la théorie des « lois de l’imitation » ;<br />
la théorie des « associations différentielles »).<br />
Le problème de la « concordance » évoque donc bien celui de la<br />
détermination.<br />
a) LE PROBLEME DE LA DETERMINATION<br />
La « détermination » du crime peut en effet être ramenée à deux théories<br />
criminologiques : la « théorie juridique » du crime et la « théorie du<br />
criminel-né ».<br />
Alors que la « théorie juridique » considère que l’aspect déterminé du<br />
crime se trouve dans son accomplissement, donc dans sa qualification<br />
juridique (puisque l’offenseur est qualifié de « criminel » par le fait<br />
même qu’il commet l’acte qualifié « crime »), la théorie du criminel-né<br />
considère que le crime est un phénomène déterminé dans l’offenseur<br />
(puisque ce sont les anomalies biologiques de l’offenseur qui le vouent<br />
nécessairement à la perpétration du crime).<br />
Les deux théories ont ceci en commun, qu’en dépit de la variation de la<br />
notion du crime dans le temps et dans l’espace, l’accomplissement de<br />
74<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
l’acte qualifié de « crime » impliquerait invariablement l’offenseur<br />
comme criminel (la théorie juridique du crime), et la présence des<br />
anomalies biologiques dans l’homme qualifieraient invariablement<br />
l’accomplissement du crime ( la théorie du criminel-né). (v. supra., « le<br />
crime selon ce qu’il est réellement).<br />
La variation de la notion de crime, par nature indéterminée, ne peut<br />
changer ni la qualification juridique de l’offenseur, lorsque l’acte<br />
criminel est accompli, ni l’accomplissement du crime par l’homme<br />
présentant des anomalies biologiques. Ainsi, selon la théorie du<br />
criminel-né, la notion de crime, pris comme une entité humaine, ne<br />
pouvant être compris que dans la connaissance de la constitution de<br />
l’homme offenseur, est en « concordance » avec la notion du crime pris<br />
comme une entité juridique, puisque tel homme présentant des<br />
anomalies biologiques le vouant nécessairement au crime n’est qualifié<br />
« criminel » qu’en fonction de la qualification juridique de son acte<br />
accompli.<br />
Cette solution est, cependant, apparente. Car il est difficile aujourd’hui<br />
de voir en la théorie du criminel-né une contribution sérieuse à la<br />
connaissance du crime. En effet, un homme voué au crime par naissance<br />
étant inconcevable. De même, il est inconcevable de détacher l’homme<br />
offenseur de son milieu pour le qualifier comme tel selon son acte,<br />
comme le veut la théorie juridique du crime, alors que c’est l’homme<br />
qui subit la peine.<br />
Une raison majeure de l’échec de la théorie juridique et de la théorie du<br />
criminel-né dans la connaissance du crime, est le fait qu’elles ont étudié<br />
le crime hors de sa « constitution ».<br />
En effet, il est bien-sûr difficile de connaître le crime tout en détachant<br />
l’homme offenseur de sa constitution ou de son milieu. Mais, il est aussi<br />
difficile de connaître le crime dans « l’homme offenseur » ou dans son<br />
« milieu » sans toutefois risquer de l’envisager comme un « phénomène<br />
indéterminé », et donc échouer à l’étudier scientifiquement. Il est<br />
également difficile de contourner ces difficultés lorsque les chercheurs<br />
criminologues veulent toujours poursuivre une étude « nonstructurelle<br />
» du crime.<br />
75<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
C’est pour éviter ces problèmes que la « théorie créologique » du crime<br />
propose de rechercher la connaissance du crime dans sa « constitution »<br />
même.<br />
B. LA THEORIE STRUCTURELLE OU CREOLOGIQUE<br />
DU CRIME<br />
1. LA THEORIE CREOLOGIQUE DU CRIME<br />
PRISE EN SOI<br />
La théorie créologique du crime propose d’étudier l’acte criminel dans<br />
sa structure, comme élément constitutif de « l’acte humain en soi ». Or<br />
admettre qu’il en est ainsi, c’est admettre en d’autres termes que l’acte<br />
humain en soi possède initialement le germe d’un acte criminel; et que<br />
le germe d’un acte criminel existe par nature dans l’acte humain en soi,<br />
en tant qu’acte criminogène.<br />
En effet, la caractéristique de l’homme est de pouvoir nommer les<br />
choses ; et toute la démarche de l’esprit humain dans l’histoire peut être<br />
réduite à l’effort de l’homme de former les choses, afin de pouvoir les<br />
comprendre. Cet effort, cependant, se manifeste moins dans certains<br />
actes humains, que dans d’autres. Or le pouvoir de nommer les choses<br />
est un pouvoir créateur. Ainsi, la caractéristique distinctive de l’homme<br />
est-elle de créer. Et puisque le pouvoir de nommer les choses se reflète<br />
dans tous les actes humains à des degrés variables, et puisque le pouvoir<br />
de nommer les choses est un pouvoir créateur, chaque acte humain est<br />
acte de créer à des degrés variables. En conséquence, chaque acte<br />
humain est constitué d’un élément créateur. Mais, l’acte de nommer les<br />
choses est cause de quelque chose, et toute cause est non seulement le<br />
germe de son effet comme Leibniz le disait, mais est aussi co-existante<br />
avec son effet comme Newton le disait.<br />
Ainsi, si l’acte législateur est un acte humain, nommant tel acte comme<br />
acte criminel, l’acte législateur et l’acte criminel devraient coexister,<br />
comme éléments constitutifs, dans le même acte humain ; l’acte<br />
législateur et l’acte criminel ne formant qu’un seul et même acte humain<br />
à double face. Et partant, la connaissance de l’acte criminel ne peut être<br />
76<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
suffisamment accomplie, selon la créologie criminelle, sans celle de<br />
l’acte législateur ; ni la connaissance de l’état dangereux criminologique<br />
ne peut se faire sans celle de l’état dangereux législateur (V. A. Frangi,<br />
L’innovation et la législation, 6th Conference : Freedom & Creativity<br />
on Reality and Ambition (16-<strong>18</strong> April 2001), Philadelphia University,<br />
Amma, Jordan). Un autre aspect de l’état dangereux créologique, doit<br />
être recherché dans la façon dont est poursuivie l’activité créatrice, qui<br />
peut se révéler criminogène, développant chez l’homme créateur qui<br />
s’en occupe les traits psychologiques de la personnalité criminelle. (V.<br />
infra, « la nécessité in se formelle de la créologie criminelle).<br />
Si la théorie créologique du crime affirme que les théories précédentes<br />
rencontrent des difficultés à cause de leur étude non-structurelle du<br />
crime, elle doit donc montrer comment elle-même, par l’approche<br />
structurelle du crime, peut se distinguer de ces théories tout d’abord, et<br />
ensuite, résoudre les difficultés rencontrées par celles-ci.<br />
1. LA THEORIE CREOLOGIQUE DU CRIME PRISE<br />
EN RELATION AVEC LES THEORIES<br />
CRIMINOLOGIQUES PRECEDENTES<br />
Ne voulant pas répéter les approches proposées par les autres théories<br />
criminologiques, la théorie de l’acte humain en soi veut « continuer »<br />
l’effort déjà entamé par ces théories, pour saisir avec confiance<br />
l’essence du phénomène criminel, en vue d’apporter des « solutions »<br />
aux problèmes rencontrés par celles-ci.<br />
a) LA THEORIE CREOLOGIQUE DU CRIME<br />
COMME « CONTINUATION »<br />
La façon dont l’effort de la créologie criminelle pour saisir l’essence du<br />
phénomène criminel peut être considéré comme une « continuation »,<br />
réside effectivement dans l’apport de la créologie criminelle à la<br />
connaissance du crime. Or les sciences criminologiques précédentes se<br />
sont limitées à une étude non-structurelle de l’acte criminel, alors que la<br />
créologie criminelle définit une étude criminologique structurelle. Cet<br />
apport peut être dégagé clairement des solutions que la théorie<br />
77<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
créologique du crime apporte aux problèmes confrontant les autres<br />
théories criminologiques.<br />
b) LA THEORIE CREOLOGIQUE DU CRIME<br />
COMME « SOLUTION »<br />
A la question comment connaître le crime alors que le crime est une<br />
notion variable dans l’espace et dans le temps, la créologie criminelle<br />
seule peut apporter une réponse satisfaisante. Car en considérant la<br />
« structure » intime de l’acte criminel, la notion espace-temps s’écarte<br />
d’office, la structure de l’acte criminel étant toujours la même, quelle<br />
que soit la législation en vigueur dans l’État et l’époque à laquelle il est<br />
commis. L’acte humain, pris en soi, n’est pas détaché au départ de l’acte<br />
criminel, l’acte humain envisagé étant lui-même l’acte criminel, pas<br />
nécessairement en accomplissement, mais nécessairement en<br />
constitution.<br />
Aussi, la théorie créologique du crime résout « le problème de la<br />
détermination ». En effet, le reproche qui peut être adressé aux théories<br />
criminologiques précédentes, à savoir que deux personnes sujettes aux<br />
mêmes conditions ne sont pas pour autant l’une et l’autre criminelles, ne<br />
peut s’adresser à la théorie créologique du crime. Car si nous<br />
considérons que l’acte criminel est un élément constitutif de « l’acte<br />
humain en soi », nous constatons, d’une part, qu’il ne peut être pris<br />
comme déterminé puisqu’il n’est pas nécessairement voué à entrer en<br />
conflit avec le droit pénal ; et d’autre part, il ne peut pas être pris<br />
comme indéterminé puisqu’il est comme tel un acte « criminogène » (v.<br />
sur ce point, infra.: « la nécessité in se essentielle de la créologie<br />
criminelle).<br />
Si l’étude de l’objet de la créologie criminelle forme bien une<br />
« continuation » des études criminologiques précédentes, et une<br />
« solution » aux problèmes qu’elles ont rencontrés, cette étude doit être<br />
donc « nécessaire ». Le besoin de la créologie criminelle apparaît dans<br />
la « nécessité » de son objet par rapport aux autres objets des sciences<br />
criminelles (« la nécessité inter se »), et dans la nécessité de sa notion<br />
(« la nécessité in se »).<br />
78<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
II. LA NECESSITE DE LA CREOLOGIE CRIMINELLE<br />
A. LA NECESSITE INTER SE DE LA CREOLOGIE<br />
CRIMINELLE<br />
La nécessité inter se de la créologie criminelle peut être montrée, d’une<br />
part, en se référant à « l’ordre historique », et d’autre part, à « l’ordre<br />
logique », auxquels sont sujettes les sciences criminelles.<br />
1. LA NECESSITE INTER SE DE LA CREOLOGIE<br />
CRIMINELLE DANS L’ORDRE HISTORIQUE<br />
L’objet des sciences criminelles est pris jusqu’à présent selon trois<br />
acceptions : ou bien en relation avec la « nature », ou bien en relation<br />
avec la « société », ou bien en relation avec « l’homme ». La « physique<br />
criminelle » étudie le crime en rapport avec les phénomènes<br />
météorologiques. La « sociologie criminelle » envisage le crime en<br />
fonction du milieu hygiénique (alimentation, habitation, misère, etc.),<br />
ou du milieu éducatif (famille, école, etc.), ou du milieu culturel (la<br />
presse, la radio, la télévision, le cinéma, etc.). La « psychologie<br />
criminelle » analyse le crime en relation avec l’homme lui-même<br />
(l’influence des troubles de l’intelligence, de la volonté ou de<br />
l’affectivité sur la genèse du crime).<br />
Il en est autrement pour la créologie criminelle qui envisage la relation<br />
existante entre l’acte de créer et l’acte criminel comme éléments<br />
constitutifs de l’acte humain en soi. Certes, celui-ci est commis dans la<br />
société mais, alors qu’il est considéré par les sciences criminologiques<br />
précédentes, comme la résultante d’une condition géo-physique, sociale,<br />
ou humaine, il est considéré par la créologie criminelle dans sa structure<br />
elle-même, comme étant un acte humain posé en soi dans l’histoire de la<br />
pensée humaine.<br />
L’objet de la créologie criminelle apparaît comme une nécessité dans<br />
l’évolution de l’histoire des sciences criminologiques. En effet, l’esprit<br />
a commencé par étudier le crime dans son accomplissement (c’est<br />
l’étude purement matérielle du droit pénal) ; dans un second temps, il<br />
s’est élevé pour l’étudier dans l’homme ; dans un autre temps, il s’est<br />
79<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
efforcé de l’étudier dans la société mais aussi dans l’environnement ou<br />
la nature.<br />
Il serait enfin temps, tout en suivant l’ordre de cette démarche<br />
ascendante, de considérer l’acte criminel dans « l’acte humain en soi »<br />
posé dans l’histoire de la pensée humaine, en vue de couronner le<br />
cheminement historique des sciences criminologiques. Ce<br />
couronnement apparaît aussi dans l’ordre logique auquel ces sciences<br />
sont sujettes.<br />
1. LA NECESSITE INTER SE DE LA CREOLOGIE<br />
CRIMINELLE DANS L’ORDRE LOGIQUE<br />
Si la créologie criminelle est une « abstraction » des autres sciences<br />
criminologiques, elle est aussi leur « précision ». Elle est leur<br />
« abstraction », car elle dégage l’acte criminel de sa nature légale,<br />
sociale, ou humaine, en vue de l’envisager en soi, dans sa constitution<br />
même. Et elle est leur « précision » car à l’étude de l’acte criminel selon<br />
les conditions météorologiques (la physique criminelle), ou selon la<br />
société (la sociologie criminelle), ou selon l’homme (la psychologie, la<br />
biologie et la psychanalyse criminelles), s’ajoute, par référence à l’ordre<br />
logique allant du général au particulier, l’étude de l’acte criminel selon<br />
« l’acte humain en soi » (la créologie criminelle).<br />
Jusqu’ici, nous avons montré que la créologie criminelle a un objet<br />
« spécifique » ; et que cet objet est « nécessaire » vis-à-vis des autres<br />
sciences criminologiques. Il nous reste à montrer comment cet objet<br />
reflète une « nécessité in se » ou « idéelle » propre à la créologie<br />
criminelle.<br />
B. LA NECESSITE IN SE DE LA CREOLOGIE<br />
CRIMINELLE<br />
La nécessité in se de la créologie criminelle peut être prise dans deux<br />
sens : elle est « essentielle » ou bien « formelle ».<br />
80<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
1. LA NECESSITE IN SE « ESSENTIELLE » DE LA<br />
CREOLOGIE CRIMINELLE<br />
Essentiellement, la créologie criminelle propose de considérer l’acte<br />
humain en soi criminogène constituant l’acte criminel, celui-ci étant pris<br />
dans sa structure intime. Poser ainsi la connaissance qualitative de l’acte<br />
criminel, en dégageant son acte humain, et puis sa connaissance<br />
quantitative, en dénonçant la quantité du caractère criminogène de l’acte<br />
criminel en fonction de son acte humain, serait suffisant pour entériner<br />
les situations criminogènes spécifiques et ultimement, pour prévenir<br />
l’accomplissement du crime.<br />
Concernant la coexistence susmentionnée de l’acte criminel et l’acte<br />
législateur, la nécessité essentielle de la créologie criminelle réside donc<br />
dans le fait de rechercher la qualification de l’état dangereux<br />
criminologique non pas seulement dans l’acte criminel, mais aussi dans<br />
l’acte législateur. Sa nécessité essentielle réside également dans la<br />
quantification de cet état dangereux, en vue de pouvoir réduire la<br />
quantité criminogène des actes humains (V. A. Frangi, L’état dangereux<br />
criminologique : une étude qualitative et quantitative (en cours de<br />
publication).<br />
Le concept de cette nécessité, qui ne forme le principe d’aucune autre<br />
science criminologique, justifie, en effet, la création d’une nouvelle<br />
discipline, la créologie criminelle, pour l’étude du crime. La nécessité<br />
formelle de la créologie criminelle peut apporter aussi une telle<br />
justification.<br />
1. LA NECESSITE IN SE « FORMELLE » DE LA<br />
CREOLOGIE CRIMINELLE<br />
Formellement, le terme « créologie » vient du latin « creare, creo »<br />
(créer), et du grec « logos » (la connaissance de, ou la science de). Le<br />
latin identifie « creo » à « creare ». Ainsi, la créologie criminelle, ou la<br />
science de la création criminelle, englobe non seulement l’étude des<br />
corrélations entre acte de créer et acte criminel, en tant qu’actes<br />
constitutifs de l’acte humain, mais aussi l’étude de l’activité créatrice<br />
(« creo », je crée) et l’activité criminelle en relation.<br />
81<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Toute démarche ultérieure concernant l’étude de l’acte de créer et l’acte<br />
criminel en relation devrait donc commencer par une étude structurelle<br />
créologique-criminelle de l’acte humain en soi.<br />
BIBLIOGRAPHIE<br />
1. LE CRIME SELON «CE QU’IL EST»<br />
A. Selon «ce qu’il est» juridiquement<br />
ANCEL, M., La défense sociale nouvelle, Paris, Cujas, 3e Ed., 1981,<br />
pp. 24-29.<br />
MARQUISET, J., Le crime, P.U.F., Paris 1948, Que sais-je ? n˚ 297, p.<br />
7-17.<br />
NUVOLONE, «Droit pénal et criminologie», Revue Internationale de<br />
Droit Pénal., 1952, p. 157 et s.<br />
SZABO, D., Criminologie, 2e Ed., Montréal 3, Presses de l’Université<br />
de Montréal, 1967, p. 34-35.<br />
YAMARELLOS et KELLENS, Crime et criminologie, marabout<br />
université, 1970, V˚ Crime, p. 103 et s. (à la p. 119)<br />
B. Selon «ce qu’il est» réellement<br />
i. Le crime pris réellement du point de vue social<br />
FERRI, E., La sociologie criminelle, Alcan, Paris 1905, p. 14-21.<br />
LACASSAGNE, Archives de l’Anthropologie Criminelle, <strong>18</strong>86, p. <strong>18</strong>2<br />
PINATEL, J., «De Lacassagne à la nouvelle école lyonnaise», Revue de<br />
Sciences Criminelles et de Droit Pénal Comparé, 1961, p. 151.<br />
82<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
TARDE, G., Les lois de l’imitation, Paris, Alcan, <strong>18</strong>90.<br />
TARDE, G., «Le crime, étude sociale», de H. Joly, Revue<br />
Philosophique, <strong>18</strong>89, 1er semestre, p. 298-306.<br />
ii. Le crime pris réellement du point de vue individuel<br />
BACHET, M., «Les précurseurs de l’anthropologie criminelle», Revue<br />
Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique, 1956, p. 82.<br />
ESCOFFIER-LAMBIOTTE, «L’hérédité de la violence», Le Monde du<br />
16 octobre 1968, p. 8.<br />
FERRI, E., La sociologie criminelle, Alcan, Paris 1905, p. 152-156.<br />
GRAVEN, J., «Existe-t-il un chromosome du crime? Comment juger le<br />
délinquant porteur d’une anomalie génétique XYY?», Revue<br />
Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique, 1968, p. 277.<br />
GRAVEN, J., «Le problème de l’anomalie chromosomique XYY en<br />
criminologie», Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police<br />
Technique, 1969, p. 21.<br />
HEUYER, G., «Histoire des doctrines en criminologie», Revue<br />
Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique, 1950 (juilletsept),<br />
p. 171.<br />
HIVERT et BRETON, J., «Cytogénétique et criminologie», Revue<br />
Pénitentiaire, 1968, p. 493.<br />
LACASSAGNE, A., «Césare Lombroso», Archives de l’Anthropologie<br />
Criminelle, 1909, p. 881.<br />
LEAUTE, J., Criminologie et pénologie (les cours de droit), Paris 1981,<br />
p. 68-71.<br />
LEY, J., «Apports possibles de la cytogénétique à l’étude de la<br />
délinquance», Revue de Droit Pénal et de Criminologie, 1967, p. 392.<br />
83<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
LOMBROSO, C., L’homme criminel, T I, 2 ème Ed. Française, Alcan,<br />
<strong>18</strong>95, p. 92-108.<br />
LOMBROSO, G., «Comment mon père est arrivé à la conception de<br />
l’homme criminel», Revue de Droit Pénal et de Criminologie, 1921, p.<br />
907.<br />
MENDLEWICK, J., WILMOTTE, J. et STOCQUART, R., «Les<br />
déterminants génétiques de la délinquance», Revue de Droit Pénal et de<br />
Criminologie, 1969-1970, p. 439<br />
MOORE, L., «Aberrations chromosomiques portant sur les<br />
chromosomes et comportement antisocial», Annales Internationales de<br />
Criminologie, 1967, p. 469.<br />
PINATEL, J., « Criminologie », in Traité de droit pénal et criminologie,<br />
de Bouzat, P. et Pinatel, J., T III, Paris, Dalloz, 3 ème Ed., p. <strong>18</strong>0 et s.<br />
PINATEL, J., «Aperçu de l’histoire des doctrines criminologiques»,<br />
Revue de Sciences Criminelles et de Droit Pénal Comparé, 1953, p.<br />
336.<br />
PINATEL, J., «La doctrine lombrosienne devant la criminologie<br />
scientifique contemporaine», Revue de Sciences Criminelles et de Droit<br />
Pénal Comparé, 1960, p. 3<strong>18</strong>.<br />
VERVAECK (Dr.), «La théorie lombrosienne et l’évolution de<br />
l’anthropologie criminelle», Archives de l’Anthropologie Criminelles,<br />
1910, p. 561.<br />
YAMARELLOS et KELLENS, Crime et criminologie, marabout<br />
université, 1970, V˚ Génétique criminelle, p. 198-199.<br />
2. LE CRIME SELON «CE QU’IL EXPRIME»<br />
GAROFALO, R., Criminologie, étude sur la nature du crime et la<br />
théorie de la pénalité, 5ème Ed., Alcan, Paris, 1905, p. 1-52.<br />
84<br />
DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN<br />
HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A<br />
NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE<br />
BY ORSOLYA BOGDÁN *<br />
I. BEVEZETÉS<br />
1. NEMZETKÖZI TÖREKVÉSEK ÉS TENDENCIÁK A FIATALKORÚAK<br />
BÜNTETŐJOGÁBAN A XX. SZÁZADBAN<br />
„A XX. század elejétől a klasszikus büntetőjogi iskola merev<br />
dogmatizmusát feloldó pozitivista kriminálpolitika tettes – büntetőjogi<br />
szemléletének máig érvényesülő hatása a fiatalkorú bűnelkövetők<br />
megkülönböztetett, a felnőttekétől eltérő kezelése.” 1<br />
Államonként azonban eltérő szemlélettel találkozhatunk: valamely<br />
állam a fiatalkorúak szankciórendszerét inkább tekinti<br />
ifjúságvédelemnek ill. ifjúságnevelésnek, mint a hagyományos<br />
büntetések és intézkedések hálózatának fiatalkorúakra szabásának. Az<br />
előbbi modell előnyben részesíti az érintettek ügyeiben eljáró<br />
szakemberek – szociális munkások, pszichológusok stb. – szélesebb<br />
körű beavatkozását, míg az ún. igazságszolgáltatási modell a klasszikus<br />
tettfelelősség, proporcionalitás és a formális garanciák talaján áll és attól<br />
nem rugaszkodik el.<br />
* Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Budapest.<br />
1<br />
Lőrincz József: Nemzetközi tendenciák a fiatalkorúak büntetés –<br />
végrehajtásában, Bv. Szakkönyvtár, IM Büntetés – végrehajtás Országos<br />
Parancsnokság, Budapest, 1992, 123. oldal<br />
85<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
A II. világháború utáni „új társadalomvédelmi iskola” (pl. Gramatica)<br />
kiinduló pontja a tettes reszocializációja, mely gyógyító – nevelő<br />
intézkedések útján érhető el, de ez nem szoríthatja háttérbe a társadalom<br />
biztonságát (hasonlóan a XIX. században, ahol elsődleges cél a bűnözők<br />
izolációja és a társadalom védelme volt).<br />
Ezzel párhuzamosan fejlődik ki az ún. treatment ideológia (a skandináv<br />
államokban, az USA - ban) a főként pszichológusokat, pszichiátereket<br />
és szociológusokat tömörítő, a humán tudományokat felhasználó<br />
rehabilicionista mozgalom termékeként; módszere a deviancia okának<br />
feltárása és az elkövetői személyiség – torzulás megszűntetése<br />
humánus, speciálpreventív eszközökkel.<br />
Ezzel szemben a hazánkban többek között Szabó András – képviselte<br />
„neo – abszolút” elmélet a büntetés megtorló jellegét helyezte előtérbe,<br />
és álláspontja szerint a büntetésnek joghátrányi és nem szociálpolitikai<br />
intézkedési jellegét kell kidomborítania. 2<br />
Rendszertől és elmélettől függetlenül szinte valamennyi országnak a<br />
fiatalkori bűnözés növekedésével kellett szembesülnie a 70 – es évektől.<br />
A szabadságvesztéssel járó büntetések nem bizonyultak a<br />
legmegfelelőbb eszköznek a kriminalitás visszaszorításához (kvázi<br />
ultima ratio – ként emlegetik): a fiatalkorú erkölcsi – szociális –<br />
tanulmányi fejlődésében való visszavető hatása tagadhatatlan. E<br />
probléma mentén alakultak ki az olyan fogalmak, mint a „szabadságban<br />
való kezelés”, a „közösségi ellenőrzés”, a jóvátétel és a mediáció. A<br />
fiatalkorúak szabadságelvonásának hosszabb, illetve határozatlan<br />
tartalmát az államok szűkülő köre, elsősorban az ún. ifjúságvédelmi<br />
modellt követők tartották fenn. 3<br />
A nemzetközi szervezetek ajánlásaikban (pl. Pekingi Szabályok) a<br />
fiatalkorú bűnelkövetők emberi jogainak specifikus védelmére<br />
szólítanak fel, pozitív diszkriminációjukat, családjuk, a társadalom és az<br />
2 Lőrincz: uo., 124. oldal<br />
3 Lőrincz: uo., 125. oldal<br />
86<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
állam velük szembeni felelősségét hangsúlyozva, így az emberi jogaikra<br />
és méltóságuk védelmére különös tekintettel kellene a<br />
büntetőtörvényeket kialakítani.<br />
A jóléti államok büntetőjogának profiljában már a 70 – es, 80 – as<br />
években középpontba kerülhettek az alap – és középfokú általános –<br />
illetve szakműveltséget biztosító iskolarendszerű intézmények, melyek<br />
a kreativitás és készségfejlesztés mellett kiegészültek praktikus, a<br />
szabadulás utáni életet megkönnyítő tanácsadó programokkal is.<br />
Újabban pedig világszerte szélesedett a társadalmi erőket az intézet<br />
életébe bekapcsoló együttműködést eredményező törekvés a fiatalkorú<br />
és szociális környezete közötti ellentmondás feloldása és a fiatalok<br />
szocializálása céljából. 4<br />
2. A FIATALKORÚAKRA VONATKOZÓ SZANKCIÓRENDSZER<br />
NEMZETKÖZI TENDENCIÁI NAPJAINKBAN – AZ ENSZ –<br />
KÖVETELMÉNYEK<br />
Az Egyesült Nemzetek Szervezete a 80 – as években meghirdetett<br />
bűnmegelőzési programjának középpontjába a fiatalkorúak<br />
igazságszolgáltatásának finomítását állította, figyelemmel az emberi<br />
jogokra és a társadalmi igazság szempontjaira. 5<br />
E szervezet égisze alatt kibontakozó reformmozgalom olyan<br />
irányelveket tett magáévá, mint a fiatalkorú életkori sajátosságain túl<br />
értelmi – erkölcsi fejlettségének a figyelembe vételét, a szankció<br />
elsődlegesen nevelő célját, az eljáró igazgatási szervek kötelességét a<br />
reszocializációban, továbbá külön büntetés – végrehajtási törvény<br />
kidolgozására hívja fel a tagállamokat.<br />
4 Lőrincz: uo., 127. oldal<br />
5<br />
ENSZ 40/33/1985. sz. határozata (Pekingi Szabályok), 23. pont<br />
87<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
A változtatás igényét először az ENSZ 1980 – ban megrendezett VI.<br />
bűnmegelőzési kongresszusán fogalmazták meg, melyet az ún. Pekingi<br />
Szabályok (az 1955 – ös ENSZ Minimum Szabályokra épül), 1985 –<br />
ben, majd a Rijadi Irányelvek a megelőzésről 1988 – ban követett,<br />
melyeket a „Gyermekek jogairól” 6 szóló 1989 – es New York – i<br />
egyezmény összegzett.<br />
Kutatásom során a Pekingi Szabályok részletesebb bemutatása mellett<br />
döntöttem, mert fejezetei lefedik mindazon probléma – köröket,<br />
melyekkel a dolgozatom foglalkozik, és amelyekkel az egyes államok<br />
jogalkotóinak szembe kellett nézniük.<br />
2.1.A PEKINGI SZABÁLYOK<br />
A dokumentum preambulumában ajánlja, hogy „a<br />
tagállamok…törekedjenek a fiatalkorú és családja jólétének<br />
előmozdítására” és csökkentsék a jogi beavatkozás szükségességét, a<br />
„törvénnyel összeütközésbe került fiatalkorú eredményes és humánus<br />
kezelését” (25. pont). Az e szabályhoz fűzött kommentár kiemeli, hogy<br />
a fiatalkorúról való gondoskodás alapvető jogpolitikai követelménye<br />
megelőzni a bűnelkövetést, ennek pedig egyik útja a fiatal jólétének<br />
elősegítése, ami egyúttal minimalizálni fogja az igazságszolgáltatás<br />
beavatkozásának szükségességét, csökkentve az ezzel okozható ártalmat<br />
is (26. pont).<br />
Kiemelendő még a Szabályokból az arányosság követelménye, mely<br />
nem egyoldalúan a bűncselekmény tárgyi súlyához fűződik, hanem az<br />
elkövető személyes körülményeihez is (pl. családi körülmények – ám<br />
ez, ebben az általános megfogalmazásban, meglátásom szerint nehezen<br />
hozható összhangban az egyenlő elbánás elvével, azaz diszkriminatív).<br />
Így a törvényi reakció arányosságát az elkövető, a bűncselekmény és az<br />
áldozat körülményeinek kontextusában kell vizsgálni (28. pont).<br />
6<br />
A décret 90-917 8 Octobre 1990 tette a francia nemzeti jog részévé. Az<br />
Egyezmény a „gyermek” szó alatt a <strong>18</strong> éven aluliakat érti (1. cikk)<br />
88<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Az eljárási garanciák körében fontos megemlíteni a fiatalkorú<br />
anonimitáshoz való jogát és a szülő/gyám jelenlétéhez való jogot a<br />
tárgyalás során (31. pont).<br />
A dokumentum bátorítást ad az alternatív szankciók minél szélesebb<br />
körben való alkalmazására, így az intézeti elhelyezés helyett az alábbi<br />
intézkedéseket/büntetéseket javasolja: a fiatalkorú gondozása,<br />
felügyelete; próbára bocsátás; közérdekű munka; pénzügyi jellegű<br />
büntetések, kártalanítás; kezelés elrendelése, csoporttanácsadáson való<br />
részvétel, valamint nevelőszülői, lakóközösségi vagy más nevelő<br />
környezet általi gondozás elrendelése (32 – 33. pont).<br />
A fenti szankciók közös tulajdonsága, hogy közösségi bázisú korrekciós<br />
törekvéseket tartalmaznak. 7 Az alternativitás elve azt is jelenti, hogy a<br />
hatóságnak legyen lehetősége kiválasztani az elkövető számára<br />
legmegfelelőbbet és adott esetben azt módosítani (34. pont).<br />
Az 1955 – ös szabályozástól eltérően, a legvégső esetben alkalmazható<br />
szabadság – elvonó (intézeti) nevelés esetén sem tartja reálisnak az<br />
elítélt erkölcsi megváltozathatóságát, sokkal inkább a társadalomba való<br />
visszailleszkedésének feltételeit kívánja elősegíteni, például a személyes<br />
erőforrások fejlesztése útján. A Szabályok ezért előtérbe akarja hozni a<br />
fél – intézeti megoldásokat, mint a nevelőotthonokat és a nappali oktató<br />
központokat, melyek hozzájárulnak a fiatalkorú reintegrációjához (49.<br />
pont).<br />
3. A FIATALKORÚAKRA VONATKOZÓ HATÁLYOS SZABÁLYOZÁS<br />
HELYE A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGBAN<br />
A fiatalkorúakra vonatkozó büntetés-szabályozás igen hamar elkülönült<br />
a nagykorúakétól; igaz, kezdetben ez nem szisztematikusan történt. Már<br />
7<br />
Lőrincz József: Nemzetközi tendenciák a fiatalkorúak büntetés –<br />
végrehajtásában, Bv. Szakkönyvtár, IM Büntetés – végrehajtás Országos<br />
Parancsnokság, Budapest, 1992, 24. oldal<br />
89<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
a rómaiak is figyelemmel voltak az életkorra, de külön bíróságot még<br />
nem állítottak fel ezen ügyek kivizsgálására. A régi francia jog ezt<br />
adaptálta. Amennyiben a fiatalkorú súlyos bűncselekményt követett el, a<br />
különleges elbánás követelménye már nem védte tovább.<br />
A forradalmi törvényhozás a 16 éves életkorhoz kötötte az enyhébb<br />
eljárást. Az <strong>18</strong>10-es Code Pénal megteremti a nevelő jellegű<br />
intézkedések alapját, elismerve a bebörtönzés kedvezőtlen hatásait és a<br />
gyógypedagógia szükségességét.<br />
Az <strong>18</strong>00-as évek derekán született jogszabályok alapján a kevésbé<br />
súlyos bűncselekményt szabálysértési hatóság előtt bírálták el, valamint<br />
a fogházakban elkülönítették a fiatalkorúakat idősebb társaiktól. A<br />
századfordulón megszületik a külön bíróság, a felügyelet intézményei és<br />
a megelőzés gondolata. 8<br />
Az új francia büntetőtörvénykönyv visszafogottan rendelkezik a<br />
fiatalkorúakkal kapcsolatban: egyrészt külön törvény hatály alá utalja<br />
(ordonnance 9 2 février 1945). A CP art. 122-8 szerint: „a<br />
bűncselekmény elkövetésében bűnösnek talált fiatallal szemben<br />
védelmi, felügyeleti és nevelési intézkedés foganatosítható megfelelő<br />
körülmények fennállása esetén.” Emellett azonban a törvény<br />
megfogalmazza a fiatalkorúak általános büntetőjogi felelősségét. Az<br />
ordonnance indoklása rögzíti a korhatárt, valamint a Köztársaság azon<br />
akaratát, hogy „hatékonyan védje különösen a bűnöző fiatalkorút, mivel<br />
Franciaországban nem olyan magas a születésszám, hogy<br />
elhanyagolhasson egészséges lényeket.”<br />
Az évtizedekkel korábbi kriminálpolitika terméke még az 1958-as a<br />
veszélyeztetett fiatalkorúak helyzetét, az 1970-es a szülői felügyeletet<br />
szabályozó törvény. E három jogszabály fogja át azt a teljes körűnek<br />
8<br />
Jean-François Renucci – Christine Courtin: Le droit pénal des mineurs, PUF,<br />
Párizs, 2001, pp. 59-60.<br />
9<br />
kormányrendelet törvényi felhatalmazással<br />
90<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
szánt megelőzési – nevelési – büntető programot a 90-es évekig, ami<br />
nem képezte integráns részét a francia Btk.-nak. 10<br />
A bűnözés szerkezetének megváltozásával, a fiatalkorú elkövetők<br />
számának növekedésével és a bűnözők „fiatalodásával” szükségessé vált<br />
az ordonnance felülvizsgálata. 1993-ban került be az art. 12-1-vel a<br />
jogszabály szövegébe a reparáció. 1998-ban a Miniszterelnök<br />
körlevélben fogalmazta meg a fiatalkorú bevonását szorgalmazva az új<br />
társadalmi cselekvési program kidolgozásába. A 2002. szeptember 9-i<br />
törvény megengedi a nevelő intézkedések és a büntetések együttes<br />
alkalmazását is.<br />
II. A FIATALKORÚAKRA VONATKOZÓ HATÁLYOS<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEK<br />
1. A FRANCIA BTK. SAJÁTOSSÁGAI<br />
1.1.1. AZ ÉLETKOR JELENTŐSÉGE<br />
Az <strong>18</strong>10-es Code Pénal szerkesztői 16 éves korban határozták meg a<br />
nagykorúság küszöbét. A szándékos bűncselekmény-elkövetőre<br />
büntetés, a nem szándékos elkövetőre javítóintézeti elhelyezés várt,<br />
amely maximálisan a 20. életévig tarthatott.<br />
Ezt a megoldást sok kritika érte egyrészt, mert a kiskorúakat nem<br />
különítették el nagykorú társaiktól, másrészt, mert a 16 év alacsonynak<br />
bizonyult.<br />
Ezt követően az 1906-os törvény kijelenti, hogy a 13. életév alatt a<br />
büntetőjogi felelősséggel nem számolhatunk, de a 13 és a <strong>18</strong> év<br />
közöttiekkel szemben a néhány évvel később felálló fiatalkorúak<br />
bírósága már érdemben eljárhat.<br />
10<br />
Lazrges, Christine: Introduction á la politique criminelle, l’Harmattan,<br />
Párizs, 2000, pp. 77-8.<br />
91<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Ez a korhatár a mai napig hatályos, a többször módisított ordonnance<br />
fenntartotta (ord. 45-174). A 13. életévét már betöltött elkövető esetén<br />
egyszerű, megdönthető vélelmet állít föl a bíró a beszámíthatóságát<br />
illetően, és a börtönbüntetésen kívül a legtöbb büntetés és intézkedés<br />
foganatosítható vele szemben (45-174, art. 2.).<br />
1.2 A FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEK<br />
Az alkalmazható intézkedések köre széles, teret engedve ezzel a bírói<br />
mérlegelésnek, a hatékony és testreszabott szankcióknak. A francia<br />
törvényhozás megkülönbözteti a büntető és a nevelő jellegű<br />
intézkedéseket. Az utóbbi alkalmazásának elsőbbségét a jogszabály<br />
egyértelművé teszi (art. 2.). 11 A 13 évet be nem töltöttek esetén a<br />
beszámíthatóság megdönthetetlen vélelem, velük szemben csak nevelő<br />
jellegű intézkedés alkalmazható. A 13. életévét betöltöttek esetén az<br />
alábbiak foganatosíthatók az 1.1. pontban foglalt feltételek alapján: pl.<br />
szülőhöz, gyámhoz, szülői felügyeletet gyakorló vagy arra alkalmas<br />
személyhez való (vissza)helyezés, magán vagy állami oktatási, gyógy-<br />
vagy gyógyító-nevelő, illetve javító intézményben való elhelyezés,<br />
valamint az art. 2-nek megfelelően büntetés kiszabása (art. 15-6.).<br />
A nevelő jellegű intézkedések körébe tartozó büntetőjogi közvetítést<br />
(mediáció – médiation) külön fejezetben tárgyalom.<br />
A büntető jellegű intézkedések (mesures répressives ou peines)<br />
részletezésétől eltekintek az összehasonlíthatóság kedvéért, mert a<br />
magyar jogszabályok ezeket a büntetések közé sorolják (közérdekű<br />
munka – travail d’intéret, pénzbüntetés – amande és börtönbüntetés –<br />
emprisonnement).<br />
11<br />
„Le tribunal pour les enfants et la cour d’assises des mineurs prononceront,<br />
suivant les cas, les mineurs de protection, d’assistance, de surveillance et<br />
d’éducation qui sembleront appropriées (…).”<br />
92<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
1.1.2 A nevelő jellegű intézkedések (mésures éducatives)<br />
1.2.1.1.Megrovás (admonestation, art. 8.)<br />
A legenyhébb válasz a bűncselekményre, hasonlóan a magyar<br />
szabályozáshoz. A bírósági szakban, a bűnösség kimondása után,<br />
kizárólag a bíró által hajtható végre. Ez az „ünnepélyes” figyelmeztetés<br />
a szülők és a sértett jelenlétében hatékony, amelyet adott esetben<br />
pártfogó felügyelet elrendelésével párosíthatnak. 12<br />
1.2.1.2.Fiatalkorú pártfogó felügyelete (liberté surveillée, art. 25-27.)<br />
Az 1912-es törvénnyel került bevezetésre, párhuzamosan alkalmazható<br />
egyéb intézkedésekkel, illetve ideiglenes megoldásként egyaránt. Az art.<br />
8. szerint elrendelésének köre igen széles: a fiatalkorúak bírósága<br />
minden esetben megteheti a nagykorúság eléréséig. Kiszabható az ítélet<br />
meghozataláig, de járulékosan is, az ítélkezés keretén belül is.<br />
Az ítélet nyomán a bíróság megbízottja folyamatosan gyűjti a fiatal<br />
körülményeinek alakulásával kapcsolatos információkat, így a családi és<br />
a beiskolázási helyzetére, az intézkedés végrehajtását nehezítő<br />
akadályokra és elhelyezésére vonatkozó adatokat továbbítja a bíróhoz.<br />
Az állandó megbízottat az Igazságügy miniszter, az önkéntest a<br />
fiatalkorú ügyével foglalkozó bíró nevezi ki.<br />
Az intézkedés szükségessége a foganatosítástól számított 1 éven belül<br />
felülvizsgálható akár a fiatal, akár szülei, gyámja kezdeményezésére.<br />
Amennyiben az eljáró hatóság a szülő/gyám részéről az együttműködési<br />
kötelezettségének megszegését tapasztalja, az intézkedés<br />
végrehajthatatlanná válik, 1,5-től 175 Euróig terjedő pénzbírságot<br />
szabhat ki.<br />
12<br />
Laurent Gebler – Ivan Guitz: Le traitement juduciaire de la délinquance des<br />
mineurs, Éditions ASH, Párizs, 2004, pp. 71.<br />
93<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
1.2.1.3. Bírói védelem alá helyezés (mis sous protection judiciaire, art.<br />
16bis)<br />
Az 1975-ben kelt törvény alapján a 16. évét betöltött fiatalkorú a<br />
fiatalkorúak bíróságának vagy ülnökbíróságának döntése alapján<br />
maximálisan 5 évre bírói védelem alá helyezhető – 21 éves koráig. Az<br />
1996-os reform alapján a fiatalkorú bármely életkorában alkalmazható,<br />
valamint valakinél/valahol való elhelyezéssel kombinálható.<br />
1.2.1.4. Nevelő jellegű elhelyezés (placement éducatif, art. 8., 10., 15.,<br />
16., 33.)<br />
Ez az intézkedés az eljárás bármely szakaszában elrendelhető.<br />
Megkülönböztetnek ún. nyitott közegben végrehajtandó intézkedést<br />
(milieu ouvert); a gyermek megmarad eredeti családi körében egy előre<br />
meghatározott időtől eltekintve, amikor a fiatalt egy harmadik<br />
személyre/intézményre bízzák. A pártfogó felügyelethez hasonlóan sor<br />
kerülhet átmeneti, ítélethozatalig tartó kiszabásra is.<br />
Az elhelyezés időtartalma alatt a szülők hivatalosan nem veszítik el<br />
felügyeleti jogukat, cserébe minden szükséges beleegyezést meg kell<br />
adniuk e jog más által történő gyakorlásához (pl. továbbtanulás iránya,<br />
veszélyes sport űzése, orvosi kezelés) és minden, a gyermek életében<br />
fontos eseményen meg kell jelenniük (pl. szülői értekezlet, tanár<br />
fogadóórája).<br />
Az elhelyezés történhet (a másik) szülőnél, gyámnál, szülői felügyeletet<br />
gyakorló vagy arra alkalmas személynél, illetve az 1.2. pontban felsorolt<br />
intézményekben.<br />
„Az arra alkalmas harmadik” többnyire „bizalomra méltó” (personne<br />
digne de confiance) természetes vagy jogi személy, aki a fiatalkorú<br />
közelebbi vagy távolabbi rokona, vagy az, aki az elkövető életében<br />
mindig fontos szerepet töltött be, esetleg egy speciális befogadó<br />
94<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
család. 13 Napjainkban, az elhelyezésre ítélt fiatalok többsége valamely<br />
nevelési – oktatási intézetben kerül elhelyezésre, ahol 8-20 fős<br />
csoportokban foglalkoznak velük.<br />
Újraszabályozásukra 2002-ben került sor. Az intézmény típusától függ<br />
az elhelyezés időtartalma, a foglalkozások fajtája, a nevelő-gárda<br />
képzettsége: például a centre éducatif renforcé-ban a marginalizálódott,<br />
többszörös visszaeső elkövetőket fogadják be, 8 fős csoportokba<br />
sorolják őket 3-6 hónapos időtartamra. Ez idő eltelte után helyezik át<br />
őket más intézetbe vagy az ún. nyitott közegű intézkedést rendelik el.<br />
Léteznek olyan otthonok, amelyek azonnali befogadásra alkalmasak,<br />
sokszor a bebörtönzés alternatívájaként 1-3 hónapra.<br />
1.1.2 Nevelő jellegű büntetések (sanctions éducatives)<br />
A magyar Btk-hoz hasonlóan itt is lehetőség nyílik a fiatalkorú által<br />
birtokolt dolog elkobzására (confication), amely az elkövetés célját<br />
szolgálja; adott esetben egy motorbicikli is lehet a francia joggyakorlat<br />
alapján (art. 15-1).<br />
Az ordonnance-ban megtaláljuk a kiutasításhoz hasonlítható, a bűntett<br />
elkövetési helyétől maximálisan 1 évre eltiltó szankciót (interdiction de<br />
paraître), azzal a megkötéssel, hogy az eltiltás nem vonatkozhat a<br />
gyermek szokásos lakhelyére ill. iskolájának körzetére.<br />
A bíróság megtilthatja a sértettel vagy tettestársával való érintkezését<br />
(interdiction de rencontre) az elkövetőnek 1 éves időtartamra.<br />
2. KÖZVETÍTÉS – REPARÁCIÓ (MÉDIATION, ART. 12-1) – AZ<br />
ALTERNATÍVA<br />
„A médiáció a bűncselekmény elkövetője és sértettje között létrejövő<br />
önkéntes megállapodás arról, hogy a tettes az áldozatnak okozott kárt<br />
egy mindkettőjük által elfogadott módon és mértékben jóváteszi, és<br />
13 Gebler – Giutz: u.o. pp. 76.<br />
95<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
részben vagy egészben mentesül az adott államban egyébként szokásos<br />
büntetőjogi felelősségre vonás és a büntetés alól.” 14<br />
2.1 A KÖZVETÍTÉS A NEMZETKÖZI SZERVEZETEK JOGALKOTÁSÁBAN<br />
„A bűncselekmények és a hatalommal való visszaélés áldozatainak<br />
nyújtandó igazságszolgáltatás alapelvei”-ről szóló 1985. évi ENSZ<br />
deklaráció részletesen foglalkozik azzal, hogy mit is értünk<br />
kártalanításon és jóvátételen. Szorgalmazza, hogy a nemzeti jogszabályalkotók<br />
vizsgálják meg a reparáció jogrendszerükbe való beillesztésének<br />
lehetőségét.<br />
Az ENSZ egy másik, két évvel korábbi konvenciója azt az esetkört<br />
tárgyalja, amikor a kompenzáció más forrásból nem teljesítendő,<br />
szükséges az állam fellépése: kártalanítást biztosít azoknak, akik<br />
szándékosan elkövetett erőszakos bűncselekmények áldozatává váltak<br />
és komoly testi sérülést szenvedtek (vagy elhunytak). Az összeg úgy<br />
kerül megállapításra, hogy az elegendő legyen legalább a keresetkiesés<br />
pótlására, az orvosi és temetési költségekre egyaránt.<br />
E témában ugyancsak megemlítendő az Európa Tanács<br />
büntetéskiszabással kapcsolatos ajánlása, amely a kompenzáció mind<br />
szélesebb körben való alkalmazását sürgeti, akár önállóan, a<br />
szabadságvesztés alternatívájaként, akár más szankcióval együttesen. 15<br />
A Tanács azonban figyelmeztet, hogy a jóvátétel különböző,<br />
igazságtalan helyzetbe hozhatja az elkövetőket – nem mindenki tudja<br />
„megváltani a szabadságát” (lásd az óvadék intézménye körüli vitákat).<br />
Ez alapján hívja föl a bírók figyelmét arra, hogy a reparáció nem csak<br />
pénzben kifejezve és teljesítve, hanem más, az elkövető által kifejtett<br />
jóvátétellel is megtörténhet.<br />
2.2 MEDIÁCIÓ A FRANCIA SZAKIRODALOMBAN ÉS A GYAKORLATBAN<br />
14<br />
dr. Barabás Andrea Tünde: Egyezség tettes és áldozata között – racionalitás<br />
vagy naivitás? in Kriminológiai Tanulmányok, 2002/39., pp. 114.<br />
15<br />
„Az áldozatnak a büntetőjogban és a büntetőeljárásban elfoglalt helyzeté”-ről<br />
szóló ajánlás 1985-ből<br />
96<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
2.2.1 A közvetítés célja és tárgya<br />
A mediáció egy békéltetési, kiegyezési technika a bűncselekmény<br />
elkövetője és a sértett között, amely a kár jelképes helyrehozatalán<br />
alapul.<br />
Ezen alapjait az 1945-ös jogszabályban is megtalálhatjuk, amelyet a már<br />
említett 1993. január 4-i törvény teljesített ki.<br />
Jelenleg az eljárás bármely szakaszában rendelkezésre áll akár az<br />
ügyésznek, akár a bíróságnak vagy az ügyben eljáró más hatóságnak,<br />
figyelemmel a sértett beleegyezésére és a közösség érdekére.<br />
A mediáció – reparációt meg kell különböztetni a közérdekű munkától,<br />
amelyet csak 16 éven felüliekkel szemben szabhatnak ki, és feltétlenül<br />
minimálisan 40 óra munkaként teljesítendő, ellenkező esetben büntetésvégrehajtási<br />
intézetben kerül végrehajtásra. 16<br />
Előnyei az alábbiak mentén foglalhatók össze: egyrészt, nevelő<br />
karakterű büntetőjogi választ ad egy valós bűncselekményre, kikerülvén<br />
ezzel más szankciók lehetséges kedvezőtlen hatásait. Másrészt a fiatal<br />
elkövetőben jobban tudatosodik cselekménye, a reparáció kézzel<br />
foghatóvá válik az általa okozott kár. Végül, a sértett személye sem<br />
merül feledésbe; a jogalkotó célja a gyors, természetbeni kármentesítés<br />
elérése. 17<br />
A nevelő jellege vitathatatlan: a közvetítő tevékenysége során igen nagy<br />
hatást gyakorolhat az elkövető érzelmi-lelkiismereti fejlődésére –<br />
ráébreszti a fiatalt tettének az áldozatot és a társadalmat érintő<br />
következményeire.<br />
2.2.2 A közvetítés meneteű<br />
A legfiatalabb elkövetőkkel szemben is foganatosítható; a helyrehozatal<br />
történhet természetben vagy pénzben, részben vagy egészben,<br />
közvetlenül az áldozat részére teljesítve, vagy közösségi munkaként (pl.<br />
kórházban, közlekedési vállalatnak, ami azonban nem sértheti a fiatal<br />
vallási meggyőződését). Az előbbi esetben, természetesen, a kárt<br />
elszenvedő hozzájárulása szükséges. Amikor az elkövető szülője<br />
16 Lazarges: u.o., pp. 105-8.<br />
17<br />
Mbanzoulou, Paul: La médiation pénale, l’Harmattan, Párizs, 2002, pp. 60.<br />
97<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
rendelkezik felelősségbiztosítással, gyakran a biztosító fedezi a fiatal<br />
által okozott kárt.<br />
Az art. 4-1 szerint az elkövető mellé saját ügyvéd híján hivatalból kell<br />
valakit kirendelni, aki képviselete ellátása mellett felvilágosítja jelenléte<br />
kötelező mivoltáról. Ezen kívül ő teremti meg a lehetőséget a bíró és a<br />
fiatalkorú közti dialógus létesülésére (ennek szükségképpen meg kell<br />
előznie a bírósági eljárást), amelynek során az elkövető előtt tisztázzák a<br />
bűncselekmény minősítését, a felelősség megállapítását, tettének<br />
következményeit és a sértett kártalanítását.<br />
A közvetítő megbízását a közszféra-beli Fiatalok Bírósági Védelme<br />
elnevezésű szervezettől kapja, feladata lényegében a fiatal és az eljáró<br />
hatóság közötti kommunikáció megkönnyítése. Munkája során valódi<br />
hajlandóságot ébreszt az elkövetőben tette materiális és morális<br />
helyreállítására, megértetvén védencével az eljárást és okait.<br />
2.3 A MEDIÁCIÓ MEGÍTÉLÉSE A MAGYAR SZAKIRODALOMBAN<br />
A magyar szakirodalom első jelentős restitúciós kompenzáció tana az<br />
Angliába elszármazott Schäfer István kriminológus nevéhez köthető, aki<br />
többek között „Jóvátétel a bűnözés áldozatainak” valamint „A<br />
kártalanítás és a jóvátétel a bűnözés áldozatainak” címmel publikálta<br />
műveit. Az azóta kikristályosodott fogalmak alapján a kártalanítás az<br />
állam általi, a jóvátétel pedig az elkövető általi teljesítést jelenti az<br />
áldozatok részére – igaz, más források gyakran szinonimaként<br />
használják.<br />
Az elkövető általi megtérítés többféle lehet; általában nincs mód a kár<br />
reális jóvátételére, például azért, mert az pénzben nem mérhető.<br />
Ilyenkor szimbolikus reparációra kerülhet sor, amely megnyilvánulhat<br />
bocsánatkérésben, karitatív célokért történő teljesítésben vagy<br />
munkavégzésben.<br />
98<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Azonban ez a megoldás sem maradhat kritika nélkül: az Európa Tanács<br />
ajánlásában már figyelmeztetett az elkövetők anyagi különbségeikből<br />
fakadó igazságtalanságra. Emellett komoly problémát jelent a kár<br />
megállapítása módszerének kiválasztása és alkalmazásának<br />
bizonytalanságai. <strong>18</strong> Továbbá rendszertanilag el kell tudni különíteni a<br />
pénzbüntetéstől is, ami adott esetben szintén a szabadság-vesztés<br />
alternatívájaként jelenik meg.<br />
Kerezsi Klára több munkáját szentelte ennek a témának; véleménye<br />
szerint a jóvátétel a sértett és az elkövető közötti harmónia<br />
helyreállítását szolgálja. Az utóbbit a felelősség vállalására késztette,<br />
szégyenérzetét erősítette, visszatartotta a további jogellenes<br />
magatartástól, de a kompenzációval mintegy az önbecsülését is<br />
visszanyerte. A legújabb kutatások alapján a közvetítés egy<br />
háromdimenziós értelmezést nyer: sértetti, elkövetői és társadalmi<br />
vetületet. Meglátása szerint a bűnözésre és a bűnöző kezelésére fordított<br />
költségek jó esetben nem magasabbak a bűnözéssel okozott károkkal –<br />
ezt segíthet kiegyenlíteni az elkövető által történő teljesítés. Kerezsi<br />
felhívja a figyelmet arra, hogy polgári jogi elemek szivárognak be a<br />
közjogi területre az elkövető-sértett-közvetítő egyezkedésével és a<br />
kártérítés-színezetű szankció megjelenésével (a mediáció egyébként<br />
hazánkban is működő intézmény a magánjogi vitás kérdések<br />
rendezésére).<br />
Kerezsi kidolgozta a közvetítés lehetséges hazai koncepcióját: az eljárás<br />
ügyészi vagy bírósági szakaszában az eljárás 3 hónapra feltételesen<br />
felfüggeszthető, ha lenne rá remény, hogy a sértettnek okozott kárt<br />
megtérítik, akár munkavégzéssel, akár pénzfizetéssel. A közvetítő a<br />
pártfogó szolgálat alkalmazottja. Feltételei, hogy az ügyész vagy a bíró<br />
ezt jóváhagyja, a sértett beleegyezik, a bűncselekmény csekély súlyú,<br />
valamint a közérdeket a jóvátétel nem sérti.<br />
Nagy Ferenc is a külföldi példák alapján elemzi a mediáció lehetőségeit:<br />
egyes országok közvetítését a büntetőeljárásban előrehozott informális<br />
<strong>18</strong><br />
Dr. Görgényi Ilona: A bűncselekménnyel okozott kár megtérítésének<br />
perspektívái in Kriminológiai Tanulmányok, 2002/39., pp. 96.<br />
99<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
konfliktus-szabályozásként jellemzi, egyéb eljárási cselekmények<br />
elkerülése végett; máshol a büntetőeljárás lezáró aktusa, végül önállóan<br />
alkalmazható szankcióként is értelmezhető.<br />
III. A FRANCIA SZABÁLYOZÁS KIEMELT PONTJAI A<br />
NEMZETKÖZI KÖVETELMÉNYEK TÜKRÉBEN –<br />
MEGOLDÁSI JAVASLATOK A JÖVŐRE NÉZVE<br />
„Az Egyezményben részes államok gondoskodnak arról, hogy a<br />
gyermeket szüleitől, ezek akarata ellenére, ne válasszák el, kivéve, ha az<br />
illetékes hatóságok, bírói felülvizsgálat lehetőségének fenntartásával és<br />
az erre vonatkozó törvényeknek és eljárásoknak megfelelően úgy<br />
döntenek, hogy ez az elválasztás a gyermek mindenek felett álló<br />
érdekében szükséges. Ilyen értelmű döntés szükséges lehet bizonyos<br />
különleges esetekben, például akkor, ha a szülők durván kezelik, vagy<br />
elhanyagolják gyermeküket, illetőleg ha különválva élnek és dönteni<br />
kell a gyermek elhelyezéséről. „ 19<br />
Az Egyezmény is csak példálózóan tér ki azokra az esetekre, amikor a<br />
fiatalkorú családi környezetéből való kiemelése szükséges; ennek<br />
meghatározását egyrészről az aláíró ország törvényalkotójának<br />
kompetenciájába, másrészről a bíró mérlegelési körébe utalja.<br />
Az Egyezményben részes államok elismerik a gyermekeknek az<br />
oktatáshoz való jogát, és az esélyegyenlőség jegyében történő<br />
gyakorlása céljából az alapfokú oktatást kötelezővé és ingyenessé<br />
teszik, melyet lehetőség szerint középfokú vagy szakmai képzésnek kell<br />
követni, melyhez minden gyermeknek, így a büntetés vagy intézkedés<br />
hatálya alatt állónak is hozzáférhetőnek kell lennie. 20 Láthattuk az 1.2.<br />
pontban, hogy ez az ordonnance szövegében megtalálható és különleges<br />
fontossággal bír.<br />
19<br />
New York – i egyezmény, 9. cikk, 1. bekezdés<br />
20<br />
u.o. 28. cikk<br />
100<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
A 29. cikkből – mely továbbra is az oktatás – nevelés szükségességével<br />
foglalkozik – kiemelnék egy számomra nagy jelentőséggel bíró<br />
gondolatot: a gyermekek tudatába kell vésni az emberi jogok és az<br />
alapvető szabadságjogokon kívül „…a szülei személyazonossága,<br />
nyelve és kulturális értékei iránti tiszteletet, valamint annak az<br />
országnak, amelyben él, továbbá esetleges származási országnak a<br />
nemzeti értékei iránti és a sajátjától különböző kultúrák iránti<br />
tiszteletet…”<br />
Franciaországban a büntetés – végrehajtási intézetek lakói igen nagy<br />
arányban külföldiek, illetve az egykori gyarmatbirodalom és a jelenlegi<br />
tengeren túli megyéik polgárai; az adminisztrációnak lépéseket kell<br />
tennie annak érdekékében, hogy az életkörülményeik és nemzeti -<br />
etnikai hovatartozásuk miatt marginalizálódott (e kettő többnyire<br />
halmozottan jelentkezik) fiatalokat valamiféle kapaszkodóhoz juttassa,<br />
éreztesse velük, hogy az adott társadalom megbecsült tagjai. Ennek<br />
módja pedig nem a kirekesztés, hanem az integráció lehet – de nem<br />
minden áron. Lehetőséget kell számukra adni a kisebbségi kulturális<br />
gyökereik megismerésére, és ezt véleményem szerint a normál<br />
tanintézetek keretén belül mind a kisebbségi, mind a többségben élő<br />
gyerekeknek is meg kell teremteni. A toleráns és hozzáértő<br />
megközelítés eme megnyilvánulása, az identitástudat, a mások iránti<br />
felelősségtudat hatalmas előrelépést jelenthetne az agresszió<br />
visszaszorításában s így megelőzés területén egyaránt. 21<br />
Elgondolkodtató – és talán a fentiekkel ellentétes - a<br />
„fátyoltörvényként” elhíresült jogszabály, ami a laicizmus alapelvét<br />
hivatott kiteljesíteni Franciaországban a vallási jelképek száműzésével a<br />
középiskolák falai közül. 22<br />
A 33. cikk említi az államok felelősségét arra nézve, hogy a<br />
gyermekeket megvédjék a kábító- és pszichotróp szerek tiltott<br />
21<br />
lásd bővebben: Ervin Staub: Az erőszak társadalmi – kulturális gyökerei in<br />
Történeti és politikai pszichológia (szerk. Hunyady György), Osiris, Budapest,<br />
1998, 90 – 115. oldal, továbbá a Code de l’Éducation art. 122-7-t<br />
22<br />
erről bővebben például Nicolas Sarkozy La république, les religions,<br />
l’espérance című könyvében olvashatunk (Cerf, 2004, Párizs, pp. 95-104)<br />
101<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
fogyasztásától, szabályozása elszórtan található például az egészségügyi<br />
törvényben valamint a CP-ben is.<br />
Munkám során kialakult álláspontom szerint számos, eddig<br />
megválaszolatlan vagy részben rendezett kérdésre nem csak jogalkotói,<br />
hanem szélesebb körű szakmai – társadalmi választ kell keresni mind a<br />
franciaországi, mind hazánkat érintő tapasztalatokat figyelembe véve.<br />
Érdekes kezdeményezésnek tűnik a megelőzés jegyében az ún. szülői<br />
tréning kialakítása, mely hatékony beavatkozás lehet agresszív és<br />
antiszociális gyermekek esetében azáltal, ha például szüleik is részt<br />
vesznek a fiatalok számára biztosított pozitív oktatási és szocializációs<br />
tapasztalatszerzés folyamatában. Ezek a korai beavatkozó programok<br />
kialakíthatják az iskolai munkában való hatékonyságot és érdeklődést,<br />
erősíthetik a családi kapcsolatokat is, szilárd talajt nyújtva ezzel a<br />
gyerekeknek.<br />
Kétséget ébresztenek azonban azok a próbálkozások, amelyek az<br />
igazságos és költségkímélő büntetés ideológiájának felhasználásával<br />
kívánják feltámasztani a represszív testi és megalázó büntetések<br />
alkalmazását.<br />
Míg a napóleoni Code Civil 371. cikke szerint „az apai tekintélynek és<br />
hatalomnak kell kiegészíteni a törvényeket, kijavítani az erkölcsöt és az<br />
engedelmességet kialakítania a gyermekben”, addig ma már több<br />
nemzetközi szervezet, helyi kezdeményezés és iskolai szintű programok<br />
segítik a fiatalokat abban, hogy megtalálják a helyes utat, ehhez<br />
azonban az életkörülményeik javítása elengedhetetlen – az állam<br />
hathatós közreműködésével.<br />
102<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
IV. FELHASZNÁLT IRODALOM<br />
Dr. Barabás Andrea Tünde: Egyezség tettes és áldozata között –<br />
racionalitás vagy naivitás? in Kriminológiai Tanulmányok, 2002/39.<br />
Gebler, Laurent –Guitz, Ivan: Le traitement juduciaire de la délinquance<br />
des mineurs, Éditions ASH, Párizs, 2004<br />
Dr. Görgényi Ilona: A bűncselekménnyel okozott kár megtérítésének<br />
perspektívái in Kriminológiai Tanulmányok, 2002/39.<br />
Lazrges, Christine: Introduction á la politique criminelle, l’Harmattan,<br />
Párizs, 2000<br />
Lőrincz József: Nemzetközi tendenciák a fiatalkorúak büntetés –<br />
végrehajtásában, Bv. Szakkönyvtár, IM Büntetés – végrehajtás<br />
Országos Parancsnokság, Budapest, 1992<br />
Martinetti, Françoise: Les Droits de l’enfants, edition Unicef, Librio,<br />
Párizs, 2002<br />
Mbanzoulou, Paul: La médiation pénale, l’Harmattan, Párizs, 2002<br />
Nagy József: A fiatalkorúakra vonatkozó büntetőjogi szabályok<br />
kialakulása és változásai in Rendvédelmi Füzetek, 2002/36.<br />
Renucci, Jean-François –Courtin, Christine: Le droit pénal des<br />
mineurs, PUF, Párizs, 2001<br />
Sarkozy, Nicolas: La république, les religions, l’espérance, Cerf, 2004,<br />
Párizs<br />
Staub, Ervin: Az erőszak társadalmi – kulturális gyökerei in Történeti és<br />
politikai pszichológia (szerk. Hunyady György), Osiris, Budapest, 1998<br />
103<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />
FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> WORLD PUBLISHING Inc.<br />
HTTP://WWW.FWPUBLISHING.NET<br />
CALL FOR ARTICLES<br />
Free World Publishing is calling for articles by<br />
Academics, Practitioners and Post-Graduate<br />
Students to be published in its new journals :<br />
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9877)<br />
WAR & PEACE <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9885)<br />
WORLD HISTORY <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9893)<br />
Articles are welcomed in : English, French, Bosnian,<br />
Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Finnish, German, Greek,<br />
Hungarian, Icelandic, Innuktikut, Italian, Latin,<br />
Polish, Portugese, Romanian, Russian, Serb,<br />
Slovenian as well as Spanish.<br />
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : pertains all legal subjects,<br />
whether from a national, comparative or<br />
international perspective and including Canon Law,<br />
International Law, Islamic Law or social and<br />
historical perspective of laws' impacts on societies.<br />
WAR & PEACE <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : pertains to all issues<br />
ranging from conflict prevention to nation-building;<br />
including political sciences and diplomacy, nationbuilding,<br />
defense policies, strategies, operations,<br />
tactics, logistics, intelligence, peacekeeping,<br />
peacemaking, leadership, psychology of combat,<br />
technological developments and counter-terrorism;<br />
and finally Military Historical studies, relating to the<br />
conduct of operations, their causes and effects, the<br />
avoidance of conflict, leadership and personalities.<br />
WORLD HISTORY <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : pertains to the whole<br />
spectrum of human development, whether from<br />
local, regional or global perspectives, including<br />
history from all periods, paleontology, anthropology,<br />
linguistics, letters and languages, arts as well as<br />
sociological perspectives.<br />
For details, please consult the respective page of<br />
each journal and its submissions guidelines from<br />
http://www.FWPublishing.net or contact the editorin-chief<br />
at FWP@FWPublishing.net .<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Louis-Philippe F. Rouillard<br />
Editor-in-Chief, Free World Publishing Inc.<br />
APPEL POUR ARTICLES<br />
Free World Publishing accepte les articles<br />
d’académiciens, praticiens et d’étudiants supérieurs<br />
à être publier dans ses nouveaux journeaux :<br />
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9877)<br />
WAR & PEACE <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9885)<br />
WORLD HISTORY <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9893)<br />
Les articles sont bienvenus en : Français, Anglais,<br />
Allemand, Bosniaque, Bulgare, Croate, Espagnol,<br />
Finlandais, Grecque, Hongrois, Islandais, Innuktikut,<br />
Italien, Latin, Polonais, Portugais, Roumain, Russe,<br />
Serbe, Slovène et Tchèque.<br />
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : porte sur tous les sujets<br />
juridiques de perspectives nationale, comparative ou<br />
internationale, incluant les droits canonique,<br />
international, islamique, et les perspectives sociales<br />
et historiques de l’impact des lois sur les sociétés.<br />
WAR & PEACE <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : porte sur le spectre de la<br />
prévention de conflit jusqu’à la reconstruction<br />
d’État, incluant : sciences politiques, diplomacie,<br />
politique de défense, stratégie, operation, tactiques,<br />
logistique, renseignement, maintien et imposition de<br />
la paix, art du commandement, psychologie du<br />
combat, avancées technologiques et contreterrorisme,<br />
l’histoire militaire étudiant la conduite<br />
des opérations, l’évitement des conflits, leurs<br />
causes et effets, les commandants et personalités.<br />
WORLD HISTORY <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : porte sur l’ensemble<br />
du spectre du développement humain, d’une<br />
perspective locale, régionale ou globale, incluant :<br />
histoire de toutes les périodes, paleontologie,<br />
anthropologie, linguistiques, lettres et langages, les<br />
arts de même que les perspectives sociologiques.<br />
Pour les détails, consulter la page respective de<br />
chaque journal et ses critères de soumissions de<br />
http://www.FWPublishing.net ou contactez l’éditeur-<br />
chef à FWP@FWPublishing.net .<br />
Sincèrement,<br />
Louis-Philippe F. Rouillard<br />
Éditeur-chef, Free World Publishing Inc.
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL<br />
SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS<br />
ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL<br />
A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE<br />
BY ORSOLYA BOGDÁN<br />
I. BEVEZETÉS<br />
1. NEMZETKÖZI TÖREKVÉSEK ÉS TENDENCIÁK A FIATALKORÚAK<br />
BÜNTETŐJOGÁBAN A XX. SZÁZADBAN<br />
„A XX. század elejétől a klasszikus büntetőjogi iskola merev<br />
dogmatizmusát feloldó pozitivista kriminálpolitika tettes – büntetőjogi<br />
szemléletének máig érvényesülő hatása a fiatalkorú bűnelkövetők<br />
megkülönböztetett, a felnőttekétől eltérő kezelése.” 1<br />
Államonként azonban eltérő szemlélettel találkozhatunk: valamely<br />
állam a fiatalkorúak szankciórendszerét inkább tekinti<br />
ifjúságvédelemnek ill. ifjúságnevelésnek, mint a hagyományos<br />
büntetések és intézkedések hálózatának fiatalkorúakra szabásának. Az<br />
előbbi modell előnyben részesíti az érintettek ügyeiben eljáró<br />
szakemberek – szociális munkások, pszichológusok stb. – szélesebb<br />
körű beavatkozását, míg az ún. igazságszolgáltatási modell a klasszikus<br />
tettfelelősség, proporcionalitás és a formális garanciák talaján áll, és<br />
attól nem rugaszkodik el.<br />
1<br />
Lőrincz József: Nemzetközi tendenciák a fiatalkorúak büntetés –<br />
végrehajtásában, Bv. Szakkönyvtár, IM Büntetés – végrehajtás Országos<br />
Parancsnokság, Budapest, 1992, 123. oldal<br />
105<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
A II. világháború utáni „új társadalomvédelmi iskola” (pl. Gramatica)<br />
kiinduló pontja a tettes reszocializációja, amely gyógyító–nevelő<br />
intézkedések útján érhető el, de ez nem szoríthatja háttérbe a társadalom<br />
biztonságát (hasonlóan a XIX. században, ahol elsődleges cél a bűnözők<br />
izolációja, de emellett a társadalom védelme volt).<br />
Ezzel párhuzamosan fejlődik ki az ún. treatment ideológia (a skandináv<br />
államokban, az USA-ban) a főként pszichológusokat, pszichiátereket és<br />
szociológusokat tömörítő, a humán tudományokat felhasználó<br />
rehabilicionista mozgalom termékeként; módszere a deviancia okának<br />
feltárása és az elkövetői személyiség–torzulás megszüntetése humánus,<br />
speciálpreventív eszközökkel.<br />
Ezzel szemben a hazánkban többek között Szabó András – képviselte<br />
„neo–abszolút” elmélet a büntetés megtorló jellegét helyezte előtérbe, és<br />
álláspontja szerint a büntetésnek joghátrányi és nem szociálpolitikai<br />
intézkedési jellegét kell kidomborítania. 2<br />
Rendszertől és elmélettől függetlenül szinte valamennyi országnak a<br />
fiatalkori bűnözés növekedésével kellett szembesülnie a 70–es évektől.<br />
A szabadságvesztéssel járó büntetések nem bizonyultak a<br />
legmegfelelőbb eszköznek a kriminalitás visszaszorításához (kvázi<br />
ultima ratio–ként emlegetik): a fiatalkorú erkölcsi – szociális –<br />
tanulmányi fejlődésében való visszavető hatása tagadhatatlan. E<br />
probléma mentén alakultak ki az olyan fogalmak, mint a „szabadságban<br />
való kezelés”, a „közösségi ellenőrzés”, a jóvátétel és a mediáció. A<br />
fiatalkorúak szabadságelvonásának hosszabb illetve határozatlan<br />
tartalmát az államok szűkülő köre, elsősorban az ún. ifjúságvédelmi<br />
modellt követők tartották fenn. 3<br />
A nemzetközi szervezetek ajánlásaikban (pl. Pekingi Szabályok) a<br />
fiatalkorú bűnelkövetők emberi jogainak specifikus védelmére<br />
szólítanak fel, pozitív diszkriminációjukat, családjuk, a társadalom és az<br />
2 Lőrincz: uo., 124. oldal<br />
3 Lőrincz: uo., 125. oldal<br />
106<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
állam velük szembeni felelősségét hangsúlyozva, így, az emberi<br />
jogaikra és méltóságuk védelmére különös tekintettel kellene a<br />
büntetőtörvényeket kialakítani.<br />
A jóléti államok büntetőjogának profiljában már a 70–es, 80–as években<br />
középpontba kerülhettek az alap– és középfokú, általános– illetve<br />
szakműveltséget biztosító iskolarendszerű intézmények, amelyek a<br />
kreativitás és készségfejlesztés mellett kiegészültek praktikus, a<br />
szabadulás utáni életet megkönnyítő tanácsadó programokkal is.<br />
Újabban pedig világszerte szélesedett a társadalmi erőket az intézet<br />
életébe bekapcsoló együttműködési törekvés a fiatalkorú és szociális<br />
környezete közötti ellentmondás feloldása és a fiatalok szocializálása<br />
céljából. 4<br />
2. A FIATALKORÚAKRA VONATKOZÓ HATÁLYOS SZABÁLYOZÁS<br />
HELYE A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI BÜNTETŐJOGBAN<br />
2.1. A MAGYAR SZABÁLYOZÁS<br />
Magyarországon eddig három büntető törvénykönyvet alkottak. Az elsőt<br />
az <strong>18</strong>43. évi Büntető Törvényjavaslat előzte meg, ezen túl a reformkori<br />
irodalom valamint német és az osztrák büntetőkódexek is nagy hatással<br />
voltak rá.<br />
Csemegi Károly, nagy felkészültségű ügyvéd, a Deák–párt bizalmát<br />
élvezve kapott megbízást a Btk. szöveganyagának és indoklásának<br />
kidolgozására, amelyet másfél éves országgyűlési vita után az <strong>18</strong>78. V.<br />
tc.– ként törvényerőre emeltek.<br />
A Csemegi – kódex még nem kezelte egységesen a fiatalkorúak<br />
büntetőjogát, de a felnőttekétől eltérő büntetési mértéket már külön, a<br />
VII. fejezetben tárgyalta.<br />
4 Lőrincz: uo., 127. oldal<br />
107<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
A reformtörekvések eredményeként létrejött 1908. évi I. Büntető<br />
Novella intézkedési tárában már helyet kaphatott a házi felügyelet és az<br />
iskolai fenyítés mellett a javító nevelés, dorgálás és a javító nevelés is.<br />
Az 1951. évi 34. számú tvr. a fiatalkorúakra vonatkozó anyagi és<br />
eljárásjogi szabályokat egy jogszabályban határozta meg, és növelte a<br />
nevelő jellegű intézkedések súlyát.<br />
Az 1961. évi V. törvény a fenti szabályokat a Btk. általános részébe<br />
építette be VI. fejezetként.<br />
Az 1961–es törvény szakmai gyengesége miatt szükségessé vált egy új<br />
kódex megalkotása, amelyet az igazságügyi minisztérium előkészítése<br />
után, a tudományos elit bevonásával 1978. december 20–án az<br />
országgyűlés elfogadott. Az új és máig hatályos Btk. már határozottan<br />
állást foglalt a nevelő jellegű intézkedések elsőbbsége mellett, s a 108.§ban<br />
(korábban 87.§) arról rendelkezik, hogy büntetés kiszabására csak<br />
akkor van mód, ha az intézkedés nem célravezető. Az intézkedések<br />
alkalmazása azonban nem a felelősség „elmosására” irányul, hanem<br />
olyan szankciók preferálásra, amelyek jobban alkalmazkodnak az e<br />
korban lévők életkori sajátosságaihoz. 5<br />
A törvényhozó célja ily módon a fiatalkorú helyes irányba fejlődésének<br />
és a társadalom hasznos tagjává válásának elősegítése.<br />
2.2. A SVÁJCI SZABÁLYOZÁS<br />
1798–ban, az „egy és oszthatatlan helvét köztársaság” létrejötte után<br />
nem sokat késlekedett a liberalizmus eszméit magán viselő<br />
büntetőtörvénykönyv kidolgozásával. 6<br />
5<br />
Nagy József: A fiatalkorúakra vontatkozó büntetőjogi szabályok kialakulása és<br />
változásai in Rendvédelmi Füzetek, 2002/36., 8. oldal<br />
6<br />
Nagy Ferenc: A svájci büntetőjogi szankciórendszer, Acta Universitatis<br />
Szegediensis De Attila József Nominatae – Acta Juridica et Politica, tomus<br />
XXXVI., Szeged, 1986, 145. oldal<br />
108<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Svájc államszövetséggé alakulásával azonban rövidesen 15 kantonális<br />
Btk. született, hiszen néhány speciális törvényi tényállást kivéve, a<br />
szövetségi tagok szabad kezet kaptak az anyagi és alaki törvényhozás<br />
körében is 7 .<br />
Carl Stooss berni professzor <strong>18</strong>89–ben kapott megbízást a Szövetségi<br />
Tanácstól az államszövetségi Btk. tervezetének kidolgozására. Az ő<br />
keze nyomán épült ki először a társadalmilag szükséges intézkedések<br />
rendszere a törvényhozási munkában.<br />
Végül 1937. december 21–én került sor a törvény kihirdetésére, amit kis<br />
többséggel megerősített a kiírt népszavazás is, majd 1942. január 1–én<br />
hatályba lépett. A fiatalkorúakra vonatkozóak a 4. cím alatt kerültek<br />
szabályozásra.<br />
A dualista elképzelés szerint a büntetések mellett az intézkedések<br />
katalógusa biztonsági és más jellegű intézkedéseket fog át. Különbség<br />
tehető továbbá a szabadságelvonással és az azzal nem járó, valamint a<br />
javító–izoláló, illetve személyi és tárgyi intézkedések között.<br />
A törvény hatályba lépése után már mintegy tíz évvel, 1950–ben, majd<br />
1974. január 1–i hatállyal szükségessé váltak jelentősebb módosítások;<br />
ez utóbbi helyezte be a szankciók közé a fiatal felnőttek munkára nevelő<br />
intézeti beutalását, illetve megváltoztatta a korcsoport – elhatárolásokat<br />
is.<br />
A svájci Btk. intézkedéseiről összefoglalóan elmondható Rahberg<br />
szavaival, hogy „jövőre irányuló, célorientált prevenciók”.<br />
2.3. A FIATALKORÚAKRA VONATKOZÓ SZANKCIÓRENDSZER<br />
NEMZETKÖZI TENDENCIÁI NAPJAINKBAN – AZ ENSZ–KÖVETELMÉNYEK<br />
Az Egyesült Nemzetek Szervezete a 80–as években meghirdetett<br />
7 svájci Btk. 369., 371. cikke<br />
109<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
bűnmegelőzési programjának középpontjába a fiatalkorúak<br />
igazságszolgáltatásának finomítását állította, figyelemmel az emberi<br />
jogokra és a társadalmi igazság szempontjaira. 8<br />
E szervezet égisze alatt kibontakozó reformmozgalom olyan<br />
irányelveket tett magáévá, mint a fiatalkorú életkori sajátosságain túl<br />
értelmi–erkölcsi fejlettségének a figyelembe vételét, a szankció<br />
elsődlegesen nevelő célját, az eljáró igazgatási szervek kötelességét a<br />
reszocializációban, továbbá külön büntetés–végrehajtási törvény<br />
kidolgozására hívja fel a tagállamokat.<br />
A változtatás igényét először az ENSZ 1980–ban megrendezett VI.<br />
bűnmegelőzési kongresszusán fogalmazták meg, amelyet az ún. Pekingi<br />
Szabályok (az 1955–ös ENSZ Minimum Szabályokra épül), 1985–ben,<br />
majd a Rijadi Irányelvek a megelőzésről 1988–ban követett, amelyeket<br />
a „Gyermekek jogairól” 9 szóló 1989–es New York– i egyezmény<br />
összegzett.<br />
Kutatásom során a Pekingi Szabályok részletesebb bemutatása mellett<br />
döntöttem, mert fejezetei lefedik mindazon probléma–köröket,<br />
amelyekkel a dolgozatom foglalkozik, és amelyekkel az egyes államok<br />
jogalkotóinak szembe kellett nézniük.<br />
2.3.1. A Pekingi Szabályok<br />
A dokumentum preambulumában ajánlja, hogy „a tagállamok (…)<br />
törekedjenek a fiatalkorú és családja jólétének előmozdítására” és<br />
csökkentsék a jogi beavatkozás szükségességét, a „törvénnyel<br />
összeütközésbe került fiatalkorú eredményes és humánus kezelését” (25.<br />
pont). Az e szabályhoz fűzött kommentár kiemeli, hogy a fiatalkorúról<br />
való gondoskodás alapvető jogpolitikai követelménye megelőzni a<br />
8<br />
ENSZ 40/33/1985. sz. határozata (Pekingi Szabályok), 23. pont<br />
9<br />
Magyarországon az 1991 – től (LXIV. tv.), Svájcban 1997 – től hatályos. Az<br />
Egyezmény a „gyermek” szó alatt a <strong>18</strong> éven aluliakat érti (1. cikk)<br />
110<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
bűnelkövetést, ennek pedig egyik útja a fiatal jólétének elősegítése, ami<br />
egyúttal minimalizálni fogja az igazságszolgáltatás beavatkozásának<br />
szükségességét, ez pedig csökkenti az ezzel okozható ártalmat is (26.<br />
pont).<br />
Kiemelendő még a Szabályokból az arányosság követelménye, amely<br />
nem egyoldalúan a bűncselekmény tárgyi súlyához fűződik, hanem az<br />
elkövető személyes körülményeihez is (pl. családi körülmények – ám<br />
ez, ebben az általános megfogalmazásban, meglátásom szerint nehezen<br />
hozható összhangban az egyenlő elbánás elvével, azaz a formális logika<br />
szerint diszkriminatív). Így a törvényi reakció arányosságát az elkövető,<br />
a bűncselekmény és az áldozat körülményeinek kontextusában kell<br />
vizsgálni (28. pont).<br />
Az eljárási garanciák körében fontos megemlíteni a fiatalkorú<br />
anonimitáshoz való jogát és a szülő/gyám jelenlétéhez való jogot a<br />
tárgyalás során (31. pont).<br />
A dokumentum bátorítást ad az alternatív szankciók minél szélesebb<br />
körben való alkalmazására, így az intézeti elhelyezés helyett az alábbi<br />
intézkedéseket/büntetéseket javasolja: a fiatalkorú gondozása,<br />
felügyelete; próbára bocsátás; közérdekű munka; pénzügyi jellegű<br />
büntetések, kártalanítás; kezelés elrendelése, csoporttanácsadáson való<br />
részvétel, valamint nevelőszülői, lakóközösségi vagy más nevelő<br />
környezet általi gondozás elrendelése (32 – 33. pont).<br />
A fenti szankciók közös tulajdonsága, hogy közösségi bázisú korrekciós<br />
törekvéseket tartalmaznak. 10 Az alternativitás elve azt is jelenti, hogy a<br />
hatóságnak legyen lehetősége kiválasztani az elkövető számára<br />
legmegfelelőbbet, és adott esetben azt módosítani (34. pont).<br />
Az 1955–ös szabályozástól eltérően, a legvégső esetben alkalmazható<br />
szabadság–elvonó (intézeti) nevelés esetén sem tartja reálisnak az elítélt<br />
erkölcsi megváltozathatóságát, sokkal inkább a társadalomba való<br />
10 Lőrincz József: uo. 24. oldal<br />
111<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
visszailleszkedésének feltételeit kívánja elősegíteni, például a személyes<br />
erőforrások fejlesztése útján. A Szabályok ezért előtérbe akarja hozni a<br />
fél–intézeti megoldásokat, mint a nevelőotthonokat és a nappali oktató<br />
központokat, amelyek hozzájárulnak a fiatalkorú reintegrációjához (49.<br />
pont).<br />
II. A FIATALKORÚAKRA VONATKOZÓ HATÁLYOS<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEK A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐJOGBAN<br />
1. A SVÁJCI BTK. SAJÁTOSSÁGAI<br />
1.1. AZ ÉLETKOR JELENTŐSÉGE<br />
A szövetségi Btk. 4. címe két differenciáló ismérvet említ a<br />
fiatalkorúkkal szembeni intézkedések elrendelésére tekintettel. Az egyik<br />
a kezelés – nevelésre szorultság, a másik az életkor 11 . Ez utóbbi a<br />
magyartól eltérően három tartományt határoz meg: a 7 év alattiak nem<br />
büntethetők, azt a polgári jog körébe utalja, míg a 7 és 15 év közöttiekre<br />
(„enfant”) vonatkozó szankciókat tételesen elkülöníti a 16 – <strong>18</strong> év<br />
(„adolescent”) közöttiektől, amelyek a jogszabály kidolgozói az<br />
iskolalátogatási kötelezettséggel, illetve a pedagógusoktól való függés<br />
idejével hoznak összefüggésbe.<br />
1.2. A FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEK<br />
A svájci Btk. 83. cikkelyében a fiatal elkövetési magatartásának és<br />
fizikai, pszichikai állapotának előzetes felmérését követeli meg,<br />
amelynek során világossá válik, melyik szankció lenne a<br />
legalkalmasabb vele szemben. Ennek érdekében elrendelhető a<br />
11 svájci Btk. 82. és 89. cikkelye<br />
112<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
fiatalkorú ún. megfigyelő intézetben 12 való elhelyezése. Az azonban,<br />
hogy e vizsgálatot melyik hatóság(ok) végezzék, az adott kanton<br />
szabályozásának függvénye 13 . Az intézkedéseken belül nevelő jellegűek<br />
és speciális kezelést nyújtók is megtalálhatók, ám a büntetések közé<br />
sorolt fegyelmi jellegű szankciókkal is szeretnék foglalkozni, hiszen<br />
ezek eszközükben inkább dolgozatom tárgyához állnak közelebb,<br />
alkalmazási körük a svájci gyakorlatban vitatott.<br />
1.2.1. A nevelő jellegű intézkedések (mesures éducatives)<br />
Ha a fiatalkorú nem igényel speciális kezelést, de nehezen kezelhető,<br />
elhanyagolt vagy veszélyeztetett, az illetékes hatóság elrendelheti<br />
nevelőotthonban, nevelőcsaládban való elhelyezését, illetve ún. nevelési<br />
segítség nyújtását mind a 7 – 14, mind a 15 – <strong>18</strong> évesek körében 14 .<br />
1.2.1.1. A nevelési segítség (assistance éducative)<br />
Az 1973–as módosítások óta ez utóbbi intézkedés képezi sarokkövét a<br />
fiatal elkövetők büntetőjogának, így például a „veszélyeztetettséget”<br />
ugyan tágan kell értelmezni (családi körülmények, pszichés fejlődése,<br />
zavartság stb.), de a családból való kiszakítását alapos érvekkel kell<br />
alátámasztani. A nevelési segítség megadja a fiatal számára azt a<br />
körültekintő segítséget, nevelést és útbaigazítást, amelyre életkori<br />
sajátosságaiból és körülményeiből kifolyólag szüksége van. A 15 éven<br />
felettieknél ez kiegészül szakmai képzésben való részvételük és<br />
munkájuk rendszeressé válásának támogatásával, szemmel tartásával. A<br />
nevelési segítség mellett megállapítható fogház- és pénzbüntetés is.<br />
12<br />
uo. 83., 90., 384. cikke<br />
13<br />
a szankciókat a fiatalkorúak bírósága szabja ki, pl. Vaud kantonban az 1973.<br />
november 26–i törvény 9. cikkelye tartalmazza az erre vonatkozó szabályokat<br />
14<br />
svájci Btk. 84. és 91. cikkelye. Az intézkedések megnevezéséhez Nagy Ferenc<br />
fordítását használtam fel.<br />
113<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
1.2.1.2. Elhelyezés nevelőotthonban (placement dans une maison<br />
d’éducation)<br />
Ha a fiatalkorú családi környezete ártalmas a fejlődésére nézve,<br />
hátráltatja testi – lelki fejlődését vagy kizsákmányolják, továbbá olyan<br />
bűntettet vagy vétséget követ el, ami a fiatal különleges<br />
veszélyességére, nehezen kezelhetőségére utal, és a családnál való<br />
elhelyezése nem célszerű, a fiatalkorú nevelőotthonba való beutalását<br />
rendeli el a hatóság. Az 1.2. pont bevezetőjében említett előzetes<br />
megfigyelést is ezekben az intézményekben kell végrehajtani, de a<br />
szélsőségesen kezelhetetlen, a többiek számára elviselhetetlen<br />
magatartásúak terápia otthonokba 15 való átszállítása lehetséges. Ezen túl<br />
a fiatal felnőttek számára ún. munkára nevelő intézeteket is felállítottak<br />
(lásd később), illetve az utógondozás is megoldott.<br />
Svájci specialitások a Btk. 384. cikke alapján a privátintézetek, otthonok<br />
engedélyezése, amelyek megfelelő, többek között orvosi felügyeletéről<br />
a kantonok gondoskodnak.<br />
A svájci nevelőotthonok fokozatos végrehajtásúak és a fiatalkorúak<br />
hosszabb tartalmú nevelésére és kezelésére szolgálnak, amikor az<br />
ambuláns intézkedések nem elegendőek. A főszerepet az iskolázási és a<br />
képzési lehetőségek biztosítása játsza.<br />
Az ott-tartózkodás határozatlan idejű (kivéve, ha a fiatalkorú különösen<br />
romlott, vagy bűntettet vagy súlyos vétséget követ el; ilyenkor az<br />
maximum 2 év). Az elkövetőt 25. életéve betöltésekor az intézetből el<br />
kell bocsátani.<br />
1.2.2. A speciális kezelés 16 (traitement spécial)<br />
15 uo. 93 ter cikke<br />
16 uo. 85. és 92. cikkelye<br />
114<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Ha a fiatalkorú szellemi fogyatékos, gyengeelméjű, gyengén látó,<br />
súlyosan hallás- vagy beszédképességében károsult, epilepsziás,<br />
rendellenesen visszamaradott szellemi vagy erkölcsi fejlődésében,<br />
speciális kezelés elrendelésére kerül sor. A 14 – <strong>18</strong> év közötti<br />
korosztállyal szemben ezen kívül alkoholizmus és drogfüggőség esetén<br />
is alkalmazható. Végrehajtása a hatóság által kijelölt korházban vagy<br />
szanatóriumban, de lehetőség szerint ambulánsan történik.<br />
Ebben a szabályban erőteljesebben látjuk érvényesülni az elkövető<br />
speciális rászorultságát a megkülönböztetett bánásmódra, ám a 84.<br />
cikkben lévő intézkedések párhuzamosan kiszabhatók vele.<br />
Ha az intézkedés oka megszűnt, az elkövető elbocsátható; de ha ez még<br />
nem állapítható meg, próbára bocsátásnak van helye.<br />
1.2.3. A fegyelmi büntetés (punitions disciplinaires) 17<br />
A svájci Btk. - a magyartól eltérően - büntetésként határozza meg a<br />
fegyelmi jellegű szankciókat, amelyek kiszabását akkor tartja<br />
célszerűnek, ha a fiatalkorúnak nincs szüksége sem nevelő intézkedésre,<br />
sem speciális kezelésre, amelynek eldöntésére a híresen tág bírói<br />
mérlegelés körében kerül sor.<br />
A kérdés szabályozására többek között Neuchâtel és Bâle–Ville<br />
kantonok szolgáltatták a példát <strong>18</strong> ; ezek nyomán beszélhetünk<br />
megrovásról, a kár helyrehozásáról, munkáról vagy 6 napos iskolai<br />
felfüggesztésről.<br />
Ezek közül kiemelném egyrészt a megrovást, ami nyilván szóban,<br />
szemtől-szemben lehet igazán hatékony; igaz, erről a törvény nem<br />
rendelkezik. A hatóság közvetlenül a fiatalhoz címzi kellő tapintattal és<br />
a megfelelő komolysággal.<br />
17 uo. 87. cikke<br />
<strong>18</strong><br />
korábban lehetőség kínálkozott iskolai elzárás és szobafogság elrendelésére is<br />
115<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Az elkövető őszinte megbánása a kár helyreállításában is<br />
megnyilvánulhat. A megbánásnak nem kell feltétlenül tettekben is<br />
kifejeződnie a jelen szabályozás szerint, a lényeg a hajlandósága,<br />
továbbá a részleges, szimbolikus jóvátétel is bírhat kellő nevelő<br />
hatással.<br />
A bíróság ugyanakkor le is mondhat a szankcionálásról, ha például<br />
törvénysértés óta 3 hónap telt el (az indoklás szerint ebben a korban a<br />
fiatalok gyorsan fejlődnek és felejtenek, így valamely fegyelmi<br />
intézkedés elrendelésével nem érnék el nevelő céljukat), a kárt<br />
helyreállította vagy a tette igen kis súlyú bűncselekmény.<br />
2. A MAGYAR BTK. SAJÁTOSSÁGAI<br />
2.1. AZ ÉLETKOR JELENTŐSÉGE<br />
A hatályos szabályozás szerint nem büntethető, aki az elkövetéskor nem<br />
töltötte be 14. életévét, azaz kiskorú 19 . Az 1978. IV. törvény miniszteri<br />
indoklása azonban kimondja, hogy a 14 – <strong>18</strong> év közötti fiatal büntető<br />
törvénybe ütköző cselekményei elleni küzdelemben az általános<br />
gyermek- és ifjúságvédelem eszközei egymagukban elégtelenek, az<br />
ilyen elkövetők már büntetőjogi felelősséggel tartoznak, velük szemben<br />
büntetést és intézkedést lehet alkalmazni 20 . Ma büntetés akkor szabható<br />
ki, ha az intézkedés célszerűtlennek bizonyul, nincs korhoz kötve<br />
(korábban 16. életév), így szigorítást jelent az 1961–es szabályozáshoz<br />
képest. Érdekességképpen megemlíteném, hogy az 1951. évi 34. sz.<br />
rendelet a fiatalkorúakon belül – Svájchoz hasonlóan – két korcsoportot<br />
állapított meg (12 – 14 és 15 – <strong>18</strong> évesek).<br />
19<br />
magyar Btk. 22 – 23. §<br />
20<br />
uo. 107. §<br />
116<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
2.2. A FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />
INTÉZKEDÉSEK<br />
A magyar Btk. 108.§-a egyértelműen állást foglal amellett, hogy a<br />
fiatalkorúval szemben kiszabott / elrendelt büntetés vagy intézkedés<br />
elsődleges célja az egyéni megelőzés, azaz az elkövetőt helyes irányba<br />
fejlesztő nevelés és társadalomba való beilleszkedésének elősegítése.<br />
Három fajtáját különíthetjük el az intézkedéseknek: a kifejezetten<br />
nevelő jellegűek (megrovás, próbára bocsátás, javítóintézeti elhelyezés),<br />
a gyógyító jellegű (kényszergyógykezelés), gyógyító és nevelő jellegű<br />
(kényszergyógyítás) és biztonsági célú (elkobzás).<br />
Munkámban csak a svájci Btk.–ban is megtalálható intézkedési<br />
fajtákkal foglalkozom, hogy lehetőségem legyen a bilaterális<br />
összehasonlításra.<br />
2.2.1. Megrovás<br />
A megrovás 71.§-beli szabályozása vonatkozik mind a felnőtt -, mind a<br />
fiatalkorúakra; a legenyhébb büntetőjogi jogkövetkezmény.<br />
A szakirodalomban vita folyt arról, hogy az ún. „bagatell–<br />
bűncselekményeknél” beszélhetünk–e társadalomra veszélyességről,<br />
mert a tényállás ugyan megvalósult, de hatása lényegében<br />
elhanyagolható. A 80–as években olyan javaslat is született, hogy<br />
kiveszik a törvény szövegből a társadalomra veszélyességre utaló<br />
fordulatot. 21<br />
Jelenleg megrovás akkor alkalmazandó, ha a társadalomra veszélyesség<br />
csekély foka, csekéllyé válása vagy megszűnése (nem kötelező) miatt a<br />
tett nem büntethető, illetve, ha a büntethetősége egyéb okból<br />
megszűnik.<br />
21<br />
Györgyi Kálmán: Büntetések és intézkedések, Közgazdasági és Jogi<br />
Könyvkiadó, Budapest, 1984, 361. oldal<br />
117<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
A megrovás elsősorban rosszallást fejez ki, amit a bíróságon kívül<br />
egyéb hatóság is végrehajthat (ügyész, nyomozó hatóság), amelyet<br />
szóban indokolt megtenni.<br />
2.2.2. A javítóintézeti nevelés<br />
A 1<strong>18</strong>. § szerinti intézkedés szükségességéről a törvény igen<br />
szűkszavúan rendelkezik. A szakirodalomban például az alábbi<br />
indokokat olvashatjuk 22 : a fiatalkorú környezete káros befolyást<br />
gyakorol a fejlődésére, és környezeterősítésre van szüksége; környezete<br />
ugyan nem gyakorol rá káros befolyást, de erői elégtelennek<br />
mutatkoznak a kriminalitás elleni hatékony küzdelemre. Végül<br />
lehetséges, hogy a fiatal káros erkölcsi tulajdonságai és jellemének<br />
fogyatékosságai újabb büntettek megelőzése érdekében elszigetelést és<br />
szigorú közösségi fegyelemben való nevelést tesznek szükségessé.<br />
A javítóintézetek gyermekvédelmi rendszer részeként sajátos<br />
pedagógiai feladatokat ellátó nevelőintézetek.<br />
A magyar szabályozás az általános formán kívül további két típusát<br />
említi az intézményeknek. Az egyik zárt jellegű, ahova az intézmény<br />
igazgatója az elkövetőt áthelyezheti, ha az ismételten és súlyosan<br />
megsérti az intézet rendjét, míg a másik az utógondozó, ahogy ez a<br />
svájci törvényben is megtalálható.<br />
A nevelés időtartalma a 1.2.1.2. pontban tárgyaltaktól eltérően<br />
határozott időtartamú; egy évtől három évig terjedhet, de az intézet<br />
lakóját 19. életévének betöltésekor onnan el kell bocsátani.<br />
Svájchoz hasonlóan – nemzetközi kötelezettségekből eredően -, a<br />
nevelés célja a fiatal beilleszkedési zavarainak enyhítése, pszichés<br />
állapotának rendezése, oktatása, szakképzettségének fejlesztése,<br />
22<br />
Szabó András: A fiatalkorúak és a büntetőjog, Közgazdasági és Jogi<br />
Könyvkiadó, Budapest, 1961, 310. oldal<br />
1<strong>18</strong><br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
egészséges életmódra való felkészítése. Kiemelten kell foglalkozni az<br />
alkohol, a kábítószer veszélyeivel és a szexuális élet problémáival.<br />
2.2.3. Gyógyító jellegű intézkedések<br />
A magyar büntetőjog nem rendelkezik speciálisan a fiatalkorúak<br />
gyógykezeléséről szóló paragrafussal, igaz, a Büntetés - végrehajtási<br />
tvr. 23 107. §-ának (2) bekezdése szerint különös gondot kell fordítani a<br />
gyógypedagógiai nevelésre szoruló és a személyiségzavarban szenvedő<br />
fiatalkorúak gyógyítására, sajátos nevelésére és oktatására, de ez nem<br />
feltételez külön intézetet.<br />
A 74. és a 75. § rendelkezik a kényszergyógykezelésről és az<br />
alkoholisták kényszergyógyításáról. Itt nem találkozhatunk a fiatalkorú<br />
olyan különleges körülményeinek, tulajdonságainak leírásával, mint a<br />
svájci törvényben (pl. gyengén látó); az intézkedés elrendelendő, ha<br />
személy elleni erőszakos vagy közveszélyt okozó – 1 évi<br />
szabadságvesztésnél súlyosabban büntethető – cselekményt követ el, de<br />
nincs beszámítási képessége az elmeműködésének kóros állapota miatt.<br />
A kényszergyógykezelés elrendelhető akkor is, ha a bűnelkövetés<br />
kábítószer-élvező életmódjával függ össze.<br />
A kezelés elsődleges célja a szakszerű gyógyítás, állapota romlásának<br />
megakadályozása, valamint újabb bűncselekmény elkövetésének<br />
megelőzése (tekintettel a törvény (1) bekezdésének harmadik,<br />
konjunktív feltételére). Az ápolás mellett azonban fontos szerepet<br />
kapnak a munkaterápiás foglalkozások is.<br />
Végrehajtására arra kijelölt, zárt intézetben kerül sor (IMEI),<br />
határozatlan időtartamra, folytatásának szükségességét a bíróság<br />
hivatalból évente megvizsgálja.<br />
A kényszergyógyítás végrehajtása fiatalkorú esetében javítóintézetben<br />
történik. A 103/1981. büntetőkollégiumi állásfoglalás szerint az<br />
intézkedés eredményes végrehajtásához legalább 4 hónapi időtartam<br />
23<br />
1979. évi 11. tvr. többszörösen módosítva<br />
119<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
szükséges, amelyet egy maximum 30 napos kivizsgálás előz meg.<br />
Ennek alapján készítik el az elítéltek sajátos nevelésének, oktatásának és<br />
kezelésének a programját, irányítják csoportokba.<br />
Időtartama legfeljebb 1 év, a svájci szabályozástól eltérően nem önálló<br />
szankció.<br />
3. A „FIATAL FELNŐTT” MINT ÖNÁLLÓ KORCSOPORT?<br />
3.1. KEZDEMÉNYEZÉSEK HAZÁNKBAN<br />
A fiatalkorúakkal kapcsolatos jogfejlődést végigtekintve egy rendkívül<br />
fontos, de sikertelen kezdeményezés tanúi lehettünk az 1970–es<br />
években, az új Btk. előkészítésével összefüggésében. Molnár József 24 ,<br />
kiindulva a személyiségfejlődés 24 – 25 éves korra történő<br />
lezárulásának következményeiből, széles körű nemzetközi<br />
összehasonlítással is alátámasztott kriminológiai vizsgálatot végzett.<br />
Célja, hogy a fiatal felnőttek büntetőjogi felelősségét külön<br />
kategóriaként ismerjék el, átmenetet képezzen a fiatalkorúakra és a<br />
felnőtt korúakra vonatkozó szankciórendszer között, és az<br />
bekerülhessen az 1978 – as törvénybe.<br />
A kodifikáció során ezek a külföldön már bevált megoldások nem<br />
valósulhattak meg ugyan, de a szakma figyelmét sikerült e kérdéskörre<br />
irányítani.<br />
3.2. MEGVALÓSULÁSA SVÁJCBAN<br />
A svájci Btk. külön alpontjában tárgyalja a fiatal felnőttekre vonatkozó<br />
szabályozást – igaz, igen röviden.<br />
24<br />
Molnár József: A fiatalkori bűnözés helyzete és megelőzése Magyarországon,<br />
Kriminológiai és Kriminalisztikai Tanulmányok X. kötet, Budapest, 1973, 159.<br />
oldal<br />
120<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Főszabályként 25 ha az elkövető elkövetéskor <strong>18</strong>. életévét már betöltötte,<br />
de még nem múlt el 25, az általános büntetési tételeket kell vele<br />
szemben is alkalmazni. Ez alóli kivételeket a 100 bis és a 100 ter<br />
tartalmazza.<br />
A törvény szerint a bíró tájékozódik az elkövető magaviseletéről,<br />
tanulmányairól és társadalmi helyzetéről, és ha szükséges, szakértői<br />
vizsgálatot rendel el fizikai és szellemi állapotáról, így tanulási– és<br />
munkaképességéről, és kérheti a fiatal munkára nevelő intézeti<br />
(„dologház”) beutalását.<br />
Ez az intézkedés kizárólag a <strong>18</strong> – 25 év közötti azon elkövetőkkel<br />
szemben alkalmazható, akik jellembeli fejlődésükben jelentősen<br />
zavartak vagy veszélyeztetettek, léhák vagy munkakerülők, tettük ezzel<br />
összefüggésben áll, és feltehető, hogy ezzel a jövőbeni bűncselekmény<br />
megelőzhető.<br />
A fiatalnak biztosítani kell az intézeten belüli szellemi és testi fejődést,<br />
szakmai ismereteinek bővítésének lehetőségét, kötelezni kell szakmai<br />
végzettség megszerzésére vagy intézeten kívüli munkavégzésre.<br />
Tartama minimálisan 1 év, 1 – 3 év próbaidőre feltételesen elbocsátható,<br />
de védőfelügyeletet biztosítanak számára. Ha az elkövető az intézet<br />
szabályait súlyosan megszegi, a hatóság elrendelheti a felnőttek számra<br />
fenntartott büntetés – végrehajtási intézetek egyikébe történő<br />
átszállítását.<br />
III. A MAGYAR ÉS SVÁJCI SZABÁLYOZÁS KIEMELT<br />
PONTJAI A NEMZETKÖZI KÖVETELMÉNYEK TÜKRÉBEN –<br />
MEGOLDÁSI JAVASLATOK A JÖVŐRE NÉZVE<br />
„Az Egyezményben részes államok gondoskodnak arról, hogy a<br />
25 svájci Btk. 100. cikke<br />
121<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
gyermeket szüleitől, ezek akarata ellenére, ne válasszák el, kivéve, ha az<br />
illetékes hatóságok, bírói felülvizsgálat lehetőségének fenntartásával és<br />
az erre vonatkozó törvényeknek és eljárásoknak megfelelően úgy<br />
döntenek, hogy ez az elválasztás a gyermek mindenek felett álló<br />
érdekében szükséges. Ilyen értelmű döntés szükséges lehet bizonyos<br />
különleges esetekben, például akkor, ha a szülők durván kezelik, vagy<br />
elhanyagolják gyermeküket, illetőleg ha különválva élnek és dönteni<br />
kell a gyermek elhelyezéséről. „ 26<br />
Az Egyezmény is csak példálózóan tér ki azokra az esetekre, amikor a<br />
fiatalkorú családi környezetéből való kiemelése szükséges; ennek<br />
meghatározását egyrészről az aláíró ország törvényalkotójának<br />
kompetenciájába, másrészről a bíró mérlegelési körébe utalja.<br />
Dolgozatom körébe csak azok az esetek tartoznak, amikor a fiatalkorú<br />
bűnelkövető. A Szabó András – iránymutatásból a jelen szabályozásba<br />
csak az a fordulat került bele, hogy a javítóintézeti elhelyezés (mint<br />
egyetlen, eddigi környezetétől távoli elhelyezést biztosító alternatíva) az<br />
elkövető nevelése szempontjából szükséges.<br />
A svájci megoldás sokkal körültekintőbben dolgozza ki a fiatal<br />
körülmény–rendszerét, ezen túl pedig lehetővé teszi az ún. nevelési<br />
segítséget is.<br />
Az Egyezményben részes államok elismerik a gyermekeknek az<br />
oktatáshoz való jogát, és az esélyegyenlőség jegyében történő<br />
gyakorlása céljából az alapfokú oktatást kötelezővé és ingyenessé<br />
teszik, ami lehetőség szerint középfokú vagy szakmai képzésnek kell<br />
követnie 27 , amihez minden gyermeknek, így a büntetés vagy intézkedés<br />
hatálya alatt állónak is hozzáférhetőnek kell lennie. Láthattuk az 1.2.1.2<br />
és 2.2.2. pontokban, hogy ez mindkét Btk. szövegében megtalálható és<br />
különleges fontossággal bír.<br />
26<br />
New York– i egyezmény, 9. cikk, 1. bekezdés<br />
27<br />
u.o. 28. cikk<br />
122<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
A 29. cikkből – ami továbbra is az oktatás–nevelés szükségességével<br />
foglalkozik – kiemelnék egy számomra nagy jelentőséggel bíró<br />
gondolatot: a gyermekek tudatába kell vésni az emberi jogok és az<br />
alapvető szabadságjogokon kívül „…a szülei személyazonossága,<br />
nyelve és kulturális értékei iránti tiszteletet, valamint annak az<br />
országnak, amelyben él, továbbá esetleges származási országnak a<br />
nemzeti értékei iránti és a sajátjától különböző kultúrák iránti<br />
tiszteletet…”<br />
Mind Svájcnak (a büntetés – végrehajtási intézetek lakói igen nagy<br />
arányban külföldiek), mind hazánknak (roma kisebbség) lépéseket kell<br />
tennie annak érdekékében, hogy az életkörülményei és nemzeti - etnikai<br />
hovatartozása miatt marginalizálódott (e kettő többnyire halmozottan<br />
jelentkezik) fiatalokat valamiféle kapaszkodóhoz juttassa, éreztesse<br />
velük, hogy az adott társadalom megbecsült tagjai. Ennek módja pedig<br />
nem a kirekesztés, hanem az integráció lehet – de nem minden áron.<br />
Lehetőséget kell számukra adni a kisebbségi kulturális gyökereik<br />
megismerésére, és ezt véleményem szerint a normál tanintézetek keretén<br />
belül mind a kisebbségi, mind a többségben élő gyerekeknek is meg kell<br />
teremteni. A toleráns és hozzáértő megközelítés eme megnyilvánulása,<br />
az egészséges identitástudat kialakulása, a mások iránti felelősségtudat<br />
hatalmas előrelépést jelenthetne az agresszió visszaszorításában s így a<br />
megelőzés területén egyaránt 28 .<br />
A 33. cikk említi az államok felelősségét arra nézve, hogy a<br />
gyermekeket megvédjék a kábító- és pszichotróp szerek tiltott<br />
fogyasztásától, amelyet mindkét törvénykönyv külön kiemel, és a<br />
használattal összefüggésben bűnözővé vált fiatalkorú speciális kezelését<br />
írják elő.<br />
Összehasonlító munkám során nem tapasztaltam lényegi eltéréseket a<br />
vizsgált két szankciórendszer elvi alapjaiban. Azonban álláspontom<br />
28<br />
lásd bővebben: Ervin Staub: Az erőszak társadalmi – kulturális gyökerei in<br />
Történeti és politikai pszichológia (szerk. Hunyady György), Osiris, Budapest,<br />
1998, 90 – 115. oldal<br />
123<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
szerint számos, eddig megválaszolatlan vagy részben rendezett kérdésre<br />
nem csak jogalkotói, hanem szélesebb körű szakmai–társadalmi<br />
megoldást kell keresni.<br />
Érdemes lenne talán újragondolni hazánkban az egyes korbesorolásokat,<br />
nem csak azért, hogy a fiatalkorú fejlettségéhez mérten adekvált<br />
büntetés / intézkedés alkalmazására kerülhessen sor, hanem a bűnügyi<br />
mutatók arra a sajnálatos tényre is felhívják a figyelmünket, hogy az<br />
első elkövetések egyre fiatalabb korra tevődnek.<br />
Külön tanulmányt megérne a – 1.2.1. pontban csak megemlített –<br />
Svájcban ismert ún. nevelőszülői elhelyezés, amely társadalmi, nem<br />
pedig állami intézményi szinten kívánja a deviáns fiatalok helyzetét<br />
rendezni; itt azonban az országra olyan többlet felelősség és feladat is<br />
hárulna, mint például a családok kiválasztása, képzése, ellenőrzése.<br />
Kétséget kizáróan ez tűnik a leghumánusabb megoldásnak, ám az<br />
anyagi kérdéseken túl ott van egy személyi is: felkészültünk- e vajon<br />
arra, hogy egyenrangúként kezeljünk, befogadjunk egy olyan fiatalt,<br />
akit a büntetőjog történetének hosszú évszázadai alatt kirekeszteni<br />
törekedtünk...<br />
Érdeklődéssel olvastam, hogy Svájcban a nevelőotthonban való<br />
tartózkodás 25 éves korig is kitolódhat; a jogalkotó szándéka nyilván az<br />
lehetett, hogy a fiatalkorú (fiatal felnőtt) minél tovább legyen egy olyan<br />
közeg tagja, ahonnan megerősítést kaphat és erkölcsi nevelését, szakmai<br />
képzését is biztosítják. A magyar megoldás mellett fel lehet hozni<br />
érvként, hogy a fiatalok nagy része 16-19 évesen ösztönösen lázad<br />
mindenfajta kötöttséggel szemben (különösen, ha komoly intézeti<br />
házirendről van szó), ami hátráltathatja a többi ott-lakó nevelését,<br />
veszélyeztetheti a fegyelmet. A javítóintézetek feladataikban<br />
túlterheltek, gyakran diszfunkcionálisak, ezért szükségét látnám<br />
hazánkban a probléma megvizsgálását.<br />
Érdekes kezdeményezésnek tűnik a megelőzés jegyében az ún. szülői<br />
tréning kialakítása, amely hatékony beavatkozás lehet agresszív és<br />
antiszociális gyermekek esetében azáltal, ha például szüleik is részt<br />
124<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
vesznek a fiatalok számára biztosított pozitív oktatási és szocializációs<br />
tapasztalatszerzés folyamatában. Ezek a korai beavatkozó programok<br />
kialakíthatják az iskolai munkában való hatékonyságot és érdeklődést,<br />
erősíthetik a családi kapcsolatokat is, szilárd talajt nyújtva ezzel a<br />
gyerekeknek.<br />
Kétséget ébresztenek azonban azok a próbálkozások, amelyek az<br />
igazságos és költségkímélő büntetés ideológiájának felhasználásával<br />
kívánják feltámasztani a represszív testi és megalázó büntetések<br />
alkalmazását.<br />
Nem utolsó sorban megemlítem a svájci Btk. 57. cikkében szereplő –<br />
felnőttekre vonatkozó - ún. békekezesség intézményét, amelynek<br />
lényege, hogy a bíró a bűncselekménnyel vagy annak ismétlésével<br />
fenyegető személy ígéretét veszi, hogy tettét mégsem viszi véghez.<br />
Sajnos azonban úgy tűnik, hogy ez nem jelent különösebb visszatartó<br />
erőt egy, a magyarnál régebbi jóléti demokráciában sem, hiszen<br />
alkalmazási köre igencsak leszűkült, ritkán alkalmazott, kevéssé<br />
hatékony.<br />
Míg a napóleoni Code Civil 371. cikke szerint „az apai tekintélynek és<br />
hatalomnak kell kiegészíteni a törvényeket, kijavítani az erkölcsöt és az<br />
engedelmességet kialakítania a gyermekben”, addig ma már több<br />
nemzetközi szervezet, helyi kezdeményezés és iskolai szintű programok<br />
segítik a fiatalokat abban, hogy megtalálják a helyes utat, ehhez<br />
azonban az életkörülményeik javítása elengedhetetlen – az állam<br />
hathatós közreműködésével.<br />
125<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
IV. FELHASZNÁLT IRODALOM<br />
Belovics Ervin – Vokó György: A büntetés – végrehajtási jog<br />
magyarázata, HVG – ORAC, Budapest, 2001<br />
Büntetőjog – Általános rész (szerk. dr. Békés Imre), HVG – ORAC,<br />
Budapest, 2002<br />
Ervin Staub: Az erőszak társadalmi – kulturális gyökerei in Történeti és<br />
politikai pszichológia (szerk. Hunyady György), Osiris, Budapest<br />
Fraçoise Martinetti: Les Droit de l’enfant, edition Unicef, Librio, Paris,<br />
2002<br />
Györgyi Kálmán: Büntetések és intézkedések, Közgazdasági és Jogi<br />
Könyvkiadó, Budapest, 1984<br />
Lőrincz József: Nemzetközi tendenciák a fiatalkorúak büntetés –<br />
végrehajtásában, Bv. Szakkönyvtár, IM Büntetés – végrehajtás<br />
Országos Parancsnokság, Budapest, 1992.<br />
Molnár József: A fiatalkori bűnözés helyzete és megelőzése<br />
Magyarországon, Kriminológiai és Kriminalisztikai Tanulmányok X.<br />
kötet, Budapest, 1973<br />
Nagy Ferenc: A svájci büntetőjogi szankciórendszer, Acta Universitatis<br />
Szegediensis De Attila József Nominatae – Acta Juridica et Politica,<br />
tomus XXXVI., Szeged, 1986<br />
Ausztria, NSZK, Svájc, Hollandia és Spanyolország büntetés –<br />
végrehajtási rendszerének áttekintése, Bv. Szakkönyvtár, Budapest,<br />
1990/1.<br />
Intézkedések a büntetőjog szankciórendszerében, Közgazdasági és Jogi<br />
Könyvkiadó, Budapest, 1986<br />
Nagy József: A fiatalkorúakra vonatkozó büntetőjogi szabályok<br />
kialakulása és változásai in Rendvédelmi Füzetek, 2002/36.<br />
Paul Logoz: Commentaire du Code Pénal Suisse - Partie Générale,<br />
Delachaux&Niesté SA., Neuchâtel – Paris, 1976<br />
Szabó András: A fiatalkorúak és a büntetőjog, Közgazdasági és Jogi<br />
Könyvkiadó, Budapest, 1961<br />
Vokó György: A magyar büntetés – végrehajtási jog, Dialóg Campus,<br />
Budapest – Pécs, 2001<br />
www.parlament.ch<br />
126<br />
ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />
BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />
FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />
KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND THE<br />
PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN<br />
CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong><br />
BY DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI<br />
1. The notion of legal validity appeared for the first time during the<br />
period of the Hammurabi State, which dates back to more than 1750<br />
BC. In the Hammurabi Code, and in numerous documents from court<br />
proceedings that have been preserved on clay tablets, it is recorded that<br />
a judge who altered a judgment recorded on a sealed tablet would be<br />
removed from judicial office, and face a fine of twelve times the value<br />
of the claim. 1<br />
Further on in history, the institution of legal validity was connected with<br />
the prohibition of ne bis in idem. In ancient Greece the principle of ne<br />
bis in eadem re was in force in Athens and Sparta – no one could be<br />
tried twice for the same offence. The purpose of this principle was to<br />
prevent the same person from facing repeated prosecution. 2 As early as<br />
the fourth century BC Demosthenes referred to this as one of the rights<br />
guaranteed to a defendant facing trial. 3<br />
In Roman times, Ulpian maintained that a final court judgment should<br />
not be changed (res judicata pro veritate accipitur). Roman lawyers<br />
believed that a judgment, if it was to serve the aim of the trial, had to<br />
constitute law in that specific case. 4 In this respect, both sentences and<br />
acquittals became valid in law. During the period of the Republic, once<br />
a case had been decided, there was no higher court or instance which<br />
had jurisdiction over the case, so each judgment carried immediate legal<br />
validity. 5 Once courts of instance were introduced, before a judgment<br />
1<br />
S. Waltoś: Proces karny. Zarys systemu, Warszawa 2002, p 75.<br />
2<br />
J. W. Jones: Law and Legal Theory of the Greeks, 1956, p 148.<br />
3<br />
M. L. Friedland: Double Jeopardy, Oxford 1969, pp 15-16.<br />
4<br />
Z. Resich: Res judicata, Warszawa 1978, p 7.<br />
5<br />
W. Kufel: Res judicata. Przegląd zapatrywań na istotę powagi rzeczy osądzonej<br />
127<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
could become valid in law, all appeals first had to be exhausted. During<br />
the same period, the principle of non bis in idem was also observed 6 ,<br />
and it was expressed in other Latin proverbs: nemo debet bis vexari pro<br />
una et eadem causa, nemo debet bis puniri pro uno delicto 7 , or the one<br />
formulated by Joannes Teutonius: ne bis in idem crimen iudicetur. 8<br />
The principle of the legal validity of judgments in criminal cases was<br />
considered as a principle of both canon law and older German<br />
legislation. This was mentioned by Gratian who, basing it on the Old<br />
Testament, used the formulation of non iudicabit Deus bis in id ipsum. 9<br />
The principle of ne bis in idem appeared in the Saxon Mirror. Emperor<br />
Charles V’s criminal legislation of 1532 (Constitutio Criminalis<br />
Carolina) contained no provisions covering the legal validity of<br />
sentences. In trials during the Inquisition, the principle of ne bis in idem<br />
was abolished. In 16 th -century continental Europe, the principle of ne<br />
bis in idem was replaced by the institution of “release from the court of<br />
first instance” (absolutio ab instantia) prepared by Milanese lawyers.<br />
This meant that where there was insufficient evidence to pass judgment,<br />
the proceedings were suspended, but could be reopened on new<br />
evidence. 10 In Germany, the institution of absolutio ab instantia was<br />
introduced in 1635, and by the end of the <strong>18</strong> th century, it became<br />
common court practice. In 1751, the validity of “release from the court<br />
of first instance” was confirmed in the Codex Juris Bavarici Criminalis.<br />
In line with the binding concept of absolutio ab instantia, undertaking<br />
of final proceedings was dependent on new circumstances coming to<br />
w procesie cywilnym, Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 1964, No.<br />
1, p 49.<br />
6<br />
See Jolowicz: Roman Foundations of Modern Law, 1957, pp 87, 94-100.<br />
7<br />
R. Kmiecik: Prawomocność postanowień prokuratora w świetle k.p.k. z 1997 r.<br />
(in:) Nowy Kodeks postępowania karnego. Zagadnienia węzłowe, Kraków 1998,<br />
p 193.<br />
8<br />
M. Lipczyńska: Polski proces karny. Zagadnienia ogólne, t. I, Warszawa 1986,<br />
p 53; S. Waltoś: op. cit. p 63.<br />
9<br />
F.C. Schroeder: Die Rechtsnatur des Grundsatzes „ne bis in idem“, Juristische<br />
Schulung 1997, No.3, p 228.<br />
10<br />
G. Schwarplies: Die rechtsgeschichtliche Entwicklung des Grundsatzes “ne bis<br />
in idem” im Strafprozess, Zürich 1970, p 27.<br />
128<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
light. 11<br />
By the end of the <strong>18</strong> th Century, the French Revolution once again<br />
restored the principle of ne bis in idem. 12 The first regulations in French<br />
law (The Constitution of September 1791, Chapter V and Art. 9 of the<br />
Criminal Procedure Code of <strong>18</strong>08) limited the principle to prohibiting<br />
punishment and prosecution once a person had been acquitted. 13<br />
In Germany during the Enlightenment, the individual was granted new<br />
rights in criminal proceedings. 14 The framework for the modern criminal<br />
trial was established by the Frankfurt Constitution of <strong>18</strong>49, which<br />
among other things significantly limited the possibility for a retrial of<br />
the same criminal case and against the same person, thereby increasing<br />
the importance of the institution of legal validity. However, no<br />
provisions of the German Reich’s Criminal Procedure of 1 February<br />
<strong>18</strong>77 referred directly to the institution of legal validity. Nevertheless, it<br />
did accept the principle of ne bis in idem which from that moment on<br />
has been generally accepted in Reich Court judgments. 15<br />
In Anglo-Saxon legal theory, the ne bis in idem prohibition is described<br />
as a “rule against double jeopardy”. This prohibition is as old as the<br />
common law itself. In 12 th Century England, during the controversy<br />
between Henry II and Archbishop Thomas Becket over Church<br />
independence, this principle was exploited in the defence of the<br />
independence of ecclesiastical courts. An official accused of murder<br />
was tried by an ecclesiastical court. In order to exclude the jurisdiction<br />
of the Royal court, the principle of ne bis in idipsum, then in force in<br />
ecclesiastical courts, was invoked: “no one may be punished twice for<br />
the same offence”. 16 During a later period, a principle was observed in<br />
11<br />
U. Dithmar: Der Gundsatz “ne bis in idem” und das fortgesetzte Delikt, Berlin<br />
1993, p 6.<br />
12<br />
Barbey: La Rẻgle Non Bis in Idem, 1930, p 23.<br />
13<br />
F. C. Schroeder: op. cit., p 228.<br />
14<br />
T. Maciejewski: Historia powszechna ustroju i prawa, Warszawa 2000, pp<br />
838-840.<br />
15<br />
U. Dithmar: op. cit., p 7.<br />
16<br />
M. L. Friedland: op. cit., p 5.<br />
129<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
practice according to which it was impermissible to conduct several<br />
proceedings in the same case. In 1660, the Court of the King’s Bench in<br />
England forbade the conduct of two proceedings in the same case. 17<br />
In Ireland the double jeopardy concept is often recognisable in the<br />
language of anglicised Norman French (i. e. autrefois acquit and<br />
convict) whereas in most of the Code nations is it expressed in the Latin<br />
maxim of non bis in idem. <strong>18</strong><br />
The principle of double jeopardy is to be found in the Fifth Amendment<br />
of the United States Constitution and provides that no person shall “be<br />
subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb”.<br />
The Fifth Amendment has been held to consist of three separate<br />
guarantees, namely: autrefois acquit, autrefois convict and protection<br />
against multiple punishment for the same offence. In addition to the<br />
United States, the German, Canadian, Indian and South African<br />
constitutions also embody this principle. Article 35(3)(m) of the<br />
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa provides that a person is<br />
“not to be tried for an offence in respect of an act or omission for which<br />
that person has previously been either acquitted or convicted”. 19<br />
The principle of ne bis in idem is contained in the International<br />
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 16 December 1966.<br />
According to Art. 14 par. 7, “No one shall be liable to be tried or<br />
punished again for an offence for which he has already been finally<br />
convicted or acquitted in accordance with the law and criminal<br />
procedure of each country”. This provision concerns only criminal<br />
proceedings in a given state. 20<br />
This principle can also be found in the 1984 Protocol No. 7 to the<br />
European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and<br />
17<br />
P. A. McDermott: Res Judicata and Double Jeopardy, Butterworths 1999, p<br />
200.<br />
<strong>18</strong><br />
P. A. McDermott: op. cit., p 201.<br />
19<br />
P. A. McDermott: op. cit., pp 198, 201.<br />
20<br />
Dziennik Ustaw, 1977 , No. 38, item 167. See J. Tylman: Postępowanie karne.<br />
Zbiór przepisów, orzecznictwo i literatura, Bydgoszcz-Łódź 2002, p 30.<br />
130<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that, ”No one shall be liable to<br />
be tried or punished again in criminal proceedings under the jurisdiction<br />
of the same State for an offence for which he has already been finally<br />
acquitted or convicted in accordance with the law and criminal<br />
procedure of the State.” 21 Thus formulated, the prohibition of ne bis in<br />
idem does not prevent the reopening of proceedings in accordance with<br />
the law and procedure of a state concerned where new facts have been<br />
discovered or if there has been a fundamental defect in the previous<br />
proceedings that could affect the outcome of the case (Art. 4 par. 2). In<br />
the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and<br />
Fundamental Freedom, the principle of ne bis in idem is a principle<br />
which is not subject to derogation, which means that states cannot<br />
temporarily suspend its binding force even in extraordinary<br />
circumstances (“In time of war or other public emergency threatening<br />
the life of the nation”) within the meaning of Art. 15 of the European<br />
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental<br />
Freedom. 22 This prohibition protects citizens against a feeling of<br />
uncertainty and the legal order from the instability of court decisions. 23<br />
2. Res judicata is a legal institution preventing situations arising where<br />
further proceedings would be instigated against the same person, in the<br />
same case, once a final valid judgement had been passed terminating the<br />
proceedings. If a given case is examined ex officio to determine<br />
whether res judicata applies, even before criminal proceedings<br />
commence , this ensures that people are not involved without due cause<br />
in a process with all the negative consequences this can entail. 24 On the<br />
21 Dziennik Ustaw 2003, No. 42, item 364.<br />
22 See B. Gronowska: Wyrok Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka w<br />
sprawach: Gradinger przeciwko Austrii, 23 <strong>October</strong> 1995, ref.. 33/1994/480/562<br />
and Oliveira przeciwko Szwajcarii, 30 June 1998, ref. 84/1997/868/1080, Prok. i<br />
Pr. 1999, Nos. 11-12, p 150; F. C. Schroeder: op. cit., p 230.<br />
23 R. Kmiecik, E. Skrętowicz: Proces karny. Część ogólna, Kraków-Lublin 1999,<br />
pp205-206; R. Kmiecik: Prawomocność postanowień prokuratora w świetle<br />
k.p.k. z 1997 (in:) Nowy Kodeks postępowania karnego. Zagadnienia węzłowe,<br />
Kraków 1998, p 193.<br />
24 S. Waltoś: op. cit., p 440.<br />
131<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
other hand, obviously, this cannot be allowed to lead to the perpetrator<br />
of an offence avoiding responsibility. 25<br />
The principle of ne bis in idem guarantees the accused that he will not<br />
be held criminally responsible for an act which has already been<br />
adjudged. This is a right of the perpetrator of a punishable act, who can<br />
then demand that proceedings not be instituted against him, or where<br />
proceedings have already commenced, that they be discontinued, if<br />
criminal proceedings against him in the same case have already<br />
terminated with a valid judgement.<br />
The prohibition against reopening proceedings in the same case thus<br />
takes priority over the principle of justice. This may sometimes be<br />
difficult to accept due to “society’s notion of justice”. It is worth noting<br />
that the Parliamentary Council in Germany, as a result of “past<br />
experience”, i.e. endemic infringement of the law by institutions and<br />
offices of National Socialism, has added Art. 103 par. 3 to the current<br />
Constitution, which prohibits multiple punishment, . However, this did<br />
not relate to the prohibition against multiple punishment, but rather with<br />
the fact that sentences were set aside as too lenient and replaced with<br />
more severe ones on the basis of an extraordinary appeal and petition<br />
for annulment. Therefore, these were in fact ordinary multiple<br />
prosecutions, rather than cases of multiple punishment 26<br />
German doctrine established the concepts of substantive justice and<br />
legal certainty (the reliability of a legally established order) that are the<br />
fundamental elements of a nation of laws. Substantive justice is the<br />
authorisation, and duty of, the state to punish the perpetrator of an act<br />
commensurately with his degree of guilt and type of offence. However,<br />
the notion of legal certainty is based on the fact that where the<br />
perpetrator has been judged by the state apparatus, he cannot be retried<br />
for the same act in the same case. The state, in instituting and<br />
conducting proceedings against a specific person, in effect exhausts its<br />
25 A. Kaftal: O niektórych zagadnieniach tożsamości przedmiotowej czynu przy<br />
przestępstwie ciągłym, Palestra 1964, No.8, p 33.<br />
26 F. C. Schroeder: op. cit., p 228.<br />
132<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
right to judge the offender. German doctrine accepts the precedence of<br />
legal certainty over the principle of substantive justice. 27<br />
Both the individual and society as a whole should be able to rely on<br />
legal certainty. A society should have confidence in the legal order of its<br />
state. This confidence is strengthened among other things by the fact<br />
that court judgments are irreversible. The principle of legal certainty<br />
also has a disciplinary significance for state organs conducting<br />
proceedings, who must exercise particular care as it will not be possible<br />
to re-open proceedings or rectify errors later : they will be restricted by<br />
the principle of ne bis in idem. The principle of legal certainty is<br />
exceptionally important for citizens. No citizen need fear that<br />
proceedings will be reopened in a given case once the court has made a<br />
legally valid judgment.. This reflects the dignity and freedom of the<br />
individual and in this way he is protected against any possible abuse of<br />
authority by the state. 28<br />
It is generally accepted that the principle of ne bis in idem serves<br />
foremost to protect those who have been judged, whether convicted or<br />
acquitted. This principle also means that proceedings may not be<br />
conducted with the aim of acquittal or mitigating the penalty for a<br />
person who has received a legally valid sentence. 29 However, it should<br />
27 E. Schmidt: Strafprozeß und Rechtsstaat, Strafprozeßrechtliche Aufsätze und<br />
Vorträge (1952 bis 1969), Göttingen 1970, p 273; H. J. Behrendt: Der Tatbegriff<br />
im materiellen und formellen Steuerrecht, Zeitschrift für die gesamte<br />
Strafrechtswisseschaft 1982, No. 94, p 888; U. Dithmar: Der Grundsatz..., pp 11-<br />
12.<br />
28 E. Beling: Deutsches Reichsstrafprozessrecht, Berlin-Lepzig 1928; M. Faber:<br />
Strafklageverbrauch und fortgesetzte Handlung, München 1966, p 29; W. Stree:<br />
Teilrechtskraft und fortgesetzte Tat (in:) Festschrift für Karl Engisch zum 70<br />
Geburstag, Frankfurt am Main 1969, p 676; R. Neuhaus: Der<br />
strafverfahrensrechtliche Tatbegriff – „ne bis in idem“, Bochum 1985, p 165; U.<br />
Dithmar: op.cit. pp 12-14.<br />
29<br />
G. Grünwald: Die materielle Rechtskraft im Strafverfahren der Bundesrepublik<br />
Deutschland (in:) H. H. Jescheck (red.): Deutsche strafrechtliche Landesreferate<br />
zum IX Internationallen Kongreβ für Rechtsvergleichung, Teheran 1974, Berlin-<br />
New York 1974, p 97.<br />
133<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
be noted that the ne bis in idem prohibition may in certain circumstances<br />
prevent the accused from demonstrating his innocence. 30 Therefore,<br />
one should note that under modern criminal procedures the binding<br />
principle of presumption of innocence stands until the court pronounces<br />
the accused guilty in a legally valid judgment. The accused is presumed<br />
innocent until his guilt is determined in a legally valid verdict, which<br />
puts into effect the ne bis in idem prohibition. Errors committed by the<br />
court that lead to the sentencing of an innocent person should not be<br />
rectified by infringing this principle. Furthermore, legal systems have<br />
measures allowing even those verdicts which are legally valid to be<br />
overturned.<br />
3. The principle of ne bis in idem is not one that is binding without any<br />
qualification. Provisions of the Code on Penal Proceedings and<br />
provisions of other laws provide exceptions to the prohibition against<br />
conducting criminal proceedings for the same matter. In Polish criminal<br />
procedure, the foremost exceptions include: cassation and reopening<br />
proceedings; changes to the judgment as a result of an amendment to the<br />
law; judicial decisions on carrying out the sentence and other criminal<br />
sanctions; changes to judicial decisions on probation; criminal<br />
proceedings in a matter where a foreign court has already passed<br />
judgment; verdicts changing a previous decision as a result of<br />
extradition conditions; correction of evident typographical errors and<br />
mistakes in accounting or in the calculation of time periods; restoration<br />
of final time limits; proceedings supplementing resolutions contained in<br />
the verdict; pardons; amnesties, and proceedings on the basis of the Law<br />
of 23 February 1991 on the Invalidity of Judicial Decisions in Respect<br />
of Persons Repressed for Activities in Favour of the Independence of<br />
the Polish Nation. 31<br />
According to Art. 17 par. 1 sub. 7 of the Polish Criminal Procedure<br />
30<br />
M. L. Friedland: op. cit., p 4.<br />
31<br />
M. Rogalski: Res judicata jako przesłanka procesu karnego, Rzeszów 2004, p<br />
142; M. Cieślak: Polska procedura karna. Podstawowe założenia teoretyczne,<br />
Warszawa 1984, p 375; T. Grzegorczyk, J. Tylman: Polskie postępowanie karne,<br />
Warszawa 2001, p 192.<br />
134<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Code , the substantive legal validity of a court judgment constitutes a ne<br />
bis in idem prohibition (precluding a trial) in respect of a trial where the<br />
accused is to be tried again for the same act. The possibility of<br />
continuing proceedings that have been validly concluded under the law<br />
should be seen as an exception to the ne bis in idem prohibition.<br />
According to the principle of ne bis in idem, there should be no<br />
proceedings if the same accused stands trial for an act in a case that has<br />
already been resolved by a legally valid judgement. Hence, the law<br />
provides cassation and reopening of proceedings as exceptions to the ne<br />
bis in idem prohibition. 32<br />
In Polish literature the view predominates that cassation or reopening of<br />
proceedings are continuations of the previous proceedings, not the<br />
beginning of new ones (bis). 33 A legally valid judicial decision settling<br />
proceedings is set aside as part of the same, not in new, proceedings. 34<br />
A contrary view is presented by G. Grünwald, according to whom, the<br />
reopening of such proceedings constitutes new proceedings,<br />
independent of the first, in which general legal norms are binding and in<br />
particular in dubio pro reo. In Grünwald’s view, if proceedings are<br />
reopened in accordance with the requirements of substantive legal<br />
validity and are to the benefit of the accused, they cannot be recognized<br />
as an infringement of substantive legal validity. 35 Grünwald also notes<br />
that there are no criteria justifying the acceptance of the argument that<br />
during a re-examination of the same case based on the same factual<br />
state, the second court would apply the provisions of law better than the<br />
previous one. However, the legislator, in establishing the binding legal<br />
order, assumes that is not based on an empirically justified normative<br />
rule, but rather a normative designation that the legal position of appeals<br />
courts has priority before courts of first instance. An exception is where<br />
new facts or evidence become available, in which case the trial will lead<br />
32<br />
R. Kmiecik, E. Skrętowicz: Proces karny. Część ogólna, Kraków-Lublin 1999,<br />
p 208.<br />
33<br />
P. Hofmański, E. Sadzik, K. Zgryzek: Kodeks postępowania karnego.<br />
Komentarz, t. I, Warszawa 1999, pp 131-132. See also W. Grzeszczyk: Kasacja<br />
w polskim procesie karnym, Kraków 2000, p 35.<br />
34<br />
W. Daszkiewicz: Proces karny. Część ogólna, Poznań 1995, p 140.<br />
35<br />
G. Grünwald: op. cit., pp 94-95.<br />
135<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
to a better discovery of historical truth. 36<br />
In accordance with the Polish Criminal Procedure Code, cassation may<br />
also be instituted to the disadvantage of the accused where<br />
circumstances excluding prosecution arise, particularly where there is a<br />
legally valid judgment. According to Art. 519 of the Polish Criminal<br />
Procedure Code cassation may be initiated from each legally valid<br />
appeal court judgment which terminates the proceedings. Cassation in<br />
this form allows the setting aside of a legally valid substantive judgment<br />
of an appeals court and judgement to be passed again on the accused. 37<br />
In connection with these provisions, doubts appear as to the very<br />
institution of legal validity, if a party can, within a set time period,<br />
appeal a legally valid judgment by cassation, which is essentially an<br />
ordinary means of appeal. 38 S. Waltoś pointed out, for instance, that<br />
cassation as a means of appeal against a legally valid judicial decision<br />
may present problems for Poland’s ratification of Protocol No. 7 to the<br />
European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and<br />
Fundamental Freedoms, which has already been signed, as according to<br />
the Convention no one can again be judged or penalised in proceedings<br />
before a court of the same state where previously he was sentenced with<br />
a legally valid sentence or acquitted in accordance with the law and the<br />
principles of criminal procedure of that state. Proceedings may be<br />
reopened in accordance with the law and criminal procedure of a given<br />
state if newly discovered facts are disclosed or if an error that may have<br />
had a bearing on the outcome of the case was committed in previous<br />
proceedings. The Convention’s provisions allow an exception to the<br />
prohibition against infringing the ne bis in idem rule to the detriment of<br />
the accused only in the form of reopening proceedings. 39 It should be<br />
36<br />
G. Grünwald: op.cit., pp 104-105.<br />
37<br />
R. Kmiecik, E. Skrętowicz: op. cit., p 208.<br />
38<br />
R. Kmiecik: Trójinstancyjny system apelacyjno-kasacyjny czy dwuinstancyjna<br />
hybryda rewizyjno-kasacyjna? (w związku z nowelizacją k.p.k. w zakresie<br />
postępowania odwoławczego) (in:) Kierunki i stan reformy prawa karnego,<br />
Lublin 1995, p 71. See also R. Kmiecik: Kodeks postępowania karnego w ocenie<br />
doktryny i publicystyki (in:) Racjonalna reforma prawa karnego, Warszawa<br />
2001, p 64.<br />
39<br />
S. Waltoś: Nowa kasacja w procesie karnym, Palestra 1996, Nos. 1-2, pp 21-<br />
136<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
noted that Protocol No. 7 of the European Convention on the Protection<br />
of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms refers to the ”the law and<br />
penal procedure of a given State”. This results from the order to take<br />
into account the specific criminal procedure law of each signatory to<br />
Protocol No. 7. Therefore it would be difficult to acknowledge that the<br />
use of the institution of cassation for correcting blatantly defective<br />
legally valid judicial decisions is an infringement of the principle of ne<br />
bis in idem, since cassation does not mean new proceedings should be<br />
opened despite previous proceedings being concluded with a legally<br />
valid judicial decision. Instead, it is a decision as to whether the judicial<br />
decision that ended the proceedings is flawed by a blatant infringement<br />
of the law, hence exceptionally allowing proceedings to be continued. 40<br />
Doubts also arise in German doctrine as to the permissibility of<br />
reopening proceedings terminated with legal validity to the detriment of<br />
the sentenced offender (Art. 362 Strafprozeβordnung together with the<br />
provisions of Art. 103 par. 3 of the German Constitution which provides<br />
for the ne bis in idem prohibition). This situation is justified by principle<br />
of justice taking the priority over the principle of legal certainty. One<br />
should also note that in German law proceedings may not be reopened<br />
where their only the aim is to impose a different penalty on the basis of<br />
the same penal law (Art. 363 Strafprozeβordnung). 41<br />
4. According to Art. 540 par. 1 of the Polish Criminal Procedure Code,<br />
proceedings concluded with a legally valid judicial decision can be<br />
reopened if:<br />
1) an offence has been committed in connection with the<br />
proceedings and there exists a reasonable basis for belief that<br />
22.<br />
40<br />
Z. Doda, A. Gaberle: Kontrola odwoławcza w procesie karnym, Warszawa<br />
1997, pp 45-46. See also Z. Doda, J. Grajewski, A. Murzynowski: Kasacja w<br />
postępowaniu karnym – Komentarz, Warszawa 1996, p 7. Protocol No. 7 of the<br />
European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental<br />
Freedoms has already been announced in Dziennik Ustaw 2003, No. 42, item<br />
364.<br />
41<br />
F. C. Schroeder: op. cit., pp 229-230.<br />
137<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
this could have influenced the contents of the judicial<br />
decision;<br />
2) after the judgment was pronounced, new facts or evidence<br />
came to light that were previously unknown to the court and<br />
which indicate that:<br />
a) the sentenced person did not commit the act or his act<br />
did not constitute an offence or was not subject to a<br />
penalty,<br />
b) he was sentenced for an offence that is subject to a more<br />
rigorous penalty, or if circumstances that required an<br />
extraordinary mitigation of penalty were not taken into<br />
account, or if the court erroneously accepted<br />
circumstances that caused an extraordinary aggravation<br />
of penalty,<br />
c) the court discontinued or conditionally discontinued<br />
criminal proceedings, erroneously accepting that the<br />
accused committed the act of which he is accused.<br />
Proceedings are reopened to the benefit of the accused if the need arises<br />
as a consequence of a decision by an international authority by virtue of<br />
an international agreement ratified by the Republic of Poland (Art. 540<br />
par. 3 of the Polish Criminal Procedure Code). On the basis of<br />
international agreements ratified by Poland these authorities are: the<br />
European Commission of Human Rights, which is concerned with<br />
individual petitions raised against Poland, and the European Tribunal of<br />
Human Rights.<br />
According to Art. 540a of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure, court<br />
proceedings which ended in a legally valid judgment may also be<br />
reopened if:<br />
1) a convicted person to whom provisions of Art. 60 par. 3 or 4 of<br />
the Polish Criminal Code were applied did not confirm<br />
138<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
previously disclosed information during criminal proceedings,<br />
2) circumstances specified in Art. 11 par. 3 of the Polish Criminal<br />
Procedure Code arise.<br />
Pursuant to Art. 60 par. 3 of the Polish Criminal Code, a court applies<br />
extraordinary mitigation of penalty and perhaps even conditional<br />
suspension of the sentence in respect of a perpetrator participating with<br />
other persons in the commission of an offence, if he reveals the offence<br />
and its material circumstances to the prosecuting authority. Under Art.<br />
60 par. 4 of the Polish Criminal Code, upon a motion from the<br />
prosecution, a court may apply extraordinary mitigation of penalty and<br />
even conditional suspension of the penalty in respect of a perpetrator<br />
who, irrespective of clarifications submitted in his case, revealed to the<br />
prosecution a hitherto unknown offence and presented its material<br />
circumstances, if the offence is subject to a penalty of deprivation of<br />
liberty for a period of more than five years.<br />
However, under Art. 11 par. 1 of the Polish Code of Criminal<br />
Procedure, proceedings concerning an offence carrying a penalty of up<br />
to five years’ deprivation of liberty may be set aside if, due to the type<br />
and level of the penalty imposed in a legally valid judgement for<br />
another offence, the sentence would clearly be inappropriate and if this<br />
does not conflict with the interests of the injured party. Under Art. 11<br />
par. 3 of the Polish Criminal Procedure Code criminal proceedings that<br />
have been annulled under Art. 11 par. 1 may be reopened in the event<br />
that the legally valid verdict causing them to be annulled is set aside or<br />
an essential change is made to it.<br />
Hence, the provisions of Art. 540a of the Polish Criminal Procedure<br />
Code permit the reopening of proceedings, but only where it would be<br />
to the disadvantage of the accused. 42 In the grounds for the draft<br />
changes to the Polish Criminal Procedure Code it was provided that<br />
42<br />
T. Grzegorczyk: Wybrane zagadnienia najnowszej procedury karnej, Państwo i<br />
Prawo 2003, No. 8, p 15.<br />
139<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
"In proceedings to reopen proceedings there are two bases for the<br />
infringement of a legally valid judgment, unknown in legislation until<br />
now. Thus, it will be possible to reopen proceedings where the text of a<br />
legally valid judgment has been set aside or its essence has been<br />
changed, because of which proceedings were annulled pursuant to Art.<br />
11 par. 1 (see Art. 540a point 2) and where, after the judgment had been<br />
handed down, new facts or evidence not previously known to the court<br />
are revealed indicating that a convicted person to whom provisions of<br />
Art. 60 par. 3 or par. 4 of the Criminal Code were applied had<br />
substantially changed his testimony or explanations (see Art. 540a point<br />
1). The draft amendment aims to prevent accused persons from<br />
deceitfully “obtaining under false pretences” benefits provided under<br />
Art. 11 par. 1 of the Criminal Procedure Code and under Art. 60 par. 3<br />
and 4 of the Criminal Code. It continues to conform with the text of Art.<br />
4 par. 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention for the Protection<br />
of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and does not conflict with<br />
the international standard of prohibition against repeated judgments or<br />
penalties.” 43<br />
In German criminal procedure, the reasons for reopening proceedings<br />
fall into two categories, those that are to the benefit of the convict and<br />
those to his disadvantage. Proceedings are reopened to the benefit of the<br />
convict in the following cases:<br />
1) Disclosure of new facts and evidence that justify a resolution to<br />
the case other than the previous one. Facts and evidence that<br />
were not presented during the main hearing are recognised as<br />
new facts and evidence. These are not only facts of which the<br />
accused was unaware during the proceedings, but also those<br />
which have their source in court files but which were not<br />
exploited during the main hearing.<br />
2) Documents presented to the disadvantage of the accused were<br />
43<br />
Projekt ustawy o zmianie ustawy – Kodeks postępowania karnego – Przepisy<br />
wprowadzające Kodeks karny oraz niektórych innych ustaw, Druk Sejmowy No.<br />
<strong>18</strong>2, 20 December 2001, pp 70-71.<br />
140<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
either not genuine or were falsified, a witness or expert<br />
intentionally or negligently provided false testimony under<br />
oath. Reopening is possible if on the basis of evidence in its<br />
possession the court finds that the falsified documents or<br />
testimony were not genuine.<br />
3) A civil court judgement, on the basis of which the criminal<br />
court issued its verdict, had been set aside. The difference<br />
between the new judgement of a civil court and the previous<br />
one may occur if new facts or evidence have appeared or the<br />
material evidence before the civil court was wrongly assessed.<br />
After the civil court verdict is set aside, the decision of the<br />
criminal court must be verified;<br />
4) The judge accepted material benefit in return for granting a<br />
specific resolution;<br />
5) A defect has been found in the law which has been applied. In<br />
accordance with Art. 79 of the German Constitution, reopening<br />
is possible if the Constitutional Court determines that the<br />
provisions of the Constitution have been infringed. 44<br />
In German law the substantive legal validity of a verdict may also be set<br />
aside as a consequence of extraordinary means of accusation being<br />
introduced by one of the co-defendants due to infringement of the<br />
provisions of substantive law. However, the verdict is set aside only in<br />
respect of the co-defendant in regard to whom the law was infringed. 45<br />
Proceedings may, however, be reopened to the disadvantage of the<br />
accused in the event that falsification of a document used as evidence to<br />
his benefit is disclosed, false testimony is given, or an offence ex officio<br />
is committed by the judge. There are however are limitations to the<br />
range of possibilities for conducting a new criminal proceedings to the<br />
disadvantage of the convict. A person acquitted or convicted by a<br />
44<br />
G. Grünwald: op. cit., pp 98-101.<br />
45<br />
Ibid., p 101.<br />
141<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
legally valid verdict is protected against new penal proceedings to his<br />
disadvantage , even where new facts or evidence come to light. 46<br />
In French procedure proceedings concluded with a legally valid judicial<br />
decision are reopened in the following circumstances:<br />
- the alleged victim of a murder is in fact alive;<br />
- there are two judicial decisions in the same case;<br />
- a witness has been sentenced for false testimony;<br />
- new facts come to light indicating the innocence of the<br />
convicted person. 47<br />
In French procedure, infringement of the prohibition of ne bis in idem<br />
(”two judicial decisions in the same case”) constitutes a basis for<br />
reopening proceedings.<br />
There is a provision in the Polish Criminal Procedure Code (Art. 549<br />
par. 2) that may constitute a basis for reopening proceedings to the<br />
benefit of the accused if, as a result of Constitutional Tribunal decision,<br />
the legal provision that was the basis for the sentencing or conditional<br />
annulment has lost its force of law or been changed. The decision of the<br />
Constitutional Tribunal may follow a constitutional petition. A<br />
constitutional petition is most often described as a specific,<br />
extraordinary legal measure on the basis of which a citizen or another<br />
legal entity may turn to the Constitutional Tribunal to grant it protection<br />
from the infringement of its constitutional rights by a state organ or<br />
other public authority. 48<br />
With the assistance of such legal measures, a party dissatisfied with the<br />
resolution of the criminal proceedings may initiate proceedings before<br />
the Constitutional Tribunal aimed at instigating a constitutional<br />
46 Ibid., pp 98-101.<br />
47 H. H. Kühne: Ne bis in idem in den Schengen Vertragsstaaten, Juristenzeitung<br />
1998, No. <strong>18</strong>, p 878.<br />
48<br />
B. Nita: Skarga konstytucyjna jako środek prawny umożliwiający korektę<br />
prawomocnego orzeczenia wydanego w postępowaniu karnym (in:) Środki<br />
zaskarżenia w procesie karnym. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci prof. Zbigniewa<br />
Dody, Kraków 2000, p427; B. Nita: Trybunał Konstytucyjny a proces karny,<br />
Kraków 1999, p 229.<br />
142<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
examination of the legal provision it is questioning that became the<br />
basis for the resolution issued in his case. 49<br />
In Polish criminal procedure, such a petition may only be granted where<br />
there is a conflict between the Constitution and the law that was the<br />
basis for the judgment issued in a specific case. Hence, one cannot have<br />
a constitutional petition on the grounds that the judgment infringes<br />
constitutional rights, through failure to apply, or erroneous application<br />
of, the law. The decision of the Constitutional Tribunal determining<br />
whether a provision that has been examined is unconstitutional does not<br />
automatically invalidate judicial decisions that were made as a result of<br />
such a provision being applied. However, it is possible to reopen<br />
proceedings to the benefit of the accused. 50 The exception to the<br />
principle of ne bis in idem in the form of reopening proceedings as a<br />
result of a Constitutional Tribunal judgement applies only in<br />
circumstances where there is a change in the law to the benefit of the<br />
perpetrator, in that the act of which he was accused has ceased to be a<br />
criminal offence or its classification as a criminal offence has changed. 51<br />
5. In Polish criminal procedure, a change in verdict as a result of a<br />
change in law may be regarded as an exception to the ne bis in idem<br />
principle. According to art. 4 § 2 of the Polish Criminal Code the<br />
(“PCC”), if, under a new law, an offence carries a maximum sentence<br />
that is lower than the maximum sentence that was previously imposed,<br />
the maximum sentence will be reduced to the level provided for in the<br />
new law. If, under the new law, the punishable offence no longer carries<br />
a prison sentence, the prison sentence that was previously imposed must<br />
be commuted to a fine or imprisonment, on the basis that one month’s<br />
imprisonment is the equivalent of a fine equal to 60 daily rates 52 or 2<br />
49<br />
B. Nita: Skarga konstytucyjna..., p 428.<br />
50<br />
B. Nita: Skarga konstytucyjna..., p 437, p 444.<br />
51<br />
See J. Rybak: Trybunał Konstytucyjny a proces karny, Przegląd Sądowy 1992,<br />
No.10, p 30; J. Oniszczuk: Powszechnie obowiązująca wykładnia ustaw ustalana<br />
przez Trybunał Konstytucyjny, Studia i Materiały, Vol. III, Warszawa 1995, p<br />
<strong>18</strong>8; B. Nita: Trybunał Konstytucyjny..., p 226.<br />
52<br />
Daily rates are calculated on the basis of the accused’s economic situation, i.e,<br />
143<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
months of detention (art. 4 § 3 PCC). If, under the new law, the offence<br />
is no longer punishable, the punishment will be cancelled ex lege<br />
(art. 4 § 4 PCC).<br />
The change in law results in a change in the verdict handed down in the<br />
same case and against the same person. The change in verdict under this<br />
procedure should be considered permissible because it is the result of a<br />
change in legislation and works to the advantage of the convicted<br />
person.<br />
6. Further exceptions to the ne bis in idem principle in Polish criminal<br />
proceedings can be found in relation to judgments on the carrying out of<br />
sentences and other penal measures, and changes to probationary<br />
judgments.<br />
Judgments issued in connection with the carrying out of sentences and<br />
other penal measures apply to one offence committed by one and the<br />
same person. They are a continuation of the previous proceedings, and<br />
are an exception to the ne bis in idem principle. They include, in<br />
particular, judgments on the following matters: changes to the duties<br />
imposed in connection with suspended prison sentences (art. 74 § 2<br />
PCC), release on parole (art. 77 et seq. PCC), payment of a fine in<br />
instalments (art. 49 of the Polish Executive Criminal Code) and a<br />
moratorium on imprisonment (art. 150 et seq. of the Polish Executive<br />
Criminal Code).<br />
An exception to the ne bis in idem principle can be found where there<br />
has been a change in a conditional (“probationary”) judgment as a result<br />
of an unsuccessful attempt at probation, i.e., the resumption of<br />
proceedings that were suspended conditionally (art. 68 PCC), an order<br />
to carry out a suspended sentence (art. 75 PCC), and the revocation of<br />
parole (art. 81 PCC).<br />
The resumption of proceedings that were suspended conditionally<br />
salary etc.<br />
144<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
(chapter 57 of the Polish Criminal Procedure Code - ‘PCPC’), an order<br />
to carry out a suspended sentence, or the revocation of parole, leads to<br />
the imposition of the prison sentence. The fact that these issues are<br />
being considered does not mean that the previous verdicts are being<br />
questioned. These judgments merely confirm that the conditions<br />
imposed on the convicted person have not been fulfilled, and that,<br />
therefore, the consideration of criminal liability must be resumed,<br />
involving either an order to carry out a sentence or the revocation of<br />
parole.<br />
With regard to judgments that involve the application of penal sanctions<br />
of a conditional nature (conditional suspension of sentence, parole,<br />
quashing of proceedings), the PCPC and PCC deal with the principle of<br />
ne bis in idem in a relative way. This is evident by the fact that if certain<br />
new circumstances come to light, it is possible to alter the sentence<br />
resulting from this type of judgment. If new circumstances envisaged in<br />
the act come to light during the period of probation, it is permissible to<br />
impose a suspended sentence, and revoke parole and resume the<br />
proceedings that were suspended conditionally. This does not affect the<br />
legally binding nature of this type of verdict and stems directly from the<br />
provisions of law. For instance, art. 70 § 1 PCC states that the period of<br />
probation commences as of the moment the verdict assumes the force of<br />
law. 53<br />
7. Another exception to the ne bis in idem principle in Polish criminal<br />
proceedings occurs when a verdict is issued abroad. Art. 109 PCC<br />
provides that Polish criminal legislation applies to Polish citizens who<br />
have committed offences abroad. According, however, to art. 110 § 1<br />
PCC, Polish criminal legislation applies to foreigners who, while<br />
abroad, have committed offences directed against the interests of the<br />
Republic of Poland, Polish citizens, Polish natural persons or legal<br />
entities, as well as to foreigners who have committed acts of terrorism.<br />
In turn, art. 110 § 2 PCC provides that Polish criminal legislation<br />
53<br />
See Z. Doda: Rewizja nadzwyczajna w polskim procesie karnym, Warszawa<br />
1972, p. 103.<br />
145<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
applies to offences committed by foreigners abroad, other than those<br />
referred to in art. 110 § 1 PCC, if under Polish criminal legislation the<br />
offence carried a sentence of greater than 2 years’ imprisonment and the<br />
perpetrator were on the territory of the Republic of Poland and no<br />
extradition order were issued.<br />
Until recently, the principle of prosecuting Polish citizens for all<br />
offences they committed while abroad has been approved by the Polish<br />
courts and by Polish legal commentators. But nowadays, many<br />
arguments are being raised against the idea of prosecuting and<br />
punishing Polish citizens twice for offences they committed abroad. In<br />
particular, it is claimed that such double prosecution is a violation of the<br />
ne bis in idem principle. The following arguments are also cited: the<br />
high costs of such proceedings are not commensurate with their results;<br />
the fact that an offence committed abroad does not harm the legal<br />
interests of the Polish state and its citizens; and the general world trend<br />
of abandoning the principle of legalism in favour of the principle of<br />
opportunism.<br />
The ne bis in idem crimen iudicetur principle, universally accepted in<br />
developed legal systems, applies to offences committed on the territory<br />
of Poland. In relation to offences committed by Polish citizens outside<br />
the territory of Poland, this principle is not absolutely binding. Polish<br />
law permits dual proceedings for the same offence vis-à-vis the same<br />
person (art. 111 and 114 PCC). 54<br />
Such a principle of liability raises serious concerns. It is stressed that<br />
each offence committed by a Polish citizen should be the subject of only<br />
one lawfully concluded court hearing. The principle of legalism,<br />
however, imposes on the prosecutor a duty to re-open investigative<br />
proceedings; and on the court, the duty to hold a second trial in a<br />
situation where an offence committed by a Polish citizen abroad had<br />
already been tried abroad. There are doubts as to the rationality of such<br />
54<br />
W. Groszyk: Czy demokratyczne państwo stać na zasadę legalizmu,<br />
Rzeczpospolita of 12 September 2001. See also P. Sucholiński, Jeśli ukarać<br />
Polaka za granicą – to jak ?, text available on the website: Praca i nauka za<br />
granicą, www.pracainauka.pl/szuk2.php?types.<br />
146<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
a principle of dual criminal liability. The only explanation for such a<br />
regulation is the desire of the state to exercise control over offences<br />
committed by its own citizens whilst abroad. It has no justification in<br />
the generally accepted sense of justice. After all, an offence committed<br />
abroad breaches neither the interests of the Polish state as such, nor the<br />
interests of that state’s individual citizens. Instead, it harms the legal<br />
order of the country in which it was committed and the interests of its<br />
citizens. If a foreign state decides that its legal order has been seriously<br />
damaged, it will certainly decide to punish the offender. Whether or not<br />
to punish a Polish citizen (application of the principle of opportunism)<br />
is a decision best left to the appropriate authorities of the foreign state. 55<br />
People have also correctly observed that now that Poland is a member<br />
of the European Union, there is no reason for the state to continue to<br />
enjoy the “right” to try its own citizens. M. Płachta has demanded the<br />
practical realisation of the principle of aut dedere, aut poenam, i.e.,<br />
either issue a sentence, or carry it out. The realisation of this principle<br />
means the need to respect foreign court verdicts and observe the<br />
principle of ne bis in idem. 56<br />
According to art. 111 § 1 PCC, one of the conditions for liability for an<br />
offence committed abroad is that the deed also be considered an offence<br />
under the legislation of the place where it was committed. If there are<br />
differences between Polish legislation and the local legislation, the<br />
Polish court, when applying the Polish legislation, may take these<br />
differences into account, to the benefit of the perpetrator (art. 111 § 2<br />
PCC). The condition envisaged in art. 111 § 1 PCC does not apply to a<br />
Polish public official who, while serving abroad, has committed an<br />
offence during the course of his service, or to a person who has<br />
committed an offence in a place that is not subject to any state authority<br />
(art. 111 § 3 PCC).<br />
According, however, to art. 114 PCC, a verdict issued abroad is no<br />
55<br />
W. Groszyk: op. cit..<br />
56<br />
M. Płachta: Zasada aut dedere aut judicare w dziedzinie międzynarodowej<br />
wspólpracy w sprawach karnych, Palestra 2000, no. 7-8, p. 34-43.<br />
147<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
obstacle to the initiation or continuation of criminal proceedings for the<br />
same offence before a Polish court. (art. 114 § 1 PCC). With regard,<br />
therefore, to sentences issued by foreign courts, res judicata does not<br />
apply. When imposing a sentence, however, a Polish court will consider<br />
any actual periods of detention spent abroad and the punishment handed<br />
down there, taking into account the differences between these<br />
punishments (art. 114 § 2 PCC). The provision contained art. 114 § 2<br />
PCC, prevents the perpetrator from being punished twice. This rule not<br />
only permits, but also obliges, Polish courts to take into account during<br />
sentencing any sentence that has already been served abroad and any<br />
period of detention already spent there.<br />
Art. 114 § 3 PCC provides the following three exceptions to the rule<br />
whereby the verdict of a foreign court does not make a deed, to which<br />
Polish criminal legislation applies, a case of res judicata: 57<br />
1) where the sentence that was passed abroad has been<br />
accepted for implementation in the territory of the<br />
Republic of Poland 58 , and also where the sentence that<br />
was passed abroad concerns an offence in relation to<br />
which the case was transferred 59 abroad, or the<br />
57<br />
M. Kalitowski, Z. Sienkiewicz, J. Szumski, L. Tyszkiewicz, A. Wąsek: Kodeks<br />
karny. Komentarz, vol. II, Gdańsk 2001, p. 357.<br />
58<br />
See Konwencja o przekazywaniu osób skazanych na karę pozbawienia<br />
wolności w celu odbycia kary w państwie, którego są obywatelami, sprządzona w<br />
Berlinie dnia 19 maja 1978 r., Dziennik Ustaw 1980 no. 8, item 21; Konwencja o<br />
przekazywaniu osób skazanych, sprządzona w Strasburgu dnia 21 marca 1983 r.,<br />
Dziennik Ustaw 1995 no. 51, item 279; Protokół dodatkowy do konwencji o<br />
przekazywaniu osób skazanych, sprządzony w Strasburgu dnia <strong>18</strong> grudnia 1997<br />
r., Dziennik Ustaw 2000 no. 43, item 490; M. Płachta: Przekazywanie skazanych<br />
pomiędzy państwami w celu wykonania kary, Prokuratura i Prawo 1997 no.3, p.<br />
21-33.<br />
59<br />
See F. Rafałowski: Ekstradycja a przejęcie ścigania, Problemy<br />
Praworządności 1973, no. 10, p. 12; L. Gardocki: Przejęcie (przekazanie)<br />
ścigania, Studia Prawnicze 1977, no. 53, p. <strong>18</strong>5 et seq.; J. Zientek: Przekazanie i<br />
przejęcie ścigania a stadium procesu, Prokuratura i Prawo 1997, no. 3, p. 34; E.<br />
Janczur: Przejęcie i przekazanie ścigania karnego, Prokuratura i Prawo 1999,<br />
148<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
perpetrator was extradited from the territory of the<br />
Republic of Poland, 60<br />
2) to judgments of international criminal tribunals acting on<br />
the basis of international law binding the Republic of<br />
Poland,<br />
3) to foreign court judgments, where this has been provided<br />
for under an international agreement to which the<br />
Republic of Poland is party.<br />
8. According to art. 597 PCPC, if, when extraditing an offender to<br />
Poland, the foreign country stipulates that the sentences imposed on him<br />
must be carried out only for the offences for which extradition was<br />
granted, the adjudicating court may, if necessary, revise the verdict in<br />
such a way that sentence will be carried out only for those offences for<br />
which the perpetrator was extradited. Thus, art. 597 PCPC is yet another<br />
exception to the substantive force of law.<br />
9. Art. 17 § 1 sub. 7 PCPC, which prohibits the initiation of fresh<br />
criminal proceedings if criminal proceedings vis-à-vis the same deed by<br />
the same person have already been concluded, is not an obstacle to the<br />
initiation of supplementary proceedings, provided that this is legally<br />
permissible.<br />
Supplementary proceedings occur when, after the end of a trial, separate<br />
no. 5, p. 61.<br />
60<br />
See: Europejska konwencja o ekstradycji sporządzona w Paryżu dnia 13<br />
grudnia 1957 r., Protokół dodatkowy do powyższej konwencji sporządzony w<br />
Strasburgu dnia 15 października 1975 r., i Drugi protokół dodatkowy do<br />
powyższej konwencji sporządzony s Strasburgu dnia 17 marca 1978 r., Dziennik<br />
Ustaw 1994, no. 70, item 307; M. Lipczyńska, A. Kordzik, Z. Kegel, Z. Świda-<br />
Łagiewska: Polski proces karny, Warszawa - Wrocław 1975, p. 69; L. Gradocki:<br />
Podwójna przestępczość czynu zabronionego w prawie ekstradycyjnym [w:]<br />
Problemy nauk penalnych. Prace ofiarowane Profesor Oktawii Górniok, L.<br />
Tyszkiewicz ed., Katowice 1996, p. 69-70.<br />
149<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
proceedings are held in order to resolve an issue that was not resolved<br />
during the original proceedings, whether through oversight or through<br />
the emergence of certain circumstances after the sentence has been<br />
passed. It is never the intention of supplementary proceedings to<br />
invalidate the binding force of the original verdict. Some supplementary<br />
proceedings can only be held after the lawful conclusion of the previous<br />
proceedings.<br />
Supplementary proceedings can cover the following matters: forfeiture<br />
of property; the counting of custody or detention towards a prison<br />
sentence; preventative measures involving the suspension of an accused<br />
person from his official duties or from exercising his profession, a ban<br />
on specific activity or on driving certain types of vehicle; and matters<br />
involving additional material evidence (art. 420 § 1 PCPC). 61 In other<br />
cases, supplementary proceedings or changes made to the verdicts of<br />
lawfully concluded proceedings are permissible only through cassation<br />
or through reopening proceedings. A supplementary verdict is issued in<br />
a case involving the same deed, committed by the same person vis-à-vis<br />
whom the original proceedings have already been concluded. In the<br />
narrow sense of idem, i.e., that it applies only to questions regarding the<br />
legal liability of the accused, the issuing of such supplementary verdicts<br />
is not an exception to the ne bis in idem principle. 62 The ne bis in idem<br />
prohibition concerns not only an accused person’s responsibility for the<br />
deed he has committed, but also other decisions connected with his<br />
criminal responsibility, e.g., the counting of custody towards a sentence.<br />
In this sense, supplementary proceedings are an exception to the ne bis<br />
in idem prohibition.<br />
10. The next exception is connected with art. 126 PCPC, which states<br />
that if a final deadline has not been met for reasons beyond a party’s<br />
control, the party may, within 7 days of the date on which it has notice<br />
of the above reasons, apply for a new deadline, at the same time<br />
performing the action that should have been performed by the original<br />
deadline. The decision to set the new deadline is taken by the authority<br />
for whom the action was to have been performed. Any refusal to fix the<br />
61<br />
See: M. Cieślak: op. cit., p. 72; W. Daszkiewicz: op. cit., p. 141.<br />
62<br />
P. Hofmański, E. Sadzik, K. Zgryzek: op. cit., p. 131.<br />
150<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
new deadline may be appealed. Thus, the status of the res iudicata is no<br />
obstacle to the extension of the deadline.<br />
11. According to art. 105 § 1 PCPC, evident typographical errors and<br />
mistakes in accounting or in the calculation of time periods in a verdict<br />
or order may be corrected at any time. 63 The correction is made by the<br />
authority that made the mistake. If proceedings are taking place before<br />
an appeal body, that body may correct the verdict of the first instance<br />
body ex officio (art. 105 § 2 PCPC). The correction of a verdict or of a<br />
statement of reasons thereto is made by way of a decision, and a<br />
correction to decrees is made by way of a decree. Though often a mere<br />
formality, such action constitutes interference with a verdict that marks<br />
the conclusion of proceedings, and is an exception to the ne bis in idem<br />
prohibition.<br />
12. A decision on the granting of amnesty should also be regarded an<br />
exception to the ne bis in idem prohibition because it involves the<br />
reopening of proceedings in the same case and against the same person<br />
(art. 560 et seq. PCPC). There are, however, serious doubts as to<br />
whether idem exists fully in such a case, because circumstances that<br />
change with the passing of time, and especially the actual carrying out<br />
of a sentence, create new factors that may be considered as affecting the<br />
substantive basis of an indictment, and the subject of the proceedings. 64<br />
The substantive basis for a pardon is set forth in art. 139 of the Polish<br />
Constitution, which states that the President of the Republic of Poland<br />
has the power to grant pardons. For a pardon to be granted there must<br />
have been a verdict that has the force of law. A pardon is granted by a<br />
body of executive authority, whose decision changes the verdict of the<br />
judicial body, which was reached on the basis of binding principles of<br />
law, despite, the absence of a statutory basis on which to question the<br />
63 M. Cieślak: op. cit., p. 371-372.<br />
64 Ibidem, p. 375.<br />
151<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
correctness of that verdict 65<br />
Neither the Constitution nor any other legal instrument regulates the<br />
actions of the President when considering motions or settling issues ex<br />
officio. The President is not bound by any formal restrictions. 66 The<br />
scope of a pardon remains at his discretion. A sentence may be repealed<br />
in full, or it may be commuted. The carrying out of a sentence already<br />
handed down, or remaining to be carried out may also be suspended. 67<br />
A pardon may not be identified with legal remedies, for it does not alter<br />
the convicted person’s guilt or the legal qualification of his offence. The<br />
main purpose of a pardon is to correct a lawful verdict in that part of it<br />
that concerns the sentence and the remedies at law. 68<br />
13. The purpose of an amnesty is to alleviate or eliminate the effects of<br />
a lawful sentence, by altering it. Thus, an amnesty is another exception<br />
to the ne bis in idem prohibition.<br />
Ne bis in idem applies when a verdict is issued after a case has been<br />
considered on the basis of the regulations governing an amnesty. In such<br />
a case, apart from extraordinary remedies at law, the reopening of<br />
proceedings is prohibited, even if the court mistakenly failed to apply<br />
the regulations that govern an amnesty.<br />
14. The Act of 23 February 1991, on the Invalidity of Judicial Decisions<br />
in Respect of Persons Repressed for Activities Aiding the Independence<br />
65<br />
J. Grajewski: Przebieg procesu karnego, Warszawa 2001, p. 346.<br />
66<br />
E. Samborski: Zarys metodyki pracy sędziego w sprawach karnych, Warszawa<br />
2002, p.. 460-461.<br />
67<br />
J. Grajewski: op. cit., p. 346, 349. See also A. Murzynowski: Ułaskawienie w<br />
Polsce Ludowej, Warszawa 1965, p. 163; T. Grzegorczyk: Kodeks postępowania<br />
karnego. Komentarz, Zakamycze 1998, p. 1303; A. Bulsiewicz, M. Jeż-<br />
Ludwichowska, D. Kala, D. Osowska: Przebieg postępowania karnego, Toruń<br />
1999, p. 279.<br />
68<br />
A. Bulsiewicz, M. Jeż-Ludwichowska, D. Kala, D. Osowska: op. cit., p.. 280.<br />
152<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
of the Polish Nation, is in force in Poland. 69 It contains regulations on<br />
proceedings to annul verdicts and to award eligible persons with<br />
compensation for the harm they suffered as a result of a sentence that<br />
has been declared null and void. In the matters covered by this Act, the<br />
legislator has restored the institution of the invalidity of penal verdicts<br />
ex lege, something that was absent from the 1969 Polish Code of<br />
Criminal procedure. Verdicts are void ex tunc, and the role of the<br />
criminal court is merely to state that they are void. 70 All verdicts issued<br />
by Polish law enforcement bodies and judicial authorities, or by nonjudicial<br />
bodies, during the period between the commencement of their<br />
activities on the Polish territory as of 1 January 1944 to 31 December<br />
1956, have been rendered void, if the deed for which they were issued<br />
was connected with activity furthering the existence of an independent<br />
Polish State, or if the verdict was issued on account of such activity or<br />
on account of resistance to the collectivisation of farms, and also if the<br />
deed was committed in order to save oneself and others from repression<br />
for conducting such activity (art. 1 sub. 1 and 2 of this law). Also<br />
considered void are verdicts issued after 31 December 1956, if they<br />
pertained to deeds or actions that occurred during the period 1 January<br />
1944 to 31 December 1956 (art. 1 sub. 4 of the act). The same applies to<br />
verdicts issued by the Polish Armed Forces in the USSR, which were<br />
not under the authority of the Government of Poland, regardless of the<br />
date and place of their issue (art. 14 of the act). 71<br />
69<br />
Dziennik Ustaw 1991 no. 34, item 149, as amended.<br />
70<br />
A. Bulsiewicz, M. Jeż-Ludwichowska, D. Kala, D. Osowska: op. cit., p. 303-<br />
304. See also A. Czarnota, P. Hofmański: Prawo, historia i sprawiedliwość (in:)<br />
Aktualne problemy prawa karnego i kryminologii, Białystok 1998, p. 142, 147.<br />
71<br />
See also the Supreme Court resolution of 22 September 1994, I KZP 22/94,<br />
OSNKW 1994, no. 9-10, item 59; B. Bladowski: Glosa do uchwały Sądu<br />
Najwyższego z dnia 22 września 1994 r., I KZP 22/94, Orzecznictwo Sądów<br />
Polskich 1995, no. 7-8, item 169; S. Zabłocki: Przegląd orzecznictwa Sądu<br />
Najwyższego i Sądów Apelacyjnych do ustawy z 23 lutego 1991 r. o uznaniu za<br />
nieważne orzeczeń wydanych wobec osób represjonowanych za działalność na<br />
recz niepodległego bytu Państwa Polskiego (Dz. U. Nr 34, poz. 149 z późn. zm.),<br />
Palestra 1995, no. 11-12, p. 197; T. Grzegorczyk, J. Tylman: Polskie<br />
postępowanie karne, Warszawa <strong>2005</strong>, p. 869.<br />
153<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
According to art. 4 of this Act, determination that a verdict was invalid<br />
is not prevented by the carrying out of the sentence, the granting of<br />
amnesty, removal of the sentence from the records, a pardon, limitation,<br />
compensation, the death of the oppressed person to whom the verdict<br />
applied, a suspension or quashing of proceedings for reasons other than<br />
the fact that the deed was not committed, or if the deed does not bear the<br />
hallmarks of a crime, or if according to law it is held that the perpetrator<br />
did not commit the crime. In these last three cases, the court will not<br />
consider a motion to determine the invalidity of the verdict if the<br />
convicted person was acquitted for these reasons or if the proceedings<br />
were discontinued (art. 7 sub. 1 of the law). Thus, the seriousness of the<br />
res iudicata is no obstacle to the issuing of a decision in proceedings to<br />
declare a verdict void. The institution of the invalidity of verdicts,<br />
envisaged in the Act on the Invalidity of Judicial Decisions in Respect<br />
of Persons Repressed for Activities Aiding the Independence of the<br />
Polish Nation, constitutes an exception to the ne bis in idem principle.<br />
This raises no doubts where the verdict was issued by a court, but<br />
certain doubts may arise where the verdict was issued by a non-judicial<br />
authority. One should, however, realise that although these state<br />
authorities were neither law-enforcement bodies nor judicial authorities,<br />
they were nevertheless empowered under the regulations then in force to<br />
pass judgment on matters that were considered to be offences. If you<br />
accept that the ne bis in idem principle is meant to protect a particular<br />
person from the re-opening of proceedings in the same case against him,<br />
then the re-opening of proceedings that were not considered by a court<br />
of law but by another, non-judicial body, must therefore, be considered<br />
a departure from this principle. In this respect, the type of body that<br />
issued judgments in matters that were considered to be offences, is of<br />
secondary importance. The most important thing is that proceedings will<br />
be re-opened in the same case and against the same person.<br />
A court determines that a verdict is void if it determines the existence of<br />
the prerequisites set forth in art. 1 and 14 of the 1991 act. The<br />
determination of the invalidity of a verdict is deemed to be synonymous<br />
with the acquittal of the convicted person (art. 2 sub. 1 sentence two of<br />
154<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
the act). 72 Although the proceedings to determine the invalidity of a<br />
verdict is a departure from the ne bis in idem prohibition, this departure<br />
is, therefore, in the interests of the person who was convicted earlier.<br />
The ne bis in idem prohibition is meant to protect a person whose case<br />
has already been lawfully judged, from the re-opening of proceedings.<br />
This ban applies to cases where the accused was found innocent, as well<br />
as cases where he was found guilty. In the case of proceedings taking<br />
place on the basis of the provisions of the Act on the Invalidity of<br />
Judicial Decisions in Respect of Persons Repressed for Activities<br />
Aiding the Independence of the Polish Nation, such proceedings are<br />
initiated at the request of the person concerned, in other words, he alone<br />
decides whether proceedings in his case are to re-opened, the purpose of<br />
which is to verify judgments he considers unfair. Although proceedings<br />
to determine the invalidity of a judgment is a departure from the ne bis<br />
in idem prohibition, this exception can, therefore, hardly be considered a<br />
breach of the rights of the person whose case has already been judged.<br />
The opposite is true.<br />
Once a judgment regarding the invalidity of a verdict under the terms of<br />
the Act of 1991 has assumed the force of law, it is not possible to take<br />
any action to acquit the convicted person or annul the proceedings,<br />
whatever the justification for doing so, because the verdict that could be<br />
subjected to court control by way of extraordinary measures at law, will<br />
have ceased to exist. 73<br />
72<br />
Ibidem, p. 871-872.<br />
73<br />
Ibidem, p. 872. See also Supreme Court verdict of 29 March 1994, WO 37/94,<br />
OSNKW 1994, no. 7-8, item 51.<br />
155<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />
THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>
<strong>FREE</strong> WORLD PUBLISHING Inc.<br />
HTTP://WWW.FWPUBLISHING.NET<br />
CALL FOR ARTICLES<br />
Free World Publishing is calling for articles by<br />
Academics, Practitioners and Post-Graduate<br />
Students to be published in its new journals :<br />
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9877)<br />
WAR & PEACE <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9885)<br />
WORLD HISTORY <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9893)<br />
Articles are welcomed in : English, French, Bosnian,<br />
Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Finnish, German, Greek,<br />
Hungarian, Icelandic, Innuktikut, Italian, Latin,<br />
Polish, Portugese, Romanian, Russian, Serb,<br />
Slovenian as well as Spanish.<br />
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : pertains all legal subjects,<br />
whether from a national, comparative or<br />
international perspective and including Canon Law,<br />
International Law, Islamic Law or social and<br />
historical perspective of laws' impacts on societies.<br />
WAR & PEACE <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : pertains to all issues<br />
ranging from conflict prevention to nation-building;<br />
including political sciences and diplomacy, nationbuilding,<br />
defense policies, strategies, operations,<br />
tactics, logistics, intelligence, peacekeeping,<br />
peacemaking, leadership, psychology of combat,<br />
technological developments and counter-terrorism;<br />
and finally Military Historical studies, relating to the<br />
conduct of operations, their causes and effects, the<br />
avoidance of conflict, leadership and personalities.<br />
WORLD HISTORY <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : pertains to the whole<br />
spectrum of human development, whether from<br />
local, regional or global perspectives, including<br />
history from all periods, paleontology, anthropology,<br />
linguistics, letters and languages, arts as well as<br />
sociological perspectives.<br />
For details, please consult the respective page of<br />
each journal and its submissions guidelines from<br />
http://www.FWPublishing.net or contact the editorin-chief<br />
at FWP@FWPublishing.net .<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Louis-Philippe F. Rouillard<br />
Editor-in-Chief, Free World Publishing Inc.<br />
APPEL POUR ARTICLES<br />
Free World Publishing accepte les articles<br />
d’académiciens, praticiens et d’étudiants supérieurs<br />
à être publier dans ses nouveaux journeaux :<br />
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9877)<br />
WAR & PEACE <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9885)<br />
WORLD HISTORY <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9893)<br />
Les articles sont bienvenus en : Français, Anglais,<br />
Allemand, Bosniaque, Bulgare, Croate, Espagnol,<br />
Finlandais, Grecque, Hongrois, Islandais, Innuktikut,<br />
Italien, Latin, Polonais, Portugais, Roumain, Russe,<br />
Serbe, Slovène et Tchèque.<br />
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : porte sur tous les sujets<br />
juridiques de perspectives nationale, comparative ou<br />
internationale, incluant les droits canonique,<br />
international, islamique, et les perspectives sociales<br />
et historiques de l’impact des lois sur les sociétés.<br />
WAR & PEACE <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : porte sur le spectre de la<br />
prévention de conflit jusqu’à la reconstruction<br />
d’État, incluant : sciences politiques, diplomacie,<br />
politique de défense, stratégie, operation, tactiques,<br />
logistique, renseignement, maintien et imposition de<br />
la paix, art du commandement, psychologie du<br />
combat, avancées technologiques et contreterrorisme,<br />
l’histoire militaire étudiant la conduite<br />
des opérations, l’évitement des conflits, leurs<br />
causes et effets, les commandants et personalités.<br />
WORLD HISTORY <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : porte sur l’ensemble<br />
du spectre du développement humain, d’une<br />
perspective locale, régionale ou globale, incluant :<br />
histoire de toutes les périodes, paleontologie,<br />
anthropologie, linguistiques, lettres et langages, les<br />
arts de même que les perspectives sociologiques.<br />
Pour les détails, consulter la page respective de<br />
chaque journal et ses critères de soumissions de<br />
http://www.FWPublishing.net ou contactez l’éditeur-<br />
chef à FWP@FWPublishing.net .<br />
Sincèrement,<br />
Louis-Philippe F. Rouillard<br />
Éditeur-chef, Free World Publishing Inc.
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
NE BIS IN IDEM IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE<br />
ACT IN THE UNITED KINGDOM<br />
BY DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI<br />
1. In Anglo-Saxon legal theory, the ne bis in idem prohibition is<br />
described as a “rule against double jeopardy”. This prohibition is as old<br />
as the common law itself. In 12 th Century England, during the<br />
controversy between Henry II and Archbishop Thomas Becket over<br />
Church independence, this principle was exploited in the defence of the<br />
independence of ecclesiastical courts. An official accused of murder<br />
was tried by an ecclesiastical court. In order to exclude the jurisdiction<br />
of the Royal court, the principle of ne bis in idipsum, then in force in<br />
ecclesiastical courts, was invoked: “no one may be punished twice for<br />
the same offence”. 1 During a later period, a principle was observed in<br />
practice according to which it was impermissible to conduct several<br />
proceedings in the same case. In 1660, the Court of the King’s Bench in<br />
England forbade the conduct of two proceedings in the same case. 2<br />
In Ireland the double jeopardy concept is often recognisable in the<br />
language of anglicised Norman French (i. e. autrefois acquit and<br />
convict) whereas in most of the Code nations is it expressed in the Latin<br />
maxim of non bis in idem. 3<br />
The principle of double jeopardy is to be found in the Fifth Amendment<br />
of the United States Constitution and provides that no person shall “be<br />
subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb”.<br />
The Fifth Amendment has been held to consist of three separate<br />
guarantees, namely: autrefois acquit, autrefois convict and protection<br />
against multiple punishment for the same offence. In addition to the<br />
United States, the German, Canadian, Indian and South African<br />
1<br />
M. L. Friedland: Double Jeopardy, Oxford 1969, p 5.<br />
2<br />
P. A. McDermott: Res Judicata and Double Jeopardy, Butterworths 1999, p<br />
200.<br />
3<br />
P. A. McDermott: op. cit., p 201.<br />
157<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - NE BIS IN IDEM IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT<br />
IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
constitutions also embody this principle. Article 35(3)(m) of the<br />
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa provides that a person is<br />
“not to be tried for an offence in respect of an act or omission for which<br />
that person has previously been either acquitted or convicted”. 4<br />
2. The principle of ne bis in idem guarantees the accused that he will not<br />
be held criminally responsible for an act which has already been<br />
adjudged. This is a right of the perpetrator of a punishable act, who can<br />
then demand that proceedings not be instituted against him, or where<br />
proceedings have already commenced, that they be discontinued, if<br />
criminal proceedings against him in the same case have already<br />
terminated with a valid judgement.<br />
It is generally accepted that the principle of ne bis in idem serves<br />
foremost to protect those who have been judged, whether convicted or<br />
acquitted. This principle also means that proceedings may not be<br />
conducted with the aim of acquittal or mitigating the penalty for a<br />
person who has received a legally valid sentence. 5 However, it should<br />
be noted that the ne bis in idem prohibition may in certain circumstances<br />
prevent the accused from demonstrating his innocence. 6 Therefore, one<br />
should note that under modern criminal procedures the binding principle<br />
of presumption of innocence stands until the court pronounces the<br />
accused guilty in a legally valid judgment. The accused is presumed<br />
innocent until his guilt is determined in a legally valid verdict, which<br />
puts into effect the ne bis in idem prohibition. Errors committed by the<br />
court that lead to the sentencing of an innocent person should not be<br />
rectified by infringing this principle. Furthermore, legal systems have<br />
measures allowing even those verdicts which are legally valid to be<br />
overturned.<br />
4 P. A. McDermott: op. cit., pp 198, 201.<br />
5 G. Grünwald: Die materielle Rechtskraft im Strafverfahren der Bundesrepublik<br />
Deutschland (in:) H. H. Jescheck (red.): Deutsche strafrechtliche Landesreferate<br />
zum IX Internationallen Kongreβ für Rechtsvergleichung, Teheran 1974, Berlin-<br />
New York 1974, p 97.<br />
6 M. L. Friedland: op. cit., p 4.<br />
158<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - NE BIS IN IDEM IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT<br />
IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
3. In the United Kingdom, as a consequence of criticism of the<br />
prevailing solutions in the area of double jeopardy, the relevant<br />
provisions of the Criminal Justice Act were fundamentally amended.<br />
The critics of the previous provisions indicated that it was necessary to<br />
ensure greater rights for the victims of crime and to provide the<br />
possibility for the prosecutor to reopen proceedings, under specific<br />
conditions, in case of serious offences. A specific circumstance that<br />
would allow the reopening of proceedings is the disclosure of new,<br />
important evidence after the accused has been acquitted of a serious<br />
offence. 7<br />
The new Criminal Justice Act came into force on 20 November 2003.<br />
Of significance from the point of view of double jeopardy are the<br />
provisions of Part 10 of the Criminal Justice Act (the “CJA”) entitled<br />
Retrial for Serious Offences. Art. 75 of the CJA specifies cases that can<br />
be the subject to reopened proceedings. According to Art. 75 (1) CJA:<br />
“This Part applies where a person has been acquitted of a qualifying<br />
offence in proceedings-<br />
(a) on indictment in England and Wales,<br />
(b) on appeal against a conviction, verdict or finding in proceedings<br />
on indictment in England and Wales, or<br />
(c) on appeal from a decision on such an appeal.”<br />
According to Art. 75 (2) CJA, “A person acquitted of an offence in<br />
proceedings mentioned in Subsection (1) is treated for the purposes of<br />
that Subsection as also acquitted of any qualifying offence of which he<br />
could have been convicted in the proceedings because of the firstmentioned<br />
offence being charged in the indictment, except an offence-<br />
(a) of which he has been convicted,<br />
(b) of which he has been found not guilty by reason of insanity, or<br />
(c) in respect of which, in proceedings where he has been found<br />
to be under a disability (as defined by Section 4 of the Criminal<br />
Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964 (c. 84)), a finding has been<br />
7<br />
The Criminal Justice Bill: Double jeopardy and prosecution appeals. Bill 8 of<br />
2002-3, Home Affair Section, House of Commons Library, Research Paper<br />
02/74, p6, pp 19-42.<br />
159<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - NE BIS IN IDEM IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT<br />
IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
made that he committed the act or made the omission charged<br />
against him.”<br />
According to Art. 75 (4) CJA, “This Part also applies where a person<br />
has been acquitted, in proceedings elsewhere than in the United<br />
Kingdom, of an offence under the law of the place where the<br />
proceedings were held, if the commission of the offence as alleged<br />
would have amounted to or included the commission (in the United<br />
Kingdom or elsewhere) of a qualifying offence”. “Conduct punishable<br />
under the law in force elsewhere than in the United Kingdom is an<br />
offence under that law for the purposes of Subsection (4), however it is<br />
described in that law” (Art. 75 (5) CJA).<br />
Part 10 CJA applies whether the acquittal happened before or after the<br />
passing of this Act (Art. 75 (6) CJA). In Part 10 CJA, a "qualifying<br />
offence" means an offence listed in Part 1 of Schedule 5 (Art. 75 (8)<br />
CJA). Schedule 5 lists 29 offences: murder, attempted murder, soliciting<br />
murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, rape, attempted rape, intercourse<br />
with a girl under thirteen, incest by a man with a girl under thirteen,<br />
assault by penetration, rape of a child under thirteen, attempted rape of a<br />
child under thirteen, assault of a child under thirteen by penetration,<br />
causing a child under thirteen to engage in sexual activity, sexual<br />
activity with a person with a mental disorder impeding choice, causing a<br />
person with a mental disorder impeding choice to engage in sexual<br />
activity, unlawful importation of Class A drug, unlawful exportation of<br />
Class A drug, fraudulent evasion in respect of Class A drug, producing<br />
or being concerned in production of Class A drug, arson endangering<br />
life, causing explosion likely to endanger life or property, intent or<br />
conspiracy to cause explosion likely to endanger life or property,<br />
genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, grave breaches of<br />
the Geneva Conventions, directing terrorist organization, hostagetaking,<br />
conspiracy.<br />
(a) To reopen proceedings, an application must be filed with the<br />
Court of Appeal. ”A prosecutor may apply to the Court of<br />
Appeal for an order- quashing a person's acquittal in<br />
proceedings within Section 75(1), and<br />
160<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - NE BIS IN IDEM IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT<br />
IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
(b) ordering him to be retried for the qualifying offence” (Art. 76<br />
(1) CJA).<br />
“A prosecutor may apply to the Court of Appeal, in the case of a person<br />
acquitted elsewhere than in the United Kingdom, for-<br />
(a) a determination whether the acquittal is a bar to the person<br />
being tried in England and Wales for the qualifying offence,<br />
and<br />
(b) if it is, an order that the acquittal is not to be a bar” (Art. 76 (2)<br />
CJA).<br />
“A prosecutor may make an application under Subsection (1) or (2) only<br />
with the written consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions” (Art. 76<br />
(3) CJA).<br />
“The Director of Public Prosecutions may give his consent only if<br />
satisfied that-<br />
(a) there is evidence as respects which the requirements of Section<br />
78 appear to be met,<br />
(b) it is in the public interest for the application to proceed, and<br />
(c) any trial pursuant to an order on the application would not be<br />
inconsistent with obligations of the United Kingdom under<br />
Article 31 or 34 of the Treaty on European Union relating to the<br />
principle of ne bis in idem” (Art. 76 (4) CJA).<br />
“On an application under Section 76(1), the Court of Appeal-<br />
(a) if satisfied that the requirements of Sections 78 and 79 are met,<br />
must make the order applied for;<br />
(b) otherwise, must dismiss the application” (Art. 77 (1) CJA).<br />
“Where the Court of Appeal determines that the acquittal is a bar to the<br />
person being tried for the qualifying offence, the court-<br />
(a) if satisfied that the requirements of Sections 78 and 79 are met,<br />
must make the order applied for;<br />
(b) otherwise, must make a declaration to the effect that the<br />
acquittal is a bar to the person being tried for the offence” (Art.<br />
77 (3) CJA).<br />
161<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - NE BIS IN IDEM IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT<br />
IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Provisions of Sections 78 and 79 CJA concern new and compelling<br />
evidence and interests of justice. Evidence is new if it was not adduced<br />
in the proceedings in which the person was acquitted (nor, if those were<br />
appeal proceedings, in earlier proceedings to which the appeal related)<br />
(Art. 78 (2) CJA).<br />
“Evidence is compelling if-<br />
(a) it is reliable,<br />
(b) it is substantial, and<br />
(c) in the context of the outstanding issues, it appears highly<br />
probative of the case against the acquitted person” (Art. 78 (3)<br />
CJA).<br />
The requirements of interests of justice are met if in all the<br />
circumstances it is in the interests of justice for the court to make the<br />
order under Section 77 (Art. 79 (1) CJA).<br />
“That question is to be determined having regard in particular to-<br />
(a) whether existing circumstances make a fair trial unlikely;<br />
(b) for the purposes of that question and otherwise, the length of<br />
time since the qualifying offence was allegedly committed;<br />
(c) whether it is likely that the new evidence would have been<br />
adduced in the earlier proceedings against the acquitted person<br />
but for a failure by an officer or by a prosecutor to act with due<br />
diligence or expedition;<br />
(d) whether, since those proceedings or, if later, since the<br />
commencement of this Part, any officer or prosecutor has failed<br />
to act with due diligence or expedition” (Art. 79 (2) CJA).<br />
162<br />
DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - NE BIS IN IDEM IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT<br />
IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG<br />
NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR ٭<br />
I. Allgemeines<br />
Das geltende türkische Vormundschaftsrecht sieht wie schweizerisches<br />
Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB) und Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB) vier Arten<br />
vormundschaftlicher Institutionen vor: Vormund-, Beistand-,<br />
Beiratschaft und fürsorgerische Freiheitsentziehung (FFE) 1 .<br />
In der Türkei sind die neuen Bestimmungen über die fürsorgerische<br />
Freiheitsentziehung (in Art. 432 ff. als neuer, im sechster Abschnitt,<br />
zehnter Titel, dritter Abteilung, zweiter Teil des tZGB) schon am 1.<br />
Januar 2002 in Kraft getreten.<br />
Mit dem neuen türkischen Zivilgesetzbuch (Art. 432–437 tZGB) wurde<br />
die vormundschaftliche fürsorgerische Freiheitsentziehung (FFE) in<br />
aller Ausführlichkeit geregelt. Diese Bestimmungen enthalten die<br />
Voraussetzungen bezüglich der betroffenen Person (der persönliche<br />
Geltungsbereich) und den Einweisungsvoraussetzungen eingeteilt. Die<br />
Einweisungsvoraussetzungen i.e.w. umfassen die einzelnen<br />
Schwächezustände, die Fürsorgebedürftigkeit, die Belastung für die<br />
Umgebung sowie die geeignete Anstalt.<br />
٭<br />
Dozent am Lehrstuhl des Zivilrechts, Juristische Fakultät und Rechtspflege-<br />
Hochschule der Universität Ankara.<br />
1<br />
Spirig, E.: Die allgemeine Ordnung der Vormundschaft, Die fürsorgerische<br />
Freiheitsentziehung Art. 397a– 397f (in: Peter Gauch/Jörg Schmid, Das<br />
Familienrecht, Teilband II 3a), Zürich 1995, Vorbem. N. 25, 10 ff.; Riemer, Hans<br />
M., Grundriss des Vormundschaftsrechts, Zweite, überarbeitete Auflage, Bern<br />
1997, Rdn. 12, 38 ff. und gesondert siehe für Spezialliteraturverzeichnis:<br />
Riemer,15 ff.; Spirig, S. XIII ff.<br />
163<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Im türkischen Zivilgesetzbuch werden zivilrechtliche und<br />
zivilprozessuale spezifische Regeln über die FFE vorgesehen 2 . Art. 432<br />
des türkischen Zivilgesetzbuches regelt die materiellen<br />
Voraussetzungen einer Anstaltseinweisung aus fürsorgerischen Gründen<br />
bei Mündigen und Entmündigten. Das neue türkische Zivilgesetzbuch<br />
enthält aber auch ausführliche Regeln über die FFE für Kinder (Art. 446<br />
tZGB) 3 . Demnach kann ein Kind, der unter Vormundschaft steht, selbst<br />
gerichtliche Beurteilung verlangen (Art. 446 Abs. 3 tZGB). Für die<br />
Kinder, die unter elterlicher Gewalt stehen sind, eine solche<br />
Bestimmung im Gesetz nicht vorgesehen. Man kann aber Art. 446 Abs.<br />
3 auch für die unter elterliche Gewalt stehende Kinder anolog<br />
anwenden. Allerdings muss dieses Kind mindestens 16 Jahre alt sein<br />
(Art. 446 Abs. 3 tZGB), um selbst gerichtliche Beurteilung verlangen zu<br />
können. Auch hier muss für die Einweisung eine Gefährdung des<br />
Kindes vorliegen (vgl. Art. 347 Abs. 1; Art. 432 tZGB). Ferner gelten<br />
sowohl für die Entziehungsgründe und Einweisungsoraussetzungen als<br />
auch verfahrensrechtlichen Sicherheiten gleiche Regelungen wie für<br />
2<br />
für die Ausführliche zu diesen Bestimmungen siehe: Dural, M. / Öğüz, T./<br />
Gümüş, A., Türk Özel Hukuku, C.III, Aile Hukuku, (Das türkische Privatrecht,<br />
Bd. III, Das Familienrecht), İstanbul <strong>2005</strong>, 679 ff. ; Öztan, B., Aile Hukuku, 5.<br />
Bası (Das Familienrecht, fünfte Aufl.), Ankara 2004, 805 ff.; Kılıçoğlu, A.. M.,<br />
Medeni Kanun’umuzun Aile-Miras-Eşya Hukukuna Getirdiği Yenilikler,<br />
Genişletilmiş 2. Bası (Die Neuerungen des neuen türkischen Zivilgesetzbuches<br />
bezüglich Familien-, Erb- und Sachrecht, Zweite, erweiterte Aufl.) Ankara 2004,<br />
160 ff. ; Gümüş, M. A., Kısıtlı ve Kısıtlı Olmayan Ergin Kişilerin Koruma Amaçlı<br />
Özgürlüğünün Kısıtlanması, Yeditepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi I/2,<br />
Cilt:1, Sayı:2 Yıl: <strong>2005</strong>, <strong>18</strong>9–228 (Die fürsorgerische Freiheitsentziehung der<br />
entmündigten- und nichtentmündigten Mündige Personen trZGB 432-437, in:<br />
Zeitschrift der Juristische Fakultät der Yeditepe Universität, I/2, <strong>2005</strong>, S. <strong>18</strong>9-<br />
228); Gençcan, Ömer U., Koruma Amacıyla Kısıtlama Davaları, Adalet Dergisi<br />
Y. 93, Temmuz 2002, 41 vd. (Die Rechtsstreite der fürsorgerischen<br />
Freiheitsentziehung, Zeitschrift der Justiz, J. 93, Juli 2002,. 41–42); Gençcan,<br />
Ömer U., 4721 Sayılı Türk Medeni Kanunu, Bilimsel Açıklama- İçtihatlar-İlgili<br />
Mevzuat, 2. Cilt: Madde 352–1030 (mit der Nummer 4721 des türkischen<br />
Zivilgesetzbuches, Die wissenschaftliche Ausführung- Jurisprudenz- betreffende<br />
Gesetzgebung, Bd. 2, Art. 352-1030), Ankara 2004, <strong>18</strong>41 ff.<br />
3<br />
mit schweizerischem Zivilgesetzbuch vgl.: Art. 405a ZGB<br />
164<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Mündige und Entmündigte 4 .<br />
In den Bestimmungen zur FFE handelt es sich um einen schweren<br />
Eingriff in die persönliche Freiheit und von diesem Standpunkt aus<br />
gesehen gilt die FFE als eine umfassende vormundschaftliche<br />
Maßnahme.<br />
Im türkischen Recht steht FFE auch mit dem Verfassungsrecht in<br />
Verbindung. In dieser Hinsicht impliziert das türkische Grundgesetz<br />
einen wichtigen Artikel (Art. 19 tGG) über die FFE. Nach Art. 19 Abs.<br />
3 kann man sich der individuellen Freiheit entziehen. Der türkische<br />
Grundgesetzesgeber bestimmt in Art.19 Abs. 3 des tGG 5 , dass in<br />
gesetzlichen Ausnahmesituationen die Freiheitsentziehung beschränkt<br />
werden kann. Ohne weiteres gehört FFE zu diesen Ausnahmefällen<br />
auch. Dennoch ist FFE kein Ordnungsinstrument, sondern ein<br />
persönliches fürsorgliches Instrument. Also wird die<br />
4 für ausführliche Erläuterungen zu diesem Thema siehe: Lustenberger, Markus,<br />
Die Fürsorgerische Freiheitsentziehung bei Unmündigen unter elterlicher Gewalt<br />
(Art. 310/314a ZGB), Freiburg 1987.<br />
5<br />
Die türkische Verfassung (Art. 19 Abs. 3 t GG) heißt ganz genau: ‘‘<br />
Niemandem darf seiner Freiheit entzogen werden, es sei denn in den nach Art<br />
und Voraussetzungen durch Gesetz bestimmten Fällen:<br />
Vollstreckung von durch die Gerichte verhängten Freiheitsstrafen und<br />
Sicherungsmaßnahmen, Festnahme oder Verhaftung des Betroffenen aufgrund<br />
einer Gerichtsentscheidung oder einer im Gesetz bestimmten Verpflichtung,<br />
Vollstreckung einer Entscheidung zur Besserung unter Aufsicht oder Vorführung<br />
eines Minderjährigen vor die zuständige Behörde, Vollstreckung einer im<br />
Einklang mit den im Gesetz bestimmten Grundsätzen getroffenen Maßnahme zur<br />
Behandlung, Erziehung oder Besserung eines gemeingefährlichen<br />
Geisteskranken, Rauschgift- oder Alkoholsüchtigen, eines Landstreichers oder<br />
einer Person, welche die Ausbreitung einer Krankheit herbeizuführen geeignet<br />
ist, in einer Anstalt, Festnahme oder Verhaftung einer Person, welche illegal in<br />
das Land einzureisen versucht oder einreist oder gegen die eine Ausweisungsoder<br />
Auslieferungsentscheidung ergangen ist. ’’. Das parallele Bedürfnis zu<br />
diesem Artikel wird mit 4721 N. türkisches Zivilgesetzbuch Art. 432–437<br />
gedeckt. Ebenso für Erläuterungen und Auslegungen siehe : Gençcan, <strong>18</strong>42;<br />
Gümüş, 200f. und 201 Fn. 44<br />
165<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
vormundschaftliche fürsorgliche Freiheitsentziehung gegenüber anderen<br />
grundgesetzlichen freiheitsentziehenden Maßnahmen abgegrenzt 6 .<br />
Besonders schützt man sich die Interessen der betroffenen Personen<br />
dadurch, dass das Gesetz für solche Personen grundsätzlich die<br />
verfahrensrechtlichen Sicherheiten wie umfassende gerichtliche<br />
Beurteilung sicherstellt (zum Beispiel: Art. 434 tZGB<br />
Mitteilungspflichten; Art. 435 tZGB Eine gerichtliche Beurteilung der<br />
Einweisungsentscheidung; Art. 436 tZGB Gewisse verfahrensrechtliche<br />
Minimalanforderungen).<br />
In diesem Aufsatz wird die FFE im Rahmen des Art. 432 des tZGB<br />
behandelt, der die materiellen Voraussetzungen der fürsorgerischen<br />
Freiheitsentziehung regelt.<br />
II. Grundprinzipien über die FFE<br />
A. Das Verhältnismässigkeitsprinzip<br />
FFE beruht im Allgemeinen auf dem Grundsatz der<br />
Verhältnismässigkeit oder Proportionalität. Dieses Prinzip wird von den<br />
sichernden Maßnahmen des Strafrechts abgegrenzt 7 . Es handelt sich bei<br />
einer fürsorgerischen Freiheitsentziehung nicht um eine Strafe. Deshalb<br />
gibt es zwischen den Voraussetzungen beider Arten von Maßnahmen<br />
Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede 8 .<br />
6<br />
gesondert siehe: Schnyder, Bernhard, Vormundschaft und Menschenrechte, in:<br />
ZVW 27/1972, 41 ff. (in: ZVW 28/1973, 3 ff.); Spirig, Rdn. 29 f., 10-11.<br />
7<br />
hierzu ausführlich: Schultz, H., Persönlichkeitsschutz und Freiheitsrechte im<br />
Vormundschaftswesen: Strafrechtliche Aspekte, in: ZVW 43 (1988), 121 ff.;<br />
Bigger, E., Fürsorgliche Freiheitsentziehung (FFE) und Strafrechtliche<br />
Massnahme bei Suchtkranken aus rechtlicher Sicht (Art. 397a ZGB/44 StGB), in:<br />
ZVW 47 (1992), 41 ff. ; Gümüş, 203–204<br />
8<br />
zu diesem Vergleich und Verhältnismässigkeitsprinzip im Vormundschaftsrecht<br />
siehe: Caviezel-Jost, Barbara, Die materiellen Voraussetzungen der<br />
fürsorgerischen Freiheitsentziehung (Art. 397a Abs. 1 und 2 ZGB), 1988, 241 ff.<br />
166<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Im Vormundschaftsrecht ist der Grundsatz der Verhältnismässigkeit<br />
eine wichtige Maßgabe. Dieses Prinzip besteht aus den drei Unterteilen:<br />
Geeignetheit, Erforderlichkeit und Verhältnismässigkeit i.e.S., die<br />
einzeln auf eine konkrete Maßnahme angewendet werden sollen.<br />
Nach diesem Grundsatz muss das Mittel und die Maßnahme zur FFE<br />
dem angestrebten Ziel angepasst sein. Bei Anwendung dieses<br />
Grundsatzes muss man sehr vorsichtig und behutsam sein. Daher muss<br />
ein Eingriff in die persönliche Freiheit weder stärker noch schwächer<br />
sein.<br />
Das Verhältnismässigkeitprinzip kommt bei den gesetzliche<br />
Modalitäten des Vollzugs einer FFE zur Anwendung.<br />
B. Typengebuntheit und Typenfixierung<br />
Im Vormundschaftsrecht wie im Sachenrecht, im ehelichen Güterrecht<br />
und bei den Formen der juristischen Personen besteht ein sog. Numerus<br />
Clausus, also ein beschränkter Zahl-Formen und Typen Grundsatz. In<br />
Anlehnung an den Grundsatz der Typengebundheit regelt man an<br />
Formen und Möglichkeiten vormundschaftliche Maßnahmen. Aber für<br />
Rechts– und Verkehrssicherheit bedarf es auch des Grundsatzes der<br />
Typenfixierung 9 .<br />
Nach diesem Grundprinzip werden im Gesetz FFE–Maßnahmen<br />
umschreiben. Die Maßnahme darf nicht beliebig ausgewählt werden.<br />
Sie ist richtig zu wählen und zu dosieren.<br />
In der Anwendung der Maβnahmen wird man nicht nur die Interessen<br />
der Hilfsbedürftigen, sondern auch diejenigen der Dritten, die mit ihm<br />
und 323 ff.; Schnyder, B., Die Stufenfolge der vormundschaftlichen Massnahmen<br />
und die Verhältnismässigkeit des Eingriffes, in: ZVW 26/1971, 41 ff. (ZBJV<br />
105/1969, 268 ff.); Riemer, s.35 f., N. 6-7 und 159, N. 17; Spirig, 68, Rdn. 257<br />
ff. ; Dural/Öğüz/Gümüş, 691f.<br />
9 Riemer, 36 f., N. 8.<br />
167<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
in Rechtsverkehr treten, berücksichtigen 10 .<br />
C. Der Schutz der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten<br />
Der Zweck des türkischen Vormundschaftsrecht besteht auch darin, die<br />
schwachen und hilfsbedürftigen Personen zu umsorgen und zu<br />
unterstützen. Die FFE als eine zivilrechtliche Möglichkeit und<br />
Massnahme verfolgt das Grundrecht der persönlichen Freiheit und<br />
Sicherheit bestmöglich zu schützen 11 .<br />
Die persönliche Freiheit wird als Grundrecht ausdrücklich durch das<br />
EMRK ( Konvention zum Schutz der Menschenrechte und<br />
Grundfreiheiten ) geschützt 12 . Am <strong>18</strong>. Mai 1954 trat die Türkei dem<br />
EMRK bei 13 . Diese Konvention ist hinsichtlich der Gründe der FFE sehr<br />
bedeutsam auf dem Gebiet der Menschenrechte.<br />
Im Hinblick auf die Verfahrensgarantien der EMRK soll die türkische<br />
vormundschaftsrechtliche Gesetzgebung künftig als gegenwärtige<br />
Regeln vermehrt verbindliche Organisations- und<br />
Verfahrensvorschriften enthalten 14 .<br />
10<br />
Riemer, 37, N. 9-10.<br />
11<br />
Im türkischen Recht besonders für die Verbindung zwischen dem Prinzip des<br />
Schutzes des Persönlichkeitsrechtes und Vormundschaftrechtes siehe : Helvacı,<br />
S., Kişiliğin Korunması ve Vesayet Hukuku, Prof. Dr. Erdoğan Moroğlu’na 65.<br />
Yaş Günü Armağanı, 2. Baskı (Der Schutz der Persönlichkeit und<br />
Vormundschaftsrecht, in: FS 65. Geburtstag für Prof. Dr. Erdoğan MOROĞLU,<br />
zweite Aufl.), Ocak-2001, İstanbul 2001, 863 ff.; Güneş, S., Teori ve Uygulamada<br />
Kişi Özgürlüğü ve Güvencesi (In der Theorie und Anwendung die Freiheit und<br />
Sicherung der Individiuum), İstanbul 1988, 2 ff. ; Gümüş, 201-202.<br />
12<br />
Spirig, 12, Rdn.35; Riemer, 154–155, N. 6-7.<br />
13<br />
dafür siehe: Offizielle Anzeiger (türkische Gesetzblatt) v. 19.03.1954 / mit N.<br />
8662.<br />
14<br />
Gölcüklü, A. F/Gözübüyük, A.Ş., Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve<br />
Uygulaması, 3. Bası, (Europaeische Menschenrechtskonvention und ihre<br />
Anwendung, dritte Aufl.), Ankara 2002, 234 ff.<br />
168<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Es gibt das Prinzip des Persönlichkeitsschutzes als Verbindlichkeit eines<br />
Rechtsstaats auf wichtige Wirkungen auf das türkische<br />
Vormundschaftsrecht. Auch FFE zählt zu diesen rechtliche Wirkungen.<br />
III. Neue Regelung bezüglich der FFE in Art. 432 tZGB<br />
Im türkischen Zivilrecht wird die materielle Voraussetzung für die FFE<br />
nach Art. 432 tZGB wie folgt bestimmt :<br />
‘‘Jede mündige Person, die wegen Geisteskrankheit, Geistesschwäche,<br />
Trunksucht oder anderen Suchterkrankungen, gefahrdarstellenden<br />
ansteckenden Krankheiten oder Vagabundismus der Gesellschaft eine<br />
Gefahr darstellt, darf in einer Anstalt, geeignet für ihre Heilung,<br />
Erziehung oder Vernünftigung untergebracht werden, wenn ihr die<br />
nötige persönliche Fürsorge nicht anders erwiesen werden kann.<br />
Staatsbeauftragte, die während ihres Dienstes einen dieser Gründe<br />
erfahren, haben unverzüglich die berechtigte Vormundschaftsstelle über<br />
diesen Zustand in Kenntnis zu setzen.<br />
Dabei ist auch die Belastung zu berücksichtigen, welche die Person für<br />
ihre Umgebung bedeutet.<br />
Die betroffene Person muss entlassen werden, sobald ihr Zustand es<br />
erlaubt."<br />
Wie oben ausgeführt wurde, bezieht sich dieser Artikel auf die<br />
materiellen (i.e.S und i.w.S) Voraussetzungen der FFE. Danach besteht<br />
dieser Artikel kurz im Vorliegen eines Schwächezustandes (die Existenz<br />
einer der Einweisungsgründe), einer daraus folgenden<br />
Fürsorgebedürftigkeit und Belastung für sich und die Umgebung, in der<br />
Verhältnismässigkeit der Massnahme und im Vorhandsein einer<br />
geeigneten Anstalt.<br />
Im Art. 432 tZGB werden die Freiheitsentziehunsgründe und die in<br />
diesem Zusammenhang stehenden materiellen Voraussetzungen der<br />
169<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
FFE verständlicherweise aufgezählt. Auch dieser Aufzählung im tZGB<br />
432 zu den Freiheitsentziehungsgründen ist ebenso EMRK (Art. 5 Ziff.<br />
1) und ZGB (Art. 397 a) abschliessend. Darin sind die<br />
Freiheitsentziehungsgründe wie folgt:<br />
A. Die Existenz einer der Freiheitsentziehunsgründe als eine<br />
materielle Voraussetzung : Geisteskrankheit oder Geistesschwäche /<br />
Alkoholismus oder Suchterkrankungen (Drogenabhängigkeit) / eine<br />
schwere gefahrdarstellende ansteckende Krankheit /<br />
Vagabundentum<br />
Dieser Absatz (Art. 432 Abs.1 tZGB) enthält an und für sich die<br />
Voraussetzungen für die betroffenen Person, d.h. den persönlichen<br />
Geltungsbereich. Die betroffenen Personen sind mündige oder<br />
entmündigte Personen. Der Gesetzgeber zieht ausdrücklich eine<br />
Freiheitsentziehung für die mündige Person in Erwägung in Art. 432.<br />
Die fürsorgliche Freiheitsentziehung für Kinder ist nach diesem Artikel<br />
nicht möglich (vgl. Art. 446 tZGB) 15 .<br />
Die persönlichen Schwächezustände 16 müssen die Ursache für die<br />
Fürsorgebedürftigkeit sein, d.h. ein Kausalzusammenhang muss<br />
zwischen dem Schwächezustand und der Fürsorgebedürftigkeit<br />
bestehen.<br />
Es muss für die fürsorgerische Freiheitsentziehung einer der möglichen<br />
Schwächezustände sowie die Fürsorgebedürftigkeit kumulativ<br />
vorhanden sein.<br />
Es werden vom Gesetzgeber die nachstehenden gewissen<br />
Schwächezustande 17 (Geisteskrankheit, Geistesschwäche, Trunksucht,<br />
andere Suchterkrankungen und schwere Verwahrlosung) aufgezählt.<br />
15<br />
Öztan, 805 f.; Kılıçoğlu, 162; Gümüş, 196-197.<br />
16<br />
Caviel-Jost, 117 ff.<br />
17<br />
für die Abgrenzung, Konkurrenz und Kumulation der Schwächezustände<br />
siehe: Caviel-Jost, 233 ff.<br />
170<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Mit diesen Zuständen wird sich der untere Teil generell befassen.<br />
1. Geiteskrankheit oder Geistesschwäche<br />
Die Begriffe Geisteskrankheit und Geistesschwäche werden sowohl im<br />
medizinischen Sinn als auch im juristischen Sinn behandelt und kurz<br />
unter dem Oberbegriff der Psychischen Störungen zusammengefasst <strong>18</strong> .<br />
Diese sind als Rechtsbegriffe zu verstehen und bedürfen dieser<br />
Konkretisierung 19 . Bei der Geisteskrankheit oder Geistesschwäche<br />
handelt es sich um pyschische Störungen. Aber es gibt bei der<br />
Geisteskrankheit im Vergleich zur Geistesschwäche pyschische Störung<br />
schwererer Art. In der Literatur schreibt Schorn 20 ausdrücklich, dass<br />
auch der Geistesschwache unter den Begriff der Geisteskrankheit fällt.<br />
Zum Beispiel im juristischen Sinne:<br />
• Eine paranoide Psychose oder Schizophrenie,<br />
• Die chronische Epilepsi begleitet von einer Psychose,<br />
• Eine Psychopathie, wenn sie eine gewisse Schwere aufweist…<br />
usw.<br />
Bei der Geistesschwäche handelt es sich um Fälle, bei denen auffälliges<br />
Verhalten der persönlichen Situation und des Vorlebens noch einfühlbar<br />
sind. Für die Geistesschwäche wurden als Beispiele angenommen 21 :<br />
• Absonderung von der Familie und realer Suizidgefahr<br />
(Selbstmord),<br />
• Die Kurz- und Langzeitgedächtnisstörungen,<br />
• Die Verzweiflung, übersteigerte Niedergeschlagenheit,<br />
• Eine Psychopathie, die nicht eine gewisse Schwere erreicht…<br />
usw.<br />
<strong>18</strong> zu diesen Begriffen siehe weiters: Caviezel-Jost: 1<strong>18</strong> ff.; Spirig, 28 ff.<br />
19 Dazu : BGE 62 II 264; 85 II 460; 117 II 233/234.<br />
20 Schorn, H., Die Europäische Konvention zum Schutze der Menschenrechte<br />
und Grundfreiheiten und ihr Zusatzprotokoll in Einwirkung auf das deutsche<br />
Recht, Frankfurt 1965, 158.<br />
21 Spirig, s.28, Rdn. 25 ff.<br />
171<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Die Geisteskrankheiten und Geistesschwächen sollen nicht im<br />
medizinischen Sinn zu verstehen. Die fürsorgebedürftigkeit des<br />
Betroffenen spielt im Grunde eine entscheidende Rolle.<br />
2. Alkoholismus oder Suchterkrankungen (Drogenabhängigkeit)<br />
Das Problem des Alkoholismus ist sowohl eine medizinische als auch<br />
juristischen Tatsache. Dadurch muss deren Verhältnis zueinander<br />
abgeklärt werden 22 . Es gibt als medizinischen Begriff je nach Grund und<br />
Phase verschiedene Formen des Alkoholismus. Die Einteilung nach<br />
Gründen: Alpha-, Beta-, Gamma-, Delta- und Epsilon-Alkoholismus.<br />
Die Einteilung nach Phasen: präalkoholische (vor der Trunksucht), die<br />
Phase der Trunksucht. Besonders beim dem Gamma-Alkoholismus ist<br />
die dritte Phase die wichtigste. Diese sind die prodromale-, kritische-<br />
und chronische Phase 23 .<br />
In der juristischen Literatur 24 und Rechtsprechung 25 gibt es<br />
verschiedenen Definitionen für den Begriff des Alkoholismus und der<br />
Trunksucht. Die Begriffbestimmungen über das Alkoholismus- und die<br />
Rauschgiftsüchtigkeit - sind relativ vage und unklar. Die Trunksucht<br />
wird als abnormaler Hang zum Trinken oder als Haltlosigkeit im<br />
Zusammenhang mit dem Hang zum Trinken beschreiben 26 .<br />
Die Drogenabhängigkeit kann als allgemeiner Begriff betrachtet<br />
werden, weil die Begriffe Alkoholismus und Suchterkrankung im Sinne<br />
von Drogenabhängigkeit verstanden werden 27 .<br />
22<br />
siehe hierzu ausführlich: Spühler, K., Die Voraussetzungen der fürsorgerischen<br />
Freiheitsentziehung bei Drogensüchtigen, in: ZBl. 1983, 49 ff. ; Caviezel-Jost,<br />
157 ff.<br />
23<br />
Caviel-Jost, 160–162.<br />
24<br />
Caviel-Jost, 157; Spirig, s. 35, Rdn. 49 ff.; Gümüş, 198 f.<br />
25<br />
Caviel-Jost, 164.<br />
26<br />
BGE 39 II 509; BGE 65 II 141; BGE 78 II 337 (Caviel-Jost, 155, Fn. 14)<br />
27<br />
Caviezel-Jost, 200 f.<br />
172<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Wie beim Vormundsurteil gemäss Art. 409 tZGB muss der Richter vor<br />
dem Urteil zu FFE aufgrund von Alkohol- und Drogenabhängigkeit von<br />
dem Gesundheitsgremium ein ärztliches Attest beschaffen und die<br />
betreffende Person anhören 28 .<br />
3. Die schwere gefahrdarstellende ansteckende Krankheit<br />
Dieser Freiheitsentziehungsgrund betrifft besonders den Schutz der<br />
öffentlichen Gesundheit. Dabei sind schweren gefahrdarstellenden<br />
ansteckende Krankheiten sowohl in die persönlichen- als auch<br />
gemeingefährlichen Zustände einzuteilen.<br />
Die Bestimmung dieser verschiedenartigen Krankheiten ist eine<br />
medizinwissenschaftliche Arbeit 29 . Jedoch in der Begründung des oben<br />
erwähnter Artikels wird auf z.B. Aids (Acquired immune deficiency<br />
syndrome), Cholera, die fortgeschrittene Tuberkulose (Schwindsucht),<br />
Pest (Epidemi) und andere stärker ansteckende Krankheiten<br />
verwiesen 30 .<br />
4. Als ein spezifischer Zustand schwerer Verwahrlosung und<br />
Fürsorgebedürftigkeit: Vagabundheit / Vagabundismus<br />
Die schwere Verwahrlosung und Fürsorgebedüftigkeit zur FFE sind<br />
neue Begriffe im Vormundschaftsrecht. Der Inhalt dieser Begriffe wird<br />
in Literatur 31 und Rechtsprechung 32 in unterschiedlichem Sinne<br />
28<br />
dafür siehe die Urteile des 2. Senats des türkisches Kassationsgerichtshofs: Y<br />
2. HD. 06.03.2003, 1622/2977 (Gençcan, <strong>18</strong>45); Y. 2. HD. v. 7.3.1996,<br />
1035/2203 (Öztan, 762, Fn. 64).<br />
29<br />
Dural/Öğüz/Gümüş, 686; Öztan, 806; Kılıçoğlu, 162-163; Gümüş, 198 und<br />
225f.<br />
30<br />
Kılıçoğlu, 163.<br />
31<br />
für Ansichten : Caviel-Jost, 209 ff.; Öztan, 806; Kılıçoğlu, 163; Gümüş, 198 f.<br />
und S. 199, Fn. 38.<br />
32<br />
für Rechtsprechungen: Caviel-Jost, 223–224.<br />
173<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
dargestellt und definiert.<br />
Besonders die Verwahrlosungzustände auf die gestützte FFE können<br />
vom Gesetzgeber auf bestimmte Fälle beschränkt werden 33 .<br />
Die Vagabundheit als materielle Voraussetzung für FFE ist ein<br />
spezifischer Grund des türkischen Vormundschaftsrechtes. Dieser<br />
Grund wird im schweizerischen (ZGB) nicht geregelt. Es wird<br />
Landstreicher als sinngemäßer Ausdruck in der EMRK 34 verwendet.<br />
Die Begriffe Vagabundheit, Vagabundismus oder das Vagabundentum<br />
bedeuten unzwecks umherzuwander, d.h. es heißt sog. vagabundierend<br />
sein. Andererseits ist das Vagabundenleben ein ungebundenes und<br />
unstetes Leben, mit häufigem Wechsel des Aufenthaltsortes und der<br />
Lebensumstände. Ein richtiger Vagabund 35 od. Landstreicher 36 liebt das<br />
unstete Leben, hält es nicht lange an einem Ort aus.<br />
Bei der Entziehung aufgrund von Vagabundheit muss noch mehr die<br />
Erziehung und Besserung der betroffene Person in Betracht gezogen<br />
werden 37 .<br />
B. Die Belastung für die Umgebung<br />
Der türkische Gesetzgeber sieht in dem zweiten Absatz des Artikels<br />
(Art. 432 Abs.2 tZGB) vor, dass zur FFE der betroffenen Person auch<br />
33 Iberg, Gottlieb, Die fürsorgerische Freiheitsentziehung, erste Erfahrungen mit<br />
einem neuen Gesetz, in: Brennpunkt 1982, S. 85 ff. und besonders 97.<br />
34 Art. 5 Ziff. 1 lit. e EMRK<br />
35 englisch: Vagrant / französische : Vagabond<br />
36 Unter einem Landstreicher ist im Sinne der EMRK (Art. 5) im Wesentlichen<br />
ein arbeitsfähiger, jedoch arbeitsscheuer Müssiggänger zu verstehen.; vgl. :<br />
Ulusan, İ., Die Neugestaltung des Familienrechts durch das neue türkische<br />
Notariatszeitung, 8/2002, 225 ff. und besonders 234 (GÜMÜŞ, zitiert auf der<br />
Seite 199, Fn. 38).<br />
37 Gümüş, 199–200.<br />
174<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
die Belastungen für ihrer Umgebung zu berücksichtigen sind 38 . Dieses<br />
Element ist eine feststehende Tatsache. Dadurch wird es sich auf einen<br />
Entschluss zur FFE auswirken.<br />
Die Belastung für die Umgebung kann sich für die nähere Umgebung 39<br />
und weitere Umgebung 40 ergeben. Zur näheren Umgebung sind<br />
diejenigen Personen zu zählen, wie Ehegatte, Familiengehörige und im<br />
gleichen Haushalt mit der betroffen Person lebende Personen sowie<br />
Nachbarn. Diese Personen haben die größte Belastung zu tragen. Für die<br />
nähere Umgebung weist die Belastung zwei Aspekte auf. Zum Beispiel<br />
für die nähere Umgebungen: Wohnungsgenossen, Konkubinatspartner,<br />
Hausangestellte. Die weitere Umgebung umfasst die<br />
Familiengemeinschaft und Nachbarschaft sowie Arzt, Fürsorger,<br />
Vormund und jedermann, der mit dem Hilfsbedürftigen in Berührung<br />
kommt.<br />
Auch auf solcher Belastungs-Situationen sind die Voraussetzung für<br />
Pflege und Behandlung zu betrachten, um die betroffene Person in eine<br />
Anstalt einweisen zu können.<br />
C. Die geignete Anstalt als Einweisungsvoraussetzung<br />
Wie in der schweizerischen Rechtsprechung 41 so ist auch im türkischen<br />
Vormundschaftsrecht der Begriff der geeignete Anstalt 42 in einem<br />
weiten Sinne zu verstehen. In diesem Sinn kann die FFE auch in einem<br />
Kinder-, Schul-, Therapie-, Pflegeheim, in einer psychiatrischen Klinik<br />
oder einer Strafanstalt vollzogen werden.<br />
38<br />
Öztan, 807; Kılıçoğlu, 163; Gümüş, 196-197.<br />
39<br />
Zur Belastung für die nähere Umhebung: Cavier-Jost, 295.<br />
40<br />
Zur Belastung für die nähere Umhebung: Cavier-Jost, 296.<br />
41<br />
‘‘… Nicht nur geschlossen Anstalten zählen dazu, sondern alle Institutionen,<br />
welche die Bewegungsfreiheit der betroffene Personen aufgrund der Betreuung<br />
und Überwachung spürbar einschranken …’’ (BGE 121 III 306).<br />
42<br />
für dieser Begriff: Breitenstein, F., Was ist im Sine von Art. 397a<br />
ZGB ?, in: ZVW 36 (1981), 98 ff.<br />
175<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Unterbringung oder Zurückbehaltung der betroffene Person in einer<br />
Anstalt behindert grundsätzlich das Recht auf ihrer persönliche Freiheit.<br />
Die eingewiesene oder zurückbehaltete Person muss entlassen werden,<br />
sobald ihr Zustand es erlaubt<br />
In der Literatur 43 muss die Geeignetheit der Anstalt als<br />
Einweisungsvoraussetzung konkret definiert werden, weil es im<br />
Einzellfall oft wenig wirklich geeignete Anstalten gibt.<br />
IV. Zusammenfassende Ergebnisse<br />
Einer der wichtigen Revisionen, welches das neue Zivilgesetzbuch mit<br />
Nummer 4721 in das türkische Vormundschaftsrecht eingeführt hat, ist<br />
die fürsorgliche Freiheitsentziehung. Das Hauptziel dieser Maßnahme<br />
ist die Umgebung sowie die Freiheit und Sicherheit der volljährigen<br />
Person, dessen Freiheit eingeschränkt werden soll, von den Gefahren,<br />
die sie sich und ihrem Umfeld zufügen kann, zu schützen.<br />
Das türkische Verfassungsgesetz vom 1982 regelt das Recht auf Freiheit<br />
und Sicherheit der Person unter den Grundrechten (Art. 19 tGG). Das<br />
Grundgesetz erlaubt eine Freiheitsentziehung nur unter den im Gesetz<br />
vorgeschriebenen Grundsätzen und spezifischen Umständen. Somit<br />
können nur bestimmte Personen, die für die Gesellschaft eine Gefahr<br />
darstellen, zur Behandlung, Erziehung oder Besserung in eine geeignete<br />
Anstalt eingewiesen werden. Der Gesetzeszweck welcher im<br />
Verfassungsgesetz als ‚‚sachgemäß den im Gesetz vorgeschriebenen<br />
Grundsätzen’’ formuliert wurde, ist mit dem neuen türkischen<br />
Zivilgesetzbuch (Art. 432 ff. tZGB) verwirklicht worden.<br />
Die Regelungen der fürsorgerischen Freiheitsentziehung für Mündige<br />
sind im Gegensatz deren für Minderjährige ausgiebiger und in Artikel<br />
43<br />
Spirig, s.45, Rdn. 1<strong>18</strong> ff.; Caviel-Jost, 5. Kapitel: Geeignete Anstalt, 344 ff.<br />
und besonders 383 f.; Riemer, N. <strong>18</strong>-19, 159; Dural/Öğüz/Gümüş, 694 f; Öztan,<br />
807; Kılıçoğlu, 163 f.; Gümüş, 206–208.<br />
176<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
432 ff. tZGB detailliert geregelt. In dieser Regelung hat der<br />
Gesetzesgeber, anders als in den ausgängigen schweizerischen<br />
Zivilgesetzbuchregeln (Art. 397a–f ZGB), nicht die Möglichkeit einer<br />
fürsorgerischen Freiheitsentziehung für eine Minderjährige Person<br />
vorgesehen. Zudem wird der Begriff „mündig“ erweiternd ausgelegt, so<br />
dass auch die Freiheitsentziehung für volljährige Personen unter<br />
elterlicher Gewalt und Volljährige, welchen rechtliche Berater oder<br />
Verwalter ernannt wurden, erlaubt wird 44 .<br />
Für fürsorgerische Freiheitsentziehungen für Volljährige haben gewisse<br />
rechtliche Gründe zu bestehen. Diese beschränkten Gründe sind<br />
materielle Voraussetzungen einer fürsorgerischen Freiheitsentziehung.<br />
Deshalb hat der Gesetzesgeber in dem entsprechenden Artikel, um das<br />
Anwendungsgebiet dieser Maßnahme einzuschränken, diese rechtlichen<br />
Gründe in dieser Art aufgezählt: Geisteskrankheit, Geistesschwäche,<br />
Trunk- und Drogensucht, Vagabundenleben und ansteckende<br />
Krankheiten, welche eine schwere Gefahr darstellen (Art. 432 tZGB).<br />
Besonders zu erwähnen ist, dass der letzte rechtliche Grund, also<br />
ansteckende Krankheiten die eine schwere Gefahr darstellen, welcher<br />
im ausgängigen schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuch nicht geregelt ist, als<br />
ein gesonderter rechtlicher Grund für fürsorgliche Freiheitsentziehung<br />
für Volljährige genannt wird.<br />
Die Feststellung der Existenz dieser Gründe, außer dem<br />
Vagabundenleben, hängt von einem Bericht, welcher die Ansichten der<br />
Sachverständigen beinhaltet und von einer amtlichen<br />
Gesundheitskommission aufgesetzt wurde, ab. Der Bestand eines<br />
Vagabundenlebens ist mit jeglichen Nachweisen festzustellen 45 .<br />
Das Hauptzweck der Entziehungsgründe, ausschließlich ansteckende<br />
Krankheiten, die eine schwere Gefahr darstellen, ist die jeweilige<br />
volljährige Person wieder für die Gesellschaft zu gewinnen. Deshalb<br />
wird somit unter diesen Umständen die Personenfreiheit und -sicherheit<br />
44<br />
Dural/Öğüz/Gümüş,683; Öztan, 805 f.<br />
45<br />
Öztan, 806; Kılıçoğlu, 162 f.; Gümüş, 225 f.<br />
177<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
nicht verletzt und letztendlich das Persönlichkeitsschutzprinzip aufrecht<br />
erhalten.<br />
In Artikel 432 des tZGB werden schwere ansteckende Krankheiten wie<br />
AIDS, Cholera, fortgeschrittene Tuberkulose und Pest als Beispiele<br />
genannt. Eigentlich steht im Falle des Auftretens dieser Krankheiten<br />
nicht der Schutz der Personenfreiheit sondern die Gesundheit der<br />
Umwelt und somit das Interesse der Gesellschaft im Vordergrund. Um<br />
das Interesse der Gesellschaft zu beurteilen, werden die Lasten, die die<br />
volljährige Person, wessen Freiheit entzogen werden soll, der<br />
Gesellschaft bringt, vor Augen gehalten. Lasten, die diese Person der<br />
Gesellschaft bringt, bedeuten schwerwiegende Belastungen, die die<br />
normale Grenzen, welche seine Familie und sein nahes Umfeld auf sich<br />
zu nehmen haben, überschreiten.<br />
Um eine fürsorgerische Freiheitsentziehung für eine volljährige Person<br />
anzuordnen, ist allein der Bestand einer oder einiger der im Gesetz<br />
beschränkten Gründe nicht ausreichend. Neben dem Geschehen des<br />
rechtlichen Vorsatzes benötigt es den Personenschutz durch eine<br />
Freiheitsentziehung. Angemessene Maßnahmen die in diesem Falle<br />
genommen werden zu haben, werden als Grundsatz des Prinzips der<br />
Verhältnismäßigkeit, welches in der Lehre anerkannt wird, angesehen.<br />
Nachdem ist eine Einweisung in eine geeignete Anstalt oder nach einer<br />
Einweisung das dortige Aufbewahren nur für die Heilung, Erziehung<br />
oder Besserung der volljährigen Person, wessen Freiheit entzogen<br />
werden soll, zu begünstigen. Während eine Unterbringung oder eine<br />
Einweisung der Person in eine geeignete Anstalt, die zwangsweise<br />
erfolgt, bedeutet: eine Aufbewahrung / die Aufnahme der Person auf<br />
eigenen Wunsch oder den dortigen Halt dieser. Unter den geeigneten<br />
Maßnahmen ist die Heilungsmethode bei psychischen und schweren<br />
physischen Krankheiten, der Weg der Erziehung und Besserung eher bei<br />
Entziehung wie im Falle von Vagabundenleben zu nennen. Um es zu<br />
wiederholen; sollte trotz Heilungs- Erziehungs- und Besserungsversuch<br />
die psychische oder schwere physische Krankheit der jeweiligen Person<br />
eine Gefahr für die Gesellschaft darstellen, kann eine fürsorgerische<br />
Freiheitsentziehung für diese Person angeordnet werden.<br />
178<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Sollte der persönliche Schutz durch eine andere Maßnahme anstatt einer<br />
Freiheitsentziehung, trotz dessen das die psychische oder schwere<br />
physische Krankheit der volljährigen Person eine Gefahr für die<br />
Gesellschaft darstellt, gewährleistet werden können, ist in solchen<br />
Fällen keine Freiheitsentziehung anzuordnen.<br />
Bezüglich dieses kann eine Einweisung in eine geeignete Anstalt oder<br />
die dortige Aufbewahrung nur dann angeordnet werden, wenn der<br />
persönliche Schutz nicht auf anderem Wege gewährleistet werden kann.<br />
Grundsätzlich ist die zuständige Behörde, die diesen Entscheid erlassen<br />
kann, die Vormundschaftsbehörde, also das Amtsgericht am Wohnsitz<br />
des Betroffenen. Doch ist im Gesetz dieser Zuständigkeit eine<br />
Ausnahme gestellt. Dieser Ausnahme nach ist, wenn Gefahr im Verzug<br />
ist, die Vormundschaftsbehörde am Aufenthaltsort der betroffenen<br />
Person zuständig (Art. 433 tZGB).<br />
Nach Artikel 434 hat die Ausnahme darstellende zuständige<br />
Vormundschaftsbehörde die Einweisung oder Aufbewahrung der<br />
mündigen (volljährigen) Person in eine geeignete Anstalt oder der unter<br />
manchen besonderen Umständen vorgesehene Zuständige, falls er<br />
bezüglich der Vormundschaft Maßnahmen durchsetzt, diesen Zustand<br />
der Vormundschaftsbehörde am Wohnsitz der betroffenen Person<br />
mitzuteilen 46 .<br />
Die zuständige Behörde setzt den Betroffenen oder dessen<br />
Nahestehende über den Einweisungsentscheid in Kenntnis. Innerhalb<br />
zehn Tagen nach Mitteilung des Einweisungsentscheids sowie der<br />
Abweisung eines Entlassungsgesuches ist es möglich, dagegen innert<br />
zehn nach der Mitteilung an der Aufsichtsbehörde, also am Gericht<br />
erster Instanz, Einwand zu erheben (Art. tZGB 435).<br />
Spezifisch für den Prozess in der fürsorglichen Freiheitsentziehung sind<br />
einige besondere Verfahrungsrechtsregelungen vorgesehen (Art. tZGB<br />
436). Außer diesen einzigartigen Verfahrensregeln sind die in der<br />
46 Dural/Öğüz/Gümüş, 700 f.<br />
179<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
türkische Zivilprozessordnung (trZPO) 47 vorgesehenen allgemeinen<br />
Regeln anzuwenden 48 .<br />
Letztendlich ist zu sagen, dass der Entscheid über eine fürsorgliche<br />
Freiheitsentziehung nach vereinfachtem Verfahren zu erlassen ist.<br />
Gemäss diesem Verfahren muss der zuständige Richter vor dem<br />
Erlassen des Freiheitsentziehungsentscheides den Betroffen mündlich<br />
einvernehmen. Alleine das Postulat des Bevollmächtigten oder des<br />
Vertreters ist nicht ausreichend. Auf Grund dessen hat der Richter<br />
folgend unmittelbarer Anhörung des Betroffenen nach innerer<br />
Überzeugung von der Notwendigkeit einer Entziehung zu entscheiden<br />
(Art. t ZGB 437) 49 .<br />
47 auf türkisch: Hukuk Usulü Muhakemeleri Kanunu (HUMK).<br />
48 für Ausführungen über diese Prozessuale Regeln siehe: Dural/Öğüz/Gümüş,<br />
705 ff.; Öztan, 808 f.; Kılıçoğlu, 167 f.; Gençcan, Art. 436 trZGB, <strong>18</strong>49 ff;<br />
Gümüş, 220 ff. und besonders 226-228.<br />
49 Dural/Öğüz/Gümüş, 711-713.<br />
<strong>18</strong>0<br />
DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />
FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />
ZIVILGESETZBUCHES
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL<br />
HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong> IN SITUATIONS OF<br />
ARMED CONFLICT<br />
BY ALEXANDRU MOCANU<br />
Introduction<br />
After almost half a century from the International Conference on<br />
Human Rights held at Teheran, where the Resolution on Human Rights<br />
in Armed Conflicts 1 was adopted, some authors talk about a confusion<br />
that continues to exist, pointing out that many people still think that<br />
human rights law only applies in times of peace, while international<br />
humanitarian law in time of war. 2 Although contemporary international<br />
humanitarian law is focused only on jus in bello and its laws concerning<br />
the conduct of hostilities during an armed conflict, apparently, have<br />
nothing to do with human rights protection, the final purpose of<br />
humanitarian law is protection of victims of armed conflicts, what<br />
makes it closer to the kind of protection provided by human rights law,<br />
applicable both in times of peace and war, with certain restrictions. This<br />
article attempts to thrash out the historical and conceptual differences<br />
and similarities of these two branches of law, in order to clarify their<br />
scope of application and the way they interplay in the context of armed<br />
conflict.<br />
1 Human Rights in Armed Conflicts, Resolution XXIII adopted by the<br />
International Conference on Human Rights, Teheran, 12 May 1968,<br />
http://www.icrc.org/ihl.<br />
2<br />
<strong>FREE</strong>MAN Mark, International Law and Internal Armed Conflicts: Clarifying<br />
the Interplay between Human Rights and Humanitarian Protection, The Journal<br />
of Humanitarian Assistance, 17 <strong>October</strong> 2000,<br />
http://www.jha.ac/articles/a059.htm.<br />
<strong>18</strong>1<br />
ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />
PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />
IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Historical Overview<br />
The classic public international law recognized distinction between the<br />
law of peace and the law of war. Depending on the state of international<br />
relations, was applied either the corpus juris of the law of peace or that<br />
of the law of war. 3 That is why only the jus in bello was recognized<br />
during wars. This situation prevailed until 1945, when the UN Charter<br />
and subsequent international instruments in the field of human rights<br />
protection diminished the rigidity of this division. Since then there are<br />
norms, witch are applicable during both the peace and the wartimes.<br />
However, since the international human rights law and the international<br />
humanitarian law have completely different historical origins and<br />
philosophical concepts, these innovations were not immediately<br />
accepted. 4<br />
The law of war began to develop when the use of force as an instrument<br />
of national politics was considered legal. As a result, a common interest<br />
aroused to develop some norms of “civilized” conduct on the battlefield.<br />
Consequently, the law of war had an international input, which is not<br />
the case of human rights law. The first concepts relating to human rights<br />
emerged in the national legal orders, mainly in Europe and North<br />
America, due to writings of John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau on<br />
“natural law” and, respectively, “social contract”, which dramatically<br />
influenced the constitutional development of the domestic political<br />
institutions. Nevertheless, the human rights concepts latter were<br />
internationalized, while the law of armed conflicts extended its area of<br />
application on internal affairs. Thus, the states were concerned about the<br />
faith of their nationals abroad and were trying to ensure, by means of<br />
bilateral agreements “minimum standards of civilization”, meaning<br />
respect for certain rights in all circumstances. Later, a new concern<br />
3 HEINTZE Hans-Joachim, On the Relationship between Human Rights Law<br />
Protection and International Humanitarian Law, International Review of the Red<br />
Cross, December, 2004, Vol. 86, No. 856, p. 789.<br />
4<br />
DOSWALD-BECK Louise, VITÉ Sylvian, International Humanitarian Law<br />
and Human Rights Law, Offprint from International Review of the Red Cross,<br />
March-April 1993, p. 94.<br />
<strong>18</strong>2<br />
ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />
PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />
IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
regarding national minorities was asserted. Therefore, at a given<br />
historical point, a states’ common interest emerged in the field of human<br />
rights. Consequently, the national concepts relating to human rights had<br />
been acquired by international law. The most firm step in the<br />
internationalization of the human rights law has been made by adopting<br />
the Universal Declaration in 1948 5 . Further, this was followed by the<br />
adoption of a series of international conventions in the field of human<br />
rights, some of them under the United Nations’ auspices, while others in<br />
the framework of the regional organizations.<br />
The law of armed conflicts followed, as mentioned above, a very<br />
different course, starting as a branch of international law. However, the<br />
most important thing in the evolution of this branch is that, by the<br />
adoption of the four Geneva Conventions in 1949, it penetrated the<br />
national sovereignty, extending over internal armed conflicts and<br />
ceasing to be only a branch of international law, aimed exclusively on<br />
regulating interstate relations. The common article 3 of the four Geneva<br />
Conventions from 1949 marked the first step in nearing the international<br />
humanitarian law and international human rights law. In the same<br />
context, the fourth Geneva Convention relative to the protection of<br />
civilian persons in time of war and applicable to situations of<br />
occupation, even if it meets with no armed resistance, makes these two<br />
branches to get even closer. 6<br />
Distinctions<br />
Nevertheless, there are a series of obvious distinctions between<br />
international humanitarian law and international human rights law, what<br />
5<br />
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Adopted and proclaimed by General<br />
Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948,<br />
http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html.<br />
6<br />
EIDE Asbjørn, The Laws of War and Human Rights – Differences and<br />
Convergences, Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red<br />
Cross Principles in Honour of Jean PICTET (ed. Christophe SWINARSKI),<br />
Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Geneva-Hague, 1984, p. 678.<br />
<strong>18</strong>3<br />
ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />
PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />
IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
makes it difficult to perceive these two branches as applicable to the<br />
same range of relationships. These differences are due to different<br />
philosophies.<br />
The international humanitarian law has been conceived as a code of<br />
conduct during armed conflicts aimed on protecting persons and<br />
property that are, or may be, affected by the conflict, and to limit<br />
parties’ rights of using methods and means of warfare of their choice. 7<br />
The human rights law is based on the principle that individuals and<br />
groups can expect and/or claim certain behaviors or benefits from their<br />
governments. 8 The above formulations reveal that the first branch<br />
focuses on the way a party in a conflict is to behave in relations to<br />
people at its mercy, whereas human rights law concentrates on the rights<br />
of the recipient of a certain treatment. 9 To sum up, the main goal of the<br />
law of war is to prevent, as far as possible, unnecessary suffering during<br />
an armed conflict by prescribing certain behaviors. The major concern<br />
of human rights is to ensure good governance (by imposing some<br />
standards), which consists in respect and protection of the individual in<br />
all circumstances. 10<br />
Besides, from the human rights standpoint, there are two situations: the<br />
“normal one” and the state of emergency, which endanger the life of the<br />
nation. The last one allows, by virtue of most international instruments<br />
in the field, for a relaxation of the states’ obligations to respect human<br />
rights. Unlike human rights law, the international humanitarian law does<br />
not recognize any kind of derogations. By exceptional nature of armed<br />
conflicts, the rules of international humanitarian law have an imperative<br />
character and are created for each particular situation. Moreover, it<br />
considers the principle of military necessity so that to keep feasible the<br />
7<br />
Frequently Asked Questions on International Humanitarian Law, Human Rights<br />
and Refugee Law in the context of armed conflict, Inter-Agency Standing<br />
Committee Task Force on Humanitarian Action and Human Rights, UN, 2004, p.<br />
4.<br />
8<br />
Ibidem, p. 10.<br />
9<br />
DOSWALD-BECK Louise, VITÉ Sylvian, op. cit., p. 101.<br />
10<br />
EIDE Asbjørn, op. cit., p. 676.<br />
<strong>18</strong>4<br />
ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />
PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />
IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
parties’ capacity to win.<br />
Nevertheless, there are a series of rights which cannot be derogated<br />
from and should be respected in any circumstances, as well as a set of<br />
rules according to which a state is allowed to derogate. 11 Moreover,<br />
even those rights that allow for derogations must be respected as far as<br />
possible. Finally, the human rights law may question the purpose and<br />
legitimacy of the governmental actions. The international humanitarian<br />
law is different to this regard by placing the issue of the state’ purpose<br />
in using the force outside its scope of application, regulating only the<br />
means and methods of warfare.<br />
The concomitant application<br />
Generally, international humanitarian law is today less and less<br />
perceived as a code of honour for combatants, but as a mean of sparing<br />
non-combatants as much as possible from the horrors of war. 12 In its<br />
discussion on relations between law of armed conflicts and human<br />
rights law, Jean Pictet was talking about merging these two branches of<br />
law under a generic heading: humanitarian law. Pictet goes even further,<br />
by suggesting to include some other elements of international law, like<br />
refugee law, or aspects of international law regarding social relations,<br />
particularly those developed by the International Labor Organization. 13<br />
It is interesting to see at least how these two branches of law interact<br />
and apply to the same social relations. The International Court of Justice<br />
upheld this fact through its Advisory Opinions on Nuclear Weapons 14<br />
and Legal Consequences 15 clearly denying that International Covenant<br />
11<br />
See: HEINTZE Hans-Joachim, op. cit., p. 799.<br />
12<br />
DOSWALD-BECK Louise, VITÉ Sylvian, op. cit., p. 105.<br />
13<br />
Quoted by EIDE Asbjørn, op. cit., p. 675.<br />
14<br />
Legality of Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, ICJ, July 8,<br />
1996, paragraph 26. http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/icases/iunan/iunanframe.htm.<br />
15<br />
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian<br />
Territory, ICJ, Advisory Oppinion, July 9, 2004, paragraph 102-106,<br />
<strong>18</strong>5<br />
ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />
PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />
IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
on Civil and Political Rights is applicable only during peacetime.<br />
The most relevant treaties in the field of Human rights contain clear<br />
stipulations regarding the obligation of the states to respect human<br />
rights during armed conflicts. Let us take, for instance, article 15 of the<br />
European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and<br />
Fundamental Freedoms from 1950, which makes reference to the faith<br />
of human rights in situations when the life of the nation is endangered<br />
by a war or another public emergency. In such circumstances, the state<br />
may take measures derogating from its obligations arising from the<br />
Convention. The human rights stipulated in the Convention may be<br />
limited strictly according to the dictates of the specific circumstances of<br />
a particular situation. However, some expressly mentioned rights (inter<br />
alia right to life and prohibition of torture) cannot be limited in any<br />
circumstances. These rights are called inalienable, witch means that no<br />
derogations are admitted and they are to be considered in all<br />
circumstances without exceptions. Thus, the “traditional impermeable<br />
border” between international humanitarian law, which is applied<br />
during armed conflicts, and the law of peace is thereby crossed. 16<br />
Further, this “crossing of the border” is supported by the common<br />
article 3 of the Geneva Conventions from 1949, which contains a list of<br />
rights to be protected in all circumstances. These rights practically<br />
coincide with the inalienable human rights. This determined the<br />
academics to adopt the Turku Declaration 17 aimed on filling out the<br />
gaps from the border area between the law of peace and the law of war<br />
and to ensure a minimum humanitarian standard by cumulating the<br />
application of both humanitarian and human rights law.<br />
The European Convention is not the single instrument that refers to<br />
human rights law application during wars. Another regional instrument,<br />
the American Convention on Human Rights <strong>18</strong> from 1969, also lists in<br />
http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/idocket/imwp/imwpframe.htm.<br />
16<br />
HEINTZE Hans-Joachim, op. cit., p. 791.<br />
17<br />
Declaration of Minimum Humanitarian Standards, Turku (Finland), 2<br />
December 1990, http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/1990b.htm.<br />
<strong>18</strong><br />
American Convention on Human Rights, signed at the Inter-American<br />
<strong>18</strong>6<br />
ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />
PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />
IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
article 27 the rights from which no derogation is allowed during the<br />
wartime. Other international treaties in the field of human rights also<br />
refer to the so-called "inalienable" rights. For example, article 4 of the<br />
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights contains an<br />
emergence clause with a similar wording to those from the regional<br />
instruments.<br />
The Child Convention 19 from 1989 combines those two branches of law<br />
in an obvious manner. Article 38 (1) of the Convention obliges the<br />
Contracting Parties to respect and ensure respect for the rules of<br />
international humanitarian law in the field of children protection.<br />
Therefore, a human rights treaty, normally applicable during peacetime,<br />
contains also provisions of humanitarian law. Actually, article 38 (2,3,4)<br />
simply reiterates the provisions of article 77 of the Additional Protocol I<br />
to the Geneva Conventions, which limits recruitment and participation<br />
in hostilities of children younger than 15 years old during an armed<br />
conflict. In 2000 was adopted the Optional Protocol 20 to this<br />
Convention, which raised the age threshold to <strong>18</strong> years, imposing to<br />
member states a higher standard of protection than that set by<br />
humanitarian law.<br />
All these international instruments prove that human rights law is an<br />
essential part of the legal provisions that govern the war and other<br />
situations of emergency. Particularly, the example of the Child<br />
Convention shows how the norms of law of peace overlap with those<br />
that regulate warfare, as well as the fact that during wars states must<br />
look for their international obligations in other branches of law, as well.<br />
Specialized Conference on Human Rights, San Josi, Costa Rica, 22 November<br />
1969, http://www.hrcr.org/docs/American_Convention/oashr.html.<br />
19<br />
Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989,<br />
http://www.icrc.org/ihl.<br />
20<br />
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the<br />
involvement of children in armed conflict, 25 May 2000, http://www.icrc.org/ihl.<br />
<strong>18</strong>7<br />
ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />
PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />
IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
The mutual influence<br />
Despite different historical origins and philosophy of the human rights<br />
law and the international humanitarian law, nowadays the jurists from<br />
one or another branch resort more and more to a combined use of their<br />
concepts. This is either because a branch assists another in the correct<br />
interpretation of its provisions, or because the application of one of the<br />
branches automatically ensures application of another one. For example,<br />
in order to determine the content of torture, as prohibited method of<br />
warfare must necessarily be consulted the UN Convention against<br />
Torture. 21<br />
An interesting example is the right to life. Many human rights defenders<br />
would still avoid any reference to humanitarian law, which a priori<br />
accepts the possibility for persons directly involved in hostilities to be<br />
deprived of their life. However, it must be noted that international<br />
documents in the field of human rights 22 expressly mention that<br />
deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention to<br />
this right, when it results from the use of force, which is no more than<br />
necessary in legally taken actions for quelling a riot or insurrection.<br />
Important is to keep in mind that “arbitrary” deprivation of life is<br />
prohibited, the term having a particular meaning during an armed<br />
conflict. Actually, humanitarian law ensures the right to life by means<br />
of a series of provisions, such as sparing of civilians as far as possible,<br />
limitation of attacks exclusively on military objects, prohibition of<br />
starvation of population, creating of demilitarized zones, collecting sick<br />
and wounded and offering them medical assistance or facilitating<br />
human life conditions for keeping the prisoners of war and internees.<br />
Some examples would rather frame into the category of "economic and<br />
cultural" rights according to human rights law. This shows that<br />
21<br />
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment<br />
or Punishment, New York, 10 December 1984,<br />
http://www.hrweb.org/legal/cat.html.<br />
22<br />
Ex.: Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental<br />
Freedoms (article 2), Rome, 4 November 1950; The International Covenant on<br />
Civil and Political Rights has not such a provision - a gap identified by doctrine.<br />
<strong>18</strong>8<br />
ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />
PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />
IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
international humanitarian law protects the right to life in a manner that<br />
outruns the traditional concept of protection of this right. Finally,<br />
relevant for the respect of the right to life are the restrictions imposed by<br />
international humanitarian law in connection with death penalty<br />
application to persons under <strong>18</strong> years old or pregnant women and with<br />
little children, or in occupied territories where it was abolished.<br />
The list of these examples of convergence of human rights law and<br />
international humanitarian law can be continued. However, it should be<br />
mentioned that there are a series of rights (right to association and other<br />
political rights) which are not provided for by the international<br />
humanitarian law because of their irrelevance for the protection of<br />
persons against dangers that an armed conflict implies.<br />
International Humanitarian Law as lex specialis<br />
The cumulative application of the international humanitarian law and<br />
human rights law inevitably brings on discussion concerning the<br />
relationship between those two branches of law. The jurisdiction of the<br />
International Court of Justice in its Advisory Opinions regarding<br />
Nuclear Weapons 23 and the Legal Consequences recognized the primacy<br />
of humanitarian law during armed conflicts and its character of lex<br />
specialis. This means that during an armed conflict the provisions of<br />
human rights law and, respectively, the content of some rights<br />
(especially right to life) are to be interpreted according to international<br />
humanitarian law. Thus, in some circumstances of war the international<br />
human rights law cannot be taken into consideration. For instance, a<br />
combatant who kills an enemy will be not, according to jus in bello,<br />
criminally responsible for the act of murder committed on the battlefield<br />
during an armed conflict. That is why the term “arbitrary deprivation of<br />
life” from human rights law must be considered from the humanitarian<br />
23<br />
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, ICJ,<br />
July 8, 1996, paragraph 36 http://www.icjcij.org/icjwww/icases/iunan/iunanframe.htm.<br />
<strong>18</strong>9<br />
ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />
PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />
IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
law perspective. Namely, the regional human rights instruments give<br />
such an interpretation. Article 15 of the European Convention clearly<br />
stipulates that the cases of death resulting from acts of war must not be<br />
regarded as violation of right to life.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The interplay between international human rights law and international<br />
humanitarian law consists in mutual influence during the processes of<br />
formation, implementation and application, experiencing a significant<br />
convergence in recent years. Although historically and conceptually are<br />
still distinct categories of international law, these two branches of law<br />
are not mutually exclusive, but complement each other, shaping in such<br />
way their future development. This is how the protective provisions of<br />
human rights and humanitarian law have equivalents under each other’s<br />
instruments and already make extensive use of each other’s<br />
implementation and supervision mechanisms. The recent study on<br />
customary international humanitarian law 24 confirms the overlapping<br />
nature of a series of fundamental guaranties provided for in both<br />
humanitarian and human rights law. 25 Establishment of the category of<br />
crimes against humanity which does not require nexus to armed conflict<br />
is an obvious example of "cooperation" between these two fields having<br />
a common major goal: the protection of the life, health and dignity of<br />
the human beings.<br />
Bibliography:<br />
24 The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) conducted the study at<br />
the specific request of States who sought the ICRC's assistance in trying to<br />
identify the unwritten rules of customary humanitarian law.<br />
25<br />
KELLENBERGER Jakob, International Humanitarian Law and Other Legal<br />
Regimes: Interplay in Situations of Violence, Address at the 27<br />
190<br />
th Annual Round<br />
Table on Current Problems of International Humanitarian Law, 4 September<br />
2003, International Review of the Red Cross, September 2003, vol. 85, No. 851,<br />
p. 649.<br />
ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />
PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />
IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
1. DOSWALD-BECK Louise, VITÉ Sylvian, International<br />
Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law, Offprint from<br />
International Review of the Red Cross, March-April 1993.<br />
2. EIDE Asbjørn, The Laws of War and Human Rights –<br />
Differences and Convergences, Studies and Essays on<br />
International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in<br />
Honour of Jean PICTET (ed. Christophe SWINARSKI),<br />
Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Geneva-Hague, 1984.<br />
3. <strong>FREE</strong>MAN Mark, International Law and Internal Armed<br />
Conflicts: Clarifying the Interplay between Human Rights and<br />
Humanitarian Protection, The Journal of Humanitarian<br />
Assistance, 17 <strong>October</strong> 2000,<br />
http://www.jha.ac/articles/a059.htm.<br />
4. Frequently Asked Questions on International Humanitarian<br />
Law, Human Rights and Refugee Law in the context of armed<br />
conflict, Inter-Agency Standing Committee Task Force on<br />
Humanitarian Action and Human Rights, UN, 2004.<br />
5. HEINTZE Hans-Joachim, On the Relationship between Human<br />
Rights Law Protection and International Humanitarian Law,<br />
International Review of the Red Cross, December, 2004, Vol.<br />
86, No. 856.<br />
6. KELLENBERGER Jakob, International Humanitarian Law and<br />
Other Legal Regimes: Interplay in Situations of Violence,<br />
Address at the 27th Annual Round Table on Current Problems<br />
of International Humanitarian Law, 4 September 2003,<br />
International Review of the Red Cross, September 2003, vol.<br />
85, No. 851.<br />
Documents<br />
7. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Adopted and<br />
proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10<br />
December 1948, http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html.<br />
8. Geneva Conventions for the Protection of Victims of Armed<br />
Conflicts, 12 August, 1949 and their Additional Protocols, 8<br />
June 1977, http://www.icrc.org/ihl.<br />
191<br />
ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />
PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />
IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or<br />
Degrading Treatment or Punishment, New York, 10 December<br />
1984, http://www.hrweb.org/legal/cat.html.<br />
10. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and<br />
Fundamental Freedoms, Rome, 4 November 1950,<br />
http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/z17euroco.html<br />
11. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, New<br />
York, 16 December 1966, http://www.hrweb.org/legal/cpr.html.<br />
12. Human Rights in Armed Conflicts, Resolution XXIII adopted<br />
by the International Conference on Human Rights, Teheran, 12<br />
May 1968, http://www.icrc.org/ihl.<br />
13. American Convention on Human Rights, signed at the Inter-<br />
American Specialized Conference on Human Rights, San Josi,<br />
Costa Rica, 22 November 1969,<br />
http://www.hrcr.org/docs/American_Convention/oashr.html.<br />
14. Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989, and<br />
its Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed<br />
conflict, 25 May 2000, http://www.icrc.org/ihl.<br />
15. Declaration of Minimum Humanitarian Standards, Turku<br />
(Finland), 2 December 1990,<br />
http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/1990b.htm.<br />
Case Law<br />
16. Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory<br />
Oppinion, ICJ, July 8, 1996, http://www.icjcij.org/icjwww/icases/iunan/iunanframe.htm.<br />
17. Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the<br />
Occupied Palestinian Territory, ICJ, Advisory Oppinion, July 9,<br />
2004, http://www.icjcij.org/icjwww/idocket/imwp/imwpframe.htm.<br />
192<br />
ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />
PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />
IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL<br />
PEOPLE IN POLISH <strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO<br />
THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN<br />
COUNTRIES AND INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>.<br />
FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH<br />
TOLERANCE UNTIL FULL EMANCIPATION<br />
BY AGNIESZKA SZPAK*<br />
SUMMARY<br />
Although homosexuality has never been dominant sexual orientation, it<br />
has existed in every society and every culture. In the law of ancient<br />
Mediterranean Sea States it was repressed (among others in<br />
Mesopotamia and Egypt). However, in the ancient Greece and Rome<br />
homosexuality was accepted; especially in Greece where it was<br />
regarded as a natural form of sexual life.<br />
In the XIX century European States began abolishing penalization of<br />
homosexuality; France was the first State that did so, Holland was the<br />
next one. But in most European States homosexuality was penalized<br />
until the beginnings of the XX century. In 1973 the American<br />
Psychiatric Association deleted homosexuality from its official<br />
nomenclature of mental disorders, and in 1991 the World Health<br />
Organization deleted it of its list of diseases.<br />
In Polish legislation the first Penal Code of 1932 abolished the<br />
penalization of homosexuality yet it envisaged a penalty of up to 3 years<br />
in prison for male homosexual prostitution. The next Penal Code of<br />
1969 apart from abolishing the penalization of homosexuality abolished<br />
the penalization of homosexual prostitution as well.<br />
* Public International Law Faculty, Nicolas Copernicus University in<br />
Toruń, Poland.<br />
193<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
The Penal Code of 1997 now in force includes the same provisions.<br />
Outside the criminal law Polish law contains only a very small number<br />
of provisions regulating the legal status of homosexuals. Most of them<br />
are antidiscriminatory provisions that can be found in the Constitution<br />
of 1997 (Arts. 32 and 47 – protection of private life), the Labour Code<br />
(Chapter IIa – Equal treatment in employment) and in the Act on<br />
Promotion of Employment and on Institutions of the Labour Market of<br />
2004. Polish legal system guarantees to homosexual people a minimum<br />
of minimum by way of antidiscriminatory provisions but that does not<br />
equal lack of discrimination.<br />
In this context it should be mentioned that Art. <strong>18</strong> of the Polish<br />
Constitution defines marriage as a relationship between a man and a<br />
woman. In Polish law now in force homosexual couples have no right to<br />
marry, not even to contract registered partnerships; they are not allowed<br />
to adopt children. In 2003 Professor M. Szyszkowska (a senator)<br />
submitted a draft act on registered partnerships. It envisaged the<br />
possibility of contracting a registered partnership and many rights<br />
connected with it, mainly of economic character. The amendments of<br />
the Senate considerably reduced the extent of rights accorded to<br />
homosexual couples.<br />
Polish draft act follows an example of other countries, mainly European<br />
such as among others Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Sweden,<br />
Norway, France, Belgium, Germany, Croatia or Spain recently which<br />
passed similar acts. The most recent events are the approval of the<br />
same sex partnership laws by New Zealand and Switzerland<br />
Significant changes relating to the attitude towards people of<br />
homosexual orientation have been taking place in the legal systems of<br />
those States; generally they are aimed at the equality of rights for<br />
heterosexual and homosexual persons. Many times have also the<br />
European Tribunal of Human Rights passed judgments in favour of<br />
homosexuals in cases of their discrimination and protection of their<br />
private life.<br />
194<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
On the basis of the presented stages of regulation of the legal status of<br />
homosexuality it may be noticed that they have evolved from<br />
depenalization through tolerance into full emancipation. Particular<br />
European States are in different stages – some of them on lower and<br />
some on higher levels – but significant changes in relation to<br />
homosexuality and people of homosexual orientation in the direction of<br />
introducing different forms of legalized homosexual relationships or<br />
marriages and their equality with heterosexual marriages are evident. It<br />
is to be hoped that Poland will follow the example of other European<br />
States and changes contributing to the struggle against discrimination<br />
will take place, the changes that will guarantee the equality of rights and<br />
chances for homosexuals. There is no reason to treat homosexuality as<br />
something unnatural; it is natural sexual orientation as same as<br />
heterosexuality.<br />
195<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
ARTICLE<br />
It is truism to say that all societies are diversified – socially, nationally,<br />
culturally and religiously. People as well are different in terms of their<br />
origins, age, colour, wealth, opinions or finally sexual orientation. These<br />
features can not be judged – they are neither good nor bad in<br />
themselves. They are simply some objective factors. “All human beings<br />
are born free and equal in dignity and rights” - states the Universal<br />
Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 (Art.1). In the Preamble we read<br />
that “[…] recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and<br />
inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation<br />
of freedom, justice and peace in the world“ 1 . And this is what really<br />
matters, what is significant and should constitute a signpost also for<br />
creating national laws.<br />
Although homosexuality has never been a dominant sexual orientation it<br />
has existed in every society and every culture. The space does not allow<br />
for detailed presentation of the evolution of legal regulations concerning<br />
homosexuality from historic perspective; therefore I will confine myself<br />
to just a few remarks. In the law of ancient Asian Mediterranean<br />
countries homosexuality was repressed (inter alia old Hebrew law<br />
envisaged a death penalty for male homosexual relations; the legal<br />
situation was similar in Mesopotamia and Egypt) 2 . But in the ancient<br />
Greece and Rome homosexuality was accepted 3 . It was especially so in<br />
Greece where we could have encountered unprecedented sexual<br />
freedom. For the Greeks aesthetic values and experience were more<br />
important than rigid gender division. Therefore homosexuality was<br />
regarded as a natural form of sexual life and there were no attempts to<br />
1<br />
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, available at:<br />
http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html<br />
2<br />
M. Filar, Status prawny homoseksualizmu w prawie polskim na tle prawa<br />
porównawczego i międzynarodowego, in: Księga Jubileuszowa Profesora<br />
Tadeusza Jasudowicza, Toruń 2004, p. 114 (translation by the author).<br />
3<br />
K. Boczkowski, Homoseksualizm, Warsaw 1992, pp. 63-64 (translation by<br />
the author).<br />
196<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
legally repress it.<br />
Moving forward in time to modern times it should be noted that in <strong>18</strong>10<br />
France was a first country that abolished the criminality of<br />
homosexuality; the Netherlands was next to have done so in <strong>18</strong>11 4 .<br />
However, in most European countries homosexuality was penalized<br />
until the beginning of the XX century. It should not be forgotten that in<br />
1935-1945 in the Nazi Germany 50 000 homosexuals were executed<br />
and 25 000 were sent to concentration camps on the basis of new harsh<br />
law of 1935 5 . For example in Denmark the penalization of homosexual<br />
relations was abolished in 1933, in Sweden in 1944, in Norway and<br />
Finland only at the beginning of 70’s of the XX century (in 1972 and<br />
1971 respectively) 6 . In 1973 the American Psychiatric Society deleted<br />
homosexuality from its official nomenclature of mental disorders, which<br />
meant recognizing homosexuality as natural variant of our sexuality. In<br />
1991 also the World Health Organization deleted it of its list of<br />
diseases.<br />
Despite abolishing criminalization of homosexuality in many countries<br />
homosexual relations were still subject to restrictions that were not<br />
imposed on heterosexual relations. I mean most of all the different ages<br />
of consent for heterosexual and homosexual relations. For homosexual<br />
relations they were higher, for example in Finland they were<br />
respectively: 15 years of age for heterosexual relations and <strong>18</strong> for<br />
4 K. Waaldijk, Civil Developments: Patterns of Reform In the Legal Position of<br />
Same-Sex Partners in Europe, “Canadian Journal of Family Law” 17(1), 2000,<br />
p. 68; available at:<br />
http://www.meijers.leidenuniv.nl/content_docs/Publications%20Kees%20Waal<br />
dijk/17_canadian_journal_of_family_law_2000__p._62-88.doc<br />
5 An earlier provision (<strong>18</strong>73) stated that a man who commits obscene relations<br />
with another men or that participates in such relations will be punished with<br />
imprisonment. Quote from R. Biedroń, Piętno różowego trójkąta, “Polityka”,<br />
no. 34(2415), 2003, pp.62-63 (translation by the author).<br />
6<br />
J.M. Krawczyk, Homoseksualiści w systemach prawnych i społecznych<br />
państw skandynawskich, Grodzisk Mazowiecki, 2002, pp.5-6 (translation by<br />
the author).<br />
197<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
homosexual ones. Nowadays in all the Scandinavian countries the age<br />
of consent is the same for heterosexual and homosexual relations. As for<br />
other countries, especially not European ones, there is still much left to<br />
be done; for example in Afghanistan, Morocco, Libya, Pakistan, Saudi<br />
Arabia, Iran, Sudan and Yemen homosexual relations are punished and<br />
in the last four even with death penalty, and in Pakistan with flogging<br />
or stoning! 7<br />
With regard to Polish legislation the first penal code of 1932 abolished<br />
penalization of homosexuality, yet it envisaged a penalty of up to 3<br />
years imprisonment for the crime of male homosexual prostitution (Art.<br />
207). Apart from repeating the provisions of its predecessor pertaining<br />
to abolishing criminalization of homosexuality, next penal code of 1969<br />
also abolished penalization of homosexual prostitution. Penal code of<br />
1997 – currently in force - also stands on the ground of depenalization<br />
of homosexuality 8 . It means that homosexual relations between two<br />
adult partners that consent to that can not be punished and such acts<br />
belong to the sphere of one’s private life, in which sphere the law must<br />
not interfere (the possibilities of such interference have been formulated<br />
in very restrictive manner) 9 . The penal code does not criminalize<br />
prostitution – every prostitution heterosexual as well as homosexual but<br />
forms of its organizing and benefiting from it. In these terms Polish law<br />
namely criminal law may be regarded as “showing liberal tendencies” 10<br />
but in other branches just like family law, inheritance law or tax law it is<br />
very conservative.<br />
7<br />
See: http://www.mojeprawa.info/lista_krajow.rtf<br />
8<br />
Penal Code, Dz.U. 1997 No. 88, item 553 amended.<br />
9<br />
Art. 31 (3) of the Polish Constitution states: „ Any limitation upon the<br />
exercise of constitutional freedoms and rights may be imposed only by statute,<br />
and only when necessary in a democratic state for the protection of its security<br />
or public order, or to protect the natural environment, health or public morals,<br />
or the freedoms and rights of other persons. Such limitations shall not violate<br />
the essence of freedoms and rights”. The exceptions are thus formulated very<br />
narrowly.<br />
10<br />
M.Filar, op.cit., p. 117.<br />
198<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Polish law currently in force contains a small number of provisions<br />
regulating the legal situation of homosexual people. They are mainly<br />
provisions of antidiscriminatory character. Most fundamental of them is<br />
Art. 32 of the Constitution of 2 April 1997, which states: “(1) All<br />
persons shall be equal before the law. All persons shall have the right to<br />
equal treatment by public authorities. (2) No one shall be discriminated<br />
against in political, social or economic life for any reason<br />
whatsoever” 11 . Although the formula “any reason whatsoever” includes<br />
sexual orientation it would be a better solution to adopt another formula<br />
– of explicit, non-exhaustive listing of the criteria, on the basis of which<br />
any discrimination would be prohibited and among them sexual<br />
orientation should be enumerated. That was the initial idea; in the 1995<br />
draft Art. 32 (2) listed criteria on the basis of which no body could be<br />
discriminated against and there was an explicit mention of sexual<br />
orientation. The draft had been rejected because of the protests of the<br />
catholic church, right-wing parties and the then President Lech<br />
Wałęsa 12 . As we read in a report issued by Lambda Association and<br />
Campaign Against Homophobia 13 on discrimination and intolerance for<br />
reason of sexual orientation in Poland of 2002 (page 36) “Art. 32 of the<br />
Constitution does not fulfill its role in regards to homosexual minorities<br />
– it does not translate into passing of legal bills and decrees that would<br />
regulate the legal situation of Polish gays and lesbians in more details”<br />
11<br />
Dz.U. 1997, No. 78 item 483.<br />
12<br />
P. Leszkowicz, Przełamując hetero-matrix. Wojna seksualna w Polsce i<br />
kryzys praw człowieka, in: Z. Sypniewski, B. Warkocki (ed.), Homofobia po<br />
polsku, Warsaw 2004, p. 104 (translation by the autor).<br />
13<br />
The Report is available at:<br />
http://warszawa.lambda.org.pl/dokumenty/Raport_dyskryminacja_2002_pl.pdf<br />
(in Polish). Lambda Association is a Polish law association with the aim to<br />
create a positive identity of lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transexuals as well as<br />
shaping the social acceptance of them; check the website:<br />
http://www.lambda.org.pl; Campaign Against Homophobia was founded in<br />
2001 and is a non-governmental organization operating throughout Poland.<br />
Only volunteers work for the Campaign and they focus their efforts on a<br />
broadly understood fight against homophobia; check the website:<br />
http://www.kampania.org.pl/homofobia/angwer.php<br />
199<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
(translation by the author).<br />
Equally important is Art. 47 of Polish Constitution according to which:<br />
“Everyone shall have the right to legal protection of his private and<br />
family life, of his honour and good reputation and to make decisions<br />
about his personal life”.<br />
With no doubts these provisions ensure protection of private life<br />
including its such important part as sexual life; this protection exists as<br />
long as acts of sexual activity do not comprise a crime and as has been<br />
written above homosexual relations between consenting partners<br />
definitely are not a crime.<br />
First Polish legal act which contained the antidiscriminatory provisions<br />
with regard to sexual orientation was the Act on Employment and<br />
Counteracting Unemployment (as amended in December 2002, in force<br />
since 6 February 2003) 14 . This Act was then replaced by a new Act on<br />
Promotion of Employment and on Institutions of the Labour Market of<br />
20 April 2004 15 . Earlier on 1 January 2004 amendments to the Labour<br />
code came into force – a new chapter II a entitled “Equal treatment in<br />
employment” (Art. <strong>18</strong> 3a – Art. <strong>18</strong> 3e ) was added. According to Art. <strong>18</strong> 3a<br />
“employees shall be treated equally as regards the establishment and<br />
termination of employment relationships, the conditions of employment,<br />
promotion and access to training in order to raise occupational<br />
qualifications, particularly regardless of sex, age, disability, race,<br />
religion, nationality, political views, trade union membership, ethnic<br />
origin, religious convictions, sexual orientation […]”. This amendment<br />
resulted from the obligation to harmonize Polish law with the European<br />
Community law and more specifically with the EU Council directive<br />
2000/78/EC establishing a general framework for equal treatment in<br />
employment and occupation of 27 November 2000 16 . The indemnity can<br />
be awarded for infringement of the equal treatment principle; it must not<br />
14 Dz. U. 2003 No. 58, item 514.<br />
15 Dz.U. 2004 No. 99, item 1001.<br />
16<br />
Official Journal L 303, 02/12/2000 P. 0016 - 0022<br />
200<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
be lower than the minimum remuneration for work determined under<br />
separate provisions (Art. <strong>18</strong> 3d of the Labour code). Equally important is<br />
the provision of the next Article (<strong>18</strong> 3e ) according to which “ employee’s<br />
exercise of the rights resulting from infringement of the principle of<br />
equal treatment in employment may not constitute the grounds for the<br />
employer’s submitting of a notice of termination of the employment<br />
relationship or terminating such relationship without notice 17 “.<br />
The above mentioned Act on Promotion of Employment and on<br />
Institutions of the Labour Market of 2004 in a few articles (36, 38 and<br />
123) enumerates among grounds of prohibited discrimination sexual<br />
orientation. Art. 36(4) stipulates that employment agency should be<br />
based on the principle of equality meaning an obligation to give<br />
assistance to all seeking job in its finding regardless of the sexual<br />
orientation. At the same time the employers may not formulate their<br />
employment requirements in such a way that they be discriminatory for<br />
the candidates because of their sexual orientation, among others. The<br />
provision concerning employment counseling was construed in an<br />
analogous way (Art. 38(2)). Every person who refuses to employ a<br />
candidate for reason of his/her sexual orientation will be punished with<br />
a fine not lower than 3 000 zł (Art. 123).<br />
Polish legal system ensures for people of homosexual orientation<br />
minimum of minimum of rights through the antidiscriminatory<br />
provisions but does this mean lack of discrimination? <strong>18</strong><br />
17<br />
Labour code Dz. U. 1998, No. 21, item 94, amended.<br />
<strong>18</strong><br />
In its concluding observations of 2 December 2004 concerning Poland’s<br />
respect for her international legal obligations resulting from the International<br />
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966 Human Rights Committee<br />
expressed its concern about the legal situation of sexual minorities. It stated<br />
that the prohibition of discrimination principle is not respected and that the<br />
discriminatory acts are not adequately investigated and punished; see the<br />
observations at:<br />
http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/66db176cabc27b16c1256f43005ba<br />
2e7?Opendocument<br />
201<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
In this context it should be mentioned that Art. <strong>18</strong> of the Polish<br />
Constitution defines marriage as a relationship between a man and a<br />
women (in the same way Art. 1 of the Family code of 25 February<br />
1964) 19 . In conformity with currently binding Polish law homosexual<br />
couples are not allowed to marry or even to contract any registered<br />
partnerships; they are also not allowed to adopt children. However,<br />
there is a draft act on registered same-sex relationships in the Sejm (the<br />
lower chamber of Polish parliament) but it is unfortunately practically<br />
impossible that the act be passed in this term of the parliament (and in<br />
the next as well). The initial draft prepared by professor Maria<br />
Szyszkowska, SLD-UP senator (left-wing parties), entitled the act on<br />
the registered partnerships was forwarded to the Senate (the upper<br />
chamber of Polish parliament) on 21 November 2003 20 . The purpose of<br />
this draft act was to regulate the legal situation of homosexual people in<br />
Poland. It envisaged the possibility of contracting a registered<br />
partnership and many rights connected with it mainly of economic<br />
character. The most important of these rights were the right to inherit<br />
after the dead partner, the right to health insurance for family members,<br />
the right to joint taxation or to working benefits such as pension The<br />
original draft did not include the right to children adoption but it did not<br />
exclude a possibility of raising one partner’s child by the two partners as<br />
well as representing the child by the partner without the parental<br />
authority. It is worth mentioning that the draft contained a provision<br />
pertaining to the internal relations between the partners – they were to<br />
be based on mutual assistance, support, maintaining and deepening of<br />
spiritual agreement, as well as on the cooperation and mutual planning<br />
of the future.<br />
On 3 December 2004 the Senate decided that a redrafted act will be<br />
forwarded to the Sejm. The name of the draft was amended into the Act<br />
on the registered same-sex relationships because the term partnership<br />
was thought to be reserved only for a relationship between a man and a<br />
19<br />
Dz.U. 1964 No. 9, item 59, amended.<br />
20<br />
The draft bill (in Polish) is available at:<br />
http://www.prawo.lex.pl/czasopisma/sp/1_04.html<br />
202<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
woman 21 . According to the redrafted act, registration of the relationship<br />
in the registry office implicates the acquirement of rights mainly of<br />
economic character, inter alia: the right to inherit after the dead partner,<br />
the right to alimony for the partner in a state of scarcity that resulted<br />
from the termination of the relationship. Joint property of partners will<br />
not begin ipso iure (like in the initial draft) but the partners will be<br />
allowed to enact it by way of contract (notarial act); partners will not<br />
have the right to joint taxation. Another difference between the initial<br />
and current draft act is the impossibility of taking by partners the same<br />
name and representing one partner’s child by a second partner without<br />
the parental authority rights. In the new draft the provision on the<br />
internal relations between the partners was crossed out which should be<br />
grieved as law should also reflect values and mutual assistance, support<br />
or deepening of emotional ties between partners are with no doubt such<br />
values. Polish Senators – when adapting the amendments – decided that<br />
a person in a partnership will be allowed to receive information and visit<br />
his or her partner being in a hospital as well as make decisions<br />
concerning the manner of treatment of the other partner. Partners were<br />
also granted a right to collect correspondence of the other partner as<br />
well as a right to refuse to testify in a legal suit as a witness according to<br />
the same rules as for the marital spouses. The act does not allow for<br />
adoption.<br />
Polish draft act draws patterns from other countries. In many European<br />
states similar acts were adopted, among others in Denmark, the<br />
Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, France, Belgium, Germany, Croatia or<br />
recently in Spain. Spain became the third European country after<br />
Belgium and the Netherlands to legalize the same sex marriages and<br />
adoptions. The most recent events are the approval of the same sex<br />
partnership laws by New Zealand and Switzerland. On June 5th <strong>2005</strong>,<br />
the Swiss people finally approved the same-sex partnership law with a<br />
21<br />
In this way the resolution of the Sejm of 3 December 2004 on the issue of<br />
introducing in the Sejm the draft act on the registered same-sex relationships<br />
(the justification); available at (in Polish):<br />
http://www.senat.gov.pl/K5/DOK/UCH/073/548uch.htm<br />
203<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
clear 58% vote in favour, thus becoming the first people in the world to<br />
directly approve same sex partnerships. Also Great Britain passed Civil<br />
Partnership Act (2004) and first registrations start in December <strong>2005</strong>,<br />
open to same-sex partners only with all the same rights and<br />
responsilibities as marriage. In the legal systems of these states<br />
significant changes relating to the attitude towards homosexual people<br />
can be noticed. These changes can be generally characterized as<br />
heading for equalization of homosexual people with heterosexuals. For<br />
instance in Denmark, which was the first country to grant to<br />
homosexual people a right to legalize their relationships and made their<br />
status equal with the status of heterosexual marriages, the Danish<br />
Registered Partnership Act was adopted (1989). The legislative<br />
technique consisted in making most of the provisions on marriages<br />
applicable to registered partnerships; there is no possibility of adoption<br />
for homosexual couples, however. The next state that passed analogous<br />
law was Norway; in April 1993 Norwegian parliament adopted a Bill on<br />
Registered Partnerships. Finland passed an act with the same title in<br />
2001 22 . In all the Scandinavian countries partnerships have not been<br />
accorded a right to adoption except for Sweden where partnerships and<br />
marriages (heterosexual) have been equalized also in this regard 23 . In<br />
other Scandinavian states a person being in a legalized relationship has<br />
a right to adoption of partner’s children. In the Netherlands there are<br />
two legal acts in force – the Act on the Opening Up of Marriage and the<br />
Act on Adoption by persons of the same sex, both of 2000. They<br />
enabled contracting marriages between homosexual people and granted<br />
them a right to adoption (except for foriegn adoption). In this moment it<br />
is worth indicating motives that constituted guidelines for Scandinavian<br />
countries when passing the above mentioned acts taking as an example<br />
Norway. The most important among the motives were: a need to<br />
regulate rights and duties between same-sex partners and between them<br />
22<br />
Texts of the relevant acts are available at:<br />
http://www.mojeprawa.info/aktyprawa-kraje.htm<br />
23<br />
J.M.Krawczyk, op.cit., p.<strong>18</strong>. Text of the Act on Registered Partnerships was<br />
adopted in Sweden in 1994; originally it did not envisage a right to adoption, it<br />
was introduced by the Act of 2002.<br />
204<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
and the society; a need for changes in the people’s attitude towards<br />
homosexual people; a need for stabilization of homosexual relationships<br />
and a need to strengthen the paradigm of family and marriage 24 .<br />
Rationality and necessity for forging these motives into legal acts<br />
should not give rise to doubts. It is interesting to note that changes in<br />
social attitude were achieved through changes in law.<br />
The European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental<br />
Freedoms (ECHRF) of 4 November 1950 and the judgments of the<br />
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) deserve a few remarks.<br />
Poland as a state-party to the Convention is obliged to respect its<br />
provisions; it is advisable to give a few exemplary ECHR’s judgments<br />
significant to the legal situation of homosexual people. In this context,<br />
Art. 8 of the Convention is relevant; it stipulates that:<br />
“(1) Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his<br />
home and his correspondence.<br />
(2) There shall be no interference by a public authority with the<br />
exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is<br />
necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security,<br />
public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the<br />
prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals,<br />
or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others” 25 .<br />
The ECHR’s judgments which have been passed on the basis of this<br />
provision are numerous and there is no possibility to analyze them all in<br />
this article; all that can be done is to draw some attention to the most<br />
important judgments. In the Dudgeon case (Dudgeon v. Great Britain)<br />
of 22 <strong>October</strong> 1981 the Court stated that the legislation that prohibits<br />
homosexual acts committed in private between consenting males<br />
constitutes unjustified interference with a right to respect for private life<br />
24<br />
Ibidem, p.17.<br />
25<br />
Text of the Convention is available at:<br />
http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Word/005.doc<br />
205<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
and as a consequence such prohibition violates Art. 8 of the<br />
Convention 26 . The Strasburg Court took an analogous position in its<br />
following judgments – Norris v. Ireland case of 26 <strong>October</strong> 1988,<br />
Modinos v. Cyprus of 22 April 1993 and A.D.T. v. Great Britain of 31<br />
July 2000 27 . In da Silva Mouta v. Portugal of 21 December 1999<br />
European Court of Human Rights stated that limitation of parental<br />
responsibility of a father of a minor daughter only on the ground of his<br />
homosexual orientation violates Art. 8 of the Convention in connection<br />
with Art. 14 (which will be explored next).<br />
In this group of judgments the Court tried to examine whether there was<br />
a breach of Art. 14 of the Convention or not. Article 14 reads as follows<br />
(prohibition of discrimination):<br />
“The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention<br />
shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race,<br />
colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social<br />
origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other<br />
status” 28 .<br />
In its judgments in cases of L. and V. v. Austria of 9 January 2003, B.<br />
B. v. Great Britain of 10 February 2004 and Woditschka and Wilfling v.<br />
Austria of 21 <strong>October</strong> 2004, the Court took the position that setting<br />
26<br />
Jeffrey Dudgeon complained about the British law which regarded some<br />
homosexual acts between consenting adults as a crime. British government<br />
indicated that the law is actually a dead letter and had not been applied for<br />
years but the European Court stated that mere existence of such provisions<br />
makes them possible to be applied in the future; thus the Court considered it as<br />
an unjustified interference with private life and violence of Art. 8 of the<br />
Convention. The judgment is available at:<br />
http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?item=2&portal=hbkm&action=html<br />
&highlight=dudgeon&sessionid=3374870&skin=hudoc-en<br />
27<br />
Judgments are available at:<br />
http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/search.asp?skin=hudoc-en<br />
28<br />
Text of the Convention is available at:<br />
http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Word/005.doc<br />
206<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
different ages of consent for heterosexual and homosexual relations<br />
between adults and adolescents has no justification and constitutes<br />
discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation, thus violates the<br />
prohibition of discrimination and the right to respect for private life<br />
(Art. 14 in connection with Art. 8 of the Convention).<br />
In another group of judgments concerning gays in military especially<br />
two cases are important: Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. The United<br />
Kingdom and Smith and Grady v. The United Kingdom both of 27<br />
September 1999. All four applicants in two cases were members of the<br />
armed forces of the U.K. After investigations by the military police into<br />
their sexual orientations and their admitting that he or she was<br />
homosexual they were administralively discharged. They complained<br />
that the investigations into their sexual orientations and their subsequent<br />
discharges constituted violation of Art. 8 (the right to respect for private<br />
life) as well as of Art. 14 (prohibition of discrimination). The Court<br />
found that the U.K. violated Art. 8 of the Convention, however it<br />
decided that the complaint under Art. 14 provided no separate issue<br />
from that already addressed under the Art. 8 complaint 29 .<br />
On the basis of the above presented phases which can be discern in the<br />
legal regulation of homosexuality we can notice some kind of regularity<br />
– from depenalization through tolerance to full emancipation. Particular<br />
European countries are at different levels but significant changes in<br />
attitudes towards homosexuality and homosexual people are visible – in<br />
some countries more and in some less visible but still they are there.<br />
These changes are heading for introducing various forms of legalized<br />
homosexual relationships or marriages. A good example in this sphere<br />
is given by Scandinavian countries and the Netherlands where<br />
homosexual persons are guaranteed equal rights; and where<br />
homosexuals constitute quite large part of their societies. In Poland as<br />
well live about 20 million homosexual people (about 5 % of the<br />
society). This is a huge number of citizens deprived of many rights only<br />
because of their sexual orientation. Such a legal and factual situation<br />
29<br />
Judgments are available at: http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/search.asp?skin=hudoc-en .<br />
207<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
cannot be sustained any longer; we cannot ignore such a numerous<br />
group of Polish citizens since “the Republic of Poland shall be the<br />
common good of all its citizens“ (Art. 1 of the Polish Constitution).<br />
How can we talk about justice and equality when a part of the society is<br />
being denied rights because of sexual orientation? It is to be hoped that<br />
following example of other European states also in Poland changes will<br />
come, changes that will contribute to the struggle against discrimination<br />
and will ensure equality of rights and chances for homosexual people.<br />
There is no reason to regard homosexuality as something unnatural; it is<br />
a natural sexual orientation to the same extent as heterosexual one. It is<br />
usually emphasized that when making new law relating to the legal<br />
status of homosexuality the social awareness should not be ignored but<br />
it must also be borne in mind that the majority opinion is not always<br />
righteous. Professor Szyszkowska righteously said that “very rarely the<br />
right belongs to the majority. The number of voices in favour of an<br />
opinion cannot be the measure of its legitimacy” 30 . Statistics cannot<br />
justify discrimination and prohibition thereof is recognized as standard<br />
of Polish law and the European Community law as well as the<br />
international law. As the example of Scandinavian states demonstrates –<br />
it is possible to create changes in social attitude through changes in law.<br />
In this place we could ask ourselves whether the protection accorded in<br />
Polish law is sufficient or whether maybe we still deal with<br />
discrimination. How should ‘tolerance’ be understood – in negative<br />
terms only as enduring something unpleasant mere lack of<br />
discrimination? And is it enough? Despite all the positive changes in<br />
Polish legal system, the protection is – in my opinion – not sufficient. It<br />
is not sufficient to depenalize homosexuality and pass a few<br />
antidiscriminatory provisions. The mere non-existence in internal law of<br />
provisions “institutionalizing” 31 homosexuality equals discrimination;<br />
provisions that accord to gays and lesbians full, equal rights as<br />
compared to those accorded to heterosexuals. At the end it is worth<br />
30<br />
Quote from: Z.Sypniewski, B.Warkocki (ed.), op.cit., p.288 (translation by<br />
the author).<br />
31<br />
Adjective taken from M. Filar, op.cit., p.122.<br />
208<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
invoking the UNESCO Declaration of the Principles on Tolerance of 16<br />
November 1995 where we can find a meaning of tolerance (Art. 1):<br />
“1.1 Tolerance is respect, acceptance and appreciation of the rich<br />
diversity of our world's cultures, our forms of expression and ways of<br />
being human. It is fostered by knowledge, openness, communication<br />
and freedom of thought, conscience and belief. Tolerance is harmony in<br />
difference. It is not only a moral duty, it is also a political and legal<br />
requirement. Tolerance, the virtue that makes peace possible,<br />
contributes to the replacement of the culture of war by a culture of<br />
peace.<br />
1.2 Tolerance is not concession, condescension or indulgence.<br />
Tolerance is, above all, an active attitude prompted by recognition of<br />
the universal human rights and fundamental freedoms of others. In no<br />
circumstance can it be used to justify infringements of these<br />
fundamental values. Tolerance is to be exercised by individuals, groups<br />
and States.<br />
1.3 Tolerance is the responsibility that upholds human rights, pluralism<br />
(including cultural pluralism), democracy and the rule of law. It<br />
involves the rejection of dogmatism and absolutism and affirms the<br />
standards set out in international human rights instruments.<br />
1.4 Consistent with respect for human rights, the practice of tolerance<br />
does not mean toleration of social injustice or the abandonment or<br />
weakening of one's convictions. It means that one is free to adhere to<br />
one's own convictions and accepts that others adhere to theirs. It means<br />
accepting the fact that human beings, naturally diverse in their<br />
appearance, situation, speech, behaviour and values, have the right to<br />
live in peace and to be as they are. It also means that one’s views are not<br />
to be imposed on others” 32 .<br />
32<br />
Text of the Declaration in: J.Symonides (ed.), The struggle against<br />
discrimination. A collection of international instruments adopted by the United<br />
Nations System, UNESCO, Paris, 1996, p.<strong>18</strong>6.<br />
209<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
In such an understanding of tolerance it means acceptance and<br />
appreciation of values and benefits resulting from pluralism and<br />
diversity; it does not mean just a mere lack of discrimination. There is<br />
no such tolerance in Poland.<br />
210<br />
AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />
<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />
INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />
FULL EMANCIPATION
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY<br />
ADVOCATES (OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC<br />
OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF<br />
HUMAN RIGHTS<br />
BY ALEXANDR SVETLICINII *<br />
Present situation with human rights in Moldova is very typical for many<br />
developing countries, where government has officially proclaimed<br />
protection of human rights and freedoms as a priority in the public<br />
affairs. However, due to the difficult social-economic conditions and<br />
authoritarian legacy of the past these declarations often remain on paper.<br />
One would hardly argue that Moldova didn’t move since the<br />
proclamation of its independence to the better protection of human<br />
rights. National Constitution adopted in 1994 contains the majority of<br />
the civil, political and economic rights and liberties guaranteed by the<br />
state in the majority of democratic nations. Moldovan legislation has<br />
been continuously reformed in order to correspond to the international<br />
standards in this area. Moldova has joined several international and<br />
regional treaties that provide certain mechanisms for monitoring the<br />
situation of human rights in the country, addressing the causes of<br />
violations and encouraging the government to undertake proper steps in<br />
combating the identified violations.<br />
Thus, Moldova is a part in both International Covenants on political,<br />
economic, social and cultural rights; it has ratified Universal<br />
Declaration of Human Rights and several international documents<br />
*<br />
Alexandr Svetlicinii holds LL.B International Law degree from Free<br />
International University of Moldova, Chisinau and is currently enrolled in LL.M<br />
International Business Law program at Central European University, Budapest.<br />
Present article is a product of the author’s internship at the Center for Human<br />
Rights of Moldova in spring of <strong>2005</strong>.<br />
211<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
addressing particular categories of individuals and their rights such as<br />
Convention of the Rights of the Child and other. Within the Community<br />
of Independent States Republic of Moldova is part to the Convention of<br />
the Community of Independent States on Human Rights of May 26,<br />
1995 and Law of the Community of Independent States regarding<br />
Human Rights Committee of September 24, 1993. However, these two<br />
documents remain merely declarations; they are amorphous legal<br />
instruments that lack basic enforcement mechanisms. 1<br />
Among regional treaties the most important is European Convention of<br />
Human Rights and Fundamental Liberties, which Moldova ratified in<br />
order to become a member in Council of Europe. This regional treaty<br />
creates an effective mechanism that is aimed to protect human rights<br />
under the Convention even in case when Member-state allows or fails to<br />
prosecute the violation. It is the European Court of Human Rights that<br />
accepts individual complaints against the governments of Memberstates<br />
when all domestic remedies were exhausted. Unfortunately,<br />
citizens of Moldova, due to certain objective factors, cannot fully take<br />
advantage of this method when deprived of their rights and liberties.<br />
However, there were several decisions of the ECHR against Moldovan<br />
government that had a great impact on the situation with human rights<br />
in certain areas. 2<br />
National judiciary is aimed to be the key institution, which should<br />
provide effective reestablishment of citizens in their rights in case of<br />
violations committed by the government officials or private parties.<br />
There were several judicial reforms that shaped the structure and<br />
internal hierarchy of the judicial system, trying to provide maximum<br />
level of accessibility to justice for the ordinary citizen. New Code of<br />
Criminal Procedure provides more guarantees for the suspects, accused,<br />
victims, and witnesses in protection of their constitutional rights during<br />
1<br />
Parliamentary Advocate, Newsletter of the CHRM, Oct-Dec 2000, <strong>Number</strong> 5,<br />
<strong>Volume</strong> 1, p. 2<br />
2<br />
Alexandr Svetlicinii, Republic of Moldova as a Respondent State in the<br />
European Court of Human Rights, Eastern European Human Rights Law Journal,<br />
<strong>Volume</strong> 2, <strong>Number</strong> 2 (April <strong>18</strong>,<strong>2005</strong>) p. 8<br />
212<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
the course of investigation, interrogation, trial, appeal and other stages<br />
during the process of criminal justice. Thus, with the introduction of the<br />
position of special judge for criminal investigation, every action taken<br />
by the investigator and prosecutor, that cause limitation or intrusion<br />
with constitutional rights of the citizens, now require the prior approval<br />
of that judge.<br />
Another important and active player in the field of human rights<br />
protection that is continuously increasing its capabilities is civil society<br />
represented by numerous non-governmental organizations, grass root<br />
groups, representatives of local administration and responsible citizens.<br />
They have been very active in fighting against violations filing law<br />
suits, writing petitions and legislative proposals and assisting individual<br />
citizens in their cases. Majority of the complaints filed with the<br />
European Court of Human Rights against Moldovan authorities where<br />
filed by lawyers and legal experts, members of the non-governmental<br />
human rights organizations. 3<br />
But this panorama of national, regional and international mechanisms<br />
for protection of human rights applicable to the Republic of Moldova<br />
wouldn’t be comprehensive without mentioning another important<br />
element in the national protection system. It is the institute of the<br />
Parliamentary Advocates (ombudsman) that are appointed by the<br />
Parliament in order to guarantee the observance of constitutional rights<br />
and freedoms by central and local public administration, institutions,<br />
organizations and enterprises regardless of their type of ownership, by<br />
public associations, as well as by officials at all levels.<br />
At present ombudsman institutions are in operation in over ninety<br />
countries world-wide. They complement and expand the traditional<br />
parliamentary control over the executive authorities, and yet do not take<br />
over the functions of other institutions, such as courts. In 1995-1996<br />
3<br />
Two most active nonprofit organization in this matter were Lawyers for Human<br />
Rights and Moldova Helsinki Committee for Human Rights, both Chisinau-based<br />
NGOs<br />
213<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
special expert missions, on an assignment of the United Nations<br />
Development Programme, made a rigorous assessment of the exercise<br />
of fundamental human rights in Moldova and found it expedient that a<br />
national institution for protection of human rights be established in the<br />
republic. In its report experts have also found that there must be actions,<br />
conditions and mechanisms by which to ensure the protection of the life<br />
of individuals, their honor, their dignity and their property. These<br />
mechanisms were still ineffective in Moldova. 4<br />
In 1996 United Nations Development Programme and the United<br />
Nations Office of High Commissioner for Human Rights have initiated<br />
a project “Support to Democratic Initiatives in the Field of Human<br />
Rights in the Republic of Moldova”. One of the goals was the creation<br />
and capacity building of the independent national institution for<br />
promotion and protection of human rights. This project has been also<br />
supported financially by the Governments of Sweden and the<br />
Netherlands. The Second International Conference on Ombudsman and<br />
Human Rights Institutions that was held in spring of 1996 in Chisinau<br />
arrived at similar conclusion, this time in the context of international<br />
experience, though. All these experiences were later embodied into the<br />
Law on Parliamentary Advocates enacted in <strong>October</strong> 1997 by Moldovan<br />
Parliament. Administering the above Law, in February 1998 the<br />
Parliament appointed three Parliamentary Advocates and assigned equal<br />
rights and responsibilities to each of them. 5<br />
To incorporate this newly established institution into a separate agency,<br />
Moldovan Government has adopted a statute of the Center for Human<br />
Rights of Moldova (CHRM) – office of Parliamentary Advocates that<br />
should provide them with necessary logistical and technical support and<br />
4<br />
Republic of Moldova Human Development Report 1996, Chapter 2 Political<br />
Reforms – Conditions for Building a State and Integration of Society, United<br />
Nations Development Programme (UNDP), available at<br />
http://www.undp.org/rbec/nhdr/1996/moldova/<br />
5 http://www.iatp.md/cpdom/en/ombudsmen.htm<br />
214<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
assistance. 6 When analyzing the legal status of the CHRM, we can<br />
easily identify the provisions that since the beginning undermine the<br />
efficiency of the Center in achieving its objectives. According to the<br />
provisions that regulate the internal structure of the Center, its staff is<br />
composed of only 22 employees including Parliamentary Advocates.<br />
Leaving auxiliary personnel outside discussion we have 17 persons of<br />
whom 12 are lawyers and 5 are of supporting personnel. 7 Several<br />
employees work on behalf of UNDP program in supporting the Center,<br />
as, for instance, the project manager and legal specialist responsible for<br />
hot line established to consult the citizens on legal matters. CHRM has<br />
also three branch offices in Balti, Cahul and Comrat that were<br />
established to ensure the access of the citizens in these areas (North,<br />
Center and South of the Republic) to the Parliamentary Advocates. 8<br />
Currently, only two Parliamentary Advocates work at the CHRM: Ms.<br />
Raisa Apolschii (Director) and Mr. Iurie Perevoznic. Third<br />
Parliamentary Advocate Ms. Alina Ianucenco has been recently<br />
appointed, as a judge in the Constitutional Court and her position is<br />
vacant waiting for another person to be appointed by the newly elected<br />
Parliament. The three Parliamentary Advocates concentrations area is<br />
drawn on the mechanical criteria of division of laws in Moldova: Civil<br />
Law-Labor Law-Land Law; Criminal<br />
Law-Administrative Law-Penitentiary Law; Social Security Law-<br />
Family Law.<br />
It is obvious that if the Center is aimed to be a key organization in the<br />
human rights area, if it has to research each petition and effectively react<br />
6<br />
Hotarirea Parlamentului Republicii Moldova cu privire la aprobarea<br />
Regulamentului privind Centrul pentru Drepturile Omului, a structurii, statului de<br />
functii si modului de finantare a acestuia Nr.1484 din 05.02.98, Monitorul<br />
Oficial al R. Moldova nr.22-23 din 12.03.1998<br />
7<br />
For detailed table of the internal structure of the CHRM see Anexa nr.2 la<br />
Hotarirea Parlamentului nr.1484-XIII din 5 februarie 1998 Structura si statul de<br />
functii ale Centrului pentru Drepturile Omului<br />
8<br />
Anexa nr. 3 la Hotarirea Parlamentului nr. 1484-XIII din 5 februarie 1998<br />
structura si statul de functii ale filialelor Centrului pentru Drepturile Omului din<br />
judetele Balti, Cahul si U.T.A. Gagauzia<br />
215<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
on the identified violations, it has to be provided with sufficient amount<br />
of human resources, i.e. competent personnel of legal specialists,<br />
attorneys, program managers, administrative and technical assistance<br />
staff. The structure of the regional branches of the Center was<br />
developed in the same way: each branch employs only five people<br />
including specialists and administrative staff. Throughout the years of<br />
Center’s existence the situation hasn’t changed: the structure and the<br />
budget remain strictly limited and doesn’t include the resources<br />
necessary for providing qualified public service.<br />
In 2001 Chamber of State Auditors has conducted an inspection aimed<br />
at assuring that the Center is properly managing the financial resources<br />
allocated for its activity as a part of the state budget. In this report<br />
Chamber of State Auditors has revealed that Center failed to follow<br />
several regulations that are related to the accounting and financial<br />
transactions. Specifically, the Chamber notes that Center had no right to<br />
increase certain categories of expenses such as salary for its staff.<br />
Regarding these violations, state auditors recommend the Government<br />
to decrease next year Center’s budget proportionally to the amount that<br />
was overspent. 9 These failures and violations can be viewed from<br />
different perspectives, first of all they show the lack of competence of<br />
the Center’s employees responsible for accountancy matters. But at the<br />
same time it is an obvious factor of the deficiency of the Center’s<br />
budget that does not allow this institution to function properly. Article<br />
37 of the Law on Parliamentary Advocates stipulates that Center has its<br />
own budget that with preliminary evaluation of the Ministry of Finances<br />
shall be approved by the Parliament along with the state budget. In<br />
reality, Ministry of Finances sets the annual volume of CHRM<br />
financing at its own competence. As a result, it is difficult to carry out<br />
surveys, attract experts, run projects, and invite foreign experts. CHRM<br />
9<br />
Curtea de Conturi, Hotarire privind rezultatele controlului asupra utilizarii<br />
mijloacelor bugetare alocate pentru intretinerea Centrului pentru Drepturile<br />
Omului in anul 2000 Nr.25 din 14.03.2001 Monitorul Oficial al R.Moldova<br />
nr.35-38 din 29.03.2001<br />
216<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
simply works on examining petitions, which is more affordable in<br />
present funding conditions. 10<br />
Thus, in 2000 Parliamentary Advocates had to increase the salaries and<br />
authorize some other payments related to reparations and supplies that<br />
were necessary for the Center’s efficient work and were not reflected in<br />
the budget.<br />
It would be logical to start the analysis of the activity of Parliamentary<br />
Advocates with the commentary on the annual reports – the official<br />
documents produced by the CHRM on the yearly basis that supposed to<br />
reflect the situation with respect for human rights in Moldova.<br />
Throughout the year CHRM collects and processes the information that<br />
later on will be put in the basis of its annual report that should be<br />
presented to the Parliament. This report also regards the activity of<br />
Parliamentary Advocates according to their mandate.<br />
Although established in 1997, CHRM did not release publicly any<br />
reports until 1999. The Annual Report of 1999 states that its purpose is<br />
to present to the legislative authority, in accordance with the Law on<br />
Parliamentary Advocates, an ample information regarding “the<br />
observance of human rights in the Republic of Moldova during the<br />
previous year”, based on received complaints, highlighting the areas in<br />
which the most gross violations of human rights and freedoms took<br />
place, the causes of such violations as well as the measures taken by the<br />
Parliamentary Advocates in accordance with their mandate in order to<br />
reinstate citizens in their rights, the perfection of the national legislation<br />
and its adjustment to the international instruments, the education of the<br />
community in human rights. 11<br />
Starting with its first report, CHRM has demonstrated obvious<br />
inconsistency and subjective approach to the assessment of the situation<br />
10<br />
Parliamentary Advocate, Newsletter of the CHRM, Jan-Dec <strong>2005</strong>, <strong>Number</strong> 1,<br />
from the interview with Parliamentary Advocate Mr. Iurie Perevoznic<br />
11<br />
1999 Annual Report, Center for Human Rights of Moldova, Chisinau, p. 5<br />
217<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
with human rights in Moldova. First of all, Parliamentary Advocates<br />
have divided human rights not by the “right” criteria itself, but<br />
according to the social categories, such as rights of the elderly people,<br />
rights of the disabled people, rights of the children, etc. This approach<br />
suggests that Parliamentary Advocates assume the authority to judge<br />
what rights are more important to the particular category of the citizens.<br />
For instance, all above mentioned chapters of the Annual Report of<br />
1999 focus exclusively on the social and economic rights describing<br />
difficult economic situation of these categories of the citizens and<br />
criticizing governmental decisions to cut certain social benefits or<br />
privileges. Secondly, quantitative data provided by the center is based<br />
on the content of the petitions and on the statistical information that is<br />
publicly available from the government agencies. Many conclusions<br />
produced in the report rely on the information from the Department of<br />
Statistics and Sociology and written complaints submitted to the CHRM<br />
by the applicants who claim that their rights were violated. All these<br />
facts show that CHRM in its official reports cannot provide credible and<br />
comprehensive data regarding the true situation with human rights.<br />
Adding some more statistical data approved by the CHRM to be used in<br />
its annual reports will help to support this statement. From 1999 to 2003<br />
only about 30%-40% of the petitions fell under the authority of the<br />
Center to launch its own investigation in order to verify the facts<br />
provided by the complaining parties. This means that the rest (up to<br />
60%) of the complaints were simply redirected for consideration to the<br />
competent authorities. Moreover, continuously, every year about 60%<br />
of the complaints come from the Chisinau municipality alone, which<br />
means extreme “under-representation” of other regions of the country<br />
where human rights violations is much harder to track. This again<br />
shows, that CHRM when describing human rights situation in Moldova<br />
either paraphrases publicly available information from governmental<br />
sources, or depicts very subjective, one-sided and often unrealistic<br />
image based on the incoming complaints.<br />
Annual Report of 2000 reflects very similar pattern. Human rights<br />
situation is again linked to the difficult social and economic conditions<br />
2<strong>18</strong><br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
in the country. Chapters about the right to assistance and social<br />
protection, right to education, right to labor and right to property are<br />
dominated by the numerous examples of different claims, material in<br />
nature, made to the government on the behalf of the applicants. Other<br />
important issues such as trafficking in persons and inhuman treatment of<br />
detainees are addressed only slightly, despite the increased attention of<br />
international organizations and governments to these problems. 12<br />
CHRM admitted that despite numerous complaints about degrading<br />
treatment, physical violence and tortures that detainees experience from<br />
penitentiary officers, during 1998-2000 there was only one registered<br />
case of inhuman, humiliating behavior towards the convicts on the part<br />
of penitentiary officer. 13<br />
In Annual Report of 2001 again, all human rights’ violations noted by<br />
the CHRM are limited to the inadequate funding and social assistance<br />
from the Government: right to private property and social assistance,<br />
right to social protection and assistance, right to labor, right to health.<br />
The overall analysis by CHRM concludes that government should<br />
provide more social assistance, create more jobs, pay higher salaries,<br />
provide free medical treatment, etc. For the first time CHRM has<br />
mentioned a very important political right, crucial to the stable<br />
democratic governance – right to elect and to be elected. Remarkably,<br />
CHRM confirmed that it had received no complaints concerning<br />
violation of this right, thus explaining why this right is not addressed in<br />
the official reports. This once again proves that the assessment of<br />
human rights situation in Moldova provided by the CHRM is<br />
incomplete and subjective.<br />
In Annual report of 2002 CHRM for the first time has addresses civil<br />
rights in a separate, although very short and incomprehensive chapter.<br />
Parliamentary Advocates have addressed the situation discussing<br />
increasing crime rates in Moldova and expressing concerns about<br />
12<br />
Supporting human rights and democracy: the U.S. record 2004-<strong>2005</strong>,<br />
Department of State Publication 11237, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights<br />
and Labor, Bureau of Public Affairs, Released March <strong>2005</strong>, p. 139-143<br />
13<br />
2000 Annual Report, Center for Human Rights of Moldova, Chisinau, p. 23<br />
219<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
inhuman treatment of detainees. Under subtitle Justice no factual<br />
information was provided. All problems of detainees were linked to the<br />
poor financing of the penitentiary system. The rest of the Report<br />
dedicated to the human rights situation assessment presents a simple<br />
listing of statistical data from governmental sources that depicts difficult<br />
economic situation, poverty, low salary and benefit rates and<br />
insufficient spending on the health care system.<br />
Annual Report of 2003 draws more comprehensive situation with<br />
respect to the political and civil rights in Moldova. Issues of<br />
discrimination, access to public records and right to defense are<br />
evaluated separately. Chapter II Social and Economic Rights present<br />
traditional for the CHRM evaluation and attitude.<br />
Summarizing the analysis of the annual reports released by the CHRM<br />
and presented to the Parliament, we can conclude that they do not create<br />
a clear and objective picture of the human rights situation in the<br />
country. The cause for this failure is two-folded. First is the insufficient<br />
information that CHRM uses in preparing its reports, as it was proved in<br />
the above passages. Governmentally produced statistical data and<br />
information derived from the written complaints cannot provide for a<br />
comprehensive and objective analysis. As a result, such issues as<br />
governmental control over media, human trafficking, violations during<br />
local elections of 2003 and other problems of this sort noted by other<br />
observers, are almost completely absent from the CHRM reports.<br />
Second is subjective attitude of Parliamentary Advocates and their<br />
personal judgment about the priorities in the field of human rights.<br />
Obviously, throughout its history, CHRM has emphasized the<br />
importance of social and economic and called the government to<br />
increase spending on social programs. This subjective attitude has<br />
marginalized political and civil rights that constitute the foundation of<br />
the democratic society. Ignoring the fact that political rights should be<br />
first secured in order for democratically elected governance to perform<br />
its functions being accountable for the people, Parliamentary Advocates<br />
continue to push for the social assistance as a remedy for the majority of<br />
problems with human rights in the country.<br />
220<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
As a result, CHRM’s annual reports create a misguiding assessment of<br />
the observance of human rights. An uninformed reader can form an<br />
impression that difficult economic situation is the cause of all problems.<br />
Talking about Members of Parliament and ordinary citizens, the reports<br />
do not present any original conclusions or suggestions that cannot be<br />
derived from the media, public sources, or human rights watchdogs’<br />
reports. At the same time political and civil rights should draw special<br />
attention of independent observers. Their observance is the indicator of<br />
democratic development in Moldova, which is on its way to join the<br />
family of European democracies.<br />
On July 28, <strong>2005</strong> Parliament of the Republic of Moldova has adopted a<br />
decision regarding the Report presented by the CHRM about the<br />
situation with human rights and activity of the Center in 2004. After<br />
analysis of the statistics concerning the complaints received and<br />
investigated by the Center, Members of Parliament have assessed that<br />
human rights situation in Moldova hasn’t changed significantly<br />
comparing with the indications of the previous year. 14 Their decision<br />
also emphasizes that Parliamentary Advocates haven’t demonstrated<br />
sufficient initiative when existing information confirmed massive<br />
violation of constitutional freedoms and liberties of the citizens.<br />
Parliament has also estimated that CHRM hasn’t succeeded in reaching<br />
the objectives of the National Actions Plan in the Field of Human<br />
Rights for 2004-2008. National legislature has adopted several<br />
suggestions for the perfection of the situation with human rights and<br />
efficiency of the CHRM activities. This area became one of major<br />
concern taking into account political course towards European<br />
integration and fulfillment of the provisions of the Actions Plan<br />
European Union - Republic of Moldova, agreed in 2004.<br />
In their Annual Report of 1999 Parliamentary Advocates proudly<br />
acclaimed that as a result of the action taken in 1999 by the CHRM in<br />
accordance with art. 31 of the Law on Parliamentary Advocates,<br />
14<br />
http://www.parliament.md/news/plenaryday/28.07-29.07.<strong>2005</strong>/<br />
221<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
800,000 people have been reinstated in their constitutional rights. 15<br />
Indeed, art. 31 of the above mentioned law gives Parliamentary<br />
Advocates a very powerful tool to use in their fighting for better human<br />
rights protection. This is the authority to petition Constitutional Court<br />
asking to examine the constitutionality of the complete laws or their<br />
parts that according to the Parliamentary Advocates violate certain<br />
rights of the citizens guaranteed by the national Constitution. Due to the<br />
fact that the right to petition Constitutional Court directly has been<br />
attributed only to the limited number of state agencies, Parliamentary<br />
Advocates have a unique opportunity to get unconstitutional laws that<br />
violate constitutional rights cancelled or amended. The analysis of this<br />
important element in the activity of the Parliamentary Advocates can<br />
add to the overall assessment of their effectiveness.<br />
In 1999 Parliamentary Advocates have succeeded in several<br />
applications to the Constitutional Court. Among these cases: petition<br />
regarding constitutional control of the Decision #338 26/05/95 of the<br />
Government on “Returning of property, reimbursement of its value and<br />
payment of compensation to the victims of political repression” which<br />
violated the right of this category of the citizens for fair compensation.<br />
Parliamentary Advocates have also petitioned the Constitutional Court<br />
on the suspension of the art. 32 of the Law regarding the status of<br />
judges as unconstitutional stipulating the social rights of judges for<br />
pension upon retirement. Analyzing the content of Parliamentary<br />
Advocates petitions one can clearly see the tendency for “overrepresenting”<br />
the professional interests of strong interest groups of the<br />
Moldovan society: prosecutors, lawyers, judges, investigators, state<br />
employees, notaries, etc. The majority of the hearings in 1999 in the<br />
Constitutional Court initiated by the Parliamentary Advocates were<br />
regarding the right for social assistance and benefits of the above<br />
mentioned categories of citizens. 16<br />
15<br />
1999 Annual Report, Center for Human Rights of Moldova, Chisinau, p. 39<br />
16<br />
Moldova: Two years under the communist rule in the new millennium /<br />
Moldova Helsinki Committee for Human Rights, editor Serghei Ostaf, Colograf-<br />
Com, 2003, 632 p Observations on the Center for Human Rights Ombudsman<br />
Office in Moldova p 7-17<br />
222<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
In 2000 Parliamentary Advocates were preoccupied with defending<br />
professional rights of the Moldovan legal community. New Law of the<br />
Bar has obliged all practicing lawyers who have obtained a license from<br />
the Department of Justice to join Lawyers’ Union. This was considered<br />
as a limit of the access to the legal profession and declared<br />
unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court. The Parliamentary<br />
Advocates also submitted another petition, addressing the exclusion of<br />
social and material guarantees for the prosecutors and judges.<br />
In 2001 CHRM was not very active in petitioning the Constitutional<br />
Court. Archives of the Center show that the Court rejected numerous<br />
petitions this year. They included several problematic issues of the<br />
military organization, judiciary structure, citizenship by naturalization<br />
and few other questions of minor importance, that do not address<br />
massive human rights violations.<br />
In 2002 CHRM has defended political rights of the citizens to elect their<br />
local representatives in city councils when Parliament first adopted a<br />
law regarding the administrative reform and assigned a date for the new<br />
local election. This has terminated the authority of the elected officials<br />
to continue serving their terms and ignored the choice of the population<br />
made during the previous elections. Although supported by the<br />
Constitutional Court, petition of the Parliamentary Advocates wasn’t the<br />
only one – both opposition and coalition parties have submitted their<br />
petitions claiming the law to be unconstitutional.<br />
Several petitions were again rejected. For example, on January 28, 2002<br />
Parliamentary Advocate considered that Code of Administrative<br />
Violations contains unconstitutional provisions because appointment<br />
decisions by the Parliament, President and Government cannot be<br />
argued before the court. Constitutional Court has rejected this petition<br />
as unmotivated, containing mistakes and not following the Code of<br />
Constitutional Procedure.<br />
223<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
On March 21, 2002 Parliamentary Advocate sent a petition to the<br />
Constitutional Court arguing that provision of the Code of Criminal<br />
Procedure that requires that decision about the termination of<br />
investigation should first be attacked before the prosecutor, and then<br />
before the court, as limiting free access to justice. Constitutional Court<br />
has rejected to hear the matter of this case because other law has already<br />
corrected this deficiency. These two examples can indicate the level of<br />
professional competence of the office of Parliamentary Advocates.<br />
Annual Report 2003 contains no examples when Parliamentary<br />
Advocates have petitioned the Constitutional Court. Indeed, CHRM<br />
archives show that Parliamentary Advocates were not very active in this<br />
regard. One of the few cases filed with Constitutional Court this year<br />
was the case about right for defense, when Parliamentary Advocates<br />
argued that the requirement to have a lawyer when taking the case to the<br />
Supreme Court of Justice violates the right of the citizens to defend<br />
themselves in the court using various means, including direct<br />
representation of one’s own interests.<br />
Analyzing the history of petitioning the Constitutional Court by the<br />
Parliamentary Advocates, there can be found several tendencies that<br />
shift the activity of CHRM in this direction and explain the only average<br />
performance if judging by the number of petitions supported by the<br />
Court.<br />
First of all, Parliamentary Advocates have been continuously<br />
prioritizing social and economic rights over civil and political rights.<br />
Only few petitions address right to elect and to be elected and freedom<br />
of association. The majority of the petitions pursue the reinstatement of<br />
social or material benefits revoked by the legislature.<br />
Secondly, CHRM has served as another channel used by the<br />
professional interest groups such as lawyers, judges, prosecutors,<br />
notaries and others to protect their professional interests and privileges.<br />
Note, that these groups also have powerful voices in Parliament,<br />
224<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Supreme Court of Justice and other institutions that have the authority<br />
to petition Constitutional Court.<br />
Significant number of petitions that have been rejected as unmotivated<br />
and beyond the authority of Parliamentary Advocates can be used as a<br />
proof of lack of professional competence of the CHRM staff.<br />
Clearly, the authority to petition Constitutional Court is may be the only<br />
truly efficient tool that is granted to the CHRM by the legislature that, if<br />
wisely utilized, could produce a significant impact on human rights<br />
situation in the country and reinstatement of particular groups of<br />
citizens in their rights. However, because the limited capability of the<br />
Center, Parliamentary Advocates were unable to filter every legislative<br />
act and its impact on the observance of human rights. Majority of the<br />
petitions resulted from the previous written complaints submitted to the<br />
CHRM by the interested parties. As a result, poor, marginalized and<br />
uninformed majority of the population can seldom call for justice using<br />
this initiative. This also helps to understand why some well organized<br />
professional communities are “over-represented” in Parliamentary<br />
Advocates petitions to the Constitutional Courts.<br />
Another important element in the activity of the Parliamentary<br />
Advocates consists in the research and investigation of the possible<br />
causes of human rights violation and collecting necessary data for their<br />
annual reports, publications and legislative proposals. Being constantly<br />
involved in investigating the alleged human rights violations claimed by<br />
the applicants in their petitions addressed to the CHRM, Parliamentary<br />
Advocates lack resources and power to find the truth. First and<br />
foremost, current budget of the Center does not allow its employees to<br />
make on-site visits and investigations. The only method of investigation<br />
commonly used by the CHRM – written requests to the competent<br />
authorities – often proves to be inefficient because responsible officials<br />
are reluctant in investigating violations committed under their own<br />
jurisdiction.<br />
225<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
Audience of the citizens is another component of CHRM daily activity.<br />
Legal counselors are on duty every day to interview the visitors and<br />
offer them free of charge legal advise. Audience of the citizens follows<br />
the same pattern as analysis of written complaints. Current activity has<br />
demonstrated that the population does not yet know the rights stipulated<br />
in different legal instruments and how they can enjoy them. Many<br />
citizens address continuously to the CHRM with legal issues that are<br />
beyond the mandate of Parliamentary Advocates. 17 Often happens that<br />
individuals use audience service for their own advantage to receive free<br />
legal advice from counselors, that otherwise would require significant<br />
attorney’s fees. We believe that this activity proved to be very<br />
unproductive and should be replaced by the scheduled appointments<br />
that would follow after the written complaint has been accepted for the<br />
examination. This will increase the usefulness of these appointments<br />
and give CHRM counselors more time to work on the accepted<br />
complaints. Following chart, compiled from the annual reports of the<br />
CHRM illustrate the quantitative features of the Center’s activity<br />
including audience of the citizens:<br />
Year Written<br />
Complaints<br />
Signatories Audience<br />
1999 1368 4654 2049<br />
2000 1005 3264 4036<br />
2001 902 2651 2668<br />
2002 1214 3349 3107<br />
2003 1217 1907 1422<br />
2004 1102 1517 ????<br />
Finally, the most successful, but unfortunately not the most powerful<br />
component of the CHRM’s activity consists in educational and<br />
informational campaigns that are aimed to increase the awareness of the<br />
general population and particular groups of citizens such as civil society<br />
17<br />
Parliamentary Advocate, Newsletter of the CHRM, Aug-Oct 2000, <strong>Number</strong> 4,<br />
<strong>Volume</strong> 1, p. 2<br />
226<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
activists, lawyers, and teachers about human rights and legal ways to<br />
protect them. So far, Center has managing this part of its activity well<br />
enough, actively cooperating with various human rights organizations,<br />
local administrations and government agencies. In its annual reports,<br />
Parliamentary Advocates allocate almost one third of its content for the<br />
description of their publications and educational events they have<br />
conducted.<br />
International experts assessing the efficiency of the activity of the<br />
CHRM has noted educational and informational components are the<br />
strongest elements. Thus, senior consultant at the United Nations Office<br />
of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Mr. Peter Hosking has<br />
stated in an interview evaluating the activity of the Center that<br />
educational and training activities are perhaps most effective, while<br />
complaints team needs more skills in investigation techniques,<br />
legislative analysis and human rights policy advise. An example of this<br />
deficiency will be the situations of the penitentiary system, where<br />
policies and legislative amendments should be proposed and<br />
investigation in prisons should be carried out. <strong>18</strong><br />
Finalizing the analysis of the activity of the Center for Human<br />
Rights in Moldova, we can admit that the institution of<br />
Parliamentary Advocates constitutes a part of the national<br />
mechanism for protection of human rights and fundamental<br />
freedoms, which could be extremely potential and efficient, since by<br />
the law regulating the activity of the present institution, the national<br />
ombudsmen have been attributed great functions and significant<br />
possibilities. 19 However, there are certain objective and subjective<br />
obstacles that do not allow Parliamentary Advocates to perform<br />
their functions efficiently and to make a difference improving<br />
overall respect for human rights in the country.<br />
<strong>18</strong><br />
Parliamentary Advocate, Newsletter of the CHRM, Oct-Dec 2000, <strong>Number</strong> 5,<br />
<strong>Volume</strong> 1, p. 3-4<br />
19<br />
This opinion has been supported by Petru Ciuchitu, Chief of the Petitions and<br />
Audience section of the CHRM, for details see Parliamentary Advocate,<br />
Newsletter of the CHRM, Aug-Oct 2000, <strong>Number</strong> 4, <strong>Volume</strong> 1<br />
227<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
These objective obstacles include insufficient funding and overall<br />
disregarding attitude of the Parliament and central authorities to the<br />
work of the Parliamentary Advocates. Basically, because of this lack of<br />
attention from the part of the country’s authorities Center for Human<br />
Rights looks more like a non-governmental organization, which,<br />
however being financed from the public budget, does not exercise any<br />
significant authority or influence attributed to other state agencies. At<br />
the same time, Parliamentary Advocates do not enjoy any special<br />
respect or authority among nonprofit sector either. Human rights NGOs<br />
have been continuously criticizing CHRM for the lack of strategic<br />
policies and initiative. 20<br />
Among the subjective weaknesses in the activity of the CHRM are lack<br />
of leadership and result-oriented management. All of current<br />
Parliamentary Advocates have been holding public service offices of<br />
judges, prosecutors, and investigators previously to their appointment.<br />
Their professional backgrounds might constrain them from taking<br />
radical initiative, criticizing current policies and demanding change in<br />
the respect for human rights in the country.<br />
All the above mentioned reasons make us to conclude that the<br />
institution of Parliamentary Advocates in Moldova requires significant<br />
reforms, external and internal, in order to improve its efficiency.<br />
Moldova does not yet have sufficient experience in human rights<br />
protection. Unfortunately, this institution fails to provide an effective<br />
redress in rights of the applicants and does not have any significant<br />
influence on the general state policies regarding human rights, which is<br />
much more influenced by the recommendations of the Council of<br />
Europe, European Union and other regional and international<br />
organizations.<br />
20<br />
Moldova: Two years under the communist rule in the new millennium /<br />
Moldova Helsinki Committee for Human Rights, editor Serghei Ostaf, Colograf-<br />
Com, 2003, 632 p Observations on the Center for Human Rights Ombudsman<br />
Office in Moldova p 7-17<br />
228<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />
The key directions in the reforming the Center’s ability to effectively<br />
fulfill its mission could be following: concentration on the legislative<br />
proposals and analysis of the proposed legislative acts that have<br />
negative impact on the human rights situation. This could be achieved<br />
through an increased level of cooperation with parliamentary<br />
commission on human rights. CHRM must revise its attitude towards<br />
cooperation with the non-governmental human rights organizations and<br />
other civic society groups. Its policy should be shifted from the pure<br />
informational and educational activity towards policy building and<br />
advocacy. It could serve as a link between government and civic society<br />
in matters concerning human rights and their protection.<br />
Parliament and central authorities in their turn should realize that<br />
without sufficient funding, internal reform and revision of the strategic<br />
directions of the Center’s activity, national mechanism for protection of<br />
human rights will remain incomplete, lacking an independent, selfsufficient,<br />
lucrative and objective state agency that will be able to<br />
produce clear and unbiased picture of the human rights situation and<br />
assist legislative body in drafting national legislation for the better<br />
human rights protection.<br />
229<br />
ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />
(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />
MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS