27.10.2013 Views

FREE LAW JOURNAL Volume 1, Number 2 (October 18, 2005)

FREE LAW JOURNAL Volume 1, Number 2 (October 18, 2005)

FREE LAW JOURNAL Volume 1, Number 2 (October 18, 2005)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong><br />

IN THIS ISSUE :<br />

<strong>Volume</strong> 1, <strong>Number</strong> 2 (<strong>October</strong> <strong>18</strong>, <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

ISSN 1712-9877<br />

EDITORIAL - LOUIS-PHILIPPE ROUILLARD (CANADA)<br />

HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND<br />

MONTENEGRO - DR. DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ (SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO)<br />

APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL<br />

CRIMINAL JUSTICE – DR. DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ (SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO)<br />

THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT BY DR. ANWAR FRANGI (LEBANON)<br />

INTRODUCTION A LA ‘CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE’ - DR. ANWAR FRANGI (LEBANON)<br />

A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI<br />

EGYEZMÉNYEKRE - ORSOLYA BOGDÁN (HUNGARY)<br />

A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA, KÜLÖNÖS<br />

TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE - ORSOLYA BOGDÁN (HUNGARY)<br />

EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> - DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI (POLAND)<br />

NE BIS IN IDEM IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT IN THE UNITED KINGDOM - DR MACIEJ<br />

ROGALSKI (POLAND)<br />

DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG<br />

NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN ZIVILGESETZBUCHES - DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR (TURKEY)<br />

THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong> PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL<br />

HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong> IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT - ALEXANDRU MOCANU (MOLDOVA)<br />

THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH <strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE<br />

<strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM<br />

DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL FULL EMANCIPATION - AGNIESZKA SZPAK<br />

(POLAND)<br />

THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES (OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF<br />

MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS BY<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII (MOLDOVA)<br />

<strong>FREE</strong> WORLD PUBLISHING Inc. @ http://www.FWPublishing.net<br />

4<br />

7<br />

21<br />

43<br />

61<br />

85<br />

105<br />

127<br />

157<br />

163<br />

<strong>18</strong>1<br />

193<br />

211


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

The Free Law Journal results of a merger with the Eastern European Law Journals. It builds<br />

upon this previous success and aims at providing the freedom of publishing juridical research<br />

from everywhere and on all subjects of law. Its goal is to promote respect of the rule of law and<br />

the fair application of justice by sharing juridical research in its pages.<br />

Academics, post-graduate students and practitioners of law are welcome to submit in the<br />

academic section their articles, notes, book reviews or comments on any legal subject, while<br />

undergraduate students are welcome to publish in our student section. The list of fields of law<br />

addressed in these pages is ever-expanding and non-restrictive, as needs and interests arise. If a<br />

field is not listed, the author simply needs to propose the article and the field believed of law<br />

applicable; we will insure to create and list it.<br />

We accept articles in English, French, Bosnian, Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Finnish, German,<br />

Greek, Hungarian, Icelandic, Innuktikut, Italian, Latin, Polish, Portugese (both Brazilian and<br />

European), Romanian, Russian, Serb (both Latin and Cyrillic), Slovenian,Spanish and Turkish.<br />

Articles not in English are provided with a synopsis to explain their content. Articles of<br />

exceptional quality, or requested to be, can be translated into English and/or French. All of this<br />

is the measure of freedom we provide.<br />

The material submitted for publication remains copyrighted to the author. If the author has<br />

interest in publishing elsewhere after having published in our pages, no permission to do so will<br />

be necessary. The author remains in full control of his or her writings. Articles of superior value<br />

will be considered for incorporation in collective works for publishing.<br />

We always accept submissions. To submit, please read the submission guidelines or ask us any<br />

question at : FLJ@FWPublishing.net .<br />

List of subject addressed (as it currently stands - subject to modifications as need arise)<br />

Administrative Law<br />

Admiralty law<br />

Antitrust law<br />

Alternative dispute resolution<br />

Anti-Terrorism<br />

Bankruptcy<br />

Business Law<br />

Canon Law<br />

Civil Law<br />

Common Law<br />

Comparative Law<br />

Constitutional Law<br />

Contract Law<br />

(Consuetudinary law)<br />

Obligations<br />

Quasi-contract<br />

Corporations law<br />

Criminal Law<br />

Organised Crime<br />

Criminal Procedure<br />

Cyber Crime Law<br />

Penal law<br />

Cyber law<br />

Election law<br />

Environmental law<br />

European Law<br />

Evidence Law<br />

Family law<br />

History of Law<br />

Human Rights Law<br />

Immigration Law<br />

Intellectual Property Law<br />

International trade law<br />

Patent<br />

Trademark Law<br />

International Humanitarian<br />

Rights Law<br />

Laws of Armed Conflicts<br />

Laws of war<br />

War Crimes Law (Belgium)<br />

International Law (Public)<br />

Diplomatic Relations<br />

Jus Gentium<br />

Treaties Law<br />

Labor law<br />

Law and economics<br />

Law and literature<br />

Medical Law<br />

Public Health Law<br />

Public Law<br />

Malpractice<br />

Mental health law<br />

Military law<br />

National Legal Systems -<br />

(Laws of any national legal<br />

system that is not of a<br />

precise category)<br />

Nationality and naturalisation<br />

Laws<br />

Natural law<br />

Philosophy of Law<br />

2<br />

Private International Law<br />

Private law<br />

Procedural law<br />

Property law (Public)<br />

International Law (See<br />

International Law (Public))<br />

Refugee Law<br />

Religious law<br />

Islamic Law (Sharia)<br />

Qur'an<br />

Sharia<br />

Jewish law (Halakha)<br />

Hebrew law (Mishpat Ivri)<br />

Talmud<br />

Taqlid<br />

Christian (other than Canon<br />

Law)<br />

Twelve Tables<br />

Roman Law<br />

Sacred text<br />

State of Emergencies Laws<br />

Space law<br />

Tax law<br />

Technology law<br />

Torts Law<br />

Quasi-delict<br />

Trusts and estates Law<br />

Liens<br />

Water law<br />

Zoning


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Free World Publishing is a partner of the Free European Collegium, provider of web-based, elearning<br />

education in matters related to the European Union.<br />

All material published are available for free on Free World Publishing Inc. web site at<br />

http://www.FWPublishing.net and can be used freely for research purposes, as long as the<br />

authors’ sources are acknowledged in keeping with national standards and laws regarding<br />

copyrights.<br />

All mail correspondence can be made with the editorial board at Karikas Frigyes u.11, 2/1, XIII<br />

kerulet, 1138 Budapest, Republic of Hungary, while electronic correspondence can be made<br />

through FLJ@FWPublishing.net .<br />

The views and opinions expressed in these pages are solely those of the authors and not<br />

necessarily those of the editors, Free World Publishing Inc. or that of the Free European<br />

Collegium Inc.<br />

Cited as (<strong>2005</strong>) 1(2) Free L. J.<br />

ISSN 1712-9877<br />

3


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Free Law Journal Submission Guidelines<br />

Important. The following is not meant to discourage from submitting; only to ensure quality. If<br />

your article conforms to your own national standard of writings, we accept all and any format as<br />

long as arguments are justified by footnotes or endnotes. Never hesitate to submit an article : if<br />

there is a need for improvement, we will inform you and we will always remain open for resubmissions.<br />

1. Academics, Post-Graduate Students and Practitioners of law are all welcomed to publish their<br />

book reviews, comments, notes and articles.<br />

2. All legal subjects are considered for publication, regardless of the legal tradition, national or<br />

international field of expertise. The only limit to the extend of our publishing would be content<br />

that is illegal in national legislation (i.e. enticement to hatred) or against international norms (i.e.<br />

promoting genocide).<br />

3. Articles are welcomed in English, French, Bosnian, Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Finnish,<br />

German, Greek, Hungarian, Icelandic, Innuktikut, Italian, Latin, Polish, Portugese (both<br />

Brazilian and European), Romanian, Russian, Serb (both Latin and Cyrillic), Slovenian as well<br />

as Spanish. Note that our staff is limited and therefore we use "Word Recognition<br />

Processors" to communicate in some languages. Nonetheless, this does not prevent<br />

understanding articles submitted in these language and we are not interested in measuring every<br />

word of your article : simply in publishing your writings. Therefore, we will review the general<br />

content, but leave with you the precise sense and meaning that you want to convey in your own<br />

language. If translation is desired by the author, we then submit it for translation to a translator.<br />

4. Their is no defined system of reference (footnotes or endnotes) demanded. As long as you<br />

justify your argument through references (author and work), we accept all writings respecting<br />

your own national standards. Exceptions : For Canadians, the Canadian Legal Guide to Citation<br />

is recommended but not mandatory. For Americans, referencing is expected to be in accordance<br />

with Harvard University's The Bluebook, A Uniform System of Citation. Any breach of<br />

copyrights is the sole responsibility of the author.<br />

5. The author retains the copyrights to his or her writings. As articles are unpaid for, ownership<br />

remains within your hands. We act as publishers and caretaker. Nothing prevents you from<br />

publishing elsewhere. You may even decide to have the article taken off this site if another<br />

publisher desires to buy the rights to your article.<br />

6. We reserve ourselves the right to edit the content or length of the article, if at all necessary.<br />

7. We do not discriminate in any way. Our aim is to bring under one roof perspectives from<br />

everywhere and everyone. Never hesitate to submit.<br />

8. If you desire information or desire to submit, do not hesitate to contact us at :<br />

FLJ@FWPublishing.net.<br />

4


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

EDITORIAL<br />

Welcome to the second issue of the Free Law Journal, a print and electronic journal aiming at<br />

promoting respect of the rule of law and the fair application of justice everywhere through the sharing<br />

of juridical research.<br />

The Free Law Journal’s first issue was a definitive success in terms of scope and reach, registering a<br />

very high volume of consultation on the web and orders of paper copies. This signals a definitive<br />

interest in getting to know the legal research produced everywhere and to share this knowledge.<br />

As such, this permits us to reach our first and foremost objective to promote the rule of law.<br />

Knowledge is definitely part of the application of this objective and we see a clear desire from people<br />

all over the world to gain access to this knowledge in order to foster the fair application of justice for<br />

all.<br />

Therefore, welcome to our second issue and we hope that our contributions to legal research and<br />

knowledge will expand through your witten contributions.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Louis-Philippe F. Rouillard<br />

Editor-in-Chief, Free World Publishing Inc.<br />

5


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

6


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY<br />

DEFENCE IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF<br />

SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO<br />

BY DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ*<br />

Introductory remarks<br />

All men in the world have the use of many natural, universal rights who<br />

names are human rights. These rights have general law protection. The<br />

attack to these rights many criminal codes has prescribed as criminal<br />

acts. Lack of any of general, basic elements of the definition of the<br />

criminal act in criminal code, of objective or subjective character,<br />

exempts that act (that is, the act committed by a person, with resulting<br />

consequences) from the character of criminal act 1 . It is regarded to the<br />

circumstances which an act of a man exempts from either social danger<br />

or illegality, or of both elements 2 .<br />

Namely, the exclusion of these elements exists when the act, which is<br />

otherwise regulated by law as a criminal act, is considered as excusable,<br />

according to some special provision. Provisions which allow this<br />

otherwise “forbidden” act in a specific case exclude illegality, so that<br />

there is no criminal act in that case.<br />

There are two bases for the exclusion of the criminal act in the criminal<br />

law of Serbia and Montenegro. They are:<br />

1) general bases (which are specifically provided by law and may be<br />

found in any criminal act or for any perpetrator) and<br />

* Dragan Jovašević PhD, Associate Professor, Faculty of Law in Nis, Serbia<br />

and Montenegro.<br />

1<br />

Ljubiša Jovanović, Dragan Jovašević, Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Nomos,<br />

Beograd, 2002.p.72<br />

2<br />

Borislav Petrović- Dragan Jovašević, Kazneno pravo Bosne i Hercegovine,<br />

Opći dio, Pravni fakultet, Sarajevo, <strong>2005</strong>. godine, p. 34-41<br />

7<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />

CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

2) special bases ( which are not specifically provided by law and could<br />

not be found in any criminal act or for any perpetrator) 3 .<br />

General bases 4 in the criminal law of the Republic of Serbia (according<br />

to the provisions of the General criminal law) are: 1) insignificant social<br />

danger (article 8. paragraph 2. Basic Criminal Code former Criminal<br />

code of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 5 from July 1976.), 2)<br />

necessary defence (article 9. paragraph 2. Basic Criminal Code) and 3)<br />

extreme necessity (article 10. paragraph 2. Basic Criminal Code).<br />

In the Criminal code of the Republic of Montenegro 6 from December<br />

2003. there is also a number of bases for the exclusion of the criminal<br />

act. They are: 1) an act of little significance (article 9. ), 2) necessary<br />

defence (article 10. ), 3) extreme necessity (article 11. ) and 4) force and<br />

threat (article 12. ).<br />

Special bases for the exclusion of the criminal act are not specifically<br />

provided by law. They present a creation of the law theory and court<br />

practice (but some of them are seen in the foreign legislations in specific<br />

cases). Specific bases usually include: 1) assent of the inflicted, 2) selfinfliction,<br />

3) performing the official duty, 4) superior’s order, 5) the<br />

right for disciplinary or corrective punishment and 6) allowed risk.<br />

According to the fact that these special bases are not specifically<br />

provided by law, their effect and applicability are of controversial<br />

matter 7 .<br />

3 Dragan Jovašević, Leksikon krivičnog prava, Službeni list , Beograd, 2002.p.<br />

376<br />

4 Bogdan Zlatarić- Mirjan Damaška ,Rječnik krivičnog prava i postupka,<br />

Informator, Zagreb,1960.p.193<br />

5 Dragan Jovašević, Komentar Krivičnog zakona SR Jugoslavije, Službeni<br />

glasnik, Beograd, 2002.p.26-29<br />

6 Službeni list Republike Crne Gore, Podgorica, No. 70/2003 ; Ljubiša Lazarević-<br />

Branko Vučković- Vesna Vučković, Komentar Krivičnog zakonika Republike<br />

Crne Gore, Obod, Cetinje, 2004.p.142<br />

7<br />

Zoran Stojanović, Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Službeni glasnik, Beograd,<br />

2000.p.148<br />

8<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />

CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

The notion of necessary defence<br />

According to provision article 9. paragraph 2. Basic Criminal Code<br />

(with aplication in Republic of Serbia) , and article 10. paragraph 2.<br />

Criminal code of the Republic of Montenegro , necessary defence is<br />

defence which is necessary for a perpetrator in order to protect himself<br />

or other person from an imminent illegal attack 8 . An act committed in<br />

necessary defence is excusable because the legislator himself considers<br />

that the perpetrator of such act is authorised for commission of that act 9 .<br />

From this definition 10 , it results that necessary defence, in the sense of<br />

institute of criminal law, has to fulfil two conditions-the existence of<br />

attack and protection from such attack. But not every attack gives the<br />

right for necessary defence, nor every protection from attack is<br />

necessary defence. Attack, as well as protection from attack, has to fulfil<br />

conditions cumulatively provided by law.<br />

Conditions for the existence of attack<br />

Attack is every act aimed towards violating or endangering legal<br />

property or legal interest of a person 11 . It is most often undertaken by<br />

action, and sometimes by inaction. In order for an act to be relevant<br />

with the view to institute of necessary defence, it has to fulfil certain<br />

conditions, which are: attack has to be undertaken by man; attack has to<br />

be aimed against any legal property or legal interest of a person; attack<br />

has to be illegal; and attack has to be real.<br />

This solution are providing many modern criminal codes as : article 19.<br />

of Criminal code of the Republic of Albania 12 , article 3 of the Criminal<br />

8 H.H. Jescheck, Lehrbuch des Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Berlin,1972.p.251<br />

9 Vojislav Đurđić- Dragan Jovašević - Ljubiša Zdravković, Nužna odbrana u<br />

krivičnom pravu, Niš, 2004.p. 42-53<br />

10 Dragan Jovašević, Tarik Hašimbegović, Osnovi isključenja krivičnog dela,<br />

Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd, 2001. p. 78-93<br />

11 Josip Šilović, Nužna odbrana, Zagreb, 1910.p.97<br />

12<br />

The Criminal code of the Republic of Albania, Offialia text, Tirana, 2000.<br />

9<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />

CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

code of the Republic of Osterrei 13 , article 13. of the Criminal code of<br />

the Republic of Belarus 14 , article 12. of the Criminal code of<br />

theRepublic of Bulgaria 15 , article 6. of the Criminal code of the<br />

Republic of Finland 16 , article 122-5 of Criminal code of the Republic of<br />

France 17 , article 22. of the Greek criminal law <strong>18</strong> , article 11. of Criminal<br />

code of the Republic of Slovenia 19 , article 9. of the Criminal code of the<br />

Republic of Macedonia 20 , article 29. of the Criminal code of the<br />

Republic of Croatia 21 , article 52. of the Criminal code of the Republic of<br />

Italy 22 , article 22. of the Criminal code of the Republic of Israel 23 , article<br />

20. of the Criminal code of the Peoples Republic of China 24 , articles 32.<br />

and 33. of the Criminal cdoe of the Federal Republic of Germany 25 ,<br />

article 37. of the Criminal code of the Russian federation 26 , article 33. of<br />

the Criminal code of the Swiss federation 27 , article 15. of the Republic<br />

of Ukraine 28 etc.<br />

1) Attack can only be undertaken by man.-If an act is not undertaken by<br />

13<br />

Otto Trifterer, Osterreischesches Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Wien, New<br />

York, 1994.<br />

14<br />

The Suprime Soviet of the BSSR, Criminal code of the Republic of Belarus,<br />

Official text, Minsk, 2001.<br />

15<br />

I. Nenov, Nakazatelno pravo, Obša čast, Sofia, 1993.<br />

16<br />

Finnish Penal code, Finnish Ministry of Justice, Helsinky, 1996.<br />

17<br />

G. Stefani, G. Levasseur, B. Bulock, Droit penal general, Paris, 1994.<br />

<strong>18</strong><br />

N.B.Lolis, G. Mangakis, The Greek penal code, London, 1973.<br />

19<br />

B.Penko, K. Strog, Kazenski zakonik z uvodnimi pojasnili, Ljubljana, 1999.<br />

20<br />

Gorgi Marjanovik, Krivično pravo, Opšt del, Skoplje, 1998.<br />

21<br />

Željko Horvatić, Miroslav Šeparović, Novo hrvatsko kazneno pravo, Zagreb,<br />

1997. ; Željko Horvatić, Petar Novoselec, Kazneno pravo, Opći dio, zagreb,<br />

2001.<br />

22<br />

Compendio di diritto penale, Parte generale e speciale, Simone, Napoli, 2004.<br />

23<br />

Laws of the State of the Israel, Special volume, Penal law, Jerusalem, 1977.<br />

24<br />

C.D. Pagle, Criminal law of the People’s Republic of China, Peking, 1997.<br />

25<br />

W.Gropp, Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1998. ;<br />

U: Ebert, Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Heidelberg, 1993.<br />

26<br />

J.I. Skuratov, V.M.Lebedov, Kommentarii k Ugolovnomu kodeksu v<br />

Rossijskoj federacii, Norma, Moskva, 1996.<br />

27<br />

Schweiserisches Strafgesetzbuch, Stand Am 1. April 1996., Bern, 1997.<br />

28<br />

M.I.Koržanskij, Popularnij kommentar Kriminolnogu kodeksu Ukrajini,<br />

NAUkova dumka, Kiev, 1997.<br />

10<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />

CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

man but by an animal or by a force of nature, then there is the existence<br />

of danger as an element of extreme necessity, but not as well necessary<br />

defence. However, if a person directed a force of nature (torrent,<br />

rockslide) in order to endanger other person or his legal property, or if<br />

an animal (a dangerous dog or a horse) is used as means for<br />

endangering protected property, than these cases are also considered as<br />

necessary defence. Attack could be undertaken by any person, no matter<br />

of the age, accountability or guilt. It could be undertaken by any action<br />

or inaction, as well as using any means which is suitable for violation or<br />

endangering some legal property 29 .<br />

Therefore, necessary defence is excusable in case of an actual attack<br />

(instantaneous or present), as well as in case of imminent attack.<br />

Whether the attack is imminent, is a question which is determined by<br />

court in each particular case, judging all the circumstances of the<br />

committed act and the perpetrator. The attack is imminent when there is<br />

a possibility (in time and place) of the close carrying out an attack 30 .<br />

But, it does not mean that necessary defence is excusable against future,<br />

undetermined in place and time, but indicated attacks. Measures of<br />

precaution and preventive protection against indicated or expected<br />

attacks are excusable only if they do not go over the limits of necessary<br />

measures for that specific moment.<br />

2) Attack has to be aimed against a person, his legal property or legal<br />

interest.-Attacked or endangered properties, in the sense of necessary<br />

defence, could be different. Most often, life and physical integrity is<br />

being attacked, but sometimes it can be property, honour, reputation,<br />

dignity, moral. The object of attack could be any legal property or legal<br />

interest. Law does not explicitly state which are those goods that can be<br />

the objects of attack in the sense of necessary defence. Attack can be<br />

aimed against any legal property of the attacked person, but also against<br />

any legal property of some other physical or legal person. In that way,<br />

29<br />

Petar Novoselec, Krivično pravo, Krivično delo i njegovi elementi, Osijek,<br />

1990.p.35-36<br />

30<br />

Toma Živanović, Krivično pravo Kraljevine Jugoslavije, Opšti deo, Beograd,<br />

1935.p.231<br />

11<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />

CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

attack can be aimed at violating the property of a corporation, facility or<br />

some other organization, but also against state security and its<br />

constitution.<br />

Therefore, necessary defence exists not only in case of protecting from<br />

the attack on a legal property, but also in case of protecting from the<br />

attack on any property of other person (physical or legal) if that person<br />

is not capable of protecting himself from such attack. There are theories<br />

in criminal law 31 , according to which some cases of protecting from the<br />

attack are not considered to be necessary defence, but called “necessary<br />

help”. In any case, the scope and necessity of defence depend in the first<br />

place on the nature of legal property which is attacked or endangered.<br />

3) Attack has to be illegal.-Attack is illegal when it is not based on some<br />

legal regulation and when it is not undertaken on the bases of some<br />

legal authorisation. Therefore, attack which is undertaken during<br />

exercising duty according to some legal authorisation, is not illegal and<br />

necessary defence in that case is not excusable. However, if an<br />

authorised person oversteps the limits of legal authorisation, then such<br />

situation is changed into illegal attack against which necessary defence<br />

is allowed. On the other hand, violation of necessary defence also<br />

changes into illegal attack, in which case the attacker has the right for<br />

defence (because in this case he is in the state of necessary defence).<br />

The right for necessary defence exists no matter if the attacker is<br />

conscious of illegality of his attack or not. Namely, it is enough that the<br />

attacked person objectively realises the attack. It is of no significance<br />

whether the attacker is guilty or not, as well as whether his act is<br />

punishable. Illegal attack could be undertaken by a child or by a<br />

mentally incompetent person. That means that necessary defence on<br />

necessary defence is not excusable. But, different situations in life can<br />

happen, when the attacked person anticipates the possibility of being<br />

attacked in certain place and time because of his relationship with some<br />

person. If in such situations anticipated attack is undertaken, it is<br />

31<br />

Vojislav Đurđić - Dragan Jovašević, Praktikum za krivično pravo, Knjiga<br />

prva, Opšti deo, Službeni glasnik, Beograd,2003.p.26-32<br />

12<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />

CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

considered as illegal.<br />

Even more controversial situation is when a person provokes attack.<br />

There is no dilemma if the attacked person had previously endangered<br />

someone’s integrity or property. The problem arises if such attack is<br />

manifested verbally or only with concluding acts which irritate, provoke<br />

or underestimate the attacker. Social component of the institute of<br />

necessary defence should be considered in such situations. Namely,<br />

necessary defence stands for protecting the rights from illegality, and<br />

because of that abuse of this institute is not excusable. If the attacked<br />

person had deliberately provoked the attack, so as to use it and violate<br />

the attacker or his property, than the attacked person has no right on<br />

necessary defence. Such cases are known as feign necessary defence 32 .<br />

4) Attack has to be real.-Namely, it has to exist really in the outside<br />

world. It means that it is necessary that the attack has already started or<br />

it is imminent. Whether an attack exists or not, is a factual question<br />

which is being solved by court in each specific case. Typical example of<br />

real attack is endangering life or making physical injuries to a person. If<br />

there is no real attack, but the attacked person had a wrong or<br />

incomplete impression or illusion of its existence, there is no basis for<br />

necessary defence. In such case there is putative, imaginable or<br />

ostensible necessary defence. This defence does not exclude the<br />

existence of a criminal act, but it could be a ground for exclusion of the<br />

guilt 33 .<br />

Therefore, putative necessary defence represents, in fact, the lack of<br />

conscience of the attacked person about some real circumstance of the<br />

attack. That is, in fact, wrong impression and conviction that the attack<br />

aimed at violation of some property is real. This mistake could be<br />

related to the conscience about the illegality of the attack (when there is<br />

legal mistake). In other words, putative necessary defence is reduced to<br />

32<br />

Ljubo Bavcon, Alenka Šelih, Kazensko pravo, Splošni del,<br />

Ljubljana,1987.p.151<br />

33<br />

Zoran Stojanović, Komentar Krivičnog zakona SR Jugoslavije, Službeni list,<br />

Beograd, 1999.p.22-24<br />

13<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />

CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

unavoidable mistake, in broader or narrower sense that the attacked<br />

person is in a condition of real and objectively needed necessary<br />

defence. When judging the existence of necessary defence or its<br />

violation, an act has to be seen on the whole, which means that it cannot<br />

be reduced and limited to only what had happened between the<br />

defendant and late (that is, the one who has suffered loss) immediately<br />

before the gun shot 34 .<br />

Conditions for the existence of defence<br />

Defence or protection from the attack is every action of the attacked<br />

person aimed at eliminating, preventing or protecting from the attack.<br />

By protection from the attack, the attacked person himself violates or<br />

endangers some legal property of the attacker. This violation or<br />

endangerment represents, in essence, formal characteristics of some<br />

criminal act from the federal or republic law (most often it is about a<br />

criminal act against life or physical integrity).<br />

Only in case when the attacked person, during the protection from<br />

attack, violates some property of the attacker, the existence of the<br />

institute of necessary defence is possible 35 . Necessary defence is not<br />

only the defence from the attack which endangers security of life of the<br />

attacked person, but every defence from present and illegal attack, if<br />

such defence was necessary for protection from the attack 36 .<br />

For the definition of needed defence, in the sense of penal law, it is<br />

absolutely necessary that the illegal attack is protected from by a<br />

punishable act towards the attacker. If such protection would not be<br />

considered as a punishable act, then it would be a situation beyond the<br />

area of penal law 37 .<br />

34 presuda Vrhovnog suda Srbije Kž. 474/91<br />

35 Gorgi Marjanovik, Krivično pravo, Opšt del, Prosvetno<br />

delo,Skopje,1998.p.<strong>18</strong>3<br />

36 presuda Vrhovnog suda Srbije Kž. 260/70<br />

37<br />

Đorđe Avakumović, Teorija kaznenog prava, Beograd, <strong>18</strong>87-<strong>18</strong>89,p.279<br />

14<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />

CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Defence, as an element of necessary defence, as well, has to fulfil<br />

certain conditions in order to be of criminal legal relevance. These<br />

conditions are: defence consists of protection from the attack; defence<br />

has to be aimed against the property of the attacker; defence has to be<br />

simultaneous with the attack, and defence has to be necessary for the<br />

protection from attack.<br />

1) Defence has to be consisted of protection from the attack.-If defence<br />

is not aimed at protection or prevention of attack, than it is not an<br />

element of necessary defence. Defence, in fact, depends on the existence<br />

of attack. The kind of defence has to be according to the attack.<br />

Attacked person is not obliged to retreat before the attacker. On the<br />

contrary, he is authorised to frustrate and disable the real illegal attack,<br />

in the aim of defence of legal property, by simultaneous legal attack on<br />

the attacker’s legal property 38 .<br />

2) Defence has to be aimed against the attacker and against any of his<br />

legal property or legal interest.-These properties could be various, like:<br />

life, body, estate, honour, reputation, human dignity, though most often<br />

situation is when life of the attacker is violated. But, there are situations<br />

in life, when it is about the violation or endangering legal property and<br />

the attacker, as well as some other person.<br />

Then, in relation to the property of the attacker, the attacked person acts<br />

in necessary defence, and in relation to the violation of property of some<br />

other person, he acts in extreme necessity (if all the conditions provided<br />

by law are fulfilled). That means that the attacked person, in order to<br />

protect his property, cannot put to extreme risk legal properties of other<br />

people. But, if the attacker had used properties of other person while<br />

committing an illegal attack as means of that attack, then, in case of<br />

violation those properties, there is necessary defence 39 .<br />

3) Defence has to be simultaneous with attack.-Defence is simultaneous<br />

38<br />

presuda Vrhovnog suda Srbije Kž. 1355/94<br />

39<br />

Draan Jovašević, Tarik Hašimbegović, Osnovi isključenja krivičnog dela,<br />

Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd, 2001.p.50<br />

15<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />

CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

if it was undertaken at time when attack has been imminent or when it<br />

began, but only up to the moment when it ceased. Attack is imminent<br />

when, from all the circumstances, it could be concluded that it was<br />

about to start, and when there was such danger that violation of legal<br />

property would occur in the next moment. The beginning of an act<br />

which could have direct consequences (death, physical injury, taking<br />

away, destroying or damaging property) is not crucial for beginning of<br />

the attack. Undertaken action which objectively represents imminent<br />

source of danger is essential.<br />

Whether an attack is imminent or not is a factual question which is<br />

being solved by court in each particular case. Only threat of imminent<br />

attack, without undertaking previous actions from which it can be<br />

concluded that the attack was imminent, could not be the reason for<br />

undertaking the act of defence. Defence of future attack is not excusable<br />

either, but still undertaking of some measures of precaution and some<br />

protective measures which start to work automatically in the moment<br />

when the attack starts (like various alarm systems connected with<br />

electrical circuit) is allowed.<br />

When the attack has started, defence could begin in the same moment.<br />

But, it often happens that the attacked person is not in position to react<br />

at the same time when the attack starts. In that case defence could be<br />

undertaken at any time during the attack. Continuity of defence has to<br />

coincide with the continuity of attack. When the attack has stopped, the<br />

right of the attacked on necessary defence stops, too. An attack was<br />

ended if legal property of the attacked person has been violated and<br />

when danger has been caused (as a kind of consequence in cases of<br />

criminal acts of endangering), and when the attacker has committed the<br />

action of attack, but due to accidental circumstances there was no<br />

violation of property of the attacked person.<br />

The right for necessary defence stops if the attack has finally and<br />

definitely ceased, but not in case when the attack was only temporarily<br />

ceased. Whether an attack has ceased or only temporarily ceased is a<br />

factual question which is being solved by court in each particular case.<br />

Attack has temporarily ceased if there is a possibility that it could be<br />

16<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />

CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

continued any moment.<br />

4) Defence has to be necessary for protection from attack.-It is the<br />

defence which exists in case when attack cannot be prevented from in<br />

any other way except for violating the attacker’s property. This means<br />

that violation of attacker’s property has to be necessary, unavoidable in<br />

order to protect from the attack, so the intensity of defence is<br />

correspondent to the intensity of the attack and the manner and means<br />

which were used by attacker. When judging this necessity of defence,<br />

the equivalence between intensity of attack and intensity of defence in<br />

each particular case should be taken into consideration. On the other<br />

hand, this proportion means that violation of the attacker’s property is<br />

proportional with value of the property of the attacked person which<br />

was saved in this way.<br />

Violation of necessary defence<br />

If an attacked person, during the protection from attack on his or<br />

someone else’s legal property, oversteps the limits of defence which is<br />

necessary for protection from that attack, there is violation or excerpt of<br />

necessary defence has prescribed in article 9. paragraph 3. Basic<br />

Criminal Code and article 10. paragraph 3. Criminal code of the<br />

Republic of Montenegro.<br />

This violation, according to intensity, exists when violated property of<br />

the attacker is of greater value then the property saved in this way.<br />

Another kind of violation of necessary defence, according to broadness,<br />

exists in case when the attacked person returns an attack which hasn’t<br />

even started or hasn’t been imminent, or if he/she continues violating<br />

the attacked property after the attack has finally and definitely stopped.<br />

In these cases court is authorised to mitigate the sentence for a<br />

perpetrator of criminal act in violation of necessary defence. In case<br />

when violation of necessary defence was due to strong irritation or<br />

freight of the attacked person, court is authorised to release a perpetrator<br />

of such criminal act from the legal sentence.<br />

17<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />

CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

BASIC LITERATURE<br />

Avakumović Djordje, Teorija kaznenog prava, Beograd, <strong>18</strong>87-<strong>18</strong>89.<br />

Babić Miloš, Krivični zakonik Republike Srpske, Banja Luka, 2001.<br />

Babić Miloš, Komentari krivičnih zakona u Bosni i Hercegovini,<br />

Sarajevo, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />

Bačić Franjo, Komentar Kaznenog zakonika Republike Hrvatske,<br />

Zagreb, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />

Bavcon Ljubo – Šelih Alenka, Kazensko pravo, Splošnij del, Ljubljana,<br />

1987.<br />

Compendio di diritto penale, Parte generale e speciale, Milano, 2004.<br />

Đurđić Vojislav – Jovašević Dragan, Međunarodno krivično pravo,<br />

Nomos, Beograd, 2003.<br />

Đurđić Vojislav – Jovašević Dragan, Praktikum za krivično pravo, Prva<br />

knjiga, Opšti deo, Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2003.<br />

Đurđić Vojislav – Jovašević Dragan – Zdravković Ljubiša, Nužna<br />

odbrana u krivičnom pravu, Niš, 2004.<br />

Ebert Udo, Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Heidelberg, 1993.<br />

Foregger Eugen- Serini Egmont, Strafecht, Gesetzbuch, Wien, 1989.<br />

Gropp Walter, Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Berlin, Heidelberg, New<br />

York, 1998.<br />

Horvatić Željko- Šeparović Miroslav, Novo hrvatsko kazneno pravo,<br />

Informator, Zagreb, 1997.<br />

Horvatić Željko – Novoselac Petar, Kazneno pravo, Opći dio, Zagreb,<br />

2001.<br />

Jescheck H.H., Lehrbuch des Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Berlin, 1972.<br />

Jovanović Ljubiša – Jovašević Dragan, Krivično pravo, Opšti deo,<br />

Nomos, Beograd, 2002.<br />

Jovašević Dragan , Leksikon krivičnog prava, Službeni list, Beograd,<br />

2002.<br />

Jovašević Dragan, Komentar Krivičnog zakona SR Jugoslavije,<br />

Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2002.<br />

Jovašević Dragan – Hašimbegović Tarik, Osnovi isključenja krivičnog<br />

dela, Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd, 2001.<br />

Kambovski Vlado, Krivičen zakonik so kratok objasnuvanja i registar<br />

na poini, Skoplje, 1996.<br />

Kambovski Vlado, Krivično pravo, Opšt del, Skoplje, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />

<strong>18</strong><br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />

CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Koržanskij M.I., Popularnij komentar Kriminolnogu kodeksu, Naukova<br />

dumka, Kiev, 1997.<br />

Lazarević Ljubiša, Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Savremena<br />

administracija, Beograd, 2003.<br />

Lazarević Ljubiša- Vučković Branko- Vučković Vesna, Komentar<br />

Krivič nogzakonika Republike Crne Gore, Cetinje, 2004.<br />

Lolis Nicholas – Mangakis Georgis, The Greek penal code, London,<br />

1973.<br />

Marjanovik Gorgi, Krivično pravo, opšt del, Skoplje, 1998.<br />

Nenov Ivan, Nakazateljno pravo, Obša čast, Paralaks, Norma, Sofija,<br />

1993.<br />

Novoselec Petar, Krivično pravo, Krivično djelo i njegovi elementi,<br />

Osijek, 1990.<br />

Pagle C.D., Criminal lae of the People's Republic of China, Peking,<br />

1997.<br />

Pavišić Berislav, Komentar Kaznenog zakonika Republike Hrvatske ,<br />

Rijeka, 2003.<br />

Petrović Borislav – Jovašević Dragan, Krivično (kazneno) pravo Bosne<br />

i Hercegovine, Opći dio, Sarajevo, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />

Roxin Claus, Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Band 1, Munchen, 1997.<br />

Schweiserisches Strafgesetzbuch, Stand Am 1. April 1996., Bern, 1997.<br />

Skuratov J.I.- Lebedov V.M., Kommentarii k Ugolovnomu kodeksu v<br />

Rossijskoj federacii, Norma, Moskva, 1996.<br />

Stefani G., Levasseur G., Bouloc B., Droit penal general, Pars, 1994.<br />

Stojanović Zoran, Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Službeni glasnik,<br />

Beograd, 2000.<br />

Stojanović Zoran , Komentar Krivičnog zakona SR Jugoslavije,<br />

Beograd, 1999.<br />

Šilović Josip, Nužna odbrana, Zagreb, 1910.<br />

Trifterer Otto, Ostereischisches Strafrecht, Allgemeiner teil, Wien,<br />

Berlin, New York, 1994.<br />

Zlatarić Bogdan, Krivični zakonik u praktičnoj primjeni, Opći dio, Prvi<br />

svezak, Zagreb, 1958.<br />

Zlatarić Bogdan – Damaška Mirjan, Rječnik krivičnog prava i postupka,<br />

Zagreb, 1960.<br />

Živanović Toma, Krivično pravo Kraljevine Jugoslavije, Beograd,<br />

1935.<br />

19<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />

CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

20<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - HUMAN RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF NECESSARY DEFENCE IN<br />

CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND<br />

BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF<br />

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE<br />

BY DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ*<br />

INTRODUCTORY REMARKS<br />

When the Roman Statute of permanent International Criminal Court<br />

came into force in the middle of 2002, international criminal law and<br />

international criminal justice – have finally been constituted. It is in the<br />

beginning on XXI century. It is a system of legal regulations contained<br />

within the documents of the international community and national<br />

criminal legislations which determine the concept and characteristics of<br />

international criminal offences, the system of criminal responsibility<br />

and punishments , as well as the bodies and procedures to pronounce<br />

penalties to perpetrators of the most serious crimes against humanity,<br />

peace and international security. This finally brings into life centuries<br />

long idea of establishing universal criminal justice, or justice superior to<br />

national ones, which would pronounce penalties for breaches of<br />

international rules of conduct of states and individuals.<br />

HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL<br />

CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong> AND JUSTICE<br />

The appearance and development of international criminal law and<br />

international criminal justice in the recent history can be devided into<br />

three periods : 1) up to the First World War, 2) between the two World<br />

Wars and 3) after the Second World War to today 1 .<br />

* Dragan Jovašević PhD, Associate Professor, Faculty of Law in Nis,<br />

Serbia and Montenegro.<br />

1<br />

Đurđić V., Jovašević D., Medjunarodno krivično pravo,Nomos, Beograd,<br />

2003.p.25-35<br />

21<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

In the first period, the appearance and the development of the<br />

international criminal law was tightly connected with international laws<br />

of war – a special branch of the law that regulates relations between<br />

states, separately belligerents and establishes concrete legal rules of how<br />

a war is started and ended and procedure against civil people, war<br />

prisoners and wounded 2 .<br />

The sources of international criminal law of that time can be found in<br />

the significant codification documents of international laws of war such<br />

as : 1) the Paris Declaration of <strong>18</strong>56. (which provides the principles<br />

according to which goods of neutral countries can’t be seized in<br />

maritime conflicts and piracy is prohibited), 2) the Geneva Convention<br />

of <strong>18</strong>64.(which regulates the position and prohibition of the wounded in<br />

land conflicts), 3) the Petrograd Convention of <strong>18</strong>68. (which prohibits<br />

the usage of explosive grains that weigh less than 400 gr) and 4) the<br />

Hague Conventions of <strong>18</strong>99. and 1907. (which regulate the position and<br />

prohibition of the wounded and civilian in war). It is beginning of new<br />

branch of penal law in XIX century 3 .<br />

In the second period, the period between the two World Wars, following<br />

up the above mentioned legal sources, a number of important<br />

international legal documents were adopted : 1) the Geneva<br />

Conventions of 1919. (which regulate the position and prohibition of the<br />

wounded, sick men and war prisoner), 2) the Geneva Protocol of 1925.<br />

(which prohibits the usage of poison gas and bacteriological means), 3)<br />

the Paris or Briand-Kellog Pact of 1928. (which prohibition a war as<br />

instrument of international politics) and 4) the London Protocol of 1936.<br />

(which regulate the rules of submarine war) 4 .<br />

Besides these normative activities, that under the strong impression of<br />

the previous war, the issue of concrete individual criminal responsibility<br />

was raised for the first time in the international legal system. Pursuant to<br />

2<br />

Radojković M., Rat i medjunarodno pravo,Beograd, 1947.p.12-31<br />

3<br />

Schwarzenberger G. , The Law of the Armed Conflict,London, 1968.<br />

4<br />

More : Lopičić J., Ratni zločin protiv ratnih zarobljenika, Naša knjiga, Beograd,<br />

<strong>2005</strong>.p.13-42<br />

22<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

articles 227. and 230. of the Versailles Peace Treaty from 1919., the<br />

question of the criminal responsibility of German Emperor William II<br />

Hohenzollern, for ‘’a supreme offence against international morality and<br />

the sanctity of treaties has been raised’’. These articles also have<br />

stipulated the constitution of a special ad hoc tribunal to try the accused<br />

highest german state officials upon very serious charges for committing<br />

an act in violation of the laws and customs of war and high principles of<br />

humanity 5 . However, the justice was not served because the former<br />

german emperor was given asylum in the Netherlands which rejected<br />

the request for fih extradiction 6 .<br />

The third period of historical development of international criminal law<br />

is the period after Second World War. This period is marked by the<br />

most virgorous activity and development of this the most joungest<br />

branches of the modern penal law – international criminal law in<br />

therecent history. This is understandable keeping in mind that the world<br />

was faced with more informations about many millions of innocent<br />

victims and invaluable material damage. The knowlwdgw of<br />

individuals, organizations and countries that led to such tragical<br />

consequences had a significant impact on the final decision to raise the<br />

question of criminal responsibility in a proper manner 7 .<br />

Starting from principles of the protection of universal human values and<br />

general interests and then the principle that violations of international<br />

public law have to be sanctioned and that responsibility is not only<br />

historical, morarly and political question or a question of civil law, the<br />

international responsibility of states and the individual (and command)<br />

criminal responsibility have come to the forefront. The changed<br />

approach to the issue of responsibility was founded on the theory to<br />

application the principle of territory, universal values and protection 8 .<br />

In this period , the most important codification of international criminal<br />

5<br />

Lopičić J., Ratni zločin protiv civilnog stanovništva,Beograd, 1999.p.19-27<br />

6<br />

Perazić G., Medjunarodno ratno pravo, Beograd, 1986.p.16-19<br />

7<br />

Avramov S., Kreća M., Medjunarodno javno pravo,Beograd, 1981.p.14-23<br />

8<br />

Leon F., The Law of War, New York, 1972.p.56<br />

23<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

law included the famous Nuremberg Principles ( which were contain in<br />

the Nuremberg judgment from 1948.). Also, this judgment has definited<br />

of new international criminal offences. Pursuant to the United Nations<br />

Security Council Resolution from 1946. the Commission for the<br />

Codification of International law was founded with the purpose of<br />

establishing new principles of international criminal law and of drafting<br />

a new International criminal code.<br />

The draft Code of Crimes against Peace and Security of Mankind was<br />

published in 1954. and it was composed of thirteen articles with<br />

concrete international criminal offences 9 . The work was followed up by<br />

the United Nations International Law Commission which among other<br />

things, was the first to discuss the foundation of a special international<br />

criminal court. Such an approach was supported by the United Nations<br />

Security Council Resolution from 1968. by which the UN Convention<br />

on Unexpirability of International criminal offences ( genocide, was<br />

crimes , crimes against peace and crimes against humanity) was<br />

adapted. In the period from 1980. till July 1998.(Roma Statute), that<br />

Commission has kept on working, specially on the draft Statute of the<br />

permanent International criminal court 10 .<br />

ESTABLISMENT OF AD HOC MILITARY TRIBUNALS<br />

After the victory ver fascism, the question of individual criminal<br />

responsibility for committed crimes war raised again. The legal bases<br />

were the Declaration Concering Atrocities and conclusions of the<br />

Moscow Conference of the Allies from <strong>October</strong> 1943. and the London<br />

Agreement from August 1945. on the established of the International ad<br />

hoc Military Tribunal and on the punishment of war criminals. the<br />

constituent part of this legal document were the Agreement of the Allies<br />

to Try and Punish Major War Criminals of the European Axis and the<br />

Statute of the Military tribunal.<br />

9<br />

V. Vasilijević, Medjunarodni krivični sud, Beograd, 1961.p.34-52<br />

10<br />

Brownlie J., Basic Documents in International Law,Oxford, 2002<br />

24<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Military tribunal in Nuremberg tried the highest military and political<br />

officials of the Third Reich who were accused of initiating the<br />

aggressive war, suffering, atrocities, destructions, crimes against<br />

humanity and war crimes. The criminal trial has started on November<br />

20,1945. and lasted more than two hundred days and the Prosecution<br />

entered indictments against twenty one major war criminals. The<br />

verdicts were announced on <strong>October</strong> 1, 1946 : eleven sentences to death<br />

hanging , three sentences to life imprisonment, four sentences to longer<br />

terms and three acquittals. The verdicts of guilty were handed down on<br />

the leadership and the organizations of the SS, NSDAP, SD and the<br />

Gestapo and these organizations were declared criminal. This is s first<br />

judgment which the legal entities has proclaimed criminal responsibility<br />

because committing war crimes.<br />

The real jurisdiction of this international military tribunal was<br />

determined by article 6. of the Statute (in London Agreement) pursuant<br />

to which international criminal offences were classified into three<br />

categories : 1) crimes against peace, 2) war crimes and 3) crimes<br />

against humanity. The territorial jurisdiction of the tribunal included<br />

implicitly the prosecution of the Second World War war criminals<br />

‘’whose criminal offences do not have some specific geographical<br />

commitment, regardless the fact whether they will be accused<br />

individually or as members of an organization or a group or in both<br />

capacities’’.<br />

Second military ad hoc tribunal 11 was established in Tokyo pursuant to<br />

the Declaration of the military commander, american general Daghlas<br />

Macarthur of allies January 16. 1946. with the purpose of trying<br />

japanese war criminals for war crimes committed in the Far East. The<br />

process in Tokyo has started on April 29. 1946. and lasted till<br />

November 12. 1948. with the result that twenty eight persons were<br />

pronounced guilty for committing war crimes (specialy war crimes<br />

against war prisoners). During the proccedings four perons died, one<br />

was pronounced insane and the criminal proccedings against him was<br />

stayed. The Tokyo military tribunal passed the following sentences :<br />

11<br />

Josipović I., Haško implenetacijsko kazneno pravo,Zagreb, 2000. p.45-62<br />

25<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

seven dealth penalties, fourteen life imprisonment sentences and two<br />

persons were sentenced to prison with various terms 12 .<br />

In short, legal proccedings before ad hoc tribunals in Nuremberg and<br />

Tokyo contrinuted significantly to the afirmation of principles of<br />

individual criminal responsibility, command responsibility (in Tokyo<br />

judgement), system international criminal offences, and to the<br />

development of international criminal law and especially to the<br />

institutionalization of the idea of international criminal justice 13 . The<br />

end XX century give first permanent international (Roma) criminal<br />

court in Hague 14 .<br />

HAGUE TRIBUNAL (ICTY) FOR FORMER<br />

SFR YUGOSLAVIA<br />

The international tribunal for criminal procesution of persons<br />

responsible for serious violations of international humanitarian law<br />

committed in the teritory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991.<br />

(International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia – ICTY) is one<br />

of ad hoc tribunals established after strong indications of war crimes or<br />

crimes against humanity committed in war conflicts in the territory of<br />

the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY). This<br />

tribunal was established by the United Nations Security Council<br />

Resolution No. 827/93 from May 25,1993. and accordance with the<br />

previous acts issued by the same body – Resolution No. 780/92 from<br />

<strong>October</strong> 6. 1992 and Resolution No. 808/93 from February 22. 1993. In<br />

the material legal sense of meaning, this international ad hoc tribunal is<br />

authorized to investigate alleged war crimes belonging to the group of<br />

legal principles of the Nuremberg (1946.) and Tokyo (1948.)<br />

Tribunales Judgements and Code of the crimes against peace and safety<br />

of Mankind and to establish cempetenlty the individual responsibility<br />

12<br />

Perazić G., Međunarodno ratno pravo,Beograd, 1986. p.14-31<br />

13<br />

C.Van den Wyngaert, International criminal law, Kluwer, Hague, London,<br />

Boston, 2001.p.12-34<br />

14<br />

UN. Doc. A/Conf. <strong>18</strong>3/9, International Legal Materials, 1999.<br />

26<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

for concrete international criminal acts 15 .<br />

Similar ad hoc tribunales with similar jurisdiction, system international<br />

criminal offences and rules about criminal responsibility and<br />

punishments have established United Nations Security Council as : 1)<br />

International criminal tribunal for Rwanda which established of Security<br />

Council Resolution No.955/94 from November 8. 1994 16 , 2) Special<br />

court for Sierra Leone which established of Security Council<br />

Resolution No 1315/2000 from August 14, 2000 and 3) Iraqi special<br />

tribunal which established of the Statute of the Iraqi special tribunal<br />

from December 10. 2003 17 .<br />

The establishment of the Hague tribunal attracted large attention of the<br />

whole world, especially of expert circles in Serbia and Montenegro and<br />

abroad. The first remark is deal with statutory questions. Legal<br />

representatives and the accused raised most often the question of the<br />

legality of the establishment, existence and functioning of ad hoc<br />

tribunals <strong>18</strong> .<br />

The second remark is deal with the defense of the accused. Some legal<br />

representatives of the Defense have pointed out that they do not have<br />

the same effective abilities as the Prosecution, especially in the very<br />

important phase of evidence collection and finding witnesses 19 . Defense<br />

are significantly of the protected witness because the identity of the<br />

witness is not revealed till the trial and it is not possible to contact that<br />

group of persons till the very moment of having the main hearings 20 .<br />

Third remark is deal with the tribulal procedure and the trial in absentia.<br />

15<br />

Vasilijević V., Međunarodni krivični sud,Beograd, 1961.p. 64-68<br />

16<br />

Blakesley Ch., Definition and Triggering Mechanism, The International<br />

criminal court, AIDP,1997.<br />

17<br />

www. cpa-iraq.org/human _rights/statute.htm<br />

<strong>18</strong><br />

Josipović I., Haško implementacijsko kazneno pravo, Zagreb, 2000.p. 124-141<br />

19<br />

Đurđić V., Jovašević D., Međunarodno krivično pravo, Beograd, 2003. p. 33-<br />

34<br />

20<br />

More about remarks against Hague Tribunal in theory criminal law in Serbia<br />

and Montenegro : Stojanović Z., Međunarodno krivično pravo, Beograd, 2002.<br />

27<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Pursuant article 61. of the Statuet of Hague Criminal Tribunale (ICTY)<br />

there is a possibility to initiate proceedings against a person who<br />

currently can’t be accessed by the Tribunal in Hague under the<br />

condition that the indictment against the person has already been raised<br />

and the procedure of brining evidence has been initiated. Here again, the<br />

Hague Tribunal has wide authorities and a possibility to initiate the<br />

proceedings to rewiev and reconfirm the indictment, to declare<br />

internationally a wanted person and to make all countries collaboration.<br />

The participation of the Defense attorneys at this stage is not permitted<br />

and it is conditioned by the first appearance of the accused before the<br />

Tribual 21 . Up to that moment, the Defense attorneys may participate in<br />

the process only as spectators.<br />

REWIEV ON COLLABORATION BETWEEN SERBIA AND<br />

MONTENEGRO AND HAGUE TRIBUNAL<br />

The Dayton-Paris Peace Agreement that was signed in the end of 1995.<br />

(which finnished civil war in Bosnia and Herzegovina) established a<br />

whole range of obligations assigned to all signatories.Among other<br />

things, by singing the agreement the signatories undoubtedly<br />

acknowledged and accepted the existence and activity of the Hague<br />

Tribunal (ICTY) and have undertaken upon themselves the international<br />

legal obligation to collaboration with this Tribunale in Hague. As a<br />

signatory, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (today Serbia and<br />

Montenegro from February 4. 2003 22 .) similarly has undertaken this<br />

and other international obligations, keeping in mind that the same issue<br />

was regulated directly or indirectly by the internal legislation and<br />

numerous previously enacted international documents (as United<br />

Nations Security Council resolutions, conventions, agreements etc).<br />

The collaboration between a government in Belgrade and the Hague<br />

Tribunal evolved in several periods between from 1995. to <strong>2005</strong>. In the<br />

21<br />

Đurđić V., Jovašević D., Međunarodno krivično pravo, Beograd, 2003. p. 117-<br />

1<strong>18</strong><br />

22<br />

Official Gazette of Serbia and Montenegro No. 1/2003<br />

28<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

first period (1995.-2000), the relationship between the FR Yugoslavia<br />

and the Hague Tribunal was hampered with political antagonism,<br />

general lack of trust, politics of the international community that was<br />

expressed by making conditions and putting pressure. The official<br />

bodies of government in Belgrad ( competent organs of the Federal<br />

Republic of Yugoslavia or competent organs of the Republic of Serbia)<br />

at the time did not manage to harmonize their relations with other<br />

relevant key players of the international relations (in international<br />

community) above all the United States or their European allies.<br />

After the change power in FR Yugoslavia (after presidental elections in<br />

Octobar 2000.) aarived the second period in relationship and<br />

collaboration between FR Yugoslavia and Hague tribunal. This<br />

collaboration has have a many remarks and stoppages. From the point of<br />

view of internal law system, the legal situation was somewhat unclear<br />

and that led to delay in concrete forms of collaboration with the Hague<br />

Tribunal . First of all, this may be applied to the requests made by the<br />

Hague Tribunal to the FR Yugoslavia to extradite its citizens suspected<br />

of committing war crimes and crimes against humanity who are in the<br />

territory of our country. The dilemma about the collaboration with the<br />

Hague Tribunal appeared because of constitutional, political, legal and<br />

other reasons.<br />

Legal dilemmas appeared above all because of normative solutions of<br />

the Yugoslav Constitution (from 1992.) and Constitution of Republic of<br />

Serbia (from 1990.) and Code about Criminal Proceedings 23 (from 1976.<br />

with more novels) and especially because of the provision dealing with<br />

the extradition of Yugoslav citizens to foreign courts. In the legal<br />

vacuum, the Federal Government have tried to find legal form that<br />

would enable the protection of our national interest and to avoid the<br />

introduction of new sanctions of international community and fulfil the<br />

requests made by the Hague Tribunal. Till the federal law was enacted,<br />

the Federal Government as a temporary solution has adopted the<br />

Provision on the Collaboration Procedures with the International<br />

23<br />

Jekić Z., Krivično procesno pravo,Beograd, 1992.p.347-351 ; Đurđić V.,<br />

Krivično procesno pravo, Niš, 1998.p. 269-272<br />

29<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Criminal Tribunal 24 (2001.). According to this legal act, the rules<br />

dealing with the jurisdiction of the Hague Tribunal to undertake<br />

investigations in the FR Yugoslavia, the yielding of criminal<br />

proceedings led before Yugoslav courts, the appropriate application of<br />

the Code about Criminal Proceedings provisions, the issue of leagl<br />

assistance, the execution of the verdicts in the territory of the FR<br />

Yugoslavia etc. were established.<br />

The Federal Government of FR Yugoslavia has given priority to<br />

international law and direct application of the Statute of the Hague<br />

Tribunal, starting from the view that the Tribunal is as international<br />

institution and that the FR Yugoslavia has to respect all internationally<br />

undertaken obligations and norms of international public law and<br />

international criminal law. But, the Federal Constitution Court has<br />

passed the decision that this Provision does not comply with the<br />

Yugoslav Constitution and Code about Criminal Proceedings 25 . In its<br />

legal explanation, the Federal Constitution Court started from the<br />

opposite opinion in comparision to the Federal Government’s opinion,<br />

giving priority to the internal legal order.<br />

Starting from these facts, the government of the Republic of Serbia<br />

adopted a similar by law a special Provision on the Collaboration with<br />

the International Criminal Tribunal 26 (2002.). The enactment of the<br />

Republic act ‘’solved’’ the problem of collaboration with the Hague<br />

Tribunal for a very short period of time because internally there were<br />

still political disputes and no consensus in that respect. The adoption of<br />

the legal acts of a higher hierarchy was an imperative and more serious<br />

considerations started especially because of the international factor.<br />

Finally, the Federal Assembly of FR Yugoslavia adopted in 2002.the<br />

Code on the Collaboration of the FR Yugoslavia with the International<br />

Tribunal for criminal procesution of persons responsible for serious<br />

violations of international humanitarian law in territory of former<br />

24 Official Gazette of the FR Yugoslavia, No. 30/2001<br />

25 Official Gazette of FR Yugoslavia, No. 70/2001<br />

26<br />

Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 14/2002<br />

30<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Yugoslavia from 1991 27 . This Code is short legal act and it has 41<br />

articles in total, classified in seven chapters that cover : 1) general<br />

provisions, 2) the authorities of the Tribunal to conduct investigation in<br />

the territory of the FR Yugoslavia, 3) the yielding of cases led before<br />

local courts, 4) the extradition of the accused, 5) legal help to the<br />

Tribunal, 6) the execution of the verdicts made by the Tribunal in the<br />

territory of the FR Yugoslavia and 7) other provosions 28 .<br />

In material-legal sense f meaning, the nature of this Code iz lex<br />

specialis in this matter. In the general provisions, special emphasis has<br />

been given to the principle of priority of international obligations<br />

accepted by the FR Yugoslavia pursuant to international law, especially<br />

the provisons of the Statute of the Hague Tribunal (article 2. of this<br />

Code). On the other hand, the principle of the sovereignty of the FR<br />

Yugoslavia is also stressed in cases of potential collisions with the<br />

Hague Tribunal requests (article 4. of this Code) and the establishment<br />

of the Special National Council for Collaboration with the Hague<br />

Tribunal has been envisaged (article 7. of this Code). Other legal<br />

solutions under this Code in initial chapters are mainly well-known to<br />

experts and general public from the previous practice of the Hague<br />

Tribunal.<br />

In procedural-legal sense of meaning, the Code has regulated to a great<br />

extent and very precisely , the collaboration procedures of domestic<br />

citizens with the Hague Tribunal. The second chapter provisions<br />

(articles 9-11. of this Code) envisage concrete powers of the Hague<br />

Tribunal to undertake investigative activities in the FR Yugoslavia such<br />

as : the collection of informations, interviews with the suspects,<br />

accused, witnesses, sworn-in court experts, the performance of<br />

autopsies and exhumation of corpses, the collection of material<br />

evidence, review and coping of records etc. One limitation deals with<br />

an obligation to respect national sovereignty, security and legal order of<br />

the FR Yugoslavia (article 10. paragraph 3. of this Code). The next<br />

27<br />

Official Gazette of FR Yugoslavia, No.<strong>18</strong>/2002<br />

28<br />

More: Jovašević D., Medjunarodno krivično pravo – teorija,<br />

zakonodavstvo,praksa, Službeni list, Beograd, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />

31<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

chapter (articles 12-17. of this Code) regulates the yielding of criminal<br />

cases conducted before a local court which is in keeping with already<br />

known forms of international criminal court collaboration (legal<br />

assistance).<br />

The central place of the Code from 2002. has been given to the<br />

extradition procedure of the accused that is envisaged under the fourth<br />

chapter (articles <strong>18</strong>-31. of this Code). In compliance with article <strong>18</strong>. the<br />

extradition procedure is relevant, first of all, for the accused and there<br />

are no exceptions on that basis as for their privilegs and immunity, not<br />

even for the Heads of States. The decision on the extradition of the<br />

accused is passed by bodies of Republic of Serbia. The body that is<br />

really authorized to pass a decision on the extradition of a person is the<br />

court that receives from the Ministry of Justice of Republic of Serbia<br />

(former Federal Ministry of Justice , before February 4. 2003.), the case,<br />

that is the request for extradition, confirmed indictment and an orrder to<br />

perform the arrest. Pursuant to that, the authorized investigative judge<br />

determines obligatory detention for the person asked for in the<br />

extradition request and the accused always has to have a lawyer. The<br />

detention term may be also defined before the request is submitted and<br />

expecially in urgent and justifiable cases (the person is on the run or<br />

hiding etc). The Code offers other guarantees as well in relation to the<br />

perpetrator and the criminal offence, especially that the accused shall be<br />

released within 48 hours if the domestic competent court does not<br />

receive theextradition reguest with the confirmed indictment.<br />

The bodies of the Interior Ministry of Republic of Serbia have a<br />

significant role in this phase of the extradition procedure because they<br />

are authorized to arrest the accused (article 23. of this Code). This also<br />

applies to persons for whom formally-legally there is no order issued by<br />

an investigative judge. It is sufficient to be put on the wanted list a local<br />

body or the Hague Tribunal. The obligation of the police is to give the<br />

arrested person to further jurisdiction of the court, so that provosion is<br />

the same as in Code about Criminal Proceedings 29 . Other provisions in<br />

29<br />

More : Jovašević D., Zakonik o krivičnom postupku, Službeni list, Beograd,<br />

2004. In the Republic of Serbia in application is Code about od Criminal<br />

32<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

this chapter deal with the imprisonment appeal procedures and passing<br />

the final decision.<br />

Closing chapters (chapter five and chapter six) contain standard forms<br />

of international criminal legal assistance (articles 32-35). The last , seve<br />

chapter of this Code on the Collaboration of the FR Yugoslavia with the<br />

Hague Tribunal from 2002. includes other provisons and the most<br />

important is the one dealing with the voluntary surrender of persons<br />

(Article 36. of this Code) and guarantees given by domestic local<br />

bodies in relation to a request to be out on pre-trial release.<br />

THE THEORY NOTION OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL<br />

<strong>LAW</strong><br />

There is not a unanimous understanding of the notion and content of the<br />

international criminal law in theory. According to the oldest 19 th century<br />

view this notion includes a set of rules on special validity of national<br />

criminal legislation or the set of rules on application of national criminal<br />

law depending on where a crime was committed or depending on the<br />

nationality of its perpetrator. 30 A slightly broader view of this branch of<br />

law is the one, which in addition to the above said content includes also<br />

the rules regarding international legal aid in criminal matters (lodging<br />

information on perpetrators, validity of international courts decisions<br />

and other). Since they lack the international rules certain countries<br />

determine on their own the validity of their criminal laws referring to<br />

the acts committed abroad or to foreign citizens as crime perpetrators; in<br />

this way the international criminal law adequately to international<br />

private law used to be limited to the settlement of conflicts of criminal<br />

laws of various countries.<br />

Proceedings from 2001. Official Gazette of FR Yugoslavia, No. 70/2001 and<br />

68/2002 and Official Gazette of Republic of Serbia, No. 58/2004. In the Republic<br />

of Montenegro in application is Code about Criminal Proceedings from 2003.<br />

Official Gazette of Republic of Montenegro, No. 70/2003<br />

30<br />

Jescheck, H. H., Lehrbuch des Strafrechts, Allgemeiner Teil, 2. Auflage,<br />

Berlin, 1972, p. 127<br />

33<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

There is also a specific view of international criminal law, which<br />

defines this branch of law as a set of rules that determine the conditions<br />

and assumptions according to which the states must help each other in<br />

legal cases in order to insure the performance of their penal authority<br />

within the international community. 31 There are also some views in<br />

theory according to which the international criminal law is a discipline<br />

that determines the jurisdiction of criminal courts of a country in<br />

relation to the jurisdiction of foreign courts, then the application of<br />

material and criminal proceedings laws in relation to the place and<br />

perpetrators as well as the execution of foreign court decisions,<br />

especially criminal court decisions, and legal aid in criminal matters and<br />

extradition. 32<br />

There are also various interpretations of this notion in our domestic<br />

criminal law theory. For instance, the international criminal law is<br />

determined as a set of rules of international community of states or<br />

contracts between certain states by which the international criminal acts<br />

and penalties for their perpetrators are established in order to protect<br />

international relations (international peace and security of mankind). 33<br />

There is a similar opinion according to which the international criminal<br />

law is a set of rules and regulations contained in the documents of the<br />

international community and contracts concluded between certain<br />

countries by which the international criminal acts and penalties are<br />

established in order to preserve the international peace and security of<br />

mankind, as well as a set of rules which provide for the conditions for<br />

international legal aid referring to the application of penalties to the<br />

crime perpetrators. 34 In theory we can also find a definition of<br />

international criminal law as an entirety of criminal law norms referring<br />

to international relations. 35 There is also an interesting definition<br />

31<br />

Martens, Traite de droit international penal, Paris, <strong>18</strong>87, p.5<br />

32<br />

Zlatarić, B., Medjunarodno krivično pravo, Prvi deo, Rasprostranjenost<br />

represivne vlasti države, Zagreb, 1979, p. 15-<strong>18</strong><br />

33<br />

Čejović, B., Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Beograd, 2002, p. 51-52; Radovanović,<br />

M., Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Beograd, 1975. p. 10<br />

34<br />

Jovanović, Lj., Jovašević, D., Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Beograd, 2002, p. 24-<br />

25<br />

35<br />

B. Zlatarić, op. cit., p. 24<br />

34<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

according to which the international criminal law includes both the<br />

international legal aspects of criminal law and criminal law aspects of<br />

public international law. 36<br />

THE CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL<br />

<strong>LAW</strong><br />

According to such definitions of the notion of the international criminal<br />

law, it follows that it has the below mentioned characteristics:<br />

1) It consists of two set of rules. The first set is made of rules, which<br />

establish the international criminal offences. Here we can distinguish<br />

two kinds of criminal offences. The first kind covers the conduct<br />

breaching the international contracts, agreements or guarantees and in<br />

this way disturbing or endangering peace between nations and the<br />

security of mankind or breaching war rules and practices and<br />

maltreatment of war prisoners, the wounded, the sick, shipwrecked<br />

persons and civilians, or the conduct destroying biological, economic,<br />

cultural and other conditions necessary for the existence of a nation or<br />

national, racial, religious or ethnic group. The second kind includes all<br />

remaining international crimes breaching or endangering values<br />

protected by the international criminal law (offences related to<br />

narcotics, prostitution, pornography, piracy, hijacking, terrorism,<br />

hostage taking, and other) 37 .<br />

The second set consists of the rules by which the conflicts regarding<br />

spatial validity of criminal laws of various countries are settled and the<br />

rules regarding the international legal aid related to the extradition of<br />

crime perpetrators to countries on whose territories they committed<br />

crimes for pronouncing or execution of penalties.<br />

2) The source of these rules is in the international legal documents. Here<br />

36<br />

Stojanović, Z., Medjunarodno krivično pravo, Beograd, 2002, p. 3<br />

37<br />

Đurđić V., Jovašević D., Međunarodno krivično pravo, Beograd, 2003. godine,<br />

str.46<br />

35<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

we distinguish the universal documents of the international community<br />

which are therefore yielded within or under the wing of the UN, and<br />

then the documents of regional organizations (such as the Council of<br />

Europe) or the contracts concluded between two or more countries.<br />

3) These are the legal rules, which do not have statutory character, so<br />

unlike the national criminal law that is the statutory law, here we do not<br />

have a statutory law although one of the basic principles of the<br />

international criminal law is the principle of legality.<br />

4) The rules refer both to material and proceedings law. There are<br />

certain rules, which only partially determine certain issues or institutes<br />

of international criminal law, but there are also rules (Roman Statute of<br />

the permanent International Criminal Court –1998.) which completely<br />

establish the field of this branch of law.<br />

5) Some of the rules which have the international character are applied<br />

directly to concrete cases where crimes were committed and to their<br />

perpetrators through the practices of the International Court of Justice of<br />

the Hague for former SFR Yugoslavia (1993.)or the Court for Rwanda<br />

(1994.) or Sijerra Leone (2000.) or Iraqi Special tribunal (2003.) and<br />

some only in case and when certain countries incorporate them in their<br />

national criminal legislation after ratification (for instance, the<br />

Convention on the laundry, search, seizure or confiscation of illegally<br />

gained income or UN Convention against transnational organized<br />

crime).<br />

The notion of the international criminal law very often means a set of<br />

international documents, which is binding for the states, which accepted<br />

them to incorporate certain conducts qualified as crimes in their<br />

respective criminal legislations. According to such opinions, there are<br />

two kinds of international crimes – in narrow or broad sense. In narrow<br />

sense, these are the crimes contained in the sentences of Nuremberg<br />

(1946) and Tokyo (1948) courts: crimes against peace, crimes against<br />

humankind and war crimes. In a broader sense, it is any conduct, which<br />

the international community would like to suppress on the national<br />

level: crimes related to narcotics, trafficking in white slaves, weapons,<br />

36<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

nuclear substances, pornography and prostitution, hijacking, and<br />

similar. 38<br />

Therefore, the international criminal law, which referred to settling of<br />

conflicts of spatial validity of criminal laws and international legal aid,<br />

becomes the international criminal law, which refers to establishing of<br />

international crimes and penalties for their perpetrators. Considering the<br />

tendencies expressed during recent years in the field of international law<br />

in general, it can be assumed that the content of such an understood<br />

international criminal law will be extended further. After the Roman<br />

Statute of the permanent International Criminal Court came into force it<br />

can be said that the international criminal law is a system of legal rules<br />

determined by this Statute establishing international crimes, basic penal<br />

responsibility and penal system for the perpetrators as well as the<br />

proceedings before the international criminal court and the rules<br />

contained in the national criminal legislation determining basics and<br />

conditions for international criminal legal aid. 39<br />

But taking into account that in the majority of countries today there is a<br />

large number of the same or very similar crimes with the same type and<br />

range of prescribed penalties, that a great number of the institutes of<br />

criminal law in general refers to crimes, complicity, the system of<br />

criminal liability, and that the penal system which is unified to a great<br />

extent, the theory raised a question of unification of criminal legislation<br />

which would lead to the creation of such a criminal law which would be<br />

binding for all or at least the majority of countries and their citizens.<br />

This would in a specific manner bring about the idea of the international<br />

criminal law, which would be uniform and generally applied for the<br />

whole human and social community.<br />

This concept, however, could not be brought to life at this level of<br />

mankind development, first of all due to the differences in socioeconomic<br />

and political systems and legal system of certain countries<br />

(although there are certain shifts, for instance regarding the construction<br />

38<br />

Stojanović, Z., Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Beograd, 2001, p. 33<br />

39<br />

Jovašević, D., Leksikon krivičnog prava, Beograd, 2002, p. 275-276<br />

37<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

of criminal law of European union or European criminal law), and in<br />

addition to this due to the differences in opinions, degree of<br />

development, tradition, culture, criminal policy and other. This is why<br />

we talk less about a complex and thorough international criminal law<br />

and insist more that certain socially dangerous acts of the international<br />

character be established as punishable in all countries.<br />

Therefore, the unification of criminal legislation under present<br />

conditions of development of international community is not realistic.<br />

This however does not mean that the cooperation among countries<br />

cannot and should not be established which would include building of<br />

certain general principles and rules of criminal law. It should also take<br />

into account that the legislations of some countries (such as Germany,<br />

France or Great Britain) have considerable influence on the<br />

development of criminal legislations of other countries (there is a great<br />

influence of Anglo-Saxon precedent criminal law in the countries of<br />

former Commonwealth).<br />

THE SUBJECT OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong><br />

Regardless of what term we use to name this branch of law, it is<br />

obviously the branch of law, which aims to determine international<br />

criminal offences, the penal system for their perpetrators, the bases and<br />

conditions of penal responsibility and culpability, as well as the<br />

procedures to establish liability and pronounce and execute penalties by<br />

the competent judicial authorities. The subject of the international<br />

criminal law therefore includes two notions and institutes – the notions<br />

of material and procedural character. The notion of general and the<br />

notion of special part of criminal law are distinguished within the<br />

material notion and institutes.<br />

The subject of the general part of criminal law includes establishing of<br />

the notion and elements of international criminal offences, stages in<br />

their commitment, grounds excluding the existence of crime,<br />

commitment of crime by one person or types of complicity, grounds for<br />

criminal liability (state of mind and guilt) as well as the system of<br />

38<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

penalties and bases of excluding from criminal liability and right to<br />

punishment.<br />

The special part of criminal law determines the notion, features and<br />

characteristics of basic, qualified and privileged forms of international<br />

crimes and penalties for their perpetrators.<br />

The procedural part of international criminal law determines the system<br />

and organization of international criminal justice, architecture and<br />

course of proceedings (first instance proceedings and proceedings on<br />

appeal), place, role and status of certain proceedings subjects (parties<br />

and other participants) in conducting proceedings activities aimed at<br />

clearing and resolving criminal matter in whole in a legal and equitable<br />

manner.<br />

However, when we speak about the international criminal law (as a<br />

branch of positive law) it should be said that this term in addition to the<br />

above said includes also the science of international criminal law as a<br />

law of legal science which studies all above mentioned terms and<br />

institutes which actually represent the subject of regulation and<br />

establishing of the international criminal law as a set of legal rules of<br />

the international community. On one hand this study aims at providing<br />

as good an understanding and as regular application on concrete<br />

practical cases as possible, and on the other hand at providing for its<br />

further development and improvement in order to increase the efficiency<br />

of action.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Following two and a half century long historical development a new<br />

branch of penal law – the international criminal law – has finally grew<br />

up at the beginning of 21 st century. This branch of law has formally<br />

acquired ‘civil rights’ when the Roman Statute of the permanent<br />

International Criminal Court in the Hague came into force in the middle<br />

of 2003. It is namely the law which analogue to other branches of<br />

positive penal law determines the notion and elements of international<br />

39<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

criminal offences (aggression, crimes against humanity, genocide and<br />

war crimes), stages of their commitment, forms of complicity, notion<br />

and characteristics of penal responsibility, as well as a system of<br />

penalties (material law) and the notion and features of proceedings<br />

subjects: prosecution and courts, the course and architecture of criminal<br />

proceedings (procedural part).<br />

By pronouncing sentences and execution of penalties to perpetrators of<br />

international crimes within Nuremberg and Tokyo courts, as well as by<br />

ad hoc tribunals, the norms of the international criminal law came into<br />

life in court practice. This has created not only theoretical and legal but<br />

also practical bases for establishing and further implementation of the<br />

international criminal law and this paper presents its basic notions,<br />

features and characteristics. Further development of national criminal<br />

laws and unification of many general and basic institutes of criminal<br />

law create bases for final establishment of transnational criminal law,<br />

which would include all, or at least the majority of contemporary<br />

civilization by its implementation.<br />

BASIC LITERATURE:<br />

Avramov, S. Kreća, M., Medjunarodno javno pravo, Beograd, 1981.<br />

Babić M., Komentari krivičnih zakona u Bosni i Hercegovini, Sarajevo,<br />

<strong>2005</strong>.<br />

Bačić F., Komentar Kaznenog zakonika Republike Hrvatske, Zagreb,<br />

<strong>2005</strong>.<br />

Basic Documents , United Nations, ICTY, 1995.<br />

Bassiouni, M.C., Crimes against Humanity in International criminal<br />

Law, Dordecht, 1992.<br />

Brownlie J., Basic Documents in International Law, Oxford, 2002.<br />

Compendio di Diritto penale, Parte generale e speciale, Napoli, 2004.<br />

Čejović B., Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Beograd, 2002.<br />

Gattegno, P, Droit penal special, Paris, 2003.<br />

Geninet, B., L indispensable du droit penal, Paris, 2002.<br />

Djurdjić V., Krivično procesno pravo,Niš, 1998.<br />

Djurdjić, V. – Jovašević, D., Medjunarodno krivično pravo, Beograd,<br />

40<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

2003.<br />

Janković, B., Medjunarodno javno pravo, Sarajevo, 1960.<br />

Janković, B.,- Radivojević, Z., Medjunarodno javno pravo, Niš, 2002.<br />

Jekić Simić Z., Krivično procesno pravo, Beograd, 1992.<br />

Jescheck H.H., Lehrbuch des Strafrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, Berlin, 1972.<br />

Josipović I., Haško implementacijsko kazneno pravo, Zagreb, 2000.<br />

Jovanović, Lj. – Jovašević, D., Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Beograd,<br />

2002.<br />

Jovašević D., Leksikon krivičnog prava, Beograd, 2002.<br />

Jovašević D., Komentar Krivičnog zakona SR Jugoslavije, Beograd,<br />

2002.<br />

Jovašević D., Zakonik o krivičnom postupku, Beograd, 2004.<br />

Jovašević D., Medjunarodno krivično pravo – teorija, zakonodavstvo,<br />

praksa, Beograd, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />

Klotter, J.-Edwards, T., Criminal Law, Cinsinnati, 1998.<br />

Kambovski V., Megunarodno krivično pravo, Skoplje, 2003<br />

Koržanskij M.I., Popularnij komenar Kriminolnogu kodeksu, Kiev,<br />

1997.<br />

Lazarević Lj., Vučković B., Vučković V., Komentar Krivičnog zakonika<br />

Republike Crne Gore, Cetinje, 2004.<br />

Leon, F.,The Law of the War, New York, 1972.<br />

Lopičić J., Ratni zločin protiv civilnog stanovništva,Beograd, 1999.<br />

Lopičić J., Ratni zločin protiv ratnih zarobljenika, Beograd, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />

Martens, Traite de droit international penal, Paris, <strong>18</strong>87.<br />

Molan M., Criminal law, Textbook, Charlton, London,2003.<br />

Marjanović G., Krivično pravo, Opšt del, Skoplje, 1998.<br />

Nenov I., Nakazatelno pravo na Republika Blgaria, Obša čast, Knjiga<br />

vtora, Sofija, 1992.<br />

Perazić G., Medjunarodno ratno pravo, Beograd, 1986.<br />

Petrović B., Jovašević D., Krivično (kazneno) pravo Bosne i<br />

Hercegovine, Opći dio, Sarajevo, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />

Petrović B:, Jovašević D., Krivično (kazneno) pravo Bosne i<br />

Hercegovine, Posebni dio, Sarajevo, <strong>2005</strong>.<br />

Radojković M., Rat i medjunarodno pravo, Beograd, 1947.<br />

Radulović D., Medjunarodno krivično pravo, Podgorica, 1999.<br />

Schwarzenberger G., The Law of the Armed Conflict, London, 1968.<br />

Skuratov J.., Lebedov V.M., Kommentari k Ugolonomu kodeksu v<br />

41<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Rossijskoj federacii, Moskva, 1996.<br />

Spinelis D.D., Essays on criminal sciences, Atina Komotini,2001.<br />

Stojanović Z., Komentar Krivičnog zakona SR Jugoslavije, Beograd,<br />

1999.<br />

Stojanović Z., Medjunarodno krivično pravo, Beograd, 2002.<br />

Vasilijević V., Medjunarodni krivični sud, Beograd, 1961.<br />

Vučinić Z., Medjunarodno ratno i humanitarno pravo, Beograd, 1996.<br />

Zlatarić B.,Medjunarodno krivično pravo, Rasprostranjenost represivne<br />

vlasti države, Zagreb, 1979.<br />

Wyngaert C.V., International criminal law, Hague, London, Boston,<br />

2001.<br />

42<br />

DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - APPEARANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED<br />

INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT<br />

BY DR. ANWAR FRANGI*<br />

There are three general types of conflict under positive international<br />

humanitarian law: (1) tension 1 , (2) disturbance 2 , and (3) armed conflict 3 .<br />

* LL.M. 1995, Harvard University Law School (Massachusetts, USA); LL.M.<br />

1992, American University Washington College of Law (Washington, D.C.);<br />

Doctorat en droit 1986, University of Poitiers Law School (France); D.E.A.<br />

1983, University of Poitiers Law School (France); LL.B. 1982, Lebanese<br />

University Law School (Lebanon). Dr. Frangi is full-time Senior Lecturer<br />

and Researcher at the Holy Spirit University of Kaslik (Lebanon), and<br />

professor of international law and philosophy of law at La Sagesse<br />

University Faculty of Law (Lebanon).<br />

1<br />

‘Internal tensions’ involve situations “which are not marked by acts of violence.”<br />

(See Commentaire des Protocoles additionnels du 8 juin 1977 aux<br />

Conventions de Genève du 12 août 1949, Comité international de la Croix-<br />

Rouge, Genève, 1986, p. 89). Under ‘internal tensions’ may be included massive<br />

arrests; a large number of ‘political’ detainees; probable existence of<br />

maltreatment or inhumane conditions of detention; suspension of fundamental<br />

judicial guarantees, because of either the proclamation of a state of exception, or<br />

a de facto situation; allegations of disappearances (See id. at 1379). Civil<br />

disobedience is deemed to be “tension” when it does not manifest acts of<br />

violence. Under ‘civil disobedience’ may be included, e.g., sit-in, draft card<br />

burning, peaceful strike. The origin of acts of violence may not change the<br />

characterization of the act, acts of violence being characterized as conflicts<br />

independently of the actor.<br />

2<br />

‘Internal disturbances’ involve situations in which there exists not a noninternational<br />

armed conflict as such, but a confrontation within the country,<br />

characterized by a certain seriousness or duration and which involves acts of<br />

violence. (See International Committee of the Red Cross, Conference of<br />

Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Development of International<br />

Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva, 24 May-12 June<br />

1971, Vol. V, “Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts,” p.<br />

79). Under ‘internal disturbances’ all acts of violence short of armed conflicts<br />

may be included, such as riots, violent strikes and protests, etc.<br />

3<br />

An ‘armed conflict’ is a collective act of violence indicating the existence of<br />

open hostilities between organized armed forces. There are two types of armed<br />

43<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

There is also a fourth general type of conflict not foreseen by positive<br />

international humanitarian law, namely, the intra-nationalized<br />

international conflict. 4<br />

1. Definition. The intra-nationalized international conflict involves a<br />

situation of international tension or disturbance or armed conflict which<br />

has degenerated into a non-international tension or disturbance or armed<br />

conflict.<br />

‘International tension’ involves situations of unfriendly acts short of<br />

violence; legal or illegal unfriendly acts short of violence, and which may<br />

be deemed as threat of peace. May be included under ‘international<br />

tension: (i) reprisals, such as refusing to fulfill treaty obligations; war-like<br />

operations without the intention of making war or massing troops along<br />

conflict according to positive international humanitarian law, an international,<br />

and a non-international, armed conflict. The ‘international armed conflict’ breaks<br />

down into two: (i) an armed conflict within the meaning of Common Article 2 to<br />

the Four Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, such as cases of declared war<br />

or of partial or total occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party, and<br />

(ii) an armed conflict within the meaning of article 1(4) of Protocol I of 1977,<br />

such as cases of people fighting against colonial domination and alien occupation<br />

and against racist régimes in the exercise of their right of self-determination.<br />

The ‘non-international armed conflict’ breaks down also into two: (i) that<br />

which is within the meaning of Common Article 3 to the Four Geneva<br />

Conventions of 1949, and (ii) that which is within the meaning of Article 1 of<br />

Protocol II of 1977. Thus, under the latter the non-international armed conflict<br />

covers situations in which an armed faction is opposed to another armed faction,<br />

and in which the government is not necessarily a party to the conflict; and under<br />

(i) the non-international armed conflict involves situations in which the<br />

government is opposed to national dissident armed forces, which are commonly<br />

known as “classical civil war.” These situations cover group’s acts of violence<br />

which tend either (a) to change the policy of the established government, (b) or to<br />

force a concession, or (c) to secede from the established government.<br />

4<br />

For a brief analysis of the Intra-Nationalized International Conflict, see A.T.<br />

Frangi, The Internationalized Non-International Armed Conflict in Lebanon,<br />

1975-1990: Introduction to Confligology, 22 CAP.U.L. REV. 965, 1037-1040<br />

(1993). See also L.-Ph. Rouillard, Les conflits armés à caractère noninternationaux‘internationalisés’,<br />

FLJ (1)(1) (Special Issue, August <strong>2005</strong>) at 104<br />

et s.<br />

44<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

international borders; putting pressure on the offending state by seizing or<br />

destroying property, holding territory or capturing of vessels; nuclear arms<br />

race; (ii) embargo; (iii) pacific blockade, such temporary suspension of the<br />

commerce of the offending state; (iv) retorsion, such as imposing similar<br />

restrictions upon the subjects of the offending state in retaliation of its<br />

wrongful acts, recalling ambassadors, termination of diplomatic relations,<br />

withdrawal of fiscal and tariff concessions; (v) competition for<br />

international political influence, and propaganda campaigns.<br />

‘International disturbance’ involves situations of acts of violence short of<br />

armed conflict, which are committed by individuals or subjects of<br />

international law or groups not subjects of international law, and which<br />

bear seriousness in terms of high number of victims or in terms of threat to<br />

international peace. May be included under ‘international disturbance, (i)<br />

political assassinations; (2) acts of terrorism; (3) sporadic international<br />

attacks.<br />

2. Characteristics. Five features characterize the intra-nationalized<br />

international conflict:<br />

a. It is a conflict of international character in origin.<br />

b. It is an international conflict degenerating into a noninternational<br />

conflict.<br />

c. It is a multidimensional conflict, it being concerned with<br />

various conflicts at the same time and not with one type of<br />

conflict at a time.<br />

d. It is a relational conflict, which means that it is concerned<br />

with the relation between the types of conflict. If<br />

humanitarian laws may be applicable to some conflicts,<br />

such as disturbances and armed conflicts, and may not be<br />

applicable to some conflicts, such as internal and<br />

international tensions, the generation of one conflict into<br />

another can, however, within a continuum of humanitarian<br />

and human rights norms. It is this relation between the<br />

types of conflict that justifies breaking the frontiers<br />

delineating conflicts.<br />

Not only is the intra-nationalized international conflict:<br />

45<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

- an international conflict in origin;<br />

- an international conflict degenerating into a noninternational<br />

conflict;<br />

- a multidimensional conflict, and<br />

- a relational conflict. It is also, and most<br />

importantly,<br />

e. A multi-legal and non-legal conflict, 5 since it can be<br />

extended to non-legal conflicts, meaning conflicts that do<br />

not fall formally within the provisions of Geneva Law,<br />

such as internal and international tensions, to which<br />

minimum humanitarian rules do not usually apply.<br />

3. Classification. In combining all types of conflict foreseen by<br />

positive international humanitarian laws, namely, tensions, disturbances,<br />

and armed conflicts, 9 possible conflicts covered by the intranationalized<br />

international conflict may be distinguished:<br />

1. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />

tension, such as the Cold War degenerating into (a) the Soviet’s<br />

Blockade of the Western-held sectors of West Berlin in 1948-<br />

1949; (b) the Berlin Crisis of 1961; (c) the Western powers’<br />

rearmament of West Germany, which became a member of<br />

NATO, and the Soviets’ establishment of the Warsaw Pact in<br />

May 1955; (d) the Martial Law in Poland 6 .<br />

5 On the Multi-Legal and Nonlegal Approach see A. T. Frangi, The<br />

Internationalized Noninternational Armed Conflict, 22 CAP.U.L. REV. 965,<br />

965-966 (1993); see also A.T. Frangi, Democracy of History: A Theory of<br />

Minority Group Law, a paper submitted to Harvard Law School on May 5, 1995,<br />

p. 37. Two activities divide the law, legal and illegal activities. Every activity<br />

that is not foreseen by the law is ‘non-legal.’ On the Multi-Legal and Non-legal<br />

Approach see A. T. Frangi, The Internationalized Non-International Armed<br />

Conflict, 22 CAP.U.L. REV. 965, 965-966 (1993); see also A.T. Frangi,<br />

Democracy of History: A Theory of Minority Group Law, a paper submitted to<br />

Harvard Law School on May 5, 1995, p. 37, of which only part was published in<br />

FLJ (1) (1) (July <strong>2005</strong>) at 7.<br />

6<br />

In 1981, under pressure from Moscow, the Polish government imposed<br />

martial law in an attempt to destroy the challenge to its authority presented by<br />

Solidarity, an independent labor union. In protest, the United States imposed<br />

economic sanctions on Poland.<br />

46<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

2. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />

disturbance, such as the Cold War degenerating into: (a) the<br />

Cuban missile crisis of 1962 7 ; (b) the Korean plane incident 8 .<br />

3. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />

armed conflict, such as the Cold War degenerating into the<br />

Korea War in the early 1950s.<br />

4. International disturbance degenerating into non-international<br />

tension, such as the September 11 th attacks 9 occurred in the<br />

territory of the United States, generating limitation of personal<br />

freedoms for security purposes in the United States.<br />

5. International disturbance degenerating into non-international<br />

disturbance, such as the attacks launched by the Palestinians<br />

against Israel from the territory of Lebanon, and which resulted<br />

into disturbances in Lebanon 10 .<br />

6. International disturbance degenerating into non-international<br />

armed conflict, such as the acts of terrorism launched by the<br />

Palestinians against the Israelis, which degenerated into noninternational<br />

armed conflicts between the Palestinians and the<br />

Phalangists in Lebanon between 1975-1990.<br />

7. International armed conflict degenerating into non-<br />

7 This crisis would be considered as a situation of disturbance and not a<br />

situation of tension, although it had not developed into a US-Soviet armed<br />

conflict, because there was an actual soviet’s secret installation of missiles in<br />

Cuba in 1062 that could be used to launch nuclear attacks on U.S. cities. This had<br />

sparked a confrontation that might have generated into an armed conflict between<br />

the two superpowers in the territory of Cuba.<br />

8 A Soviet fighter shot down a Korean Airlines 747 that had strayed over<br />

Soviet territory on a flight from Alaska to Seoul, South Korea. All persons aboard<br />

the plane died. The Soviets insisted that the plane had been engaged in espionage.<br />

9 An act of tension of high intensity may be characterized as a ‘disturbance,’ it<br />

being not only a threat to, but also a breach of, international peace.<br />

10<br />

After 1967, the Palestinians started to launch attacks from the Territory of<br />

Lebanon against Israel. This international disturbance divided Lebanon into two<br />

camps: one camp, mostly Christians, opposed the Palestinians’ freedom of<br />

actions against Israel from the Lebanese territory, and another camp, mostly<br />

Moslems, encouraged that freedom. In December-January 1968, this crisis<br />

developed into interior armed clashes between the Palestinians and the Lebanese<br />

army and security forces.<br />

47<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

international tension, such as the Arab-Israeli armed conflict<br />

degenerating into the troublesome issue of the Palestinians<br />

refugees in many Arab countries.<br />

8. International armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />

disturbance, such as the US-led coalition v. Iraq<br />

armed conflict which resulted into serious armed clashes<br />

between the Shiites and the Sunnites in Iraq, bringing the Iraqi<br />

factions to the brink of civil war in July <strong>2005</strong>.<br />

9. International armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />

armed conflict, such as Arab-Israel armed<br />

conflict degenerating into non-international armed conflicts in<br />

Lebanon or Jordan 11 .<br />

4. Modes. All the above 9 possible conflicts covered by the intranationalized<br />

international conflict may arise between two or more states,<br />

and may occur in the territory of the parties to the conflict or of a third<br />

state not a party to the conflict. Accordingly, 36 possible conflicts covered<br />

by the intra-nationalized international conflict may be distinguished. But<br />

since the application of international law and humanitarian laws would not<br />

be much different whether the conflict is international or multinational,<br />

these modes can be reduced to <strong>18</strong> as follows:<br />

1. Intra-nationalized International Conflict in the Territory of<br />

One of the Parties To the Conflict:<br />

1.1. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />

tension, such as the East-West antagonism degenerating into<br />

the U-2 incident of 1960 12 .<br />

1.2. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />

disturbance: US v. fundamentalists tension resulting into the<br />

September 11 th attacks occurred on the land of the United<br />

11<br />

In September 1970, King Hussein of Jordan fell on the Palestinians in his<br />

kingdom, killing thousands.<br />

12<br />

Since 1955, American high-altitude U-2 spy planes had been carrying out<br />

surveillance operations over Soviet territory. On May 1, 1960, the Soviets<br />

succeeded in downing a U-2 and capturing its pilot. Khrushchev used this U-2<br />

incident to break up the Paris summit meeting as it was about to convene in June.<br />

48<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

States.<br />

1.3. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />

armed conflict: US v. fundamentalists tension resulting<br />

ultimately into armed conflicts in Afghanistan after 2001.<br />

1.4. International disturbance degenerating into noninternational<br />

tension, such as the September 11 th attacks<br />

occurred in the territory of the United States, which generated<br />

dozens of retaliatory incidents throughout the United States,<br />

where Arab American communities have been “in a state of<br />

siege” since the time of the attacks 13 .<br />

1.5. International disturbance degenerating into noninternational<br />

disturbance, such as the September 11 th attacks<br />

occurred in the territory of the United States, which generated<br />

into violent attacks in the United States on Arab Americans 14 .<br />

1.6. International disturbance degenerating into noninternational<br />

armed conflict, such as the acts of terrorism<br />

launched by the Palestinians from the territory of Lebanon<br />

against the Israelis, which degenerated into non-international<br />

armed conflicts between the Palestinians and the Phalangists<br />

in Lebanon.<br />

1.7. International armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />

tension, such as US-Iraq armed conflict<br />

generating, inter alia, into anti-war demonstrations in the<br />

United States 15 .<br />

13<br />

See Stuart Millar, Violent Attacks on Arab Americans. Special Report:<br />

Terrorism in the US, The Guardian, September 14, 2001: “300 marchers – some<br />

waving American flags and chanting ‘USA!USA!’ – tried to march on a mosque<br />

in Briedgeview, a suburb to the south-west of the city. Three demonstrators were<br />

arrested as police sealed off the blocks around the closed mosque and turned the<br />

march away. One of the marchers, Colin Zaremba, 19, said: ‘I’m proud to be<br />

American and I hate Arabs and I always have.’ ”<br />

14<br />

See id: “In Chicago, a Molotov cocktail was thrown at an Arab American<br />

community center.” “Gunshots were fired at an Islamic center in a Dallas suburb<br />

yesterday”<br />

15<br />

See Matthew Engel, Anti-War Message Blunted: Globalization<br />

Demonstration Replaced by Peace Rally, The Guardian, <strong>October</strong> 1, 2001: “As<br />

the main body of protesters, about 8,000 of them, marched down Pennsylvania<br />

Avenue towards Capitol Hill on Saturday afternoon, they passed a hundred or so<br />

49<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

1.8. International armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />

disturbance: US-Afghanistan armed conflict<br />

degenerating into anti-American attacks launched by the<br />

Mujahedeens Front which groups Talibanis, and loyals to Ex-<br />

Prime Minister Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, and members of Al-<br />

Qaida in Afghanistan, against American soldiers on August<br />

21.<br />

1.9. International armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />

armed conflict, such as the Arab Israeli armed<br />

conflict which was at the origin of many Arab governments-<br />

Palestinians non-international armed conflicts, such in<br />

Jordan 16 . Also, the withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from<br />

Lebanon in the 1980s generated into various armed conflicts<br />

between Lebanese factions in Lebanon.<br />

2. Intra-Nationalized International Conflict in the Territory of a<br />

Third State:<br />

2.1. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />

tension, such as the Cold War generating into (a) the Martial<br />

Law imposed in Poland in 1981; (b) the Western Alliance<br />

(NATO) and Eastern Alliance (Warsaw Pact); (c) the Berlin<br />

Blockade in 1949.<br />

2.2. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />

disturbance, such as the Cold War resulting into (a) the Bay<br />

of Pigs conflict on Cuba’s Southern coast; (b) the East<br />

German Revolt in 1953.<br />

2.3. International tension degenerating into non-international<br />

armed conflict, such as the Cold War generating into (a) the<br />

overthrow of the government of Fulgencio Balista, the<br />

American-supported Cuban dictator, by the communism<br />

inspired Fidel Castro; (b) the American invasion of the<br />

counter-demonstrators carrying US flags and banners like “Welcome traitors,”<br />

“Seek Therapy,” and “Is It Halloween already?”<br />

16 During its 1948 War of Independence, Israel drove hundreds of thousands of<br />

Palestinians from their homes into neighboring countries.<br />

50<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Dominican Republic in 1965; (c) the American invasion of<br />

Grenada in 1983; (d) the long and unsuccessful military effort<br />

to prevent communist North Vietnam from bringing South<br />

Vietnam under its rule.<br />

2.4. International disturbance degenerating into noninternational<br />

tension, such as the September 11 th attacks<br />

generating rising tide of anti-Muslim anger in Australia 17 .<br />

2.5. International disturbance degenerating into noninternational<br />

disturbance, such as the September 11 th attacks<br />

generating violent attacks amid a rising tide of anti-Muslim<br />

anger across North America <strong>18</strong> .<br />

2.6. International disturbance degenerating into noninternational<br />

armed conflict, such as the troublesome issue<br />

of the Palestinians refugees which generated armed conflicts<br />

between Palestinians and various Lebanese factions between<br />

1975-1990 in Lebanon.<br />

2.7. International armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />

tension, such as the bombing campaign against<br />

Afghanistan in 2001, which generated protests in Pakistan,<br />

and Indonesia 19 .<br />

17<br />

See Stuart Millar, Violent Attacks on Arab Americans. Special Report:<br />

Terrorism in the US, The Guardian, September 14, 2001: “In Brisbane, Australia,<br />

a school bus packed with Muslim children was stoned.”<br />

<strong>18</strong><br />

See id: “In Montreal, Canada, a firebomb was thrown at a mosque.”<br />

19<br />

See Anti-US Protests Continue in Muslim Countries, The Guardian, <strong>October</strong><br />

15, 2001: “Muslim leaders called for a general strike to coincide with a visit by<br />

the US secretary of state, Colin Powell, who is seeking to build support for<br />

Operation Enduring Freedom. In response, thousands of shopkeepers across the<br />

country closed their stores today to protest against their government’s support for<br />

the US-led military strikes against Afghanistan…Nearly every store was reported<br />

closed in the border city of Quetta, and the entire business district was shuttered<br />

in the southern town of Jacobabad, the site of yesterday’s large anti-American<br />

demonstrations near Shahbaz air base, currently being used by US military<br />

personnel…In Jacobabad, about 500 people who had been detained over the<br />

weekend were released this morning after police said they had promised to<br />

‘peaceful’.”<br />

51<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

2.8. International armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />

disturbance, such as the bombing campaign<br />

against Afghanistan in 2001, which generated bombs attacks<br />

in Yemen 20 .<br />

2.9. International armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />

armed conflict, such as the bombing campaign<br />

against Afghanistan in 2001, which generated fighting<br />

between Muslims and Christians in Nigeria 21 .<br />

5. Applicability of the Law.<br />

5.1. Applicability of the Law to the Intra-Nationalization<br />

Approach.<br />

If intra-nationalization is stigmatized as legal it may need moral approval.<br />

No law may approve of intra-nationalizing international tensions or<br />

disturbances or armed conflicts. For it would be in violation of human<br />

rights norms: Intra-nationalization is intimately related to the wider<br />

“After a quiet weekend in the world’s most populous Muslim country, about 700<br />

anti-American protesters gathered outside the Indonesian parliament building in<br />

Jakarta (Indonesia) today. Police fired tear gas and water cannon into the crowd.”<br />

20 See id: “A bomb exploded today in a garbage container near Aden’s central<br />

post office, causing damage, witnesses said. Following the blast, police arrested<br />

two people after a chase and confiscated the vehicle, the witnesses said.<br />

Yesterday, another bomb exploded in a garbage container, this time during<br />

celebrations marking the beginning of the city’s 1967 revolt against British rule,<br />

witnesses said, adding that police had arrested at least six people in relation to the<br />

blast. Aden was the site of last year’s bombing of the USS Cole destroyer, which<br />

killed 17 sailors and injured 39. Osama bin Laden, whose family was originally<br />

from Yemen, is also accused of orchestrating the Cole attack.”<br />

21 See id: “A fourth day of fighting between Muslims and Christians erupted in<br />

the western Nigerian city of Kano today, after community leaders said 200<br />

protesters were killed over the weekend. The violence broke out on Friday in the<br />

wake of anti-America protests, and police have been ordered to shoot rioters on<br />

sight. The Nigerian president, Olusegun Obasanjo, today defended the use of<br />

police force against anyone found rioting in the town and said he was not<br />

concerned by reports that up to 200 people had been killed in the clashes.”<br />

52<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

problem not only of the effective limitation of the liberty of States, but also<br />

and particularly of jeopardizing their national security.<br />

If intra-nationalization is deemed illegal it is hard to say at what point<br />

along the continuum of all the situations listed above it becomes as such.<br />

Intra-nationalization is closely linked to the problem of interference, and<br />

both intra-nationalization and interference amount to violations of states’<br />

independence. However, where intra-nationalization is but illegal,<br />

interference may be either legal or illegal: A mere friendly advice to<br />

another state is legal interference, whereas a forcible interference or one<br />

that is backed by the threat of force is illegal. Tension and armed conflict<br />

are at opposite ends of the intra-nationalization spectrum. The intranationalized<br />

tension is necessarily less than forcible or backed by the threat<br />

of force, but more than mere friendly advice to the State in which the<br />

international tension is being intra-nationalized. Thus, intranationalization<br />

is not ‘legal interference’ on its face. It is not ‘illegal<br />

interference’ either. For international tension or disturbance or armed<br />

conflict lies at the root of intra-nationalization; this, however, does not<br />

hold true for interference. Also, intra-nationalization and interference are<br />

diametrically opposed; for interference may be deemed a method short of<br />

war for the settlement of disputes, which is not the case of intranationalization.<br />

5.2. Applicability of the Law to the Intra-nationalized<br />

International Conflict.<br />

The intra-nationalized international conflict could prove useful in<br />

applying (a) a continuum of legal system of protection in all situations<br />

of intra-nationalized international conflict, and (b) either a multi-legal<br />

system of protection, or one legal system of protection, in every<br />

situation thereof.<br />

a. Applicability of a continuum of legal system of protection in<br />

all situations of intra-nationalized international conflict.<br />

The intra-nationalized international conflict allows the application of a<br />

continuum of legal norms in all the situations of intra-nationalized<br />

conflict, from situations of international tension degenerating into non-<br />

53<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

international tensions at one end of the spectrum all the way through to<br />

situations of international armed conflict degenerating into a noninternational<br />

armed conflict.<br />

Two principles govern the intra-nationalized international conflicts:<br />

i. The principle of non intra-nationalization:<br />

Every nation, as subject of international law,<br />

has a right to the respect of integrity, both<br />

territorial and juridical, and of the attributes inseparable<br />

from its national personality.<br />

Thus, intra-nationalizing legal and/or non-legal international unfriendly<br />

acts short of violence that may pose risk to intra-nationalizing situations<br />

of national tensions or disturbances or armed conflicts, are forbidden;<br />

intra-nationalizing international state torture, be it territorial such as acts<br />

of terrorism or sporadic attacks or moral such as propaganda campaigns,<br />

and degrading or inhuman international treatment are forbidden; intranationalizing<br />

international pressure by seizing or destroying property,<br />

holding territory or capturing of vessels is forbidden.<br />

ii. The principle of national security:<br />

Every nation, as a subject of international law,<br />

has the right to national security.<br />

Thus, conducting war-like operations even without the intention of<br />

making war or massing troops along international borders, which may<br />

intra-nationalize a sense of national insecurity are forbidden; intranationalizing<br />

legal and/or non-legal international unfriendly acts short<br />

of violence that may pose risk to intra-nationalizing reprisals and<br />

hostage-takings are forbidden.<br />

These principles protect the existence of a continuum of legal norms<br />

that may justify the extension of basic humanitarian rules to non-legal<br />

activities such as international and internal tensions. In every situation<br />

of intra-nationalized of international conflict, however, there should be a<br />

specific legal system of protection that should apply to every aspect of<br />

the intra-nationalized international conflict in question.<br />

54<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

b. Applicability of a multi-legal system of protection, or one<br />

legal system of protection, in every situation involving an<br />

intra-nationalized international conflict.<br />

A multi-legal system of protection or one legal system of protection may<br />

clearly apply to every situation involving an intra-nationalized<br />

international conflict. The first situation of the intra-nationalized<br />

international conflict, namely, the international tension degenerating into<br />

non-international tension, may be subject to the application of the<br />

following laws: (i) international law may be applicable to the intranationalization<br />

per se, it being a violation of the sovereignty and security<br />

of the state; (ii) international law may be applicable to the international<br />

aspect of ‘the international tension degenerating into a non-international<br />

tension,’ i.e., the international tension, since it may be deemed, if of high<br />

intensity, as threat to peace within the provisions of Chapter VII of UN<br />

Charter, and (iii) basic international human rights provisions may be<br />

applicable to the non-international aspect of ‘the international tension<br />

degenerating into a non-international tension,’ i.e., the non-international<br />

tension, and which regulate issues of, inter alia, probable existence of<br />

maltreatment or inhumane conditions of detention; suspension of<br />

fundamental judicial guarantees, because of either the proclamation of a<br />

state of exception, or a de facto situation; allegations of disappearances.<br />

The second situation of the intra-nationalized international conflict,<br />

namely, the international tension degenerating into non-international<br />

disturbance, may be subject to the application of the following laws: (i)<br />

international law may be applicable to the intra-nationalization per se, it<br />

being a violation of the sovereignty and security of the state; (ii)<br />

international law may be applicable to the international aspect of ‘the<br />

international tension degenerating into a non-international disturbance’,<br />

since it may be deemed as threat to peace within the provisions of Chapter<br />

VII of UN Charter, and (iii) basic international human rights provisions<br />

may be applicable to the non-international aspect of ‘the international<br />

tension degenerating into a non-international disturbance,’ i.e., the noninternational<br />

disturbance, and which regulate issues of, inter alia, internal<br />

terrorist disturbance.<br />

55<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

The third situation of the intra-nationalized international conflict, namely,<br />

the international tension degenerating into non-international armed<br />

conflict, may be subject to the application of the following laws: (i)<br />

international law may be applicable to the intra-nationalization per se, it<br />

being a violation of the sovereignty and security of the state; (ii)<br />

international law may be applicable to the international aspect of ‘the<br />

international tension degenerating into a non-international disturbance,’<br />

i.e., the international tension, since it may be deemed as threat to peace<br />

within the provisions of Chapter VII of UN Charter, and (iii) Common<br />

Article 3 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions may be applicable to the noninternational<br />

aspect of the ‘international tension degenerating into noninternational<br />

armed conflict, i.e., the non-international armed conflict.<br />

The fourth situation of the intra-nationalized international conflict, namely,<br />

the international disturbance degenerating into non-international tension,<br />

may be subject to the application of the following laws: (i) international<br />

law may be applicable to the intra-nationalization per se, it being a<br />

violation of the sovereignty and security of the state; (ii) international law<br />

may be applicable to the international aspect of ‘the international<br />

disturbance degenerating into non-international tension,’ i.e., the<br />

international disturbance, since it may be deemed as threat to peace within<br />

the provisions of Chapter VII of UN Charter, and (iii) basic international<br />

human rights provisions may be applicable to the non-international aspect<br />

of ‘the international disturbance degenerating into a non-international<br />

tension,’ i.e., the non-international tension, and which regulate issues of,<br />

inter alia, probable existence of maltreatment or inhumane conditions of<br />

detention; suspension of fundamental judicial guarantees, because of<br />

either the proclamation of a state of exception, or a de facto situation,<br />

and allegations of disappearances.<br />

The fifth situation of the intra-nationalized international conflict, namely,<br />

the international disturbance degenerating into non-international<br />

disturbance, may be subject to the application of the following laws: (i)<br />

international law may be applicable to the intra-nationalization per se, it<br />

being a violation of the sovereignty and security of the state; (ii)<br />

international law may be applicable to the international aspect of ‘the<br />

international disturbance degenerating into non-international disturbance,’<br />

i.e., the international disturbance, since it may be deemed as threat to<br />

56<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

peace within the provisions of Chapter VII of UN Charter, and (iii) basic<br />

international human rights provisions may be applicable to the noninternational<br />

aspect of ‘the international disturbance degenerating into a<br />

non-international disturbance,’ i.e., the non-international disturbance, and<br />

which regulate issues of, inter alia, internal terrorist disturbance.<br />

The sixth situation of the intra-nationalized international conflict, namely,<br />

the international disturbance degenerating into non-international armed<br />

conflict, may be subject to the application of the following laws: (i)<br />

international law may be applicable to the intra-nationalization per se, it<br />

being a violation of the sovereignty and security of the state; (ii)<br />

international law may be applicable to the international aspect of ‘the<br />

international disturbance degenerating into a non-international armed<br />

conflict’, since it may be deemed as threat to peace within the provisions<br />

of Chapter VII of UN Charter, and (iii) Common Article 3 to the 1949<br />

Geneva Conventions may be applicable to the non-international aspect of<br />

the ‘international tension degenerating into non-international armed<br />

conflict, i.e., the non-international armed conflict.<br />

The seventh situation of the intra-nationalized international conflict,<br />

namely, the international armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />

tension, may be subject to the application of the following<br />

laws: (i) international law may be applicable to the intra-nationalization<br />

per se, it being a violation the sovereignty and security of the state; (ii)<br />

with regard to the international aspect of the ‘international armed conflict<br />

degenerating into non-international tension,’ i.e., the international armed<br />

conflict, international humanitarian law may be applicable, within the<br />

meaning of Common Article 2 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions in cases<br />

of declared war or of partial or total occupation of the territory of a High<br />

Contracting Party, and within the meaning of article 1(4) of Protocol I of<br />

1977, in cases of people fighting against colonial domination and alien<br />

occupation and against racist régimes in the exercise of their right of<br />

self-determination, and (iii) basic international human rights provisions<br />

may be applicable to the non-international aspect of ‘the international<br />

armed conflict degenerating into a non-international tension,’ i.e., the noninternational<br />

tension, and which regulate issues of, inter alia, probable<br />

existence of maltreatment or inhumane conditions of detention;<br />

suspension of fundamental judicial guarantees, because of either the<br />

57<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

proclamation of a state of exception, or a de facto situation, and<br />

allegations of disappearances.<br />

The eighth situation of the intra-nationalized international conflict,<br />

namely, the international armed conflict degenerating into noninternational<br />

disturbance, may be subject to the application of the<br />

following laws: (i) international law may be applicable to the intranationalization<br />

per se, it being a violation the sovereignty and security of<br />

the state; (ii) with regard to the international aspect of the ‘international<br />

armed conflict degenerating into non-international disturbance,’ i.e., the<br />

international armed conflict, international humanitarian law may be<br />

applicable, within the meaning of Common Article 2 to the 1949 Geneva<br />

Conventions in cases of declared war or of partial or total occupation of<br />

the territory of a High Contracting Party, and within the meaning of article<br />

1(4) of Protocol I of 1977, in cases of people fighting against colonial<br />

domination and alien occupation and against racist régimes in the<br />

exercise of their right of self-determination, and (iii) basic international<br />

human rights provisions may be applicable to the non-international aspect<br />

of ‘the international armed conflict degenerating into a non-international<br />

disturbance,’ i.e., the non-international disturbance, and which regulate<br />

issues of, inter alia, internal terrorist disturbance.<br />

The ninth situation of the intra-nationalized international conflict, namely,<br />

the international armed conflict degenerating into non-international armed<br />

conflict, may be subject to the application of the following laws: (i)<br />

international law may be applicable to the intra-nationalization per se, it<br />

being a violation the sovereignty and security of the state; (ii) with regard<br />

to the international aspect of the ‘international armed conflict degenerating<br />

into non-international armed conflict,’ i.e., the international armed conflict,<br />

international humanitarian law may be applicable, within the meaning of<br />

Common Article 2 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions in cases of declared<br />

war or of partial or total occupation of the territory of a High Contracting<br />

Party, and within the meaning of article 1(4) of Protocol I of 1977, in cases<br />

of people fighting against colonial domination and alien occupation and<br />

against racist régimes in the exercise of their right of self-determination,<br />

and (iii) Common Article 3 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions may be<br />

applicable to the non-international aspect of the ‘international tension<br />

58<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

degenerating into non-international armed conflict, i.e., the noninternational<br />

armed conflict.<br />

Conclusion:<br />

The intra-nationalized international conflict is an umbrella term for a<br />

variety of different legal and non-legal conflicts, thus brightening up<br />

shady activities, and shadowy political dimensions. The fact that nonlegal<br />

activities, such as international tension which does not fall<br />

formally within the provisions of humanitarian norms, degenerate into<br />

legal or illegal activities, makes it imperative to contain non-legal<br />

activities by applying to them humanitarian norms even though they do<br />

no fall formally within the circumstances of application set out therein,<br />

such as extending to internal tension the provisions of Common Article<br />

3 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions. Because international non-legal<br />

activities may degenerate easily into non-international illegal activities<br />

and thus adversely degenerate further into non-international<br />

disturbances and armed conflicts.<br />

This is why it is difficult to understand that what is being labeled as<br />

internationalization of non-international conflicts is actually the effect<br />

of intra-nationalization of international conflicts. For example,<br />

throughout the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union<br />

avoided direct confrontation in the world, and engaged in foreign<br />

policies or combat operations only to expand communism rule or to<br />

contain expansion of communism rule, i.e., to keep allies from defecting<br />

to the other side or to overthrow them after they had done so. Thus the<br />

Soviet Union sent troops to preserve communist rule in East Germany<br />

(1953), Hungary (1956), Czechoslovakia (1968), and Afghanistan<br />

(1979). For its part, the United States helped overthrow a left-wing<br />

government in Guatemala (1954), supported an unsuccessful invasion of<br />

Cuba (1961), invaded the Dominican Republic (1965) and Grenada<br />

(1983), and undertook a long (1964-1975) and unsuccessful effort to<br />

prevent communist North Vietnam from bringing South Vietnam under<br />

its rule.<br />

It is out of context to understand these conflicts as essentially noninternational<br />

conflicts then internationalized by the intervention of the<br />

United States and the Soviet Union. For they were intra-nationalization<br />

59<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

of the East-West mounting tensions. Thus, what has being stigmatized<br />

as internationalization has actually been a further development of intranationalizing<br />

international conflicts. Considering them as<br />

internationalized can indeed throw out of the law non-legal activities<br />

which influence the generation of non-international conflicts.<br />

60<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI - THE INTRA-NATIONALIZED INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

INTRODUCTION A LA ‘CRÉOLOGIE<br />

CRIMINELLE’<br />

BY DR. ANWAR FRANGI*<br />

Maître de Conférences-Chercheur (Usek)<br />

TABLE DES MATIERES<br />

I. L’OBJET DE LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE<br />

A. LES THÉORIES « NON-STRUCTURELLES » DU<br />

CRIME<br />

1. Formulation des théories « non-structurelles » du crime<br />

a) La théorie du crime selon « ce qu’il est »<br />

b) La théorie du crime selon « ce qu’il exprime »<br />

2. Problèmes posés par les théories « non-structurelles » du<br />

crime<br />

a) Le problème de l’antériorité<br />

b) Le problème de la détermination<br />

B. LA THÉORIE «STRUCTURELLE » OU<br />

« CRÉOLOGIQUE» DU CRIME<br />

1. La théorie créologique du crime prise en soi<br />

2. La théorie créologique du crime prise en relation avec les<br />

autres théories criminologiques précédentes<br />

II. LA NÉCESSITÉ DE LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE<br />

A. LA NÉCESSITÉ INTER SE DE LA CRÉOLOGIE<br />

CRIMINELLE<br />

1. La nécessité Inter Se de la créologie criminelle dans l’ordre<br />

historique<br />

2. La nécessité Inter Se de la créologie criminelle dans l’ordre<br />

logique<br />

B. LA NÉCESSITÉ IN SE DE LA CRÉOLOGIE<br />

CRIMINELLE<br />

1. La nécessité In Se essentielle de la créologie criminelle<br />

2. La nécessité In Se formelle de la créologie criminelle<br />

61<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Toute science humaine ou exacte suppose un objet spécifique qui<br />

justifie sa création. Elle suppose aussi être nécessaire par rapport aux<br />

autres sciences, prête à affronter et résoudre les problèmes qu’elle pose<br />

ou ceux que les autres sciences soulèvent. L’on ne saurait ainsi évoquer<br />

la créologie criminelle comme science criminologique nouvelle sans<br />

que ces deux conditions soient remplies. Nous étudions donc dans ce<br />

qui suit, tout d’abord l’objet de la créologie criminelle (section I) et<br />

ensuite, sa nécessité (section II).<br />

I. L’OBJET DE LA CREOLOGIE CRIMINELLE<br />

Il existe deux théories générales relatives à l’étude criminologique du<br />

crime : une première théorie qui étudie le crime en tant que phénomène<br />

juridique, le considérant ou bien ‘dans’ ou bien ‘hors’ de son contexte<br />

humain et social ; et une seconde théorie qui étudie le crime en tant que<br />

phénomène ‘conventionnel’ ou ‘naturel’, par référence aux sentiments<br />

provoqués dans la société par l’acte ainsi qualifié. Ce sont les théories<br />

dites ‘non-structurelles’, qui étudient le crime en dehors de sa<br />

constitution.<br />

Il existe une troisième théorie générale relative à l’étude criminologique<br />

du crime. C’est la théorie ‘créologique’, qui étudie le crime dans sa<br />

constitution même.<br />

* LL.M. 1995, Faculté de Droit de l’Université Harvard (Massachusetts,<br />

USA); LL.M. 1992, Faculté de Droit de l’Université Américaine<br />

(Washington, D.C.); Doctorat en droit (nouveau régime) 1986, Faculté de<br />

Droit de l’Université de Poitiers (France); D.E.A. 1983, Faculté de Droit de<br />

l’Université de Poitiers (France); Licence de droit 1982, Faculté de Droit de<br />

l’Université libanaise (Liban). Dr Frangi est Maître de Conférences-<br />

Chercheur à l’Université Saint-Esprit de Kaslik (Liban), et professeur de<br />

droit international et de philosophie de droit à l’Institut supérieur pour<br />

l’étude du droit de l’Université La Sagesse (Liban). Le présent article forme,<br />

en substance, l’introduction de sa thèse de doctorat intitulée La création<br />

comme facteur criminogène : introduction à la ‘créologie criminelle’, soutenue<br />

le 2 juillet 1986 à la Faculté de Droit de l’Université de Poitiers. Il avait<br />

originairement formé le sujet-matière de son mémoire intitulé Introduction à<br />

la créologie criminelle, soutenu au mois d’octobre 1983, à la Faculté de Droit<br />

de l’Université de Poitiers, en vue de l’obtention du Diplôme d’Etudes<br />

Approfondies en Droit pénal.<br />

62<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

A. LES THEORIES NON-STRUTURELLES DU CRIME<br />

1. LA FORMULATION DES THEORIES NON-<br />

STRUCTURELLES DU CRIME<br />

Selon les théories non-structurelles, le crime est appréhendé dans deux<br />

sens : il est ou bien ‘ce qu’il est’ ou bien ‘ce qu’il exprime’ ; l’une et<br />

l’autre acception dépendant respectivement de la manière dont il est<br />

considéré ou expliqué.<br />

a) LA THEORIE DU CRIME SELON ‘CE QU’IL EST’<br />

En tant « qu’il est », le crime est conçu ou bien comme une<br />

‘entité légale’, ou bien comme une ‘entité réelle’.<br />

i. LE CRIME SELON ‘CE QU’IL EST<br />

JURIDIQUEMENT’<br />

Juridiquement, le crime est une entité purement formelle, ce qu’il<br />

recouvre étant uniquement soumis à une description juridique<br />

spécifique. Ainsi, l’homicide est un acte dont l’existence est attribué<br />

non pas à l’homme lui-même, cette existence n’étant en rien d’ailleurs<br />

différente de celle d’autres actes, mais à l’acte juridique, qui lui a<br />

permis d’être différente de l’existence d’autres actes. (v. Carrara cité par<br />

J. Pinatel, La définition criminologique du crime, le caractère<br />

scientifique de la criminologie, RSC, 1957, p. 194 ; D. Szabo,<br />

Criminologie, p. 34-35 ; E. Yamarellos et G. Kellens, Crime et<br />

criminologie, p. 129).<br />

Au départ, c’est avec l’acte juridique qu’une distinction de fait<br />

commence, et par conséquent, qu’une étiquette d’anormalité ou de<br />

normalité s’attache sur l’existence de tel ou tel acte commis. Mais en<br />

distinguant les faits, l’acte juridique crée désormais une nouvelle façon<br />

d’aborder la réalité humaine ; car après la promulgation de la loi, l’acte<br />

humain devenant crime, acquiert une réalité nouvelle, étant attribué<br />

chaque fois qu’il est commis à ce qu’il est devenu, et non pas à ce qu’il<br />

était avant la promulgation de la loi.<br />

63<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Le crime donc, selon la théorie juridique, est conçu comme une entité<br />

absolument relative, tout d’abord, à l’acte juridique, et par suite, à la<br />

réalité. Juridiquement, il l’est car d’une part, le crime est défini par<br />

l’acte juridique en ce qu’il ne peut y avoir de crime sans une législation<br />

(au sens large du terme); et car d’autre part, il est pris invariablement<br />

pour ses conséquences envisagées à l’avance par l’acte juridique. C’est<br />

ce à quoi amène effectivement l’acte qui détermine la nature de celui-ci,<br />

et non pas celui qui l’a amené à exister (l’homme). Et c’est<br />

l’accomplissement du crime qui qualifie juridiquement l’offenseur,<br />

celui-ci étant envisagé comme un être abstrait, pris uniquement selon<br />

son acte perpétré.<br />

Ensuite, réellement, il l’est car l’acte juridique imprime une telle<br />

influence dans la société qu’un tel acte humain qualifié<br />

crime juridiquement le sera tout de même réellement. L’acte juridique<br />

change l’ordre des actes humains ; on ne dira plus, par exemple, que<br />

l’homicide en tant qu’acte juridique, ressemble à l’homicide en tant<br />

qu’acte humain, mais que, tout au contraire, l’homicide en tant qu’acte<br />

humain, ressemble à l’homicide en tant qu’acte juridique.<br />

Mais, s’il en est ainsi, la notion de crime selon la théorie juridique<br />

résisterait à toute connaissance scientifique. Tout d’abord, la notion du<br />

« crime juridique » est variable à l’intérieur d’une législation donnée et<br />

à une époque donnée, tel fait étant ou non incriminé selon les<br />

circonstances. Ensuite, la notion de « crime juridique » est variable dans<br />

le temps et dans l’espace. Ainsi, des faits incriminés jadis ne le sont<br />

plus aujourd’hui, et des faits incriminés par une législation dans tel État<br />

ne le sont pas par une autre législation dans d’autres États. La variabilité<br />

de la réaction sociale face à l’avortement, par exemple, prouve que<br />

celui-ci possède une entité indépendante de celle que l’acte juridique lui<br />

a fournie. Car si l’avortement est qualifié de « crime » en fonction de<br />

l’évolution de la réaction sociale, cela prouve justement que<br />

l’avortement ne couvre pas une réalité « mystique », mais plutôt une<br />

réalité sociale, détachée de toute loi formelle.<br />

C’est ainsi qu’il paraît intéressant pour d’autres chercheurs<br />

criminologues d’envisager la réalité humaine et sociale que l’acte<br />

juridique couvre.<br />

64<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

ii. LE CRIME SELON « CE QU’ IL EST<br />

REELLEMENT »<br />

Selon la « théorie réelle » du crime, l’acte juridique apparaît comme un<br />

aspect du phénomène criminel. La nature de l’homme et les conditions<br />

sociales déterminent la perpétration du crime, non pas l’acte juridique.<br />

Si, en effet, le crime est une notion juridique, il n’en reste pas moins que<br />

le concept légal recouvre une réalité humaine et sociale qui, en tant que<br />

phénomène, est antérieure à l’acte juridique et le motive. Et une bonne<br />

connaissance du « droit » exige une connaissance bien poussée du<br />

« fait ». Il n’est pas rationnel, par exemple, de réprimer le proxénétisme<br />

sans avoir connaissance du monde de la prostitution. Et le suicide,<br />

l’avortement, sont des matières sur lesquelles se base tout choix<br />

juridique. (v. J. Pinatel, op. cit., p. 194).<br />

D’un autre côté, le phénomène humain et social devient non plus une<br />

entité fondue dans celle de l’acte juridique, mais une entité qui<br />

intervient invariablement dans l’accomplissement du crime. Ainsi,<br />

l’homme peut présenter des anomalies biologiques qui déterminent son<br />

penchant au crime 1 ; et il ne peut être détaché de son milieu qui oriente<br />

la formation de sa « personnalité criminelle ». 2<br />

1 Cesare Lombroso (<strong>18</strong>36-1909), le « père » de la criminologie, est connu<br />

notamment pour sa notion du criminel atavique. Le « criminel-né », comme l’a<br />

nommé plus tard Enrico Ferri, serait une résurgence de l’homme primitif, une<br />

espèce de Néanderthal attardé, « un homme anormal avant sa naissance ». Dans<br />

son livre intitulé « l’Uomo Delinquente » (<strong>18</strong>76), Lombroso dit que ce criminel<br />

peut être reconnu d’après des anomalies anatomiques (une capacité réduite du<br />

crâne, arcades sourcilières proéminentes, front fuyant, oreilles écartées…), des<br />

anomalies physiologiques (daltonisme, insensibilité à la douleur…), et des<br />

anomalies caractériels (égoïsme, frivolité…).<br />

Voulant apaiser les critiques, surtout adressées par Ferri, Lombroso tempère sa<br />

théorie. A la notion du « criminel-né », il ajoute les notions de « criminel par<br />

passion », de « criminel fou », de « criminel occasionnel » et de « criminel par<br />

habitude ». Discutant ces notions, Lombroso reconnaît la part que le<br />

conditionnement social peut jouer dans l’accomplissement du crime.<br />

Lombroso a même considéré que le « criminel-né » peut toujours éviter la<br />

65<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

courbure de sa destinée criminelle si le milieu social où il s’est développé n’est<br />

pas favorable au crime.<br />

Une variante de la recherche de Lombroso, entamée par Ernst Kretschmer<br />

(1921) et William Sheldon (1940), est l’investigation portant sur la relation<br />

entre la criminalité et la forme du corps. Cette recherche apparaît plus<br />

scientifique que celle menée par Lombroso. Alors que celui-ci n’avait<br />

considéré que les délinquants, Kretschmer et Sheldon ont comparé délinquants<br />

et non-délinquants. Ils ont, tout d’abord, classé les individus en fonction de leur<br />

forme anatomique, soit 4 catégories : (1) les pycniques (trapus, aux formes<br />

arrondies) ; (2) les dysplastiques (moins larges, bras mince, présentant un<br />

déséquilibre glandulaire) ; (3) les leptosomes (maigres, anguleux) ; et (4) les<br />

athlétomorphes (épaules larges, de type sportif). Ensuite, ils ont étudié ces<br />

individus en fonction de leur caractère. Ils ont montré, par exemple, que les<br />

pycniques sont des cyclothymiques, alternant l’excitation et la dépression, ou<br />

que les leptosomes sont des schizoïdes ou introvertis, etc. Enfin, en appliquant<br />

ces investigations aux délinquants, ils ont trouvé que (i) les pycniques, souvent<br />

sans récidive, commettent habituellement des attentats contre les biens ; (ii) les<br />

dysplastiques commettent souvent des infractions sexuelles ; (iii) les<br />

leptosomes sont souvent des voleurs agressifs, escrocs et récidivistes ; et (iv)<br />

les athlétomorphes commettent souvent des meurtres et des incendies.<br />

Autres recherches se sont alignées dans l’étude positiviste de Lombroso.<br />

Celle portant sur les anomalies chromosomiques retient le plus d’attention.<br />

Cette théorie essaie d’établir une corrélation entre le supplément Y dans le<br />

gonosome et la criminalité. Normalement, chaque cellule contient 46<br />

chromosomes, dont 2 gonosomes ou chromosomes sexuels (XY chez l’homme,<br />

XX chez la femme). Cependant, dans des rares cas, un chromosome peut être<br />

absent, ou il pourrait y avoir des chromosomes suppléments. Par exemple, la<br />

combinaison XXY se produit 1.3 par mille chez des bébés masculins, et celle<br />

XYY 1.0 par mille. Autres combinaisons, plus rares, se produisent encore<br />

comme par exemple, XYYY, XXYY et XXXYY.<br />

Dans une investigation menée par le groupe Price et al. en Ecosse, on a<br />

observé que les patients portant un supplément Y avaient une tendance (1)<br />

d’être des psychopathes ; (2) d’être condamnés à un âge plus tendre que<br />

d’autres psychopathes, et (3) de commettre plus de crime contre les biens que<br />

de crime contre la personne.<br />

La théorie des « aberrations chromosomiques » est intéressante, en ce sens<br />

qu’elle prétend pouvoir fonder la base génétique pour une disposition<br />

criminelle particulière. Cette théorie apparaît cependant insuffisante. Tout<br />

d’abord, elle n’essaie pas d’aborder une explication pouvant indiquer<br />

« comment » la différence génétique peut être traduite en une différence de<br />

66<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

C’est ainsi que la « théorie réelle » du crime croit résoudre le problème<br />

de la variation de la notion du crime dans le temps et dans l’espace, en<br />

insistant sur le « déterminisme ». Chaque homme qui présente des<br />

anomalies biologiques particulières (le criminel-né de Lombroso, les<br />

types de délinquants de Kretchmer et de Sheldon), ou qui vit dans un<br />

milieu criminogène, est voué à commettre un crime ; et ce, par rapport à<br />

n’importe quelle législation et à n’importe quelle époque donnée.<br />

Mais s’il en est ainsi, le crime en tant qu’un phénomène humain et<br />

social résisterait à toute connaissance scientifique.<br />

Il est sûr que la « nature » peut prédisposer à devenir délinquant<br />

l’homme qui présente une personnalité asociale; mais il est certain<br />

qu’elle ne peut déterminer son passage à l’acte délictueux. Les<br />

recherches scientifiques contemporaines affirment que les aberrations<br />

chromosomiques ne peuvent déterminer qu’une orientation seulement<br />

« possible », favorable à la genèse du crime. Un supplément de<br />

chromosome dans le gonosome (XYY) ne détermine pas la formation<br />

d’une « personnalité criminelle », mais au plus l’agressivité qui peut<br />

contribuer, au côté d’autres composantes, à influencer le passage à<br />

l’acte délictueux. (v. J. Léauté, Criminologie et pénologie, Les Cours<br />

de Droit (1981), pp. 282-293 ; Criminologie et science pénitentiaire, pp.<br />

453-457).<br />

Ensuite, il est reconnu aujourd’hui qu’il ne faut plus rechercher la<br />

connaissance du crime dans l’homme « pathologique ». Car<br />

comportement. Ensuite, la théorie est très étroite en ce sens que son explication<br />

porte sur une proportion minuscule de la population générale et délinquante.<br />

2<br />

Depuis Enrico Ferri (<strong>18</strong>56-1929), l’importance du milieu social dans la<br />

genèse du crime ne peut être ignorée. A la fin du 19<br />

67<br />

e siècle, Ferri disait que « le<br />

niveau de la criminalité est déterminé, chaque année, par les différentes<br />

conditions du milieu physique et social combinées avec les tendances<br />

héréditaires et les impulsions occasionnelles des individus ». Plusieurs enquêtes<br />

menées aux Etats-Unis ont confirmé les corrélations entre criminalité et milieu.<br />

Ainsi, une comparaison de 500 délinquants et de 500 non-délinquants a montré<br />

que 35% des délinquants contre 5% des non-délinquants avaient manqué<br />

d’affection maternelle (V. J. Pradel, Droit pénal général, éditions Cujas : Paris,<br />

1986, p. 47-48) .<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

l’accomplissement du crime, dans ce cas, est certainement une<br />

expression, parmi d’autres, de la personnalité pathologique de l’homme<br />

offenseur. La connaissance du crime doit être recherchée plutôt dans les<br />

perturbations psychiques qui sont considérées comme moins<br />

pathologiques qu’acquises ou « normales ». 3 C’est seulement à l’aide de<br />

cette recherche que nous pouvons reconnaître l’intérieur de l’homme<br />

criminel qui, loin d’être une « variété de l’espèce humaine », est<br />

« pourvu des mêmes idées, des mêmes sentiments que tout autre<br />

3<br />

Parmi les criminels qui présentent des « troubles psychiques », ceux atteints<br />

d’une maladie mentale dite « grave » (comme la psychose) ne sont pas tenus<br />

normalement responsables de leurs actes. Ils bénéficient d’un non lieu ou d’un<br />

acquittement. En revanche, les criminels atteints d’une maladie « moins<br />

grave » (comme la névrose) sont normalement tenus responsables de leurs<br />

actes, mais bénéficient toutefois des circonstances atténuantes, donc de la<br />

réduction de la peine, ou d’un traitement tendant à l’amélioration de leur état<br />

mental, à leur rééducation morale et à leur réadaptation sociale.<br />

Les délinquants dits « pathologiques », dont la maladie entraîne souvent leur<br />

irresponsabilité pénale, présentent des troubles psychiques ou neuropsychiques<br />

ayant aboli le discernement ou le contrôle de leurs actes. Ces troubles peuvent<br />

consister en une « maladie de l’intelligence » (crétinisme, idiotie, imbécillité),<br />

ou en une psychose paranoïde ou une schizophrénie, ou encore en crises<br />

d’épilepsie. Pour entraîner l’irresponsabilité pénale, un lien doit exister entre<br />

l’aliénation mentale (consistant en un trouble psychique « grave ») et<br />

l’infraction commise (par ex., le cas de « l’homicide volontaire » provoqué par<br />

la manie de la persécution).<br />

Les délinquants dits « normaux », dont la maladie entraîne souvent leur<br />

responsabilité pénale, sont ceux qui présentent moins des maladies perturbant<br />

le développement de leur intelligence ou leurs facultés de raisonnement, que<br />

des maladies perturbant leur « volonté » ; comme, par exemple, la<br />

psychasténie, la neurasthénie, l’hystérie, la kleptomanie (manie du vol), la<br />

pyromanie (manie du feu). Normalement, les troubles de la volonté entraînent<br />

des « circonstances atténuantes », donc abaissant la peine, lorsqu’un lien causal<br />

est établi entre la maladie et l’infraction commise (par ex., le cas du « vol »<br />

commis par le kleptomane).<br />

Toutefois, la distinction entre les maladies de l’intelligence, et celles de la<br />

volonté, est difficile à faire. On a du mal, en effet, à considérer des impulsions<br />

irrésistibles pouvant entraîner le « malade » à commettre des infractions<br />

particulières, sans considérer parallèlement un mal entraînant un dérèglement<br />

de son être psychique perturbant ses facultés de raisonnement.<br />

68<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

homme », toutefois en exagération par rapport à celui-ci. (v. E. Ferri,<br />

Sociologie criminelle, p.42 ; J. Pinatel, « La théorie de la personnalité<br />

criminelle », in Traité de Droit Pénal et de Droit Pénal, T.III, p.473 ; E.<br />

de Greeff, « La criminogenèse », rapport général au 1 er C.I.C., Actes,<br />

T.VI, p. 277).<br />

Aussi, l’explication du crime par le milieu social apparaît insuffisante.<br />

Deux individus qui présentent les mêmes aberrations chromosomiques,<br />

et qui vivent dans le même milieu criminogène, ne sont pas pour autant<br />

des criminels l’un et l’autre.<br />

Montrant que le crime selon « ce qu’il est », juridiquement ou<br />

réellement, contribue peu à connaître le crime, d’autres chercheurs<br />

criminologues proposent d’envisager plutôt un « crime absolu », qui<br />

résisterait au changement de l’espace-temps. (v. R. Garofalo,<br />

Criminologie, « Étude sur la nature du crime et la théorie de la<br />

pénalité », pp. 1-52). En effet, ces chercheurs prétendent que le<br />

problème posé par la théorie de « ce que le crime est », est mal posé. Il<br />

ne s’agit pas de rechercher si certains actes qualifiés « crimes » à une<br />

époque déterminée, ont toujours été comme tels dans le temps et dans<br />

l’espace. Il faut précisément analyser les sentiments provoqués dans la<br />

société par les actes ainsi qualifiés. Pour ce faire, ces chercheurs<br />

proposent de remplacer l’étude portant sur « ce que le crime est » par<br />

celle plus pratique portant sur « ce que le crime exprime ».<br />

a) LA THEORIE DU CRIME SELON « CE QU’ IL<br />

EXPRIME »<br />

En tant « qu’il exprime », le crime peut se prendre de deux acceptions :<br />

ou bien ce qu’il exprime est l’effet d’une « convention », ou bien l’effet<br />

de la « nature ».<br />

i. LE DELIT CONVENTIONNEL<br />

Selon Garofalo, le « délit conventionnel » est tout acte violant des<br />

sentiments évolutifs et contingents, tels que l’amour de la patrie, le<br />

69<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

sentiment religieux, la chasteté. Le « délit conventionnel » exprime<br />

donc tout ce qu’une communauté a entrevu en tant que possibilité de<br />

répression ; et ce, par référence aux sentiments provoqués dans cette<br />

communauté par l’acte ainsi qualifié.<br />

La théorie du « délit conventionnel » se distingue de la théorie juridique<br />

du crime. Tout d’abord, contrairement à celle-ci qui prend le crime hors<br />

de son contexte humain et social, la théorie du « délit conventionnel » le<br />

prend dans son contexte social, le délit étant ainsi qualifié par référence<br />

aux sentiments évolutifs qu’il provoque dans la société. Ensuite, alors<br />

que la variation de la notion de crime dans le temps et dans l’espace<br />

n’est pas compréhensible par référence à la théorie juridique, elle<br />

devient compréhensible par référence à la théorie du « délit<br />

conventionnel ». Et la notion de crime change dans le temps et dans<br />

l’espace parce que les sentiments provoqués par l’acte ainsi qualifié sont<br />

eux-mêmes évolutifs et contingents.<br />

La théorie du « délit conventionnel » se distingue également de la<br />

théorie réelle du crime. Contrairement à celle-ci qui prend le crime<br />

juridique dans son contexte humain et social et qui cherche à prouver<br />

qu’une anomalie biologique ou un milieu criminogène peut déterminer<br />

l’accomplissement de l’acte ainsi qualifié, la théorie du « délit<br />

conventionnel » prend le crime dans son contexte social, cherchant à<br />

prouver que l’acte est ainsi qualifié parce qu’il provoque dans la société<br />

des sentiments évolutifs particuliers.<br />

ii. LE DELIT NATUREL<br />

En revanche, le « délit naturel » exprime toute violation des<br />

« sentiments altruistes fondamentaux, c’est-à-dire, la pitié et la<br />

probité », que l’on trouve dans tout groupe social.<br />

Il ne s’agit pas donc, de rechercher si un acte normalement pris pour un<br />

crime, l’est ou ne l’est pas effectivement, ni de rassembler les « faits<br />

universellement haïs ». Il s’agit plutôt de voir les « sentiments blessés »<br />

par cet acte, « non pas la partie supérieure et la plus délicate de ces<br />

sentiments, mais la mesure moyenne dans laquelle ils sont procédés par<br />

70<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

une communauté et qui est indispensable pour l’adaptation de l’individu<br />

à la société ». (Garofalo, ibid., pp. 38-39).<br />

Ainsi, l’acte nuisible n’est plus considéré comme tel à cause de la loi<br />

mais à cause des « sentiments rudimentaires » blessés, ceux-ci seuls<br />

pouvant déterminer ce qui serait ou ne serait pas naturellement un<br />

crime.<br />

Cependant, il faut préciser la notion de « sentiment altruiste<br />

fondamental ». Il faut donc voir si Garofalo tout en proposant d’analyser<br />

les « sentiments altruistes fondamentaux » violés par le crime, n’établit<br />

pas par là, une « loi » qui prendrait une autre forme que la loi juridique.<br />

Et il faut voir d’ailleurs, si la définition des « sentiments altruistes<br />

fondamentaux » reviendrait exclusivement à la « pitié » et la « probité ».<br />

Car, il n’est pas évident que la pitié et la probité constituent à elles<br />

seules, les « sentiments altruistes fondamentaux ». D’autres sentiments<br />

relatifs à l’honneur, par exemple, ou à la pudeur, ou à la religion,<br />

peuvent aussi être attribués à la définition de ces « sentiments ».<br />

Ensuite, on peut se demander si les sentiments collectifs violés par le<br />

crime sont toujours les mêmes dans les différentes sociétés, et cela<br />

malgré la variation de la notion de l’acte ainsi qualifié. Car la question<br />

de l’avortement ou de la prostitution prouve qu’ils ne sont pas<br />

considérés par toute l’espèce humaine comme des « cruautés inutiles à<br />

la communauté », même s’ils l’étaient à une époque déterminée.<br />

Enfin, il faut se poser la question de savoir s’il est possible que d’autres<br />

délits, non attribués à la définition du « délit naturel », peuvent quand<br />

même exister par eux-mêmes. Car autres délits, relatifs à la politique,<br />

par exemple, ou à la presse, ne peuvent pas être constitués ni par la<br />

« pitié », ni par la « probité », ni par aucun autre sentiment, si tant est<br />

que Garofalo aurait accepté de ranger à côté de ceux-ci, l’honneur, la<br />

religion, ou la pudeur, etc. (v. J. Constant, Eléments de criminologie, pp.<br />

46-48).<br />

Ainsi, la théorie réelle du crime paraît insuffisante pour la connaissance<br />

du crime, et la théorie juridique de plus en plus irremplaçable.<br />

71<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

1. PROBLEMES POSES PAR LES THEORIES<br />

« NON-STRUCTURELLES » DU CRIME<br />

Nous constatons de ce qui précède, que l’acte criminel a été pris en<br />

dehors de sa « constitution », en rapport avec « l’acte juridique »,<br />

« l’homme », le « milieu social » ou les « sentiments violés ».<br />

Considérant le crime en dehors de sa « constitution », les chercheurs<br />

criminologues ont voulu montrer que le crime est « absolument relatif »<br />

ou bien à « l’acte juridique » (la théorie juridique du crime), ou bien à<br />

« l’homme » ou au « milieu social » (la théorie réelle du crime), ou bien<br />

aux « sentiments violés » (la théorie de Garofalo). Ainsi, selon la théorie<br />

juridique, un acte criminel qualifie juridiquement l’offenseur par le fait<br />

même qu’il est accompli. De même, selon la théorie réelle, des<br />

anomalies biologiques ou un milieu criminogène qualifient<br />

juridiquement l’offenseur, puisqu’ils déterminent l’accomplissement du<br />

crime. De plus, selon la théorie de Garofalo, un acte blessant les<br />

sentiments de pitié et de probité qualifie l’offenseur comme criminel par<br />

le fait même que cet acte est commis. (v. supra, « le délit naturel »).<br />

En voulant établir que le crime est un phénomène « déterminé », pour<br />

prouver que le crime peut être connu scientifiquement, les théories<br />

« non-structurelles » du crime sont prises dans un dilemme dont il faut<br />

sortir. Car l’expérience prouve, au contraire, que le crime est un<br />

phénomène « indéterminé ». L’homme qui commet un crime n’est plus<br />

« nécessairement » juridiquement qualifié « criminel » ; et l’homme qui<br />

présente des anomalies biologiques, ou qui évolue dans un milieu<br />

criminogène, n’est plus, non plus, nécessairement voué à<br />

l’accomplissement du crime. De même qu’un acte blessant les<br />

sentiments altruistes fondamentaux ne qualifie pas nécessairement son<br />

offenseur de « criminel ». (ibid.).<br />

Les théories « non-structurelles » du crime posent en général deux types<br />

de problèmes auxquels la « théorie créologique » apportera une<br />

solution :<br />

(1) le problème de l’antériorité et<br />

(2) le problème de la détermination.<br />

72<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

a) LE PROBLEME DE L’ANTERIORITE<br />

Au commencement, c’est l’entité juridique du crime qui a été<br />

envisagée ; ainsi la réalité humaine et sociale du crime se posait comme<br />

« absolument relative » à l’acte juridique. Dans un second temps, c’est<br />

l’entité humaine et sociale du crime qui a été envisagée ; ainsi l’entité<br />

juridique du crime se posait comme « absolument relative » au<br />

phénomène humain et social.<br />

Le problème de l’antériorité pose des difficultés au chercheur<br />

criminologue car si le phénomène humain et social est pris comme<br />

« absolument relatif » à l’acte juridique, le crime apparaît alors comme<br />

une entité purement formelle, et le phénomène humain et social que<br />

couvre le crime, ne serait qu’une réalité purement définie, donc<br />

inexistante en soi (v. supra., « le crime selon ce qu’il est<br />

juridiquement ») ; et ce qui est considéré comme postérieur, apparaît en<br />

effet comme une entité antérieure à l’acte juridique, et le motive.<br />

Et si le phénomène humain et social que le crime couvre, est antérieur à<br />

l’acte juridique qui ne fait que le proclamer comme crime, nous<br />

retombons dans le même problème qu’a soulevé l’antériorité du crime<br />

juridique. Car il faudra alors définir les critères sur lesquels se base la<br />

qualification comme crime d’un phénomène social, plutôt qu’un autre.<br />

(voir également les problèmes engendrés par le « délit naturel »).<br />

Le problème de l’antériorité, ainsi souvent soulevé par les chercheurs<br />

criminologues, est en effet mal posé.<br />

Le concept « d’antériorité » évoque nécessairement celui du temps ;<br />

concevoir un objet dans le temps c’est l’envisager antérieurement ou<br />

postérieurement par référence à un autre objet. Concevoir le crime<br />

comme une entité juridique, implique nécessairement sa variabilité, et<br />

en conséquence, sa relation avec l’entité sociale qu’elle couvre, puisque<br />

le changement de la qualification du crime apparaît en fonction de<br />

l’évolution sociale. De même, concevoir le crime comme une entité<br />

humaine et sociale implique nécessairement sa variabilité et, en<br />

conséquence, sa relation avec l’entité juridique qui la couvre, puisque<br />

73<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

c’est l’acte juridique qui qualifie cette entité, et qui change en fonction<br />

de l’Etat.<br />

C’est ainsi que d’autres chercheurs criminologues ont essayé de<br />

résoudre le « problème de l’antériorité » du crime d’une autre façon, en<br />

prouvant que l’entité juridique du crime est en « concordance » avec son<br />

entité humaine et sociale. En effet, la « théorie juridique » du crime<br />

« détermine » l’aspect criminel de l’acte dans ses « conséquences », car<br />

tout homme est « criminel » si son acte « concorde » avec la<br />

qualification juridique que lui impose la loi (ce raisonnement s’applique<br />

également, par analogie, à la théorie de Garofalo). Et la « théorie<br />

réelle » du crime « détermine » l’aspect criminel de l’acte dans l’homme<br />

ou le milieu social, car tout homme est « criminel » si son acte<br />

« concorde » avec la qualification psychologique, biologique, ou<br />

sociale, que lui impose son statut psychique, ou constitutionnel (v. la<br />

théorie du « criminel-né » ; la théorie des « aberrations<br />

chromosomiques »), ou social (v. la théorie des « lois de l’imitation » ;<br />

la théorie des « associations différentielles »).<br />

Le problème de la « concordance » évoque donc bien celui de la<br />

détermination.<br />

a) LE PROBLEME DE LA DETERMINATION<br />

La « détermination » du crime peut en effet être ramenée à deux théories<br />

criminologiques : la « théorie juridique » du crime et la « théorie du<br />

criminel-né ».<br />

Alors que la « théorie juridique » considère que l’aspect déterminé du<br />

crime se trouve dans son accomplissement, donc dans sa qualification<br />

juridique (puisque l’offenseur est qualifié de « criminel » par le fait<br />

même qu’il commet l’acte qualifié « crime »), la théorie du criminel-né<br />

considère que le crime est un phénomène déterminé dans l’offenseur<br />

(puisque ce sont les anomalies biologiques de l’offenseur qui le vouent<br />

nécessairement à la perpétration du crime).<br />

Les deux théories ont ceci en commun, qu’en dépit de la variation de la<br />

notion du crime dans le temps et dans l’espace, l’accomplissement de<br />

74<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

l’acte qualifié de « crime » impliquerait invariablement l’offenseur<br />

comme criminel (la théorie juridique du crime), et la présence des<br />

anomalies biologiques dans l’homme qualifieraient invariablement<br />

l’accomplissement du crime ( la théorie du criminel-né). (v. supra., « le<br />

crime selon ce qu’il est réellement).<br />

La variation de la notion de crime, par nature indéterminée, ne peut<br />

changer ni la qualification juridique de l’offenseur, lorsque l’acte<br />

criminel est accompli, ni l’accomplissement du crime par l’homme<br />

présentant des anomalies biologiques. Ainsi, selon la théorie du<br />

criminel-né, la notion de crime, pris comme une entité humaine, ne<br />

pouvant être compris que dans la connaissance de la constitution de<br />

l’homme offenseur, est en « concordance » avec la notion du crime pris<br />

comme une entité juridique, puisque tel homme présentant des<br />

anomalies biologiques le vouant nécessairement au crime n’est qualifié<br />

« criminel » qu’en fonction de la qualification juridique de son acte<br />

accompli.<br />

Cette solution est, cependant, apparente. Car il est difficile aujourd’hui<br />

de voir en la théorie du criminel-né une contribution sérieuse à la<br />

connaissance du crime. En effet, un homme voué au crime par naissance<br />

étant inconcevable. De même, il est inconcevable de détacher l’homme<br />

offenseur de son milieu pour le qualifier comme tel selon son acte,<br />

comme le veut la théorie juridique du crime, alors que c’est l’homme<br />

qui subit la peine.<br />

Une raison majeure de l’échec de la théorie juridique et de la théorie du<br />

criminel-né dans la connaissance du crime, est le fait qu’elles ont étudié<br />

le crime hors de sa « constitution ».<br />

En effet, il est bien-sûr difficile de connaître le crime tout en détachant<br />

l’homme offenseur de sa constitution ou de son milieu. Mais, il est aussi<br />

difficile de connaître le crime dans « l’homme offenseur » ou dans son<br />

« milieu » sans toutefois risquer de l’envisager comme un « phénomène<br />

indéterminé », et donc échouer à l’étudier scientifiquement. Il est<br />

également difficile de contourner ces difficultés lorsque les chercheurs<br />

criminologues veulent toujours poursuivre une étude « nonstructurelle<br />

» du crime.<br />

75<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

C’est pour éviter ces problèmes que la « théorie créologique » du crime<br />

propose de rechercher la connaissance du crime dans sa « constitution »<br />

même.<br />

B. LA THEORIE STRUCTURELLE OU CREOLOGIQUE<br />

DU CRIME<br />

1. LA THEORIE CREOLOGIQUE DU CRIME<br />

PRISE EN SOI<br />

La théorie créologique du crime propose d’étudier l’acte criminel dans<br />

sa structure, comme élément constitutif de « l’acte humain en soi ». Or<br />

admettre qu’il en est ainsi, c’est admettre en d’autres termes que l’acte<br />

humain en soi possède initialement le germe d’un acte criminel; et que<br />

le germe d’un acte criminel existe par nature dans l’acte humain en soi,<br />

en tant qu’acte criminogène.<br />

En effet, la caractéristique de l’homme est de pouvoir nommer les<br />

choses ; et toute la démarche de l’esprit humain dans l’histoire peut être<br />

réduite à l’effort de l’homme de former les choses, afin de pouvoir les<br />

comprendre. Cet effort, cependant, se manifeste moins dans certains<br />

actes humains, que dans d’autres. Or le pouvoir de nommer les choses<br />

est un pouvoir créateur. Ainsi, la caractéristique distinctive de l’homme<br />

est-elle de créer. Et puisque le pouvoir de nommer les choses se reflète<br />

dans tous les actes humains à des degrés variables, et puisque le pouvoir<br />

de nommer les choses est un pouvoir créateur, chaque acte humain est<br />

acte de créer à des degrés variables. En conséquence, chaque acte<br />

humain est constitué d’un élément créateur. Mais, l’acte de nommer les<br />

choses est cause de quelque chose, et toute cause est non seulement le<br />

germe de son effet comme Leibniz le disait, mais est aussi co-existante<br />

avec son effet comme Newton le disait.<br />

Ainsi, si l’acte législateur est un acte humain, nommant tel acte comme<br />

acte criminel, l’acte législateur et l’acte criminel devraient coexister,<br />

comme éléments constitutifs, dans le même acte humain ; l’acte<br />

législateur et l’acte criminel ne formant qu’un seul et même acte humain<br />

à double face. Et partant, la connaissance de l’acte criminel ne peut être<br />

76<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

suffisamment accomplie, selon la créologie criminelle, sans celle de<br />

l’acte législateur ; ni la connaissance de l’état dangereux criminologique<br />

ne peut se faire sans celle de l’état dangereux législateur (V. A. Frangi,<br />

L’innovation et la législation, 6th Conference : Freedom & Creativity<br />

on Reality and Ambition (16-<strong>18</strong> April 2001), Philadelphia University,<br />

Amma, Jordan). Un autre aspect de l’état dangereux créologique, doit<br />

être recherché dans la façon dont est poursuivie l’activité créatrice, qui<br />

peut se révéler criminogène, développant chez l’homme créateur qui<br />

s’en occupe les traits psychologiques de la personnalité criminelle. (V.<br />

infra, « la nécessité in se formelle de la créologie criminelle).<br />

Si la théorie créologique du crime affirme que les théories précédentes<br />

rencontrent des difficultés à cause de leur étude non-structurelle du<br />

crime, elle doit donc montrer comment elle-même, par l’approche<br />

structurelle du crime, peut se distinguer de ces théories tout d’abord, et<br />

ensuite, résoudre les difficultés rencontrées par celles-ci.<br />

1. LA THEORIE CREOLOGIQUE DU CRIME PRISE<br />

EN RELATION AVEC LES THEORIES<br />

CRIMINOLOGIQUES PRECEDENTES<br />

Ne voulant pas répéter les approches proposées par les autres théories<br />

criminologiques, la théorie de l’acte humain en soi veut « continuer »<br />

l’effort déjà entamé par ces théories, pour saisir avec confiance<br />

l’essence du phénomène criminel, en vue d’apporter des « solutions »<br />

aux problèmes rencontrés par celles-ci.<br />

a) LA THEORIE CREOLOGIQUE DU CRIME<br />

COMME « CONTINUATION »<br />

La façon dont l’effort de la créologie criminelle pour saisir l’essence du<br />

phénomène criminel peut être considéré comme une « continuation »,<br />

réside effectivement dans l’apport de la créologie criminelle à la<br />

connaissance du crime. Or les sciences criminologiques précédentes se<br />

sont limitées à une étude non-structurelle de l’acte criminel, alors que la<br />

créologie criminelle définit une étude criminologique structurelle. Cet<br />

apport peut être dégagé clairement des solutions que la théorie<br />

77<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

créologique du crime apporte aux problèmes confrontant les autres<br />

théories criminologiques.<br />

b) LA THEORIE CREOLOGIQUE DU CRIME<br />

COMME « SOLUTION »<br />

A la question comment connaître le crime alors que le crime est une<br />

notion variable dans l’espace et dans le temps, la créologie criminelle<br />

seule peut apporter une réponse satisfaisante. Car en considérant la<br />

« structure » intime de l’acte criminel, la notion espace-temps s’écarte<br />

d’office, la structure de l’acte criminel étant toujours la même, quelle<br />

que soit la législation en vigueur dans l’État et l’époque à laquelle il est<br />

commis. L’acte humain, pris en soi, n’est pas détaché au départ de l’acte<br />

criminel, l’acte humain envisagé étant lui-même l’acte criminel, pas<br />

nécessairement en accomplissement, mais nécessairement en<br />

constitution.<br />

Aussi, la théorie créologique du crime résout « le problème de la<br />

détermination ». En effet, le reproche qui peut être adressé aux théories<br />

criminologiques précédentes, à savoir que deux personnes sujettes aux<br />

mêmes conditions ne sont pas pour autant l’une et l’autre criminelles, ne<br />

peut s’adresser à la théorie créologique du crime. Car si nous<br />

considérons que l’acte criminel est un élément constitutif de « l’acte<br />

humain en soi », nous constatons, d’une part, qu’il ne peut être pris<br />

comme déterminé puisqu’il n’est pas nécessairement voué à entrer en<br />

conflit avec le droit pénal ; et d’autre part, il ne peut pas être pris<br />

comme indéterminé puisqu’il est comme tel un acte « criminogène » (v.<br />

sur ce point, infra.: « la nécessité in se essentielle de la créologie<br />

criminelle).<br />

Si l’étude de l’objet de la créologie criminelle forme bien une<br />

« continuation » des études criminologiques précédentes, et une<br />

« solution » aux problèmes qu’elles ont rencontrés, cette étude doit être<br />

donc « nécessaire ». Le besoin de la créologie criminelle apparaît dans<br />

la « nécessité » de son objet par rapport aux autres objets des sciences<br />

criminelles (« la nécessité inter se »), et dans la nécessité de sa notion<br />

(« la nécessité in se »).<br />

78<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

II. LA NECESSITE DE LA CREOLOGIE CRIMINELLE<br />

A. LA NECESSITE INTER SE DE LA CREOLOGIE<br />

CRIMINELLE<br />

La nécessité inter se de la créologie criminelle peut être montrée, d’une<br />

part, en se référant à « l’ordre historique », et d’autre part, à « l’ordre<br />

logique », auxquels sont sujettes les sciences criminelles.<br />

1. LA NECESSITE INTER SE DE LA CREOLOGIE<br />

CRIMINELLE DANS L’ORDRE HISTORIQUE<br />

L’objet des sciences criminelles est pris jusqu’à présent selon trois<br />

acceptions : ou bien en relation avec la « nature », ou bien en relation<br />

avec la « société », ou bien en relation avec « l’homme ». La « physique<br />

criminelle » étudie le crime en rapport avec les phénomènes<br />

météorologiques. La « sociologie criminelle » envisage le crime en<br />

fonction du milieu hygiénique (alimentation, habitation, misère, etc.),<br />

ou du milieu éducatif (famille, école, etc.), ou du milieu culturel (la<br />

presse, la radio, la télévision, le cinéma, etc.). La « psychologie<br />

criminelle » analyse le crime en relation avec l’homme lui-même<br />

(l’influence des troubles de l’intelligence, de la volonté ou de<br />

l’affectivité sur la genèse du crime).<br />

Il en est autrement pour la créologie criminelle qui envisage la relation<br />

existante entre l’acte de créer et l’acte criminel comme éléments<br />

constitutifs de l’acte humain en soi. Certes, celui-ci est commis dans la<br />

société mais, alors qu’il est considéré par les sciences criminologiques<br />

précédentes, comme la résultante d’une condition géo-physique, sociale,<br />

ou humaine, il est considéré par la créologie criminelle dans sa structure<br />

elle-même, comme étant un acte humain posé en soi dans l’histoire de la<br />

pensée humaine.<br />

L’objet de la créologie criminelle apparaît comme une nécessité dans<br />

l’évolution de l’histoire des sciences criminologiques. En effet, l’esprit<br />

a commencé par étudier le crime dans son accomplissement (c’est<br />

l’étude purement matérielle du droit pénal) ; dans un second temps, il<br />

s’est élevé pour l’étudier dans l’homme ; dans un autre temps, il s’est<br />

79<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

efforcé de l’étudier dans la société mais aussi dans l’environnement ou<br />

la nature.<br />

Il serait enfin temps, tout en suivant l’ordre de cette démarche<br />

ascendante, de considérer l’acte criminel dans « l’acte humain en soi »<br />

posé dans l’histoire de la pensée humaine, en vue de couronner le<br />

cheminement historique des sciences criminologiques. Ce<br />

couronnement apparaît aussi dans l’ordre logique auquel ces sciences<br />

sont sujettes.<br />

1. LA NECESSITE INTER SE DE LA CREOLOGIE<br />

CRIMINELLE DANS L’ORDRE LOGIQUE<br />

Si la créologie criminelle est une « abstraction » des autres sciences<br />

criminologiques, elle est aussi leur « précision ». Elle est leur<br />

« abstraction », car elle dégage l’acte criminel de sa nature légale,<br />

sociale, ou humaine, en vue de l’envisager en soi, dans sa constitution<br />

même. Et elle est leur « précision » car à l’étude de l’acte criminel selon<br />

les conditions météorologiques (la physique criminelle), ou selon la<br />

société (la sociologie criminelle), ou selon l’homme (la psychologie, la<br />

biologie et la psychanalyse criminelles), s’ajoute, par référence à l’ordre<br />

logique allant du général au particulier, l’étude de l’acte criminel selon<br />

« l’acte humain en soi » (la créologie criminelle).<br />

Jusqu’ici, nous avons montré que la créologie criminelle a un objet<br />

« spécifique » ; et que cet objet est « nécessaire » vis-à-vis des autres<br />

sciences criminologiques. Il nous reste à montrer comment cet objet<br />

reflète une « nécessité in se » ou « idéelle » propre à la créologie<br />

criminelle.<br />

B. LA NECESSITE IN SE DE LA CREOLOGIE<br />

CRIMINELLE<br />

La nécessité in se de la créologie criminelle peut être prise dans deux<br />

sens : elle est « essentielle » ou bien « formelle ».<br />

80<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

1. LA NECESSITE IN SE « ESSENTIELLE » DE LA<br />

CREOLOGIE CRIMINELLE<br />

Essentiellement, la créologie criminelle propose de considérer l’acte<br />

humain en soi criminogène constituant l’acte criminel, celui-ci étant pris<br />

dans sa structure intime. Poser ainsi la connaissance qualitative de l’acte<br />

criminel, en dégageant son acte humain, et puis sa connaissance<br />

quantitative, en dénonçant la quantité du caractère criminogène de l’acte<br />

criminel en fonction de son acte humain, serait suffisant pour entériner<br />

les situations criminogènes spécifiques et ultimement, pour prévenir<br />

l’accomplissement du crime.<br />

Concernant la coexistence susmentionnée de l’acte criminel et l’acte<br />

législateur, la nécessité essentielle de la créologie criminelle réside donc<br />

dans le fait de rechercher la qualification de l’état dangereux<br />

criminologique non pas seulement dans l’acte criminel, mais aussi dans<br />

l’acte législateur. Sa nécessité essentielle réside également dans la<br />

quantification de cet état dangereux, en vue de pouvoir réduire la<br />

quantité criminogène des actes humains (V. A. Frangi, L’état dangereux<br />

criminologique : une étude qualitative et quantitative (en cours de<br />

publication).<br />

Le concept de cette nécessité, qui ne forme le principe d’aucune autre<br />

science criminologique, justifie, en effet, la création d’une nouvelle<br />

discipline, la créologie criminelle, pour l’étude du crime. La nécessité<br />

formelle de la créologie criminelle peut apporter aussi une telle<br />

justification.<br />

1. LA NECESSITE IN SE « FORMELLE » DE LA<br />

CREOLOGIE CRIMINELLE<br />

Formellement, le terme « créologie » vient du latin « creare, creo »<br />

(créer), et du grec « logos » (la connaissance de, ou la science de). Le<br />

latin identifie « creo » à « creare ». Ainsi, la créologie criminelle, ou la<br />

science de la création criminelle, englobe non seulement l’étude des<br />

corrélations entre acte de créer et acte criminel, en tant qu’actes<br />

constitutifs de l’acte humain, mais aussi l’étude de l’activité créatrice<br />

(« creo », je crée) et l’activité criminelle en relation.<br />

81<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Toute démarche ultérieure concernant l’étude de l’acte de créer et l’acte<br />

criminel en relation devrait donc commencer par une étude structurelle<br />

créologique-criminelle de l’acte humain en soi.<br />

BIBLIOGRAPHIE<br />

1. LE CRIME SELON «CE QU’IL EST»<br />

A. Selon «ce qu’il est» juridiquement<br />

ANCEL, M., La défense sociale nouvelle, Paris, Cujas, 3e Ed., 1981,<br />

pp. 24-29.<br />

MARQUISET, J., Le crime, P.U.F., Paris 1948, Que sais-je ? n˚ 297, p.<br />

7-17.<br />

NUVOLONE, «Droit pénal et criminologie», Revue Internationale de<br />

Droit Pénal., 1952, p. 157 et s.<br />

SZABO, D., Criminologie, 2e Ed., Montréal 3, Presses de l’Université<br />

de Montréal, 1967, p. 34-35.<br />

YAMARELLOS et KELLENS, Crime et criminologie, marabout<br />

université, 1970, V˚ Crime, p. 103 et s. (à la p. 119)<br />

B. Selon «ce qu’il est» réellement<br />

i. Le crime pris réellement du point de vue social<br />

FERRI, E., La sociologie criminelle, Alcan, Paris 1905, p. 14-21.<br />

LACASSAGNE, Archives de l’Anthropologie Criminelle, <strong>18</strong>86, p. <strong>18</strong>2<br />

PINATEL, J., «De Lacassagne à la nouvelle école lyonnaise», Revue de<br />

Sciences Criminelles et de Droit Pénal Comparé, 1961, p. 151.<br />

82<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

TARDE, G., Les lois de l’imitation, Paris, Alcan, <strong>18</strong>90.<br />

TARDE, G., «Le crime, étude sociale», de H. Joly, Revue<br />

Philosophique, <strong>18</strong>89, 1er semestre, p. 298-306.<br />

ii. Le crime pris réellement du point de vue individuel<br />

BACHET, M., «Les précurseurs de l’anthropologie criminelle», Revue<br />

Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique, 1956, p. 82.<br />

ESCOFFIER-LAMBIOTTE, «L’hérédité de la violence», Le Monde du<br />

16 octobre 1968, p. 8.<br />

FERRI, E., La sociologie criminelle, Alcan, Paris 1905, p. 152-156.<br />

GRAVEN, J., «Existe-t-il un chromosome du crime? Comment juger le<br />

délinquant porteur d’une anomalie génétique XYY?», Revue<br />

Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique, 1968, p. 277.<br />

GRAVEN, J., «Le problème de l’anomalie chromosomique XYY en<br />

criminologie», Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police<br />

Technique, 1969, p. 21.<br />

HEUYER, G., «Histoire des doctrines en criminologie», Revue<br />

Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique, 1950 (juilletsept),<br />

p. 171.<br />

HIVERT et BRETON, J., «Cytogénétique et criminologie», Revue<br />

Pénitentiaire, 1968, p. 493.<br />

LACASSAGNE, A., «Césare Lombroso», Archives de l’Anthropologie<br />

Criminelle, 1909, p. 881.<br />

LEAUTE, J., Criminologie et pénologie (les cours de droit), Paris 1981,<br />

p. 68-71.<br />

LEY, J., «Apports possibles de la cytogénétique à l’étude de la<br />

délinquance», Revue de Droit Pénal et de Criminologie, 1967, p. 392.<br />

83<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

LOMBROSO, C., L’homme criminel, T I, 2 ème Ed. Française, Alcan,<br />

<strong>18</strong>95, p. 92-108.<br />

LOMBROSO, G., «Comment mon père est arrivé à la conception de<br />

l’homme criminel», Revue de Droit Pénal et de Criminologie, 1921, p.<br />

907.<br />

MENDLEWICK, J., WILMOTTE, J. et STOCQUART, R., «Les<br />

déterminants génétiques de la délinquance», Revue de Droit Pénal et de<br />

Criminologie, 1969-1970, p. 439<br />

MOORE, L., «Aberrations chromosomiques portant sur les<br />

chromosomes et comportement antisocial», Annales Internationales de<br />

Criminologie, 1967, p. 469.<br />

PINATEL, J., « Criminologie », in Traité de droit pénal et criminologie,<br />

de Bouzat, P. et Pinatel, J., T III, Paris, Dalloz, 3 ème Ed., p. <strong>18</strong>0 et s.<br />

PINATEL, J., «Aperçu de l’histoire des doctrines criminologiques»,<br />

Revue de Sciences Criminelles et de Droit Pénal Comparé, 1953, p.<br />

336.<br />

PINATEL, J., «La doctrine lombrosienne devant la criminologie<br />

scientifique contemporaine», Revue de Sciences Criminelles et de Droit<br />

Pénal Comparé, 1960, p. 3<strong>18</strong>.<br />

VERVAECK (Dr.), «La théorie lombrosienne et l’évolution de<br />

l’anthropologie criminelle», Archives de l’Anthropologie Criminelles,<br />

1910, p. 561.<br />

YAMARELLOS et KELLENS, Crime et criminologie, marabout<br />

université, 1970, V˚ Génétique criminelle, p. 198-199.<br />

2. LE CRIME SELON «CE QU’IL EXPRIME»<br />

GAROFALO, R., Criminologie, étude sur la nature du crime et la<br />

théorie de la pénalité, 5ème Ed., Alcan, Paris, 1905, p. 1-52.<br />

84<br />

DR. ANWAR FRANGI – INTRODUCTION À LA CRÉOLOGIE CRIMINELLE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN<br />

HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A<br />

NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE<br />

BY ORSOLYA BOGDÁN *<br />

I. BEVEZETÉS<br />

1. NEMZETKÖZI TÖREKVÉSEK ÉS TENDENCIÁK A FIATALKORÚAK<br />

BÜNTETŐJOGÁBAN A XX. SZÁZADBAN<br />

„A XX. század elejétől a klasszikus büntetőjogi iskola merev<br />

dogmatizmusát feloldó pozitivista kriminálpolitika tettes – büntetőjogi<br />

szemléletének máig érvényesülő hatása a fiatalkorú bűnelkövetők<br />

megkülönböztetett, a felnőttekétől eltérő kezelése.” 1<br />

Államonként azonban eltérő szemlélettel találkozhatunk: valamely<br />

állam a fiatalkorúak szankciórendszerét inkább tekinti<br />

ifjúságvédelemnek ill. ifjúságnevelésnek, mint a hagyományos<br />

büntetések és intézkedések hálózatának fiatalkorúakra szabásának. Az<br />

előbbi modell előnyben részesíti az érintettek ügyeiben eljáró<br />

szakemberek – szociális munkások, pszichológusok stb. – szélesebb<br />

körű beavatkozását, míg az ún. igazságszolgáltatási modell a klasszikus<br />

tettfelelősség, proporcionalitás és a formális garanciák talaján áll és attól<br />

nem rugaszkodik el.<br />

* Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Budapest.<br />

1<br />

Lőrincz József: Nemzetközi tendenciák a fiatalkorúak büntetés –<br />

végrehajtásában, Bv. Szakkönyvtár, IM Büntetés – végrehajtás Országos<br />

Parancsnokság, Budapest, 1992, 123. oldal<br />

85<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

A II. világháború utáni „új társadalomvédelmi iskola” (pl. Gramatica)<br />

kiinduló pontja a tettes reszocializációja, mely gyógyító – nevelő<br />

intézkedések útján érhető el, de ez nem szoríthatja háttérbe a társadalom<br />

biztonságát (hasonlóan a XIX. században, ahol elsődleges cél a bűnözők<br />

izolációja és a társadalom védelme volt).<br />

Ezzel párhuzamosan fejlődik ki az ún. treatment ideológia (a skandináv<br />

államokban, az USA - ban) a főként pszichológusokat, pszichiátereket<br />

és szociológusokat tömörítő, a humán tudományokat felhasználó<br />

rehabilicionista mozgalom termékeként; módszere a deviancia okának<br />

feltárása és az elkövetői személyiség – torzulás megszűntetése<br />

humánus, speciálpreventív eszközökkel.<br />

Ezzel szemben a hazánkban többek között Szabó András – képviselte<br />

„neo – abszolút” elmélet a büntetés megtorló jellegét helyezte előtérbe,<br />

és álláspontja szerint a büntetésnek joghátrányi és nem szociálpolitikai<br />

intézkedési jellegét kell kidomborítania. 2<br />

Rendszertől és elmélettől függetlenül szinte valamennyi országnak a<br />

fiatalkori bűnözés növekedésével kellett szembesülnie a 70 – es évektől.<br />

A szabadságvesztéssel járó büntetések nem bizonyultak a<br />

legmegfelelőbb eszköznek a kriminalitás visszaszorításához (kvázi<br />

ultima ratio – ként emlegetik): a fiatalkorú erkölcsi – szociális –<br />

tanulmányi fejlődésében való visszavető hatása tagadhatatlan. E<br />

probléma mentén alakultak ki az olyan fogalmak, mint a „szabadságban<br />

való kezelés”, a „közösségi ellenőrzés”, a jóvátétel és a mediáció. A<br />

fiatalkorúak szabadságelvonásának hosszabb, illetve határozatlan<br />

tartalmát az államok szűkülő köre, elsősorban az ún. ifjúságvédelmi<br />

modellt követők tartották fenn. 3<br />

A nemzetközi szervezetek ajánlásaikban (pl. Pekingi Szabályok) a<br />

fiatalkorú bűnelkövetők emberi jogainak specifikus védelmére<br />

szólítanak fel, pozitív diszkriminációjukat, családjuk, a társadalom és az<br />

2 Lőrincz: uo., 124. oldal<br />

3 Lőrincz: uo., 125. oldal<br />

86<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

állam velük szembeni felelősségét hangsúlyozva, így az emberi jogaikra<br />

és méltóságuk védelmére különös tekintettel kellene a<br />

büntetőtörvényeket kialakítani.<br />

A jóléti államok büntetőjogának profiljában már a 70 – es, 80 – as<br />

években középpontba kerülhettek az alap – és középfokú általános –<br />

illetve szakműveltséget biztosító iskolarendszerű intézmények, melyek<br />

a kreativitás és készségfejlesztés mellett kiegészültek praktikus, a<br />

szabadulás utáni életet megkönnyítő tanácsadó programokkal is.<br />

Újabban pedig világszerte szélesedett a társadalmi erőket az intézet<br />

életébe bekapcsoló együttműködést eredményező törekvés a fiatalkorú<br />

és szociális környezete közötti ellentmondás feloldása és a fiatalok<br />

szocializálása céljából. 4<br />

2. A FIATALKORÚAKRA VONATKOZÓ SZANKCIÓRENDSZER<br />

NEMZETKÖZI TENDENCIÁI NAPJAINKBAN – AZ ENSZ –<br />

KÖVETELMÉNYEK<br />

Az Egyesült Nemzetek Szervezete a 80 – as években meghirdetett<br />

bűnmegelőzési programjának középpontjába a fiatalkorúak<br />

igazságszolgáltatásának finomítását állította, figyelemmel az emberi<br />

jogokra és a társadalmi igazság szempontjaira. 5<br />

E szervezet égisze alatt kibontakozó reformmozgalom olyan<br />

irányelveket tett magáévá, mint a fiatalkorú életkori sajátosságain túl<br />

értelmi – erkölcsi fejlettségének a figyelembe vételét, a szankció<br />

elsődlegesen nevelő célját, az eljáró igazgatási szervek kötelességét a<br />

reszocializációban, továbbá külön büntetés – végrehajtási törvény<br />

kidolgozására hívja fel a tagállamokat.<br />

4 Lőrincz: uo., 127. oldal<br />

5<br />

ENSZ 40/33/1985. sz. határozata (Pekingi Szabályok), 23. pont<br />

87<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

A változtatás igényét először az ENSZ 1980 – ban megrendezett VI.<br />

bűnmegelőzési kongresszusán fogalmazták meg, melyet az ún. Pekingi<br />

Szabályok (az 1955 – ös ENSZ Minimum Szabályokra épül), 1985 –<br />

ben, majd a Rijadi Irányelvek a megelőzésről 1988 – ban követett,<br />

melyeket a „Gyermekek jogairól” 6 szóló 1989 – es New York – i<br />

egyezmény összegzett.<br />

Kutatásom során a Pekingi Szabályok részletesebb bemutatása mellett<br />

döntöttem, mert fejezetei lefedik mindazon probléma – köröket,<br />

melyekkel a dolgozatom foglalkozik, és amelyekkel az egyes államok<br />

jogalkotóinak szembe kellett nézniük.<br />

2.1.A PEKINGI SZABÁLYOK<br />

A dokumentum preambulumában ajánlja, hogy „a<br />

tagállamok…törekedjenek a fiatalkorú és családja jólétének<br />

előmozdítására” és csökkentsék a jogi beavatkozás szükségességét, a<br />

„törvénnyel összeütközésbe került fiatalkorú eredményes és humánus<br />

kezelését” (25. pont). Az e szabályhoz fűzött kommentár kiemeli, hogy<br />

a fiatalkorúról való gondoskodás alapvető jogpolitikai követelménye<br />

megelőzni a bűnelkövetést, ennek pedig egyik útja a fiatal jólétének<br />

elősegítése, ami egyúttal minimalizálni fogja az igazságszolgáltatás<br />

beavatkozásának szükségességét, csökkentve az ezzel okozható ártalmat<br />

is (26. pont).<br />

Kiemelendő még a Szabályokból az arányosság követelménye, mely<br />

nem egyoldalúan a bűncselekmény tárgyi súlyához fűződik, hanem az<br />

elkövető személyes körülményeihez is (pl. családi körülmények – ám<br />

ez, ebben az általános megfogalmazásban, meglátásom szerint nehezen<br />

hozható összhangban az egyenlő elbánás elvével, azaz diszkriminatív).<br />

Így a törvényi reakció arányosságát az elkövető, a bűncselekmény és az<br />

áldozat körülményeinek kontextusában kell vizsgálni (28. pont).<br />

6<br />

A décret 90-917 8 Octobre 1990 tette a francia nemzeti jog részévé. Az<br />

Egyezmény a „gyermek” szó alatt a <strong>18</strong> éven aluliakat érti (1. cikk)<br />

88<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Az eljárási garanciák körében fontos megemlíteni a fiatalkorú<br />

anonimitáshoz való jogát és a szülő/gyám jelenlétéhez való jogot a<br />

tárgyalás során (31. pont).<br />

A dokumentum bátorítást ad az alternatív szankciók minél szélesebb<br />

körben való alkalmazására, így az intézeti elhelyezés helyett az alábbi<br />

intézkedéseket/büntetéseket javasolja: a fiatalkorú gondozása,<br />

felügyelete; próbára bocsátás; közérdekű munka; pénzügyi jellegű<br />

büntetések, kártalanítás; kezelés elrendelése, csoporttanácsadáson való<br />

részvétel, valamint nevelőszülői, lakóközösségi vagy más nevelő<br />

környezet általi gondozás elrendelése (32 – 33. pont).<br />

A fenti szankciók közös tulajdonsága, hogy közösségi bázisú korrekciós<br />

törekvéseket tartalmaznak. 7 Az alternativitás elve azt is jelenti, hogy a<br />

hatóságnak legyen lehetősége kiválasztani az elkövető számára<br />

legmegfelelőbbet és adott esetben azt módosítani (34. pont).<br />

Az 1955 – ös szabályozástól eltérően, a legvégső esetben alkalmazható<br />

szabadság – elvonó (intézeti) nevelés esetén sem tartja reálisnak az<br />

elítélt erkölcsi megváltozathatóságát, sokkal inkább a társadalomba való<br />

visszailleszkedésének feltételeit kívánja elősegíteni, például a személyes<br />

erőforrások fejlesztése útján. A Szabályok ezért előtérbe akarja hozni a<br />

fél – intézeti megoldásokat, mint a nevelőotthonokat és a nappali oktató<br />

központokat, melyek hozzájárulnak a fiatalkorú reintegrációjához (49.<br />

pont).<br />

3. A FIATALKORÚAKRA VONATKOZÓ HATÁLYOS SZABÁLYOZÁS<br />

HELYE A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGBAN<br />

A fiatalkorúakra vonatkozó büntetés-szabályozás igen hamar elkülönült<br />

a nagykorúakétól; igaz, kezdetben ez nem szisztematikusan történt. Már<br />

7<br />

Lőrincz József: Nemzetközi tendenciák a fiatalkorúak büntetés –<br />

végrehajtásában, Bv. Szakkönyvtár, IM Büntetés – végrehajtás Országos<br />

Parancsnokság, Budapest, 1992, 24. oldal<br />

89<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

a rómaiak is figyelemmel voltak az életkorra, de külön bíróságot még<br />

nem állítottak fel ezen ügyek kivizsgálására. A régi francia jog ezt<br />

adaptálta. Amennyiben a fiatalkorú súlyos bűncselekményt követett el, a<br />

különleges elbánás követelménye már nem védte tovább.<br />

A forradalmi törvényhozás a 16 éves életkorhoz kötötte az enyhébb<br />

eljárást. Az <strong>18</strong>10-es Code Pénal megteremti a nevelő jellegű<br />

intézkedések alapját, elismerve a bebörtönzés kedvezőtlen hatásait és a<br />

gyógypedagógia szükségességét.<br />

Az <strong>18</strong>00-as évek derekán született jogszabályok alapján a kevésbé<br />

súlyos bűncselekményt szabálysértési hatóság előtt bírálták el, valamint<br />

a fogházakban elkülönítették a fiatalkorúakat idősebb társaiktól. A<br />

századfordulón megszületik a külön bíróság, a felügyelet intézményei és<br />

a megelőzés gondolata. 8<br />

Az új francia büntetőtörvénykönyv visszafogottan rendelkezik a<br />

fiatalkorúakkal kapcsolatban: egyrészt külön törvény hatály alá utalja<br />

(ordonnance 9 2 février 1945). A CP art. 122-8 szerint: „a<br />

bűncselekmény elkövetésében bűnösnek talált fiatallal szemben<br />

védelmi, felügyeleti és nevelési intézkedés foganatosítható megfelelő<br />

körülmények fennállása esetén.” Emellett azonban a törvény<br />

megfogalmazza a fiatalkorúak általános büntetőjogi felelősségét. Az<br />

ordonnance indoklása rögzíti a korhatárt, valamint a Köztársaság azon<br />

akaratát, hogy „hatékonyan védje különösen a bűnöző fiatalkorút, mivel<br />

Franciaországban nem olyan magas a születésszám, hogy<br />

elhanyagolhasson egészséges lényeket.”<br />

Az évtizedekkel korábbi kriminálpolitika terméke még az 1958-as a<br />

veszélyeztetett fiatalkorúak helyzetét, az 1970-es a szülői felügyeletet<br />

szabályozó törvény. E három jogszabály fogja át azt a teljes körűnek<br />

8<br />

Jean-François Renucci – Christine Courtin: Le droit pénal des mineurs, PUF,<br />

Párizs, 2001, pp. 59-60.<br />

9<br />

kormányrendelet törvényi felhatalmazással<br />

90<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

szánt megelőzési – nevelési – büntető programot a 90-es évekig, ami<br />

nem képezte integráns részét a francia Btk.-nak. 10<br />

A bűnözés szerkezetének megváltozásával, a fiatalkorú elkövetők<br />

számának növekedésével és a bűnözők „fiatalodásával” szükségessé vált<br />

az ordonnance felülvizsgálata. 1993-ban került be az art. 12-1-vel a<br />

jogszabály szövegébe a reparáció. 1998-ban a Miniszterelnök<br />

körlevélben fogalmazta meg a fiatalkorú bevonását szorgalmazva az új<br />

társadalmi cselekvési program kidolgozásába. A 2002. szeptember 9-i<br />

törvény megengedi a nevelő intézkedések és a büntetések együttes<br />

alkalmazását is.<br />

II. A FIATALKORÚAKRA VONATKOZÓ HATÁLYOS<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEK<br />

1. A FRANCIA BTK. SAJÁTOSSÁGAI<br />

1.1.1. AZ ÉLETKOR JELENTŐSÉGE<br />

Az <strong>18</strong>10-es Code Pénal szerkesztői 16 éves korban határozták meg a<br />

nagykorúság küszöbét. A szándékos bűncselekmény-elkövetőre<br />

büntetés, a nem szándékos elkövetőre javítóintézeti elhelyezés várt,<br />

amely maximálisan a 20. életévig tarthatott.<br />

Ezt a megoldást sok kritika érte egyrészt, mert a kiskorúakat nem<br />

különítették el nagykorú társaiktól, másrészt, mert a 16 év alacsonynak<br />

bizonyult.<br />

Ezt követően az 1906-os törvény kijelenti, hogy a 13. életév alatt a<br />

büntetőjogi felelősséggel nem számolhatunk, de a 13 és a <strong>18</strong> év<br />

közöttiekkel szemben a néhány évvel később felálló fiatalkorúak<br />

bírósága már érdemben eljárhat.<br />

10<br />

Lazrges, Christine: Introduction á la politique criminelle, l’Harmattan,<br />

Párizs, 2000, pp. 77-8.<br />

91<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Ez a korhatár a mai napig hatályos, a többször módisított ordonnance<br />

fenntartotta (ord. 45-174). A 13. életévét már betöltött elkövető esetén<br />

egyszerű, megdönthető vélelmet állít föl a bíró a beszámíthatóságát<br />

illetően, és a börtönbüntetésen kívül a legtöbb büntetés és intézkedés<br />

foganatosítható vele szemben (45-174, art. 2.).<br />

1.2 A FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEK<br />

Az alkalmazható intézkedések köre széles, teret engedve ezzel a bírói<br />

mérlegelésnek, a hatékony és testreszabott szankcióknak. A francia<br />

törvényhozás megkülönbözteti a büntető és a nevelő jellegű<br />

intézkedéseket. Az utóbbi alkalmazásának elsőbbségét a jogszabály<br />

egyértelművé teszi (art. 2.). 11 A 13 évet be nem töltöttek esetén a<br />

beszámíthatóság megdönthetetlen vélelem, velük szemben csak nevelő<br />

jellegű intézkedés alkalmazható. A 13. életévét betöltöttek esetén az<br />

alábbiak foganatosíthatók az 1.1. pontban foglalt feltételek alapján: pl.<br />

szülőhöz, gyámhoz, szülői felügyeletet gyakorló vagy arra alkalmas<br />

személyhez való (vissza)helyezés, magán vagy állami oktatási, gyógy-<br />

vagy gyógyító-nevelő, illetve javító intézményben való elhelyezés,<br />

valamint az art. 2-nek megfelelően büntetés kiszabása (art. 15-6.).<br />

A nevelő jellegű intézkedések körébe tartozó büntetőjogi közvetítést<br />

(mediáció – médiation) külön fejezetben tárgyalom.<br />

A büntető jellegű intézkedések (mesures répressives ou peines)<br />

részletezésétől eltekintek az összehasonlíthatóság kedvéért, mert a<br />

magyar jogszabályok ezeket a büntetések közé sorolják (közérdekű<br />

munka – travail d’intéret, pénzbüntetés – amande és börtönbüntetés –<br />

emprisonnement).<br />

11<br />

„Le tribunal pour les enfants et la cour d’assises des mineurs prononceront,<br />

suivant les cas, les mineurs de protection, d’assistance, de surveillance et<br />

d’éducation qui sembleront appropriées (…).”<br />

92<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

1.1.2 A nevelő jellegű intézkedések (mésures éducatives)<br />

1.2.1.1.Megrovás (admonestation, art. 8.)<br />

A legenyhébb válasz a bűncselekményre, hasonlóan a magyar<br />

szabályozáshoz. A bírósági szakban, a bűnösség kimondása után,<br />

kizárólag a bíró által hajtható végre. Ez az „ünnepélyes” figyelmeztetés<br />

a szülők és a sértett jelenlétében hatékony, amelyet adott esetben<br />

pártfogó felügyelet elrendelésével párosíthatnak. 12<br />

1.2.1.2.Fiatalkorú pártfogó felügyelete (liberté surveillée, art. 25-27.)<br />

Az 1912-es törvénnyel került bevezetésre, párhuzamosan alkalmazható<br />

egyéb intézkedésekkel, illetve ideiglenes megoldásként egyaránt. Az art.<br />

8. szerint elrendelésének köre igen széles: a fiatalkorúak bírósága<br />

minden esetben megteheti a nagykorúság eléréséig. Kiszabható az ítélet<br />

meghozataláig, de járulékosan is, az ítélkezés keretén belül is.<br />

Az ítélet nyomán a bíróság megbízottja folyamatosan gyűjti a fiatal<br />

körülményeinek alakulásával kapcsolatos információkat, így a családi és<br />

a beiskolázási helyzetére, az intézkedés végrehajtását nehezítő<br />

akadályokra és elhelyezésére vonatkozó adatokat továbbítja a bíróhoz.<br />

Az állandó megbízottat az Igazságügy miniszter, az önkéntest a<br />

fiatalkorú ügyével foglalkozó bíró nevezi ki.<br />

Az intézkedés szükségessége a foganatosítástól számított 1 éven belül<br />

felülvizsgálható akár a fiatal, akár szülei, gyámja kezdeményezésére.<br />

Amennyiben az eljáró hatóság a szülő/gyám részéről az együttműködési<br />

kötelezettségének megszegését tapasztalja, az intézkedés<br />

végrehajthatatlanná válik, 1,5-től 175 Euróig terjedő pénzbírságot<br />

szabhat ki.<br />

12<br />

Laurent Gebler – Ivan Guitz: Le traitement juduciaire de la délinquance des<br />

mineurs, Éditions ASH, Párizs, 2004, pp. 71.<br />

93<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

1.2.1.3. Bírói védelem alá helyezés (mis sous protection judiciaire, art.<br />

16bis)<br />

Az 1975-ben kelt törvény alapján a 16. évét betöltött fiatalkorú a<br />

fiatalkorúak bíróságának vagy ülnökbíróságának döntése alapján<br />

maximálisan 5 évre bírói védelem alá helyezhető – 21 éves koráig. Az<br />

1996-os reform alapján a fiatalkorú bármely életkorában alkalmazható,<br />

valamint valakinél/valahol való elhelyezéssel kombinálható.<br />

1.2.1.4. Nevelő jellegű elhelyezés (placement éducatif, art. 8., 10., 15.,<br />

16., 33.)<br />

Ez az intézkedés az eljárás bármely szakaszában elrendelhető.<br />

Megkülönböztetnek ún. nyitott közegben végrehajtandó intézkedést<br />

(milieu ouvert); a gyermek megmarad eredeti családi körében egy előre<br />

meghatározott időtől eltekintve, amikor a fiatalt egy harmadik<br />

személyre/intézményre bízzák. A pártfogó felügyelethez hasonlóan sor<br />

kerülhet átmeneti, ítélethozatalig tartó kiszabásra is.<br />

Az elhelyezés időtartalma alatt a szülők hivatalosan nem veszítik el<br />

felügyeleti jogukat, cserébe minden szükséges beleegyezést meg kell<br />

adniuk e jog más által történő gyakorlásához (pl. továbbtanulás iránya,<br />

veszélyes sport űzése, orvosi kezelés) és minden, a gyermek életében<br />

fontos eseményen meg kell jelenniük (pl. szülői értekezlet, tanár<br />

fogadóórája).<br />

Az elhelyezés történhet (a másik) szülőnél, gyámnál, szülői felügyeletet<br />

gyakorló vagy arra alkalmas személynél, illetve az 1.2. pontban felsorolt<br />

intézményekben.<br />

„Az arra alkalmas harmadik” többnyire „bizalomra méltó” (personne<br />

digne de confiance) természetes vagy jogi személy, aki a fiatalkorú<br />

közelebbi vagy távolabbi rokona, vagy az, aki az elkövető életében<br />

mindig fontos szerepet töltött be, esetleg egy speciális befogadó<br />

94<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

család. 13 Napjainkban, az elhelyezésre ítélt fiatalok többsége valamely<br />

nevelési – oktatási intézetben kerül elhelyezésre, ahol 8-20 fős<br />

csoportokban foglalkoznak velük.<br />

Újraszabályozásukra 2002-ben került sor. Az intézmény típusától függ<br />

az elhelyezés időtartalma, a foglalkozások fajtája, a nevelő-gárda<br />

képzettsége: például a centre éducatif renforcé-ban a marginalizálódott,<br />

többszörös visszaeső elkövetőket fogadják be, 8 fős csoportokba<br />

sorolják őket 3-6 hónapos időtartamra. Ez idő eltelte után helyezik át<br />

őket más intézetbe vagy az ún. nyitott közegű intézkedést rendelik el.<br />

Léteznek olyan otthonok, amelyek azonnali befogadásra alkalmasak,<br />

sokszor a bebörtönzés alternatívájaként 1-3 hónapra.<br />

1.1.2 Nevelő jellegű büntetések (sanctions éducatives)<br />

A magyar Btk-hoz hasonlóan itt is lehetőség nyílik a fiatalkorú által<br />

birtokolt dolog elkobzására (confication), amely az elkövetés célját<br />

szolgálja; adott esetben egy motorbicikli is lehet a francia joggyakorlat<br />

alapján (art. 15-1).<br />

Az ordonnance-ban megtaláljuk a kiutasításhoz hasonlítható, a bűntett<br />

elkövetési helyétől maximálisan 1 évre eltiltó szankciót (interdiction de<br />

paraître), azzal a megkötéssel, hogy az eltiltás nem vonatkozhat a<br />

gyermek szokásos lakhelyére ill. iskolájának körzetére.<br />

A bíróság megtilthatja a sértettel vagy tettestársával való érintkezését<br />

(interdiction de rencontre) az elkövetőnek 1 éves időtartamra.<br />

2. KÖZVETÍTÉS – REPARÁCIÓ (MÉDIATION, ART. 12-1) – AZ<br />

ALTERNATÍVA<br />

„A médiáció a bűncselekmény elkövetője és sértettje között létrejövő<br />

önkéntes megállapodás arról, hogy a tettes az áldozatnak okozott kárt<br />

egy mindkettőjük által elfogadott módon és mértékben jóváteszi, és<br />

13 Gebler – Giutz: u.o. pp. 76.<br />

95<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

részben vagy egészben mentesül az adott államban egyébként szokásos<br />

büntetőjogi felelősségre vonás és a büntetés alól.” 14<br />

2.1 A KÖZVETÍTÉS A NEMZETKÖZI SZERVEZETEK JOGALKOTÁSÁBAN<br />

„A bűncselekmények és a hatalommal való visszaélés áldozatainak<br />

nyújtandó igazságszolgáltatás alapelvei”-ről szóló 1985. évi ENSZ<br />

deklaráció részletesen foglalkozik azzal, hogy mit is értünk<br />

kártalanításon és jóvátételen. Szorgalmazza, hogy a nemzeti jogszabályalkotók<br />

vizsgálják meg a reparáció jogrendszerükbe való beillesztésének<br />

lehetőségét.<br />

Az ENSZ egy másik, két évvel korábbi konvenciója azt az esetkört<br />

tárgyalja, amikor a kompenzáció más forrásból nem teljesítendő,<br />

szükséges az állam fellépése: kártalanítást biztosít azoknak, akik<br />

szándékosan elkövetett erőszakos bűncselekmények áldozatává váltak<br />

és komoly testi sérülést szenvedtek (vagy elhunytak). Az összeg úgy<br />

kerül megállapításra, hogy az elegendő legyen legalább a keresetkiesés<br />

pótlására, az orvosi és temetési költségekre egyaránt.<br />

E témában ugyancsak megemlítendő az Európa Tanács<br />

büntetéskiszabással kapcsolatos ajánlása, amely a kompenzáció mind<br />

szélesebb körben való alkalmazását sürgeti, akár önállóan, a<br />

szabadságvesztés alternatívájaként, akár más szankcióval együttesen. 15<br />

A Tanács azonban figyelmeztet, hogy a jóvátétel különböző,<br />

igazságtalan helyzetbe hozhatja az elkövetőket – nem mindenki tudja<br />

„megváltani a szabadságát” (lásd az óvadék intézménye körüli vitákat).<br />

Ez alapján hívja föl a bírók figyelmét arra, hogy a reparáció nem csak<br />

pénzben kifejezve és teljesítve, hanem más, az elkövető által kifejtett<br />

jóvátétellel is megtörténhet.<br />

2.2 MEDIÁCIÓ A FRANCIA SZAKIRODALOMBAN ÉS A GYAKORLATBAN<br />

14<br />

dr. Barabás Andrea Tünde: Egyezség tettes és áldozata között – racionalitás<br />

vagy naivitás? in Kriminológiai Tanulmányok, 2002/39., pp. 114.<br />

15<br />

„Az áldozatnak a büntetőjogban és a büntetőeljárásban elfoglalt helyzeté”-ről<br />

szóló ajánlás 1985-ből<br />

96<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

2.2.1 A közvetítés célja és tárgya<br />

A mediáció egy békéltetési, kiegyezési technika a bűncselekmény<br />

elkövetője és a sértett között, amely a kár jelképes helyrehozatalán<br />

alapul.<br />

Ezen alapjait az 1945-ös jogszabályban is megtalálhatjuk, amelyet a már<br />

említett 1993. január 4-i törvény teljesített ki.<br />

Jelenleg az eljárás bármely szakaszában rendelkezésre áll akár az<br />

ügyésznek, akár a bíróságnak vagy az ügyben eljáró más hatóságnak,<br />

figyelemmel a sértett beleegyezésére és a közösség érdekére.<br />

A mediáció – reparációt meg kell különböztetni a közérdekű munkától,<br />

amelyet csak 16 éven felüliekkel szemben szabhatnak ki, és feltétlenül<br />

minimálisan 40 óra munkaként teljesítendő, ellenkező esetben büntetésvégrehajtási<br />

intézetben kerül végrehajtásra. 16<br />

Előnyei az alábbiak mentén foglalhatók össze: egyrészt, nevelő<br />

karakterű büntetőjogi választ ad egy valós bűncselekményre, kikerülvén<br />

ezzel más szankciók lehetséges kedvezőtlen hatásait. Másrészt a fiatal<br />

elkövetőben jobban tudatosodik cselekménye, a reparáció kézzel<br />

foghatóvá válik az általa okozott kár. Végül, a sértett személye sem<br />

merül feledésbe; a jogalkotó célja a gyors, természetbeni kármentesítés<br />

elérése. 17<br />

A nevelő jellege vitathatatlan: a közvetítő tevékenysége során igen nagy<br />

hatást gyakorolhat az elkövető érzelmi-lelkiismereti fejlődésére –<br />

ráébreszti a fiatalt tettének az áldozatot és a társadalmat érintő<br />

következményeire.<br />

2.2.2 A közvetítés meneteű<br />

A legfiatalabb elkövetőkkel szemben is foganatosítható; a helyrehozatal<br />

történhet természetben vagy pénzben, részben vagy egészben,<br />

közvetlenül az áldozat részére teljesítve, vagy közösségi munkaként (pl.<br />

kórházban, közlekedési vállalatnak, ami azonban nem sértheti a fiatal<br />

vallási meggyőződését). Az előbbi esetben, természetesen, a kárt<br />

elszenvedő hozzájárulása szükséges. Amikor az elkövető szülője<br />

16 Lazarges: u.o., pp. 105-8.<br />

17<br />

Mbanzoulou, Paul: La médiation pénale, l’Harmattan, Párizs, 2002, pp. 60.<br />

97<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

rendelkezik felelősségbiztosítással, gyakran a biztosító fedezi a fiatal<br />

által okozott kárt.<br />

Az art. 4-1 szerint az elkövető mellé saját ügyvéd híján hivatalból kell<br />

valakit kirendelni, aki képviselete ellátása mellett felvilágosítja jelenléte<br />

kötelező mivoltáról. Ezen kívül ő teremti meg a lehetőséget a bíró és a<br />

fiatalkorú közti dialógus létesülésére (ennek szükségképpen meg kell<br />

előznie a bírósági eljárást), amelynek során az elkövető előtt tisztázzák a<br />

bűncselekmény minősítését, a felelősség megállapítását, tettének<br />

következményeit és a sértett kártalanítását.<br />

A közvetítő megbízását a közszféra-beli Fiatalok Bírósági Védelme<br />

elnevezésű szervezettől kapja, feladata lényegében a fiatal és az eljáró<br />

hatóság közötti kommunikáció megkönnyítése. Munkája során valódi<br />

hajlandóságot ébreszt az elkövetőben tette materiális és morális<br />

helyreállítására, megértetvén védencével az eljárást és okait.<br />

2.3 A MEDIÁCIÓ MEGÍTÉLÉSE A MAGYAR SZAKIRODALOMBAN<br />

A magyar szakirodalom első jelentős restitúciós kompenzáció tana az<br />

Angliába elszármazott Schäfer István kriminológus nevéhez köthető, aki<br />

többek között „Jóvátétel a bűnözés áldozatainak” valamint „A<br />

kártalanítás és a jóvátétel a bűnözés áldozatainak” címmel publikálta<br />

műveit. Az azóta kikristályosodott fogalmak alapján a kártalanítás az<br />

állam általi, a jóvátétel pedig az elkövető általi teljesítést jelenti az<br />

áldozatok részére – igaz, más források gyakran szinonimaként<br />

használják.<br />

Az elkövető általi megtérítés többféle lehet; általában nincs mód a kár<br />

reális jóvátételére, például azért, mert az pénzben nem mérhető.<br />

Ilyenkor szimbolikus reparációra kerülhet sor, amely megnyilvánulhat<br />

bocsánatkérésben, karitatív célokért történő teljesítésben vagy<br />

munkavégzésben.<br />

98<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Azonban ez a megoldás sem maradhat kritika nélkül: az Európa Tanács<br />

ajánlásában már figyelmeztetett az elkövetők anyagi különbségeikből<br />

fakadó igazságtalanságra. Emellett komoly problémát jelent a kár<br />

megállapítása módszerének kiválasztása és alkalmazásának<br />

bizonytalanságai. <strong>18</strong> Továbbá rendszertanilag el kell tudni különíteni a<br />

pénzbüntetéstől is, ami adott esetben szintén a szabadság-vesztés<br />

alternatívájaként jelenik meg.<br />

Kerezsi Klára több munkáját szentelte ennek a témának; véleménye<br />

szerint a jóvátétel a sértett és az elkövető közötti harmónia<br />

helyreállítását szolgálja. Az utóbbit a felelősség vállalására késztette,<br />

szégyenérzetét erősítette, visszatartotta a további jogellenes<br />

magatartástól, de a kompenzációval mintegy az önbecsülését is<br />

visszanyerte. A legújabb kutatások alapján a közvetítés egy<br />

háromdimenziós értelmezést nyer: sértetti, elkövetői és társadalmi<br />

vetületet. Meglátása szerint a bűnözésre és a bűnöző kezelésére fordított<br />

költségek jó esetben nem magasabbak a bűnözéssel okozott károkkal –<br />

ezt segíthet kiegyenlíteni az elkövető által történő teljesítés. Kerezsi<br />

felhívja a figyelmet arra, hogy polgári jogi elemek szivárognak be a<br />

közjogi területre az elkövető-sértett-közvetítő egyezkedésével és a<br />

kártérítés-színezetű szankció megjelenésével (a mediáció egyébként<br />

hazánkban is működő intézmény a magánjogi vitás kérdések<br />

rendezésére).<br />

Kerezsi kidolgozta a közvetítés lehetséges hazai koncepcióját: az eljárás<br />

ügyészi vagy bírósági szakaszában az eljárás 3 hónapra feltételesen<br />

felfüggeszthető, ha lenne rá remény, hogy a sértettnek okozott kárt<br />

megtérítik, akár munkavégzéssel, akár pénzfizetéssel. A közvetítő a<br />

pártfogó szolgálat alkalmazottja. Feltételei, hogy az ügyész vagy a bíró<br />

ezt jóváhagyja, a sértett beleegyezik, a bűncselekmény csekély súlyú,<br />

valamint a közérdeket a jóvátétel nem sérti.<br />

Nagy Ferenc is a külföldi példák alapján elemzi a mediáció lehetőségeit:<br />

egyes országok közvetítését a büntetőeljárásban előrehozott informális<br />

<strong>18</strong><br />

Dr. Görgényi Ilona: A bűncselekménnyel okozott kár megtérítésének<br />

perspektívái in Kriminológiai Tanulmányok, 2002/39., pp. 96.<br />

99<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

konfliktus-szabályozásként jellemzi, egyéb eljárási cselekmények<br />

elkerülése végett; máshol a büntetőeljárás lezáró aktusa, végül önállóan<br />

alkalmazható szankcióként is értelmezhető.<br />

III. A FRANCIA SZABÁLYOZÁS KIEMELT PONTJAI A<br />

NEMZETKÖZI KÖVETELMÉNYEK TÜKRÉBEN –<br />

MEGOLDÁSI JAVASLATOK A JÖVŐRE NÉZVE<br />

„Az Egyezményben részes államok gondoskodnak arról, hogy a<br />

gyermeket szüleitől, ezek akarata ellenére, ne válasszák el, kivéve, ha az<br />

illetékes hatóságok, bírói felülvizsgálat lehetőségének fenntartásával és<br />

az erre vonatkozó törvényeknek és eljárásoknak megfelelően úgy<br />

döntenek, hogy ez az elválasztás a gyermek mindenek felett álló<br />

érdekében szükséges. Ilyen értelmű döntés szükséges lehet bizonyos<br />

különleges esetekben, például akkor, ha a szülők durván kezelik, vagy<br />

elhanyagolják gyermeküket, illetőleg ha különválva élnek és dönteni<br />

kell a gyermek elhelyezéséről. „ 19<br />

Az Egyezmény is csak példálózóan tér ki azokra az esetekre, amikor a<br />

fiatalkorú családi környezetéből való kiemelése szükséges; ennek<br />

meghatározását egyrészről az aláíró ország törvényalkotójának<br />

kompetenciájába, másrészről a bíró mérlegelési körébe utalja.<br />

Az Egyezményben részes államok elismerik a gyermekeknek az<br />

oktatáshoz való jogát, és az esélyegyenlőség jegyében történő<br />

gyakorlása céljából az alapfokú oktatást kötelezővé és ingyenessé<br />

teszik, melyet lehetőség szerint középfokú vagy szakmai képzésnek kell<br />

követni, melyhez minden gyermeknek, így a büntetés vagy intézkedés<br />

hatálya alatt állónak is hozzáférhetőnek kell lennie. 20 Láthattuk az 1.2.<br />

pontban, hogy ez az ordonnance szövegében megtalálható és különleges<br />

fontossággal bír.<br />

19<br />

New York – i egyezmény, 9. cikk, 1. bekezdés<br />

20<br />

u.o. 28. cikk<br />

100<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

A 29. cikkből – mely továbbra is az oktatás – nevelés szükségességével<br />

foglalkozik – kiemelnék egy számomra nagy jelentőséggel bíró<br />

gondolatot: a gyermekek tudatába kell vésni az emberi jogok és az<br />

alapvető szabadságjogokon kívül „…a szülei személyazonossága,<br />

nyelve és kulturális értékei iránti tiszteletet, valamint annak az<br />

országnak, amelyben él, továbbá esetleges származási országnak a<br />

nemzeti értékei iránti és a sajátjától különböző kultúrák iránti<br />

tiszteletet…”<br />

Franciaországban a büntetés – végrehajtási intézetek lakói igen nagy<br />

arányban külföldiek, illetve az egykori gyarmatbirodalom és a jelenlegi<br />

tengeren túli megyéik polgárai; az adminisztrációnak lépéseket kell<br />

tennie annak érdekékében, hogy az életkörülményeik és nemzeti -<br />

etnikai hovatartozásuk miatt marginalizálódott (e kettő többnyire<br />

halmozottan jelentkezik) fiatalokat valamiféle kapaszkodóhoz juttassa,<br />

éreztesse velük, hogy az adott társadalom megbecsült tagjai. Ennek<br />

módja pedig nem a kirekesztés, hanem az integráció lehet – de nem<br />

minden áron. Lehetőséget kell számukra adni a kisebbségi kulturális<br />

gyökereik megismerésére, és ezt véleményem szerint a normál<br />

tanintézetek keretén belül mind a kisebbségi, mind a többségben élő<br />

gyerekeknek is meg kell teremteni. A toleráns és hozzáértő<br />

megközelítés eme megnyilvánulása, az identitástudat, a mások iránti<br />

felelősségtudat hatalmas előrelépést jelenthetne az agresszió<br />

visszaszorításában s így megelőzés területén egyaránt. 21<br />

Elgondolkodtató – és talán a fentiekkel ellentétes - a<br />

„fátyoltörvényként” elhíresült jogszabály, ami a laicizmus alapelvét<br />

hivatott kiteljesíteni Franciaországban a vallási jelképek száműzésével a<br />

középiskolák falai közül. 22<br />

A 33. cikk említi az államok felelősségét arra nézve, hogy a<br />

gyermekeket megvédjék a kábító- és pszichotróp szerek tiltott<br />

21<br />

lásd bővebben: Ervin Staub: Az erőszak társadalmi – kulturális gyökerei in<br />

Történeti és politikai pszichológia (szerk. Hunyady György), Osiris, Budapest,<br />

1998, 90 – 115. oldal, továbbá a Code de l’Éducation art. 122-7-t<br />

22<br />

erről bővebben például Nicolas Sarkozy La république, les religions,<br />

l’espérance című könyvében olvashatunk (Cerf, 2004, Párizs, pp. 95-104)<br />

101<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

fogyasztásától, szabályozása elszórtan található például az egészségügyi<br />

törvényben valamint a CP-ben is.<br />

Munkám során kialakult álláspontom szerint számos, eddig<br />

megválaszolatlan vagy részben rendezett kérdésre nem csak jogalkotói,<br />

hanem szélesebb körű szakmai – társadalmi választ kell keresni mind a<br />

franciaországi, mind hazánkat érintő tapasztalatokat figyelembe véve.<br />

Érdekes kezdeményezésnek tűnik a megelőzés jegyében az ún. szülői<br />

tréning kialakítása, mely hatékony beavatkozás lehet agresszív és<br />

antiszociális gyermekek esetében azáltal, ha például szüleik is részt<br />

vesznek a fiatalok számára biztosított pozitív oktatási és szocializációs<br />

tapasztalatszerzés folyamatában. Ezek a korai beavatkozó programok<br />

kialakíthatják az iskolai munkában való hatékonyságot és érdeklődést,<br />

erősíthetik a családi kapcsolatokat is, szilárd talajt nyújtva ezzel a<br />

gyerekeknek.<br />

Kétséget ébresztenek azonban azok a próbálkozások, amelyek az<br />

igazságos és költségkímélő büntetés ideológiájának felhasználásával<br />

kívánják feltámasztani a represszív testi és megalázó büntetések<br />

alkalmazását.<br />

Míg a napóleoni Code Civil 371. cikke szerint „az apai tekintélynek és<br />

hatalomnak kell kiegészíteni a törvényeket, kijavítani az erkölcsöt és az<br />

engedelmességet kialakítania a gyermekben”, addig ma már több<br />

nemzetközi szervezet, helyi kezdeményezés és iskolai szintű programok<br />

segítik a fiatalokat abban, hogy megtalálják a helyes utat, ehhez<br />

azonban az életkörülményeik javítása elengedhetetlen – az állam<br />

hathatós közreműködésével.<br />

102<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

IV. FELHASZNÁLT IRODALOM<br />

Dr. Barabás Andrea Tünde: Egyezség tettes és áldozata között –<br />

racionalitás vagy naivitás? in Kriminológiai Tanulmányok, 2002/39.<br />

Gebler, Laurent –Guitz, Ivan: Le traitement juduciaire de la délinquance<br />

des mineurs, Éditions ASH, Párizs, 2004<br />

Dr. Görgényi Ilona: A bűncselekménnyel okozott kár megtérítésének<br />

perspektívái in Kriminológiai Tanulmányok, 2002/39.<br />

Lazrges, Christine: Introduction á la politique criminelle, l’Harmattan,<br />

Párizs, 2000<br />

Lőrincz József: Nemzetközi tendenciák a fiatalkorúak büntetés –<br />

végrehajtásában, Bv. Szakkönyvtár, IM Büntetés – végrehajtás<br />

Országos Parancsnokság, Budapest, 1992<br />

Martinetti, Françoise: Les Droits de l’enfants, edition Unicef, Librio,<br />

Párizs, 2002<br />

Mbanzoulou, Paul: La médiation pénale, l’Harmattan, Párizs, 2002<br />

Nagy József: A fiatalkorúakra vonatkozó büntetőjogi szabályok<br />

kialakulása és változásai in Rendvédelmi Füzetek, 2002/36.<br />

Renucci, Jean-François –Courtin, Christine: Le droit pénal des<br />

mineurs, PUF, Párizs, 2001<br />

Sarkozy, Nicolas: La république, les religions, l’espérance, Cerf, 2004,<br />

Párizs<br />

Staub, Ervin: Az erőszak társadalmi – kulturális gyökerei in Történeti és<br />

politikai pszichológia (szerk. Hunyady György), Osiris, Budapest, 1998<br />

103<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A FRANCIA BÜNTETŐJOGSZABÁLYOK<br />

FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEI, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> WORLD PUBLISHING Inc.<br />

HTTP://WWW.FWPUBLISHING.NET<br />

CALL FOR ARTICLES<br />

Free World Publishing is calling for articles by<br />

Academics, Practitioners and Post-Graduate<br />

Students to be published in its new journals :<br />

<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9877)<br />

WAR & PEACE <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9885)<br />

WORLD HISTORY <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9893)<br />

Articles are welcomed in : English, French, Bosnian,<br />

Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Finnish, German, Greek,<br />

Hungarian, Icelandic, Innuktikut, Italian, Latin,<br />

Polish, Portugese, Romanian, Russian, Serb,<br />

Slovenian as well as Spanish.<br />

<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : pertains all legal subjects,<br />

whether from a national, comparative or<br />

international perspective and including Canon Law,<br />

International Law, Islamic Law or social and<br />

historical perspective of laws' impacts on societies.<br />

WAR & PEACE <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : pertains to all issues<br />

ranging from conflict prevention to nation-building;<br />

including political sciences and diplomacy, nationbuilding,<br />

defense policies, strategies, operations,<br />

tactics, logistics, intelligence, peacekeeping,<br />

peacemaking, leadership, psychology of combat,<br />

technological developments and counter-terrorism;<br />

and finally Military Historical studies, relating to the<br />

conduct of operations, their causes and effects, the<br />

avoidance of conflict, leadership and personalities.<br />

WORLD HISTORY <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : pertains to the whole<br />

spectrum of human development, whether from<br />

local, regional or global perspectives, including<br />

history from all periods, paleontology, anthropology,<br />

linguistics, letters and languages, arts as well as<br />

sociological perspectives.<br />

For details, please consult the respective page of<br />

each journal and its submissions guidelines from<br />

http://www.FWPublishing.net or contact the editorin-chief<br />

at FWP@FWPublishing.net .<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Louis-Philippe F. Rouillard<br />

Editor-in-Chief, Free World Publishing Inc.<br />

APPEL POUR ARTICLES<br />

Free World Publishing accepte les articles<br />

d’académiciens, praticiens et d’étudiants supérieurs<br />

à être publier dans ses nouveaux journeaux :<br />

<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9877)<br />

WAR & PEACE <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9885)<br />

WORLD HISTORY <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9893)<br />

Les articles sont bienvenus en : Français, Anglais,<br />

Allemand, Bosniaque, Bulgare, Croate, Espagnol,<br />

Finlandais, Grecque, Hongrois, Islandais, Innuktikut,<br />

Italien, Latin, Polonais, Portugais, Roumain, Russe,<br />

Serbe, Slovène et Tchèque.<br />

<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : porte sur tous les sujets<br />

juridiques de perspectives nationale, comparative ou<br />

internationale, incluant les droits canonique,<br />

international, islamique, et les perspectives sociales<br />

et historiques de l’impact des lois sur les sociétés.<br />

WAR & PEACE <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : porte sur le spectre de la<br />

prévention de conflit jusqu’à la reconstruction<br />

d’État, incluant : sciences politiques, diplomacie,<br />

politique de défense, stratégie, operation, tactiques,<br />

logistique, renseignement, maintien et imposition de<br />

la paix, art du commandement, psychologie du<br />

combat, avancées technologiques et contreterrorisme,<br />

l’histoire militaire étudiant la conduite<br />

des opérations, l’évitement des conflits, leurs<br />

causes et effets, les commandants et personalités.<br />

WORLD HISTORY <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : porte sur l’ensemble<br />

du spectre du développement humain, d’une<br />

perspective locale, régionale ou globale, incluant :<br />

histoire de toutes les périodes, paleontologie,<br />

anthropologie, linguistiques, lettres et langages, les<br />

arts de même que les perspectives sociologiques.<br />

Pour les détails, consulter la page respective de<br />

chaque journal et ses critères de soumissions de<br />

http://www.FWPublishing.net ou contactez l’éditeur-<br />

chef à FWP@FWPublishing.net .<br />

Sincèrement,<br />

Louis-Philippe F. Rouillard<br />

Éditeur-chef, Free World Publishing Inc.


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL<br />

SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS<br />

ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA, KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL<br />

A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE<br />

BY ORSOLYA BOGDÁN<br />

I. BEVEZETÉS<br />

1. NEMZETKÖZI TÖREKVÉSEK ÉS TENDENCIÁK A FIATALKORÚAK<br />

BÜNTETŐJOGÁBAN A XX. SZÁZADBAN<br />

„A XX. század elejétől a klasszikus büntetőjogi iskola merev<br />

dogmatizmusát feloldó pozitivista kriminálpolitika tettes – büntetőjogi<br />

szemléletének máig érvényesülő hatása a fiatalkorú bűnelkövetők<br />

megkülönböztetett, a felnőttekétől eltérő kezelése.” 1<br />

Államonként azonban eltérő szemlélettel találkozhatunk: valamely<br />

állam a fiatalkorúak szankciórendszerét inkább tekinti<br />

ifjúságvédelemnek ill. ifjúságnevelésnek, mint a hagyományos<br />

büntetések és intézkedések hálózatának fiatalkorúakra szabásának. Az<br />

előbbi modell előnyben részesíti az érintettek ügyeiben eljáró<br />

szakemberek – szociális munkások, pszichológusok stb. – szélesebb<br />

körű beavatkozását, míg az ún. igazságszolgáltatási modell a klasszikus<br />

tettfelelősség, proporcionalitás és a formális garanciák talaján áll, és<br />

attól nem rugaszkodik el.<br />

1<br />

Lőrincz József: Nemzetközi tendenciák a fiatalkorúak büntetés –<br />

végrehajtásában, Bv. Szakkönyvtár, IM Büntetés – végrehajtás Országos<br />

Parancsnokság, Budapest, 1992, 123. oldal<br />

105<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

A II. világháború utáni „új társadalomvédelmi iskola” (pl. Gramatica)<br />

kiinduló pontja a tettes reszocializációja, amely gyógyító–nevelő<br />

intézkedések útján érhető el, de ez nem szoríthatja háttérbe a társadalom<br />

biztonságát (hasonlóan a XIX. században, ahol elsődleges cél a bűnözők<br />

izolációja, de emellett a társadalom védelme volt).<br />

Ezzel párhuzamosan fejlődik ki az ún. treatment ideológia (a skandináv<br />

államokban, az USA-ban) a főként pszichológusokat, pszichiátereket és<br />

szociológusokat tömörítő, a humán tudományokat felhasználó<br />

rehabilicionista mozgalom termékeként; módszere a deviancia okának<br />

feltárása és az elkövetői személyiség–torzulás megszüntetése humánus,<br />

speciálpreventív eszközökkel.<br />

Ezzel szemben a hazánkban többek között Szabó András – képviselte<br />

„neo–abszolút” elmélet a büntetés megtorló jellegét helyezte előtérbe, és<br />

álláspontja szerint a büntetésnek joghátrányi és nem szociálpolitikai<br />

intézkedési jellegét kell kidomborítania. 2<br />

Rendszertől és elmélettől függetlenül szinte valamennyi országnak a<br />

fiatalkori bűnözés növekedésével kellett szembesülnie a 70–es évektől.<br />

A szabadságvesztéssel járó büntetések nem bizonyultak a<br />

legmegfelelőbb eszköznek a kriminalitás visszaszorításához (kvázi<br />

ultima ratio–ként emlegetik): a fiatalkorú erkölcsi – szociális –<br />

tanulmányi fejlődésében való visszavető hatása tagadhatatlan. E<br />

probléma mentén alakultak ki az olyan fogalmak, mint a „szabadságban<br />

való kezelés”, a „közösségi ellenőrzés”, a jóvátétel és a mediáció. A<br />

fiatalkorúak szabadságelvonásának hosszabb illetve határozatlan<br />

tartalmát az államok szűkülő köre, elsősorban az ún. ifjúságvédelmi<br />

modellt követők tartották fenn. 3<br />

A nemzetközi szervezetek ajánlásaikban (pl. Pekingi Szabályok) a<br />

fiatalkorú bűnelkövetők emberi jogainak specifikus védelmére<br />

szólítanak fel, pozitív diszkriminációjukat, családjuk, a társadalom és az<br />

2 Lőrincz: uo., 124. oldal<br />

3 Lőrincz: uo., 125. oldal<br />

106<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

állam velük szembeni felelősségét hangsúlyozva, így, az emberi<br />

jogaikra és méltóságuk védelmére különös tekintettel kellene a<br />

büntetőtörvényeket kialakítani.<br />

A jóléti államok büntetőjogának profiljában már a 70–es, 80–as években<br />

középpontba kerülhettek az alap– és középfokú, általános– illetve<br />

szakműveltséget biztosító iskolarendszerű intézmények, amelyek a<br />

kreativitás és készségfejlesztés mellett kiegészültek praktikus, a<br />

szabadulás utáni életet megkönnyítő tanácsadó programokkal is.<br />

Újabban pedig világszerte szélesedett a társadalmi erőket az intézet<br />

életébe bekapcsoló együttműködési törekvés a fiatalkorú és szociális<br />

környezete közötti ellentmondás feloldása és a fiatalok szocializálása<br />

céljából. 4<br />

2. A FIATALKORÚAKRA VONATKOZÓ HATÁLYOS SZABÁLYOZÁS<br />

HELYE A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI BÜNTETŐJOGBAN<br />

2.1. A MAGYAR SZABÁLYOZÁS<br />

Magyarországon eddig három büntető törvénykönyvet alkottak. Az elsőt<br />

az <strong>18</strong>43. évi Büntető Törvényjavaslat előzte meg, ezen túl a reformkori<br />

irodalom valamint német és az osztrák büntetőkódexek is nagy hatással<br />

voltak rá.<br />

Csemegi Károly, nagy felkészültségű ügyvéd, a Deák–párt bizalmát<br />

élvezve kapott megbízást a Btk. szöveganyagának és indoklásának<br />

kidolgozására, amelyet másfél éves országgyűlési vita után az <strong>18</strong>78. V.<br />

tc.– ként törvényerőre emeltek.<br />

A Csemegi – kódex még nem kezelte egységesen a fiatalkorúak<br />

büntetőjogát, de a felnőttekétől eltérő büntetési mértéket már külön, a<br />

VII. fejezetben tárgyalta.<br />

4 Lőrincz: uo., 127. oldal<br />

107<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

A reformtörekvések eredményeként létrejött 1908. évi I. Büntető<br />

Novella intézkedési tárában már helyet kaphatott a házi felügyelet és az<br />

iskolai fenyítés mellett a javító nevelés, dorgálás és a javító nevelés is.<br />

Az 1951. évi 34. számú tvr. a fiatalkorúakra vonatkozó anyagi és<br />

eljárásjogi szabályokat egy jogszabályban határozta meg, és növelte a<br />

nevelő jellegű intézkedések súlyát.<br />

Az 1961. évi V. törvény a fenti szabályokat a Btk. általános részébe<br />

építette be VI. fejezetként.<br />

Az 1961–es törvény szakmai gyengesége miatt szükségessé vált egy új<br />

kódex megalkotása, amelyet az igazságügyi minisztérium előkészítése<br />

után, a tudományos elit bevonásával 1978. december 20–án az<br />

országgyűlés elfogadott. Az új és máig hatályos Btk. már határozottan<br />

állást foglalt a nevelő jellegű intézkedések elsőbbsége mellett, s a 108.§ban<br />

(korábban 87.§) arról rendelkezik, hogy büntetés kiszabására csak<br />

akkor van mód, ha az intézkedés nem célravezető. Az intézkedések<br />

alkalmazása azonban nem a felelősség „elmosására” irányul, hanem<br />

olyan szankciók preferálásra, amelyek jobban alkalmazkodnak az e<br />

korban lévők életkori sajátosságaihoz. 5<br />

A törvényhozó célja ily módon a fiatalkorú helyes irányba fejlődésének<br />

és a társadalom hasznos tagjává válásának elősegítése.<br />

2.2. A SVÁJCI SZABÁLYOZÁS<br />

1798–ban, az „egy és oszthatatlan helvét köztársaság” létrejötte után<br />

nem sokat késlekedett a liberalizmus eszméit magán viselő<br />

büntetőtörvénykönyv kidolgozásával. 6<br />

5<br />

Nagy József: A fiatalkorúakra vontatkozó büntetőjogi szabályok kialakulása és<br />

változásai in Rendvédelmi Füzetek, 2002/36., 8. oldal<br />

6<br />

Nagy Ferenc: A svájci büntetőjogi szankciórendszer, Acta Universitatis<br />

Szegediensis De Attila József Nominatae – Acta Juridica et Politica, tomus<br />

XXXVI., Szeged, 1986, 145. oldal<br />

108<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Svájc államszövetséggé alakulásával azonban rövidesen 15 kantonális<br />

Btk. született, hiszen néhány speciális törvényi tényállást kivéve, a<br />

szövetségi tagok szabad kezet kaptak az anyagi és alaki törvényhozás<br />

körében is 7 .<br />

Carl Stooss berni professzor <strong>18</strong>89–ben kapott megbízást a Szövetségi<br />

Tanácstól az államszövetségi Btk. tervezetének kidolgozására. Az ő<br />

keze nyomán épült ki először a társadalmilag szükséges intézkedések<br />

rendszere a törvényhozási munkában.<br />

Végül 1937. december 21–én került sor a törvény kihirdetésére, amit kis<br />

többséggel megerősített a kiírt népszavazás is, majd 1942. január 1–én<br />

hatályba lépett. A fiatalkorúakra vonatkozóak a 4. cím alatt kerültek<br />

szabályozásra.<br />

A dualista elképzelés szerint a büntetések mellett az intézkedések<br />

katalógusa biztonsági és más jellegű intézkedéseket fog át. Különbség<br />

tehető továbbá a szabadságelvonással és az azzal nem járó, valamint a<br />

javító–izoláló, illetve személyi és tárgyi intézkedések között.<br />

A törvény hatályba lépése után már mintegy tíz évvel, 1950–ben, majd<br />

1974. január 1–i hatállyal szükségessé váltak jelentősebb módosítások;<br />

ez utóbbi helyezte be a szankciók közé a fiatal felnőttek munkára nevelő<br />

intézeti beutalását, illetve megváltoztatta a korcsoport – elhatárolásokat<br />

is.<br />

A svájci Btk. intézkedéseiről összefoglalóan elmondható Rahberg<br />

szavaival, hogy „jövőre irányuló, célorientált prevenciók”.<br />

2.3. A FIATALKORÚAKRA VONATKOZÓ SZANKCIÓRENDSZER<br />

NEMZETKÖZI TENDENCIÁI NAPJAINKBAN – AZ ENSZ–KÖVETELMÉNYEK<br />

Az Egyesült Nemzetek Szervezete a 80–as években meghirdetett<br />

7 svájci Btk. 369., 371. cikke<br />

109<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

bűnmegelőzési programjának középpontjába a fiatalkorúak<br />

igazságszolgáltatásának finomítását állította, figyelemmel az emberi<br />

jogokra és a társadalmi igazság szempontjaira. 8<br />

E szervezet égisze alatt kibontakozó reformmozgalom olyan<br />

irányelveket tett magáévá, mint a fiatalkorú életkori sajátosságain túl<br />

értelmi–erkölcsi fejlettségének a figyelembe vételét, a szankció<br />

elsődlegesen nevelő célját, az eljáró igazgatási szervek kötelességét a<br />

reszocializációban, továbbá külön büntetés–végrehajtási törvény<br />

kidolgozására hívja fel a tagállamokat.<br />

A változtatás igényét először az ENSZ 1980–ban megrendezett VI.<br />

bűnmegelőzési kongresszusán fogalmazták meg, amelyet az ún. Pekingi<br />

Szabályok (az 1955–ös ENSZ Minimum Szabályokra épül), 1985–ben,<br />

majd a Rijadi Irányelvek a megelőzésről 1988–ban követett, amelyeket<br />

a „Gyermekek jogairól” 9 szóló 1989–es New York– i egyezmény<br />

összegzett.<br />

Kutatásom során a Pekingi Szabályok részletesebb bemutatása mellett<br />

döntöttem, mert fejezetei lefedik mindazon probléma–köröket,<br />

amelyekkel a dolgozatom foglalkozik, és amelyekkel az egyes államok<br />

jogalkotóinak szembe kellett nézniük.<br />

2.3.1. A Pekingi Szabályok<br />

A dokumentum preambulumában ajánlja, hogy „a tagállamok (…)<br />

törekedjenek a fiatalkorú és családja jólétének előmozdítására” és<br />

csökkentsék a jogi beavatkozás szükségességét, a „törvénnyel<br />

összeütközésbe került fiatalkorú eredményes és humánus kezelését” (25.<br />

pont). Az e szabályhoz fűzött kommentár kiemeli, hogy a fiatalkorúról<br />

való gondoskodás alapvető jogpolitikai követelménye megelőzni a<br />

8<br />

ENSZ 40/33/1985. sz. határozata (Pekingi Szabályok), 23. pont<br />

9<br />

Magyarországon az 1991 – től (LXIV. tv.), Svájcban 1997 – től hatályos. Az<br />

Egyezmény a „gyermek” szó alatt a <strong>18</strong> éven aluliakat érti (1. cikk)<br />

110<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

bűnelkövetést, ennek pedig egyik útja a fiatal jólétének elősegítése, ami<br />

egyúttal minimalizálni fogja az igazságszolgáltatás beavatkozásának<br />

szükségességét, ez pedig csökkenti az ezzel okozható ártalmat is (26.<br />

pont).<br />

Kiemelendő még a Szabályokból az arányosság követelménye, amely<br />

nem egyoldalúan a bűncselekmény tárgyi súlyához fűződik, hanem az<br />

elkövető személyes körülményeihez is (pl. családi körülmények – ám<br />

ez, ebben az általános megfogalmazásban, meglátásom szerint nehezen<br />

hozható összhangban az egyenlő elbánás elvével, azaz a formális logika<br />

szerint diszkriminatív). Így a törvényi reakció arányosságát az elkövető,<br />

a bűncselekmény és az áldozat körülményeinek kontextusában kell<br />

vizsgálni (28. pont).<br />

Az eljárási garanciák körében fontos megemlíteni a fiatalkorú<br />

anonimitáshoz való jogát és a szülő/gyám jelenlétéhez való jogot a<br />

tárgyalás során (31. pont).<br />

A dokumentum bátorítást ad az alternatív szankciók minél szélesebb<br />

körben való alkalmazására, így az intézeti elhelyezés helyett az alábbi<br />

intézkedéseket/büntetéseket javasolja: a fiatalkorú gondozása,<br />

felügyelete; próbára bocsátás; közérdekű munka; pénzügyi jellegű<br />

büntetések, kártalanítás; kezelés elrendelése, csoporttanácsadáson való<br />

részvétel, valamint nevelőszülői, lakóközösségi vagy más nevelő<br />

környezet általi gondozás elrendelése (32 – 33. pont).<br />

A fenti szankciók közös tulajdonsága, hogy közösségi bázisú korrekciós<br />

törekvéseket tartalmaznak. 10 Az alternativitás elve azt is jelenti, hogy a<br />

hatóságnak legyen lehetősége kiválasztani az elkövető számára<br />

legmegfelelőbbet, és adott esetben azt módosítani (34. pont).<br />

Az 1955–ös szabályozástól eltérően, a legvégső esetben alkalmazható<br />

szabadság–elvonó (intézeti) nevelés esetén sem tartja reálisnak az elítélt<br />

erkölcsi megváltozathatóságát, sokkal inkább a társadalomba való<br />

10 Lőrincz József: uo. 24. oldal<br />

111<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

visszailleszkedésének feltételeit kívánja elősegíteni, például a személyes<br />

erőforrások fejlesztése útján. A Szabályok ezért előtérbe akarja hozni a<br />

fél–intézeti megoldásokat, mint a nevelőotthonokat és a nappali oktató<br />

központokat, amelyek hozzájárulnak a fiatalkorú reintegrációjához (49.<br />

pont).<br />

II. A FIATALKORÚAKRA VONATKOZÓ HATÁLYOS<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEK A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐJOGBAN<br />

1. A SVÁJCI BTK. SAJÁTOSSÁGAI<br />

1.1. AZ ÉLETKOR JELENTŐSÉGE<br />

A szövetségi Btk. 4. címe két differenciáló ismérvet említ a<br />

fiatalkorúkkal szembeni intézkedések elrendelésére tekintettel. Az egyik<br />

a kezelés – nevelésre szorultság, a másik az életkor 11 . Ez utóbbi a<br />

magyartól eltérően három tartományt határoz meg: a 7 év alattiak nem<br />

büntethetők, azt a polgári jog körébe utalja, míg a 7 és 15 év közöttiekre<br />

(„enfant”) vonatkozó szankciókat tételesen elkülöníti a 16 – <strong>18</strong> év<br />

(„adolescent”) közöttiektől, amelyek a jogszabály kidolgozói az<br />

iskolalátogatási kötelezettséggel, illetve a pedagógusoktól való függés<br />

idejével hoznak összefüggésbe.<br />

1.2. A FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEK<br />

A svájci Btk. 83. cikkelyében a fiatal elkövetési magatartásának és<br />

fizikai, pszichikai állapotának előzetes felmérését követeli meg,<br />

amelynek során világossá válik, melyik szankció lenne a<br />

legalkalmasabb vele szemben. Ennek érdekében elrendelhető a<br />

11 svájci Btk. 82. és 89. cikkelye<br />

112<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

fiatalkorú ún. megfigyelő intézetben 12 való elhelyezése. Az azonban,<br />

hogy e vizsgálatot melyik hatóság(ok) végezzék, az adott kanton<br />

szabályozásának függvénye 13 . Az intézkedéseken belül nevelő jellegűek<br />

és speciális kezelést nyújtók is megtalálhatók, ám a büntetések közé<br />

sorolt fegyelmi jellegű szankciókkal is szeretnék foglalkozni, hiszen<br />

ezek eszközükben inkább dolgozatom tárgyához állnak közelebb,<br />

alkalmazási körük a svájci gyakorlatban vitatott.<br />

1.2.1. A nevelő jellegű intézkedések (mesures éducatives)<br />

Ha a fiatalkorú nem igényel speciális kezelést, de nehezen kezelhető,<br />

elhanyagolt vagy veszélyeztetett, az illetékes hatóság elrendelheti<br />

nevelőotthonban, nevelőcsaládban való elhelyezését, illetve ún. nevelési<br />

segítség nyújtását mind a 7 – 14, mind a 15 – <strong>18</strong> évesek körében 14 .<br />

1.2.1.1. A nevelési segítség (assistance éducative)<br />

Az 1973–as módosítások óta ez utóbbi intézkedés képezi sarokkövét a<br />

fiatal elkövetők büntetőjogának, így például a „veszélyeztetettséget”<br />

ugyan tágan kell értelmezni (családi körülmények, pszichés fejlődése,<br />

zavartság stb.), de a családból való kiszakítását alapos érvekkel kell<br />

alátámasztani. A nevelési segítség megadja a fiatal számára azt a<br />

körültekintő segítséget, nevelést és útbaigazítást, amelyre életkori<br />

sajátosságaiból és körülményeiből kifolyólag szüksége van. A 15 éven<br />

felettieknél ez kiegészül szakmai képzésben való részvételük és<br />

munkájuk rendszeressé válásának támogatásával, szemmel tartásával. A<br />

nevelési segítség mellett megállapítható fogház- és pénzbüntetés is.<br />

12<br />

uo. 83., 90., 384. cikke<br />

13<br />

a szankciókat a fiatalkorúak bírósága szabja ki, pl. Vaud kantonban az 1973.<br />

november 26–i törvény 9. cikkelye tartalmazza az erre vonatkozó szabályokat<br />

14<br />

svájci Btk. 84. és 91. cikkelye. Az intézkedések megnevezéséhez Nagy Ferenc<br />

fordítását használtam fel.<br />

113<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

1.2.1.2. Elhelyezés nevelőotthonban (placement dans une maison<br />

d’éducation)<br />

Ha a fiatalkorú családi környezete ártalmas a fejlődésére nézve,<br />

hátráltatja testi – lelki fejlődését vagy kizsákmányolják, továbbá olyan<br />

bűntettet vagy vétséget követ el, ami a fiatal különleges<br />

veszélyességére, nehezen kezelhetőségére utal, és a családnál való<br />

elhelyezése nem célszerű, a fiatalkorú nevelőotthonba való beutalását<br />

rendeli el a hatóság. Az 1.2. pont bevezetőjében említett előzetes<br />

megfigyelést is ezekben az intézményekben kell végrehajtani, de a<br />

szélsőségesen kezelhetetlen, a többiek számára elviselhetetlen<br />

magatartásúak terápia otthonokba 15 való átszállítása lehetséges. Ezen túl<br />

a fiatal felnőttek számára ún. munkára nevelő intézeteket is felállítottak<br />

(lásd később), illetve az utógondozás is megoldott.<br />

Svájci specialitások a Btk. 384. cikke alapján a privátintézetek, otthonok<br />

engedélyezése, amelyek megfelelő, többek között orvosi felügyeletéről<br />

a kantonok gondoskodnak.<br />

A svájci nevelőotthonok fokozatos végrehajtásúak és a fiatalkorúak<br />

hosszabb tartalmú nevelésére és kezelésére szolgálnak, amikor az<br />

ambuláns intézkedések nem elegendőek. A főszerepet az iskolázási és a<br />

képzési lehetőségek biztosítása játsza.<br />

Az ott-tartózkodás határozatlan idejű (kivéve, ha a fiatalkorú különösen<br />

romlott, vagy bűntettet vagy súlyos vétséget követ el; ilyenkor az<br />

maximum 2 év). Az elkövetőt 25. életéve betöltésekor az intézetből el<br />

kell bocsátani.<br />

1.2.2. A speciális kezelés 16 (traitement spécial)<br />

15 uo. 93 ter cikke<br />

16 uo. 85. és 92. cikkelye<br />

114<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Ha a fiatalkorú szellemi fogyatékos, gyengeelméjű, gyengén látó,<br />

súlyosan hallás- vagy beszédképességében károsult, epilepsziás,<br />

rendellenesen visszamaradott szellemi vagy erkölcsi fejlődésében,<br />

speciális kezelés elrendelésére kerül sor. A 14 – <strong>18</strong> év közötti<br />

korosztállyal szemben ezen kívül alkoholizmus és drogfüggőség esetén<br />

is alkalmazható. Végrehajtása a hatóság által kijelölt korházban vagy<br />

szanatóriumban, de lehetőség szerint ambulánsan történik.<br />

Ebben a szabályban erőteljesebben látjuk érvényesülni az elkövető<br />

speciális rászorultságát a megkülönböztetett bánásmódra, ám a 84.<br />

cikkben lévő intézkedések párhuzamosan kiszabhatók vele.<br />

Ha az intézkedés oka megszűnt, az elkövető elbocsátható; de ha ez még<br />

nem állapítható meg, próbára bocsátásnak van helye.<br />

1.2.3. A fegyelmi büntetés (punitions disciplinaires) 17<br />

A svájci Btk. - a magyartól eltérően - büntetésként határozza meg a<br />

fegyelmi jellegű szankciókat, amelyek kiszabását akkor tartja<br />

célszerűnek, ha a fiatalkorúnak nincs szüksége sem nevelő intézkedésre,<br />

sem speciális kezelésre, amelynek eldöntésére a híresen tág bírói<br />

mérlegelés körében kerül sor.<br />

A kérdés szabályozására többek között Neuchâtel és Bâle–Ville<br />

kantonok szolgáltatták a példát <strong>18</strong> ; ezek nyomán beszélhetünk<br />

megrovásról, a kár helyrehozásáról, munkáról vagy 6 napos iskolai<br />

felfüggesztésről.<br />

Ezek közül kiemelném egyrészt a megrovást, ami nyilván szóban,<br />

szemtől-szemben lehet igazán hatékony; igaz, erről a törvény nem<br />

rendelkezik. A hatóság közvetlenül a fiatalhoz címzi kellő tapintattal és<br />

a megfelelő komolysággal.<br />

17 uo. 87. cikke<br />

<strong>18</strong><br />

korábban lehetőség kínálkozott iskolai elzárás és szobafogság elrendelésére is<br />

115<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Az elkövető őszinte megbánása a kár helyreállításában is<br />

megnyilvánulhat. A megbánásnak nem kell feltétlenül tettekben is<br />

kifejeződnie a jelen szabályozás szerint, a lényeg a hajlandósága,<br />

továbbá a részleges, szimbolikus jóvátétel is bírhat kellő nevelő<br />

hatással.<br />

A bíróság ugyanakkor le is mondhat a szankcionálásról, ha például<br />

törvénysértés óta 3 hónap telt el (az indoklás szerint ebben a korban a<br />

fiatalok gyorsan fejlődnek és felejtenek, így valamely fegyelmi<br />

intézkedés elrendelésével nem érnék el nevelő céljukat), a kárt<br />

helyreállította vagy a tette igen kis súlyú bűncselekmény.<br />

2. A MAGYAR BTK. SAJÁTOSSÁGAI<br />

2.1. AZ ÉLETKOR JELENTŐSÉGE<br />

A hatályos szabályozás szerint nem büntethető, aki az elkövetéskor nem<br />

töltötte be 14. életévét, azaz kiskorú 19 . Az 1978. IV. törvény miniszteri<br />

indoklása azonban kimondja, hogy a 14 – <strong>18</strong> év közötti fiatal büntető<br />

törvénybe ütköző cselekményei elleni küzdelemben az általános<br />

gyermek- és ifjúságvédelem eszközei egymagukban elégtelenek, az<br />

ilyen elkövetők már büntetőjogi felelősséggel tartoznak, velük szemben<br />

büntetést és intézkedést lehet alkalmazni 20 . Ma büntetés akkor szabható<br />

ki, ha az intézkedés célszerűtlennek bizonyul, nincs korhoz kötve<br />

(korábban 16. életév), így szigorítást jelent az 1961–es szabályozáshoz<br />

képest. Érdekességképpen megemlíteném, hogy az 1951. évi 34. sz.<br />

rendelet a fiatalkorúakon belül – Svájchoz hasonlóan – két korcsoportot<br />

állapított meg (12 – 14 és 15 – <strong>18</strong> évesek).<br />

19<br />

magyar Btk. 22 – 23. §<br />

20<br />

uo. 107. §<br />

116<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

2.2. A FIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ<br />

INTÉZKEDÉSEK<br />

A magyar Btk. 108.§-a egyértelműen állást foglal amellett, hogy a<br />

fiatalkorúval szemben kiszabott / elrendelt büntetés vagy intézkedés<br />

elsődleges célja az egyéni megelőzés, azaz az elkövetőt helyes irányba<br />

fejlesztő nevelés és társadalomba való beilleszkedésének elősegítése.<br />

Három fajtáját különíthetjük el az intézkedéseknek: a kifejezetten<br />

nevelő jellegűek (megrovás, próbára bocsátás, javítóintézeti elhelyezés),<br />

a gyógyító jellegű (kényszergyógykezelés), gyógyító és nevelő jellegű<br />

(kényszergyógyítás) és biztonsági célú (elkobzás).<br />

Munkámban csak a svájci Btk.–ban is megtalálható intézkedési<br />

fajtákkal foglalkozom, hogy lehetőségem legyen a bilaterális<br />

összehasonlításra.<br />

2.2.1. Megrovás<br />

A megrovás 71.§-beli szabályozása vonatkozik mind a felnőtt -, mind a<br />

fiatalkorúakra; a legenyhébb büntetőjogi jogkövetkezmény.<br />

A szakirodalomban vita folyt arról, hogy az ún. „bagatell–<br />

bűncselekményeknél” beszélhetünk–e társadalomra veszélyességről,<br />

mert a tényállás ugyan megvalósult, de hatása lényegében<br />

elhanyagolható. A 80–as években olyan javaslat is született, hogy<br />

kiveszik a törvény szövegből a társadalomra veszélyességre utaló<br />

fordulatot. 21<br />

Jelenleg megrovás akkor alkalmazandó, ha a társadalomra veszélyesség<br />

csekély foka, csekéllyé válása vagy megszűnése (nem kötelező) miatt a<br />

tett nem büntethető, illetve, ha a büntethetősége egyéb okból<br />

megszűnik.<br />

21<br />

Györgyi Kálmán: Büntetések és intézkedések, Közgazdasági és Jogi<br />

Könyvkiadó, Budapest, 1984, 361. oldal<br />

117<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

A megrovás elsősorban rosszallást fejez ki, amit a bíróságon kívül<br />

egyéb hatóság is végrehajthat (ügyész, nyomozó hatóság), amelyet<br />

szóban indokolt megtenni.<br />

2.2.2. A javítóintézeti nevelés<br />

A 1<strong>18</strong>. § szerinti intézkedés szükségességéről a törvény igen<br />

szűkszavúan rendelkezik. A szakirodalomban például az alábbi<br />

indokokat olvashatjuk 22 : a fiatalkorú környezete káros befolyást<br />

gyakorol a fejlődésére, és környezeterősítésre van szüksége; környezete<br />

ugyan nem gyakorol rá káros befolyást, de erői elégtelennek<br />

mutatkoznak a kriminalitás elleni hatékony küzdelemre. Végül<br />

lehetséges, hogy a fiatal káros erkölcsi tulajdonságai és jellemének<br />

fogyatékosságai újabb büntettek megelőzése érdekében elszigetelést és<br />

szigorú közösségi fegyelemben való nevelést tesznek szükségessé.<br />

A javítóintézetek gyermekvédelmi rendszer részeként sajátos<br />

pedagógiai feladatokat ellátó nevelőintézetek.<br />

A magyar szabályozás az általános formán kívül további két típusát<br />

említi az intézményeknek. Az egyik zárt jellegű, ahova az intézmény<br />

igazgatója az elkövetőt áthelyezheti, ha az ismételten és súlyosan<br />

megsérti az intézet rendjét, míg a másik az utógondozó, ahogy ez a<br />

svájci törvényben is megtalálható.<br />

A nevelés időtartalma a 1.2.1.2. pontban tárgyaltaktól eltérően<br />

határozott időtartamú; egy évtől három évig terjedhet, de az intézet<br />

lakóját 19. életévének betöltésekor onnan el kell bocsátani.<br />

Svájchoz hasonlóan – nemzetközi kötelezettségekből eredően -, a<br />

nevelés célja a fiatal beilleszkedési zavarainak enyhítése, pszichés<br />

állapotának rendezése, oktatása, szakképzettségének fejlesztése,<br />

22<br />

Szabó András: A fiatalkorúak és a büntetőjog, Közgazdasági és Jogi<br />

Könyvkiadó, Budapest, 1961, 310. oldal<br />

1<strong>18</strong><br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

egészséges életmódra való felkészítése. Kiemelten kell foglalkozni az<br />

alkohol, a kábítószer veszélyeivel és a szexuális élet problémáival.<br />

2.2.3. Gyógyító jellegű intézkedések<br />

A magyar büntetőjog nem rendelkezik speciálisan a fiatalkorúak<br />

gyógykezeléséről szóló paragrafussal, igaz, a Büntetés - végrehajtási<br />

tvr. 23 107. §-ának (2) bekezdése szerint különös gondot kell fordítani a<br />

gyógypedagógiai nevelésre szoruló és a személyiségzavarban szenvedő<br />

fiatalkorúak gyógyítására, sajátos nevelésére és oktatására, de ez nem<br />

feltételez külön intézetet.<br />

A 74. és a 75. § rendelkezik a kényszergyógykezelésről és az<br />

alkoholisták kényszergyógyításáról. Itt nem találkozhatunk a fiatalkorú<br />

olyan különleges körülményeinek, tulajdonságainak leírásával, mint a<br />

svájci törvényben (pl. gyengén látó); az intézkedés elrendelendő, ha<br />

személy elleni erőszakos vagy közveszélyt okozó – 1 évi<br />

szabadságvesztésnél súlyosabban büntethető – cselekményt követ el, de<br />

nincs beszámítási képessége az elmeműködésének kóros állapota miatt.<br />

A kényszergyógykezelés elrendelhető akkor is, ha a bűnelkövetés<br />

kábítószer-élvező életmódjával függ össze.<br />

A kezelés elsődleges célja a szakszerű gyógyítás, állapota romlásának<br />

megakadályozása, valamint újabb bűncselekmény elkövetésének<br />

megelőzése (tekintettel a törvény (1) bekezdésének harmadik,<br />

konjunktív feltételére). Az ápolás mellett azonban fontos szerepet<br />

kapnak a munkaterápiás foglalkozások is.<br />

Végrehajtására arra kijelölt, zárt intézetben kerül sor (IMEI),<br />

határozatlan időtartamra, folytatásának szükségességét a bíróság<br />

hivatalból évente megvizsgálja.<br />

A kényszergyógyítás végrehajtása fiatalkorú esetében javítóintézetben<br />

történik. A 103/1981. büntetőkollégiumi állásfoglalás szerint az<br />

intézkedés eredményes végrehajtásához legalább 4 hónapi időtartam<br />

23<br />

1979. évi 11. tvr. többszörösen módosítva<br />

119<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

szükséges, amelyet egy maximum 30 napos kivizsgálás előz meg.<br />

Ennek alapján készítik el az elítéltek sajátos nevelésének, oktatásának és<br />

kezelésének a programját, irányítják csoportokba.<br />

Időtartama legfeljebb 1 év, a svájci szabályozástól eltérően nem önálló<br />

szankció.<br />

3. A „FIATAL FELNŐTT” MINT ÖNÁLLÓ KORCSOPORT?<br />

3.1. KEZDEMÉNYEZÉSEK HAZÁNKBAN<br />

A fiatalkorúakkal kapcsolatos jogfejlődést végigtekintve egy rendkívül<br />

fontos, de sikertelen kezdeményezés tanúi lehettünk az 1970–es<br />

években, az új Btk. előkészítésével összefüggésében. Molnár József 24 ,<br />

kiindulva a személyiségfejlődés 24 – 25 éves korra történő<br />

lezárulásának következményeiből, széles körű nemzetközi<br />

összehasonlítással is alátámasztott kriminológiai vizsgálatot végzett.<br />

Célja, hogy a fiatal felnőttek büntetőjogi felelősségét külön<br />

kategóriaként ismerjék el, átmenetet képezzen a fiatalkorúakra és a<br />

felnőtt korúakra vonatkozó szankciórendszer között, és az<br />

bekerülhessen az 1978 – as törvénybe.<br />

A kodifikáció során ezek a külföldön már bevált megoldások nem<br />

valósulhattak meg ugyan, de a szakma figyelmét sikerült e kérdéskörre<br />

irányítani.<br />

3.2. MEGVALÓSULÁSA SVÁJCBAN<br />

A svájci Btk. külön alpontjában tárgyalja a fiatal felnőttekre vonatkozó<br />

szabályozást – igaz, igen röviden.<br />

24<br />

Molnár József: A fiatalkori bűnözés helyzete és megelőzése Magyarországon,<br />

Kriminológiai és Kriminalisztikai Tanulmányok X. kötet, Budapest, 1973, 159.<br />

oldal<br />

120<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Főszabályként 25 ha az elkövető elkövetéskor <strong>18</strong>. életévét már betöltötte,<br />

de még nem múlt el 25, az általános büntetési tételeket kell vele<br />

szemben is alkalmazni. Ez alóli kivételeket a 100 bis és a 100 ter<br />

tartalmazza.<br />

A törvény szerint a bíró tájékozódik az elkövető magaviseletéről,<br />

tanulmányairól és társadalmi helyzetéről, és ha szükséges, szakértői<br />

vizsgálatot rendel el fizikai és szellemi állapotáról, így tanulási– és<br />

munkaképességéről, és kérheti a fiatal munkára nevelő intézeti<br />

(„dologház”) beutalását.<br />

Ez az intézkedés kizárólag a <strong>18</strong> – 25 év közötti azon elkövetőkkel<br />

szemben alkalmazható, akik jellembeli fejlődésükben jelentősen<br />

zavartak vagy veszélyeztetettek, léhák vagy munkakerülők, tettük ezzel<br />

összefüggésben áll, és feltehető, hogy ezzel a jövőbeni bűncselekmény<br />

megelőzhető.<br />

A fiatalnak biztosítani kell az intézeten belüli szellemi és testi fejődést,<br />

szakmai ismereteinek bővítésének lehetőségét, kötelezni kell szakmai<br />

végzettség megszerzésére vagy intézeten kívüli munkavégzésre.<br />

Tartama minimálisan 1 év, 1 – 3 év próbaidőre feltételesen elbocsátható,<br />

de védőfelügyeletet biztosítanak számára. Ha az elkövető az intézet<br />

szabályait súlyosan megszegi, a hatóság elrendelheti a felnőttek számra<br />

fenntartott büntetés – végrehajtási intézetek egyikébe történő<br />

átszállítását.<br />

III. A MAGYAR ÉS SVÁJCI SZABÁLYOZÁS KIEMELT<br />

PONTJAI A NEMZETKÖZI KÖVETELMÉNYEK TÜKRÉBEN –<br />

MEGOLDÁSI JAVASLATOK A JÖVŐRE NÉZVE<br />

„Az Egyezményben részes államok gondoskodnak arról, hogy a<br />

25 svájci Btk. 100. cikke<br />

121<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

gyermeket szüleitől, ezek akarata ellenére, ne válasszák el, kivéve, ha az<br />

illetékes hatóságok, bírói felülvizsgálat lehetőségének fenntartásával és<br />

az erre vonatkozó törvényeknek és eljárásoknak megfelelően úgy<br />

döntenek, hogy ez az elválasztás a gyermek mindenek felett álló<br />

érdekében szükséges. Ilyen értelmű döntés szükséges lehet bizonyos<br />

különleges esetekben, például akkor, ha a szülők durván kezelik, vagy<br />

elhanyagolják gyermeküket, illetőleg ha különválva élnek és dönteni<br />

kell a gyermek elhelyezéséről. „ 26<br />

Az Egyezmény is csak példálózóan tér ki azokra az esetekre, amikor a<br />

fiatalkorú családi környezetéből való kiemelése szükséges; ennek<br />

meghatározását egyrészről az aláíró ország törvényalkotójának<br />

kompetenciájába, másrészről a bíró mérlegelési körébe utalja.<br />

Dolgozatom körébe csak azok az esetek tartoznak, amikor a fiatalkorú<br />

bűnelkövető. A Szabó András – iránymutatásból a jelen szabályozásba<br />

csak az a fordulat került bele, hogy a javítóintézeti elhelyezés (mint<br />

egyetlen, eddigi környezetétől távoli elhelyezést biztosító alternatíva) az<br />

elkövető nevelése szempontjából szükséges.<br />

A svájci megoldás sokkal körültekintőbben dolgozza ki a fiatal<br />

körülmény–rendszerét, ezen túl pedig lehetővé teszi az ún. nevelési<br />

segítséget is.<br />

Az Egyezményben részes államok elismerik a gyermekeknek az<br />

oktatáshoz való jogát, és az esélyegyenlőség jegyében történő<br />

gyakorlása céljából az alapfokú oktatást kötelezővé és ingyenessé<br />

teszik, ami lehetőség szerint középfokú vagy szakmai képzésnek kell<br />

követnie 27 , amihez minden gyermeknek, így a büntetés vagy intézkedés<br />

hatálya alatt állónak is hozzáférhetőnek kell lennie. Láthattuk az 1.2.1.2<br />

és 2.2.2. pontokban, hogy ez mindkét Btk. szövegében megtalálható és<br />

különleges fontossággal bír.<br />

26<br />

New York– i egyezmény, 9. cikk, 1. bekezdés<br />

27<br />

u.o. 28. cikk<br />

122<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

A 29. cikkből – ami továbbra is az oktatás–nevelés szükségességével<br />

foglalkozik – kiemelnék egy számomra nagy jelentőséggel bíró<br />

gondolatot: a gyermekek tudatába kell vésni az emberi jogok és az<br />

alapvető szabadságjogokon kívül „…a szülei személyazonossága,<br />

nyelve és kulturális értékei iránti tiszteletet, valamint annak az<br />

országnak, amelyben él, továbbá esetleges származási országnak a<br />

nemzeti értékei iránti és a sajátjától különböző kultúrák iránti<br />

tiszteletet…”<br />

Mind Svájcnak (a büntetés – végrehajtási intézetek lakói igen nagy<br />

arányban külföldiek), mind hazánknak (roma kisebbség) lépéseket kell<br />

tennie annak érdekékében, hogy az életkörülményei és nemzeti - etnikai<br />

hovatartozása miatt marginalizálódott (e kettő többnyire halmozottan<br />

jelentkezik) fiatalokat valamiféle kapaszkodóhoz juttassa, éreztesse<br />

velük, hogy az adott társadalom megbecsült tagjai. Ennek módja pedig<br />

nem a kirekesztés, hanem az integráció lehet – de nem minden áron.<br />

Lehetőséget kell számukra adni a kisebbségi kulturális gyökereik<br />

megismerésére, és ezt véleményem szerint a normál tanintézetek keretén<br />

belül mind a kisebbségi, mind a többségben élő gyerekeknek is meg kell<br />

teremteni. A toleráns és hozzáértő megközelítés eme megnyilvánulása,<br />

az egészséges identitástudat kialakulása, a mások iránti felelősségtudat<br />

hatalmas előrelépést jelenthetne az agresszió visszaszorításában s így a<br />

megelőzés területén egyaránt 28 .<br />

A 33. cikk említi az államok felelősségét arra nézve, hogy a<br />

gyermekeket megvédjék a kábító- és pszichotróp szerek tiltott<br />

fogyasztásától, amelyet mindkét törvénykönyv külön kiemel, és a<br />

használattal összefüggésben bűnözővé vált fiatalkorú speciális kezelését<br />

írják elő.<br />

Összehasonlító munkám során nem tapasztaltam lényegi eltéréseket a<br />

vizsgált két szankciórendszer elvi alapjaiban. Azonban álláspontom<br />

28<br />

lásd bővebben: Ervin Staub: Az erőszak társadalmi – kulturális gyökerei in<br />

Történeti és politikai pszichológia (szerk. Hunyady György), Osiris, Budapest,<br />

1998, 90 – 115. oldal<br />

123<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

szerint számos, eddig megválaszolatlan vagy részben rendezett kérdésre<br />

nem csak jogalkotói, hanem szélesebb körű szakmai–társadalmi<br />

megoldást kell keresni.<br />

Érdemes lenne talán újragondolni hazánkban az egyes korbesorolásokat,<br />

nem csak azért, hogy a fiatalkorú fejlettségéhez mérten adekvált<br />

büntetés / intézkedés alkalmazására kerülhessen sor, hanem a bűnügyi<br />

mutatók arra a sajnálatos tényre is felhívják a figyelmünket, hogy az<br />

első elkövetések egyre fiatalabb korra tevődnek.<br />

Külön tanulmányt megérne a – 1.2.1. pontban csak megemlített –<br />

Svájcban ismert ún. nevelőszülői elhelyezés, amely társadalmi, nem<br />

pedig állami intézményi szinten kívánja a deviáns fiatalok helyzetét<br />

rendezni; itt azonban az országra olyan többlet felelősség és feladat is<br />

hárulna, mint például a családok kiválasztása, képzése, ellenőrzése.<br />

Kétséget kizáróan ez tűnik a leghumánusabb megoldásnak, ám az<br />

anyagi kérdéseken túl ott van egy személyi is: felkészültünk- e vajon<br />

arra, hogy egyenrangúként kezeljünk, befogadjunk egy olyan fiatalt,<br />

akit a büntetőjog történetének hosszú évszázadai alatt kirekeszteni<br />

törekedtünk...<br />

Érdeklődéssel olvastam, hogy Svájcban a nevelőotthonban való<br />

tartózkodás 25 éves korig is kitolódhat; a jogalkotó szándéka nyilván az<br />

lehetett, hogy a fiatalkorú (fiatal felnőtt) minél tovább legyen egy olyan<br />

közeg tagja, ahonnan megerősítést kaphat és erkölcsi nevelését, szakmai<br />

képzését is biztosítják. A magyar megoldás mellett fel lehet hozni<br />

érvként, hogy a fiatalok nagy része 16-19 évesen ösztönösen lázad<br />

mindenfajta kötöttséggel szemben (különösen, ha komoly intézeti<br />

házirendről van szó), ami hátráltathatja a többi ott-lakó nevelését,<br />

veszélyeztetheti a fegyelmet. A javítóintézetek feladataikban<br />

túlterheltek, gyakran diszfunkcionálisak, ezért szükségét látnám<br />

hazánkban a probléma megvizsgálását.<br />

Érdekes kezdeményezésnek tűnik a megelőzés jegyében az ún. szülői<br />

tréning kialakítása, amely hatékony beavatkozás lehet agresszív és<br />

antiszociális gyermekek esetében azáltal, ha például szüleik is részt<br />

124<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

vesznek a fiatalok számára biztosított pozitív oktatási és szocializációs<br />

tapasztalatszerzés folyamatában. Ezek a korai beavatkozó programok<br />

kialakíthatják az iskolai munkában való hatékonyságot és érdeklődést,<br />

erősíthetik a családi kapcsolatokat is, szilárd talajt nyújtva ezzel a<br />

gyerekeknek.<br />

Kétséget ébresztenek azonban azok a próbálkozások, amelyek az<br />

igazságos és költségkímélő büntetés ideológiájának felhasználásával<br />

kívánják feltámasztani a represszív testi és megalázó büntetések<br />

alkalmazását.<br />

Nem utolsó sorban megemlítem a svájci Btk. 57. cikkében szereplő –<br />

felnőttekre vonatkozó - ún. békekezesség intézményét, amelynek<br />

lényege, hogy a bíró a bűncselekménnyel vagy annak ismétlésével<br />

fenyegető személy ígéretét veszi, hogy tettét mégsem viszi véghez.<br />

Sajnos azonban úgy tűnik, hogy ez nem jelent különösebb visszatartó<br />

erőt egy, a magyarnál régebbi jóléti demokráciában sem, hiszen<br />

alkalmazási köre igencsak leszűkült, ritkán alkalmazott, kevéssé<br />

hatékony.<br />

Míg a napóleoni Code Civil 371. cikke szerint „az apai tekintélynek és<br />

hatalomnak kell kiegészíteni a törvényeket, kijavítani az erkölcsöt és az<br />

engedelmességet kialakítania a gyermekben”, addig ma már több<br />

nemzetközi szervezet, helyi kezdeményezés és iskolai szintű programok<br />

segítik a fiatalokat abban, hogy megtalálják a helyes utat, ehhez<br />

azonban az életkörülményeik javítása elengedhetetlen – az állam<br />

hathatós közreműködésével.<br />

125<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

IV. FELHASZNÁLT IRODALOM<br />

Belovics Ervin – Vokó György: A büntetés – végrehajtási jog<br />

magyarázata, HVG – ORAC, Budapest, 2001<br />

Büntetőjog – Általános rész (szerk. dr. Békés Imre), HVG – ORAC,<br />

Budapest, 2002<br />

Ervin Staub: Az erőszak társadalmi – kulturális gyökerei in Történeti és<br />

politikai pszichológia (szerk. Hunyady György), Osiris, Budapest<br />

Fraçoise Martinetti: Les Droit de l’enfant, edition Unicef, Librio, Paris,<br />

2002<br />

Györgyi Kálmán: Büntetések és intézkedések, Közgazdasági és Jogi<br />

Könyvkiadó, Budapest, 1984<br />

Lőrincz József: Nemzetközi tendenciák a fiatalkorúak büntetés –<br />

végrehajtásában, Bv. Szakkönyvtár, IM Büntetés – végrehajtás<br />

Országos Parancsnokság, Budapest, 1992.<br />

Molnár József: A fiatalkori bűnözés helyzete és megelőzése<br />

Magyarországon, Kriminológiai és Kriminalisztikai Tanulmányok X.<br />

kötet, Budapest, 1973<br />

Nagy Ferenc: A svájci büntetőjogi szankciórendszer, Acta Universitatis<br />

Szegediensis De Attila József Nominatae – Acta Juridica et Politica,<br />

tomus XXXVI., Szeged, 1986<br />

Ausztria, NSZK, Svájc, Hollandia és Spanyolország büntetés –<br />

végrehajtási rendszerének áttekintése, Bv. Szakkönyvtár, Budapest,<br />

1990/1.<br />

Intézkedések a büntetőjog szankciórendszerében, Közgazdasági és Jogi<br />

Könyvkiadó, Budapest, 1986<br />

Nagy József: A fiatalkorúakra vonatkozó büntetőjogi szabályok<br />

kialakulása és változásai in Rendvédelmi Füzetek, 2002/36.<br />

Paul Logoz: Commentaire du Code Pénal Suisse - Partie Générale,<br />

Delachaux&Niesté SA., Neuchâtel – Paris, 1976<br />

Szabó András: A fiatalkorúak és a büntetőjog, Közgazdasági és Jogi<br />

Könyvkiadó, Budapest, 1961<br />

Vokó György: A magyar büntetés – végrehajtási jog, Dialóg Campus,<br />

Budapest – Pécs, 2001<br />

www.parlament.ch<br />

126<br />

ORSOLYA BOGDÁN - A MAGYAR ÉS A SVÁJCI<br />

BÜNTETŐTÖRVÉNYKÖNYVIATALKORÚAKKAL SZEMBEN HATÁLYOSAN<br />

FOGANATOSÍTHATÓ INTÉZKEDÉSEINEK ÁLTALÁNOS ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÁSA,<br />

KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A NEMZETKÖZI EGYEZMÉNYEKRE


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND THE<br />

PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN<br />

CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong><br />

BY DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI<br />

1. The notion of legal validity appeared for the first time during the<br />

period of the Hammurabi State, which dates back to more than 1750<br />

BC. In the Hammurabi Code, and in numerous documents from court<br />

proceedings that have been preserved on clay tablets, it is recorded that<br />

a judge who altered a judgment recorded on a sealed tablet would be<br />

removed from judicial office, and face a fine of twelve times the value<br />

of the claim. 1<br />

Further on in history, the institution of legal validity was connected with<br />

the prohibition of ne bis in idem. In ancient Greece the principle of ne<br />

bis in eadem re was in force in Athens and Sparta – no one could be<br />

tried twice for the same offence. The purpose of this principle was to<br />

prevent the same person from facing repeated prosecution. 2 As early as<br />

the fourth century BC Demosthenes referred to this as one of the rights<br />

guaranteed to a defendant facing trial. 3<br />

In Roman times, Ulpian maintained that a final court judgment should<br />

not be changed (res judicata pro veritate accipitur). Roman lawyers<br />

believed that a judgment, if it was to serve the aim of the trial, had to<br />

constitute law in that specific case. 4 In this respect, both sentences and<br />

acquittals became valid in law. During the period of the Republic, once<br />

a case had been decided, there was no higher court or instance which<br />

had jurisdiction over the case, so each judgment carried immediate legal<br />

validity. 5 Once courts of instance were introduced, before a judgment<br />

1<br />

S. Waltoś: Proces karny. Zarys systemu, Warszawa 2002, p 75.<br />

2<br />

J. W. Jones: Law and Legal Theory of the Greeks, 1956, p 148.<br />

3<br />

M. L. Friedland: Double Jeopardy, Oxford 1969, pp 15-16.<br />

4<br />

Z. Resich: Res judicata, Warszawa 1978, p 7.<br />

5<br />

W. Kufel: Res judicata. Przegląd zapatrywań na istotę powagi rzeczy osądzonej<br />

127<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

could become valid in law, all appeals first had to be exhausted. During<br />

the same period, the principle of non bis in idem was also observed 6 ,<br />

and it was expressed in other Latin proverbs: nemo debet bis vexari pro<br />

una et eadem causa, nemo debet bis puniri pro uno delicto 7 , or the one<br />

formulated by Joannes Teutonius: ne bis in idem crimen iudicetur. 8<br />

The principle of the legal validity of judgments in criminal cases was<br />

considered as a principle of both canon law and older German<br />

legislation. This was mentioned by Gratian who, basing it on the Old<br />

Testament, used the formulation of non iudicabit Deus bis in id ipsum. 9<br />

The principle of ne bis in idem appeared in the Saxon Mirror. Emperor<br />

Charles V’s criminal legislation of 1532 (Constitutio Criminalis<br />

Carolina) contained no provisions covering the legal validity of<br />

sentences. In trials during the Inquisition, the principle of ne bis in idem<br />

was abolished. In 16 th -century continental Europe, the principle of ne<br />

bis in idem was replaced by the institution of “release from the court of<br />

first instance” (absolutio ab instantia) prepared by Milanese lawyers.<br />

This meant that where there was insufficient evidence to pass judgment,<br />

the proceedings were suspended, but could be reopened on new<br />

evidence. 10 In Germany, the institution of absolutio ab instantia was<br />

introduced in 1635, and by the end of the <strong>18</strong> th century, it became<br />

common court practice. In 1751, the validity of “release from the court<br />

of first instance” was confirmed in the Codex Juris Bavarici Criminalis.<br />

In line with the binding concept of absolutio ab instantia, undertaking<br />

of final proceedings was dependent on new circumstances coming to<br />

w procesie cywilnym, Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 1964, No.<br />

1, p 49.<br />

6<br />

See Jolowicz: Roman Foundations of Modern Law, 1957, pp 87, 94-100.<br />

7<br />

R. Kmiecik: Prawomocność postanowień prokuratora w świetle k.p.k. z 1997 r.<br />

(in:) Nowy Kodeks postępowania karnego. Zagadnienia węzłowe, Kraków 1998,<br />

p 193.<br />

8<br />

M. Lipczyńska: Polski proces karny. Zagadnienia ogólne, t. I, Warszawa 1986,<br />

p 53; S. Waltoś: op. cit. p 63.<br />

9<br />

F.C. Schroeder: Die Rechtsnatur des Grundsatzes „ne bis in idem“, Juristische<br />

Schulung 1997, No.3, p 228.<br />

10<br />

G. Schwarplies: Die rechtsgeschichtliche Entwicklung des Grundsatzes “ne bis<br />

in idem” im Strafprozess, Zürich 1970, p 27.<br />

128<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

light. 11<br />

By the end of the <strong>18</strong> th Century, the French Revolution once again<br />

restored the principle of ne bis in idem. 12 The first regulations in French<br />

law (The Constitution of September 1791, Chapter V and Art. 9 of the<br />

Criminal Procedure Code of <strong>18</strong>08) limited the principle to prohibiting<br />

punishment and prosecution once a person had been acquitted. 13<br />

In Germany during the Enlightenment, the individual was granted new<br />

rights in criminal proceedings. 14 The framework for the modern criminal<br />

trial was established by the Frankfurt Constitution of <strong>18</strong>49, which<br />

among other things significantly limited the possibility for a retrial of<br />

the same criminal case and against the same person, thereby increasing<br />

the importance of the institution of legal validity. However, no<br />

provisions of the German Reich’s Criminal Procedure of 1 February<br />

<strong>18</strong>77 referred directly to the institution of legal validity. Nevertheless, it<br />

did accept the principle of ne bis in idem which from that moment on<br />

has been generally accepted in Reich Court judgments. 15<br />

In Anglo-Saxon legal theory, the ne bis in idem prohibition is described<br />

as a “rule against double jeopardy”. This prohibition is as old as the<br />

common law itself. In 12 th Century England, during the controversy<br />

between Henry II and Archbishop Thomas Becket over Church<br />

independence, this principle was exploited in the defence of the<br />

independence of ecclesiastical courts. An official accused of murder<br />

was tried by an ecclesiastical court. In order to exclude the jurisdiction<br />

of the Royal court, the principle of ne bis in idipsum, then in force in<br />

ecclesiastical courts, was invoked: “no one may be punished twice for<br />

the same offence”. 16 During a later period, a principle was observed in<br />

11<br />

U. Dithmar: Der Gundsatz “ne bis in idem” und das fortgesetzte Delikt, Berlin<br />

1993, p 6.<br />

12<br />

Barbey: La Rẻgle Non Bis in Idem, 1930, p 23.<br />

13<br />

F. C. Schroeder: op. cit., p 228.<br />

14<br />

T. Maciejewski: Historia powszechna ustroju i prawa, Warszawa 2000, pp<br />

838-840.<br />

15<br />

U. Dithmar: op. cit., p 7.<br />

16<br />

M. L. Friedland: op. cit., p 5.<br />

129<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

practice according to which it was impermissible to conduct several<br />

proceedings in the same case. In 1660, the Court of the King’s Bench in<br />

England forbade the conduct of two proceedings in the same case. 17<br />

In Ireland the double jeopardy concept is often recognisable in the<br />

language of anglicised Norman French (i. e. autrefois acquit and<br />

convict) whereas in most of the Code nations is it expressed in the Latin<br />

maxim of non bis in idem. <strong>18</strong><br />

The principle of double jeopardy is to be found in the Fifth Amendment<br />

of the United States Constitution and provides that no person shall “be<br />

subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb”.<br />

The Fifth Amendment has been held to consist of three separate<br />

guarantees, namely: autrefois acquit, autrefois convict and protection<br />

against multiple punishment for the same offence. In addition to the<br />

United States, the German, Canadian, Indian and South African<br />

constitutions also embody this principle. Article 35(3)(m) of the<br />

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa provides that a person is<br />

“not to be tried for an offence in respect of an act or omission for which<br />

that person has previously been either acquitted or convicted”. 19<br />

The principle of ne bis in idem is contained in the International<br />

Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 16 December 1966.<br />

According to Art. 14 par. 7, “No one shall be liable to be tried or<br />

punished again for an offence for which he has already been finally<br />

convicted or acquitted in accordance with the law and criminal<br />

procedure of each country”. This provision concerns only criminal<br />

proceedings in a given state. 20<br />

This principle can also be found in the 1984 Protocol No. 7 to the<br />

European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and<br />

17<br />

P. A. McDermott: Res Judicata and Double Jeopardy, Butterworths 1999, p<br />

200.<br />

<strong>18</strong><br />

P. A. McDermott: op. cit., p 201.<br />

19<br />

P. A. McDermott: op. cit., pp 198, 201.<br />

20<br />

Dziennik Ustaw, 1977 , No. 38, item 167. See J. Tylman: Postępowanie karne.<br />

Zbiór przepisów, orzecznictwo i literatura, Bydgoszcz-Łódź 2002, p 30.<br />

130<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that, ”No one shall be liable to<br />

be tried or punished again in criminal proceedings under the jurisdiction<br />

of the same State for an offence for which he has already been finally<br />

acquitted or convicted in accordance with the law and criminal<br />

procedure of the State.” 21 Thus formulated, the prohibition of ne bis in<br />

idem does not prevent the reopening of proceedings in accordance with<br />

the law and procedure of a state concerned where new facts have been<br />

discovered or if there has been a fundamental defect in the previous<br />

proceedings that could affect the outcome of the case (Art. 4 par. 2). In<br />

the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and<br />

Fundamental Freedom, the principle of ne bis in idem is a principle<br />

which is not subject to derogation, which means that states cannot<br />

temporarily suspend its binding force even in extraordinary<br />

circumstances (“In time of war or other public emergency threatening<br />

the life of the nation”) within the meaning of Art. 15 of the European<br />

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental<br />

Freedom. 22 This prohibition protects citizens against a feeling of<br />

uncertainty and the legal order from the instability of court decisions. 23<br />

2. Res judicata is a legal institution preventing situations arising where<br />

further proceedings would be instigated against the same person, in the<br />

same case, once a final valid judgement had been passed terminating the<br />

proceedings. If a given case is examined ex officio to determine<br />

whether res judicata applies, even before criminal proceedings<br />

commence , this ensures that people are not involved without due cause<br />

in a process with all the negative consequences this can entail. 24 On the<br />

21 Dziennik Ustaw 2003, No. 42, item 364.<br />

22 See B. Gronowska: Wyrok Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka w<br />

sprawach: Gradinger przeciwko Austrii, 23 <strong>October</strong> 1995, ref.. 33/1994/480/562<br />

and Oliveira przeciwko Szwajcarii, 30 June 1998, ref. 84/1997/868/1080, Prok. i<br />

Pr. 1999, Nos. 11-12, p 150; F. C. Schroeder: op. cit., p 230.<br />

23 R. Kmiecik, E. Skrętowicz: Proces karny. Część ogólna, Kraków-Lublin 1999,<br />

pp205-206; R. Kmiecik: Prawomocność postanowień prokuratora w świetle<br />

k.p.k. z 1997 (in:) Nowy Kodeks postępowania karnego. Zagadnienia węzłowe,<br />

Kraków 1998, p 193.<br />

24 S. Waltoś: op. cit., p 440.<br />

131<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

other hand, obviously, this cannot be allowed to lead to the perpetrator<br />

of an offence avoiding responsibility. 25<br />

The principle of ne bis in idem guarantees the accused that he will not<br />

be held criminally responsible for an act which has already been<br />

adjudged. This is a right of the perpetrator of a punishable act, who can<br />

then demand that proceedings not be instituted against him, or where<br />

proceedings have already commenced, that they be discontinued, if<br />

criminal proceedings against him in the same case have already<br />

terminated with a valid judgement.<br />

The prohibition against reopening proceedings in the same case thus<br />

takes priority over the principle of justice. This may sometimes be<br />

difficult to accept due to “society’s notion of justice”. It is worth noting<br />

that the Parliamentary Council in Germany, as a result of “past<br />

experience”, i.e. endemic infringement of the law by institutions and<br />

offices of National Socialism, has added Art. 103 par. 3 to the current<br />

Constitution, which prohibits multiple punishment, . However, this did<br />

not relate to the prohibition against multiple punishment, but rather with<br />

the fact that sentences were set aside as too lenient and replaced with<br />

more severe ones on the basis of an extraordinary appeal and petition<br />

for annulment. Therefore, these were in fact ordinary multiple<br />

prosecutions, rather than cases of multiple punishment 26<br />

German doctrine established the concepts of substantive justice and<br />

legal certainty (the reliability of a legally established order) that are the<br />

fundamental elements of a nation of laws. Substantive justice is the<br />

authorisation, and duty of, the state to punish the perpetrator of an act<br />

commensurately with his degree of guilt and type of offence. However,<br />

the notion of legal certainty is based on the fact that where the<br />

perpetrator has been judged by the state apparatus, he cannot be retried<br />

for the same act in the same case. The state, in instituting and<br />

conducting proceedings against a specific person, in effect exhausts its<br />

25 A. Kaftal: O niektórych zagadnieniach tożsamości przedmiotowej czynu przy<br />

przestępstwie ciągłym, Palestra 1964, No.8, p 33.<br />

26 F. C. Schroeder: op. cit., p 228.<br />

132<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

right to judge the offender. German doctrine accepts the precedence of<br />

legal certainty over the principle of substantive justice. 27<br />

Both the individual and society as a whole should be able to rely on<br />

legal certainty. A society should have confidence in the legal order of its<br />

state. This confidence is strengthened among other things by the fact<br />

that court judgments are irreversible. The principle of legal certainty<br />

also has a disciplinary significance for state organs conducting<br />

proceedings, who must exercise particular care as it will not be possible<br />

to re-open proceedings or rectify errors later : they will be restricted by<br />

the principle of ne bis in idem. The principle of legal certainty is<br />

exceptionally important for citizens. No citizen need fear that<br />

proceedings will be reopened in a given case once the court has made a<br />

legally valid judgment.. This reflects the dignity and freedom of the<br />

individual and in this way he is protected against any possible abuse of<br />

authority by the state. 28<br />

It is generally accepted that the principle of ne bis in idem serves<br />

foremost to protect those who have been judged, whether convicted or<br />

acquitted. This principle also means that proceedings may not be<br />

conducted with the aim of acquittal or mitigating the penalty for a<br />

person who has received a legally valid sentence. 29 However, it should<br />

27 E. Schmidt: Strafprozeß und Rechtsstaat, Strafprozeßrechtliche Aufsätze und<br />

Vorträge (1952 bis 1969), Göttingen 1970, p 273; H. J. Behrendt: Der Tatbegriff<br />

im materiellen und formellen Steuerrecht, Zeitschrift für die gesamte<br />

Strafrechtswisseschaft 1982, No. 94, p 888; U. Dithmar: Der Grundsatz..., pp 11-<br />

12.<br />

28 E. Beling: Deutsches Reichsstrafprozessrecht, Berlin-Lepzig 1928; M. Faber:<br />

Strafklageverbrauch und fortgesetzte Handlung, München 1966, p 29; W. Stree:<br />

Teilrechtskraft und fortgesetzte Tat (in:) Festschrift für Karl Engisch zum 70<br />

Geburstag, Frankfurt am Main 1969, p 676; R. Neuhaus: Der<br />

strafverfahrensrechtliche Tatbegriff – „ne bis in idem“, Bochum 1985, p 165; U.<br />

Dithmar: op.cit. pp 12-14.<br />

29<br />

G. Grünwald: Die materielle Rechtskraft im Strafverfahren der Bundesrepublik<br />

Deutschland (in:) H. H. Jescheck (red.): Deutsche strafrechtliche Landesreferate<br />

zum IX Internationallen Kongreβ für Rechtsvergleichung, Teheran 1974, Berlin-<br />

New York 1974, p 97.<br />

133<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

be noted that the ne bis in idem prohibition may in certain circumstances<br />

prevent the accused from demonstrating his innocence. 30 Therefore,<br />

one should note that under modern criminal procedures the binding<br />

principle of presumption of innocence stands until the court pronounces<br />

the accused guilty in a legally valid judgment. The accused is presumed<br />

innocent until his guilt is determined in a legally valid verdict, which<br />

puts into effect the ne bis in idem prohibition. Errors committed by the<br />

court that lead to the sentencing of an innocent person should not be<br />

rectified by infringing this principle. Furthermore, legal systems have<br />

measures allowing even those verdicts which are legally valid to be<br />

overturned.<br />

3. The principle of ne bis in idem is not one that is binding without any<br />

qualification. Provisions of the Code on Penal Proceedings and<br />

provisions of other laws provide exceptions to the prohibition against<br />

conducting criminal proceedings for the same matter. In Polish criminal<br />

procedure, the foremost exceptions include: cassation and reopening<br />

proceedings; changes to the judgment as a result of an amendment to the<br />

law; judicial decisions on carrying out the sentence and other criminal<br />

sanctions; changes to judicial decisions on probation; criminal<br />

proceedings in a matter where a foreign court has already passed<br />

judgment; verdicts changing a previous decision as a result of<br />

extradition conditions; correction of evident typographical errors and<br />

mistakes in accounting or in the calculation of time periods; restoration<br />

of final time limits; proceedings supplementing resolutions contained in<br />

the verdict; pardons; amnesties, and proceedings on the basis of the Law<br />

of 23 February 1991 on the Invalidity of Judicial Decisions in Respect<br />

of Persons Repressed for Activities in Favour of the Independence of<br />

the Polish Nation. 31<br />

According to Art. 17 par. 1 sub. 7 of the Polish Criminal Procedure<br />

30<br />

M. L. Friedland: op. cit., p 4.<br />

31<br />

M. Rogalski: Res judicata jako przesłanka procesu karnego, Rzeszów 2004, p<br />

142; M. Cieślak: Polska procedura karna. Podstawowe założenia teoretyczne,<br />

Warszawa 1984, p 375; T. Grzegorczyk, J. Tylman: Polskie postępowanie karne,<br />

Warszawa 2001, p 192.<br />

134<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Code , the substantive legal validity of a court judgment constitutes a ne<br />

bis in idem prohibition (precluding a trial) in respect of a trial where the<br />

accused is to be tried again for the same act. The possibility of<br />

continuing proceedings that have been validly concluded under the law<br />

should be seen as an exception to the ne bis in idem prohibition.<br />

According to the principle of ne bis in idem, there should be no<br />

proceedings if the same accused stands trial for an act in a case that has<br />

already been resolved by a legally valid judgement. Hence, the law<br />

provides cassation and reopening of proceedings as exceptions to the ne<br />

bis in idem prohibition. 32<br />

In Polish literature the view predominates that cassation or reopening of<br />

proceedings are continuations of the previous proceedings, not the<br />

beginning of new ones (bis). 33 A legally valid judicial decision settling<br />

proceedings is set aside as part of the same, not in new, proceedings. 34<br />

A contrary view is presented by G. Grünwald, according to whom, the<br />

reopening of such proceedings constitutes new proceedings,<br />

independent of the first, in which general legal norms are binding and in<br />

particular in dubio pro reo. In Grünwald’s view, if proceedings are<br />

reopened in accordance with the requirements of substantive legal<br />

validity and are to the benefit of the accused, they cannot be recognized<br />

as an infringement of substantive legal validity. 35 Grünwald also notes<br />

that there are no criteria justifying the acceptance of the argument that<br />

during a re-examination of the same case based on the same factual<br />

state, the second court would apply the provisions of law better than the<br />

previous one. However, the legislator, in establishing the binding legal<br />

order, assumes that is not based on an empirically justified normative<br />

rule, but rather a normative designation that the legal position of appeals<br />

courts has priority before courts of first instance. An exception is where<br />

new facts or evidence become available, in which case the trial will lead<br />

32<br />

R. Kmiecik, E. Skrętowicz: Proces karny. Część ogólna, Kraków-Lublin 1999,<br />

p 208.<br />

33<br />

P. Hofmański, E. Sadzik, K. Zgryzek: Kodeks postępowania karnego.<br />

Komentarz, t. I, Warszawa 1999, pp 131-132. See also W. Grzeszczyk: Kasacja<br />

w polskim procesie karnym, Kraków 2000, p 35.<br />

34<br />

W. Daszkiewicz: Proces karny. Część ogólna, Poznań 1995, p 140.<br />

35<br />

G. Grünwald: op. cit., pp 94-95.<br />

135<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

to a better discovery of historical truth. 36<br />

In accordance with the Polish Criminal Procedure Code, cassation may<br />

also be instituted to the disadvantage of the accused where<br />

circumstances excluding prosecution arise, particularly where there is a<br />

legally valid judgment. According to Art. 519 of the Polish Criminal<br />

Procedure Code cassation may be initiated from each legally valid<br />

appeal court judgment which terminates the proceedings. Cassation in<br />

this form allows the setting aside of a legally valid substantive judgment<br />

of an appeals court and judgement to be passed again on the accused. 37<br />

In connection with these provisions, doubts appear as to the very<br />

institution of legal validity, if a party can, within a set time period,<br />

appeal a legally valid judgment by cassation, which is essentially an<br />

ordinary means of appeal. 38 S. Waltoś pointed out, for instance, that<br />

cassation as a means of appeal against a legally valid judicial decision<br />

may present problems for Poland’s ratification of Protocol No. 7 to the<br />

European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and<br />

Fundamental Freedoms, which has already been signed, as according to<br />

the Convention no one can again be judged or penalised in proceedings<br />

before a court of the same state where previously he was sentenced with<br />

a legally valid sentence or acquitted in accordance with the law and the<br />

principles of criminal procedure of that state. Proceedings may be<br />

reopened in accordance with the law and criminal procedure of a given<br />

state if newly discovered facts are disclosed or if an error that may have<br />

had a bearing on the outcome of the case was committed in previous<br />

proceedings. The Convention’s provisions allow an exception to the<br />

prohibition against infringing the ne bis in idem rule to the detriment of<br />

the accused only in the form of reopening proceedings. 39 It should be<br />

36<br />

G. Grünwald: op.cit., pp 104-105.<br />

37<br />

R. Kmiecik, E. Skrętowicz: op. cit., p 208.<br />

38<br />

R. Kmiecik: Trójinstancyjny system apelacyjno-kasacyjny czy dwuinstancyjna<br />

hybryda rewizyjno-kasacyjna? (w związku z nowelizacją k.p.k. w zakresie<br />

postępowania odwoławczego) (in:) Kierunki i stan reformy prawa karnego,<br />

Lublin 1995, p 71. See also R. Kmiecik: Kodeks postępowania karnego w ocenie<br />

doktryny i publicystyki (in:) Racjonalna reforma prawa karnego, Warszawa<br />

2001, p 64.<br />

39<br />

S. Waltoś: Nowa kasacja w procesie karnym, Palestra 1996, Nos. 1-2, pp 21-<br />

136<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

noted that Protocol No. 7 of the European Convention on the Protection<br />

of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms refers to the ”the law and<br />

penal procedure of a given State”. This results from the order to take<br />

into account the specific criminal procedure law of each signatory to<br />

Protocol No. 7. Therefore it would be difficult to acknowledge that the<br />

use of the institution of cassation for correcting blatantly defective<br />

legally valid judicial decisions is an infringement of the principle of ne<br />

bis in idem, since cassation does not mean new proceedings should be<br />

opened despite previous proceedings being concluded with a legally<br />

valid judicial decision. Instead, it is a decision as to whether the judicial<br />

decision that ended the proceedings is flawed by a blatant infringement<br />

of the law, hence exceptionally allowing proceedings to be continued. 40<br />

Doubts also arise in German doctrine as to the permissibility of<br />

reopening proceedings terminated with legal validity to the detriment of<br />

the sentenced offender (Art. 362 Strafprozeβordnung together with the<br />

provisions of Art. 103 par. 3 of the German Constitution which provides<br />

for the ne bis in idem prohibition). This situation is justified by principle<br />

of justice taking the priority over the principle of legal certainty. One<br />

should also note that in German law proceedings may not be reopened<br />

where their only the aim is to impose a different penalty on the basis of<br />

the same penal law (Art. 363 Strafprozeβordnung). 41<br />

4. According to Art. 540 par. 1 of the Polish Criminal Procedure Code,<br />

proceedings concluded with a legally valid judicial decision can be<br />

reopened if:<br />

1) an offence has been committed in connection with the<br />

proceedings and there exists a reasonable basis for belief that<br />

22.<br />

40<br />

Z. Doda, A. Gaberle: Kontrola odwoławcza w procesie karnym, Warszawa<br />

1997, pp 45-46. See also Z. Doda, J. Grajewski, A. Murzynowski: Kasacja w<br />

postępowaniu karnym – Komentarz, Warszawa 1996, p 7. Protocol No. 7 of the<br />

European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental<br />

Freedoms has already been announced in Dziennik Ustaw 2003, No. 42, item<br />

364.<br />

41<br />

F. C. Schroeder: op. cit., pp 229-230.<br />

137<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

this could have influenced the contents of the judicial<br />

decision;<br />

2) after the judgment was pronounced, new facts or evidence<br />

came to light that were previously unknown to the court and<br />

which indicate that:<br />

a) the sentenced person did not commit the act or his act<br />

did not constitute an offence or was not subject to a<br />

penalty,<br />

b) he was sentenced for an offence that is subject to a more<br />

rigorous penalty, or if circumstances that required an<br />

extraordinary mitigation of penalty were not taken into<br />

account, or if the court erroneously accepted<br />

circumstances that caused an extraordinary aggravation<br />

of penalty,<br />

c) the court discontinued or conditionally discontinued<br />

criminal proceedings, erroneously accepting that the<br />

accused committed the act of which he is accused.<br />

Proceedings are reopened to the benefit of the accused if the need arises<br />

as a consequence of a decision by an international authority by virtue of<br />

an international agreement ratified by the Republic of Poland (Art. 540<br />

par. 3 of the Polish Criminal Procedure Code). On the basis of<br />

international agreements ratified by Poland these authorities are: the<br />

European Commission of Human Rights, which is concerned with<br />

individual petitions raised against Poland, and the European Tribunal of<br />

Human Rights.<br />

According to Art. 540a of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure, court<br />

proceedings which ended in a legally valid judgment may also be<br />

reopened if:<br />

1) a convicted person to whom provisions of Art. 60 par. 3 or 4 of<br />

the Polish Criminal Code were applied did not confirm<br />

138<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

previously disclosed information during criminal proceedings,<br />

2) circumstances specified in Art. 11 par. 3 of the Polish Criminal<br />

Procedure Code arise.<br />

Pursuant to Art. 60 par. 3 of the Polish Criminal Code, a court applies<br />

extraordinary mitigation of penalty and perhaps even conditional<br />

suspension of the sentence in respect of a perpetrator participating with<br />

other persons in the commission of an offence, if he reveals the offence<br />

and its material circumstances to the prosecuting authority. Under Art.<br />

60 par. 4 of the Polish Criminal Code, upon a motion from the<br />

prosecution, a court may apply extraordinary mitigation of penalty and<br />

even conditional suspension of the penalty in respect of a perpetrator<br />

who, irrespective of clarifications submitted in his case, revealed to the<br />

prosecution a hitherto unknown offence and presented its material<br />

circumstances, if the offence is subject to a penalty of deprivation of<br />

liberty for a period of more than five years.<br />

However, under Art. 11 par. 1 of the Polish Code of Criminal<br />

Procedure, proceedings concerning an offence carrying a penalty of up<br />

to five years’ deprivation of liberty may be set aside if, due to the type<br />

and level of the penalty imposed in a legally valid judgement for<br />

another offence, the sentence would clearly be inappropriate and if this<br />

does not conflict with the interests of the injured party. Under Art. 11<br />

par. 3 of the Polish Criminal Procedure Code criminal proceedings that<br />

have been annulled under Art. 11 par. 1 may be reopened in the event<br />

that the legally valid verdict causing them to be annulled is set aside or<br />

an essential change is made to it.<br />

Hence, the provisions of Art. 540a of the Polish Criminal Procedure<br />

Code permit the reopening of proceedings, but only where it would be<br />

to the disadvantage of the accused. 42 In the grounds for the draft<br />

changes to the Polish Criminal Procedure Code it was provided that<br />

42<br />

T. Grzegorczyk: Wybrane zagadnienia najnowszej procedury karnej, Państwo i<br />

Prawo 2003, No. 8, p 15.<br />

139<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

"In proceedings to reopen proceedings there are two bases for the<br />

infringement of a legally valid judgment, unknown in legislation until<br />

now. Thus, it will be possible to reopen proceedings where the text of a<br />

legally valid judgment has been set aside or its essence has been<br />

changed, because of which proceedings were annulled pursuant to Art.<br />

11 par. 1 (see Art. 540a point 2) and where, after the judgment had been<br />

handed down, new facts or evidence not previously known to the court<br />

are revealed indicating that a convicted person to whom provisions of<br />

Art. 60 par. 3 or par. 4 of the Criminal Code were applied had<br />

substantially changed his testimony or explanations (see Art. 540a point<br />

1). The draft amendment aims to prevent accused persons from<br />

deceitfully “obtaining under false pretences” benefits provided under<br />

Art. 11 par. 1 of the Criminal Procedure Code and under Art. 60 par. 3<br />

and 4 of the Criminal Code. It continues to conform with the text of Art.<br />

4 par. 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention for the Protection<br />

of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and does not conflict with<br />

the international standard of prohibition against repeated judgments or<br />

penalties.” 43<br />

In German criminal procedure, the reasons for reopening proceedings<br />

fall into two categories, those that are to the benefit of the convict and<br />

those to his disadvantage. Proceedings are reopened to the benefit of the<br />

convict in the following cases:<br />

1) Disclosure of new facts and evidence that justify a resolution to<br />

the case other than the previous one. Facts and evidence that<br />

were not presented during the main hearing are recognised as<br />

new facts and evidence. These are not only facts of which the<br />

accused was unaware during the proceedings, but also those<br />

which have their source in court files but which were not<br />

exploited during the main hearing.<br />

2) Documents presented to the disadvantage of the accused were<br />

43<br />

Projekt ustawy o zmianie ustawy – Kodeks postępowania karnego – Przepisy<br />

wprowadzające Kodeks karny oraz niektórych innych ustaw, Druk Sejmowy No.<br />

<strong>18</strong>2, 20 December 2001, pp 70-71.<br />

140<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

either not genuine or were falsified, a witness or expert<br />

intentionally or negligently provided false testimony under<br />

oath. Reopening is possible if on the basis of evidence in its<br />

possession the court finds that the falsified documents or<br />

testimony were not genuine.<br />

3) A civil court judgement, on the basis of which the criminal<br />

court issued its verdict, had been set aside. The difference<br />

between the new judgement of a civil court and the previous<br />

one may occur if new facts or evidence have appeared or the<br />

material evidence before the civil court was wrongly assessed.<br />

After the civil court verdict is set aside, the decision of the<br />

criminal court must be verified;<br />

4) The judge accepted material benefit in return for granting a<br />

specific resolution;<br />

5) A defect has been found in the law which has been applied. In<br />

accordance with Art. 79 of the German Constitution, reopening<br />

is possible if the Constitutional Court determines that the<br />

provisions of the Constitution have been infringed. 44<br />

In German law the substantive legal validity of a verdict may also be set<br />

aside as a consequence of extraordinary means of accusation being<br />

introduced by one of the co-defendants due to infringement of the<br />

provisions of substantive law. However, the verdict is set aside only in<br />

respect of the co-defendant in regard to whom the law was infringed. 45<br />

Proceedings may, however, be reopened to the disadvantage of the<br />

accused in the event that falsification of a document used as evidence to<br />

his benefit is disclosed, false testimony is given, or an offence ex officio<br />

is committed by the judge. There are however are limitations to the<br />

range of possibilities for conducting a new criminal proceedings to the<br />

disadvantage of the convict. A person acquitted or convicted by a<br />

44<br />

G. Grünwald: op. cit., pp 98-101.<br />

45<br />

Ibid., p 101.<br />

141<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

legally valid verdict is protected against new penal proceedings to his<br />

disadvantage , even where new facts or evidence come to light. 46<br />

In French procedure proceedings concluded with a legally valid judicial<br />

decision are reopened in the following circumstances:<br />

- the alleged victim of a murder is in fact alive;<br />

- there are two judicial decisions in the same case;<br />

- a witness has been sentenced for false testimony;<br />

- new facts come to light indicating the innocence of the<br />

convicted person. 47<br />

In French procedure, infringement of the prohibition of ne bis in idem<br />

(”two judicial decisions in the same case”) constitutes a basis for<br />

reopening proceedings.<br />

There is a provision in the Polish Criminal Procedure Code (Art. 549<br />

par. 2) that may constitute a basis for reopening proceedings to the<br />

benefit of the accused if, as a result of Constitutional Tribunal decision,<br />

the legal provision that was the basis for the sentencing or conditional<br />

annulment has lost its force of law or been changed. The decision of the<br />

Constitutional Tribunal may follow a constitutional petition. A<br />

constitutional petition is most often described as a specific,<br />

extraordinary legal measure on the basis of which a citizen or another<br />

legal entity may turn to the Constitutional Tribunal to grant it protection<br />

from the infringement of its constitutional rights by a state organ or<br />

other public authority. 48<br />

With the assistance of such legal measures, a party dissatisfied with the<br />

resolution of the criminal proceedings may initiate proceedings before<br />

the Constitutional Tribunal aimed at instigating a constitutional<br />

46 Ibid., pp 98-101.<br />

47 H. H. Kühne: Ne bis in idem in den Schengen Vertragsstaaten, Juristenzeitung<br />

1998, No. <strong>18</strong>, p 878.<br />

48<br />

B. Nita: Skarga konstytucyjna jako środek prawny umożliwiający korektę<br />

prawomocnego orzeczenia wydanego w postępowaniu karnym (in:) Środki<br />

zaskarżenia w procesie karnym. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci prof. Zbigniewa<br />

Dody, Kraków 2000, p427; B. Nita: Trybunał Konstytucyjny a proces karny,<br />

Kraków 1999, p 229.<br />

142<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

examination of the legal provision it is questioning that became the<br />

basis for the resolution issued in his case. 49<br />

In Polish criminal procedure, such a petition may only be granted where<br />

there is a conflict between the Constitution and the law that was the<br />

basis for the judgment issued in a specific case. Hence, one cannot have<br />

a constitutional petition on the grounds that the judgment infringes<br />

constitutional rights, through failure to apply, or erroneous application<br />

of, the law. The decision of the Constitutional Tribunal determining<br />

whether a provision that has been examined is unconstitutional does not<br />

automatically invalidate judicial decisions that were made as a result of<br />

such a provision being applied. However, it is possible to reopen<br />

proceedings to the benefit of the accused. 50 The exception to the<br />

principle of ne bis in idem in the form of reopening proceedings as a<br />

result of a Constitutional Tribunal judgement applies only in<br />

circumstances where there is a change in the law to the benefit of the<br />

perpetrator, in that the act of which he was accused has ceased to be a<br />

criminal offence or its classification as a criminal offence has changed. 51<br />

5. In Polish criminal procedure, a change in verdict as a result of a<br />

change in law may be regarded as an exception to the ne bis in idem<br />

principle. According to art. 4 § 2 of the Polish Criminal Code the<br />

(“PCC”), if, under a new law, an offence carries a maximum sentence<br />

that is lower than the maximum sentence that was previously imposed,<br />

the maximum sentence will be reduced to the level provided for in the<br />

new law. If, under the new law, the punishable offence no longer carries<br />

a prison sentence, the prison sentence that was previously imposed must<br />

be commuted to a fine or imprisonment, on the basis that one month’s<br />

imprisonment is the equivalent of a fine equal to 60 daily rates 52 or 2<br />

49<br />

B. Nita: Skarga konstytucyjna..., p 428.<br />

50<br />

B. Nita: Skarga konstytucyjna..., p 437, p 444.<br />

51<br />

See J. Rybak: Trybunał Konstytucyjny a proces karny, Przegląd Sądowy 1992,<br />

No.10, p 30; J. Oniszczuk: Powszechnie obowiązująca wykładnia ustaw ustalana<br />

przez Trybunał Konstytucyjny, Studia i Materiały, Vol. III, Warszawa 1995, p<br />

<strong>18</strong>8; B. Nita: Trybunał Konstytucyjny..., p 226.<br />

52<br />

Daily rates are calculated on the basis of the accused’s economic situation, i.e,<br />

143<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

months of detention (art. 4 § 3 PCC). If, under the new law, the offence<br />

is no longer punishable, the punishment will be cancelled ex lege<br />

(art. 4 § 4 PCC).<br />

The change in law results in a change in the verdict handed down in the<br />

same case and against the same person. The change in verdict under this<br />

procedure should be considered permissible because it is the result of a<br />

change in legislation and works to the advantage of the convicted<br />

person.<br />

6. Further exceptions to the ne bis in idem principle in Polish criminal<br />

proceedings can be found in relation to judgments on the carrying out of<br />

sentences and other penal measures, and changes to probationary<br />

judgments.<br />

Judgments issued in connection with the carrying out of sentences and<br />

other penal measures apply to one offence committed by one and the<br />

same person. They are a continuation of the previous proceedings, and<br />

are an exception to the ne bis in idem principle. They include, in<br />

particular, judgments on the following matters: changes to the duties<br />

imposed in connection with suspended prison sentences (art. 74 § 2<br />

PCC), release on parole (art. 77 et seq. PCC), payment of a fine in<br />

instalments (art. 49 of the Polish Executive Criminal Code) and a<br />

moratorium on imprisonment (art. 150 et seq. of the Polish Executive<br />

Criminal Code).<br />

An exception to the ne bis in idem principle can be found where there<br />

has been a change in a conditional (“probationary”) judgment as a result<br />

of an unsuccessful attempt at probation, i.e., the resumption of<br />

proceedings that were suspended conditionally (art. 68 PCC), an order<br />

to carry out a suspended sentence (art. 75 PCC), and the revocation of<br />

parole (art. 81 PCC).<br />

The resumption of proceedings that were suspended conditionally<br />

salary etc.<br />

144<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

(chapter 57 of the Polish Criminal Procedure Code - ‘PCPC’), an order<br />

to carry out a suspended sentence, or the revocation of parole, leads to<br />

the imposition of the prison sentence. The fact that these issues are<br />

being considered does not mean that the previous verdicts are being<br />

questioned. These judgments merely confirm that the conditions<br />

imposed on the convicted person have not been fulfilled, and that,<br />

therefore, the consideration of criminal liability must be resumed,<br />

involving either an order to carry out a sentence or the revocation of<br />

parole.<br />

With regard to judgments that involve the application of penal sanctions<br />

of a conditional nature (conditional suspension of sentence, parole,<br />

quashing of proceedings), the PCPC and PCC deal with the principle of<br />

ne bis in idem in a relative way. This is evident by the fact that if certain<br />

new circumstances come to light, it is possible to alter the sentence<br />

resulting from this type of judgment. If new circumstances envisaged in<br />

the act come to light during the period of probation, it is permissible to<br />

impose a suspended sentence, and revoke parole and resume the<br />

proceedings that were suspended conditionally. This does not affect the<br />

legally binding nature of this type of verdict and stems directly from the<br />

provisions of law. For instance, art. 70 § 1 PCC states that the period of<br />

probation commences as of the moment the verdict assumes the force of<br />

law. 53<br />

7. Another exception to the ne bis in idem principle in Polish criminal<br />

proceedings occurs when a verdict is issued abroad. Art. 109 PCC<br />

provides that Polish criminal legislation applies to Polish citizens who<br />

have committed offences abroad. According, however, to art. 110 § 1<br />

PCC, Polish criminal legislation applies to foreigners who, while<br />

abroad, have committed offences directed against the interests of the<br />

Republic of Poland, Polish citizens, Polish natural persons or legal<br />

entities, as well as to foreigners who have committed acts of terrorism.<br />

In turn, art. 110 § 2 PCC provides that Polish criminal legislation<br />

53<br />

See Z. Doda: Rewizja nadzwyczajna w polskim procesie karnym, Warszawa<br />

1972, p. 103.<br />

145<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

applies to offences committed by foreigners abroad, other than those<br />

referred to in art. 110 § 1 PCC, if under Polish criminal legislation the<br />

offence carried a sentence of greater than 2 years’ imprisonment and the<br />

perpetrator were on the territory of the Republic of Poland and no<br />

extradition order were issued.<br />

Until recently, the principle of prosecuting Polish citizens for all<br />

offences they committed while abroad has been approved by the Polish<br />

courts and by Polish legal commentators. But nowadays, many<br />

arguments are being raised against the idea of prosecuting and<br />

punishing Polish citizens twice for offences they committed abroad. In<br />

particular, it is claimed that such double prosecution is a violation of the<br />

ne bis in idem principle. The following arguments are also cited: the<br />

high costs of such proceedings are not commensurate with their results;<br />

the fact that an offence committed abroad does not harm the legal<br />

interests of the Polish state and its citizens; and the general world trend<br />

of abandoning the principle of legalism in favour of the principle of<br />

opportunism.<br />

The ne bis in idem crimen iudicetur principle, universally accepted in<br />

developed legal systems, applies to offences committed on the territory<br />

of Poland. In relation to offences committed by Polish citizens outside<br />

the territory of Poland, this principle is not absolutely binding. Polish<br />

law permits dual proceedings for the same offence vis-à-vis the same<br />

person (art. 111 and 114 PCC). 54<br />

Such a principle of liability raises serious concerns. It is stressed that<br />

each offence committed by a Polish citizen should be the subject of only<br />

one lawfully concluded court hearing. The principle of legalism,<br />

however, imposes on the prosecutor a duty to re-open investigative<br />

proceedings; and on the court, the duty to hold a second trial in a<br />

situation where an offence committed by a Polish citizen abroad had<br />

already been tried abroad. There are doubts as to the rationality of such<br />

54<br />

W. Groszyk: Czy demokratyczne państwo stać na zasadę legalizmu,<br />

Rzeczpospolita of 12 September 2001. See also P. Sucholiński, Jeśli ukarać<br />

Polaka za granicą – to jak ?, text available on the website: Praca i nauka za<br />

granicą, www.pracainauka.pl/szuk2.php?types.<br />

146<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

a principle of dual criminal liability. The only explanation for such a<br />

regulation is the desire of the state to exercise control over offences<br />

committed by its own citizens whilst abroad. It has no justification in<br />

the generally accepted sense of justice. After all, an offence committed<br />

abroad breaches neither the interests of the Polish state as such, nor the<br />

interests of that state’s individual citizens. Instead, it harms the legal<br />

order of the country in which it was committed and the interests of its<br />

citizens. If a foreign state decides that its legal order has been seriously<br />

damaged, it will certainly decide to punish the offender. Whether or not<br />

to punish a Polish citizen (application of the principle of opportunism)<br />

is a decision best left to the appropriate authorities of the foreign state. 55<br />

People have also correctly observed that now that Poland is a member<br />

of the European Union, there is no reason for the state to continue to<br />

enjoy the “right” to try its own citizens. M. Płachta has demanded the<br />

practical realisation of the principle of aut dedere, aut poenam, i.e.,<br />

either issue a sentence, or carry it out. The realisation of this principle<br />

means the need to respect foreign court verdicts and observe the<br />

principle of ne bis in idem. 56<br />

According to art. 111 § 1 PCC, one of the conditions for liability for an<br />

offence committed abroad is that the deed also be considered an offence<br />

under the legislation of the place where it was committed. If there are<br />

differences between Polish legislation and the local legislation, the<br />

Polish court, when applying the Polish legislation, may take these<br />

differences into account, to the benefit of the perpetrator (art. 111 § 2<br />

PCC). The condition envisaged in art. 111 § 1 PCC does not apply to a<br />

Polish public official who, while serving abroad, has committed an<br />

offence during the course of his service, or to a person who has<br />

committed an offence in a place that is not subject to any state authority<br />

(art. 111 § 3 PCC).<br />

According, however, to art. 114 PCC, a verdict issued abroad is no<br />

55<br />

W. Groszyk: op. cit..<br />

56<br />

M. Płachta: Zasada aut dedere aut judicare w dziedzinie międzynarodowej<br />

wspólpracy w sprawach karnych, Palestra 2000, no. 7-8, p. 34-43.<br />

147<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

obstacle to the initiation or continuation of criminal proceedings for the<br />

same offence before a Polish court. (art. 114 § 1 PCC). With regard,<br />

therefore, to sentences issued by foreign courts, res judicata does not<br />

apply. When imposing a sentence, however, a Polish court will consider<br />

any actual periods of detention spent abroad and the punishment handed<br />

down there, taking into account the differences between these<br />

punishments (art. 114 § 2 PCC). The provision contained art. 114 § 2<br />

PCC, prevents the perpetrator from being punished twice. This rule not<br />

only permits, but also obliges, Polish courts to take into account during<br />

sentencing any sentence that has already been served abroad and any<br />

period of detention already spent there.<br />

Art. 114 § 3 PCC provides the following three exceptions to the rule<br />

whereby the verdict of a foreign court does not make a deed, to which<br />

Polish criminal legislation applies, a case of res judicata: 57<br />

1) where the sentence that was passed abroad has been<br />

accepted for implementation in the territory of the<br />

Republic of Poland 58 , and also where the sentence that<br />

was passed abroad concerns an offence in relation to<br />

which the case was transferred 59 abroad, or the<br />

57<br />

M. Kalitowski, Z. Sienkiewicz, J. Szumski, L. Tyszkiewicz, A. Wąsek: Kodeks<br />

karny. Komentarz, vol. II, Gdańsk 2001, p. 357.<br />

58<br />

See Konwencja o przekazywaniu osób skazanych na karę pozbawienia<br />

wolności w celu odbycia kary w państwie, którego są obywatelami, sprządzona w<br />

Berlinie dnia 19 maja 1978 r., Dziennik Ustaw 1980 no. 8, item 21; Konwencja o<br />

przekazywaniu osób skazanych, sprządzona w Strasburgu dnia 21 marca 1983 r.,<br />

Dziennik Ustaw 1995 no. 51, item 279; Protokół dodatkowy do konwencji o<br />

przekazywaniu osób skazanych, sprządzony w Strasburgu dnia <strong>18</strong> grudnia 1997<br />

r., Dziennik Ustaw 2000 no. 43, item 490; M. Płachta: Przekazywanie skazanych<br />

pomiędzy państwami w celu wykonania kary, Prokuratura i Prawo 1997 no.3, p.<br />

21-33.<br />

59<br />

See F. Rafałowski: Ekstradycja a przejęcie ścigania, Problemy<br />

Praworządności 1973, no. 10, p. 12; L. Gardocki: Przejęcie (przekazanie)<br />

ścigania, Studia Prawnicze 1977, no. 53, p. <strong>18</strong>5 et seq.; J. Zientek: Przekazanie i<br />

przejęcie ścigania a stadium procesu, Prokuratura i Prawo 1997, no. 3, p. 34; E.<br />

Janczur: Przejęcie i przekazanie ścigania karnego, Prokuratura i Prawo 1999,<br />

148<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

perpetrator was extradited from the territory of the<br />

Republic of Poland, 60<br />

2) to judgments of international criminal tribunals acting on<br />

the basis of international law binding the Republic of<br />

Poland,<br />

3) to foreign court judgments, where this has been provided<br />

for under an international agreement to which the<br />

Republic of Poland is party.<br />

8. According to art. 597 PCPC, if, when extraditing an offender to<br />

Poland, the foreign country stipulates that the sentences imposed on him<br />

must be carried out only for the offences for which extradition was<br />

granted, the adjudicating court may, if necessary, revise the verdict in<br />

such a way that sentence will be carried out only for those offences for<br />

which the perpetrator was extradited. Thus, art. 597 PCPC is yet another<br />

exception to the substantive force of law.<br />

9. Art. 17 § 1 sub. 7 PCPC, which prohibits the initiation of fresh<br />

criminal proceedings if criminal proceedings vis-à-vis the same deed by<br />

the same person have already been concluded, is not an obstacle to the<br />

initiation of supplementary proceedings, provided that this is legally<br />

permissible.<br />

Supplementary proceedings occur when, after the end of a trial, separate<br />

no. 5, p. 61.<br />

60<br />

See: Europejska konwencja o ekstradycji sporządzona w Paryżu dnia 13<br />

grudnia 1957 r., Protokół dodatkowy do powyższej konwencji sporządzony w<br />

Strasburgu dnia 15 października 1975 r., i Drugi protokół dodatkowy do<br />

powyższej konwencji sporządzony s Strasburgu dnia 17 marca 1978 r., Dziennik<br />

Ustaw 1994, no. 70, item 307; M. Lipczyńska, A. Kordzik, Z. Kegel, Z. Świda-<br />

Łagiewska: Polski proces karny, Warszawa - Wrocław 1975, p. 69; L. Gradocki:<br />

Podwójna przestępczość czynu zabronionego w prawie ekstradycyjnym [w:]<br />

Problemy nauk penalnych. Prace ofiarowane Profesor Oktawii Górniok, L.<br />

Tyszkiewicz ed., Katowice 1996, p. 69-70.<br />

149<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

proceedings are held in order to resolve an issue that was not resolved<br />

during the original proceedings, whether through oversight or through<br />

the emergence of certain circumstances after the sentence has been<br />

passed. It is never the intention of supplementary proceedings to<br />

invalidate the binding force of the original verdict. Some supplementary<br />

proceedings can only be held after the lawful conclusion of the previous<br />

proceedings.<br />

Supplementary proceedings can cover the following matters: forfeiture<br />

of property; the counting of custody or detention towards a prison<br />

sentence; preventative measures involving the suspension of an accused<br />

person from his official duties or from exercising his profession, a ban<br />

on specific activity or on driving certain types of vehicle; and matters<br />

involving additional material evidence (art. 420 § 1 PCPC). 61 In other<br />

cases, supplementary proceedings or changes made to the verdicts of<br />

lawfully concluded proceedings are permissible only through cassation<br />

or through reopening proceedings. A supplementary verdict is issued in<br />

a case involving the same deed, committed by the same person vis-à-vis<br />

whom the original proceedings have already been concluded. In the<br />

narrow sense of idem, i.e., that it applies only to questions regarding the<br />

legal liability of the accused, the issuing of such supplementary verdicts<br />

is not an exception to the ne bis in idem principle. 62 The ne bis in idem<br />

prohibition concerns not only an accused person’s responsibility for the<br />

deed he has committed, but also other decisions connected with his<br />

criminal responsibility, e.g., the counting of custody towards a sentence.<br />

In this sense, supplementary proceedings are an exception to the ne bis<br />

in idem prohibition.<br />

10. The next exception is connected with art. 126 PCPC, which states<br />

that if a final deadline has not been met for reasons beyond a party’s<br />

control, the party may, within 7 days of the date on which it has notice<br />

of the above reasons, apply for a new deadline, at the same time<br />

performing the action that should have been performed by the original<br />

deadline. The decision to set the new deadline is taken by the authority<br />

for whom the action was to have been performed. Any refusal to fix the<br />

61<br />

See: M. Cieślak: op. cit., p. 72; W. Daszkiewicz: op. cit., p. 141.<br />

62<br />

P. Hofmański, E. Sadzik, K. Zgryzek: op. cit., p. 131.<br />

150<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

new deadline may be appealed. Thus, the status of the res iudicata is no<br />

obstacle to the extension of the deadline.<br />

11. According to art. 105 § 1 PCPC, evident typographical errors and<br />

mistakes in accounting or in the calculation of time periods in a verdict<br />

or order may be corrected at any time. 63 The correction is made by the<br />

authority that made the mistake. If proceedings are taking place before<br />

an appeal body, that body may correct the verdict of the first instance<br />

body ex officio (art. 105 § 2 PCPC). The correction of a verdict or of a<br />

statement of reasons thereto is made by way of a decision, and a<br />

correction to decrees is made by way of a decree. Though often a mere<br />

formality, such action constitutes interference with a verdict that marks<br />

the conclusion of proceedings, and is an exception to the ne bis in idem<br />

prohibition.<br />

12. A decision on the granting of amnesty should also be regarded an<br />

exception to the ne bis in idem prohibition because it involves the<br />

reopening of proceedings in the same case and against the same person<br />

(art. 560 et seq. PCPC). There are, however, serious doubts as to<br />

whether idem exists fully in such a case, because circumstances that<br />

change with the passing of time, and especially the actual carrying out<br />

of a sentence, create new factors that may be considered as affecting the<br />

substantive basis of an indictment, and the subject of the proceedings. 64<br />

The substantive basis for a pardon is set forth in art. 139 of the Polish<br />

Constitution, which states that the President of the Republic of Poland<br />

has the power to grant pardons. For a pardon to be granted there must<br />

have been a verdict that has the force of law. A pardon is granted by a<br />

body of executive authority, whose decision changes the verdict of the<br />

judicial body, which was reached on the basis of binding principles of<br />

law, despite, the absence of a statutory basis on which to question the<br />

63 M. Cieślak: op. cit., p. 371-372.<br />

64 Ibidem, p. 375.<br />

151<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

correctness of that verdict 65<br />

Neither the Constitution nor any other legal instrument regulates the<br />

actions of the President when considering motions or settling issues ex<br />

officio. The President is not bound by any formal restrictions. 66 The<br />

scope of a pardon remains at his discretion. A sentence may be repealed<br />

in full, or it may be commuted. The carrying out of a sentence already<br />

handed down, or remaining to be carried out may also be suspended. 67<br />

A pardon may not be identified with legal remedies, for it does not alter<br />

the convicted person’s guilt or the legal qualification of his offence. The<br />

main purpose of a pardon is to correct a lawful verdict in that part of it<br />

that concerns the sentence and the remedies at law. 68<br />

13. The purpose of an amnesty is to alleviate or eliminate the effects of<br />

a lawful sentence, by altering it. Thus, an amnesty is another exception<br />

to the ne bis in idem prohibition.<br />

Ne bis in idem applies when a verdict is issued after a case has been<br />

considered on the basis of the regulations governing an amnesty. In such<br />

a case, apart from extraordinary remedies at law, the reopening of<br />

proceedings is prohibited, even if the court mistakenly failed to apply<br />

the regulations that govern an amnesty.<br />

14. The Act of 23 February 1991, on the Invalidity of Judicial Decisions<br />

in Respect of Persons Repressed for Activities Aiding the Independence<br />

65<br />

J. Grajewski: Przebieg procesu karnego, Warszawa 2001, p. 346.<br />

66<br />

E. Samborski: Zarys metodyki pracy sędziego w sprawach karnych, Warszawa<br />

2002, p.. 460-461.<br />

67<br />

J. Grajewski: op. cit., p. 346, 349. See also A. Murzynowski: Ułaskawienie w<br />

Polsce Ludowej, Warszawa 1965, p. 163; T. Grzegorczyk: Kodeks postępowania<br />

karnego. Komentarz, Zakamycze 1998, p. 1303; A. Bulsiewicz, M. Jeż-<br />

Ludwichowska, D. Kala, D. Osowska: Przebieg postępowania karnego, Toruń<br />

1999, p. 279.<br />

68<br />

A. Bulsiewicz, M. Jeż-Ludwichowska, D. Kala, D. Osowska: op. cit., p.. 280.<br />

152<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

of the Polish Nation, is in force in Poland. 69 It contains regulations on<br />

proceedings to annul verdicts and to award eligible persons with<br />

compensation for the harm they suffered as a result of a sentence that<br />

has been declared null and void. In the matters covered by this Act, the<br />

legislator has restored the institution of the invalidity of penal verdicts<br />

ex lege, something that was absent from the 1969 Polish Code of<br />

Criminal procedure. Verdicts are void ex tunc, and the role of the<br />

criminal court is merely to state that they are void. 70 All verdicts issued<br />

by Polish law enforcement bodies and judicial authorities, or by nonjudicial<br />

bodies, during the period between the commencement of their<br />

activities on the Polish territory as of 1 January 1944 to 31 December<br />

1956, have been rendered void, if the deed for which they were issued<br />

was connected with activity furthering the existence of an independent<br />

Polish State, or if the verdict was issued on account of such activity or<br />

on account of resistance to the collectivisation of farms, and also if the<br />

deed was committed in order to save oneself and others from repression<br />

for conducting such activity (art. 1 sub. 1 and 2 of this law). Also<br />

considered void are verdicts issued after 31 December 1956, if they<br />

pertained to deeds or actions that occurred during the period 1 January<br />

1944 to 31 December 1956 (art. 1 sub. 4 of the act). The same applies to<br />

verdicts issued by the Polish Armed Forces in the USSR, which were<br />

not under the authority of the Government of Poland, regardless of the<br />

date and place of their issue (art. 14 of the act). 71<br />

69<br />

Dziennik Ustaw 1991 no. 34, item 149, as amended.<br />

70<br />

A. Bulsiewicz, M. Jeż-Ludwichowska, D. Kala, D. Osowska: op. cit., p. 303-<br />

304. See also A. Czarnota, P. Hofmański: Prawo, historia i sprawiedliwość (in:)<br />

Aktualne problemy prawa karnego i kryminologii, Białystok 1998, p. 142, 147.<br />

71<br />

See also the Supreme Court resolution of 22 September 1994, I KZP 22/94,<br />

OSNKW 1994, no. 9-10, item 59; B. Bladowski: Glosa do uchwały Sądu<br />

Najwyższego z dnia 22 września 1994 r., I KZP 22/94, Orzecznictwo Sądów<br />

Polskich 1995, no. 7-8, item 169; S. Zabłocki: Przegląd orzecznictwa Sądu<br />

Najwyższego i Sądów Apelacyjnych do ustawy z 23 lutego 1991 r. o uznaniu za<br />

nieważne orzeczeń wydanych wobec osób represjonowanych za działalność na<br />

recz niepodległego bytu Państwa Polskiego (Dz. U. Nr 34, poz. 149 z późn. zm.),<br />

Palestra 1995, no. 11-12, p. 197; T. Grzegorczyk, J. Tylman: Polskie<br />

postępowanie karne, Warszawa <strong>2005</strong>, p. 869.<br />

153<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

According to art. 4 of this Act, determination that a verdict was invalid<br />

is not prevented by the carrying out of the sentence, the granting of<br />

amnesty, removal of the sentence from the records, a pardon, limitation,<br />

compensation, the death of the oppressed person to whom the verdict<br />

applied, a suspension or quashing of proceedings for reasons other than<br />

the fact that the deed was not committed, or if the deed does not bear the<br />

hallmarks of a crime, or if according to law it is held that the perpetrator<br />

did not commit the crime. In these last three cases, the court will not<br />

consider a motion to determine the invalidity of the verdict if the<br />

convicted person was acquitted for these reasons or if the proceedings<br />

were discontinued (art. 7 sub. 1 of the law). Thus, the seriousness of the<br />

res iudicata is no obstacle to the issuing of a decision in proceedings to<br />

declare a verdict void. The institution of the invalidity of verdicts,<br />

envisaged in the Act on the Invalidity of Judicial Decisions in Respect<br />

of Persons Repressed for Activities Aiding the Independence of the<br />

Polish Nation, constitutes an exception to the ne bis in idem principle.<br />

This raises no doubts where the verdict was issued by a court, but<br />

certain doubts may arise where the verdict was issued by a non-judicial<br />

authority. One should, however, realise that although these state<br />

authorities were neither law-enforcement bodies nor judicial authorities,<br />

they were nevertheless empowered under the regulations then in force to<br />

pass judgment on matters that were considered to be offences. If you<br />

accept that the ne bis in idem principle is meant to protect a particular<br />

person from the re-opening of proceedings in the same case against him,<br />

then the re-opening of proceedings that were not considered by a court<br />

of law but by another, non-judicial body, must therefore, be considered<br />

a departure from this principle. In this respect, the type of body that<br />

issued judgments in matters that were considered to be offences, is of<br />

secondary importance. The most important thing is that proceedings will<br />

be re-opened in the same case and against the same person.<br />

A court determines that a verdict is void if it determines the existence of<br />

the prerequisites set forth in art. 1 and 14 of the 1991 act. The<br />

determination of the invalidity of a verdict is deemed to be synonymous<br />

with the acquittal of the convicted person (art. 2 sub. 1 sentence two of<br />

154<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

the act). 72 Although the proceedings to determine the invalidity of a<br />

verdict is a departure from the ne bis in idem prohibition, this departure<br />

is, therefore, in the interests of the person who was convicted earlier.<br />

The ne bis in idem prohibition is meant to protect a person whose case<br />

has already been lawfully judged, from the re-opening of proceedings.<br />

This ban applies to cases where the accused was found innocent, as well<br />

as cases where he was found guilty. In the case of proceedings taking<br />

place on the basis of the provisions of the Act on the Invalidity of<br />

Judicial Decisions in Respect of Persons Repressed for Activities<br />

Aiding the Independence of the Polish Nation, such proceedings are<br />

initiated at the request of the person concerned, in other words, he alone<br />

decides whether proceedings in his case are to re-opened, the purpose of<br />

which is to verify judgments he considers unfair. Although proceedings<br />

to determine the invalidity of a judgment is a departure from the ne bis<br />

in idem prohibition, this exception can, therefore, hardly be considered a<br />

breach of the rights of the person whose case has already been judged.<br />

The opposite is true.<br />

Once a judgment regarding the invalidity of a verdict under the terms of<br />

the Act of 1991 has assumed the force of law, it is not possible to take<br />

any action to acquit the convicted person or annul the proceedings,<br />

whatever the justification for doing so, because the verdict that could be<br />

subjected to court control by way of extraordinary measures at law, will<br />

have ceased to exist. 73<br />

72<br />

Ibidem, p. 871-872.<br />

73<br />

Ibidem, p. 872. See also Supreme Court verdict of 29 March 1994, WO 37/94,<br />

OSNKW 1994, no. 7-8, item 51.<br />

155<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - EXCEPTIONS TO RES JUDICATA AND<br />

THE PROHIBITION OF NE BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL <strong>LAW</strong>


<strong>FREE</strong> WORLD PUBLISHING Inc.<br />

HTTP://WWW.FWPUBLISHING.NET<br />

CALL FOR ARTICLES<br />

Free World Publishing is calling for articles by<br />

Academics, Practitioners and Post-Graduate<br />

Students to be published in its new journals :<br />

<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9877)<br />

WAR & PEACE <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9885)<br />

WORLD HISTORY <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9893)<br />

Articles are welcomed in : English, French, Bosnian,<br />

Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Finnish, German, Greek,<br />

Hungarian, Icelandic, Innuktikut, Italian, Latin,<br />

Polish, Portugese, Romanian, Russian, Serb,<br />

Slovenian as well as Spanish.<br />

<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : pertains all legal subjects,<br />

whether from a national, comparative or<br />

international perspective and including Canon Law,<br />

International Law, Islamic Law or social and<br />

historical perspective of laws' impacts on societies.<br />

WAR & PEACE <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : pertains to all issues<br />

ranging from conflict prevention to nation-building;<br />

including political sciences and diplomacy, nationbuilding,<br />

defense policies, strategies, operations,<br />

tactics, logistics, intelligence, peacekeeping,<br />

peacemaking, leadership, psychology of combat,<br />

technological developments and counter-terrorism;<br />

and finally Military Historical studies, relating to the<br />

conduct of operations, their causes and effects, the<br />

avoidance of conflict, leadership and personalities.<br />

WORLD HISTORY <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : pertains to the whole<br />

spectrum of human development, whether from<br />

local, regional or global perspectives, including<br />

history from all periods, paleontology, anthropology,<br />

linguistics, letters and languages, arts as well as<br />

sociological perspectives.<br />

For details, please consult the respective page of<br />

each journal and its submissions guidelines from<br />

http://www.FWPublishing.net or contact the editorin-chief<br />

at FWP@FWPublishing.net .<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Louis-Philippe F. Rouillard<br />

Editor-in-Chief, Free World Publishing Inc.<br />

APPEL POUR ARTICLES<br />

Free World Publishing accepte les articles<br />

d’académiciens, praticiens et d’étudiants supérieurs<br />

à être publier dans ses nouveaux journeaux :<br />

<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9877)<br />

WAR & PEACE <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9885)<br />

WORLD HISTORY <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - (ISSN 1712-9893)<br />

Les articles sont bienvenus en : Français, Anglais,<br />

Allemand, Bosniaque, Bulgare, Croate, Espagnol,<br />

Finlandais, Grecque, Hongrois, Islandais, Innuktikut,<br />

Italien, Latin, Polonais, Portugais, Roumain, Russe,<br />

Serbe, Slovène et Tchèque.<br />

<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : porte sur tous les sujets<br />

juridiques de perspectives nationale, comparative ou<br />

internationale, incluant les droits canonique,<br />

international, islamique, et les perspectives sociales<br />

et historiques de l’impact des lois sur les sociétés.<br />

WAR & PEACE <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : porte sur le spectre de la<br />

prévention de conflit jusqu’à la reconstruction<br />

d’État, incluant : sciences politiques, diplomacie,<br />

politique de défense, stratégie, operation, tactiques,<br />

logistique, renseignement, maintien et imposition de<br />

la paix, art du commandement, psychologie du<br />

combat, avancées technologiques et contreterrorisme,<br />

l’histoire militaire étudiant la conduite<br />

des opérations, l’évitement des conflits, leurs<br />

causes et effets, les commandants et personalités.<br />

WORLD HISTORY <strong>JOURNAL</strong> : porte sur l’ensemble<br />

du spectre du développement humain, d’une<br />

perspective locale, régionale ou globale, incluant :<br />

histoire de toutes les périodes, paleontologie,<br />

anthropologie, linguistiques, lettres et langages, les<br />

arts de même que les perspectives sociologiques.<br />

Pour les détails, consulter la page respective de<br />

chaque journal et ses critères de soumissions de<br />

http://www.FWPublishing.net ou contactez l’éditeur-<br />

chef à FWP@FWPublishing.net .<br />

Sincèrement,<br />

Louis-Philippe F. Rouillard<br />

Éditeur-chef, Free World Publishing Inc.


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

NE BIS IN IDEM IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE<br />

ACT IN THE UNITED KINGDOM<br />

BY DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI<br />

1. In Anglo-Saxon legal theory, the ne bis in idem prohibition is<br />

described as a “rule against double jeopardy”. This prohibition is as old<br />

as the common law itself. In 12 th Century England, during the<br />

controversy between Henry II and Archbishop Thomas Becket over<br />

Church independence, this principle was exploited in the defence of the<br />

independence of ecclesiastical courts. An official accused of murder<br />

was tried by an ecclesiastical court. In order to exclude the jurisdiction<br />

of the Royal court, the principle of ne bis in idipsum, then in force in<br />

ecclesiastical courts, was invoked: “no one may be punished twice for<br />

the same offence”. 1 During a later period, a principle was observed in<br />

practice according to which it was impermissible to conduct several<br />

proceedings in the same case. In 1660, the Court of the King’s Bench in<br />

England forbade the conduct of two proceedings in the same case. 2<br />

In Ireland the double jeopardy concept is often recognisable in the<br />

language of anglicised Norman French (i. e. autrefois acquit and<br />

convict) whereas in most of the Code nations is it expressed in the Latin<br />

maxim of non bis in idem. 3<br />

The principle of double jeopardy is to be found in the Fifth Amendment<br />

of the United States Constitution and provides that no person shall “be<br />

subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb”.<br />

The Fifth Amendment has been held to consist of three separate<br />

guarantees, namely: autrefois acquit, autrefois convict and protection<br />

against multiple punishment for the same offence. In addition to the<br />

United States, the German, Canadian, Indian and South African<br />

1<br />

M. L. Friedland: Double Jeopardy, Oxford 1969, p 5.<br />

2<br />

P. A. McDermott: Res Judicata and Double Jeopardy, Butterworths 1999, p<br />

200.<br />

3<br />

P. A. McDermott: op. cit., p 201.<br />

157<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - NE BIS IN IDEM IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT<br />

IN THE UNITED KINGDOM


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

constitutions also embody this principle. Article 35(3)(m) of the<br />

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa provides that a person is<br />

“not to be tried for an offence in respect of an act or omission for which<br />

that person has previously been either acquitted or convicted”. 4<br />

2. The principle of ne bis in idem guarantees the accused that he will not<br />

be held criminally responsible for an act which has already been<br />

adjudged. This is a right of the perpetrator of a punishable act, who can<br />

then demand that proceedings not be instituted against him, or where<br />

proceedings have already commenced, that they be discontinued, if<br />

criminal proceedings against him in the same case have already<br />

terminated with a valid judgement.<br />

It is generally accepted that the principle of ne bis in idem serves<br />

foremost to protect those who have been judged, whether convicted or<br />

acquitted. This principle also means that proceedings may not be<br />

conducted with the aim of acquittal or mitigating the penalty for a<br />

person who has received a legally valid sentence. 5 However, it should<br />

be noted that the ne bis in idem prohibition may in certain circumstances<br />

prevent the accused from demonstrating his innocence. 6 Therefore, one<br />

should note that under modern criminal procedures the binding principle<br />

of presumption of innocence stands until the court pronounces the<br />

accused guilty in a legally valid judgment. The accused is presumed<br />

innocent until his guilt is determined in a legally valid verdict, which<br />

puts into effect the ne bis in idem prohibition. Errors committed by the<br />

court that lead to the sentencing of an innocent person should not be<br />

rectified by infringing this principle. Furthermore, legal systems have<br />

measures allowing even those verdicts which are legally valid to be<br />

overturned.<br />

4 P. A. McDermott: op. cit., pp 198, 201.<br />

5 G. Grünwald: Die materielle Rechtskraft im Strafverfahren der Bundesrepublik<br />

Deutschland (in:) H. H. Jescheck (red.): Deutsche strafrechtliche Landesreferate<br />

zum IX Internationallen Kongreβ für Rechtsvergleichung, Teheran 1974, Berlin-<br />

New York 1974, p 97.<br />

6 M. L. Friedland: op. cit., p 4.<br />

158<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - NE BIS IN IDEM IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT<br />

IN THE UNITED KINGDOM


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

3. In the United Kingdom, as a consequence of criticism of the<br />

prevailing solutions in the area of double jeopardy, the relevant<br />

provisions of the Criminal Justice Act were fundamentally amended.<br />

The critics of the previous provisions indicated that it was necessary to<br />

ensure greater rights for the victims of crime and to provide the<br />

possibility for the prosecutor to reopen proceedings, under specific<br />

conditions, in case of serious offences. A specific circumstance that<br />

would allow the reopening of proceedings is the disclosure of new,<br />

important evidence after the accused has been acquitted of a serious<br />

offence. 7<br />

The new Criminal Justice Act came into force on 20 November 2003.<br />

Of significance from the point of view of double jeopardy are the<br />

provisions of Part 10 of the Criminal Justice Act (the “CJA”) entitled<br />

Retrial for Serious Offences. Art. 75 of the CJA specifies cases that can<br />

be the subject to reopened proceedings. According to Art. 75 (1) CJA:<br />

“This Part applies where a person has been acquitted of a qualifying<br />

offence in proceedings-<br />

(a) on indictment in England and Wales,<br />

(b) on appeal against a conviction, verdict or finding in proceedings<br />

on indictment in England and Wales, or<br />

(c) on appeal from a decision on such an appeal.”<br />

According to Art. 75 (2) CJA, “A person acquitted of an offence in<br />

proceedings mentioned in Subsection (1) is treated for the purposes of<br />

that Subsection as also acquitted of any qualifying offence of which he<br />

could have been convicted in the proceedings because of the firstmentioned<br />

offence being charged in the indictment, except an offence-<br />

(a) of which he has been convicted,<br />

(b) of which he has been found not guilty by reason of insanity, or<br />

(c) in respect of which, in proceedings where he has been found<br />

to be under a disability (as defined by Section 4 of the Criminal<br />

Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964 (c. 84)), a finding has been<br />

7<br />

The Criminal Justice Bill: Double jeopardy and prosecution appeals. Bill 8 of<br />

2002-3, Home Affair Section, House of Commons Library, Research Paper<br />

02/74, p6, pp 19-42.<br />

159<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - NE BIS IN IDEM IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT<br />

IN THE UNITED KINGDOM


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

made that he committed the act or made the omission charged<br />

against him.”<br />

According to Art. 75 (4) CJA, “This Part also applies where a person<br />

has been acquitted, in proceedings elsewhere than in the United<br />

Kingdom, of an offence under the law of the place where the<br />

proceedings were held, if the commission of the offence as alleged<br />

would have amounted to or included the commission (in the United<br />

Kingdom or elsewhere) of a qualifying offence”. “Conduct punishable<br />

under the law in force elsewhere than in the United Kingdom is an<br />

offence under that law for the purposes of Subsection (4), however it is<br />

described in that law” (Art. 75 (5) CJA).<br />

Part 10 CJA applies whether the acquittal happened before or after the<br />

passing of this Act (Art. 75 (6) CJA). In Part 10 CJA, a "qualifying<br />

offence" means an offence listed in Part 1 of Schedule 5 (Art. 75 (8)<br />

CJA). Schedule 5 lists 29 offences: murder, attempted murder, soliciting<br />

murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, rape, attempted rape, intercourse<br />

with a girl under thirteen, incest by a man with a girl under thirteen,<br />

assault by penetration, rape of a child under thirteen, attempted rape of a<br />

child under thirteen, assault of a child under thirteen by penetration,<br />

causing a child under thirteen to engage in sexual activity, sexual<br />

activity with a person with a mental disorder impeding choice, causing a<br />

person with a mental disorder impeding choice to engage in sexual<br />

activity, unlawful importation of Class A drug, unlawful exportation of<br />

Class A drug, fraudulent evasion in respect of Class A drug, producing<br />

or being concerned in production of Class A drug, arson endangering<br />

life, causing explosion likely to endanger life or property, intent or<br />

conspiracy to cause explosion likely to endanger life or property,<br />

genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, grave breaches of<br />

the Geneva Conventions, directing terrorist organization, hostagetaking,<br />

conspiracy.<br />

(a) To reopen proceedings, an application must be filed with the<br />

Court of Appeal. ”A prosecutor may apply to the Court of<br />

Appeal for an order- quashing a person's acquittal in<br />

proceedings within Section 75(1), and<br />

160<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - NE BIS IN IDEM IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT<br />

IN THE UNITED KINGDOM


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

(b) ordering him to be retried for the qualifying offence” (Art. 76<br />

(1) CJA).<br />

“A prosecutor may apply to the Court of Appeal, in the case of a person<br />

acquitted elsewhere than in the United Kingdom, for-<br />

(a) a determination whether the acquittal is a bar to the person<br />

being tried in England and Wales for the qualifying offence,<br />

and<br />

(b) if it is, an order that the acquittal is not to be a bar” (Art. 76 (2)<br />

CJA).<br />

“A prosecutor may make an application under Subsection (1) or (2) only<br />

with the written consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions” (Art. 76<br />

(3) CJA).<br />

“The Director of Public Prosecutions may give his consent only if<br />

satisfied that-<br />

(a) there is evidence as respects which the requirements of Section<br />

78 appear to be met,<br />

(b) it is in the public interest for the application to proceed, and<br />

(c) any trial pursuant to an order on the application would not be<br />

inconsistent with obligations of the United Kingdom under<br />

Article 31 or 34 of the Treaty on European Union relating to the<br />

principle of ne bis in idem” (Art. 76 (4) CJA).<br />

“On an application under Section 76(1), the Court of Appeal-<br />

(a) if satisfied that the requirements of Sections 78 and 79 are met,<br />

must make the order applied for;<br />

(b) otherwise, must dismiss the application” (Art. 77 (1) CJA).<br />

“Where the Court of Appeal determines that the acquittal is a bar to the<br />

person being tried for the qualifying offence, the court-<br />

(a) if satisfied that the requirements of Sections 78 and 79 are met,<br />

must make the order applied for;<br />

(b) otherwise, must make a declaration to the effect that the<br />

acquittal is a bar to the person being tried for the offence” (Art.<br />

77 (3) CJA).<br />

161<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - NE BIS IN IDEM IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT<br />

IN THE UNITED KINGDOM


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Provisions of Sections 78 and 79 CJA concern new and compelling<br />

evidence and interests of justice. Evidence is new if it was not adduced<br />

in the proceedings in which the person was acquitted (nor, if those were<br />

appeal proceedings, in earlier proceedings to which the appeal related)<br />

(Art. 78 (2) CJA).<br />

“Evidence is compelling if-<br />

(a) it is reliable,<br />

(b) it is substantial, and<br />

(c) in the context of the outstanding issues, it appears highly<br />

probative of the case against the acquitted person” (Art. 78 (3)<br />

CJA).<br />

The requirements of interests of justice are met if in all the<br />

circumstances it is in the interests of justice for the court to make the<br />

order under Section 77 (Art. 79 (1) CJA).<br />

“That question is to be determined having regard in particular to-<br />

(a) whether existing circumstances make a fair trial unlikely;<br />

(b) for the purposes of that question and otherwise, the length of<br />

time since the qualifying offence was allegedly committed;<br />

(c) whether it is likely that the new evidence would have been<br />

adduced in the earlier proceedings against the acquitted person<br />

but for a failure by an officer or by a prosecutor to act with due<br />

diligence or expedition;<br />

(d) whether, since those proceedings or, if later, since the<br />

commencement of this Part, any officer or prosecutor has failed<br />

to act with due diligence or expedition” (Art. 79 (2) CJA).<br />

162<br />

DR MACIEJ ROGALSKI - NE BIS IN IDEM IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT<br />

IN THE UNITED KINGDOM


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG<br />

NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR ٭<br />

I. Allgemeines<br />

Das geltende türkische Vormundschaftsrecht sieht wie schweizerisches<br />

Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB) und Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB) vier Arten<br />

vormundschaftlicher Institutionen vor: Vormund-, Beistand-,<br />

Beiratschaft und fürsorgerische Freiheitsentziehung (FFE) 1 .<br />

In der Türkei sind die neuen Bestimmungen über die fürsorgerische<br />

Freiheitsentziehung (in Art. 432 ff. als neuer, im sechster Abschnitt,<br />

zehnter Titel, dritter Abteilung, zweiter Teil des tZGB) schon am 1.<br />

Januar 2002 in Kraft getreten.<br />

Mit dem neuen türkischen Zivilgesetzbuch (Art. 432–437 tZGB) wurde<br />

die vormundschaftliche fürsorgerische Freiheitsentziehung (FFE) in<br />

aller Ausführlichkeit geregelt. Diese Bestimmungen enthalten die<br />

Voraussetzungen bezüglich der betroffenen Person (der persönliche<br />

Geltungsbereich) und den Einweisungsvoraussetzungen eingeteilt. Die<br />

Einweisungsvoraussetzungen i.e.w. umfassen die einzelnen<br />

Schwächezustände, die Fürsorgebedürftigkeit, die Belastung für die<br />

Umgebung sowie die geeignete Anstalt.<br />

٭<br />

Dozent am Lehrstuhl des Zivilrechts, Juristische Fakultät und Rechtspflege-<br />

Hochschule der Universität Ankara.<br />

1<br />

Spirig, E.: Die allgemeine Ordnung der Vormundschaft, Die fürsorgerische<br />

Freiheitsentziehung Art. 397a– 397f (in: Peter Gauch/Jörg Schmid, Das<br />

Familienrecht, Teilband II 3a), Zürich 1995, Vorbem. N. 25, 10 ff.; Riemer, Hans<br />

M., Grundriss des Vormundschaftsrechts, Zweite, überarbeitete Auflage, Bern<br />

1997, Rdn. 12, 38 ff. und gesondert siehe für Spezialliteraturverzeichnis:<br />

Riemer,15 ff.; Spirig, S. XIII ff.<br />

163<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Im türkischen Zivilgesetzbuch werden zivilrechtliche und<br />

zivilprozessuale spezifische Regeln über die FFE vorgesehen 2 . Art. 432<br />

des türkischen Zivilgesetzbuches regelt die materiellen<br />

Voraussetzungen einer Anstaltseinweisung aus fürsorgerischen Gründen<br />

bei Mündigen und Entmündigten. Das neue türkische Zivilgesetzbuch<br />

enthält aber auch ausführliche Regeln über die FFE für Kinder (Art. 446<br />

tZGB) 3 . Demnach kann ein Kind, der unter Vormundschaft steht, selbst<br />

gerichtliche Beurteilung verlangen (Art. 446 Abs. 3 tZGB). Für die<br />

Kinder, die unter elterlicher Gewalt stehen sind, eine solche<br />

Bestimmung im Gesetz nicht vorgesehen. Man kann aber Art. 446 Abs.<br />

3 auch für die unter elterliche Gewalt stehende Kinder anolog<br />

anwenden. Allerdings muss dieses Kind mindestens 16 Jahre alt sein<br />

(Art. 446 Abs. 3 tZGB), um selbst gerichtliche Beurteilung verlangen zu<br />

können. Auch hier muss für die Einweisung eine Gefährdung des<br />

Kindes vorliegen (vgl. Art. 347 Abs. 1; Art. 432 tZGB). Ferner gelten<br />

sowohl für die Entziehungsgründe und Einweisungsoraussetzungen als<br />

auch verfahrensrechtlichen Sicherheiten gleiche Regelungen wie für<br />

2<br />

für die Ausführliche zu diesen Bestimmungen siehe: Dural, M. / Öğüz, T./<br />

Gümüş, A., Türk Özel Hukuku, C.III, Aile Hukuku, (Das türkische Privatrecht,<br />

Bd. III, Das Familienrecht), İstanbul <strong>2005</strong>, 679 ff. ; Öztan, B., Aile Hukuku, 5.<br />

Bası (Das Familienrecht, fünfte Aufl.), Ankara 2004, 805 ff.; Kılıçoğlu, A.. M.,<br />

Medeni Kanun’umuzun Aile-Miras-Eşya Hukukuna Getirdiği Yenilikler,<br />

Genişletilmiş 2. Bası (Die Neuerungen des neuen türkischen Zivilgesetzbuches<br />

bezüglich Familien-, Erb- und Sachrecht, Zweite, erweiterte Aufl.) Ankara 2004,<br />

160 ff. ; Gümüş, M. A., Kısıtlı ve Kısıtlı Olmayan Ergin Kişilerin Koruma Amaçlı<br />

Özgürlüğünün Kısıtlanması, Yeditepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi I/2,<br />

Cilt:1, Sayı:2 Yıl: <strong>2005</strong>, <strong>18</strong>9–228 (Die fürsorgerische Freiheitsentziehung der<br />

entmündigten- und nichtentmündigten Mündige Personen trZGB 432-437, in:<br />

Zeitschrift der Juristische Fakultät der Yeditepe Universität, I/2, <strong>2005</strong>, S. <strong>18</strong>9-<br />

228); Gençcan, Ömer U., Koruma Amacıyla Kısıtlama Davaları, Adalet Dergisi<br />

Y. 93, Temmuz 2002, 41 vd. (Die Rechtsstreite der fürsorgerischen<br />

Freiheitsentziehung, Zeitschrift der Justiz, J. 93, Juli 2002,. 41–42); Gençcan,<br />

Ömer U., 4721 Sayılı Türk Medeni Kanunu, Bilimsel Açıklama- İçtihatlar-İlgili<br />

Mevzuat, 2. Cilt: Madde 352–1030 (mit der Nummer 4721 des türkischen<br />

Zivilgesetzbuches, Die wissenschaftliche Ausführung- Jurisprudenz- betreffende<br />

Gesetzgebung, Bd. 2, Art. 352-1030), Ankara 2004, <strong>18</strong>41 ff.<br />

3<br />

mit schweizerischem Zivilgesetzbuch vgl.: Art. 405a ZGB<br />

164<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Mündige und Entmündigte 4 .<br />

In den Bestimmungen zur FFE handelt es sich um einen schweren<br />

Eingriff in die persönliche Freiheit und von diesem Standpunkt aus<br />

gesehen gilt die FFE als eine umfassende vormundschaftliche<br />

Maßnahme.<br />

Im türkischen Recht steht FFE auch mit dem Verfassungsrecht in<br />

Verbindung. In dieser Hinsicht impliziert das türkische Grundgesetz<br />

einen wichtigen Artikel (Art. 19 tGG) über die FFE. Nach Art. 19 Abs.<br />

3 kann man sich der individuellen Freiheit entziehen. Der türkische<br />

Grundgesetzesgeber bestimmt in Art.19 Abs. 3 des tGG 5 , dass in<br />

gesetzlichen Ausnahmesituationen die Freiheitsentziehung beschränkt<br />

werden kann. Ohne weiteres gehört FFE zu diesen Ausnahmefällen<br />

auch. Dennoch ist FFE kein Ordnungsinstrument, sondern ein<br />

persönliches fürsorgliches Instrument. Also wird die<br />

4 für ausführliche Erläuterungen zu diesem Thema siehe: Lustenberger, Markus,<br />

Die Fürsorgerische Freiheitsentziehung bei Unmündigen unter elterlicher Gewalt<br />

(Art. 310/314a ZGB), Freiburg 1987.<br />

5<br />

Die türkische Verfassung (Art. 19 Abs. 3 t GG) heißt ganz genau: ‘‘<br />

Niemandem darf seiner Freiheit entzogen werden, es sei denn in den nach Art<br />

und Voraussetzungen durch Gesetz bestimmten Fällen:<br />

Vollstreckung von durch die Gerichte verhängten Freiheitsstrafen und<br />

Sicherungsmaßnahmen, Festnahme oder Verhaftung des Betroffenen aufgrund<br />

einer Gerichtsentscheidung oder einer im Gesetz bestimmten Verpflichtung,<br />

Vollstreckung einer Entscheidung zur Besserung unter Aufsicht oder Vorführung<br />

eines Minderjährigen vor die zuständige Behörde, Vollstreckung einer im<br />

Einklang mit den im Gesetz bestimmten Grundsätzen getroffenen Maßnahme zur<br />

Behandlung, Erziehung oder Besserung eines gemeingefährlichen<br />

Geisteskranken, Rauschgift- oder Alkoholsüchtigen, eines Landstreichers oder<br />

einer Person, welche die Ausbreitung einer Krankheit herbeizuführen geeignet<br />

ist, in einer Anstalt, Festnahme oder Verhaftung einer Person, welche illegal in<br />

das Land einzureisen versucht oder einreist oder gegen die eine Ausweisungsoder<br />

Auslieferungsentscheidung ergangen ist. ’’. Das parallele Bedürfnis zu<br />

diesem Artikel wird mit 4721 N. türkisches Zivilgesetzbuch Art. 432–437<br />

gedeckt. Ebenso für Erläuterungen und Auslegungen siehe : Gençcan, <strong>18</strong>42;<br />

Gümüş, 200f. und 201 Fn. 44<br />

165<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

vormundschaftliche fürsorgliche Freiheitsentziehung gegenüber anderen<br />

grundgesetzlichen freiheitsentziehenden Maßnahmen abgegrenzt 6 .<br />

Besonders schützt man sich die Interessen der betroffenen Personen<br />

dadurch, dass das Gesetz für solche Personen grundsätzlich die<br />

verfahrensrechtlichen Sicherheiten wie umfassende gerichtliche<br />

Beurteilung sicherstellt (zum Beispiel: Art. 434 tZGB<br />

Mitteilungspflichten; Art. 435 tZGB Eine gerichtliche Beurteilung der<br />

Einweisungsentscheidung; Art. 436 tZGB Gewisse verfahrensrechtliche<br />

Minimalanforderungen).<br />

In diesem Aufsatz wird die FFE im Rahmen des Art. 432 des tZGB<br />

behandelt, der die materiellen Voraussetzungen der fürsorgerischen<br />

Freiheitsentziehung regelt.<br />

II. Grundprinzipien über die FFE<br />

A. Das Verhältnismässigkeitsprinzip<br />

FFE beruht im Allgemeinen auf dem Grundsatz der<br />

Verhältnismässigkeit oder Proportionalität. Dieses Prinzip wird von den<br />

sichernden Maßnahmen des Strafrechts abgegrenzt 7 . Es handelt sich bei<br />

einer fürsorgerischen Freiheitsentziehung nicht um eine Strafe. Deshalb<br />

gibt es zwischen den Voraussetzungen beider Arten von Maßnahmen<br />

Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede 8 .<br />

6<br />

gesondert siehe: Schnyder, Bernhard, Vormundschaft und Menschenrechte, in:<br />

ZVW 27/1972, 41 ff. (in: ZVW 28/1973, 3 ff.); Spirig, Rdn. 29 f., 10-11.<br />

7<br />

hierzu ausführlich: Schultz, H., Persönlichkeitsschutz und Freiheitsrechte im<br />

Vormundschaftswesen: Strafrechtliche Aspekte, in: ZVW 43 (1988), 121 ff.;<br />

Bigger, E., Fürsorgliche Freiheitsentziehung (FFE) und Strafrechtliche<br />

Massnahme bei Suchtkranken aus rechtlicher Sicht (Art. 397a ZGB/44 StGB), in:<br />

ZVW 47 (1992), 41 ff. ; Gümüş, 203–204<br />

8<br />

zu diesem Vergleich und Verhältnismässigkeitsprinzip im Vormundschaftsrecht<br />

siehe: Caviezel-Jost, Barbara, Die materiellen Voraussetzungen der<br />

fürsorgerischen Freiheitsentziehung (Art. 397a Abs. 1 und 2 ZGB), 1988, 241 ff.<br />

166<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Im Vormundschaftsrecht ist der Grundsatz der Verhältnismässigkeit<br />

eine wichtige Maßgabe. Dieses Prinzip besteht aus den drei Unterteilen:<br />

Geeignetheit, Erforderlichkeit und Verhältnismässigkeit i.e.S., die<br />

einzeln auf eine konkrete Maßnahme angewendet werden sollen.<br />

Nach diesem Grundsatz muss das Mittel und die Maßnahme zur FFE<br />

dem angestrebten Ziel angepasst sein. Bei Anwendung dieses<br />

Grundsatzes muss man sehr vorsichtig und behutsam sein. Daher muss<br />

ein Eingriff in die persönliche Freiheit weder stärker noch schwächer<br />

sein.<br />

Das Verhältnismässigkeitprinzip kommt bei den gesetzliche<br />

Modalitäten des Vollzugs einer FFE zur Anwendung.<br />

B. Typengebuntheit und Typenfixierung<br />

Im Vormundschaftsrecht wie im Sachenrecht, im ehelichen Güterrecht<br />

und bei den Formen der juristischen Personen besteht ein sog. Numerus<br />

Clausus, also ein beschränkter Zahl-Formen und Typen Grundsatz. In<br />

Anlehnung an den Grundsatz der Typengebundheit regelt man an<br />

Formen und Möglichkeiten vormundschaftliche Maßnahmen. Aber für<br />

Rechts– und Verkehrssicherheit bedarf es auch des Grundsatzes der<br />

Typenfixierung 9 .<br />

Nach diesem Grundprinzip werden im Gesetz FFE–Maßnahmen<br />

umschreiben. Die Maßnahme darf nicht beliebig ausgewählt werden.<br />

Sie ist richtig zu wählen und zu dosieren.<br />

In der Anwendung der Maβnahmen wird man nicht nur die Interessen<br />

der Hilfsbedürftigen, sondern auch diejenigen der Dritten, die mit ihm<br />

und 323 ff.; Schnyder, B., Die Stufenfolge der vormundschaftlichen Massnahmen<br />

und die Verhältnismässigkeit des Eingriffes, in: ZVW 26/1971, 41 ff. (ZBJV<br />

105/1969, 268 ff.); Riemer, s.35 f., N. 6-7 und 159, N. 17; Spirig, 68, Rdn. 257<br />

ff. ; Dural/Öğüz/Gümüş, 691f.<br />

9 Riemer, 36 f., N. 8.<br />

167<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

in Rechtsverkehr treten, berücksichtigen 10 .<br />

C. Der Schutz der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten<br />

Der Zweck des türkischen Vormundschaftsrecht besteht auch darin, die<br />

schwachen und hilfsbedürftigen Personen zu umsorgen und zu<br />

unterstützen. Die FFE als eine zivilrechtliche Möglichkeit und<br />

Massnahme verfolgt das Grundrecht der persönlichen Freiheit und<br />

Sicherheit bestmöglich zu schützen 11 .<br />

Die persönliche Freiheit wird als Grundrecht ausdrücklich durch das<br />

EMRK ( Konvention zum Schutz der Menschenrechte und<br />

Grundfreiheiten ) geschützt 12 . Am <strong>18</strong>. Mai 1954 trat die Türkei dem<br />

EMRK bei 13 . Diese Konvention ist hinsichtlich der Gründe der FFE sehr<br />

bedeutsam auf dem Gebiet der Menschenrechte.<br />

Im Hinblick auf die Verfahrensgarantien der EMRK soll die türkische<br />

vormundschaftsrechtliche Gesetzgebung künftig als gegenwärtige<br />

Regeln vermehrt verbindliche Organisations- und<br />

Verfahrensvorschriften enthalten 14 .<br />

10<br />

Riemer, 37, N. 9-10.<br />

11<br />

Im türkischen Recht besonders für die Verbindung zwischen dem Prinzip des<br />

Schutzes des Persönlichkeitsrechtes und Vormundschaftrechtes siehe : Helvacı,<br />

S., Kişiliğin Korunması ve Vesayet Hukuku, Prof. Dr. Erdoğan Moroğlu’na 65.<br />

Yaş Günü Armağanı, 2. Baskı (Der Schutz der Persönlichkeit und<br />

Vormundschaftsrecht, in: FS 65. Geburtstag für Prof. Dr. Erdoğan MOROĞLU,<br />

zweite Aufl.), Ocak-2001, İstanbul 2001, 863 ff.; Güneş, S., Teori ve Uygulamada<br />

Kişi Özgürlüğü ve Güvencesi (In der Theorie und Anwendung die Freiheit und<br />

Sicherung der Individiuum), İstanbul 1988, 2 ff. ; Gümüş, 201-202.<br />

12<br />

Spirig, 12, Rdn.35; Riemer, 154–155, N. 6-7.<br />

13<br />

dafür siehe: Offizielle Anzeiger (türkische Gesetzblatt) v. 19.03.1954 / mit N.<br />

8662.<br />

14<br />

Gölcüklü, A. F/Gözübüyük, A.Ş., Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve<br />

Uygulaması, 3. Bası, (Europaeische Menschenrechtskonvention und ihre<br />

Anwendung, dritte Aufl.), Ankara 2002, 234 ff.<br />

168<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Es gibt das Prinzip des Persönlichkeitsschutzes als Verbindlichkeit eines<br />

Rechtsstaats auf wichtige Wirkungen auf das türkische<br />

Vormundschaftsrecht. Auch FFE zählt zu diesen rechtliche Wirkungen.<br />

III. Neue Regelung bezüglich der FFE in Art. 432 tZGB<br />

Im türkischen Zivilrecht wird die materielle Voraussetzung für die FFE<br />

nach Art. 432 tZGB wie folgt bestimmt :<br />

‘‘Jede mündige Person, die wegen Geisteskrankheit, Geistesschwäche,<br />

Trunksucht oder anderen Suchterkrankungen, gefahrdarstellenden<br />

ansteckenden Krankheiten oder Vagabundismus der Gesellschaft eine<br />

Gefahr darstellt, darf in einer Anstalt, geeignet für ihre Heilung,<br />

Erziehung oder Vernünftigung untergebracht werden, wenn ihr die<br />

nötige persönliche Fürsorge nicht anders erwiesen werden kann.<br />

Staatsbeauftragte, die während ihres Dienstes einen dieser Gründe<br />

erfahren, haben unverzüglich die berechtigte Vormundschaftsstelle über<br />

diesen Zustand in Kenntnis zu setzen.<br />

Dabei ist auch die Belastung zu berücksichtigen, welche die Person für<br />

ihre Umgebung bedeutet.<br />

Die betroffene Person muss entlassen werden, sobald ihr Zustand es<br />

erlaubt."<br />

Wie oben ausgeführt wurde, bezieht sich dieser Artikel auf die<br />

materiellen (i.e.S und i.w.S) Voraussetzungen der FFE. Danach besteht<br />

dieser Artikel kurz im Vorliegen eines Schwächezustandes (die Existenz<br />

einer der Einweisungsgründe), einer daraus folgenden<br />

Fürsorgebedürftigkeit und Belastung für sich und die Umgebung, in der<br />

Verhältnismässigkeit der Massnahme und im Vorhandsein einer<br />

geeigneten Anstalt.<br />

Im Art. 432 tZGB werden die Freiheitsentziehunsgründe und die in<br />

diesem Zusammenhang stehenden materiellen Voraussetzungen der<br />

169<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

FFE verständlicherweise aufgezählt. Auch dieser Aufzählung im tZGB<br />

432 zu den Freiheitsentziehungsgründen ist ebenso EMRK (Art. 5 Ziff.<br />

1) und ZGB (Art. 397 a) abschliessend. Darin sind die<br />

Freiheitsentziehungsgründe wie folgt:<br />

A. Die Existenz einer der Freiheitsentziehunsgründe als eine<br />

materielle Voraussetzung : Geisteskrankheit oder Geistesschwäche /<br />

Alkoholismus oder Suchterkrankungen (Drogenabhängigkeit) / eine<br />

schwere gefahrdarstellende ansteckende Krankheit /<br />

Vagabundentum<br />

Dieser Absatz (Art. 432 Abs.1 tZGB) enthält an und für sich die<br />

Voraussetzungen für die betroffenen Person, d.h. den persönlichen<br />

Geltungsbereich. Die betroffenen Personen sind mündige oder<br />

entmündigte Personen. Der Gesetzgeber zieht ausdrücklich eine<br />

Freiheitsentziehung für die mündige Person in Erwägung in Art. 432.<br />

Die fürsorgliche Freiheitsentziehung für Kinder ist nach diesem Artikel<br />

nicht möglich (vgl. Art. 446 tZGB) 15 .<br />

Die persönlichen Schwächezustände 16 müssen die Ursache für die<br />

Fürsorgebedürftigkeit sein, d.h. ein Kausalzusammenhang muss<br />

zwischen dem Schwächezustand und der Fürsorgebedürftigkeit<br />

bestehen.<br />

Es muss für die fürsorgerische Freiheitsentziehung einer der möglichen<br />

Schwächezustände sowie die Fürsorgebedürftigkeit kumulativ<br />

vorhanden sein.<br />

Es werden vom Gesetzgeber die nachstehenden gewissen<br />

Schwächezustande 17 (Geisteskrankheit, Geistesschwäche, Trunksucht,<br />

andere Suchterkrankungen und schwere Verwahrlosung) aufgezählt.<br />

15<br />

Öztan, 805 f.; Kılıçoğlu, 162; Gümüş, 196-197.<br />

16<br />

Caviel-Jost, 117 ff.<br />

17<br />

für die Abgrenzung, Konkurrenz und Kumulation der Schwächezustände<br />

siehe: Caviel-Jost, 233 ff.<br />

170<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Mit diesen Zuständen wird sich der untere Teil generell befassen.<br />

1. Geiteskrankheit oder Geistesschwäche<br />

Die Begriffe Geisteskrankheit und Geistesschwäche werden sowohl im<br />

medizinischen Sinn als auch im juristischen Sinn behandelt und kurz<br />

unter dem Oberbegriff der Psychischen Störungen zusammengefasst <strong>18</strong> .<br />

Diese sind als Rechtsbegriffe zu verstehen und bedürfen dieser<br />

Konkretisierung 19 . Bei der Geisteskrankheit oder Geistesschwäche<br />

handelt es sich um pyschische Störungen. Aber es gibt bei der<br />

Geisteskrankheit im Vergleich zur Geistesschwäche pyschische Störung<br />

schwererer Art. In der Literatur schreibt Schorn 20 ausdrücklich, dass<br />

auch der Geistesschwache unter den Begriff der Geisteskrankheit fällt.<br />

Zum Beispiel im juristischen Sinne:<br />

• Eine paranoide Psychose oder Schizophrenie,<br />

• Die chronische Epilepsi begleitet von einer Psychose,<br />

• Eine Psychopathie, wenn sie eine gewisse Schwere aufweist…<br />

usw.<br />

Bei der Geistesschwäche handelt es sich um Fälle, bei denen auffälliges<br />

Verhalten der persönlichen Situation und des Vorlebens noch einfühlbar<br />

sind. Für die Geistesschwäche wurden als Beispiele angenommen 21 :<br />

• Absonderung von der Familie und realer Suizidgefahr<br />

(Selbstmord),<br />

• Die Kurz- und Langzeitgedächtnisstörungen,<br />

• Die Verzweiflung, übersteigerte Niedergeschlagenheit,<br />

• Eine Psychopathie, die nicht eine gewisse Schwere erreicht…<br />

usw.<br />

<strong>18</strong> zu diesen Begriffen siehe weiters: Caviezel-Jost: 1<strong>18</strong> ff.; Spirig, 28 ff.<br />

19 Dazu : BGE 62 II 264; 85 II 460; 117 II 233/234.<br />

20 Schorn, H., Die Europäische Konvention zum Schutze der Menschenrechte<br />

und Grundfreiheiten und ihr Zusatzprotokoll in Einwirkung auf das deutsche<br />

Recht, Frankfurt 1965, 158.<br />

21 Spirig, s.28, Rdn. 25 ff.<br />

171<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Die Geisteskrankheiten und Geistesschwächen sollen nicht im<br />

medizinischen Sinn zu verstehen. Die fürsorgebedürftigkeit des<br />

Betroffenen spielt im Grunde eine entscheidende Rolle.<br />

2. Alkoholismus oder Suchterkrankungen (Drogenabhängigkeit)<br />

Das Problem des Alkoholismus ist sowohl eine medizinische als auch<br />

juristischen Tatsache. Dadurch muss deren Verhältnis zueinander<br />

abgeklärt werden 22 . Es gibt als medizinischen Begriff je nach Grund und<br />

Phase verschiedene Formen des Alkoholismus. Die Einteilung nach<br />

Gründen: Alpha-, Beta-, Gamma-, Delta- und Epsilon-Alkoholismus.<br />

Die Einteilung nach Phasen: präalkoholische (vor der Trunksucht), die<br />

Phase der Trunksucht. Besonders beim dem Gamma-Alkoholismus ist<br />

die dritte Phase die wichtigste. Diese sind die prodromale-, kritische-<br />

und chronische Phase 23 .<br />

In der juristischen Literatur 24 und Rechtsprechung 25 gibt es<br />

verschiedenen Definitionen für den Begriff des Alkoholismus und der<br />

Trunksucht. Die Begriffbestimmungen über das Alkoholismus- und die<br />

Rauschgiftsüchtigkeit - sind relativ vage und unklar. Die Trunksucht<br />

wird als abnormaler Hang zum Trinken oder als Haltlosigkeit im<br />

Zusammenhang mit dem Hang zum Trinken beschreiben 26 .<br />

Die Drogenabhängigkeit kann als allgemeiner Begriff betrachtet<br />

werden, weil die Begriffe Alkoholismus und Suchterkrankung im Sinne<br />

von Drogenabhängigkeit verstanden werden 27 .<br />

22<br />

siehe hierzu ausführlich: Spühler, K., Die Voraussetzungen der fürsorgerischen<br />

Freiheitsentziehung bei Drogensüchtigen, in: ZBl. 1983, 49 ff. ; Caviezel-Jost,<br />

157 ff.<br />

23<br />

Caviel-Jost, 160–162.<br />

24<br />

Caviel-Jost, 157; Spirig, s. 35, Rdn. 49 ff.; Gümüş, 198 f.<br />

25<br />

Caviel-Jost, 164.<br />

26<br />

BGE 39 II 509; BGE 65 II 141; BGE 78 II 337 (Caviel-Jost, 155, Fn. 14)<br />

27<br />

Caviezel-Jost, 200 f.<br />

172<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Wie beim Vormundsurteil gemäss Art. 409 tZGB muss der Richter vor<br />

dem Urteil zu FFE aufgrund von Alkohol- und Drogenabhängigkeit von<br />

dem Gesundheitsgremium ein ärztliches Attest beschaffen und die<br />

betreffende Person anhören 28 .<br />

3. Die schwere gefahrdarstellende ansteckende Krankheit<br />

Dieser Freiheitsentziehungsgrund betrifft besonders den Schutz der<br />

öffentlichen Gesundheit. Dabei sind schweren gefahrdarstellenden<br />

ansteckende Krankheiten sowohl in die persönlichen- als auch<br />

gemeingefährlichen Zustände einzuteilen.<br />

Die Bestimmung dieser verschiedenartigen Krankheiten ist eine<br />

medizinwissenschaftliche Arbeit 29 . Jedoch in der Begründung des oben<br />

erwähnter Artikels wird auf z.B. Aids (Acquired immune deficiency<br />

syndrome), Cholera, die fortgeschrittene Tuberkulose (Schwindsucht),<br />

Pest (Epidemi) und andere stärker ansteckende Krankheiten<br />

verwiesen 30 .<br />

4. Als ein spezifischer Zustand schwerer Verwahrlosung und<br />

Fürsorgebedürftigkeit: Vagabundheit / Vagabundismus<br />

Die schwere Verwahrlosung und Fürsorgebedüftigkeit zur FFE sind<br />

neue Begriffe im Vormundschaftsrecht. Der Inhalt dieser Begriffe wird<br />

in Literatur 31 und Rechtsprechung 32 in unterschiedlichem Sinne<br />

28<br />

dafür siehe die Urteile des 2. Senats des türkisches Kassationsgerichtshofs: Y<br />

2. HD. 06.03.2003, 1622/2977 (Gençcan, <strong>18</strong>45); Y. 2. HD. v. 7.3.1996,<br />

1035/2203 (Öztan, 762, Fn. 64).<br />

29<br />

Dural/Öğüz/Gümüş, 686; Öztan, 806; Kılıçoğlu, 162-163; Gümüş, 198 und<br />

225f.<br />

30<br />

Kılıçoğlu, 163.<br />

31<br />

für Ansichten : Caviel-Jost, 209 ff.; Öztan, 806; Kılıçoğlu, 163; Gümüş, 198 f.<br />

und S. 199, Fn. 38.<br />

32<br />

für Rechtsprechungen: Caviel-Jost, 223–224.<br />

173<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

dargestellt und definiert.<br />

Besonders die Verwahrlosungzustände auf die gestützte FFE können<br />

vom Gesetzgeber auf bestimmte Fälle beschränkt werden 33 .<br />

Die Vagabundheit als materielle Voraussetzung für FFE ist ein<br />

spezifischer Grund des türkischen Vormundschaftsrechtes. Dieser<br />

Grund wird im schweizerischen (ZGB) nicht geregelt. Es wird<br />

Landstreicher als sinngemäßer Ausdruck in der EMRK 34 verwendet.<br />

Die Begriffe Vagabundheit, Vagabundismus oder das Vagabundentum<br />

bedeuten unzwecks umherzuwander, d.h. es heißt sog. vagabundierend<br />

sein. Andererseits ist das Vagabundenleben ein ungebundenes und<br />

unstetes Leben, mit häufigem Wechsel des Aufenthaltsortes und der<br />

Lebensumstände. Ein richtiger Vagabund 35 od. Landstreicher 36 liebt das<br />

unstete Leben, hält es nicht lange an einem Ort aus.<br />

Bei der Entziehung aufgrund von Vagabundheit muss noch mehr die<br />

Erziehung und Besserung der betroffene Person in Betracht gezogen<br />

werden 37 .<br />

B. Die Belastung für die Umgebung<br />

Der türkische Gesetzgeber sieht in dem zweiten Absatz des Artikels<br />

(Art. 432 Abs.2 tZGB) vor, dass zur FFE der betroffenen Person auch<br />

33 Iberg, Gottlieb, Die fürsorgerische Freiheitsentziehung, erste Erfahrungen mit<br />

einem neuen Gesetz, in: Brennpunkt 1982, S. 85 ff. und besonders 97.<br />

34 Art. 5 Ziff. 1 lit. e EMRK<br />

35 englisch: Vagrant / französische : Vagabond<br />

36 Unter einem Landstreicher ist im Sinne der EMRK (Art. 5) im Wesentlichen<br />

ein arbeitsfähiger, jedoch arbeitsscheuer Müssiggänger zu verstehen.; vgl. :<br />

Ulusan, İ., Die Neugestaltung des Familienrechts durch das neue türkische<br />

Notariatszeitung, 8/2002, 225 ff. und besonders 234 (GÜMÜŞ, zitiert auf der<br />

Seite 199, Fn. 38).<br />

37 Gümüş, 199–200.<br />

174<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

die Belastungen für ihrer Umgebung zu berücksichtigen sind 38 . Dieses<br />

Element ist eine feststehende Tatsache. Dadurch wird es sich auf einen<br />

Entschluss zur FFE auswirken.<br />

Die Belastung für die Umgebung kann sich für die nähere Umgebung 39<br />

und weitere Umgebung 40 ergeben. Zur näheren Umgebung sind<br />

diejenigen Personen zu zählen, wie Ehegatte, Familiengehörige und im<br />

gleichen Haushalt mit der betroffen Person lebende Personen sowie<br />

Nachbarn. Diese Personen haben die größte Belastung zu tragen. Für die<br />

nähere Umgebung weist die Belastung zwei Aspekte auf. Zum Beispiel<br />

für die nähere Umgebungen: Wohnungsgenossen, Konkubinatspartner,<br />

Hausangestellte. Die weitere Umgebung umfasst die<br />

Familiengemeinschaft und Nachbarschaft sowie Arzt, Fürsorger,<br />

Vormund und jedermann, der mit dem Hilfsbedürftigen in Berührung<br />

kommt.<br />

Auch auf solcher Belastungs-Situationen sind die Voraussetzung für<br />

Pflege und Behandlung zu betrachten, um die betroffene Person in eine<br />

Anstalt einweisen zu können.<br />

C. Die geignete Anstalt als Einweisungsvoraussetzung<br />

Wie in der schweizerischen Rechtsprechung 41 so ist auch im türkischen<br />

Vormundschaftsrecht der Begriff der geeignete Anstalt 42 in einem<br />

weiten Sinne zu verstehen. In diesem Sinn kann die FFE auch in einem<br />

Kinder-, Schul-, Therapie-, Pflegeheim, in einer psychiatrischen Klinik<br />

oder einer Strafanstalt vollzogen werden.<br />

38<br />

Öztan, 807; Kılıçoğlu, 163; Gümüş, 196-197.<br />

39<br />

Zur Belastung für die nähere Umhebung: Cavier-Jost, 295.<br />

40<br />

Zur Belastung für die nähere Umhebung: Cavier-Jost, 296.<br />

41<br />

‘‘… Nicht nur geschlossen Anstalten zählen dazu, sondern alle Institutionen,<br />

welche die Bewegungsfreiheit der betroffene Personen aufgrund der Betreuung<br />

und Überwachung spürbar einschranken …’’ (BGE 121 III 306).<br />

42<br />

für dieser Begriff: Breitenstein, F., Was ist im Sine von Art. 397a<br />

ZGB ?, in: ZVW 36 (1981), 98 ff.<br />

175<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Unterbringung oder Zurückbehaltung der betroffene Person in einer<br />

Anstalt behindert grundsätzlich das Recht auf ihrer persönliche Freiheit.<br />

Die eingewiesene oder zurückbehaltete Person muss entlassen werden,<br />

sobald ihr Zustand es erlaubt<br />

In der Literatur 43 muss die Geeignetheit der Anstalt als<br />

Einweisungsvoraussetzung konkret definiert werden, weil es im<br />

Einzellfall oft wenig wirklich geeignete Anstalten gibt.<br />

IV. Zusammenfassende Ergebnisse<br />

Einer der wichtigen Revisionen, welches das neue Zivilgesetzbuch mit<br />

Nummer 4721 in das türkische Vormundschaftsrecht eingeführt hat, ist<br />

die fürsorgliche Freiheitsentziehung. Das Hauptziel dieser Maßnahme<br />

ist die Umgebung sowie die Freiheit und Sicherheit der volljährigen<br />

Person, dessen Freiheit eingeschränkt werden soll, von den Gefahren,<br />

die sie sich und ihrem Umfeld zufügen kann, zu schützen.<br />

Das türkische Verfassungsgesetz vom 1982 regelt das Recht auf Freiheit<br />

und Sicherheit der Person unter den Grundrechten (Art. 19 tGG). Das<br />

Grundgesetz erlaubt eine Freiheitsentziehung nur unter den im Gesetz<br />

vorgeschriebenen Grundsätzen und spezifischen Umständen. Somit<br />

können nur bestimmte Personen, die für die Gesellschaft eine Gefahr<br />

darstellen, zur Behandlung, Erziehung oder Besserung in eine geeignete<br />

Anstalt eingewiesen werden. Der Gesetzeszweck welcher im<br />

Verfassungsgesetz als ‚‚sachgemäß den im Gesetz vorgeschriebenen<br />

Grundsätzen’’ formuliert wurde, ist mit dem neuen türkischen<br />

Zivilgesetzbuch (Art. 432 ff. tZGB) verwirklicht worden.<br />

Die Regelungen der fürsorgerischen Freiheitsentziehung für Mündige<br />

sind im Gegensatz deren für Minderjährige ausgiebiger und in Artikel<br />

43<br />

Spirig, s.45, Rdn. 1<strong>18</strong> ff.; Caviel-Jost, 5. Kapitel: Geeignete Anstalt, 344 ff.<br />

und besonders 383 f.; Riemer, N. <strong>18</strong>-19, 159; Dural/Öğüz/Gümüş, 694 f; Öztan,<br />

807; Kılıçoğlu, 163 f.; Gümüş, 206–208.<br />

176<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

432 ff. tZGB detailliert geregelt. In dieser Regelung hat der<br />

Gesetzesgeber, anders als in den ausgängigen schweizerischen<br />

Zivilgesetzbuchregeln (Art. 397a–f ZGB), nicht die Möglichkeit einer<br />

fürsorgerischen Freiheitsentziehung für eine Minderjährige Person<br />

vorgesehen. Zudem wird der Begriff „mündig“ erweiternd ausgelegt, so<br />

dass auch die Freiheitsentziehung für volljährige Personen unter<br />

elterlicher Gewalt und Volljährige, welchen rechtliche Berater oder<br />

Verwalter ernannt wurden, erlaubt wird 44 .<br />

Für fürsorgerische Freiheitsentziehungen für Volljährige haben gewisse<br />

rechtliche Gründe zu bestehen. Diese beschränkten Gründe sind<br />

materielle Voraussetzungen einer fürsorgerischen Freiheitsentziehung.<br />

Deshalb hat der Gesetzesgeber in dem entsprechenden Artikel, um das<br />

Anwendungsgebiet dieser Maßnahme einzuschränken, diese rechtlichen<br />

Gründe in dieser Art aufgezählt: Geisteskrankheit, Geistesschwäche,<br />

Trunk- und Drogensucht, Vagabundenleben und ansteckende<br />

Krankheiten, welche eine schwere Gefahr darstellen (Art. 432 tZGB).<br />

Besonders zu erwähnen ist, dass der letzte rechtliche Grund, also<br />

ansteckende Krankheiten die eine schwere Gefahr darstellen, welcher<br />

im ausgängigen schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuch nicht geregelt ist, als<br />

ein gesonderter rechtlicher Grund für fürsorgliche Freiheitsentziehung<br />

für Volljährige genannt wird.<br />

Die Feststellung der Existenz dieser Gründe, außer dem<br />

Vagabundenleben, hängt von einem Bericht, welcher die Ansichten der<br />

Sachverständigen beinhaltet und von einer amtlichen<br />

Gesundheitskommission aufgesetzt wurde, ab. Der Bestand eines<br />

Vagabundenlebens ist mit jeglichen Nachweisen festzustellen 45 .<br />

Das Hauptzweck der Entziehungsgründe, ausschließlich ansteckende<br />

Krankheiten, die eine schwere Gefahr darstellen, ist die jeweilige<br />

volljährige Person wieder für die Gesellschaft zu gewinnen. Deshalb<br />

wird somit unter diesen Umständen die Personenfreiheit und -sicherheit<br />

44<br />

Dural/Öğüz/Gümüş,683; Öztan, 805 f.<br />

45<br />

Öztan, 806; Kılıçoğlu, 162 f.; Gümüş, 225 f.<br />

177<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

nicht verletzt und letztendlich das Persönlichkeitsschutzprinzip aufrecht<br />

erhalten.<br />

In Artikel 432 des tZGB werden schwere ansteckende Krankheiten wie<br />

AIDS, Cholera, fortgeschrittene Tuberkulose und Pest als Beispiele<br />

genannt. Eigentlich steht im Falle des Auftretens dieser Krankheiten<br />

nicht der Schutz der Personenfreiheit sondern die Gesundheit der<br />

Umwelt und somit das Interesse der Gesellschaft im Vordergrund. Um<br />

das Interesse der Gesellschaft zu beurteilen, werden die Lasten, die die<br />

volljährige Person, wessen Freiheit entzogen werden soll, der<br />

Gesellschaft bringt, vor Augen gehalten. Lasten, die diese Person der<br />

Gesellschaft bringt, bedeuten schwerwiegende Belastungen, die die<br />

normale Grenzen, welche seine Familie und sein nahes Umfeld auf sich<br />

zu nehmen haben, überschreiten.<br />

Um eine fürsorgerische Freiheitsentziehung für eine volljährige Person<br />

anzuordnen, ist allein der Bestand einer oder einiger der im Gesetz<br />

beschränkten Gründe nicht ausreichend. Neben dem Geschehen des<br />

rechtlichen Vorsatzes benötigt es den Personenschutz durch eine<br />

Freiheitsentziehung. Angemessene Maßnahmen die in diesem Falle<br />

genommen werden zu haben, werden als Grundsatz des Prinzips der<br />

Verhältnismäßigkeit, welches in der Lehre anerkannt wird, angesehen.<br />

Nachdem ist eine Einweisung in eine geeignete Anstalt oder nach einer<br />

Einweisung das dortige Aufbewahren nur für die Heilung, Erziehung<br />

oder Besserung der volljährigen Person, wessen Freiheit entzogen<br />

werden soll, zu begünstigen. Während eine Unterbringung oder eine<br />

Einweisung der Person in eine geeignete Anstalt, die zwangsweise<br />

erfolgt, bedeutet: eine Aufbewahrung / die Aufnahme der Person auf<br />

eigenen Wunsch oder den dortigen Halt dieser. Unter den geeigneten<br />

Maßnahmen ist die Heilungsmethode bei psychischen und schweren<br />

physischen Krankheiten, der Weg der Erziehung und Besserung eher bei<br />

Entziehung wie im Falle von Vagabundenleben zu nennen. Um es zu<br />

wiederholen; sollte trotz Heilungs- Erziehungs- und Besserungsversuch<br />

die psychische oder schwere physische Krankheit der jeweiligen Person<br />

eine Gefahr für die Gesellschaft darstellen, kann eine fürsorgerische<br />

Freiheitsentziehung für diese Person angeordnet werden.<br />

178<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Sollte der persönliche Schutz durch eine andere Maßnahme anstatt einer<br />

Freiheitsentziehung, trotz dessen das die psychische oder schwere<br />

physische Krankheit der volljährigen Person eine Gefahr für die<br />

Gesellschaft darstellt, gewährleistet werden können, ist in solchen<br />

Fällen keine Freiheitsentziehung anzuordnen.<br />

Bezüglich dieses kann eine Einweisung in eine geeignete Anstalt oder<br />

die dortige Aufbewahrung nur dann angeordnet werden, wenn der<br />

persönliche Schutz nicht auf anderem Wege gewährleistet werden kann.<br />

Grundsätzlich ist die zuständige Behörde, die diesen Entscheid erlassen<br />

kann, die Vormundschaftsbehörde, also das Amtsgericht am Wohnsitz<br />

des Betroffenen. Doch ist im Gesetz dieser Zuständigkeit eine<br />

Ausnahme gestellt. Dieser Ausnahme nach ist, wenn Gefahr im Verzug<br />

ist, die Vormundschaftsbehörde am Aufenthaltsort der betroffenen<br />

Person zuständig (Art. 433 tZGB).<br />

Nach Artikel 434 hat die Ausnahme darstellende zuständige<br />

Vormundschaftsbehörde die Einweisung oder Aufbewahrung der<br />

mündigen (volljährigen) Person in eine geeignete Anstalt oder der unter<br />

manchen besonderen Umständen vorgesehene Zuständige, falls er<br />

bezüglich der Vormundschaft Maßnahmen durchsetzt, diesen Zustand<br />

der Vormundschaftsbehörde am Wohnsitz der betroffenen Person<br />

mitzuteilen 46 .<br />

Die zuständige Behörde setzt den Betroffenen oder dessen<br />

Nahestehende über den Einweisungsentscheid in Kenntnis. Innerhalb<br />

zehn Tagen nach Mitteilung des Einweisungsentscheids sowie der<br />

Abweisung eines Entlassungsgesuches ist es möglich, dagegen innert<br />

zehn nach der Mitteilung an der Aufsichtsbehörde, also am Gericht<br />

erster Instanz, Einwand zu erheben (Art. tZGB 435).<br />

Spezifisch für den Prozess in der fürsorglichen Freiheitsentziehung sind<br />

einige besondere Verfahrungsrechtsregelungen vorgesehen (Art. tZGB<br />

436). Außer diesen einzigartigen Verfahrensregeln sind die in der<br />

46 Dural/Öğüz/Gümüş, 700 f.<br />

179<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

türkische Zivilprozessordnung (trZPO) 47 vorgesehenen allgemeinen<br />

Regeln anzuwenden 48 .<br />

Letztendlich ist zu sagen, dass der Entscheid über eine fürsorgliche<br />

Freiheitsentziehung nach vereinfachtem Verfahren zu erlassen ist.<br />

Gemäss diesem Verfahren muss der zuständige Richter vor dem<br />

Erlassen des Freiheitsentziehungsentscheides den Betroffen mündlich<br />

einvernehmen. Alleine das Postulat des Bevollmächtigten oder des<br />

Vertreters ist nicht ausreichend. Auf Grund dessen hat der Richter<br />

folgend unmittelbarer Anhörung des Betroffenen nach innerer<br />

Überzeugung von der Notwendigkeit einer Entziehung zu entscheiden<br />

(Art. t ZGB 437) 49 .<br />

47 auf türkisch: Hukuk Usulü Muhakemeleri Kanunu (HUMK).<br />

48 für Ausführungen über diese Prozessuale Regeln siehe: Dural/Öğüz/Gümüş,<br />

705 ff.; Öztan, 808 f.; Kılıçoğlu, 167 f.; Gençcan, Art. 436 trZGB, <strong>18</strong>49 ff;<br />

Gümüş, 220 ff. und besonders 226-228.<br />

49 Dural/Öğüz/Gümüş, 711-713.<br />

<strong>18</strong>0<br />

DOZENT DR. MEHMET DEMIR - DIE MATERIELLEN VORAUSSETZUNGEN DER<br />

FÜRSORGERISCHEN FREIHEITSENTZIEHUNG NACH ART. 432 DES TÜRKISCHEN<br />

ZIVILGESETZBUCHES


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL<br />

HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong> IN SITUATIONS OF<br />

ARMED CONFLICT<br />

BY ALEXANDRU MOCANU<br />

Introduction<br />

After almost half a century from the International Conference on<br />

Human Rights held at Teheran, where the Resolution on Human Rights<br />

in Armed Conflicts 1 was adopted, some authors talk about a confusion<br />

that continues to exist, pointing out that many people still think that<br />

human rights law only applies in times of peace, while international<br />

humanitarian law in time of war. 2 Although contemporary international<br />

humanitarian law is focused only on jus in bello and its laws concerning<br />

the conduct of hostilities during an armed conflict, apparently, have<br />

nothing to do with human rights protection, the final purpose of<br />

humanitarian law is protection of victims of armed conflicts, what<br />

makes it closer to the kind of protection provided by human rights law,<br />

applicable both in times of peace and war, with certain restrictions. This<br />

article attempts to thrash out the historical and conceptual differences<br />

and similarities of these two branches of law, in order to clarify their<br />

scope of application and the way they interplay in the context of armed<br />

conflict.<br />

1 Human Rights in Armed Conflicts, Resolution XXIII adopted by the<br />

International Conference on Human Rights, Teheran, 12 May 1968,<br />

http://www.icrc.org/ihl.<br />

2<br />

<strong>FREE</strong>MAN Mark, International Law and Internal Armed Conflicts: Clarifying<br />

the Interplay between Human Rights and Humanitarian Protection, The Journal<br />

of Humanitarian Assistance, 17 <strong>October</strong> 2000,<br />

http://www.jha.ac/articles/a059.htm.<br />

<strong>18</strong>1<br />

ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />

PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />

IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Historical Overview<br />

The classic public international law recognized distinction between the<br />

law of peace and the law of war. Depending on the state of international<br />

relations, was applied either the corpus juris of the law of peace or that<br />

of the law of war. 3 That is why only the jus in bello was recognized<br />

during wars. This situation prevailed until 1945, when the UN Charter<br />

and subsequent international instruments in the field of human rights<br />

protection diminished the rigidity of this division. Since then there are<br />

norms, witch are applicable during both the peace and the wartimes.<br />

However, since the international human rights law and the international<br />

humanitarian law have completely different historical origins and<br />

philosophical concepts, these innovations were not immediately<br />

accepted. 4<br />

The law of war began to develop when the use of force as an instrument<br />

of national politics was considered legal. As a result, a common interest<br />

aroused to develop some norms of “civilized” conduct on the battlefield.<br />

Consequently, the law of war had an international input, which is not<br />

the case of human rights law. The first concepts relating to human rights<br />

emerged in the national legal orders, mainly in Europe and North<br />

America, due to writings of John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau on<br />

“natural law” and, respectively, “social contract”, which dramatically<br />

influenced the constitutional development of the domestic political<br />

institutions. Nevertheless, the human rights concepts latter were<br />

internationalized, while the law of armed conflicts extended its area of<br />

application on internal affairs. Thus, the states were concerned about the<br />

faith of their nationals abroad and were trying to ensure, by means of<br />

bilateral agreements “minimum standards of civilization”, meaning<br />

respect for certain rights in all circumstances. Later, a new concern<br />

3 HEINTZE Hans-Joachim, On the Relationship between Human Rights Law<br />

Protection and International Humanitarian Law, International Review of the Red<br />

Cross, December, 2004, Vol. 86, No. 856, p. 789.<br />

4<br />

DOSWALD-BECK Louise, VITÉ Sylvian, International Humanitarian Law<br />

and Human Rights Law, Offprint from International Review of the Red Cross,<br />

March-April 1993, p. 94.<br />

<strong>18</strong>2<br />

ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />

PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />

IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

regarding national minorities was asserted. Therefore, at a given<br />

historical point, a states’ common interest emerged in the field of human<br />

rights. Consequently, the national concepts relating to human rights had<br />

been acquired by international law. The most firm step in the<br />

internationalization of the human rights law has been made by adopting<br />

the Universal Declaration in 1948 5 . Further, this was followed by the<br />

adoption of a series of international conventions in the field of human<br />

rights, some of them under the United Nations’ auspices, while others in<br />

the framework of the regional organizations.<br />

The law of armed conflicts followed, as mentioned above, a very<br />

different course, starting as a branch of international law. However, the<br />

most important thing in the evolution of this branch is that, by the<br />

adoption of the four Geneva Conventions in 1949, it penetrated the<br />

national sovereignty, extending over internal armed conflicts and<br />

ceasing to be only a branch of international law, aimed exclusively on<br />

regulating interstate relations. The common article 3 of the four Geneva<br />

Conventions from 1949 marked the first step in nearing the international<br />

humanitarian law and international human rights law. In the same<br />

context, the fourth Geneva Convention relative to the protection of<br />

civilian persons in time of war and applicable to situations of<br />

occupation, even if it meets with no armed resistance, makes these two<br />

branches to get even closer. 6<br />

Distinctions<br />

Nevertheless, there are a series of obvious distinctions between<br />

international humanitarian law and international human rights law, what<br />

5<br />

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Adopted and proclaimed by General<br />

Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948,<br />

http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html.<br />

6<br />

EIDE Asbjørn, The Laws of War and Human Rights – Differences and<br />

Convergences, Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red<br />

Cross Principles in Honour of Jean PICTET (ed. Christophe SWINARSKI),<br />

Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Geneva-Hague, 1984, p. 678.<br />

<strong>18</strong>3<br />

ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />

PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />

IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

makes it difficult to perceive these two branches as applicable to the<br />

same range of relationships. These differences are due to different<br />

philosophies.<br />

The international humanitarian law has been conceived as a code of<br />

conduct during armed conflicts aimed on protecting persons and<br />

property that are, or may be, affected by the conflict, and to limit<br />

parties’ rights of using methods and means of warfare of their choice. 7<br />

The human rights law is based on the principle that individuals and<br />

groups can expect and/or claim certain behaviors or benefits from their<br />

governments. 8 The above formulations reveal that the first branch<br />

focuses on the way a party in a conflict is to behave in relations to<br />

people at its mercy, whereas human rights law concentrates on the rights<br />

of the recipient of a certain treatment. 9 To sum up, the main goal of the<br />

law of war is to prevent, as far as possible, unnecessary suffering during<br />

an armed conflict by prescribing certain behaviors. The major concern<br />

of human rights is to ensure good governance (by imposing some<br />

standards), which consists in respect and protection of the individual in<br />

all circumstances. 10<br />

Besides, from the human rights standpoint, there are two situations: the<br />

“normal one” and the state of emergency, which endanger the life of the<br />

nation. The last one allows, by virtue of most international instruments<br />

in the field, for a relaxation of the states’ obligations to respect human<br />

rights. Unlike human rights law, the international humanitarian law does<br />

not recognize any kind of derogations. By exceptional nature of armed<br />

conflicts, the rules of international humanitarian law have an imperative<br />

character and are created for each particular situation. Moreover, it<br />

considers the principle of military necessity so that to keep feasible the<br />

7<br />

Frequently Asked Questions on International Humanitarian Law, Human Rights<br />

and Refugee Law in the context of armed conflict, Inter-Agency Standing<br />

Committee Task Force on Humanitarian Action and Human Rights, UN, 2004, p.<br />

4.<br />

8<br />

Ibidem, p. 10.<br />

9<br />

DOSWALD-BECK Louise, VITÉ Sylvian, op. cit., p. 101.<br />

10<br />

EIDE Asbjørn, op. cit., p. 676.<br />

<strong>18</strong>4<br />

ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />

PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />

IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

parties’ capacity to win.<br />

Nevertheless, there are a series of rights which cannot be derogated<br />

from and should be respected in any circumstances, as well as a set of<br />

rules according to which a state is allowed to derogate. 11 Moreover,<br />

even those rights that allow for derogations must be respected as far as<br />

possible. Finally, the human rights law may question the purpose and<br />

legitimacy of the governmental actions. The international humanitarian<br />

law is different to this regard by placing the issue of the state’ purpose<br />

in using the force outside its scope of application, regulating only the<br />

means and methods of warfare.<br />

The concomitant application<br />

Generally, international humanitarian law is today less and less<br />

perceived as a code of honour for combatants, but as a mean of sparing<br />

non-combatants as much as possible from the horrors of war. 12 In its<br />

discussion on relations between law of armed conflicts and human<br />

rights law, Jean Pictet was talking about merging these two branches of<br />

law under a generic heading: humanitarian law. Pictet goes even further,<br />

by suggesting to include some other elements of international law, like<br />

refugee law, or aspects of international law regarding social relations,<br />

particularly those developed by the International Labor Organization. 13<br />

It is interesting to see at least how these two branches of law interact<br />

and apply to the same social relations. The International Court of Justice<br />

upheld this fact through its Advisory Opinions on Nuclear Weapons 14<br />

and Legal Consequences 15 clearly denying that International Covenant<br />

11<br />

See: HEINTZE Hans-Joachim, op. cit., p. 799.<br />

12<br />

DOSWALD-BECK Louise, VITÉ Sylvian, op. cit., p. 105.<br />

13<br />

Quoted by EIDE Asbjørn, op. cit., p. 675.<br />

14<br />

Legality of Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, ICJ, July 8,<br />

1996, paragraph 26. http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/icases/iunan/iunanframe.htm.<br />

15<br />

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian<br />

Territory, ICJ, Advisory Oppinion, July 9, 2004, paragraph 102-106,<br />

<strong>18</strong>5<br />

ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />

PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />

IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

on Civil and Political Rights is applicable only during peacetime.<br />

The most relevant treaties in the field of Human rights contain clear<br />

stipulations regarding the obligation of the states to respect human<br />

rights during armed conflicts. Let us take, for instance, article 15 of the<br />

European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and<br />

Fundamental Freedoms from 1950, which makes reference to the faith<br />

of human rights in situations when the life of the nation is endangered<br />

by a war or another public emergency. In such circumstances, the state<br />

may take measures derogating from its obligations arising from the<br />

Convention. The human rights stipulated in the Convention may be<br />

limited strictly according to the dictates of the specific circumstances of<br />

a particular situation. However, some expressly mentioned rights (inter<br />

alia right to life and prohibition of torture) cannot be limited in any<br />

circumstances. These rights are called inalienable, witch means that no<br />

derogations are admitted and they are to be considered in all<br />

circumstances without exceptions. Thus, the “traditional impermeable<br />

border” between international humanitarian law, which is applied<br />

during armed conflicts, and the law of peace is thereby crossed. 16<br />

Further, this “crossing of the border” is supported by the common<br />

article 3 of the Geneva Conventions from 1949, which contains a list of<br />

rights to be protected in all circumstances. These rights practically<br />

coincide with the inalienable human rights. This determined the<br />

academics to adopt the Turku Declaration 17 aimed on filling out the<br />

gaps from the border area between the law of peace and the law of war<br />

and to ensure a minimum humanitarian standard by cumulating the<br />

application of both humanitarian and human rights law.<br />

The European Convention is not the single instrument that refers to<br />

human rights law application during wars. Another regional instrument,<br />

the American Convention on Human Rights <strong>18</strong> from 1969, also lists in<br />

http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/idocket/imwp/imwpframe.htm.<br />

16<br />

HEINTZE Hans-Joachim, op. cit., p. 791.<br />

17<br />

Declaration of Minimum Humanitarian Standards, Turku (Finland), 2<br />

December 1990, http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/1990b.htm.<br />

<strong>18</strong><br />

American Convention on Human Rights, signed at the Inter-American<br />

<strong>18</strong>6<br />

ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />

PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />

IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

article 27 the rights from which no derogation is allowed during the<br />

wartime. Other international treaties in the field of human rights also<br />

refer to the so-called "inalienable" rights. For example, article 4 of the<br />

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights contains an<br />

emergence clause with a similar wording to those from the regional<br />

instruments.<br />

The Child Convention 19 from 1989 combines those two branches of law<br />

in an obvious manner. Article 38 (1) of the Convention obliges the<br />

Contracting Parties to respect and ensure respect for the rules of<br />

international humanitarian law in the field of children protection.<br />

Therefore, a human rights treaty, normally applicable during peacetime,<br />

contains also provisions of humanitarian law. Actually, article 38 (2,3,4)<br />

simply reiterates the provisions of article 77 of the Additional Protocol I<br />

to the Geneva Conventions, which limits recruitment and participation<br />

in hostilities of children younger than 15 years old during an armed<br />

conflict. In 2000 was adopted the Optional Protocol 20 to this<br />

Convention, which raised the age threshold to <strong>18</strong> years, imposing to<br />

member states a higher standard of protection than that set by<br />

humanitarian law.<br />

All these international instruments prove that human rights law is an<br />

essential part of the legal provisions that govern the war and other<br />

situations of emergency. Particularly, the example of the Child<br />

Convention shows how the norms of law of peace overlap with those<br />

that regulate warfare, as well as the fact that during wars states must<br />

look for their international obligations in other branches of law, as well.<br />

Specialized Conference on Human Rights, San Josi, Costa Rica, 22 November<br />

1969, http://www.hrcr.org/docs/American_Convention/oashr.html.<br />

19<br />

Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989,<br />

http://www.icrc.org/ihl.<br />

20<br />

Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the<br />

involvement of children in armed conflict, 25 May 2000, http://www.icrc.org/ihl.<br />

<strong>18</strong>7<br />

ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />

PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />

IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

The mutual influence<br />

Despite different historical origins and philosophy of the human rights<br />

law and the international humanitarian law, nowadays the jurists from<br />

one or another branch resort more and more to a combined use of their<br />

concepts. This is either because a branch assists another in the correct<br />

interpretation of its provisions, or because the application of one of the<br />

branches automatically ensures application of another one. For example,<br />

in order to determine the content of torture, as prohibited method of<br />

warfare must necessarily be consulted the UN Convention against<br />

Torture. 21<br />

An interesting example is the right to life. Many human rights defenders<br />

would still avoid any reference to humanitarian law, which a priori<br />

accepts the possibility for persons directly involved in hostilities to be<br />

deprived of their life. However, it must be noted that international<br />

documents in the field of human rights 22 expressly mention that<br />

deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention to<br />

this right, when it results from the use of force, which is no more than<br />

necessary in legally taken actions for quelling a riot or insurrection.<br />

Important is to keep in mind that “arbitrary” deprivation of life is<br />

prohibited, the term having a particular meaning during an armed<br />

conflict. Actually, humanitarian law ensures the right to life by means<br />

of a series of provisions, such as sparing of civilians as far as possible,<br />

limitation of attacks exclusively on military objects, prohibition of<br />

starvation of population, creating of demilitarized zones, collecting sick<br />

and wounded and offering them medical assistance or facilitating<br />

human life conditions for keeping the prisoners of war and internees.<br />

Some examples would rather frame into the category of "economic and<br />

cultural" rights according to human rights law. This shows that<br />

21<br />

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment<br />

or Punishment, New York, 10 December 1984,<br />

http://www.hrweb.org/legal/cat.html.<br />

22<br />

Ex.: Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental<br />

Freedoms (article 2), Rome, 4 November 1950; The International Covenant on<br />

Civil and Political Rights has not such a provision - a gap identified by doctrine.<br />

<strong>18</strong>8<br />

ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />

PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />

IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

international humanitarian law protects the right to life in a manner that<br />

outruns the traditional concept of protection of this right. Finally,<br />

relevant for the respect of the right to life are the restrictions imposed by<br />

international humanitarian law in connection with death penalty<br />

application to persons under <strong>18</strong> years old or pregnant women and with<br />

little children, or in occupied territories where it was abolished.<br />

The list of these examples of convergence of human rights law and<br />

international humanitarian law can be continued. However, it should be<br />

mentioned that there are a series of rights (right to association and other<br />

political rights) which are not provided for by the international<br />

humanitarian law because of their irrelevance for the protection of<br />

persons against dangers that an armed conflict implies.<br />

International Humanitarian Law as lex specialis<br />

The cumulative application of the international humanitarian law and<br />

human rights law inevitably brings on discussion concerning the<br />

relationship between those two branches of law. The jurisdiction of the<br />

International Court of Justice in its Advisory Opinions regarding<br />

Nuclear Weapons 23 and the Legal Consequences recognized the primacy<br />

of humanitarian law during armed conflicts and its character of lex<br />

specialis. This means that during an armed conflict the provisions of<br />

human rights law and, respectively, the content of some rights<br />

(especially right to life) are to be interpreted according to international<br />

humanitarian law. Thus, in some circumstances of war the international<br />

human rights law cannot be taken into consideration. For instance, a<br />

combatant who kills an enemy will be not, according to jus in bello,<br />

criminally responsible for the act of murder committed on the battlefield<br />

during an armed conflict. That is why the term “arbitrary deprivation of<br />

life” from human rights law must be considered from the humanitarian<br />

23<br />

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, ICJ,<br />

July 8, 1996, paragraph 36 http://www.icjcij.org/icjwww/icases/iunan/iunanframe.htm.<br />

<strong>18</strong>9<br />

ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />

PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />

IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

law perspective. Namely, the regional human rights instruments give<br />

such an interpretation. Article 15 of the European Convention clearly<br />

stipulates that the cases of death resulting from acts of war must not be<br />

regarded as violation of right to life.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The interplay between international human rights law and international<br />

humanitarian law consists in mutual influence during the processes of<br />

formation, implementation and application, experiencing a significant<br />

convergence in recent years. Although historically and conceptually are<br />

still distinct categories of international law, these two branches of law<br />

are not mutually exclusive, but complement each other, shaping in such<br />

way their future development. This is how the protective provisions of<br />

human rights and humanitarian law have equivalents under each other’s<br />

instruments and already make extensive use of each other’s<br />

implementation and supervision mechanisms. The recent study on<br />

customary international humanitarian law 24 confirms the overlapping<br />

nature of a series of fundamental guaranties provided for in both<br />

humanitarian and human rights law. 25 Establishment of the category of<br />

crimes against humanity which does not require nexus to armed conflict<br />

is an obvious example of "cooperation" between these two fields having<br />

a common major goal: the protection of the life, health and dignity of<br />

the human beings.<br />

Bibliography:<br />

24 The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) conducted the study at<br />

the specific request of States who sought the ICRC's assistance in trying to<br />

identify the unwritten rules of customary humanitarian law.<br />

25<br />

KELLENBERGER Jakob, International Humanitarian Law and Other Legal<br />

Regimes: Interplay in Situations of Violence, Address at the 27<br />

190<br />

th Annual Round<br />

Table on Current Problems of International Humanitarian Law, 4 September<br />

2003, International Review of the Red Cross, September 2003, vol. 85, No. 851,<br />

p. 649.<br />

ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />

PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />

IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

1. DOSWALD-BECK Louise, VITÉ Sylvian, International<br />

Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law, Offprint from<br />

International Review of the Red Cross, March-April 1993.<br />

2. EIDE Asbjørn, The Laws of War and Human Rights –<br />

Differences and Convergences, Studies and Essays on<br />

International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in<br />

Honour of Jean PICTET (ed. Christophe SWINARSKI),<br />

Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Geneva-Hague, 1984.<br />

3. <strong>FREE</strong>MAN Mark, International Law and Internal Armed<br />

Conflicts: Clarifying the Interplay between Human Rights and<br />

Humanitarian Protection, The Journal of Humanitarian<br />

Assistance, 17 <strong>October</strong> 2000,<br />

http://www.jha.ac/articles/a059.htm.<br />

4. Frequently Asked Questions on International Humanitarian<br />

Law, Human Rights and Refugee Law in the context of armed<br />

conflict, Inter-Agency Standing Committee Task Force on<br />

Humanitarian Action and Human Rights, UN, 2004.<br />

5. HEINTZE Hans-Joachim, On the Relationship between Human<br />

Rights Law Protection and International Humanitarian Law,<br />

International Review of the Red Cross, December, 2004, Vol.<br />

86, No. 856.<br />

6. KELLENBERGER Jakob, International Humanitarian Law and<br />

Other Legal Regimes: Interplay in Situations of Violence,<br />

Address at the 27th Annual Round Table on Current Problems<br />

of International Humanitarian Law, 4 September 2003,<br />

International Review of the Red Cross, September 2003, vol.<br />

85, No. 851.<br />

Documents<br />

7. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Adopted and<br />

proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10<br />

December 1948, http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html.<br />

8. Geneva Conventions for the Protection of Victims of Armed<br />

Conflicts, 12 August, 1949 and their Additional Protocols, 8<br />

June 1977, http://www.icrc.org/ihl.<br />

191<br />

ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />

PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />

IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or<br />

Degrading Treatment or Punishment, New York, 10 December<br />

1984, http://www.hrweb.org/legal/cat.html.<br />

10. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and<br />

Fundamental Freedoms, Rome, 4 November 1950,<br />

http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/z17euroco.html<br />

11. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, New<br />

York, 16 December 1966, http://www.hrweb.org/legal/cpr.html.<br />

12. Human Rights in Armed Conflicts, Resolution XXIII adopted<br />

by the International Conference on Human Rights, Teheran, 12<br />

May 1968, http://www.icrc.org/ihl.<br />

13. American Convention on Human Rights, signed at the Inter-<br />

American Specialized Conference on Human Rights, San Josi,<br />

Costa Rica, 22 November 1969,<br />

http://www.hrcr.org/docs/American_Convention/oashr.html.<br />

14. Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989, and<br />

its Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed<br />

conflict, 25 May 2000, http://www.icrc.org/ihl.<br />

15. Declaration of Minimum Humanitarian Standards, Turku<br />

(Finland), 2 December 1990,<br />

http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/1990b.htm.<br />

Case Law<br />

16. Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory<br />

Oppinion, ICJ, July 8, 1996, http://www.icjcij.org/icjwww/icases/iunan/iunanframe.htm.<br />

17. Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the<br />

Occupied Palestinian Territory, ICJ, Advisory Oppinion, July 9,<br />

2004, http://www.icjcij.org/icjwww/idocket/imwp/imwpframe.htm.<br />

192<br />

ALEXANDRU MOCANU - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS <strong>LAW</strong><br />

PROTECTION AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN <strong>LAW</strong><br />

IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL<br />

PEOPLE IN POLISH <strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO<br />

THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN<br />

COUNTRIES AND INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>.<br />

FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH<br />

TOLERANCE UNTIL FULL EMANCIPATION<br />

BY AGNIESZKA SZPAK*<br />

SUMMARY<br />

Although homosexuality has never been dominant sexual orientation, it<br />

has existed in every society and every culture. In the law of ancient<br />

Mediterranean Sea States it was repressed (among others in<br />

Mesopotamia and Egypt). However, in the ancient Greece and Rome<br />

homosexuality was accepted; especially in Greece where it was<br />

regarded as a natural form of sexual life.<br />

In the XIX century European States began abolishing penalization of<br />

homosexuality; France was the first State that did so, Holland was the<br />

next one. But in most European States homosexuality was penalized<br />

until the beginnings of the XX century. In 1973 the American<br />

Psychiatric Association deleted homosexuality from its official<br />

nomenclature of mental disorders, and in 1991 the World Health<br />

Organization deleted it of its list of diseases.<br />

In Polish legislation the first Penal Code of 1932 abolished the<br />

penalization of homosexuality yet it envisaged a penalty of up to 3 years<br />

in prison for male homosexual prostitution. The next Penal Code of<br />

1969 apart from abolishing the penalization of homosexuality abolished<br />

the penalization of homosexual prostitution as well.<br />

* Public International Law Faculty, Nicolas Copernicus University in<br />

Toruń, Poland.<br />

193<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

The Penal Code of 1997 now in force includes the same provisions.<br />

Outside the criminal law Polish law contains only a very small number<br />

of provisions regulating the legal status of homosexuals. Most of them<br />

are antidiscriminatory provisions that can be found in the Constitution<br />

of 1997 (Arts. 32 and 47 – protection of private life), the Labour Code<br />

(Chapter IIa – Equal treatment in employment) and in the Act on<br />

Promotion of Employment and on Institutions of the Labour Market of<br />

2004. Polish legal system guarantees to homosexual people a minimum<br />

of minimum by way of antidiscriminatory provisions but that does not<br />

equal lack of discrimination.<br />

In this context it should be mentioned that Art. <strong>18</strong> of the Polish<br />

Constitution defines marriage as a relationship between a man and a<br />

woman. In Polish law now in force homosexual couples have no right to<br />

marry, not even to contract registered partnerships; they are not allowed<br />

to adopt children. In 2003 Professor M. Szyszkowska (a senator)<br />

submitted a draft act on registered partnerships. It envisaged the<br />

possibility of contracting a registered partnership and many rights<br />

connected with it, mainly of economic character. The amendments of<br />

the Senate considerably reduced the extent of rights accorded to<br />

homosexual couples.<br />

Polish draft act follows an example of other countries, mainly European<br />

such as among others Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Sweden,<br />

Norway, France, Belgium, Germany, Croatia or Spain recently which<br />

passed similar acts. The most recent events are the approval of the<br />

same sex partnership laws by New Zealand and Switzerland<br />

Significant changes relating to the attitude towards people of<br />

homosexual orientation have been taking place in the legal systems of<br />

those States; generally they are aimed at the equality of rights for<br />

heterosexual and homosexual persons. Many times have also the<br />

European Tribunal of Human Rights passed judgments in favour of<br />

homosexuals in cases of their discrimination and protection of their<br />

private life.<br />

194<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

On the basis of the presented stages of regulation of the legal status of<br />

homosexuality it may be noticed that they have evolved from<br />

depenalization through tolerance into full emancipation. Particular<br />

European States are in different stages – some of them on lower and<br />

some on higher levels – but significant changes in relation to<br />

homosexuality and people of homosexual orientation in the direction of<br />

introducing different forms of legalized homosexual relationships or<br />

marriages and their equality with heterosexual marriages are evident. It<br />

is to be hoped that Poland will follow the example of other European<br />

States and changes contributing to the struggle against discrimination<br />

will take place, the changes that will guarantee the equality of rights and<br />

chances for homosexuals. There is no reason to treat homosexuality as<br />

something unnatural; it is natural sexual orientation as same as<br />

heterosexuality.<br />

195<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

ARTICLE<br />

It is truism to say that all societies are diversified – socially, nationally,<br />

culturally and religiously. People as well are different in terms of their<br />

origins, age, colour, wealth, opinions or finally sexual orientation. These<br />

features can not be judged – they are neither good nor bad in<br />

themselves. They are simply some objective factors. “All human beings<br />

are born free and equal in dignity and rights” - states the Universal<br />

Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 (Art.1). In the Preamble we read<br />

that “[…] recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and<br />

inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation<br />

of freedom, justice and peace in the world“ 1 . And this is what really<br />

matters, what is significant and should constitute a signpost also for<br />

creating national laws.<br />

Although homosexuality has never been a dominant sexual orientation it<br />

has existed in every society and every culture. The space does not allow<br />

for detailed presentation of the evolution of legal regulations concerning<br />

homosexuality from historic perspective; therefore I will confine myself<br />

to just a few remarks. In the law of ancient Asian Mediterranean<br />

countries homosexuality was repressed (inter alia old Hebrew law<br />

envisaged a death penalty for male homosexual relations; the legal<br />

situation was similar in Mesopotamia and Egypt) 2 . But in the ancient<br />

Greece and Rome homosexuality was accepted 3 . It was especially so in<br />

Greece where we could have encountered unprecedented sexual<br />

freedom. For the Greeks aesthetic values and experience were more<br />

important than rigid gender division. Therefore homosexuality was<br />

regarded as a natural form of sexual life and there were no attempts to<br />

1<br />

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, available at:<br />

http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html<br />

2<br />

M. Filar, Status prawny homoseksualizmu w prawie polskim na tle prawa<br />

porównawczego i międzynarodowego, in: Księga Jubileuszowa Profesora<br />

Tadeusza Jasudowicza, Toruń 2004, p. 114 (translation by the author).<br />

3<br />

K. Boczkowski, Homoseksualizm, Warsaw 1992, pp. 63-64 (translation by<br />

the author).<br />

196<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

legally repress it.<br />

Moving forward in time to modern times it should be noted that in <strong>18</strong>10<br />

France was a first country that abolished the criminality of<br />

homosexuality; the Netherlands was next to have done so in <strong>18</strong>11 4 .<br />

However, in most European countries homosexuality was penalized<br />

until the beginning of the XX century. It should not be forgotten that in<br />

1935-1945 in the Nazi Germany 50 000 homosexuals were executed<br />

and 25 000 were sent to concentration camps on the basis of new harsh<br />

law of 1935 5 . For example in Denmark the penalization of homosexual<br />

relations was abolished in 1933, in Sweden in 1944, in Norway and<br />

Finland only at the beginning of 70’s of the XX century (in 1972 and<br />

1971 respectively) 6 . In 1973 the American Psychiatric Society deleted<br />

homosexuality from its official nomenclature of mental disorders, which<br />

meant recognizing homosexuality as natural variant of our sexuality. In<br />

1991 also the World Health Organization deleted it of its list of<br />

diseases.<br />

Despite abolishing criminalization of homosexuality in many countries<br />

homosexual relations were still subject to restrictions that were not<br />

imposed on heterosexual relations. I mean most of all the different ages<br />

of consent for heterosexual and homosexual relations. For homosexual<br />

relations they were higher, for example in Finland they were<br />

respectively: 15 years of age for heterosexual relations and <strong>18</strong> for<br />

4 K. Waaldijk, Civil Developments: Patterns of Reform In the Legal Position of<br />

Same-Sex Partners in Europe, “Canadian Journal of Family Law” 17(1), 2000,<br />

p. 68; available at:<br />

http://www.meijers.leidenuniv.nl/content_docs/Publications%20Kees%20Waal<br />

dijk/17_canadian_journal_of_family_law_2000__p._62-88.doc<br />

5 An earlier provision (<strong>18</strong>73) stated that a man who commits obscene relations<br />

with another men or that participates in such relations will be punished with<br />

imprisonment. Quote from R. Biedroń, Piętno różowego trójkąta, “Polityka”,<br />

no. 34(2415), 2003, pp.62-63 (translation by the author).<br />

6<br />

J.M. Krawczyk, Homoseksualiści w systemach prawnych i społecznych<br />

państw skandynawskich, Grodzisk Mazowiecki, 2002, pp.5-6 (translation by<br />

the author).<br />

197<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

homosexual ones. Nowadays in all the Scandinavian countries the age<br />

of consent is the same for heterosexual and homosexual relations. As for<br />

other countries, especially not European ones, there is still much left to<br />

be done; for example in Afghanistan, Morocco, Libya, Pakistan, Saudi<br />

Arabia, Iran, Sudan and Yemen homosexual relations are punished and<br />

in the last four even with death penalty, and in Pakistan with flogging<br />

or stoning! 7<br />

With regard to Polish legislation the first penal code of 1932 abolished<br />

penalization of homosexuality, yet it envisaged a penalty of up to 3<br />

years imprisonment for the crime of male homosexual prostitution (Art.<br />

207). Apart from repeating the provisions of its predecessor pertaining<br />

to abolishing criminalization of homosexuality, next penal code of 1969<br />

also abolished penalization of homosexual prostitution. Penal code of<br />

1997 – currently in force - also stands on the ground of depenalization<br />

of homosexuality 8 . It means that homosexual relations between two<br />

adult partners that consent to that can not be punished and such acts<br />

belong to the sphere of one’s private life, in which sphere the law must<br />

not interfere (the possibilities of such interference have been formulated<br />

in very restrictive manner) 9 . The penal code does not criminalize<br />

prostitution – every prostitution heterosexual as well as homosexual but<br />

forms of its organizing and benefiting from it. In these terms Polish law<br />

namely criminal law may be regarded as “showing liberal tendencies” 10<br />

but in other branches just like family law, inheritance law or tax law it is<br />

very conservative.<br />

7<br />

See: http://www.mojeprawa.info/lista_krajow.rtf<br />

8<br />

Penal Code, Dz.U. 1997 No. 88, item 553 amended.<br />

9<br />

Art. 31 (3) of the Polish Constitution states: „ Any limitation upon the<br />

exercise of constitutional freedoms and rights may be imposed only by statute,<br />

and only when necessary in a democratic state for the protection of its security<br />

or public order, or to protect the natural environment, health or public morals,<br />

or the freedoms and rights of other persons. Such limitations shall not violate<br />

the essence of freedoms and rights”. The exceptions are thus formulated very<br />

narrowly.<br />

10<br />

M.Filar, op.cit., p. 117.<br />

198<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Polish law currently in force contains a small number of provisions<br />

regulating the legal situation of homosexual people. They are mainly<br />

provisions of antidiscriminatory character. Most fundamental of them is<br />

Art. 32 of the Constitution of 2 April 1997, which states: “(1) All<br />

persons shall be equal before the law. All persons shall have the right to<br />

equal treatment by public authorities. (2) No one shall be discriminated<br />

against in political, social or economic life for any reason<br />

whatsoever” 11 . Although the formula “any reason whatsoever” includes<br />

sexual orientation it would be a better solution to adopt another formula<br />

– of explicit, non-exhaustive listing of the criteria, on the basis of which<br />

any discrimination would be prohibited and among them sexual<br />

orientation should be enumerated. That was the initial idea; in the 1995<br />

draft Art. 32 (2) listed criteria on the basis of which no body could be<br />

discriminated against and there was an explicit mention of sexual<br />

orientation. The draft had been rejected because of the protests of the<br />

catholic church, right-wing parties and the then President Lech<br />

Wałęsa 12 . As we read in a report issued by Lambda Association and<br />

Campaign Against Homophobia 13 on discrimination and intolerance for<br />

reason of sexual orientation in Poland of 2002 (page 36) “Art. 32 of the<br />

Constitution does not fulfill its role in regards to homosexual minorities<br />

– it does not translate into passing of legal bills and decrees that would<br />

regulate the legal situation of Polish gays and lesbians in more details”<br />

11<br />

Dz.U. 1997, No. 78 item 483.<br />

12<br />

P. Leszkowicz, Przełamując hetero-matrix. Wojna seksualna w Polsce i<br />

kryzys praw człowieka, in: Z. Sypniewski, B. Warkocki (ed.), Homofobia po<br />

polsku, Warsaw 2004, p. 104 (translation by the autor).<br />

13<br />

The Report is available at:<br />

http://warszawa.lambda.org.pl/dokumenty/Raport_dyskryminacja_2002_pl.pdf<br />

(in Polish). Lambda Association is a Polish law association with the aim to<br />

create a positive identity of lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transexuals as well as<br />

shaping the social acceptance of them; check the website:<br />

http://www.lambda.org.pl; Campaign Against Homophobia was founded in<br />

2001 and is a non-governmental organization operating throughout Poland.<br />

Only volunteers work for the Campaign and they focus their efforts on a<br />

broadly understood fight against homophobia; check the website:<br />

http://www.kampania.org.pl/homofobia/angwer.php<br />

199<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

(translation by the author).<br />

Equally important is Art. 47 of Polish Constitution according to which:<br />

“Everyone shall have the right to legal protection of his private and<br />

family life, of his honour and good reputation and to make decisions<br />

about his personal life”.<br />

With no doubts these provisions ensure protection of private life<br />

including its such important part as sexual life; this protection exists as<br />

long as acts of sexual activity do not comprise a crime and as has been<br />

written above homosexual relations between consenting partners<br />

definitely are not a crime.<br />

First Polish legal act which contained the antidiscriminatory provisions<br />

with regard to sexual orientation was the Act on Employment and<br />

Counteracting Unemployment (as amended in December 2002, in force<br />

since 6 February 2003) 14 . This Act was then replaced by a new Act on<br />

Promotion of Employment and on Institutions of the Labour Market of<br />

20 April 2004 15 . Earlier on 1 January 2004 amendments to the Labour<br />

code came into force – a new chapter II a entitled “Equal treatment in<br />

employment” (Art. <strong>18</strong> 3a – Art. <strong>18</strong> 3e ) was added. According to Art. <strong>18</strong> 3a<br />

“employees shall be treated equally as regards the establishment and<br />

termination of employment relationships, the conditions of employment,<br />

promotion and access to training in order to raise occupational<br />

qualifications, particularly regardless of sex, age, disability, race,<br />

religion, nationality, political views, trade union membership, ethnic<br />

origin, religious convictions, sexual orientation […]”. This amendment<br />

resulted from the obligation to harmonize Polish law with the European<br />

Community law and more specifically with the EU Council directive<br />

2000/78/EC establishing a general framework for equal treatment in<br />

employment and occupation of 27 November 2000 16 . The indemnity can<br />

be awarded for infringement of the equal treatment principle; it must not<br />

14 Dz. U. 2003 No. 58, item 514.<br />

15 Dz.U. 2004 No. 99, item 1001.<br />

16<br />

Official Journal L 303, 02/12/2000 P. 0016 - 0022<br />

200<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

be lower than the minimum remuneration for work determined under<br />

separate provisions (Art. <strong>18</strong> 3d of the Labour code). Equally important is<br />

the provision of the next Article (<strong>18</strong> 3e ) according to which “ employee’s<br />

exercise of the rights resulting from infringement of the principle of<br />

equal treatment in employment may not constitute the grounds for the<br />

employer’s submitting of a notice of termination of the employment<br />

relationship or terminating such relationship without notice 17 “.<br />

The above mentioned Act on Promotion of Employment and on<br />

Institutions of the Labour Market of 2004 in a few articles (36, 38 and<br />

123) enumerates among grounds of prohibited discrimination sexual<br />

orientation. Art. 36(4) stipulates that employment agency should be<br />

based on the principle of equality meaning an obligation to give<br />

assistance to all seeking job in its finding regardless of the sexual<br />

orientation. At the same time the employers may not formulate their<br />

employment requirements in such a way that they be discriminatory for<br />

the candidates because of their sexual orientation, among others. The<br />

provision concerning employment counseling was construed in an<br />

analogous way (Art. 38(2)). Every person who refuses to employ a<br />

candidate for reason of his/her sexual orientation will be punished with<br />

a fine not lower than 3 000 zł (Art. 123).<br />

Polish legal system ensures for people of homosexual orientation<br />

minimum of minimum of rights through the antidiscriminatory<br />

provisions but does this mean lack of discrimination? <strong>18</strong><br />

17<br />

Labour code Dz. U. 1998, No. 21, item 94, amended.<br />

<strong>18</strong><br />

In its concluding observations of 2 December 2004 concerning Poland’s<br />

respect for her international legal obligations resulting from the International<br />

Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966 Human Rights Committee<br />

expressed its concern about the legal situation of sexual minorities. It stated<br />

that the prohibition of discrimination principle is not respected and that the<br />

discriminatory acts are not adequately investigated and punished; see the<br />

observations at:<br />

http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/66db176cabc27b16c1256f43005ba<br />

2e7?Opendocument<br />

201<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

In this context it should be mentioned that Art. <strong>18</strong> of the Polish<br />

Constitution defines marriage as a relationship between a man and a<br />

women (in the same way Art. 1 of the Family code of 25 February<br />

1964) 19 . In conformity with currently binding Polish law homosexual<br />

couples are not allowed to marry or even to contract any registered<br />

partnerships; they are also not allowed to adopt children. However,<br />

there is a draft act on registered same-sex relationships in the Sejm (the<br />

lower chamber of Polish parliament) but it is unfortunately practically<br />

impossible that the act be passed in this term of the parliament (and in<br />

the next as well). The initial draft prepared by professor Maria<br />

Szyszkowska, SLD-UP senator (left-wing parties), entitled the act on<br />

the registered partnerships was forwarded to the Senate (the upper<br />

chamber of Polish parliament) on 21 November 2003 20 . The purpose of<br />

this draft act was to regulate the legal situation of homosexual people in<br />

Poland. It envisaged the possibility of contracting a registered<br />

partnership and many rights connected with it mainly of economic<br />

character. The most important of these rights were the right to inherit<br />

after the dead partner, the right to health insurance for family members,<br />

the right to joint taxation or to working benefits such as pension The<br />

original draft did not include the right to children adoption but it did not<br />

exclude a possibility of raising one partner’s child by the two partners as<br />

well as representing the child by the partner without the parental<br />

authority. It is worth mentioning that the draft contained a provision<br />

pertaining to the internal relations between the partners – they were to<br />

be based on mutual assistance, support, maintaining and deepening of<br />

spiritual agreement, as well as on the cooperation and mutual planning<br />

of the future.<br />

On 3 December 2004 the Senate decided that a redrafted act will be<br />

forwarded to the Sejm. The name of the draft was amended into the Act<br />

on the registered same-sex relationships because the term partnership<br />

was thought to be reserved only for a relationship between a man and a<br />

19<br />

Dz.U. 1964 No. 9, item 59, amended.<br />

20<br />

The draft bill (in Polish) is available at:<br />

http://www.prawo.lex.pl/czasopisma/sp/1_04.html<br />

202<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

woman 21 . According to the redrafted act, registration of the relationship<br />

in the registry office implicates the acquirement of rights mainly of<br />

economic character, inter alia: the right to inherit after the dead partner,<br />

the right to alimony for the partner in a state of scarcity that resulted<br />

from the termination of the relationship. Joint property of partners will<br />

not begin ipso iure (like in the initial draft) but the partners will be<br />

allowed to enact it by way of contract (notarial act); partners will not<br />

have the right to joint taxation. Another difference between the initial<br />

and current draft act is the impossibility of taking by partners the same<br />

name and representing one partner’s child by a second partner without<br />

the parental authority rights. In the new draft the provision on the<br />

internal relations between the partners was crossed out which should be<br />

grieved as law should also reflect values and mutual assistance, support<br />

or deepening of emotional ties between partners are with no doubt such<br />

values. Polish Senators – when adapting the amendments – decided that<br />

a person in a partnership will be allowed to receive information and visit<br />

his or her partner being in a hospital as well as make decisions<br />

concerning the manner of treatment of the other partner. Partners were<br />

also granted a right to collect correspondence of the other partner as<br />

well as a right to refuse to testify in a legal suit as a witness according to<br />

the same rules as for the marital spouses. The act does not allow for<br />

adoption.<br />

Polish draft act draws patterns from other countries. In many European<br />

states similar acts were adopted, among others in Denmark, the<br />

Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, France, Belgium, Germany, Croatia or<br />

recently in Spain. Spain became the third European country after<br />

Belgium and the Netherlands to legalize the same sex marriages and<br />

adoptions. The most recent events are the approval of the same sex<br />

partnership laws by New Zealand and Switzerland. On June 5th <strong>2005</strong>,<br />

the Swiss people finally approved the same-sex partnership law with a<br />

21<br />

In this way the resolution of the Sejm of 3 December 2004 on the issue of<br />

introducing in the Sejm the draft act on the registered same-sex relationships<br />

(the justification); available at (in Polish):<br />

http://www.senat.gov.pl/K5/DOK/UCH/073/548uch.htm<br />

203<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

clear 58% vote in favour, thus becoming the first people in the world to<br />

directly approve same sex partnerships. Also Great Britain passed Civil<br />

Partnership Act (2004) and first registrations start in December <strong>2005</strong>,<br />

open to same-sex partners only with all the same rights and<br />

responsilibities as marriage. In the legal systems of these states<br />

significant changes relating to the attitude towards homosexual people<br />

can be noticed. These changes can be generally characterized as<br />

heading for equalization of homosexual people with heterosexuals. For<br />

instance in Denmark, which was the first country to grant to<br />

homosexual people a right to legalize their relationships and made their<br />

status equal with the status of heterosexual marriages, the Danish<br />

Registered Partnership Act was adopted (1989). The legislative<br />

technique consisted in making most of the provisions on marriages<br />

applicable to registered partnerships; there is no possibility of adoption<br />

for homosexual couples, however. The next state that passed analogous<br />

law was Norway; in April 1993 Norwegian parliament adopted a Bill on<br />

Registered Partnerships. Finland passed an act with the same title in<br />

2001 22 . In all the Scandinavian countries partnerships have not been<br />

accorded a right to adoption except for Sweden where partnerships and<br />

marriages (heterosexual) have been equalized also in this regard 23 . In<br />

other Scandinavian states a person being in a legalized relationship has<br />

a right to adoption of partner’s children. In the Netherlands there are<br />

two legal acts in force – the Act on the Opening Up of Marriage and the<br />

Act on Adoption by persons of the same sex, both of 2000. They<br />

enabled contracting marriages between homosexual people and granted<br />

them a right to adoption (except for foriegn adoption). In this moment it<br />

is worth indicating motives that constituted guidelines for Scandinavian<br />

countries when passing the above mentioned acts taking as an example<br />

Norway. The most important among the motives were: a need to<br />

regulate rights and duties between same-sex partners and between them<br />

22<br />

Texts of the relevant acts are available at:<br />

http://www.mojeprawa.info/aktyprawa-kraje.htm<br />

23<br />

J.M.Krawczyk, op.cit., p.<strong>18</strong>. Text of the Act on Registered Partnerships was<br />

adopted in Sweden in 1994; originally it did not envisage a right to adoption, it<br />

was introduced by the Act of 2002.<br />

204<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

and the society; a need for changes in the people’s attitude towards<br />

homosexual people; a need for stabilization of homosexual relationships<br />

and a need to strengthen the paradigm of family and marriage 24 .<br />

Rationality and necessity for forging these motives into legal acts<br />

should not give rise to doubts. It is interesting to note that changes in<br />

social attitude were achieved through changes in law.<br />

The European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental<br />

Freedoms (ECHRF) of 4 November 1950 and the judgments of the<br />

European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) deserve a few remarks.<br />

Poland as a state-party to the Convention is obliged to respect its<br />

provisions; it is advisable to give a few exemplary ECHR’s judgments<br />

significant to the legal situation of homosexual people. In this context,<br />

Art. 8 of the Convention is relevant; it stipulates that:<br />

“(1) Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his<br />

home and his correspondence.<br />

(2) There shall be no interference by a public authority with the<br />

exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is<br />

necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security,<br />

public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the<br />

prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals,<br />

or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others” 25 .<br />

The ECHR’s judgments which have been passed on the basis of this<br />

provision are numerous and there is no possibility to analyze them all in<br />

this article; all that can be done is to draw some attention to the most<br />

important judgments. In the Dudgeon case (Dudgeon v. Great Britain)<br />

of 22 <strong>October</strong> 1981 the Court stated that the legislation that prohibits<br />

homosexual acts committed in private between consenting males<br />

constitutes unjustified interference with a right to respect for private life<br />

24<br />

Ibidem, p.17.<br />

25<br />

Text of the Convention is available at:<br />

http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Word/005.doc<br />

205<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

and as a consequence such prohibition violates Art. 8 of the<br />

Convention 26 . The Strasburg Court took an analogous position in its<br />

following judgments – Norris v. Ireland case of 26 <strong>October</strong> 1988,<br />

Modinos v. Cyprus of 22 April 1993 and A.D.T. v. Great Britain of 31<br />

July 2000 27 . In da Silva Mouta v. Portugal of 21 December 1999<br />

European Court of Human Rights stated that limitation of parental<br />

responsibility of a father of a minor daughter only on the ground of his<br />

homosexual orientation violates Art. 8 of the Convention in connection<br />

with Art. 14 (which will be explored next).<br />

In this group of judgments the Court tried to examine whether there was<br />

a breach of Art. 14 of the Convention or not. Article 14 reads as follows<br />

(prohibition of discrimination):<br />

“The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention<br />

shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race,<br />

colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social<br />

origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other<br />

status” 28 .<br />

In its judgments in cases of L. and V. v. Austria of 9 January 2003, B.<br />

B. v. Great Britain of 10 February 2004 and Woditschka and Wilfling v.<br />

Austria of 21 <strong>October</strong> 2004, the Court took the position that setting<br />

26<br />

Jeffrey Dudgeon complained about the British law which regarded some<br />

homosexual acts between consenting adults as a crime. British government<br />

indicated that the law is actually a dead letter and had not been applied for<br />

years but the European Court stated that mere existence of such provisions<br />

makes them possible to be applied in the future; thus the Court considered it as<br />

an unjustified interference with private life and violence of Art. 8 of the<br />

Convention. The judgment is available at:<br />

http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?item=2&portal=hbkm&action=html<br />

&highlight=dudgeon&sessionid=3374870&skin=hudoc-en<br />

27<br />

Judgments are available at:<br />

http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/search.asp?skin=hudoc-en<br />

28<br />

Text of the Convention is available at:<br />

http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Word/005.doc<br />

206<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

different ages of consent for heterosexual and homosexual relations<br />

between adults and adolescents has no justification and constitutes<br />

discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation, thus violates the<br />

prohibition of discrimination and the right to respect for private life<br />

(Art. 14 in connection with Art. 8 of the Convention).<br />

In another group of judgments concerning gays in military especially<br />

two cases are important: Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. The United<br />

Kingdom and Smith and Grady v. The United Kingdom both of 27<br />

September 1999. All four applicants in two cases were members of the<br />

armed forces of the U.K. After investigations by the military police into<br />

their sexual orientations and their admitting that he or she was<br />

homosexual they were administralively discharged. They complained<br />

that the investigations into their sexual orientations and their subsequent<br />

discharges constituted violation of Art. 8 (the right to respect for private<br />

life) as well as of Art. 14 (prohibition of discrimination). The Court<br />

found that the U.K. violated Art. 8 of the Convention, however it<br />

decided that the complaint under Art. 14 provided no separate issue<br />

from that already addressed under the Art. 8 complaint 29 .<br />

On the basis of the above presented phases which can be discern in the<br />

legal regulation of homosexuality we can notice some kind of regularity<br />

– from depenalization through tolerance to full emancipation. Particular<br />

European countries are at different levels but significant changes in<br />

attitudes towards homosexuality and homosexual people are visible – in<br />

some countries more and in some less visible but still they are there.<br />

These changes are heading for introducing various forms of legalized<br />

homosexual relationships or marriages. A good example in this sphere<br />

is given by Scandinavian countries and the Netherlands where<br />

homosexual persons are guaranteed equal rights; and where<br />

homosexuals constitute quite large part of their societies. In Poland as<br />

well live about 20 million homosexual people (about 5 % of the<br />

society). This is a huge number of citizens deprived of many rights only<br />

because of their sexual orientation. Such a legal and factual situation<br />

29<br />

Judgments are available at: http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/search.asp?skin=hudoc-en .<br />

207<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

cannot be sustained any longer; we cannot ignore such a numerous<br />

group of Polish citizens since “the Republic of Poland shall be the<br />

common good of all its citizens“ (Art. 1 of the Polish Constitution).<br />

How can we talk about justice and equality when a part of the society is<br />

being denied rights because of sexual orientation? It is to be hoped that<br />

following example of other European states also in Poland changes will<br />

come, changes that will contribute to the struggle against discrimination<br />

and will ensure equality of rights and chances for homosexual people.<br />

There is no reason to regard homosexuality as something unnatural; it is<br />

a natural sexual orientation to the same extent as heterosexual one. It is<br />

usually emphasized that when making new law relating to the legal<br />

status of homosexuality the social awareness should not be ignored but<br />

it must also be borne in mind that the majority opinion is not always<br />

righteous. Professor Szyszkowska righteously said that “very rarely the<br />

right belongs to the majority. The number of voices in favour of an<br />

opinion cannot be the measure of its legitimacy” 30 . Statistics cannot<br />

justify discrimination and prohibition thereof is recognized as standard<br />

of Polish law and the European Community law as well as the<br />

international law. As the example of Scandinavian states demonstrates –<br />

it is possible to create changes in social attitude through changes in law.<br />

In this place we could ask ourselves whether the protection accorded in<br />

Polish law is sufficient or whether maybe we still deal with<br />

discrimination. How should ‘tolerance’ be understood – in negative<br />

terms only as enduring something unpleasant mere lack of<br />

discrimination? And is it enough? Despite all the positive changes in<br />

Polish legal system, the protection is – in my opinion – not sufficient. It<br />

is not sufficient to depenalize homosexuality and pass a few<br />

antidiscriminatory provisions. The mere non-existence in internal law of<br />

provisions “institutionalizing” 31 homosexuality equals discrimination;<br />

provisions that accord to gays and lesbians full, equal rights as<br />

compared to those accorded to heterosexuals. At the end it is worth<br />

30<br />

Quote from: Z.Sypniewski, B.Warkocki (ed.), op.cit., p.288 (translation by<br />

the author).<br />

31<br />

Adjective taken from M. Filar, op.cit., p.122.<br />

208<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

invoking the UNESCO Declaration of the Principles on Tolerance of 16<br />

November 1995 where we can find a meaning of tolerance (Art. 1):<br />

“1.1 Tolerance is respect, acceptance and appreciation of the rich<br />

diversity of our world's cultures, our forms of expression and ways of<br />

being human. It is fostered by knowledge, openness, communication<br />

and freedom of thought, conscience and belief. Tolerance is harmony in<br />

difference. It is not only a moral duty, it is also a political and legal<br />

requirement. Tolerance, the virtue that makes peace possible,<br />

contributes to the replacement of the culture of war by a culture of<br />

peace.<br />

1.2 Tolerance is not concession, condescension or indulgence.<br />

Tolerance is, above all, an active attitude prompted by recognition of<br />

the universal human rights and fundamental freedoms of others. In no<br />

circumstance can it be used to justify infringements of these<br />

fundamental values. Tolerance is to be exercised by individuals, groups<br />

and States.<br />

1.3 Tolerance is the responsibility that upholds human rights, pluralism<br />

(including cultural pluralism), democracy and the rule of law. It<br />

involves the rejection of dogmatism and absolutism and affirms the<br />

standards set out in international human rights instruments.<br />

1.4 Consistent with respect for human rights, the practice of tolerance<br />

does not mean toleration of social injustice or the abandonment or<br />

weakening of one's convictions. It means that one is free to adhere to<br />

one's own convictions and accepts that others adhere to theirs. It means<br />

accepting the fact that human beings, naturally diverse in their<br />

appearance, situation, speech, behaviour and values, have the right to<br />

live in peace and to be as they are. It also means that one’s views are not<br />

to be imposed on others” 32 .<br />

32<br />

Text of the Declaration in: J.Symonides (ed.), The struggle against<br />

discrimination. A collection of international instruments adopted by the United<br />

Nations System, UNESCO, Paris, 1996, p.<strong>18</strong>6.<br />

209<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

In such an understanding of tolerance it means acceptance and<br />

appreciation of values and benefits resulting from pluralism and<br />

diversity; it does not mean just a mere lack of discrimination. There is<br />

no such tolerance in Poland.<br />

210<br />

AGNIESZKA SZPAK - THE LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUAL PEOPLE IN POLISH<br />

<strong>LAW</strong> WITH REGARD TO THE <strong>LAW</strong>S OF OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND<br />

INTERNATIONAL <strong>LAW</strong>. FROM DEPENALIZATION THROUGH TOLERANCE UNTIL<br />

FULL EMANCIPATION


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY<br />

ADVOCATES (OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC<br />

OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF<br />

HUMAN RIGHTS<br />

BY ALEXANDR SVETLICINII *<br />

Present situation with human rights in Moldova is very typical for many<br />

developing countries, where government has officially proclaimed<br />

protection of human rights and freedoms as a priority in the public<br />

affairs. However, due to the difficult social-economic conditions and<br />

authoritarian legacy of the past these declarations often remain on paper.<br />

One would hardly argue that Moldova didn’t move since the<br />

proclamation of its independence to the better protection of human<br />

rights. National Constitution adopted in 1994 contains the majority of<br />

the civil, political and economic rights and liberties guaranteed by the<br />

state in the majority of democratic nations. Moldovan legislation has<br />

been continuously reformed in order to correspond to the international<br />

standards in this area. Moldova has joined several international and<br />

regional treaties that provide certain mechanisms for monitoring the<br />

situation of human rights in the country, addressing the causes of<br />

violations and encouraging the government to undertake proper steps in<br />

combating the identified violations.<br />

Thus, Moldova is a part in both International Covenants on political,<br />

economic, social and cultural rights; it has ratified Universal<br />

Declaration of Human Rights and several international documents<br />

*<br />

Alexandr Svetlicinii holds LL.B International Law degree from Free<br />

International University of Moldova, Chisinau and is currently enrolled in LL.M<br />

International Business Law program at Central European University, Budapest.<br />

Present article is a product of the author’s internship at the Center for Human<br />

Rights of Moldova in spring of <strong>2005</strong>.<br />

211<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

addressing particular categories of individuals and their rights such as<br />

Convention of the Rights of the Child and other. Within the Community<br />

of Independent States Republic of Moldova is part to the Convention of<br />

the Community of Independent States on Human Rights of May 26,<br />

1995 and Law of the Community of Independent States regarding<br />

Human Rights Committee of September 24, 1993. However, these two<br />

documents remain merely declarations; they are amorphous legal<br />

instruments that lack basic enforcement mechanisms. 1<br />

Among regional treaties the most important is European Convention of<br />

Human Rights and Fundamental Liberties, which Moldova ratified in<br />

order to become a member in Council of Europe. This regional treaty<br />

creates an effective mechanism that is aimed to protect human rights<br />

under the Convention even in case when Member-state allows or fails to<br />

prosecute the violation. It is the European Court of Human Rights that<br />

accepts individual complaints against the governments of Memberstates<br />

when all domestic remedies were exhausted. Unfortunately,<br />

citizens of Moldova, due to certain objective factors, cannot fully take<br />

advantage of this method when deprived of their rights and liberties.<br />

However, there were several decisions of the ECHR against Moldovan<br />

government that had a great impact on the situation with human rights<br />

in certain areas. 2<br />

National judiciary is aimed to be the key institution, which should<br />

provide effective reestablishment of citizens in their rights in case of<br />

violations committed by the government officials or private parties.<br />

There were several judicial reforms that shaped the structure and<br />

internal hierarchy of the judicial system, trying to provide maximum<br />

level of accessibility to justice for the ordinary citizen. New Code of<br />

Criminal Procedure provides more guarantees for the suspects, accused,<br />

victims, and witnesses in protection of their constitutional rights during<br />

1<br />

Parliamentary Advocate, Newsletter of the CHRM, Oct-Dec 2000, <strong>Number</strong> 5,<br />

<strong>Volume</strong> 1, p. 2<br />

2<br />

Alexandr Svetlicinii, Republic of Moldova as a Respondent State in the<br />

European Court of Human Rights, Eastern European Human Rights Law Journal,<br />

<strong>Volume</strong> 2, <strong>Number</strong> 2 (April <strong>18</strong>,<strong>2005</strong>) p. 8<br />

212<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

the course of investigation, interrogation, trial, appeal and other stages<br />

during the process of criminal justice. Thus, with the introduction of the<br />

position of special judge for criminal investigation, every action taken<br />

by the investigator and prosecutor, that cause limitation or intrusion<br />

with constitutional rights of the citizens, now require the prior approval<br />

of that judge.<br />

Another important and active player in the field of human rights<br />

protection that is continuously increasing its capabilities is civil society<br />

represented by numerous non-governmental organizations, grass root<br />

groups, representatives of local administration and responsible citizens.<br />

They have been very active in fighting against violations filing law<br />

suits, writing petitions and legislative proposals and assisting individual<br />

citizens in their cases. Majority of the complaints filed with the<br />

European Court of Human Rights against Moldovan authorities where<br />

filed by lawyers and legal experts, members of the non-governmental<br />

human rights organizations. 3<br />

But this panorama of national, regional and international mechanisms<br />

for protection of human rights applicable to the Republic of Moldova<br />

wouldn’t be comprehensive without mentioning another important<br />

element in the national protection system. It is the institute of the<br />

Parliamentary Advocates (ombudsman) that are appointed by the<br />

Parliament in order to guarantee the observance of constitutional rights<br />

and freedoms by central and local public administration, institutions,<br />

organizations and enterprises regardless of their type of ownership, by<br />

public associations, as well as by officials at all levels.<br />

At present ombudsman institutions are in operation in over ninety<br />

countries world-wide. They complement and expand the traditional<br />

parliamentary control over the executive authorities, and yet do not take<br />

over the functions of other institutions, such as courts. In 1995-1996<br />

3<br />

Two most active nonprofit organization in this matter were Lawyers for Human<br />

Rights and Moldova Helsinki Committee for Human Rights, both Chisinau-based<br />

NGOs<br />

213<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

special expert missions, on an assignment of the United Nations<br />

Development Programme, made a rigorous assessment of the exercise<br />

of fundamental human rights in Moldova and found it expedient that a<br />

national institution for protection of human rights be established in the<br />

republic. In its report experts have also found that there must be actions,<br />

conditions and mechanisms by which to ensure the protection of the life<br />

of individuals, their honor, their dignity and their property. These<br />

mechanisms were still ineffective in Moldova. 4<br />

In 1996 United Nations Development Programme and the United<br />

Nations Office of High Commissioner for Human Rights have initiated<br />

a project “Support to Democratic Initiatives in the Field of Human<br />

Rights in the Republic of Moldova”. One of the goals was the creation<br />

and capacity building of the independent national institution for<br />

promotion and protection of human rights. This project has been also<br />

supported financially by the Governments of Sweden and the<br />

Netherlands. The Second International Conference on Ombudsman and<br />

Human Rights Institutions that was held in spring of 1996 in Chisinau<br />

arrived at similar conclusion, this time in the context of international<br />

experience, though. All these experiences were later embodied into the<br />

Law on Parliamentary Advocates enacted in <strong>October</strong> 1997 by Moldovan<br />

Parliament. Administering the above Law, in February 1998 the<br />

Parliament appointed three Parliamentary Advocates and assigned equal<br />

rights and responsibilities to each of them. 5<br />

To incorporate this newly established institution into a separate agency,<br />

Moldovan Government has adopted a statute of the Center for Human<br />

Rights of Moldova (CHRM) – office of Parliamentary Advocates that<br />

should provide them with necessary logistical and technical support and<br />

4<br />

Republic of Moldova Human Development Report 1996, Chapter 2 Political<br />

Reforms – Conditions for Building a State and Integration of Society, United<br />

Nations Development Programme (UNDP), available at<br />

http://www.undp.org/rbec/nhdr/1996/moldova/<br />

5 http://www.iatp.md/cpdom/en/ombudsmen.htm<br />

214<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

assistance. 6 When analyzing the legal status of the CHRM, we can<br />

easily identify the provisions that since the beginning undermine the<br />

efficiency of the Center in achieving its objectives. According to the<br />

provisions that regulate the internal structure of the Center, its staff is<br />

composed of only 22 employees including Parliamentary Advocates.<br />

Leaving auxiliary personnel outside discussion we have 17 persons of<br />

whom 12 are lawyers and 5 are of supporting personnel. 7 Several<br />

employees work on behalf of UNDP program in supporting the Center,<br />

as, for instance, the project manager and legal specialist responsible for<br />

hot line established to consult the citizens on legal matters. CHRM has<br />

also three branch offices in Balti, Cahul and Comrat that were<br />

established to ensure the access of the citizens in these areas (North,<br />

Center and South of the Republic) to the Parliamentary Advocates. 8<br />

Currently, only two Parliamentary Advocates work at the CHRM: Ms.<br />

Raisa Apolschii (Director) and Mr. Iurie Perevoznic. Third<br />

Parliamentary Advocate Ms. Alina Ianucenco has been recently<br />

appointed, as a judge in the Constitutional Court and her position is<br />

vacant waiting for another person to be appointed by the newly elected<br />

Parliament. The three Parliamentary Advocates concentrations area is<br />

drawn on the mechanical criteria of division of laws in Moldova: Civil<br />

Law-Labor Law-Land Law; Criminal<br />

Law-Administrative Law-Penitentiary Law; Social Security Law-<br />

Family Law.<br />

It is obvious that if the Center is aimed to be a key organization in the<br />

human rights area, if it has to research each petition and effectively react<br />

6<br />

Hotarirea Parlamentului Republicii Moldova cu privire la aprobarea<br />

Regulamentului privind Centrul pentru Drepturile Omului, a structurii, statului de<br />

functii si modului de finantare a acestuia Nr.1484 din 05.02.98, Monitorul<br />

Oficial al R. Moldova nr.22-23 din 12.03.1998<br />

7<br />

For detailed table of the internal structure of the CHRM see Anexa nr.2 la<br />

Hotarirea Parlamentului nr.1484-XIII din 5 februarie 1998 Structura si statul de<br />

functii ale Centrului pentru Drepturile Omului<br />

8<br />

Anexa nr. 3 la Hotarirea Parlamentului nr. 1484-XIII din 5 februarie 1998<br />

structura si statul de functii ale filialelor Centrului pentru Drepturile Omului din<br />

judetele Balti, Cahul si U.T.A. Gagauzia<br />

215<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

on the identified violations, it has to be provided with sufficient amount<br />

of human resources, i.e. competent personnel of legal specialists,<br />

attorneys, program managers, administrative and technical assistance<br />

staff. The structure of the regional branches of the Center was<br />

developed in the same way: each branch employs only five people<br />

including specialists and administrative staff. Throughout the years of<br />

Center’s existence the situation hasn’t changed: the structure and the<br />

budget remain strictly limited and doesn’t include the resources<br />

necessary for providing qualified public service.<br />

In 2001 Chamber of State Auditors has conducted an inspection aimed<br />

at assuring that the Center is properly managing the financial resources<br />

allocated for its activity as a part of the state budget. In this report<br />

Chamber of State Auditors has revealed that Center failed to follow<br />

several regulations that are related to the accounting and financial<br />

transactions. Specifically, the Chamber notes that Center had no right to<br />

increase certain categories of expenses such as salary for its staff.<br />

Regarding these violations, state auditors recommend the Government<br />

to decrease next year Center’s budget proportionally to the amount that<br />

was overspent. 9 These failures and violations can be viewed from<br />

different perspectives, first of all they show the lack of competence of<br />

the Center’s employees responsible for accountancy matters. But at the<br />

same time it is an obvious factor of the deficiency of the Center’s<br />

budget that does not allow this institution to function properly. Article<br />

37 of the Law on Parliamentary Advocates stipulates that Center has its<br />

own budget that with preliminary evaluation of the Ministry of Finances<br />

shall be approved by the Parliament along with the state budget. In<br />

reality, Ministry of Finances sets the annual volume of CHRM<br />

financing at its own competence. As a result, it is difficult to carry out<br />

surveys, attract experts, run projects, and invite foreign experts. CHRM<br />

9<br />

Curtea de Conturi, Hotarire privind rezultatele controlului asupra utilizarii<br />

mijloacelor bugetare alocate pentru intretinerea Centrului pentru Drepturile<br />

Omului in anul 2000 Nr.25 din 14.03.2001 Monitorul Oficial al R.Moldova<br />

nr.35-38 din 29.03.2001<br />

216<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

simply works on examining petitions, which is more affordable in<br />

present funding conditions. 10<br />

Thus, in 2000 Parliamentary Advocates had to increase the salaries and<br />

authorize some other payments related to reparations and supplies that<br />

were necessary for the Center’s efficient work and were not reflected in<br />

the budget.<br />

It would be logical to start the analysis of the activity of Parliamentary<br />

Advocates with the commentary on the annual reports – the official<br />

documents produced by the CHRM on the yearly basis that supposed to<br />

reflect the situation with respect for human rights in Moldova.<br />

Throughout the year CHRM collects and processes the information that<br />

later on will be put in the basis of its annual report that should be<br />

presented to the Parliament. This report also regards the activity of<br />

Parliamentary Advocates according to their mandate.<br />

Although established in 1997, CHRM did not release publicly any<br />

reports until 1999. The Annual Report of 1999 states that its purpose is<br />

to present to the legislative authority, in accordance with the Law on<br />

Parliamentary Advocates, an ample information regarding “the<br />

observance of human rights in the Republic of Moldova during the<br />

previous year”, based on received complaints, highlighting the areas in<br />

which the most gross violations of human rights and freedoms took<br />

place, the causes of such violations as well as the measures taken by the<br />

Parliamentary Advocates in accordance with their mandate in order to<br />

reinstate citizens in their rights, the perfection of the national legislation<br />

and its adjustment to the international instruments, the education of the<br />

community in human rights. 11<br />

Starting with its first report, CHRM has demonstrated obvious<br />

inconsistency and subjective approach to the assessment of the situation<br />

10<br />

Parliamentary Advocate, Newsletter of the CHRM, Jan-Dec <strong>2005</strong>, <strong>Number</strong> 1,<br />

from the interview with Parliamentary Advocate Mr. Iurie Perevoznic<br />

11<br />

1999 Annual Report, Center for Human Rights of Moldova, Chisinau, p. 5<br />

217<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

with human rights in Moldova. First of all, Parliamentary Advocates<br />

have divided human rights not by the “right” criteria itself, but<br />

according to the social categories, such as rights of the elderly people,<br />

rights of the disabled people, rights of the children, etc. This approach<br />

suggests that Parliamentary Advocates assume the authority to judge<br />

what rights are more important to the particular category of the citizens.<br />

For instance, all above mentioned chapters of the Annual Report of<br />

1999 focus exclusively on the social and economic rights describing<br />

difficult economic situation of these categories of the citizens and<br />

criticizing governmental decisions to cut certain social benefits or<br />

privileges. Secondly, quantitative data provided by the center is based<br />

on the content of the petitions and on the statistical information that is<br />

publicly available from the government agencies. Many conclusions<br />

produced in the report rely on the information from the Department of<br />

Statistics and Sociology and written complaints submitted to the CHRM<br />

by the applicants who claim that their rights were violated. All these<br />

facts show that CHRM in its official reports cannot provide credible and<br />

comprehensive data regarding the true situation with human rights.<br />

Adding some more statistical data approved by the CHRM to be used in<br />

its annual reports will help to support this statement. From 1999 to 2003<br />

only about 30%-40% of the petitions fell under the authority of the<br />

Center to launch its own investigation in order to verify the facts<br />

provided by the complaining parties. This means that the rest (up to<br />

60%) of the complaints were simply redirected for consideration to the<br />

competent authorities. Moreover, continuously, every year about 60%<br />

of the complaints come from the Chisinau municipality alone, which<br />

means extreme “under-representation” of other regions of the country<br />

where human rights violations is much harder to track. This again<br />

shows, that CHRM when describing human rights situation in Moldova<br />

either paraphrases publicly available information from governmental<br />

sources, or depicts very subjective, one-sided and often unrealistic<br />

image based on the incoming complaints.<br />

Annual Report of 2000 reflects very similar pattern. Human rights<br />

situation is again linked to the difficult social and economic conditions<br />

2<strong>18</strong><br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

in the country. Chapters about the right to assistance and social<br />

protection, right to education, right to labor and right to property are<br />

dominated by the numerous examples of different claims, material in<br />

nature, made to the government on the behalf of the applicants. Other<br />

important issues such as trafficking in persons and inhuman treatment of<br />

detainees are addressed only slightly, despite the increased attention of<br />

international organizations and governments to these problems. 12<br />

CHRM admitted that despite numerous complaints about degrading<br />

treatment, physical violence and tortures that detainees experience from<br />

penitentiary officers, during 1998-2000 there was only one registered<br />

case of inhuman, humiliating behavior towards the convicts on the part<br />

of penitentiary officer. 13<br />

In Annual Report of 2001 again, all human rights’ violations noted by<br />

the CHRM are limited to the inadequate funding and social assistance<br />

from the Government: right to private property and social assistance,<br />

right to social protection and assistance, right to labor, right to health.<br />

The overall analysis by CHRM concludes that government should<br />

provide more social assistance, create more jobs, pay higher salaries,<br />

provide free medical treatment, etc. For the first time CHRM has<br />

mentioned a very important political right, crucial to the stable<br />

democratic governance – right to elect and to be elected. Remarkably,<br />

CHRM confirmed that it had received no complaints concerning<br />

violation of this right, thus explaining why this right is not addressed in<br />

the official reports. This once again proves that the assessment of<br />

human rights situation in Moldova provided by the CHRM is<br />

incomplete and subjective.<br />

In Annual report of 2002 CHRM for the first time has addresses civil<br />

rights in a separate, although very short and incomprehensive chapter.<br />

Parliamentary Advocates have addressed the situation discussing<br />

increasing crime rates in Moldova and expressing concerns about<br />

12<br />

Supporting human rights and democracy: the U.S. record 2004-<strong>2005</strong>,<br />

Department of State Publication 11237, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights<br />

and Labor, Bureau of Public Affairs, Released March <strong>2005</strong>, p. 139-143<br />

13<br />

2000 Annual Report, Center for Human Rights of Moldova, Chisinau, p. 23<br />

219<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

inhuman treatment of detainees. Under subtitle Justice no factual<br />

information was provided. All problems of detainees were linked to the<br />

poor financing of the penitentiary system. The rest of the Report<br />

dedicated to the human rights situation assessment presents a simple<br />

listing of statistical data from governmental sources that depicts difficult<br />

economic situation, poverty, low salary and benefit rates and<br />

insufficient spending on the health care system.<br />

Annual Report of 2003 draws more comprehensive situation with<br />

respect to the political and civil rights in Moldova. Issues of<br />

discrimination, access to public records and right to defense are<br />

evaluated separately. Chapter II Social and Economic Rights present<br />

traditional for the CHRM evaluation and attitude.<br />

Summarizing the analysis of the annual reports released by the CHRM<br />

and presented to the Parliament, we can conclude that they do not create<br />

a clear and objective picture of the human rights situation in the<br />

country. The cause for this failure is two-folded. First is the insufficient<br />

information that CHRM uses in preparing its reports, as it was proved in<br />

the above passages. Governmentally produced statistical data and<br />

information derived from the written complaints cannot provide for a<br />

comprehensive and objective analysis. As a result, such issues as<br />

governmental control over media, human trafficking, violations during<br />

local elections of 2003 and other problems of this sort noted by other<br />

observers, are almost completely absent from the CHRM reports.<br />

Second is subjective attitude of Parliamentary Advocates and their<br />

personal judgment about the priorities in the field of human rights.<br />

Obviously, throughout its history, CHRM has emphasized the<br />

importance of social and economic and called the government to<br />

increase spending on social programs. This subjective attitude has<br />

marginalized political and civil rights that constitute the foundation of<br />

the democratic society. Ignoring the fact that political rights should be<br />

first secured in order for democratically elected governance to perform<br />

its functions being accountable for the people, Parliamentary Advocates<br />

continue to push for the social assistance as a remedy for the majority of<br />

problems with human rights in the country.<br />

220<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

As a result, CHRM’s annual reports create a misguiding assessment of<br />

the observance of human rights. An uninformed reader can form an<br />

impression that difficult economic situation is the cause of all problems.<br />

Talking about Members of Parliament and ordinary citizens, the reports<br />

do not present any original conclusions or suggestions that cannot be<br />

derived from the media, public sources, or human rights watchdogs’<br />

reports. At the same time political and civil rights should draw special<br />

attention of independent observers. Their observance is the indicator of<br />

democratic development in Moldova, which is on its way to join the<br />

family of European democracies.<br />

On July 28, <strong>2005</strong> Parliament of the Republic of Moldova has adopted a<br />

decision regarding the Report presented by the CHRM about the<br />

situation with human rights and activity of the Center in 2004. After<br />

analysis of the statistics concerning the complaints received and<br />

investigated by the Center, Members of Parliament have assessed that<br />

human rights situation in Moldova hasn’t changed significantly<br />

comparing with the indications of the previous year. 14 Their decision<br />

also emphasizes that Parliamentary Advocates haven’t demonstrated<br />

sufficient initiative when existing information confirmed massive<br />

violation of constitutional freedoms and liberties of the citizens.<br />

Parliament has also estimated that CHRM hasn’t succeeded in reaching<br />

the objectives of the National Actions Plan in the Field of Human<br />

Rights for 2004-2008. National legislature has adopted several<br />

suggestions for the perfection of the situation with human rights and<br />

efficiency of the CHRM activities. This area became one of major<br />

concern taking into account political course towards European<br />

integration and fulfillment of the provisions of the Actions Plan<br />

European Union - Republic of Moldova, agreed in 2004.<br />

In their Annual Report of 1999 Parliamentary Advocates proudly<br />

acclaimed that as a result of the action taken in 1999 by the CHRM in<br />

accordance with art. 31 of the Law on Parliamentary Advocates,<br />

14<br />

http://www.parliament.md/news/plenaryday/28.07-29.07.<strong>2005</strong>/<br />

221<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

800,000 people have been reinstated in their constitutional rights. 15<br />

Indeed, art. 31 of the above mentioned law gives Parliamentary<br />

Advocates a very powerful tool to use in their fighting for better human<br />

rights protection. This is the authority to petition Constitutional Court<br />

asking to examine the constitutionality of the complete laws or their<br />

parts that according to the Parliamentary Advocates violate certain<br />

rights of the citizens guaranteed by the national Constitution. Due to the<br />

fact that the right to petition Constitutional Court directly has been<br />

attributed only to the limited number of state agencies, Parliamentary<br />

Advocates have a unique opportunity to get unconstitutional laws that<br />

violate constitutional rights cancelled or amended. The analysis of this<br />

important element in the activity of the Parliamentary Advocates can<br />

add to the overall assessment of their effectiveness.<br />

In 1999 Parliamentary Advocates have succeeded in several<br />

applications to the Constitutional Court. Among these cases: petition<br />

regarding constitutional control of the Decision #338 26/05/95 of the<br />

Government on “Returning of property, reimbursement of its value and<br />

payment of compensation to the victims of political repression” which<br />

violated the right of this category of the citizens for fair compensation.<br />

Parliamentary Advocates have also petitioned the Constitutional Court<br />

on the suspension of the art. 32 of the Law regarding the status of<br />

judges as unconstitutional stipulating the social rights of judges for<br />

pension upon retirement. Analyzing the content of Parliamentary<br />

Advocates petitions one can clearly see the tendency for “overrepresenting”<br />

the professional interests of strong interest groups of the<br />

Moldovan society: prosecutors, lawyers, judges, investigators, state<br />

employees, notaries, etc. The majority of the hearings in 1999 in the<br />

Constitutional Court initiated by the Parliamentary Advocates were<br />

regarding the right for social assistance and benefits of the above<br />

mentioned categories of citizens. 16<br />

15<br />

1999 Annual Report, Center for Human Rights of Moldova, Chisinau, p. 39<br />

16<br />

Moldova: Two years under the communist rule in the new millennium /<br />

Moldova Helsinki Committee for Human Rights, editor Serghei Ostaf, Colograf-<br />

Com, 2003, 632 p Observations on the Center for Human Rights Ombudsman<br />

Office in Moldova p 7-17<br />

222<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

In 2000 Parliamentary Advocates were preoccupied with defending<br />

professional rights of the Moldovan legal community. New Law of the<br />

Bar has obliged all practicing lawyers who have obtained a license from<br />

the Department of Justice to join Lawyers’ Union. This was considered<br />

as a limit of the access to the legal profession and declared<br />

unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court. The Parliamentary<br />

Advocates also submitted another petition, addressing the exclusion of<br />

social and material guarantees for the prosecutors and judges.<br />

In 2001 CHRM was not very active in petitioning the Constitutional<br />

Court. Archives of the Center show that the Court rejected numerous<br />

petitions this year. They included several problematic issues of the<br />

military organization, judiciary structure, citizenship by naturalization<br />

and few other questions of minor importance, that do not address<br />

massive human rights violations.<br />

In 2002 CHRM has defended political rights of the citizens to elect their<br />

local representatives in city councils when Parliament first adopted a<br />

law regarding the administrative reform and assigned a date for the new<br />

local election. This has terminated the authority of the elected officials<br />

to continue serving their terms and ignored the choice of the population<br />

made during the previous elections. Although supported by the<br />

Constitutional Court, petition of the Parliamentary Advocates wasn’t the<br />

only one – both opposition and coalition parties have submitted their<br />

petitions claiming the law to be unconstitutional.<br />

Several petitions were again rejected. For example, on January 28, 2002<br />

Parliamentary Advocate considered that Code of Administrative<br />

Violations contains unconstitutional provisions because appointment<br />

decisions by the Parliament, President and Government cannot be<br />

argued before the court. Constitutional Court has rejected this petition<br />

as unmotivated, containing mistakes and not following the Code of<br />

Constitutional Procedure.<br />

223<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

On March 21, 2002 Parliamentary Advocate sent a petition to the<br />

Constitutional Court arguing that provision of the Code of Criminal<br />

Procedure that requires that decision about the termination of<br />

investigation should first be attacked before the prosecutor, and then<br />

before the court, as limiting free access to justice. Constitutional Court<br />

has rejected to hear the matter of this case because other law has already<br />

corrected this deficiency. These two examples can indicate the level of<br />

professional competence of the office of Parliamentary Advocates.<br />

Annual Report 2003 contains no examples when Parliamentary<br />

Advocates have petitioned the Constitutional Court. Indeed, CHRM<br />

archives show that Parliamentary Advocates were not very active in this<br />

regard. One of the few cases filed with Constitutional Court this year<br />

was the case about right for defense, when Parliamentary Advocates<br />

argued that the requirement to have a lawyer when taking the case to the<br />

Supreme Court of Justice violates the right of the citizens to defend<br />

themselves in the court using various means, including direct<br />

representation of one’s own interests.<br />

Analyzing the history of petitioning the Constitutional Court by the<br />

Parliamentary Advocates, there can be found several tendencies that<br />

shift the activity of CHRM in this direction and explain the only average<br />

performance if judging by the number of petitions supported by the<br />

Court.<br />

First of all, Parliamentary Advocates have been continuously<br />

prioritizing social and economic rights over civil and political rights.<br />

Only few petitions address right to elect and to be elected and freedom<br />

of association. The majority of the petitions pursue the reinstatement of<br />

social or material benefits revoked by the legislature.<br />

Secondly, CHRM has served as another channel used by the<br />

professional interest groups such as lawyers, judges, prosecutors,<br />

notaries and others to protect their professional interests and privileges.<br />

Note, that these groups also have powerful voices in Parliament,<br />

224<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Supreme Court of Justice and other institutions that have the authority<br />

to petition Constitutional Court.<br />

Significant number of petitions that have been rejected as unmotivated<br />

and beyond the authority of Parliamentary Advocates can be used as a<br />

proof of lack of professional competence of the CHRM staff.<br />

Clearly, the authority to petition Constitutional Court is may be the only<br />

truly efficient tool that is granted to the CHRM by the legislature that, if<br />

wisely utilized, could produce a significant impact on human rights<br />

situation in the country and reinstatement of particular groups of<br />

citizens in their rights. However, because the limited capability of the<br />

Center, Parliamentary Advocates were unable to filter every legislative<br />

act and its impact on the observance of human rights. Majority of the<br />

petitions resulted from the previous written complaints submitted to the<br />

CHRM by the interested parties. As a result, poor, marginalized and<br />

uninformed majority of the population can seldom call for justice using<br />

this initiative. This also helps to understand why some well organized<br />

professional communities are “over-represented” in Parliamentary<br />

Advocates petitions to the Constitutional Courts.<br />

Another important element in the activity of the Parliamentary<br />

Advocates consists in the research and investigation of the possible<br />

causes of human rights violation and collecting necessary data for their<br />

annual reports, publications and legislative proposals. Being constantly<br />

involved in investigating the alleged human rights violations claimed by<br />

the applicants in their petitions addressed to the CHRM, Parliamentary<br />

Advocates lack resources and power to find the truth. First and<br />

foremost, current budget of the Center does not allow its employees to<br />

make on-site visits and investigations. The only method of investigation<br />

commonly used by the CHRM – written requests to the competent<br />

authorities – often proves to be inefficient because responsible officials<br />

are reluctant in investigating violations committed under their own<br />

jurisdiction.<br />

225<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

Audience of the citizens is another component of CHRM daily activity.<br />

Legal counselors are on duty every day to interview the visitors and<br />

offer them free of charge legal advise. Audience of the citizens follows<br />

the same pattern as analysis of written complaints. Current activity has<br />

demonstrated that the population does not yet know the rights stipulated<br />

in different legal instruments and how they can enjoy them. Many<br />

citizens address continuously to the CHRM with legal issues that are<br />

beyond the mandate of Parliamentary Advocates. 17 Often happens that<br />

individuals use audience service for their own advantage to receive free<br />

legal advice from counselors, that otherwise would require significant<br />

attorney’s fees. We believe that this activity proved to be very<br />

unproductive and should be replaced by the scheduled appointments<br />

that would follow after the written complaint has been accepted for the<br />

examination. This will increase the usefulness of these appointments<br />

and give CHRM counselors more time to work on the accepted<br />

complaints. Following chart, compiled from the annual reports of the<br />

CHRM illustrate the quantitative features of the Center’s activity<br />

including audience of the citizens:<br />

Year Written<br />

Complaints<br />

Signatories Audience<br />

1999 1368 4654 2049<br />

2000 1005 3264 4036<br />

2001 902 2651 2668<br />

2002 1214 3349 3107<br />

2003 1217 1907 1422<br />

2004 1102 1517 ????<br />

Finally, the most successful, but unfortunately not the most powerful<br />

component of the CHRM’s activity consists in educational and<br />

informational campaigns that are aimed to increase the awareness of the<br />

general population and particular groups of citizens such as civil society<br />

17<br />

Parliamentary Advocate, Newsletter of the CHRM, Aug-Oct 2000, <strong>Number</strong> 4,<br />

<strong>Volume</strong> 1, p. 2<br />

226<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

activists, lawyers, and teachers about human rights and legal ways to<br />

protect them. So far, Center has managing this part of its activity well<br />

enough, actively cooperating with various human rights organizations,<br />

local administrations and government agencies. In its annual reports,<br />

Parliamentary Advocates allocate almost one third of its content for the<br />

description of their publications and educational events they have<br />

conducted.<br />

International experts assessing the efficiency of the activity of the<br />

CHRM has noted educational and informational components are the<br />

strongest elements. Thus, senior consultant at the United Nations Office<br />

of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Mr. Peter Hosking has<br />

stated in an interview evaluating the activity of the Center that<br />

educational and training activities are perhaps most effective, while<br />

complaints team needs more skills in investigation techniques,<br />

legislative analysis and human rights policy advise. An example of this<br />

deficiency will be the situations of the penitentiary system, where<br />

policies and legislative amendments should be proposed and<br />

investigation in prisons should be carried out. <strong>18</strong><br />

Finalizing the analysis of the activity of the Center for Human<br />

Rights in Moldova, we can admit that the institution of<br />

Parliamentary Advocates constitutes a part of the national<br />

mechanism for protection of human rights and fundamental<br />

freedoms, which could be extremely potential and efficient, since by<br />

the law regulating the activity of the present institution, the national<br />

ombudsmen have been attributed great functions and significant<br />

possibilities. 19 However, there are certain objective and subjective<br />

obstacles that do not allow Parliamentary Advocates to perform<br />

their functions efficiently and to make a difference improving<br />

overall respect for human rights in the country.<br />

<strong>18</strong><br />

Parliamentary Advocate, Newsletter of the CHRM, Oct-Dec 2000, <strong>Number</strong> 5,<br />

<strong>Volume</strong> 1, p. 3-4<br />

19<br />

This opinion has been supported by Petru Ciuchitu, Chief of the Petitions and<br />

Audience section of the CHRM, for details see Parliamentary Advocate,<br />

Newsletter of the CHRM, Aug-Oct 2000, <strong>Number</strong> 4, <strong>Volume</strong> 1<br />

227<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

These objective obstacles include insufficient funding and overall<br />

disregarding attitude of the Parliament and central authorities to the<br />

work of the Parliamentary Advocates. Basically, because of this lack of<br />

attention from the part of the country’s authorities Center for Human<br />

Rights looks more like a non-governmental organization, which,<br />

however being financed from the public budget, does not exercise any<br />

significant authority or influence attributed to other state agencies. At<br />

the same time, Parliamentary Advocates do not enjoy any special<br />

respect or authority among nonprofit sector either. Human rights NGOs<br />

have been continuously criticizing CHRM for the lack of strategic<br />

policies and initiative. 20<br />

Among the subjective weaknesses in the activity of the CHRM are lack<br />

of leadership and result-oriented management. All of current<br />

Parliamentary Advocates have been holding public service offices of<br />

judges, prosecutors, and investigators previously to their appointment.<br />

Their professional backgrounds might constrain them from taking<br />

radical initiative, criticizing current policies and demanding change in<br />

the respect for human rights in the country.<br />

All the above mentioned reasons make us to conclude that the<br />

institution of Parliamentary Advocates in Moldova requires significant<br />

reforms, external and internal, in order to improve its efficiency.<br />

Moldova does not yet have sufficient experience in human rights<br />

protection. Unfortunately, this institution fails to provide an effective<br />

redress in rights of the applicants and does not have any significant<br />

influence on the general state policies regarding human rights, which is<br />

much more influenced by the recommendations of the Council of<br />

Europe, European Union and other regional and international<br />

organizations.<br />

20<br />

Moldova: Two years under the communist rule in the new millennium /<br />

Moldova Helsinki Committee for Human Rights, editor Serghei Ostaf, Colograf-<br />

Com, 2003, 632 p Observations on the Center for Human Rights Ombudsman<br />

Office in Moldova p 7-17<br />

228<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


<strong>FREE</strong> <strong>LAW</strong> <strong>JOURNAL</strong> - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 (<strong>18</strong> OCTOBER <strong>2005</strong>)<br />

The key directions in the reforming the Center’s ability to effectively<br />

fulfill its mission could be following: concentration on the legislative<br />

proposals and analysis of the proposed legislative acts that have<br />

negative impact on the human rights situation. This could be achieved<br />

through an increased level of cooperation with parliamentary<br />

commission on human rights. CHRM must revise its attitude towards<br />

cooperation with the non-governmental human rights organizations and<br />

other civic society groups. Its policy should be shifted from the pure<br />

informational and educational activity towards policy building and<br />

advocacy. It could serve as a link between government and civic society<br />

in matters concerning human rights and their protection.<br />

Parliament and central authorities in their turn should realize that<br />

without sufficient funding, internal reform and revision of the strategic<br />

directions of the Center’s activity, national mechanism for protection of<br />

human rights will remain incomplete, lacking an independent, selfsufficient,<br />

lucrative and objective state agency that will be able to<br />

produce clear and unbiased picture of the human rights situation and<br />

assist legislative body in drafting national legislation for the better<br />

human rights protection.<br />

229<br />

ALEXANDR SVETLICINII - THE INSTITUTE OF PARLIAMENTARY ADVOCATES<br />

(OBBUDSMAN) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: PART OF THE NATIONAL<br />

MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!