05.11.2013 Views

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

When Family <strong>Networks</strong> Don’t Work<br />

cery, wrote that when Blundell junior went to Liverpool, noth<strong>in</strong>g was<br />

done regard<strong>in</strong>g the settlement of accounts between Ra<strong>in</strong>ford,<br />

Blundell & Ra<strong>in</strong>ford <strong>and</strong> Blundell senior, <strong>and</strong> certa<strong>in</strong>ly the accounts<br />

were never seriously attended to. 60 The failure of these networks <strong>and</strong><br />

its ramifications were still be<strong>in</strong>g felt <strong>in</strong> 1805, when Blundell senior’s<br />

gr<strong>and</strong>son was sort<strong>in</strong>g out his estate. Although Blundell senior had<br />

noth<strong>in</strong>g directly to do with the sett<strong>in</strong>g up of the Liverpool sister<br />

house, his gr<strong>and</strong>son obviously felt the withdrawals were legitimate.<br />

Aggrieved at his perception that Samuel Ra<strong>in</strong>ford had not made<br />

good remittances <strong>and</strong> fulfilled his obligations, he compla<strong>in</strong>ed to<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong>ford’s executors of ‘the many unhappy hours, the want of remittances<br />

occasioned him [Jonathon Blundell senior], <strong>and</strong> the many<br />

mortifications he suffer’d <strong>in</strong> part<strong>in</strong>g with favourite Estates to make<br />

good his <strong>in</strong>gagements [sic] for them’. 61 This was rather melodramatic,<br />

<strong>and</strong> perhaps the gr<strong>and</strong>son did not realize that the Ra<strong>in</strong>fords felt<br />

that the Blundells had not fulfilled their obligations either, whether<br />

as the result of fraud or simply a misunderst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g. Either way, this<br />

evidence is <strong>in</strong>dicative of the high emotions aroused when networks<br />

did not function properly. It appears that the rift between the two<br />

houses was serious. By 1791 the accounts between the two houses<br />

were <strong>in</strong> arbitration. 62<br />

Worse still, the deteriorat<strong>in</strong>g relationship between the K<strong>in</strong>gston<br />

house <strong>and</strong> the Blundells had wider consequences. Follow<strong>in</strong>g their<br />

<strong>in</strong>itial slav<strong>in</strong>g voyage, the K<strong>in</strong>gston house greatly <strong>in</strong>creased its<br />

<strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> the slave <strong>and</strong> other trades. Between August 1783 <strong>and</strong><br />

September 1785, Ra<strong>in</strong>ford, Blundell & Ra<strong>in</strong>ford were <strong>in</strong>volved as<br />

agents for a variety of vessels, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g some to New York, to the<br />

value of £21,790, for which Blundell senior arranged <strong>in</strong>surance. 63<br />

They were also <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> a total of thirty-seven slave trade voyages<br />

60 Memor<strong>and</strong>um on the Death of Samuel Ra<strong>in</strong>ford . . . [n.d.], 920 CHA/1/18.<br />

61 Henry Blundell Holl<strong>in</strong>shead to Thomas Berry & William Parke, 1 Mar.<br />

1805, 920 CHA/1/24, PEC. Berry & Parke were the executors of Robert<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong>ford, who died on 11 Sept 1803 <strong>and</strong> Jonathan Blundell Jr. had died on 18<br />

Apr. 1800. Memord m s of ye Death . . . , 920 CHA/1/18, PEC. I have not yet<br />

been able to establish to what extent claims of sell<strong>in</strong>g estates were true.<br />

62 The Accounts of Ra<strong>in</strong>ford, Blundell & Ra<strong>in</strong>ford with Jonathon Blundell<br />

sen., 6 Nov. 1779 to 6 Nov. 1791, 920 CHA/1/21, PEC.<br />

63 Ra<strong>in</strong>ford, Blundell & Ra<strong>in</strong>ford Account with Jonathon Blundell, 6 Nov.<br />

1783 to 6 Nov. 1785.<br />

331

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!