05.11.2013 Views

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SHERYLLYNNE HAGGERTY<br />

between the arrival of the Rumbold <strong>in</strong> 1779 <strong>and</strong> the start of the<br />

Napoleonic Wars <strong>in</strong> 1793. 64 Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, although Blundell senior<br />

was <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> many slave voyages, as noted above, he was not a<br />

shareholder <strong>in</strong> any of the slave trade vessels sent care of Ra<strong>in</strong>ford,<br />

Blundell & Ra<strong>in</strong>ford. This was because he withdrew from the trade<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1775 (along with many other slave traders), rather than be<strong>in</strong>g any<br />

comment on Ra<strong>in</strong>ford. 65 Dur<strong>in</strong>g this period Ra<strong>in</strong>ford, Blundell &<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong> ford traded with William Earle, Thomas Stanforth, Francis Ing -<br />

ram, Thomas Parke, Charles Pole, <strong>and</strong> Thomas Leyl<strong>and</strong>, an impressive<br />

roll-call of Liverpool merchants. Richard Miles (one time Gover -<br />

nor of Cape Coast Castle <strong>in</strong> Africa) was also one of the owners of the<br />

slave vessels they were <strong>in</strong>volved with. 66 However, from 1788, Ra<strong>in</strong> -<br />

ford, Blundell & Ra<strong>in</strong>ford only acted as agents for the slave trade<br />

voyages of owners Thomas Seaman, James Percival, <strong>and</strong> William<br />

Boats, who all <strong>in</strong>vested together <strong>in</strong> a number of voyages. Of the fortyone<br />

other owners who had a share <strong>in</strong> vessels sent to the firm before<br />

1788, only three, Thomas Hodgson, George Case, <strong>and</strong> the Gregsons<br />

ever traded aga<strong>in</strong> with Ra<strong>in</strong>ford, Blundell & Ra<strong>in</strong>ford—<strong>and</strong> then<br />

only once each. Of the others, seventeen dropped out of the slave<br />

trade altogether, but were never serious players <strong>in</strong> any case. More<br />

importantly, serious players such as John Backhouse, Francis Ingram,<br />

Richard Miles, Thomas Tarleton, <strong>and</strong> Thomas Leyl<strong>and</strong> never dealt<br />

with the K<strong>in</strong>gston house after 1788, despite their cont<strong>in</strong>ued heavy<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> the slave trade. It would appear that the Ra<strong>in</strong>ford<br />

brothers were unceremoniously dropped <strong>in</strong> 1788. It is quite possible<br />

64 The follow<strong>in</strong>g analysis is based on Ra<strong>in</strong>ford, Blundell & Ra<strong>in</strong>ford Pocket<br />

Ledger MG-54-No 74, National Archives Canada <strong>and</strong> The Transatlantic Slave<br />

Trade Database at . The voyage numbers on the Database are 92449, 92450, 83975, 83259,<br />

81670, 81141, 81988, 83624, 82853 (London-based voyage), 81606, 83977,<br />

81989, 80848, 82770, 81671, 81921 (London-based voyage), 83918, 81672,<br />

83814, 82156, 80255, 81673, 81182, 82626, 80256, 81561, 83272, 82627, 80516,<br />

80257, 83757, 83273, 81008, 80517, 80862, 83984.<br />

65 The Transatlantic Slave Trade Database at: .<br />

66 Richard Miles knew a Capta<strong>in</strong> Fayrer, Thomas Rumbold, <strong>and</strong> other Liver -<br />

pool merchants. See Richard Miles to Will McCourbie, 6 Sept. 1776, Com -<br />

pany of Royal Adventurers of Engl<strong>and</strong> Trad<strong>in</strong>g to Africa <strong>and</strong> Successors, T70<br />

1534, <strong>and</strong> passim, TNA.<br />

332

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!