February, 2008 - Glebe Report
February, 2008 - Glebe Report
February, 2008 - Glebe Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
GCA<br />
Why the sudden rush to re-develop Lansdowne?<br />
By<br />
Bob<br />
Brocklebank<br />
Parking<br />
One of the issues that seems to<br />
have seized the neighbourhood is the<br />
decision by city council to raise rates<br />
for parking meters and to extend the<br />
time that meters need to be fed.<br />
There are several concerns which<br />
have led the GCA to express opposition<br />
to the decision and to request<br />
that it be reconsidered.<br />
Although the impact of higher<br />
parking charges on our local businesses<br />
is of concern, we worry most<br />
about the effect on community activity.<br />
The need at odd hours to run out<br />
in the middle of fitness class or choir<br />
practice to stuff coins in a parking<br />
meter may scare away friends who<br />
regularly come to the <strong>Glebe</strong>.<br />
The decision on parking fees was<br />
a sudden grab for funds in the midst<br />
of the city budget debate. It was not<br />
a thoughtful examination taking into<br />
account the effect of asking that<br />
meters be fed on Sunday mornings<br />
or weekday evenings. A more comprehensive<br />
discussion of parking<br />
issues is needed.<br />
Residencial property tax<br />
The press has been filled with dire<br />
warnings about the impact of<br />
reassessments and the increased tax<br />
burden to be placed on dwellers in<br />
the city centre. There is probably<br />
good reason to be concerned<br />
although the new assessments by<br />
MPAC are not scheduled for release<br />
until the autumn.<br />
But back in August 2006 the<br />
provincial government, in association<br />
with the Association of Municipalities<br />
of Ontario, launched a<br />
“Provincial-Municipal Fiscal and<br />
Service Delivery Review” with a<br />
timetable calling for a report in<br />
spring <strong>2008</strong>. There have been no<br />
leaks, no trial balloons, in short –<br />
nothing from the review deliberations<br />
since it was established.<br />
Free parking<br />
Some cynical people thought that<br />
the review was simply a way to stifle<br />
all discussion of property taxes and<br />
similar problems for the provincial<br />
election. I thought it was a genuine<br />
attempt to find solutions and I hope<br />
we will soon learn what the review<br />
recommends. If the review fails to<br />
consider property tax reform, it will<br />
be a bitter disappointment, considering<br />
the number of politicians and<br />
community spokesmen who have<br />
described the tax system as “broken.”<br />
Sunnyside public library<br />
At the January GCA board meeting<br />
we heard from Doug Casey of<br />
Charlesfort Developements about his<br />
concept of redevelopment of the<br />
Sunnyside public library. We welcome<br />
such presentations at the idea<br />
stage of a project as it gives the community<br />
time to think about the pros<br />
and cons of a proposal, before it has<br />
gone too far. The idea, and that is all<br />
it is, would see the site of the library<br />
hosting a tower of condos with a new<br />
library on the lower floors of the<br />
building. Mr. Casey indicated that he<br />
was about to begin discussions with<br />
the city concerning his ideas.<br />
Board members at the meeting<br />
asked questions about this concept –<br />
some were beginning to form opinions<br />
for and against the idea. But at<br />
the moment, there is no specific project<br />
proposal and the GCA has taken<br />
no position with respect to the concept.<br />
Lansdowne Park<br />
The GCA had been pressing for<br />
public consultations on the future<br />
development of Lansdowne Park<br />
and the city has responded, notably<br />
with a workshop held on Jan. 29 and<br />
another to be held Feb. 26. We are<br />
pleased that the public will have a<br />
say and we want to encourage<br />
everyone with an interest to participate<br />
on Feb. 26 and in the online<br />
forum on Lansdowne on the city<br />
website.<br />
We do have two areas of concern<br />
about the process for addressing the<br />
future of Lansdowne Park. First, the<br />
process has a very aggressive<br />
timetable. After doing virtually nothing<br />
for years (with the sole exception<br />
of saving the Aberdeen Pavilion)<br />
why are we in such a rush? In particular,<br />
why are we in such a haste to<br />
come up with a design brief? Surely<br />
we need to decide what we want on<br />
<strong>Glebe</strong> Pet Hospital<br />
Serving the<strong>Glebe</strong>area since1976...<br />
233-8326<br />
595 Bank Street<br />
(just south of the Queensway)<br />
Weekdays 8-7, Saturday 9-2:30<br />
Housecalls available<br />
Students & seniors welcome.<br />
We care for dogs, cats, ferrets, rabbits, reptiles, birds & other pets<br />
Dr. Hussein Fattah<br />
DANJO CREATIONS (613)526-4424<br />
Sunnyside public library<br />
the site before we start asking for<br />
designs.<br />
The second concern is about the<br />
idea of offering “right to develop” to<br />
the successful competitor. This<br />
forces the formation of consortia<br />
bringing together architects,<br />
builders, developers, and financiers.<br />
The winning team, which might have<br />
the worst plan for development but<br />
the best financing and project management<br />
skills, would be granted the<br />
approval to proceed to redevelop the<br />
entire Lansdowne site in accordance<br />
with their plan.<br />
Public-private partnerships<br />
Both the idea for the Sunnyside<br />
public library site and the competition<br />
for Lansdowne Park are possible<br />
examples of public-private partnerships<br />
(often abbreviated to P3).<br />
I have no ideological position of<br />
opposition to P3 proposals. Some<br />
<strong>Glebe</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>February</strong> 15, <strong>2008</strong> 7<br />
things are better done by government,<br />
others by private companies.<br />
Often the two can work together. The<br />
challenge is to find the right mix.<br />
Our experience in Ottawa with P3<br />
projects is neither all bad nor all<br />
good. We should approach such proposals<br />
cautiously but with an open<br />
mind. Frankly, I was surprised to<br />
read comments by a P3 proponent<br />
who made negative remarks about<br />
public servants. That is no basis for a<br />
reasoned discussion, particularly in<br />
this city, traditionally dominated by<br />
the civil service.<br />
Next meeting<br />
The GCA board meets Mon., Feb.<br />
25 at 7:30 at the <strong>Glebe</strong> Community<br />
Centre. (The meeting is moved from<br />
Tuesday to permit full participation<br />
in the city workshop on Lansdowne<br />
Park on Feb. 26 from 6:30 p.m., in<br />
salons A & B of the Civic Centre.)<br />
Enjoy Winterlude <strong>2008</strong>!<br />
Photo courtesy of the City of Ottawa<br />
Always available to answer<br />
your real estate questions.<br />
“Service built our business.<br />
Let us be of service to you and<br />
your family.” Jeff Hooper<br />
PHOTO: MURRAY MCGREGOR