16.11.2013 Views

February, 2008 - Glebe Report

February, 2008 - Glebe Report

February, 2008 - Glebe Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GCA<br />

Why the sudden rush to re-develop Lansdowne?<br />

By<br />

Bob<br />

Brocklebank<br />

Parking<br />

One of the issues that seems to<br />

have seized the neighbourhood is the<br />

decision by city council to raise rates<br />

for parking meters and to extend the<br />

time that meters need to be fed.<br />

There are several concerns which<br />

have led the GCA to express opposition<br />

to the decision and to request<br />

that it be reconsidered.<br />

Although the impact of higher<br />

parking charges on our local businesses<br />

is of concern, we worry most<br />

about the effect on community activity.<br />

The need at odd hours to run out<br />

in the middle of fitness class or choir<br />

practice to stuff coins in a parking<br />

meter may scare away friends who<br />

regularly come to the <strong>Glebe</strong>.<br />

The decision on parking fees was<br />

a sudden grab for funds in the midst<br />

of the city budget debate. It was not<br />

a thoughtful examination taking into<br />

account the effect of asking that<br />

meters be fed on Sunday mornings<br />

or weekday evenings. A more comprehensive<br />

discussion of parking<br />

issues is needed.<br />

Residencial property tax<br />

The press has been filled with dire<br />

warnings about the impact of<br />

reassessments and the increased tax<br />

burden to be placed on dwellers in<br />

the city centre. There is probably<br />

good reason to be concerned<br />

although the new assessments by<br />

MPAC are not scheduled for release<br />

until the autumn.<br />

But back in August 2006 the<br />

provincial government, in association<br />

with the Association of Municipalities<br />

of Ontario, launched a<br />

“Provincial-Municipal Fiscal and<br />

Service Delivery Review” with a<br />

timetable calling for a report in<br />

spring <strong>2008</strong>. There have been no<br />

leaks, no trial balloons, in short –<br />

nothing from the review deliberations<br />

since it was established.<br />

Free parking<br />

Some cynical people thought that<br />

the review was simply a way to stifle<br />

all discussion of property taxes and<br />

similar problems for the provincial<br />

election. I thought it was a genuine<br />

attempt to find solutions and I hope<br />

we will soon learn what the review<br />

recommends. If the review fails to<br />

consider property tax reform, it will<br />

be a bitter disappointment, considering<br />

the number of politicians and<br />

community spokesmen who have<br />

described the tax system as “broken.”<br />

Sunnyside public library<br />

At the January GCA board meeting<br />

we heard from Doug Casey of<br />

Charlesfort Developements about his<br />

concept of redevelopment of the<br />

Sunnyside public library. We welcome<br />

such presentations at the idea<br />

stage of a project as it gives the community<br />

time to think about the pros<br />

and cons of a proposal, before it has<br />

gone too far. The idea, and that is all<br />

it is, would see the site of the library<br />

hosting a tower of condos with a new<br />

library on the lower floors of the<br />

building. Mr. Casey indicated that he<br />

was about to begin discussions with<br />

the city concerning his ideas.<br />

Board members at the meeting<br />

asked questions about this concept –<br />

some were beginning to form opinions<br />

for and against the idea. But at<br />

the moment, there is no specific project<br />

proposal and the GCA has taken<br />

no position with respect to the concept.<br />

Lansdowne Park<br />

The GCA had been pressing for<br />

public consultations on the future<br />

development of Lansdowne Park<br />

and the city has responded, notably<br />

with a workshop held on Jan. 29 and<br />

another to be held Feb. 26. We are<br />

pleased that the public will have a<br />

say and we want to encourage<br />

everyone with an interest to participate<br />

on Feb. 26 and in the online<br />

forum on Lansdowne on the city<br />

website.<br />

We do have two areas of concern<br />

about the process for addressing the<br />

future of Lansdowne Park. First, the<br />

process has a very aggressive<br />

timetable. After doing virtually nothing<br />

for years (with the sole exception<br />

of saving the Aberdeen Pavilion)<br />

why are we in such a rush? In particular,<br />

why are we in such a haste to<br />

come up with a design brief? Surely<br />

we need to decide what we want on<br />

<strong>Glebe</strong> Pet Hospital<br />

Serving the<strong>Glebe</strong>area since1976...<br />

233-8326<br />

595 Bank Street<br />

(just south of the Queensway)<br />

Weekdays 8-7, Saturday 9-2:30<br />

Housecalls available<br />

Students & seniors welcome.<br />

We care for dogs, cats, ferrets, rabbits, reptiles, birds & other pets<br />

Dr. Hussein Fattah<br />

DANJO CREATIONS (613)526-4424<br />

Sunnyside public library<br />

the site before we start asking for<br />

designs.<br />

The second concern is about the<br />

idea of offering “right to develop” to<br />

the successful competitor. This<br />

forces the formation of consortia<br />

bringing together architects,<br />

builders, developers, and financiers.<br />

The winning team, which might have<br />

the worst plan for development but<br />

the best financing and project management<br />

skills, would be granted the<br />

approval to proceed to redevelop the<br />

entire Lansdowne site in accordance<br />

with their plan.<br />

Public-private partnerships<br />

Both the idea for the Sunnyside<br />

public library site and the competition<br />

for Lansdowne Park are possible<br />

examples of public-private partnerships<br />

(often abbreviated to P3).<br />

I have no ideological position of<br />

opposition to P3 proposals. Some<br />

<strong>Glebe</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>February</strong> 15, <strong>2008</strong> 7<br />

things are better done by government,<br />

others by private companies.<br />

Often the two can work together. The<br />

challenge is to find the right mix.<br />

Our experience in Ottawa with P3<br />

projects is neither all bad nor all<br />

good. We should approach such proposals<br />

cautiously but with an open<br />

mind. Frankly, I was surprised to<br />

read comments by a P3 proponent<br />

who made negative remarks about<br />

public servants. That is no basis for a<br />

reasoned discussion, particularly in<br />

this city, traditionally dominated by<br />

the civil service.<br />

Next meeting<br />

The GCA board meets Mon., Feb.<br />

25 at 7:30 at the <strong>Glebe</strong> Community<br />

Centre. (The meeting is moved from<br />

Tuesday to permit full participation<br />

in the city workshop on Lansdowne<br />

Park on Feb. 26 from 6:30 p.m., in<br />

salons A & B of the Civic Centre.)<br />

Enjoy Winterlude <strong>2008</strong>!<br />

Photo courtesy of the City of Ottawa<br />

Always available to answer<br />

your real estate questions.<br />

“Service built our business.<br />

Let us be of service to you and<br />

your family.” Jeff Hooper<br />

PHOTO: MURRAY MCGREGOR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!