Council Minutes - 27 October 2009 - City of Greater Geelong
Council Minutes - 27 October 2009 - City of Greater Geelong
Council Minutes - 27 October 2009 - City of Greater Geelong
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Greater</strong> <strong>Geelong</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>27</strong> <strong>October</strong> <strong>2009</strong><br />
<strong>Minutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ordinary Meeting<br />
SECTION A – PROCEDURAL MATTERS Page 2<br />
QUESTION TIME (CONT’D)<br />
Kevin Butler asked a question in relation to McAdam Park. As a condition <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />
$660,000 land purchase, how is the facility management structured and who is<br />
representing the <strong>Geelong</strong> Motorcross Club?<br />
Dean Frost, General Manager <strong>City</strong> Services, Infrastructure and Recreation, responded<br />
that <strong>Council</strong>’s resolution 25 August <strong>2009</strong>, required a facility management structure (the<br />
McAdam Park Management entity), that includes <strong>Geelong</strong> Motorcross Club<br />
representation is established to <strong>Council</strong>’s satisfaction.<br />
Sheryl Goatman, spokesperson, Township <strong>of</strong> Lara Care Group (T.L.C) addressed<br />
<strong>Council</strong> as follows:<br />
1) Why is the Lara Structure Plan <strong>2009</strong> up for public submission at the end <strong>of</strong> this<br />
year? The mid November/December period disadvantages the Lara Community<br />
due to the festive season in December. We request that public submission process<br />
for the Lara Structure Plan to be commenced next year after the holiday period to<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer the Lara community a more fair and reasonable process to submit their<br />
concerns.<br />
Kate Sullivan, General Manager, Economic Development and Planning responded the<br />
question would be taken on notice and a written response forwarded.<br />
2) Is it a regular planning practice to have a 30 day submission period? The previous<br />
structure plan process in 2006 was for a 60 day period. Why is this process for<br />
only a 30 day period?<br />
Kate Sullivan, General Manager, Economic Development and Planning responded that<br />
30 days is the minimum period for submissions, however, the question would be taken<br />
on notice and a written response forwarded.<br />
The Mayor asked if a 60 day period was granted, would Sheryl Goatman be happy with<br />
a submission process commencing mid November? Sheryl Goatman responded, no<br />
that it should be in the New Year after the holiday period.<br />
Graham Gittins asked questions in relation to the Lara Structure Plan and C73<br />
Caddy’s Lane Development. The Lara Structure Plan is still not open for public<br />
consultation along with the structure plan Amendment C73 the Caddy’s Road<br />
development is also up for public considerations.<br />
Why would I therefore be sent a draft agreement under section 173 <strong>of</strong> the Planning and<br />
Environment Act 1987? This proposal has not gone before <strong>Council</strong> and yet I am being<br />
sent draft documents that would indicate decisions have been made. How do you<br />
explain this please?<br />
Kate Sullivan, General Manager, Economic Development and Planning responded the<br />
questions would be taken on notice and a written response forwarded.