Dioxin emissions after installation of a polishing wet ... - BVSDE
Dioxin emissions after installation of a polishing wet ... - BVSDE
Dioxin emissions after installation of a polishing wet ... - BVSDE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chemosphere 61 (2005) 405–412<br />
www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere<br />
<strong>Dioxin</strong> <strong>emissions</strong> <strong>after</strong> <strong>installation</strong> <strong>of</strong> a <strong>polishing</strong> <strong>wet</strong><br />
scrubber in a hazardous waste incineration facility<br />
Carl-Johan Löthgren * , Bert van Bavel<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Natural Sciences, Man-Technology-Environment Research Centre, Örebro University, SE-701 82 Örebro, Sweden<br />
Received 22 December 2003; received in revised form 10 January 2005; accepted 15 February 2005<br />
Available online 13 April 2005<br />
Abstract<br />
<strong>Dioxin</strong> levels measured <strong>after</strong> <strong>wet</strong> scrubbing systems have been found to be higher than levels measured before the<br />
scrubber. It is believed that there is an adsorption <strong>of</strong> PCDD/Fs on plastic materials in the scrubber. The PCDD/F levels<br />
<strong>after</strong> a <strong>polishing</strong> <strong>wet</strong> scrubber were followed continuously for 18 months using long-time sampling equipment at a hazardous<br />
waste incineration facility in Sweden. Each sampling period lasted two weeks. It was found that the levels during<br />
and shortly <strong>after</strong> start-up periods were elevated. The decline was very slowly, which supports a memory effect in the<br />
scrubber. Further, a multivariate model showed that the relation between different homologues changed over time,<br />
which is in agreement with a desorption model, taking into account the vapour pressures for different congeners.<br />
Ó 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.<br />
Keywords: PCDD/PCDF; Memory effect; Flue gas cleaning; MVDA; Incineration<br />
1. Introduction<br />
<strong>Dioxin</strong> formation from incineration is known since<br />
1977 when dibenzo-dioxins and dibenzo-furans were<br />
found in fly ashes and flue gases (Olie et al., 1977). Their<br />
toxic effects are well known and dioxins have been in<br />
focus in the environmental discussions for almost 20<br />
years (Van den Berg et al., 1998). Throughout these<br />
years efforts have been made to minimize the formation<br />
and emission <strong>of</strong> dioxins from incineration facilities, both<br />
by means <strong>of</strong> primary measures, i.e. combustion control<br />
and by secondary measures such as the supply <strong>of</strong> additives<br />
or catalysts to the flue gas treatment system. One<br />
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +46 1930 5100; fax: +46 1957<br />
7027.<br />
E-mail address: carl-johan.lothgren@sakab.se (C.-J. Löthgren).<br />
<strong>of</strong> the most used methods is the injection <strong>of</strong> activated<br />
carbon into the flue gas channel just before a bag house<br />
filter, where the carbon together with the fly ash form an<br />
adsorption layer on the bag on which dioxins are adsorbed.<br />
Emissions <strong>after</strong> such an <strong>installation</strong> are known<br />
to be well below the EU emission limit <strong>of</strong> 0.1 ng/m 3<br />
(Chang and Lin, 2001).<br />
According to the EU directive 94/67/EG and EU<br />
directive 2000/76/EC emission measurements <strong>of</strong><br />
PCDD/Fs only have to take place once or twice yearly<br />
and such measurements are made under normal, i.e.<br />
good operation conditions. Typical CO levels are well<br />
below the stipulated 50 mg/m 3 normal dry gas. The<br />
emission levels under other operating conditions have<br />
been poorly studied until recently, when Belgian MSW<br />
incinerators started continuous flue gas sampling for dioxin<br />
analyses. Blumenstock et al. (2000) found an increase<br />
in PCDD/F levels <strong>after</strong> a period with bad<br />
operating conditions in a pilot scale incinerator. This<br />
0045-6535/$ - see front matter Ó 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.<br />
doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.02.015
406 C.-J. Löthgren, B. van Bavel / Chemosphere 61 (2005) 405–412<br />
was later confirmed by several other authors (Gullett<br />
et al., 2000; Zimmermann et al., 2001; Gass et al., 2002).<br />
Gass et al. (2002) investigated the <strong>emissions</strong> from a full<br />
scale incinerator and obtained the same results as earlier<br />
were shown in pilot scale.<br />
Wet scrubbing, i.e. the physical or chemical absorption<br />
<strong>of</strong> gases in a liquid, has been used for a long time<br />
for the removal <strong>of</strong> acid components in flue gases from<br />
incineration facilities because <strong>of</strong> its good removal efficiency<br />
(Onnen, 1972; Korell et al., 2003). High dioxin<br />
<strong>emissions</strong> have, however, been found <strong>after</strong> <strong>wet</strong> scrubbers<br />
when they have been placed as the final step in a flue gas<br />
cleaning system. It has further been shown that this is<br />
caused by the so called memory effect, where dioxins<br />
are adsorbed on plastic details such as scrubber fillings<br />
when the formation and emission from the incinerator<br />
is high. The adsorbed dioxins are then desorbed slowly<br />
when the plant is running under more stable conditions.<br />
A comparative study using a pilot scale scrubber made <strong>of</strong><br />
glass showed no such increased emission levels (Hunsinger<br />
et al., 1998). This memory effect can be distinguished<br />
from high <strong>emissions</strong> caused by bad combustion<br />
through its different congener pattern (Kreisz et al.,<br />
1996; Gass and Neugebauer, 1999; Adams et al., 2001;<br />
Giugliano et al., 2002).<br />
To comply with the hazardous waste incineration<br />
directive (EU directive 94/67/EG), which came in force<br />
on the first <strong>of</strong> July 2000 in Sweden, a hazardous waste<br />
treatment facility in Kumla, Sweden was equipped with<br />
an enhanced flue gas cleaning. A <strong>wet</strong> scrubber was installed<br />
<strong>after</strong> the existing semi-dry system, which consisted<br />
<strong>of</strong> a spray dryer and a fabric filter with activated<br />
carbon injection. Already five weeks <strong>after</strong> the new scrubber<br />
was taken into operation, elevated PCDD/F <strong>emissions</strong><br />
were observed. In order to learn more about the<br />
dynamic behaviour <strong>of</strong> the scrubber as to dioxin <strong>emissions</strong><br />
a continuos sampling device was installed in July<br />
2001. The results from these measurements are presented<br />
in this article.<br />
2. Material and methods<br />
The hazardous waste treatment facility studied<br />
mainly consists <strong>of</strong> an incineration line with a rotary kiln,<br />
secondary combustion chamber, boiler and a flue gas<br />
cleaning system. The flue gas cleaning consists <strong>of</strong> a<br />
semi-dry absorber, a fabric filter and the new <strong>wet</strong> scrubber.<br />
In the absorber lime milk is injected to neutralize<br />
the main part <strong>of</strong> HCl and SO 2 present in the flue gas. Between<br />
the absorber and the fabric filter activated carbon<br />
is injected for dioxin removal. The incineration temperature<br />
in the rotary kiln is above 1100 °C. Outlet temperature<br />
from the boiler is 280 °C. In the semi-dry flue gas<br />
cleaning system the temperature is lowered to 160 °C<br />
and in the scrubber the temperature is 70 °C.<br />
The scrubber consists <strong>of</strong> a quench and a 28 m high<br />
scrubbing tower, 5.5 m in diameter, filled with filling<br />
material <strong>of</strong> polypropylene (Rauschert hiflow rings type<br />
50–6). The scrubber and quench shell are made <strong>of</strong><br />
glass fibre reinforced plastic (GRP) Derakane 470.<br />
After the scrubber the flue gas fan is situated and the<br />
gases leave the plant through a 60 m high chimney,<br />
which interior surface also is made <strong>of</strong> GRP. A schematic<br />
sketch <strong>of</strong> the plant and the sampling points are shown in<br />
Fig. 1.<br />
Fig. 1. Schematic sketch <strong>of</strong> the plant and indication <strong>of</strong> sampling points for dioxins. The layout <strong>of</strong> the Amesa sampling system is shown<br />
in the bubble.
C.-J. Löthgren, B. van Bavel / Chemosphere 61 (2005) 405–412 407<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> the <strong>wet</strong> scrubber is to polish the emission<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> HCl and SO 2 to comply with the 1/2-hour<br />
averages prescribed by the Swedish implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
the European Hazardous Waste incineration directive.<br />
This is achieved by introducing H 2 O 2 to the scrubber<br />
liquid, the so called MercOx-process. The H 2 O 2 content<br />
in the scrubber liquid also increases the removal efficiency<br />
for mercury. The MercOx process has been described<br />
in detail by Korell et al. (2003).<br />
Five weeks <strong>after</strong> the first start-up <strong>of</strong> the plant with<br />
the new scrubber, dioxin levels were measured before<br />
and <strong>after</strong> the scrubber. High concentrations were found<br />
<strong>after</strong> the scrubber even though the concentrations before<br />
the scrubber were low. Further measurements during the<br />
autumn 2000 confirmed these results. In order to learn<br />
more about the dynamic behaviour <strong>of</strong> the scrubber as<br />
to dioxin <strong>emissions</strong> a continuos sampling device was installed<br />
in July 2001. Since then samples have been taken<br />
continuously whenever the plant has been in operation.<br />
The commercial sampling equipment used has been described<br />
by Funcke and Linnemann (1992) and Mayer<br />
et al. (2000) and consists <strong>of</strong> a titanium probe, a XAD-<br />
2-cartridge and a control cabinet. (Fig. 1). Flue gases<br />
are taken out isokinetically, pass the cartridge and are<br />
transferred to the control cabinet where flue gas volume<br />
and water content is measured.<br />
The sampling period for each analysis has varied between<br />
one to two weeks. Sample preparation and analyses<br />
have been made by Eur<strong>of</strong>ins GfA-laboratories in<br />
Germany according to EN1948. Eur<strong>of</strong>ins GfA is accredited<br />
according DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025:2000 and is<br />
participating on a regular basis in international intercalibration<br />
studies.<br />
3. Multivariate data treatment<br />
Multivariate data analysis (MVDA) has been used<br />
successfully in a number <strong>of</strong> investigations where complex<br />
data sets are to be evaluated, also in the field <strong>of</strong> dioxin<br />
research (Pitea et al., 1994; Buekens et al., 2000;<br />
Wang et al., 2003). Multivariate data analysis (MVDA)<br />
consists <strong>of</strong> several methods to extract information from<br />
large data matrices. In MVDA the samples (objects k),<br />
in our case the weekly dioxin measurements, are seen<br />
as points in a multidimensional space with as many<br />
dimensions as variables (i) measured on the samples.<br />
In principal component analysis (PCA) the points in<br />
the multidimensional space are projected down onto a<br />
line, a plane or a hyperplane to give the best low-dimensional<br />
representation <strong>of</strong> the data. The data matrix (X) is<br />
now approximated by a systematic part (the loading and<br />
the score vectors) and a random part (the residuals)<br />
which consists <strong>of</strong> errors in the measurements and imperfections<br />
in the approximation. The dimension <strong>of</strong> PCA is<br />
determined by cross validation.<br />
The visualisation <strong>of</strong> the PCA is normally done in diagram<br />
form. The variables are plotted in a diagram with<br />
the loading vectors as the axes. The greater the absolute<br />
value (positive or negative) <strong>of</strong> a variable is, the greater<br />
impact it has on its loading vector. Variables correlated<br />
with a specific vector can thus be identified. The objects<br />
are plotted in a diagram with the score vectors as the<br />
axes. Objects that have similar patterns will be located<br />
near each other and objects with different patterns will<br />
be more apart.<br />
Before MVDA was performed on the data set, all<br />
data were centered and scaled to unit variance. The calculations<br />
were performed on a PC with the s<strong>of</strong>tware program<br />
Simca 7.01 (Umetri AB, Umeå, Sweden). PCA is<br />
described in detail elsewhere (Wold et al., 1983; Wold<br />
et al., 1984).<br />
4. Result and discussion<br />
The sum <strong>of</strong> the different homologues for all measurements<br />
performed in the flue gas since 1998 are shown as<br />
series <strong>of</strong> time in Fig. 2. The first part shows the measurements<br />
made before the <strong>wet</strong> scrubber and the second part<br />
shows the measurements made <strong>after</strong> the <strong>wet</strong> scrubber,<br />
both short-time and long-time samplings. Each sampling<br />
is named according to the time when it was performed<br />
with the year and the consecutive week number <strong>of</strong> that<br />
year in the form yyww. When two measurements have<br />
been accomplished the same week, the individual measurements<br />
have been denoted a and b. Two maintenance<br />
stops in April and October 2002 are also indicated in the<br />
figure. The TEQ values for the measurements before the<br />
<strong>wet</strong> scrubber varied between 0.003 ng/m 3 (W9839a) and<br />
0.033 ng/m 3 (W9935). A significant higher level <strong>of</strong> TeC-<br />
DDs (0.19 and 0.5 ng/m 3 ) explains much <strong>of</strong> the rise in<br />
1999. No further investigations have been made in this<br />
study as to the cause <strong>of</strong> the results before the <strong>wet</strong> scrubber.<br />
The values shall be seen in comparison to the results<br />
from the measurements performed <strong>after</strong> the <strong>wet</strong><br />
scrubber.<br />
In the year 2000 when the <strong>wet</strong> scrubber was installed,<br />
sampling was performed simultaneously before and <strong>after</strong><br />
the <strong>wet</strong> scrubber. The results before the <strong>wet</strong> scrubber as<br />
to TEQ values were 0.010, 0.006 and 0.005 ng/m 3 , which<br />
are in the same range as earlier results, i.e. well below<br />
0.1 ng/m 3 . The TEQ-values <strong>after</strong> the <strong>wet</strong> scrubber in<br />
the sampling campaigns in year 2000 were much higher,<br />
0.18, 0.10, 0.36 and 0.45 ng/m 3 . During the first sampling<br />
campaign in May (W0021), the difference between<br />
the TEQ value before and <strong>after</strong> the scrubber is about<br />
one order <strong>of</strong> magnitude, 0.01 ng/m 3 before the scrubber<br />
compared to 0.18 and 0.10 ng/m 3 <strong>after</strong> the scrubber. In<br />
the campaign in October (W0040) this difference has increased<br />
to almost two orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude, 0.006 and<br />
0.005 ng/m 3 before the scrubber compared to 0.36 and
408 C.-J. Löthgren, B. van Bavel / Chemosphere 61 (2005) 405–412<br />
Measurements<br />
100<br />
before scrubber<br />
Measurements<br />
<strong>after</strong> scrubber<br />
Maintenance<br />
stop spring<br />
2002<br />
Maintenance stop<br />
autumn 2002<br />
10<br />
ng/m 3<br />
1<br />
0.1<br />
0.01<br />
0.001<br />
9839a<br />
9839b<br />
9934<br />
9935<br />
0021<br />
0040a<br />
0040b<br />
0021a<br />
0021b<br />
0040a<br />
0040b<br />
0127<br />
0131<br />
0136<br />
0137<br />
0138<br />
0139<br />
0140<br />
0141<br />
0146<br />
0147<br />
0148<br />
0149<br />
0150<br />
0151<br />
0152<br />
0201<br />
0202<br />
0203<br />
0204<br />
0205<br />
0206<br />
0207<br />
0209<br />
0211<br />
0213<br />
0215<br />
0218<br />
0220<br />
0222<br />
0224<br />
0226<br />
0228<br />
0230<br />
0232<br />
0234<br />
0235<br />
0236<br />
0237<br />
0238<br />
0240<br />
0242<br />
0244<br />
0247<br />
0249<br />
0251<br />
0252<br />
Sum TeCDD<br />
Sum PnCDD<br />
Sum HxCDD<br />
Sum HpCDD<br />
OCDD<br />
Sum TeCDF<br />
Sum PnCDF<br />
Sum HxCDF<br />
Sum HpCDF<br />
OCDF<br />
TEQ<br />
Fig. 2. Results <strong>of</strong> dioxin measurements 1998–2002 for all homologues and the TEQ value. To the left <strong>of</strong> the dotted line the results<br />
before the scrubber <strong>installation</strong> are shown. Maintenance stops are indicated with solid lines. Each sampling period is named with year<br />
and week number in the form yyww.<br />
0.45 ng/m 3 <strong>after</strong> the scrubber. It is clear that the differences<br />
in TEQ values before and <strong>after</strong> the scrubber above<br />
all can be explained by the drastically higher levels <strong>of</strong><br />
low-chlorinated homologues <strong>after</strong> the scrubber. For<br />
example TeCDD increased from the range 0.02 to<br />
0.14 ng/m 3 before the scrubber to 0.1–0.7 ng/m 3 <strong>after</strong><br />
the scrubber, TeCDF increased from the range 0.01 to<br />
0.07 ng/m 3 before the scrubber to 3.5–5.7 ng/m 3 <strong>after</strong><br />
the scrubber and PnCDF increased from the range<br />
0.02 to 0.07 ng/m 3 before the scrubber to 1.54–3.11<br />
ng/m 3 <strong>after</strong> the scrubber. OCDD, on the other hand,<br />
was in the range 0.03–0.15 ng/m 3 before the scrubber<br />
and 0.01–0.04 ng/m 3 <strong>after</strong> the scrubber. The same<br />
applies for OCDF, which was in the range 0.02–0.19<br />
ng/m 3 before the scrubber and 0.01–0.05 ng/m 3 <strong>after</strong><br />
the scrubber.<br />
This change in composition is illustrated in the fingerprint<br />
plots in Figs. 3 and 4. Especially the fraction<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> TeCDFs have risen. Before the scrubber the<br />
average fraction <strong>of</strong> TeCDF is 8% and <strong>after</strong> the scrubber<br />
it is 49%. The somewhat deviating pattern for the measurements<br />
in 1999 can also be seen. At this time the<br />
TeCDD fractions are the most deviating homologue<br />
with values <strong>of</strong> 44% and 52% compared to 5–14% for<br />
other measurement periods before the scrubber.<br />
The fingerprint plot in Fig. 4 shows clearly decreasing<br />
values with the degree <strong>of</strong> chlorination. For the PCDFs<br />
the average level <strong>of</strong> the TeCDF is 49% and that is<br />
approximately double the amount <strong>of</strong> the PeCDFs,<br />
which is 23%, i.e. more than the double <strong>of</strong> HxCDFs<br />
(9%). HpCDFs have an average fraction <strong>of</strong> 2% and<br />
OCDFs have an average fraction <strong>of</strong> 0.2%. For PCDDs<br />
the trend is similar but to a lesser extent (TeCDD 6%,<br />
PeCDD 6%, HxCDD 4%, PnCDD 1% and OCDD<br />
0.2%).<br />
In August 2000, as soon as the results from the measuring<br />
campaign in May 2000 were available, an electrostatic<br />
precipitator (ESP) used as by-pass for the fabric<br />
filter during start-up and shut down was closed since it<br />
was suspected that PCDD/Fs were loaded into the<br />
scrubber during its operation periods and slowly released<br />
<strong>after</strong>wards, the ‘‘so called’’ memory effect described<br />
in the literature by Kreisz et al. (1997); Wevers<br />
and De Fré (1998); Giugliano et al. (2000); Adams
C.-J. Löthgren, B. van Bavel / Chemosphere 61 (2005) 405–412 409<br />
Fig. 3. Homologue fingerprint for the measurements made before the <strong>wet</strong> scrubber. This includes both measurements made before and<br />
<strong>after</strong> the scrubber <strong>installation</strong>. In the years 1998–2000.<br />
Fig. 4. Homologue fingerprint for the measurements made <strong>after</strong> the <strong>wet</strong> scrubber in the period May 2000 to July 2001. High ratio <strong>of</strong><br />
low chlorinated congeners can be observed due to memory effects in the <strong>wet</strong> scrubber.
410 C.-J. Löthgren, B. van Bavel / Chemosphere 61 (2005) 405–412<br />
et al. (2001). When the ESP was in operation no carbon<br />
could be injected so it seemed logical that dioxins were<br />
transported to the <strong>wet</strong> scrubber during these periods.<br />
As can be seen in Fig. 2 the dioxin levels were elevated<br />
also in the measuring campaign in October 2000 (0.36<br />
and 0.45 ng/m 3 TEQ in W0040). When the continuous<br />
sampling equipment was installed in July 2001 the<br />
TEQ-value <strong>after</strong> the scrubber was 0.52 ng/m 3 , which is<br />
in the same range as in the October measurement. In<br />
Fig. 2 it can be seen that all the homologues except<br />
OCDF and OCDD fell from this high level to a level<br />
comparable to the levels measured before the scrubber<br />
(0.003–0.03 ng/m 3 ). This decline took almost 15 months<br />
from the shut down <strong>of</strong> the ESP. In W0147, which is in<br />
the beginning <strong>of</strong> November 2001 the first result below<br />
0.1 ng/m 3 TEQ <strong>after</strong> the scrubber was obtained. The result<br />
was 0.06 ng/m 3 TEQ and two weeks later the level<br />
had decreased further to 0.04 ng/m 3 .<br />
During the period <strong>of</strong> continuos sampling presented<br />
here, two dramatically risings <strong>of</strong> TEQ levels were observed,<br />
both in the period just <strong>after</strong> a maintenance stop<br />
<strong>of</strong> the plant. At the first occasion (W0215) the TEQ<br />
value increased from 0.02 ng/m 3 to 0.25 ng/m 3 and at the<br />
second occasion (W0240) the TEQ-value increased from<br />
0.03 to 0.15 ng/m 3 . It is believed that during the start-up<br />
periods high levels <strong>of</strong> dioxins are generated which normally<br />
is not recognized since sampling normally takes<br />
place only during stable operating conditions.<br />
The high concentrations just <strong>after</strong> start-up and the<br />
somewhat exponential decline <strong>after</strong>wards indicate that<br />
dioxins are adsorbed on the olefin plastics in the scrubber<br />
and released slowly. Otherwise a sharp peak would<br />
be expected just <strong>after</strong> start-up. It is also typical that<br />
the concentrations <strong>of</strong> OCDD/F do not vary over time<br />
since it is known that the absorption for these homologues<br />
are much stronger than for the others, (Kreisz<br />
et al., 1996). The different absorption pattern for different<br />
congeners can be explained by their different vapour<br />
pressures. The strong dependence on vapour pressures<br />
with the degree <strong>of</strong> chlorination has been described by<br />
Rordorf (1989).<br />
The change in composition can be seen even better<br />
when the data is studied using multivariate statistics.<br />
The concentrations <strong>of</strong> the 17 congenes that are used in<br />
the calculation <strong>of</strong> the TEQ value and the results in<br />
Fig. 2 were evaluated using PCA. At first a general<br />
PCA analysis <strong>of</strong> the data was made. This model gave little<br />
information as to the memory effect, since most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
variation in the data set was used to explain the changes<br />
in concentrations between the different sampling periods.<br />
If, however, the individual results for every congener<br />
was divided by the total amount <strong>of</strong> all dioxins and<br />
furans in that sample, the influence from variations in<br />
concentration could be eliminated.<br />
A new PCA model was calculated using the new variables<br />
and it was found that principal components 1 and<br />
3 <strong>of</strong> this model best described the variations in congener<br />
pattern that had been observed. The score and loading<br />
plots for these vectors are shown in Figs. 5 and 6<br />
respectively.<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
t [3]<br />
1<br />
0<br />
-1<br />
-2<br />
-3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
10<br />
8<br />
50<br />
45 44<br />
49<br />
4743<br />
46 48 40<br />
3536 29 32 33 4239<br />
38<br />
31<br />
20 26 34<br />
24 25 30<br />
41 37<br />
55<br />
56<br />
53<br />
57 22<br />
9<br />
1119<br />
52<br />
21 181716<br />
5<br />
23 27 51 1314<br />
54<br />
12 15<br />
7<br />
28<br />
-4<br />
-5<br />
6<br />
-10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
t [1]<br />
Fig. 5. Score plot vector 1 vs vector 3. Observations 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 are measurements before the <strong>wet</strong> scrubber. Maintenance stops<br />
are between obs. 36–37 and obs. 50–51. The ellipse indicates the Hotelling T2 95% confidence interval.
C.-J. Löthgren, B. van Bavel / Chemosphere 61 (2005) 405–412 411<br />
0.40<br />
totdioxin<br />
TEQ<br />
TCDD<br />
0.30<br />
0.20<br />
2378TCDD<br />
HxCDD<br />
PnCDD<br />
0.20<br />
p [3]<br />
0.00<br />
-0.10<br />
-0.20<br />
HpCDD<br />
1234678hpCDD<br />
1234789hpCDF<br />
HpCDF 123789hxCDF<br />
OCDD OCDF<br />
1234678hpCDF<br />
123789hxCDD<br />
123478hxCDD<br />
123678hxCDD123478hxCDF<br />
23478pCDF<br />
HxCDF<br />
123678hxCDF<br />
12378pCDD<br />
2378TCDF<br />
234678hxCDF<br />
12378pCDF<br />
PnCDF<br />
TCDF<br />
-0.30<br />
TotFuran<br />
-0.30<br />
-0.20 -0.10<br />
0.00<br />
p [1]<br />
0.10<br />
0.20<br />
Fig. 6. Loading plot vector 1 vs vector 3. Low-chlorinated congeners are situated to the right and PCDDs are situated to the top,<br />
PCDFs to the bottom <strong>of</strong> the diagram.<br />
To the left in Fig. 5, with low values in score vector 1,<br />
all the measurements before the scrubber are located<br />
(obs. nos 1,2,3,4,6,8,10) and the measurements <strong>after</strong><br />
the scrubber are located more to the right. Two maintenance<br />
stops are located between obs. nos 36 and 37 and<br />
between nos 50 and 51. A rapid shift in score vector 1<br />
can be observed during the two maintenance stops. Further<br />
it is visible how the observations at the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />
the continuos sampling period (obs. nos 12–16) are all<br />
located close together. During a transition period <strong>of</strong><br />
four weeks the observations have moved to a new point<br />
in the diagram, indicating a new composition in the<br />
emission pattern. The emission pattern is then relatively<br />
stable until the maintenance stop between observations<br />
36 and 37 occurs.<br />
Observation 12, which is the first measurement with<br />
the continuos sampling device, and observation 37 almost<br />
have the same score in vector 1 but differ in vector<br />
3. From observation 37, which is the first observation<br />
<strong>after</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the maintenance stops, the process again<br />
moves from high values in vector 1 to lower values over<br />
a couple <strong>of</strong> weeks. The same shift can be seen even better<br />
between observations 50 and 51 which is the second<br />
maintenance stop during the period covered in this study.<br />
The loading plot (Fig. 6) shows a tendency that the<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> chlorination is described by loading vector 1<br />
and the ratio <strong>of</strong> PCDD to PCDF is described by loading<br />
vector 3. Low-chlorinated congeners have higher loadings<br />
in vector 1 and PCDFs are situated toward lower<br />
values in loading vector 3. Implementing this in the<br />
score diagram it seems that just <strong>after</strong> a maintenance stop<br />
there is a big loss <strong>of</strong> dioxins and furans with four chlorine<br />
atoms. The difference in score vector 3 for the observations<br />
12 and 37 would then indicate that the ratio<br />
PCDD/PCDF is higher <strong>after</strong> the maintenance stop than<br />
it was when the continuos samplings were started. The<br />
PCA model also shows that there is a shift between<br />
PCDDs and PCDFs over time since the loadings for<br />
total-PCDD and total-PCDF are situated on one <strong>of</strong><br />
the diagonals in Fig. 6.<br />
5. Conclusions<br />
• The high PCDD/F <strong>emissions</strong> found <strong>after</strong> the <strong>installation</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>wet</strong> scrubber was caused by memory<br />
effects due to high formation in the incinerator during<br />
start up <strong>of</strong> the plant.<br />
• The homologue pattern <strong>after</strong> the <strong>wet</strong> scrubber differs<br />
significantly from the pattern before the scrubber. A<br />
relation between the degree <strong>of</strong> chlorination, the<br />
vapour pressure and the emission level for a specific<br />
congener was found with the use <strong>of</strong> multivariate<br />
statistics.<br />
• Start-up periods, e.g. <strong>after</strong> maintenance stops, are the<br />
main cause <strong>of</strong> elevated dioxin <strong>emissions</strong> from an<br />
incinerator. This can only be shown by continuos<br />
monitoring where all modes <strong>of</strong> operation are covered.
412 C.-J. Löthgren, B. van Bavel / Chemosphere 61 (2005) 405–412<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The authors would like to thank the staff at Sydkraft<br />
SAKAB for their assistance and acknowledge the analyses<br />
work <strong>of</strong> Eur<strong>of</strong>ins, Münster Roxel.<br />
This study was financially supported by the Swedish<br />
Knowledge foundation and SAKAB Kumla<br />
Miljöstiftelse.<br />
References<br />
Adams, B., Goemans, M., Joannes, J., 2001. Elevated <strong>Dioxin</strong><br />
Emission from a MSWI Due to the Memory Effect in the<br />
Wet Scrubbers. Seghers Bettertechnology for Solids + air.<br />
Willebroek, Belgium.<br />
Blumenstock, M., Zimmermann, R., Schramm, K.-W., Kettrup,<br />
A., 2000. Influence <strong>of</strong> combustion conditions on the<br />
PCDD/F-, PCB-, PCBz- and PAH-concentrations in the<br />
post-combustion chamber <strong>of</strong> a waste incineration pilot<br />
plant. Chemosphere 40, 987–993.<br />
Buekens, A., Cornelis, E., Huang, H., De<strong>wet</strong>tinck, T., 2000.<br />
Fingerprints <strong>of</strong> dioxin from thermal industrial processes.<br />
Chemosphere 40, 1021–1024.<br />
Chang, M.B., Lin, J.J., 2001. Memory effect on the dioxin<br />
<strong>emissions</strong> from municipal waste incinerator in Taiwan.<br />
Chemosphere 45, 1151–1157.<br />
Funcke, W., Linnemann, H., 1992. Sampling <strong>of</strong> polychlorinated<br />
dibenz<strong>of</strong>urans (PCDF) and dibenzo(p)dioxins (PCDD) in<br />
<strong>emissions</strong> from combustion facilities using an adsorption<br />
method. Chemosphere 24, 1563–1572.<br />
Gass, H.C., Lüder, K., Wilken, M., 2002. PCDD/F-<strong>emissions</strong><br />
during cold start-up and shut-down <strong>of</strong> a municipal waste<br />
incinerator. Organohalogen Compd. 56, 193–196.<br />
Gass, H.C., Neugebauer, F., 1999. Change <strong>of</strong> PCDD/PCDF<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>iles in the <strong>wet</strong> scrubber system <strong>of</strong> a fluidized bed<br />
incinerator used for municipal solid waste. Organohalogen<br />
Compd. 41, 153–156.<br />
Giugliano, M., Cernuschi, S., Grosso, M., Miglo, R., Aloigi, E.,<br />
2000. PCDD/F concentrations and mass balance in the flue<br />
gas cleaning section <strong>of</strong> a state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art MSW incineration<br />
plant. Organohalogen Compd. 46, 146–149.<br />
Giugliano, M., Cernuschi, S., Grosso, M., Miglio, R., Aloigi,<br />
E., 2002. PCDD/F mass balance in the flue gas cleaning<br />
units <strong>of</strong> a MSW incineration plant. Chemosphere 46, 1321–<br />
1328.<br />
Gullett, B.K., Touati, A., Lee, C.W., 2000. Formation <strong>of</strong><br />
chlorinated dioxins and furans in a hazardous-waste-firing<br />
industrial boiler. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34, 2069–2074.<br />
Hunsinger, H., Kreisz, S., Seifert, H., 1998. PCDD/F behavior<br />
in <strong>wet</strong> scrubbing systems <strong>of</strong> waste incineration plants.<br />
Chemosphere 37, 2293–2297.<br />
Korell, J., Seifert, H., Paur, H.-R., Andersson, S., Bolin, P.,<br />
2003. Flue gas cleaning with the Mercox process. Chem.<br />
Eng. Tech. 26, 737–740.<br />
Kreisz, S., Hunsinger, H., Vogg, H., 1996. Wet scrubbers—a<br />
potential PCDD/F source? Chemosphere 32, 73–78.<br />
Kreisz, S., Hunsinger, H., Vogg, H., 1997. Technical plastics as<br />
PCDD/F absorbers. Chemosphere 34, 1045–1052.<br />
Mayer, J., Linnemann, H., Becker, E., Rentschler, W., Jockel,<br />
W., Wilbring, P., Gerchel, B., 2000. Certification <strong>of</strong> a long<br />
term sampling system for PCDFs and PCDDs in the flue gas<br />
from industrial facilities. Chemosphere 40, 1025–1027.<br />
Olie, K., Vermeulen, P.L., Hutzinger, O., 1977. Chlorodibenzop-dioxins<br />
and chlorodibenz<strong>of</strong>urans are trace components <strong>of</strong><br />
fly ash <strong>of</strong> some municipal incinerators in the Netherlands.<br />
Chemosphere 6, 455–459.<br />
Onnen, J.H., 1972. Wet scrubbers tackle pollution. Environ.<br />
Sci. Technol. 6, 994–998.<br />
Pitea, D., Bonati, L., Collina, E., Cosentino, U., Lasagni, M.,<br />
Moro, G., Todeschini, R., 1994. Chemometric approaches<br />
in environmental-problems concerning PCDD and PCDFdata<br />
interpretation and source correlation—mechanisms <strong>of</strong><br />
formation and destruction in MSW combustion process.<br />
Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 348, 111–120.<br />
Rordorf, B.F., 1989. Prediction <strong>of</strong> vapor pressures, boiling<br />
points and enthalpies <strong>of</strong> fusion for twenty-nine halogenated<br />
dibenzo-p-dioxins and fifty-five dibenz<strong>of</strong>urans by a vapor<br />
pressure correlation method. Chemosphere 18, 783–788.<br />
Van den Berg, M., Birnbaum, L., Bosveld, A.T.C., Brunstrom,<br />
B., Cook, P., Feeley, M., Giesy, J.P., Hanberg, A., Hasegawa,<br />
R., Kennedy, S.W., Kubiak, T., Larsen, J.C., van Leeuwen,<br />
F.X.R., Liem, A.K.D., Nolt, C., Peterson, R.E., Poellinger,<br />
L., Safe, S., Schrenk, D., Tillitt, D., Tysklind, M., Younes,<br />
M., Waern, F.T., Zacharewski, T., 1998. Toxic equivalency<br />
factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and<br />
wildlife. Environ. Health Perspect. 106, 775–792.<br />
Wang, L.-C., Lee, W.-J., Lee, W.-S., Guo-Ping, Chang-Chien,<br />
Tsai, P.-J., 2003. Effect <strong>of</strong> chlorine content in feeding wastes<br />
<strong>of</strong> incineration on the emission <strong>of</strong> polychlorinated dibenzop-dioxins/dibenz<strong>of</strong>urans.<br />
Sci. Total Environ. 302, 185–198.<br />
Wevers, M., De Fré, R., 1998. <strong>Dioxin</strong> emission reduction <strong>of</strong> a<br />
municipal waste incinerator by injection <strong>of</strong> activated<br />
carbon—the abatement <strong>of</strong> memory effects. Organohalogen<br />
Compd. 36, 343–346.<br />
Wold, S., Albano, C., Dunn III, W.J., Esbensen, K., Hellberg,<br />
S., Johansson, E., Sjöström, M., 1983. Pattern recognition:<br />
finding and using regularities in multivariate data. In:<br />
Hmartens, , Russwurm, H. (Eds.), Food Research and Data<br />
Analysis. Applied Science, London and New York, pp. 147–<br />
188.<br />
Wold, S., Albano, C., Dunn III, W.J., Esbensen, K., Hellberg,<br />
S., Johansson, E., Sjöström, M., Edlund, U., Geladi, P.,<br />
1984. Multivariate data analysis in chemistry. In: Kowalski,<br />
B. (Ed.), Chemometrics: Mathematics and Statistics in<br />
Chemistry. Riedel, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 17–95.<br />
Zimmermann, R., Blumenstock, M., Heger, H.J., Schramm,<br />
K.-W., Kettrup, A., 2001. Emission <strong>of</strong> nonchlorinated and<br />
chlorinated aromatics in the flue gas <strong>of</strong> incineration plants<br />
during and <strong>after</strong> transient disturbances <strong>of</strong> combustion<br />
conditions: delayed emission effects. Environ. Sci. Technol.<br />
35, 1019–1030.