20.11.2013 Views

SB000238 95130098 T i l 3240568 - Legacy Tobacco Documents ...

SB000238 95130098 T i l 3240568 - Legacy Tobacco Documents ...

SB000238 95130098 T i l 3240568 - Legacy Tobacco Documents ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

<strong>SB000238</strong> <strong>95130098</strong> Til <strong>3240568</strong><br />

Sunmary of Statement by Jackie Giso<br />

on behalf of the National Association of <strong>Tobacco</strong><br />

Distributors(N.A # T.D.)<br />

before the Senate Finance Committee 9-10-85<br />

The National Association of <strong>Tobacco</strong> Distributors(NATD),which represents<br />

the wholesale-distribution industry selling tobacco and other<br />

products having an estimated annual wholesale value of over $16 billion<br />

dollars,urges the committee to comply with the intent of Public Law 97-248,<br />

which contains a "sunset" provision that would reduce the cigarette tax<br />

rate from 16 cents to 8 cents per pack on October 1,1985. The NATO also<br />

urges the Committee to adopt a floor stocks tax rebate provision,similar<br />

to the one considered for inclusion in last year's Deficit Reduction Act<br />

(P.L.98-369),that would provide for refunds of 8 cents for every pack held<br />

in inventory on October 1,1985.<br />

The NATD's testimony indicates that a floor stocks rebate provision<br />

should be passed by the Congress and signed by the President prior to<br />

October 1,1985. In supporting the "sunset" provision, the NATD points out<br />

that tobacco excise taxes are regressive, that tobacco is unfairly being<br />

singled out,and shows the impact of State excise tax increases on the Federal<br />

decision relating to cigarette excise taxes.


<strong>SB000238</strong> <strong>95130098</strong> Til 3240569<br />

STATEMENT OF JACKIE GISO r PRESIDENT<br />

JACKIE GISO f INC.,<br />

CRANSTON, RHODE ISLAND<br />

BEFORE THE<br />

SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE<br />

ON<br />

CIGARETTE EXCISE TAXES<br />

SEPTEMBER 10, 1985<br />

Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee.<br />

My name is<br />

Jackie Giso, President of Jackie Giso r Inc., a tobacco wholesale<br />

distribution company based in Cranston, Rhode Island,<br />

I am a member of the National Association of <strong>Tobacco</strong> Distributors<br />

(NATD), which represents over 570 small business<br />

wholesaler-distributor members, with over 740 distribution<br />

outlets.<br />

Our Association also represents 230 manufacturer and<br />

supplier associate members whose 12,000 salesmen canvass and<br />

supply almost 1.5 million retail outlets selling tobacco products<br />

across the United States.<br />

Our industry markets goods with an<br />

estimated annual wholesale value of over $16 billion dollars.<br />

We appreciate the opportunity to present NATD ! s position on<br />

whether the current level of federal cigarette excise tax should<br />

be extended beyond September 30, 1985. The NATD urges this<br />

Committee to comply with the intent of Public Law 97-248, the Tax<br />

Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), which<br />

contains a "sunset" provision that would reduce the tax rate from<br />

16 cents to 8 cents per pack on October 1, 1985. In addition, we<br />

1


<strong>SB000238</strong> <strong>95130098</strong> Til 3240570<br />

believe that the Committee should also adopt a floor stocks tax<br />

rebate provision r similar to the one considered for inclusion in<br />

last year's. Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 (P.L. 98-369), that<br />

would provide for refunds of 8 cents for every pack held in<br />

inventory on October 1, 1985.<br />

I would like to emphasize some of our policy considerations<br />

regarding the sunset provision and rebates.<br />

Rebates<br />

In 1983, the TEFRA cigarette tax increase placed a<br />

significant burden on wholesalers because it included a floor<br />

stocks tax. According to the Treasury Department, the one-time<br />

tobacco floor stocks tax on inventory held on January 1, 1983<br />

produced $180 million in revenue, all of which was paid by the<br />

tobacco wholesale industry. With the scheduled lowering of the<br />

federal cigarette excise tax, the opposite should occur. There<br />

should be a rebate of the taxes which have already been paid on<br />

inventory held on October 1, 1985. Legislative language should<br />

be included in the House and Senate tax bill, as was included by<br />

the House Ways and Means Committee last year, to include a floor<br />

stocks rebate for such inventory. At this time, Mr. Chairman, I<br />

would like to include in my testimony a copy of a letter which<br />

was sent by Steve Bloom, Chairman of the NATD's Legislative<br />

Committee and a member of the Executive Committee, to the<br />

Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Congressman Dan<br />

Rostenkowski(D-Ill),outlining the floor stocks rebate language we<br />

support. We would urge you to include this language in Senate<br />

2


SBQ00238 <strong>95130098</strong> Til 3240571<br />

legislation prior to the end of this month.<br />

<strong>Tobacco</strong> Excise £az££ &££ Regressive<br />

It is unfair to place the burden of deficit reduction on<br />

cigarette excise taxes. These taxes are regressive taxes because<br />

their impact is proportionally greater on persons with low and<br />

moderate incomes. Regressive taxes should not be utilized as a<br />

means either to recoup federal deficits, or to reduce through<br />

earmarking, any deficits in specific programs such as Medicare.<br />

This latter point is true now more than ever because of the<br />

greatly improved financial situation of the Medicare Trust Fund.<br />

ImEaSfc 01 State Excise £&& Increases<br />

Keeping the federal excise tax at 16 cents ignores the<br />

policy of leaving to the states any potential revenue to be<br />

derived beyond the basic 8 cents federal excise tax. As least<br />

sixteen states have already passed contingent tax increases based<br />

on the sunset provision. Eight states have pending contingent<br />

tax legislation. We recall that the Administration several years<br />

ago had proposed an elimination of federal cigarette excise taxes<br />

as part of its "New Federalism" initiatives, by stating that such<br />

taxes should be State revenue options. Given recent proposals to<br />

reduce revenue sharing and block grants, and to eliminate deduc<br />

tions for state and local income taxes f it is important that some<br />

revenue-generating areas be preserved for States.<br />

<strong>Tobacco</strong> Unfairly Singled Qut<br />

Of the various federal excise taxes which could be raised,<br />

tobacco was singled out for a substantial tax increase.<br />

We<br />

3


elieve that excise taxes in several are repressive r but<br />

certainly tobacco should not be discriminated against.<br />

Thank you for this opportunity to present our views*<br />

<strong>SB000238</strong> <strong>95130098</strong><br />

TI13240572

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!