SB000238 95130098 T i l 3240568 - Legacy Tobacco Documents ...
SB000238 95130098 T i l 3240568 - Legacy Tobacco Documents ...
SB000238 95130098 T i l 3240568 - Legacy Tobacco Documents ...
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
<strong>SB000238</strong> <strong>95130098</strong> Til <strong>3240568</strong><br />
Sunmary of Statement by Jackie Giso<br />
on behalf of the National Association of <strong>Tobacco</strong><br />
Distributors(N.A # T.D.)<br />
before the Senate Finance Committee 9-10-85<br />
The National Association of <strong>Tobacco</strong> Distributors(NATD),which represents<br />
the wholesale-distribution industry selling tobacco and other<br />
products having an estimated annual wholesale value of over $16 billion<br />
dollars,urges the committee to comply with the intent of Public Law 97-248,<br />
which contains a "sunset" provision that would reduce the cigarette tax<br />
rate from 16 cents to 8 cents per pack on October 1,1985. The NATO also<br />
urges the Committee to adopt a floor stocks tax rebate provision,similar<br />
to the one considered for inclusion in last year's Deficit Reduction Act<br />
(P.L.98-369),that would provide for refunds of 8 cents for every pack held<br />
in inventory on October 1,1985.<br />
The NATD's testimony indicates that a floor stocks rebate provision<br />
should be passed by the Congress and signed by the President prior to<br />
October 1,1985. In supporting the "sunset" provision, the NATD points out<br />
that tobacco excise taxes are regressive, that tobacco is unfairly being<br />
singled out,and shows the impact of State excise tax increases on the Federal<br />
decision relating to cigarette excise taxes.
<strong>SB000238</strong> <strong>95130098</strong> Til 3240569<br />
STATEMENT OF JACKIE GISO r PRESIDENT<br />
JACKIE GISO f INC.,<br />
CRANSTON, RHODE ISLAND<br />
BEFORE THE<br />
SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE<br />
ON<br />
CIGARETTE EXCISE TAXES<br />
SEPTEMBER 10, 1985<br />
Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee.<br />
My name is<br />
Jackie Giso, President of Jackie Giso r Inc., a tobacco wholesale<br />
distribution company based in Cranston, Rhode Island,<br />
I am a member of the National Association of <strong>Tobacco</strong> Distributors<br />
(NATD), which represents over 570 small business<br />
wholesaler-distributor members, with over 740 distribution<br />
outlets.<br />
Our Association also represents 230 manufacturer and<br />
supplier associate members whose 12,000 salesmen canvass and<br />
supply almost 1.5 million retail outlets selling tobacco products<br />
across the United States.<br />
Our industry markets goods with an<br />
estimated annual wholesale value of over $16 billion dollars.<br />
We appreciate the opportunity to present NATD ! s position on<br />
whether the current level of federal cigarette excise tax should<br />
be extended beyond September 30, 1985. The NATD urges this<br />
Committee to comply with the intent of Public Law 97-248, the Tax<br />
Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), which<br />
contains a "sunset" provision that would reduce the tax rate from<br />
16 cents to 8 cents per pack on October 1, 1985. In addition, we<br />
1
<strong>SB000238</strong> <strong>95130098</strong> Til 3240570<br />
believe that the Committee should also adopt a floor stocks tax<br />
rebate provision r similar to the one considered for inclusion in<br />
last year's. Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 (P.L. 98-369), that<br />
would provide for refunds of 8 cents for every pack held in<br />
inventory on October 1, 1985.<br />
I would like to emphasize some of our policy considerations<br />
regarding the sunset provision and rebates.<br />
Rebates<br />
In 1983, the TEFRA cigarette tax increase placed a<br />
significant burden on wholesalers because it included a floor<br />
stocks tax. According to the Treasury Department, the one-time<br />
tobacco floor stocks tax on inventory held on January 1, 1983<br />
produced $180 million in revenue, all of which was paid by the<br />
tobacco wholesale industry. With the scheduled lowering of the<br />
federal cigarette excise tax, the opposite should occur. There<br />
should be a rebate of the taxes which have already been paid on<br />
inventory held on October 1, 1985. Legislative language should<br />
be included in the House and Senate tax bill, as was included by<br />
the House Ways and Means Committee last year, to include a floor<br />
stocks rebate for such inventory. At this time, Mr. Chairman, I<br />
would like to include in my testimony a copy of a letter which<br />
was sent by Steve Bloom, Chairman of the NATD's Legislative<br />
Committee and a member of the Executive Committee, to the<br />
Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Congressman Dan<br />
Rostenkowski(D-Ill),outlining the floor stocks rebate language we<br />
support. We would urge you to include this language in Senate<br />
2
SBQ00238 <strong>95130098</strong> Til 3240571<br />
legislation prior to the end of this month.<br />
<strong>Tobacco</strong> Excise £az££ &££ Regressive<br />
It is unfair to place the burden of deficit reduction on<br />
cigarette excise taxes. These taxes are regressive taxes because<br />
their impact is proportionally greater on persons with low and<br />
moderate incomes. Regressive taxes should not be utilized as a<br />
means either to recoup federal deficits, or to reduce through<br />
earmarking, any deficits in specific programs such as Medicare.<br />
This latter point is true now more than ever because of the<br />
greatly improved financial situation of the Medicare Trust Fund.<br />
ImEaSfc 01 State Excise £&& Increases<br />
Keeping the federal excise tax at 16 cents ignores the<br />
policy of leaving to the states any potential revenue to be<br />
derived beyond the basic 8 cents federal excise tax. As least<br />
sixteen states have already passed contingent tax increases based<br />
on the sunset provision. Eight states have pending contingent<br />
tax legislation. We recall that the Administration several years<br />
ago had proposed an elimination of federal cigarette excise taxes<br />
as part of its "New Federalism" initiatives, by stating that such<br />
taxes should be State revenue options. Given recent proposals to<br />
reduce revenue sharing and block grants, and to eliminate deduc<br />
tions for state and local income taxes f it is important that some<br />
revenue-generating areas be preserved for States.<br />
<strong>Tobacco</strong> Unfairly Singled Qut<br />
Of the various federal excise taxes which could be raised,<br />
tobacco was singled out for a substantial tax increase.<br />
We<br />
3
elieve that excise taxes in several are repressive r but<br />
certainly tobacco should not be discriminated against.<br />
Thank you for this opportunity to present our views*<br />
<strong>SB000238</strong> <strong>95130098</strong><br />
TI13240572