AGENDA - Swakopmund Municipality

More documents

Recommendations

Info

(a) (b) That those applicants who fail to show up without reasons not be considered for new applicants again for one (1) month. That Messrs Roads Authority be informed about Council’s decision on applicants who fail to turn up without valid reasons. B. After the matter was considered, the following was:- RECOMMENDED: (a) That applicants who fail to show up without valid reasons not be permitted to apply again for a period of one (1) month. (b) That Messrs Roads Authority be informed about Council’s decision regarding applicants who fail to turn up without valid reasons.
11.1.12 REPORT ON DRC AND PDA DEVELOPMENTS (C/M 2012/06/28 - H 5, H 5/7) Ordinary Management Committee Meeting of 14 June 2012, Addendum 8.12 page 53 refers. A. The following item was submitted to the Management Committee for consideration: 1. Application for Need and Desirability was approved by the Namibian Planning Advisory Board (NAMPAB) on 22 December 2011 under item 66/2011. The approval letter for the Need and Desirability dated 29 February 2012 was forwarded to Messrs Winplan Town and Regional Planning Consultants to inform them accordingly. 2. Applications for Township Establishment were then submitted to Townships Board on 4 April 2012. These applications needed to be advertised in terms of the Ordinance 11 of 1963 before the application is submitted for final approval by the Townships Board. On the 25 May 2012 Messrs Winplan Town and Regional Planning Consultants received a telephone call from the Ministry informing them that they cannot advertise the proposed application. This was due to the lack of an Environmental Clearance Certificate that needs to be given in terms of the new Environmental Management Act that was promulgated in February 2012. 3. To minimise delays, the Engineering Services Department advertised the tender for the surveying of the DRC and the PDA on 23 March 2012 in order to start the surveying as soon as final approval was granted. The tender was not awarded as one tender was too high and the other was incomplete. The Tender Board then approved the request to re-advertise the informal tender. The new tender documentation was then drawn up by the Engineering Services Department and the intention was to re-advertise on the 8 June 2012. 4. Messrs Winplan Town and Regional Planning Consultants has in the meantime taken it upon them to draft a letter to the Ministry of Environment and Tourism to request exemption for these applications. The request is based on the fact that the Need and Desirability was already approved by NAMPAB before the Environmental Management Act was promulgated in February 2012. 5. If no exemption is granted for the applications it will be necessary to obtain the services of a company to do an EIA. This will have an additional cost to Council towards the project. The cost to Council can not be estimated since no formal scale of fees exists for such work to be done. It can only be established through a tender process.
Page 1 and 2: AGENDA Ordinary Council Meeting on
Page 3 and 4: INDEX 1. OPENING 2. APPLICATIONS FO
Page 5 and 6: ITEM NO 11.1.16 11.1.17 11.1.18 11.
Page 7 and 8: 10. REPORT TO COUNCIL ON RESOLUTION
Page 9 and 10: 7.8 APPLICATION BY MESSRS ALL-SAFE
Page 11 and 12: 8. POLICY MATTERS 8.3 PERMISSION TO
Page 13 and 14: 9. PERSONNEL MATTERS 9.1 COMPOSITIO
Page 15 and 16: 9.6 BUDGET FOR TOWN PLANNING OFFICE
Page 17 and 18: 11. RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE MANAGEME
Page 19 and 20: 11.1.3 BUILD TOGETHER APPLICATION:
Page 21 and 22: 11.1.4 BUILD TOGETHER APPLICANTS WH
Page 23 and 24: whereas private companies purchase
Page 25 and 26: ORGANISATION / BODY Swakopmund Bapt
Page 27 and 28: 11.1.7 ILLEGAL BUILDING ON LEASE AR
Page 29 and 30: Objection by Mr R Moisel Mr R Moise
Page 31 and 32: As an indication of the possible co
Page 33 and 34: Kühnast Street The specific Street
Page 35 and 36: 206,800.00 CONTINGENCIES 30.00% 62,
Page 37: 11.1.11 FAILURE TO SHOW UP BY DRIVE
Page 41 and 42: 11.1.13 DECENTRALIZED BUILD TOGETHE
Page 43 and 44: 11.1.15 APPLICATION TO PURCHASE A P
Page 45 and 46: 5. Cost of installation of Services
Page 47 and 48: 11.1.16 REZONING OF ERF 623, SWAKOP
Page 49 and 50: B. After the matter was considered,
Page 51 and 52: also sent to the surrounding proper
Page 53 and 54: from the surrounding properties. He
Page 55 and 56: Comments from Mr W A van der Plas,
Page 57 and 58: e done within his rights with regar
Page 59 and 60: 11.1.23 APPLICATION FOR THE RELAXAT
Page 61 and 62: (xi) Products not manufactured or f
Page 63 and 64: (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) (xi) The resi
Page 65 and 66: 11.1.27 APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION
Page 67 and 68: 11.1.28 CONSOLIDATION AND REZONING
Page 69 and 70: 11.1.29 REQUEST FOR PROJECTS TO BE
Page 71 and 72: 11.1.30 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL FUND
Page 73 and 74: 11.1.32 REQUEST TO TRANSFER FUNDS T
Page 75 and 76: transaction will be cancelled with
Page 77 and 78: 11.1.34 REQUEST FOR CONSENT FROM ME
Page 79: The operation involves large volume

AGENDA - Swakopmund Municipality

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?