22.12.2013 Views

Investigations of Faraday Rotation Maps of Extended Radio Sources ...

Investigations of Faraday Rotation Maps of Extended Radio Sources ...

Investigations of Faraday Rotation Maps of Extended Radio Sources ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION<br />

This synchrotron emission spectrum can then be related to the energy density <strong>of</strong><br />

relativistic electrons ɛ re = ∫ dE n e (E)E and the magnetic field B ⊥ (Burbidge 1956;<br />

Pacholczyk 1970; Leahy 1991). Suppose that the total flux density S ν emitted by the<br />

source in a frequency range ν 1 < ν < ν 2 and the angular size <strong>of</strong> the source Θ are<br />

measured, one can obtain the relativistic energy density ɛ re<br />

ɛ re =<br />

∫ ν2<br />

ν 1<br />

dE n e (E)E = aB −3/2 Θ 2 S ν (ν 0 ), (1.21)<br />

where ν 0 is a characteristic frequency between ν 1 and ν 2 and the proportionality factor<br />

a is a known function which depends on ν 1 , ν 2 and α (see e.g. chap. 7, Pacholczyk<br />

1970).<br />

If the relativistic particle energy can be determined by an additional method, the<br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> the magnetic field strength follows from Eq. (1.21). Often this necessary<br />

information is not directly available. Therefore, an additional assumption is <strong>of</strong>ten used<br />

by considering the total energy budget<br />

ɛ tot = ɛ re + ɛ rp + ɛ B , (1.22)<br />

where ɛ B = B 2 /8π is the magnetic energy density, ɛ re and ɛ rp are the relativistic<br />

energy density <strong>of</strong> the electrons and <strong>of</strong> the heavy particles, respectively. Assuming<br />

that the energy density <strong>of</strong> heavy particles is proportional to the energy density <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relativistic electrons ɛ rp = kɛ re , where k ∼ 100 for relativistic particles in our Galaxy<br />

(Beck et al. 1996), Eq. (1.22) reduces to<br />

ɛ tot = (1 + k)ɛ re + ɛ B . (1.23)<br />

In order to estimate the magnetic field strength, one can either assume equipartition<br />

between the energies (1 + k)ɛ re = ɛ B or minimise ɛ tot with respect to B. The latter<br />

results in<br />

∂ɛ tot<br />

∂B<br />

= 0 = −(1 + k)<br />

3c<br />

2 Θ2 S ν (ν 0 ) B −5/2 + 1<br />

4π<br />

B, (1.24)<br />

where Eq. (1.21) was used, leading to a magnetic field estimate <strong>of</strong> the form B 7/2 ∝<br />

Θ 2 S ν (ν 0 ). However, the equipartition assumption leads to a similar result which deviates<br />

only by a factor <strong>of</strong> 8/6. As an example using equipartition arguments, Niklas<br />

(1995) determined a mean magnetic field strength <strong>of</strong> 9 ± 3 µG from a sample <strong>of</strong> 74<br />

spiral galaxies, however larger field strength have been locally detected in Galaxies<br />

(Beck et al. 1996).<br />

The assumption <strong>of</strong> equipartition or minimum energy is continously under debate.<br />

It is not clear if this assumption is valid over all length and time scales. On large length<br />

scales or long time scales equilibrium might have developed whereas on small length<br />

or short time scales this may not be true. However, in our Galaxy the assumption <strong>of</strong><br />

equipartition can be tested, since independent measurement <strong>of</strong> the relativistic electron<br />

energy density and <strong>of</strong> the relativistic proton energy density exist. A combination <strong>of</strong><br />

these information yields an excellent agreement with the estimates using the equipartition<br />

assumption (Beck 2001).<br />

Another possibility to use synchrotron emission in order to estimate the magnetic<br />

field strength for extragalactic sources is the comparison between inverse Compton<br />

(IC) X-ray emission and radio synchrotron emission (Harris & Grindlay 1979;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!