26.12.2013 Views

Adverbial and Argument-Doubling Clauses in Cree - MSpace

Adverbial and Argument-Doubling Clauses in Cree - MSpace

Adverbial and Argument-Doubling Clauses in Cree - MSpace

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5<br />

An Analysis of <strong>Adverbial</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Argument</strong>-Doubüng <strong>Clauses</strong><br />

S. 1 Introduction<br />

1 have proposed that a dist<strong>in</strong>ction between complernent-like <strong>and</strong> adjunct-like subord<strong>in</strong>ate<br />

clauses <strong>in</strong> <strong>Cree</strong> can be made without claim<strong>in</strong>g a contrast <strong>in</strong> argwnent/adjunct position.<br />

The version of the PAH which 1 adopt places ody pronom<strong>in</strong>al arguments <strong>in</strong> argument<br />

positions. <strong>in</strong>side the verbal complex, while al1 other constituents occur <strong>in</strong> non-argument<br />

positions. While both argument-doubl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> adverbial clauses are <strong>in</strong> non-argument<br />

positions, the need to differentiate between these two types of subord<strong>in</strong>ate clauses is<br />

apparent when we consider the evidence presented <strong>in</strong> chapters 3 <strong>and</strong> 4.<br />

I have claimed a dist<strong>in</strong>ction between argument-doubl<strong>in</strong>g clauses, which<br />

demonstrate complement-like characteristics, <strong>and</strong> adverbial clauses, which behave like<br />

adjuncts. This dist<strong>in</strong>ction replicates one already made between A-doubl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> oblique<br />

NPs. The present chapter will discuss <strong>in</strong> detail the form <strong>and</strong> implications of this dist<strong>in</strong>ction<br />

between subord<strong>in</strong>ate clauses.<br />

I propose that some subord<strong>in</strong>ate clauses, those with complement-like propenies,<br />

are A-doubl<strong>in</strong>g clauses, while other subord<strong>in</strong>ate clauses are not. A-doubl<strong>in</strong>g clauses are<br />

construed with an argument, <strong>and</strong> this is captured by be<strong>in</strong>g referentially-l<strong>in</strong>ked to apro<br />

argument <strong>in</strong> the matrix verbal complex. This l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g forms a cha<strong>in</strong>, thereby establish<strong>in</strong>g a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!