31.12.2013 Views

George w. casey jr. - Federation of American Scientists

George w. casey jr. - Federation of American Scientists

George w. casey jr. - Federation of American Scientists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Role <strong>of</strong> the Company Intelligence Support<br />

Team in Full Spectrum Operations<br />

by Thomas Tomes and Christopher Maxwell<br />

Introduction<br />

In the usual theater mission rehearsal exercises<br />

(MRE) at the Joint Readiness Training Center<br />

(JRTC), the Company Intelligence Support Team<br />

(CoIST) in each maneuver battalion (BN) is pivotal<br />

in supporting company commanders (CO Cdrs)<br />

and BN S2s. Rotation 11-01 with the 3rd Brigade<br />

Combat Team (BCT), 82 nd Airborne Division was the<br />

first full spectrum operations (FSO) rotation at JRTC<br />

in eight years. Recognizing that CoISTs should play<br />

a role in FSO, 3/82 ABN elected to use a modified<br />

CoIST concept with CO command posts (CPs) serving<br />

this critical requirement among all <strong>of</strong> its other<br />

requirements.<br />

What was discovered during the BCT’s rotation is<br />

that FSO does not lessen the need for CoISTs at the<br />

maneuver company; it modifies the mission’s priorities<br />

and adds to them. During this rotation, both<br />

the 3/82 ABN and JRTC observed several CoIST<br />

challenges. This article will discuss three <strong>of</strong> those<br />

challenges:<br />

Manning a CoIST for FSO.<br />

Resourcing a CoIST with appropriate automation<br />

and communication resources.<br />

Establishing standing operating procedures<br />

(SOP) for CoISTs during FSO.<br />

Building the CoIST<br />

The initial challenge for the BCT was to select the<br />

right Soldiers to build these CoIST cells and provide<br />

those Soldiers with the necessary tools and training.<br />

CoISTs may not be the three to five man elements<br />

normally seen in a counterinsurgency (COIN) rotation<br />

because <strong>of</strong> manning constraints and priorities<br />

but they need to have the same functionality. They<br />

must be properly configured and properly trained.<br />

The Army has become much more technologically<br />

advanced in the last 10 years and is able to process<br />

much more data as compared to previous decades<br />

when we last trained for FSO. Analytical and battle<br />

tracking cells (CoISTs) at the lowest level help process<br />

this data in a near real-time environment. The<br />

Army must continue to allocate resources such as<br />

Soldiers, equipment, and time to “train” on critical<br />

CoIST tasks such as intelligence preparation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

battlefield, CoIST system technology, battle tracking,<br />

report writing, and other skills to be successful.<br />

“CoIST-like” duties were assigned to the CO CPs<br />

as opposed to identifying an independent element to<br />

perform these functions. These CPs used SOPs specifically<br />

designating responsibilities, processes, and<br />

formats as well as a primary, alternate, contingency,<br />

and emergency (PACE) plan for communications.<br />

No two CP SOPs were the same for 3/82 ABN with<br />

respect to CoIST duties. This caused much confusion<br />

across the BCT and never allowed the Intel War<br />

Fighting Function to effectively connect from CO to<br />

BCT. Having an independent CoIST, resourced with<br />

personnel and equipment, and clearly assigning<br />

that intelligence functions would have significantly<br />

enabled 3/82 ABN to make the intelligence connection.<br />

Additionally, CoISTs would have assisted BCT<br />

CO Cdrs understanding <strong>of</strong> the threat and assisted<br />

BN S2s with threat analysis at the company level.<br />

Soldiers manning a CoIST do not have to be intelligence<br />

analysts. In most cases, a BCT will likely<br />

not have the MOS 35F, Intelligence Analyst Soldiers<br />

available to man each maneuver company CoIST. 1<br />

The BCTs will continue to have to train other<br />

Soldiers already in the company on how to generate,<br />

build, and update map graphics and how to push<br />

and pull information from the BN S2 over the FM<br />

operations and intelligence (O/I) net. This is a full<br />

time requirement and cannot be effectively managed<br />

by the Soldiers manning the CO CP. The BN or BCT<br />

S2 should create an SOP with the Cdrs and S3s that<br />

specifically defines a digital and analog PACE plan<br />

along with a timeline <strong>of</strong> how information and intelligence<br />

will be passed vertically.<br />

Automation Obstacles<br />

The second challenge for CO CPs during this FSO<br />

rotation was the reduced communication capabilities<br />

(both digital and analog). During a JRTC MRE<br />

rotation, communication capabilities organic to<br />

the unit or JRTC issued, are shipped in on convoy<br />

logistics patrols or signed over from the outgoing<br />

unit and are setup at the CO CP with little effort or<br />

18 Military Intelligence

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!