01.01.2014 Views

Download - GRaBS

Download - GRaBS

Download - GRaBS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 1<br />

Data types<br />

Partner level<br />

Social Infrastructure (schools, hospitals, emergency services, care homes, prisons, etc.)<br />

Civil infrastructure (utility services, railway stations, roads at risk of flooding, waste<br />

disposal facilities, etc.)<br />

Population structure (population density, areas of deprivation)<br />

Green and blue space (parks, trees, playgrounds, sports fields, water bodies,<br />

cemeteries, etc.)<br />

Vulnerability (population ages over 75 and under 4, people with poor health, people on<br />

low income, people vulnerable to high temperatures and to flooding, properties<br />

vulnerable to flooding, population living on a ground floor or basement and living on<br />

a third floor or higher)<br />

Hazards (flood zones, historic flooding events, surface water flooding, groundwater<br />

flooding, sewer flood risk)<br />

Urban development (current and proposed residential and industrial development,<br />

historic and cultural buildings)<br />

European level<br />

Climate (including the 2080 IPCC A2 emissions scenarios and PRUDENCE 1961-1990<br />

mean temperature and precipitation)<br />

Climate hazards (drought, extreme temperature, river flooding, forest fires, storm surge,<br />

storm events)<br />

Civil infrastructure (airports, major roads and railway lines)<br />

Population structure (density, growth, 0-14 and 60+ years)<br />

Urban development (degree of urbanisation, urban areas)<br />

Green and blue space (urban green space, blue space, protected areas)<br />

Number of<br />

layers<br />

55<br />

55<br />

14<br />

79<br />

60<br />

45<br />

7<br />

15<br />

5<br />

3<br />

4<br />

2<br />

3<br />

layers (see Table 1). This reflects the extent to which<br />

different municipalities have been collecting relevant<br />

data and their ability to work across departmental<br />

boundaries to obtain necessary data. In the UK the<br />

Cabinet Office’s PAT 17 and 18 reports 5,6 have<br />

helped local authorities to put in place robust<br />

systems for the collection and storage of spatial<br />

data. At the EU level 32 spatial layers are available.<br />

To complement the UNRA, a review of climate<br />

change vulnerability, risk and adaptation assessment<br />

tools was undertaken. 7 This review concluded that a<br />

wide range of online tools are available for risk<br />

assessment and risk management, but that there<br />

was debate surrounding what comprises such a tool<br />

in relation to climate adaptation. The review also<br />

identified that there was no existing tool specifically for<br />

vulnerability assessment, and that there was a scarcity<br />

of tools specifically focused on cities and urban areas.<br />

This assessment was further enhanced by a<br />

review of the available technology: at the time of<br />

development only the Google Maps platform<br />

provided an API, allowing software developers to<br />

customise and build other tools on top of a<br />

common map base. Given the popularity and<br />

familiarity of the Google Maps interface, this was<br />

deemed a suitable platform on which to build the<br />

Tool. The combination of the above aspects of<br />

development revealed that the Tool needed to:<br />

● map risk (where data is available) and vulnerability<br />

to climate change hazards and show spatial<br />

distributions;<br />

● allow map overlay to enable identification of<br />

priority areas for adaptation actions;<br />

● identify relative patterns of risk in urban<br />

environments;<br />

● show the severity of the impacts;<br />

● generate a list of climate hazards and receptors;<br />

● inform preparation of planning documents to<br />

enable accounting of climate change impacts on<br />

people, property, assets and infrastructure (i.e.<br />

the AAPs); and<br />

● be fully accessible to all stakeholders online,<br />

including residents, developers, local business,<br />

utilities, and councils.<br />

User testing<br />

The Tool has been built in a single technical<br />

environment which can be used seamlessly across<br />

Europe – both during the project and after its lifetime.<br />

The project budget and timetable did not allow for<br />

11 individual partner approaches to the underlying<br />

technical development of the Tool, but the approach<br />

266 Town & Country Planning June 2011 : <strong>GRaBS</strong> Project – INTERREG IVC; ERDF-funded

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!