solar thermal power - Greenpeace
solar thermal power - Greenpeace
solar thermal power - Greenpeace
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
US Policy Priorities<br />
Three trends are giving <strong>solar</strong> <strong>thermal</strong> <strong>power</strong> some market momentum in the US. Firstly, a deregulated <strong>power</strong> generation system<br />
has inspired state-mandated Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards, the right of interconnection and the sale of green <strong>power</strong>.<br />
Secondly, concerns about implementing the Clean Air Act and implementing climate change emissions reductions are driving<br />
use of cleaner technologies, including renewable energy. And thirdly, the private sector has been advancing <strong>solar</strong> <strong>thermal</strong><br />
technologies on its own, with a bare minimum of federal support and some at a state and local government level.<br />
Emerging technologies need sustained orderly development, however, to attract further private capital, scale-up manufacturing<br />
and establish installation and service capabilities to meet expanding market demand. Six policies are required to expand the<br />
market for <strong>solar</strong> <strong>thermal</strong> and to achieve the economies-of-scale required in manufacturing, system integration and deployment.<br />
1. National or Regional Solar Portfolio Standard – Establishing minimum set asides based on relative renewable energy resource<br />
availability, including <strong>solar</strong> <strong>thermal</strong> <strong>power</strong> alongside other clean distributed generation, is an essential tool to create market<br />
based mechanisms.<br />
2. Production and investment tax credits – With energy costs slightly higher than geo<strong>thermal</strong> and wind, <strong>solar</strong> <strong>thermal</strong> <strong>power</strong><br />
needs investment credits for its first two years of initial plant construction (with accelerated depreciation) and then production<br />
credits (1.8 cents per kWh) for the following eight years, with waivers for investors from the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT).<br />
3. Encouragement for <strong>solar</strong> electric <strong>power</strong> can come via mandated green <strong>power</strong> purchases for federal agencies and other public<br />
and municipal bodies.<br />
4. Expanded federal support for a <strong>solar</strong> <strong>thermal</strong> <strong>power</strong> R&D program is required to support the market expansion envisaged for<br />
the Southwestern United States. A recent study by Sargent & Lundy concluded that further technology improvements will<br />
result in approximately a 50% reduction in the cost of electricity from trough plants and 25% from <strong>power</strong> tower plants.<br />
5. Federal loan guarantees – As proposed for emerging coal and nuclear technologies, these should first be applied to CSP<br />
installations to “prove out” these federal tools in the cleanest, lowest emission technology available to displace higher cost,<br />
higher emissions midday peak <strong>power</strong>.<br />
6. Formal federal support to existing federal-to-state programs could yield a significant number of megawatts in both larger<br />
central CSP generating facilities and distributed CSP generation.<br />
There is no question that the United States has some of the world’s best high-value <strong>solar</strong> radiation, which is optimal for<br />
concentrated <strong>solar</strong> <strong>power</strong>. There now exists a critical mass of private companies and private investment along with a range of<br />
technologies that could play a meaningful role in the US and global markets. Policy trends relating to deregulation and<br />
environmental protection bode well for establishing a maturing industry.<br />
SOLAR THERMAL POWER PLANTS 32