Presentation slides - Harvard Graduate School of Education

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Sample of 17 States • Each state received a RTTT grant or NCLB waiver before July 1, 2012; • Conducted a pilot-test of its new teacher evaluation system during or before the 2012-13 school year; • Had statutory language describing a teacher evaluation system which satisfied the requirements of RTTT or NCLB waiver; • And did not have any pending legislation, as of 7/1/12, which would substantially change the system
Methods • Document collection and analyses to answer basic questions about state-level guidance ▫ Legislation and government guidelines, ▫ RTTT applications, and ▫ NCLB flexibility requests, etc. • Led to creation of a 25-question interview protocol • Interviews with 13 state DOE staff from 12 states, typically a director, coordinator or executive officer of the state’s efforts to implement new teacher evaluation system
Page 1 and 2: State and Local Efforts to Investig
Page 3: Purpose • We examine states’ ef
Page 8 and 9: What do we mean by reliable and val
Page 10 and 11: What efforts are underway to ensure
Page 12 and 13: What would you like to see in order
Page 14 and 15: Questions about the evaluators •
Page 16 and 17: Evaluators Who is required to condu
Page 18 and 19: Evaluators Who is responsible for t
Page 20 and 21: What we learned about instruments
Page 22 and 23: What we learned about instruments
Page 24 and 25: What we learned about sampling of l
Page 26 and 27: Are there plans to report the relia
Page 28 and 29: What purposes will the overall teac
Page 30 and 31: Are there efforts to ensure those d
Page 32 and 33: What kinds of PD are teachers recei
Page 34 and 35: Do you think the evaluation system
Page 36: If you have questions or would like

Presentation slides - Harvard Graduate School of Education

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?