08.01.2014 Views

HCMC_P_049062 - Hennepin County Medical Center

HCMC_P_049062 - Hennepin County Medical Center

HCMC_P_049062 - Hennepin County Medical Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case Reports<br />

Figure Five.<br />

The LUCAS device<br />

several pounds of negative force. Newer software<br />

automatically adjusts the plunger to ensure good<br />

contact with the sternum. It is unlike human CPR,<br />

which degrades due to fatigue or distraction, and is<br />

often done at a rate too slow or too fast for optimal<br />

blood flow, does not allow for full chest wall recoil as<br />

the provider tends to lean on the chest, and must be<br />

stopped during administration of shocks. It has been<br />

shown to improve blood flow in experimental models<br />

and anecdotal reports in humans. We have found in<br />

some cases that it creates exceptional blood<br />

pressure in ED cardiac arrest patients, as measured<br />

by arterial line; and it is more likely than manual<br />

chest compression to keep the brain perfused (and<br />

therefore alive) in prolonged arrest. The LUCAS<br />

device also allows safe transport of the patient with<br />

ongoing CPR, thus making it possible to go to the<br />

cath lab with ongoing CPR.<br />

Therapeutic Hypothermia<br />

In 2002, 2 randomized studies in the New England<br />

Journal of Medicine compared therapeutic cooling for<br />

24 hours to standard care. 3, 4 These trials, and<br />

evidence from dog studies, form the basis of this now<br />

standard therapy for comatose survivors of cardiac<br />

arrest. In these studies, patients who were<br />

resuscitated from pulseless ventricular fibrillation<br />

(VF) or tachycardia (VT) were randomized within 3<br />

hours, and those who underwent hypothermia were<br />

sedated, chemically paralyzed, and externally cooled<br />

to a target temperature of 32 to 34 degrees Celsius,<br />

where they were kept for 24 hours before rewarming.<br />

Only 8% of cardiac arrest patients met eligibility<br />

criteria. The primary endpoint was good neurologic<br />

outcome at 6 months, which, when combining the 2<br />

studies, was achieved in the hypothermia group in<br />

54% vs. 37%. Mortality was 43% vs. 58%. Adverse<br />

events were not different between the groups.<br />

Based on this, the International Liaison Committee<br />

on Resuscitation advised use of therapeutic<br />

hypothermia, to 32-34 degrees for 12 to 24 hours, for<br />

unconscious adult patients with return of spontaneous<br />

circulation after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation<br />

arrest. 5 Therapeutic hypothermia requires intubation<br />

and paralysis and very intensive monitoring for<br />

electrolyte shifts and dysrhythmias.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Since 2003, we at <strong>Hennepin</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Center</strong><br />

have cooled comatose survivors of cardiac arrest.<br />

We have decided to broaden the indications for the<br />

therapy beyond those with VF or VT to those patients<br />

who have been resuscitated from asystole, pulseless<br />

electrical activity (PEA) and respiratory etiologies of<br />

cardiac arrest, as long as they have return of<br />

spontaneous circulation within 60 minutes of arrest.<br />

From January 2008 through December 2011,<br />

<strong>Hennepin</strong> had 129 patients resuscitated after cardiac<br />

arrests who were eligible for and underwent<br />

therapeutic hypothermia: 86 had VF or VT, and 43<br />

had PEA or asystole. Of the 129, 61 (47%) survived<br />

with good neurologic outcome; 6 of these had PEA or<br />

asystole as the initial rhythm. In total, 57 (44%) died,<br />

35 of whom had asystole or PEA. There were 11<br />

survivors, but with poor neurologic outcomes; 2 of<br />

these had asystole or PEA. The 56 of 86 (65%) with<br />

a shockable rhythm survived with good neurologic<br />

outcome. Most of these were before the use of the<br />

LUCAS device.<br />

This case and our survival statistics illustrate the<br />

rapid advancements occurring in the management of<br />

patients with cardiac arrest. Combining new therapies,<br />

such as those described in this case report, has the<br />

potential to improve survival even more. <br />

References<br />

1. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon<br />

support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J<br />

Med 2012; 367(14):1287-96.<br />

2. Aufderheide TP, Frascone RJ, Wayne MA, et al. Standard<br />

cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus active compressiondecompression<br />

cardiopulmonary resuscitation with augmentation<br />

of negative intrathoracic pressure for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest:<br />

a randomised trial. Lancet 2011;377(9762):301-11.<br />

3. Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, et al. Treatment of comatose<br />

survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced<br />

hypothermia. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(8):557-63.<br />

4. The_Hypothermia_after_Cardiac_Arrest_Study_Group. Mild<br />

therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after<br />

cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(8):549-56.<br />

5. Nolan JP, Morley PT, Hoek TL, Hickey RW. Therapeutic<br />

hypothermia after cardiac arrest. An advisory statement by the<br />

Advancement Life support Task Force of the International Liaison<br />

committee on Resuscitation. Resuscitation 2003;57(3):231-5.<br />

Approaches in Critical Care | January 2013 | 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!