17.01.2014 Views

Age-standardized incidence rates by histological type - IARC

Age-standardized incidence rates by histological type - IARC

Age-standardized incidence rates by histological type - IARC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Age</strong>-<strong>standardized</strong> (world) <strong>incidence</strong> <strong>rates</strong> (per 100,000)<br />

<strong>by</strong> <strong>histological</strong> <strong>type</strong><br />

Hodgkin lymphoma - Female (Contd)<br />

Nodular Classical Nodular Mixed Lymphocytic Unspec.<br />

Number of cases<br />

lymphocytic lymphocyte-rich sclerosis cellularity depletion MV Total<br />

Asia (Contd)<br />

Korea, Jejudo - - 0.1 0.1 - 0.1 3 3<br />

Korea, Seoul 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 55 56<br />

Korea, Ulsan - - 0.1 0.1 - 0.1 6 6<br />

Kuwait: Kuwaitis 0.1 0.3 1.0 0.2 - 0.2 33 33<br />

Kuwait: Non-Kuwaitis 0.1 - 0.7 0.1 - 0.3 24 25<br />

Malaysia, Penang 0.0 - 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 10 10<br />

Malaysia, Sarawak - - 0.0 - - 0.5 23 23<br />

Oman: Omani - 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.4 32 33 *<br />

Pakistan, South Karachi - - 0.4 0.3 - 0.3 31 32 *<br />

Philippines, Manila 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 60 63 *<br />

Singapore - - 0.4 0.0 - 0.2 48 48<br />

Singapore: Chinese - - 0.3 0.0 - 0.1 27 27<br />

Singapore: Indian - - 0.5 0.2 - 0.2 7 7<br />

Singapore: Malay - - 0.7 0.1 - 0.5 14 14<br />

Thailand, Chiang Mai - - 0.0 0.2 - 0.2 18 18 *<br />

Thailand, Lampang - - - - - . 0 0*<br />

Thailand, Songkhla - 0.1 0.0 0.0 - 0.1 10 11<br />

Turkey, Antalya - 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.3 32 35 *<br />

Turkey, Izmir - 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.1 76 77 *<br />

Europe<br />

Austria 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.6 319 334<br />

Austria, Tyrol 0.1 - 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.4 21 21<br />

Austria, Vorarlberg - 0.1 1.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 18 18<br />

Belarus 0.0 0.2 1.4 0.6 0.1 0.3 703 712 *<br />

Belgium, Antwerp 0.1 0.0 1.2 0.2 - 0.2 72 72 *<br />

Belgium, Flanders 0.1 0.0 1.5 0.2 0.0 0.4 280 280<br />

Bulgaria - 0.1 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.4 369 369 *<br />

Croatia - 0.1 0.2 0.0 - 2.1 306 312<br />

Czech Republic 0.0 0.2 1.0 0.4 0.1 0.4 620 646<br />

Denmark - 0.0 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.2 250 260<br />

Estonia - 0.2 1.6 0.5 0.0 0.2 91 93<br />

Finland (data not available) - - - - - - - -<br />

France, Bas-Rhin - 0.1 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 52 52<br />

France, Calvados 0.1 - 1.5 - 0.0 0.1 30 30<br />

France, Doubs - 0.3 1.7 0.1 - 0.3 31 31<br />

France, Haut-Rhin 0.0 0.2 1.3 0.4 - 0.3 42 44<br />

France, Herault 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.3 0.0 0.2 73 73<br />

France, Isere 0.1 - 1.5 0.1 0.0 0.3 58 60<br />

France, Loire-Atlantique 0.1 - 1.4 0.1 - 0.7 68 68<br />

France, Manche - - 1.2 0.1 - . 15 15<br />

France, Somme - - 1.4 - - 0.4 27 27<br />

France, Tarn - 0.1 0.5 0.6 - 0.4 18 18<br />

France, Vendee 0.1 - 1.7 0.3 - 0.6 36 36<br />

Germany, Brandenburg (data not available) - - - - - - - -<br />

Germany, Free State of Saxony (data not available) - - - - - - - -<br />

Germany, Hamburg 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.2 0.0 1 99 107<br />

Germany, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (data not available) - - - - - - - -<br />

Germany, Munich 0.0 0.2 1.6 0.3 0.0 0.1 128 138<br />

Germany, Northrhine-Westphalia: Munster 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.5 108 110<br />

Germany, Saarland 0.1 0.3 0.8 0.4 - 0 45 45<br />

Iceland - 0.2 1.4 0.2 - . 14 14<br />

Ireland 0.0 0.1 1.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 211 213<br />

Italy, Biella Province - - 2.7 - - 0.1 15 15<br />

Italy, Brescia Province 0.0 - 1.7 0.3 0.0 1 53 54<br />

Italy, Ferrara Province - 0.2 2.8 0.2 - 0.1 34 34<br />

Italy, Florence and Prato - 0.0 2.6 0.1 0.0 1 95 102<br />

Italy, Genoa Province 0.0 0.1 2.7 0.6 - 0.2 37 40<br />

Italy, Macerata Province - 0.0 1.4 0.3 - 1 14 14<br />

Italy, Milan 0.1 - 1.7 0.5 0.0 0.3 77 77<br />

Italy, Modena Province 0.1 0.1 1.9 0.4 0.1 0.2 47 47<br />

Italy, Naples 0.1 0.1 1.5 0.3 - 0.5 35 35<br />

Italy, North East Cancer Surveillance Network 0.1 0.1 1.2 0.2 0.0 0.9 152 154<br />

Italy, Parma Province 0.1 - 3.5 0.3 0.1 0.2 42 42<br />

Italy, Ragusa Province 0.1 - 1.8 0.1 - 0.2 17 17<br />

Italy, Reggio Emilia Province - 0.1 0.9 0.1 0.1 1.3 37 37<br />

Italy, Romagna Region 0.0 0.1 2.2 0.1 0.0 0.6 73 73<br />

Italy, Salerno Province 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.3 0.0 0.9 61 61<br />

Italy, Sassari Province 0.1 - 2.7 0.3 - 0.2 40 40<br />

Italy, Sondrio - - 0.4 0.6 - 1.9 13 13<br />

Italy, Syracuse Province - 0.1 1.9 0.4 0.2 0.3 21 21<br />

Italy, Torino 0.1 0.1 1.3 0.4 0.1 0.4 68 68<br />

Italy, Umbria Region 0.0 0.1 1.2 0.8 0.0 0.4 50 59<br />

Italy, Varese Province - 0.2 2.2 0.4 - 0.4 40 40<br />

Italy, Veneto Region 0.1 0.0 1.3 0.2 - 1 107 112<br />

Latvia 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 120 126<br />

Lithuania 0.0 0.1 1.1 0.2 0.1 1 255 255<br />

Malta - 0.1 0.9 0.2 0.1 0 15 15<br />

Norway 0.0 0.1 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 219 222<br />

Poland, Cracow - - 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.6 40 42 *<br />

Poland, Kielce (data not available) - - - - - - - -<br />

Poland, Warsaw City - 0.1 1.6 0.1 - 0.2 93 93<br />

Portugal, Porto - 0.0 1.2 0.1 - 0.6 164 164 *<br />

Portugal, South Regional 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.1 - 0.8 165 165<br />

Russia, St Petersburg - 0.0 1.4 0.4 0.0 0.6 324 327<br />

*Important. See note on population page.<br />

Note: The <strong>rates</strong> are based on the <strong>histological</strong> groups described in Chapter 4.<br />

790<br />

732<br />

Cancer Incidence in Five Continents Vol. IX, <strong>IARC</strong> 2008<br />

Eu<br />

O<br />

*I<br />

N

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!