18.01.2014 Views

Interoperability in the US

Interoperability in the US

Interoperability in the US

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE INTEROPERABILITY LANDSCAPE<br />

IN THE UNITED STATES<br />

James P. Angl<strong>in</strong>, PE<br />

HNTB Corporation October 2008<br />

KEY DATES IN U.S. INTEROPERABILITY<br />

1988 – First electronic toll<strong>in</strong>g - Dallas North<br />

Tollway<br />

1990 – Formation of <strong>the</strong> “Inter-Agency Group”<br />

(IAG) <strong>in</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern U.S.<br />

1992 – First “at-speed” ETC express lanes –<br />

Oklahoma Turnpike, followed by<br />

Georgia 400<br />

1995 – First “All-Electronic” toll facility opens<br />

– SR 91 HOT Lanes <strong>in</strong> California<br />

1998-2007 – Widespread adoption of ETC and<br />

implementation of at-speed express<br />

lanes throughout <strong>the</strong> country<br />

2007 – Alliance for Toll <strong>Interoperability</strong><br />

founded (sou<strong>the</strong>rn states)<br />

1


ETC – MIXED OR DEDICATED LANES<br />

(Toll Booth Geometry)<br />

ORT – HIGHWAY SPEED EXPRESS LANES<br />

(or Managed Lanes)<br />

2


THE IAG / E-Z PASS GROUP<br />

IAG KEY ELEMENTS<br />

• 24 Member agencies <strong>in</strong> 13 states,<br />

started <strong>in</strong> 1990<br />

• Nearly 15 million active transponders<br />

• Mark IV IVHS hard case transponders<br />

with “7-year” (non-replaceable) battery<br />

• Represents approximately half of all toll<br />

dollars collected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S.<br />

3


IAG – FUTURE PLANS<br />

• Currently develop<strong>in</strong>g RFP for “nextgeneration”<br />

technology<br />

• Several members evaluat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> move<br />

to All-Electronic Toll<strong>in</strong>g (AET or 100%<br />

transponder and video toll<strong>in</strong>g)<br />

MAJOR FLORIDA TOLL AGENCIES<br />

4


FLORIDA TRANSPONDERS<br />

Total<br />

• FL Turnpike System 2,500,000<br />

• OOCEA 480,000<br />

• Lee County 104,000<br />

• MDX & THEA <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> FTE<br />

FLORIDA – KEY ELEMENTS<br />

• Uses Transcore RFID transponders<br />

– Hard case versions with user replaceable<br />

batteries<br />

– “Sticker tag” version without battery<br />

• Florida agencies have <strong>in</strong>teroperability<br />

agreement and cost-shar<strong>in</strong>g agreement<br />

5


FLORIDA – FUTURE PLANS<br />

• Turnpike – currently <strong>in</strong> midst of toll<br />

system replacement project<br />

• MDX – “clos<strong>in</strong>g” system and<br />

convert<strong>in</strong>g to AET start<strong>in</strong>g 2010<br />

• THEA video toll<strong>in</strong>g experiment<br />

• Current plans stay with TransCore<br />

transponders, 915 MHz<br />

• <strong>Interoperability</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial arrangements<br />

under review by <strong>the</strong> agencies<br />

TEXAS – CURRENT TOLL FACILITIES<br />

NTTA<br />

NE TX RMA<br />

El Paso RMA<br />

Central Texas<br />

RMA<br />

Harris County<br />

TRA<br />

Alamo RMA<br />

Cameron County<br />

RMA<br />

6


TEXAS TANSPONDERS<br />

• NTTA (Dallas) 1,300,000<br />

• HCTRA (Houston) 1,100,000<br />

• TX DOT / CTRMA (Aust<strong>in</strong>) 400,000<br />

Source: IBTTA Survey, 2008<br />

TEXAS KEY ELEMENTS<br />

• Currently all systems <strong>in</strong> Texas are<br />

<strong>in</strong>teroperable us<strong>in</strong>g Transcore<br />

transponders<br />

• Major CSC operations <strong>in</strong>-place by NTTA<br />

(Dallas), HCRTA (Houston) and TXDOT<br />

(Aust<strong>in</strong>)<br />

7


TEXAS – FUTURE PLANS<br />

• NTTA convert<strong>in</strong>g to AET by 2010<br />

• CTRMA facilities <strong>in</strong> Aust<strong>in</strong> area<br />

convert<strong>in</strong>g to AET<br />

• Several new agencies (RMA’s) may be<br />

open<strong>in</strong>g new toll roads as AET<br />

CALIFORNIA CURRENT<br />

MAJOR TOLL FACILITIES<br />

Bay Area Toll<br />

Authority<br />

Golden Gate<br />

Bridge<br />

OCTA<br />

TCA<br />

SANDAG<br />

8


CALIFORNIA TRANSPONDERS<br />

• Golden Gate Bridge 1,000,000<br />

• BATA 730,000<br />

• OCTA (SR-91) 180,000<br />

• TCA 720,000<br />

Source: IBTTA Survey, 2008<br />

CALIFORNIA KEY ELEMENTS<br />

• All CA facilities <strong>in</strong>teroperable with<br />

each o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

• Use “Title 21” compliant tags –<br />

manufactured by Sirit and Transcore<br />

9


TITLE 21<br />

• Legislation passed <strong>in</strong> 1993 and<br />

amended <strong>in</strong> 1998<br />

• Key features<br />

– 915 MHz + 13 MHz<br />

– Open protocol and communications<br />

– Passive tags<br />

– Backscatter technology<br />

CALIFORNIA – FUTURE PLANS<br />

• BATA mov<strong>in</strong>g toward ORT<br />

• Use of tags at park<strong>in</strong>g facilities<br />

throughout State<br />

• Expansion of managed lanes – Los<br />

Angeles area and San Francisco Bay<br />

area<br />

10


ETC GLOBAL TRANSPONDER<br />

MARKET SHARE<br />

IBTTA Members 2008 Surevy<br />

Mark IV - 38.5%<br />

Autostrade - 13.6%<br />

Transcore - 13.4%<br />

Kapsch - 11.4%<br />

Q=Free - 9.3%<br />

Sirit - 5.4%<br />

TG - 2.8%<br />

CS - 2.4%<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r - 3%<br />

THE ALLIANCE FOR TOLL<br />

INTEROPERABILITY (ATI)<br />

11


ATI’S MISSION<br />

• To promote and implement<br />

<strong>in</strong>teroperability between toll operators<br />

for <strong>the</strong> benefit of customers and<br />

agencies<br />

ATI’S GOALS AND OBJECTIVES<br />

• Extend toll<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>teroperability beyond today’s<br />

boundaries<br />

• Develop specification for license plate violation and<br />

video toll<strong>in</strong>g data exchange, get DMV’s and o<strong>the</strong>r key<br />

stakeholders <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

• Determ<strong>in</strong>e state legislation of ETC/DMV and shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation<br />

• Investigate RFID toll <strong>in</strong>teroperability<br />

• Consider future technology <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 5.9 GHz DSRC<br />

(WiMax), GPS/Cellular, and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

• Evaluate cost effectiveness and efficiencies/controls<br />

12


ATI STAT<strong>US</strong><br />

• 19 toll agency members<br />

• Current chair J.J. Eden, NCTA<br />

• Stage 1 license plate based reciprocity<br />

specification is currently be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

developed to identify a plate’s “last<br />

known payer” (scheduled for release Feb. 2009)<br />

IBTTA SPECIAL SUMMIT:<br />

INTEROPERABILITY<br />

AND ORT<br />

BE THERE!!!<br />

Abstracts Due December 1st<br />

June 14-16, 2009<br />

Tampa, Florida<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!