19.01.2014 Views

Volume V. No. 1 Spring & Summer 2010 - ichper•sd

Volume V. No. 1 Spring & Summer 2010 - ichper•sd

Volume V. No. 1 Spring & Summer 2010 - ichper•sd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Research<br />

The Official Publication of the International<br />

Council for Health, Physical Education,<br />

Recreation, Sport, and Dance (ICHPER•SD)<br />

<strong>Volume</strong> V. <strong>No</strong>. 1<br />

<strong>Spring</strong> & <strong>Summer</strong> <strong>2010</strong>


The Mission of the ICHPER•SD Journal of Research<br />

The mission of the journal is to meet the needs of the academic community from both a national and an international<br />

perspective. Thus, academicians and professionals engaged in or studying HPERSD, and related activities, at all levels, are<br />

encouraged to contribute to the professional literature by submitting research-oriented manuscripts that will contribute and<br />

expand the knowledge base of the disciplines within our profession. The ICHPER•SD Journal of Research is exclusively what<br />

is termed a "research journal" and invites data based manuscripts representing cutting edge research.<br />

Manuscript Guidelines for Authors<br />

Articles are invited in the areas of health, physical education, adapted physical education, recreation, dance, sport, human<br />

performance, coaching, sports medicine, and sport management. This journal is international in scope in the sense that authors/<br />

researchers and topics can originate from any part of the world.<br />

All manuscripts must be submitted in English. An original hard copy of the manuscript plus a computer CD (virus free)<br />

containing the article and any tables and/or figures (as separate files, in Microsoft Word®), should be submitted to:<br />

Editor<br />

ICHPER•SD Journal of Research<br />

International Council for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport, & Dance (ICHPER·SD)<br />

1900 Association Drive, Reston, Virginia 20191-1598, USA<br />

Phone: (703) 476-3462 Fax: (703) 476-9527 Email: ichper@aahperd.org<br />

Each manuscript must be accompanied by a one-paragraph abstract (100 words or less). The APA (latest edition) format<br />

[Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association] must be used consistently throughout the entire manuscript.<br />

At least one of the authors (if there is more than one) must be (or become) a member of ICHPER•SD. Authors should number<br />

pages and lines throughout the manuscript, including the references. Be sure and double check references for correct spelling of<br />

authors and publication dates as well as to insure that the names in the references and in the body of the manuscript match.<br />

For manuscripts sent from the United States, a large, self-addressed, stamped envelope (9” by 12”) must be included for<br />

the return of the manuscripts (with editor’s and reviewers’ comments) for possible revision. For manuscripts sent from outside<br />

the United States, only a large self-addressed envelope (9” by 12”) must be included. Manuscripts should not be submitted to<br />

another journal while under review by the ICHPER•SD Journal of Research.<br />

The first page of each manuscript should include only the title of the article. The senior author’s name, affiliation, and<br />

full address (including phone number, fax number and e-mail address) should be provided on a separate cover sheet, along<br />

with identification of co-authors, if any. The manuscripts should be typed double-spaced with a 1½ -inch margin. Generally,<br />

manuscripts should be 20-27 pages in length, plus tables, figures and references, for a total of no more than 35-37 pages.<br />

Manuscripts longer than this will be reviewed, and if accepted, can be published – space permitting. The body of the manuscript<br />

should not contain any information identifying the author(s).<br />

All graphs, tables as well as figures and drawings should be placed on separate pages. Tables should be double-spaced.<br />

Figures and drawings must be professionally prepared and camera ready. Final manuscripts, including all corrections and<br />

revisions, must be submitted on a computer CD in Microsoft Word® as well as one hard copy.<br />

Submitted manuscripts are reviewed by at least three members of the "review board" and by the editor. The evaluation of<br />

manuscripts is by a blind review process. Authors are notified as to the disposition of their manuscripts as soon as all reviews<br />

are completed. Once a manuscript has been tentatively accepted, the author should return two hard copies of the revised<br />

manuscript and a computer CD (Microsoft Word®) containing the manuscript and any tables or figures as separate files, for a<br />

final review, prior to being scheduled for publication.<br />

Galley proofs of accepted manuscripts are sent to the author and are to be returned within one week following receipt from<br />

the editor. Only minor corrections are acceptable on the galley proofs. <strong>No</strong> major additions or revisions are permitted at this<br />

stage in the publication process. The senior author receives two copies of the issue in which the article appears.<br />

There are no page charges to authors. All authors must transfer copyright to International Council for Health, Physical<br />

Education, Recreation, Sport, & Dance (ICHPER•SD) by signing a copyright release document. At least one of the authors (if<br />

there is more than one) must be a member of ICHPER•SD or become a member before the beginning of the review process.<br />

Form a-7-4-06-06a


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

2 ICHPER•SD Officers and Editorial Policy Board<br />

Pedagogy<br />

3 A Descriptive Analysis of Undergraduate PETE Programs in the Central District<br />

Kristen Hetland and Bradford Strand<br />

10 The Web Quest: Its Impact on Developing Teaching Skills of Physical Education Student Teachers<br />

Haythem Abdel Mageed Mohamed and Rasha Nageh Ali Abd El Rheem<br />

16 Podcasting in Physical Education Teacher Education<br />

Michael C. McNeill, Swarup Mukherjee and Gurmit Singh<br />

Physical Education<br />

20 Validating Pedometer-based Physical Activity Time against Accelerometer in<br />

Middle School Physical Education<br />

Zan Gao, Amelia M. Lee, Melinda A. Solmon, Maria Kosma, Russell L. Carson, Tao Zhang,<br />

Elizabeth Domangue, and Delilah Moore<br />

26 Patterns of Interactions and Behaviors: Physical Education in Korean Elementary,<br />

Middle, and High Schools<br />

Jong-Hoon Yu and Jwa K. Kim<br />

33 Differences in Exercise Identity Between Secondary Physical Education Students and Athletes<br />

Gregory J. Soukup, Sr., Timothy W. Henrich, and Heather M. Barton-Wieston<br />

Health<br />

37 Tobacco, the Common Enemy and a Gateway Drug: Policy Implications<br />

Mohammad R. Torabi, Mi Kyung Jun, Carole <strong>No</strong>wicke, Barbara Seitz de Martinez, and Ruth Gassman<br />

45 The Health and Wellbeing of Staff Members at a Tertiary Institution in New Zealand<br />

Sonja Dreyer, Lukas I. Dreyer, and Dean M. Rankin<br />

Recreation<br />

54 An Examination of Immunity Statutes Regarding the Liability of Recreational Youth Sport<br />

Organizations for the Pedophilic Actions of Coaches, Administrators, and Officials<br />

Thomas A. Baker III, Daniel P. Connaughton, and James J. Zhang<br />

Sports Marketing<br />

60 A Brand Loyalty Model Utilitizing Team Identification and Customer Satisfaction in the<br />

Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />

Dr. Soonhwan Lee, Dr. Hongbum Shin, Dr. Jung-Jun Park, and Dr. Oh-Ryun Kwon<br />

Coaching<br />

68 Pre-Activity and Post-Activity Stretching Perceptions and Practices in NCAA<br />

Division I Volleyball Programs<br />

Lawrence W. Judge, Kimberly J. Bodey, David Bellar, Adam Bottone, and Elizabeth Wanless<br />

76 The Rules and Review Process<br />

79 Membership Application<br />

International Council for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport, and Dance<br />

Counsel International pour l'Hygiene, de l'Education Physique, de la Récréation, du Sport, et de la Danse<br />

Consejo Internacional para la Salud, Educación Fisica, Recreación, el Deporte y la Danza<br />

ISSN 1930-4595: ISBN 978-0-<br />

9821604-3-5 0-9821604-3-7: The<br />

ICHPER·SD Journal of Research is<br />

issued biannually by the International<br />

Council for Health, Physical Education,<br />

Recreation, Sport, and Dance<br />

(ICHPER·SD), 1900 Association Drive,<br />

Reston, Virginia 20191-1598, U.S.A.<br />

(Phone: 703-476-3462; Fax: 703-<br />

476-9527; E-mail: ichper@aahperd.<br />

org; Website: www.ichpersd.org). The<br />

annual subscription price of $50.00 is<br />

included in the annual ICHPER·SD<br />

membership dues as a membership<br />

benefit. ICHPER·SD members can<br />

purchase additional copies of the<br />

journal at $15.00. <strong>No</strong>nmembers can<br />

purchase copies at $25.00 each.<br />

The ICHPER·SD Journal of Research<br />

is the peer-reviewed official biannual<br />

publication of the International Council<br />

for Health, Physical Education, Recreation,<br />

Sport, and Dance. The journal is<br />

published as a service to members of the<br />

Council and others concerned with our<br />

disciplinary areas. Views and opinions<br />

expressed in the journal or articles<br />

herein are those of the authors and not<br />

necessarily those of the publisher.<br />

COPYRIGHT: Entire content copyright<br />

2008 by the International Council for<br />

Health, Physical Education, Recreation,<br />

sport, and Dance. All rights reserved.<br />

INDEXING: Index Coverage has only<br />

recently begun, as we are a fairly new<br />

journal. To date we have agreements<br />

with:<br />

EBSCOhost -<br />

•Education Research Complete: Index<br />

and full database<br />

•SPORTDiscus: Index and full database<br />

H.W. Wilson -<br />

•Education Full Text (and index)<br />

ADVERTISING: Contact Mrs.<br />

Carmella Gilpin, Administrative<br />

Associate, ICHPER·SD Headquarters<br />

at 1900 Association Drive, Reston,<br />

Virginia. Advertising is accepted in full,<br />

half, or quarter pages. The rate schedule<br />

for advertisements follows:<br />

Full Page $500.00<br />

Half Page $300.00<br />

Quarter Page $200.00<br />

LAYOUT & DESIGN: McDonough<br />

Democrat, Inc., Box 269, 358 East<br />

Main Street, Bushnell, Illinois 61422,<br />

U.S.A.<br />

Founded 1958 in Rome, Italy<br />

1900 Association Drive, Reston, Virginia 20191-1598, U.S.A.<br />

(Phone: 703-476-3462; Fax: 703-476-9527; E-mail: ichper@aahperd.org; Website: www.ichpersd.org).<br />

volume 5, issue 1 1


International Council for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport, and Dance<br />

(ICHPER•SD)<br />

ICHPER•SD Journal of Research<br />

<strong>Volume</strong> V, <strong>No</strong>. 1, <strong>Spring</strong> & <strong>Summer</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

ICHPER•SD OFFICERS & EDITORIAL POLICY BOARD<br />

Dr. Dong Ja Yang, President & Chair<br />

Dr. Adel Elnashar, Secretary General & Associate Chair<br />

Dr. Mini Murray, Immediate Past President<br />

Dr. Veronica C. Igbanugo, Vice President for Africa<br />

Dr. Frank Chin-Lung Fang, Vice President for Asia<br />

Prof. Kenneth Butcher, Vice President for Caribbean<br />

Dr. Alberto Calderon Garcia, Vice President for Latin America<br />

Dr. Hasan Kasap, Vice President for Europe<br />

Dr. Mosaad S. Ewies, Vice President for Middle East<br />

Dr. Timothy Henrich, Vice President for <strong>No</strong>rth America<br />

Prof. Peter Chen, Vice President for Oceania<br />

Dr. Steven Wright, Editor & Executive Assistant to the President<br />

Dr. Yoshiro Hatano, Chair, Finance Committee<br />

Dr. Robert C. Serfass, Chair, Research Committee<br />

Dr. Mohammad R. Torabi, Commissioner, Health Division<br />

Dr. Young Kee Lee, Recreation Division<br />

Dr. Janice D. LaPointe-Crump, Dance Division<br />

Dr. Seung Wook Choi, Representative, ICHPER•SD Regional Journals of Research<br />

EDITOR<br />

Dr. Steven C. Wright<br />

Pedagogy Option Coordinator and Professor of Kinesiology<br />

Department of Kinesiology<br />

College of Health and Human Services<br />

University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824<br />

ASSOCIATE EDITOR<br />

Dr. Michael McNeill<br />

Coordinator for Postgraduate Research, Associate Professor<br />

Physical Education and Sports Sciences<br />

National Institute of Education<br />

Nanyang Technological University, Singapore<br />

ASSISTANT EDITOR<br />

Dr. Wenhao Liu<br />

Associate Professor<br />

Department of Physical Education<br />

Slippery Rock University, Pennsylvania<br />

REVIEWERS FOR ICHPER•SD JOURNAL OF RESEARCH<br />

Dr. Isaac Olusola Akindutire, University of Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria<br />

Dr. Garth Babcock, Eastern Washington University<br />

Dr. David Berry, Weber State University<br />

Dr. Robert Case, Old Dominion University<br />

Dr. Brian Culp, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis<br />

Dr. Blanche W. Evans, Indiana State University<br />

Dr. Wendy Frappier, Minnesota State University @ Moorhead<br />

Dr. Ron French, Texas WomenÔs University<br />

Dr. Zan Gao, University of Utah<br />

Dr. Michelle Grenier, University of New Hampshire<br />

Dr. Bryan L. Haddock, California State University<br />

Dr. Tim Henrich, University of the Incarnate Wood<br />

Dr. Julia Ann Hypes, Moorehead State University<br />

Dr. Michael G. Hypes, Moorehead State University<br />

Dr. Lawrence W. Judge, Ball State University<br />

Dr. Susan E. King, University of Kansas<br />

Dr. Richard J. LaRue, University of New England<br />

Dr. Wenhao Liu, Slippery Rock University<br />

Dr. Michael McNeill, Nanyang Technological University,<br />

Singapore<br />

Dr. Millie Naquin, Southeastern Louisiana University<br />

Dr. Yasenka Petersen, Indiana State University<br />

Dr. Greg Reid, McGill University<br />

Dr. Gregory J. Soukup, University of the Incarnate Word<br />

Dr. Kurt Stahura, University of Nevada, Las Vegas<br />

Dr. E. William Vogler, Southern Illinois University @<br />

Edwardsville<br />

Dr. Hal Walker, Elon University<br />

Dr. Wee Eng Hoe, Tunka Abdul Rahman College, Malaysia<br />

2 Journal of Research


A Descriptive Analysis of Undergraduate PETE<br />

Programs in the Central District<br />

by Kristen M. Hetland, Concordia College, Moorhead, MN and<br />

Bradford Strand, <strong>No</strong>rth Dakota State University<br />

Abstract<br />

The current study described physical education teacher<br />

education (PETE) programs at institutions located within the<br />

Central District of the United States (CDAAAHPERD). Of the<br />

72 institutions invited to participate, 44 institutions completed<br />

the survey (58% response rate). The purpose of this study was<br />

to describe the general profile/practices of undergraduate PETE<br />

programs and to provide an overview of their similarities and<br />

differences among the colleges and universities located within the<br />

CDAAAHPERD. The 61- item survey included topics related to<br />

basic program information, curricular items incorporated into each<br />

program, and coverage of various areas of course content.<br />

Key Words: Physical Education Teacher Education<br />

Curriculum<br />

Le Masurier and Corbin (2006) stated that the need for quality<br />

physical education is clear, based on the current trends of obesity<br />

and physical inactivity among children and adolescents. They cited<br />

ten reasons why quality physical education is necessary:<br />

1. Regular physical activity helps prevent disease.<br />

2. Regular physical activity promotes lifetime wellness.<br />

3. Quality physical education can help fight obesity.<br />

4. Quality physical education can help promote lifetime physical<br />

fitness.<br />

5. Quality physical education provides unique opportunities for<br />

activity.<br />

6. Quality physical education teaches self-management and<br />

motor skills.<br />

7. Physical activity and physical education promotes learning.<br />

8. Regular physical activity participation makes economic<br />

sense.<br />

9. Physical education is widely endorsed.<br />

10. Quality physical education helps to educate the total child.<br />

Quality K-12 physical education programs depend on a highly<br />

qualified teacher. In early 2002, Congress passed a law called<br />

the <strong>No</strong> Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act (a.k.a. 2001 [Public<br />

Law 107-110, 107 th Congress, January 8, 2002]). This law was<br />

established in an attempt to improve the United States educational<br />

system. Though this law has actually reduced physical education<br />

programs across the United States, it defines the general term<br />

“highly qualified teacher.” The NCLB definition of a highly<br />

qualified teacher is one who has completed a bachelor’s degree,<br />

holds a full state certification, and demonstrates competence in<br />

each content area taught (U.S. Department of Education, Office of<br />

Postsecondary Education [DOE], 2005).<br />

The National Association for Sport and Physical Education<br />

(NASPE) has also helped to define a “highly qualified teacher”<br />

by developing the position paper, What Constitutes a Highly<br />

Qualified Physical Education Teacher (2007a). “Highly qualified<br />

physical education teachers possess the skills and knowledge to<br />

facilitate improved teaching practices, strengthen the quality of<br />

physical education instruction, and empower students to achieve<br />

and maintain healthy, active lifestyles” (p. 1).<br />

Napper-Owen, Marston,Van Volkinburg, Afeman, & Brewer<br />

(2008) described a variety of elements that can define a highly<br />

qualified teacher. The elements fall under one of three categories:<br />

(a) designing and delivering the physical education program, (b)<br />

professional development, and (c) preservice preparation.<br />

Quality physical education is the most effective tool for<br />

providing all children, regardless of, individual differences<br />

and capabilities with skills, attitudes, values, knowledge, and<br />

understanding for lifelong participation in physical activity. In<br />

order to design and deliver a high quality physical education<br />

program, physical educators will (a) utilize the national standards<br />

for physical education in developing program quality, (b) align<br />

assessment to the programs’ standards, instruction, and outcomes,<br />

(c) exhibit those process skills (Dunkin & Biddle, 1974) and, (d)<br />

display dispositions associated with effective teaching (p. 28).<br />

Highly qualified teachers should be able to design K-12 physical<br />

education programs using appropriate infrastructure (opportunity<br />

to learn), meaningful content defined by curriculum, appropriate<br />

instructional practices including good classroom management,<br />

student and program assessment, and evaluation (NASPE, 2007b).<br />

Teachers should also be able to design programs and base lessons<br />

on national standards for K-12 physical education (NASPE, 2004a),<br />

and establish high expectations for learning within psychomotor,<br />

cognitive, and affective domains. They should support student<br />

learning through the creation of an environment that is conducive<br />

to learning and view assessment as an integral component of the<br />

teaching-learning process (NASPE, 2007a).<br />

Highly qualified teachers need to contribute to their schools<br />

outside of their respective classrooms as well. For example, other<br />

important responsibilities that help define a ‘highly qualified<br />

teacher’ are to demonstrate professionalism and ethical behavior<br />

in the learning environment through positive interactions with<br />

students, colleagues, administrators, and community members.<br />

“PETE programs are designed to facilitate preservice teachers’<br />

progress toward being deemed ‘highly qualified’ upon entrance<br />

into the profession” (NASPE, 2007a). PETE programs should be<br />

accredited, based on PETE standards, and the faculty should model<br />

passion, reflection, and dedication (Napper-Owens et al., 2008).<br />

Physical Education Teacher Education programs should provide<br />

preservice teachers with substantial pedagogical and content<br />

knowledge bases; afford many opportunities for preservice<br />

teachers to participate in an array of field experiences where<br />

they can interact with veteran teachers and diverse students<br />

at all grade levels while seeing the application of classroom<br />

principles; and develop, nurture and reinforce specific<br />

professional behaviors that facilitate student learning (NASPE,<br />

volume 5, issue 1 3


Undergraduate PETE Programs<br />

2007a, p.1).<br />

NASPE acknowledges that highly qualified physical education<br />

teachers will be certified to teach by virtue of having completed<br />

an accredited PETE program (NASPE, 2007a). NASPE (2004b)<br />

developed a pledge that can be used as a starting point when<br />

forming one’s own idea of what it means to be highly qualified.<br />

The pledge was developed to create “Positive Physical Education”<br />

and is as follows:<br />

•Establish a positive, safe learning environment for all<br />

students.<br />

•Teach a variety of physical activities that make physical<br />

education class enjoyable.<br />

•Create maximum opportunities for students of all abilities to<br />

be successful.<br />

•Promote student honesty, integrity and good sportsmanship.<br />

•Guide students into becoming skillful and confident movers.<br />

•Facilitate the development and maintenance of physical<br />

fitness.<br />

•Assist students in setting and achieving personal goals.<br />

•Provide specific, constructive feedback to help students master<br />

motor skills.<br />

•Afford opportunities for students to succeed in cooperative<br />

and competitive situations.<br />

•Prepare and encourage students to practice skills and be active<br />

for a lifetime.<br />

The current state of health problems in the world suggests that<br />

there is a need for effective and quality physical education programs<br />

(Bulger, Housner, & Lee, 2008). These programs rely on highly<br />

qualified teachers. Teaching K-12 physical education can be a<br />

very challenging profession; therefore, it is imperative that higher<br />

education institutions provide instruction and experiences that will<br />

prepare preservice teachers to make a successful transition into the<br />

teaching profession (Hill & Brodin, 2004).<br />

The goal of PETE programs should be to produce highly<br />

competent and effective K-12 teachers (Hill & Brodin, 2004).<br />

Tinning (2002) stated that most people would agree that teacher<br />

preparation programs should prepare preservice teachers to fulfill<br />

the purpose that the profession considers to be the most important.<br />

What is that purpose? “Physical education should be devoted to<br />

optimizing the likelihood that people so value physical activity<br />

(sport, leisure activity, fitness, and dance) that they organize their<br />

lives so regular involvement occurs throughout the lifespan”<br />

(Siedentop, 1994, p. 11). To help fulfill this purpose, PETE faculty<br />

must consistently self-assess their programs based on the NASPE<br />

Initial Beginning Physical Education Teachers standards (NASPE,<br />

2008).<br />

An effective way to clarify one’s belief is to compare his/her<br />

philosophical position on curriculum with others (Bahneman,<br />

1996). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to describe the<br />

general profile/practices of undergraduate PETE programs and to<br />

provide an overview of their similarities and differences among<br />

the colleges and universities located within the Central District<br />

(AAHPERD).<br />

Methods<br />

Participants<br />

The survey participants were PETE faculty members who<br />

4 Journal of Research<br />

were considered the point person or program coordinator for<br />

the undergraduate PETE program. These faculty members were<br />

employed by four-year colleges and universities located within<br />

the nine states in the Central District (Colorado, Iowa, Kansas,<br />

Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, <strong>No</strong>rth Dakota, South Dakota,<br />

and Wyoming). PETE faculty were defined as those who teach<br />

physical education teacher preparation courses and were identified<br />

by a knowledgeable person at each specific university or college.<br />

Overall, 72 PETE program coordinators/point persons were<br />

selected as the potential sample for this study. In all, 44 universities<br />

returned usable results, a rate of 58%, and surveys were returned<br />

from all nine states. In an attempt to keep the results accurate, only<br />

one survey was sent to each institution.<br />

Instrument<br />

A 61-item survey was designed to gather information regarding<br />

the participants’ specific institution’s undergraduate PETE<br />

program. The programmatic items included general program<br />

demographics, student enrollment, curricular items, pre-student<br />

teaching opportunities, and the student teaching experience. The<br />

questions were answered in a variety of ways (multiple choice, yes/<br />

no, and a drop down box). The survey was reviewed for readability,<br />

and a pilot study was conducted to verify content validity.<br />

Specific survey questions were determined after a thorough<br />

review of PETE program research conducted by Metzler and<br />

Freedman (1985), Metzler and Tjeerdsma (1998), and Strand<br />

(1992). In addition, three other documents, PETE Standards<br />

(NASPE, 2008), NASPE’s (2007a) position paper on highly<br />

qualified physical education teachers, and an article on what<br />

constitutes a highly qualified physical education teacher (Napper-<br />

Owen et al., 2008) revealed common themes. Some of the<br />

questions for this study were used in previous research and other<br />

questions were developed to represent the common themes.<br />

Procedures<br />

A complete list of United States universities, colleges, and<br />

community colleges including links to each institution’s website<br />

can be found by using the University of Texas at Austin website<br />

(http://www.utexas.edu/world/univ/). From the website, the user<br />

has the option to review the schools according to type of institution<br />

(universities or community colleges), state, or alphabetical list.<br />

This website was used to compile a list of the possible four-year<br />

institutions located within the Central District.<br />

The Central District four-year institutions’ websites were<br />

searched to identify the colleges or universities that offered a<br />

physical education teaching degree. If the websites indicated<br />

that the institution did offer PETE as an undergraduate major, the<br />

specific department’s website was visited in search for names and<br />

e-mail addresses of physical education faculty members. If no<br />

point person or program coordinator for the PETE program could<br />

be found on the website, phone calls were made to the department<br />

head or administrative assistant to obtain the appropriate contact<br />

information. If the website did not indicate whether or not a degree<br />

was offered, follow-up e-mails were written or phone calls were<br />

made to the admissions office.<br />

Data collection took place in the spring of 2009 using<br />

SurveyMonkey©, an on-line survey tool. Surveys were sent to


Undergraduate PETE Programs<br />

PETE faculty members employed by a variety of universities and<br />

colleges located within the American Alliance of Health, Physical<br />

Education, Recreation and Dance’s (AAHPERD) Central District<br />

region. A detailed consent form was provided and potential<br />

participants were asked to read it before they proceeded to a link<br />

to the questionnaire. By clicking on the “Yes” button of the survey,<br />

each person gave his/her informed consent to taking the survey.<br />

The questionnaire guaranteed anonymity. In an attempt to collect<br />

as much usable data as possible, three separate e-mails were sent<br />

(two weeks apart) requesting responses. There were no incentives<br />

provided to the participants. The university Institutional Review<br />

Board (IRB) reviewed and approved the study prior to the data<br />

collection.<br />

Data Analysis<br />

The results from SurveyMonkey© were downloaded into an<br />

Excel file where the data were cleaned and coded to ensure that<br />

all data were accurate. Responses that included missing data and/<br />

or appeared to be inaccurately recorded were deemed unusable;<br />

therefore, they were removed from the data set. The coded Excel<br />

file was then uploaded into the SPSS (version 17.0) statistical<br />

package. Descriptive statistics such as means, percentages, and<br />

frequencies were calculated for each of the variables.<br />

Results<br />

The following findings are descriptive in nature and not intended<br />

to represent all institutions located within the Central District. The<br />

data were organized into the following categories; program profile,<br />

professional activity courses, skill and fitness testing, observation/<br />

field experiences, student teaching, practical teaching experiences,<br />

curriculum content, student professional organization involvement<br />

and advisory boards.<br />

Program Profile<br />

Data indicated that the average physical education program<br />

located within the Central District included 51.8 (SD= 32.05)<br />

total students and graduated 11.68 (SD= 9.065) students per<br />

year. Undergraduate physical education students were required<br />

to complete 122.70 (SD= 13.22) credits to graduate, and were<br />

required to maintain a minimum grade-point-average of 2.59 (2.50<br />

and 2.75 most frequent). Nearly all of the programs (n=39; 89%)<br />

were accredited by NCATE and/or NASPE, and used semesters as<br />

their institution’s measure for coursework (n=43; 97%).<br />

Professional Activity Courses<br />

The participants were first asked to identify whether the<br />

professional activity courses were single or multiple-credit courses.<br />

Responses indicated that 86.4% of the professional activity courses<br />

were offered as multiple-credit courses. Overall, the students were<br />

required to complete an average of 8.93 credits.<br />

Participants were also asked to identify which class format most<br />

closely matched the one used in their professional activity courses.<br />

The format options were categorized by age (elementary, middle<br />

school or high school), type (individual, dual, team, and combative),<br />

or activity (court, net, long/short implement). The most common<br />

format indicated by the participants for the professional activity<br />

courses was a multiple-credit course, categorized by type (45.5%,<br />

n= 20). This was followed by multiple-credit course categorized by<br />

age (20.5%, n=9), single credit course (13.6%, n=6), and multiplecredit<br />

course categorized by activity (6.8%, n=3). Finally, 13.6%<br />

(n=6) of the institutions formatted their activity courses in an<br />

alternative format.<br />

Skill and Fitness Testing<br />

The third edition of the PETE standards (NASPE, 2008)<br />

included a requirement on fitness and skill capabilities; therefore,<br />

participants were asked if the institutions required their students<br />

to pass skill and fitness tests either as a course requirement and/or<br />

a graduation requirement. This survey found that 45.5% (n=20)<br />

of the programs required their students to pass skill tests in their<br />

courses, and 11.8% (n=5) required skill testing as a graduation<br />

requirement. Data indicated that 20.5% (n=9) of the institutions<br />

required students to pass fitness tests in courses and 4.5% (n=2)<br />

required the fitness tests for graduation.<br />

Curricular Issues<br />

Observations/field experiences. Table 1 displays the average<br />

number of K-12 physical education observations/field experiences<br />

hours that PETE students were required to complete during each<br />

respective year of school. The table also shows the average<br />

number of hours completed at each level of education (elementary,<br />

middle school, and high school). The findings showed that the<br />

third year in the program appeared to contain the highest number<br />

of observations with 31.45 total hours. The number of hours<br />

completed at each level of education appeared to be fairly even<br />

between the elementary level (24.73 hours) and the high school<br />

(23.16 hours). Middle school observations averaged about 17.07<br />

total hours.<br />

Table 1. Observations - Hours Per Year<br />

Hours<br />

Range<br />

Year<br />

1 8.14 0-65<br />

2 17.27 0-50<br />

3 31.45 0-65<br />

4/5 27.11 0-65<br />

Education Level<br />

Elementary 24.73 0-65<br />

Middle School 17.07 0-50<br />

High School 23.16 0-65<br />

Student teaching. Student teaching experiences averaged about<br />

14.41 weeks. Participating universities and colleges reported that<br />

their PETE students student teach at each of the three age levels<br />

20.5 % (n= 9) (elementary, middle school, and high school), 77.3%<br />

(n= 34) of the programs placed their student teachers in two age<br />

levels (primary and secondary), and 2.3% (n= 1) of the programs<br />

required their students to student teach at the middle school level<br />

only.<br />

Practical teaching experiences. Practice teaching sessions<br />

(including peer teaching and teaching in the K-12 physical<br />

education class) are a common component of teacher preparation<br />

programs. On average, students had the opportunity to teach to<br />

their peers 12.75 hours (range 0-40). Undergraduate PETE students<br />

volume 5, issue 1 5


Undergraduate PETE Programs<br />

also had the opportunity to teach to K-12 students for about 15.02<br />

hours (range 0-25). Overall, the students averaged 27.77 hours of<br />

practice teaching opportunities prior to student teaching.<br />

Curricular items included. There are a variety of curricular and<br />

technology/equipment options that can be incorporated into PETE<br />

programs. The survey asked participants which of the following<br />

items were incorporated into their respective PETE programs (see<br />

Table 2). The curricular items that were most frequently imbedded<br />

into a program’s curriculum were the physical education national<br />

or state standards (86.4%), curriculum models (79.5%), concepts<br />

of fitness and wellness (75.0%), and the appropriate practices<br />

documents (68.2%). The top three technology items used were<br />

heart-rate monitors (72.7%), pedometers (61.4%), and FitnessGram<br />

(56.8%).<br />

Table 2. Percentage of Institutions that Incorporate<br />

Curriculum Items into PETE Program<br />

Curriculum content. The survey included a question about<br />

curriculum content delivery (see Table 3). Based on the curricular<br />

options listed, participants were asked to indicate how the<br />

curriculum was delivered to the students (separately, infused/<br />

imbedded, separately and infused, or not covered). The most<br />

common curricular content taught in separate courses were exercise<br />

physiology (75%), administration (61.4%), biomechanics (61.4%),<br />

historical perspective (56.8%), adapted (56.8%), exercise science<br />

(50%), and social psychology (50%). Curricular topics covered<br />

separately least often were activities and materials (20.5%), fitness<br />

education (18.2%), assessment (15.9%), technology (13.6%), and<br />

behavior management (4.5%).<br />

6 Journal of Research<br />

% n=<br />

Curricular Items<br />

National PE Standards/State Standards 86.4 38<br />

Curriculum Models 79.5 35<br />

Concepts of Fitness and Wellness 75.0 33<br />

Appropriate Practices (NASPE) 68.2 30<br />

Assessment Series (NASPE) 40.9 18<br />

Physical Best 38.6 17<br />

PE Metrics: Standard 1 34.1 15<br />

SPARK 25.0 11<br />

President’s Council of Fitness and Sport 22.7 10<br />

PECAT 18.2 8<br />

Beyond Activities: Elementary and/or<br />

Secondary 15.9 7<br />

Opportunities to Learn Document 15.9 7<br />

Technology/Equipment<br />

Heart-rate Monitors 72.7 32<br />

Pedometers 61.4 27<br />

FitnessGram 56.8 25<br />

ActivityGram 20.5 9<br />

Climbing Wall 15.9 7<br />

TriFit/MicroFit 15.9 7<br />

Dance, Dance Revolution (DDR) 13.6 6<br />

Sport Wall 4.5 2<br />

HOPSports 2.3 1<br />

<strong>No</strong>te. N=44<br />

Table 3. Content Taught in PETE Curricucla<br />

Separate Infused Separate <strong>No</strong>t<br />

Course & Infused Covered<br />

% n= % n= % n= % n=<br />

Adapted 54.5 24 6.8 3 38.6 17 0 0<br />

Act. & Mat. 20.5 9 45.5 20 34.1 15 0 0<br />

Administration 61.4 27 15.9 7 18.2 8 4.5 2<br />

Assessment 15.9 7 40.9 18 43.2 19 0 0<br />

Behavior Mgmt 4.5 2 72.7 32 22.7 10 0 0<br />

Biomechanics 61.4 27 11.4 5 25.0 11 2.3 1<br />

Coaching 63.6 28 4.5 2 20.5 9 11.4 5<br />

Methods 31.8 14 25 11 43.2 19 0 0<br />

Exercise Science 50 22 18.2 8 22.7 10 9.1 4<br />

Exercise Phys. 75 33 2.3 1 20.5 9 2.3 1<br />

Fitness Education 18.2 8 47.7 21 31.8 14 2.3 1<br />

Historical 56.8 25 25 11 15.9 7 2.3 1<br />

Motor Dev. 36.4 16 27.3 12 34.1 15 2.3 1<br />

Motor Learning 45.5 20 11.4 5 40.9 18 2.3 1<br />

Social Psychology 50.0 22 22.7 10 18.2 8 9.1 4<br />

Technology 13.6 6 52.3 23 31.8 14 2.3 1<br />

<strong>No</strong>te. N=44<br />

The curricular areas that were infused only included behavior<br />

management (72.7%), technology (52.3%), fitness education<br />

(47.7%), activities and materials (45.5%), and assessment (40.9%).<br />

Topics with the lowest percentage infused were administration<br />

(15.9%), motor learning (11.4%), biomechanics (11.4%), adapted<br />

(6.8%), coaching (4.5%), and exercise physiology (2.3%).<br />

The curricular areas that were separate and infused were<br />

assessment (43.2%), curriculum design/methods (43.2%), motor<br />

learning (40.9%), adapted (38.6%), activities and materials<br />

(34.1%), motor development (34.1%), fitness education (31.8%),<br />

and technology (31.8%). The areas that were lowest on the separate<br />

and infused were social psychology (18.2%), administration<br />

(18.2%), and historical perspective (15.9%).<br />

Curricular content areas that were not covered were coaching<br />

(11.4%), exercise science (9.1%), social psychology (9.1%),<br />

and administration (4.5%). Five curricular areas covered by<br />

all respondent’s institutions included adapted, activities and<br />

materials, assessment, behavior management, and curriculum<br />

design/methods.<br />

Student Professional Organization Involvement<br />

Participants were asked to identify whether the students were<br />

required to join a professional organization and whether students<br />

attended a professional conference within the past two years.<br />

Findings indicated that 27.3% (n= 12) of the programs required<br />

their students to join a professional organization and 79.5% (n=35)<br />

gave students the opportunity to attend a conference within the<br />

past two years.<br />

Advisory Boards<br />

An advisory board is a small group of K-12 physical educators<br />

that serves as both a focus group and a liaison between higher<br />

education and the K-12 community. Participants were asked<br />

to indicate whether or not they believed advisory boards were<br />

an important resource for higher education curriculum. The<br />

participants were also asked if they had used an advisory board<br />

within the past five years. Findings indicated that 36.4% (n=16)


Undergraduate PETE Programs<br />

of the institutions believed that advisory boards were important<br />

and 25% (n=11) had used an advisory board within the past five<br />

years.<br />

Discussion<br />

There are a variety of key elements that may be included in<br />

a typical physical education curriculum. The following elements<br />

may be included, but not limited to, professional activity courses,<br />

fitness and skill testing, curricular items, curriculum content,<br />

observations/field experiences/student teaching, practice peer and<br />

K-12 teaching experiences.<br />

Findings from this study indicated that physical education<br />

students, on average, were expected to enroll in nine credits of<br />

professional activity courses. The third edition of the PETE<br />

standards (NASPE, 2008) included a fitness and skill standard. It<br />

may be interesting to note that nearly 46 percent of the programs<br />

required their students to pass skill tests in their courses, and about<br />

12 percent required skill testing as a graduation requirement. In<br />

addition, about 20 percent of the institutions required students to<br />

pass fitness tests in courses and less than five percent required the<br />

fitness tests for graduation. It will be interesting to see how these<br />

numbers change as the updated PETE standards (NASPE, 2008)<br />

become a part of the accreditation process.<br />

Technology is also a new theme imbedded into the PETE<br />

standards (NASPE, 2008). In recent years, there have been<br />

significant advances in the use of technology in physical education.<br />

The most common technology/equipment items mentioned<br />

by the participants were heart-rate monitors, pedometers, and<br />

FitnessGram. Ayers and Housner (2008) claimed that preservice<br />

physical education teachers need to have knowledge of the<br />

pedagogical applications of technology; however, less than 12%<br />

(Liang, Walls, Hicks, Clayton, & Yang, 2006) of PETE students<br />

believed they were fluent. Perhaps the PETE programs should<br />

assess the quality and quantity of technological applications so the<br />

students could feel more confident bringing technology into their<br />

K-12 classes.<br />

It is incumbent upon teacher educators to identify the most<br />

pedagogically relevant knowledge in the academic disciplines<br />

and to provide preservice physical educators with teaching and<br />

learning experiences that demonstrate the connections between the<br />

knowledge from various academic disciplines and its relevance to<br />

professional practice (Bulger, Housner, & Lee, 2008).<br />

“In an ideal world, PETE programs would provide prospective<br />

teachers with subject-matter knowledge related to the physiology,<br />

anatomy, and neuromuscular structures of the body, and an<br />

understanding of how these systems respond and adapt to physical<br />

activity” (Bulger, Housner, & Lee, 2008, p. 44). The data indicated<br />

that most of the programs that participated in the study are, indeed,<br />

covering these topics.<br />

Based on the findings from this study, one could question<br />

the delivery choice of certain curricular items. For example, if<br />

a curricular area was solely “infused” into curriculums (verses<br />

offered in a separate course), would that choice of delivery affect<br />

the preservice teacher’s perception of the importance of the<br />

information? Or, if a topic is taught only in a separate course (and<br />

not infused throughout the curriculum) does that choice of delivery<br />

matter to the students? Ross (1987) believed that universities<br />

and institutions do have a profound effect on the value systems<br />

of students based on the curriculum to which those students are<br />

exposed. So, the question emerges, if certain curricular topics<br />

such as behavior management or assessment are not taught, at<br />

minimum, in a discrete course, are the students less likely to value<br />

those topics? Or if topics are taught earlier in the curriculum, and<br />

not reviewed or infused in higher-level courses, are students less<br />

likely to value those areas?<br />

Some institutions offer courses taught by professors who are not<br />

physical education specialists. In fact, they may be non-teacher<br />

educators and/or influenced little by PETE faculty regarding<br />

both course content and instructional methods (Verner, 1991).<br />

While certain disciplinary specialists may have a more complete<br />

understanding of the involved subject matter and knowledge, they<br />

may lack the ability to apply the essential pedagogical concepts<br />

that will enable preservice physical educators to apply the content<br />

in physical activity promotion settings (Bulger et al., 2008). The<br />

survey indicated that the curriculum content areas most often<br />

taught as separate courses (!60%) were administration, coaching,<br />

biomechanics, and exercise physiology.<br />

“As previously described, PETE programs need to employ<br />

course content, instructional methods, and teaching-learning<br />

environments that enable students to make explicit connections<br />

between the various disciplines and best practices in teaching<br />

physical education” (Bulger et al., 2008).<br />

It is apparent that the capacity of a PETE curriculum to<br />

positively affect the preservice socialization of prospective<br />

physical educators is significantly related to the overall<br />

quality of that curriculum. Strong, individual curricular<br />

components are insufficient to insure curricular quality. All<br />

segments of the curriculum must operate well in a coordinated<br />

manner (Weigand, Bulger, & Mohr, 2004, p. 53).<br />

It appears as though biomechanics and exercise physiology are<br />

not typically being infused into subsequent courses.<br />

The previously mentioned study by Collier and Hebert<br />

(2004) found that K-12 in-service teachers believed that “…<br />

Pre-professional preparation faculty must closely examine the<br />

curricular opportunities afforded pre-professionals with respect to<br />

exposure to lifetime activities, physical and health-related fitness,<br />

behavior management, and classroom organization” (p. 111).<br />

These K-12 teachers were asking for greater emphasis to be place<br />

on the aforementioned curricular areas. The results of the current<br />

study paralleled the request of the K-12 teachers in Collier and<br />

Hebert’s study (2004).<br />

In the current study, results indicated that Central District<br />

preservice teachers typically had the opportunity to teach to their<br />

peers for about 13 hours and teach in actual K-12 settings for<br />

about 15 hours. Overall, the students averaged nearly 28 hours of<br />

teaching opportunities prior to student teaching.<br />

Field experiences are not limited exclusively to student teaching<br />

(Ayers & Housner, 2008); they can happen any time throughout the<br />

PETE program. Observations and field experiences in which the<br />

preservice teacher has the opportunity to observe and participate in<br />

authentic K-12 physical education experiences are crucial to their<br />

preparation. Professionals teaching teacher preparation courses<br />

and in-service teachers believe that it is important to integrate the<br />

preservice teachers into the K-12 system and allow them early<br />

volume 5, issue 1 7


Undergraduate PETE Programs<br />

teaching experiences (O’Sullivan, 1990). Collier and Hebert (2004)<br />

stated that pre-professional programs must specifically analyze<br />

the depth and breadth of opportunities afforded students to work<br />

directly with children in well-supervised practicum settings. “The<br />

opportunity to apply theory to practice and receive appropriate<br />

feedback from faculty, cooperating teachers, peers, and children<br />

allows for individual growth and ultimately, growth within the<br />

profession” (p.111). It is important to note that over the last 20<br />

years, there has been an increase in the amount of time preservice<br />

teachers have spent in K-12 physical education classes (Ayers &<br />

Housner, 2008; Nixon & Vendien, 1985; Tannehill & Zakrajsek,<br />

1988). However, Dodds (1989) believed that simply placing the<br />

student into the K-12 system is not enough and recommended that<br />

field experiences should be progressive, increasingly complex,<br />

sequential, and well timed.<br />

Assuming that the preservice students are imbedded in their<br />

primary pedagogy courses by their third year, it should not<br />

be surprising that the findings showed that the third year in the<br />

program appears to contain the highest number of observations/<br />

field experiences with slightly more than 31 total hours.<br />

A positive note is that 97% of programs had their preservice<br />

students in observations/field experiences at some point during<br />

their preservice preparation. It should be noted that half of the<br />

programs had their students in a practicum experience in their first<br />

year, 86% during the second year, 97% during the third year, and<br />

81% during the final year in the program. In addition, 89% of the<br />

preservice students had the opportunity to teach to K-12 students<br />

prior to student teaching. These numbers appear to be much<br />

higher than those in previous studies; however, if PETE faculty are<br />

authentically preparing preservice teachers, every program should<br />

include some type of practicum experience during each year of<br />

their preservice preparation.<br />

In addition, in-service teachers had the opportunity to share<br />

their anecdotal information on preparing tomorrow’s physical<br />

educators in the Physical Education News (Jeffries, 2008). The<br />

following are some of the comments found on the website.<br />

“Students need authentic experiences such as: site visits to observe<br />

effective teachers, interactions with quality teachers, opportunities<br />

to field test lesson plans, opportunities to learn about and design<br />

differentiated curriculum based on interactions with actual school<br />

age student.” “Young college students are sometimes unsure if<br />

physical education is for them. If you require these students to<br />

help with physical education classes, they will learn quickly if<br />

this is for them or not. Have the students participate with young<br />

students, help demonstrate, help keep control of the classes, etc.”<br />

Even if students start their respective programs with a fairly<br />

good idea of the grade level they would like to teach, exposing<br />

them to all age levels should increase the chance that the students<br />

would consider the possibility of teaching at other age levels as<br />

well. Data showed that the number of hours completed at each<br />

level of education appeared to be balanced between elementary<br />

and high school hours. Middle school field experiences averaged<br />

about five hours less than the hours spent at elementary and high<br />

school levels.<br />

Student-teaching experiences averaged about 14 weeks and<br />

the majority of the institutions placed students at two age levels—<br />

elementary and secondary. An important area to note is that over<br />

8 Journal of Research<br />

20 percent of the programs placed their students at each of the<br />

three age levels (i.e. elementary, middle school, and high school).<br />

A contemporary approach to student teaching was presented<br />

by Wiegand, Bulger, and Mohr (2004). Generally speaking,<br />

student teaching is viewed as the culminating experience, but that<br />

placement in the curriculum may not afford the PETE student the<br />

opportunity to adequately reflect upon the lessons learned during<br />

student teaching with their peers and college supervisor. The<br />

authors suggested two options for improving the traditional student<br />

teaching model. In short, both options would change the order in<br />

which student teaching would occur and they would attempt to<br />

“bridge the gap” between the student teaching experiences and<br />

best practice. The first option would entail adding a capstone class<br />

to follow the student teaching experience. The second involved<br />

dividing the student teaching experience into two parts. The first<br />

part would be designed as a five-week block following the majority<br />

of the pedagogy courses. The second part would be designed as a<br />

capstone experience following all of the student’s coursework.<br />

Harrison and Blakemore (1992) stated that joining and getting<br />

involved in the state and national associations helps preservice<br />

and in-service teachers become true professionals. Professional<br />

development is an important element in keeping in-service teachers<br />

current, aware of trends, and involved in leadership roles (Chen,<br />

2006). Professionals are identified by their socializations into<br />

membership and their organizations (Morocco & Solomon, 1999).<br />

However, research has shown that very few beginning teachers<br />

actually attend these professional development opportunities<br />

(Harrison & Blakemore, 1992).<br />

Another perspective is that K-12 in-service teachers have become<br />

out of touch with the current trends related to physical education<br />

research. Regardless of which perspective is right, there does seem<br />

to be some disconnect between what K-12 physical educators and<br />

college professors believe to be the most effective and achievable<br />

curriculum. A positive recent development is the increased<br />

collaboration of K-12 teachers and teacher preparation professors<br />

(Metzler & Tjeerdsma, 2000; Strand, Anderson, & Reeder, 1996;<br />

Van der Mars as cited in Collier & Hebert, 2004). Two possible<br />

suggestions to minimize this “disconnection” include university/<br />

college professors continually supervising student teachers and<br />

utilizing an advisory board. A survey question relating to advisory<br />

boards showed that only 36% believed that advisory boards were<br />

actually important, and only 25% of PETE programs have used<br />

an advisory board within the last five years. Though these two<br />

suggestions may not completely solve this disconnect, they may<br />

help bridge the gap and improve the communication between the<br />

two groups.<br />

Summary<br />

The study attempted to describe the content of undergraduate<br />

PETE programs based on a general program profile, curricular<br />

items, field experiences, and professional involvement/<br />

development. Overall, the goal was to provide an overview of<br />

many key elements of PETE programs that would allow readers<br />

to compare their program offerings with others in a similar<br />

geographic area. Another goal was to encourage institutions to<br />

assess, and therefore improve the preparation of future physical<br />

education professionals.


Undergraduate PETE Programs<br />

Possible areas of further study include surveying and comparing<br />

other PETE programs internationally. One could also research<br />

one or more specific areas of study (e.g., student teaching and/or<br />

capstone experiences or pedagogical content knowledge for specific<br />

courses) and investigate how institutions relay this information to<br />

preservice teachers.<br />

References<br />

Ayers, S. A. & Housner, L. D. (2008). A descriptive analysis of<br />

undergraduate PETE programs. Journal of Teaching Physical<br />

Education, 27, 51-67.<br />

Bahneman, C. P. (1996). An analysis of the undergraduate physical<br />

education teacher certification requirements within institutions which<br />

offer a doctoral degree in physical education. The Physical<br />

Educator, 54, 198-205.<br />

Bulger, S. M., Housner, L. D., & Lee, A. M. (2008). Curriculum alignment:<br />

Aview from physical education teacher education. Journal of Physical<br />

Education, Recreation and Dance, 79(7), 44-49.<br />

Collier, D. & Hebert, F. (2004). Undergraduate physical education teacher<br />

preparation: What practitioners tell us. The Physical Educator, 61,<br />

102-112.<br />

Dodds, P. (1989). Trainees, field experiences, and socialization into<br />

teaching. In T. J. Templin & P. G. Schempp (Eds.), Socialization<br />

into physical education: Learning to teach (pp.81-104). Indianapolis:<br />

Benchmark Press, Inc.<br />

Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. J. (1974). The study of teaching, New York:<br />

Holt, Rinehart & Winston.<br />

Harrison, J.M., & Blakemore, C.L. (1992). Instructional strategies for<br />

secondary school physical education (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Brown.<br />

Hill, G., & Brodin, K. L. (2004). Physical education teachers’ perceptions<br />

of the adequacy of university coursework in preparation for teaching.<br />

The Physical Educator, 61, 75-87.<br />

Jeffries, S. (2008, <strong>No</strong>vember). Physical Education News. Retrieved<br />

<strong>No</strong>vember 18, 2008, from www.PElinks4u.org<br />

Le Masurier, G., & Corbin, C. (2006). Top 10 reasons for quality<br />

physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation<br />

and Dance, 77(6), 44-53.<br />

Liang, G., Walls, R. T., Hicks, V. L., Clayton, L. B., & Yang, L. (2006).<br />

Will tomorrow’s physical educators be prepared to teach in the digital<br />

age? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education,<br />

6(1), 143-156.<br />

Metzler, M., W. & Freedman, M., S. (1985). Here’s looking at you, PETE:<br />

A profile of physical education teacher education faculty. Journal of<br />

Teaching in Physical Education, 4, 123-133.<br />

Metzler, M. & Tjeerdsma, B. (1998). PETE programs assessment within<br />

a development, research, and improvement framework. Journal of<br />

Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 468-492.<br />

Metzler, M., & Tjeerdsma, B. (2000). Assessment of physical education<br />

teacher education programs. Reston, VA: NASPE.<br />

Morocco, C. C., & Solomon, M. Z. (1999). Revitalizing professional<br />

development. In M.Z. Solomon (Ed.), The diagnostic teacher:<br />

Constructing new approaches to professional development (pp. 247-<br />

267). New York: Teachers College Press.<br />

Napper-Owen, G., Marston, R., Van Volkinburg, P., Afeman, H., & Brewer,<br />

J. (2008). What constitutes a highly qualified physical education<br />

teacher. Journal of Physical Education Recreation and Dance, 79(8),<br />

26-30.<br />

National Association for Sport & Physical Education. (2004a). Moving<br />

into the future: National standards for physical education: A guide to<br />

content and assessment. (2nd ed.). Reston, VA: Author.<br />

National Association for Sport & Physical Education. (2004b). Positive<br />

physical education pledge. Retrieved <strong>No</strong>vember 3, 2008, from http://<br />

www.aahperd.org/naspe/template.cfm?template=principalContest/<br />

main.html<br />

National Association for Sport & Physical Education. (2007a). What<br />

constitutes a highly qualified physical education teacher? Retrieved<br />

<strong>No</strong>vember 3, 2008, from http://www.aahperd.org/naspe/pdf_files/<br />

HiQualified.pdf<br />

National Association for Sport & Physical Education. (2007b)<br />

Physical education teacher evaluation tool. Retrieved <strong>No</strong>vember<br />

3, 2008, from http://www.aahperd.org/naspe/pdf_files/pos_papers/<br />

TeacherEvaluationTool.pdf<br />

National Association for Sport & Physical Education. (2008). National<br />

standards for beginning physical education teachers. Reston, VA:<br />

Author.<br />

Nixon, J. E., & Vendien, C. L. (1985). Early field experiences: First<br />

encounters with field experiences with reality. In C.L. Vendien &<br />

J.E. Nixon (Eds.), Physical education teacher education guidelines<br />

for sport pedagogy, (pp.175-186). New York: MacMillian Publishing<br />

Company.<br />

O’Sullivan, M. (1990). Physical education teacher education in the United<br />

States. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 61(2), 41-<br />

45.<br />

Ross, S. (1987). Humanizing the undergraduate physical education<br />

curriculum. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 7, 46-60.<br />

Siedentop, D. (1994). Curriculum innovation: Towards the 21st century.<br />

The Journal of ICHPER•SD, 30(2), 11-14.<br />

SPSS, Inc. (2008). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Version<br />

17.0) [Computer software]. Chicago, IL; Author.<br />

Strand, B., Anderson, C., & Reeder, S. (1996). University/school<br />

collaborative research: Heart rate intensity in middle school physical<br />

education. California Association for Health, Physical Education,<br />

Recreation and Dance Journal Times, 58(8), 13-15, 34.<br />

Strand, B. N. (1992). A descriptive profile of teacher preparation practices<br />

in physical education teacher education. The Physical Educator, 49,<br />

104-112.<br />

Tannehill, D. & Zakrajsek, D. (1998). What is happening in supervision<br />

of student teachers in secondary physical education. The Journal of<br />

Teaching Physical Education, 4(1), 1-12.<br />

Tinning, R. (2002). Engaging Siedentopian perspectives on content<br />

knowledge of physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical<br />

Education, 21, 378-391.<br />

Verner, M. (1991). Anatomy and physiology offerings in physical education<br />

professional preparation programs. Physical Educator, 48(2), 80.<br />

Wiegand, R. L., Bulger, S. M., & Mohr, D. J. (2004). Curricular issues in<br />

physical education teacher education. Journal of Physical Education<br />

Recreation and Dance, 75(8), 47-55.<br />

The University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved January 12, 2009 from http://<br />

www.utexas.edu/world/univ/ !<br />

volume 5, issue 1 9


The Web Quest: Its Impact on Developing<br />

Teaching Skills of Physical Education Student<br />

Teachers<br />

by Haythem Abdel Mageed Mohamed & Rasha Nageh Ali Abd El<br />

Rheem, Faculty of Physical Education, Minia University, Egypt<br />

Abstract<br />

The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which<br />

the use of WebQuests would impact the teaching performance of<br />

the physical education (PE) teacher candidates enrolled in Minia<br />

University. Twenty-eight, third-year teacher candidates were<br />

involved in the study (N=28) and were randomly divided into<br />

two groups: a control and experimental (14 teacher candidates<br />

each). A teaching practice observation sheet was used to assess the<br />

teaching performance of the participants. Results indicated that the<br />

experimental group, or the participants who used the WebQuest<br />

to learn the teaching skills, achieved significantly higher levels in<br />

their teaching performance than did the control group, or those<br />

who were instructed using the traditional methods of modeling and<br />

lecturing. A discussion of the possible reasons for this difference<br />

and practical implications of this study on using WebQuests in<br />

teacher preparation programs are included.<br />

Key words: Teacher Preparation Programs<br />

Introduction<br />

The WebQuest model was created as a tool for integrating<br />

Internet use into classroom activities. The WebQest asks young<br />

people to use the Internet to learn about an issue and apply that<br />

knowledge to attitudes and to enhance their own environments<br />

or future orientations (Abbit & Ophus, 2008). The developers<br />

of the WebQuest, Bernie Dodge and Tom March, have written<br />

widely about the technique, suggesting that it is a synthesis of<br />

inquiry methods, cooperative learning, problem-based learning,<br />

constructivism, and technology integration. While each of the<br />

foundational practices has its own body of research, there is limited<br />

research about the WebQuest model itself (Dodge, 1998; March,<br />

2000).<br />

WebQuests were originally created by Dodge in 1995, during<br />

the early stages of widespread Internet access. With the increase<br />

in Internet access in university labs, he began to experiment with<br />

effective ways to integrate technology into classroom instruction.<br />

As Dodge developed activities for pre-service teachers, “he<br />

launched the WebQuest, arguably the most popular approach for<br />

integrating the Web in classroom learning” (Gorghiu, Gorghiul,<br />

González & de la Santa, 2005; Strickland, 2005).<br />

WebQuest came out as one of the buzz terms that emerged in the<br />

last 15 years in multiple fields of education and teacher education<br />

alike as they are used to achieve the best use of learners' time,<br />

knowledge acquisition and integration and extending and refining<br />

knowledge. After working with a WebQuest, learners will have<br />

grappled with a significant amount of new information and made<br />

sense of it. WebQuests help the participants in meeting standards<br />

concentrated on both critical-thinking and analysis skills. Based on<br />

ideas of inquiry and constructivism, WebQuests involve cooperative<br />

learning, with students having to work on projects in groups. In<br />

10 Journal of Research<br />

addition, there is a strong connection between WebQuests and<br />

multimedia techniques, which leads to an important opportunity<br />

for using the Internet in education.<br />

Williams (2004) asserted that WebQests promote good<br />

instructional practice in many ways. They provide structure and<br />

guidance for the students and instructors. WebQuests also help<br />

focus students' attention on the provided resources, rather than<br />

having students search for them. And they are linked to a variety<br />

of positive affective outcomes, such as motivation, increased level<br />

of engagement, positive attitudes, and decreased anxiety.<br />

Many researchers have attempted to define WebQuests but<br />

Dodge, the parent of the WebQuest, made the essential description<br />

of the technique. He defined a WebQuest as "an inquiry-oriented<br />

activity in which some or all of the information that learners<br />

interact with comes from resources on the Internet." Learners<br />

gather information, analyze a body of knowledge, transform it<br />

in some way into new understandings and demonstrate in-depth<br />

understanding of the material by creating a final product that others<br />

can react or respond to (Milson & Downey, 2001; Strickland,<br />

2005).<br />

There are different types of WebQuests, taking the form of<br />

mystery tasks, retelling of a situation, problem solving, or judgment<br />

decisions. All types of WebQuests share the same optimal goal;<br />

they aim at structuring and directing higher-order learning using<br />

computers. In a WebQuest the learner must interact with the new<br />

knowledge to formulate a new hypothesis or to create a new artifact<br />

for which the use of computers is essential (Williams, 2004).<br />

WebQuests also share the same structure as they all follow a<br />

template design of (introduction, task, sources of information,<br />

process, evaluation and conclusion). The introduction describes the<br />

topic and purpose of the WebQuest, provides necessary background<br />

information and catches the readers' attention to draw them into<br />

the quest. The Task explains to the students what they are going to<br />

do in the activity, the final performance or product and the tools to<br />

be used. The Process describes the steps for completing the tasks.<br />

The resources provide the students with the necessary resources<br />

to complete the tasks and websites. The Evaluation describes to<br />

the students how their performance or products will be evaluated<br />

and displays a rubric to measure the product as objectively as<br />

possible. The Conclusion wraps up the activity, summarizing<br />

what the students have accomplished during the WebQuest in a<br />

short paragraph. Additional links or questions can be included to<br />

encourage students to extend their thinking beyond the WebQuest<br />

(Dodge, 2008; Kelly, 2000).<br />

Recently, teacher educators have applied the WebQuest model<br />

with preservice teachers in order to develop technology integration<br />

skills akin to those used in everyday schools. Scaffolding, used to<br />

support the gradual acquisition of knowledge and skills, may help<br />

preservice teachers to better understand the underlying assumptions<br />

and assess the feas ibility of WebQuests for their teaching (Wang<br />

& Hannafin, 2008).


The Web Quest<br />

Purpose of the Study<br />

Traditional teacher preparation programs tend to operate from<br />

a subject base. The aim is to help practitioners to improve subject<br />

knowledge and expertise. Support is offered by a subject adviser<br />

- then practitioners implement the advice and the advisor evaluates<br />

the outcomes. Jarvis (1992) asserted that student teachers need<br />

advanced strategies that move beyond mere practices. Support for<br />

professional development through using the ‘WebQuest technique’<br />

builds on a model of learning, where practitioners are challenged<br />

to find new ways of locating information and of integrating<br />

technology in education.<br />

The purpose of this study was to compare the WebQuest<br />

technique to the traditional techniques used in teacher preparation<br />

institutions in enhancing preservice teachers' teaching skills. The<br />

WebQuest technique was administered to a sample of third-year PE<br />

teacher candidates enrolled in Minia University, Egypt to enhance<br />

their teaching skills.<br />

Methods<br />

Approach to the Problem<br />

The present study utilized a randomized experimental design in<br />

order to examine the hypotheses and research question. Trochim<br />

(2006) asserts that when random assignment is used, the design<br />

is called a randomized experiment or true experiment. Thomas<br />

& Nelson (2001) assert that the experimental design allows the<br />

researcher to gain insight into the methods of instruction, to have<br />

control over the variables and to determine what is best for the<br />

population. The specific approach utilized for this study was the<br />

pre-post two groups design.<br />

The Participants and Research Setting<br />

The population for this study included 28 third-year PE teacher<br />

candidates enrolled in Minia University during the first semester.<br />

Participants in both groups ranged in age from 19 to 20 years old<br />

and they were all males.<br />

Third-year teacher candidates were chosen because they start<br />

their school placement and find it difficult to adapt with their<br />

first encounter with real teaching situations. In the traditional<br />

instructional methods of preparing these teacher candidates,<br />

they watch models, study available materials on the teaching<br />

skills, teach exactly the same way they were taught with limited<br />

improvisations, and wait for feedback. They need to be trained in<br />

a way that allows them to find the knowledge themselves, assess<br />

their own practices, and identify their weaknesses and strengths.<br />

During the experiment period, the PE teacher candidates in<br />

the two groups studied the three major teaching skills (planning,<br />

implementation and evaluation) and how to apply these three<br />

skills in any PE class with all its stages of presentation (warmup,<br />

physical preparation and basic skills). The experimental group<br />

surfed the WebQuest to find information on such skills with the<br />

instructor (the senior researcher, a lecturer within the faculty of<br />

PE, Minia University) monitoring and offering help when needed.<br />

They also went through the five cycles of the WebQuest (See<br />

Procedures, p.7-9). Participants in the control group, on the other<br />

hand, were lectured on these skills by their instructor (the coauthor,<br />

a lecturer at the faculty of PE, Minia University), watched<br />

her modeling the skills, and finally peer-taught a model lesson of<br />

their own preparation.<br />

The experiment lasted for three months from February to<br />

May, 2008, with two lectures a week for each group (a total of 21<br />

sessions). The time assigned for each session was (120 min.) to<br />

simulate the pre-scheduled timetable set by the college regulations.<br />

One session was devoted to the orientation at the beginning of the<br />

program. The other 20 sessions were divided into 5 major cycles<br />

representing the five lessons provided in the WebQuest (each<br />

consisting of 4 successive sessions).<br />

Instrument<br />

To measure teacher candidates' teaching performance,<br />

the investigators adopted a 70-item observation sheet from a<br />

previous study (Azmy & Mohamed, 2006). The teaching practice<br />

observation sheet consists of three main dimensions representing<br />

the three major teaching skills addressed by the researchers (see<br />

Appendix 1); including planning skills (16 items), implementation<br />

skills (46 items), and evaluation skills (8 items).<br />

A three-point scale was used as a coding system for weighing<br />

each statement (1=Never; 2=Sometimes; 3= Always). Giving<br />

'Always' a maximum score of 3 marks, the maximum score of the<br />

first dimension (with a total number of 16 items) was 16 x 3 = 48,<br />

that of the second dimension (with a total number of 46 items) was<br />

46 x 3=138, and that of the third dimension (with a total number<br />

of 8 items) was 8 x 3= 24. A Cronbach's Alpha for reliability was<br />

conducted for each dimension in the sheet. The Cronbach alpha<br />

coefficients for dimensions 1 through 3 were between .93 and .98,<br />

indicating satisfactory levels of reliability.<br />

The Pearson Correlation Formula was also used to determine<br />

the inter-rater reliability of the observation sheet by administering<br />

the observation sheet to a randomly chosen sample of 20 fourth<br />

year PE teacher candidates in the Faculty of Physical Education,<br />

Minia University. The teaching performance of these participants<br />

was videotaped and two lecturers at the same university observed<br />

these videotapes and rated their performance using the observation<br />

sheet. The mean scores obtained by the two observers were<br />

calculated and the correlation coefficient was (0.97) which was<br />

considered acceptable.<br />

Data Analysis<br />

The Teaching Practice Observation Sheet (Azmy & Mohamed,<br />

2006) was administered again to determine the extent to which<br />

participants exhibited a change in the peer-teaching performance<br />

following the intervention period. Posttest scores were obtained for<br />

each participant of the two groups; each participant was videotaped<br />

again while teaching one model PE class in the University sports<br />

hall and the three judges observed these videotapes and rated their<br />

performance. Independent t-tests were used to analyze the extent<br />

to which there were statistically significant differences between<br />

pretest and posttest scores for the addressed two variables. The<br />

effects of the dependent variables were considered statistically<br />

significant at p


The Web Quest<br />

control (14 participants each). They were instructed by the two<br />

researchers; one for the experimental group using the WebQuest<br />

technique, and the other for the control group using the conventional<br />

methods of instruction (e.g. lecturing and modeling). Participants<br />

in the regular classes listened to the instructor's lecture, took notes,<br />

watched the instructor modeling, participated in discussions on the<br />

given teaching skills, and taught a mini-class as an application.<br />

Pretest scores for the observation sheet (Azmy & Mohamed,<br />

2006) were obtained for each participant of the two groups to<br />

identify their level of performance considering the three target<br />

teaching skills before being exposed to the treatment intervention;<br />

each participant was videotaped while teaching one model PE<br />

class in the university sports hall. Three external judges (experts<br />

in PE curriculum and instruction) observed the videotapes, rated<br />

their performance using the observation sheet two times for each<br />

participant (once for the pre-measurement and the other for the post<br />

one), and the average was calculated from the three obtained raw<br />

scores of the judges giving a total of two scores for each participant<br />

(one for the pre and one for the post) to ensure objectivity of the<br />

evaluation process.<br />

The instructor who taught the experimental group utilized a fivecycle<br />

intervention. Before going through the five successive cycles,<br />

he started with an orientation session at the very beginning of the<br />

program in which he provided a brief theoretical background on<br />

the WebQuest. He also explained why they are using the Internet,<br />

how to surf for the WebQuest and when and how to ask for help<br />

from the instructor. A random selection divided the experimental<br />

participants into three sub-groups.<br />

The students then went through the five WebQuest Cycles; in<br />

each cycle, participants were required to choose one lesson from<br />

the WebQuest and prepare a lesson plan to peer-teach at the end of<br />

the cycle. The suggested five lessons incorporated different types<br />

of warm-up, physical preparation and basic skills and participants<br />

who were surfing the WebQuest were required to choose one of<br />

them with all its components for their peer-teaching. Each cycle<br />

consisted of four successive sessions. The task for each group was<br />

changed among cycles switching the three target teaching skills<br />

among the groups giving the PE candidate teachers the opportunity<br />

to choose from among the different exercises that can be employed<br />

in applying these skills. Figure 1 depicts the four sessions of<br />

implementing each WebQuest cycle (Insert Figure 1 here) They<br />

can be briefed as follows:<br />

Session (1)<br />

Session (2)<br />

Teamwork<br />

Session (3)<br />

Exchanging of Information<br />

Session (4)<br />

12 Journal of Research<br />

Session 1: Surfing the WebQuest (120 min)<br />

In the first session of each cycle, participants of the<br />

experimental group used the university lab to surf the Internet<br />

through the WebQuest. They read through the general instructions<br />

on the required mission for each group; each group had to gather<br />

information about one teaching skill from the Internet (planning,<br />

implementation or evaluation). They also read through the<br />

evaluation rubric to identify their level of performance. Then, they<br />

used the available resources to find the required information on the<br />

target skill.<br />

Session 2: Teamwork (120 min)<br />

Teacher candidates teamed up in their sub-groups and shared<br />

the information they retrieved among themselves. They exchanged<br />

and reconstructed the information about the one target skill assigned<br />

for each group and finally came up with an idea on how to present<br />

their assigned skill to the members of the other two groups.<br />

Session 3: Exchanging of Information (120 min)<br />

Members of the three groups sat together in one big circle to<br />

exchange the information they retrieved about the three major<br />

teaching skills. At the end, they chose one lesson from the suggested<br />

ones in the WebQuest to peer-teach in the next session in the sports<br />

hall. They also chose one student from each group to teach (a total<br />

of three students, one for each stage of presentation).<br />

Session 4: Teaching and Feedback (120 min)<br />

In this final session of each cycle, the three chosen teacher<br />

candidates presented their planned lessons (in 90 min.); one student<br />

prepared and arranged the equipment for the class, one taught the<br />

lesson and one did the evaluation stage of presentation. At the end<br />

of this session, a post conference was held with all members (30<br />

min.) in which they all sat in one big circle with the instructor in<br />

the middle. They assessed the teaching performance of their mates<br />

on the basis of the WebQuest's evaluation rubric.<br />

Results<br />

Analysis of the collected data on the participants revealed<br />

improved scores in all domains of the observation sheet. A<br />

paired samples t test revealed a statistically reliable difference<br />

between the mean scores for the experimental group in the preperformance<br />

in the planning, implementation and evaluation skills<br />

(M=21.93; M=65.43; M=12.21) and in the post-performance on<br />

the observation sheet (M=40.79, M=126.64; M=18.79), t=30.92,<br />

p=0.000; t=42.91, p=0.000; t=14.12, p=0.000, respectively (see<br />

Table 1).<br />

Table 1. Differences between the Pre-post Measurements<br />

of the Teaching Practice Observation Sheet for the<br />

Experimental Group<br />

Pre<br />

Post<br />

Teaching<br />

skills Mean SD. Mean SD. t Sig.<br />

Lesson<br />

Planning<br />

21.93 1.21 40.79 1.67 30.92 0.000<br />

Implementation<br />

65.43 3.99 126.64 5.03 42.91 0.000<br />

Evaluation 12.07 1.31 20.71 1.05 18.16 0.000<br />

*P


The Web Quest<br />

Findings on the control group also revealed a statistically<br />

reliable difference between the mean scores in the preperformance<br />

in the planning, implementation and evaluation skills<br />

(M=21.71; M=65.14; M=12.07) and in the post-performance on<br />

the observation sheet (M=37.64, M=114.21; M=20.71), t=27.99,<br />

p=0.000; t=33.40, p=0.000; t=18.16, p=0.000, respectively, (see<br />

Table 2).<br />

Table 2. Differences between the Pre-post Measurements<br />

of the Teaching Practice Observation Sheet for the<br />

Control Group<br />

*P


The Web Quest<br />

solving and creative skills in a manner that assured their direct<br />

involvement both in locating and practicing the intended knowledge.<br />

Thus, learners had the upper hand in controlling their learning<br />

environment, which increased the effectiveness of the teachinglearning<br />

process. The post conference that was held after the actual<br />

teaching of the student teachers also had a positive impact on the<br />

teaching performance of the subjects of the experimental group.<br />

It paved the way for better self, peer, and teacher assessment as<br />

all the participants together with the instructor himself were<br />

given mutual opportunities to give feedback and exchange views<br />

and suggestions for a better presentation of the target lesson. It<br />

also helped in revealing their points of weaknesses and points of<br />

strengths that provided learners with an extra eye to view their<br />

teaching skills, which is rarely found in the traditional methods<br />

of instruction. These findings suggest the effectiveness of the<br />

WebQuest technique in enhancing the teaching performance of PE<br />

teacher candidates.<br />

With the current call for new and effective trends in the field<br />

of teacher preparation programs that is being evidenced across the<br />

Egyptian environment, findings such as the ones in this research<br />

study are very promising to PE instructors who are in constant<br />

search for integrating Internet technology in their instruction to<br />

maximize the learning outcomes of their learners.<br />

Finally, this study supports the notion that the WebQuest can<br />

be effectively employed in teacher preparation programs and can<br />

result in better learning outcomes when it is properly designed,<br />

implemented and monitored.<br />

Practical Implications<br />

This study serves to demonstrate the practicality of incorporating<br />

WebQuests into the teacher preparation programs in the faculties<br />

of physical education. The procedures followed in this study<br />

can be successfully incorporated into the methodology sessions<br />

addressing different teaching skills and sub-skills. The WebQuest<br />

can also be modified according to the nature of each sport presenting<br />

various models of how to: plan for a PE class, manage the class,<br />

and evaluate the outcomes of the students. Additional research<br />

into the WebQuest model is needed. The WebQuest should also<br />

be evaluated in various subject areas with learners of differing age<br />

groups and academic abilities.<br />

References<br />

Abbit, J., & Ophus, J. (2008). What we know about the impact of Web-<br />

Quests: A review of research. AACE Journal, 16(4), 441-456.<br />

Azmi, E., & Mohamed, H. A. (2006, September). The effect of an<br />

educational program using the virtual reality technology on developing<br />

some teaching skills of the student teacher in the department of<br />

teaching, Faculty of Physical Education, Minia University. The<br />

Scientific Journal of Physical & Sports Education, Helwan University,<br />

48, 239-279.<br />

Dodge, B. (1998). WebQuests: A strategy for scaffolding higher level<br />

thinking. Retrieved from http://webquest.sdsu.edu/necc98.htm<br />

Dodge, B. (2008). A webquest about webquests: Middle school/high school<br />

version. Retrieved from: http://webquest.sdsu.edu/webquestwebquesths.html<br />

Gorghiu, G., Gorghiul, L., González, V. R., & de la Santa, A. G. (2005).<br />

WebQuest in the classroom – analysis of its impact. Paper presented<br />

at The International Conference on Multimedia and ICT Education<br />

(from 22nd-24th April, 2009). Lisbon, Portugal. Retrieved from: www.<br />

formatex.org/micte2009/<br />

14 Journal of Research<br />

Hassanien, A. (2006, July). An evaluation of the webquest as a computerbased<br />

learning tool. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 11 (2),<br />

235 - 250<br />

Jarvis, J. (1992, April). Using diaries for teacher reflection on in-service<br />

course. ELT Journal, 46 (2), 133-143.<br />

Kelly, R. (2000, July/August). Working with WebQuests: Making the web<br />

accessible to students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children,<br />

32 (6), 4-13.<br />

March, T. (2000). WebQuests 101. Multimedia Schools, 7 (5), 55-56, 58.<br />

Milson, A. J., & Downey, P. (2001). WebQuest: Using Internet resources<br />

for cooperative inquiry. Social Education, 65(3), 144-146<br />

Strickland, J. (2005). Using webquests to teach content: Comparing<br />

instructional strategies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and<br />

Teacher Education, 5(2), 138-148.<br />

Thomas, J. R. & Nelson, J. K. (2001). Research methods in physical<br />

activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 3-24.<br />

Trochim, W. M.K. (2006). Research methods knowledge base. Web<br />

Center for Social Research Methods. Retrieved from: http://www.<br />

socialresearchmethods.net/kb/destypes.php<br />

Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2008, March). Integrating WebQuests in<br />

preservice teacher education. Educational Media International, 45(1),<br />

59 – 73.<br />

Williams, F. A. (2004). Voicing diversity: How can I integrate webquests<br />

and moodle into religious education at second level? A Thesis submitted<br />

for the master degree in education. School of Education, DCU.<br />

N<br />

Appendix (1) The Teaching Practice Observation Sheet<br />

Statement<br />

I. Lesson Planning Skills.<br />

1 Lesson objectives are clearly stated.<br />

2 Objectives are behavioral, observable and<br />

measurable.<br />

3 Objectives suit the level of maturity of students.<br />

4 Levels of learning for each area of the lesson<br />

objectives are clear and specific.<br />

5 Place of the lesson is well-equipped in a way<br />

that allows the implementation of the activities<br />

of the lesson.<br />

6 The content (description of the desired<br />

performance and the learning stages) is<br />

formulated in a clear manner that suits students'<br />

age level.<br />

7 Evaluation techniques that assess the achievement<br />

of the objectives are specific.<br />

8 The educational resources used by faculty to<br />

increase the effectiveness of teaching are<br />

mentioned clearly.<br />

9 The alternative tools mentioned suit the designed<br />

activities, students' number and their level.<br />

10 Lesson formations suit the designed activities.<br />

11 The chosen method of teaching is specified in a<br />

manner that suits the educational situation.<br />

12 The educational content of activities (steps) takes<br />

into consideration logic implementation (according<br />

to the logical and psychological organization).<br />

13 The content of the activities suit the instructional time.<br />

14 Activities for students with specific needs are stated in<br />

the lesson.<br />

15 The activities suit the weather.<br />

16 The lesson contains a variety of activities that create<br />

learning situations to develop students' values and<br />

sports culture.<br />

Always<br />

Sometimes<br />

Never


The Web Quest<br />

N<br />

Statement<br />

Always<br />

Sometimes<br />

Never<br />

N<br />

Statement<br />

Always<br />

Sometimes<br />

Never<br />

II. The Implementation Skills<br />

1 Escort students from class to the field.<br />

2 Finishes the administrative work on time so as not to<br />

affect the actual time of other parts of the lesson.<br />

3 Begins the actual performance of the lesson at the<br />

beginning of the period.<br />

4 Follows the regulative methods\Keeps order while<br />

assigning activities.<br />

5 The warm-up activities suit the objectives put for them.<br />

6 Models and performs the skill effectively and precisely<br />

in a way that suits students' age level.<br />

7 The alternative tools used are appropriate for learning<br />

motor skills.<br />

8 The available formation suites the learning style of the<br />

motor skill.<br />

9 Provides students with opportunities to guess.<br />

10 Stands where all students can easily see.<br />

11 Creates opportunities for application to make the most<br />

of his instructional time.<br />

12 Uses equipments appropriately in a way that helps<br />

students learn motor skills effectively.<br />

13 Avoids long pauses during the implementation of the<br />

lesson.<br />

14 Takes into consideration the principles of teaching<br />

motor skills while presenting the target skill.<br />

15 Carries out formations in an aesthetic manner.<br />

16 Smoothly moves among activities without having to<br />

stop as if the lesson is a total unit.<br />

17 Demonstrates mastery in manipulating the aiding<br />

media sets.<br />

18 Specifies an organizational method in distributing<br />

tools among students.<br />

19 Determines the location of students' entry onto the<br />

court to guarantee the principle of security and safety.<br />

20 Moves through and among students during the<br />

implementation of the activities in a way that allows<br />

him to note the performance of each student.<br />

21 Speaks in a clear and expressive manner so that all<br />

students hear him\her.<br />

22 Uses the appropriate reinforcement techniques that<br />

encourage students' performance.<br />

23 Sticks to the prepared lesson plan.<br />

24 Properly uses the whistle when needed.<br />

25 Makes good use of the spaces and gaps in the court<br />

taking into account safety and security factors.<br />

26 Distributes his attention among all students during the<br />

implementation of the lesson.<br />

27 Always there for the students while performing a<br />

difficult skill that might be dangerous for them.<br />

28 Vary his voice pitch according to the learning situation.<br />

29 Demonstrates effective body gestures or facial<br />

expressions to draw the attention of his\her students.<br />

30 Establishes a good rapport and an effective interaction<br />

and communication with the students.<br />

31 Uses proper and well-mannered expressions to<br />

speak with the students.<br />

32 Encourages behaved behaviors of students.<br />

33 Motivates students to participate in the activities of<br />

the lesson.<br />

34 Shows sharpness and firmness in both observing and<br />

managing different learning situations.<br />

35 Provides students with some educational situations<br />

that develop their personal qualities and values.<br />

36 Focuses on the previous educational experiences and<br />

makes use of them in teaching the new intended<br />

educational experiences.<br />

37 Takes into consideration the individual differences<br />

among students during the implementation of the<br />

activities.<br />

38 Employs the surrounding environment for the<br />

implementation of the activities.<br />

39 Uses modern teaching techniques that provide<br />

opportunities for students to self-assess their<br />

performance.<br />

40 Varies his\her teaching techniques to avoid boredom.<br />

41 Capable of demonstrating high self-control towards<br />

the popping up of situations.<br />

42 Utilizes exercises correctly and in accordance with<br />

the rules.<br />

43 Presents the material according to the level of each<br />

learner.<br />

44 Maximizes time-on-task for practicing different skills,<br />

taking into account the performance and rest periods.<br />

45 Creates opportunities for students' innovation and<br />

creativity through the competitive nature of the<br />

activities.<br />

46 Is organized in collecting tools and equipment<br />

immediately after the lesson and before students<br />

leave the court.<br />

III. The Evaluation Skill<br />

47 Uses the appropriate evaluation techniques to<br />

measure the objectives.<br />

48 Uses a variety of evaluation techniques<br />

(e.g. Observation Sheets and Level of performance<br />

records).<br />

49 Discovers individual and group mistakes and<br />

corrects them immediately.<br />

50 Provides opportunities for peer-assessment so that<br />

students evaluate each others' performance.<br />

51 Comprehensive evaluation of the lesson objectives to<br />

include cognitive, psychomotor and affective domains.<br />

52 Capable of diagnosing students with learning<br />

difficulties.<br />

53 Keeps reports on his\her students' level of<br />

performance for future diagnosis and assessment.<br />

54 Evaluates each phase of the lesson after finishing<br />

its presentation.<br />

!<br />

volume 5, issue 1 15


Podcasting in Physical Education<br />

Teacher Education<br />

by Mike McNeill, Swarup Mukherjee & Gurmit Singh, National<br />

Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University,<br />

Singapore<br />

Abstract<br />

This paper assesses the role of podcasting in a postgraduate<br />

physical education teacher education (PETE) program. Twice<br />

weekly podcasts reflecting student teachers’ participation in<br />

a games education module were made available shortly after<br />

instruction. Podcasting was used to enhance the social, emotional<br />

and pedagogical dimensions of games for these students. After 12<br />

weeks of instruction, feedback on the intervention was provided<br />

through completion of a short survey. The survey was followed by<br />

a focus group interview involving a randomly selected group of six.<br />

Findings revealed that the majority rated podcasts highly in terms<br />

of being educationally helpful, conceptually enriching, and ‘worth<br />

looking forward to’. Postgraduates also suggested that podcasting<br />

substantially supported preparing for tests and examinations,<br />

strengthened the teacher-student relationship, and had the potential<br />

to develop the physical education (PE) curriculum in schools. The<br />

preliminary results for games learning in PE were promising.<br />

Key words: ICT, pedagogy, game-play<br />

As Information Communication Technology (ICT) takes an<br />

ever increasing role in our everyday lives, educators are challenged<br />

to make this a reality in the pedagogy of the 21st Century. Can<br />

Physical Education (PE) afford to avoid making this leap of faith,<br />

is a question that confronts the profession. While students become<br />

more internet savvy in their day-to-day existence, PE has to grapple<br />

with such technological advances to maintain its relevance in<br />

their lives. How can technological advances be achieved without<br />

compromising the key domains of fitness, performance and sport?<br />

Several internet facilities such as online discussion boards<br />

that involve discourse analysis, assignment drop-boxes, and the<br />

role of urls for selecting appropriate websites are familiar ways<br />

of enhancing Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE).<br />

However, these technologies may not be going far enough!<br />

Although some research on the role of ICT in education has been<br />

published (Abt & Barry, 2007; Campbell, 2005; Lazzari, 2009;<br />

Malan, 2007), a literature search revealed that little has been<br />

conducted in the domain of PE.<br />

Of the many technological resources available, podcasting has<br />

emerged as a teaching and learning tool that is easy to deliver and<br />

has the convenience of access. However, the related literature<br />

suggests some ambiguity about the efficacy of podcasting. On<br />

one hand podcasts were seen as unpopular (Cann, 2007), without<br />

significantly affecting learning (Abt & Barry, 2007; Deal, 2007),<br />

while on the other they were reported to be supportive (Evans, 2007;<br />

Malan, 2007). Evans and Malan claimed that students’ feedback<br />

was more enthusiastic about this medium than traditional methods<br />

and Kutz, Fenwick, and Ellsworth (2007) stated that final grades<br />

improved significantly. As it is common knowledge that students<br />

learn in different ways, the auditory experience of podcasting<br />

offers another avenue for learning (Honey & Mumford, 2006).<br />

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore and evaluate<br />

the social, emotional and pedagogical efficacy of podcasting as a<br />

potential enhancement for PE in teacher education.<br />

Podcasting was added on top of all the normal pedagogical<br />

deliverables (such as lesson notes, lesson discussion and debriefing)<br />

in a foundation course called ‘Principles of Games’. The course<br />

promoted an understanding of tactical awareness through a variety<br />

of different game-play experiences for student teachers to translate<br />

into suitable content for pupils in schools. Aspects of curriculum<br />

models such as Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU: Thorpe<br />

& Bunker, 1986), Game Sense (den Duyn, 1997), Games Concept<br />

Approach (GCA: CPDD, 1999), Play-practice (Launder, 2001)<br />

and Sport Education (Siedentop, Hastie & van der Mars, 2004)<br />

were introduced to a new cohort of PE professionals.<br />

Principles of play, as well as creatively designed packages for<br />

invasion clusters, were experienced by the student teachers with the<br />

average child in mind. In the ‘Developmental Hockey’ component,<br />

for example, a range of options from deck hockey (using dusters<br />

and quoits) to puckball (a fusion of ice hockey and floorball played<br />

on an indoor wooden court) and culminating with field hockey<br />

allowed students to experience a much wider range of activity<br />

and game play within a hockey cluster. Similarly, ‘Developmental<br />

Rugby’ explored variants of the code through sogger (a mixture of<br />

rugby and soccer), buntball (a fusion of Speedball with modified<br />

Aussie Rules), and ended with touch rugby. Whereas the ‘hockey’<br />

exposure featured small-sidedness as an important pedagogical<br />

feature, the ‘rugby’ experience used larger numbers, but included<br />

several balls simultaneously in play. Sogger, for example,<br />

began with nine balls (eight soccer and one rugby), and reduced<br />

incrementally to three rugby balls, then one.<br />

A 2009 Nielsen Media Index survey (The Media Group, 2009)<br />

of internet behaviors declared that “Singaporeans are [sic] more<br />

wired up than ever,” especially Generation Y, whose age range<br />

(15-29) covers the majority of the participants involved in this<br />

study. Nielsen reported that 53% of Generation Y participated<br />

in social networking portals, such as podcasts, compared to 20%<br />

of generation X (30-44 years old). This statistic indicated a good<br />

match between the internet behavior of the postgraduates in the<br />

study and the technology being evaluated.<br />

Method<br />

Podcast – the Instrument<br />

A 36-hour foundation course, Principles of Games, was taught<br />

twice a week with a single and a double hour combination of<br />

intensely practical lessons. After each lesson, a podcast was<br />

generated using a script of the salient pedagogical features that<br />

were implemented, discussed or alluded to in class. The script was<br />

enhanced with commentary based on the teacher’s observations of<br />

16 Journal of Research


Podcasting in PETE<br />

individual as well as group performance or critical incidents that<br />

occurred during play. Issues, anomalies and questions that arose in<br />

the post-lesson debrief were also included in the podcast summary<br />

to add a sense of humor, déjà-vu and relevance to the context, as<br />

well as a source of “deepening” (Lazzari, 2009, p. 29).<br />

Delivery<br />

Although the process of publication was somewhat timeconsuming,<br />

this inconvenience was tempered by the knowledge<br />

that the podcasts would become more-or-less a permanent<br />

resource for faculty as well as students. The podcasts, ranging in<br />

time from three minutes, 45 seconds to seven minutes for every<br />

session, were available within a day of the practical and forwarded<br />

to the students’ e-mail accounts. ‘Audacity’ was the software used<br />

to capture the commentary and this was converted into an audiofile<br />

by Posterous.com. This system was relatively smooth, was<br />

easy to use and was proven to deliver very good quality sound. To<br />

attract attention to each podcast a separate group sms (text) was<br />

simultaneously delivered to the students’ cell phones.<br />

Participants<br />

The participants were first year PETE students in a Postgraduate<br />

diploma program. The student cohort was divided into<br />

two equal groups of 20: One group became the experimental<br />

group and the other the control group. Each group had a different<br />

teacher, but both teachers, who had taught this course together<br />

previously, used the same course outline and sequence, materials<br />

and resources. The role of the podcasts was initially explained to<br />

the experimental group simply as an enhancement, in addition to<br />

the normal course materials and tutorials that both groups would<br />

receive. The experimental group participants were requested to<br />

protect the podcast content as a private arrangement.<br />

Survey and Focus-Group Interview<br />

After the end of course test, the experimental group was<br />

subsequently invited to attend a briefing to further describe the<br />

intervention and complete a survey. The survey was administered<br />

by a neutral faculty member, not a part of the cohort instruction or<br />

program administration, nor directly known to the students. The<br />

students were briefed about the purpose of the survey and informed<br />

that it was voluntary (they could withdraw at any time without<br />

penalty) as well as confidential (no names were submitted). All of<br />

the students were able to provide consent (over the age of 21) and<br />

were capable of making this decision without any duress.<br />

After the survey was completed, the same faculty member<br />

randomly selected a group of six (every third member on the<br />

class roster) for a focus group interview. This whole process of<br />

completing the survey and interview was managed in less than<br />

an hour. The survey included 17 questions, many using a fivepoint<br />

Likert scale, with several seeking clarification of the graded<br />

response.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Survey Findings<br />

A significant majority of postgraduates (80%) were not<br />

receiving any ICT support in PE beyond this course. <strong>No</strong> other<br />

course was engaging the students in blogging or podcasting and<br />

only one respondent mentioned access to a website in another<br />

game-related module, reinforcing the paucity of ICT in PETE<br />

practical instruction. Everyone (100%) listened to the podcast<br />

alone, not with friends or in groups, and the majority (70%)<br />

listened to them at home. The other major engagement away from<br />

home was while driving or exercising (25%). When asked about<br />

the convenience aspect of listening to the podcast, there was almost<br />

an even distribution between tuning in ‘the same week’ (45%) and<br />

listening ‘over the weekend’ (55%).<br />

The lowest response on quantity of podcast access was ‘half’<br />

(5%), whereas just over a third (35%) said ‘many’, and the<br />

majority (60%) reported listening to ‘every single one’ of them.<br />

This question produced an M=4.6 on a five-point Likert scale and<br />

resonated with Lazzari’s (2009, p. 33) study which referenced the<br />

commitment and ‘high level of engagement within the podcasting<br />

project’.<br />

The media delivery platform (Audacity) was rated M=4.5 on a<br />

5-point Likert scale: good (10%), very good (30%) and excellent<br />

(60%). The audio quality was similarly rated as M=4.4 (good,<br />

10%; very good, 40%; excellent, 50%).<br />

From a social and emotional perspective, the postgraduates were<br />

asked to rate the podcasts from ‘irritating’ (1) to ‘worth looking<br />

forward to’ (5) and the results indicated that 10% were ‘neutral’<br />

(3) about this question, 60% found them ‘enjoyable’ (4) and 30%<br />

reported that the podcasts were ‘worth looking forward to’ (5:<br />

M=4.2). On a similar scale ranging from ‘awful’ (1) to ‘awesome’<br />

(5), a quarter of the postgraduates (25%) responded about the<br />

content as ‘satisfactory’ (3), half (50%) as ‘really interesting’ (4)<br />

and the remaining quarter as ‘awesome’ (5: M= 4.0).<br />

When asked if the material was educationally helpful: 15%<br />

responded with ‘OK’ (3), 50% with ‘very helpful’ (4), and 40%<br />

as ‘exceptionally helpful’ (5: M= 4.5). The most popular response<br />

from the postgraduates revolved around the aspect of consolidation,<br />

reiteration, and reinforcement. The second most popular response<br />

suggested that the podcasts were important for reflection, as the<br />

lessons were very dynamic with an intense pace that presented<br />

insufficient time to spontaneously internalize everything that was<br />

happening or why! Thirdly, in agreement with Lazzari’s (2009)<br />

finding, the podcasts are perennial and offer convenient access<br />

at anytime and as such were invaluable as resources before<br />

tests or exams. Some stated that the podcasts were beneficial<br />

for visualizing the content as well as for elaborating on the key<br />

teaching/pedagogical inputs: in Lazzari’s words (2009, p. 31) they<br />

had a ‘positive impact on their learning process and reduced their<br />

stress before the exam.” Arising from this, other respondents felt<br />

that the podcasts would be of significant value during a teaching<br />

practicum (TP) as they could act as a constant reminder of what,<br />

how, where and when to enact the principles of game play.<br />

To investigate the impact of podcasting on learning, an<br />

independent t-test was conducted on the grades from both the<br />

experimental as well as the control group. SPSS17 found no<br />

significant difference between the two groups in overall marks (t=<br />

-3.162, df 38, p =.650), or test scores (t= -.963, df38, p =.883),<br />

whereas there was a significant difference in the assignment marks<br />

(t= -5.839, df 38, p=.011). Although the final grade statistic would<br />

suggest agreement with Deal’s (2007) finding of no measurable<br />

improvement, the assignment statistic, which supports Evans<br />

volume 5, issue 1 17


Podcasting in PETE<br />

(2007) finding of grade improvement, may have nothing to relate<br />

to podcasting, but leaves the door open for further investigation of<br />

this effect.<br />

Intermittent anecdotes arising from questions and opinions<br />

expressed during lesson debriefing or from class performances<br />

and/or idiosyncracies observed during class made the podcasts<br />

more personal and alluring. All of the students (100%) reported<br />

that the podcasts accurately represented what they had experienced<br />

and were consequently authentic resources for them.<br />

In relation to a question about learning, where the podcast<br />

contributed to an extension of ‘game-sense’ or ‘increased<br />

understanding’, 5% reported ‘not much’ (2), 10% were ‘neutral’<br />

(3), 45% said ‘a little’ (4) and 40% reported ‘a great deal’ (5: M=<br />

4.2). More than half (60%) reported that the material added a<br />

valuable element of pedagogical content knowledge (M= 4.5) and<br />

65% suggested that the podcasts would be useful to them in the<br />

future as PE teachers (M= 4.6). Finally, as an overall rank of the<br />

podcasting experience on a 10 point scale, the postgraduates gave<br />

podcasting a resounding thumbs up (7=15%; 8=20%; 9=40%;<br />

10=25%: M= 8.75).<br />

As a summary, the postgraduates were asked how the podcasting<br />

procedure could be improved and there were some useful and<br />

interesting comments: 40% said the podcasts were ‘fine as they<br />

were’ and could not be improved, whereas 15% suggested that<br />

‘blogs’ for class discussion could be promoted intermittently, but<br />

not regularly. As the podcast was challenging to digest in one<br />

sitting, it was suggested that making a hard copy of the podcast<br />

notes available would make this experience even more rewarding.<br />

One respondent further suggested that posting on i-tunes would<br />

be “Cooler”, while another suggested that podcasting would be a<br />

tremendous aid for PE examinations in schools.<br />

Focus Group Interview<br />

The Focus Group Interview strongly reinforced the survey<br />

findings. While mindful of a ‘Hawthorne’ (Gillespie, 1991) or<br />

‘Rosenthal’ effect (Rosenthal & Jacobsen, 1968), the group<br />

members were consistently unanimous throughout, except for one<br />

suggestion to ‘cluster’ several podcasts of a similar nature together.<br />

This opinion was over ruled by the others, who commented on the<br />

unique and diverse nature of each lesson, suggesting a danger that<br />

valuable commentary may be overlooked.<br />

Podcasts were helpful for diverse learners as not everyone<br />

rationalized their learning and understanding from the same<br />

perspective, and they contributed significantly to everyone’s<br />

memory bank regardless of disposition. Customization of the<br />

commentary to the class allowed different people to refocus their<br />

principles and values in light of the bigger picture of a games<br />

education, something not always achieved in a conventional<br />

pedagogy. Similarly, tailoring the content added extra meaning<br />

at an individual level as this provided an opportunity to present<br />

comments that were unique to the class being taught. As the content<br />

was not generalized for mass consumption, the podcast became<br />

more personal, was greatly appreciated and constituted part of the<br />

‘worth looking forward to’ dimension.<br />

In view of constraints such as time, the podcast was reportedly<br />

a convenient means of reflection that afforded the opportunity<br />

to reinforce learning through the concepts taught, as well as<br />

18 Journal of Research<br />

the opportunity to expand on them. This served an even more<br />

important function for students who were absent from class or<br />

who were engaged in external training (athletic) development<br />

programs. One group member even stated that s/he became<br />

too reliant on the podcasts to the detriment of the other course<br />

materials. The group was unanimous about the impact of podcasts<br />

for examination revision and how significant they were in this<br />

process. Access ‘while driving’ and ‘when exercising’ were also<br />

mentioned as positive features of the versatility and convenience of<br />

this technology-‘anywhere, anytime’ was the anthem reverberating<br />

around the forum.<br />

The Focus Group interviewees were unanimously of the opinion<br />

that podcasting strengthened the teacher-student relationship and<br />

was therefore indispensible. The group believed podcasting was<br />

an excellent way to interact with students beyond the classroom<br />

and had potential for developing the PE curriculum in schools.<br />

As there was some concern communicated about the access and<br />

availability some pupils might experience, some reservations<br />

about disadvantage were expressed. There was also a question of<br />

managing such a resource when regular PE classes in Singapore<br />

have 40 or more pupils. As each teacher has multiple classes per day,<br />

podcasting will require logistical scrutiny and careful evaluation to<br />

achieve a satisfactory level of feasibility. There might also be a<br />

dissonance in many schools where pupils are not examined in PE,<br />

and the ‘why do we have to think in PE’ brigade would represent<br />

a challenge to be convinced of podcasting’s purpose and value.<br />

Finally, one postgraduate suggested that a compilation of podcasts<br />

and other technological resources in the form of a cd/dvd would<br />

be a wonderful souvenir for a pupil at the end of an academic<br />

year or the end of a school program. This memento would act as<br />

a testament to the experiences acquired, as well as the knowledge<br />

and values espoused, during their PE life in school.<br />

Conclusion and Recommendations<br />

Podcasting was acknowledged by this postgraduate population,<br />

as a significant qualitative success in terms of social, emotional<br />

and pedagogical enhancement. As a technological tool podcasting<br />

provided individual convenience and promoted a strong bond with<br />

the teacher. However, more investigation is necessary to establish<br />

a stronger association to ‘learning’, as this would still appear to<br />

be unclear. Lazzari (2009) used podcasts as a student assessment<br />

tool and this represents a clear extension to the present pedagogy,<br />

taking the form of a regular discourse analysis. Although examining<br />

podcasting for grades is a possible consideration in the future, this<br />

could easily impact on the strong social and emotional dimensions<br />

of engagement that were an outcome of this intervention; and, at<br />

the time of the study direct assessment was not an intended purpose<br />

of its efficacy.<br />

References<br />

Abt, G., & Barry, T. (2007). The quantitative effect of students using<br />

podcast in a first year undergraduate exercise physiology module.<br />

Bioscience Education e-journal, 10-8.<br />

Campbell, G. (2005). There’s something in the air: Podcasting in education,<br />

EDUCAUSE Review, 40(6), 33-46.<br />

Cann, A. J. (2007). Podcasting is dead. Long live video! Bioscience<br />

Education e-journal, 10-c1.<br />

Curriculum Planning and Development Division (1999). Revised physical


Podcasting in PETE<br />

education syllabus for primary, secondary & pre-university levels.<br />

Ministry of Education, Singapore.<br />

Deal, A. (2007). Podcasting. In Teaching with technologies papers.<br />

Carnegie Mellon University. Retrieved from: http:// www.cmu.<br />

edu/teaching/resources/PublicationsArchives/StudiesWhitepapers/<br />

Podcasting_Jun07.pdf<br />

den Duyn, N. (1997). Game sense: Developing thinking players. Canberra,<br />

Australian 21 Sports Commission.<br />

Evans, C. (2007). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast<br />

revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education, 50(2),<br />

491-498.<br />

Gillespie, R. (1991). Manufacturing knowledge: A history of the Hawthorne<br />

experiments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.<br />

Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (2006). Learner’s styles helper’s guide.<br />

Maidenhead, UK: Peter Honey.<br />

Kutz, B. L., Fenwick, J. B., & Ellsworth, C. C. (2007). Using podcasts and<br />

tablet PCs in computer science. In Proceedings of the 45 th annual ACM<br />

Southeast regional conference. Winston-Salem, NC, USA.<br />

Launder, A. G. (2001). Play Practice: The games approach to teaching<br />

and coaching sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.<br />

Lazzari, M. (2009). Creative use of podcasting in higher education and its<br />

effect on competitive agency, Computers & Education, 52, 27-34.<br />

Malan, D. (2007). Podcasting computer science E-1. In Proceedings of<br />

the 38 th ACM technical symposium on computer science education<br />

(SIGCSE ’07). Covington, KY, USA.<br />

Metzler, M. W. (2005). Instructional models for physical education (2nd<br />

ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway.<br />

Rosenthal, R., & Jacobsen, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom:<br />

Teacher expectations and pupils’ intellectual development. New York,<br />

NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.<br />

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new<br />

reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.<br />

Siedentop, D., Hastie, P., & van der Mars, H. (2004). Complete guide to<br />

sport education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.<br />

The Media Group, Nielsen Media Index. Weekend Today (24-25 October,<br />

2009) Nielsen Company, Singapore.<br />

Thorpe, R., & Bunker, D. (1986). Landmarks on our way to ‘Teaching<br />

for Understanding’. In R. Thorpe, D. Bunker, & L. Almond (Eds.)<br />

Rethinking Games Teaching (pp.5-6) Loughborough: University of<br />

Technology. !<br />

volume 5, issue 1 19


Validating Pedometer-based Physical Activity<br />

Time against Accelerometer in Middle School<br />

Physical Education<br />

by Zan Gao, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX; Amelia M. Lee,<br />

Melinda A. Solmon, Maria Kosma, Russell L. Carson, Louisiana<br />

State University, Baton Rouge, LA; Tao Zhang, University of <strong>No</strong>rth<br />

Texas, Denton, TX; Elizabeth Domangue and Delilah Moore,<br />

Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA<br />

Abstract<br />

The purpose of this study was to validate physical activity time<br />

in middle school physical education as measured by pedometers in<br />

relation to a criterion measure, namely, students’ accelerometerdetermined<br />

moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA).<br />

Participants were 155 sixth to eighth graders participating in<br />

regularly scheduled physical education classes from a suburban<br />

public school. Physical activity levels were measured by Yamax<br />

pedometers and Actical accelerometers. Descriptive analyses were<br />

conducted to calculate steps per minute (SPM) for pedometers and<br />

time engaged in MVPA (TMVPA) and percentage of time engaged<br />

in MVPA (PMVPA) for accelerometers, respectively. Correlation<br />

analyses yielded that SPM were positively and significantly related<br />

to TMVPA and PMVPA. Additionally, the percentage of agreement<br />

and modified kappa between SPM and PMVPA were .45 and .24,<br />

respectively. In conclusion, pedometer-based SPM is a valid tool<br />

to survey physical activity time against accelerometers.<br />

Key words: moderate to vigorous physical activity, physical<br />

activity levels, steps per minute<br />

The number of children and adolescents in the United States who<br />

are overweight and obese has dramatically increased. Specifically,<br />

the percentage of female children and adolescents who are<br />

overweight has increased dramatically from 13.8% in 1999-2000<br />

to 16.0% in 2003-2004. Similarly, the percentage of male children<br />

and adolescents who are overweight has increased from 14.0% to<br />

18.2% during the same period (Ogden et al., 2006). The increased<br />

levels of overweight and obesity among children and adolescents<br />

are partly related to decreased levels of activity (Levin, McKenzie,<br />

Hussey, Kelder, & Lytle, 2001; Ogden et al., 2006). Children’s<br />

physical activity levels tend to decline during the developmental<br />

years, especially during middle school (Parish & Treasure, 2003).<br />

For example, 61.5% of children aged 9-13 years do not participate<br />

in any organized extracurricular physical activities, and 22.6% of<br />

them do not engage in any free time physical activity (Centers for<br />

Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2003; U.S. Department of<br />

Health and Human Services [USDHHS], 1996). Although decline<br />

of physical activity in middle school years has been evident,<br />

carefully designed research can assist teachers to develop strategies<br />

that will reverse this trend and create a culture that values physical<br />

activity and realizes its full benefits.<br />

Nearly all adolescents in school settings can participate in<br />

physical activity through physical education programs for health<br />

and wellness (e.g., maintaining healthy body composition) (Levin<br />

20 Journal of Research<br />

et al., 2001; Simons-Morton, O’Hara, Parcel, Baranowski, &<br />

Wilson, 1990; USDHHS, 1996; World Health Organization,<br />

1996). Given that physical activity during adolescence tracks<br />

into adulthood to a certain degree, and the fact that an important<br />

health objective of Healthy People <strong>2010</strong> is to promote students’<br />

active participation in physical education classes to at least 50%<br />

of the class time (USDHHS, 2000), structured physical education<br />

programs represent an important avenue to promote school-based<br />

physical activities of moderate-to-vigorous intensity (Simons-<br />

Morton et al., 1990). Accordingly, effectively delivering physical<br />

education to school children becomes extremely imperative among<br />

physical educators. The ability to accurately measure physical<br />

activity levels in physical education class and classify these levels<br />

would facilitate an evaluation of the effectiveness of structured<br />

physical education programs.<br />

To date, several different instruments for the assessment<br />

of physical activity levels exist. Self-report physical activity<br />

instruments have been scarcely used among children because of<br />

such limitations as high cognitive demanding for children and the<br />

sporadic nature of children’s physical activity. Direct observation is<br />

considered one excellent way to assess children’s physical activity<br />

behavior (Kohl, Fulton, & Caspersen, 2000; Scruggs, Beveridge, &<br />

Clocksin, 2005; Sirard & Pate, 2001). However, direct observation<br />

in physical education settings is cumbersome because it is costly<br />

and it requires high expertise and long measurement time periods<br />

(Scruggs et al., 2005; Sirard & Pate, 2001). Heart rate monitors<br />

have been widely used to measure physical activity in physical<br />

education because of the linear relationship between heart rate and<br />

energy expenditure during steady-state exercise (Stratton, 1996).<br />

However, they are unable to accurately distinguish between light<br />

and moderate-intensity activities and record frequency of activity<br />

within a limited time frame (Hands, Parker, & Larkin, 2006).<br />

The accuracy of heart rate monitors can also be affected by such<br />

environmental factors as temperature, heat, and humidity.<br />

As motion sensors, pedometers and accelerometers are<br />

considered practical, objective, and valid assessments of<br />

physical activity (Sirard & Pate, 2001). These instruments have<br />

advantages such as minimal participant and experimenter burden<br />

for the researchers; being unobtrusive to the subjects; and being<br />

comfortable and acceptable for the subjects to wear. Pedometers<br />

count the number of steps an individual takes by lifting the lever arm<br />

mechanically or electrically or using a piezoelectric strain gauge<br />

(e.g., New Lifestyles NL-1000). Accelerometers are designed to<br />

assess total ambulatory activity levels and thus they provide an<br />

estimate of energy expenditure (Ainsworth, 2000; Bassett, 2000;<br />

Westerterp, 1999). Pedometers are less expensive (approximately<br />

$20-$50) than accelerometers (e.g., approximately $100-$500),<br />

they can measure the number of steps during a designated time<br />

period, record distance, and provide estimated calories. In<br />

comparison, accelerometers can provide very detailed information


Middle School Physical Activity<br />

regarding the intensity (sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous)<br />

of time spent at different intensity levels, and estimated energy<br />

expenditure. In general, these motion sensors can accurately<br />

measure physical activity among children in real world settings<br />

(e.g., physical education). However, they are not efficient to<br />

capture activity levels during such activities as stationary cycling<br />

and weightlifting (Freedson & Miller, 2000; Sirard & Pate, 2001).<br />

<strong>No</strong>wadays, the pedometer has been utilized as an activity<br />

surveillance tool in physical education as it holds the most<br />

promise for implementation due to validity, cost, and practicality<br />

(e.g., daily use) (Scruggs, 2007a, 2007b). Most recently, Scruggs<br />

and colleagues have established a pedometer steps per minute<br />

(SPM) guideline to quantify students’ time engaged in physical<br />

activity in physical education (Scruggs, 2007a, 2007b; Scruggs,<br />

Beveridge, Eisenman, Watson, Schultz, & Ransdell, 2003;<br />

Scruggs, Beveridge, Watson, & Clocksin, 2005). In particular,<br />

these scholars have quantified the minimum SPM values indicating<br />

50% of the lesson time in physical activity. Specifically, Scruggs<br />

and colleagues examined the number of pedometer-based steps<br />

equivalent to one third of the lesson time first through sixth-grade<br />

students engaged in during physical activity and determined 58-<br />

63 SPM was an accurate indicator. Using the lesson time of 42 to<br />

50 minutes, Scruggs et. al. (2007b) also specified a SPM interval<br />

of 82-88 for seventh and eighth graders to comply with the 50%<br />

physical activity recommendation. In their studies, pedometer<br />

SPM and duration recorded physical activity via the System for<br />

Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT) (McKenzie, Sallis,<br />

& Nader, 1999) have been found to relate strongly, r = .74 to .89.<br />

These empirically derived SPM indices across different grade<br />

levels set scientifically sound application of physical education<br />

physical activity guidelines for the researchers and practitioners<br />

in the field. However, the validity of the pedometer-based physical<br />

activity outputs (e.g., SPM) against criterion measures remains<br />

largely unexplored. Further research in this area of inquiry is<br />

highly warranted.<br />

Researchers have demonstrated that accelerometer-determined<br />

physical activity levels had a higher correlation with VO 2<br />

max<br />

scores than heart rate- or pedometer-determined physical activity<br />

levels among school children (Eston, Rowlands, & Ingledew,<br />

1998; Louie et al., 1999). Accelerometer-determined physical<br />

activity levels have been marginally better correlated with physical<br />

activity scores measured by direct observation than with heart<br />

rate-determined physical activity levels among young children<br />

(Scruggs, Beveridge, & Clocksin, 2005). Furthermore, due to the<br />

intrusiveness of direct observation, unreliability of self-report<br />

measures, the complexity of heart rate analysis, and limited outputs<br />

of the pedometer, accelerometers have gained in popularity and<br />

have been recommended as a valid and practical tool to measure<br />

physical activity levels (Puyau, Adolph, Vohra, Zakeri & Butte,<br />

2004; Sirard & Pate, 2001). Indeed, many researchers consider it<br />

a criterion against which other measures of physical activity can<br />

be validated (Behrens, Hawkins, & Dinger, 2005; Ward, Evenson,<br />

Vaughn, Rodges, & Troiano, 2005). Therefore, in the present<br />

study the Actical accelerometer was used as the criterion measure<br />

because it uses an omnidirectional sensor that may capture some<br />

activities not typically well assessed by accelerometer. Actical<br />

accelerometer contains a cantilevered rectangular piezo-electric<br />

bimorph plate and seismic mass, which is sensitive to movement<br />

in all directions. Its sensitivity allows for detection of sedentary<br />

movements as well as high intensity movements (Puyau et al.,<br />

2004).<br />

To our knowledge, there is a need to examine the validity of the<br />

pedometer-based outputs against criterion measures in the field of<br />

physical activity. However, no data are available which validate<br />

pedometer outputs against accelerometer-determined physical<br />

activity concurrently in measuring children’s MVPA, especially in<br />

middle school physical education settings. Therefore, the purpose<br />

of the present study was to validate one pedometer output, SPM,<br />

as a measure of students’ physical activity using accelerometerdetermined<br />

MVPA as the criterion. SPM was validated against<br />

accelerometer-determined outputs including time engaged in<br />

MVPA (TMVPA) and percentage of time engaged in MVPA<br />

(PMVPA). It was hypothesized that SPM would correlate strongly<br />

with both TMVPA and PMVPA and be a significant and accurate<br />

measure of PMVPA.<br />

Method<br />

The Participants and Setting<br />

The participants were 225 sixth - eighth graders (112 boys,<br />

113 girls) enrolled in one public school in the Southern region of<br />

the United States. The typical class size was 30 to 35 students.<br />

Twenty-five students were randomly selected as participants for<br />

each class. In the present study, each grade level consisted of three<br />

intact classes, including 75 sixth graders, 75 seventh graders, and<br />

75 eighth graders, respectively. The majority of the participants<br />

were from families of middle to high socioeconomic status. The<br />

participants had a 90-minute physical education class taught by<br />

three certified physical education teachers on alternate days. Given<br />

the time allotted for dress change and roll check, approximately 60<br />

minutes was typically devoted to the physical education lesson.<br />

All the teachers had taught for more than 10 years and they shared<br />

the responsibility for the teaching assignments in the three classes<br />

of each grade. Permission to conduct this study was obtained from<br />

the university institutional review board, the school district, the<br />

principal, and the physical education teachers. Additionally, consent<br />

to participate in the study was obtained from all participants and<br />

their parents/guardians prior to the start of the study.<br />

When students arrived in the gym, the physical education<br />

teachers took attendance. Then the students participated in warmup,<br />

activities, and games. Typically, within each lesson component,<br />

students were introduced to the skills to be learned, organized for<br />

practice, and provided feedback when necessary. All classes ended<br />

with a closure to the lesson. The learning activities consisted of<br />

catch/kick ball (n = 66, n = participants), walking/jogging (n =<br />

25), line dance (n = 18), soccer (n = 29), and table tennis (n =<br />

17) during the time of data collection. Classes were held indoors<br />

for catch/kick ball, line dance, and table tennis and outdoors for<br />

walking/jogging and soccer. For the catch/kick ball, table tennis,<br />

and walking/jogging units, no formal instructions were given.<br />

However, in the line dance unit, students spent approximately 10<br />

minutes practicing. Additionally, it is important to note that students<br />

were divided into two or more groups of 8-9 students per squads<br />

based on their sex (single sex groups) after the warm-up in the<br />

soccer unit. For this unit, instructions and basic rules were given<br />

volume 5, issue 1 21


Middle School Physical Activity<br />

by the physical education teachers before the start of this study.<br />

Every 15 minutes, the squads switched side of the playing field. At<br />

the start of each class, the physical education teachers reinforced<br />

the game rules and then allowed the games to commence following<br />

the warm-up activities. As a result, no formal instruction was given<br />

throughout the class.<br />

Measures<br />

This study involved the simultaneous monitoring of physical<br />

activity by two objective instruments: (a) Yamax Digi-Walker SW-<br />

701 (Yamax Inc., Tokyo, Japan); and (b) Actical activity monitor<br />

(Mini-Mitter Co., Inc., Bend, OR). A total of 25 units of each<br />

instrument were used in this study, allowing all the participants<br />

in a class to be monitored simultaneously. Self-report information<br />

on sex, race, grade, age, height, and weight were also obtained to<br />

characterize the study sample.<br />

Pedometer. The Yamax Digi-Walker SW-701 has been shown<br />

to be an accurate pedometer for measuring adolescents’ physical<br />

activity levels in field settings (Scruggs, 2007a, 2007b; Scruggs,<br />

et al., 2005). This pedometer can record steps, calculate distance<br />

traveled on the basis of individual stride length, and estimate<br />

caloric expenditure on the basis of total body weight. In this<br />

study, only the step-count data were used. Before the initiation<br />

of data collection, the pedometers were validated. The validation<br />

followed Vincent and Sidman’s recommended procedure (2003).<br />

Specifically, the pedometer was shaken vertically 100 times and<br />

then the error between shaken and recorded steps was examined<br />

for each pedometer. Deviation from the 100 shakes for all<br />

pedometers was less than 5%. The validation demonstrated that<br />

the pedometers could provide accurate step counts. Pedometer step<br />

output was expressed as SPM, which was calculated by dividing<br />

the total number of steps taken in class by the duration of the class<br />

(Scruggs, et al., 2005). The students were advised to reset the<br />

pedometers to zero at the beginning of the warm-up, and turn in<br />

the pedometers at the end of the class.<br />

Accelerometer. The Actical accelerometer is one of the smallest<br />

accelerometers available (28 x 27 x 10 mm, 17 grams with a<br />

watch battery), and is also water resistant. In this study, the Actical<br />

devices were worn at each student’s hip, and recorded physical<br />

activity counts using 15-second epochs. The sampling frequency<br />

for the Actical devices was 32 Hz, and the sensitivity was 0.01<br />

g. The devices collected motions in the frequency range of 0.5-<br />

3.0 Hz. That is, voltage generated by the sensor is amplified and<br />

filtered by analog circuitry. The amplified and filtered voltage<br />

is passed into an analog to digital converter, and this process is<br />

repeated 32 times per second. The resulting one second value is<br />

divided by four, and then is added to an accumulated activity value<br />

for the epoch. Actical devices were programmed and downloaded<br />

by connecting the monitor to a serial port computer interface using<br />

ActiReaders. Once data were downloaded to the corresponding<br />

software, data files were exported into a Microsoft Excel format<br />

(Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA).<br />

Cut points established by Puyau et al. (2004) were applied to<br />

the data: (a) 0-99 counts per min. = sedentary; (b) 100-1499 counts<br />

per min. = light; and (c) ! 1500 counts per min. = moderate to<br />

vigorous physical activity. According to Puyau et al. (2004), optimal<br />

thresholds for classifying counts into sedentary, light, moderate<br />

and vigorous levels of physical activity have been determined<br />

22 Journal of Research<br />

by regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Data<br />

were categorized into sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous<br />

levels based upon the thresholds as follows: (a) sedentary level<br />

was defined as activity energy expenditure (AEE) less than .01<br />

kcal·kg -1·min -1 , encompassing physical activities of minimal body<br />

movements in the sitting or reclined position; (b) light level was<br />

set as AEE larger than .01 kcal·kg -1·min -1 and less than .04 kcal·kg -<br />

1·min -1 , reflecting a low level of exertion in the standing position;<br />

and (c) moderate and vigorous level was set at AEE larger than .04<br />

kcal·kg -1·min -1 , involving medium and high levels of exertion in<br />

the standing position. The Actical cut points were then calculated<br />

based on the AEE cutoffs and the prediction equations.<br />

Most recently, researchers have demonstrated acceptable validity<br />

and reliability of Actical activity monitors when used with children<br />

(Pfeiffer, McIver, Dowda, Almeida, & Pate, 2006; Puyau et al.,<br />

2004). For example, Puyau et al. (2004) validated Actical activity<br />

monitors as measures of children’s (7-18 yrs.) physical activity<br />

using energy expenditure as the criterion measure. They found<br />

that activity counts accounted for the majority of the variability in<br />

activity energy expenditure (as basal metabolic rate) and physical<br />

activity ratio (energy expenditure/basal metabolic rate), with small<br />

contributions of age, sex, weight, and height. Pfeiffer et al. (2006)<br />

also provided strong support for the validation for this monitor by<br />

revealing a high correlation (r = .89) between VO 2<br />

and activity<br />

counts.<br />

Given that longer epochs are unable to detect bursts of high<br />

activity counts (Nilsson, Ekelund, Yngve, & Sjöstrom, 2002)<br />

and the aims of this study, the Actical monitors were set to 15-<br />

second epochs in order to better capture the short bursts of activity<br />

typical of school children (Pfeiffer et al., 2006). In this study,<br />

students’ time engaged in MVPA (TMVPA) was used as the first<br />

outcome variable. The second outcome variable (i.e., percentage<br />

of time engaged in MVPA [PMVPA]) was quantified as the time<br />

students engaged in MVPA divided by the duration of the physical<br />

education class (Arnett & Lutz, 2003). These outcome variables<br />

were retrieved from the Actical outputs directly.<br />

Procedures<br />

Data collection took place during a typical instructional day<br />

for one physical education class. A schedule was coordinated with<br />

the physical education teachers for the data collection so as to not<br />

interrupt instructional time. One accelerometer and one pedometer<br />

were attached to the left side of students’ waistband, before the<br />

beginning of class. Each student was assigned an identification<br />

number which corresponded to the number on his or her waistband.<br />

The waistbands with the attached monitors (accelerometers and<br />

pedometers) were then distributed to students when the teachers<br />

were taking roll. The researchers helped the students wear the<br />

waistbands and verified that they fit closely around their waists.<br />

Then the students reset the pedometers to zero. At the end of<br />

each class, the students were told to return the accelerometers<br />

and pedometers to the start location by placing the waistband on<br />

the floor (i.e., visual cue to stop lesson time). Accelerometer and<br />

pedometer data were collected concurrently by synchronizing<br />

accelerometers. In other words, accelerometer time began with<br />

pedometer reset and concluded with waistband removal. In this<br />

way, all the data from the two objective instruments reflected an<br />

identical time frame.


Middle School Physical Activity<br />

Data Analyses<br />

Means and standard deviations were generated for age,<br />

body mass index (BMI), and physical activity measures (SPM,<br />

TMVPA, and PMVPA). Percentage statistics were calculated<br />

to describe the proportion of participants who achieved and did<br />

not achieve physical activity guideline compliance for SPM and<br />

PMVPA. Pearson product-moment correlations and coefficients of<br />

determination were used to determine the concurrent validity of the<br />

instruments for the total sample. The general cutoffs established<br />

for correlation coefficients were set as follows: above .76 is high,<br />

.51 to .75 is fair, .26 to .50 is moderate, and .25 and below are<br />

weak (Berg & Latin, 1994). Percentage of agreement and modified<br />

kappa (Landis & Koch, 1977) were obtained after dichotomizing<br />

the data for meeting or not meeting 50% of lesson time for SPM<br />

and PMVPA. According to Landis and Koch (1977), modified<br />

kappa value above .61 is substantial, .41 to .60 is moderate, .21<br />

to .40 is fair, and .20 and below are weak. All statistical analyses<br />

were performed using SPSS statistical software, version 13.0<br />

(SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).<br />

Results<br />

Univariate outliers were detected by transforming the data to z-<br />

scores. Following a recommendation of Stevens (1992), when the<br />

sample size is relatively large (e.g., n >100), any z value greater<br />

than + 4.00 or less than – 4.00 indicates an unlikely value and this<br />

extreme value should be considered an outlier. If the researcher<br />

determines that the extreme value was correctly entered and that<br />

the subject is simply different from the rest of the sample, then it is<br />

appropriate to drop the case from the analysis (Mertler & Vannatta,<br />

2005). In the present study, nine univariate outliers and 61 missing<br />

data were identified and excluded from the study. Therefore, the<br />

final sample size comprised 155 students (80 boys, 75 girls). The<br />

participants consisted of sixth (28.4%), seventh (34.8%), and<br />

eighth (36.8%) graders ranging in age from 10 to 14 years (M age<br />

= 12.52, SD = 1.02). The majority of the participants, 88.4%, were<br />

Caucasian, 7.7% were African American, 2.6% were Hispanic<br />

American, and 1.3% were Asian American. The average BMI was<br />

19.79 kg·m -2 , with a range of 14.01 kg·m -2 to 32.11 kg·m -2 .<br />

Table 1 shows the descriptive statistics for the whole sample.<br />

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics among Variables (N = 155)<br />

Minimum Maximum Mean SD<br />

age 10 14 12.48 1.01<br />

Body mass index 14.01 32.11 19.81 3.10<br />

Steps per minute 19.2 104.68 52.99 20.36<br />

Time in MVPA 2.00 57.00 39.96 10.29<br />

Percentage of<br />

time in sedentary .00 61.67 8.86 9.56<br />

Percentage of time<br />

in light intensity .00 58.33 24.25 11.83<br />

Percentage of<br />

time in MVPA 3.34 92.20 66.89 17.02<br />

<strong>No</strong>tes. SD = Standard Deviation.<br />

MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity.<br />

Overall, the students spent 66.89% of the class time engaged<br />

in MVPA as measured via accelerometer. Among them, 85.8% of<br />

the students spent more than 50% of the lesson time in MVPA. In<br />

addition, the physical education classes provided a mean MVPA<br />

for more than 50% of the class time for the students across all<br />

learning activities (i.e., catch/kick ball: 62.99%, walking/jogging:<br />

77.09%, line dance: 59.37%, soccer: 78.84%, and table tennis:<br />

54.63%). In terms of the pedometer SPM, 44.5% of the students<br />

achieved physical activity guideline established by Scruggs<br />

(2007a, 2007b).<br />

The relationship between SPM and PMVPA was significant (p<br />

< .01) and fair (r = .57). The pedometer data shared 32.49% of<br />

variance with PMVPA. Similarly, SPM was positively related to<br />

TMVPA (r = .55, p < .01), accounting for 30.25% of variance with<br />

TMVPA. After dichotomizing the SPM data for meeting or not<br />

meeting 50% of lesson time based on Scruggs’ physical activity<br />

guideline (Scruggs, 2007a, 2007b), the percentage of agreement<br />

and modified kappa between SPM and PMVPA were .45 and .24,<br />

respectively.<br />

Discussion<br />

Validating the assessment of the 50% of lesson time in MVPA<br />

recommendation using pedometers in middle school physical<br />

education was the primary purpose of this study. Students’<br />

accelerometer-based MVPA (TMVPA and PMVPA) were used<br />

as a criterion instead of physical activity time measured via<br />

direct observation. Evidence has shown a decline in students’<br />

physical activity levels across the middle school years (Aaron,<br />

Storti, Robertson, Kriska, & LaPorte, 2002; Parish & Treasure,<br />

2003), therefore there is a call for providing adequate schoolbased<br />

structured physical education for all middle school<br />

students (National Association for Sport and Physical Education<br />

[NASPE], 2000; USDHHS, 1996). Middle school students should<br />

accumulate enough physical activity to at least achieve the 50%<br />

physical education class time recommendation. In this study,<br />

85.5% of the students met or exceeded the 50% of the lesson<br />

time engaged in MVPA when the activities were assessed via<br />

accelerometer. Recently, Scruggs (2007b) reported that 68.9%<br />

of middle school students enrolled in physical education met the<br />

50% physical activity recommendation. Accordingly, this result of<br />

this study echoes the recommendations indicating that 50% of the<br />

physical education time should involve MVPA (CDC, 2004; Sallis<br />

& Patrick, 1994) and is consistent with recent research (Arnett &<br />

Lutz, 2003; Scruggs, 2007b).<br />

It is assumed that, if students accumulated more pedometer<br />

steps in class, they would be more physically active. In this<br />

study, the pedometer outcome variables (SPM) were consistently<br />

significantly and positively associated with TMVPA and PMVPA.<br />

That is, those students with higher SPM tended to engage more<br />

in MVPA in class. This finding is in line with recent studies<br />

indicating that pedometer outputs were positively and moderately<br />

related to accelerometer data (Behrens, Hawkins, & Dinger, 2005;<br />

Treuth et al., 2003). In addition, we dichotomized the SPM data<br />

for meeting or not meeting 50% of lesson time according to the<br />

physical activity guideline established by Scruggs (Scruggs,<br />

2007a, 2007b) and found that percentage of agreement and<br />

modified kappa between SPM and PMVPA was good. This<br />

volume 5, issue 1 23


Middle School Physical Activity<br />

finding indicates that the pedometer SPM guideline is valid to<br />

quantify students’ time engaged in MVPA in physical education.<br />

Taken together, the finding supports the notion that a pedometer<br />

is a valid assessment tool to measure school children’s physical<br />

activity levels (Kilanowski, Consalvi, & Epstein, 1999; Rowlands,<br />

Eston, & Ingledew, 1997). Given their low prices and easiness to<br />

use, pedometers have been extensively employed as a valid and<br />

practical tool for physical activity surveillance within the physical<br />

education context (Scruggs, et al., 2005).<br />

In this study, 45.5% of middle school students engaged in<br />

pedometer-determined MVPA for more than 50% of the lesson<br />

time using Scruggs’ guideline (Scruggs, 2007a, 2007b). It should<br />

also be noted that correlations between SPM and the criterion<br />

measures (.55 to .57) were slightly lower than those in Scruggs<br />

and colleagues’ studies (.74 to .89). We can speculate two<br />

explanations. First, when interpreting SPM results, Scruggs et al.<br />

(2005) suggested that application be made when physical education<br />

parameters of grade, lesson time, and learning content are similar.<br />

In their studies, 10 minutes of lesson time were used for elementary<br />

students, while 42-50 minutes were used for the middle school<br />

students (Scruggs, 2007a, 2007b; Scruggs et al., 2003; Scruggs, et<br />

al., 2005). However, in the present study 60 minutes of the lesson<br />

time was used which includes warm-up, activities, and games.<br />

Different lesson times might make a significant difference in terms<br />

of MVPA between studies. In addition, the learning content may<br />

also influence students’ MVPA in physical education (Fairclough<br />

& Stratton, 2006). In general, team-based invasion games (i.e.,<br />

soccer and football) usually promote relatively high MVPA levels.<br />

In Scruggs’ studies (2007a, 2007b), a large variety of activities<br />

such as basketball, speedball, archery, interval running, soccer,<br />

flag football, volleyball, ball exploration and routine, dance,<br />

floor hockey, hula-hoop exploration and routine, obstacle course,<br />

paddle birdie, and ultimate ball/Frisbee were utilized as learning<br />

contents for physical education classes. In this study, only five<br />

learning contents (catch/kick ball, walking/jogging, dance, soccer,<br />

and table tennis) were used which might result in different MVPA<br />

for students. Second, the criterion measures for Scruggs and<br />

colleagues’ studies and our study were different. Scruggs et al.<br />

(Scruggs, 2007a, 2007b; Scruggs et al., 2003; Scruggs, et al., 2005)<br />

used direct observation as the criterion measure to assess MVPA.<br />

Although the interrater coefficients have been substantiated in<br />

their studies, the MVPA generated from direct observation was<br />

subjective and sometimes inaccurate. In this study, we used the<br />

Actical accelerometer which can capture MVPA accurately and<br />

reliably. It is plausible that the use of different criterion measures<br />

might cause the different correlations between SPM and the<br />

criterion measures.<br />

In summary, the findings of this study support the supposition<br />

that pedometer-based SPM is a valid tool to survey the 50%<br />

physical activity recommendation in comparison to accelerometerdetermined<br />

MVPA in a middle school physical education setting. As<br />

expected, pedometer outcome variable (SPM) was a good indicator<br />

of school children’s MVPA in class. Because the pedometer is<br />

low cost, objective, and easy for researchers and teachers to use<br />

and implement, physical educators and health promoters can use<br />

pedometers to capture changes in physical activity levels (i.e.,<br />

MVPA) following different interventions in educational practice.<br />

24 Journal of Research<br />

Important study limitations, however, should be identified when<br />

interpreting the results. First, when the nature of physical activity<br />

cannot be captured by the pedometer, additional errors would occur<br />

in the estimation of time engaged in MVPA in physical education.<br />

Therefore, the pedometer SPM recommendations should not<br />

be applied when learning contents are activities that cannot be<br />

measured by pedometer (e.g., swimming, weight lifting, and rock<br />

climbing). Scruggs (2007a) has proposed that there is a need to<br />

develop a physical activity assessment tool which combines<br />

pedometer-assessed physical activity and self-report of activity<br />

content. In this way, the odds of misapplication of pedometer SPM<br />

recommendation in physical education can be decreased. Second,<br />

researchers (e.g., Stratton, 1996; Vincent & Pangrazi, 2002) have<br />

reported that students differ in their physical activity levels in<br />

physical education classes across different gender and age groups.<br />

However, the gender and age differences were not examined in this<br />

study. Future studies might focus on the moderate effects of gender<br />

and age on children’s MVPA in physical education. Additionally,<br />

only one middle school was used in this study. The participants<br />

came from middle to upper-middle class families and their ethnic/<br />

racial background was homogeneous. Future studies need to<br />

recruit a large number of diverse students (in both socioeconomic<br />

status and ethnicity/race) from multiple school sites to increase the<br />

generalizability of the findings.<br />

References<br />

Aaron, D.J., Storti, K.L., Robertson, R.J., Kriska, A.M., & LaPorte, R.E.<br />

(2002). Longitudinal study of the number and choice of leisure time<br />

physical activities from mid to late adolescence. Archives of Pediatric<br />

& Adolescent Medicine, 156, 1075-1080.<br />

Ainsworth, B. (2000). Practical assessment of physical activity. In K.A.<br />

Tritschler (Ed.), Barrow & McGee’s practical measurement and<br />

assessment (5th ed., pp. 475-492). Baltimore: Lippincott.<br />

Arnett, M.C., & Lutz, R.B. (2003). Measurement of moderate to vigorous<br />

physical activity of middle school girls, using Tritrac activity monitors<br />

during small-sided, game-based lessons. Measurement in Physical<br />

Education & Exercise Science, 7, 149-159.<br />

Bassett, D.R., Jr. (2000). Validity and reliability issues in objective<br />

monitoring of physical activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise &<br />

Sport, 71(Suppl.2), 30-36.<br />

Behrens, T.K., Hawkins, S.B., & Dinger, M.K. (2005). Relationship<br />

between objectively measured steps and time spent in physical<br />

activity among free-living college students. Measurement in Physical<br />

Education & Exercise Science, 9, 67-77.<br />

Berg, K. E., & Latin, R. W. (1994). Essentials of modern research methods<br />

in health, physical education, and recreation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:<br />

Prentice-Hall.<br />

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2003). Physical activity<br />

levels among children aged 9-13 years-United States, 2002. Morbidity<br />

& Mortality Weekly Report, 52(33), 785-788.<br />

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004). Surveillance<br />

summaries. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, 53(SS-4), 1-96.<br />

Eston, R.G., Rowlands, A.V., & Ingledew, D.K. (1998). Validity of heart<br />

rate, pedometry, and accelerometry for predicting the energy cost of<br />

children’s activities. Journal of Applied Physiology, 84, 362-371.<br />

Fairclough, S.J., & Stratton, G. (2006). A review of physical activity levels<br />

during elementary school physical education. Journal of Teaching in<br />

Physical Education, 25, 239-257.<br />

Freedson, P.S., & Miller, K. (2000). Objective monitoring of physical<br />

activity using motion sensors and heart rate. Research Quarterly for<br />

Exercise & Sport, 71, 21-29.<br />

Hands, B., Parker, H., & Larkin, D. (2006). Physical activity measurement<br />

methods for young children: A comparative study. Measurement in


Middle School Physical Activity<br />

Physical Education & Exercise Science, 10, 203-214.<br />

Kilanowski, C., Consalvi, A., & Epstein, L.H. (1999). Validation of an<br />

electronic pedometer for measurement of physical activity in children.<br />

Pediatric Exercise Science, 11, 63-68.<br />

Kohl, H.W., Fulton, J.E., & Caspersen, C.J. (2000). Assessment of physical<br />

activity among children and adolescents: A review and synthesis.<br />

Preventive Medicine, 31, S54-S76.<br />

Landis, J. & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement<br />

for categorical data. Biometrics, (33), 159-174.<br />

Levin, S., McKenzie, T.L., Hussey, J.R., Kelder, S.H., & Lytle, L.A.<br />

(2001). Variability of physical activity during physical education<br />

lessons across elementary school grades. Measurement in Physical<br />

Education & Exercise Science, 5, 207-218.<br />

Louie, L., Eston, R.G., Rowlands, A.V., Tong, K.K., Ingledew, D.K., &<br />

Fu, F.H. (1999). Validity of heart rate, pedometry, and accelerometry<br />

for estimating the energy cost of activity in Hong Kong. Pediatric<br />

Exercise Science, 11(3), 229-239.<br />

McKenzie, T. L., Sallis, J. F. & Nader, P. R. (1999). SOFIT: System for<br />

observing fitness instruction time. Journal of Teaching in Physical<br />

Education, 11, 195-205.<br />

Mertler, C.A., & Vannatta, R.A. (2005). Advanced and multivariate<br />

statistical methods:Practical application and interpretation. (3rd ed.).<br />

Los Angeles: Pyrczak.<br />

National Association for Sport and Physical Education. (2000). 2000 shape<br />

of the nation report: A survey of state physical education requirements.<br />

Reston, VA: Author.<br />

Nilsson, A., Ekelund, U., Yngve, A., & Sjöstrom, M. (2002). Assessing<br />

physical activity among children with accelerometers during different<br />

time sampling intervals and placements. Pediatric Exercise Science,<br />

14, 87-96.<br />

Ogden, C.L., Carroll, M. D., Curtin, L.R., McDowell, M.A., Tabak, C.<br />

J., & Flegal, K.M. (2006). Prevalence of overweight and obesity in<br />

the United States (1999-2004). Journal of the American Medical<br />

Association, 295, 1549-1555.<br />

Parish, L.E., & Treasure, D.C. (2003). Physical activity and situational<br />

motivation in physical education: Influence of the motivational climate<br />

and perceived ability. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 74,<br />

173-182.<br />

Pfeiffer, K., McIver, K., Dowda, M., Almeida, J., & Pate, R. (2006).<br />

Validity and calibration of the Actical accelerometer in preschool<br />

children. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 38(1), 152-157.<br />

Puyau, M.R., Adolph, A.L., Vohra, F.A., Zakeri, I., & Butte, N.F. (2004).<br />

Prediction of activity energy expenditure using accelerometers in<br />

children. Medicine & Science in Sport & Exercise, 36, 1625-1631.<br />

Rowlands, A.V., Eston, R.B., & Ingledew, D.K., (1997). Measurement<br />

of physical activity in children with particular reference to the use of<br />

heart rate and pedometry. Sports Medicine, 24, 258-272.<br />

Sallis, J.F., & Patrick, K. (1994). Physical activity guidelines for<br />

adolescents: Consensus statement. Pediatric Exercise Science, 6, 302-<br />

314.<br />

Scruggs, P.W. (2007a). Quantifying activity time via pedometry in fifthand<br />

six-grade physical education. Journal of Physical Activity &<br />

Health, 4, 215-227.<br />

Scruggs, P.W. (2007b). Middle school physical education physical activity<br />

quantification: A pedometer steps/min guideline. Research Quarterly<br />

for Exercise & Sport, 78(4), 284-292.<br />

Scruggs, P.W., Beveridge, S.K., & Clocksin, B.D. (2005). Tri-axial<br />

accelerometer and heart rate telemetry: Relation and agreement with<br />

behavioral observation in elementary physical education. Measurement<br />

in Physical Education & Exercise Science, 9, 203-218.<br />

Scruggs, P.W., Beveridge, S.K., Eisenman, P.A., Watson, D.L., Schultz,<br />

B.B., & Ransdell, L.B. (2003). Quantifying physical activity via<br />

pedometry in elementary physical education. Medicine & Science in<br />

Sports & Exercise, 35, 1065-1071.<br />

Scruggs, P.W., Beveridge, S.K., Watson, D.L., & Clocksin, B.D. (2005).<br />

Quantifying physical activity in first- through fourth-grade physical<br />

education via pedometry. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,<br />

76(2), 166-175.<br />

Simons-Morton, B.G., O’Hara, G.S., Parcel, T., Baranowski, T., & Wilson,<br />

B. (1990). Children’s participation in moderate to vigorous physical<br />

activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 61, 307-314.<br />

Sirard, J.R., & Pate, R.R. (2001). Physical activity assessment in children<br />

and adolescents. Sports Medicine, 31(6), 439-454.<br />

Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences<br />

(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.<br />

Stratton, G. (1996). Children’s heart rates during physical education<br />

lessons: A review. Pediatric Exercise Science, 8, 215-233.<br />

Treuth, M. S., Sherwood, N. E., Butte, N. F., McClanahan, B., Obarzanek,<br />

E., Zhou, A., et al.. (2003). Validity and reliability of activity measures<br />

in African-American girls for GEMS. Medicine and Science in Sports<br />

and Exercise, 35, 532-539.<br />

Vincent, S.D., & Pangrazi, R.P. (2002).An examination of the activity<br />

patterns of elementary school children. Pediatric Exercise Science, 14,<br />

432-441.<br />

Vincent, S.D., & Sidman, C.L. (2003). Determining measurement error<br />

in digital pedometers. Measurement in Physical Education & Exercise<br />

Science, 7, 19-24.<br />

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS). (1996).<br />

Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta:<br />

Center for Disease Control and Prevention.<br />

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS). (2000).<br />

Healthy people <strong>2010</strong> (2nd ed., pp.22-28). Washington, DC: U.S.<br />

Government Printing Office.<br />

Ward, D.S., Evenson, K.R., Vaughn, A., Rodges, A.B., & Troiano, R.P.<br />

(2005). Accelerometer use in physical activity: Best practices and<br />

research recommendations. Medicine & Science in Sport & Exercise,<br />

37, S582-S588.<br />

Westerterp, K.R. (1999). Physical activity assessment with accelerometers.<br />

International Journal of Obesity, 23, S45-S49.<br />

World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe. Regional<br />

guidelines: Development of health-promoting schools: A framework<br />

for action. Manila, WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific,1996.<br />

Retrieved 22 January <strong>2010</strong> from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/wpro/1994-<br />

99/a53203.pdf. !<br />

volume 5, issue 1 25


Patterns of Interactions and Behaviors:<br />

Physical Education in Korean Elementary,<br />

Middle, and High Schools<br />

by Jong-Hoon Yu, Ed.D., Canisius College, Buffalo, NY 14208<br />

& Jwa K. Kim, Ph.D., Middle Tennessee State University,<br />

Murfreesboro, TN<br />

Abstract<br />

The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the<br />

differences between elementary, middle, and high school physical<br />

education classes in Korea based on teacher and student behavior<br />

and teacher-student interaction patterns. The subjects who<br />

participated in this study were fifteen certified full-time physical<br />

education teachers at selected schools in Seoul. Teacher and student<br />

behavior and teacher-student interaction patterns were coded using<br />

Cheffers' Adaptation of Flanders' Interaction Analysis System<br />

(CAFIAS). Statistically significant differences in the teacher and<br />

student behaviors among the three school levels were analyzed<br />

using a Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA. Additional multiple comparisons<br />

using the Mann-Whitney U test were employed when significant<br />

differences resulted from the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA among<br />

the three school levels. This study demonstrated that elementary<br />

school physical education classes exhibited more humanistic<br />

behaviors. In contrast, middle school classes were conducted with<br />

a great deal of teacher input and high school classes had a very<br />

structured atmosphere.<br />

Key Words: systematic observation, descriptive data<br />

Historically, educational trends have followed cyclical patterns<br />

reflecting the changing conditions and demands of society. As<br />

the pendulum of educational values has swung back and forth,<br />

two educational philosophies have emerged within the teaching<br />

profession, both claiming to provide the best education for<br />

students. These are the traditional philosophies and the progressive<br />

philosophies.<br />

These two philosophies approach the educational process from<br />

different perspectives. The traditional perspective represents a<br />

top-down approach to the process of teaching and learning, with<br />

the principal role of the teacher to disseminate knowledge and<br />

control the learning process, while students are expected to acquire<br />

objective knowledge by digesting facts and concepts and searching<br />

for correct answers.<br />

In contrast, the progressive perspective presents a bottom-up<br />

approach in which the teacher's role is primarily to encourage<br />

students to pursue their own educational objectives. In this<br />

model, students are taught to generate their own questions and<br />

answers, express their own ideas and thoughts, and seek out their<br />

own solutions to problems rather than simply receiving them from<br />

teachers.<br />

However, in spite of their differing approaches to the<br />

educational process, traditionalists and progressivists share the<br />

same goal, namely to develop the ability of students to reach their<br />

full potential. In both cases, this goal can only be achieved with<br />

26 Journal of Research<br />

quality teaching by competent teachers. Thus, regardless of the<br />

philosophical approach, teachers play an extremely important role<br />

in helping students achieve the intended educational goals. Since<br />

students must learn in an effective manner in order to acquire<br />

knowledge, teachers must provide effective teaching in order for<br />

students to receive a quality education.<br />

As a result, the study of teaching has become a prominent<br />

area of interest in the field of education. As our profession has<br />

progressed, some educational scholars endeavored to study the<br />

art of teaching in a more analytical way and therefore developed<br />

scientific observational techniques to validate their research<br />

(Hilberg, Waxman, & Tharp, 2004; Ornstein, 1986). The use of<br />

observational systems specifically designed to examine a wide<br />

variety of teacher and student behaviors has profoundly affected<br />

research on teaching and teacher training (Rink, 2006; Schempp,<br />

2003; Senne, 2004). Consequently, the teaching process is no<br />

longer viewed as a nebulous, inexplicable interaction between<br />

the teacher and student, but rather a process that can be planned,<br />

systematically observed, and readily assessed.<br />

Research employing observation techniques in the field of<br />

educational studies as a whole has greatly impacted the research<br />

approach of those specifically studying physical education (Lee,<br />

2003; Tinning, Macdonald, Wright, & Hickey, 2001). Various<br />

systematic observation techniques which enable a more objective<br />

investigation of the teaching and learning process have been<br />

developed for the study of physical education. Continued research<br />

efforts employing systematic observation techniques are needed to<br />

pursue previously unexplored teacher behavior variables (Marco,<br />

Mancini, Wuest, & Schempp, 1996).<br />

Since the mid-1980s, South Korean sports pedagogues have<br />

been actively engaged in the study of teaching, making use of<br />

systematic observation techniques. Their findings have made<br />

an invaluable contribution toward our improved understanding<br />

of the current state of formal physical education in South Korea.<br />

However, despite the remarkable achievements made in the field,<br />

the majority of studies to date have concentrated on examining<br />

teacher effectiveness based largely on the amount of time students<br />

spend on task while in physical education classes (e.g., Chang,<br />

1996; Cho, 2003; Choi, 2000; Choi, 2004; Ji, 2008; Kang, 1989;<br />

Kim, Hwang, & Park, 2002; Kim, 2006; Kim, 2000; Kim, 2001;<br />

Kim & Jeong, 1994; Kim, 2005; Ko, 1988; Kwak, 2006; Lee,<br />

2007; Paek & Lee, 2003; Park, 2007; Park, 2001; Park, 2003; Yoo,<br />

1989; Youn, 1994).<br />

As a result, there is an obvious need to broaden this approach<br />

by studying the complex act of teaching in physical education<br />

settings. This study aimed to expand the current body of knowledge<br />

by observing, describing, comparing, and analyzing teacher and<br />

student behaviors as well as teacher and student interaction patterns<br />

among elementary, middle, and high school physical education<br />

classes in South Korea.<br />

Several studies investigating the differences between physical


Patterns of Interactions and Behaviors<br />

education classes at different grade and school levels were done in<br />

the 70s, 80s and 90s. These studies employed a variety of systematic<br />

observation techniques to uncover similarities and differences<br />

across school or grade levels. However, the findings of these<br />

studies were scant, contradictory, and inconclusive. For example,<br />

the studies conducted by Stewart (1977), Morgenegg (1978), and<br />

Lombardo (1979) found that positive teacher behaviors increased<br />

as school or grade level decreased. These results were inconsistent<br />

with those of study conducted by Schempp (1986) who found that<br />

praise or encouragement from the teachers, and acceptance from<br />

the teacher increased as school or grade level increased.<br />

In other studies, Pieron and Hacourt (1979) and Schempp<br />

(1986) found that lecturing from the teachers increased as grade<br />

level increased. However, these findings were contradictory to<br />

those of Anderson and Barrette (1978), Yoon et al. (1996), Cheffers<br />

and Mancini (1978), Lombardo (1979), and Buckett (1983), which<br />

revealed that teacher contribution increased as school or grade<br />

level decreased, and student contribution increased as school or<br />

grade level increased.<br />

Method<br />

Participants<br />

Eleven schools were randomly selected from the five different<br />

school districts in Seoul, South Korea. Of the eleven schools,<br />

fifteen certified full-time elementary (n=5), middle (n=5), and high<br />

(n=5) school physical education teachers volunteered to participate<br />

in the study. All subjects were male teachers, simply because a<br />

significant majority of physical education teachers in South Korea<br />

are male.<br />

In this study, the elementary school classes consisted of one<br />

each of a third, fourth, and fifth grade, and two of sixth grade.<br />

Since physical education in the first and second grades is conducted<br />

alongside music and fine arts as an integrated subject, these grade<br />

levels were not included in the selection of elementary school<br />

physical education classes. Middle school classes were one seventh<br />

grade and two of eighth and ninth grades. High school classes were<br />

one tenth grade and two of eleventh and twelfth grades. Several<br />

activities were shown in both indoor classes and outdoor classes.<br />

For instance, there were two handball, two basketball, one track &<br />

field, one badminton, two gymnastics, one tennis, two volleyball,<br />

one jump rope, and three miscellaneous games.<br />

Instrumentation<br />

Cheffers’ Adaptation of Flanders’ Interaction Analysis System<br />

(CAFIAS) was used as an instrument to identify the dependent<br />

variables in teacher and student behavior as well as teacherstudent<br />

interaction patterns. Cheffers (1972) developed CAFIAS<br />

to allow a clearer and more complete description of direct and<br />

indirect verbal and non-verbal teacher and student behavior as<br />

well as interactions between teachers and students in physical<br />

education classes. The CAFIAS was also employed to analyze<br />

class structure, teaching agencies, and student response behaviors<br />

(Cheffers, Amidon, & Rodgers, 1974). The behaviors classified<br />

by CAFIAS were recorded every three seconds, or whenever the<br />

behaviors changed.<br />

Cheffers (1972) determined the validity of CAFIAS by<br />

comparing "blind" interpretations to "live" interpretation. He<br />

reported a Pearson Product Moment Correlation of .80, which<br />

was converted to a t-ration of 3.5 (p


Patterns of Interactions and Behaviors<br />

top cells for the interaction patterns between teachers and students<br />

for each lesson were extracted from the basic 20X20 matrix in<br />

the computer program. Those cells with the highest percentages<br />

indicated primary interaction patterns.<br />

Data Analysis<br />

Statistically significant differences in the teacher and student<br />

behavior between three school levels were analyzed using<br />

a Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA test, at the .05 level of<br />

significance. Additional multiple comparisons using the Mann-<br />

Whitney U test were employed when significant differences<br />

resulted from the Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA test between the<br />

three school levels. The Bonferroni adjusted level of significance<br />

(p


Patterns of Interactions and Behaviors<br />

Table 2. Summary of the Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA Test and the Mann-Whitney U Test as Multiple Comparisons<br />

for the Differentiation among the Three School Levels According to 12 CAFIAS Parameters<br />

12 CAFIAS Parameters E M H<br />

M SD M SD M SD H P<br />

1 Teacher Contribution, Verbal 27.82 7.89 32.87 7.11 31.11 7.65 1.04 .59<br />

2 Teacher Contribution, <strong>No</strong>nverbal 18.98 7.52 22.63 4.70 20.98 7.54 1.04 .59<br />

3 Total Teacher Contribution 46.81 15.04 55.50 9.16 52.09 14.48 .86 .65<br />

4 Student Contribution, Verbal 19.02 11.25 11.38 3.62 12.61 7.99 1.52 .46<br />

5 Student Contribution, <strong>No</strong>nverbal 32.17 4.82 31.97 6.25 33.73 6.30 .62 .73<br />

6 Total Student Contribution 51.18 14.05 43.35 9.17 46.34 14.01 1.04 .59<br />

7 Teacher as Teacher* 100.00 a<br />

.00 95.14 a,b<br />

3.62 96.49 b<br />

3.25 8.24 .01<br />

8 Other Student as Teacher* .00 a<br />

.00 4.86 a,b<br />

3.62 3.51 b<br />

3.25 8.23 .01<br />

9 The Environment as Teacher .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00<br />

10 Class Structure as One Unit 70.20 40.73 51.30 45.34 68.10 34.35 .40 .81<br />

11 Class Structure as Group or as Individual 29.70 40.82 48.65 45.28 31.90 34.35 .68 .70<br />

12 Class Structure with <strong>No</strong> Teacher Influence .10 .22 .05 .11 .00 .00 1.08 .58<br />

<strong>No</strong>te . E = elementary school classes (n =5); M = middle school classes (n =5); H = high school classes (n =5); M = mean;<br />

SD = standard deviation. Means with different subscripts differ significantly at the Bonferroni adjusted level of significance,<br />

p


Patterns of Interactions and Behaviors<br />

verbal criticism. This suggests high teacher contribution at the<br />

middle school level, meaning that teachers did not allow students<br />

ample time to practice skills in class. Thus, Korean middle school<br />

students seemed to have few opportunities to participate in skills<br />

practice due to increased information giving and direction from<br />

the teacher.<br />

This finding was very similar to the results from study by<br />

Schempp (1986), which found that lecturing from the teachers<br />

increased as grade level increased. Similarly, a study by Pieron and<br />

Hacourt (1979) showed that teacher speech increased with school<br />

level, and student speech increased as school level decreased.<br />

However, this finding did not concur with those of Anderson<br />

and Barrette (1978) and Yoon et al. (1996), where teachers at the<br />

elementary school level spent more time instructing and less time<br />

observing than teachers at the secondary school level. Studies<br />

by Cheffers and Mancini (1978), Lombardo (1979), and Buckett<br />

(1983) also presented results contradictory to those of the current<br />

study, indicating that teacher contribution increased as school or<br />

grade level decreased, and student contribution increased as school<br />

or grade level increased.<br />

Additionally, these Korean elementary school teachers fostered<br />

a humanistic approach emphasizing praise, acceptance of student’s<br />

ideas, and encouragement of student questions. The contribution<br />

exhibited by teachers at the elementary school level included<br />

verbal and nonverbal praising, verbal and nonverbal accepting,<br />

and verbal and nonverbal questioning. The finding is consistent<br />

with previous studies by Stewart (1977), Morgenegg (1978), and<br />

Lombardo (1979), which revealed that positive teacher behaviors<br />

increased as school or grade level decreased. This data contradicts<br />

the findings of Schempp (1986), which showed that praise or<br />

encouragement from the teachers, and acceptance by the teacher<br />

increased as school or grade level increased.<br />

The descriptive data indicated that teacher criticism was<br />

expressed more at the secondary school level. For example,<br />

verbal criticism occurred more often at the high school level while<br />

nonverbal criticism was observed more at the middle school level.<br />

It is assumed that teachers at the Korean middle and high school<br />

levels frequently used verbal and nonverbal criticism in order to<br />

punish and control students. This assumption is supported by<br />

conclusions reached by Kang (1994), who reported that teachers<br />

at the middle school level were more often required to discipline<br />

deviant student behaviors than teachers at the elementary school<br />

level in South Korea.<br />

Students at each school level seemed to be more engaged in<br />

nonverbal than verbal contribution. As a general rule, Korean<br />

school students tended to exhibit nonverbal involvement in physical<br />

education classes. Specifically, students at the elementary school<br />

level showed higher total student contribution than students at the<br />

middle school level, followed by students at the high school level.<br />

The contribution displayed by elementary school students consisted<br />

of predictable verbal and nonverbal responses, analytical verbal<br />

and nonverbal responses, initiated verbal and nonverbal responses,<br />

and confusion. This suggests that the elementary school teachers<br />

allowed students more time to practice skills during lessons.<br />

<strong>No</strong>tably, students at all school levels generally exhibited a low<br />

level of analytical response in the classes. However, students at<br />

the elementary school level showed higher analytical verbal and<br />

30 Journal of Research<br />

nonverbal responses than students at the middle and high school<br />

levels. According to Cheffers, student analytical responses<br />

frequently occur during game-playing. Many lessons conducted<br />

at the Korean elementary school level consisted of game-playing,<br />

which provided opportunities to experience “broad individual<br />

interpretation leading to much wider cognitive activity, with<br />

individual creativity still remaining within the scope of prediction”<br />

(Corbett, Cheffers, & Sullivan, 2001, p. 383).<br />

Particularly, student confusion occurred more often at the<br />

elementary school level than at the middle and high school levels,<br />

while student silence occurred more at the middle and high school<br />

levels. This was largely due to the fact that Korean elementary<br />

school classes were conducted in a more permissive atmosphere,<br />

and as a result, the students were somewhat more disorderly. On<br />

the other hand, the middle and high school classes were presented<br />

in a more teacher-dominated climate, with the students typically<br />

more passive.<br />

Furthermore, this study revealed that Korean physical education<br />

classes represented a poor educational environment in which<br />

a single teacher was responsible for an average of thirty-eight<br />

students. Because of the large class size, teachers had difficulty<br />

encouraging students to be active in class. At the elementary<br />

school level, teachers more frequently acted as the teaching agency<br />

for the whole class. These findings were identical to the findings<br />

of studies conducted by Cheffers and Mancini (1978), Lombardo<br />

(1979), and Jung (1998) where instruction of the whole class was<br />

found to increase as school or grade level decreased. It is assumed<br />

that teacher instruction of the whole class is more effective for<br />

controlling a large class containing some mischievous elementary<br />

school students, since if games were performed in small groups,<br />

the teacher might be too busy to maintain control of the class.<br />

In contrast, teachers at the Korean middle and high school classes<br />

displayed greater use of other students acting as the teaching agency<br />

in small groups. Students in secondary school are more mature<br />

than elementary school students, making it more appropriate for<br />

skills to be developed in a small group arrangement. Lombardo’s<br />

(1979) study also made this observation by indicating that the<br />

use of other students acting as the teaching agency increased as<br />

grade level increased. This behavior was attributed to the fact that<br />

students commonly led preparatory exercises in the beginning of<br />

the class at the Korean middle and high school levels. Moreover,<br />

the students who could perform well were asked to demonstrate<br />

skills, while the teacher provided concurrent commentary.<br />

Meanwhile, some teachers at the elementary and middle school<br />

levels showed no teacher influence on the class structure in this<br />

study. This might be attributed to the fact that one elementary<br />

school teacher forgot to turn off his cellular phone before teaching,<br />

and appeared perplexed while handling the abrupt ringing of his<br />

cellular phone. Later, the teacher received a suddenly delivered<br />

document, and read and signed the document during the class. It<br />

is common for teachers to deal with urgently delivered documents<br />

and notifications even during class periods in South Korea.<br />

Furthermore, one middle school teacher had his lesson interrupted<br />

by a colleague, who asked him to lend him some badminton<br />

feather shuttlecocks. These episodes indicated that teachers did<br />

have significant influence on their classes due to their incautious<br />

behaviors, careless preparation of equipment, and responsibilities


Patterns of Interactions and Behaviors<br />

dealing with suddenly delivered documents. These episodes<br />

seemed to interfere with the continuity of instruction and led to<br />

ineffective teaching and learning processes. Therefore, school<br />

administrators and teachers need to pay attention to creating an<br />

environment in which teachers are more fully engaged in classes.<br />

The most common teacher and student interaction patterns at<br />

the three school levels predominately involved teachers giving<br />

direction and information, while students were primarily in a<br />

listening and obedient responding mode. Specifically, the teacher<br />

and student interaction patterns at the elementary school level<br />

exhibited dominant student predictable verbal and nonverbal<br />

responses. The middle and high school levels exhibited a similar<br />

command style of interaction. The interaction displayed by the<br />

middle school level combined extended teacher direction, lecture,<br />

and student predictable nonverbal responses, while the high school<br />

level demonstrated a similar pattern as the middle school level, but<br />

required fewer lectures.<br />

In a nutshell, the findings supported the aforementioned results<br />

that students at the Korean elementary school level had more<br />

opportunities to be involved in activities than Korean students<br />

at the middle and high school levels. In contrast, teachers at the<br />

Korean middle and high school levels used more direct teacher<br />

input than teachers at the elementary school level.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The analytic information in the study defined some important<br />

implications nested in the attributes or causes that underlie the<br />

behavior observed at all levels of Korean physical education<br />

classes. Namely, the traditional teaching mode was employed<br />

in classes at all levels and consisted of the teacher distributing<br />

information and giving directions, followed by predictable student<br />

responses, or game-paying activities. Though the traditional mode<br />

of teaching seems to be more effective for classroom control,<br />

safety, and organization, it is less than ideal for students because<br />

it makes them more passive in the learning process, and therefore<br />

leads students to become dependent on the teacher for directions.<br />

As a result, the traditional teaching mode observed prevalently<br />

in Korean physical education classes appears insufficient for the<br />

development of students’ creative and cognitive dimensions.<br />

Moreover, teachers were typically viewed as authority figures<br />

in Korean physical education classes. The role of the teacher<br />

was to command, and the student’s role was to obey respectfully,<br />

with corporal punishment frequently used as an effective means<br />

of discipline. This traditional value is deeply rooted in Korea’s<br />

Confucian culture.<br />

In addition, it was observed that students spent relatively long<br />

periods of time waiting for their turn to practice and participate<br />

because of large class sizes, resulting in wasted time and ineffective<br />

learning.<br />

The analytic data in the study also lead to the following<br />

suggestions related to the aforementioned implications. First,<br />

Korean physical education teachers need to consider how to<br />

provide a more open, friendly, and reciprocal environment, rather<br />

than a hierarchical and military climate, in order to enhance<br />

learning and motivate students. Such an approach will also help to<br />

develop student’s cognitive functions as they participate in physical<br />

activities. Second, a reduction in class size and high teacher-to-<br />

student ratio is needed in Korean physical education classes in<br />

order to promote effective teaching. In this way, teachers may<br />

more easily support students in being active in class and can be<br />

less rigid in their approach to students.<br />

References<br />

Anderson, W. G., & Barrette, G. T. (1978). Teacher behavior. In W. G.<br />

Anderson & G. T. Barrette (Eds.), What’s going on in gym: Descriptive<br />

studies of physical education classes (pp. 25-38). Newtown, CT: Motor<br />

Skills: Theory into Practice.<br />

Batchelder, A. S. (1975). Process objectives, observed behaviors, and<br />

teaching patterns in elementary math, English, and physical education<br />

classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.<br />

Buckett, B. J. (1983). A descriptive analysis of teacher behavior and<br />

interaction patterns of selected elementary physical education<br />

specialists. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle Tennessee State<br />

University.<br />

Chang, E. S. (1996). The effects of three disparate learning subgroup on<br />

academic learning time in elementary physical education classes. The<br />

Journal of Institute of School Health & Physical Education, 3(1), 53-<br />

68.<br />

Cheffers, J. (1972). The validation of an instruction design to expand<br />

the Flanders system of interaction analysis to describe nonverbal<br />

interaction, different varieties of teacher behavior and pupil responses.<br />

Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University.<br />

Cheffers, J., Amidon, E., & Rodgers, K. (1974). Interaction analysis: An<br />

application to nonverbal activity. St. Paul, MN: Paul S. Amidon &<br />

Associates, Inc.<br />

Cheffers, J., & Mancini, V. H. (1978). Teacher-student interaction. In W. G.<br />

Anderson & G. T. Barrette (Eds), What’s going on in gym: Descriptive<br />

studies of physical education classes (pp. 39-50). Newtown, CT: Motor<br />

Skills: Theory into Practice.<br />

Cheffers, J., Mancini, V., & Martinek, T. (1980). Interaction analysis:<br />

An application to nonverbal activity (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: Paul S.<br />

Amidon & Associates, Inc.<br />

Cho, K. R. (2003). A study on the relationship between academic learning<br />

time and swimming level. Unpublished master’s thesis, Myongji<br />

University, Seoul, Korea.<br />

Choi, J. M. (2000). A comparison on academic learning time in secondary<br />

physical education class taught by teachers and student teachers.<br />

Journal of Educational Science. 14(2), 183-195.<br />

Choi, J.S. (2004). A study on the teachers’ behavior and ALT-PE in physical<br />

class. Unpublished master’s thesis, Kongju National University,<br />

Kongju, Chungnam, Korea.<br />

Corbett, D., Cheffers, J., & Sullivan, E. C. (Eds.). (2001). Unique games<br />

and sports around the world. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.<br />

Ephraty, N. (1988). CAFIAS computer program kit. [A manual of running<br />

the program] Israel: The Zinman College of Physical Education at the<br />

Wingate Institute.<br />

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research:<br />

Competencies for analysis and applications (8th ed.). Upper Saddle<br />

River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.<br />

Hilberg, R.S., Waxman, H. C., & Tharp, R.G. (2004). Introduction:<br />

Purposes and perspectives on classroom observation research. In H.C.<br />

Waxman, R.G. Tharp, & R.S. Hilberg (Eds.), Observational research<br />

in U.S. classrooms: New approaches for understanding cultural and<br />

linguistic diversity (pp. 1-20). Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University<br />

Press.<br />

Ji, H. G. (2008). The effects of station instruction on academic learning<br />

time in physical education and activity with regard to long jump class.<br />

Unpublished master’s thesis, Daegu National University of Education,<br />

Daegu, Korea.<br />

Jung, M. Y. (1998). A comparative of P.E. teaching behavior between<br />

elementary and teachers and middle school teachers. Unpublished<br />

master’s thesis, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Korea.<br />

Kang, S. B. (1989). An analysis of academic learning time on elementary<br />

physical education classes. The Korean Journal of Physical Education,<br />

volume 5, issue 1 31


Patterns of Interactions and Behaviors<br />

28(1), 139-152.<br />

Kang, S. B. (1994). An analysis on the instructional time of physical<br />

education at selected elementary and secondary schools. The Korean<br />

Journal of Physical Education, 33(1), 13-28.<br />

Kelly, P. W. (1995). The validation of an instrument measuring cognitive<br />

and emotional involvement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston<br />

University.<br />

Kim, D. H., Hwang, Y.S., & Park, J. S. (2002). A study on the academic<br />

learning time. The Journal of the Research Institute of Physical<br />

Education & Sport Science, 18. 37-49.<br />

Kim, I. H. (2006). An analytic study on teaching and learning behaviors<br />

in secondary physical education classes. Unpublished master’s thesis,<br />

Kongju National University, Kongju, Chungnam, Korea.<br />

Kim, S. D. (2000). A study on the actual learning hours among the practical<br />

skill class of physical training in the high school. Journal of Natural<br />

Science, 9(2), 113-124.<br />

Kim, S. J. (2001). A comparison of academic learning time in physical<br />

education and physical activity level during physical education classes<br />

in Korea and Japan. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 40(4),<br />

307-318.<br />

Kim, S. K., & Jeong, J. S. (1994). Teaching method analysis on physical<br />

education class by teachers and teacher-assistants in the elementary<br />

school. Konju Kyodae <strong>No</strong>nchong, 31(2). 33-52.<br />

Kim, T. H. (2005). The effects of teaching behaviors on academic learning<br />

time in high school physical education classes. Unpublished master’s<br />

thesis, Sejong University. Seoul, Korea.<br />

Ko, B. K. (1988). Differences in academic learning time in physical<br />

education (ALT-PE) among three sport patterns. Proceeding of<br />

1988 Seoul Olympic Scientific Congress, Sport Scientific Institute of<br />

Dankook University, Cheonan, Choongnam, korea, 264-270.<br />

Kwak, H. K. (2006). The effects of cooperative learning on academic<br />

learning time in physical education. Unpublished master’s thesis,<br />

Gyeongin National University of Education, Incheon, Korea.<br />

Lee, A.M. (2003). How the field evolved. In S. J. Silverman & C. D. Ennis<br />

(Eds.), Student learning in physical education: Applying research to<br />

enhance instruction (pp. 9-25), Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.<br />

Lee, Y. S. (2007). Redesigning time-lined structure diagram analysis<br />

and active learning time diagram analysis for the consulting and selfanalysis<br />

of teaching. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 15(2), 21-49.<br />

Lombardo, B. J. (1979). The observation and description of the teaching<br />

behavior and interaction of selected physical education teachers.<br />

Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.<br />

Marco, G. M., Mancini, V. H., Wuest, D. A., & Schempp, P. G. (1996).<br />

Becoming reacquainted with a once familiar and skill valuable tool:<br />

Systematic observation methodology revisited. International Journal<br />

of Physical Education, 32(1), 17-26.<br />

Morgenegg, B. L. (1978). Descriptive analytic research in physical<br />

education. In C. B. Corbin (Ed.), AAHPER Research Consortium<br />

Symposium Papers: Vol. 1. Teaching behavior and sport history (pp.<br />

34-38). Washington, DC: AAHPER Publications.<br />

Ornstein, A. C. (1986). Teacher effectiveness research: Some ideas and<br />

issues. Education and Urban Society, 18(2), 168-175.<br />

Paek, B. J., & Lee, W. K. (2003). The academic learning time research on<br />

physical education teachers at a middle school. The Yongin University<br />

Journal, 21, 195-221.<br />

Park, J. S. (2007). An analysis study on the teaching behavior of taekwondo<br />

instructor. Unpublished master’s thesis, Pusan National University,<br />

Pusan, Korea.<br />

Park, Y. S. (2001). A descriptive-analytic study on academic learning time<br />

in college physical education classes. Journal of physical education<br />

and sport & leisure studies, 8(1), 85-95.<br />

Park, Y.Y. (2003). An analysis of class of physical education’s management<br />

and real ALT-PE of learner. The Journal of Elementary Education<br />

Research, 14(1), 181-193.<br />

Pieron, M., & Hacourt, J. (1979). Teaching behaviours at different levels<br />

of physical education teaching. FIEP Bulletin, 49(2), 33-41.<br />

Rink, J. E. (2006). Teaching physical education for learning (5th ed.).<br />

Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.<br />

Schempp, P. G. (1986). Interaction change as a function of grade level in<br />

physical education. In M. Pieron & G. Graham (Eds.), Sport Pedagogy<br />

(pp. 85-89). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc.<br />

Schempp, P.G. (2003). Teaching sport and physical activity: Insights on<br />

the road to excellence. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.<br />

Senne, T. A. (2004). On your mark, get set, go!: A guide for beginning<br />

physical education teachers. Reston, VA: National Association for<br />

Sport and Physical Education.<br />

Stewart, M. J. (1977). A descriptive analysis of teaching behavior and its<br />

relationship to presage and context variables. Unpublished doctoral<br />

dissertation, Ohio State University.<br />

Tinning, R., Macdonald, D., Wright, J., & Hickey, C. (2001). Becoming<br />

a physical education teacher: Contemporary and enduring issues.<br />

Frenchs Forest NSW, Australia: Pearson Education Australia Pty<br />

Limited.<br />

Yoo, S. S. (1989). The modification of teacher behavior and its effect<br />

on student academic learning time in elementary school. Unpublished<br />

doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi.<br />

Yoon, M. H., Kim, J. W., Yhe, J. E., Ju, M. D., Lee, C. H., & Cho, S. M.<br />

(1996). A descriptive-analytic study on teaching behaviors and motor<br />

engagement time in physical education classes. The Korean Journal of<br />

Physical Education, 35(4), 321-335.<br />

Youn, M. H. (1994). A descriptive-analytic study on academic learning<br />

time in elementary time in physical education classes. Faculty Forum,<br />

10(2), 343-356. !<br />

32 Journal of Research


Differences in Exercise Identity<br />

Between Secondary Physical Education<br />

Students and Athletes<br />

by Gregory J. Soukup, Sr., Timothy W. Henrich, and Heather M.<br />

Barton-Weston, University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio,<br />

Texas<br />

Abstract<br />

Texas (USA) public schools require high school students to take<br />

one year of physical education to graduate. However, students can<br />

meet this requirement by participating on a state sanctioned athletic<br />

team for a year. The Texas Education Agency states the physical<br />

education curriculum should teach affective attitudes and values<br />

that will encourage students to be “physically active and healthy<br />

for a lifetime” (TEA, <strong>2010</strong>). Only physical education students are<br />

exposed to this curriculum that specifically incorporates instruction<br />

and knowledge related to physical education and fitness concepts.<br />

The purpose of the study was to determine if significant differences<br />

existed between physical education students and students who<br />

chose to participate in sports regarding exercise identity. Data were<br />

collected from 207 students with 151 in the physical education<br />

group and 56 athletes with the Exercise Identity Scale (EIS)<br />

(Anderson & Cychosz, 1994). Scores on the EIS range from 9 to<br />

63. Higher scores indicate greater exercise identity. The physical<br />

education group had an average EIS score of 32.9 and athletes<br />

had an average score of 45.4. T-test analysis determined athletes<br />

had significantly higher exercise identities than physical education<br />

students at the p < .000 level.<br />

Introduction<br />

Despite the well documented benefits that regular exercise and<br />

physical activity have on the immediate and long term health of<br />

adolescents, the United States Center of Disease Control (CDC)<br />

2008 revealed that only 34.7% of high school students reported<br />

being vigorously active for at least 60 minutes a day for at least 5<br />

days from the previous week. In 2007, 54% of high school students<br />

reported attending physical education; however, only 30% of them<br />

attend daily physical education classes (CDC, 2008). The United<br />

States Department of Health and Human Services recommend<br />

that adolescents should engage in 60 minutes or more of moderate<br />

to vigorous - intensity aerobic physical activity on a daily basis<br />

(USDHHS, 2008). The Youth Risk Behavior Survey 2007 results<br />

determined that 65.3% of adolescents did not meet this minimum<br />

recommendation for physical activity.<br />

Reports by the National Association for Sport and Physical<br />

Education (2002), the Secretary of Health and Human Services<br />

and the Secretary of Education to the President of the United<br />

States (U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2000b),<br />

and Healthy People <strong>2010</strong> (U. S. Department of Health and Human<br />

Services, 2000a) all identified increasing rates of physical activity<br />

for adolescents as primary goals for improving health and reducing<br />

obesity rates in adolescents. The National Association for Sport<br />

and Physical Education stresses the importance of physical<br />

education and fitness knowledge and defines a physically educated<br />

person as being physically active on a regular basis and knowing<br />

the implications and benefits of involvement in physical activity<br />

and its contribution to a healthy lifestyle (National Association for<br />

Sport and Physical Education, 1992).<br />

Numerous researchers and reports have stressed the importance<br />

that physical education knowledge and activities play in promoting<br />

physical activity in school aged children that will continue into<br />

adulthood (Corbin, 2000; McKenzie & Sallis, 1996; Morrow,<br />

Jackson, & Payne; 1999; National Association for Sport and<br />

Physical Education, 2004; Sallis & Patrick, 1994; U. S. Department<br />

of Health and Human Services, 1990; U. S. Department of Health<br />

and Human Services, 1996). Physically active adolescents develop<br />

and maintain higher rates of physical fitness into adulthood (Blair,<br />

1993; Colditz & Mariani, 2000; Lee, Blair, & Jackson, 1999; Pate<br />

et al., 1995; Sallis, 1993), and active adolescents are more likely<br />

to be physically active adults (Telama, Yang, Laakso, & Viikari,<br />

1997). However, many youth are not enrolled in any physical<br />

education classes. In fact, most states in the United States have deemphasized<br />

and reduced the amount of time required that students<br />

spend in secondary physical education classes (Morrow et al.,<br />

1999; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1996; U.<br />

S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2000).<br />

Exercise Identity<br />

Role identities give meaning and importance to past behavior<br />

as well as provide direction to future behavior (Anderson &<br />

Cychosz, 1995; Anderson, Cychosz, & Franke, 1998; Anderson,<br />

Cychosz, & Franke, 2001; Storer, Cychosz, & Anderson, 1997).<br />

Individuals with strong exercise identities validate and reinforce<br />

their identities by exercising, and the validation of the exercise role<br />

identity increases the likelihood that the individual will continue to<br />

adhere to exercise programs in the future. Exercise and the social<br />

interactions that individuals develop through exercise become<br />

important to an exerciser’s role identity (Storer et al., 1997;<br />

Anderson et al., 2001; Anderson et al., 1998). Helping individuals<br />

develop stronger exercise identities will help them adopt and<br />

maintain more physically active lifestyles (Anderson et al., 1998;<br />

Anderson et al., 2001; Cardinal & Cardinal, 1997). Several studies<br />

have demonstrated the association between exercise behavior<br />

and exercise identity (Anderson & Cychosz, 1995; Anderson<br />

et al., 1998; Anderson et al., 2001; Cardinal & Cardinal, 1997;<br />

Gray, Soukup, & Sherals, 2007; Soukup & Clayton, 2008). The<br />

Exercise Identity Scale (EIS) was developed to identify individuals<br />

who would and would not be likely to exercise and be physically<br />

active on a regular basis (Storer et al., 1997; Anderson et al., 1998;<br />

Anderson et al., 2001). The purpose of the study was to determine<br />

if significant differences existed between physical education<br />

students and students who chose to participate in sports regarding<br />

exercise identity.<br />

volume 5, issue 1 33


Differences in Exercise Identity<br />

Method<br />

Participants<br />

A stratified sample of students was drawn from an inner-city<br />

high school in Texas. Data were collected from 207 students with<br />

151 of the participants having completed their physical education<br />

requirements for graduation and 56 of the students having<br />

participated in athletics. The distribution of students by grade<br />

level was 31.1% 10th graders, 31.8% 11th graders and 37.1% 12th<br />

graders. The ethnic diversity of the participants was 8.6% African-<br />

American, 20.5% Asian, 13.9% Hispanic, and 55.6% White. The<br />

sample was 58.3% female and 41.7% male. Participants in the<br />

study ranged in age from 15 to 19 years old.<br />

Instrumentation<br />

The Exercise Identity Scale (EIS) was used to quantify levels<br />

of exercise identity of participants in the study. The EIS was<br />

developed by Anderson and Cychosz (1994) to measure and assess<br />

the extent to which exercise behavior is descriptive of one’s concept<br />

of self (Anderson & Cychosz, 1995). The EIS is comprised of nine<br />

Likert-scaled items.<br />

Each item can range from strongly disagree (1) to strongly<br />

agree (7) with a final score that will range from a low of 9 to a<br />

high score of 63. Higher scores indicate greater exercise identity.<br />

Alpha reliability coefficients for the scale have been reported at .94<br />

to .95 (Anderson et al., 1998; Anderson et al., 2001). One week<br />

test-retest reliability of the scale was reported at .93 (Anderson &<br />

Cychosz, 1994), and was determined by the authors of this article<br />

to be .96. Factor analysis assessment of the EIS determined the<br />

scale to be unidimensional (Anderson & Cychosz, 1994; Anderson<br />

et al., 1998; Anderson et al., 2001) with factor loadings ranging<br />

from .74 to .89 that accounted for 68.4% of the total variance of<br />

the instrument (Anderson et al., 1998).<br />

Data Collection<br />

The researchers received permission for the study from the<br />

university committee for the protection of human subjects.<br />

Permission to collect data from students was obtained from a<br />

very large and diverse inner-city school district in Texas. A<br />

stratified sample of students who had either totally completed<br />

all traditional physical education classes or who all substituted<br />

their physical education graduation requirements by participating<br />

on an athletic team/teams were used for the study. All data was<br />

collected from students in one day by the lead investigator at the<br />

high school. Student and parental consent forms were obtained<br />

from all participants before data were collected. Before data were<br />

collected, the nature of the instrument and the measurements that<br />

would be obtained were explained to all participants. Participants<br />

were informed that all measurements would be confidential, and<br />

that individual results would not be seen by any other students,<br />

personnel, teachers, or administrators. All forms were in English<br />

and no student requested a translation.<br />

Data Analysis<br />

T-test analysis was used to test for differences in exercise identity<br />

rates between students who completed physical education classes<br />

and students who participated on athletic teams. The independent<br />

variable for the study was students who took physical education<br />

34 Journal of Research<br />

and students who participated on athletic teams. The dependent<br />

variable was the exercise identity scores of students determined by<br />

the EIS. The Alpha level for significance was established at the p<br />

< .05 level.<br />

Results<br />

A two-tailed T-test determined that the students that had<br />

substituted their physical education graduation requirement by<br />

participating in athletics had significantly higher exercise identity<br />

rates than the physical education students. The mean score on the<br />

EIS for physical education students was 32.9 and for the athletes<br />

it was 45.4. The difference in exercise identity between physical<br />

education students and the athletes on exercise identity was<br />

significant at the p < .000 level. Means and standard deviations<br />

for the groups are presented in Table 1.<br />

Table 1. Means, Standard Deviation, F Ratio, and P Value for<br />

Significance of EIS Scores for High School Physical<br />

Education Students and Athletes<br />

Group M SD T P<br />

PE 32.9 14.0 5.96 0.000<br />

Athletics 45.4 11.4<br />

p value for significance is .05.<br />

Discussion<br />

This study was conducted to determine if exercise identity rates<br />

would be higher for students who completed traditional physical<br />

education classes at the high school level when compared to students<br />

who substituted their physical education graduation requirement<br />

by participating in athletics. The data analysis determined that<br />

the students who fulfilled their physical education requirement<br />

by participating on athletic teams had significantly higher rates<br />

of exercise identity than students in traditional physical education<br />

classes.<br />

Cognitive Instruction and Exercise Identity<br />

Learning in physical education is through the affective,<br />

cognitive, and psychomotor domains. Students in the physical<br />

education and athletic team groups both received instruction to<br />

improve their psychomotor skills; however, only the students in<br />

physical education received cognitive instruction specifically<br />

designed to improve their knowledge of how lifelong exercise<br />

and physical activity would benefit and improve their long-term<br />

health. Several researchers have emphasized the importance<br />

that health and physical fitness knowledge plays in promoting<br />

healthy and physically active lifestyles in school children that<br />

will carry over into adulthood (Corbin, 2000; McKenzie & Sallis,<br />

1996; Morrow et al.; 1999; Sallis & Patrick, 1994). While the<br />

cognitive domain is an important aspect of instruction in physical<br />

education; many researchers have reported that increased health<br />

and fitness knowledge related to nutrition (Chapman & Toma,<br />

1997), cardiovascular disease (Suminski et al., 1999), sexuality<br />

and sexually transmitted diseases (Johnson, Rozmus, & Edmisson,<br />

1999), smoking (Schofield, Lynagh, & Mishra, 2003), and physical<br />

activity (Morrow et al., 2004) did not result in improved fitness<br />

behaviors. Simply knowing the benefits of how regular exercise


Differences in Exercise Identity<br />

and lifelong physical activity will improve student health did not<br />

seem to be enough on its own to improve the exercise identity of<br />

the students in these studies.<br />

Affective Instruction and Exercise Identity<br />

The results of this study seem to suggest that positive affective<br />

values and attitudes related to and developed through regular<br />

exercise, physical activity, and participation in sport significantly<br />

impacted the exercise identities of the athletes in the study. The<br />

athletes seemed to have developed and internalized stronger<br />

exercise identities through their sport participation than the<br />

students that took physical education. “Knowledge can have little<br />

impact on a person’s behavior if one’s social identity carries the<br />

message that he or she is not the kind of person who engages in<br />

such behavior” (Storer et al., 1997, pp. 266-267).<br />

Sport Team Participation and Exercise Identity<br />

Another factor that could account for the significant differences<br />

in exercise identity rates of the students is that most of the students<br />

that participated in athletics continued participating on their<br />

athletic teams after they finished their graduation requirements for<br />

physical education. The athletes continued to have opportunities<br />

for supervised practices, scrimmages, games, competitions,<br />

conditioning, and training sessions with coaches associated with<br />

their sports before and/or after-school during their sophomore,<br />

junior and senior years in high school. The students who had taken<br />

physical education to fulfill their graduation requirements had no<br />

opportunities available from the school to participate in supervised<br />

after-school physical activities. According to the exercise identity<br />

literature, the on-going participation of the athletes in after-school<br />

physical activity and on school sponsored sports teams would have<br />

continued to strengthen their exercise identities.<br />

Physical Education, After-School Physical Activities and<br />

Intramural Clubs<br />

The researchers recommend that physical education be a<br />

required course in schools for every year and that no other classes<br />

be allowed to substitute for the physical education requirement.<br />

Participation in after-school physical activities and intramural<br />

programs; that are supervised by certified physical educators,<br />

should be made available to all students in an attempt to increase<br />

rates of physical activity and to help develop and reinforce positive<br />

exercise identities in all students. The Centers for Disease Control<br />

and Prevention (2000) recommended that supervised after school<br />

activities and programs, like intramurals and physical activity<br />

clubs, need to be developed and implemented on a national<br />

level for all school children. Wechsler, Devereaux, Davis, and<br />

Collins (2000) recommended that all schools should offer quality<br />

intramural programs that feature a diverse selection of competitive<br />

and non-competitive, structured, and unstructured activities that<br />

meet the needs, interests, and abilities of all students. After<br />

school programs would provide students with the opportunity to<br />

be physically active and to engage in regular exercise behaviors<br />

that will improve their exercise identities and motivate them to<br />

be more active on a regular basis. By improving the affective<br />

aspects of physical education, like exercise identity, students will<br />

be motivated to adopt new behaviors that will help them develop<br />

and maintain healthier and more active lifestyles.<br />

Implications<br />

Physical inactivity has contributed to an unprecedented<br />

epidemic of childhood obesity that is currently plaguing the United<br />

States (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2000). Quality<br />

physical education classes taught by licensed physical educators<br />

(NASPE, 2002) should provide a daily minimum of 60 minutes<br />

of moderate to vigorous levels of physical activity for elementary<br />

students (Corbin, Pangrazi, Beighle, Le Masurier, & Morgan,<br />

2004) and 45 minutes to secondary students (NASPE, 2004).<br />

These physical education classes should incorporate curriculums<br />

that help students develop knowledge, attitudes, skills, behaviors,<br />

and confidence to adopt and maintain physically active lifestyles,<br />

while providing opportunities for enjoyable physical activity<br />

(CDC, 2000). To ensure quality instruction, physical education<br />

classes must be limited to the class sizes of other school subjects<br />

(CDC, 2000; NASPE, 2002).<br />

Texas needs to develop standardized assessment instruments<br />

that will accurately measure information on health and physical<br />

education knowledge, attitudes, and fitness levels of all high school<br />

students. Students that are inactive, overweight/obese, have low<br />

rates of fitness knowledge, and low exercise identity rates need to<br />

be identified and evaluated throughout their entire public school<br />

education (K – 12). Curriculums need to be specifically created<br />

that will improve exercise identity and motivate all students to be<br />

more physically active and exercise on a regular basis.<br />

Physical activity instruments like pedometers, heart rate<br />

monitors, and questionnaires like the PDPAR could be used by<br />

physical educators to assess if students are currently achieving<br />

recommended rates of physical activity and exercise to maintain<br />

proper health. Simple body composition assessments like the<br />

body mass index, waist to hip ratio, and percent body fat could be<br />

used to evaluate possible future health risks for students. The EIS<br />

could also be used to assess current and future attitudes of students<br />

towards exercise and physical activity. Recent research has shown<br />

that children as young as three are not active enough and are<br />

developing overly sedentary lifestyles and behaviors (Reilly et al.,<br />

2004). An estimated 10.4% of two to five year-olds, 15.3% of 6<br />

to 11 year-olds, and 15.5% of 12 to 19 year-olds are overweight<br />

(Ogden, Flegal, Carroll, & Johnson, 2002). Among children 6 to<br />

19, 31% are at risk of being overweight (Hedley et al., 2004). By<br />

using these types of assessments together, educators could quickly<br />

and easily identify and intervene with students who are sedentary,<br />

overweight/obese, and have poor exercise identities.<br />

Recommendations for Future Study<br />

Data for this study were collected from a very limited<br />

population. Further data needs to be collected from an expanded<br />

population of participants distributed across the United States<br />

to determine if significant differences in exercise identity exist<br />

between physical education students and athletes at the national<br />

level. Further research is also recommended to determine if<br />

significant differences between physical education students and<br />

athletes regarding exercise identity would persist as they aged and<br />

graduated from high school and were no longer associated with<br />

high school teams and clubs.<br />

volume 5, issue 1 35


Differences in Exercise Identity<br />

References<br />

Anderson, D.F. & Cychosz, C.M. (1994). Development of an exercise<br />

identity scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 78, 747-751.<br />

Anderson, D.F. & Cychosz, C.M. (1995). Exploration of the relationship<br />

between exercise behavior and exercise identity. Journal of Sport<br />

Behavior. 18, (3), 159-166.<br />

Anderson, D.F. & Cychosz, C.M. & Franke, W.D. (1998). Association<br />

of exercise identity with measures of exercise commitment and<br />

physiological indicators of fitness in law enforcemen cohort. Journal<br />

of Sport Behavior. 21, (3), 233-241.<br />

Anderson, D.F. & Cychosz, C.M., & Franke, W.D. (2001). Preliminary<br />

exercise identity scale (EIS): <strong>No</strong>rms for three adult samples. Journal<br />

of Sport Behavior. 24, (1), 1-9.<br />

Blair, S. N. (1993). Evidence for success of exercise in weight loss and<br />

control. Annals of Internal Medicine, 119, (7), 702-706.<br />

Cardinal, B.J. & Cardinal, M.K. (1997). Changes in exercise behavior<br />

and exercise identity associated with a 14-week aerobic exercise class.<br />

Journal of Sport Behavior. 20, (4), 377-386.<br />

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2000). Promoting better<br />

health for young people through physical activity and sports<br />

(Washington, DC., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).<br />

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008). Youth risk behavior<br />

surveillance – United States, 2007. www.cdc.gov.mmwr.<br />

Chapman, P. & Toma, R.B., (1997). Nutrition knowledge among adolescent<br />

high school female athletes. Adolescence, 32, (126), 437-446.<br />

Colditz, G. A. & Mariani, A. (2000). The cost of obesity and sedentarism<br />

in the United States, in: C. Bouchard (Ed) Physical Activity and Obesity<br />

(Human Kinetics/Champaign, IL).<br />

Corbin, C. B. (2002). Physical activity for everyone: What every physical<br />

educator should know about promoting lifelong physical activity.<br />

Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 128-144.<br />

Corbin, C.B., Pangrazi, R. P., Beighle, A., Le Masurier, G. & Morgan, C.<br />

(2004). Physical activity for children: A statement of guidelines for<br />

children ages 5-12 (2nd Ed.) (Reston, VA: National Association for<br />

Sport and Physical Education).<br />

Gray, J. P., Soukup, G. J., & Sherals, P. (2007). Influence of exercise<br />

identity on college students’ physical fitness. Research Quarterly for<br />

Exercise and Sport, 78, (1), February, A-92.<br />

Hedley, A.A., Ogden, C.L., Johnson, C.L., Carroll, M.D., Curtin, L.R.,<br />

Flegal, K.M. (2004). Overweight and obesity among US children,<br />

adolescents, and adults, 1999-2002. Journal of the American Medical<br />

Association, 291, 2847-2850.<br />

Johnson, L.S., Rozmus, C., & Edmisson, K. (1999). Adolescent sexuality<br />

and sexually transmitted diseases: Attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, and<br />

values. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 14, (3), 177-185.<br />

Lee, C. D., Blair, S. N., & Jackson, A. S. (1999). Cardiorespiratory fitness,<br />

body composition, and all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality<br />

in men. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69, 373-380.<br />

McKenzie, T. L., & Sallis, J. F. (1996). Physical activity, fitness, and<br />

health-related physical education, in: S. J. Silverman, & C. D. Ennis<br />

(Eds.) Student Learning in Physical Education (Champaign, IL:<br />

Human Kinetics), 223-246.<br />

Morrow, J. R., Jackson, A. W., & Payne, V. G. (1999). Physical activity<br />

promotion and school physical education. President's Council on<br />

Physical Fitness and Sports Research Digest, 3, (7), 1-7.<br />

Morrow, J.R., Krzewinski-Malone, J. A., Jackson, A.W., Bungum, T.J.,<br />

& FitzGerald, S.J (2004). American adults’ knowledge of exercise<br />

recommendations. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 75, (3),<br />

231-237.<br />

National Association for Sport and Physical Education. (1992). Physical<br />

education outcomes (Reston, VA, National Association for Sport and<br />

Physical Education).<br />

National Association for Sport and Physical Education. (2002). Shape<br />

of the nation report (Reston, VA, National Association for Sport and<br />

Physical Education).<br />

National Association for Sport and Physical Education. (2004). Moving<br />

into the future: National standards for physical education (New York:<br />

Mosby).<br />

Ogden, C. L., Flegal, K. M., Carroll, M. D., & Johnson, C. L. (2002).<br />

Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and<br />

adolescents, 1999-2000. Journal of the American Medical Association,<br />

288, 1723-1727.<br />

Pate, R. R., Pratt, M., Blair, S. N., Haskell, W. L., Macera, C. A.,<br />

Bouchard, C., Buchner, D., Ettiger, W., Heath, G. W., King, A. C.,<br />

Kriska, A., Leon, A. S., Marcus, B. H., Morris, J., Paffenbarger, R. S.,<br />

Patrick, K., Pollock, M. L., Rippe, J. M., Sallis, J., & Wilmore, J. H.<br />

(1995). Physical activity and public health: A recommendation from<br />

the centers for disease control and prevention and the american college<br />

of sports medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273,<br />

(5), 402-407.<br />

Reilly, J.J., Jackson, D.M., Montgomery, C., Kelly, L.A., Slaater, C.,<br />

Grant, S., Paton, J.Y. (2004). Total energy expenditure and physical<br />

activity in young Scottish children: mixed longitudinal study. The<br />

Lancet, 363, 9404, 211-212.<br />

Sallis, J. F. (1993). Epidemiology of physical activity and fitness in children<br />

and adolescents. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 33,<br />

(4-5), 403-408.<br />

Sallis, J. F. & Patrick, K. (1994). Physical activity guidelines for<br />

adolescents: Consensus statement. Pediatric Exercise Science, 6, 302-<br />

314.<br />

Schofield, M.J., Lynagh, M., & Mishra, G. (2003). Evaluation of a health<br />

promoting schools program to reduce smoking in australian secondary<br />

schools. Health Education Research, 18, (6), 678-692.<br />

Soukup, G.J. & Clayton, L. B. (2008). Relationship between adolescent<br />

exercise identity scale scores and self-reported rates of physical<br />

activity. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, June, S200.<br />

Storer, J. H., Cychosz, C. M., Anderson, D. F. (1997). Wellness behaviors,<br />

social identities, and health promotion. American Journal of Health<br />

Behavior, 21, (4), 266-267.<br />

Suminski, R.R., Anding, J., Smith, D., Zhang, J.J., Utter, A.C., & Kang,<br />

J. (1999). Risk and reality: The association between cardiovascular<br />

disease risk factor knowledge and selected risk-reducing behaviors.<br />

Family and Community Health, 21, (4), 51-62.<br />

Telama, R., Yang, X., Laakso, L., & Viikari, J. (1997). Physical activity in<br />

childhood and adolescence as a predictor of physical activity in young<br />

adulthood. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 13, 317-323.<br />

Texas Education Agency (<strong>2010</strong>). State board of education: Curriculum<br />

requirements. (Austin, TX).<br />

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1990). Healthy People<br />

2000 (DHHS Publication <strong>No</strong>. [PHS] 91-50213) (Hyattsville, MD:<br />

Public Health Service).<br />

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1996). Physical activity<br />

and Health: A report of the surgeon general (Atlanta, GA).<br />

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000a). Healthy People<br />

<strong>2010</strong> (Conference Edition, in Two <strong>Volume</strong>s) (Washington, DC).<br />

U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000b). Promoting<br />

better health for young people through physical activity and sports<br />

(Silver <strong>Spring</strong>, MD).<br />

U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2008). Physical activity<br />

guidelines for Americans. www.health.gov/paguidelines.<br />

Wechsler, H., Devereaux, R. S., Davis, M., Collins, J. (2000). Using the<br />

school environment to promote physical activity and healthy eating.<br />

Preventive Medicine, 31, S121-S137. !<br />

36 Journal of Research


Tobacco, the Common Enemy and a Gateway<br />

Drug: Policy Implications<br />

by Mohammad R. Torabi, Mi Kyung Jun, Carole <strong>No</strong>wicke, Barbara<br />

Seitz de Martinez, and Ruth Gassman<br />

Abstract<br />

For the four leading causes of death in the United States (heart<br />

disease, cancer, stroke and chronic respiratory disease), tobacco<br />

use is a common risk factor. Tobacco use is responsible for almost<br />

450,000 deaths per year and impacts the health of every member<br />

of our society. Tobacco is a gateway drug for substance abuse.<br />

That role is critical to revisit and revalidate. From 490 schools, a<br />

total of 175,460 students in grades 6-12 participated in an alcohol,<br />

tobacco and other drug use survey, the descriptive analyses of<br />

the data being stated in a 2007 technical report. The secondary<br />

analyses of the data clearly demonstrated that a dose-response<br />

relationship pattern of association existed between increasing<br />

quantity of cigarette use and the use of alcohol and other drugs.<br />

Additionally, logit analysis revealed that selected demographic and<br />

other variables were statistically significant predictors of the past<br />

month's use of cigarettes. The secondary analyses were replicated<br />

for the 2008 survey, in which 152,732 students responded to the<br />

same questionnaire. Similar results were obtained. Smoking is<br />

a major risk factor to the leading causes of death and sufficient<br />

empirical evidence establishes that tobacco is a gateway drug.<br />

To combat tobacco use, a comprehensive ecological approach,<br />

including tobacco education and cessation, enacting and enforcing<br />

smoke-free policies, and increasing taxes on tobacco products, is<br />

recommended.<br />

Introduction<br />

Mazzone and Arroglio asked, "How many ways can we say that<br />

cigarette smoking is bad for you?" (Mazzone & Arroglio, 2004,<br />

p. 1717), Tobacco use is responsible for almost 450,000 deaths<br />

per year in the U.S. and affects every cell, every organ, and every<br />

aspect of the human body.<br />

Tobacco use is directly involved in neoplasms in many parts of<br />

the body, including the oral cavity, pharynx, esophagus, pancreas,<br />

kidney, urinary bladder, cervix and lungs. It is also implicated in<br />

cataracts, periodontal disease, cerebrovascular disease, coronary<br />

heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory<br />

disease, aortic aneurisms and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)<br />

(The Health Consequences of Smoking, 2004; Stewart, Cardinez,<br />

et al., 2008). While the top four leading causes of mortality in<br />

the U. S. are heart disease, cancer, stroke and chronic respiratory<br />

disease, the number one risk factor for all of those premature<br />

deaths is tobacco use. And, as public health enemy number one,<br />

tobacco use is the most preventable.<br />

Whether it be through exposure to second-hand smoke, direct<br />

smoking or chewing (The Health Consequences of Involuntary<br />

Exposure to Tobacco Smoke, 2006), through environmental<br />

contamination, or increased cost of medical care and lost worker<br />

productivity, tobacco has literally impacted the health and wealth of<br />

every member of our society. Gro Harlem Brundtland, the former<br />

Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO), said,<br />

"Tobacco is one of the greatest emerging health disasters in human<br />

history" (WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2008, p.<br />

13). The WHO also states that tobacco "is the only legal consumer<br />

product that can harm everyone exposed to it–and it kills up to<br />

half of those who use it as intended" (WHO report on the global<br />

tobacco epidemic, 2008, p. 8).<br />

Tobacco causes premature deaths, negatively impacts quality of<br />

life and contributes significantly to the exponentially rising costs<br />

for health care. Results from the WHO's Global Youth Surveillance<br />

Survey (GYTS) suggest that the estimated world-wide deaths from<br />

smoking will double from 5 million per year to 10 million per year<br />

by 2020 and that these projected 10 million deaths may even be an<br />

underestimate (Warren et al., 2008, p. 1). The Centers for Disease<br />

Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate that smoking and exposure<br />

to second-hand smoke cost the United States 5.5 million Years<br />

of Potential Life Lost (YPLL) and $92 billion annually in lost<br />

productivity (Armour, Woollery, Malarcher, Pechacek, & Husten,<br />

2005). That amounts to $1.9 billion on average per state for loss<br />

of productivity, and the average smoking attributable cost per state<br />

in 2004 was nearly an additional $1.9 billion or the equivalent of<br />

$5.31 per every pack of cigarettes sold. Whereas the CDC estimate<br />

of annual health care costs at $75 billion, the direct Medicaid costs<br />

from smoking are calculated to be $607 million, or the equivalent<br />

of $1.63 per pack (Sustaining state programs for tobacco control:<br />

Data highlights, 2006). Medicaid costs for smoking-related<br />

coverage comes to $129.90 per capita annually for adults in the<br />

U.S. (Sustaining state programs, 2006). Even if people don't<br />

smoke, they pay the costs in taxes because of smoking's national<br />

economic implications.<br />

Smoking impacts the health of every member of society.<br />

Annually in the U.S., smoking results in the death of 26,000 to<br />

73,000 non-smokers exposed to second-hand smoke (Proposed<br />

Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air<br />

Contaminant, 2005). in addition to the approximately 450,000<br />

smoker deaths (Sustaining state programs, 2006). The leading<br />

cause of premature death in the U.S. is smoking (Sustaining<br />

state programs, 2006). Over 200,000 episodes of asthma, nearly<br />

72,000 pre-term deliveries, nearly 800,000 otitis media visits,<br />

and approximately 46,000 cardiac deaths each year in the U.S.<br />

are attributable to environmental tobacco smoke (Proposed<br />

Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air<br />

Contaminant, 2005). At current smoking rates, it is estimated<br />

that more than 6.3 million of today's youth, 18 and under, will die<br />

from tobacco-related causes (Sustaining state programs, 2006).<br />

Each death represents more than a statistic. Each person who died<br />

volume 5, issue 1 37


Tobacco, the Common Enemy<br />

was someone's child, parent, sibling, neighbor, teacher, employer,<br />

employee, or loved one.<br />

Tobacco as a Gateway Drug<br />

Denise Kandel and fellow researchers (Kandel, 1975, 2002;<br />

Kandel & Faust, 1975; Kandel & Yamaguchi, 1992) have<br />

popularized study of both the "gateway hypothesis" of drug use<br />

and the notion of "stages of acquisition" of drug use (Kelley,<br />

Denny, & Young, 1999). Kelley, Denny and Young (1999) found<br />

that adolescents who began drug experimentation with alcohol<br />

progressed through "stages" quicker than those who started with<br />

cigarettes and did not "graduate" to other illicit substances. After<br />

studying nicotine dependence in youth, DiFranza (DiFranza, 2007,<br />

2008; DiFranza et al., 2007) reported that those who felt relaxed<br />

upon smoking for the first time and those who sampled tobacco<br />

in a depressed mood were the most susceptible to accelerated<br />

addiction. From a study of youth who started using smokeless<br />

tobacco, Tomar concluded that those youth were more than three<br />

times as likely in four years to smoke tobacco than subjects who<br />

had not started using smokeless tobacco at the time of the initial<br />

survey (Tomar, 2003). This study, and others demonstrate how<br />

adolescents can swiftly become habituated to tobacco, indicating<br />

the need to prevent tobacco experimentation through educational<br />

efforts and programs, such as after-school activities.<br />

Torabi, Bailey, and Madj-Jabbari (1993) provided evidence<br />

that tobacco serves as a gateway drug, another reason for those<br />

educational efforts and programs. To continue the public health<br />

work addressing tobacco and other drug use, it is important to<br />

revisit those 1993 findings that implicated tobacco as a gateway<br />

drug (Torabi, Bailey, & Madj-Jabbari, 1993). This study aims to<br />

answer the following questions:<br />

1. How does drug use, including tobacco, by students in a<br />

Midwestern state compare with national data?<br />

2. What are the relationships between demographic and selected<br />

risk factors with reported use of tobacco and other common drugs,<br />

such as alcohol, marijuana and cocaine?<br />

3. As a gateway drug, does a dose-response relationship exist<br />

between cigarette use and selected other drug use, including<br />

alcohol, marijuana and cocaine?<br />

Methods<br />

Participants<br />

The data were obtained from a statewide cross-sectional survey<br />

of Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use by Indiana Children and<br />

Adolescents conducted by the Indiana Prevention Resource Center<br />

(IPRC) at Indiana University in 2007 (Gassman et al, 2007).<br />

The survey's sampling frame consisted of all schools in Indiana<br />

that serve grades 6-12. Recruitment materials (i.e., an invitation<br />

letter, a statement on parental consent, an application form and<br />

a stamped return envelope) were sent to all superintendents,<br />

principals and Safe and Drug Free School Coordinators. Obtaining<br />

parental consent for student participation in the survey was each<br />

school's responsibility. To improve the consistency of the survey<br />

administration procedures, a training video and written instruction<br />

were supplied to all school personnel. Schools were directed to<br />

administer the survey to all students in a classroom setting and<br />

inform them that participation was voluntary. When students<br />

38 Journal of Research<br />

completed the survey, they were advised to place their forms<br />

into the envelope provided. Besides gender, age, grade, race and<br />

ethnicity, no other identifying information was collected.<br />

The total student population, grades 6-12, in Indiana during<br />

the academic year 2006-2007 was 558,429. A sample of 175,460<br />

students in grades 6-12 from 490 schools participated in the survey:<br />

40.8% from public schools and 3.2% from non-public schools.<br />

There was no difference between non-participant and participant<br />

schools in terms of urban/rural location ( 2 = 1.20, P = 0.27).<br />

To cross-validate the current findings, the same analyses were<br />

conducted with data collected a year later in the spring of 2008<br />

(Gassman et al., 2008). The same instrument and protocol were<br />

applied. A total of 152,732 students participated in that study. The<br />

socio-demographic characteristics of students in the 2007 and<br />

the 2008 samples were similar (Gassman et al, 2007, 2008). For<br />

example, 49% of the 2007 sample was male, and 49% of the 2008<br />

sample was male.<br />

To address inconsistent and incomplete responses, a protocol<br />

was developed. Students who provided inconsistent response<br />

patterns to items on annual and monthly use of substances<br />

(e.g., those students who reported never using a particular drug<br />

during the past year and who also reported using that same drug<br />

during the past month) and those who provided a pattern of<br />

pharmacologically implausible responses (i.e., a combination of<br />

drugs and frequency of use considered lethal) were excluded. The<br />

final item on the survey asked, "How truthfully have you answered<br />

these questions?" with response options "not truthfully at all"<br />

"somewhat truthfully" and "completely truthfully." Students who<br />

responded "not truthfully at all" were eliminated from the analysis.<br />

A sample of 158,632 from data originally collected, or 90.3%, was<br />

used in this data analyses.<br />

Instrumentation<br />

The survey items were based on national surveys, such as the<br />

Monitoring the Future Survey (Johnston, O'Malley, Bachman, &<br />

Schulenberg, 2006), the National Survey on Drug Use and Health<br />

(formerly called the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse)<br />

(National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings<br />

2006, 2007), and the Youth Risk Behavioral Surveillance System<br />

(Eaton et al., 2006) in order to allow direct comparisons at the<br />

national level. The instrument is comprised of 181 items asking<br />

about socio-demographic characteristics, use of various substances,<br />

risk and protective factors (e.g., perceived risk of harm), perceived<br />

personal safety, violent behavior and gambling behavior. For the<br />

present study, the following variables were extracted:<br />

Monthly Use. The outcome variables were measured by multiple<br />

choice items asking, "How often in the past month (30 days) have<br />

you used. . ." followed by a list of drugs or drug classifications,<br />

such as cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, cigars, alcohol, marijuana,<br />

cocaine and other drugs. The response options were "never," "1-5<br />

times," "6-19 times," "20-40 times," and "more than 40 times."<br />

However, for cigarette use 7 response options were provided:<br />

"none," "a few times," "1 to 5 cigarettes per day," "about one half<br />

pack per day," "about 1 pack per day," "about 1 and a half packs<br />

per day," "and two or more packs per day." Binge alcohol drinking<br />

was asked about separately: "How many times in the last two<br />

weeks have you had five or more alcoholic drinks at a sitting?"


Tobacco, the Common Enemy<br />

The response options were "none," "once," "twice," "3 to 5 times,"<br />

"6 to 9 times," and "10 or more times." For the logit analysis,<br />

responses to having used substances in the past month, as well as<br />

binge drinking responses were coded into dichotomous categories,<br />

0 (no use) and 1 (one time or more).<br />

A similar set of items was asked in reference to the annual use of<br />

other drugs. Responses to the annual and corresponding monthly<br />

use item for each drug were highly correlated (r = 0.89, P < 0.01),<br />

indicating a high level of response consistency.<br />

Perceived Risk of Harm. Seven items measured perceived risk<br />

of harm due to substance usage: "How much do you think people<br />

risk harming themselves (physically or in other ways) if they<br />

smoke one or more packs of cigarettes per day; smoke marijuana<br />

(pot) occasionally; smoke marijuana regularly; use cocaine<br />

occasionally; use cocaine regularly; take one or two drinks of<br />

alcohol (beer, wine, liquor) occasionally; have five or more drinks<br />

once or twice each weekend?" For each item, the response options<br />

ranged from 0 (no risk) to 3 (great risk). Numeric values for all<br />

seven items were averaged for a scale ranging from 0 to 3 with<br />

Cronbach's alpha of .90. For use in the logit regression analyses<br />

the mid-points were used to recode the scores to their original<br />

response categories, 0.00-0.49 (no risk), 0.50-1.49 (slight risk),<br />

1.50-2.49 (moderate risk) and 2.50-3.00 (great risk).<br />

Perceived Peer Disapproval. To measure perceived peer<br />

approval of using substances, 7 more items were used: "How do<br />

you think your close friends feel (or would feel) about you doing<br />

each of the following things? Smoke one or more packs of cigarettes<br />

per day; smoke marijuana (pot) occasionally; smoke marijuana<br />

regularly; use cocaine occasionally; use cocaine regularly; take<br />

one or two drinks of alcohol (beer, wine, liquor) occasionally; and<br />

have five or more drinks once or twice each weekend?" For each<br />

item the response options ranged from 0 (strongly approve) to 4<br />

(strongly disapprove). Numeric values for all seven items were<br />

averaged for a scale from 0 to 4 with Cronbach's alpha of .94. For<br />

use in the logit regression analyses the mid-points were used to<br />

recode the scores to their original response categories: 0.00-0.49<br />

(strongly approve); 0.50-1.49 (approve); 1.50-2.49 (don't know);<br />

2.50-3.49 (disapprove); and 3.50-4.00 (strongly disapprove).<br />

Perceived Parental Disapproval. Seven items were also used to<br />

measure perceived parental approval of using substances: "How<br />

do you think your parents/guardians feel (or would feel) about<br />

you doing each of the following things? Smoke one or more<br />

packs of cigarettes per day; smoke marijuana (pot) occasionally;<br />

smoke marijuana regularly; use cocaine occasionally; use cocaine<br />

regularly; take one or two drinks of alcohol (beer, wine, liquor)<br />

occasionally; have five or more drinks once or twice each<br />

weekend?" For each item the response options ranged from 0<br />

(strongly approve) to 4 (strongly disapprove). Numeric values for<br />

all seven items were averaged for a scale ranging from 0 to 4 with<br />

Cronbach's alpha of .96. For use in the logit regression analysis the<br />

mid-points were used to recode the scores to their original response<br />

categories: 0.00-0.49 (strongly approve); 0.50-1.49 (approve);<br />

1.50-2.49 (don't know); 2.50-3.49 (disapprove); and 3.50-4.00<br />

(strongly disapprove).<br />

Data Analysis<br />

Chi-square analyses (SPSS 15.0) were used to examine sociodemographic<br />

differences between the student sample and the<br />

population. Three separate binomial logit regression analyses<br />

(STATA, version 9) were applied to examine the relationship<br />

between socio-demographic factors, risk factors and cigarette use<br />

with reported use of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine during the past<br />

month, respectively (categories of no use versus 1 time or more). To<br />

test which factors significantly increase or decrease the probability<br />

of using substances, binomial logit analyses were performed. Logit<br />

models are superior to standard linear models when estimating<br />

binary outcomes because the latter can give erroneous predicted<br />

probabilities due to heteroscedasticity or non-normality of error<br />

terms. Due to the asymmetry or lack of comparability with odds<br />

ratios, logit coefficients are preferred as a measure of strength of<br />

relationship (Garson, 2008). Odds ratios vary from 0.00 to 0.99<br />

for negative relationships, whereas they vary from 1.01 to infinity<br />

for positive relationships. The general form of the binomial logit<br />

p<br />

model is: 1n[ 17 ] = 2<br />

2<br />

where the natural logarithm and p/(1 -<br />

2<br />

p) is the odds ratio. The logit term refers to the natural log of the<br />

odds ratio. B represents the parameter estimate going with X, and<br />

X represents the vector of independent variables (q varies from 1<br />

to n for n independent variables). Finally, predicted probabilities of<br />

using alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine were examined separately<br />

across increasing doses of cigarette use: from none to 1-plus pack<br />

per day.<br />

Results<br />

Table 1 compares the socio-demographic characteristics of<br />

students in the sample with the statewide population. Chi-square<br />

analyses showed that gender, race/ethnicity and grade level varied<br />

significantly between the sample and the population. In many cases<br />

these differences were slight; however, due to the large sample<br />

volume 5, issue 1 39


Tobacco, the Common Enemy<br />

size, they were statistically significant. For example, the sample<br />

contained more females than the state population (51.0% vs. 49.0%)<br />

and more 6 th grade students (15.2% vs. 14.5%). Simultaneously,<br />

modest differences in race/ethnicity suggest caution in generalizing<br />

results for white and black students who were under-represented in<br />

the sample compared to the population.<br />

Figure 1 compares the monthly use of various substances for the<br />

sample of 8 th grade students in Indiana with national counterparts<br />

who were administered the Monitoring the Future Survey in 2007.<br />

<strong>No</strong>tably higher percentages of students in the Indiana sample used<br />

cigarettes, alcohol and marijuana compared to the nation. Slightly<br />

higher percentages of Indiana students used smokeless tobacco,<br />

cocaine and methamphetamines compared to students nationally.<br />

Generally, similar results were obtained for selected other grades<br />

where comparable data were available at the national level. Due<br />

to space limitations, those figures are not included in this research<br />

article but are available upon request.<br />

Figure 2 illustrates the relationship between percentage of<br />

students in grades 6-12 who smoked progressive dosages of<br />

cigarettes monthly and reported use of different substances (e.g.,<br />

alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, etc.) at least once during the past<br />

month. In the majority of instances, the percentage of respondents<br />

who reported using a drug in the past month increased significantly<br />

as cigarette dosage increased from none to 1 or more packs per<br />

day. Applying chi-square analyses, the findings consistently<br />

demonstrate a linear dose-response relationship between cigarette<br />

usage and use of 12 separate substances (P < 0.01).<br />

Separate binomial logit regression analyses (STATA, version 9)<br />

were used to examine the relationship between gender, race, grade<br />

level, several risk/protective factors and level (dose) of cigarette<br />

smoking with each of 3 different substances–alcohol, marijuana,<br />

or cocaine–reportedly used in the past month. The categories were<br />

never and at least once.<br />

The first set of results in Table 2 show factors associated with<br />

using alcohol in the past month versus no use in the past month. The<br />

odds of reporting alcohol use were 14.6% greater for female than<br />

male adolescents. The odds of drinking alcohol were 10.5% greater<br />

for white than non-white adolescents. As grade level advanced, the<br />

odds of drinking alcohol in the past month increased 26.9%. As<br />

40 Journal of Research<br />

perceived risk of harm rose from no risk to great risk, the odds<br />

of drinking alcohol decreased 25.4%. Likewise, as perceived peer<br />

disapproval rose, the odds of drinking alcohol in the past month<br />

decreased 43.3%. And as perceived parental disapproval grew,<br />

the odds of drinking alcohol in the past month increased 17.5%.<br />

Finally, as cigarette dosage climbed, the odds of drinking alcohol<br />

rose by 106.7%.<br />

The second and third sets of results in Table 2 show factors<br />

associated with reporting marijuana and cocaine use, respectively.<br />

Although the numeric values differ, with few exceptions, the<br />

results are similar to those found for reported use of alcohol.<br />

Gender was an exception, in that the odds of using marijuana<br />

and cocaine were greater for males than for females (3.4% and<br />

36.8%, respectively). In addition, the odds of using marijuana<br />

were 30.1% greater and, for using cocaine, 27.2% greater for nonwhites<br />

compared to whites. The opposite was found for alcohol:<br />

the odds of using alcohol were greater for whites than nonwhites.<br />

Overall, however, the relationships were consistent across<br />

substances. Moreover, as cigarette dosage increased, the odds of<br />

using marijuana and cocaine grew as well, 134.2% and 62.2%,<br />

respectively.<br />

Via percentage, Table 3 shows predicted probabilities of using<br />

alcohol in the past month by gender, race, grade level, perceived<br />

risk of harm and perceived risk of peer disapproval and parental


Tobacco, the Common Enemy<br />

disapproval, according to reported dose of cigarette smoking.<br />

The predicted probability of using alcohol in the past month<br />

rose within gender and race groups for every categorical increase<br />

in reported dose of cigarette smoking. The predicted probability of<br />

using alcohol in the past month when no cigarettes were smoked<br />

ranged from 17% to 19% between gender and race (white, nonwhite)<br />

categories compared to probabilities ranging from 79% to<br />

81% when 1 or more packs a day were smoked. There were small<br />

differences in the predicted probabilities between gender categories.<br />

Females who smoked cigarettes in any amount had from 2% to<br />

4% greater predicted probability of consuming alcohol in the past<br />

month compared to males who smoked the same amount. Smaller<br />

differences were seen in the predicted probabilities between race<br />

categories. White adolescents who smoked cigarettes in any amount<br />

had from a 1% to 3% greater predicted probability of consuming<br />

alcohol in the past month compared to non-whites.<br />

As dose of cigarettes smoked grew within each grade level,<br />

predicted probability of drinking alcohol consistently grew as<br />

well. For instance, 8 th graders who reported no use of cigarettes<br />

had a 16% predicted probability of consuming alcohol. Those who<br />

reported using a few cigarettes had a 28% probability, and those<br />

who smoked 1-plus pack per day had a 77% predicted probability of<br />

drinking alcohol in the past month. As dose of cigarettes increased<br />

within the category of perceived risk of harm, the predicted<br />

probabilities of drinking alcohol in the past month increased. For<br />

instance, adolescents who reported smoking cigarettes a few times<br />

and perceived no risk of harm had a 46% predicted probability of<br />

drinking alcohol. Those who smoked !-packs per day had a 78%,<br />

and those who smoked 1-plus packs per day had an 88% predicted<br />

probability of using alcohol. Likewise, as cigarette dosage grew<br />

within the category of perceived peer disapproval, the predicted<br />

probabilities of drinking alcohol in the past month grew. For<br />

example, adolescents who reported smoking 1-5 cigarettes per<br />

day and perceived strong peer disapproval had a 37% predicted<br />

probability of drinking alcohol, and those who smoked 1-plus pack<br />

per day had a 71% predicted probability of using alcohol.<br />

Although the expected inverse relationship between perceived<br />

parental disapproval and the odds of drinking alcohol in the past<br />

month was not found (Table 2), the familiar dose-response pattern<br />

within categories of perceived parental disapproval was evident.<br />

For instance, adolescents who reported smoking a few times<br />

and perceived strong parent disapproval had a 33% predicted<br />

probability of using alcohol compared to those who smoked 1-<br />

plus pack per day who had an 81% predicted probability of using<br />

alcohol in the past month.<br />

The separate patterns of predicted probabilities for using<br />

marijuana and cocaine in the past month were similar to those<br />

found for alcohol use (not shown). Specifically, the predicted<br />

probabilities of using marijuana (and cocaine) increased in relation<br />

to incremental doses of cigarette use within socio-demographic<br />

(e.g., gender, race) and risk categories. Regardless of gender, race,<br />

grade-level and level of risk factor, this same dose-response pattern<br />

was unequivocal.<br />

The main results of the cross-validation of the 2008 survey of<br />

over 150,000 students were consistent with the original results of<br />

this study. The percentage of students who reported using alcohol,<br />

marijuana, and cocaine in the past month and the predicted<br />

volume 5, issue 1 41


Tobacco, the Common Enemy<br />

probabilities increased significantly as cigarette dosage increased<br />

(P < 0.01).<br />

Discussion<br />

Tobacco use is clearly the most preventable cause of premature<br />

death and suffering, and it contributes significantly to skyrocketing<br />

health care costs in the U.S. and beyond. That is why, in this paper,<br />

tobacco is labeled as everyone's common enemy, regardless of<br />

socio-demographics. As the first section of this article pointed out,<br />

tobacco use affects smokers' and non-smokers' health and wellbeing.<br />

The main purpose of this paper was to answer the three questions<br />

listed in the introduction section. To do this, it was analyzed in 2007<br />

and cross-validated with 2008 data relative to tobacco, alcohol and<br />

other drug use among students' grades 6-12.<br />

With regard to monthly use, the present study found that Indiana<br />

8 th graders used cigarettes, alcohol and marijuana at a notably higher<br />

rate and smokeless tobacco, cocaine and methamphetamines at a<br />

slightly higher rate than 8th graders nationally. The comparison<br />

of other grades in Indiana with their national counterparts<br />

(where comparable data were available) revealed similar results.<br />

Consequently, it is clear that tobacco and other drug use is<br />

prevalent among students all over the country. A Midwestern state<br />

is not immune from this devastating public health problem.<br />

Also, this study revealed that a strong dose-response relationship,<br />

with regard to monthly use of cigarettes and other substances, was<br />

found across all grades surveyed: increased smoking was strongly<br />

associated with increased use of alcohol, smokeless tobacco and<br />

five other drugs. Comparing use versus non-use in the past month,<br />

a strong dose-response relationship was also found across all<br />

grades with alcohol, the odds of having drunk alcohol increasing<br />

by 106.7%. Similarly, past-month use of cigarettes was associated<br />

with increased odds of marijuana and cocaine use (134.2% and<br />

62.2%, respectively). The strength of the dose-response relationship<br />

and patterns of predicted probabilities between increasing monthly<br />

cigarette use and increasing alcohol use (Table 3) were observed<br />

within gender and race (white versus non-white).<br />

The pattern of dose-response between cigarette use and alcohol<br />

use was found to extend also to marijuana and cocaine use. Within<br />

each category of perception for harm and for peer and parental<br />

disapproval, growing cigarette dosage was associated with<br />

predicted probability of increased past-month alcohol use (Table<br />

3): the heavier the level of smoking, the greater the predicted<br />

probability of alcohol use.<br />

Whereas some demographic subgroups were at a higher risk for<br />

drug use than others, even without cigarette smoking, the relationship<br />

between rising cigarette use and use of alcohol, marijuana, and<br />

cocaine occurred across gender, race and risk/protective factors.<br />

Females who smoked cigarettes were slightly more susceptible to<br />

alcohol use. In contrast, males were incrementally more at risk for<br />

cocaine use. Whites who smoked cigarettes were more vulnerable<br />

than nonwhites to alcohol use. At the same time, incremental use<br />

of cigarettes placed nonwhites at a higher risk for marijuana and<br />

cocaine use. Regardless of the adolescent's level of risk/protective<br />

factors, the cigarette dose-dependent relationship existed, which<br />

suggests diminution of smoking contributes to drug use prevention<br />

beyond what is derived through perceived risk of harm, peer<br />

42 Journal of Research<br />

disapproval, and parental disapproval.<br />

Through its confirmation of tobacco's deleterious character and<br />

powerful association of youth cigarette smoking and use of other<br />

drugs, this study has strong implications for policies and other<br />

strategies to address this problem. Given the human and economic<br />

toll exerted by tobacco, this study calls for action on multiple levels<br />

in the form of evidence-based programs, policies and practices to<br />

reduce smoking incidence and prevalence.<br />

Parents constitute perhaps the most important ingredient in<br />

preventing youth tobacco use. Research by NIDA suggests that<br />

parents set clear and reasonable rules and follow up with consistent<br />

and appropriate enforcement and consequences (Family Guide:<br />

Keeping Youth Mentally Health and Drug-Free, 2008). Beyond<br />

parental rule-setting and general oversight of children's behaviors,<br />

such explicit actions as monitoring which movies children view<br />

can provide protective influence, since certain movies glamorizing<br />

tobacco use can negatively influence children (Sargent, Tanski &<br />

Gibson, 2007). Parents need to provide positive role models and<br />

never allow smoking in their home or family car.<br />

Tobacco use affects the entire community and, hence, communitybased<br />

strategies are needed. Evidence-based community strategies<br />

include increasing taxes on cigarettes, interventions to reduce<br />

youth access to tobacco in combination with mobilization efforts,<br />

and counter-marketing campaigns (Sustaining state programs,<br />

2006; Zaza, 2009).<br />

Stubera, Galea, and Link raise another intriguing possibility,<br />

that of increasing stigmatization of smoking lowering its use. They<br />

suggest marketing that stresses the danger of second-hand smoke<br />

and discrimination against smokers in health insurance costs are<br />

two factors that can contribute to that stigmatization (Stubera,<br />

Galea, & Link, 2008). Programs which are shown to work, such<br />

as the combination of school- and community-based prevention<br />

efforts as described by Lohrmann, Alter, Greene, and Younoszai,<br />

should be implemented (Lohrmann, Alter, Green & Younoszai,<br />

2005).<br />

Also, the National Registry of Effective Prevention Programs<br />

and Practices (National Registry, 2008) includes evidence-based<br />

tobacco prevention program and practice strategies, which have<br />

been evaluated for all ages and settings across the lifespan (www.<br />

nrepp.samhsa.gov) and across domains, including schools,<br />

families, communities and workplace. Schools need to employ<br />

smoking bans on and around their campuses, to adopt evidencebased<br />

tobacco prevention curricula and to offer and promote<br />

smoking cessation programs.<br />

Policies that ban or restrict smoking can effectively reduce the<br />

volume of secondhand smoke and exposure to it, as well as decrease<br />

cigarette consumption, including among teens (Sustaining state<br />

programs, 2006; Wakefield, et al 2000). In contrast to industry<br />

predictions, smoking bans in restaurants and bars have not been<br />

found to result in large declines in sales (Alamar, & Glantz,<br />

2004; Bartosch, & Pope, 1999; Huang, De, & McCusker, 2004).<br />

The greater the exposure of children to pro-tobacco messages,<br />

the more open they are to smoking in the future (Seo, Torabi, &<br />

Weaver, 2008). Research shows that communities have the power<br />

to influence the perceptions of youth and adults on smoking norms<br />

by enacting and enforcing a wide variety of strong regulations on<br />

tobacco control (Hamilton, Biener, & Brennan, 2008). 38 The greater


Tobacco, the Common Enemy<br />

the exposure of children to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) in<br />

their homes and family cars, the more likely they are to consider<br />

smoking in their future (Seo, Torabi, & Weaver, 2008). Studies<br />

support restricting smoking in the home as a recommended method<br />

to reduce youth smoking (Wakefield et al., 2000). Communities<br />

should restrict smoking indoors and approve legislation to ban<br />

smoking in cars transporting children.<br />

The findings of the study should be interpreted in light of the<br />

following limitations. Like most other studies on this topic, the<br />

findings of the study are based on students' self-report. Although<br />

this cross-sectional data cannot be used to determine causality,<br />

the association between amount of cigarettes used and the use of<br />

alcohol and other drugs is unequivocal. Although the sample size<br />

was large and differences between the sample and the population<br />

for gender, race/ethnicity and grade level were slight, they were<br />

statistically significant. Caution should be exercised, particularly in<br />

regard to the generalization of results for groups under-represented<br />

in the sample.<br />

Implications<br />

Whether the association of smoking with increased use of other<br />

drugs is a relationship of cause and effect or a manifestation of<br />

a common association with another variable such as high risktaking<br />

or rebelliousness, it remains true that every parent, teacher,<br />

and person who works with youth in our society should recognize<br />

the powerful predictive relationship that exists between cigarette<br />

smoking by children and adolescents and use of alcohol and other<br />

drugs. This is particularly true where use of cigarettes is heavy, for<br />

example, daily smoking or smoking of 1-plus packs per day. This<br />

study clearly provides further evidence that tobacco use serves as a<br />

"gateway drug."<br />

The present study highlights dose-response rates that suggest the<br />

need for further investigation of tobacco as a "gateway drug" that<br />

increases the likelihood of other drug use. The younger a person<br />

begins smoking, the more difficult it is to quit and the greater<br />

the likelihood of addiction and disease (Cancer Trends Progress<br />

Report–2007; DeWit, Offord, & Wong, 1997; Elders, Perry,<br />

Eriksen, & Giovino, 1994; Helping teens stop smoking, 2008).<br />

Given the serious health consequences of smoking on individuals<br />

and on those exposed to their smoking and given the economic<br />

burden that smoking represents, society should aggressively adopt<br />

multiple strategies built around evidence-based policies, programs<br />

and practices, and implement those strategies across multiple<br />

community domains to delay smoking initiation and to reduce its<br />

incidence and prevalence.<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Mohammad R. Torabi is Chancellor's professor and Chairperson<br />

in the Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana University,<br />

Bloomington, IN 47405; E-mail: torabi@indiana.edu. Mi Kyung<br />

Jun is a research associate in the Indiana Prevention Resource<br />

Center, Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana University,<br />

Bloomington, IN 47405. Carole <strong>No</strong>wicke is a reference librarian<br />

in the Indiana Prevention Resource Center, Department of<br />

Applied Health Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN<br />

17405. Barbara Seitz de Martinez is the deputy director in the<br />

Indiana Prevention Resource Center, Department of Applied<br />

Health Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47404.<br />

Ruth Gassman is the executive director in the Indiana Prevention<br />

Resource Center, Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana<br />

University, Bloomington, IN 47404.<br />

Author <strong>No</strong>te: This article is reproduce with permission and<br />

was previously published by the American Journal of Health<br />

Education–January/February <strong>2010</strong>, <strong>Volume</strong> 41, <strong>No</strong>. 1, 4-13<br />

Author <strong>No</strong>te: This research was supported by a contract with the<br />

Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, Division of<br />

Mental Health and Addiction, financially supported through HHS/<br />

Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration, Center<br />

for Substance Abuse Prevention, Substance Abuse Prevention and<br />

Treatment Block Grant.<br />

Reference<br />

Alamar, B. C., & Glantz, S. A. (2004). Smoke-free ordinances increase<br />

restaurant profit and value. Contemporary Economic Policy, 22, 520-<br />

525. doi:10.1093/cep/byh038.<br />

Armour, B., Woollery, T., Malarcher, A., Pechacek, T., & Husten, C.<br />

(2005). Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life<br />

lost, and productivity losses–United States, 1997-2001. JAMA: Journal<br />

of the American Medical Association, 294(7), 788-789.<br />

Bartosch, W., & Pope, G. (1999). Local restaurant smoking policy<br />

enactment in Massachusetts. Journal of public health management<br />

and practice, 5, 63-73.<br />

Cancer Trends Progress Report--2007 Update. (2007). Bethesda, MD:<br />

National Cancer Institute. Retrieved from http://progressreport.cancer.<br />

gov/2007/<br />

DeWit, D. J., Offord, D. R., & Wong, M. (1997). Patterns of onset and<br />

cessation of drug use over the early part of the life course. Health<br />

education & behavior, 24, 746-758.<br />

DiFranza, J. (2007). Hooked from the first cigarette. Journal of Family<br />

Practice, 56, 1017-1022.<br />

DiFranza, J. (2008). Hooked from the first cigarette. Scientific American,<br />

298, 82-87.<br />

DiFranza, J., Savageau, J., Fletcher, K., Pbert, L., O'Loughlin, J.,<br />

McNeill, A., et al. (2007). Susceptibility to nicotine dependence: the<br />

Development and Assessment of Nicotine Dependence in Youth 2<br />

study. Pediatrics, 120, e974-983. Retrieved from http://www.cinahl.<br />

com/cgi-bin/refsvc?jid=783&accno=2009688065<br />

Eaton, D., Kann, L., Kinchen, S., Ross, J., Hawkins, J., Harris, W., et al.<br />

(2006). Youth risk behavior surveillance–United States, 2005. Journal<br />

of school health, 76, 353-372.<br />

Elders, M., Perry, C., Eriksen, M., & Giovino, G. (1994). The Report of<br />

the Surgeon General: Preventing tobacco use among young people.<br />

American journal of public health, 84, 543.<br />

Garson, G. D. (2008). Log-linear, logit, and probit models. [Web<br />

page]. <strong>No</strong>rth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. Retrieved from<br />

http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/logit.htm<br />

Family Guide: Keeping Youth Mentally Health and Drug-Free. (2008).<br />

[Web site]. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health<br />

Services Administration. Retrieved from http://family.samhsa.gov/<br />

Gassman, R., Jun, M.K, Samuel, S., Martin, E.V., Agley, J.D., et al. (2007).<br />

Alcohol, tobacco and other drug use in Indiana by Indiana children and<br />

adolescents: 2007 Prevalence statistics main findings. Bloomington,<br />

IN: Institute for Drug Abuse Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.<br />

drugs.indiana.edu/publications/survey/indianaSurvey_2007.pdf<br />

Gassman, R., Jun, M. K., Samuel, S., Martin, E. V., Lee, J., Burmeister,<br />

S. L., et al. (2008). Alcohol, tobacco and other drug use in Indiana<br />

by Indiana children and adolescents: 2008 Prevalence statistics main<br />

findings. Bloomington, IN: Institute for Drug Abuse Prevention.<br />

Retrieved from http://www.drugs.indiana.edu/publications/survey/<br />

indianaSurvey_2008.pdf<br />

volume 5, issue 1 43


Tobacco, the Common Enemy<br />

Hamilton, W., Biener, L., & Brennan, R. (2008). Do local tobacco<br />

regulations influence perceived smoking norms? Evidence from adult<br />

and youth surveys in Massachusetts. Health Education Research, 23,<br />

709-722.<br />

Huang, P., De, A. K, & McCusker, M. E. (2004). Impact of a Smoking<br />

Ban on Restaurant and Bar Revenues --El Paso, Texas, 2002. MMWR:<br />

Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, 53, 150-152.<br />

Hawkins, J., Catalano, R., & Miller, J. (1992). Risk and protective<br />

factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early<br />

adulthood: implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological<br />

Bulletin, 112(1), 64-105.<br />

The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon<br />

General (2004). Department of Health and Human Services, Centers<br />

for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic<br />

Disease Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health. Washington,<br />

DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://www.<br />

surgeongeneral.gov/library/smokingconsequences/<br />

The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke:<br />

A Report of the Surgeon General. (2006). Department of Health and<br />

Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National<br />

Center for Chronic Disease Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health.<br />

Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://<br />

www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/secondhandsmoke/<br />

Helping teens stop smoking. (2008). [Web site]. Boston, MA: Harvard<br />

Medical School Family Health Guide. Retrieved from http://www.<br />

health.harvard.edu/fhg/updates/Helping-teens-stop-smoking.shtml<br />

Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E.<br />

(2006). Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use,<br />

1975-2005. <strong>Volume</strong> I: Secondary school students (NIH Publication<br />

<strong>No</strong>. 06-5883). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.<br />

Kandel, D, & Faust R., (1975). Sequence and stages in patterns of<br />

adolescent drug-use. Archives of general psychiatry, 32, 923-932.<br />

Kandel, D. B. (1975). Stages in adolescent involvement in drug-use.<br />

Science, 190, 912-914.<br />

Kandel, D. B. (2002). Examining the gateway hypothesis: Stages and<br />

pathways of drug involvement. In: D. B. Kandel, (Ed.), Stages and<br />

pathways of drug involvement: Examining the gateway hypothesis (pp.<br />

3-15). New York: Cambridge University Press.<br />

Kandel, D., & Yamaguchi, K. (1992). Stages of progression in drug<br />

involvement from adolescence to adulthood: Further evidence for the<br />

gateway theory. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 53, 447-457.<br />

Kelley, R., Denny, G., & Young, M. (1999). Modified stages of<br />

acquisition of gateway drug use: a primary prevention application of<br />

the Stages of Change Model. Journal of Drug Education, 29, 189-<br />

203.<br />

Lohrmann, D., Alter, R., Greene, R., & Younoszai, T. (2005). Longterm<br />

impact of a district-wide school/community-based substance<br />

abuse prevention initiative on gateway drug use. Journal of drug<br />

education, 35, 233-253. Retrieved from http://www.cinahl.com/cgibin/refsvc?jid=1828&accno=2009240337<br />

Mazzone, P. & Arroliga, A. (2004, December). How many ways can we<br />

say that cigarette smoking is bad for you? Chest, 126, 1717-1718.<br />

doi:10.1378/chest.126.6.1717<br />

National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings 2006.<br />

(2007). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services<br />

Administration. Retrieved from http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/cocoon/<br />

SAMHDA/STUDY/21240.xml<br />

National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP).<br />

(2008). [Web site]. Rockville, M.D.: Substance Abuse and Mental<br />

Health Services Administration. Retrieved from http://www.nrepp.<br />

samhsa.gov/<br />

Proposed IdentiÆcation of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic<br />

Air Contaminant. (2005) Sacramento, CA: California Environmental<br />

Protection Agency; 2005. Retrieved from http://www.arb.ca.gov/<br />

regact/ets2006/ets2006.htm<br />

Sargent, J., Tanski, S. & Gibson, J. (2007). Exposure to movie smoking<br />

among US adolescents aged 10 to 14 years: a population estimate.<br />

Pediatrics, 119, e1167-e1176.<br />

Seo, D., Torabi, M., & Weaver, A. (2008). Factors influencing openness<br />

to future smoking among nonsmoking adolescents. Journal of School<br />

Health, 78, 328-336.<br />

Stewart, S., Cardinez, C., Richardson, L., <strong>No</strong>rman, L., Kaufmann,<br />

R., Pechacek, T., et al. (2008). Surveillance for cancers associated<br />

with tobacco use--United States, 1999-2004. MMWR: Morbidity &<br />

Mortality Weekly Report, 57(SS-8), 1-33.<br />

Stubera, J., Galea, S., & Link, B. G. (2008). Smoking and the emergence<br />

of a stigmatized social status. Social Science & Medicine, 67, 420-<br />

430.<br />

Sustaining state programs for tobacco control: Data highlights. (2006).<br />

Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease<br />

Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from http://www.<br />

cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/state_data/data_highlights/2006/pdfs/<br />

dataHighlights06rev.pdf<br />

Tomar S. L. (2003). Is use of smokeless tobacco a risk factor for cigarette<br />

smoking? The U.S. experience. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 5, 561-<br />

569.<br />

Torabi, M., Bailey, W., & Majd-Jabbari, M. (1993). Cigarette smoking as<br />

a predictor of alcohol and other drug use by children and adolescents:<br />

evidence of the "gateway drug effect". Journal of school health, 63,<br />

302-306.<br />

Wakefield, M., Ruel, E., Chaloupka, F., Kaufman, N., Orleans, C., &<br />

Barker, D. (2000). Effect of restrictions on smoking at home, at school,<br />

and in public places on teenage smoking: cross sectional study. BMJ:<br />

British Medical Journal, 321, 333-337.<br />

Warren, C., Jones, N., Peruga, A., Chauvin, J., Baptiste, J., de Silva, V.,<br />

et al. (2008). Global youth tobacco surveillance, 2000-2007. MMWR<br />

Surveillance Summaries, 57(SS-1), 1-28.<br />

WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2008: the MPOWER<br />

package. (2008). Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from<br />

http://www.who.int/tobacco/mpower/package/en/index.html<br />

Zaza S., (Ed.) (2009). Tobacco Use, in The community guide: What works<br />

to promote health. [Web site]. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control<br />

and Prevention, National Center for Health Marketing. Retrieved from<br />

http://www.thecommunityguide.org/tobacco/index.html !<br />

44 Journal of Research


The Health and Wellbeing of Staff Members<br />

at a Tertiary Institution in New Zealand<br />

by Sonja Dreyer, Universal College of Learning, Palmerston <strong>No</strong>rth,<br />

New Zealand; Lukas I. Dreyer, Massey University Manawatu,<br />

Palmerston <strong>No</strong>rth, New Zealand; Dean M. Rankin, Universal<br />

College of Learning, Palmerston <strong>No</strong>rth, New Zealand<br />

Abstract<br />

The purpose of this study was to determine the physical,<br />

psychological and biochemical health status of staff members at a<br />

higher educational institution (Institute of Technology). Relative<br />

large numbers of subjects were identified with hypertension<br />

(18.5%), stress symptoms (32.1%), job stress (36%) and emotional<br />

exhaustion (11.4%). Thirty percent presented with more than three<br />

risk factors, 49% with one or two risk factors while only 21% were<br />

risk free. Cardiovascular fitness showed positive associations with<br />

body fat, body weight, stress, emotional exhaustion and fasting<br />

blood glucose levels. Psychological health correlated significantly<br />

(p"0.05) with measures of coronary risk, health status, body<br />

composition and cardiovascular fitness. Staff assistance programs<br />

focusing on exercise, weight management and job stress could<br />

potentially have a positive impact on overall health of staff at<br />

tertiary institutions.<br />

Key words: Happiness and quality of life<br />

Various researchers from across the globe reflect in scientific<br />

publications on the continuous and disquieting increase in levels<br />

of occupational stress experienced by staff at higher educational<br />

institutions (Dua, 1994; Gillespie, Walsh, Winefields, Dua & Souch,<br />

2001; Houston, Meyer & Paewai, 2006; Tytherleigh, Webb, Cooper<br />

& Ricketts, 2005). Stress might arise from job environmental factors,<br />

like overload, time constraints, lack of promotion, changing job<br />

roles and/or from individual interpretation (cognitive assessment)<br />

of the situation. There is general agreement that chronic job related<br />

stress can impact negatively on psycho-emotional well-being,<br />

physical health, as well as on lifestyle and exercise habits (Lovalla<br />

& Gerin, 2003; Nicholson, Fuhrer & Marmot, 2005; Rosengren et<br />

al., 2004). The impact of occupational stress on the physical and<br />

psychological health of staff at higher educational institutions is as<br />

yet not fully explored. This is surprising as the higher educational<br />

sector has commonly been regarded as a working environment<br />

that has become increasingly more stressful and psychologically<br />

demanding due to multiple triggers for stress-related illnesses<br />

(Kinman, 2001; Winefield & Jarret, 2001). In a national survey of<br />

British working conditions, university lecturers reported the lowest<br />

levels of self-reported psychological health compared to 19 other<br />

occupational groups (Millward-Brown, 1996). In a comprehensive<br />

study by Tytherleigh et al. (2005) examining occupational stress in<br />

higher education institutions, it was concluded that universities no<br />

longer provide the low stress working environment they once did.<br />

Research conducted at a number of academic institutions (United<br />

Kingdom, United States of America, Australia, Netherlands,<br />

New Zealand and South Africa) identified several key stressors<br />

commonly associated with stress among faculty staff. Overload,<br />

time constraints, lack of promotion opportunities, inadequate<br />

recognition, salary, changing job role, inadequate management and/<br />

or participation in management, inadequate resources and funding,<br />

and student interactions were listed as the majors stressors in most<br />

of these studies (Barkhuizen & Rothman, 2008; Taris, Scheurs &<br />

Van Iersel-Van Silfhout, 2001; Tytherleigh et al., 2005; Winefield<br />

& Jarrett, 2001; Winter & Sarros, 2002). Research by Barkhuizen<br />

and Rothman (2008) indicate that the academic environment is<br />

still largely a male dominated occupation and express the opinion<br />

that female academics might therefore experience more stressors<br />

and strains than male academics. Reasons for this may include<br />

the lack of role models, less socialization from women of their<br />

own rank, gender stereotypes and role conflict as they endeavor to<br />

balance roles at work and home. Longer working hours resulting<br />

from trying to balance work and family responsibilities might<br />

make female academics more susceptible to psychological health<br />

and well-being problems (Barkhuizen & Rothman, 2008).<br />

Health is traditionally determined by assessing coronary artery<br />

disease (CAD) risk and includes measures such as: a) family<br />

history, b) body weight, c) smoking status, d) total cholesterol<br />

(TC), e) total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein-ratio (TC/HDLratio),<br />

f) resting blood pressure, g) diabetes, h) gout (which is<br />

defined as elevated uric acid levels associated with pain attacks<br />

in selected joints like the big toe) and i) perceived levels of stress.<br />

Exercise capacity and elevated blood pressure responses during<br />

sub-maximal exercise testing have also been identified as potent<br />

predictors of long-term health (Ashley & Myers, 2003). In addition<br />

certain psycho-emotional constructs (e.g. depression, anxiety)<br />

have emerged lately as significant predictors of long-term health<br />

(Carney, 1998; Lovallo & Gerin, 2003; Nicholson et al. 2005;<br />

Rosengren et al., 2004).<br />

Psychological stress is regarded as a secondary risk factor<br />

for coronary artery disease (CAD) (American College of Sports<br />

Medicine, <strong>2010</strong>) but limited information is available regarding the<br />

association, or clustering, of psycho-emotional constructs with<br />

coronary risk and overall health status of staff at higher educational<br />

institutions. Higher education seems to equate with healthier<br />

lifestyles (Ogden, 2004). Kobasa, Maddi, and Courington (1981)<br />

introduced the concept of the hardy personality, or individuals<br />

that seem to flourish on stress, in essence, indicating that an<br />

individual’s appraisal of the situation (stressor) could impact on the<br />

potential health consequences of a stressor like job environment.<br />

It is therefore quite possible that this type of population (highly<br />

educated individuals working at educational institutions) are better<br />

able to manage stress, or that higher probable levels of participation<br />

in physical exercise in this type of population would negate<br />

potentially positive relationships between psychological distress<br />

and markers of morphological, biochemical and physiological<br />

health.<br />

The aims of this study were:<br />

volume 5, issue 1 45


Health and Wellbeing<br />

1) To report the coronary risk and psycho-emotional health,<br />

physical work capacity and morphological profiles of staff<br />

members at a higher educational institution.<br />

2) To determine if female staff members exhibit more<br />

psychological distress and whether that correlates with<br />

inferior or lesser levels of morphological, physiological and<br />

biochemical health.<br />

3) To study the contribution of various psychological constructs<br />

to the variance of coronary risk and health status of staff<br />

members at a higher educational institution.<br />

4) To determine whether the level of cardiovascular fitness<br />

influences (negate or strengthen) the relationships between<br />

selected measurements of psychological, morphological,<br />

biochemical and physiological health.<br />

Method<br />

Subjects<br />

The subjects (n=81 randomly sampled out of 150 volunteers for<br />

the study) were either teaching (44.3% - n=35) or administrative<br />

(56.7% - n= 46) staff members at a higher educational teaching<br />

institution in New Zealand. This institution currently employs<br />

a total of 350 staff members. A total of 14.8% (n=12) of the 81<br />

staff members participating in this study were in either academic<br />

or administrative managerial positions, the remainder (n=69) were<br />

in general administrative positions and/or lecturing staff. Eighty<br />

(80.2%- n=65) percent of the group were females and 19.8%<br />

(n=16) were males. This study reports baseline data of an exercise/<br />

lifestyle intervention study and subject numbers were dictated by<br />

amount required to obtain statistical power with intervention.<br />

Health Status Questionnaires<br />

All subjects completed two health-screening questionnaires<br />

after providing informed consent. Symptomatology of illness was<br />

measured through the Seriousness of Illness Rating Scale (IRS)<br />

(Wyler, Masuda & Holmes, 1967), a self-reported checklist of<br />

126 commonly recognized physical and mental symptoms and<br />

diseases. In the development of this instrument by the Department<br />

of Psychiatry at the Washington University School of Medicine, a<br />

general severity weighting for each disorder was obtained by asking<br />

a large sample of physicians, interns, residents, and lay persons<br />

to rate each of them as to their relative seriousness. The ratings<br />

reflected prognosis, duration, threat to life, degree of disability,<br />

and degree of discomfort. A highly significant mean rank-order<br />

correlation (r=0.947) was found between the medical and the lay<br />

samples, and a system of weightings was accordingly constructed<br />

by essentially placing a list of 126 diseases in a hierarchical rank<br />

order from 1 to 126, with number 1 being the least troublesome<br />

or serious, and number 126 the one with the largest impact on<br />

health and well-being. This seriousness of illness rating scale<br />

has served as a frequent tool in stress and illness studies (Kobasa<br />

et al., 1981; Schroeder & Costa, 1984) and still reflects most of<br />

the common health problems that could potentially force people<br />

to use medication or visit a general practitioner. Modern diseases<br />

like fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome are not on the list<br />

but are covered by diseases/problems/ symptoms like tiredness,<br />

anxiety, nervousness, depression and a whole range of infectious<br />

problems. The questionnaire was used in this study to complement<br />

46 Journal of Research<br />

other measures of health in order to gain a concrete overall<br />

impression of general health.<br />

Coronary risk was assessed using a Coronary risk index<br />

reflecting the 14 most common or typical risk factors for CAD.<br />

Fourteen risk factors namely a) age, b) family history, c) body<br />

weight, d) exercise, e) tobacco smoking, f) total cholesterol, g)<br />

systolic blood pressure (SBP), h) diastolic blood pressure (DBP),<br />

i) gender, j) perceived stress, k) cardiovascular disease symptoms,<br />

l) personal history of cardiovascular disease, m) diabetes mellitus<br />

and n) gout are included in this index utilising a Likert scale format<br />

based on levels of risk (Bjurstrom & Alexiou, 1978). For example,<br />

females younger than 45, would get a gender risk score of 1, those<br />

older than 45 would get a risk score of 2, while a male would<br />

get a risk score of 4, a bald male a score of 5 and a short bald<br />

stocky male a score of 7. The category score for each of the 14 risk<br />

factors are summed to get an overall risk score for each individual<br />

and the highest probable score that an individual can get with this<br />

Coronary risk index is 114 and the lowest possible score is 5.<br />

Psychological Health<br />

Psychological health was assessed by means of reliable<br />

questionnaires, validated by their respective designers, through<br />

the process of using random controlled samples and by correlating<br />

results with various other accepted and validated questionnaires<br />

measuring similar or opposite psychological constructs. The<br />

Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein,<br />

1983) was included as a measure of general life stress. The PSS<br />

measures the degree to which the subject perceives situations in<br />

her/his life as stressful. The PSS consists of 14 items referring to<br />

the general frequency of feelings or thoughts about stress during<br />

the past month. Items are rated on a 5 - point scale from "never"<br />

to "very often". The items are quite general in nature in order to<br />

assess a global level of perceived stress. Internal reliability has<br />

been shown to range from .84 to .86 across a variety of populations<br />

(Cohen et al., 1983). Emotional exhaustion was measured by<br />

the Psychological Burnout questionnaire (Pines, Aronson &<br />

Kafry, 1981) and Happiness, Well-being and Quality of Life by<br />

the Affectometer 2 (Kammann & Flett, 1983). Job Stress was<br />

determined by a questionnaire designed by Dua (1994), which<br />

specifically measures job stress in the academic environment.<br />

Biochemical Measures<br />

Fasting venous blood samples were taken in the week after<br />

which fitness testing was conducted. Total cholesterol (TC),<br />

Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), High density<br />

lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides, glucose and the<br />

total cholesterol/HDL-ratio (TC/HDL-ratio) were assessed using<br />

a registered biochemistry laboratory.<br />

Physiological Variables<br />

The physiological variables included height, weight, body<br />

composition, resting heart rate (RHR), and resting blood pressure<br />

(RBP). Body composition was obtained using the six skinfold<br />

procedure according to the guidelines of the International Society<br />

for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (2001). Resting blood<br />

pressure was taken after subjects had been lying for 5 minutes in<br />

the supine position in a quiet room, and was repeated three times.


Health and Wellbeing<br />

The lowest reading was recorded in cases where the three measures<br />

were within a 4 mmHg range. In cases where differences of larger<br />

than 4 mmHg were found the lower of the two measures that<br />

were within 4 mmHg from each other were used. Resting heart<br />

rate (RHR) was measured after the blood pressure readings, for a<br />

full minute with a stethoscope, and compared with the heart rate<br />

obtained with a polar heart rate monitor. This was repeated (if it<br />

didn’t match 100%) by checking the polar monitor and recounting<br />

heart rate for a full minute until a 100% match was obtained.<br />

All measurements on every subject were completed by the same<br />

person. Pulse Pressure (SBP-DBP) and Mean Arterial Pressure<br />

[DBP+ (PP/3)] were mathematically calculated using systolic<br />

(SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP).<br />

Functional Capacity<br />

Baseline physiological assessments of aerobic fitness were<br />

made using the YMCA cycle ergometer sub maximal test protocol<br />

(ACSM, <strong>2010</strong>). The testing protocol was comprised of a 3-minute<br />

warm-up at 25 Watts followed by 3-minute stages with increments<br />

in power output, depending on the subject’s heart rate and blood<br />

pressure exercise response. The aim was that each individual<br />

reached at least 70% of his/her age predicted maximum heart rate<br />

but blood pressure responses were used to determine symptom<br />

maximums on occasions where blood pressure responded poorly<br />

(systolic raising above 230 mmHg or diastolic increasing by more<br />

than 10 mmHg) during the exercise test. Heart rate was recorded<br />

every minute of each stage manually and with a heart rate monitor,<br />

while exercise blood pressure was manually recorded during the<br />

last minute of each stage. Karvonen’s formula (ACSM, <strong>2010</strong>) was<br />

used to determine 80% of maximum heart rate (220 - age - RHR<br />

x training percentage + RHR). The ACSM’s (<strong>2010</strong>) guidelines<br />

were used for early termination of the test. The ACSM (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

metabolic and multistage equations were utilized to calculate each<br />

individual’s relative predicted VO 2max<br />

.<br />

Procedure<br />

Following ethics approval (Central Regional Ethics Committee,<br />

New Zealand) the project was advertised using the institutions<br />

website. A request was made for volunteers to join a health promotion<br />

and fitness training program run by the Department of Exercise and<br />

Sport Science. A total of 81 staff members out of 150 volunteers<br />

(from a possible cohort of 350 employees) were randomly selected<br />

for the study. The data in this study represent baseline data (prior<br />

to any lifestyle interventions). Although the population are a selfselected<br />

group it does provide valuable information regarding the<br />

health status of staff at a higher educational institution and on the<br />

interrelationships between baseline physiological, biochemical,<br />

cardiovascular, morphological and psychological variables. Staff<br />

were scheduled for one-hour appointments to perform the fitness<br />

test and complete the questionnaires starting on the first day of the<br />

week. The fitness testing was completed within 5 days (two stations<br />

testing nine people per day). Blood tests were taken between<br />

07h00 and 09h00 on two consecutive week days (Tuesday and<br />

Wednesday) the week after the fitness test was conducted, utilising<br />

a roster system.<br />

An independent t-test was used to assess for statistical differences<br />

between the two genders (male and female) with regard to the<br />

morphological, physiological, biochemical and psychological<br />

variables measured. Statistical analyses were also performed using<br />

correlations, stepwise multiple regression analysis and simple<br />

(one-way) analysis of variance (ANOVA). The Newman-Keuls<br />

post hoc test was used to determine intergroup differences. For<br />

the purpose of the ANOVA the respondents (male and females<br />

separately) were placed in fitness groups based on the VO 2max<br />

group<br />

distribution. Those with VO 2max<br />

scores above the 70th percentile of<br />

the respective gender group distribution curves were placed in the<br />

highly fit groups and those below the 30th percentile in the low<br />

fitness groups. The rest were classified as moderately fit. The exact<br />

VO 2max<br />

fitness grouping cut-off values for males and females can<br />

be found in Table 3 where the results of an ANOVA are reported.<br />

Results<br />

Independent T-test Comparing Gender Groups Regarding<br />

Morphological, Physiological, Biochemical and Psychological<br />

Profiles<br />

Descriptive data (means and standard deviations) for male and<br />

female respondents are reported in Table 1.<br />

Table 1. Independent T-test Comparing Descriptive Data<br />

Of Male and Female Respondents<br />

Males (n=25)<br />

<strong>No</strong>te: N.S. = <strong>No</strong>t statistically significant;<br />

Statistical significance at p


Health and Wellbeing<br />

body fat, height, body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, VO 2max<br />

, Physical<br />

work capacity 1701<br />

, total cholesterol, Triglycerides (Trig), HDLcholesterol,<br />

LDL-cholesterol and the TC/HDL-ratio.<br />

Males and females both had mean BMI scores in the overweight<br />

category (BMI – 25.0-29.9) and Waist-to-Hip circumference ratio<br />

scores that could be classified as moderately high for the age<br />

group 40-49 according to the ASCM (<strong>2010</strong>). The mean percentage<br />

body fat values for both males and females were however within<br />

acceptable ranges (males 13% and females 24% body fat).<br />

Percentage body fat correlated significantly with body weight<br />

(r=0.75), BMI (r=0.76) and WHR (r=0.93).<br />

The VO 2max<br />

(ml.kg.min -1 ) scores of both groups indicated low<br />

levels of cardiorespiratory fitness according to normative data<br />

provided for the age groups 40-49 by the ACSM (<strong>2010</strong>). Females<br />

presented with borderline LDL-cholesterol levels (>2.60 mmol.l -1 )<br />

while males had elevated mean total cholesterol (>5.2 mmol.l -1 ) and<br />

LDL-cholesterol (>2.60 mmol.l -1 ) levels. Mean HDL-cholesterol<br />

level were lower for males and females than the optimal or desired<br />

level of 1.6 mmol.l -1 (ACSM, <strong>2010</strong>).<br />

<strong>No</strong> significant (p>0.05) differences were found between the two<br />

gender groups using the independent t-test, regarding their general<br />

physical and psychological health profiles. Males had an average<br />

emotional health score that can be classed as moderate burnout<br />

(Pines et al. 1981) while the females had a mean Happiness and<br />

Quality of life score that could be regarded as low according to<br />

normative information provided by Kammann and Flett (1983).<br />

The mean job stress scores can be regarded as medium (1.51-<br />

2.00) for both gender groups according to normative information<br />

provided by Dua (1994).<br />

Staff at Risk Based on Classification Cut-offs<br />

The percentage respondents with abnormal physical,<br />

biochemical and psychological profiles are presented in Table 2.<br />

Total cholesterol’s cut-off to indicate high risk was set at >6.3<br />

mmol.l -1 , HDL-cholesterol at 4.2 mmol.l -1 and triglycerides at >2.3 mmol.l -1 (ACSM, <strong>2010</strong>).<br />

Elevated total cholesterol (>6.3 mmol.l -1 ) was prevalent in<br />

8.64% (n=7) of the overall group, while 6.2% (n=5) presented with<br />

elevated triglyceride levels (>2.3 mmol.l -1 ), and 18.52% (n=15)<br />

and 16.05% (n=13) with abnormal resting systolic and diastolic<br />

blood pressure values respectively (see Table 2). Nearly forty<br />

percent (39.5% or n= 32) of the respondents also had a functional<br />

capacity lower than 8 METS.<br />

As indicated (Table 2), 48% (n=38) were categorised as unhappy<br />

and 36% (n=29) reported elevated levels of job stress. Further<br />

analysis indicate that only 21% (n=17) of the overall group were<br />

risk free, while 19% (n=15) exhibited two, and 30% (n=24) three<br />

or more physical, biochemical, morphological or psychological<br />

markers of risk. This indicates that a relatively large percentage<br />

of staff members at this tertiary institution, which volunteered for<br />

this study, may be at risk for CAD and/or exhibit psychological<br />

profiles that could compromise both general health and work<br />

performance.<br />

Results of the ANOVA<br />

Results of a simple (one-way) analysis of variance in which<br />

respondents were grouped into three (3) VO 2max<br />

groups and<br />

48 Journal of Research<br />

Table 2. Percentage Of Respondents With Elevated CAD Risk<br />

And Abnormal Psychological Health Profiles<br />

Total group Males Females<br />

Risk factors (n=81) (n=25) (n=56)<br />

Resting systolic blood pressure (>140 mmHg)<br />

Resting diastolic blood pressure (>90 mmHg)<br />

Percentage body fat (Male >16% & F >26%)<br />

BMI (Obesity class I, II and III)<br />

Waist-Hip ratio (Male >0.94 & Female>0.82)<br />

Functional capacity (< 8.0 Mets)<br />

Physically inactive<br />

Total cholesterol (> 6.3 mmol.l-1)<br />

Triglycerides (> 2.3 mmol.l-1)<br />

Glucose (> 6.0 mmol.l-1)<br />

HDL-cholesterol (< 0.9 mmol.l-1)<br />

LDL-cholesterol (> 4.2 mmol.l-1)<br />

TC/HDL-ratio (> 4.6)<br />

Unhappy (Negative effect < 24)<br />

Emotional exhaustion ( Burnout scores > 4.0)<br />

Stress symptoms (>15)<br />

Job stress (>1.67)<br />

18.52%<br />

16.05%<br />

27.85%<br />

25.90%<br />

23.61%<br />

39.51%<br />

34.57%<br />

8.64%<br />

6.20%<br />

4.94%<br />

1.24%<br />

6.17%<br />

8.64%<br />

48.12%<br />

11.37%<br />

32.10%<br />

36.03%<br />

28%<br />

16%<br />

20%<br />

26%<br />

24%<br />

20%<br />

32%<br />

12%<br />

12%<br />

4.0%<br />

4.0%<br />

28%<br />

24%<br />

60%<br />

12%<br />

20%<br />

40%<br />

14.30%<br />

16.07%<br />

37.50%<br />

26.76%<br />

23.21%<br />

35.71%<br />

35.70%<br />

8.93%<br />

1.79%<br />

5.35%<br />

0.0%<br />

1.79%<br />

1.78%<br />

42.85%<br />

10.71%<br />

42.85%<br />

34.00%<br />

compared regarding morphological, biochemical, physiological<br />

and psychological markers of health and well-being are presented<br />

in Table 3.<br />

As indicated in this table, cardiovascular fitness, or VO 2max<br />

,<br />

showed statistically significant (p"0.05) relationships with a large<br />

number of the dependent variables, with the high fitness groups<br />

presenting with the healthier profiles. Highly fit females presented<br />

with statistically significant (p"0.05) lower resting heart rate<br />

F(2,53)=4.73, body weight F(2,53)=10.68, job stress F(2,53)=4.04,<br />

fasting glucose F(2,53)=4.79 and higher HDL-cholesterol<br />

F(2,53)=2.14 values. Male respondents differed significantly<br />

(p"0.05) regarding stress symptoms F(2,22)=1.57 and emotional<br />

exhaustion F(2,22)=0.64 and in both males and females, the highly<br />

fit groups presented with more favourable (p"0.05) percentage<br />

body fat, physical activity and coronary risk profiles (see F-values<br />

in table 3).<br />

These results are consistent with the scientific literature, namely<br />

that both males and females with higher levels of cardiovascular<br />

fitness present with healthier morphological, biochemical and<br />

physiological profiles. The statistically significant relationships<br />

that cardiovascular fitness shows with psychological constructs like<br />

job stress (females), emotional exhaustion and stress symptoms<br />

(males) are interesting (though not entirely unexpected or out of<br />

line with what is generally reported) and justified further statistical<br />

investigation to explore the relative contribution of psychological<br />

well-being to morphological, biochemical and overall physical<br />

health.<br />

Correlations of Psychological Constructs with Other Risk<br />

Factors<br />

The correlations of the four psychological variables with<br />

the traditional morphological, biochemical and physiological<br />

cardiovascular risk factors as well as with measures of health are<br />

reported in Table 4. Stress symptoms, emotional exhaustion and


Health and Wellbeing<br />

Table 3. Cardiovascular Fitness (VO 2max<br />

) And Morphological, Biochemical, Physiological And Psychological<br />

Well-being As Determined With a One-way ANOVA<br />

VO 2max<br />

groups<br />

Low Fitness (L) Moderate Fitness (M) High Fitness (H) F-value Newman Keuls<br />

F 30.76(n=16) (2, 53) post hoc p"0.05<br />

M 40.10(n=7) (2, 22)<br />

Variable Group Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD<br />

Age F 46.4 12.2 38.4 10.1 45.7 8.9 3.66 N.S.<br />

M 41.6 5.2 39.2 5.6 40.8 7.6 0.32 N.S.<br />

RHR F 76.3 11.5 76.3 13.6 66.0 7.8 4.73* H from L & M<br />

M 74.1 12.6 66.7 10.4 62.6 9.9 2.13 N.S.<br />

SBP F 130.6 9.7 125.7 11.9 123.2 9.8 2.04 N.S.<br />

M 135.4 10.1 133.0 12.6 126.3 10.7 1.35 N.S.<br />

DBP F 81.8 10.3 78.3 7.5 76.2 8.9 1.67 N.S.<br />

M 83.4 9.1 75.8 9.9 79.0 8.1 1.41 N.S.<br />

Pulse F 48.9 9.1 47.3 10.6 47.1 8.3 0.18 N.S.<br />

Pressure M 52.0 12.6 57.2 14.0 47.3 12.3 1.28 N.S.<br />

Body F 27.3 6.4 26.4 7.9 18.1 3.9 10.68* H from L & M<br />

Fat (%) M 14.1 2.9 15.4 3.4 10.8 2.6 9.21* H from L & M<br />

Body F 77.8 16.0 76.0 15.2 62.4 5.3 8.90* H from L & M<br />

Weight M 91.7 11.8 93.3 20.8 79.9 8.4 1.90 N.S.<br />

PAI F 32.6 27.7 53.7 36.9 83.6 42.2 8.27* H from L & M<br />

M 16.3 23.1 67.2 48.4 89.1 29.6 7.46* L from M & H<br />

CRI F 28.3 7.4 22.8 6.9 20.4 5.7 5.93* L from M & H<br />

M 29.1 2.5 27.0 5.8 19.9 4.8 8.16* H from L & M<br />

IRS F 237.3 107.1 233.0 162.6 190.6 112.2 0.65 N.S.<br />

M 279.3 252.2 223.9 106.7 199.9 176.4 0.38 N.S.<br />

Stress F 13.4 8.7 13.0 7.0 13.4 7.8 0.02 N.S.<br />

Symptoms M 16.4 6.8 11.4 5.1 8.8 3.8 1.57* H from L & M<br />

Job F 1.40 0.21 1.55 0.28 1.64 0.35 3.04* H from L<br />

Stress M 1.60 0.35 1.56 0.20 1.69 0.23 0.53 N.S.<br />

Emotional F 3.02 .072 2.78 0.65 2.97 0.96 0.52 N.S.<br />

Exhaustion M 3.38 0.58 3.18 0.56 2.93 0.54 0.64* H from L<br />

Happiness F 21.2 10.0 24.8 10.2 20.8 10.7 0.73 N.S.<br />

M 15.8 10.5 18.2 12.5 17.6 9.5 0.09 N.S.<br />

TC F 4.79 0.68 4.91 0.82 5.14 1.36 0.54 N.S.<br />

M 5.78 1.10 5.46 0.71 5.04 0.77 1.44 N.S.<br />

Fasting F 5.01 1.08 4.45 0.51 4.33 0.31 4.79* L from M & H<br />

Glucose M 4.65 0.38 5.22 1.24 4.46 0.38 1.95 N.S.<br />

Trig F 1.90 0.38 1.12 0.36 1.08 0.59 0.05 N.S.<br />

M 1.64 0.78 1.65 1.09 1.42 0.42 0.19 N.S.<br />

LDL-C F 2.64 0.57 2.71 0.73 2.73 1.14 0.04 N.S.<br />

M 3.63 0.95 3.14 0.70 3.07 0.72 1.15 N.S.<br />

HDL-C F 1.65 0.38 1.69 0.34 1.93 0.35 2.14* L from H<br />

M 1.34 0.32 1.40 0.48 1.56 0.13 1.03 N.S.<br />

TC/HDL- F 3.02 0.69 2.98 0.65 2.78 0.79 0.57 N.S.<br />

Ratio M 4.31 0.72 3.88 0.74 3.84 0.76 0.35 N.S.<br />

<strong>No</strong>te: F=female; N.S.=not statistically significant; M=male; L=low fitness; M=moderate fitness; H=high fitness; *=p"0.05<br />

volume 5, issue 1 49


Health and Wellbeing<br />

the Affectometer2 (happiness and quality of life) had a significant<br />

negative correlation (p"0.05) with the coronary risk index and the<br />

illness rating scale.<br />

Table 4. Correlation Of The Four (4) Psychological Measures<br />

With Markers Of Morphological, Biochemical<br />

And Physiological Health<br />

Health variables<br />

Age in years<br />

Heart rate in rest (RHR)<br />

Systolic blood Pressure (SBP)<br />

Diastolic blood pressure (DBP)<br />

Pulse pressure (PP)<br />

Mean arterial pressure (MAP)<br />

Percentage body fat<br />

Body weight in kg (BW)<br />

Body mass index (BMI)<br />

Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR)<br />

VO 2max<br />

in ml.kg.min-1<br />

Physical work capacity 170<br />

Physical activity index (PAI)<br />

Coronary risk index (CRI)<br />

Illness rating scale (IRS)<br />

Total cholesterol (TC)<br />

Fasting glucose (GLU)<br />

Triglycerides (Trig)<br />

HDL-cholesterol<br />

LDL-cholesterol<br />

TC/HDL-ratio<br />

<strong>No</strong>te: *= p"0.05<br />

Job stress<br />

-0.05<br />

Psychological variables<br />

0.10<br />

0.04<br />

0.08<br />

0.11<br />

0.04<br />

0.19<br />

0.02<br />

-0.08<br />

-0.09<br />

-0.31*<br />

-0.30*<br />

-0.19<br />

0.17<br />

0.10<br />

0.14<br />

-0.06<br />

0.14<br />

-0.06<br />

0.09<br />

0.09<br />

Stress Emotional Happiness<br />

symptoms exhaustion quality of<br />

life<br />

-0.03<br />

0.15<br />

0.02<br />

0.06<br />

0.03<br />

0.06<br />

0.05<br />

0.04<br />

-0.05<br />

-0.03<br />

-0.17<br />

-0.16<br />

-0.12<br />

0.29*<br />

0.54*<br />

0.16<br />

-0.05<br />

0.15<br />

-0.07<br />

0.09<br />

0.08<br />

0.09<br />

0.16<br />

0.18<br />

0.14<br />

0.07<br />

0.18<br />

0.05<br />

0.14<br />

0.10<br />

0.20<br />

-0.10<br />

-0.07<br />

-0.15<br />

0.42*<br />

0.42*<br />

0.13<br />

0.13<br />

0.01<br />

-0.10<br />

0.09<br />

0.12<br />

-0.01<br />

-0.13<br />

-0.16<br />

-0.07<br />

-0.10<br />

-0.12<br />

-0.12<br />

-0.12<br />

-0.08<br />

-0.25*<br />

0.12<br />

0.12<br />

0.09<br />

-0.26*<br />

-0.32*<br />

-0.04<br />

-0.16<br />

-0.02<br />

0.17<br />

-0.03<br />

-0.11<br />

Results of the Stepwise Multiple Regression Analysis<br />

In order to obtain more specific information on the relative<br />

importance of the psychological variables with regard to overall<br />

health, the contribution of all morphological, biochemical and<br />

physiological risk factors and the four psychological variables to<br />

the variance of the coronary risk index and the illness rating scale<br />

was studied using a stepwise multiple regression analysis. The<br />

results of this analysis are reported in Table 5.<br />

A total of 22 factors, including the four psychological measures<br />

(emotional exhaustion, job stress, stress symptoms and happiness<br />

and quality of life), were used in this stepwise multiple regression<br />

analysis (Table 5).<br />

Ten of the 22 variables were listed as contributors (the<br />

contribution of the rest of the variables were very low and as such<br />

are not listed), and their combined contribution to the variance of<br />

the two health status measures (coronary risk index and the illness<br />

rating scale) was 61.4%. Body mass index (24.9%), emotional<br />

burnout (15.6%), glucose (6.3%), physical activity (4.8%) and<br />

the TC/HDL ratio (2.3%) were the only statistically significant<br />

(p"0.05) contributors. All four of the psychological measures<br />

contributed to the variance of overall health. Emotional exhaustion<br />

50 Journal of Research<br />

Table 5. Contribution Of Risk Factors To The Variance Of<br />

Overall Coronary Risk And Health Status Of Staff<br />

Members At a Tertiary Institution<br />

Contributing<br />

variables R R 2 R 2 -change F-value<br />

Body Mass Index (BMI)<br />

Emotional exhaustion<br />

Glucose<br />

Physical activity Index<br />

Happiness<br />

Job Stress<br />

TC/HDL-ratio<br />

Stress symptoms<br />

Systolic blood pressure<br />

Resting Heart rate<br />

<strong>No</strong>te: *= p"0.05<br />

was, however, the only psychological variables which contributed<br />

statistically significantly (p"0.05) to the variance of the two health<br />

status measures.<br />

In order to determine if level of fitness would influence the<br />

contribution of the psychological variables to general health, their<br />

contribution to the two health status variables (Coronary risk index<br />

and illness rating scale) were studied in individuals grouped as<br />

low, moderate and highly fit.<br />

As indicated in Table 6, emotional exhaustion was the primary<br />

contributor to the variance of the coronary risk index and illness<br />

rating scale in the stepwise multiple regression analysis performed<br />

on females. This was the case in all three of the fitness groups. The<br />

overall contribution of the psychological constructs to the variance<br />

of the health status (coronary risk index and illness rating scale)<br />

increased from 23.47% in the low fitness group to 54.32% in the<br />

moderate fitness group, but decreased to 24.04% in the high fitness<br />

group. In the moderately fit group, stress symptoms (18.1%) were<br />

also a statistically significant contributor (p"0.05) to the variance<br />

of overall health.<br />

Table 6. Contribution Of Various Psychological Variables To<br />

The Variance Of Overall Coronary Risk And<br />

Health Status Of Females With Low, Moderate<br />

And High Levels Of Cardiovascular Fitness<br />

Fitness grouping Contributing variables R R 2 R 2 - F-value<br />

change<br />

Low fit Emotional exhaustion 0.4694 0.2123 0.2123 10.24*<br />

(VO 2max<br />

30.75) Job Stress 0.4902 0.2404 0.0315 1.493<br />

<strong>No</strong>te *= p "0.05.<br />

0.499630<br />

0.636654<br />

0.684506<br />

0.718741<br />

0.734081<br />

0.747183<br />

0.762848<br />

0.772049<br />

0.779226<br />

0.783778<br />

0.249631<br />

0.405328<br />

0.468548<br />

0.516589<br />

0.538875<br />

0.558283<br />

0.581936<br />

0.596059<br />

0.607194<br />

0.614308<br />

0.249631<br />

0.155697<br />

0.063221<br />

0.048040<br />

0.022286<br />

0.019409<br />

0.023653<br />

0.014123<br />

0.01135<br />

0.007114<br />

26.28*<br />

20.42*<br />

9.159*<br />

7.553*<br />

3.625<br />

3.251<br />

4.130*<br />

2.517<br />

2.013<br />

0.259<br />

In males, job stress was the only statistically significant (p"0.05)<br />

contributor, and only in those respondents classified as moderately


Health and Wellbeing<br />

fit (Table 7). The psychological variables made no contribution<br />

to the variance of health in the low fitness group, while job stress<br />

and stress symptoms contributed 22.9% (p>0.05) to the variance<br />

of health as measured with the coronary risk index and the Illness<br />

rating scale, in the high fitness group.<br />

Table 7. Contribution Of Various Psychological Variables To<br />

The Variance Of Overall Coronary Risk And<br />

Health Status Of Males With Low, Moderate<br />

And High Levels Of Cardiovascular Fitness<br />

Fitness grouping Contributing variables R R 2 R 2 - F-value<br />

change<br />

Low fit<br />

(VO 2max<br />

40.09) Stress symptoms 0.4791 0.2295 0.0986 1.792<br />

<strong>No</strong>te *= p "0.05.<br />

Measures of psychological health seem to be as potent a marker/<br />

predictor of health in fit and in unfit individuals. The results of<br />

these analyses therefore indicate that the level of fitness does not<br />

seem to negate the contribution of psychological health to overall<br />

health, as measured with a coronary risk index and the illness<br />

rating scale.<br />

Discussion<br />

There is now overwhelming evidence in the scientific literature<br />

attesting to what many academics have believed for years:<br />

academia is a highly stressful occupation. The work environment<br />

has been implicated in various studies as a causal factor of<br />

impaired work performance, decrease in faculty productivity,<br />

increase in absenteeism, propensity to leave, and higher staff<br />

turnover (Kinman, 2001; Taris et al., 2001). The effect of a<br />

stressful work environment on health and well-being is also well<br />

established (Lovallo & Gerrin, 2003; Nicholson et al. 2005) but<br />

very few studies have investigated the impact (or relationship)<br />

of psychological health variables on markers of morphological,<br />

biochemical and physiological health in academia.<br />

Psychological health among academics is, generally speaking,<br />

relatively poor (Kinman, 2001). Academics in Gillespie et al.’s<br />

(2001) study reported feelings of anxiety, depression, burnout,<br />

anger, irritability and helplessness as a direct consequence of<br />

perceived work related stress. The link between psychological<br />

exhaustion/burnout, depression and suicidal tendencies has been<br />

well established and indications of an epidemiological study on<br />

the contribution of occupation and geography to suicide death in<br />

England and Wales conducted by Kelly, Charlton, and Jenkins<br />

(1995) are that academics are at 50 percent greater risk than the<br />

average worker to commit suicide as a direct consequence of work<br />

environment related distress. A survey carried out for the UKbased<br />

Association of University Teachers (AUT, 2003) found that<br />

93% of its members (representing almost 160,000 academic staff)<br />

suffered from work-related stress and 62% from ‘excessive’ strain,<br />

while approximately 27% reported ‘fairly seriously’ considering a<br />

career change, 46% said their morale had worsened in the past two<br />

years, 72% were dissatisfied with pay and 86% felt their workload<br />

was too heavy (Smithers, 2003). The above-mentioned survey<br />

results are matched by other international studies (Barkhuizen &<br />

Rothman, 2008; Forlin, 2001; Gillespie et al., 2001; Kinman, 2001;<br />

Winefield et al., 2003; Winter & Sarros, 2002). Psychological<br />

stress now appears to be a feature of occupational life of university<br />

staff (Fisher, 1994) and working during evenings and weekends is<br />

commonplace (Kinman, 1998).<br />

In this study 48% of the respondents were unhappy as measured<br />

by the Affectometer2 (Kammann & Flett, 1983). The Affectometer2<br />

consists of 20 items concerning the subject's present life situation.<br />

Each item is rated on a 5 - point scale of agreement/disagreement<br />

regarding questions like “my life is on the right track, my future<br />

looks good, I like myself, I have energy to spare” and so forth. A<br />

lower score reflects a more negative orientation and less satisfaction<br />

with life. In terms of whether a person has, in general, a negative or<br />

positive orientation towards life, these questions are as applicable<br />

today as when the questionnaire was developed. People seem to<br />

be less happy today than after the second world war (Persaud,<br />

1998) but it is debatable whether normative scores established<br />

by Kamannn and Flett, 26 years ago, and calibrated using the<br />

academic gravitated population of Dunedin (same country and<br />

same type of population used in this study) should be rejected<br />

based on the fact that the normative scores are 26 years old. The<br />

focus of the present study is more on the impact of psychological<br />

distress on other measures of health and according to this data about<br />

half of the staff participating in this project were in general fairly<br />

unhappy, while 32% exhibited a high amount of stress symptoms<br />

and 36% presented with job stress. The implication is that this<br />

study population provided enough participants with psychological<br />

distress to examine the relationships of the psychological constructs<br />

with other measures of health.<br />

Our study suggests that relatively large numbers of staff at<br />

this tertiary institution may be at risk of cardiovascular disease,<br />

and that a relationship seems to exist between constructs of<br />

psychological health and markers of morphological, biochemical<br />

and physiological health. Firstly, regarding relative risk for<br />

cardiovascular disease, our results indicate that if optimal or<br />

desirable levels were to be considered, 40.7% of volunteering<br />

staff presented with total cholesterol values above the desirable<br />

level of 1.7 mmol.l -1 ) that could be regarded as<br />

being high. In addition, 50.6% presented with abnormal HDLcholesterol<br />

(2.6 mmol.l -1 ) levels.<br />

In a study by Meyers, Prakash, Froelicher, Partington and Atwood<br />

(2002) it was reported that in both healthy and cardiovascular<br />

disease subjects, the peak exercise capacity achieved was a<br />

stronger predictor of overall mortality than hypertension, smoking,<br />

diabetes, obesity, development of arrhythmias during exercise, or<br />

elevated total cholesterol level. The mortality risk from any cause<br />

in participants whose exercise capacity was less than 5 METS<br />

was roughly double that of subjects whose exercise capacity was<br />

more than 8 METS. In this study 39.51% of the respondents had a<br />

functional capacity lower than 8 METS and 2.47% had a functional<br />

volume 5, issue 1 51


Health and Wellbeing<br />

capacity lower than 5 METS.<br />

Secondly, concerning the interrelationship between the physical,<br />

biochemical and psychological measures it is evident that the level<br />

of cardiovascular fitness does not negate or weaken the contribution<br />

of the psychological constructs to overall health.<br />

Lastly, the psychological constructs correlated negatively<br />

with physical activity and VO 2max<br />

. For example job stress, stress<br />

symptoms and emotional burnout showed correlations of r = -0.31,<br />

r = -0.17 and r = -0.10 with VO 2max<br />

and correlations of r = -0.19,<br />

r = -012 and r = -0.15 with participation in physical activity. This<br />

indicates that psychological health can impact in an indirect manner<br />

on health through its negative effect on lifestyle and exercise habits.<br />

It seems therefore that the work environment impacts negatively<br />

on cardiovascular and overall health in both a direct and indirect<br />

manner. The results of this study support the need for intervention<br />

for these lecturers and administrators, especially in areas of stress<br />

management and mental health.<br />

Conclusions<br />

1. High percentages of staff presented with risk factors for CAD as<br />

well as with unfavourable psychological profiles.<br />

2. Female staff members did not exhibit more psychological<br />

distress and/or worse levels of biochemical and overall health<br />

than their male counterparts. As can be expected females do<br />

present with lower levels of cardiovascular fitness and higher<br />

morphological measurements (percentage body fat and waistto-hip<br />

ratio’s). <strong>No</strong>rmatively speaking, both the male and<br />

female BMI and waist-to-hip ratio averages in this study can be<br />

regarded as moderately high.<br />

3. Reported emotional exhaustion seems to be a significant<br />

contributor to the variance of health in both males and females<br />

at this tertiary institution.<br />

4. The level of cardiovascular fitness improves overall health status<br />

but does not negate the relationship of emotional exhaustion with<br />

health. The overall contribution of the psychological constructs<br />

to the variance of health status stayed the same or increased<br />

in male and female respondents classified as respectively low,<br />

moderately or highly fit.<br />

References<br />

American College of Sport Medicine (ACSM). (<strong>2010</strong>). ACSM’s healthrelated<br />

physical fitness assessment manual. Philadelphia: Lippincott<br />

Williams & Wilkins.<br />

Ashley, E. & Myers, J. (2003). New insights into the clinical exercise test.<br />

ACSM’s Certified News, 13(4), 1-5.<br />

Association of University Teachers. (2003). Survey for members. London:<br />

AUT.<br />

Barkhuizen, N. & Rothmann, S. (2008). Occupational stress of academic<br />

staff in South African higher education insitutions. South African<br />

Journal of Psychology, 38(2), 321-336.<br />

Bjurtsrom, L.A. & Alexiou, N.G. (1978). A program of heart disease<br />

intervention for public employees: A five year report. Journal of<br />

Occupational Medicine, 20(8), 521-531.<br />

Carney, R.M. (1998). Psychological risk factors for cardiac events.<br />

Could there be just one? Circulation, 97, 128-129.<br />

Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure<br />

of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385<br />

- 396.<br />

Dua, J.K. (1994). Job stressors and their effects on physical health,<br />

emotional health, and job satisfaction in a university. Journal of<br />

Educational Administration, 32(1), 59-78.<br />

Fisher, S. (1994). Stress in academic life: The mental assembly line.<br />

Buckingham: SHRE/Open University Press.<br />

Forlin, C. (2001). Inclusion: Identifying potential stressors for regular<br />

class teachers. Educational Research, 43(3), 235-245.<br />

Gillespie, N.A., Walsh, M., Winefields, A.H., Dua, J. & Souch, C. (2001).<br />

Occupational stress in universities: Staff perceptions of the causes,<br />

consequences and moderators of stress. Work and Stress, 15(1), 53-<br />

72.<br />

Houston, D., Meyer, L.H. & Paewai, S. (2006). Academic staff workloads<br />

and job satisfaction: Expectations and values in academe. Journal of<br />

Higher Education Policy, 28(1), 17-30.<br />

International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (2001).<br />

International standards for anthropometric assessment. National<br />

Library of Australia.<br />

Kammann, R. & Flett, R. (1983). Affectometer 2: A scale to measure<br />

current levels of general happiness. Australian Journal of Psychology,<br />

35(2), 259-265.<br />

Kelly, S., Charlton, J. & Jenkins, R. (1995). Suicide deaths in England<br />

and Wales, 1982-1992: The contribution of occupation and geography.<br />

Population Trends, 80:18-21.<br />

Kinman, G. (1998). Pressure points: A survey into the causes and<br />

consequences of occupational stress in UK academics and related<br />

staff. London: Association of University Teachers.<br />

Kinman, G. (2001). Pressure points: A review of research on stressors and<br />

strains in UK academics. Educational Psychology, 21, 473-492.<br />

Kobasa, S.D., Maddi, S.R. & Courington, S. (1981). Personality and<br />

constitution as mediators in the stress-illness relationship. Journal of<br />

Health and Social Behavior, 22, 368-378.<br />

Lovallo, W.R. & Gerin, W.G. (2003). Psychophysiological reactivity:<br />

Mechanisms and pathways to cardiovascular disease. Psychosomatic<br />

Medicine, 65, 36-45.<br />

Meyers, J., Prakash, M., Froelicher, V., Partington, S. & Atwood, J.E.<br />

(2002). Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for<br />

exercise testing. New England Journal of Medicine, 346(11), 793-<br />

801.<br />

Millward-Brown. (1996). Powerful people: A survey of Britain’s<br />

professional workforce. London: Guardian Publishing.<br />

Nicholson, A., Fuhrer, R. & Marmot, M. (2005). Psychological Distress<br />

as a predictor of CHD events in men: The effect of persistence and<br />

components of risk. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, 522-530.<br />

Ogden, J. (2004). Health psychology: A textbook. 3 rd edition. Berkshire :<br />

Open University Press.<br />

Persaud, R. (1998). Staying sane: How to make your mind work for you.<br />

London: Metro Publishing Ltd.<br />

Pines, A.M., Aronson, E. & Kafry, D. (1981). Burnout: From tedium to<br />

personal growth. New York: Free Press.<br />

Rosengren, A., Hawken, S.O., Sliwa, K., Zubaid, M., Almahmeed, W.A.,<br />

Blackett, K.N., … & Yusuf, S. (2004). Association of psychosocial<br />

risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11119 cases and<br />

13648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Casecontrol<br />

study. The Lancet, 364, 953-364<br />

Schroeder, D.H. & Costa, P.T. (1984). Influence of life event stress on<br />

physical illness: Substantive effects or methodological flaws. Journal<br />

of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 853-863.<br />

Smithers, R. (2003). Third of academics want to quit. Retrieved October<br />

14, 2009 from HYPERLINK "http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/<br />

news/story/%200,9830,911076,00.html"http://education.guardian.<br />

co.uk/higher/news/story/ 0,9830,911076,00.html.<br />

Taris, T.W., Schreurs, P.J.G. & Van Iersel-Van Silfhout, I.J. (2001). Job<br />

stress, job strain, and psychological withdrawal among Dutch university<br />

staff: Towards a dual-process model for the effects of occupational<br />

stress. Work and Stress, 15(4), 283-296.<br />

Tytherleigh, M.Y., Webb, D., Cooper, C.L. & Ricketts, C. (2005).<br />

Occupational stress in UK higher education institutions: A comparative<br />

study of all staff categories. Higher Education Research and<br />

Development, 24(1), 41-61.<br />

Winefield, A.H., Gillespie, N.A., Stough, C., Dua, J., Hapuarachchi, J.,<br />

52 Journal of Research


Health and Wellbeing<br />

& Boyd, C. (2003). Occupational stress in Australian university<br />

staff: Results from a national survey. International Journal of<br />

Stress Management, 10, 51-63.<br />

Winefield, A.H. & Jarrett, R. (2001). Occupational stress in university<br />

staff. International Journal of Stress Management, 8(4), 285-298.<br />

Winter, R. & Sarros, J. (2002). The academic work environment in<br />

Australian universities: A motivating place to work? Higher Education<br />

Research & Development, 21(3), 241-258.<br />

Wyler, A.R., Masuda, M. & Holmes, T.H. (1967). Seriousness of illness<br />

rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 363-374.<br />

1<br />

The physical work capacity 170<br />

is an expression of maximum<br />

exercise capacity in watts divided by body weight at 170 beats<br />

per minute. It is obtained by explorating HR responses during the<br />

three stages of the YMCA Cycle Ergometer test to 170 beats per<br />

minute !<br />

volume 5, issue 1 53


An Examination of Immunity Statutes Regarding<br />

the Liability of Recreational Youth Sport<br />

Organizations for the Pedophilic Actions of<br />

Coaches, Administrators, and Officials<br />

by Thomas A. Baker III, University of Georgia; Daniel P.<br />

Connaughton & James J. Zhang, University of Florida<br />

Abstract<br />

Millions of children in the United States participate in youth<br />

sports. The literature demonstrates that sexual abuse is a problem in<br />

sport. This study examined voluntary immunity statutes for all 50<br />

states and the District of Columbia with the purpose of determining<br />

potential liability for recreational youth sport organizations for the<br />

pedophilic actions of their coaches, administrators, and officials.<br />

Comparisons and differences were drawn between the states<br />

regarding whether voluntary immunity statutes were applicable.<br />

Key words: Statutory protection, sexual abuse<br />

Introduction<br />

Millions of children participate in youth sports. For instance,<br />

in 2008, it is estimated that more than 44 million children played<br />

organized sports and more than 7.3 million adults served as<br />

coaches, administrators, and officials for local, regional, or national<br />

youth sport organizations in the U.S. (National Council of Youth<br />

Sports, 2008). Many of these children are coached by volunteer,<br />

unscreened, adult males (Peterson, 2004). The lack of screening on<br />

the part of many youth sport organizations, the ‘power’ relationship<br />

between adult (coach, administrator, official) and child (youth<br />

sport participant), out-of-town competitions often without parental<br />

supervision, and lack of policies and procedures, combined with<br />

the access that youth sport provides to a large number of children<br />

increase the opportunities for abuse to take place (Brackenridge,<br />

2001; Kirby, Greaves, & Hankivsky, 2000; Nack & Yaeger, 1999;<br />

Zaichkowsky, 2000).<br />

The purpose of this study was to examine volunteer immunity<br />

statutes for all 50 states and the District of Columbia to determine<br />

whether such statutes provide defenses for recreational youth<br />

sport organizations. By examining the law of all 50 states and the<br />

District of Columbia, this study made comparisons between the<br />

states in how volunteer immunity statutes may be applied. Key<br />

legal doctrines, terms, and operational definitions are provided in<br />

Table 1.<br />

It was necessary to conduct an expansive study that included all<br />

50 states and Washington D.C. because negligence is a creation of<br />

state law and the application of negligence theories varies among<br />

the states. Local and regional youth sport organizations (such as<br />

church, park and recreation departments, and municipal programs)<br />

need to understand the law for their specific jurisdiction. However,<br />

national recreational youth sport organizations including but<br />

not limited to Little League Baseball and Softball, Inc., Pony<br />

Baseball/Softball, Inc., U.S. Youth Soccer, American Youth Soccer<br />

Organization, American Youth Football Inc., and Pop Warner<br />

54 Journal of Research<br />

Table 1. Legal Doctrines, Terms, and Operational<br />

Definitions<br />

Term<br />

Tort<br />

Intentional<br />

Tort<br />

Negligence<br />

Scope of<br />

Employment<br />

Respondeat<br />

Superior<br />

Volunteer<br />

Immunity<br />

Recreational<br />

Youth Sport<br />

Organizations<br />

Definition<br />

A tort is a civil wrong for which the law provides a remedy<br />

(Keeton, 1984). A tort can derive from either an intentional<br />

or unintentional act or omission.<br />

A tort committed when the actor desires the consequence, or<br />

the actor knows to a substantial certainty that the consequence<br />

will follow (Restatement (Second) of Torts § 8A, 1965). A<br />

youth sport coach, administrator, or official who sexually abuses<br />

an athlete is subject to civil liability for an intentional tort<br />

because the perpetrator of the tort acted with intent, meaning<br />

that he or she intended to do the tortious act.<br />

The term negligence is given to those unintentional torts<br />

that injure others in person, property or reputation (van der<br />

Smissen, 2007). Negligence can be defined as conduct<br />

involving an unreasonably great risk of causing harm or<br />

damage; conduct that falls below the standard established by<br />

law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of<br />

harm (Restatement (Second) of Torts § 282, 1965).<br />

The doctrine of respondeat superior is often referred to as<br />

vicarious liability because it serves as a method of holding<br />

one person vicariously liable for the wrongs committed<br />

by another (Keeton, 1984). The phrase respondeat superior<br />

means “let the master answer” (Garner, 2004, p. X).<br />

Perhaps the most critical element of respondeat superior is the<br />

requirement that the employee was acting within the scope of<br />

his employment (Keeton, 1984). Acts committed by the<br />

employee that exceed the scope of employment are considered<br />

ultra vires. Employers are generally not vicariously liable for<br />

the ultra vires actions committed by their employees (Cotten,<br />

2007). However, the definition of scope of employment<br />

has extended to include all acts committed in furtherance of the<br />

employer’s business (Keeton, 1984). Jurisdictions that use a<br />

broader definition of scope of employment provide a greater<br />

opportunity for plaintiffs to recover against recreational youth<br />

sport organizations based on respondeat superior<br />

(Weeber, 1992).<br />

A large number of states have passed volunteer immunity<br />

statutes to protect volunteers from being sued for ordinary<br />

negligence (Hurst & Knight, 2003). These statutes grew out of<br />

a fear that people would stop volunteering and the services<br />

provided by these volunteer-dependant agencies would stop<br />

(Smith, 1999). Some states have gone further with their<br />

coverage and have expanded the statutes to cover gross<br />

negligence and even willful, wanton, and reckless conduct<br />

(Smith, 1999). Congress enacted its own volunteer protection<br />

statute in 1997 when it passed the Federal Volunteer Protection<br />

Act (FVPA) (Biedzynski, 1999).<br />

For the purpose of this paper, recreational youth sport<br />

organizations are youth sport programs that exist outside of an<br />

educational/school setting. Examples of recreational youth sport<br />

organizations include Little League Baseball and Softball, Pop<br />

Warner Little Scholars, and community-based (local and<br />

regional) youth sport programs (church, municipal, park and<br />

recreation department programs, etc.).


Immunity Statutes<br />

Little Scholars, Inc. provide programs in most states and need to<br />

understand the variances that may exist among legal jurisdictions.<br />

It is important for recreational youth sport administrators to<br />

understand volunteer immunity statutes and how they may be<br />

applied so that they can better protect their organizations against<br />

the pedophilic actions of coaches, administrators, and officials<br />

within their programs.<br />

Review of Literature<br />

Children in a coach-player relationship tend to be more<br />

susceptible to sexual assault (Peterson, 2004). Young athletes<br />

often spend considerable amounts of time with their coaches.<br />

Coaches often take on a role similar to that of a parent and children<br />

typically consent to activities they would never undertake under<br />

the guidance of a parental figure (Appenzeller, 2000). Children<br />

also look to coaches as role models, heroes, or even as best friends.<br />

Further, children are often told by their parents from the outset of<br />

their athletic involvement to obey the coach and never argue with<br />

the coach (Peterson, 2004). Coaches often become very significant<br />

figures in the lives of such young athletes, and the power that some<br />

of these coaches acquire within such relationships is robust with<br />

the potential for misuse (Gervis & Dunn, 2004).<br />

Opportunity and Prevalence<br />

Unfortunately, youth sports often provide an excellent hunting<br />

ground for pedophiles. It is estimated that one in three girls and<br />

one in seven boys in the United States are sexually molested<br />

before the age of 18 (Earl-Hubbard, 1996). Unfortunately, these<br />

overwhelming numbers do not even represent the true extent of<br />

sexual abuse because it is estimated that only 10 to 35 percent of<br />

incidents involving sexual exploitation are ever reported (Peterson,<br />

2004). Some pedophiles have admitted to molesting 500-600<br />

children before getting caught. Although no one has ever studied<br />

the number of young athletes who have been molested by their<br />

coaches, experts including the Executive Director of the National<br />

Institute for Child Centered Coaching, Stephen Bavolek, believe<br />

that sexual abuse in sports is prevalent (Deak, 1999) and it is not<br />

a problem that is unique to the United States. By coaching youth<br />

sports, pedophiles are given an opportunity to win over parents<br />

and gain the trust of children. Parents and athletes alike put faith in<br />

their coaches and this faith can easily be exploited by coaches who<br />

are sexual abusers (Deak, 1999). The literature and findings from<br />

studies in Canada (Kirby & Greaves, 1996), the U.S. (Gibbons<br />

& Campbell, 2003; Pike-Masteralexis, 1995; Volkwein, Franke,<br />

Schnell, Sherwood, & Livezey, 1997), the United Kingdom<br />

(Brackenridge, 1997), Denmark (Nielson, 2001), and Australia<br />

(Leahy, Pretty, & Tenenbaum, 2002) demonstrate that sexual abuse<br />

is a problem in sport.<br />

In Canada, the Canadian Hockey League has gone as far as to<br />

label the protection of its athletes from pedophilia “a paramount<br />

concern” (Kirk, 1997). A study conducted in Denmark revealed<br />

that 2% of athletes in that country were the survivors of sexual<br />

abuse within sport and 3% of coaches admitted to being intimately<br />

involved with athletes under the age of 18 (Nielson, 2001). In<br />

2004, a survey titled “Citizens of the European Union and Sport”<br />

polled citizens within all 25 European Union members and found<br />

that 29% of those surveyed believe that sexual abuse of children<br />

is the main negative aspect associated with sport (Eurobarometer,<br />

2004).<br />

In 2007, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) addressed<br />

the problem of sexual abuse when it adopted a consensus<br />

statement titled “Sexual Harassment and Abuse in Sport.” The<br />

IOC adopted the statement with the goal of promoting effective<br />

preventive policy and increasing awareness of sexual harassment<br />

and abuse in sport. Through the consensus statement, the IOC<br />

recommended that all sport organizations should: (a) develop<br />

policies and procedures for the prevention of sexual harassment<br />

and abuse; (b) monitor the implementation of these policies and<br />

procedures; (c) evaluate the impact of these policies in identifying<br />

and reducing sexual harassment and abuse; (d) develop an<br />

education and training program on sexual harassment and abuse in<br />

their sport(s); (e) promote and exemplify equitable, respectful and<br />

ethical leadership; (f) foster strong partnerships with parents in the<br />

prevention of sexual harassment and abuse; and (g) promote and<br />

support scientific research on these issues (IOC, 2007).<br />

Imposition of Civil Liability and Volunteer Immunity Statutes<br />

Nations around the globe have recognized both moral and ethical<br />

justifications for preventative measures aimed at preventing sexual<br />

abuse in youth sport. In addition to these justifications, there is<br />

a legal duty on the part of recreational youth sport organizations<br />

to protect their athletes from foreseeable risks (van der Smissen,<br />

1990). It is possible that a youth sport organization could be found<br />

liable if appropriate protective measures are not in place to prevent,<br />

or at least limit the possibility of sexual harassment or abuse. Even<br />

the best protective measures are not foolproof in removing the<br />

threat posed by pedophiles to recreational youth sport participants<br />

and organizations.<br />

Furthermore, it is possible that a youth sport organization<br />

could be found vicariously liable for the actions of its coaches,<br />

administrators, or officials through the doctrine of respondeat<br />

superior. Under this doctrine, liability can attach to a master if the<br />

servant, while acting on the master’s behalf, harms someone to<br />

whom the master owes a duty of care (Mayer, 2005). Accordingly,<br />

if an employee (servant) acts negligently during the course of<br />

employment, then the employer (master) may be held liable for the<br />

employee’s negligence. Simply put, the negligence of the employee<br />

is imputed to the employer. To be successful in a respondeat<br />

superior claim, the plaintiff must establish that the tortfeasor is<br />

liable in tort, the tortfeasor is employed by the defendant, and the<br />

employee was acting within the scope of employment when the<br />

tortious act was committed (27 American Jurisprudence 2nd § 459,<br />

2005).<br />

Thus, it is important that these organizations understand how<br />

they can defend themselves from the imposition of civil liability for<br />

the actions of others. The Federal Volunteer Protection Act protects<br />

youth sport volunteers from civil liability for their negligent acts;<br />

but the statute does not protect youth sport organizations. The<br />

majority of states also have volunteer immunity statutes and these<br />

statutes vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction in the extent of<br />

the protection provided to volunteers. Many states have statutes<br />

specifically tailored for recreational youth sports and some extend<br />

volume 5, issue 1 55


Immunity Statutes<br />

protection to include recreational youth sport organizations. It<br />

is important that these organizations understand how immunity<br />

statutes work and whether they can be used to guard them against<br />

the imposition of civil liability for the actions of pedophiles who<br />

infiltrate their ranks and abuse their athletes.<br />

A review of the literature revealed a substantial void in research<br />

on this issue. <strong>No</strong> single study has ever attempted to provide a<br />

comprehensive review examining the issue immunity statutes<br />

for all 50 states and the District of Columbia regarding the civil<br />

liability of recreational youth sport organizations for the pedophilic<br />

actions of coaches, administrators, and officials. Thus, conducting<br />

the current study was deemed necessary.<br />

Method<br />

The purpose of this study was to determine if volunteer<br />

immunity statutes in the United States provide recreational youth<br />

sport organizations with a defense against lawsuits based on the<br />

pedophilic actions of their coaches, administrators, and officials.<br />

A comprehensive literature review was performed to gather<br />

information on the application of volunteer immunity statutes, as<br />

well as their impact on legal cases, which were derived from a<br />

statutory analysis and literature review. Westlaw’s legal database<br />

was used in conducting a keyword search of all 50 states and the<br />

District of Columbia. Keywords utilized in the search included the<br />

following: volunteer, immunity, recreation, sport, protection, and<br />

liability.<br />

The statutory and case law for each jurisdiction was analyzed<br />

and states were put into groups based on whether the law: (a)<br />

expressly extended statutory protection to volunteer organizations,<br />

(b) limited statutory protection to individual volunteers, or (c)<br />

was ambiguous as to whether statutory protection extended to<br />

volunteer organizations. There was a fourth category of states that<br />

did not have volunteer immunity statutes protecting recreational<br />

youth sport organizations. The next step involved analysis of<br />

the law for states with statutes that either expressly protected<br />

volunteer organizations, or were ambiguous as to whether they<br />

covered volunteer organizations. The second round of analysis<br />

was performed to determine if each statute extended its protection<br />

to cover sexual molestation or abuse on the part of coaches,<br />

administrators, or officials.<br />

This study was limited to volunteer youth sport organizations<br />

and did not include interscholastic or intercollegiate sport<br />

organizations. The theories of liability used to pursue claims<br />

against volunteer youth sport organizations, as well as the defenses<br />

available, are not necessarily the same as those that would be used<br />

in an interscholastic or intercollegiate setting. The protocol for<br />

this study was validated by a panel of experts with qualifications<br />

in legal research and/or research methodology. This protocol was<br />

mainly executed by the primary investigator of this study, who<br />

holds a Juris Doctorate and a terminal research degree in Sport<br />

Management, and has expertise in both quantitative and qualitative<br />

research methodologies. The timeframe for this study was May<br />

2006 - December 2009.<br />

Results<br />

States that had volunteer immunity statutes protecting the<br />

organizations as well as the volunteers included the following<br />

56 Journal of Research<br />

states: Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and<br />

Utah. Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, and Utah include<br />

qualifications in their volunteer immunity statutes that limit the<br />

protection in regards to the type of conduct protected by those<br />

statutes. States where volunteer immunity statutes expressly did<br />

not provide protection for the volunteer organizations include:<br />

Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, District of<br />

Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Missouri,<br />

Montana, <strong>No</strong>rth Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South<br />

Dakota, Texas, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.<br />

The following states have volunteer immunity statutes that<br />

are ambiguous in regards to whether the protection provided<br />

by the statute covers volunteer organizations, or is limited to<br />

volunteers: Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Massachusetts,<br />

<strong>No</strong>rth Dakota, New Mexico, and Rhode Island. All of these states<br />

include language in their statutes that also limits the conduct<br />

protected by their statutes. The following states did not have<br />

volunteer immunity statutes that protected recreational youth sport<br />

organizations: Alaska, California (does have a statute that exempts<br />

directors of nonprofit organizations), Connecticut, Iowa, Kentucky,<br />

Maine, Michigan, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York,<br />

Ohio, Oregon, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, and Wyoming. For<br />

an overview of state protection provided by volunteer immunity<br />

statutes see Table 2.<br />

In brief, of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, 34 states<br />

(66.7%) had volunteer immunity statutes. Of them, 5 states (9.8%)<br />

specified that the statutes would protect youth sport organizations<br />

and their volunteers, 21 states (41.2%) specified that the statutes<br />

would not protect youth sport organizations and their volunteers,<br />

and 8 states (15.7%) were ambiguous about the protection of youth<br />

sport organizations and their volunteers. The remaining 17 states<br />

(33.3%) did not have volunteer immunity statutes (see Table 2).<br />

Extent of Protection Provided by Volunteer Immunity Statutes<br />

Depending on the jurisdiction, a youth sport organization may<br />

seek the protection of a volunteer immunity statute to guard against<br />

a civil lawsuit alleging sexual molestation or abuse on the part of<br />

coaches, administrators, or officials. This study revealed, however,<br />

that a majority of states either had volunteer immunity statutes that<br />

expressly stated that they only protected volunteers and not the<br />

organizations, or did not have statutes that would protect youth<br />

sport organizations. The states that expressly exclude volunteer<br />

organizations are similar to the Federal Volunteer Immunity Act,<br />

which also limits its protection to volunteers.<br />

States that Provide Protection to Volunteer Organizations<br />

Only Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,<br />

and Utah had volunteer immunity statutes that expressly extend<br />

protection from volunteers to the organization. Four out of the<br />

five states offering protection do so with either limitations or<br />

qualifications. For example, in Minnesota volunteers are not<br />

protected from acts committed in a willful and wanton or reckless<br />

manner (Minnesota Statutes Annotated, § 604A.11, 2009).<br />

Volunteers are not protected if they act in violation of federal, local,<br />

or state law. These limitations may also extend to the organization<br />

seeking shelter under the statute and if that is the case, youth<br />

sport organizations would not be protected against cases alleging


Immunity Statutes<br />

Table 2. States and the District of Columbia with and<br />

without Volunteer Immunity Statues<br />

Volunteer Immunity Statues<br />

State With Statues Without<br />

Statues<br />

Organizations <strong>No</strong>t Providing Ambiguous<br />

Included Protection Protection<br />

Alabama #<br />

Alaska #<br />

Arizona #<br />

Arkansas #<br />

California #<br />

Colorado #<br />

Connecticut #<br />

Delaware #<br />

District of<br />

Columbia #<br />

Florida #<br />

Georgia #<br />

Hawaii #<br />

Idaho #<br />

Illinois #<br />

Indiana #<br />

Iowa #<br />

Kansas #<br />

Kentucky #<br />

Louisiana #<br />

Maine #<br />

Maryland #<br />

Massachusetts #<br />

Michigan #<br />

Minnesota #<br />

Mississippi #<br />

Missouri #<br />

Montana #<br />

Nebraska #<br />

Nevada #<br />

New Hampshire #<br />

New Jersey #<br />

New Mexico #<br />

New York #<br />

<strong>No</strong>rth Carolina #<br />

<strong>No</strong>rth Dakota #<br />

Ohio #<br />

Oklahoma #<br />

Oregon #<br />

Pennsylvania #<br />

Rhode Island #<br />

South Carolina #<br />

South Dakota #<br />

Tennessee #<br />

Texas #<br />

Utah #<br />

Vermont #<br />

Virginia #<br />

Washington #<br />

West Virginia #<br />

Wisconsin #<br />

Wyoming #<br />

N (%) 5 (9.8%) 21 (41.2%) 8 (15.7%) 17 (33.3%)<br />

sexual molestation or abuse because those actions extend beyond<br />

willful, wanton, or reckless behavior in that they are intentional.<br />

Further, sexual molestation and abuse violate the state’s criminal<br />

code, where it allows plaintiffs to use the doctrine of respondeat<br />

superior against employers for cases alleging sexual molestation<br />

or abuse on the part of employees (Minnesota Statutes Annotated,<br />

§ 604A.11, 2009).<br />

If respondeat superior is the basis for a plaintiff’s claim against<br />

a recreational youth sport organization, the volunteer immunity<br />

statute will probably not afford protection to the organization<br />

because the organization would stand in the shoes of the employee<br />

in that they are vicariously liable for the employee’s actions.<br />

Because the volunteer employee would not be able to use the<br />

volunteer immunity statute for protection, it is unlikely that the<br />

organization would be able to seek protection under the statute.<br />

However, the statute may provide protection for the organization<br />

if the plaintiff sues the recreational youth sport organization for<br />

its own negligence under a negligent hiring/retention/supervision<br />

theory. The statute does provide protection for ordinary negligence;<br />

therefore, the case will turn on whether the organization was<br />

willful, wanton, or reckless in its selection and/or retention of the<br />

pedophilic employee.<br />

Similarly, New Jersey covers the organization from its own<br />

negligence (New Jersey Statutes Annotated 2A: 53A-7, 2000)<br />

yet, the act also expressly excludes protection of volunteers or<br />

agents who commit acts of sexual misconduct. Thus, the statute<br />

leaves open the question as to whether the organization would<br />

remain protected under the act if it negligently hired, retained, or<br />

supervised the employee who committed the sexual misconduct.<br />

Mississippi’s volunteer immunity statute affords protection to<br />

youth sport organizations, but only protects organizations against<br />

claims based on negligence (Mississippi Code Annotated § 95-<br />

9-1, 1988). Pennsylvania’s statute expressly provides protection<br />

for youth sport organizations unless its’ acts or omissions<br />

fall substantially below the standards generally practiced and<br />

accepted for similar organizations (42 Pennsylvania Code Statutes<br />

Annotated § 8332.1, 2007). Due to a lack of case law interpreting<br />

Pennsylvania’s statute, the extent of protection provided under<br />

the statute is unclear as to what conduct falls below the standards<br />

generally practiced and accepted for recreational youth sport<br />

organizations. However, the statute probably does not extend its<br />

protection to include sexual misconduct as an accepted practice<br />

in recreational youth sports. Utah provides organizations with<br />

protection unless the organization reasonably had, or reasonably<br />

should have had notice of the volunteer’s unfitness (Utah Code<br />

Annotated § 78B-4-103, 1953). Thus, a recreational youth sport<br />

organization’s protection in Utah will turn on whether it knew or<br />

should have known that the volunteer was unfit.<br />

States with Statutes that are Ambiguous in Application<br />

The research revealed that eight states are ambiguous as to<br />

whether they extend protection to cover volunteer organizations<br />

as well as the volunteers. Georgia’s volunteer immunity statute<br />

provides a good example of an ambiguous volunteer immunity<br />

statute. Georgia’s statute is titled the “Liability of nonprofit<br />

associations conducting safety or sports programs” (Georgia Code<br />

Annotated, § 51-1-120, 1988). The title of the statute suggests that<br />

it applies to recreational youth sport organizations. However, the<br />

terms of the statute only provide protection for volunteers for a<br />

sports program, with no mention of whether protection extends to<br />

the program itself (Georgia Code Annotated, § 51-1-120(b), 1988).<br />

volume 5, issue 1 57


Immunity Statutes<br />

Seven other states also have statutes that do not expressly include<br />

or exclude volunteer organizations in regards to the protections<br />

that they afford.<br />

Ambiguity in application is not the only common trait found<br />

in these eight statutes. All eight statutes include qualifications<br />

or limitations that probably preclude recreational youth sport<br />

organizations from relying on their protections. Georgia limits<br />

its’ volunteer immunity protection to acts performed in good faith<br />

and within the scope of assigned duties (Georgia Code Annotated,<br />

§ 51-1-120, 1988). In Georgia, sexual misconduct does not fall<br />

within the scope of employment unless it is later ratified by the<br />

employer (Big Brother/Big Sister of Metro Atlanta, Inc. v. Terrell,<br />

1987). Further, it is unlikely that Georgia courts will find good<br />

faith in pedophilic actions. Similarly, <strong>No</strong>rth Dakota only protects<br />

acts committed in good faith and expressly excludes willful acts<br />

(<strong>No</strong>rth Dakota Century Code § 32-03(a), 2009).<br />

Idaho limits its’ volunteer protection to exclude willful or<br />

wanton activities, but also includes knowing violations of the law.<br />

Sexual misconduct with a minor is a knowing violation of the Idaho<br />

law (Idaho Code § 9-350, 2009). Indiana, Louisiana, and Rhode<br />

Island only protect volunteers for ordinary negligence and exclude<br />

heightened degrees of negligence like willful or wanton acts, or<br />

gross negligence (Indiana Code § 34-30-19-3,1999); Louisiana<br />

Revised Statutes 9:2798, 2009; Rhode Island Annotated § 9-1-48,<br />

1956). These statutes do not expressly preclude intentional acts<br />

(like sexual abuse) from protective coverage, but they do exclude<br />

acts classified as heightened degrees of negligence (like willful or<br />

wanton, and gross negligence). Since these statutes do not protect<br />

acts involving heightened degrees of negligence, it is likely that<br />

they also do not protect acts where the person intends to cause<br />

the harm. Massachusetts’ volunteer immunity statute expressly<br />

excludes intentional acts from protection under the statute<br />

(Massachusetts General Laws Annotated 231 § 85V, 2009).<br />

New Mexico limits its protection to cover only those harms that<br />

are part of the “ordinary give and take common to the particular<br />

sport.” While there are no cases that detail the type of activities<br />

included in the “ordinary give and take common to the particular<br />

sport,” sexual misconduct with minors is not common or accepted<br />

practice in any youth sport in the United States. Thus, it is unlikely<br />

that New Mexico’s volunteer immunity statute affords protection<br />

to recreational youth sport organizations for the pedophilic actions<br />

committed by its volunteers (New Mexico Statutes Annotated §<br />

41-12-1, 1978).<br />

Discussion<br />

The results of this study have implications for local, regional,<br />

and national recreational youth sport organizations in the United<br />

States. Local or regional youth sport organizations can look to the<br />

results to better understand how their specific jurisdiction would<br />

utilize immunity statutes in cases brought against recreational<br />

youth sport organizations for the pedophilic actions of coaches,<br />

administrators, and officials. While this study should not take<br />

the place of legal counsel, it can be used by recreational youth<br />

sport organizations to gain a better understanding of the problem<br />

and the need to develop risk management plans that protect their<br />

organizations from sexual predators and related legal liability.<br />

National youth sport organizations like Little League Baseball<br />

58 Journal of Research<br />

and Softball and Pop Warner Little Scholars provide youth sport<br />

leagues in most states and need to understand the variances that<br />

exist between the legal jurisdictions. It is important for national<br />

youth sport organizations to understand how different jurisdictions<br />

apply these immunity statutes so they can better protect themselves<br />

against the pedophilic actions of coaches, administrators, and<br />

officials within their programs. Thus, the results of this research can<br />

provide recreational youth sport organizations with information on<br />

the protection provided by state volunteer immunity statutes.<br />

Recreational youth sport organizations often rely on volunteers<br />

for coaches, administrators, and officials. Most jurisdictions, as<br />

well as the federal government, provide statutory immunity for<br />

volunteers. However, this study revealed that a vast majority of<br />

volunteer immunity statutes, including the federal statute, provide<br />

no protection for recreational youth sport organizations. Only<br />

Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Utah had<br />

volunteer immunity statutes that extend protection from volunteers<br />

to the organization. The research also revealed that eight states<br />

are ambiguous as to whether they extend volunteer immunity<br />

to include volunteer organizations like recreational youth sport<br />

organizations. There are qualifications on four out of the five<br />

states that expressly provide organizations with protection. All<br />

eight of the states that are ambiguous as to whether they provide<br />

protection to organizations include qualifications and limitations<br />

on the protection they afford. The qualifications and limitations<br />

for each of these 12 statutes likely render their application useless<br />

in cases where a youth sport organization needs to seek statutory<br />

protection against claims of sexual abuse or molestation by one of<br />

the organization’s volunteers. Only Pennsylvania had a statute that<br />

is apparently broad enough to provide protection for recreational<br />

youth sport organizations; yet, organizations should be cautious<br />

in relying on the statute’s protection due to the lack of case law<br />

explaining how courts will interpret the statute in sexual abuse or<br />

molestation cases.<br />

Accordingly, this research revealed that volunteer immunity<br />

statutes do not serve as dependable sources for protection against<br />

the imposition of civil liability for the pedophilic actions of coaches,<br />

administrators and officials. The best defense to the imposition of<br />

liability for the actions of others remains the adoption of reasonable<br />

protective measures (including policies, procedures, background<br />

screening, education, training, and proper supervision) to guard<br />

against the infiltration of youth sport organizations by pedophiles.<br />

Sport/recreation managers and organizations should implement<br />

policies and procedures that have been utilized elsewhere for<br />

identifying and eliminating sexual abuse in sport. Examples<br />

of such include, but are not limited to the Australian Sports<br />

Commission, 2000; European Federation of Sports Psychology,<br />

2002; IOC, 2007; Ontario Ministry of Health and Human Services,<br />

2007; Trocme & Schumaker, 1999; U.S. Department of Health and<br />

Human Services, 2007; and Women’s Sports Foundation, 2007.<br />

Conclusion<br />

By examining immunity statutes for all 50 states and the<br />

District of Columbia, information was derived that can be used to<br />

assist recreational youth sport organizations so that they can better<br />

understand the problem and the possibility that they could be found<br />

liable, for the pedophilic actions of coaches, administrators, and


Immunity Statutes<br />

officials in their jurisdiction. It is important to realize that the law<br />

is constantly changing and prudent sport managers should remain<br />

educated on this topic and the current law in their jurisdiction. This<br />

study does not provide specific legal advice and should not take<br />

the place of legal counsel. Youth sport managers and organizations<br />

should seek the advice of legal counsel when developing related<br />

risk management policies.<br />

This study was merely an initial step on this research topic.<br />

The information gathered from this study can be used as a<br />

foundation for future research. Specifically, information obtained<br />

may be utilized to develop surveys investigating if recreational<br />

youth sport organizations are risking legal exposure through their<br />

actions or inactions in guarding against sexual abuse on the part<br />

of their coaches, administrators, and officials. Additionally, this<br />

study could be replicated in common law jurisdictions such as the<br />

United Kingdom and modified for civil law jurisdictions in other<br />

European countries, or even across the globe. Sexual predators will<br />

continue to target recreational youth sports because they provide<br />

a consistent pool of potential victims. Those who operate these<br />

programs need to understand how to guard against sexual predators<br />

and how to defend themselves from claims brought against them<br />

for the actions of their coaches, administrators, and officials.<br />

References<br />

27 Am. Jur. 2nd Negligent hiring § 459 (2005).<br />

Appenzeller, T. (2000). Youth sport and the law. Durham, NC: Carolina<br />

Academic Press.<br />

Australian Sports Commission. (2000). Harassment-free sport: Protecting<br />

children from abuse in sport. Cabrera, Australia: Pirie.<br />

Biedzynski, K. W. (1999). The federal volunteer protection act: Does<br />

Congress want to play ball? Seton Hall Legislative Journal, 23(2),<br />

319-358.<br />

Big Brother/Big Sister of Metro Atlanta, Inc. v. Terrell, 359 S.E.2d 241<br />

(Ga.App. 1987).<br />

Brackenridge, C. H. (1997). He owned me basically…Women’s experience<br />

of sexual abuse in sport. International Review for the Sociology of<br />

Sport, 32(2), 115-130.<br />

Brackenridge, C. H. (2001). Spoilsport: Understanding and preventing<br />

sexual exploitation in sport. London: Routledge.<br />

Cotten, D. J. (2007). Which parties are liable? In D. J. Cotten & J. T.<br />

Wolohan (Eds.), Law for recreation and sport managers (4th ed.) (pp.<br />

66-77). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.<br />

Deak, D. (1999). Out of bounds: How sexual abuse of athletes at the hands<br />

of their coaches is costing the world of sports millions. Seton Hall<br />

Journal of Sport Law, 9(1), 171-195.<br />

Earl-Hubbard, M. L. (1996). The child sex offender registration laws:<br />

The punishment, liberty deprivation, and unintended results associated<br />

with the scarlet letter laws of the 1990s. <strong>No</strong>rthwestern University Law<br />

Review, 90(2), 788-802.<br />

European Federation of Sports Psychology. (2002). Position statements<br />

– 6. Sexual exploitation in sport. Retrieved from http://www.fepsac.<br />

com/module.asp?page=detail&XModuleId=8243&ProductId=2671<br />

Garner, B. A. (Ed.). (2004). Black’s law dictionary (8th ed.). St. Paul, MN:<br />

Thompson West.<br />

Georgia Code Annotated, § 51-1-120 (1988).<br />

Gervis, M., & Dunn, N. (2004). The emotional abuse of elite child athletes<br />

by their coaches. Child Abuse Review, 13(3), 215-223.<br />

Gibbons, M., & Campbell, D. (2003). Liability of recreation and<br />

competitive sport organizations for sexual assaults on children by<br />

administrators, coaches and volunteers. Journal of Legal Aspects of<br />

Sport, 13(3), 185-229.<br />

Hurst, T. R. & Knight, J. N. (2003). Coaches' liability for athletes' injuries<br />

and deaths. Seton Hall Journal of Sport Law, 13(1), 27-51.<br />

Idaho Code § 9-350 (2009).<br />

Indiana Code § 34-30-19-3 (1999).<br />

International Olympic Committee. (2007, February 8). IOC adopts<br />

consensus statement on sexual harassment & abuse in sport. Retrieved<br />

from http://multimedia.olympic.org/pdf/en_report_1125.pdf<br />

Keeton, W. P. (1984). Prosser and Keeton on the law of torts. St. Paul,<br />

MN: West.<br />

Kirby, S., & Greaves, L. (1996, July). Foul play: Sexual abuse and<br />

harassment in sport. Paper presented to the Pre-Olympic Scientific<br />

Congress, Dallas, TX.<br />

Kirby, S., Greaves, L., & Hankivsky, O. (2000). The dome of silence: Sexual<br />

harassment and abuse in sport. Halifax, <strong>No</strong>va Scotia: Fernwood.<br />

Kirk, G. I. (1997). Canadian Hockey League, players first. Retrieved from<br />

http://www.canoe.ca/PlayersFirst/home.html<br />

Leahy, T., Pretty, G., & Tenenbaum, G. (2002). Prevalence of sexual<br />

abuse in organized competitive sport in Australia, Journal of Sexual<br />

Aggression, 8(2), 16-36.<br />

Massachusetts General Laws Annotated 231 § 85V (2009).<br />

Mayer, M. (2005). Stepping in to step out of liability: the proper standard<br />

of liability for referees in foreseeable judgment-call situations. DePaul<br />

Journal of Sport Law and Contemporary Problems, 3, 54-101.<br />

Minnesota Statutes Annotated, § 604A.11 (2009).<br />

Mississippi Code Annotated § 95-9-1 (1988).<br />

Nack, W., & Yaeger, D. (1999, September 13). Every parent’s nightmare:<br />

The child molester has found a home in the world of youth sports,<br />

where as a coach he can gain the trust and loyalty of our kids-and then<br />

prey on them. Sports Illustrated, 91(10), 40-53.<br />

National Council of Youth Sports. (2008). Reports on trends and<br />

participation in organized youth sports. Retrieved from http://www.<br />

ncys.org/pdf/2008/2008-market-research.pdf<br />

Nielson, J. T. (2001). The forbidden zone: Intimacy, sexual relations<br />

and misconduct in the relationship between coaches and athletes.<br />

International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 36(2), 165-182.<br />

New Jersey Statutes Annotated § 2A: 53A-7 (2000).<br />

New Mexico Statutes Annotated § 41-12-1 (1978).<br />

<strong>No</strong>rth Dakota Century Code § 32-03 (2009).<br />

Pennsylvania Code Statutes Annotated 42 § 8332.1 (2007).<br />

Peterson, J. (2004). Don’t trust me with your child: <strong>No</strong>n-legal precautions<br />

when the law cannot prevent sexual exploitation in youth sports. Texas<br />

Review of Entertainment & Sports Law, 5, 297-323.<br />

Pike-Masteralexis, L. (1995). Sexual harassment and athletics: Legal and<br />

policy implications for athletic departments. Journal of Sport and<br />

Social Issues, 19(2), 141-156.<br />

Restatement (Second) of Torts § 8A (1965).<br />

Rhode Island Annotated § 9-1-48 (1956).<br />

Smith, M. (1999). Tort immunity for volunteers in Ohio: Zivich v. Mentor<br />

Soccer Club, Inc., Akron Law Review, 32(4), 699-722.<br />

Trocme , N., & Schumaker, K. (1999). Reported child sexual abuse<br />

in Canadian schools and recreational facilities: Implications for<br />

developing effective prevention strategies. Children and Youth<br />

Services, 21(8), 621-642.<br />

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2007). Preventing child<br />

sexual abuse within youth-serving organizations: Getting started on<br />

policies and procedures. Atlanta, GA: CDC.<br />

Utah Code Annotated § 78B-4-103 (1953).<br />

van der Smissen, B. (1990). Legal liability and risk management for<br />

public and private entities. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.<br />

van der Smissen, B. (2007). Elements of negligence. In D. J. Cotten & J.<br />

T. Wolohan (Eds.), Law for recreation and sport managers (4th ed.)<br />

(pp. 36-45). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.<br />

Volkwein, K. Franke, I., Schnell, I., Sherwood, D., & Livezey, A. (1997).<br />

Sexual harassment in sport: Perception and experiences of femalestudent<br />

athletes. International Review of Sociology of Sport, 32(3),<br />

283-295.<br />

Weeber, R. R. (1992). Scope of employment redefined: Holding employers<br />

vicariously liable for sexual assaults committed by their employees.<br />

Minnesota Law Review, 76(6), 1513-1541.<br />

Women’s Sports Foundation. (2007). Addressing the issue of verbal,<br />

physical, and psychological abuse of athletes: The foundation position.<br />

Retrieved from http://www.womenspsortsfoundation.org/Home.aspx<br />

Zaichkowsky, L. D. (January, 2000). The dark side of coaching youth<br />

sports: Coaches sexually abusing children - the need for a code of<br />

conduct. USA Today (Society for the Advancement of Education).<br />

Retrieved from http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1272/is_<br />

2656_128/ai_5857658 !<br />

volume 5, issue 1 59


A Brand Loyalty Model Utilitizing Team<br />

Identification and Customer Satisfaction in the<br />

Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />

by Dr. Soonhwan Lee, Indiana University Purdue University<br />

Indianapolis (IUPUI); Dr. Hongbum Shin, Assistant Professor,<br />

Keimyung University, Daegu, S. Korea; Dr. Jung-Jun Park, Pusan<br />

National University, Busan, S. Korea; Dr. Oh-Ryun Kwon, Pusan<br />

National University, Busan, S. Korea<br />

Abstract<br />

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship<br />

among the attitudinal brand loyalty variables (i.e., cognitive,<br />

affective, and conative components), team identification, and<br />

customer satisfaction by developing a structural equation model,<br />

based on Oliver's (1997) attitudinal brand loyalty model. The<br />

results of this study confirmed the study of brand loyalty stages by<br />

Oliver (1997) involving development of a brand loyalty process.<br />

Results supported the finding that consumers' strong beliefs about<br />

brand quality have increased the degree of "liking". In turn,<br />

results indicate a positive intention or commitment to repurchase a<br />

particular item. Therefore, this study emphasizes the importance<br />

of measuring attitudinal brand loyalty to identify attitudinal brand<br />

loyal customers and better understand their repurchasing intentions<br />

in the sports licensed product industry. Furthermore, this study<br />

showed the significant mediating effect of cognitive and affective<br />

brand loyalty in the relationship between customer satisfaction and<br />

conative brand loyalty.<br />

Key words: Conative Behavior, Purchase Intention<br />

The sales of licensed sports merchandise have become an<br />

increasingly important source of revenue for professional sport<br />

franchises (Mullin, Hardy, & Sutton, 2007). However, the popularity<br />

and demand for sport licensed products decreased during the 1990's<br />

and into the new millennium. Several reasons cited for the decline<br />

included poor variety, relatively lower quality products compared<br />

to branded sport products, the Major League Baseball (MLB) strike<br />

in 1994, and the National Basketball Association (NBA) lockout<br />

in 1998 (Howard & Crompton, 2004; Mullin, Hardy, & Sutton,<br />

2007). However, the Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association<br />

(2008) reported a recent trend demonstrating an increase in the<br />

sales of sports licensed products. For example, retail sales of the<br />

licensed sports merchandise in the U.S. and Canada rose 5.8% in<br />

2006 from 2005 to reach $15.1 billion (SGMA, 2008).<br />

Improved business models, new marketable rookies (e.g.,<br />

LeBron James in NBA, etc.), the popularity of retro fashion trends,<br />

new video games, and more sophisticated marketing techniques<br />

have fueled this growth (Gladden & Funk, 2002; Kwon &<br />

Armstrong, 2004; Matsuoka, Chelladurai, & Harada, 2003; Trail,<br />

Fink, & Anderson, 2003). Previous studies have examined the<br />

objectives and advantages of utilizing licensed products which<br />

include sustaining a consumer franchise, maximizing existing<br />

lines' profitability, penetrating new markets, stimulating positive<br />

attributes of the player, team, or league, and increasing the level of<br />

brand awareness (Quelch, 1985; Shank, 2004).<br />

60 Journal of Research<br />

Investigating the relationship between fans and their<br />

consumption behavior by systematically considering attitudinal<br />

approaches to team identification and fans' purchasing decisions<br />

about licensed sports products is important. The conceptual<br />

theory between sport consumer behavior and team identification<br />

has become well established and now extends to brand loyalty<br />

(Gladden & Funk, 2002). Brand loyalty by sport consumers is a<br />

cornerstone of marketing theories as it provides mutual benefits for<br />

sports fans and the licensed product marketers (Gladden & Funk,<br />

2002; McDonald & Milne, 1997; Kwon & Armstrong, 2004).<br />

Although much of the research in sport marketing has<br />

investigated brand loyalty, little attention has yet been given to the<br />

purchasing of licensed sports products in terms of measurements<br />

and antecedents. In addition, sport marketers should be able to<br />

identify a distinct target market and potentially better address<br />

their wants and needs through measuring attitudinal brand loyalty.<br />

The findings of this study also would be able to identify several<br />

marketing and general management implications. For example,<br />

team identification and attitudinal brand loyalty can be the tools<br />

to measure brand loyalty among sport licensed product customers.<br />

Moreover, sport marketers should be able to assess the attitudes of<br />

their customers toward the sport licensed products and to identify<br />

any needs that should be fulfilled. As a result, the sport licensed<br />

product customer loyalty measurement should be used as an<br />

assessment tool in evaluating customer satisfaction. Therefore,<br />

this study investigates the relationship among team identification,<br />

customer satisfaction, and fans' purchasing behavior by considering<br />

attitudinal approaches. Moreover, it examines the antecedents<br />

of purchasing behavior relating to licensed sports products by<br />

developing a structural equation model based on Oliver's (1997)<br />

attitudinal brand loyalty model. Finally, this study suggests<br />

implications for future research as well as marketing strategies for<br />

licensed sport products.<br />

Research Questions<br />

This research was originated to test the following research<br />

questions:<br />

•What is the way to measure brand loyalty to licensed<br />

products?<br />

•Is there any relationship between team identification and<br />

attitudinal purchasing behavior relating to licensed sport<br />

products?<br />

Team Identification<br />

Team identification is one of the basic psychological orientations<br />

influencing the behavior of sport fans (Kwon & Armstrong, 2002).<br />

The concept of team identification with a particular favorite sport<br />

team has been a critical element in the study of the psychology of<br />

sport fans over the last decade (Kwon & Armstrong, 2002; Wann,<br />

1994; Wann, 1996; Wann, Peterson, Cothran, & Dykes, 1999).<br />

Team identification considers the valence of the unit relationship


Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />

between the fan and the team (Madrigal, 1995). For instance, team<br />

identification has a strong relationship with self-esteem and positive<br />

outlook on life, and has been negatively related to depression and<br />

negative affective experiences (Branscombe & Wann, 1991).<br />

Numerous studies on the concept of team identification have been<br />

linked to various behaviors and phenomena that can be observed<br />

in sport settings. For instance, one such variable has been called<br />

basking in reflected glory (BIRGing) in which sport consumers<br />

seek to enhance their self-esteem by displaying a relationship<br />

between their favorite team performance and themselves (Cialdini,<br />

Borden, Thornes, Walker, Freeman, & Sloan, 1976; Kolbe &<br />

James, 2003; Kwon & Armstrong, 2002; Quick, 2000; Wann &<br />

Branscombe, 1990). BIRGing is one's inclination to "share in<br />

the glory of a successful other with whom they are in some way<br />

associated" (Cialdini et al., 1976, p. 366). It allows people to<br />

build self-esteem through the association of successful others. For<br />

example, individuals would experience greater enjoyment if they<br />

were able to BIRG. Logically, those individuals who experienced<br />

positive confirmation had higher levels of BIRGing behavior and<br />

higher levels of enjoyment (Trail, Fink, & Anderson, 2003).<br />

Customer Satisfaction<br />

Achieving customer satisfaction is a major goal of marketing<br />

efforts. These efforts lead to purchase and/or consumption and in<br />

turn result in post-purchase phenomena such as attitude change,<br />

repeat purchase, and brand loyalty. Customer satisfaction is<br />

defined as a positive outcome from a complex evaluation of a<br />

purchasing and consuming experience of a product and/or service<br />

(Churchill & Surprenant, 1982). The literature on customer<br />

satisfaction theory suggests that consumers use opinions about<br />

a product's anticipated performance to determine whether to<br />

make a purchase (Miller, 1977). The product evaluation process<br />

appears to involve a comparison of expectations about product<br />

performance with perceptions of product performance (Barber<br />

& Venkatramen, 1986; Cardozo, 1965; Swan & Trawick, 1979).<br />

When performance exceeds expectation, positive disconfirmation<br />

occurs, leading to satisfaction. When performance falls short,<br />

negative disconfirmation occurs and leads to dissatisfaction (Olson<br />

& Dover, 1977; Richins & Bloch, 1991). This indicates that<br />

customer satisfaction is based largely on how customers perceive<br />

service and/or product performance relative to their expectations.<br />

This causal sequence has also been supported in the sport context.<br />

Satisfaction with the experience of attending sporting events would<br />

be a significant predictor of the likelihood of attending future events<br />

(Madrigal, 1995). For example, successful team performance and<br />

game outcomes lead to customer satisfaction and stimulate further<br />

consumption, whereas poor team performance and game outcomes<br />

lead to dissatisfaction, which in turn results in less consumption<br />

(Greestein & Marcum, 1981; Hansen & Gauthier, 1989; Matsuoka<br />

et al., 2003).<br />

Attitudinal Brand Loyalty<br />

Numerous researchers have examined the attitudinal aspect<br />

of brand loyalty (Bowen & Shoemaker, 1998; Iwasaki & Havitz,<br />

1998; Kwon & Armstrong, 2004; McCleary & Weaver, 1992;<br />

Vallerand & Reid, 1984). According to Oliver (1997), there is a<br />

learning process in consumers' attitudinal purchasing behavior.<br />

Attitudinal brand loyalty is developed in three phases — cognitive,<br />

affective, and conative components. Cognition refers to people's<br />

logical thoughts about the object, including beliefs about facts such<br />

as price and necessity. Affect refers to irrational approaches to<br />

an object such as feelings or emotional responses (Back & Parks,<br />

2003). Quick (2000) found a relationship between the irrational<br />

feeling of team identification and consumption of sport products.<br />

For example, sport fans who identify with a certain team may buy<br />

a championship t-shirt without thinking about price and quality,<br />

when the team wins the championship game. Conative components<br />

include behavioral intentions or willingness to act (Back & Parks,<br />

2003). Bagozzi (1978) stated that the conation dimension is the<br />

active decision to either approach or avoid an object or formulate<br />

some responses.<br />

Attitudinal brand loyalty focuses not only on transactional<br />

strategies, such as frequent-user programs and gifts for repeated<br />

customers, but also on attitudinal variables, such as commitment<br />

and trust. Attitudinal studies have described brand loyalty not<br />

only as the outcome of repeated purchase behavior, but also the<br />

consequence of multidimensional attitudes toward a specific brand<br />

(Back & Parks, 2003; Backman & Crompton, 1991).<br />

In addition, the literature on the relationship between attitudinal<br />

and behavioral aspects of brand loyalty should be addressed to<br />

describe the purchasing behavior of licensed sports products.<br />

Back and Parks (2003) mentioned that many attitudinal factors are<br />

related to consumers' involvement, psychological commitment,<br />

motivation and other cognitive and affective variables that were<br />

based not theoretically, but operationally. On the other hand,<br />

behavioral brand loyalty describes measures that are based on<br />

observation of actual behavior or self-reports of behavior, such<br />

as brand choice sequence, probability of purchase period, and the<br />

proportion of purchases concentrated on a specific brand (Backman<br />

& Crompton, 1991). In addition, numerous researchers have<br />

investigated the relationship between attitudinal and behavioral<br />

intentions of purchasing behavior (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980; Bentler<br />

& Speckart, 1981; Peter & Olson, 1993). Specifically, Ajzen and<br />

Fishbein (1980) noted a relationship between customers' beliefs<br />

and attitudes and their behavioral intentions. Bentler and Speckart<br />

(1981) found that attitudes have causal priority over behaviors.<br />

Similarly, Peter and Olson (1993) found that a negative change<br />

in attitudes caused many customers to switch to other brands,<br />

indicating that change in attitude is a good predictor of purchasing<br />

behavior.<br />

The Effect of Team Identification on Cognitive Brand Loyalty<br />

Many researchers have examined the relationship between team<br />

identification and the purchasing attitude towards licensed sports<br />

products based on the theory of brand loyalty and/or brand equity<br />

(Gladden & Funk, 2002; Kwon & Armstrong, 2004; Matsuoka<br />

et al., 2003; Trail et al., 2003). As the term team identification<br />

has been adapted from the fields of organizational behavior and<br />

sport fan identification (Dutton, Dukerich, & Harquail, 1994;<br />

Milne & McDonald, 1999), many studies have shown that team<br />

identification is more likely a cognitive perception than affective<br />

perception. Foote (1951) and Kagan (1958) suggest that the term<br />

identification is portrayed only by the cognitive perception of<br />

shared experiences and characteristics, not by resultant behavior.<br />

volume 5, issue 1 61


Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />

For example, the purchasing attitudes of sport consumers who<br />

have a psychological attachment to their favorite teams may stem<br />

from team performance and outcomes, quality of product, variety<br />

of choice, and price.<br />

In addition, Gladden and Milne (1999) stated that professional<br />

sport teams are likely to possess brand equity by virtue of the added<br />

meaning that sport consumers attach to the names and logos of their<br />

favorite teams. They modified the framework to include the entire<br />

team sport setting and examined the hypothesized links among<br />

several antecedent variables (i.e., success, star players, coach, and<br />

competitive forces) and the realization of licensed merchandise<br />

sales. Moreover, several researchers have shown a relationship<br />

between team identification and sport consumer behavior<br />

(Mitrano, 1999; Sutton, McDonald, Milne, & Cimperman, 1997).<br />

Specifically, identification is highly correlated with basking in<br />

reflected glory (BIRGing) behavior (Madrigal, 1995; Sloan, 1989)<br />

and consumption of sport products (Wann & Branscombe, 1993).<br />

The Effect of Customer Satisfaction on Cognitive Brand Loyalty<br />

Numerous researchers have investigated the relationship<br />

between customer satisfaction and attitudinal brand loyalty<br />

(Fornell, Johnson, Anderson, Cha, & Bryant, 1996; Gladden &<br />

Funk, 2002; Greenstein & Marcum, 1981; Hansen & Gauthier,<br />

1989; Kwon & Armstrong, 2002; Matsuoka et al., 2003). Many<br />

consumer behavior researchers (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975; Fornell<br />

et al., 1996) have also found that customer satisfaction influences<br />

cognitive, affective, and conative components of attitudinal brand<br />

loyalty, including purchase intentions and post-purchase attitudes.<br />

These positive attitudes were found to revise purchasing decisions<br />

toward the product or brand. Other researchers have shown that<br />

customer satisfaction increases the level of positive belief or belief<br />

confidence (Albarracin & Wyer, 2000), reinforces the level of<br />

positive affect (Oliver, 1993), and enhances repurchase intentions<br />

(Yi, 1990).<br />

Customer satisfaction may have a direct effect on experiential<br />

needs. Park, Jaworski, and MacInnis (1986) suggested that<br />

consumers can be satisfied based on their different types of needs:<br />

functional, symbolic, and experiential. Of these different needs,<br />

experiential needs are °ßdesire for products that provide sensory<br />

pleasure, variety, and/or cognitive stimulation°® (Park, Jaworski,<br />

& MacInnis, 1986, p. 136). For example, sport consumers may<br />

purchase their favorite team t-shirt because of its unique design,<br />

color, or logo. They may also purchase any licensed product due to<br />

the enjoyment that is provided to them and/or their family.<br />

The Effect of Cognitive Purchasing Behavior on Affective Brand<br />

Loyalty<br />

The current study examines the influence of cognitive<br />

antecedents thought to be theoretically related to the affective<br />

reactions of BIRGing. Among the studies that explicitly tested<br />

cognition's possible influence on affective purchasing behavior,<br />

Madrigal (1995) explained cognition's effect on affect using<br />

the theory of expectancy disconfirmation. The expectancy<br />

disconfirmation paradigm refers to two processes consisting<br />

of the formation of pre-consumption normative standards (i.e.,<br />

expectations) and the subsequent confirmation or disconfirmation<br />

of those expectations through performance outcomes. The extent<br />

62 Journal of Research<br />

to which outcomes match expectations determines to a large<br />

extent how information is processed and evaluated. For example,<br />

a greater discrepancy between expectancies and outcomes should<br />

lead to greater cognitive processing and increased satisfaction/<br />

dissatisfaction with outcomes (Cohen & Basu, 1987; Hunt, Smith,<br />

& Kernan, 1989; Madrigal, 1995; Oliver, 1980). Trail et al. (2000)<br />

also indicated that disconfirmation would lead directly to an<br />

affective state. They mentioned that self-esteem responses would<br />

mediate the disconfirmation affective-state relationship. It seems<br />

much more logical to suggest that affective purchasing behavior<br />

precedes intended self-esteem behavior. Trail et al. (2000)<br />

noted that affective state predicts the intentions of future sport<br />

consumption behavior. For example, sport consumers are likely<br />

to consume licensed sport products that validate the connection<br />

between their concept of self and the source of their enhanced selfesteem<br />

(Belk, 1988).<br />

The Effect of Affective Brand Loyalty on Conative Brand Loyalty<br />

In using the general components of attitude, attitudinal brand<br />

loyalty should be considered as a sequential process in which<br />

customers become "loyal first in a cognitive sense, then later in an<br />

affective sense, and still later in a conative manner" (Oliver, 1997,<br />

p. 392). For instance, a customer initially becomes cognitively<br />

loyal based on beliefs about the brand attribute only. Then he or she<br />

may become affectively loyal, with pleasurable fulfillment based<br />

on brand performance. Next, he or she may become conatively<br />

loyal, exhibiting a brand-specific commitment.<br />

Although many researchers have studied consequential<br />

relationships with customer satisfaction and attitudinal brand<br />

loyalty, no empirical study has been undertaken in the licensed<br />

sports products business. Hence, this study tested the relationships<br />

among team identification, customer satisfaction, and attitudinal<br />

purchasing behavior of licensed sport products as listed:<br />

H 1<br />

: Team identification has a positive effect on cognitive brand<br />

loyalty of licensed sport products.<br />

H 2<br />

: Customer satisfaction has a positive effect on cognitive<br />

brand loyalty of licensed sport products.<br />

H 3<br />

: Cognitive brand loyalty has a positive effect on affective<br />

brand loyalty of licensed sport products.<br />

H 4<br />

: Affective brand loyalty has a positive effect on conative<br />

brand loyalty of licensed sport products.<br />

Conceptual Model<br />

Figure 1 displays the conceptual model used in this study. It<br />

shows the relationships among team identification and attitudinal<br />

brand loyalty of licensed sports products, as well as the relationship<br />

between cognitive brand loyalty and customer satisfaction, as based<br />

on Oliver's (1997) brand loyalty stage theory. Team identification<br />

and customer satisfaction are treated as an exogenous variable,<br />

whereas attitudinal (cognitive, affective, and conative) brand<br />

loyalty is considered as endogenous variables.<br />

Method<br />

A questionnaire was developed based on a thorough review of<br />

the literature and a pilot study. Manipulation checks from the pilot<br />

study (n=75) were conducted to ensure the reliability and validity<br />

of scales (Anderson & Gerbing, 1988; Chatterji, 2003; Fornell &


Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />

Results<br />

A reliability test was used to assess the internal homogeneity<br />

among items in this study. As Nunally (1978) suggested, the<br />

coefficient alpha is the most popular measure of reliability<br />

for a multi-item scale. The coefficient alpha estimates for the<br />

variables were as follows: team identification (TI) = .93; customer<br />

satisfaction (CS) = .95; cognitive brand loyalty (CBL) = .86;<br />

affective brand loyalty (ABL) = .82; and conative brand loyalty<br />

(CNBL) = .82. The alpha for all coefficients for the data exceeded<br />

the minimum standard for reliability of 0.7 as recommended by<br />

Nunnally (1978) for basic research. Thus, the results indicated<br />

that these measurements are highly reliable for the measurement<br />

of each construct.<br />

Figure 1. A conceptual model showing relationships among study variables.<br />

Lacker, 1981). In addition, the pilot study was administered to<br />

obtain reliability estimates and to establish the construct validity<br />

of the instrument. An additional goal of the pilot study was to<br />

reduce the number of items to be included in the final instrument<br />

so that data collection would be less time consuming and improve<br />

the consent rate from the survey respondents.<br />

The 5-item, 7-point Likert-type scale, for team identification<br />

(e.g., "It would be difficult to change my belief about my favorite<br />

team.") was modified from Wann & Branscombe (1990). The<br />

3-item, 7-point Likert-type scale, for customer satisfaction (e.g.,<br />

"Overall, I am satisfied with the decision to purchase the licensed<br />

product of my favorite team.") was adapted from Oliver (1980).<br />

Attitudinal brand loyalty was measured by using scales that were<br />

developed by Loken and John (1993), Oliver (1997), and Beatty,<br />

Kahle, and Homer (1988) and included nine items that were 7-<br />

point Likert-type measures (e.g., "The licensed product of my<br />

favorite team provides me superior quality as compared to any<br />

other similar products"; "I intend to continue purchasing my<br />

favorite team's licensed product").<br />

The sample population in this study was composed of baseball<br />

spectators who visited the Triple-A Minor League Baseball stadium<br />

in the northeastern United States. An on-site convenience sampling<br />

method was applied and complimentary tickets were raffled as an<br />

incentive. The questionnaire was distributed to 325 individuals<br />

when they entered into the stadium. Of the 325 distributed<br />

questionnaires, 268 questionnaires were returned. Some of these<br />

responses were eliminated before data coding because they were<br />

returned blank or only partially completed. In addition, the<br />

respondents who did not have any experience in purchasing the<br />

licensed products were excluded. After eliminating the unusable<br />

responses, 201 responses were coded for data analysis, resulting in<br />

a response rate of 62%. Among the respondents, the majority were<br />

male (56%), aged 30 or younger (48%) and Caucasian (87%). The<br />

household income level was normally distributed with a mean of<br />

$37,000.<br />

Construct Validity Test<br />

Construct validity assesses the degree to which a measurement<br />

represents and logically connects, via the underlying theory, the<br />

observed phenomenon to the construct (Fornell & Lacker, 1981).<br />

Following Anderson and Gerbing's (1988) two-step approach, a<br />

measurement model was estimated prior to the structural model.<br />

The results for the measurements of latent variables were very<br />

good ( 2 =228.95, df=114, RMSEA=0.07, CFI=0.98, NNFI=0.98).<br />

All indicator loadings for constructs were significant (p


Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />

Bentler and Bonett's (1980) non-normed fit index (NNFI) were<br />

performed. The results showed a better fit for the five-factor model,<br />

2 (114)=228.95, 2 / df = 2.10, RMSEA = .07, CFI = .98, NNFI<br />

= .98 than the three-factor model, 2 (119)=359.69, 2 / df = 3.10,<br />

RMSEA = .10, CFI = .95, NNFI =.95 with a significant 2 (5) =<br />

149.74, p


Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />

Hypotheses Testing<br />

H 1<br />

: Team identification has a positive effect on cognitive brand<br />

loyalty of licensed sports products.<br />

First, Hypothesis 1 was tested. The relationship between<br />

team identification and cognitive brand loyalty was found to be<br />

significant ( 11<br />

=0.52, t=6.00, p


Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />

other types of sports or geographic locations may have different<br />

strengths of effect on the variables. In addition, the sample<br />

population of this study was not selected randomly. As noted, pure<br />

random sampling is almost impossible in the industry, so including<br />

many different types of sports spectators and geographic segments<br />

would increase external validity. Thus, future studies should<br />

develop a systematic design that better represents the population.<br />

Measuring brand loyalty should be extended to include actual<br />

purchasing behaviors for the future. As Heskett et al. (1997)<br />

stated, only 100% of satisfied customers become truly brand loyal<br />

by having relatively high repurchase rates and strong emotional<br />

attachments with the brand. Including the actual purchasing rates<br />

of the licensed products of the favorite teams would enhance the<br />

quality of the study. In order to develop a more beneficial study,<br />

a longitudinal approach should be considered. By monitoring<br />

the consumers' actual purchasing behaviors and their pre-stated<br />

attitudes over time, the practitioner should be able to identify the<br />

enhancers or barriers between the attitudinal and behavioral brand<br />

loyalties.<br />

Moreover, future studies can include additional variables in the<br />

model to further develop brand loyalty strategies. For instance, by<br />

considering the effect of customers' perceptions of brand image for<br />

their favorite team on their satisfaction and brand loyalty, marketers<br />

should be able to develop selective target market strategies and<br />

enhance the effectiveness of their advertising strategies.<br />

Conclusions<br />

In summary, this study suggests that team identification<br />

enhances the level of customers' experiences of superiority,<br />

positive feelings, and strong commitment toward the brand, and<br />

subsequently greater purchasing frequencies over other brands.<br />

The results of this study also indicate that customer satisfaction<br />

does not guarantee conative brand loyalty. In other words, customer<br />

satisfaction will not automatically increase the repeated purchasing<br />

intention unless customers first build positive beliefs and emotional<br />

attachments with the brand. By using this attitudinal brand loyalty<br />

measurement, sport marketers should be able to identify a distinct<br />

target market and potentially better address their wants and needs.<br />

References<br />

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting<br />

social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.<br />

Albarracin, D., Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2000). The cognitive impact of past<br />

behavior: Influences on beliefs; attitudes, and future behavioral<br />

decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 5-22.<br />

Back, K. J., & Parks, S. (2003). A brand loyalty model involving cognitive,<br />

affective, and conative brand loyalty and customer satisfaction. Journal<br />

of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 27(4), 419-435.<br />

Backman, S. J., & Crompton, J. L. (1991). The usefulness of selected<br />

variables for predicting activity loyalty. Leisure Sciences, 13, 205-<br />

220.<br />

Bagozzi, R. P. (1978). The construct validity of the affective, behavioral,<br />

and cognitive components of attitude by analysis of covariance<br />

structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 13, 9-31.<br />

Barber, M. B., & Venkatramen, M. (1986). The determinants of<br />

satisfaction for a high involvement product. In R. Lutz (Ed.), Advances<br />

in consumer research (pp. 316-320). Provo, VT: Association for<br />

Consumer Research.<br />

Beatty, S. E., Kahle, L. R., & Homer, P. (1988). The involvementcommitment<br />

model: Theory and implications. Journal of Business<br />

Research, 16, 149-167.<br />

Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of<br />

Consumer Research, 15, 139-168.<br />

Bentler. P. M., & Speckart, G. (1981). Attitudes "cause" behaviors:<br />

A structural equation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social<br />

Psychology, 40, 226-238.<br />

Bowen, J. T., & Shoemaker, S. (1998). Loyalty: Strategic commitment.<br />

Cornell Hotel & Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 13, 12-25.<br />

Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1991). The positive social and self<br />

concept consequences of sports team identification. Journal of Sport<br />

and Social Issues, 15, 115-127.<br />

Cardozo, R. N. (1965). An experimental study of consumer effort,<br />

expectation, and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 2, 244-<br />

249.<br />

Chartterji, M. (2003). Designing and using tools for educational<br />

assessment. Boston, MA. Pearson Education, Inc.<br />

Churchill, G.A., Jr., & Surprenant, C. (1982). An investigation into the<br />

determinants of customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research,<br />

19(4), 491-504.<br />

Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thornes, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., &<br />

Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field<br />

studies. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 34(3), 366-<br />

375.<br />

Cohen, J., & Basu, K. (1987). Alternative models of categorization:<br />

Toward a contingent processing framework. Journal of Consumer<br />

Research, 13, 455-472.<br />

Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational<br />

images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly,<br />

39, 239-263.<br />

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior:<br />

An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-<br />

Wesley.<br />

Foote, N. N. (1951). Identification as the basis for a theory of motivation.<br />

American Sociological Review, 16, 14-22.<br />

Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E.<br />

(1996). The American customer satisfaction index: Nature, purpose,<br />

and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60, 7-18.<br />

Gladden, J. M., & Funk, D. C. (2002). Developing and understanding of<br />

brand associations in team sport: Empirical evidence from consumers<br />

of professional sport. Journal of Sport Management, 16, 54-81.<br />

Gladden, J. M., & Milne, G. R. (1999). Examining the importance of<br />

brand equity in professional sports. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 8(1),<br />

21-29.<br />

Greenstein, T. N., & Marcum, J. P. (1981). Factors affecting attendance<br />

of major league baseball: I. Team performance. Review of Sport and<br />

Leisure, 6(2), 21-34.<br />

Hansen, H., & Gauthier, R. (1989). Factor affecting attendance at<br />

professional sport events. Journal of Sport Management, 3(1), 15-32.<br />

Howard, D. R., & Crompton, J. L. (2004). Financing sport (2 nd ed.).<br />

Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology, Inc.<br />

Hunt, J. M., Smith, M. F., & Kernan, J. B. (1989). Processing effects of<br />

expectancy-discrepant persuasive messages. Psychological Reports,<br />

65, 1359-1376.<br />

Iwasaki, Y., & Havitz, M. E. (1998). A oath analytic model of the<br />

relationships between involvement, psychological commitment, and<br />

loyalty. Journal of Leisure Research, 30, 256-280.<br />

Janis, I. L., & King, B. T. (1954). The influence of role-playing on opinion<br />

change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 211-218<br />

Kagan, J. (1958). The concept of identification. Psychology Review, 65,<br />

296-305.<br />

Kolbe, R. H., & James, J. D. (2003). The internalization process among<br />

team followers: Implications for team loyalty. International Journal of<br />

Sport Management, 4(1), 25-43.<br />

Kwon, H., & Armstrong, K. (2002). Factors influencing impulse buying<br />

of sport team licensed merchandise. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 11(3),<br />

151-163.<br />

Kwon, H., & Armstrong, K. (2004). An exploration of the construct of<br />

psychological attachment to a sport team among college students: A<br />

66 Journal of Research


Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />

multidimensional approach. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 13(2), 94-<br />

103.<br />

Loken, B., & John, D. R. (1993). Diluting brand beliefs: When do brand<br />

extensions have negative impact? Journal of Markleting, 57, 71-84.<br />

Madrigal, R. (1995). Cognitive and affective determinants of fan<br />

satisfaction with sporting event attendance. Journal of Leisure<br />

Research, 27(3), 205-227.<br />

Matsuoka, H., Chelladurai, P., & Harada, M. (2003). Direct and interaction<br />

effects of team identification and satisfaction on intention to attend<br />

games. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12(4), 244-253.<br />

McCleary, K. W., & Weaver, P. A. (1992). Do business travelers who<br />

belong to frequent guest programs differ from those who don't being?<br />

Hospitality Research Journal, 15, 51-61.<br />

McDonald, M. A., & Milne, G. R. (1997). A conceptual framework<br />

for evaluating marketing relationships in professional sport. Sport<br />

Marketing Quarterly, 6(2), 27-32.<br />

Miller, J. A. (1977). Exploring satisfaction, modifying models, eliciting<br />

expectations, posing problems, and making meaningful measurements.<br />

In H. K. Hunt (Ed.), Conceptualization and measurement of consumer<br />

satisfaction (pp. 72-91). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science<br />

Institute.<br />

Milne, G. R., & McDonald, M. A. (1999). Fan identification. In G. R. Milne<br />

& M. A. McDonald (Eds.), Sport marketing: Managing the exchange<br />

process. (pp. 9-20). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.<br />

Mitrano, J. R. (1999). The "sudden death" of hockey in Hartford: Sports<br />

fans and franchise relocation. Sociology of Sport Journal, 16, 134-<br />

154.<br />

Mullin, B. J., Hardy, S., & Sutton, W. A. (2007). Sport marketing (3 rd ed.).<br />

Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.<br />

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences<br />

of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460-<br />

469.<br />

Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the<br />

satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 418-430.<br />

Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the<br />

consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill.<br />

Olson, J. C., & Dover, P. (1977). Effects of expectation creation and<br />

disconfirmation on belief elements of cognitive structures. In B.<br />

Anderson (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 168-175).<br />

Chicago: Association for consumer research.<br />

Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & MacInnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand<br />

concept-image management. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135-145.<br />

Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (1993). Consumer behavior and marketing<br />

strategy (3 rd ed.). Chicago: Irwin.<br />

Quelch, J. A. (1985). How to build a product licensing program. Harvard<br />

Business Review, 63(3), 186-193.<br />

Quick, S. (2000). Contemporary sport consumers: Some implications of<br />

linking fan typology with key spectator variables. Sport Marketing<br />

Quarterly, 9(3), 149-156.<br />

Richins, M. L., & Bloch, P. H. (1991). Post-purchase product satisfaction:<br />

Incorporating the effects of involvement and time. Journal of Business<br />

Research, 23(2), 145-158.<br />

Shank, M. D. (2004). Sport marketing: A strategic perspective (3 rd ed).<br />

Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.<br />

Sloan, L. R. (1989). The motives of sports fans. In J. H. Goldstein (Ed.),<br />

Sports, games, and play: Social and Psychological viewpoints (2 nd ed.,<br />

pp. 175-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.<br />

The Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association (2008). Manufacturer<br />

sales by category 2008. Retrieved from http://www.sgma.com/<br />

reports/219_Manufacturer-Sales-by-Category-2008<br />

Sutton, W. A., McDonald, M. A., Milne, G. R., & Cimperman, J. (1997).<br />

Creating and fostering fan identification in professional sports. Sport<br />

Marketing Quarterly, 6(1), 15-22.<br />

Swan, J. E., & Trawick, I. F. (1979). Testing an extended concept of<br />

consumer satisfaction. In R. L. Day & H. K. Hunt (Eds.), New<br />

dimensions of consumer satisfaction and complaining behavior (pp.<br />

55-61). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.<br />

Trail, G. T., Anderson, D. F., & Fink, J. S. (2000). A theoretical model of<br />

sport spectator consumption behavior. International Journal of Sport<br />

Management, 1, 154-180<br />

Trail, G. T., Fink, J. S., & Anderson, D. F. (2003). Sport spectator<br />

consumption behavior. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12(1), 8-17.<br />

Vallerand, R. J., & Reid, R. J. (1984). On the causal effects of perceived<br />

competence on intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive evaluation<br />

theory. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6(1), 94-102.<br />

Wann, D. L. (1994). The "noble" sports fan: The relationships between<br />

team identification, self-esteem, and aggression. Perceptual and Motor<br />

Skills, 78(3), 864-866.<br />

Wann, D. L. (1996). Seasonal changes in spectators° identification and<br />

involvement with and evaluations of college basketball and football<br />

teams. The Psychological Record, 46(1), 201-215.<br />

Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1990). Die-hard and fair-weather<br />

fans: Effects of identification on BIRGing and CORFing tendencies.<br />

Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 14(2), 103-117.<br />

Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1993). Sports fans: Measuring<br />

degree of identification with their team. International Journal of Sport<br />

Psychology, 24, 1-17.<br />

Wann, D. L., Peterson, R. R., Cothran, C., & Dykes, M. (1999). Sport<br />

fan aggression and anonymity: The importance of team identification.<br />

Social Behavior and Personality, 27(6), 597-602.<br />

Yi, Y. (1990). A critical review of consumer satisfaction. In V. A. Zeithaml<br />

(Ed.), Review of marketing (pp. 68-123). Chicago: American Marketing<br />

Association. !<br />

volume 5, issue 1 67


Pre-Activity and Post-Activity Stretching<br />

Perceptions and Practices in NCAA Division I<br />

Volleyball Programs<br />

by Lawrence W. Judge, PhD, CSCS 1 , Kimberly J. Bodey, EdD,<br />

CSCS 2 , David Bellar, PhD, CSCS 3 , Adam Bottone, MS 1 , Elizabeth<br />

Wanless, BS 1.<br />

1<br />

School of Physical Education, Sport, and Exercise Science,<br />

Ball State University, Muncie, IN<br />

2<br />

Department of Recreation and Sport Management,<br />

Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN<br />

3<br />

Department of Kinesiology, University of Louisiana-Lafayette,<br />

Lafayette, LA<br />

Abstract<br />

The purpose of this study was to determine if NCAA Division I<br />

women's volleyball programs were in compliance with suggested<br />

current pre- and post-activity stretching protocols. Questionnaires<br />

were sent to NCAA division I women's volleyball programs in<br />

the United States. Fifty six coaches (23 males & 33 females)<br />

participated in the study. Some results seemed to conflict with<br />

current suggested practices for pre-activity stretching. The results<br />

of this study indicate that certification may not influence how well<br />

research guidelines are followed. Further research is needed to<br />

delineate how these factors affect coaching decisions.<br />

Key words: warm-up, stretching, flexibility<br />

Introduction<br />

To obtain optimal performance collegiate volleyball players<br />

should perform a pre-activity protocol that systematically and<br />

progressively stimulates the musculature athletes will utilize<br />

during training or in competition. The key components are timing,<br />

sequence, and interaction of the training stimuli to allow optimum<br />

adaptive response in pursuit of specific competitive goals (Judge,<br />

2007). Active warm-up, passive warm-up, and stretching are<br />

frequent procedures used by athletes prior to engaging in intense<br />

physical activity. Although the evidence is clear in the sports science<br />

literature; some practitioners continue inappropriate warm-up and<br />

stretching combinations (Beedle, Leydig & Carnucci, 2007). The<br />

study will assess National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)<br />

Division I volleyball coaches' certifications and the relationship to<br />

current pre-activity stretching and post-activity stretching practices<br />

and perceived benefits and the gap that may exist between scientific<br />

principles and actual coaching practices.<br />

Literature Review<br />

In a competitive activity like volleyball which requires<br />

explosive strength, training protocols that influence the mechanical<br />

performance of subsequent muscle contractions should be addressed<br />

(Chiu, 2003). The theoretical goal of the pre-activity warm-up and<br />

stretching is to optimize performance and reduce the incidence of<br />

injury through increased muscle temperature, muscle compliance,<br />

and efficiency of physiological responses. A well-designed preactivity<br />

protocol will bring about various physiological changes<br />

that enhance the training activity or competition.<br />

68 Journal of Research<br />

Types of Stretching<br />

Flexibility as a biomotor quality has been extensively researched<br />

during the last several decades. Various approaches to stretching<br />

have been explored by the coaching, scientific, and physiotherapy<br />

communities. Researchers have assessed the athletic benefits of<br />

performing a general "warm-up" prior to activity (Safran, Garrett,<br />

Seaber, Glisson, & Ribbeck, 1988) and attempted to pinpoint what,<br />

if any, type of stretching should be performed before activity to<br />

maximize performance.<br />

There are essentially two forms of stretching employed on a<br />

regular basis among athletes as part of a complete flexibility<br />

procedure; pre-activity stretching (Behm, Button, & Butt, 2001;<br />

Fry, McLellan, Weiss, & Rosato, 2003; Nelson, Jokkonen, &<br />

Arnall, 2005) and post-activity stretching (Hunter & Marshall,<br />

1992; Kerrigan, Xenopoulus-Oddson, Sullivan, Lelas, & Riley,<br />

2003). Static stretching, ballistic stretching, proprioceptive<br />

neuromuscular facilitation stretching (PNF), and dynamic<br />

stretching are the specific types of stretching predominantly used<br />

by athletes, coaches, and athletic trainers in pre or post activity.<br />

The following section explains each of these types of stretching in<br />

greater detail.<br />

Static Stretching<br />

Static stretching, the most commonly used program among<br />

athletes and coaches, requires the holding of a stretch position with<br />

little or no movement for a length of time (Mann & Whedon, 2001).<br />

When done correctly, the static stretch includes the relaxation and<br />

concurrent elongation of the stretch muscle. If performed properly,<br />

the risk of injury associated with the stretch is reduced (Baechle<br />

& Earle, 2000). Static stretching should not result in excessive<br />

tension on the muscle as this may cause a reduction in the stretch<br />

and injury (Mann & Whedon, 2001).<br />

Several studies have shown that using static stretching as a preactivity<br />

warm-up has either detrimental or no effect on performance.<br />

Static stretching does little to increase the core muscle temperature<br />

(Mann & Whedon, 2001). Nelson, Kokkonen, and Arnall (2005)<br />

found static stretching reduced muscular strength endurance by<br />

28%. Mann and Jones (1999) reported vertical jump performance<br />

decreased 5.6% following static stretching as compared to no<br />

stretching at all. Unick, Kieffer, Cheesman, and Feeney (2005)<br />

found no difference in vertical-jump performance from either static<br />

or ballistic stretching as compared with no stretching. Similarly,<br />

Cramer (2006) found no effect on peak torque of leg extensors<br />

from static stretching.<br />

The current trend shows that static stretching tactics are better<br />

suited following activity, not before it (Anderson, Beauliue,<br />

Cornelius, Dominquez, Prentice, & Wallace, 1984; Egan, Cramer,<br />

Massey, & Marek, 2006; Nelson, & Brandy, 2008; Stone, Ramsey,<br />

O'Bryant, Ayers, & Sands, 2006; Swanson, 2008). Research<br />

supports that gains in range of motion can be achieved if static<br />

stretching is performed consistently post-activity as a part of the


Stretching Perceptions and Practices<br />

cool down (Mann & Whedon, 2001).<br />

Ballistic Stretching<br />

Ballistic stretching involves an active muscular effort and uses<br />

a bouncing-type movement in which the end position of the stretch<br />

is not held (Baechle & Earle, 2000). Due to the bouncing-type<br />

movement, many researchers have concluded that ballistic-type<br />

stretching is counterproductive to warm-up exercises because it<br />

leads to a firing of the muscle spindle which initiates the stretch<br />

reflex, leading to a greater potential for injury (Mann & Whedon,<br />

2001). Because the stretch reflex is activated, the muscle is not<br />

allowed to relax which defeats the purpose of stretching (Baechle<br />

& Earle, 2000). Unlike static stretching, ballistic stretching does<br />

have the potential to increase the muscle's core temperature;<br />

however, the efficacy of its use in the athletic arena is in question<br />

(Mann & Whedon, 2001). This ballistic-style of stretching popular<br />

in the 1960s was slowly replaced in the early 1980s with a focus on<br />

proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching.<br />

Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) Stretching<br />

Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching (PNF)<br />

combines static stretching with isometric contractions of either<br />

the stretched muscle or the muscle's agonist to increase the range<br />

of motion (ROM) attainable during the stretch. PNF stretching<br />

techniques are commonly used in the athletic and clinical<br />

environments to enhance both active and passive range of motion.<br />

PNF is considered the most effective stretching technique when<br />

the aim is to increase the range of motion (Sharman & Cresswell,<br />

2006). Originally developed in the 1950s, PNF stretching was<br />

used as a rehabilitation technique for stroke patients. Today,<br />

athletic trainers and therapists use PNF techniques to increase<br />

range of motion and improve strength although it does not increase<br />

core muscle temperature (Mann & Whedon, 2001). Cornelius<br />

(1984) favored PNF stretching over ballistic stretching citing the<br />

explosive nature of ballistic stretching created a higher risk for<br />

injury and the potential for muscle soreness. While PNF stretching<br />

is a good program for athletes to use for increasing range of motion<br />

and decreasing muscle soreness, it can be a very complicated<br />

procedure and may not be appropriate on the volleyball court<br />

unless the athletes are properly trained to administer the technique<br />

(Mann & Whedon, 2001).<br />

Dynamic Stretching<br />

Dynamic stretching allows for flexibility activity during a<br />

sport-specific movement. It can be argued that to most effectively<br />

prepare strength or power athletes for a specific sport activity<br />

the pre-activity routine should contain exercises that address<br />

the concept of movement pattern specificity. Although similar<br />

to ballistic stretching, dynamic stretching avoids bouncing and<br />

can include movement specific to a sport or movement pattern<br />

(Baechle & Earle, 2000). Dynamic stretching includes continuous<br />

muscle activity to exceed the static range of motion encountered<br />

during the normal full-range-of-motion activities (Yessis, 2006).<br />

This type of pre-activity flexibility is best done prior to the sport<br />

activity as it helps the athlete to prepare for the competition by<br />

allowing him or her to increase sport-specific flexibility and it<br />

increases core muscle temperature (Baechle & Earle, 2000).<br />

Research supports dynamic stretching over other types of preactivity<br />

stretching. Yamaguchi and Ishii (2005) found dynamic<br />

stretching to be better than static stretching or no stretching at<br />

all for leg extension power. In another study, athletes were tested<br />

performing underhand medicine-ball toss, and a five-step jump<br />

test. The results on all the tests were significantly greater when<br />

dynamic stretching was performed prior to the tests than when preactivity<br />

static stretching was performed (Little & Williams, 2006).<br />

Little and Williams (2006) also found agility performance to be<br />

greater following pre-activity dynamic stretching as opposed to<br />

pre-activity static stretching. This research suggests that dynamic<br />

stretching should be included as part of a pre-activity preparation<br />

routine.<br />

Research investigating the usage of pre-activity warm-up and<br />

stretching and post-activity stretching has shown a paradigm<br />

shift from activities such as ballistic-style of stretching to a focus<br />

on static and/or PNF stretching (Anderson, 1980; Anderson,<br />

Beauliue, Cornelius, Dominquez, Prentice, & Wallace, 1984;<br />

Holcomb, 2008; Stone, Ramsey, O'Bryant, Ayers, & Sands, 2006)<br />

and more recently to dynamic stretching (Little and Williams,<br />

2006). Current research indicates that dynamic stretching should<br />

be used prior to activity (Behm, Button, & Butt, 2001; Ce,<br />

Margonato, Casasco, & Veicsteinas, 2008; Egan, Cramer, Massey,<br />

& Marek, 2006; Fredrick, & Szymanski, 2001; Laroche, Lussier,<br />

& Roy, 2008; Mann, & Jones, 1999; Siatras, Mittas, Maneletzi,<br />

& Vamvakoudis, 2008; Torres, Kraemer, Vingren, Volek, Hatfield,<br />

Spiering, Ho, Fragala, Thomas, Anderson, Hakkinen, and Maresh,<br />

2008; Winchester, Nelson, Landin, Young, & Schexnayder, 2008;<br />

Yamaguchi, & Ishii, 2005). Evidence indicates that static-style<br />

stretching should be performed following exercise (Anderson,<br />

Beauliue, Cornelius, Dominquez, Prentice, & Wallace, 1984;<br />

Egan, Cramer, Massey, & Marek, 2006; Nelson, & Brandy, 2008;<br />

Stone, Ramsey, O'Bryant, Ayers, & Sands, 2006; Swanson, 2008).<br />

Researchers continued investigation of the physiological impact<br />

of pre-activity stretching and the effect it can have on performance<br />

has further awakened interest from the coaching community.<br />

The advent of coaches' education and certification programs<br />

for volleyball coaches, strength coaches, and athletic trainers<br />

should give coaches a solid physiological basis for their training<br />

recommendations.<br />

Coaches Certification<br />

The most common type of volleyball specific coaching<br />

certification training is through USA Volleyball (USA Volleyball,<br />

2009). The USA Volleyball Coaching Accreditation Program<br />

(USAV-CAP) provides an opportunity for professional preparation<br />

and advancement for the volleyball coach. The curriculum addresses<br />

the essential topics for the volunteer and the internationally<br />

aspiring coach. The USAV-CAP is a four-level volleyball coaching<br />

education program. Each course level includes a special emphasis<br />

on building the foundation and creation of a well-prepared coach.<br />

The first level, Increased Mastery and Professional Application<br />

of Coaching Theory (IMPACT), is an entry level certification<br />

which provides a general overview of volleyball drill development<br />

and ethical coaching. Next, coaches enroll in the Coaching<br />

Accreditation Program (CAP) which has four levels (i.e., CAP I-<br />

IV). Level I emphasizes teaching the skills of the game. Level<br />

volume 5, issue 1 69


Stretching Perceptions and Practices<br />

II emphasizes organizing and developing team play. Level III<br />

emphasizes taking your team to the next level though advanced<br />

training and conditioning. Level IV is by appointment only and is<br />

usually reserved for those coaches who have coached for official<br />

USA National team or have assisted with a National or Olympic<br />

team.<br />

Division I volleyball programs may also have the added benefit<br />

of working with strength and conditioning coaches. Most strength<br />

coaches and some volleyball coaches are certified through the<br />

National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA). The<br />

NSCA Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist (CSCS)<br />

program was created in 1985 to certify individuals who possess the<br />

knowledge and skills to design and implement safe and effective<br />

strength and conditioning programs (NSCA, 2009). In order to<br />

pass the certification exam individuals must possess knowledge<br />

in the scientific foundations of warm-up, stretching, cool down,<br />

periodization, nutrition and strength and conditioning, and<br />

demonstrate the skills to apply that knowledge. Today, more than<br />

21,000 professionals from a variety of academic and professional<br />

backgrounds hold the CSCS credential (NSCA, 2009). This diverse<br />

group includes strength coaches, sport coaches, athletic trainers,<br />

physical therapists, personal trainers, physicians, chiropractors,<br />

researchers, and educators.<br />

Even with the proliferation of coaches and strength training<br />

professionalsÅf education and certification programs and a greater<br />

emphasis on research in this area it is uncertain if coaches follow<br />

the suggested guidelines. Therefore, the purpose of this study<br />

was to determine if the current pre- and post-activity practices of<br />

college volleyball programs are supported by current research, and<br />

whether or not that is affected by coaching certifications.<br />

Methodology<br />

Sampling Procedure<br />

The purpose of this study was to ascertain coaches' perceptions<br />

and stretching practices conducted in Division I volleyball<br />

programs. To avoid redundancy, only one coach per program, the<br />

head coach, was contacted about the study. The assumption was<br />

the head coach would complete the survey instrument or direct the<br />

staff member responsible for stretching activities to complete the<br />

survey instrument.<br />

Current email addresses for all Division I head volleyball<br />

coaches were obtained from the 2008-2009 NCAA Coaches<br />

Directory. An introductory email explained the purpose of the<br />

study and provided a hyperlink to the institutional review board<br />

approved, web based informed consent and survey instrument.<br />

Data was collected during a four week period in February/March<br />

2009. Early off season was determined to be the best timeframe<br />

to maximize coaches' recall of stretching practices used during<br />

the previous season and coachesÅf participation in the study. A<br />

reminder email was sent to non-respondents two weeks after the<br />

initial email in an effort to increase the overall response rate.<br />

Instrumentation<br />

The survey instrument contained 17 items grouped into four<br />

areas.<br />

Pre-activity stretching practices. Three items were completed<br />

by participants. Respondents indicated the (a) type of pre-activity<br />

70 Journal of Research<br />

group stretching conducted in the warm-up period, (b) whether<br />

athletes performed static stretching following the pre-activity group<br />

stretching but prior to the athletic event, and (c) whether athletes<br />

performed static stretching with assistance of an athletic trainer or<br />

massage therapist following the pre-activity group stretching but<br />

prior to the athletic event.<br />

Post-activity stretching practices. Three items were completed<br />

by participants. Respondents indicated the (a) type of postactivity<br />

group stretching conducted during the cool-down period,<br />

(b) perceived frequency of athletes completing a post-activity<br />

stretching regimen following the athletic event, and (c) perceived<br />

frequency of athletes completing post-activity stretching plus light<br />

jogging following the athletic event.<br />

Perceived benefits of stretching activities. Four items were<br />

completed by participants. Respondents indicated their perception<br />

of whether pre-activity group stretching (a) prevents injury and (b)<br />

improves athletic performance. Similarly, respondents indicated<br />

their perception of whether post-activity group stretching (c)<br />

prevents injury and (d) improves athletic performance.<br />

Demographic information. Five items were completed.<br />

Respondents indicated their (a) title (e.g., head coach, assistant<br />

coach), (b) sex, (c) years of experience, (d) current volleyball<br />

certification(s), and (e) current strength and conditioning<br />

certification(s). Two additional questions related to institution and<br />

conference affiliation were used to make a judgment about sampling<br />

error but were not otherwise included in the data analysis.<br />

Data Analysis<br />

Data analysis was a two step process in this study. Step 1 involved<br />

generation of descriptive statistics for all the variables of interest.<br />

Univariates were used to determine whether Pearson 2 model<br />

assumptions were met. Step 2 involved applying Pearson 2 tests<br />

of independence to the following sets of variables (a) certification<br />

and type of pre-activity group stretching, (b) certification and type<br />

of post-activity group stretching, (c) certification and pre-activity<br />

group stretching — injury prevention benefit, (d) certification and<br />

pre-activity group stretching — improved performance benefit, (e)<br />

certification and post-activity group stretching — injury prevention<br />

benefit, and (f) certification and post-activity group stretching<br />

— improved performance benefit. Alpha was adjusted to .008<br />

with Bonferroni's contrasting procedure to minimize study-wide<br />

Type I error. Cramér's V was calculated to estimate the strength of<br />

relationships.<br />

Results<br />

From the 291 Division I volleyball programs, 56 coaches<br />

returned completed usable surveys. This represents 19.2% of a<br />

finite population. The low response rate may have resulted from<br />

the following factors: (a) spam control software may have sorted<br />

introductory and follow-up emails into a bulk mail folder, (b)<br />

coaches may not have been interested in the topic or may not<br />

have perceived a tangible benefit from study participation, and (c)<br />

coaches may not have had sufficient time to complete the survey<br />

instrument due to the recruiting calendar (e.g., placed on "to<br />

do" list). While the response rate is relatively low by traditional<br />

standards, review of institution and conference affiliation data<br />

suggests the sample is representative of Division I volleyball


Stretching Perceptions and Practices<br />

programs. <strong>No</strong>netheless, caution is warranted as factors may exist<br />

which limit the generalizability of study results.<br />

Demographic Data<br />

In this study, respondents were primarily head coaches<br />

(85.7%), female (58.9%), and possessed an average of 13.8 years<br />

of experience. The head coaches had an average of 14.0 years of<br />

experience compared to 12.0 years of experience for the assistant<br />

coaches. A large number of coaches (44.6%) did not possess a<br />

volleyball coaching certification nor a strength and conditioning<br />

coaching certification.<br />

Table 1. Demographic Profile of Division I Volleyball<br />

Coaches (N=56)<br />

Assistant<br />

Head Coach Coach Missing Total<br />

Gender<br />

Men 19 33.92% 3 5.36% 1 1.79% 23 41.07%<br />

Women 29 51.78% 3 5.36% 1 1.79% 33 58.93%<br />

Experience<br />

Range 2 to 42 yrs 6 to 20 yrs 1 to 10 yrs 1 to 42 yrs<br />

Mean 14.22 (7.57) 12.00 (7.21) 5.50 (6.36) 13.75 (7.58)<br />

Certification<br />

<strong>No</strong>ne 23 41.07% 2 3.57% 0 0% 25 44.64%<br />

Impact 4 7.14% 1 1.79% 0 0% 5 8.93%<br />

CAP I 9 16.07% 1 1.79% 1 1.79% 11 19.64%<br />

CAP II 4 7.14% 0 0% 0 0% 4 7.14%<br />

CAP III 6 10.71% 0 0% 0 0% 6 10.71%<br />

CSCS 1 1.79% 2 3.57% 0 0% 3 5.36%<br />

CSCS + Impact 0 0% 0 0% 1 1.79% 1 1.79%<br />

CSCS + CAP I 1 1.79% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1.79%<br />

Total 48 6 2 56<br />

Pre-Activity Stretching Practices<br />

Coaches typically prescribed a combination of static and<br />

dynamic stretching activities (44.0%) or dynamic stretching<br />

activities (42.0%) prior to the athletic event. To a much lesser<br />

extent coaches exclusively utilized static stretching activities<br />

Table 2. Pre-Activity Group Stretching Practices in<br />

Division I Volleyball Programs (N=50)<br />

Type of Pre-Activity Group Stretching<br />

Static &<br />

Certification Static Ballistic PNF Dynamic Dynamic<br />

<strong>No</strong>ne 5 10.00% 0 0% 0 0% 9 18.00% 10 20.00%<br />

Impact 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 2.0% 3 6.00%<br />

CAP I 2 4.00% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 12.00%<br />

CAP II 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 4 8.00% 0 0%<br />

CAP III 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 6.00% 2 4.00%<br />

CSCS 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 4.00% 1 2.00%<br />

CSCS + Impact 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 2.00% 0 0%<br />

CSCS + CAP I 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 2.00% 0 0%<br />

Total 7 0 0 21 22<br />

Following Pre-Activity Group Stretching, Coach<br />

Allows:<br />

Self Static 1 2.00% 0 0% 0 0% 2 4.00% 2 4.00%<br />

AT/MT Static 1 2.00% 0 0% 0 0% 5 10.00% 3 6.00%<br />

Self & AT/MT Static 4 8.00% 0 0% 0 0% 4 8.00% 10 20.00%<br />

Static <strong>No</strong>t Allowed 1 2.00% 0 0% 0 0% 8 16.00% 5 10.00%<br />

Total 7 0 0 *19 *20<br />

*Missing data.<br />

(14.0%). Interestingly, among coaches who incorporated dynamic<br />

stretching into the group warm-up, 57.9% subsequently allowed<br />

athletes to perform static stretching independently and/or with<br />

assistance from the athletic trainer or the massage therapist. The<br />

Pearson 2 test of independence between certification and preactivity<br />

group stretch type was not significant, 2 (2, N=50) =<br />

1.819, p =.403.<br />

Table 3. Certification and Pre-Activity Group Stretch<br />

Type (N=50)<br />

Stretch Type Certified <strong>No</strong>n-Certified Total<br />

Static 2 5 7<br />

(36.0) (3.4)<br />

Dynamic 12 9 21<br />

(10.9) (10.1)<br />

Static + Dynamic 12 10 22<br />

(11.4) (10.6)<br />

Total 26 24 50<br />

<strong>No</strong>te: Numbers in parenthesis are expected cell frequencies.<br />

2 (2, N=50) = 1.819, p = .403<br />

Post-Activity Stretching Practices<br />

Coaches typically used static stretching activities (71.4%)<br />

following the athletic event. To a much lesser extent, coaches used<br />

a combination of static and dynamic stretching activities (22.4%)<br />

and PNF stretching (6.1%). Coaches indicated athletes either<br />

always or almost always completed a stretching regime (54.0%)<br />

or stretching plus jogging regime (44.0%) after an athletic event.<br />

The Pearson 2 test of independence between certification and<br />

pre-activity group stretch type was not significant, 2 (2, N=50)<br />

= 2.947, p = .229.<br />

Table 4. Post-Activity Group Stretching Practices in<br />

Division I Volleyball Programs (N=49)<br />

Type of Post-Activity Group Stretching<br />

Static &<br />

Certification Static Ballistic PNF Dynamic Dynamic<br />

<strong>No</strong>ne 17 34.69% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 12.24%<br />

Impact 4 8.16% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%<br />

CAP I 5 10.20% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 4 8.16%<br />

CAP II 3 6.12% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%<br />

CAP III 3 6.12% 0 0% 2 4.08% 0 0% 1 2.04%<br />

CSCS 1 2.04% 0 0% 1 2.04% 0 0% 0 0%<br />

CSCS + Impact 1 2.04% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%<br />

CSCS + CAP I 1 2.04% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%<br />

Total 35 0 3 0 11<br />

Table 5. Coaches Perceived Frequency of Athletes Completing<br />

Post Activity Cool Down Activities (N=50)<br />

Almost<br />

Always Always Sometimes Rarely Never<br />

Stretching Regime:<br />

Head Coach 7 14.00% 18 36.00% 13 26.00% 5 10.00% 2 4.00%<br />

Assistant Coach 0 0% 2 4.00% 2 4.00% 1 2.00% 0 0%<br />

Total 7 20 15 6 2<br />

Stretching & Jogging Regime:<br />

Head Coach 7 14.00% 14 28.00% 12 24.00% 6 12.00% 5 10.00%<br />

Assistant Coach 0 0% 1 2.00% 3 6.00% 1 2.00% 0 0%<br />

Total 7 15 15 7 5<br />

volume 5, issue 1 71


Stretching Perceptions and Practices<br />

Table 6. Certification and Post-Activity Group Stretch<br />

Type (N=49)<br />

Stretch Type Certified <strong>No</strong>n-Certified Total<br />

Static 18 17 35<br />

(18.6) (16.4)<br />

PNF 3 0 3<br />

(1.6) (1.4)<br />

Static + Dynamic 5 6 11<br />

(5.8) (5.2)<br />

Total 26 23 49<br />

<strong>No</strong>te: Numbers in parenthesis are expected cell frequencies.<br />

2 (2, N=49) = 2.947, p = .229<br />

Perceived Benefits of Stretching Activities<br />

The majority of coaches indicated pre-activity group stretching<br />

was beneficial in terms of injury prevention (75.0%) and improved<br />

performance (69.1%). Similarly, coaches indicated post-activity<br />

group stretching was beneficial in terms of injury prevention<br />

(87.3%) and improved performance (69.6%). The Pearson 2 tests<br />

of independence did not reveal significant relationships between<br />

the following pairs of variables: (a) certification and pre-activity<br />

group stretching — injury prevention benefit, 2 (2, N=56) = .602,<br />

p = .438; (b) certification and pre-activity group stretching Çú<br />

improved performance benefit, 2 (2, N=55) = .696, p = .404; (c)<br />

certification and post-activity group stretching — injury prevention<br />

benefit, 2 (2, N=55) = .022, p = .883; and (d) certification and<br />

post-activity group stretching — improved performance benefit,<br />

2 (2, N=56) = 2.291, p = .130.<br />

Table 7. Certification and Pre-Activity Group Stretch -<br />

Injury Prevention Benefit (N=56)<br />

72 Journal of Research<br />

Certified <strong>No</strong>n-Certified Total<br />

Benefit 22 20 42<br />

(23.3) (18.8)<br />

<strong>No</strong> Benefit 9 5 15<br />

(7.8) (6.3)<br />

Total 31 25 56<br />

<strong>No</strong>te: Numbers in parenthesis are expected cell frequencies.<br />

2 (2, N=56) = .602, p = .438<br />

Table 8. Certification and Pre-Activity Group Stretch -<br />

Performance Benefit (N=55)<br />

Certified <strong>No</strong>n-Certified Total<br />

Benefit 20 18 38<br />

(21.4) (16.6)<br />

<strong>No</strong> Benefit 11 6 17<br />

(9.6) (7.7)<br />

Total 31 24 55<br />

<strong>No</strong>te: Numbers in parenthesis are expected cell frequencies.<br />

2 (2, N=55) = .696, p = .404<br />

Table 9. Certification and Post-Activity Group Stretch -<br />

Injury Prevention Benefit (N=55)<br />

Certified <strong>No</strong>n-Certified Total<br />

Benefit 26 22 48<br />

(26.2) (21.8)<br />

<strong>No</strong> Benefit 4 3 7<br />

(3.8) (3.2)<br />

Total 30 25 55<br />

<strong>No</strong>te: Numbers in parenthesis are expected cell frequencies.<br />

2 (2, N=55) = .022, p = .883<br />

Table 10. Certification and Post-Activity Group Stretch -<br />

Performance Benefit (N=56)<br />

Certified <strong>No</strong>n-Certified Total<br />

Benefit 19 20 39<br />

(21.6) (17.4)<br />

<strong>No</strong> Benefit 12 5 17<br />

(9.4) (7.6)<br />

Total 31 25 56<br />

<strong>No</strong>te: Numbers in parenthesis are expected cell frequencies.<br />

2 (2, N=56) = 2.291, p = .130<br />

Discussion<br />

Lack of Certifications<br />

The quality of a sports pre-activity preparation session<br />

depends on the competence of the coach. Coaching education and<br />

certification programs encourage a higher level of competence<br />

among practitioners. Surprisingly, a large number of coaches in<br />

the present study (44.6%) do not possess a volleyball coaching<br />

certification nor a strength and conditioning coaching certification.<br />

This may be due to the fact that coaching education programs have<br />

not found much support on a wide-scale effort and have limited<br />

success reaching their intended audience (Gilbert & Trudel,<br />

1999).<br />

A coach is a critical part to an athlete's sport experience<br />

beginning with the pre-activity stretching protocol. An effective<br />

practice begins with proper physical preparation. Mahoney and<br />

Stattin (2000) found the structure and context of the sport activity<br />

was important in determining whether participation led to positive<br />

or negative outcomes. Strean and Garcia-Bengoechea (2003)<br />

found it was the individual's sport experience that determined<br />

whether participation was viewed as positive or negative. The fact<br />

that coaches can readily be trained to provide such an environment<br />

for athletes (Smith & Smoll, 2002) suggests that coach training<br />

can be an important vehicle for improving the benefits of sport<br />

participation for athletes. Well trained sports coaches are better<br />

equipped to create positive sports experiences, which in turn keep<br />

athletes involved in sports. Sports organizations and National<br />

Governing Bodies (NGB's) should provide and market educational<br />

programs for all coaches. Sport organizations need to continue<br />

to extend the academic base by encouraging and supporting<br />

quality research in coaching; translating the research in practical<br />

applications and transmitting that information to coaches in<br />

accessible ways. Education and certification programs for coaches<br />

need additional marketing efforts to increase participation (Gilbert<br />

& Trudel, 1999).


Stretching Perceptions and Practices<br />

Pre-Activity Stretching Practices<br />

Based on the results of the present study, it is clear that not<br />

all of programs are in compliance with suggested current preactivity<br />

stretching practices. Coaches not consistent with literature<br />

undermine warm-up benefits by allowing athletes to do static<br />

stretching. It has been shown that dynamic flexibility stretching<br />

(not static, PNF, or ballistic-type stretches) should be used<br />

prior to activity (Behm, Button, & Butt, 2001; Ce, Margonato,<br />

Casasco, & Veicsteinas, 2008; Egan, Cramer, Massey, & Marek,<br />

2006; Fredrick, & Szymanski, 2001; Laroche, Lussier, & Roy,<br />

2008; Mann, & Jones, 1999; Siatras, Mittas, Maneletzi, &<br />

Vamvakoudis, 2008; Torres, Kraemer, Vingren, Volek, Hatfield,<br />

Spiering, Ho, Fragala, Thomas, Anderson, Hakkinen, and Maresh,<br />

2008; Winchester, Nelson, Landin, Young, & Schexnayder, 2008;<br />

Yamaguchi, & Ishii, 2005). In contradiction, 100% (50 out of<br />

50) of coaches reported that they used some form of pre-activity<br />

stretching, but only 42% (21 out of the 50) of coaches indicated that<br />

they use dynamic flexibility stretching exclusively. Also of interest<br />

were the coaches that allowed athletes to perform static stretching<br />

independently and/or with assistance from the athletic trainer or the<br />

massage therapist. The other coaches (22 out of 50) marked that<br />

they used dynamic flexibility along with a 'combination' of static,<br />

PNF, or ballistic stretching. With current research not supporting<br />

the use of static, PNF, and ballistic stretches before exercise, the<br />

data presented here demonstrates that while coaches have included<br />

pre-activity stretching in their training program they have not<br />

completely halted the use of the exercises that are not supported<br />

by current research (Judge, Craig, Baudentistal & Bodey, 2009).<br />

It should be noted that while most of the studies reviewed did not<br />

support the use of static stretching pre-exercise (Bazett-Jones,<br />

Gibson, & McBride, 2008; Ce, Margonato, Casasco, & Veicsteinas,<br />

2008; Laroche, Lussier, & Roy, 2008; Siatras, Mittas, Maneletzi,<br />

& Vamvakoudis, 2008; Winchester, Nelson, Landin, Young, &<br />

Schexnayder, 2008), one study did support ballistic stretching<br />

(Woolstenhulme, Griffins, Woolstenhulme, & Parcell, 2006). An<br />

interesting finding of the present study is there were no differences<br />

between those who are certified and those who are not in the preactivity<br />

stretching practices. One would expect certified coaches to<br />

be aware of what is in the literature and comply with the research<br />

recommendations. The knowledge of the certified coaches could<br />

be impacted by the age of their certification and whether or not<br />

the coaches kept up to date with CEU's or self study. This calls to<br />

question the efficacy of certification programs. Research further<br />

examining whether certified coaches are staying up to date with<br />

current research should be conducted in order to either improve the<br />

certification process or change/modify the certification process to<br />

ongoing learning requirements.<br />

Post-Activity Stretching Practices<br />

Current research indicates that athletes should perform staticstyle<br />

stretching following exercise (Anderson, Beauliue, Cornelius,<br />

Dominquez, Prentice, & Wallace, 1984; Egan, Cramer, Massey, &<br />

Marek, 2006; Nelson, & Brandy, 2008; Stone, Ramsey, O'Bryant,<br />

Ayers, & Sands, 2006; Swanson, 2008). The results from this<br />

study indicate that 49 of the responders had their athletes perform<br />

post-activity stretching. Of the 49 who did employ post-activity<br />

stretching, 71.4% (35 out of 49) performed static stretching, 8.0%<br />

(4 out of 49) performed PNF stretching, and 20% (10 out of 49)<br />

combined static with dynamic stretching. This indicates that while<br />

the majority of the responders were congruent with research that<br />

suggests post-activity stretching is important, not all follow current<br />

stretching guidelines.<br />

The most interesting finding of the post-stretch data is that<br />

although most coaches are consistent with literature in their postactivity<br />

stretching choice; post-activity stretching and cool down<br />

are not a consistent part of the daily routine. Coaches indicate<br />

athletes either always or almost always completed a stretching<br />

regime (54%) or stretching plus jogging regime (44.9%) after<br />

an athletic event. It can only be speculated why the post activity<br />

stretching and cool down is not completed on a consistent basis.<br />

Perceived Benefits of Stretching Activities<br />

Coaches commonly hold two beliefs concerning stretching.<br />

Acute stretching (part of the warm-up) may increase performance<br />

and will reduce the injury potential and chronic stretching will<br />

increase performance and reduce the injury potential. However,<br />

data exist indicating that these beliefs may not be completely true<br />

(Thacker, et al. 2004). The majority of coaches in the present study<br />

indicated pre-activity group stretching was advantageous in terms<br />

of injury prevention (75.0%) and improved performance (69.1%).<br />

Similarly, coaches indicated post-activity group stretching was<br />

beneficial in terms of injury prevention (87.3%) and improved<br />

performance (69.6%). This indicates that while the majority of<br />

the responders supported stretching as a means to prevent injuries<br />

and improve performance, many coaches may not be aware of the<br />

latest research findings.<br />

Most studies indicate that reduced flexibility shows little<br />

relationship to typical sports injuries. Neither acute (Pope,<br />

2000) nor chronic (Herbert, 2002) stretching appears to effect a<br />

significant reduction in physical activity related injuries. Thacker,<br />

et al. (2004), in an extensive review of the flexibility literature<br />

that included 361 articles dating back into the 1950s, concluded<br />

that there is little relationship between stretching (e.g., increased<br />

ROM) and injury. Thus, there is equivocal evidence that stretching<br />

and enhanced ROM do not result in a lower injury rate.<br />

Most of the performance studies show that pre-activity static<br />

stretching as a part of warm-up reduces maximum strength (force<br />

magnitude) and numerous related variables, such as rate of force<br />

development and power output (Behm, 2001; Godges, 1989; Nelson,<br />

2001; Rosembaum, 1995). Thus, it appears that static stretching as<br />

part of a warm-up can negatively alter force production, power<br />

output, and stretch-shortening cycle characteristics such that<br />

strength and performance, including explosive performances, can<br />

be compromised. Interestingly, among coaches who incorporated<br />

dynamic stretching into the group warm-up, 57.9% of coaches<br />

then allowed athletes to perform static stretching independently<br />

and/or with assistance from the athletic trainer or the massage<br />

therapist. This "extra" stretching may be limiting the explosive<br />

capabilities and may have little or no affect on injury prevention<br />

(Shrier, 1999). Most available data indicates that pre-activity<br />

static stretching can cause acute performance reduction relating<br />

to decreased tissue stiffness or alterations in nervous system<br />

components of the stretch-shortening cycle, such as the myototic<br />

reflex (Stone, Ramsey, O'Bryant, Ayers, & Sands 2006). These<br />

volume 5, issue 1 73


Stretching Perceptions and Practices<br />

alterations in turn can result in a decreased maximum strength and<br />

explosiveness and inferior performances. The literature dealing<br />

with flexibility suggests that athletes should perform some sort<br />

of 'general' warm-up prior to activity (Ce, Margonato, Casasco,<br />

& Veicsteinas 2008; Hedrick 1992; Laroche, Lussier, & Roy<br />

2008; Mann, & Jones 1999; Ninos 1995; Swanson 2008; Torres,<br />

Kraemer, Vingren, Volek, Hatfield, Spiering, Ho, Fragala, Thomas,<br />

Anderson, Hakkinen, & Maresh 2008; Yamaguchi, & Ishii 2005)<br />

a pre-activity stretch (Fredrick, and Szymanski 2001; Holcomb,<br />

2008; Laroche, Lussier, & Roy 2008; Mann & Jones 1999; Nelson<br />

&Brandy 2008), and post-activity stretching (Anderson, 1984;<br />

Nelson & Brandy 2008; Stone, Ramsey, O'Bryant, Ayers, & Sands<br />

2006). The majority of the respondents to this survey indicated<br />

that they use the aforementioned 3 step approach in preparing<br />

athletes, but did vary in how closely they followed research<br />

recommendations (Judge, Craig, Baudentistal, & Bodey, 2009).<br />

Implications for Coaches/Coach Educators<br />

When comparing coaching specific certification to pre-activity<br />

flexibility practices, it is clear that not all coaches are in compliance<br />

with suggested pre-activity flexibility recommendations<br />

(Faigenbaum, et al., 2006; Herda, et al., 2008; Kovacs, 2006;<br />

McMillian, et al., 2006; Samuel, et al., 2008; Yessis, 2006). It<br />

is reasonable to say that coaching certification has little impact<br />

(based on results of this study) on pre-activity flexibility protocols.<br />

Out of the 56 respondents, 29 have a volleyball specific coaching<br />

certification (just slightly over 50%). It can be concluded that if<br />

one has a volleyball specific coaching certification, they are not<br />

more likely to omit static stretching from a pre-activity flexibility<br />

than someone who does not have a volleyball specific coaching<br />

certification. Yet 14 of the 29 certified volleyball coaches still<br />

include some form of pre-activity static stretching. It is evident<br />

that some coaches are unwilling or reluctant to part with traditional<br />

methods of static stretching prior to activity (Bandy & Irion, 1994;<br />

Swanson, 2006). It would be of value for volleyball coaches to<br />

partake in a recertification course that includes current research<br />

trends in a way that positively impacts their coaching. A well<br />

educated coach with an understanding of current research will help<br />

athletes be better prepared for competition and maximize their<br />

volleyball performance. Based on these results it is evident that<br />

there exists a need for a program of accreditation for volleyball<br />

coaches. In addition, all coaches should be strongly encouraged<br />

to receive continuing education units (CEU's) so that they stay<br />

current with pre- and post-activity flexibility protocols as well as<br />

other sport specific practices.<br />

Coach Educators must continue to extend the academic base by<br />

pursuing quality research in coaching; translating the research in<br />

practical applications and transmitting that information in accessible<br />

ways. Organizations like the National Council for Accreditation<br />

of Coaching Education (NCACE) must continue facilitating the<br />

development of quality coaching education programs (college<br />

programs as well as online modular programs) and partnering with<br />

other national associations/NGBs to spread consistent messages<br />

about the importance and/value of coaches in developing research<br />

based training program for athletes. Coach Educators need to<br />

get the word out about proper pre- and post-activity stretching<br />

regimens through trade publications, conferences, and trainings.<br />

74 Journal of Research<br />

The results of this study confirm the need for continued efforts<br />

towards coachÅfs certification including continuing education to<br />

remain current with research. Governing bodies (e.g., USAVB) and<br />

certifying organizations (e.g., NSCA) need to form partnerships in<br />

the development of educational resources.<br />

Conclusion<br />

This study indicates that it is important for volleyball coaches<br />

to re-evaluate their own practices, perhaps cross-checking them<br />

with the practices of their peers and stay current with ongoing<br />

research. Although research supports dynamic warm-up/flexibility<br />

over other types of pre-activity protocols (Little & Williams, 2006;<br />

Stone, Ramsey, O'Bryant, Ayers, & Sands, 2006; Yamaguchi, &<br />

Ishii, 2006), it appears that some volleyball coaches are reluctant<br />

to totally discontinue traditional methods like pre-activity static<br />

stretching. As the knowledge base for stretching and warm-up<br />

strategies continues to evolve, coaches should change with them<br />

to ensure their athletes are being properly prepared for training<br />

and competition. The (USAVB) Coach's Education program as it<br />

exists has reached a large number of coaches, but it appears there<br />

is still work to be done. Another interesting question would be<br />

whether or not there is a CEU requirement for certified coaches in<br />

the present USAVP-CAP program. Volleyball coaches at all levels<br />

could benefit from participating in certification programs like the<br />

USA Volleyball (IMPACT, CAP I-IV) and National Strength and<br />

Conditioning Association's (CSCS) programs to keep up to date<br />

with current practices. Sport at all levels is in need of better and<br />

more thorough coaching education programs and certification<br />

processes.<br />

References<br />

Anderson, B. (1980). Conditioning report: Stretching for football.<br />

National Strength Coaches Association Journal, 2: 14-18.<br />

Anderson, B., Beauliue, J., Cornelius, W., Dominquez, R., Prentice, W., &<br />

Wallace, L.(1984). Roundtable: Flexibility. National Strength Coaches<br />

Association Journal, 10: 71-73.<br />

Baechle, T. & Earle, R.W. (2008). Essentials of strength training and<br />

conditioning, (3rd.). Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics.<br />

Bazett-Jones, D.M., Gibson, M.H., & McBride J.M. (2008).Sprint and<br />

vertical jump performances are not affected by six weeks of static<br />

hamstring stretching. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,<br />

22: 25—31.<br />

Beedle, B., Leydig, S., & Carnucci, J. (2007). <strong>No</strong> difference in preand<br />

post-exercise stretching on flexibility. Journal of Strength &<br />

Conditioning Research, 21(3), 780-783. Retrieved June 20, 2009, from<br />

Academic Search Premier database.<br />

Behm, D,G., Button, D,C., & Butt J,C. (2001). Factors effecting force loss<br />

with prolonged stretching. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology,<br />

26: 262-272.<br />

Bandy, W.D., & Irion, J.M. (1994). The effect of time on static stretch on<br />

flexibility of the hamstring muscles. Physical Therapy.<br />

Ce, E., Margonato, V., Casasco, M., & Veicsteinas, A. (2008). Effects<br />

of stretching on maximal anaerobic power: The roles of active and<br />

passive warm-ups. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research<br />

Pre-print: 1-7.<br />

Chiu L.Z., Fry, A.C., Weiss, L.W., Schilling, B.K., Brown, L. E., & Smith<br />

S.L. (2003). Postactivation potentiation response in athletic and<br />

recreationally trained individuals. Journal of Strength Conditioning<br />

Research, 17:671-677.<br />

Egan, A.D., Cramer, J,T., Massey, L.L., & Marek, S.M. (2006). Acute<br />

effects of static stretching on peak torque and mean power output in<br />

natinal collegiate athletic association division I women's basketball


Stretching Perceptions and Practices<br />

players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 20: 778-782.<br />

Faigenbaum, A., J. Kang, J. McFarland, J.M. Bloom, J. Magnatta, N.A.<br />

Ratamess, & J. Hoffman (2006). Acute effects of different warm-up<br />

protocols on anaerobic performance in teenage athletes. Pediatric<br />

Exercise Science,18(1):64—75.<br />

Fredrick, G., & Szymanski, D. (2001). Baseball (Part I): Dynamic<br />

Flexibility. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 23: 21-30.<br />

Fry, A.C., McLellan, E., Weiss, L.W., & Rosato, E.D. (2003). The effects<br />

of static stretching on power and velocity during the bench press<br />

exercise. Medicine Science Sports and Exercise, 35: S264.<br />

Gilbert, W., & Trudel, P. (1999). An evaluation strategy for coach education<br />

programs. Journal of Sport Behavior, 22, 234-250.<br />

Hedrick, A. (1992). Physiological responses to warm-up. National<br />

Strength Coaches Association Journal, 14: 25-27.<br />

Herbert, R.D., & M. Gabriel. (2002). Effects of stretching before and after<br />

exercising on muscle soreness ands risk of injury: Systematic review.<br />

British Medical Journal, 325:468Çú472.<br />

Herda, T.J., Cramer, J.T., Ryan, E.D., McHugh, M.P., & Stout, J.R. (2008).<br />

Acute effects of static versus dynamic stretching on isometric peak<br />

torque, electromygraphy, and mechanomygraphy of the biceps femoris<br />

muscle. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 22(3), 809-<br />

817.<br />

Holcomb, W.R. (2008). Stretching and warm-up. Champaign, IL: Human<br />

Kinetics, p. 321-342.<br />

Hunter, J.P., & Marshall, R.N. (1992). Effects of power and flexibility<br />

training on vertical jump technique. Medicine, Science, Sports and<br />

Exercise, 34: 478-486.<br />

Judge, L.W., Craig, B., Baudendistal, & Bodey, K. (2009). An examination<br />

of the stretching practices of division I and III college football programs<br />

in the Mid-western United States. Journal of Strength & Conditioning<br />

Research. 23: 1091-1096.<br />

Judge, L.W. (2007). Developing speed strength: In-season training<br />

program for the collegiate thrower. Strength and Conditioning, 29(5),<br />

42-54.<br />

Kerrigan, D.K., Xenopoulus-Oddson, A., Sullivan, M.J., Lelas, J.J., &<br />

Riley, P.O. (2003). Effect of hip flexor-stretching program on gait in<br />

the elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 84:1-6.<br />

Kovacs, M. (2006). The argument against static stretching before sport<br />

and physical activity. Athletic Therapy Today, 11(3), 6-8. Retrieved<br />

January 20, 2009, from Academic Search Premier database.<br />

Laroche, D.P., Lussier, M.V., & Roy, S.J. (2008). Chronic stretching<br />

and voluntary muscle force. Journal of Strength and Conditioning<br />

Research, 22: 589-596.<br />

Little, T., & Williams, A. (2006). Effects of differential stretching protocols<br />

during warm-ups on high-speed motor capacities in professional soccer<br />

players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 20: 203-<br />

207.<br />

Mahoney, J. L., & Stattin, H. (2000). Leisure activities and adolescents<br />

antisocial behavior: The role of structure and social context. Journal<br />

of Adolescence, 23, 113—127.<br />

Mann, D., & Jones, M. (1999). Guidelines to the implementation of a<br />

dynamic stretching program. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 21:<br />

53-55.<br />

Mann, D., & Whedon, C. (2001). Functional stretching: implementing<br />

a dynamic stretching program. Athletic Therapy Today, 6(3), 10-13.<br />

Retrieved January 17, 2009, from Academic Search Premier database.<br />

McMillian, D., Moore, J., Hatler, B., & Taylor, D. (2006). Dynamic<br />

vs. static-stretching warm up: The effects on power and agility<br />

performance. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 20(3),<br />

492-499. Retrieved January 17, 2009, from SPORTDiscus with Full<br />

Text database.<br />

Nelson, A., Jokkonen, J., & Arnall, D. (2005). Acute muscle stretching<br />

inhibits muscle strength endurance performance. Journal of Strength<br />

and Conditioning Research, 19: 338-343.<br />

Nelson, A.G., & Kokkonen, J. (2001). Acute ballistic muscle stretching<br />

inhibits maximal strength performance. Research Quarterly of Exercise<br />

and Sport, 72:415—419.<br />

Nelson RT, & Brandy WD. (2008). An Update on Flexibility. Strength and<br />

Conditioning Journal, 27: 10-16.<br />

Ninos J. (1995). Guidelines for Proper Stretching. Strength and<br />

Conditioning Journal, 17: 44-46.<br />

National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA). (2009). Certified<br />

strength and conditioning specialist program. Retrieved July 8, 2009,<br />

from http://www.nsca-cc.org/cscs/about.html<br />

Pope, R.P., R.D. Herbert, J.D. Kiwan, & Graham, B. J. (2000). A<br />

randomized trial of preexercise stretching for prevention of lower-limb<br />

injury. Medicine, Science, Sports and Exercise, 32:271—277.<br />

Rosenbaum, D. & Henning, E.M. (1995). The influence of stretching and<br />

warm-up exercises on Achilles tendon reflex activity. Journal of Sports<br />

Science, 3:481—490. 1995.<br />

Safran, M.R., Garrett, W.E., Seaber, A.V., Glisson, R.R., & Ribbeck, B.M.<br />

(1988). The role of warmup in muscular injury prevention. American<br />

Journal of Sports Medicine, 16: 123-129.<br />

Samuel, M.N., Holcomb, W.R., Guadagnoli, M.A., Rubley, M.D., &<br />

Wallmann, H. (2008). Acute effects of static and ballistic stretching on<br />

measures of strength and power. Journal of Strength and Conditioning<br />

Research. 00(0), 1-7.<br />

Shrier, I. (1999). Stretching before exercise does not reduce the risk of<br />

local muscle injury: A critical review of the clinical and basic science<br />

literature. Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine, 9: 221-227.<br />

Siatras, T.A., Mittas, V.P., Maneletzi, D.N., & Vamvakoudis, E,A.<br />

(2008). Peak torque production. Journal of Strength and Conditioning<br />

Research, 22: 40-46.<br />

Sharman, M., & Cresswell, A. (2006). Proprioceptive neuromuscular<br />

facilitation stretching: mechanisms and clinical implications. Sports<br />

Medicine, 36(11), 929-939. Retrieved February 11, 2009, from<br />

Academic Search Premier database.<br />

Smith, R. E., & Smoll, F. L. (2002). Youth sport interventions. In J. Van<br />

Raalte and B. Brewer (Eds.), Exploring sport and exercise psychology<br />

(2 nd ed., pp. 341-371). Washington, DC: American Psychological<br />

Association.<br />

Stone, M.H., Ramsey, R.W., O'Bryant, H.S., Ayers, C., & Sands, W.A.<br />

(2006). Stretching: Acute and chronic? The potential consequences.<br />

Strength and Conditioning Journal 28: 66-74.<br />

Strean, W. B., & García-Bengoechea, E. (2003). Beyond technical vs.<br />

tactical: Extending the games teaching debate. In J. Butler, L. Griffin,<br />

B. Lombardo, & R. Nastasi (Eds.), Teaching games for understanding<br />

in physical education and sport: An international perspective (pp.<br />

181-188). Reston, VA: NASPE publications.<br />

Swanson, J.R. (2008). A Functional Approach to Warm-up and Flexibility.<br />

Strength and Conditioning Journal, 28: 30-36.<br />

Thacker, S.B., Gilbert, J., Stroup, D.F., & Kimsey, C.D. (2004). The<br />

impact of stretching on sport injury risk: A systematic review of the<br />

literature. Medicine, Science, Sports and Exercise, 36:371—378.<br />

Torres, E, M., Kraemer, W. J., Vingren, J. L., Volek, J.S., Hatfield, D.L.,<br />

Spiering, B.A. Ho, J.Y., Fragala, M.S., Thomas, G.A.,<br />

Anderson, J.A., Hakkinen, K., & Maresh, C.M. ( 2 0 0 8 ) .<br />

Effects of Stretching on Upper-Body Muscular Performance. Strength<br />

and Conditioning Journal 22: 1279-1285.<br />

Winchester, J.B., Nelson, A.G., Landin, D., Young, M.A., & Schexnayder,<br />

I.C. (2008). Static stretching impairs sprint performance in collegiate<br />

track and field athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research<br />

22: 13-18.<br />

Woolstenhulme, M.T., Griffins, C.M., Woolstenhulme, E.M., & Parcell,<br />

A.C. (2006). Ballistic stretching increases flexibility and acute vertical<br />

jump height when combined with basketball activity. Journal of<br />

Strength and Conditioning Research 20: 799-803.<br />

USA Volleyball. (2009). Coach education program. Retrieved July 8,<br />

2009, from http://www.usavolleyball.org/content/index/404<br />

Yamaguchi, T., & Ishii, K. (2005). Effects of static stretching for 30<br />

seconds and dynamic stretching on leg extension power. Journal of<br />

Strength and Conditioning Research 19: 677-683.<br />

Yessis, M. (2006). Runners need active stretching. AMAA Journal, 18(2),<br />

8-18. Retrieved January 17, 2009, from Academic Search Premier<br />

database. !<br />

volume 5, issue 1 75


THE RULES & REVIEW PROCESS<br />

A. Submission of Manuscripts<br />

(a) Manuscripts must be submitted to ICHPER·SD headquarters<br />

at the following address: 1900 Association Drive, Reston, VA 20191-<br />

1598, USA (for hard copy submissions only); ichper@aahperd.org<br />

(for electronic submissions only).<br />

(b) Each hard copy submission must consist of: i) 2 original<br />

hard copies of the manuscript; ii) 2 computer CD’s – (Microsoft<br />

Word®); and iii) A self-addressed and U.S. stamped envelope<br />

(9“ by 12”) for manuscripts sent from the United States, but for<br />

manuscripts sent from outside the United States – only a selfaddressed<br />

envelope (9” by 12”).<br />

(c) Each electronic submission must consist of three files: i)<br />

cover page including senior author’s contact information (i.e.<br />

name of institution, email, phone number, and mailing address).<br />

ii) abstract and manuscript, and iii) tables, charts, and pictures,<br />

etc. In addition, one computer CD – (Microsoft Word®) consisting<br />

of all three files (i.e. i, ii & iii) must be mailed to ICHPER·SD<br />

headquarters.<br />

B. Manuscript Guidelines for Authors<br />

(a) Manuscripts should be typed, double-spaced, 12-point<br />

font, and include line numbers to facilitate the review process.<br />

Manuscripts should be saved as a WORD document.<br />

(b) Papers should not exceed 28 pages of text, including abstract,<br />

references, tables, and figures.<br />

(c) Author(s) should provide an abstract of no more than 200<br />

words on a separate page and at the bottom include up to four key<br />

words from the manuscript that are not also part of the title, for<br />

indexing purposes.<br />

(d) Manuscripts must conform to the Publication Manual<br />

of the American Psychological Association (APA), 5th edition.<br />

Manuscripts deviating from the recommended format will neither<br />

be reviewed nor returned.<br />

(e) Manuscripts submitted to JR may not be concurrently<br />

submitted to another journal.<br />

(f) Author(s) should consult and abide by the Guidelines for<br />

Contributors published in each issue of the journal and available<br />

on the ICHPER·SD Web site.<br />

(g) For the purposes of blind review, author(s) should i) remove<br />

any author-identifying information from manuscript submissions,<br />

such as location of study, author notes, name of research program,<br />

etc., ii) a separate cover page should include title, first author’s<br />

correspondence information (i.e., name, institution, email, phone<br />

numbers, and mailing address), iii) abstract, iv) manuscript<br />

(i.e., pages must be numbered and line numbering included), v)<br />

reference section at the end of the manuscript, vi) tables, charts,<br />

and photos at the end of the manuscript, vii) use APA style Manual<br />

(latest edition) for proper formatting.<br />

(h) When citing equipment or software used in the study, authors<br />

must include the manufacturer’s name, city, and state (or country)<br />

the first time the equipment is mentioned.<br />

(i) In the Author’s <strong>No</strong>tes, authors must mention grant support<br />

and identify the source of any funding.<br />

(j) Descriptive categories such as those used for gender, race,<br />

ethnicity, culture, special populations, etc., should be labeled with<br />

valid terms that can be documented as accepted, current, and<br />

professional. Publication in JR does not indicate editorial sanction<br />

of construct labels used by authors.<br />

(k) The senior author must be a member of ICHPER·SD.<br />

When there are more than 3 authors of the submitted manuscript,<br />

the senior author plus one author (i.e. at least 2 authors) must be<br />

members.<br />

C. ICHPER·SD Headquarters<br />

(a) Responds with one of the actions below via e-mail to the<br />

senior author who must be a member of ICHPER·SD. When there<br />

are more than 3 authors of the submitted manuscript, the senior<br />

author plus one author (i.e. at least 2 authors) must be members.<br />

•Sends an acknowledgment of receipt if he/she is a member<br />

within 5 working days.<br />

•Sends a notice of membership requirement and membership<br />

application if he/she is not a member and retains the article without<br />

processing until the author(s) complies with the membership<br />

requirement within 30 days from the date of the notice. Headquarters<br />

discards the manuscript and material after 40 days from the<br />

date of notice if the membership requirement is not met.<br />

•Sends a notice of noncompliance if the submitted material is<br />

not in compliance with the material guidelines for authors.<br />

(b) Hard Copy Submission Processing Procedures: Sends the<br />

submitted material — one original hard copy of the manuscript<br />

and a computer CD, large self-addressed envelope (stamped, for<br />

US submitters) and accompanying senior author’s letter — to<br />

the JR Editor-in-Chief via regular 1st class mail only within 7<br />

working days from the date of receipt, and keeps one original hard<br />

copy and one computer CD in the headquarters file.<br />

(c) Electronic Submission Processing Procedures: Sends the<br />

submitted three files (i.e. cover page; abstract & manuscript; tables,<br />

charts, and pictures, etc.) to the JR Editor-in-Chief electronically<br />

within 7 working days. ICHPER·SD headquarters keeps one<br />

original CD – (Microsoft Word®) for its file.<br />

76 Journal of Research


D. Review Process under the Editor-in-Chief<br />

After receiving the manuscripts and materials from ICHPER·SD<br />

headquarters, the Editor-in-Chief determines whether the manuscript<br />

warrants further review (meets APA Style Manual [latest<br />

edition]).<br />

Review of Manuscripts<br />

(a) JR is a peer-reviewed publication; all manuscripts undergo<br />

review prior to acceptance for publication. Three or more external<br />

reviewers and/or section editors, the Associate Editor and the<br />

Editor-in-Chief are part of the review process. The Editor-in-Chief<br />

makes the final decision on manuscript publication.<br />

(b) Manuscript review follows a double-blind review process.<br />

(c) Qualified reviewers in the appropriate sub-disciplines review<br />

manuscripts deemed suitable to the mission of JR. Submitted<br />

manuscripts will be referred to the most appropriate section for<br />

review, and those that blatantly do not fit any section will be<br />

rejected out-of-hand.<br />

(d) Appropriate sub-disciplines include, but are not limited to:<br />

•Biomechanics<br />

•Dance<br />

•Epidemiology<br />

•History and Philosophy<br />

•Martial Arts<br />

•Measurement and Evaluation<br />

•Motor Control and Learning<br />

•Motor Development<br />

•Pedagogy<br />

•Psychology<br />

•Recreation and Leisure Studies<br />

•Recreation and Sport Therapy<br />

•Sociology and Cultural Anthropology<br />

•Sport Finance and Marketing<br />

•Sport History<br />

•Sport Law and Governance<br />

•Sport Management<br />

•Sport Medicine<br />

•Sport Sociology<br />

(e) Author(s) are usually advised of the decision on their<br />

manuscripts within 75-90 days.<br />

(f) <strong>No</strong>rmally no more than two and rarely three versions are<br />

permitted before a manuscript is accepted or rejected.<br />

(g) Author(s) who are invited to revise and resubmit their<br />

manuscript for reconsideration will be permitted a maximum of 60<br />

days to resubmit their manuscript.<br />

E. Ethical Issues<br />

(a) Guidelines for ethics in publishing conform to the<br />

Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association<br />

(APA), 5th edition. Authors submitting manuscripts for publication<br />

are expected to know and abide by these guidelines, including<br />

plagiarism, fragmented studies, dual publication, etc.<br />

(b) Author(s) must disclose the potential for a conflict of interest<br />

in their research, which will appear in the journal.<br />

(c) Author(s) indicate whether their manuscript is part of a<br />

larger study and how the current manuscript is distinct from other<br />

papers that are published, under review, or in press. Authors are<br />

encouraged to submit manuscripts that are part of a larger study<br />

for the editor’s evaluation.<br />

(d) Author(s) should take appropriate steps to obtain the<br />

informed consent of human research participants, regardless of the<br />

country’s regulations under which the research was conducted.<br />

(e) The ICHPER·SD Journal of Research Editorial Policy Board<br />

will review violations of ethical guidelines, and an appropriate<br />

penalty or sanction will be imposed.<br />

F. Manuscripts Accepted for Publication<br />

(a) The senior author will receive page proofs for correction<br />

about 4 weeks before publication from the Editor-in-Chief. The<br />

author(s) bear responsibility for proofreading the manuscript and<br />

should, therefore, be extremely thorough.<br />

(b) Author(s) should return page proofs to the Editor-in-Chief<br />

within 7 days of the deadline stated in the cover letter provided<br />

with the page proofs.<br />

G. Permissions for Author(s) and <strong>No</strong>n-Author(s)<br />

(a) All materials contained in this publication are the property of<br />

ICHPER·SD. ICHPER·SD holds the copyright for JR. In keeping<br />

with copyright law (P.L. 94-553) all authors must, whenever<br />

legally possible, assign the copyright of accepted manuscripts<br />

prior to publication to ICHPER·SD so that both the author(s) and<br />

the Council are protected from misuse of copyrighted materials.<br />

(b) On receipt of legitimate written requests, permission is<br />

granted by ICHPER·SD, through the Chair of the ICHPER·SD<br />

Editorial Policy Board, for use of brief quotations (about 500<br />

words) in published works.<br />

(c) Permission is automatically granted to authors to use their<br />

own articles in other published work.<br />

(d) Permission to reprint entire articles, figures, or tables for<br />

inclusion in publications offered for sale, is granted only on<br />

volume 5, issue 1 77


payment of fee to JR payable to “ICHPER·SD” and receipt of<br />

legitimate written requests. In these instances, the Chair of the<br />

Editorial Policy Board requests that permission be obtained from<br />

the senior author as well.<br />

H. Subscriptions<br />

(a) All ICHPER·SD constituent members (i.e., individual and<br />

Life, national and institutional organizations, affiliated international<br />

organizations and libraries) receive a copy of JR on a bi-annual<br />

basis (i.e., <strong>Spring</strong> & <strong>Summer</strong> issue and Fall & Winter issue) and<br />

any special JR issues whenever published.<br />

(b) <strong>No</strong>n-ICHPER·SD members may subscribe to JR for an annual<br />

fee as established by the ICHPER·SD headquarters secretariat with<br />

the approval of the ICHPER·SD Executive Committee.<br />

(c) Senior authors will receive one additional copy (total of 2<br />

copies) when their articles are published.<br />

(d) A complementary copy may be provided to selected<br />

individuals and organizations (e.g., UNESCO, WHO, IOC, NOCs,<br />

IFs) that are in a partnership or are officially and/or directly<br />

associated with the mission of ICHPER·SD.<br />

(e) Members or subscribers should report address changes<br />

at least 8 weeks in advance to ICHPER·SD headquarters in the<br />

United States.<br />

I. Publication Schedules and Glossary of Terms.<br />

(a) The JR spring/summer issue will be published during the<br />

month of May/June and the fall/winter issue will be published<br />

during the month of <strong>No</strong>vember/December. By 2012, JR will<br />

be expanded to a quarterly journal published in March, June,<br />

September, and December. Further, the Journal will be moving to<br />

electronic publication within the next five years.<br />

(b) The ICHPER·SD Journal of Research does not publish a<br />

glossary of terms.<br />

78 Journal of Research


volume 5, issue 1 79


80 Journal of Research

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!