Volume V. No. 1 Spring & Summer 2010 - ichperâ¢sd
Volume V. No. 1 Spring & Summer 2010 - ichperâ¢sd
Volume V. No. 1 Spring & Summer 2010 - ichperâ¢sd
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Research<br />
The Official Publication of the International<br />
Council for Health, Physical Education,<br />
Recreation, Sport, and Dance (ICHPER•SD)<br />
<strong>Volume</strong> V. <strong>No</strong>. 1<br />
<strong>Spring</strong> & <strong>Summer</strong> <strong>2010</strong>
The Mission of the ICHPER•SD Journal of Research<br />
The mission of the journal is to meet the needs of the academic community from both a national and an international<br />
perspective. Thus, academicians and professionals engaged in or studying HPERSD, and related activities, at all levels, are<br />
encouraged to contribute to the professional literature by submitting research-oriented manuscripts that will contribute and<br />
expand the knowledge base of the disciplines within our profession. The ICHPER•SD Journal of Research is exclusively what<br />
is termed a "research journal" and invites data based manuscripts representing cutting edge research.<br />
Manuscript Guidelines for Authors<br />
Articles are invited in the areas of health, physical education, adapted physical education, recreation, dance, sport, human<br />
performance, coaching, sports medicine, and sport management. This journal is international in scope in the sense that authors/<br />
researchers and topics can originate from any part of the world.<br />
All manuscripts must be submitted in English. An original hard copy of the manuscript plus a computer CD (virus free)<br />
containing the article and any tables and/or figures (as separate files, in Microsoft Word®), should be submitted to:<br />
Editor<br />
ICHPER•SD Journal of Research<br />
International Council for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport, & Dance (ICHPER·SD)<br />
1900 Association Drive, Reston, Virginia 20191-1598, USA<br />
Phone: (703) 476-3462 Fax: (703) 476-9527 Email: ichper@aahperd.org<br />
Each manuscript must be accompanied by a one-paragraph abstract (100 words or less). The APA (latest edition) format<br />
[Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association] must be used consistently throughout the entire manuscript.<br />
At least one of the authors (if there is more than one) must be (or become) a member of ICHPER•SD. Authors should number<br />
pages and lines throughout the manuscript, including the references. Be sure and double check references for correct spelling of<br />
authors and publication dates as well as to insure that the names in the references and in the body of the manuscript match.<br />
For manuscripts sent from the United States, a large, self-addressed, stamped envelope (9” by 12”) must be included for<br />
the return of the manuscripts (with editor’s and reviewers’ comments) for possible revision. For manuscripts sent from outside<br />
the United States, only a large self-addressed envelope (9” by 12”) must be included. Manuscripts should not be submitted to<br />
another journal while under review by the ICHPER•SD Journal of Research.<br />
The first page of each manuscript should include only the title of the article. The senior author’s name, affiliation, and<br />
full address (including phone number, fax number and e-mail address) should be provided on a separate cover sheet, along<br />
with identification of co-authors, if any. The manuscripts should be typed double-spaced with a 1½ -inch margin. Generally,<br />
manuscripts should be 20-27 pages in length, plus tables, figures and references, for a total of no more than 35-37 pages.<br />
Manuscripts longer than this will be reviewed, and if accepted, can be published – space permitting. The body of the manuscript<br />
should not contain any information identifying the author(s).<br />
All graphs, tables as well as figures and drawings should be placed on separate pages. Tables should be double-spaced.<br />
Figures and drawings must be professionally prepared and camera ready. Final manuscripts, including all corrections and<br />
revisions, must be submitted on a computer CD in Microsoft Word® as well as one hard copy.<br />
Submitted manuscripts are reviewed by at least three members of the "review board" and by the editor. The evaluation of<br />
manuscripts is by a blind review process. Authors are notified as to the disposition of their manuscripts as soon as all reviews<br />
are completed. Once a manuscript has been tentatively accepted, the author should return two hard copies of the revised<br />
manuscript and a computer CD (Microsoft Word®) containing the manuscript and any tables or figures as separate files, for a<br />
final review, prior to being scheduled for publication.<br />
Galley proofs of accepted manuscripts are sent to the author and are to be returned within one week following receipt from<br />
the editor. Only minor corrections are acceptable on the galley proofs. <strong>No</strong> major additions or revisions are permitted at this<br />
stage in the publication process. The senior author receives two copies of the issue in which the article appears.<br />
There are no page charges to authors. All authors must transfer copyright to International Council for Health, Physical<br />
Education, Recreation, Sport, & Dance (ICHPER•SD) by signing a copyright release document. At least one of the authors (if<br />
there is more than one) must be a member of ICHPER•SD or become a member before the beginning of the review process.<br />
Form a-7-4-06-06a
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
2 ICHPER•SD Officers and Editorial Policy Board<br />
Pedagogy<br />
3 A Descriptive Analysis of Undergraduate PETE Programs in the Central District<br />
Kristen Hetland and Bradford Strand<br />
10 The Web Quest: Its Impact on Developing Teaching Skills of Physical Education Student Teachers<br />
Haythem Abdel Mageed Mohamed and Rasha Nageh Ali Abd El Rheem<br />
16 Podcasting in Physical Education Teacher Education<br />
Michael C. McNeill, Swarup Mukherjee and Gurmit Singh<br />
Physical Education<br />
20 Validating Pedometer-based Physical Activity Time against Accelerometer in<br />
Middle School Physical Education<br />
Zan Gao, Amelia M. Lee, Melinda A. Solmon, Maria Kosma, Russell L. Carson, Tao Zhang,<br />
Elizabeth Domangue, and Delilah Moore<br />
26 Patterns of Interactions and Behaviors: Physical Education in Korean Elementary,<br />
Middle, and High Schools<br />
Jong-Hoon Yu and Jwa K. Kim<br />
33 Differences in Exercise Identity Between Secondary Physical Education Students and Athletes<br />
Gregory J. Soukup, Sr., Timothy W. Henrich, and Heather M. Barton-Wieston<br />
Health<br />
37 Tobacco, the Common Enemy and a Gateway Drug: Policy Implications<br />
Mohammad R. Torabi, Mi Kyung Jun, Carole <strong>No</strong>wicke, Barbara Seitz de Martinez, and Ruth Gassman<br />
45 The Health and Wellbeing of Staff Members at a Tertiary Institution in New Zealand<br />
Sonja Dreyer, Lukas I. Dreyer, and Dean M. Rankin<br />
Recreation<br />
54 An Examination of Immunity Statutes Regarding the Liability of Recreational Youth Sport<br />
Organizations for the Pedophilic Actions of Coaches, Administrators, and Officials<br />
Thomas A. Baker III, Daniel P. Connaughton, and James J. Zhang<br />
Sports Marketing<br />
60 A Brand Loyalty Model Utilitizing Team Identification and Customer Satisfaction in the<br />
Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />
Dr. Soonhwan Lee, Dr. Hongbum Shin, Dr. Jung-Jun Park, and Dr. Oh-Ryun Kwon<br />
Coaching<br />
68 Pre-Activity and Post-Activity Stretching Perceptions and Practices in NCAA<br />
Division I Volleyball Programs<br />
Lawrence W. Judge, Kimberly J. Bodey, David Bellar, Adam Bottone, and Elizabeth Wanless<br />
76 The Rules and Review Process<br />
79 Membership Application<br />
International Council for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport, and Dance<br />
Counsel International pour l'Hygiene, de l'Education Physique, de la Récréation, du Sport, et de la Danse<br />
Consejo Internacional para la Salud, Educación Fisica, Recreación, el Deporte y la Danza<br />
ISSN 1930-4595: ISBN 978-0-<br />
9821604-3-5 0-9821604-3-7: The<br />
ICHPER·SD Journal of Research is<br />
issued biannually by the International<br />
Council for Health, Physical Education,<br />
Recreation, Sport, and Dance<br />
(ICHPER·SD), 1900 Association Drive,<br />
Reston, Virginia 20191-1598, U.S.A.<br />
(Phone: 703-476-3462; Fax: 703-<br />
476-9527; E-mail: ichper@aahperd.<br />
org; Website: www.ichpersd.org). The<br />
annual subscription price of $50.00 is<br />
included in the annual ICHPER·SD<br />
membership dues as a membership<br />
benefit. ICHPER·SD members can<br />
purchase additional copies of the<br />
journal at $15.00. <strong>No</strong>nmembers can<br />
purchase copies at $25.00 each.<br />
The ICHPER·SD Journal of Research<br />
is the peer-reviewed official biannual<br />
publication of the International Council<br />
for Health, Physical Education, Recreation,<br />
Sport, and Dance. The journal is<br />
published as a service to members of the<br />
Council and others concerned with our<br />
disciplinary areas. Views and opinions<br />
expressed in the journal or articles<br />
herein are those of the authors and not<br />
necessarily those of the publisher.<br />
COPYRIGHT: Entire content copyright<br />
2008 by the International Council for<br />
Health, Physical Education, Recreation,<br />
sport, and Dance. All rights reserved.<br />
INDEXING: Index Coverage has only<br />
recently begun, as we are a fairly new<br />
journal. To date we have agreements<br />
with:<br />
EBSCOhost -<br />
•Education Research Complete: Index<br />
and full database<br />
•SPORTDiscus: Index and full database<br />
H.W. Wilson -<br />
•Education Full Text (and index)<br />
ADVERTISING: Contact Mrs.<br />
Carmella Gilpin, Administrative<br />
Associate, ICHPER·SD Headquarters<br />
at 1900 Association Drive, Reston,<br />
Virginia. Advertising is accepted in full,<br />
half, or quarter pages. The rate schedule<br />
for advertisements follows:<br />
Full Page $500.00<br />
Half Page $300.00<br />
Quarter Page $200.00<br />
LAYOUT & DESIGN: McDonough<br />
Democrat, Inc., Box 269, 358 East<br />
Main Street, Bushnell, Illinois 61422,<br />
U.S.A.<br />
Founded 1958 in Rome, Italy<br />
1900 Association Drive, Reston, Virginia 20191-1598, U.S.A.<br />
(Phone: 703-476-3462; Fax: 703-476-9527; E-mail: ichper@aahperd.org; Website: www.ichpersd.org).<br />
volume 5, issue 1 1
International Council for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport, and Dance<br />
(ICHPER•SD)<br />
ICHPER•SD Journal of Research<br />
<strong>Volume</strong> V, <strong>No</strong>. 1, <strong>Spring</strong> & <strong>Summer</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />
ICHPER•SD OFFICERS & EDITORIAL POLICY BOARD<br />
Dr. Dong Ja Yang, President & Chair<br />
Dr. Adel Elnashar, Secretary General & Associate Chair<br />
Dr. Mini Murray, Immediate Past President<br />
Dr. Veronica C. Igbanugo, Vice President for Africa<br />
Dr. Frank Chin-Lung Fang, Vice President for Asia<br />
Prof. Kenneth Butcher, Vice President for Caribbean<br />
Dr. Alberto Calderon Garcia, Vice President for Latin America<br />
Dr. Hasan Kasap, Vice President for Europe<br />
Dr. Mosaad S. Ewies, Vice President for Middle East<br />
Dr. Timothy Henrich, Vice President for <strong>No</strong>rth America<br />
Prof. Peter Chen, Vice President for Oceania<br />
Dr. Steven Wright, Editor & Executive Assistant to the President<br />
Dr. Yoshiro Hatano, Chair, Finance Committee<br />
Dr. Robert C. Serfass, Chair, Research Committee<br />
Dr. Mohammad R. Torabi, Commissioner, Health Division<br />
Dr. Young Kee Lee, Recreation Division<br />
Dr. Janice D. LaPointe-Crump, Dance Division<br />
Dr. Seung Wook Choi, Representative, ICHPER•SD Regional Journals of Research<br />
EDITOR<br />
Dr. Steven C. Wright<br />
Pedagogy Option Coordinator and Professor of Kinesiology<br />
Department of Kinesiology<br />
College of Health and Human Services<br />
University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824<br />
ASSOCIATE EDITOR<br />
Dr. Michael McNeill<br />
Coordinator for Postgraduate Research, Associate Professor<br />
Physical Education and Sports Sciences<br />
National Institute of Education<br />
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore<br />
ASSISTANT EDITOR<br />
Dr. Wenhao Liu<br />
Associate Professor<br />
Department of Physical Education<br />
Slippery Rock University, Pennsylvania<br />
REVIEWERS FOR ICHPER•SD JOURNAL OF RESEARCH<br />
Dr. Isaac Olusola Akindutire, University of Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria<br />
Dr. Garth Babcock, Eastern Washington University<br />
Dr. David Berry, Weber State University<br />
Dr. Robert Case, Old Dominion University<br />
Dr. Brian Culp, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis<br />
Dr. Blanche W. Evans, Indiana State University<br />
Dr. Wendy Frappier, Minnesota State University @ Moorhead<br />
Dr. Ron French, Texas WomenÔs University<br />
Dr. Zan Gao, University of Utah<br />
Dr. Michelle Grenier, University of New Hampshire<br />
Dr. Bryan L. Haddock, California State University<br />
Dr. Tim Henrich, University of the Incarnate Wood<br />
Dr. Julia Ann Hypes, Moorehead State University<br />
Dr. Michael G. Hypes, Moorehead State University<br />
Dr. Lawrence W. Judge, Ball State University<br />
Dr. Susan E. King, University of Kansas<br />
Dr. Richard J. LaRue, University of New England<br />
Dr. Wenhao Liu, Slippery Rock University<br />
Dr. Michael McNeill, Nanyang Technological University,<br />
Singapore<br />
Dr. Millie Naquin, Southeastern Louisiana University<br />
Dr. Yasenka Petersen, Indiana State University<br />
Dr. Greg Reid, McGill University<br />
Dr. Gregory J. Soukup, University of the Incarnate Word<br />
Dr. Kurt Stahura, University of Nevada, Las Vegas<br />
Dr. E. William Vogler, Southern Illinois University @<br />
Edwardsville<br />
Dr. Hal Walker, Elon University<br />
Dr. Wee Eng Hoe, Tunka Abdul Rahman College, Malaysia<br />
2 Journal of Research
A Descriptive Analysis of Undergraduate PETE<br />
Programs in the Central District<br />
by Kristen M. Hetland, Concordia College, Moorhead, MN and<br />
Bradford Strand, <strong>No</strong>rth Dakota State University<br />
Abstract<br />
The current study described physical education teacher<br />
education (PETE) programs at institutions located within the<br />
Central District of the United States (CDAAAHPERD). Of the<br />
72 institutions invited to participate, 44 institutions completed<br />
the survey (58% response rate). The purpose of this study was<br />
to describe the general profile/practices of undergraduate PETE<br />
programs and to provide an overview of their similarities and<br />
differences among the colleges and universities located within the<br />
CDAAAHPERD. The 61- item survey included topics related to<br />
basic program information, curricular items incorporated into each<br />
program, and coverage of various areas of course content.<br />
Key Words: Physical Education Teacher Education<br />
Curriculum<br />
Le Masurier and Corbin (2006) stated that the need for quality<br />
physical education is clear, based on the current trends of obesity<br />
and physical inactivity among children and adolescents. They cited<br />
ten reasons why quality physical education is necessary:<br />
1. Regular physical activity helps prevent disease.<br />
2. Regular physical activity promotes lifetime wellness.<br />
3. Quality physical education can help fight obesity.<br />
4. Quality physical education can help promote lifetime physical<br />
fitness.<br />
5. Quality physical education provides unique opportunities for<br />
activity.<br />
6. Quality physical education teaches self-management and<br />
motor skills.<br />
7. Physical activity and physical education promotes learning.<br />
8. Regular physical activity participation makes economic<br />
sense.<br />
9. Physical education is widely endorsed.<br />
10. Quality physical education helps to educate the total child.<br />
Quality K-12 physical education programs depend on a highly<br />
qualified teacher. In early 2002, Congress passed a law called<br />
the <strong>No</strong> Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act (a.k.a. 2001 [Public<br />
Law 107-110, 107 th Congress, January 8, 2002]). This law was<br />
established in an attempt to improve the United States educational<br />
system. Though this law has actually reduced physical education<br />
programs across the United States, it defines the general term<br />
“highly qualified teacher.” The NCLB definition of a highly<br />
qualified teacher is one who has completed a bachelor’s degree,<br />
holds a full state certification, and demonstrates competence in<br />
each content area taught (U.S. Department of Education, Office of<br />
Postsecondary Education [DOE], 2005).<br />
The National Association for Sport and Physical Education<br />
(NASPE) has also helped to define a “highly qualified teacher”<br />
by developing the position paper, What Constitutes a Highly<br />
Qualified Physical Education Teacher (2007a). “Highly qualified<br />
physical education teachers possess the skills and knowledge to<br />
facilitate improved teaching practices, strengthen the quality of<br />
physical education instruction, and empower students to achieve<br />
and maintain healthy, active lifestyles” (p. 1).<br />
Napper-Owen, Marston,Van Volkinburg, Afeman, & Brewer<br />
(2008) described a variety of elements that can define a highly<br />
qualified teacher. The elements fall under one of three categories:<br />
(a) designing and delivering the physical education program, (b)<br />
professional development, and (c) preservice preparation.<br />
Quality physical education is the most effective tool for<br />
providing all children, regardless of, individual differences<br />
and capabilities with skills, attitudes, values, knowledge, and<br />
understanding for lifelong participation in physical activity. In<br />
order to design and deliver a high quality physical education<br />
program, physical educators will (a) utilize the national standards<br />
for physical education in developing program quality, (b) align<br />
assessment to the programs’ standards, instruction, and outcomes,<br />
(c) exhibit those process skills (Dunkin & Biddle, 1974) and, (d)<br />
display dispositions associated with effective teaching (p. 28).<br />
Highly qualified teachers should be able to design K-12 physical<br />
education programs using appropriate infrastructure (opportunity<br />
to learn), meaningful content defined by curriculum, appropriate<br />
instructional practices including good classroom management,<br />
student and program assessment, and evaluation (NASPE, 2007b).<br />
Teachers should also be able to design programs and base lessons<br />
on national standards for K-12 physical education (NASPE, 2004a),<br />
and establish high expectations for learning within psychomotor,<br />
cognitive, and affective domains. They should support student<br />
learning through the creation of an environment that is conducive<br />
to learning and view assessment as an integral component of the<br />
teaching-learning process (NASPE, 2007a).<br />
Highly qualified teachers need to contribute to their schools<br />
outside of their respective classrooms as well. For example, other<br />
important responsibilities that help define a ‘highly qualified<br />
teacher’ are to demonstrate professionalism and ethical behavior<br />
in the learning environment through positive interactions with<br />
students, colleagues, administrators, and community members.<br />
“PETE programs are designed to facilitate preservice teachers’<br />
progress toward being deemed ‘highly qualified’ upon entrance<br />
into the profession” (NASPE, 2007a). PETE programs should be<br />
accredited, based on PETE standards, and the faculty should model<br />
passion, reflection, and dedication (Napper-Owens et al., 2008).<br />
Physical Education Teacher Education programs should provide<br />
preservice teachers with substantial pedagogical and content<br />
knowledge bases; afford many opportunities for preservice<br />
teachers to participate in an array of field experiences where<br />
they can interact with veteran teachers and diverse students<br />
at all grade levels while seeing the application of classroom<br />
principles; and develop, nurture and reinforce specific<br />
professional behaviors that facilitate student learning (NASPE,<br />
volume 5, issue 1 3
Undergraduate PETE Programs<br />
2007a, p.1).<br />
NASPE acknowledges that highly qualified physical education<br />
teachers will be certified to teach by virtue of having completed<br />
an accredited PETE program (NASPE, 2007a). NASPE (2004b)<br />
developed a pledge that can be used as a starting point when<br />
forming one’s own idea of what it means to be highly qualified.<br />
The pledge was developed to create “Positive Physical Education”<br />
and is as follows:<br />
•Establish a positive, safe learning environment for all<br />
students.<br />
•Teach a variety of physical activities that make physical<br />
education class enjoyable.<br />
•Create maximum opportunities for students of all abilities to<br />
be successful.<br />
•Promote student honesty, integrity and good sportsmanship.<br />
•Guide students into becoming skillful and confident movers.<br />
•Facilitate the development and maintenance of physical<br />
fitness.<br />
•Assist students in setting and achieving personal goals.<br />
•Provide specific, constructive feedback to help students master<br />
motor skills.<br />
•Afford opportunities for students to succeed in cooperative<br />
and competitive situations.<br />
•Prepare and encourage students to practice skills and be active<br />
for a lifetime.<br />
The current state of health problems in the world suggests that<br />
there is a need for effective and quality physical education programs<br />
(Bulger, Housner, & Lee, 2008). These programs rely on highly<br />
qualified teachers. Teaching K-12 physical education can be a<br />
very challenging profession; therefore, it is imperative that higher<br />
education institutions provide instruction and experiences that will<br />
prepare preservice teachers to make a successful transition into the<br />
teaching profession (Hill & Brodin, 2004).<br />
The goal of PETE programs should be to produce highly<br />
competent and effective K-12 teachers (Hill & Brodin, 2004).<br />
Tinning (2002) stated that most people would agree that teacher<br />
preparation programs should prepare preservice teachers to fulfill<br />
the purpose that the profession considers to be the most important.<br />
What is that purpose? “Physical education should be devoted to<br />
optimizing the likelihood that people so value physical activity<br />
(sport, leisure activity, fitness, and dance) that they organize their<br />
lives so regular involvement occurs throughout the lifespan”<br />
(Siedentop, 1994, p. 11). To help fulfill this purpose, PETE faculty<br />
must consistently self-assess their programs based on the NASPE<br />
Initial Beginning Physical Education Teachers standards (NASPE,<br />
2008).<br />
An effective way to clarify one’s belief is to compare his/her<br />
philosophical position on curriculum with others (Bahneman,<br />
1996). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to describe the<br />
general profile/practices of undergraduate PETE programs and to<br />
provide an overview of their similarities and differences among<br />
the colleges and universities located within the Central District<br />
(AAHPERD).<br />
Methods<br />
Participants<br />
The survey participants were PETE faculty members who<br />
4 Journal of Research<br />
were considered the point person or program coordinator for<br />
the undergraduate PETE program. These faculty members were<br />
employed by four-year colleges and universities located within<br />
the nine states in the Central District (Colorado, Iowa, Kansas,<br />
Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, <strong>No</strong>rth Dakota, South Dakota,<br />
and Wyoming). PETE faculty were defined as those who teach<br />
physical education teacher preparation courses and were identified<br />
by a knowledgeable person at each specific university or college.<br />
Overall, 72 PETE program coordinators/point persons were<br />
selected as the potential sample for this study. In all, 44 universities<br />
returned usable results, a rate of 58%, and surveys were returned<br />
from all nine states. In an attempt to keep the results accurate, only<br />
one survey was sent to each institution.<br />
Instrument<br />
A 61-item survey was designed to gather information regarding<br />
the participants’ specific institution’s undergraduate PETE<br />
program. The programmatic items included general program<br />
demographics, student enrollment, curricular items, pre-student<br />
teaching opportunities, and the student teaching experience. The<br />
questions were answered in a variety of ways (multiple choice, yes/<br />
no, and a drop down box). The survey was reviewed for readability,<br />
and a pilot study was conducted to verify content validity.<br />
Specific survey questions were determined after a thorough<br />
review of PETE program research conducted by Metzler and<br />
Freedman (1985), Metzler and Tjeerdsma (1998), and Strand<br />
(1992). In addition, three other documents, PETE Standards<br />
(NASPE, 2008), NASPE’s (2007a) position paper on highly<br />
qualified physical education teachers, and an article on what<br />
constitutes a highly qualified physical education teacher (Napper-<br />
Owen et al., 2008) revealed common themes. Some of the<br />
questions for this study were used in previous research and other<br />
questions were developed to represent the common themes.<br />
Procedures<br />
A complete list of United States universities, colleges, and<br />
community colleges including links to each institution’s website<br />
can be found by using the University of Texas at Austin website<br />
(http://www.utexas.edu/world/univ/). From the website, the user<br />
has the option to review the schools according to type of institution<br />
(universities or community colleges), state, or alphabetical list.<br />
This website was used to compile a list of the possible four-year<br />
institutions located within the Central District.<br />
The Central District four-year institutions’ websites were<br />
searched to identify the colleges or universities that offered a<br />
physical education teaching degree. If the websites indicated<br />
that the institution did offer PETE as an undergraduate major, the<br />
specific department’s website was visited in search for names and<br />
e-mail addresses of physical education faculty members. If no<br />
point person or program coordinator for the PETE program could<br />
be found on the website, phone calls were made to the department<br />
head or administrative assistant to obtain the appropriate contact<br />
information. If the website did not indicate whether or not a degree<br />
was offered, follow-up e-mails were written or phone calls were<br />
made to the admissions office.<br />
Data collection took place in the spring of 2009 using<br />
SurveyMonkey©, an on-line survey tool. Surveys were sent to
Undergraduate PETE Programs<br />
PETE faculty members employed by a variety of universities and<br />
colleges located within the American Alliance of Health, Physical<br />
Education, Recreation and Dance’s (AAHPERD) Central District<br />
region. A detailed consent form was provided and potential<br />
participants were asked to read it before they proceeded to a link<br />
to the questionnaire. By clicking on the “Yes” button of the survey,<br />
each person gave his/her informed consent to taking the survey.<br />
The questionnaire guaranteed anonymity. In an attempt to collect<br />
as much usable data as possible, three separate e-mails were sent<br />
(two weeks apart) requesting responses. There were no incentives<br />
provided to the participants. The university Institutional Review<br />
Board (IRB) reviewed and approved the study prior to the data<br />
collection.<br />
Data Analysis<br />
The results from SurveyMonkey© were downloaded into an<br />
Excel file where the data were cleaned and coded to ensure that<br />
all data were accurate. Responses that included missing data and/<br />
or appeared to be inaccurately recorded were deemed unusable;<br />
therefore, they were removed from the data set. The coded Excel<br />
file was then uploaded into the SPSS (version 17.0) statistical<br />
package. Descriptive statistics such as means, percentages, and<br />
frequencies were calculated for each of the variables.<br />
Results<br />
The following findings are descriptive in nature and not intended<br />
to represent all institutions located within the Central District. The<br />
data were organized into the following categories; program profile,<br />
professional activity courses, skill and fitness testing, observation/<br />
field experiences, student teaching, practical teaching experiences,<br />
curriculum content, student professional organization involvement<br />
and advisory boards.<br />
Program Profile<br />
Data indicated that the average physical education program<br />
located within the Central District included 51.8 (SD= 32.05)<br />
total students and graduated 11.68 (SD= 9.065) students per<br />
year. Undergraduate physical education students were required<br />
to complete 122.70 (SD= 13.22) credits to graduate, and were<br />
required to maintain a minimum grade-point-average of 2.59 (2.50<br />
and 2.75 most frequent). Nearly all of the programs (n=39; 89%)<br />
were accredited by NCATE and/or NASPE, and used semesters as<br />
their institution’s measure for coursework (n=43; 97%).<br />
Professional Activity Courses<br />
The participants were first asked to identify whether the<br />
professional activity courses were single or multiple-credit courses.<br />
Responses indicated that 86.4% of the professional activity courses<br />
were offered as multiple-credit courses. Overall, the students were<br />
required to complete an average of 8.93 credits.<br />
Participants were also asked to identify which class format most<br />
closely matched the one used in their professional activity courses.<br />
The format options were categorized by age (elementary, middle<br />
school or high school), type (individual, dual, team, and combative),<br />
or activity (court, net, long/short implement). The most common<br />
format indicated by the participants for the professional activity<br />
courses was a multiple-credit course, categorized by type (45.5%,<br />
n= 20). This was followed by multiple-credit course categorized by<br />
age (20.5%, n=9), single credit course (13.6%, n=6), and multiplecredit<br />
course categorized by activity (6.8%, n=3). Finally, 13.6%<br />
(n=6) of the institutions formatted their activity courses in an<br />
alternative format.<br />
Skill and Fitness Testing<br />
The third edition of the PETE standards (NASPE, 2008)<br />
included a requirement on fitness and skill capabilities; therefore,<br />
participants were asked if the institutions required their students<br />
to pass skill and fitness tests either as a course requirement and/or<br />
a graduation requirement. This survey found that 45.5% (n=20)<br />
of the programs required their students to pass skill tests in their<br />
courses, and 11.8% (n=5) required skill testing as a graduation<br />
requirement. Data indicated that 20.5% (n=9) of the institutions<br />
required students to pass fitness tests in courses and 4.5% (n=2)<br />
required the fitness tests for graduation.<br />
Curricular Issues<br />
Observations/field experiences. Table 1 displays the average<br />
number of K-12 physical education observations/field experiences<br />
hours that PETE students were required to complete during each<br />
respective year of school. The table also shows the average<br />
number of hours completed at each level of education (elementary,<br />
middle school, and high school). The findings showed that the<br />
third year in the program appeared to contain the highest number<br />
of observations with 31.45 total hours. The number of hours<br />
completed at each level of education appeared to be fairly even<br />
between the elementary level (24.73 hours) and the high school<br />
(23.16 hours). Middle school observations averaged about 17.07<br />
total hours.<br />
Table 1. Observations - Hours Per Year<br />
Hours<br />
Range<br />
Year<br />
1 8.14 0-65<br />
2 17.27 0-50<br />
3 31.45 0-65<br />
4/5 27.11 0-65<br />
Education Level<br />
Elementary 24.73 0-65<br />
Middle School 17.07 0-50<br />
High School 23.16 0-65<br />
Student teaching. Student teaching experiences averaged about<br />
14.41 weeks. Participating universities and colleges reported that<br />
their PETE students student teach at each of the three age levels<br />
20.5 % (n= 9) (elementary, middle school, and high school), 77.3%<br />
(n= 34) of the programs placed their student teachers in two age<br />
levels (primary and secondary), and 2.3% (n= 1) of the programs<br />
required their students to student teach at the middle school level<br />
only.<br />
Practical teaching experiences. Practice teaching sessions<br />
(including peer teaching and teaching in the K-12 physical<br />
education class) are a common component of teacher preparation<br />
programs. On average, students had the opportunity to teach to<br />
their peers 12.75 hours (range 0-40). Undergraduate PETE students<br />
volume 5, issue 1 5
Undergraduate PETE Programs<br />
also had the opportunity to teach to K-12 students for about 15.02<br />
hours (range 0-25). Overall, the students averaged 27.77 hours of<br />
practice teaching opportunities prior to student teaching.<br />
Curricular items included. There are a variety of curricular and<br />
technology/equipment options that can be incorporated into PETE<br />
programs. The survey asked participants which of the following<br />
items were incorporated into their respective PETE programs (see<br />
Table 2). The curricular items that were most frequently imbedded<br />
into a program’s curriculum were the physical education national<br />
or state standards (86.4%), curriculum models (79.5%), concepts<br />
of fitness and wellness (75.0%), and the appropriate practices<br />
documents (68.2%). The top three technology items used were<br />
heart-rate monitors (72.7%), pedometers (61.4%), and FitnessGram<br />
(56.8%).<br />
Table 2. Percentage of Institutions that Incorporate<br />
Curriculum Items into PETE Program<br />
Curriculum content. The survey included a question about<br />
curriculum content delivery (see Table 3). Based on the curricular<br />
options listed, participants were asked to indicate how the<br />
curriculum was delivered to the students (separately, infused/<br />
imbedded, separately and infused, or not covered). The most<br />
common curricular content taught in separate courses were exercise<br />
physiology (75%), administration (61.4%), biomechanics (61.4%),<br />
historical perspective (56.8%), adapted (56.8%), exercise science<br />
(50%), and social psychology (50%). Curricular topics covered<br />
separately least often were activities and materials (20.5%), fitness<br />
education (18.2%), assessment (15.9%), technology (13.6%), and<br />
behavior management (4.5%).<br />
6 Journal of Research<br />
% n=<br />
Curricular Items<br />
National PE Standards/State Standards 86.4 38<br />
Curriculum Models 79.5 35<br />
Concepts of Fitness and Wellness 75.0 33<br />
Appropriate Practices (NASPE) 68.2 30<br />
Assessment Series (NASPE) 40.9 18<br />
Physical Best 38.6 17<br />
PE Metrics: Standard 1 34.1 15<br />
SPARK 25.0 11<br />
President’s Council of Fitness and Sport 22.7 10<br />
PECAT 18.2 8<br />
Beyond Activities: Elementary and/or<br />
Secondary 15.9 7<br />
Opportunities to Learn Document 15.9 7<br />
Technology/Equipment<br />
Heart-rate Monitors 72.7 32<br />
Pedometers 61.4 27<br />
FitnessGram 56.8 25<br />
ActivityGram 20.5 9<br />
Climbing Wall 15.9 7<br />
TriFit/MicroFit 15.9 7<br />
Dance, Dance Revolution (DDR) 13.6 6<br />
Sport Wall 4.5 2<br />
HOPSports 2.3 1<br />
<strong>No</strong>te. N=44<br />
Table 3. Content Taught in PETE Curricucla<br />
Separate Infused Separate <strong>No</strong>t<br />
Course & Infused Covered<br />
% n= % n= % n= % n=<br />
Adapted 54.5 24 6.8 3 38.6 17 0 0<br />
Act. & Mat. 20.5 9 45.5 20 34.1 15 0 0<br />
Administration 61.4 27 15.9 7 18.2 8 4.5 2<br />
Assessment 15.9 7 40.9 18 43.2 19 0 0<br />
Behavior Mgmt 4.5 2 72.7 32 22.7 10 0 0<br />
Biomechanics 61.4 27 11.4 5 25.0 11 2.3 1<br />
Coaching 63.6 28 4.5 2 20.5 9 11.4 5<br />
Methods 31.8 14 25 11 43.2 19 0 0<br />
Exercise Science 50 22 18.2 8 22.7 10 9.1 4<br />
Exercise Phys. 75 33 2.3 1 20.5 9 2.3 1<br />
Fitness Education 18.2 8 47.7 21 31.8 14 2.3 1<br />
Historical 56.8 25 25 11 15.9 7 2.3 1<br />
Motor Dev. 36.4 16 27.3 12 34.1 15 2.3 1<br />
Motor Learning 45.5 20 11.4 5 40.9 18 2.3 1<br />
Social Psychology 50.0 22 22.7 10 18.2 8 9.1 4<br />
Technology 13.6 6 52.3 23 31.8 14 2.3 1<br />
<strong>No</strong>te. N=44<br />
The curricular areas that were infused only included behavior<br />
management (72.7%), technology (52.3%), fitness education<br />
(47.7%), activities and materials (45.5%), and assessment (40.9%).<br />
Topics with the lowest percentage infused were administration<br />
(15.9%), motor learning (11.4%), biomechanics (11.4%), adapted<br />
(6.8%), coaching (4.5%), and exercise physiology (2.3%).<br />
The curricular areas that were separate and infused were<br />
assessment (43.2%), curriculum design/methods (43.2%), motor<br />
learning (40.9%), adapted (38.6%), activities and materials<br />
(34.1%), motor development (34.1%), fitness education (31.8%),<br />
and technology (31.8%). The areas that were lowest on the separate<br />
and infused were social psychology (18.2%), administration<br />
(18.2%), and historical perspective (15.9%).<br />
Curricular content areas that were not covered were coaching<br />
(11.4%), exercise science (9.1%), social psychology (9.1%),<br />
and administration (4.5%). Five curricular areas covered by<br />
all respondent’s institutions included adapted, activities and<br />
materials, assessment, behavior management, and curriculum<br />
design/methods.<br />
Student Professional Organization Involvement<br />
Participants were asked to identify whether the students were<br />
required to join a professional organization and whether students<br />
attended a professional conference within the past two years.<br />
Findings indicated that 27.3% (n= 12) of the programs required<br />
their students to join a professional organization and 79.5% (n=35)<br />
gave students the opportunity to attend a conference within the<br />
past two years.<br />
Advisory Boards<br />
An advisory board is a small group of K-12 physical educators<br />
that serves as both a focus group and a liaison between higher<br />
education and the K-12 community. Participants were asked<br />
to indicate whether or not they believed advisory boards were<br />
an important resource for higher education curriculum. The<br />
participants were also asked if they had used an advisory board<br />
within the past five years. Findings indicated that 36.4% (n=16)
Undergraduate PETE Programs<br />
of the institutions believed that advisory boards were important<br />
and 25% (n=11) had used an advisory board within the past five<br />
years.<br />
Discussion<br />
There are a variety of key elements that may be included in<br />
a typical physical education curriculum. The following elements<br />
may be included, but not limited to, professional activity courses,<br />
fitness and skill testing, curricular items, curriculum content,<br />
observations/field experiences/student teaching, practice peer and<br />
K-12 teaching experiences.<br />
Findings from this study indicated that physical education<br />
students, on average, were expected to enroll in nine credits of<br />
professional activity courses. The third edition of the PETE<br />
standards (NASPE, 2008) included a fitness and skill standard. It<br />
may be interesting to note that nearly 46 percent of the programs<br />
required their students to pass skill tests in their courses, and about<br />
12 percent required skill testing as a graduation requirement. In<br />
addition, about 20 percent of the institutions required students to<br />
pass fitness tests in courses and less than five percent required the<br />
fitness tests for graduation. It will be interesting to see how these<br />
numbers change as the updated PETE standards (NASPE, 2008)<br />
become a part of the accreditation process.<br />
Technology is also a new theme imbedded into the PETE<br />
standards (NASPE, 2008). In recent years, there have been<br />
significant advances in the use of technology in physical education.<br />
The most common technology/equipment items mentioned<br />
by the participants were heart-rate monitors, pedometers, and<br />
FitnessGram. Ayers and Housner (2008) claimed that preservice<br />
physical education teachers need to have knowledge of the<br />
pedagogical applications of technology; however, less than 12%<br />
(Liang, Walls, Hicks, Clayton, & Yang, 2006) of PETE students<br />
believed they were fluent. Perhaps the PETE programs should<br />
assess the quality and quantity of technological applications so the<br />
students could feel more confident bringing technology into their<br />
K-12 classes.<br />
It is incumbent upon teacher educators to identify the most<br />
pedagogically relevant knowledge in the academic disciplines<br />
and to provide preservice physical educators with teaching and<br />
learning experiences that demonstrate the connections between the<br />
knowledge from various academic disciplines and its relevance to<br />
professional practice (Bulger, Housner, & Lee, 2008).<br />
“In an ideal world, PETE programs would provide prospective<br />
teachers with subject-matter knowledge related to the physiology,<br />
anatomy, and neuromuscular structures of the body, and an<br />
understanding of how these systems respond and adapt to physical<br />
activity” (Bulger, Housner, & Lee, 2008, p. 44). The data indicated<br />
that most of the programs that participated in the study are, indeed,<br />
covering these topics.<br />
Based on the findings from this study, one could question<br />
the delivery choice of certain curricular items. For example, if<br />
a curricular area was solely “infused” into curriculums (verses<br />
offered in a separate course), would that choice of delivery affect<br />
the preservice teacher’s perception of the importance of the<br />
information? Or, if a topic is taught only in a separate course (and<br />
not infused throughout the curriculum) does that choice of delivery<br />
matter to the students? Ross (1987) believed that universities<br />
and institutions do have a profound effect on the value systems<br />
of students based on the curriculum to which those students are<br />
exposed. So, the question emerges, if certain curricular topics<br />
such as behavior management or assessment are not taught, at<br />
minimum, in a discrete course, are the students less likely to value<br />
those topics? Or if topics are taught earlier in the curriculum, and<br />
not reviewed or infused in higher-level courses, are students less<br />
likely to value those areas?<br />
Some institutions offer courses taught by professors who are not<br />
physical education specialists. In fact, they may be non-teacher<br />
educators and/or influenced little by PETE faculty regarding<br />
both course content and instructional methods (Verner, 1991).<br />
While certain disciplinary specialists may have a more complete<br />
understanding of the involved subject matter and knowledge, they<br />
may lack the ability to apply the essential pedagogical concepts<br />
that will enable preservice physical educators to apply the content<br />
in physical activity promotion settings (Bulger et al., 2008). The<br />
survey indicated that the curriculum content areas most often<br />
taught as separate courses (!60%) were administration, coaching,<br />
biomechanics, and exercise physiology.<br />
“As previously described, PETE programs need to employ<br />
course content, instructional methods, and teaching-learning<br />
environments that enable students to make explicit connections<br />
between the various disciplines and best practices in teaching<br />
physical education” (Bulger et al., 2008).<br />
It is apparent that the capacity of a PETE curriculum to<br />
positively affect the preservice socialization of prospective<br />
physical educators is significantly related to the overall<br />
quality of that curriculum. Strong, individual curricular<br />
components are insufficient to insure curricular quality. All<br />
segments of the curriculum must operate well in a coordinated<br />
manner (Weigand, Bulger, & Mohr, 2004, p. 53).<br />
It appears as though biomechanics and exercise physiology are<br />
not typically being infused into subsequent courses.<br />
The previously mentioned study by Collier and Hebert<br />
(2004) found that K-12 in-service teachers believed that “…<br />
Pre-professional preparation faculty must closely examine the<br />
curricular opportunities afforded pre-professionals with respect to<br />
exposure to lifetime activities, physical and health-related fitness,<br />
behavior management, and classroom organization” (p. 111).<br />
These K-12 teachers were asking for greater emphasis to be place<br />
on the aforementioned curricular areas. The results of the current<br />
study paralleled the request of the K-12 teachers in Collier and<br />
Hebert’s study (2004).<br />
In the current study, results indicated that Central District<br />
preservice teachers typically had the opportunity to teach to their<br />
peers for about 13 hours and teach in actual K-12 settings for<br />
about 15 hours. Overall, the students averaged nearly 28 hours of<br />
teaching opportunities prior to student teaching.<br />
Field experiences are not limited exclusively to student teaching<br />
(Ayers & Housner, 2008); they can happen any time throughout the<br />
PETE program. Observations and field experiences in which the<br />
preservice teacher has the opportunity to observe and participate in<br />
authentic K-12 physical education experiences are crucial to their<br />
preparation. Professionals teaching teacher preparation courses<br />
and in-service teachers believe that it is important to integrate the<br />
preservice teachers into the K-12 system and allow them early<br />
volume 5, issue 1 7
Undergraduate PETE Programs<br />
teaching experiences (O’Sullivan, 1990). Collier and Hebert (2004)<br />
stated that pre-professional programs must specifically analyze<br />
the depth and breadth of opportunities afforded students to work<br />
directly with children in well-supervised practicum settings. “The<br />
opportunity to apply theory to practice and receive appropriate<br />
feedback from faculty, cooperating teachers, peers, and children<br />
allows for individual growth and ultimately, growth within the<br />
profession” (p.111). It is important to note that over the last 20<br />
years, there has been an increase in the amount of time preservice<br />
teachers have spent in K-12 physical education classes (Ayers &<br />
Housner, 2008; Nixon & Vendien, 1985; Tannehill & Zakrajsek,<br />
1988). However, Dodds (1989) believed that simply placing the<br />
student into the K-12 system is not enough and recommended that<br />
field experiences should be progressive, increasingly complex,<br />
sequential, and well timed.<br />
Assuming that the preservice students are imbedded in their<br />
primary pedagogy courses by their third year, it should not<br />
be surprising that the findings showed that the third year in the<br />
program appears to contain the highest number of observations/<br />
field experiences with slightly more than 31 total hours.<br />
A positive note is that 97% of programs had their preservice<br />
students in observations/field experiences at some point during<br />
their preservice preparation. It should be noted that half of the<br />
programs had their students in a practicum experience in their first<br />
year, 86% during the second year, 97% during the third year, and<br />
81% during the final year in the program. In addition, 89% of the<br />
preservice students had the opportunity to teach to K-12 students<br />
prior to student teaching. These numbers appear to be much<br />
higher than those in previous studies; however, if PETE faculty are<br />
authentically preparing preservice teachers, every program should<br />
include some type of practicum experience during each year of<br />
their preservice preparation.<br />
In addition, in-service teachers had the opportunity to share<br />
their anecdotal information on preparing tomorrow’s physical<br />
educators in the Physical Education News (Jeffries, 2008). The<br />
following are some of the comments found on the website.<br />
“Students need authentic experiences such as: site visits to observe<br />
effective teachers, interactions with quality teachers, opportunities<br />
to field test lesson plans, opportunities to learn about and design<br />
differentiated curriculum based on interactions with actual school<br />
age student.” “Young college students are sometimes unsure if<br />
physical education is for them. If you require these students to<br />
help with physical education classes, they will learn quickly if<br />
this is for them or not. Have the students participate with young<br />
students, help demonstrate, help keep control of the classes, etc.”<br />
Even if students start their respective programs with a fairly<br />
good idea of the grade level they would like to teach, exposing<br />
them to all age levels should increase the chance that the students<br />
would consider the possibility of teaching at other age levels as<br />
well. Data showed that the number of hours completed at each<br />
level of education appeared to be balanced between elementary<br />
and high school hours. Middle school field experiences averaged<br />
about five hours less than the hours spent at elementary and high<br />
school levels.<br />
Student-teaching experiences averaged about 14 weeks and<br />
the majority of the institutions placed students at two age levels—<br />
elementary and secondary. An important area to note is that over<br />
8 Journal of Research<br />
20 percent of the programs placed their students at each of the<br />
three age levels (i.e. elementary, middle school, and high school).<br />
A contemporary approach to student teaching was presented<br />
by Wiegand, Bulger, and Mohr (2004). Generally speaking,<br />
student teaching is viewed as the culminating experience, but that<br />
placement in the curriculum may not afford the PETE student the<br />
opportunity to adequately reflect upon the lessons learned during<br />
student teaching with their peers and college supervisor. The<br />
authors suggested two options for improving the traditional student<br />
teaching model. In short, both options would change the order in<br />
which student teaching would occur and they would attempt to<br />
“bridge the gap” between the student teaching experiences and<br />
best practice. The first option would entail adding a capstone class<br />
to follow the student teaching experience. The second involved<br />
dividing the student teaching experience into two parts. The first<br />
part would be designed as a five-week block following the majority<br />
of the pedagogy courses. The second part would be designed as a<br />
capstone experience following all of the student’s coursework.<br />
Harrison and Blakemore (1992) stated that joining and getting<br />
involved in the state and national associations helps preservice<br />
and in-service teachers become true professionals. Professional<br />
development is an important element in keeping in-service teachers<br />
current, aware of trends, and involved in leadership roles (Chen,<br />
2006). Professionals are identified by their socializations into<br />
membership and their organizations (Morocco & Solomon, 1999).<br />
However, research has shown that very few beginning teachers<br />
actually attend these professional development opportunities<br />
(Harrison & Blakemore, 1992).<br />
Another perspective is that K-12 in-service teachers have become<br />
out of touch with the current trends related to physical education<br />
research. Regardless of which perspective is right, there does seem<br />
to be some disconnect between what K-12 physical educators and<br />
college professors believe to be the most effective and achievable<br />
curriculum. A positive recent development is the increased<br />
collaboration of K-12 teachers and teacher preparation professors<br />
(Metzler & Tjeerdsma, 2000; Strand, Anderson, & Reeder, 1996;<br />
Van der Mars as cited in Collier & Hebert, 2004). Two possible<br />
suggestions to minimize this “disconnection” include university/<br />
college professors continually supervising student teachers and<br />
utilizing an advisory board. A survey question relating to advisory<br />
boards showed that only 36% believed that advisory boards were<br />
actually important, and only 25% of PETE programs have used<br />
an advisory board within the last five years. Though these two<br />
suggestions may not completely solve this disconnect, they may<br />
help bridge the gap and improve the communication between the<br />
two groups.<br />
Summary<br />
The study attempted to describe the content of undergraduate<br />
PETE programs based on a general program profile, curricular<br />
items, field experiences, and professional involvement/<br />
development. Overall, the goal was to provide an overview of<br />
many key elements of PETE programs that would allow readers<br />
to compare their program offerings with others in a similar<br />
geographic area. Another goal was to encourage institutions to<br />
assess, and therefore improve the preparation of future physical<br />
education professionals.
Undergraduate PETE Programs<br />
Possible areas of further study include surveying and comparing<br />
other PETE programs internationally. One could also research<br />
one or more specific areas of study (e.g., student teaching and/or<br />
capstone experiences or pedagogical content knowledge for specific<br />
courses) and investigate how institutions relay this information to<br />
preservice teachers.<br />
References<br />
Ayers, S. A. & Housner, L. D. (2008). A descriptive analysis of<br />
undergraduate PETE programs. Journal of Teaching Physical<br />
Education, 27, 51-67.<br />
Bahneman, C. P. (1996). An analysis of the undergraduate physical<br />
education teacher certification requirements within institutions which<br />
offer a doctoral degree in physical education. The Physical<br />
Educator, 54, 198-205.<br />
Bulger, S. M., Housner, L. D., & Lee, A. M. (2008). Curriculum alignment:<br />
Aview from physical education teacher education. Journal of Physical<br />
Education, Recreation and Dance, 79(7), 44-49.<br />
Collier, D. & Hebert, F. (2004). Undergraduate physical education teacher<br />
preparation: What practitioners tell us. The Physical Educator, 61,<br />
102-112.<br />
Dodds, P. (1989). Trainees, field experiences, and socialization into<br />
teaching. In T. J. Templin & P. G. Schempp (Eds.), Socialization<br />
into physical education: Learning to teach (pp.81-104). Indianapolis:<br />
Benchmark Press, Inc.<br />
Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. J. (1974). The study of teaching, New York:<br />
Holt, Rinehart & Winston.<br />
Harrison, J.M., & Blakemore, C.L. (1992). Instructional strategies for<br />
secondary school physical education (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Brown.<br />
Hill, G., & Brodin, K. L. (2004). Physical education teachers’ perceptions<br />
of the adequacy of university coursework in preparation for teaching.<br />
The Physical Educator, 61, 75-87.<br />
Jeffries, S. (2008, <strong>No</strong>vember). Physical Education News. Retrieved<br />
<strong>No</strong>vember 18, 2008, from www.PElinks4u.org<br />
Le Masurier, G., & Corbin, C. (2006). Top 10 reasons for quality<br />
physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation<br />
and Dance, 77(6), 44-53.<br />
Liang, G., Walls, R. T., Hicks, V. L., Clayton, L. B., & Yang, L. (2006).<br />
Will tomorrow’s physical educators be prepared to teach in the digital<br />
age? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education,<br />
6(1), 143-156.<br />
Metzler, M., W. & Freedman, M., S. (1985). Here’s looking at you, PETE:<br />
A profile of physical education teacher education faculty. Journal of<br />
Teaching in Physical Education, 4, 123-133.<br />
Metzler, M. & Tjeerdsma, B. (1998). PETE programs assessment within<br />
a development, research, and improvement framework. Journal of<br />
Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 468-492.<br />
Metzler, M., & Tjeerdsma, B. (2000). Assessment of physical education<br />
teacher education programs. Reston, VA: NASPE.<br />
Morocco, C. C., & Solomon, M. Z. (1999). Revitalizing professional<br />
development. In M.Z. Solomon (Ed.), The diagnostic teacher:<br />
Constructing new approaches to professional development (pp. 247-<br />
267). New York: Teachers College Press.<br />
Napper-Owen, G., Marston, R., Van Volkinburg, P., Afeman, H., & Brewer,<br />
J. (2008). What constitutes a highly qualified physical education<br />
teacher. Journal of Physical Education Recreation and Dance, 79(8),<br />
26-30.<br />
National Association for Sport & Physical Education. (2004a). Moving<br />
into the future: National standards for physical education: A guide to<br />
content and assessment. (2nd ed.). Reston, VA: Author.<br />
National Association for Sport & Physical Education. (2004b). Positive<br />
physical education pledge. Retrieved <strong>No</strong>vember 3, 2008, from http://<br />
www.aahperd.org/naspe/template.cfm?template=principalContest/<br />
main.html<br />
National Association for Sport & Physical Education. (2007a). What<br />
constitutes a highly qualified physical education teacher? Retrieved<br />
<strong>No</strong>vember 3, 2008, from http://www.aahperd.org/naspe/pdf_files/<br />
HiQualified.pdf<br />
National Association for Sport & Physical Education. (2007b)<br />
Physical education teacher evaluation tool. Retrieved <strong>No</strong>vember<br />
3, 2008, from http://www.aahperd.org/naspe/pdf_files/pos_papers/<br />
TeacherEvaluationTool.pdf<br />
National Association for Sport & Physical Education. (2008). National<br />
standards for beginning physical education teachers. Reston, VA:<br />
Author.<br />
Nixon, J. E., & Vendien, C. L. (1985). Early field experiences: First<br />
encounters with field experiences with reality. In C.L. Vendien &<br />
J.E. Nixon (Eds.), Physical education teacher education guidelines<br />
for sport pedagogy, (pp.175-186). New York: MacMillian Publishing<br />
Company.<br />
O’Sullivan, M. (1990). Physical education teacher education in the United<br />
States. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 61(2), 41-<br />
45.<br />
Ross, S. (1987). Humanizing the undergraduate physical education<br />
curriculum. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 7, 46-60.<br />
Siedentop, D. (1994). Curriculum innovation: Towards the 21st century.<br />
The Journal of ICHPER•SD, 30(2), 11-14.<br />
SPSS, Inc. (2008). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Version<br />
17.0) [Computer software]. Chicago, IL; Author.<br />
Strand, B., Anderson, C., & Reeder, S. (1996). University/school<br />
collaborative research: Heart rate intensity in middle school physical<br />
education. California Association for Health, Physical Education,<br />
Recreation and Dance Journal Times, 58(8), 13-15, 34.<br />
Strand, B. N. (1992). A descriptive profile of teacher preparation practices<br />
in physical education teacher education. The Physical Educator, 49,<br />
104-112.<br />
Tannehill, D. & Zakrajsek, D. (1998). What is happening in supervision<br />
of student teachers in secondary physical education. The Journal of<br />
Teaching Physical Education, 4(1), 1-12.<br />
Tinning, R. (2002). Engaging Siedentopian perspectives on content<br />
knowledge of physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical<br />
Education, 21, 378-391.<br />
Verner, M. (1991). Anatomy and physiology offerings in physical education<br />
professional preparation programs. Physical Educator, 48(2), 80.<br />
Wiegand, R. L., Bulger, S. M., & Mohr, D. J. (2004). Curricular issues in<br />
physical education teacher education. Journal of Physical Education<br />
Recreation and Dance, 75(8), 47-55.<br />
The University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved January 12, 2009 from http://<br />
www.utexas.edu/world/univ/ !<br />
volume 5, issue 1 9
The Web Quest: Its Impact on Developing<br />
Teaching Skills of Physical Education Student<br />
Teachers<br />
by Haythem Abdel Mageed Mohamed & Rasha Nageh Ali Abd El<br />
Rheem, Faculty of Physical Education, Minia University, Egypt<br />
Abstract<br />
The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which<br />
the use of WebQuests would impact the teaching performance of<br />
the physical education (PE) teacher candidates enrolled in Minia<br />
University. Twenty-eight, third-year teacher candidates were<br />
involved in the study (N=28) and were randomly divided into<br />
two groups: a control and experimental (14 teacher candidates<br />
each). A teaching practice observation sheet was used to assess the<br />
teaching performance of the participants. Results indicated that the<br />
experimental group, or the participants who used the WebQuest<br />
to learn the teaching skills, achieved significantly higher levels in<br />
their teaching performance than did the control group, or those<br />
who were instructed using the traditional methods of modeling and<br />
lecturing. A discussion of the possible reasons for this difference<br />
and practical implications of this study on using WebQuests in<br />
teacher preparation programs are included.<br />
Key words: Teacher Preparation Programs<br />
Introduction<br />
The WebQuest model was created as a tool for integrating<br />
Internet use into classroom activities. The WebQest asks young<br />
people to use the Internet to learn about an issue and apply that<br />
knowledge to attitudes and to enhance their own environments<br />
or future orientations (Abbit & Ophus, 2008). The developers<br />
of the WebQuest, Bernie Dodge and Tom March, have written<br />
widely about the technique, suggesting that it is a synthesis of<br />
inquiry methods, cooperative learning, problem-based learning,<br />
constructivism, and technology integration. While each of the<br />
foundational practices has its own body of research, there is limited<br />
research about the WebQuest model itself (Dodge, 1998; March,<br />
2000).<br />
WebQuests were originally created by Dodge in 1995, during<br />
the early stages of widespread Internet access. With the increase<br />
in Internet access in university labs, he began to experiment with<br />
effective ways to integrate technology into classroom instruction.<br />
As Dodge developed activities for pre-service teachers, “he<br />
launched the WebQuest, arguably the most popular approach for<br />
integrating the Web in classroom learning” (Gorghiu, Gorghiul,<br />
González & de la Santa, 2005; Strickland, 2005).<br />
WebQuest came out as one of the buzz terms that emerged in the<br />
last 15 years in multiple fields of education and teacher education<br />
alike as they are used to achieve the best use of learners' time,<br />
knowledge acquisition and integration and extending and refining<br />
knowledge. After working with a WebQuest, learners will have<br />
grappled with a significant amount of new information and made<br />
sense of it. WebQuests help the participants in meeting standards<br />
concentrated on both critical-thinking and analysis skills. Based on<br />
ideas of inquiry and constructivism, WebQuests involve cooperative<br />
learning, with students having to work on projects in groups. In<br />
10 Journal of Research<br />
addition, there is a strong connection between WebQuests and<br />
multimedia techniques, which leads to an important opportunity<br />
for using the Internet in education.<br />
Williams (2004) asserted that WebQests promote good<br />
instructional practice in many ways. They provide structure and<br />
guidance for the students and instructors. WebQuests also help<br />
focus students' attention on the provided resources, rather than<br />
having students search for them. And they are linked to a variety<br />
of positive affective outcomes, such as motivation, increased level<br />
of engagement, positive attitudes, and decreased anxiety.<br />
Many researchers have attempted to define WebQuests but<br />
Dodge, the parent of the WebQuest, made the essential description<br />
of the technique. He defined a WebQuest as "an inquiry-oriented<br />
activity in which some or all of the information that learners<br />
interact with comes from resources on the Internet." Learners<br />
gather information, analyze a body of knowledge, transform it<br />
in some way into new understandings and demonstrate in-depth<br />
understanding of the material by creating a final product that others<br />
can react or respond to (Milson & Downey, 2001; Strickland,<br />
2005).<br />
There are different types of WebQuests, taking the form of<br />
mystery tasks, retelling of a situation, problem solving, or judgment<br />
decisions. All types of WebQuests share the same optimal goal;<br />
they aim at structuring and directing higher-order learning using<br />
computers. In a WebQuest the learner must interact with the new<br />
knowledge to formulate a new hypothesis or to create a new artifact<br />
for which the use of computers is essential (Williams, 2004).<br />
WebQuests also share the same structure as they all follow a<br />
template design of (introduction, task, sources of information,<br />
process, evaluation and conclusion). The introduction describes the<br />
topic and purpose of the WebQuest, provides necessary background<br />
information and catches the readers' attention to draw them into<br />
the quest. The Task explains to the students what they are going to<br />
do in the activity, the final performance or product and the tools to<br />
be used. The Process describes the steps for completing the tasks.<br />
The resources provide the students with the necessary resources<br />
to complete the tasks and websites. The Evaluation describes to<br />
the students how their performance or products will be evaluated<br />
and displays a rubric to measure the product as objectively as<br />
possible. The Conclusion wraps up the activity, summarizing<br />
what the students have accomplished during the WebQuest in a<br />
short paragraph. Additional links or questions can be included to<br />
encourage students to extend their thinking beyond the WebQuest<br />
(Dodge, 2008; Kelly, 2000).<br />
Recently, teacher educators have applied the WebQuest model<br />
with preservice teachers in order to develop technology integration<br />
skills akin to those used in everyday schools. Scaffolding, used to<br />
support the gradual acquisition of knowledge and skills, may help<br />
preservice teachers to better understand the underlying assumptions<br />
and assess the feas ibility of WebQuests for their teaching (Wang<br />
& Hannafin, 2008).
The Web Quest<br />
Purpose of the Study<br />
Traditional teacher preparation programs tend to operate from<br />
a subject base. The aim is to help practitioners to improve subject<br />
knowledge and expertise. Support is offered by a subject adviser<br />
- then practitioners implement the advice and the advisor evaluates<br />
the outcomes. Jarvis (1992) asserted that student teachers need<br />
advanced strategies that move beyond mere practices. Support for<br />
professional development through using the ‘WebQuest technique’<br />
builds on a model of learning, where practitioners are challenged<br />
to find new ways of locating information and of integrating<br />
technology in education.<br />
The purpose of this study was to compare the WebQuest<br />
technique to the traditional techniques used in teacher preparation<br />
institutions in enhancing preservice teachers' teaching skills. The<br />
WebQuest technique was administered to a sample of third-year PE<br />
teacher candidates enrolled in Minia University, Egypt to enhance<br />
their teaching skills.<br />
Methods<br />
Approach to the Problem<br />
The present study utilized a randomized experimental design in<br />
order to examine the hypotheses and research question. Trochim<br />
(2006) asserts that when random assignment is used, the design<br />
is called a randomized experiment or true experiment. Thomas<br />
& Nelson (2001) assert that the experimental design allows the<br />
researcher to gain insight into the methods of instruction, to have<br />
control over the variables and to determine what is best for the<br />
population. The specific approach utilized for this study was the<br />
pre-post two groups design.<br />
The Participants and Research Setting<br />
The population for this study included 28 third-year PE teacher<br />
candidates enrolled in Minia University during the first semester.<br />
Participants in both groups ranged in age from 19 to 20 years old<br />
and they were all males.<br />
Third-year teacher candidates were chosen because they start<br />
their school placement and find it difficult to adapt with their<br />
first encounter with real teaching situations. In the traditional<br />
instructional methods of preparing these teacher candidates,<br />
they watch models, study available materials on the teaching<br />
skills, teach exactly the same way they were taught with limited<br />
improvisations, and wait for feedback. They need to be trained in<br />
a way that allows them to find the knowledge themselves, assess<br />
their own practices, and identify their weaknesses and strengths.<br />
During the experiment period, the PE teacher candidates in<br />
the two groups studied the three major teaching skills (planning,<br />
implementation and evaluation) and how to apply these three<br />
skills in any PE class with all its stages of presentation (warmup,<br />
physical preparation and basic skills). The experimental group<br />
surfed the WebQuest to find information on such skills with the<br />
instructor (the senior researcher, a lecturer within the faculty of<br />
PE, Minia University) monitoring and offering help when needed.<br />
They also went through the five cycles of the WebQuest (See<br />
Procedures, p.7-9). Participants in the control group, on the other<br />
hand, were lectured on these skills by their instructor (the coauthor,<br />
a lecturer at the faculty of PE, Minia University), watched<br />
her modeling the skills, and finally peer-taught a model lesson of<br />
their own preparation.<br />
The experiment lasted for three months from February to<br />
May, 2008, with two lectures a week for each group (a total of 21<br />
sessions). The time assigned for each session was (120 min.) to<br />
simulate the pre-scheduled timetable set by the college regulations.<br />
One session was devoted to the orientation at the beginning of the<br />
program. The other 20 sessions were divided into 5 major cycles<br />
representing the five lessons provided in the WebQuest (each<br />
consisting of 4 successive sessions).<br />
Instrument<br />
To measure teacher candidates' teaching performance,<br />
the investigators adopted a 70-item observation sheet from a<br />
previous study (Azmy & Mohamed, 2006). The teaching practice<br />
observation sheet consists of three main dimensions representing<br />
the three major teaching skills addressed by the researchers (see<br />
Appendix 1); including planning skills (16 items), implementation<br />
skills (46 items), and evaluation skills (8 items).<br />
A three-point scale was used as a coding system for weighing<br />
each statement (1=Never; 2=Sometimes; 3= Always). Giving<br />
'Always' a maximum score of 3 marks, the maximum score of the<br />
first dimension (with a total number of 16 items) was 16 x 3 = 48,<br />
that of the second dimension (with a total number of 46 items) was<br />
46 x 3=138, and that of the third dimension (with a total number<br />
of 8 items) was 8 x 3= 24. A Cronbach's Alpha for reliability was<br />
conducted for each dimension in the sheet. The Cronbach alpha<br />
coefficients for dimensions 1 through 3 were between .93 and .98,<br />
indicating satisfactory levels of reliability.<br />
The Pearson Correlation Formula was also used to determine<br />
the inter-rater reliability of the observation sheet by administering<br />
the observation sheet to a randomly chosen sample of 20 fourth<br />
year PE teacher candidates in the Faculty of Physical Education,<br />
Minia University. The teaching performance of these participants<br />
was videotaped and two lecturers at the same university observed<br />
these videotapes and rated their performance using the observation<br />
sheet. The mean scores obtained by the two observers were<br />
calculated and the correlation coefficient was (0.97) which was<br />
considered acceptable.<br />
Data Analysis<br />
The Teaching Practice Observation Sheet (Azmy & Mohamed,<br />
2006) was administered again to determine the extent to which<br />
participants exhibited a change in the peer-teaching performance<br />
following the intervention period. Posttest scores were obtained for<br />
each participant of the two groups; each participant was videotaped<br />
again while teaching one model PE class in the University sports<br />
hall and the three judges observed these videotapes and rated their<br />
performance. Independent t-tests were used to analyze the extent<br />
to which there were statistically significant differences between<br />
pretest and posttest scores for the addressed two variables. The<br />
effects of the dependent variables were considered statistically<br />
significant at p
The Web Quest<br />
control (14 participants each). They were instructed by the two<br />
researchers; one for the experimental group using the WebQuest<br />
technique, and the other for the control group using the conventional<br />
methods of instruction (e.g. lecturing and modeling). Participants<br />
in the regular classes listened to the instructor's lecture, took notes,<br />
watched the instructor modeling, participated in discussions on the<br />
given teaching skills, and taught a mini-class as an application.<br />
Pretest scores for the observation sheet (Azmy & Mohamed,<br />
2006) were obtained for each participant of the two groups to<br />
identify their level of performance considering the three target<br />
teaching skills before being exposed to the treatment intervention;<br />
each participant was videotaped while teaching one model PE<br />
class in the university sports hall. Three external judges (experts<br />
in PE curriculum and instruction) observed the videotapes, rated<br />
their performance using the observation sheet two times for each<br />
participant (once for the pre-measurement and the other for the post<br />
one), and the average was calculated from the three obtained raw<br />
scores of the judges giving a total of two scores for each participant<br />
(one for the pre and one for the post) to ensure objectivity of the<br />
evaluation process.<br />
The instructor who taught the experimental group utilized a fivecycle<br />
intervention. Before going through the five successive cycles,<br />
he started with an orientation session at the very beginning of the<br />
program in which he provided a brief theoretical background on<br />
the WebQuest. He also explained why they are using the Internet,<br />
how to surf for the WebQuest and when and how to ask for help<br />
from the instructor. A random selection divided the experimental<br />
participants into three sub-groups.<br />
The students then went through the five WebQuest Cycles; in<br />
each cycle, participants were required to choose one lesson from<br />
the WebQuest and prepare a lesson plan to peer-teach at the end of<br />
the cycle. The suggested five lessons incorporated different types<br />
of warm-up, physical preparation and basic skills and participants<br />
who were surfing the WebQuest were required to choose one of<br />
them with all its components for their peer-teaching. Each cycle<br />
consisted of four successive sessions. The task for each group was<br />
changed among cycles switching the three target teaching skills<br />
among the groups giving the PE candidate teachers the opportunity<br />
to choose from among the different exercises that can be employed<br />
in applying these skills. Figure 1 depicts the four sessions of<br />
implementing each WebQuest cycle (Insert Figure 1 here) They<br />
can be briefed as follows:<br />
Session (1)<br />
Session (2)<br />
Teamwork<br />
Session (3)<br />
Exchanging of Information<br />
Session (4)<br />
12 Journal of Research<br />
Session 1: Surfing the WebQuest (120 min)<br />
In the first session of each cycle, participants of the<br />
experimental group used the university lab to surf the Internet<br />
through the WebQuest. They read through the general instructions<br />
on the required mission for each group; each group had to gather<br />
information about one teaching skill from the Internet (planning,<br />
implementation or evaluation). They also read through the<br />
evaluation rubric to identify their level of performance. Then, they<br />
used the available resources to find the required information on the<br />
target skill.<br />
Session 2: Teamwork (120 min)<br />
Teacher candidates teamed up in their sub-groups and shared<br />
the information they retrieved among themselves. They exchanged<br />
and reconstructed the information about the one target skill assigned<br />
for each group and finally came up with an idea on how to present<br />
their assigned skill to the members of the other two groups.<br />
Session 3: Exchanging of Information (120 min)<br />
Members of the three groups sat together in one big circle to<br />
exchange the information they retrieved about the three major<br />
teaching skills. At the end, they chose one lesson from the suggested<br />
ones in the WebQuest to peer-teach in the next session in the sports<br />
hall. They also chose one student from each group to teach (a total<br />
of three students, one for each stage of presentation).<br />
Session 4: Teaching and Feedback (120 min)<br />
In this final session of each cycle, the three chosen teacher<br />
candidates presented their planned lessons (in 90 min.); one student<br />
prepared and arranged the equipment for the class, one taught the<br />
lesson and one did the evaluation stage of presentation. At the end<br />
of this session, a post conference was held with all members (30<br />
min.) in which they all sat in one big circle with the instructor in<br />
the middle. They assessed the teaching performance of their mates<br />
on the basis of the WebQuest's evaluation rubric.<br />
Results<br />
Analysis of the collected data on the participants revealed<br />
improved scores in all domains of the observation sheet. A<br />
paired samples t test revealed a statistically reliable difference<br />
between the mean scores for the experimental group in the preperformance<br />
in the planning, implementation and evaluation skills<br />
(M=21.93; M=65.43; M=12.21) and in the post-performance on<br />
the observation sheet (M=40.79, M=126.64; M=18.79), t=30.92,<br />
p=0.000; t=42.91, p=0.000; t=14.12, p=0.000, respectively (see<br />
Table 1).<br />
Table 1. Differences between the Pre-post Measurements<br />
of the Teaching Practice Observation Sheet for the<br />
Experimental Group<br />
Pre<br />
Post<br />
Teaching<br />
skills Mean SD. Mean SD. t Sig.<br />
Lesson<br />
Planning<br />
21.93 1.21 40.79 1.67 30.92 0.000<br />
Implementation<br />
65.43 3.99 126.64 5.03 42.91 0.000<br />
Evaluation 12.07 1.31 20.71 1.05 18.16 0.000<br />
*P
The Web Quest<br />
Findings on the control group also revealed a statistically<br />
reliable difference between the mean scores in the preperformance<br />
in the planning, implementation and evaluation skills<br />
(M=21.71; M=65.14; M=12.07) and in the post-performance on<br />
the observation sheet (M=37.64, M=114.21; M=20.71), t=27.99,<br />
p=0.000; t=33.40, p=0.000; t=18.16, p=0.000, respectively, (see<br />
Table 2).<br />
Table 2. Differences between the Pre-post Measurements<br />
of the Teaching Practice Observation Sheet for the<br />
Control Group<br />
*P
The Web Quest<br />
solving and creative skills in a manner that assured their direct<br />
involvement both in locating and practicing the intended knowledge.<br />
Thus, learners had the upper hand in controlling their learning<br />
environment, which increased the effectiveness of the teachinglearning<br />
process. The post conference that was held after the actual<br />
teaching of the student teachers also had a positive impact on the<br />
teaching performance of the subjects of the experimental group.<br />
It paved the way for better self, peer, and teacher assessment as<br />
all the participants together with the instructor himself were<br />
given mutual opportunities to give feedback and exchange views<br />
and suggestions for a better presentation of the target lesson. It<br />
also helped in revealing their points of weaknesses and points of<br />
strengths that provided learners with an extra eye to view their<br />
teaching skills, which is rarely found in the traditional methods<br />
of instruction. These findings suggest the effectiveness of the<br />
WebQuest technique in enhancing the teaching performance of PE<br />
teacher candidates.<br />
With the current call for new and effective trends in the field<br />
of teacher preparation programs that is being evidenced across the<br />
Egyptian environment, findings such as the ones in this research<br />
study are very promising to PE instructors who are in constant<br />
search for integrating Internet technology in their instruction to<br />
maximize the learning outcomes of their learners.<br />
Finally, this study supports the notion that the WebQuest can<br />
be effectively employed in teacher preparation programs and can<br />
result in better learning outcomes when it is properly designed,<br />
implemented and monitored.<br />
Practical Implications<br />
This study serves to demonstrate the practicality of incorporating<br />
WebQuests into the teacher preparation programs in the faculties<br />
of physical education. The procedures followed in this study<br />
can be successfully incorporated into the methodology sessions<br />
addressing different teaching skills and sub-skills. The WebQuest<br />
can also be modified according to the nature of each sport presenting<br />
various models of how to: plan for a PE class, manage the class,<br />
and evaluate the outcomes of the students. Additional research<br />
into the WebQuest model is needed. The WebQuest should also<br />
be evaluated in various subject areas with learners of differing age<br />
groups and academic abilities.<br />
References<br />
Abbit, J., & Ophus, J. (2008). What we know about the impact of Web-<br />
Quests: A review of research. AACE Journal, 16(4), 441-456.<br />
Azmi, E., & Mohamed, H. A. (2006, September). The effect of an<br />
educational program using the virtual reality technology on developing<br />
some teaching skills of the student teacher in the department of<br />
teaching, Faculty of Physical Education, Minia University. The<br />
Scientific Journal of Physical & Sports Education, Helwan University,<br />
48, 239-279.<br />
Dodge, B. (1998). WebQuests: A strategy for scaffolding higher level<br />
thinking. Retrieved from http://webquest.sdsu.edu/necc98.htm<br />
Dodge, B. (2008). A webquest about webquests: Middle school/high school<br />
version. Retrieved from: http://webquest.sdsu.edu/webquestwebquesths.html<br />
Gorghiu, G., Gorghiul, L., González, V. R., & de la Santa, A. G. (2005).<br />
WebQuest in the classroom – analysis of its impact. Paper presented<br />
at The International Conference on Multimedia and ICT Education<br />
(from 22nd-24th April, 2009). Lisbon, Portugal. Retrieved from: www.<br />
formatex.org/micte2009/<br />
14 Journal of Research<br />
Hassanien, A. (2006, July). An evaluation of the webquest as a computerbased<br />
learning tool. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 11 (2),<br />
235 - 250<br />
Jarvis, J. (1992, April). Using diaries for teacher reflection on in-service<br />
course. ELT Journal, 46 (2), 133-143.<br />
Kelly, R. (2000, July/August). Working with WebQuests: Making the web<br />
accessible to students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children,<br />
32 (6), 4-13.<br />
March, T. (2000). WebQuests 101. Multimedia Schools, 7 (5), 55-56, 58.<br />
Milson, A. J., & Downey, P. (2001). WebQuest: Using Internet resources<br />
for cooperative inquiry. Social Education, 65(3), 144-146<br />
Strickland, J. (2005). Using webquests to teach content: Comparing<br />
instructional strategies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and<br />
Teacher Education, 5(2), 138-148.<br />
Thomas, J. R. & Nelson, J. K. (2001). Research methods in physical<br />
activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 3-24.<br />
Trochim, W. M.K. (2006). Research methods knowledge base. Web<br />
Center for Social Research Methods. Retrieved from: http://www.<br />
socialresearchmethods.net/kb/destypes.php<br />
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2008, March). Integrating WebQuests in<br />
preservice teacher education. Educational Media International, 45(1),<br />
59 – 73.<br />
Williams, F. A. (2004). Voicing diversity: How can I integrate webquests<br />
and moodle into religious education at second level? A Thesis submitted<br />
for the master degree in education. School of Education, DCU.<br />
N<br />
Appendix (1) The Teaching Practice Observation Sheet<br />
Statement<br />
I. Lesson Planning Skills.<br />
1 Lesson objectives are clearly stated.<br />
2 Objectives are behavioral, observable and<br />
measurable.<br />
3 Objectives suit the level of maturity of students.<br />
4 Levels of learning for each area of the lesson<br />
objectives are clear and specific.<br />
5 Place of the lesson is well-equipped in a way<br />
that allows the implementation of the activities<br />
of the lesson.<br />
6 The content (description of the desired<br />
performance and the learning stages) is<br />
formulated in a clear manner that suits students'<br />
age level.<br />
7 Evaluation techniques that assess the achievement<br />
of the objectives are specific.<br />
8 The educational resources used by faculty to<br />
increase the effectiveness of teaching are<br />
mentioned clearly.<br />
9 The alternative tools mentioned suit the designed<br />
activities, students' number and their level.<br />
10 Lesson formations suit the designed activities.<br />
11 The chosen method of teaching is specified in a<br />
manner that suits the educational situation.<br />
12 The educational content of activities (steps) takes<br />
into consideration logic implementation (according<br />
to the logical and psychological organization).<br />
13 The content of the activities suit the instructional time.<br />
14 Activities for students with specific needs are stated in<br />
the lesson.<br />
15 The activities suit the weather.<br />
16 The lesson contains a variety of activities that create<br />
learning situations to develop students' values and<br />
sports culture.<br />
Always<br />
Sometimes<br />
Never
The Web Quest<br />
N<br />
Statement<br />
Always<br />
Sometimes<br />
Never<br />
N<br />
Statement<br />
Always<br />
Sometimes<br />
Never<br />
II. The Implementation Skills<br />
1 Escort students from class to the field.<br />
2 Finishes the administrative work on time so as not to<br />
affect the actual time of other parts of the lesson.<br />
3 Begins the actual performance of the lesson at the<br />
beginning of the period.<br />
4 Follows the regulative methods\Keeps order while<br />
assigning activities.<br />
5 The warm-up activities suit the objectives put for them.<br />
6 Models and performs the skill effectively and precisely<br />
in a way that suits students' age level.<br />
7 The alternative tools used are appropriate for learning<br />
motor skills.<br />
8 The available formation suites the learning style of the<br />
motor skill.<br />
9 Provides students with opportunities to guess.<br />
10 Stands where all students can easily see.<br />
11 Creates opportunities for application to make the most<br />
of his instructional time.<br />
12 Uses equipments appropriately in a way that helps<br />
students learn motor skills effectively.<br />
13 Avoids long pauses during the implementation of the<br />
lesson.<br />
14 Takes into consideration the principles of teaching<br />
motor skills while presenting the target skill.<br />
15 Carries out formations in an aesthetic manner.<br />
16 Smoothly moves among activities without having to<br />
stop as if the lesson is a total unit.<br />
17 Demonstrates mastery in manipulating the aiding<br />
media sets.<br />
18 Specifies an organizational method in distributing<br />
tools among students.<br />
19 Determines the location of students' entry onto the<br />
court to guarantee the principle of security and safety.<br />
20 Moves through and among students during the<br />
implementation of the activities in a way that allows<br />
him to note the performance of each student.<br />
21 Speaks in a clear and expressive manner so that all<br />
students hear him\her.<br />
22 Uses the appropriate reinforcement techniques that<br />
encourage students' performance.<br />
23 Sticks to the prepared lesson plan.<br />
24 Properly uses the whistle when needed.<br />
25 Makes good use of the spaces and gaps in the court<br />
taking into account safety and security factors.<br />
26 Distributes his attention among all students during the<br />
implementation of the lesson.<br />
27 Always there for the students while performing a<br />
difficult skill that might be dangerous for them.<br />
28 Vary his voice pitch according to the learning situation.<br />
29 Demonstrates effective body gestures or facial<br />
expressions to draw the attention of his\her students.<br />
30 Establishes a good rapport and an effective interaction<br />
and communication with the students.<br />
31 Uses proper and well-mannered expressions to<br />
speak with the students.<br />
32 Encourages behaved behaviors of students.<br />
33 Motivates students to participate in the activities of<br />
the lesson.<br />
34 Shows sharpness and firmness in both observing and<br />
managing different learning situations.<br />
35 Provides students with some educational situations<br />
that develop their personal qualities and values.<br />
36 Focuses on the previous educational experiences and<br />
makes use of them in teaching the new intended<br />
educational experiences.<br />
37 Takes into consideration the individual differences<br />
among students during the implementation of the<br />
activities.<br />
38 Employs the surrounding environment for the<br />
implementation of the activities.<br />
39 Uses modern teaching techniques that provide<br />
opportunities for students to self-assess their<br />
performance.<br />
40 Varies his\her teaching techniques to avoid boredom.<br />
41 Capable of demonstrating high self-control towards<br />
the popping up of situations.<br />
42 Utilizes exercises correctly and in accordance with<br />
the rules.<br />
43 Presents the material according to the level of each<br />
learner.<br />
44 Maximizes time-on-task for practicing different skills,<br />
taking into account the performance and rest periods.<br />
45 Creates opportunities for students' innovation and<br />
creativity through the competitive nature of the<br />
activities.<br />
46 Is organized in collecting tools and equipment<br />
immediately after the lesson and before students<br />
leave the court.<br />
III. The Evaluation Skill<br />
47 Uses the appropriate evaluation techniques to<br />
measure the objectives.<br />
48 Uses a variety of evaluation techniques<br />
(e.g. Observation Sheets and Level of performance<br />
records).<br />
49 Discovers individual and group mistakes and<br />
corrects them immediately.<br />
50 Provides opportunities for peer-assessment so that<br />
students evaluate each others' performance.<br />
51 Comprehensive evaluation of the lesson objectives to<br />
include cognitive, psychomotor and affective domains.<br />
52 Capable of diagnosing students with learning<br />
difficulties.<br />
53 Keeps reports on his\her students' level of<br />
performance for future diagnosis and assessment.<br />
54 Evaluates each phase of the lesson after finishing<br />
its presentation.<br />
!<br />
volume 5, issue 1 15
Podcasting in Physical Education<br />
Teacher Education<br />
by Mike McNeill, Swarup Mukherjee & Gurmit Singh, National<br />
Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University,<br />
Singapore<br />
Abstract<br />
This paper assesses the role of podcasting in a postgraduate<br />
physical education teacher education (PETE) program. Twice<br />
weekly podcasts reflecting student teachers’ participation in<br />
a games education module were made available shortly after<br />
instruction. Podcasting was used to enhance the social, emotional<br />
and pedagogical dimensions of games for these students. After 12<br />
weeks of instruction, feedback on the intervention was provided<br />
through completion of a short survey. The survey was followed by<br />
a focus group interview involving a randomly selected group of six.<br />
Findings revealed that the majority rated podcasts highly in terms<br />
of being educationally helpful, conceptually enriching, and ‘worth<br />
looking forward to’. Postgraduates also suggested that podcasting<br />
substantially supported preparing for tests and examinations,<br />
strengthened the teacher-student relationship, and had the potential<br />
to develop the physical education (PE) curriculum in schools. The<br />
preliminary results for games learning in PE were promising.<br />
Key words: ICT, pedagogy, game-play<br />
As Information Communication Technology (ICT) takes an<br />
ever increasing role in our everyday lives, educators are challenged<br />
to make this a reality in the pedagogy of the 21st Century. Can<br />
Physical Education (PE) afford to avoid making this leap of faith,<br />
is a question that confronts the profession. While students become<br />
more internet savvy in their day-to-day existence, PE has to grapple<br />
with such technological advances to maintain its relevance in<br />
their lives. How can technological advances be achieved without<br />
compromising the key domains of fitness, performance and sport?<br />
Several internet facilities such as online discussion boards<br />
that involve discourse analysis, assignment drop-boxes, and the<br />
role of urls for selecting appropriate websites are familiar ways<br />
of enhancing Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE).<br />
However, these technologies may not be going far enough!<br />
Although some research on the role of ICT in education has been<br />
published (Abt & Barry, 2007; Campbell, 2005; Lazzari, 2009;<br />
Malan, 2007), a literature search revealed that little has been<br />
conducted in the domain of PE.<br />
Of the many technological resources available, podcasting has<br />
emerged as a teaching and learning tool that is easy to deliver and<br />
has the convenience of access. However, the related literature<br />
suggests some ambiguity about the efficacy of podcasting. On<br />
one hand podcasts were seen as unpopular (Cann, 2007), without<br />
significantly affecting learning (Abt & Barry, 2007; Deal, 2007),<br />
while on the other they were reported to be supportive (Evans, 2007;<br />
Malan, 2007). Evans and Malan claimed that students’ feedback<br />
was more enthusiastic about this medium than traditional methods<br />
and Kutz, Fenwick, and Ellsworth (2007) stated that final grades<br />
improved significantly. As it is common knowledge that students<br />
learn in different ways, the auditory experience of podcasting<br />
offers another avenue for learning (Honey & Mumford, 2006).<br />
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore and evaluate<br />
the social, emotional and pedagogical efficacy of podcasting as a<br />
potential enhancement for PE in teacher education.<br />
Podcasting was added on top of all the normal pedagogical<br />
deliverables (such as lesson notes, lesson discussion and debriefing)<br />
in a foundation course called ‘Principles of Games’. The course<br />
promoted an understanding of tactical awareness through a variety<br />
of different game-play experiences for student teachers to translate<br />
into suitable content for pupils in schools. Aspects of curriculum<br />
models such as Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU: Thorpe<br />
& Bunker, 1986), Game Sense (den Duyn, 1997), Games Concept<br />
Approach (GCA: CPDD, 1999), Play-practice (Launder, 2001)<br />
and Sport Education (Siedentop, Hastie & van der Mars, 2004)<br />
were introduced to a new cohort of PE professionals.<br />
Principles of play, as well as creatively designed packages for<br />
invasion clusters, were experienced by the student teachers with the<br />
average child in mind. In the ‘Developmental Hockey’ component,<br />
for example, a range of options from deck hockey (using dusters<br />
and quoits) to puckball (a fusion of ice hockey and floorball played<br />
on an indoor wooden court) and culminating with field hockey<br />
allowed students to experience a much wider range of activity<br />
and game play within a hockey cluster. Similarly, ‘Developmental<br />
Rugby’ explored variants of the code through sogger (a mixture of<br />
rugby and soccer), buntball (a fusion of Speedball with modified<br />
Aussie Rules), and ended with touch rugby. Whereas the ‘hockey’<br />
exposure featured small-sidedness as an important pedagogical<br />
feature, the ‘rugby’ experience used larger numbers, but included<br />
several balls simultaneously in play. Sogger, for example,<br />
began with nine balls (eight soccer and one rugby), and reduced<br />
incrementally to three rugby balls, then one.<br />
A 2009 Nielsen Media Index survey (The Media Group, 2009)<br />
of internet behaviors declared that “Singaporeans are [sic] more<br />
wired up than ever,” especially Generation Y, whose age range<br />
(15-29) covers the majority of the participants involved in this<br />
study. Nielsen reported that 53% of Generation Y participated<br />
in social networking portals, such as podcasts, compared to 20%<br />
of generation X (30-44 years old). This statistic indicated a good<br />
match between the internet behavior of the postgraduates in the<br />
study and the technology being evaluated.<br />
Method<br />
Podcast – the Instrument<br />
A 36-hour foundation course, Principles of Games, was taught<br />
twice a week with a single and a double hour combination of<br />
intensely practical lessons. After each lesson, a podcast was<br />
generated using a script of the salient pedagogical features that<br />
were implemented, discussed or alluded to in class. The script was<br />
enhanced with commentary based on the teacher’s observations of<br />
16 Journal of Research
Podcasting in PETE<br />
individual as well as group performance or critical incidents that<br />
occurred during play. Issues, anomalies and questions that arose in<br />
the post-lesson debrief were also included in the podcast summary<br />
to add a sense of humor, déjà-vu and relevance to the context, as<br />
well as a source of “deepening” (Lazzari, 2009, p. 29).<br />
Delivery<br />
Although the process of publication was somewhat timeconsuming,<br />
this inconvenience was tempered by the knowledge<br />
that the podcasts would become more-or-less a permanent<br />
resource for faculty as well as students. The podcasts, ranging in<br />
time from three minutes, 45 seconds to seven minutes for every<br />
session, were available within a day of the practical and forwarded<br />
to the students’ e-mail accounts. ‘Audacity’ was the software used<br />
to capture the commentary and this was converted into an audiofile<br />
by Posterous.com. This system was relatively smooth, was<br />
easy to use and was proven to deliver very good quality sound. To<br />
attract attention to each podcast a separate group sms (text) was<br />
simultaneously delivered to the students’ cell phones.<br />
Participants<br />
The participants were first year PETE students in a Postgraduate<br />
diploma program. The student cohort was divided into<br />
two equal groups of 20: One group became the experimental<br />
group and the other the control group. Each group had a different<br />
teacher, but both teachers, who had taught this course together<br />
previously, used the same course outline and sequence, materials<br />
and resources. The role of the podcasts was initially explained to<br />
the experimental group simply as an enhancement, in addition to<br />
the normal course materials and tutorials that both groups would<br />
receive. The experimental group participants were requested to<br />
protect the podcast content as a private arrangement.<br />
Survey and Focus-Group Interview<br />
After the end of course test, the experimental group was<br />
subsequently invited to attend a briefing to further describe the<br />
intervention and complete a survey. The survey was administered<br />
by a neutral faculty member, not a part of the cohort instruction or<br />
program administration, nor directly known to the students. The<br />
students were briefed about the purpose of the survey and informed<br />
that it was voluntary (they could withdraw at any time without<br />
penalty) as well as confidential (no names were submitted). All of<br />
the students were able to provide consent (over the age of 21) and<br />
were capable of making this decision without any duress.<br />
After the survey was completed, the same faculty member<br />
randomly selected a group of six (every third member on the<br />
class roster) for a focus group interview. This whole process of<br />
completing the survey and interview was managed in less than<br />
an hour. The survey included 17 questions, many using a fivepoint<br />
Likert scale, with several seeking clarification of the graded<br />
response.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
Survey Findings<br />
A significant majority of postgraduates (80%) were not<br />
receiving any ICT support in PE beyond this course. <strong>No</strong> other<br />
course was engaging the students in blogging or podcasting and<br />
only one respondent mentioned access to a website in another<br />
game-related module, reinforcing the paucity of ICT in PETE<br />
practical instruction. Everyone (100%) listened to the podcast<br />
alone, not with friends or in groups, and the majority (70%)<br />
listened to them at home. The other major engagement away from<br />
home was while driving or exercising (25%). When asked about<br />
the convenience aspect of listening to the podcast, there was almost<br />
an even distribution between tuning in ‘the same week’ (45%) and<br />
listening ‘over the weekend’ (55%).<br />
The lowest response on quantity of podcast access was ‘half’<br />
(5%), whereas just over a third (35%) said ‘many’, and the<br />
majority (60%) reported listening to ‘every single one’ of them.<br />
This question produced an M=4.6 on a five-point Likert scale and<br />
resonated with Lazzari’s (2009, p. 33) study which referenced the<br />
commitment and ‘high level of engagement within the podcasting<br />
project’.<br />
The media delivery platform (Audacity) was rated M=4.5 on a<br />
5-point Likert scale: good (10%), very good (30%) and excellent<br />
(60%). The audio quality was similarly rated as M=4.4 (good,<br />
10%; very good, 40%; excellent, 50%).<br />
From a social and emotional perspective, the postgraduates were<br />
asked to rate the podcasts from ‘irritating’ (1) to ‘worth looking<br />
forward to’ (5) and the results indicated that 10% were ‘neutral’<br />
(3) about this question, 60% found them ‘enjoyable’ (4) and 30%<br />
reported that the podcasts were ‘worth looking forward to’ (5:<br />
M=4.2). On a similar scale ranging from ‘awful’ (1) to ‘awesome’<br />
(5), a quarter of the postgraduates (25%) responded about the<br />
content as ‘satisfactory’ (3), half (50%) as ‘really interesting’ (4)<br />
and the remaining quarter as ‘awesome’ (5: M= 4.0).<br />
When asked if the material was educationally helpful: 15%<br />
responded with ‘OK’ (3), 50% with ‘very helpful’ (4), and 40%<br />
as ‘exceptionally helpful’ (5: M= 4.5). The most popular response<br />
from the postgraduates revolved around the aspect of consolidation,<br />
reiteration, and reinforcement. The second most popular response<br />
suggested that the podcasts were important for reflection, as the<br />
lessons were very dynamic with an intense pace that presented<br />
insufficient time to spontaneously internalize everything that was<br />
happening or why! Thirdly, in agreement with Lazzari’s (2009)<br />
finding, the podcasts are perennial and offer convenient access<br />
at anytime and as such were invaluable as resources before<br />
tests or exams. Some stated that the podcasts were beneficial<br />
for visualizing the content as well as for elaborating on the key<br />
teaching/pedagogical inputs: in Lazzari’s words (2009, p. 31) they<br />
had a ‘positive impact on their learning process and reduced their<br />
stress before the exam.” Arising from this, other respondents felt<br />
that the podcasts would be of significant value during a teaching<br />
practicum (TP) as they could act as a constant reminder of what,<br />
how, where and when to enact the principles of game play.<br />
To investigate the impact of podcasting on learning, an<br />
independent t-test was conducted on the grades from both the<br />
experimental as well as the control group. SPSS17 found no<br />
significant difference between the two groups in overall marks (t=<br />
-3.162, df 38, p =.650), or test scores (t= -.963, df38, p =.883),<br />
whereas there was a significant difference in the assignment marks<br />
(t= -5.839, df 38, p=.011). Although the final grade statistic would<br />
suggest agreement with Deal’s (2007) finding of no measurable<br />
improvement, the assignment statistic, which supports Evans<br />
volume 5, issue 1 17
Podcasting in PETE<br />
(2007) finding of grade improvement, may have nothing to relate<br />
to podcasting, but leaves the door open for further investigation of<br />
this effect.<br />
Intermittent anecdotes arising from questions and opinions<br />
expressed during lesson debriefing or from class performances<br />
and/or idiosyncracies observed during class made the podcasts<br />
more personal and alluring. All of the students (100%) reported<br />
that the podcasts accurately represented what they had experienced<br />
and were consequently authentic resources for them.<br />
In relation to a question about learning, where the podcast<br />
contributed to an extension of ‘game-sense’ or ‘increased<br />
understanding’, 5% reported ‘not much’ (2), 10% were ‘neutral’<br />
(3), 45% said ‘a little’ (4) and 40% reported ‘a great deal’ (5: M=<br />
4.2). More than half (60%) reported that the material added a<br />
valuable element of pedagogical content knowledge (M= 4.5) and<br />
65% suggested that the podcasts would be useful to them in the<br />
future as PE teachers (M= 4.6). Finally, as an overall rank of the<br />
podcasting experience on a 10 point scale, the postgraduates gave<br />
podcasting a resounding thumbs up (7=15%; 8=20%; 9=40%;<br />
10=25%: M= 8.75).<br />
As a summary, the postgraduates were asked how the podcasting<br />
procedure could be improved and there were some useful and<br />
interesting comments: 40% said the podcasts were ‘fine as they<br />
were’ and could not be improved, whereas 15% suggested that<br />
‘blogs’ for class discussion could be promoted intermittently, but<br />
not regularly. As the podcast was challenging to digest in one<br />
sitting, it was suggested that making a hard copy of the podcast<br />
notes available would make this experience even more rewarding.<br />
One respondent further suggested that posting on i-tunes would<br />
be “Cooler”, while another suggested that podcasting would be a<br />
tremendous aid for PE examinations in schools.<br />
Focus Group Interview<br />
The Focus Group Interview strongly reinforced the survey<br />
findings. While mindful of a ‘Hawthorne’ (Gillespie, 1991) or<br />
‘Rosenthal’ effect (Rosenthal & Jacobsen, 1968), the group<br />
members were consistently unanimous throughout, except for one<br />
suggestion to ‘cluster’ several podcasts of a similar nature together.<br />
This opinion was over ruled by the others, who commented on the<br />
unique and diverse nature of each lesson, suggesting a danger that<br />
valuable commentary may be overlooked.<br />
Podcasts were helpful for diverse learners as not everyone<br />
rationalized their learning and understanding from the same<br />
perspective, and they contributed significantly to everyone’s<br />
memory bank regardless of disposition. Customization of the<br />
commentary to the class allowed different people to refocus their<br />
principles and values in light of the bigger picture of a games<br />
education, something not always achieved in a conventional<br />
pedagogy. Similarly, tailoring the content added extra meaning<br />
at an individual level as this provided an opportunity to present<br />
comments that were unique to the class being taught. As the content<br />
was not generalized for mass consumption, the podcast became<br />
more personal, was greatly appreciated and constituted part of the<br />
‘worth looking forward to’ dimension.<br />
In view of constraints such as time, the podcast was reportedly<br />
a convenient means of reflection that afforded the opportunity<br />
to reinforce learning through the concepts taught, as well as<br />
18 Journal of Research<br />
the opportunity to expand on them. This served an even more<br />
important function for students who were absent from class or<br />
who were engaged in external training (athletic) development<br />
programs. One group member even stated that s/he became<br />
too reliant on the podcasts to the detriment of the other course<br />
materials. The group was unanimous about the impact of podcasts<br />
for examination revision and how significant they were in this<br />
process. Access ‘while driving’ and ‘when exercising’ were also<br />
mentioned as positive features of the versatility and convenience of<br />
this technology-‘anywhere, anytime’ was the anthem reverberating<br />
around the forum.<br />
The Focus Group interviewees were unanimously of the opinion<br />
that podcasting strengthened the teacher-student relationship and<br />
was therefore indispensible. The group believed podcasting was<br />
an excellent way to interact with students beyond the classroom<br />
and had potential for developing the PE curriculum in schools.<br />
As there was some concern communicated about the access and<br />
availability some pupils might experience, some reservations<br />
about disadvantage were expressed. There was also a question of<br />
managing such a resource when regular PE classes in Singapore<br />
have 40 or more pupils. As each teacher has multiple classes per day,<br />
podcasting will require logistical scrutiny and careful evaluation to<br />
achieve a satisfactory level of feasibility. There might also be a<br />
dissonance in many schools where pupils are not examined in PE,<br />
and the ‘why do we have to think in PE’ brigade would represent<br />
a challenge to be convinced of podcasting’s purpose and value.<br />
Finally, one postgraduate suggested that a compilation of podcasts<br />
and other technological resources in the form of a cd/dvd would<br />
be a wonderful souvenir for a pupil at the end of an academic<br />
year or the end of a school program. This memento would act as<br />
a testament to the experiences acquired, as well as the knowledge<br />
and values espoused, during their PE life in school.<br />
Conclusion and Recommendations<br />
Podcasting was acknowledged by this postgraduate population,<br />
as a significant qualitative success in terms of social, emotional<br />
and pedagogical enhancement. As a technological tool podcasting<br />
provided individual convenience and promoted a strong bond with<br />
the teacher. However, more investigation is necessary to establish<br />
a stronger association to ‘learning’, as this would still appear to<br />
be unclear. Lazzari (2009) used podcasts as a student assessment<br />
tool and this represents a clear extension to the present pedagogy,<br />
taking the form of a regular discourse analysis. Although examining<br />
podcasting for grades is a possible consideration in the future, this<br />
could easily impact on the strong social and emotional dimensions<br />
of engagement that were an outcome of this intervention; and, at<br />
the time of the study direct assessment was not an intended purpose<br />
of its efficacy.<br />
References<br />
Abt, G., & Barry, T. (2007). The quantitative effect of students using<br />
podcast in a first year undergraduate exercise physiology module.<br />
Bioscience Education e-journal, 10-8.<br />
Campbell, G. (2005). There’s something in the air: Podcasting in education,<br />
EDUCAUSE Review, 40(6), 33-46.<br />
Cann, A. J. (2007). Podcasting is dead. Long live video! Bioscience<br />
Education e-journal, 10-c1.<br />
Curriculum Planning and Development Division (1999). Revised physical
Podcasting in PETE<br />
education syllabus for primary, secondary & pre-university levels.<br />
Ministry of Education, Singapore.<br />
Deal, A. (2007). Podcasting. In Teaching with technologies papers.<br />
Carnegie Mellon University. Retrieved from: http:// www.cmu.<br />
edu/teaching/resources/PublicationsArchives/StudiesWhitepapers/<br />
Podcasting_Jun07.pdf<br />
den Duyn, N. (1997). Game sense: Developing thinking players. Canberra,<br />
Australian 21 Sports Commission.<br />
Evans, C. (2007). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast<br />
revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education, 50(2),<br />
491-498.<br />
Gillespie, R. (1991). Manufacturing knowledge: A history of the Hawthorne<br />
experiments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.<br />
Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (2006). Learner’s styles helper’s guide.<br />
Maidenhead, UK: Peter Honey.<br />
Kutz, B. L., Fenwick, J. B., & Ellsworth, C. C. (2007). Using podcasts and<br />
tablet PCs in computer science. In Proceedings of the 45 th annual ACM<br />
Southeast regional conference. Winston-Salem, NC, USA.<br />
Launder, A. G. (2001). Play Practice: The games approach to teaching<br />
and coaching sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.<br />
Lazzari, M. (2009). Creative use of podcasting in higher education and its<br />
effect on competitive agency, Computers & Education, 52, 27-34.<br />
Malan, D. (2007). Podcasting computer science E-1. In Proceedings of<br />
the 38 th ACM technical symposium on computer science education<br />
(SIGCSE ’07). Covington, KY, USA.<br />
Metzler, M. W. (2005). Instructional models for physical education (2nd<br />
ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway.<br />
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobsen, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom:<br />
Teacher expectations and pupils’ intellectual development. New York,<br />
NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.<br />
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new<br />
reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.<br />
Siedentop, D., Hastie, P., & van der Mars, H. (2004). Complete guide to<br />
sport education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.<br />
The Media Group, Nielsen Media Index. Weekend Today (24-25 October,<br />
2009) Nielsen Company, Singapore.<br />
Thorpe, R., & Bunker, D. (1986). Landmarks on our way to ‘Teaching<br />
for Understanding’. In R. Thorpe, D. Bunker, & L. Almond (Eds.)<br />
Rethinking Games Teaching (pp.5-6) Loughborough: University of<br />
Technology. !<br />
volume 5, issue 1 19
Validating Pedometer-based Physical Activity<br />
Time against Accelerometer in Middle School<br />
Physical Education<br />
by Zan Gao, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX; Amelia M. Lee,<br />
Melinda A. Solmon, Maria Kosma, Russell L. Carson, Louisiana<br />
State University, Baton Rouge, LA; Tao Zhang, University of <strong>No</strong>rth<br />
Texas, Denton, TX; Elizabeth Domangue and Delilah Moore,<br />
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA<br />
Abstract<br />
The purpose of this study was to validate physical activity time<br />
in middle school physical education as measured by pedometers in<br />
relation to a criterion measure, namely, students’ accelerometerdetermined<br />
moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA).<br />
Participants were 155 sixth to eighth graders participating in<br />
regularly scheduled physical education classes from a suburban<br />
public school. Physical activity levels were measured by Yamax<br />
pedometers and Actical accelerometers. Descriptive analyses were<br />
conducted to calculate steps per minute (SPM) for pedometers and<br />
time engaged in MVPA (TMVPA) and percentage of time engaged<br />
in MVPA (PMVPA) for accelerometers, respectively. Correlation<br />
analyses yielded that SPM were positively and significantly related<br />
to TMVPA and PMVPA. Additionally, the percentage of agreement<br />
and modified kappa between SPM and PMVPA were .45 and .24,<br />
respectively. In conclusion, pedometer-based SPM is a valid tool<br />
to survey physical activity time against accelerometers.<br />
Key words: moderate to vigorous physical activity, physical<br />
activity levels, steps per minute<br />
The number of children and adolescents in the United States who<br />
are overweight and obese has dramatically increased. Specifically,<br />
the percentage of female children and adolescents who are<br />
overweight has increased dramatically from 13.8% in 1999-2000<br />
to 16.0% in 2003-2004. Similarly, the percentage of male children<br />
and adolescents who are overweight has increased from 14.0% to<br />
18.2% during the same period (Ogden et al., 2006). The increased<br />
levels of overweight and obesity among children and adolescents<br />
are partly related to decreased levels of activity (Levin, McKenzie,<br />
Hussey, Kelder, & Lytle, 2001; Ogden et al., 2006). Children’s<br />
physical activity levels tend to decline during the developmental<br />
years, especially during middle school (Parish & Treasure, 2003).<br />
For example, 61.5% of children aged 9-13 years do not participate<br />
in any organized extracurricular physical activities, and 22.6% of<br />
them do not engage in any free time physical activity (Centers for<br />
Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2003; U.S. Department of<br />
Health and Human Services [USDHHS], 1996). Although decline<br />
of physical activity in middle school years has been evident,<br />
carefully designed research can assist teachers to develop strategies<br />
that will reverse this trend and create a culture that values physical<br />
activity and realizes its full benefits.<br />
Nearly all adolescents in school settings can participate in<br />
physical activity through physical education programs for health<br />
and wellness (e.g., maintaining healthy body composition) (Levin<br />
20 Journal of Research<br />
et al., 2001; Simons-Morton, O’Hara, Parcel, Baranowski, &<br />
Wilson, 1990; USDHHS, 1996; World Health Organization,<br />
1996). Given that physical activity during adolescence tracks<br />
into adulthood to a certain degree, and the fact that an important<br />
health objective of Healthy People <strong>2010</strong> is to promote students’<br />
active participation in physical education classes to at least 50%<br />
of the class time (USDHHS, 2000), structured physical education<br />
programs represent an important avenue to promote school-based<br />
physical activities of moderate-to-vigorous intensity (Simons-<br />
Morton et al., 1990). Accordingly, effectively delivering physical<br />
education to school children becomes extremely imperative among<br />
physical educators. The ability to accurately measure physical<br />
activity levels in physical education class and classify these levels<br />
would facilitate an evaluation of the effectiveness of structured<br />
physical education programs.<br />
To date, several different instruments for the assessment<br />
of physical activity levels exist. Self-report physical activity<br />
instruments have been scarcely used among children because of<br />
such limitations as high cognitive demanding for children and the<br />
sporadic nature of children’s physical activity. Direct observation is<br />
considered one excellent way to assess children’s physical activity<br />
behavior (Kohl, Fulton, & Caspersen, 2000; Scruggs, Beveridge, &<br />
Clocksin, 2005; Sirard & Pate, 2001). However, direct observation<br />
in physical education settings is cumbersome because it is costly<br />
and it requires high expertise and long measurement time periods<br />
(Scruggs et al., 2005; Sirard & Pate, 2001). Heart rate monitors<br />
have been widely used to measure physical activity in physical<br />
education because of the linear relationship between heart rate and<br />
energy expenditure during steady-state exercise (Stratton, 1996).<br />
However, they are unable to accurately distinguish between light<br />
and moderate-intensity activities and record frequency of activity<br />
within a limited time frame (Hands, Parker, & Larkin, 2006).<br />
The accuracy of heart rate monitors can also be affected by such<br />
environmental factors as temperature, heat, and humidity.<br />
As motion sensors, pedometers and accelerometers are<br />
considered practical, objective, and valid assessments of<br />
physical activity (Sirard & Pate, 2001). These instruments have<br />
advantages such as minimal participant and experimenter burden<br />
for the researchers; being unobtrusive to the subjects; and being<br />
comfortable and acceptable for the subjects to wear. Pedometers<br />
count the number of steps an individual takes by lifting the lever arm<br />
mechanically or electrically or using a piezoelectric strain gauge<br />
(e.g., New Lifestyles NL-1000). Accelerometers are designed to<br />
assess total ambulatory activity levels and thus they provide an<br />
estimate of energy expenditure (Ainsworth, 2000; Bassett, 2000;<br />
Westerterp, 1999). Pedometers are less expensive (approximately<br />
$20-$50) than accelerometers (e.g., approximately $100-$500),<br />
they can measure the number of steps during a designated time<br />
period, record distance, and provide estimated calories. In<br />
comparison, accelerometers can provide very detailed information
Middle School Physical Activity<br />
regarding the intensity (sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous)<br />
of time spent at different intensity levels, and estimated energy<br />
expenditure. In general, these motion sensors can accurately<br />
measure physical activity among children in real world settings<br />
(e.g., physical education). However, they are not efficient to<br />
capture activity levels during such activities as stationary cycling<br />
and weightlifting (Freedson & Miller, 2000; Sirard & Pate, 2001).<br />
<strong>No</strong>wadays, the pedometer has been utilized as an activity<br />
surveillance tool in physical education as it holds the most<br />
promise for implementation due to validity, cost, and practicality<br />
(e.g., daily use) (Scruggs, 2007a, 2007b). Most recently, Scruggs<br />
and colleagues have established a pedometer steps per minute<br />
(SPM) guideline to quantify students’ time engaged in physical<br />
activity in physical education (Scruggs, 2007a, 2007b; Scruggs,<br />
Beveridge, Eisenman, Watson, Schultz, & Ransdell, 2003;<br />
Scruggs, Beveridge, Watson, & Clocksin, 2005). In particular,<br />
these scholars have quantified the minimum SPM values indicating<br />
50% of the lesson time in physical activity. Specifically, Scruggs<br />
and colleagues examined the number of pedometer-based steps<br />
equivalent to one third of the lesson time first through sixth-grade<br />
students engaged in during physical activity and determined 58-<br />
63 SPM was an accurate indicator. Using the lesson time of 42 to<br />
50 minutes, Scruggs et. al. (2007b) also specified a SPM interval<br />
of 82-88 for seventh and eighth graders to comply with the 50%<br />
physical activity recommendation. In their studies, pedometer<br />
SPM and duration recorded physical activity via the System for<br />
Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT) (McKenzie, Sallis,<br />
& Nader, 1999) have been found to relate strongly, r = .74 to .89.<br />
These empirically derived SPM indices across different grade<br />
levels set scientifically sound application of physical education<br />
physical activity guidelines for the researchers and practitioners<br />
in the field. However, the validity of the pedometer-based physical<br />
activity outputs (e.g., SPM) against criterion measures remains<br />
largely unexplored. Further research in this area of inquiry is<br />
highly warranted.<br />
Researchers have demonstrated that accelerometer-determined<br />
physical activity levels had a higher correlation with VO 2<br />
max<br />
scores than heart rate- or pedometer-determined physical activity<br />
levels among school children (Eston, Rowlands, & Ingledew,<br />
1998; Louie et al., 1999). Accelerometer-determined physical<br />
activity levels have been marginally better correlated with physical<br />
activity scores measured by direct observation than with heart<br />
rate-determined physical activity levels among young children<br />
(Scruggs, Beveridge, & Clocksin, 2005). Furthermore, due to the<br />
intrusiveness of direct observation, unreliability of self-report<br />
measures, the complexity of heart rate analysis, and limited outputs<br />
of the pedometer, accelerometers have gained in popularity and<br />
have been recommended as a valid and practical tool to measure<br />
physical activity levels (Puyau, Adolph, Vohra, Zakeri & Butte,<br />
2004; Sirard & Pate, 2001). Indeed, many researchers consider it<br />
a criterion against which other measures of physical activity can<br />
be validated (Behrens, Hawkins, & Dinger, 2005; Ward, Evenson,<br />
Vaughn, Rodges, & Troiano, 2005). Therefore, in the present<br />
study the Actical accelerometer was used as the criterion measure<br />
because it uses an omnidirectional sensor that may capture some<br />
activities not typically well assessed by accelerometer. Actical<br />
accelerometer contains a cantilevered rectangular piezo-electric<br />
bimorph plate and seismic mass, which is sensitive to movement<br />
in all directions. Its sensitivity allows for detection of sedentary<br />
movements as well as high intensity movements (Puyau et al.,<br />
2004).<br />
To our knowledge, there is a need to examine the validity of the<br />
pedometer-based outputs against criterion measures in the field of<br />
physical activity. However, no data are available which validate<br />
pedometer outputs against accelerometer-determined physical<br />
activity concurrently in measuring children’s MVPA, especially in<br />
middle school physical education settings. Therefore, the purpose<br />
of the present study was to validate one pedometer output, SPM,<br />
as a measure of students’ physical activity using accelerometerdetermined<br />
MVPA as the criterion. SPM was validated against<br />
accelerometer-determined outputs including time engaged in<br />
MVPA (TMVPA) and percentage of time engaged in MVPA<br />
(PMVPA). It was hypothesized that SPM would correlate strongly<br />
with both TMVPA and PMVPA and be a significant and accurate<br />
measure of PMVPA.<br />
Method<br />
The Participants and Setting<br />
The participants were 225 sixth - eighth graders (112 boys,<br />
113 girls) enrolled in one public school in the Southern region of<br />
the United States. The typical class size was 30 to 35 students.<br />
Twenty-five students were randomly selected as participants for<br />
each class. In the present study, each grade level consisted of three<br />
intact classes, including 75 sixth graders, 75 seventh graders, and<br />
75 eighth graders, respectively. The majority of the participants<br />
were from families of middle to high socioeconomic status. The<br />
participants had a 90-minute physical education class taught by<br />
three certified physical education teachers on alternate days. Given<br />
the time allotted for dress change and roll check, approximately 60<br />
minutes was typically devoted to the physical education lesson.<br />
All the teachers had taught for more than 10 years and they shared<br />
the responsibility for the teaching assignments in the three classes<br />
of each grade. Permission to conduct this study was obtained from<br />
the university institutional review board, the school district, the<br />
principal, and the physical education teachers. Additionally, consent<br />
to participate in the study was obtained from all participants and<br />
their parents/guardians prior to the start of the study.<br />
When students arrived in the gym, the physical education<br />
teachers took attendance. Then the students participated in warmup,<br />
activities, and games. Typically, within each lesson component,<br />
students were introduced to the skills to be learned, organized for<br />
practice, and provided feedback when necessary. All classes ended<br />
with a closure to the lesson. The learning activities consisted of<br />
catch/kick ball (n = 66, n = participants), walking/jogging (n =<br />
25), line dance (n = 18), soccer (n = 29), and table tennis (n =<br />
17) during the time of data collection. Classes were held indoors<br />
for catch/kick ball, line dance, and table tennis and outdoors for<br />
walking/jogging and soccer. For the catch/kick ball, table tennis,<br />
and walking/jogging units, no formal instructions were given.<br />
However, in the line dance unit, students spent approximately 10<br />
minutes practicing. Additionally, it is important to note that students<br />
were divided into two or more groups of 8-9 students per squads<br />
based on their sex (single sex groups) after the warm-up in the<br />
soccer unit. For this unit, instructions and basic rules were given<br />
volume 5, issue 1 21
Middle School Physical Activity<br />
by the physical education teachers before the start of this study.<br />
Every 15 minutes, the squads switched side of the playing field. At<br />
the start of each class, the physical education teachers reinforced<br />
the game rules and then allowed the games to commence following<br />
the warm-up activities. As a result, no formal instruction was given<br />
throughout the class.<br />
Measures<br />
This study involved the simultaneous monitoring of physical<br />
activity by two objective instruments: (a) Yamax Digi-Walker SW-<br />
701 (Yamax Inc., Tokyo, Japan); and (b) Actical activity monitor<br />
(Mini-Mitter Co., Inc., Bend, OR). A total of 25 units of each<br />
instrument were used in this study, allowing all the participants<br />
in a class to be monitored simultaneously. Self-report information<br />
on sex, race, grade, age, height, and weight were also obtained to<br />
characterize the study sample.<br />
Pedometer. The Yamax Digi-Walker SW-701 has been shown<br />
to be an accurate pedometer for measuring adolescents’ physical<br />
activity levels in field settings (Scruggs, 2007a, 2007b; Scruggs,<br />
et al., 2005). This pedometer can record steps, calculate distance<br />
traveled on the basis of individual stride length, and estimate<br />
caloric expenditure on the basis of total body weight. In this<br />
study, only the step-count data were used. Before the initiation<br />
of data collection, the pedometers were validated. The validation<br />
followed Vincent and Sidman’s recommended procedure (2003).<br />
Specifically, the pedometer was shaken vertically 100 times and<br />
then the error between shaken and recorded steps was examined<br />
for each pedometer. Deviation from the 100 shakes for all<br />
pedometers was less than 5%. The validation demonstrated that<br />
the pedometers could provide accurate step counts. Pedometer step<br />
output was expressed as SPM, which was calculated by dividing<br />
the total number of steps taken in class by the duration of the class<br />
(Scruggs, et al., 2005). The students were advised to reset the<br />
pedometers to zero at the beginning of the warm-up, and turn in<br />
the pedometers at the end of the class.<br />
Accelerometer. The Actical accelerometer is one of the smallest<br />
accelerometers available (28 x 27 x 10 mm, 17 grams with a<br />
watch battery), and is also water resistant. In this study, the Actical<br />
devices were worn at each student’s hip, and recorded physical<br />
activity counts using 15-second epochs. The sampling frequency<br />
for the Actical devices was 32 Hz, and the sensitivity was 0.01<br />
g. The devices collected motions in the frequency range of 0.5-<br />
3.0 Hz. That is, voltage generated by the sensor is amplified and<br />
filtered by analog circuitry. The amplified and filtered voltage<br />
is passed into an analog to digital converter, and this process is<br />
repeated 32 times per second. The resulting one second value is<br />
divided by four, and then is added to an accumulated activity value<br />
for the epoch. Actical devices were programmed and downloaded<br />
by connecting the monitor to a serial port computer interface using<br />
ActiReaders. Once data were downloaded to the corresponding<br />
software, data files were exported into a Microsoft Excel format<br />
(Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA).<br />
Cut points established by Puyau et al. (2004) were applied to<br />
the data: (a) 0-99 counts per min. = sedentary; (b) 100-1499 counts<br />
per min. = light; and (c) ! 1500 counts per min. = moderate to<br />
vigorous physical activity. According to Puyau et al. (2004), optimal<br />
thresholds for classifying counts into sedentary, light, moderate<br />
and vigorous levels of physical activity have been determined<br />
22 Journal of Research<br />
by regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Data<br />
were categorized into sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous<br />
levels based upon the thresholds as follows: (a) sedentary level<br />
was defined as activity energy expenditure (AEE) less than .01<br />
kcal·kg -1·min -1 , encompassing physical activities of minimal body<br />
movements in the sitting or reclined position; (b) light level was<br />
set as AEE larger than .01 kcal·kg -1·min -1 and less than .04 kcal·kg -<br />
1·min -1 , reflecting a low level of exertion in the standing position;<br />
and (c) moderate and vigorous level was set at AEE larger than .04<br />
kcal·kg -1·min -1 , involving medium and high levels of exertion in<br />
the standing position. The Actical cut points were then calculated<br />
based on the AEE cutoffs and the prediction equations.<br />
Most recently, researchers have demonstrated acceptable validity<br />
and reliability of Actical activity monitors when used with children<br />
(Pfeiffer, McIver, Dowda, Almeida, & Pate, 2006; Puyau et al.,<br />
2004). For example, Puyau et al. (2004) validated Actical activity<br />
monitors as measures of children’s (7-18 yrs.) physical activity<br />
using energy expenditure as the criterion measure. They found<br />
that activity counts accounted for the majority of the variability in<br />
activity energy expenditure (as basal metabolic rate) and physical<br />
activity ratio (energy expenditure/basal metabolic rate), with small<br />
contributions of age, sex, weight, and height. Pfeiffer et al. (2006)<br />
also provided strong support for the validation for this monitor by<br />
revealing a high correlation (r = .89) between VO 2<br />
and activity<br />
counts.<br />
Given that longer epochs are unable to detect bursts of high<br />
activity counts (Nilsson, Ekelund, Yngve, & Sjöstrom, 2002)<br />
and the aims of this study, the Actical monitors were set to 15-<br />
second epochs in order to better capture the short bursts of activity<br />
typical of school children (Pfeiffer et al., 2006). In this study,<br />
students’ time engaged in MVPA (TMVPA) was used as the first<br />
outcome variable. The second outcome variable (i.e., percentage<br />
of time engaged in MVPA [PMVPA]) was quantified as the time<br />
students engaged in MVPA divided by the duration of the physical<br />
education class (Arnett & Lutz, 2003). These outcome variables<br />
were retrieved from the Actical outputs directly.<br />
Procedures<br />
Data collection took place during a typical instructional day<br />
for one physical education class. A schedule was coordinated with<br />
the physical education teachers for the data collection so as to not<br />
interrupt instructional time. One accelerometer and one pedometer<br />
were attached to the left side of students’ waistband, before the<br />
beginning of class. Each student was assigned an identification<br />
number which corresponded to the number on his or her waistband.<br />
The waistbands with the attached monitors (accelerometers and<br />
pedometers) were then distributed to students when the teachers<br />
were taking roll. The researchers helped the students wear the<br />
waistbands and verified that they fit closely around their waists.<br />
Then the students reset the pedometers to zero. At the end of<br />
each class, the students were told to return the accelerometers<br />
and pedometers to the start location by placing the waistband on<br />
the floor (i.e., visual cue to stop lesson time). Accelerometer and<br />
pedometer data were collected concurrently by synchronizing<br />
accelerometers. In other words, accelerometer time began with<br />
pedometer reset and concluded with waistband removal. In this<br />
way, all the data from the two objective instruments reflected an<br />
identical time frame.
Middle School Physical Activity<br />
Data Analyses<br />
Means and standard deviations were generated for age,<br />
body mass index (BMI), and physical activity measures (SPM,<br />
TMVPA, and PMVPA). Percentage statistics were calculated<br />
to describe the proportion of participants who achieved and did<br />
not achieve physical activity guideline compliance for SPM and<br />
PMVPA. Pearson product-moment correlations and coefficients of<br />
determination were used to determine the concurrent validity of the<br />
instruments for the total sample. The general cutoffs established<br />
for correlation coefficients were set as follows: above .76 is high,<br />
.51 to .75 is fair, .26 to .50 is moderate, and .25 and below are<br />
weak (Berg & Latin, 1994). Percentage of agreement and modified<br />
kappa (Landis & Koch, 1977) were obtained after dichotomizing<br />
the data for meeting or not meeting 50% of lesson time for SPM<br />
and PMVPA. According to Landis and Koch (1977), modified<br />
kappa value above .61 is substantial, .41 to .60 is moderate, .21<br />
to .40 is fair, and .20 and below are weak. All statistical analyses<br />
were performed using SPSS statistical software, version 13.0<br />
(SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).<br />
Results<br />
Univariate outliers were detected by transforming the data to z-<br />
scores. Following a recommendation of Stevens (1992), when the<br />
sample size is relatively large (e.g., n >100), any z value greater<br />
than + 4.00 or less than – 4.00 indicates an unlikely value and this<br />
extreme value should be considered an outlier. If the researcher<br />
determines that the extreme value was correctly entered and that<br />
the subject is simply different from the rest of the sample, then it is<br />
appropriate to drop the case from the analysis (Mertler & Vannatta,<br />
2005). In the present study, nine univariate outliers and 61 missing<br />
data were identified and excluded from the study. Therefore, the<br />
final sample size comprised 155 students (80 boys, 75 girls). The<br />
participants consisted of sixth (28.4%), seventh (34.8%), and<br />
eighth (36.8%) graders ranging in age from 10 to 14 years (M age<br />
= 12.52, SD = 1.02). The majority of the participants, 88.4%, were<br />
Caucasian, 7.7% were African American, 2.6% were Hispanic<br />
American, and 1.3% were Asian American. The average BMI was<br />
19.79 kg·m -2 , with a range of 14.01 kg·m -2 to 32.11 kg·m -2 .<br />
Table 1 shows the descriptive statistics for the whole sample.<br />
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics among Variables (N = 155)<br />
Minimum Maximum Mean SD<br />
age 10 14 12.48 1.01<br />
Body mass index 14.01 32.11 19.81 3.10<br />
Steps per minute 19.2 104.68 52.99 20.36<br />
Time in MVPA 2.00 57.00 39.96 10.29<br />
Percentage of<br />
time in sedentary .00 61.67 8.86 9.56<br />
Percentage of time<br />
in light intensity .00 58.33 24.25 11.83<br />
Percentage of<br />
time in MVPA 3.34 92.20 66.89 17.02<br />
<strong>No</strong>tes. SD = Standard Deviation.<br />
MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity.<br />
Overall, the students spent 66.89% of the class time engaged<br />
in MVPA as measured via accelerometer. Among them, 85.8% of<br />
the students spent more than 50% of the lesson time in MVPA. In<br />
addition, the physical education classes provided a mean MVPA<br />
for more than 50% of the class time for the students across all<br />
learning activities (i.e., catch/kick ball: 62.99%, walking/jogging:<br />
77.09%, line dance: 59.37%, soccer: 78.84%, and table tennis:<br />
54.63%). In terms of the pedometer SPM, 44.5% of the students<br />
achieved physical activity guideline established by Scruggs<br />
(2007a, 2007b).<br />
The relationship between SPM and PMVPA was significant (p<br />
< .01) and fair (r = .57). The pedometer data shared 32.49% of<br />
variance with PMVPA. Similarly, SPM was positively related to<br />
TMVPA (r = .55, p < .01), accounting for 30.25% of variance with<br />
TMVPA. After dichotomizing the SPM data for meeting or not<br />
meeting 50% of lesson time based on Scruggs’ physical activity<br />
guideline (Scruggs, 2007a, 2007b), the percentage of agreement<br />
and modified kappa between SPM and PMVPA were .45 and .24,<br />
respectively.<br />
Discussion<br />
Validating the assessment of the 50% of lesson time in MVPA<br />
recommendation using pedometers in middle school physical<br />
education was the primary purpose of this study. Students’<br />
accelerometer-based MVPA (TMVPA and PMVPA) were used<br />
as a criterion instead of physical activity time measured via<br />
direct observation. Evidence has shown a decline in students’<br />
physical activity levels across the middle school years (Aaron,<br />
Storti, Robertson, Kriska, & LaPorte, 2002; Parish & Treasure,<br />
2003), therefore there is a call for providing adequate schoolbased<br />
structured physical education for all middle school<br />
students (National Association for Sport and Physical Education<br />
[NASPE], 2000; USDHHS, 1996). Middle school students should<br />
accumulate enough physical activity to at least achieve the 50%<br />
physical education class time recommendation. In this study,<br />
85.5% of the students met or exceeded the 50% of the lesson<br />
time engaged in MVPA when the activities were assessed via<br />
accelerometer. Recently, Scruggs (2007b) reported that 68.9%<br />
of middle school students enrolled in physical education met the<br />
50% physical activity recommendation. Accordingly, this result of<br />
this study echoes the recommendations indicating that 50% of the<br />
physical education time should involve MVPA (CDC, 2004; Sallis<br />
& Patrick, 1994) and is consistent with recent research (Arnett &<br />
Lutz, 2003; Scruggs, 2007b).<br />
It is assumed that, if students accumulated more pedometer<br />
steps in class, they would be more physically active. In this<br />
study, the pedometer outcome variables (SPM) were consistently<br />
significantly and positively associated with TMVPA and PMVPA.<br />
That is, those students with higher SPM tended to engage more<br />
in MVPA in class. This finding is in line with recent studies<br />
indicating that pedometer outputs were positively and moderately<br />
related to accelerometer data (Behrens, Hawkins, & Dinger, 2005;<br />
Treuth et al., 2003). In addition, we dichotomized the SPM data<br />
for meeting or not meeting 50% of lesson time according to the<br />
physical activity guideline established by Scruggs (Scruggs,<br />
2007a, 2007b) and found that percentage of agreement and<br />
modified kappa between SPM and PMVPA was good. This<br />
volume 5, issue 1 23
Middle School Physical Activity<br />
finding indicates that the pedometer SPM guideline is valid to<br />
quantify students’ time engaged in MVPA in physical education.<br />
Taken together, the finding supports the notion that a pedometer<br />
is a valid assessment tool to measure school children’s physical<br />
activity levels (Kilanowski, Consalvi, & Epstein, 1999; Rowlands,<br />
Eston, & Ingledew, 1997). Given their low prices and easiness to<br />
use, pedometers have been extensively employed as a valid and<br />
practical tool for physical activity surveillance within the physical<br />
education context (Scruggs, et al., 2005).<br />
In this study, 45.5% of middle school students engaged in<br />
pedometer-determined MVPA for more than 50% of the lesson<br />
time using Scruggs’ guideline (Scruggs, 2007a, 2007b). It should<br />
also be noted that correlations between SPM and the criterion<br />
measures (.55 to .57) were slightly lower than those in Scruggs<br />
and colleagues’ studies (.74 to .89). We can speculate two<br />
explanations. First, when interpreting SPM results, Scruggs et al.<br />
(2005) suggested that application be made when physical education<br />
parameters of grade, lesson time, and learning content are similar.<br />
In their studies, 10 minutes of lesson time were used for elementary<br />
students, while 42-50 minutes were used for the middle school<br />
students (Scruggs, 2007a, 2007b; Scruggs et al., 2003; Scruggs, et<br />
al., 2005). However, in the present study 60 minutes of the lesson<br />
time was used which includes warm-up, activities, and games.<br />
Different lesson times might make a significant difference in terms<br />
of MVPA between studies. In addition, the learning content may<br />
also influence students’ MVPA in physical education (Fairclough<br />
& Stratton, 2006). In general, team-based invasion games (i.e.,<br />
soccer and football) usually promote relatively high MVPA levels.<br />
In Scruggs’ studies (2007a, 2007b), a large variety of activities<br />
such as basketball, speedball, archery, interval running, soccer,<br />
flag football, volleyball, ball exploration and routine, dance,<br />
floor hockey, hula-hoop exploration and routine, obstacle course,<br />
paddle birdie, and ultimate ball/Frisbee were utilized as learning<br />
contents for physical education classes. In this study, only five<br />
learning contents (catch/kick ball, walking/jogging, dance, soccer,<br />
and table tennis) were used which might result in different MVPA<br />
for students. Second, the criterion measures for Scruggs and<br />
colleagues’ studies and our study were different. Scruggs et al.<br />
(Scruggs, 2007a, 2007b; Scruggs et al., 2003; Scruggs, et al., 2005)<br />
used direct observation as the criterion measure to assess MVPA.<br />
Although the interrater coefficients have been substantiated in<br />
their studies, the MVPA generated from direct observation was<br />
subjective and sometimes inaccurate. In this study, we used the<br />
Actical accelerometer which can capture MVPA accurately and<br />
reliably. It is plausible that the use of different criterion measures<br />
might cause the different correlations between SPM and the<br />
criterion measures.<br />
In summary, the findings of this study support the supposition<br />
that pedometer-based SPM is a valid tool to survey the 50%<br />
physical activity recommendation in comparison to accelerometerdetermined<br />
MVPA in a middle school physical education setting. As<br />
expected, pedometer outcome variable (SPM) was a good indicator<br />
of school children’s MVPA in class. Because the pedometer is<br />
low cost, objective, and easy for researchers and teachers to use<br />
and implement, physical educators and health promoters can use<br />
pedometers to capture changes in physical activity levels (i.e.,<br />
MVPA) following different interventions in educational practice.<br />
24 Journal of Research<br />
Important study limitations, however, should be identified when<br />
interpreting the results. First, when the nature of physical activity<br />
cannot be captured by the pedometer, additional errors would occur<br />
in the estimation of time engaged in MVPA in physical education.<br />
Therefore, the pedometer SPM recommendations should not<br />
be applied when learning contents are activities that cannot be<br />
measured by pedometer (e.g., swimming, weight lifting, and rock<br />
climbing). Scruggs (2007a) has proposed that there is a need to<br />
develop a physical activity assessment tool which combines<br />
pedometer-assessed physical activity and self-report of activity<br />
content. In this way, the odds of misapplication of pedometer SPM<br />
recommendation in physical education can be decreased. Second,<br />
researchers (e.g., Stratton, 1996; Vincent & Pangrazi, 2002) have<br />
reported that students differ in their physical activity levels in<br />
physical education classes across different gender and age groups.<br />
However, the gender and age differences were not examined in this<br />
study. Future studies might focus on the moderate effects of gender<br />
and age on children’s MVPA in physical education. Additionally,<br />
only one middle school was used in this study. The participants<br />
came from middle to upper-middle class families and their ethnic/<br />
racial background was homogeneous. Future studies need to<br />
recruit a large number of diverse students (in both socioeconomic<br />
status and ethnicity/race) from multiple school sites to increase the<br />
generalizability of the findings.<br />
References<br />
Aaron, D.J., Storti, K.L., Robertson, R.J., Kriska, A.M., & LaPorte, R.E.<br />
(2002). Longitudinal study of the number and choice of leisure time<br />
physical activities from mid to late adolescence. Archives of Pediatric<br />
& Adolescent Medicine, 156, 1075-1080.<br />
Ainsworth, B. (2000). Practical assessment of physical activity. In K.A.<br />
Tritschler (Ed.), Barrow & McGee’s practical measurement and<br />
assessment (5th ed., pp. 475-492). Baltimore: Lippincott.<br />
Arnett, M.C., & Lutz, R.B. (2003). Measurement of moderate to vigorous<br />
physical activity of middle school girls, using Tritrac activity monitors<br />
during small-sided, game-based lessons. Measurement in Physical<br />
Education & Exercise Science, 7, 149-159.<br />
Bassett, D.R., Jr. (2000). Validity and reliability issues in objective<br />
monitoring of physical activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise &<br />
Sport, 71(Suppl.2), 30-36.<br />
Behrens, T.K., Hawkins, S.B., & Dinger, M.K. (2005). Relationship<br />
between objectively measured steps and time spent in physical<br />
activity among free-living college students. Measurement in Physical<br />
Education & Exercise Science, 9, 67-77.<br />
Berg, K. E., & Latin, R. W. (1994). Essentials of modern research methods<br />
in health, physical education, and recreation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:<br />
Prentice-Hall.<br />
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2003). Physical activity<br />
levels among children aged 9-13 years-United States, 2002. Morbidity<br />
& Mortality Weekly Report, 52(33), 785-788.<br />
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004). Surveillance<br />
summaries. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, 53(SS-4), 1-96.<br />
Eston, R.G., Rowlands, A.V., & Ingledew, D.K. (1998). Validity of heart<br />
rate, pedometry, and accelerometry for predicting the energy cost of<br />
children’s activities. Journal of Applied Physiology, 84, 362-371.<br />
Fairclough, S.J., & Stratton, G. (2006). A review of physical activity levels<br />
during elementary school physical education. Journal of Teaching in<br />
Physical Education, 25, 239-257.<br />
Freedson, P.S., & Miller, K. (2000). Objective monitoring of physical<br />
activity using motion sensors and heart rate. Research Quarterly for<br />
Exercise & Sport, 71, 21-29.<br />
Hands, B., Parker, H., & Larkin, D. (2006). Physical activity measurement<br />
methods for young children: A comparative study. Measurement in
Middle School Physical Activity<br />
Physical Education & Exercise Science, 10, 203-214.<br />
Kilanowski, C., Consalvi, A., & Epstein, L.H. (1999). Validation of an<br />
electronic pedometer for measurement of physical activity in children.<br />
Pediatric Exercise Science, 11, 63-68.<br />
Kohl, H.W., Fulton, J.E., & Caspersen, C.J. (2000). Assessment of physical<br />
activity among children and adolescents: A review and synthesis.<br />
Preventive Medicine, 31, S54-S76.<br />
Landis, J. & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement<br />
for categorical data. Biometrics, (33), 159-174.<br />
Levin, S., McKenzie, T.L., Hussey, J.R., Kelder, S.H., & Lytle, L.A.<br />
(2001). Variability of physical activity during physical education<br />
lessons across elementary school grades. Measurement in Physical<br />
Education & Exercise Science, 5, 207-218.<br />
Louie, L., Eston, R.G., Rowlands, A.V., Tong, K.K., Ingledew, D.K., &<br />
Fu, F.H. (1999). Validity of heart rate, pedometry, and accelerometry<br />
for estimating the energy cost of activity in Hong Kong. Pediatric<br />
Exercise Science, 11(3), 229-239.<br />
McKenzie, T. L., Sallis, J. F. & Nader, P. R. (1999). SOFIT: System for<br />
observing fitness instruction time. Journal of Teaching in Physical<br />
Education, 11, 195-205.<br />
Mertler, C.A., & Vannatta, R.A. (2005). Advanced and multivariate<br />
statistical methods:Practical application and interpretation. (3rd ed.).<br />
Los Angeles: Pyrczak.<br />
National Association for Sport and Physical Education. (2000). 2000 shape<br />
of the nation report: A survey of state physical education requirements.<br />
Reston, VA: Author.<br />
Nilsson, A., Ekelund, U., Yngve, A., & Sjöstrom, M. (2002). Assessing<br />
physical activity among children with accelerometers during different<br />
time sampling intervals and placements. Pediatric Exercise Science,<br />
14, 87-96.<br />
Ogden, C.L., Carroll, M. D., Curtin, L.R., McDowell, M.A., Tabak, C.<br />
J., & Flegal, K.M. (2006). Prevalence of overweight and obesity in<br />
the United States (1999-2004). Journal of the American Medical<br />
Association, 295, 1549-1555.<br />
Parish, L.E., & Treasure, D.C. (2003). Physical activity and situational<br />
motivation in physical education: Influence of the motivational climate<br />
and perceived ability. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 74,<br />
173-182.<br />
Pfeiffer, K., McIver, K., Dowda, M., Almeida, J., & Pate, R. (2006).<br />
Validity and calibration of the Actical accelerometer in preschool<br />
children. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 38(1), 152-157.<br />
Puyau, M.R., Adolph, A.L., Vohra, F.A., Zakeri, I., & Butte, N.F. (2004).<br />
Prediction of activity energy expenditure using accelerometers in<br />
children. Medicine & Science in Sport & Exercise, 36, 1625-1631.<br />
Rowlands, A.V., Eston, R.B., & Ingledew, D.K., (1997). Measurement<br />
of physical activity in children with particular reference to the use of<br />
heart rate and pedometry. Sports Medicine, 24, 258-272.<br />
Sallis, J.F., & Patrick, K. (1994). Physical activity guidelines for<br />
adolescents: Consensus statement. Pediatric Exercise Science, 6, 302-<br />
314.<br />
Scruggs, P.W. (2007a). Quantifying activity time via pedometry in fifthand<br />
six-grade physical education. Journal of Physical Activity &<br />
Health, 4, 215-227.<br />
Scruggs, P.W. (2007b). Middle school physical education physical activity<br />
quantification: A pedometer steps/min guideline. Research Quarterly<br />
for Exercise & Sport, 78(4), 284-292.<br />
Scruggs, P.W., Beveridge, S.K., & Clocksin, B.D. (2005). Tri-axial<br />
accelerometer and heart rate telemetry: Relation and agreement with<br />
behavioral observation in elementary physical education. Measurement<br />
in Physical Education & Exercise Science, 9, 203-218.<br />
Scruggs, P.W., Beveridge, S.K., Eisenman, P.A., Watson, D.L., Schultz,<br />
B.B., & Ransdell, L.B. (2003). Quantifying physical activity via<br />
pedometry in elementary physical education. Medicine & Science in<br />
Sports & Exercise, 35, 1065-1071.<br />
Scruggs, P.W., Beveridge, S.K., Watson, D.L., & Clocksin, B.D. (2005).<br />
Quantifying physical activity in first- through fourth-grade physical<br />
education via pedometry. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,<br />
76(2), 166-175.<br />
Simons-Morton, B.G., O’Hara, G.S., Parcel, T., Baranowski, T., & Wilson,<br />
B. (1990). Children’s participation in moderate to vigorous physical<br />
activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 61, 307-314.<br />
Sirard, J.R., & Pate, R.R. (2001). Physical activity assessment in children<br />
and adolescents. Sports Medicine, 31(6), 439-454.<br />
Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences<br />
(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.<br />
Stratton, G. (1996). Children’s heart rates during physical education<br />
lessons: A review. Pediatric Exercise Science, 8, 215-233.<br />
Treuth, M. S., Sherwood, N. E., Butte, N. F., McClanahan, B., Obarzanek,<br />
E., Zhou, A., et al.. (2003). Validity and reliability of activity measures<br />
in African-American girls for GEMS. Medicine and Science in Sports<br />
and Exercise, 35, 532-539.<br />
Vincent, S.D., & Pangrazi, R.P. (2002).An examination of the activity<br />
patterns of elementary school children. Pediatric Exercise Science, 14,<br />
432-441.<br />
Vincent, S.D., & Sidman, C.L. (2003). Determining measurement error<br />
in digital pedometers. Measurement in Physical Education & Exercise<br />
Science, 7, 19-24.<br />
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS). (1996).<br />
Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta:<br />
Center for Disease Control and Prevention.<br />
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS). (2000).<br />
Healthy people <strong>2010</strong> (2nd ed., pp.22-28). Washington, DC: U.S.<br />
Government Printing Office.<br />
Ward, D.S., Evenson, K.R., Vaughn, A., Rodges, A.B., & Troiano, R.P.<br />
(2005). Accelerometer use in physical activity: Best practices and<br />
research recommendations. Medicine & Science in Sport & Exercise,<br />
37, S582-S588.<br />
Westerterp, K.R. (1999). Physical activity assessment with accelerometers.<br />
International Journal of Obesity, 23, S45-S49.<br />
World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe. Regional<br />
guidelines: Development of health-promoting schools: A framework<br />
for action. Manila, WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific,1996.<br />
Retrieved 22 January <strong>2010</strong> from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/wpro/1994-<br />
99/a53203.pdf. !<br />
volume 5, issue 1 25
Patterns of Interactions and Behaviors:<br />
Physical Education in Korean Elementary,<br />
Middle, and High Schools<br />
by Jong-Hoon Yu, Ed.D., Canisius College, Buffalo, NY 14208<br />
& Jwa K. Kim, Ph.D., Middle Tennessee State University,<br />
Murfreesboro, TN<br />
Abstract<br />
The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the<br />
differences between elementary, middle, and high school physical<br />
education classes in Korea based on teacher and student behavior<br />
and teacher-student interaction patterns. The subjects who<br />
participated in this study were fifteen certified full-time physical<br />
education teachers at selected schools in Seoul. Teacher and student<br />
behavior and teacher-student interaction patterns were coded using<br />
Cheffers' Adaptation of Flanders' Interaction Analysis System<br />
(CAFIAS). Statistically significant differences in the teacher and<br />
student behaviors among the three school levels were analyzed<br />
using a Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA. Additional multiple comparisons<br />
using the Mann-Whitney U test were employed when significant<br />
differences resulted from the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA among<br />
the three school levels. This study demonstrated that elementary<br />
school physical education classes exhibited more humanistic<br />
behaviors. In contrast, middle school classes were conducted with<br />
a great deal of teacher input and high school classes had a very<br />
structured atmosphere.<br />
Key Words: systematic observation, descriptive data<br />
Historically, educational trends have followed cyclical patterns<br />
reflecting the changing conditions and demands of society. As<br />
the pendulum of educational values has swung back and forth,<br />
two educational philosophies have emerged within the teaching<br />
profession, both claiming to provide the best education for<br />
students. These are the traditional philosophies and the progressive<br />
philosophies.<br />
These two philosophies approach the educational process from<br />
different perspectives. The traditional perspective represents a<br />
top-down approach to the process of teaching and learning, with<br />
the principal role of the teacher to disseminate knowledge and<br />
control the learning process, while students are expected to acquire<br />
objective knowledge by digesting facts and concepts and searching<br />
for correct answers.<br />
In contrast, the progressive perspective presents a bottom-up<br />
approach in which the teacher's role is primarily to encourage<br />
students to pursue their own educational objectives. In this<br />
model, students are taught to generate their own questions and<br />
answers, express their own ideas and thoughts, and seek out their<br />
own solutions to problems rather than simply receiving them from<br />
teachers.<br />
However, in spite of their differing approaches to the<br />
educational process, traditionalists and progressivists share the<br />
same goal, namely to develop the ability of students to reach their<br />
full potential. In both cases, this goal can only be achieved with<br />
26 Journal of Research<br />
quality teaching by competent teachers. Thus, regardless of the<br />
philosophical approach, teachers play an extremely important role<br />
in helping students achieve the intended educational goals. Since<br />
students must learn in an effective manner in order to acquire<br />
knowledge, teachers must provide effective teaching in order for<br />
students to receive a quality education.<br />
As a result, the study of teaching has become a prominent<br />
area of interest in the field of education. As our profession has<br />
progressed, some educational scholars endeavored to study the<br />
art of teaching in a more analytical way and therefore developed<br />
scientific observational techniques to validate their research<br />
(Hilberg, Waxman, & Tharp, 2004; Ornstein, 1986). The use of<br />
observational systems specifically designed to examine a wide<br />
variety of teacher and student behaviors has profoundly affected<br />
research on teaching and teacher training (Rink, 2006; Schempp,<br />
2003; Senne, 2004). Consequently, the teaching process is no<br />
longer viewed as a nebulous, inexplicable interaction between<br />
the teacher and student, but rather a process that can be planned,<br />
systematically observed, and readily assessed.<br />
Research employing observation techniques in the field of<br />
educational studies as a whole has greatly impacted the research<br />
approach of those specifically studying physical education (Lee,<br />
2003; Tinning, Macdonald, Wright, & Hickey, 2001). Various<br />
systematic observation techniques which enable a more objective<br />
investigation of the teaching and learning process have been<br />
developed for the study of physical education. Continued research<br />
efforts employing systematic observation techniques are needed to<br />
pursue previously unexplored teacher behavior variables (Marco,<br />
Mancini, Wuest, & Schempp, 1996).<br />
Since the mid-1980s, South Korean sports pedagogues have<br />
been actively engaged in the study of teaching, making use of<br />
systematic observation techniques. Their findings have made<br />
an invaluable contribution toward our improved understanding<br />
of the current state of formal physical education in South Korea.<br />
However, despite the remarkable achievements made in the field,<br />
the majority of studies to date have concentrated on examining<br />
teacher effectiveness based largely on the amount of time students<br />
spend on task while in physical education classes (e.g., Chang,<br />
1996; Cho, 2003; Choi, 2000; Choi, 2004; Ji, 2008; Kang, 1989;<br />
Kim, Hwang, & Park, 2002; Kim, 2006; Kim, 2000; Kim, 2001;<br />
Kim & Jeong, 1994; Kim, 2005; Ko, 1988; Kwak, 2006; Lee,<br />
2007; Paek & Lee, 2003; Park, 2007; Park, 2001; Park, 2003; Yoo,<br />
1989; Youn, 1994).<br />
As a result, there is an obvious need to broaden this approach<br />
by studying the complex act of teaching in physical education<br />
settings. This study aimed to expand the current body of knowledge<br />
by observing, describing, comparing, and analyzing teacher and<br />
student behaviors as well as teacher and student interaction patterns<br />
among elementary, middle, and high school physical education<br />
classes in South Korea.<br />
Several studies investigating the differences between physical
Patterns of Interactions and Behaviors<br />
education classes at different grade and school levels were done in<br />
the 70s, 80s and 90s. These studies employed a variety of systematic<br />
observation techniques to uncover similarities and differences<br />
across school or grade levels. However, the findings of these<br />
studies were scant, contradictory, and inconclusive. For example,<br />
the studies conducted by Stewart (1977), Morgenegg (1978), and<br />
Lombardo (1979) found that positive teacher behaviors increased<br />
as school or grade level decreased. These results were inconsistent<br />
with those of study conducted by Schempp (1986) who found that<br />
praise or encouragement from the teachers, and acceptance from<br />
the teacher increased as school or grade level increased.<br />
In other studies, Pieron and Hacourt (1979) and Schempp<br />
(1986) found that lecturing from the teachers increased as grade<br />
level increased. However, these findings were contradictory to<br />
those of Anderson and Barrette (1978), Yoon et al. (1996), Cheffers<br />
and Mancini (1978), Lombardo (1979), and Buckett (1983), which<br />
revealed that teacher contribution increased as school or grade<br />
level decreased, and student contribution increased as school or<br />
grade level increased.<br />
Method<br />
Participants<br />
Eleven schools were randomly selected from the five different<br />
school districts in Seoul, South Korea. Of the eleven schools,<br />
fifteen certified full-time elementary (n=5), middle (n=5), and high<br />
(n=5) school physical education teachers volunteered to participate<br />
in the study. All subjects were male teachers, simply because a<br />
significant majority of physical education teachers in South Korea<br />
are male.<br />
In this study, the elementary school classes consisted of one<br />
each of a third, fourth, and fifth grade, and two of sixth grade.<br />
Since physical education in the first and second grades is conducted<br />
alongside music and fine arts as an integrated subject, these grade<br />
levels were not included in the selection of elementary school<br />
physical education classes. Middle school classes were one seventh<br />
grade and two of eighth and ninth grades. High school classes were<br />
one tenth grade and two of eleventh and twelfth grades. Several<br />
activities were shown in both indoor classes and outdoor classes.<br />
For instance, there were two handball, two basketball, one track &<br />
field, one badminton, two gymnastics, one tennis, two volleyball,<br />
one jump rope, and three miscellaneous games.<br />
Instrumentation<br />
Cheffers’ Adaptation of Flanders’ Interaction Analysis System<br />
(CAFIAS) was used as an instrument to identify the dependent<br />
variables in teacher and student behavior as well as teacherstudent<br />
interaction patterns. Cheffers (1972) developed CAFIAS<br />
to allow a clearer and more complete description of direct and<br />
indirect verbal and non-verbal teacher and student behavior as<br />
well as interactions between teachers and students in physical<br />
education classes. The CAFIAS was also employed to analyze<br />
class structure, teaching agencies, and student response behaviors<br />
(Cheffers, Amidon, & Rodgers, 1974). The behaviors classified<br />
by CAFIAS were recorded every three seconds, or whenever the<br />
behaviors changed.<br />
Cheffers (1972) determined the validity of CAFIAS by<br />
comparing "blind" interpretations to "live" interpretation. He<br />
reported a Pearson Product Moment Correlation of .80, which<br />
was converted to a t-ration of 3.5 (p
Patterns of Interactions and Behaviors<br />
top cells for the interaction patterns between teachers and students<br />
for each lesson were extracted from the basic 20X20 matrix in<br />
the computer program. Those cells with the highest percentages<br />
indicated primary interaction patterns.<br />
Data Analysis<br />
Statistically significant differences in the teacher and student<br />
behavior between three school levels were analyzed using<br />
a Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA test, at the .05 level of<br />
significance. Additional multiple comparisons using the Mann-<br />
Whitney U test were employed when significant differences<br />
resulted from the Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA test between the<br />
three school levels. The Bonferroni adjusted level of significance<br />
(p
Patterns of Interactions and Behaviors<br />
Table 2. Summary of the Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA Test and the Mann-Whitney U Test as Multiple Comparisons<br />
for the Differentiation among the Three School Levels According to 12 CAFIAS Parameters<br />
12 CAFIAS Parameters E M H<br />
M SD M SD M SD H P<br />
1 Teacher Contribution, Verbal 27.82 7.89 32.87 7.11 31.11 7.65 1.04 .59<br />
2 Teacher Contribution, <strong>No</strong>nverbal 18.98 7.52 22.63 4.70 20.98 7.54 1.04 .59<br />
3 Total Teacher Contribution 46.81 15.04 55.50 9.16 52.09 14.48 .86 .65<br />
4 Student Contribution, Verbal 19.02 11.25 11.38 3.62 12.61 7.99 1.52 .46<br />
5 Student Contribution, <strong>No</strong>nverbal 32.17 4.82 31.97 6.25 33.73 6.30 .62 .73<br />
6 Total Student Contribution 51.18 14.05 43.35 9.17 46.34 14.01 1.04 .59<br />
7 Teacher as Teacher* 100.00 a<br />
.00 95.14 a,b<br />
3.62 96.49 b<br />
3.25 8.24 .01<br />
8 Other Student as Teacher* .00 a<br />
.00 4.86 a,b<br />
3.62 3.51 b<br />
3.25 8.23 .01<br />
9 The Environment as Teacher .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00<br />
10 Class Structure as One Unit 70.20 40.73 51.30 45.34 68.10 34.35 .40 .81<br />
11 Class Structure as Group or as Individual 29.70 40.82 48.65 45.28 31.90 34.35 .68 .70<br />
12 Class Structure with <strong>No</strong> Teacher Influence .10 .22 .05 .11 .00 .00 1.08 .58<br />
<strong>No</strong>te . E = elementary school classes (n =5); M = middle school classes (n =5); H = high school classes (n =5); M = mean;<br />
SD = standard deviation. Means with different subscripts differ significantly at the Bonferroni adjusted level of significance,<br />
p
Patterns of Interactions and Behaviors<br />
verbal criticism. This suggests high teacher contribution at the<br />
middle school level, meaning that teachers did not allow students<br />
ample time to practice skills in class. Thus, Korean middle school<br />
students seemed to have few opportunities to participate in skills<br />
practice due to increased information giving and direction from<br />
the teacher.<br />
This finding was very similar to the results from study by<br />
Schempp (1986), which found that lecturing from the teachers<br />
increased as grade level increased. Similarly, a study by Pieron and<br />
Hacourt (1979) showed that teacher speech increased with school<br />
level, and student speech increased as school level decreased.<br />
However, this finding did not concur with those of Anderson<br />
and Barrette (1978) and Yoon et al. (1996), where teachers at the<br />
elementary school level spent more time instructing and less time<br />
observing than teachers at the secondary school level. Studies<br />
by Cheffers and Mancini (1978), Lombardo (1979), and Buckett<br />
(1983) also presented results contradictory to those of the current<br />
study, indicating that teacher contribution increased as school or<br />
grade level decreased, and student contribution increased as school<br />
or grade level increased.<br />
Additionally, these Korean elementary school teachers fostered<br />
a humanistic approach emphasizing praise, acceptance of student’s<br />
ideas, and encouragement of student questions. The contribution<br />
exhibited by teachers at the elementary school level included<br />
verbal and nonverbal praising, verbal and nonverbal accepting,<br />
and verbal and nonverbal questioning. The finding is consistent<br />
with previous studies by Stewart (1977), Morgenegg (1978), and<br />
Lombardo (1979), which revealed that positive teacher behaviors<br />
increased as school or grade level decreased. This data contradicts<br />
the findings of Schempp (1986), which showed that praise or<br />
encouragement from the teachers, and acceptance by the teacher<br />
increased as school or grade level increased.<br />
The descriptive data indicated that teacher criticism was<br />
expressed more at the secondary school level. For example,<br />
verbal criticism occurred more often at the high school level while<br />
nonverbal criticism was observed more at the middle school level.<br />
It is assumed that teachers at the Korean middle and high school<br />
levels frequently used verbal and nonverbal criticism in order to<br />
punish and control students. This assumption is supported by<br />
conclusions reached by Kang (1994), who reported that teachers<br />
at the middle school level were more often required to discipline<br />
deviant student behaviors than teachers at the elementary school<br />
level in South Korea.<br />
Students at each school level seemed to be more engaged in<br />
nonverbal than verbal contribution. As a general rule, Korean<br />
school students tended to exhibit nonverbal involvement in physical<br />
education classes. Specifically, students at the elementary school<br />
level showed higher total student contribution than students at the<br />
middle school level, followed by students at the high school level.<br />
The contribution displayed by elementary school students consisted<br />
of predictable verbal and nonverbal responses, analytical verbal<br />
and nonverbal responses, initiated verbal and nonverbal responses,<br />
and confusion. This suggests that the elementary school teachers<br />
allowed students more time to practice skills during lessons.<br />
<strong>No</strong>tably, students at all school levels generally exhibited a low<br />
level of analytical response in the classes. However, students at<br />
the elementary school level showed higher analytical verbal and<br />
30 Journal of Research<br />
nonverbal responses than students at the middle and high school<br />
levels. According to Cheffers, student analytical responses<br />
frequently occur during game-playing. Many lessons conducted<br />
at the Korean elementary school level consisted of game-playing,<br />
which provided opportunities to experience “broad individual<br />
interpretation leading to much wider cognitive activity, with<br />
individual creativity still remaining within the scope of prediction”<br />
(Corbett, Cheffers, & Sullivan, 2001, p. 383).<br />
Particularly, student confusion occurred more often at the<br />
elementary school level than at the middle and high school levels,<br />
while student silence occurred more at the middle and high school<br />
levels. This was largely due to the fact that Korean elementary<br />
school classes were conducted in a more permissive atmosphere,<br />
and as a result, the students were somewhat more disorderly. On<br />
the other hand, the middle and high school classes were presented<br />
in a more teacher-dominated climate, with the students typically<br />
more passive.<br />
Furthermore, this study revealed that Korean physical education<br />
classes represented a poor educational environment in which<br />
a single teacher was responsible for an average of thirty-eight<br />
students. Because of the large class size, teachers had difficulty<br />
encouraging students to be active in class. At the elementary<br />
school level, teachers more frequently acted as the teaching agency<br />
for the whole class. These findings were identical to the findings<br />
of studies conducted by Cheffers and Mancini (1978), Lombardo<br />
(1979), and Jung (1998) where instruction of the whole class was<br />
found to increase as school or grade level decreased. It is assumed<br />
that teacher instruction of the whole class is more effective for<br />
controlling a large class containing some mischievous elementary<br />
school students, since if games were performed in small groups,<br />
the teacher might be too busy to maintain control of the class.<br />
In contrast, teachers at the Korean middle and high school classes<br />
displayed greater use of other students acting as the teaching agency<br />
in small groups. Students in secondary school are more mature<br />
than elementary school students, making it more appropriate for<br />
skills to be developed in a small group arrangement. Lombardo’s<br />
(1979) study also made this observation by indicating that the<br />
use of other students acting as the teaching agency increased as<br />
grade level increased. This behavior was attributed to the fact that<br />
students commonly led preparatory exercises in the beginning of<br />
the class at the Korean middle and high school levels. Moreover,<br />
the students who could perform well were asked to demonstrate<br />
skills, while the teacher provided concurrent commentary.<br />
Meanwhile, some teachers at the elementary and middle school<br />
levels showed no teacher influence on the class structure in this<br />
study. This might be attributed to the fact that one elementary<br />
school teacher forgot to turn off his cellular phone before teaching,<br />
and appeared perplexed while handling the abrupt ringing of his<br />
cellular phone. Later, the teacher received a suddenly delivered<br />
document, and read and signed the document during the class. It<br />
is common for teachers to deal with urgently delivered documents<br />
and notifications even during class periods in South Korea.<br />
Furthermore, one middle school teacher had his lesson interrupted<br />
by a colleague, who asked him to lend him some badminton<br />
feather shuttlecocks. These episodes indicated that teachers did<br />
have significant influence on their classes due to their incautious<br />
behaviors, careless preparation of equipment, and responsibilities
Patterns of Interactions and Behaviors<br />
dealing with suddenly delivered documents. These episodes<br />
seemed to interfere with the continuity of instruction and led to<br />
ineffective teaching and learning processes. Therefore, school<br />
administrators and teachers need to pay attention to creating an<br />
environment in which teachers are more fully engaged in classes.<br />
The most common teacher and student interaction patterns at<br />
the three school levels predominately involved teachers giving<br />
direction and information, while students were primarily in a<br />
listening and obedient responding mode. Specifically, the teacher<br />
and student interaction patterns at the elementary school level<br />
exhibited dominant student predictable verbal and nonverbal<br />
responses. The middle and high school levels exhibited a similar<br />
command style of interaction. The interaction displayed by the<br />
middle school level combined extended teacher direction, lecture,<br />
and student predictable nonverbal responses, while the high school<br />
level demonstrated a similar pattern as the middle school level, but<br />
required fewer lectures.<br />
In a nutshell, the findings supported the aforementioned results<br />
that students at the Korean elementary school level had more<br />
opportunities to be involved in activities than Korean students<br />
at the middle and high school levels. In contrast, teachers at the<br />
Korean middle and high school levels used more direct teacher<br />
input than teachers at the elementary school level.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The analytic information in the study defined some important<br />
implications nested in the attributes or causes that underlie the<br />
behavior observed at all levels of Korean physical education<br />
classes. Namely, the traditional teaching mode was employed<br />
in classes at all levels and consisted of the teacher distributing<br />
information and giving directions, followed by predictable student<br />
responses, or game-paying activities. Though the traditional mode<br />
of teaching seems to be more effective for classroom control,<br />
safety, and organization, it is less than ideal for students because<br />
it makes them more passive in the learning process, and therefore<br />
leads students to become dependent on the teacher for directions.<br />
As a result, the traditional teaching mode observed prevalently<br />
in Korean physical education classes appears insufficient for the<br />
development of students’ creative and cognitive dimensions.<br />
Moreover, teachers were typically viewed as authority figures<br />
in Korean physical education classes. The role of the teacher<br />
was to command, and the student’s role was to obey respectfully,<br />
with corporal punishment frequently used as an effective means<br />
of discipline. This traditional value is deeply rooted in Korea’s<br />
Confucian culture.<br />
In addition, it was observed that students spent relatively long<br />
periods of time waiting for their turn to practice and participate<br />
because of large class sizes, resulting in wasted time and ineffective<br />
learning.<br />
The analytic data in the study also lead to the following<br />
suggestions related to the aforementioned implications. First,<br />
Korean physical education teachers need to consider how to<br />
provide a more open, friendly, and reciprocal environment, rather<br />
than a hierarchical and military climate, in order to enhance<br />
learning and motivate students. Such an approach will also help to<br />
develop student’s cognitive functions as they participate in physical<br />
activities. Second, a reduction in class size and high teacher-to-<br />
student ratio is needed in Korean physical education classes in<br />
order to promote effective teaching. In this way, teachers may<br />
more easily support students in being active in class and can be<br />
less rigid in their approach to students.<br />
References<br />
Anderson, W. G., & Barrette, G. T. (1978). Teacher behavior. In W. G.<br />
Anderson & G. T. Barrette (Eds.), What’s going on in gym: Descriptive<br />
studies of physical education classes (pp. 25-38). Newtown, CT: Motor<br />
Skills: Theory into Practice.<br />
Batchelder, A. S. (1975). Process objectives, observed behaviors, and<br />
teaching patterns in elementary math, English, and physical education<br />
classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.<br />
Buckett, B. J. (1983). A descriptive analysis of teacher behavior and<br />
interaction patterns of selected elementary physical education<br />
specialists. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle Tennessee State<br />
University.<br />
Chang, E. S. (1996). The effects of three disparate learning subgroup on<br />
academic learning time in elementary physical education classes. The<br />
Journal of Institute of School Health & Physical Education, 3(1), 53-<br />
68.<br />
Cheffers, J. (1972). The validation of an instruction design to expand<br />
the Flanders system of interaction analysis to describe nonverbal<br />
interaction, different varieties of teacher behavior and pupil responses.<br />
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University.<br />
Cheffers, J., Amidon, E., & Rodgers, K. (1974). Interaction analysis: An<br />
application to nonverbal activity. St. Paul, MN: Paul S. Amidon &<br />
Associates, Inc.<br />
Cheffers, J., & Mancini, V. H. (1978). Teacher-student interaction. In W. G.<br />
Anderson & G. T. Barrette (Eds), What’s going on in gym: Descriptive<br />
studies of physical education classes (pp. 39-50). Newtown, CT: Motor<br />
Skills: Theory into Practice.<br />
Cheffers, J., Mancini, V., & Martinek, T. (1980). Interaction analysis:<br />
An application to nonverbal activity (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: Paul S.<br />
Amidon & Associates, Inc.<br />
Cho, K. R. (2003). A study on the relationship between academic learning<br />
time and swimming level. Unpublished master’s thesis, Myongji<br />
University, Seoul, Korea.<br />
Choi, J. M. (2000). A comparison on academic learning time in secondary<br />
physical education class taught by teachers and student teachers.<br />
Journal of Educational Science. 14(2), 183-195.<br />
Choi, J.S. (2004). A study on the teachers’ behavior and ALT-PE in physical<br />
class. Unpublished master’s thesis, Kongju National University,<br />
Kongju, Chungnam, Korea.<br />
Corbett, D., Cheffers, J., & Sullivan, E. C. (Eds.). (2001). Unique games<br />
and sports around the world. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.<br />
Ephraty, N. (1988). CAFIAS computer program kit. [A manual of running<br />
the program] Israel: The Zinman College of Physical Education at the<br />
Wingate Institute.<br />
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research:<br />
Competencies for analysis and applications (8th ed.). Upper Saddle<br />
River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.<br />
Hilberg, R.S., Waxman, H. C., & Tharp, R.G. (2004). Introduction:<br />
Purposes and perspectives on classroom observation research. In H.C.<br />
Waxman, R.G. Tharp, & R.S. Hilberg (Eds.), Observational research<br />
in U.S. classrooms: New approaches for understanding cultural and<br />
linguistic diversity (pp. 1-20). Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University<br />
Press.<br />
Ji, H. G. (2008). The effects of station instruction on academic learning<br />
time in physical education and activity with regard to long jump class.<br />
Unpublished master’s thesis, Daegu National University of Education,<br />
Daegu, Korea.<br />
Jung, M. Y. (1998). A comparative of P.E. teaching behavior between<br />
elementary and teachers and middle school teachers. Unpublished<br />
master’s thesis, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Korea.<br />
Kang, S. B. (1989). An analysis of academic learning time on elementary<br />
physical education classes. The Korean Journal of Physical Education,<br />
volume 5, issue 1 31
Patterns of Interactions and Behaviors<br />
28(1), 139-152.<br />
Kang, S. B. (1994). An analysis on the instructional time of physical<br />
education at selected elementary and secondary schools. The Korean<br />
Journal of Physical Education, 33(1), 13-28.<br />
Kelly, P. W. (1995). The validation of an instrument measuring cognitive<br />
and emotional involvement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston<br />
University.<br />
Kim, D. H., Hwang, Y.S., & Park, J. S. (2002). A study on the academic<br />
learning time. The Journal of the Research Institute of Physical<br />
Education & Sport Science, 18. 37-49.<br />
Kim, I. H. (2006). An analytic study on teaching and learning behaviors<br />
in secondary physical education classes. Unpublished master’s thesis,<br />
Kongju National University, Kongju, Chungnam, Korea.<br />
Kim, S. D. (2000). A study on the actual learning hours among the practical<br />
skill class of physical training in the high school. Journal of Natural<br />
Science, 9(2), 113-124.<br />
Kim, S. J. (2001). A comparison of academic learning time in physical<br />
education and physical activity level during physical education classes<br />
in Korea and Japan. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 40(4),<br />
307-318.<br />
Kim, S. K., & Jeong, J. S. (1994). Teaching method analysis on physical<br />
education class by teachers and teacher-assistants in the elementary<br />
school. Konju Kyodae <strong>No</strong>nchong, 31(2). 33-52.<br />
Kim, T. H. (2005). The effects of teaching behaviors on academic learning<br />
time in high school physical education classes. Unpublished master’s<br />
thesis, Sejong University. Seoul, Korea.<br />
Ko, B. K. (1988). Differences in academic learning time in physical<br />
education (ALT-PE) among three sport patterns. Proceeding of<br />
1988 Seoul Olympic Scientific Congress, Sport Scientific Institute of<br />
Dankook University, Cheonan, Choongnam, korea, 264-270.<br />
Kwak, H. K. (2006). The effects of cooperative learning on academic<br />
learning time in physical education. Unpublished master’s thesis,<br />
Gyeongin National University of Education, Incheon, Korea.<br />
Lee, A.M. (2003). How the field evolved. In S. J. Silverman & C. D. Ennis<br />
(Eds.), Student learning in physical education: Applying research to<br />
enhance instruction (pp. 9-25), Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.<br />
Lee, Y. S. (2007). Redesigning time-lined structure diagram analysis<br />
and active learning time diagram analysis for the consulting and selfanalysis<br />
of teaching. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 15(2), 21-49.<br />
Lombardo, B. J. (1979). The observation and description of the teaching<br />
behavior and interaction of selected physical education teachers.<br />
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.<br />
Marco, G. M., Mancini, V. H., Wuest, D. A., & Schempp, P. G. (1996).<br />
Becoming reacquainted with a once familiar and skill valuable tool:<br />
Systematic observation methodology revisited. International Journal<br />
of Physical Education, 32(1), 17-26.<br />
Morgenegg, B. L. (1978). Descriptive analytic research in physical<br />
education. In C. B. Corbin (Ed.), AAHPER Research Consortium<br />
Symposium Papers: Vol. 1. Teaching behavior and sport history (pp.<br />
34-38). Washington, DC: AAHPER Publications.<br />
Ornstein, A. C. (1986). Teacher effectiveness research: Some ideas and<br />
issues. Education and Urban Society, 18(2), 168-175.<br />
Paek, B. J., & Lee, W. K. (2003). The academic learning time research on<br />
physical education teachers at a middle school. The Yongin University<br />
Journal, 21, 195-221.<br />
Park, J. S. (2007). An analysis study on the teaching behavior of taekwondo<br />
instructor. Unpublished master’s thesis, Pusan National University,<br />
Pusan, Korea.<br />
Park, Y. S. (2001). A descriptive-analytic study on academic learning time<br />
in college physical education classes. Journal of physical education<br />
and sport & leisure studies, 8(1), 85-95.<br />
Park, Y.Y. (2003). An analysis of class of physical education’s management<br />
and real ALT-PE of learner. The Journal of Elementary Education<br />
Research, 14(1), 181-193.<br />
Pieron, M., & Hacourt, J. (1979). Teaching behaviours at different levels<br />
of physical education teaching. FIEP Bulletin, 49(2), 33-41.<br />
Rink, J. E. (2006). Teaching physical education for learning (5th ed.).<br />
Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.<br />
Schempp, P. G. (1986). Interaction change as a function of grade level in<br />
physical education. In M. Pieron & G. Graham (Eds.), Sport Pedagogy<br />
(pp. 85-89). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc.<br />
Schempp, P.G. (2003). Teaching sport and physical activity: Insights on<br />
the road to excellence. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.<br />
Senne, T. A. (2004). On your mark, get set, go!: A guide for beginning<br />
physical education teachers. Reston, VA: National Association for<br />
Sport and Physical Education.<br />
Stewart, M. J. (1977). A descriptive analysis of teaching behavior and its<br />
relationship to presage and context variables. Unpublished doctoral<br />
dissertation, Ohio State University.<br />
Tinning, R., Macdonald, D., Wright, J., & Hickey, C. (2001). Becoming<br />
a physical education teacher: Contemporary and enduring issues.<br />
Frenchs Forest NSW, Australia: Pearson Education Australia Pty<br />
Limited.<br />
Yoo, S. S. (1989). The modification of teacher behavior and its effect<br />
on student academic learning time in elementary school. Unpublished<br />
doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi.<br />
Yoon, M. H., Kim, J. W., Yhe, J. E., Ju, M. D., Lee, C. H., & Cho, S. M.<br />
(1996). A descriptive-analytic study on teaching behaviors and motor<br />
engagement time in physical education classes. The Korean Journal of<br />
Physical Education, 35(4), 321-335.<br />
Youn, M. H. (1994). A descriptive-analytic study on academic learning<br />
time in elementary time in physical education classes. Faculty Forum,<br />
10(2), 343-356. !<br />
32 Journal of Research
Differences in Exercise Identity<br />
Between Secondary Physical Education<br />
Students and Athletes<br />
by Gregory J. Soukup, Sr., Timothy W. Henrich, and Heather M.<br />
Barton-Weston, University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio,<br />
Texas<br />
Abstract<br />
Texas (USA) public schools require high school students to take<br />
one year of physical education to graduate. However, students can<br />
meet this requirement by participating on a state sanctioned athletic<br />
team for a year. The Texas Education Agency states the physical<br />
education curriculum should teach affective attitudes and values<br />
that will encourage students to be “physically active and healthy<br />
for a lifetime” (TEA, <strong>2010</strong>). Only physical education students are<br />
exposed to this curriculum that specifically incorporates instruction<br />
and knowledge related to physical education and fitness concepts.<br />
The purpose of the study was to determine if significant differences<br />
existed between physical education students and students who<br />
chose to participate in sports regarding exercise identity. Data were<br />
collected from 207 students with 151 in the physical education<br />
group and 56 athletes with the Exercise Identity Scale (EIS)<br />
(Anderson & Cychosz, 1994). Scores on the EIS range from 9 to<br />
63. Higher scores indicate greater exercise identity. The physical<br />
education group had an average EIS score of 32.9 and athletes<br />
had an average score of 45.4. T-test analysis determined athletes<br />
had significantly higher exercise identities than physical education<br />
students at the p < .000 level.<br />
Introduction<br />
Despite the well documented benefits that regular exercise and<br />
physical activity have on the immediate and long term health of<br />
adolescents, the United States Center of Disease Control (CDC)<br />
2008 revealed that only 34.7% of high school students reported<br />
being vigorously active for at least 60 minutes a day for at least 5<br />
days from the previous week. In 2007, 54% of high school students<br />
reported attending physical education; however, only 30% of them<br />
attend daily physical education classes (CDC, 2008). The United<br />
States Department of Health and Human Services recommend<br />
that adolescents should engage in 60 minutes or more of moderate<br />
to vigorous - intensity aerobic physical activity on a daily basis<br />
(USDHHS, 2008). The Youth Risk Behavior Survey 2007 results<br />
determined that 65.3% of adolescents did not meet this minimum<br />
recommendation for physical activity.<br />
Reports by the National Association for Sport and Physical<br />
Education (2002), the Secretary of Health and Human Services<br />
and the Secretary of Education to the President of the United<br />
States (U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2000b),<br />
and Healthy People <strong>2010</strong> (U. S. Department of Health and Human<br />
Services, 2000a) all identified increasing rates of physical activity<br />
for adolescents as primary goals for improving health and reducing<br />
obesity rates in adolescents. The National Association for Sport<br />
and Physical Education stresses the importance of physical<br />
education and fitness knowledge and defines a physically educated<br />
person as being physically active on a regular basis and knowing<br />
the implications and benefits of involvement in physical activity<br />
and its contribution to a healthy lifestyle (National Association for<br />
Sport and Physical Education, 1992).<br />
Numerous researchers and reports have stressed the importance<br />
that physical education knowledge and activities play in promoting<br />
physical activity in school aged children that will continue into<br />
adulthood (Corbin, 2000; McKenzie & Sallis, 1996; Morrow,<br />
Jackson, & Payne; 1999; National Association for Sport and<br />
Physical Education, 2004; Sallis & Patrick, 1994; U. S. Department<br />
of Health and Human Services, 1990; U. S. Department of Health<br />
and Human Services, 1996). Physically active adolescents develop<br />
and maintain higher rates of physical fitness into adulthood (Blair,<br />
1993; Colditz & Mariani, 2000; Lee, Blair, & Jackson, 1999; Pate<br />
et al., 1995; Sallis, 1993), and active adolescents are more likely<br />
to be physically active adults (Telama, Yang, Laakso, & Viikari,<br />
1997). However, many youth are not enrolled in any physical<br />
education classes. In fact, most states in the United States have deemphasized<br />
and reduced the amount of time required that students<br />
spend in secondary physical education classes (Morrow et al.,<br />
1999; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1996; U.<br />
S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2000).<br />
Exercise Identity<br />
Role identities give meaning and importance to past behavior<br />
as well as provide direction to future behavior (Anderson &<br />
Cychosz, 1995; Anderson, Cychosz, & Franke, 1998; Anderson,<br />
Cychosz, & Franke, 2001; Storer, Cychosz, & Anderson, 1997).<br />
Individuals with strong exercise identities validate and reinforce<br />
their identities by exercising, and the validation of the exercise role<br />
identity increases the likelihood that the individual will continue to<br />
adhere to exercise programs in the future. Exercise and the social<br />
interactions that individuals develop through exercise become<br />
important to an exerciser’s role identity (Storer et al., 1997;<br />
Anderson et al., 2001; Anderson et al., 1998). Helping individuals<br />
develop stronger exercise identities will help them adopt and<br />
maintain more physically active lifestyles (Anderson et al., 1998;<br />
Anderson et al., 2001; Cardinal & Cardinal, 1997). Several studies<br />
have demonstrated the association between exercise behavior<br />
and exercise identity (Anderson & Cychosz, 1995; Anderson<br />
et al., 1998; Anderson et al., 2001; Cardinal & Cardinal, 1997;<br />
Gray, Soukup, & Sherals, 2007; Soukup & Clayton, 2008). The<br />
Exercise Identity Scale (EIS) was developed to identify individuals<br />
who would and would not be likely to exercise and be physically<br />
active on a regular basis (Storer et al., 1997; Anderson et al., 1998;<br />
Anderson et al., 2001). The purpose of the study was to determine<br />
if significant differences existed between physical education<br />
students and students who chose to participate in sports regarding<br />
exercise identity.<br />
volume 5, issue 1 33
Differences in Exercise Identity<br />
Method<br />
Participants<br />
A stratified sample of students was drawn from an inner-city<br />
high school in Texas. Data were collected from 207 students with<br />
151 of the participants having completed their physical education<br />
requirements for graduation and 56 of the students having<br />
participated in athletics. The distribution of students by grade<br />
level was 31.1% 10th graders, 31.8% 11th graders and 37.1% 12th<br />
graders. The ethnic diversity of the participants was 8.6% African-<br />
American, 20.5% Asian, 13.9% Hispanic, and 55.6% White. The<br />
sample was 58.3% female and 41.7% male. Participants in the<br />
study ranged in age from 15 to 19 years old.<br />
Instrumentation<br />
The Exercise Identity Scale (EIS) was used to quantify levels<br />
of exercise identity of participants in the study. The EIS was<br />
developed by Anderson and Cychosz (1994) to measure and assess<br />
the extent to which exercise behavior is descriptive of one’s concept<br />
of self (Anderson & Cychosz, 1995). The EIS is comprised of nine<br />
Likert-scaled items.<br />
Each item can range from strongly disagree (1) to strongly<br />
agree (7) with a final score that will range from a low of 9 to a<br />
high score of 63. Higher scores indicate greater exercise identity.<br />
Alpha reliability coefficients for the scale have been reported at .94<br />
to .95 (Anderson et al., 1998; Anderson et al., 2001). One week<br />
test-retest reliability of the scale was reported at .93 (Anderson &<br />
Cychosz, 1994), and was determined by the authors of this article<br />
to be .96. Factor analysis assessment of the EIS determined the<br />
scale to be unidimensional (Anderson & Cychosz, 1994; Anderson<br />
et al., 1998; Anderson et al., 2001) with factor loadings ranging<br />
from .74 to .89 that accounted for 68.4% of the total variance of<br />
the instrument (Anderson et al., 1998).<br />
Data Collection<br />
The researchers received permission for the study from the<br />
university committee for the protection of human subjects.<br />
Permission to collect data from students was obtained from a<br />
very large and diverse inner-city school district in Texas. A<br />
stratified sample of students who had either totally completed<br />
all traditional physical education classes or who all substituted<br />
their physical education graduation requirements by participating<br />
on an athletic team/teams were used for the study. All data was<br />
collected from students in one day by the lead investigator at the<br />
high school. Student and parental consent forms were obtained<br />
from all participants before data were collected. Before data were<br />
collected, the nature of the instrument and the measurements that<br />
would be obtained were explained to all participants. Participants<br />
were informed that all measurements would be confidential, and<br />
that individual results would not be seen by any other students,<br />
personnel, teachers, or administrators. All forms were in English<br />
and no student requested a translation.<br />
Data Analysis<br />
T-test analysis was used to test for differences in exercise identity<br />
rates between students who completed physical education classes<br />
and students who participated on athletic teams. The independent<br />
variable for the study was students who took physical education<br />
34 Journal of Research<br />
and students who participated on athletic teams. The dependent<br />
variable was the exercise identity scores of students determined by<br />
the EIS. The Alpha level for significance was established at the p<br />
< .05 level.<br />
Results<br />
A two-tailed T-test determined that the students that had<br />
substituted their physical education graduation requirement by<br />
participating in athletics had significantly higher exercise identity<br />
rates than the physical education students. The mean score on the<br />
EIS for physical education students was 32.9 and for the athletes<br />
it was 45.4. The difference in exercise identity between physical<br />
education students and the athletes on exercise identity was<br />
significant at the p < .000 level. Means and standard deviations<br />
for the groups are presented in Table 1.<br />
Table 1. Means, Standard Deviation, F Ratio, and P Value for<br />
Significance of EIS Scores for High School Physical<br />
Education Students and Athletes<br />
Group M SD T P<br />
PE 32.9 14.0 5.96 0.000<br />
Athletics 45.4 11.4<br />
p value for significance is .05.<br />
Discussion<br />
This study was conducted to determine if exercise identity rates<br />
would be higher for students who completed traditional physical<br />
education classes at the high school level when compared to students<br />
who substituted their physical education graduation requirement<br />
by participating in athletics. The data analysis determined that<br />
the students who fulfilled their physical education requirement<br />
by participating on athletic teams had significantly higher rates<br />
of exercise identity than students in traditional physical education<br />
classes.<br />
Cognitive Instruction and Exercise Identity<br />
Learning in physical education is through the affective,<br />
cognitive, and psychomotor domains. Students in the physical<br />
education and athletic team groups both received instruction to<br />
improve their psychomotor skills; however, only the students in<br />
physical education received cognitive instruction specifically<br />
designed to improve their knowledge of how lifelong exercise<br />
and physical activity would benefit and improve their long-term<br />
health. Several researchers have emphasized the importance<br />
that health and physical fitness knowledge plays in promoting<br />
healthy and physically active lifestyles in school children that<br />
will carry over into adulthood (Corbin, 2000; McKenzie & Sallis,<br />
1996; Morrow et al.; 1999; Sallis & Patrick, 1994). While the<br />
cognitive domain is an important aspect of instruction in physical<br />
education; many researchers have reported that increased health<br />
and fitness knowledge related to nutrition (Chapman & Toma,<br />
1997), cardiovascular disease (Suminski et al., 1999), sexuality<br />
and sexually transmitted diseases (Johnson, Rozmus, & Edmisson,<br />
1999), smoking (Schofield, Lynagh, & Mishra, 2003), and physical<br />
activity (Morrow et al., 2004) did not result in improved fitness<br />
behaviors. Simply knowing the benefits of how regular exercise
Differences in Exercise Identity<br />
and lifelong physical activity will improve student health did not<br />
seem to be enough on its own to improve the exercise identity of<br />
the students in these studies.<br />
Affective Instruction and Exercise Identity<br />
The results of this study seem to suggest that positive affective<br />
values and attitudes related to and developed through regular<br />
exercise, physical activity, and participation in sport significantly<br />
impacted the exercise identities of the athletes in the study. The<br />
athletes seemed to have developed and internalized stronger<br />
exercise identities through their sport participation than the<br />
students that took physical education. “Knowledge can have little<br />
impact on a person’s behavior if one’s social identity carries the<br />
message that he or she is not the kind of person who engages in<br />
such behavior” (Storer et al., 1997, pp. 266-267).<br />
Sport Team Participation and Exercise Identity<br />
Another factor that could account for the significant differences<br />
in exercise identity rates of the students is that most of the students<br />
that participated in athletics continued participating on their<br />
athletic teams after they finished their graduation requirements for<br />
physical education. The athletes continued to have opportunities<br />
for supervised practices, scrimmages, games, competitions,<br />
conditioning, and training sessions with coaches associated with<br />
their sports before and/or after-school during their sophomore,<br />
junior and senior years in high school. The students who had taken<br />
physical education to fulfill their graduation requirements had no<br />
opportunities available from the school to participate in supervised<br />
after-school physical activities. According to the exercise identity<br />
literature, the on-going participation of the athletes in after-school<br />
physical activity and on school sponsored sports teams would have<br />
continued to strengthen their exercise identities.<br />
Physical Education, After-School Physical Activities and<br />
Intramural Clubs<br />
The researchers recommend that physical education be a<br />
required course in schools for every year and that no other classes<br />
be allowed to substitute for the physical education requirement.<br />
Participation in after-school physical activities and intramural<br />
programs; that are supervised by certified physical educators,<br />
should be made available to all students in an attempt to increase<br />
rates of physical activity and to help develop and reinforce positive<br />
exercise identities in all students. The Centers for Disease Control<br />
and Prevention (2000) recommended that supervised after school<br />
activities and programs, like intramurals and physical activity<br />
clubs, need to be developed and implemented on a national<br />
level for all school children. Wechsler, Devereaux, Davis, and<br />
Collins (2000) recommended that all schools should offer quality<br />
intramural programs that feature a diverse selection of competitive<br />
and non-competitive, structured, and unstructured activities that<br />
meet the needs, interests, and abilities of all students. After<br />
school programs would provide students with the opportunity to<br />
be physically active and to engage in regular exercise behaviors<br />
that will improve their exercise identities and motivate them to<br />
be more active on a regular basis. By improving the affective<br />
aspects of physical education, like exercise identity, students will<br />
be motivated to adopt new behaviors that will help them develop<br />
and maintain healthier and more active lifestyles.<br />
Implications<br />
Physical inactivity has contributed to an unprecedented<br />
epidemic of childhood obesity that is currently plaguing the United<br />
States (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2000). Quality<br />
physical education classes taught by licensed physical educators<br />
(NASPE, 2002) should provide a daily minimum of 60 minutes<br />
of moderate to vigorous levels of physical activity for elementary<br />
students (Corbin, Pangrazi, Beighle, Le Masurier, & Morgan,<br />
2004) and 45 minutes to secondary students (NASPE, 2004).<br />
These physical education classes should incorporate curriculums<br />
that help students develop knowledge, attitudes, skills, behaviors,<br />
and confidence to adopt and maintain physically active lifestyles,<br />
while providing opportunities for enjoyable physical activity<br />
(CDC, 2000). To ensure quality instruction, physical education<br />
classes must be limited to the class sizes of other school subjects<br />
(CDC, 2000; NASPE, 2002).<br />
Texas needs to develop standardized assessment instruments<br />
that will accurately measure information on health and physical<br />
education knowledge, attitudes, and fitness levels of all high school<br />
students. Students that are inactive, overweight/obese, have low<br />
rates of fitness knowledge, and low exercise identity rates need to<br />
be identified and evaluated throughout their entire public school<br />
education (K – 12). Curriculums need to be specifically created<br />
that will improve exercise identity and motivate all students to be<br />
more physically active and exercise on a regular basis.<br />
Physical activity instruments like pedometers, heart rate<br />
monitors, and questionnaires like the PDPAR could be used by<br />
physical educators to assess if students are currently achieving<br />
recommended rates of physical activity and exercise to maintain<br />
proper health. Simple body composition assessments like the<br />
body mass index, waist to hip ratio, and percent body fat could be<br />
used to evaluate possible future health risks for students. The EIS<br />
could also be used to assess current and future attitudes of students<br />
towards exercise and physical activity. Recent research has shown<br />
that children as young as three are not active enough and are<br />
developing overly sedentary lifestyles and behaviors (Reilly et al.,<br />
2004). An estimated 10.4% of two to five year-olds, 15.3% of 6<br />
to 11 year-olds, and 15.5% of 12 to 19 year-olds are overweight<br />
(Ogden, Flegal, Carroll, & Johnson, 2002). Among children 6 to<br />
19, 31% are at risk of being overweight (Hedley et al., 2004). By<br />
using these types of assessments together, educators could quickly<br />
and easily identify and intervene with students who are sedentary,<br />
overweight/obese, and have poor exercise identities.<br />
Recommendations for Future Study<br />
Data for this study were collected from a very limited<br />
population. Further data needs to be collected from an expanded<br />
population of participants distributed across the United States<br />
to determine if significant differences in exercise identity exist<br />
between physical education students and athletes at the national<br />
level. Further research is also recommended to determine if<br />
significant differences between physical education students and<br />
athletes regarding exercise identity would persist as they aged and<br />
graduated from high school and were no longer associated with<br />
high school teams and clubs.<br />
volume 5, issue 1 35
Differences in Exercise Identity<br />
References<br />
Anderson, D.F. & Cychosz, C.M. (1994). Development of an exercise<br />
identity scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 78, 747-751.<br />
Anderson, D.F. & Cychosz, C.M. (1995). Exploration of the relationship<br />
between exercise behavior and exercise identity. Journal of Sport<br />
Behavior. 18, (3), 159-166.<br />
Anderson, D.F. & Cychosz, C.M. & Franke, W.D. (1998). Association<br />
of exercise identity with measures of exercise commitment and<br />
physiological indicators of fitness in law enforcemen cohort. Journal<br />
of Sport Behavior. 21, (3), 233-241.<br />
Anderson, D.F. & Cychosz, C.M., & Franke, W.D. (2001). Preliminary<br />
exercise identity scale (EIS): <strong>No</strong>rms for three adult samples. Journal<br />
of Sport Behavior. 24, (1), 1-9.<br />
Blair, S. N. (1993). Evidence for success of exercise in weight loss and<br />
control. Annals of Internal Medicine, 119, (7), 702-706.<br />
Cardinal, B.J. & Cardinal, M.K. (1997). Changes in exercise behavior<br />
and exercise identity associated with a 14-week aerobic exercise class.<br />
Journal of Sport Behavior. 20, (4), 377-386.<br />
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2000). Promoting better<br />
health for young people through physical activity and sports<br />
(Washington, DC., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).<br />
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008). Youth risk behavior<br />
surveillance – United States, 2007. www.cdc.gov.mmwr.<br />
Chapman, P. & Toma, R.B., (1997). Nutrition knowledge among adolescent<br />
high school female athletes. Adolescence, 32, (126), 437-446.<br />
Colditz, G. A. & Mariani, A. (2000). The cost of obesity and sedentarism<br />
in the United States, in: C. Bouchard (Ed) Physical Activity and Obesity<br />
(Human Kinetics/Champaign, IL).<br />
Corbin, C. B. (2002). Physical activity for everyone: What every physical<br />
educator should know about promoting lifelong physical activity.<br />
Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 128-144.<br />
Corbin, C.B., Pangrazi, R. P., Beighle, A., Le Masurier, G. & Morgan, C.<br />
(2004). Physical activity for children: A statement of guidelines for<br />
children ages 5-12 (2nd Ed.) (Reston, VA: National Association for<br />
Sport and Physical Education).<br />
Gray, J. P., Soukup, G. J., & Sherals, P. (2007). Influence of exercise<br />
identity on college students’ physical fitness. Research Quarterly for<br />
Exercise and Sport, 78, (1), February, A-92.<br />
Hedley, A.A., Ogden, C.L., Johnson, C.L., Carroll, M.D., Curtin, L.R.,<br />
Flegal, K.M. (2004). Overweight and obesity among US children,<br />
adolescents, and adults, 1999-2002. Journal of the American Medical<br />
Association, 291, 2847-2850.<br />
Johnson, L.S., Rozmus, C., & Edmisson, K. (1999). Adolescent sexuality<br />
and sexually transmitted diseases: Attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, and<br />
values. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 14, (3), 177-185.<br />
Lee, C. D., Blair, S. N., & Jackson, A. S. (1999). Cardiorespiratory fitness,<br />
body composition, and all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality<br />
in men. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69, 373-380.<br />
McKenzie, T. L., & Sallis, J. F. (1996). Physical activity, fitness, and<br />
health-related physical education, in: S. J. Silverman, & C. D. Ennis<br />
(Eds.) Student Learning in Physical Education (Champaign, IL:<br />
Human Kinetics), 223-246.<br />
Morrow, J. R., Jackson, A. W., & Payne, V. G. (1999). Physical activity<br />
promotion and school physical education. President's Council on<br />
Physical Fitness and Sports Research Digest, 3, (7), 1-7.<br />
Morrow, J.R., Krzewinski-Malone, J. A., Jackson, A.W., Bungum, T.J.,<br />
& FitzGerald, S.J (2004). American adults’ knowledge of exercise<br />
recommendations. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 75, (3),<br />
231-237.<br />
National Association for Sport and Physical Education. (1992). Physical<br />
education outcomes (Reston, VA, National Association for Sport and<br />
Physical Education).<br />
National Association for Sport and Physical Education. (2002). Shape<br />
of the nation report (Reston, VA, National Association for Sport and<br />
Physical Education).<br />
National Association for Sport and Physical Education. (2004). Moving<br />
into the future: National standards for physical education (New York:<br />
Mosby).<br />
Ogden, C. L., Flegal, K. M., Carroll, M. D., & Johnson, C. L. (2002).<br />
Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and<br />
adolescents, 1999-2000. Journal of the American Medical Association,<br />
288, 1723-1727.<br />
Pate, R. R., Pratt, M., Blair, S. N., Haskell, W. L., Macera, C. A.,<br />
Bouchard, C., Buchner, D., Ettiger, W., Heath, G. W., King, A. C.,<br />
Kriska, A., Leon, A. S., Marcus, B. H., Morris, J., Paffenbarger, R. S.,<br />
Patrick, K., Pollock, M. L., Rippe, J. M., Sallis, J., & Wilmore, J. H.<br />
(1995). Physical activity and public health: A recommendation from<br />
the centers for disease control and prevention and the american college<br />
of sports medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273,<br />
(5), 402-407.<br />
Reilly, J.J., Jackson, D.M., Montgomery, C., Kelly, L.A., Slaater, C.,<br />
Grant, S., Paton, J.Y. (2004). Total energy expenditure and physical<br />
activity in young Scottish children: mixed longitudinal study. The<br />
Lancet, 363, 9404, 211-212.<br />
Sallis, J. F. (1993). Epidemiology of physical activity and fitness in children<br />
and adolescents. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 33,<br />
(4-5), 403-408.<br />
Sallis, J. F. & Patrick, K. (1994). Physical activity guidelines for<br />
adolescents: Consensus statement. Pediatric Exercise Science, 6, 302-<br />
314.<br />
Schofield, M.J., Lynagh, M., & Mishra, G. (2003). Evaluation of a health<br />
promoting schools program to reduce smoking in australian secondary<br />
schools. Health Education Research, 18, (6), 678-692.<br />
Soukup, G.J. & Clayton, L. B. (2008). Relationship between adolescent<br />
exercise identity scale scores and self-reported rates of physical<br />
activity. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, June, S200.<br />
Storer, J. H., Cychosz, C. M., Anderson, D. F. (1997). Wellness behaviors,<br />
social identities, and health promotion. American Journal of Health<br />
Behavior, 21, (4), 266-267.<br />
Suminski, R.R., Anding, J., Smith, D., Zhang, J.J., Utter, A.C., & Kang,<br />
J. (1999). Risk and reality: The association between cardiovascular<br />
disease risk factor knowledge and selected risk-reducing behaviors.<br />
Family and Community Health, 21, (4), 51-62.<br />
Telama, R., Yang, X., Laakso, L., & Viikari, J. (1997). Physical activity in<br />
childhood and adolescence as a predictor of physical activity in young<br />
adulthood. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 13, 317-323.<br />
Texas Education Agency (<strong>2010</strong>). State board of education: Curriculum<br />
requirements. (Austin, TX).<br />
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1990). Healthy People<br />
2000 (DHHS Publication <strong>No</strong>. [PHS] 91-50213) (Hyattsville, MD:<br />
Public Health Service).<br />
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1996). Physical activity<br />
and Health: A report of the surgeon general (Atlanta, GA).<br />
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000a). Healthy People<br />
<strong>2010</strong> (Conference Edition, in Two <strong>Volume</strong>s) (Washington, DC).<br />
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000b). Promoting<br />
better health for young people through physical activity and sports<br />
(Silver <strong>Spring</strong>, MD).<br />
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2008). Physical activity<br />
guidelines for Americans. www.health.gov/paguidelines.<br />
Wechsler, H., Devereaux, R. S., Davis, M., Collins, J. (2000). Using the<br />
school environment to promote physical activity and healthy eating.<br />
Preventive Medicine, 31, S121-S137. !<br />
36 Journal of Research
Tobacco, the Common Enemy and a Gateway<br />
Drug: Policy Implications<br />
by Mohammad R. Torabi, Mi Kyung Jun, Carole <strong>No</strong>wicke, Barbara<br />
Seitz de Martinez, and Ruth Gassman<br />
Abstract<br />
For the four leading causes of death in the United States (heart<br />
disease, cancer, stroke and chronic respiratory disease), tobacco<br />
use is a common risk factor. Tobacco use is responsible for almost<br />
450,000 deaths per year and impacts the health of every member<br />
of our society. Tobacco is a gateway drug for substance abuse.<br />
That role is critical to revisit and revalidate. From 490 schools, a<br />
total of 175,460 students in grades 6-12 participated in an alcohol,<br />
tobacco and other drug use survey, the descriptive analyses of<br />
the data being stated in a 2007 technical report. The secondary<br />
analyses of the data clearly demonstrated that a dose-response<br />
relationship pattern of association existed between increasing<br />
quantity of cigarette use and the use of alcohol and other drugs.<br />
Additionally, logit analysis revealed that selected demographic and<br />
other variables were statistically significant predictors of the past<br />
month's use of cigarettes. The secondary analyses were replicated<br />
for the 2008 survey, in which 152,732 students responded to the<br />
same questionnaire. Similar results were obtained. Smoking is<br />
a major risk factor to the leading causes of death and sufficient<br />
empirical evidence establishes that tobacco is a gateway drug.<br />
To combat tobacco use, a comprehensive ecological approach,<br />
including tobacco education and cessation, enacting and enforcing<br />
smoke-free policies, and increasing taxes on tobacco products, is<br />
recommended.<br />
Introduction<br />
Mazzone and Arroglio asked, "How many ways can we say that<br />
cigarette smoking is bad for you?" (Mazzone & Arroglio, 2004,<br />
p. 1717), Tobacco use is responsible for almost 450,000 deaths<br />
per year in the U.S. and affects every cell, every organ, and every<br />
aspect of the human body.<br />
Tobacco use is directly involved in neoplasms in many parts of<br />
the body, including the oral cavity, pharynx, esophagus, pancreas,<br />
kidney, urinary bladder, cervix and lungs. It is also implicated in<br />
cataracts, periodontal disease, cerebrovascular disease, coronary<br />
heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory<br />
disease, aortic aneurisms and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)<br />
(The Health Consequences of Smoking, 2004; Stewart, Cardinez,<br />
et al., 2008). While the top four leading causes of mortality in<br />
the U. S. are heart disease, cancer, stroke and chronic respiratory<br />
disease, the number one risk factor for all of those premature<br />
deaths is tobacco use. And, as public health enemy number one,<br />
tobacco use is the most preventable.<br />
Whether it be through exposure to second-hand smoke, direct<br />
smoking or chewing (The Health Consequences of Involuntary<br />
Exposure to Tobacco Smoke, 2006), through environmental<br />
contamination, or increased cost of medical care and lost worker<br />
productivity, tobacco has literally impacted the health and wealth of<br />
every member of our society. Gro Harlem Brundtland, the former<br />
Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO), said,<br />
"Tobacco is one of the greatest emerging health disasters in human<br />
history" (WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2008, p.<br />
13). The WHO also states that tobacco "is the only legal consumer<br />
product that can harm everyone exposed to it–and it kills up to<br />
half of those who use it as intended" (WHO report on the global<br />
tobacco epidemic, 2008, p. 8).<br />
Tobacco causes premature deaths, negatively impacts quality of<br />
life and contributes significantly to the exponentially rising costs<br />
for health care. Results from the WHO's Global Youth Surveillance<br />
Survey (GYTS) suggest that the estimated world-wide deaths from<br />
smoking will double from 5 million per year to 10 million per year<br />
by 2020 and that these projected 10 million deaths may even be an<br />
underestimate (Warren et al., 2008, p. 1). The Centers for Disease<br />
Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate that smoking and exposure<br />
to second-hand smoke cost the United States 5.5 million Years<br />
of Potential Life Lost (YPLL) and $92 billion annually in lost<br />
productivity (Armour, Woollery, Malarcher, Pechacek, & Husten,<br />
2005). That amounts to $1.9 billion on average per state for loss<br />
of productivity, and the average smoking attributable cost per state<br />
in 2004 was nearly an additional $1.9 billion or the equivalent of<br />
$5.31 per every pack of cigarettes sold. Whereas the CDC estimate<br />
of annual health care costs at $75 billion, the direct Medicaid costs<br />
from smoking are calculated to be $607 million, or the equivalent<br />
of $1.63 per pack (Sustaining state programs for tobacco control:<br />
Data highlights, 2006). Medicaid costs for smoking-related<br />
coverage comes to $129.90 per capita annually for adults in the<br />
U.S. (Sustaining state programs, 2006). Even if people don't<br />
smoke, they pay the costs in taxes because of smoking's national<br />
economic implications.<br />
Smoking impacts the health of every member of society.<br />
Annually in the U.S., smoking results in the death of 26,000 to<br />
73,000 non-smokers exposed to second-hand smoke (Proposed<br />
Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air<br />
Contaminant, 2005). in addition to the approximately 450,000<br />
smoker deaths (Sustaining state programs, 2006). The leading<br />
cause of premature death in the U.S. is smoking (Sustaining<br />
state programs, 2006). Over 200,000 episodes of asthma, nearly<br />
72,000 pre-term deliveries, nearly 800,000 otitis media visits,<br />
and approximately 46,000 cardiac deaths each year in the U.S.<br />
are attributable to environmental tobacco smoke (Proposed<br />
Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air<br />
Contaminant, 2005). At current smoking rates, it is estimated<br />
that more than 6.3 million of today's youth, 18 and under, will die<br />
from tobacco-related causes (Sustaining state programs, 2006).<br />
Each death represents more than a statistic. Each person who died<br />
volume 5, issue 1 37
Tobacco, the Common Enemy<br />
was someone's child, parent, sibling, neighbor, teacher, employer,<br />
employee, or loved one.<br />
Tobacco as a Gateway Drug<br />
Denise Kandel and fellow researchers (Kandel, 1975, 2002;<br />
Kandel & Faust, 1975; Kandel & Yamaguchi, 1992) have<br />
popularized study of both the "gateway hypothesis" of drug use<br />
and the notion of "stages of acquisition" of drug use (Kelley,<br />
Denny, & Young, 1999). Kelley, Denny and Young (1999) found<br />
that adolescents who began drug experimentation with alcohol<br />
progressed through "stages" quicker than those who started with<br />
cigarettes and did not "graduate" to other illicit substances. After<br />
studying nicotine dependence in youth, DiFranza (DiFranza, 2007,<br />
2008; DiFranza et al., 2007) reported that those who felt relaxed<br />
upon smoking for the first time and those who sampled tobacco<br />
in a depressed mood were the most susceptible to accelerated<br />
addiction. From a study of youth who started using smokeless<br />
tobacco, Tomar concluded that those youth were more than three<br />
times as likely in four years to smoke tobacco than subjects who<br />
had not started using smokeless tobacco at the time of the initial<br />
survey (Tomar, 2003). This study, and others demonstrate how<br />
adolescents can swiftly become habituated to tobacco, indicating<br />
the need to prevent tobacco experimentation through educational<br />
efforts and programs, such as after-school activities.<br />
Torabi, Bailey, and Madj-Jabbari (1993) provided evidence<br />
that tobacco serves as a gateway drug, another reason for those<br />
educational efforts and programs. To continue the public health<br />
work addressing tobacco and other drug use, it is important to<br />
revisit those 1993 findings that implicated tobacco as a gateway<br />
drug (Torabi, Bailey, & Madj-Jabbari, 1993). This study aims to<br />
answer the following questions:<br />
1. How does drug use, including tobacco, by students in a<br />
Midwestern state compare with national data?<br />
2. What are the relationships between demographic and selected<br />
risk factors with reported use of tobacco and other common drugs,<br />
such as alcohol, marijuana and cocaine?<br />
3. As a gateway drug, does a dose-response relationship exist<br />
between cigarette use and selected other drug use, including<br />
alcohol, marijuana and cocaine?<br />
Methods<br />
Participants<br />
The data were obtained from a statewide cross-sectional survey<br />
of Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use by Indiana Children and<br />
Adolescents conducted by the Indiana Prevention Resource Center<br />
(IPRC) at Indiana University in 2007 (Gassman et al, 2007).<br />
The survey's sampling frame consisted of all schools in Indiana<br />
that serve grades 6-12. Recruitment materials (i.e., an invitation<br />
letter, a statement on parental consent, an application form and<br />
a stamped return envelope) were sent to all superintendents,<br />
principals and Safe and Drug Free School Coordinators. Obtaining<br />
parental consent for student participation in the survey was each<br />
school's responsibility. To improve the consistency of the survey<br />
administration procedures, a training video and written instruction<br />
were supplied to all school personnel. Schools were directed to<br />
administer the survey to all students in a classroom setting and<br />
inform them that participation was voluntary. When students<br />
38 Journal of Research<br />
completed the survey, they were advised to place their forms<br />
into the envelope provided. Besides gender, age, grade, race and<br />
ethnicity, no other identifying information was collected.<br />
The total student population, grades 6-12, in Indiana during<br />
the academic year 2006-2007 was 558,429. A sample of 175,460<br />
students in grades 6-12 from 490 schools participated in the survey:<br />
40.8% from public schools and 3.2% from non-public schools.<br />
There was no difference between non-participant and participant<br />
schools in terms of urban/rural location ( 2 = 1.20, P = 0.27).<br />
To cross-validate the current findings, the same analyses were<br />
conducted with data collected a year later in the spring of 2008<br />
(Gassman et al., 2008). The same instrument and protocol were<br />
applied. A total of 152,732 students participated in that study. The<br />
socio-demographic characteristics of students in the 2007 and<br />
the 2008 samples were similar (Gassman et al, 2007, 2008). For<br />
example, 49% of the 2007 sample was male, and 49% of the 2008<br />
sample was male.<br />
To address inconsistent and incomplete responses, a protocol<br />
was developed. Students who provided inconsistent response<br />
patterns to items on annual and monthly use of substances<br />
(e.g., those students who reported never using a particular drug<br />
during the past year and who also reported using that same drug<br />
during the past month) and those who provided a pattern of<br />
pharmacologically implausible responses (i.e., a combination of<br />
drugs and frequency of use considered lethal) were excluded. The<br />
final item on the survey asked, "How truthfully have you answered<br />
these questions?" with response options "not truthfully at all"<br />
"somewhat truthfully" and "completely truthfully." Students who<br />
responded "not truthfully at all" were eliminated from the analysis.<br />
A sample of 158,632 from data originally collected, or 90.3%, was<br />
used in this data analyses.<br />
Instrumentation<br />
The survey items were based on national surveys, such as the<br />
Monitoring the Future Survey (Johnston, O'Malley, Bachman, &<br />
Schulenberg, 2006), the National Survey on Drug Use and Health<br />
(formerly called the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse)<br />
(National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings<br />
2006, 2007), and the Youth Risk Behavioral Surveillance System<br />
(Eaton et al., 2006) in order to allow direct comparisons at the<br />
national level. The instrument is comprised of 181 items asking<br />
about socio-demographic characteristics, use of various substances,<br />
risk and protective factors (e.g., perceived risk of harm), perceived<br />
personal safety, violent behavior and gambling behavior. For the<br />
present study, the following variables were extracted:<br />
Monthly Use. The outcome variables were measured by multiple<br />
choice items asking, "How often in the past month (30 days) have<br />
you used. . ." followed by a list of drugs or drug classifications,<br />
such as cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, cigars, alcohol, marijuana,<br />
cocaine and other drugs. The response options were "never," "1-5<br />
times," "6-19 times," "20-40 times," and "more than 40 times."<br />
However, for cigarette use 7 response options were provided:<br />
"none," "a few times," "1 to 5 cigarettes per day," "about one half<br />
pack per day," "about 1 pack per day," "about 1 and a half packs<br />
per day," "and two or more packs per day." Binge alcohol drinking<br />
was asked about separately: "How many times in the last two<br />
weeks have you had five or more alcoholic drinks at a sitting?"
Tobacco, the Common Enemy<br />
The response options were "none," "once," "twice," "3 to 5 times,"<br />
"6 to 9 times," and "10 or more times." For the logit analysis,<br />
responses to having used substances in the past month, as well as<br />
binge drinking responses were coded into dichotomous categories,<br />
0 (no use) and 1 (one time or more).<br />
A similar set of items was asked in reference to the annual use of<br />
other drugs. Responses to the annual and corresponding monthly<br />
use item for each drug were highly correlated (r = 0.89, P < 0.01),<br />
indicating a high level of response consistency.<br />
Perceived Risk of Harm. Seven items measured perceived risk<br />
of harm due to substance usage: "How much do you think people<br />
risk harming themselves (physically or in other ways) if they<br />
smoke one or more packs of cigarettes per day; smoke marijuana<br />
(pot) occasionally; smoke marijuana regularly; use cocaine<br />
occasionally; use cocaine regularly; take one or two drinks of<br />
alcohol (beer, wine, liquor) occasionally; have five or more drinks<br />
once or twice each weekend?" For each item, the response options<br />
ranged from 0 (no risk) to 3 (great risk). Numeric values for all<br />
seven items were averaged for a scale ranging from 0 to 3 with<br />
Cronbach's alpha of .90. For use in the logit regression analyses<br />
the mid-points were used to recode the scores to their original<br />
response categories, 0.00-0.49 (no risk), 0.50-1.49 (slight risk),<br />
1.50-2.49 (moderate risk) and 2.50-3.00 (great risk).<br />
Perceived Peer Disapproval. To measure perceived peer<br />
approval of using substances, 7 more items were used: "How do<br />
you think your close friends feel (or would feel) about you doing<br />
each of the following things? Smoke one or more packs of cigarettes<br />
per day; smoke marijuana (pot) occasionally; smoke marijuana<br />
regularly; use cocaine occasionally; use cocaine regularly; take<br />
one or two drinks of alcohol (beer, wine, liquor) occasionally; and<br />
have five or more drinks once or twice each weekend?" For each<br />
item the response options ranged from 0 (strongly approve) to 4<br />
(strongly disapprove). Numeric values for all seven items were<br />
averaged for a scale from 0 to 4 with Cronbach's alpha of .94. For<br />
use in the logit regression analyses the mid-points were used to<br />
recode the scores to their original response categories: 0.00-0.49<br />
(strongly approve); 0.50-1.49 (approve); 1.50-2.49 (don't know);<br />
2.50-3.49 (disapprove); and 3.50-4.00 (strongly disapprove).<br />
Perceived Parental Disapproval. Seven items were also used to<br />
measure perceived parental approval of using substances: "How<br />
do you think your parents/guardians feel (or would feel) about<br />
you doing each of the following things? Smoke one or more<br />
packs of cigarettes per day; smoke marijuana (pot) occasionally;<br />
smoke marijuana regularly; use cocaine occasionally; use cocaine<br />
regularly; take one or two drinks of alcohol (beer, wine, liquor)<br />
occasionally; have five or more drinks once or twice each<br />
weekend?" For each item the response options ranged from 0<br />
(strongly approve) to 4 (strongly disapprove). Numeric values for<br />
all seven items were averaged for a scale ranging from 0 to 4 with<br />
Cronbach's alpha of .96. For use in the logit regression analysis the<br />
mid-points were used to recode the scores to their original response<br />
categories: 0.00-0.49 (strongly approve); 0.50-1.49 (approve);<br />
1.50-2.49 (don't know); 2.50-3.49 (disapprove); and 3.50-4.00<br />
(strongly disapprove).<br />
Data Analysis<br />
Chi-square analyses (SPSS 15.0) were used to examine sociodemographic<br />
differences between the student sample and the<br />
population. Three separate binomial logit regression analyses<br />
(STATA, version 9) were applied to examine the relationship<br />
between socio-demographic factors, risk factors and cigarette use<br />
with reported use of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine during the past<br />
month, respectively (categories of no use versus 1 time or more). To<br />
test which factors significantly increase or decrease the probability<br />
of using substances, binomial logit analyses were performed. Logit<br />
models are superior to standard linear models when estimating<br />
binary outcomes because the latter can give erroneous predicted<br />
probabilities due to heteroscedasticity or non-normality of error<br />
terms. Due to the asymmetry or lack of comparability with odds<br />
ratios, logit coefficients are preferred as a measure of strength of<br />
relationship (Garson, 2008). Odds ratios vary from 0.00 to 0.99<br />
for negative relationships, whereas they vary from 1.01 to infinity<br />
for positive relationships. The general form of the binomial logit<br />
p<br />
model is: 1n[ 17 ] = 2<br />
2<br />
where the natural logarithm and p/(1 -<br />
2<br />
p) is the odds ratio. The logit term refers to the natural log of the<br />
odds ratio. B represents the parameter estimate going with X, and<br />
X represents the vector of independent variables (q varies from 1<br />
to n for n independent variables). Finally, predicted probabilities of<br />
using alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine were examined separately<br />
across increasing doses of cigarette use: from none to 1-plus pack<br />
per day.<br />
Results<br />
Table 1 compares the socio-demographic characteristics of<br />
students in the sample with the statewide population. Chi-square<br />
analyses showed that gender, race/ethnicity and grade level varied<br />
significantly between the sample and the population. In many cases<br />
these differences were slight; however, due to the large sample<br />
volume 5, issue 1 39
Tobacco, the Common Enemy<br />
size, they were statistically significant. For example, the sample<br />
contained more females than the state population (51.0% vs. 49.0%)<br />
and more 6 th grade students (15.2% vs. 14.5%). Simultaneously,<br />
modest differences in race/ethnicity suggest caution in generalizing<br />
results for white and black students who were under-represented in<br />
the sample compared to the population.<br />
Figure 1 compares the monthly use of various substances for the<br />
sample of 8 th grade students in Indiana with national counterparts<br />
who were administered the Monitoring the Future Survey in 2007.<br />
<strong>No</strong>tably higher percentages of students in the Indiana sample used<br />
cigarettes, alcohol and marijuana compared to the nation. Slightly<br />
higher percentages of Indiana students used smokeless tobacco,<br />
cocaine and methamphetamines compared to students nationally.<br />
Generally, similar results were obtained for selected other grades<br />
where comparable data were available at the national level. Due<br />
to space limitations, those figures are not included in this research<br />
article but are available upon request.<br />
Figure 2 illustrates the relationship between percentage of<br />
students in grades 6-12 who smoked progressive dosages of<br />
cigarettes monthly and reported use of different substances (e.g.,<br />
alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, etc.) at least once during the past<br />
month. In the majority of instances, the percentage of respondents<br />
who reported using a drug in the past month increased significantly<br />
as cigarette dosage increased from none to 1 or more packs per<br />
day. Applying chi-square analyses, the findings consistently<br />
demonstrate a linear dose-response relationship between cigarette<br />
usage and use of 12 separate substances (P < 0.01).<br />
Separate binomial logit regression analyses (STATA, version 9)<br />
were used to examine the relationship between gender, race, grade<br />
level, several risk/protective factors and level (dose) of cigarette<br />
smoking with each of 3 different substances–alcohol, marijuana,<br />
or cocaine–reportedly used in the past month. The categories were<br />
never and at least once.<br />
The first set of results in Table 2 show factors associated with<br />
using alcohol in the past month versus no use in the past month. The<br />
odds of reporting alcohol use were 14.6% greater for female than<br />
male adolescents. The odds of drinking alcohol were 10.5% greater<br />
for white than non-white adolescents. As grade level advanced, the<br />
odds of drinking alcohol in the past month increased 26.9%. As<br />
40 Journal of Research<br />
perceived risk of harm rose from no risk to great risk, the odds<br />
of drinking alcohol decreased 25.4%. Likewise, as perceived peer<br />
disapproval rose, the odds of drinking alcohol in the past month<br />
decreased 43.3%. And as perceived parental disapproval grew,<br />
the odds of drinking alcohol in the past month increased 17.5%.<br />
Finally, as cigarette dosage climbed, the odds of drinking alcohol<br />
rose by 106.7%.<br />
The second and third sets of results in Table 2 show factors<br />
associated with reporting marijuana and cocaine use, respectively.<br />
Although the numeric values differ, with few exceptions, the<br />
results are similar to those found for reported use of alcohol.<br />
Gender was an exception, in that the odds of using marijuana<br />
and cocaine were greater for males than for females (3.4% and<br />
36.8%, respectively). In addition, the odds of using marijuana<br />
were 30.1% greater and, for using cocaine, 27.2% greater for nonwhites<br />
compared to whites. The opposite was found for alcohol:<br />
the odds of using alcohol were greater for whites than nonwhites.<br />
Overall, however, the relationships were consistent across<br />
substances. Moreover, as cigarette dosage increased, the odds of<br />
using marijuana and cocaine grew as well, 134.2% and 62.2%,<br />
respectively.<br />
Via percentage, Table 3 shows predicted probabilities of using<br />
alcohol in the past month by gender, race, grade level, perceived<br />
risk of harm and perceived risk of peer disapproval and parental
Tobacco, the Common Enemy<br />
disapproval, according to reported dose of cigarette smoking.<br />
The predicted probability of using alcohol in the past month<br />
rose within gender and race groups for every categorical increase<br />
in reported dose of cigarette smoking. The predicted probability of<br />
using alcohol in the past month when no cigarettes were smoked<br />
ranged from 17% to 19% between gender and race (white, nonwhite)<br />
categories compared to probabilities ranging from 79% to<br />
81% when 1 or more packs a day were smoked. There were small<br />
differences in the predicted probabilities between gender categories.<br />
Females who smoked cigarettes in any amount had from 2% to<br />
4% greater predicted probability of consuming alcohol in the past<br />
month compared to males who smoked the same amount. Smaller<br />
differences were seen in the predicted probabilities between race<br />
categories. White adolescents who smoked cigarettes in any amount<br />
had from a 1% to 3% greater predicted probability of consuming<br />
alcohol in the past month compared to non-whites.<br />
As dose of cigarettes smoked grew within each grade level,<br />
predicted probability of drinking alcohol consistently grew as<br />
well. For instance, 8 th graders who reported no use of cigarettes<br />
had a 16% predicted probability of consuming alcohol. Those who<br />
reported using a few cigarettes had a 28% probability, and those<br />
who smoked 1-plus pack per day had a 77% predicted probability of<br />
drinking alcohol in the past month. As dose of cigarettes increased<br />
within the category of perceived risk of harm, the predicted<br />
probabilities of drinking alcohol in the past month increased. For<br />
instance, adolescents who reported smoking cigarettes a few times<br />
and perceived no risk of harm had a 46% predicted probability of<br />
drinking alcohol. Those who smoked !-packs per day had a 78%,<br />
and those who smoked 1-plus packs per day had an 88% predicted<br />
probability of using alcohol. Likewise, as cigarette dosage grew<br />
within the category of perceived peer disapproval, the predicted<br />
probabilities of drinking alcohol in the past month grew. For<br />
example, adolescents who reported smoking 1-5 cigarettes per<br />
day and perceived strong peer disapproval had a 37% predicted<br />
probability of drinking alcohol, and those who smoked 1-plus pack<br />
per day had a 71% predicted probability of using alcohol.<br />
Although the expected inverse relationship between perceived<br />
parental disapproval and the odds of drinking alcohol in the past<br />
month was not found (Table 2), the familiar dose-response pattern<br />
within categories of perceived parental disapproval was evident.<br />
For instance, adolescents who reported smoking a few times<br />
and perceived strong parent disapproval had a 33% predicted<br />
probability of using alcohol compared to those who smoked 1-<br />
plus pack per day who had an 81% predicted probability of using<br />
alcohol in the past month.<br />
The separate patterns of predicted probabilities for using<br />
marijuana and cocaine in the past month were similar to those<br />
found for alcohol use (not shown). Specifically, the predicted<br />
probabilities of using marijuana (and cocaine) increased in relation<br />
to incremental doses of cigarette use within socio-demographic<br />
(e.g., gender, race) and risk categories. Regardless of gender, race,<br />
grade-level and level of risk factor, this same dose-response pattern<br />
was unequivocal.<br />
The main results of the cross-validation of the 2008 survey of<br />
over 150,000 students were consistent with the original results of<br />
this study. The percentage of students who reported using alcohol,<br />
marijuana, and cocaine in the past month and the predicted<br />
volume 5, issue 1 41
Tobacco, the Common Enemy<br />
probabilities increased significantly as cigarette dosage increased<br />
(P < 0.01).<br />
Discussion<br />
Tobacco use is clearly the most preventable cause of premature<br />
death and suffering, and it contributes significantly to skyrocketing<br />
health care costs in the U.S. and beyond. That is why, in this paper,<br />
tobacco is labeled as everyone's common enemy, regardless of<br />
socio-demographics. As the first section of this article pointed out,<br />
tobacco use affects smokers' and non-smokers' health and wellbeing.<br />
The main purpose of this paper was to answer the three questions<br />
listed in the introduction section. To do this, it was analyzed in 2007<br />
and cross-validated with 2008 data relative to tobacco, alcohol and<br />
other drug use among students' grades 6-12.<br />
With regard to monthly use, the present study found that Indiana<br />
8 th graders used cigarettes, alcohol and marijuana at a notably higher<br />
rate and smokeless tobacco, cocaine and methamphetamines at a<br />
slightly higher rate than 8th graders nationally. The comparison<br />
of other grades in Indiana with their national counterparts<br />
(where comparable data were available) revealed similar results.<br />
Consequently, it is clear that tobacco and other drug use is<br />
prevalent among students all over the country. A Midwestern state<br />
is not immune from this devastating public health problem.<br />
Also, this study revealed that a strong dose-response relationship,<br />
with regard to monthly use of cigarettes and other substances, was<br />
found across all grades surveyed: increased smoking was strongly<br />
associated with increased use of alcohol, smokeless tobacco and<br />
five other drugs. Comparing use versus non-use in the past month,<br />
a strong dose-response relationship was also found across all<br />
grades with alcohol, the odds of having drunk alcohol increasing<br />
by 106.7%. Similarly, past-month use of cigarettes was associated<br />
with increased odds of marijuana and cocaine use (134.2% and<br />
62.2%, respectively). The strength of the dose-response relationship<br />
and patterns of predicted probabilities between increasing monthly<br />
cigarette use and increasing alcohol use (Table 3) were observed<br />
within gender and race (white versus non-white).<br />
The pattern of dose-response between cigarette use and alcohol<br />
use was found to extend also to marijuana and cocaine use. Within<br />
each category of perception for harm and for peer and parental<br />
disapproval, growing cigarette dosage was associated with<br />
predicted probability of increased past-month alcohol use (Table<br />
3): the heavier the level of smoking, the greater the predicted<br />
probability of alcohol use.<br />
Whereas some demographic subgroups were at a higher risk for<br />
drug use than others, even without cigarette smoking, the relationship<br />
between rising cigarette use and use of alcohol, marijuana, and<br />
cocaine occurred across gender, race and risk/protective factors.<br />
Females who smoked cigarettes were slightly more susceptible to<br />
alcohol use. In contrast, males were incrementally more at risk for<br />
cocaine use. Whites who smoked cigarettes were more vulnerable<br />
than nonwhites to alcohol use. At the same time, incremental use<br />
of cigarettes placed nonwhites at a higher risk for marijuana and<br />
cocaine use. Regardless of the adolescent's level of risk/protective<br />
factors, the cigarette dose-dependent relationship existed, which<br />
suggests diminution of smoking contributes to drug use prevention<br />
beyond what is derived through perceived risk of harm, peer<br />
42 Journal of Research<br />
disapproval, and parental disapproval.<br />
Through its confirmation of tobacco's deleterious character and<br />
powerful association of youth cigarette smoking and use of other<br />
drugs, this study has strong implications for policies and other<br />
strategies to address this problem. Given the human and economic<br />
toll exerted by tobacco, this study calls for action on multiple levels<br />
in the form of evidence-based programs, policies and practices to<br />
reduce smoking incidence and prevalence.<br />
Parents constitute perhaps the most important ingredient in<br />
preventing youth tobacco use. Research by NIDA suggests that<br />
parents set clear and reasonable rules and follow up with consistent<br />
and appropriate enforcement and consequences (Family Guide:<br />
Keeping Youth Mentally Health and Drug-Free, 2008). Beyond<br />
parental rule-setting and general oversight of children's behaviors,<br />
such explicit actions as monitoring which movies children view<br />
can provide protective influence, since certain movies glamorizing<br />
tobacco use can negatively influence children (Sargent, Tanski &<br />
Gibson, 2007). Parents need to provide positive role models and<br />
never allow smoking in their home or family car.<br />
Tobacco use affects the entire community and, hence, communitybased<br />
strategies are needed. Evidence-based community strategies<br />
include increasing taxes on cigarettes, interventions to reduce<br />
youth access to tobacco in combination with mobilization efforts,<br />
and counter-marketing campaigns (Sustaining state programs,<br />
2006; Zaza, 2009).<br />
Stubera, Galea, and Link raise another intriguing possibility,<br />
that of increasing stigmatization of smoking lowering its use. They<br />
suggest marketing that stresses the danger of second-hand smoke<br />
and discrimination against smokers in health insurance costs are<br />
two factors that can contribute to that stigmatization (Stubera,<br />
Galea, & Link, 2008). Programs which are shown to work, such<br />
as the combination of school- and community-based prevention<br />
efforts as described by Lohrmann, Alter, Greene, and Younoszai,<br />
should be implemented (Lohrmann, Alter, Green & Younoszai,<br />
2005).<br />
Also, the National Registry of Effective Prevention Programs<br />
and Practices (National Registry, 2008) includes evidence-based<br />
tobacco prevention program and practice strategies, which have<br />
been evaluated for all ages and settings across the lifespan (www.<br />
nrepp.samhsa.gov) and across domains, including schools,<br />
families, communities and workplace. Schools need to employ<br />
smoking bans on and around their campuses, to adopt evidencebased<br />
tobacco prevention curricula and to offer and promote<br />
smoking cessation programs.<br />
Policies that ban or restrict smoking can effectively reduce the<br />
volume of secondhand smoke and exposure to it, as well as decrease<br />
cigarette consumption, including among teens (Sustaining state<br />
programs, 2006; Wakefield, et al 2000). In contrast to industry<br />
predictions, smoking bans in restaurants and bars have not been<br />
found to result in large declines in sales (Alamar, & Glantz,<br />
2004; Bartosch, & Pope, 1999; Huang, De, & McCusker, 2004).<br />
The greater the exposure of children to pro-tobacco messages,<br />
the more open they are to smoking in the future (Seo, Torabi, &<br />
Weaver, 2008). Research shows that communities have the power<br />
to influence the perceptions of youth and adults on smoking norms<br />
by enacting and enforcing a wide variety of strong regulations on<br />
tobacco control (Hamilton, Biener, & Brennan, 2008). 38 The greater
Tobacco, the Common Enemy<br />
the exposure of children to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) in<br />
their homes and family cars, the more likely they are to consider<br />
smoking in their future (Seo, Torabi, & Weaver, 2008). Studies<br />
support restricting smoking in the home as a recommended method<br />
to reduce youth smoking (Wakefield et al., 2000). Communities<br />
should restrict smoking indoors and approve legislation to ban<br />
smoking in cars transporting children.<br />
The findings of the study should be interpreted in light of the<br />
following limitations. Like most other studies on this topic, the<br />
findings of the study are based on students' self-report. Although<br />
this cross-sectional data cannot be used to determine causality,<br />
the association between amount of cigarettes used and the use of<br />
alcohol and other drugs is unequivocal. Although the sample size<br />
was large and differences between the sample and the population<br />
for gender, race/ethnicity and grade level were slight, they were<br />
statistically significant. Caution should be exercised, particularly in<br />
regard to the generalization of results for groups under-represented<br />
in the sample.<br />
Implications<br />
Whether the association of smoking with increased use of other<br />
drugs is a relationship of cause and effect or a manifestation of<br />
a common association with another variable such as high risktaking<br />
or rebelliousness, it remains true that every parent, teacher,<br />
and person who works with youth in our society should recognize<br />
the powerful predictive relationship that exists between cigarette<br />
smoking by children and adolescents and use of alcohol and other<br />
drugs. This is particularly true where use of cigarettes is heavy, for<br />
example, daily smoking or smoking of 1-plus packs per day. This<br />
study clearly provides further evidence that tobacco use serves as a<br />
"gateway drug."<br />
The present study highlights dose-response rates that suggest the<br />
need for further investigation of tobacco as a "gateway drug" that<br />
increases the likelihood of other drug use. The younger a person<br />
begins smoking, the more difficult it is to quit and the greater<br />
the likelihood of addiction and disease (Cancer Trends Progress<br />
Report–2007; DeWit, Offord, & Wong, 1997; Elders, Perry,<br />
Eriksen, & Giovino, 1994; Helping teens stop smoking, 2008).<br />
Given the serious health consequences of smoking on individuals<br />
and on those exposed to their smoking and given the economic<br />
burden that smoking represents, society should aggressively adopt<br />
multiple strategies built around evidence-based policies, programs<br />
and practices, and implement those strategies across multiple<br />
community domains to delay smoking initiation and to reduce its<br />
incidence and prevalence.<br />
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />
Mohammad R. Torabi is Chancellor's professor and Chairperson<br />
in the Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana University,<br />
Bloomington, IN 47405; E-mail: torabi@indiana.edu. Mi Kyung<br />
Jun is a research associate in the Indiana Prevention Resource<br />
Center, Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana University,<br />
Bloomington, IN 47405. Carole <strong>No</strong>wicke is a reference librarian<br />
in the Indiana Prevention Resource Center, Department of<br />
Applied Health Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN<br />
17405. Barbara Seitz de Martinez is the deputy director in the<br />
Indiana Prevention Resource Center, Department of Applied<br />
Health Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47404.<br />
Ruth Gassman is the executive director in the Indiana Prevention<br />
Resource Center, Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana<br />
University, Bloomington, IN 47404.<br />
Author <strong>No</strong>te: This article is reproduce with permission and<br />
was previously published by the American Journal of Health<br />
Education–January/February <strong>2010</strong>, <strong>Volume</strong> 41, <strong>No</strong>. 1, 4-13<br />
Author <strong>No</strong>te: This research was supported by a contract with the<br />
Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, Division of<br />
Mental Health and Addiction, financially supported through HHS/<br />
Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration, Center<br />
for Substance Abuse Prevention, Substance Abuse Prevention and<br />
Treatment Block Grant.<br />
Reference<br />
Alamar, B. C., & Glantz, S. A. (2004). Smoke-free ordinances increase<br />
restaurant profit and value. Contemporary Economic Policy, 22, 520-<br />
525. doi:10.1093/cep/byh038.<br />
Armour, B., Woollery, T., Malarcher, A., Pechacek, T., & Husten, C.<br />
(2005). Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life<br />
lost, and productivity losses–United States, 1997-2001. JAMA: Journal<br />
of the American Medical Association, 294(7), 788-789.<br />
Bartosch, W., & Pope, G. (1999). Local restaurant smoking policy<br />
enactment in Massachusetts. Journal of public health management<br />
and practice, 5, 63-73.<br />
Cancer Trends Progress Report--2007 Update. (2007). Bethesda, MD:<br />
National Cancer Institute. Retrieved from http://progressreport.cancer.<br />
gov/2007/<br />
DeWit, D. J., Offord, D. R., & Wong, M. (1997). Patterns of onset and<br />
cessation of drug use over the early part of the life course. Health<br />
education & behavior, 24, 746-758.<br />
DiFranza, J. (2007). Hooked from the first cigarette. Journal of Family<br />
Practice, 56, 1017-1022.<br />
DiFranza, J. (2008). Hooked from the first cigarette. Scientific American,<br />
298, 82-87.<br />
DiFranza, J., Savageau, J., Fletcher, K., Pbert, L., O'Loughlin, J.,<br />
McNeill, A., et al. (2007). Susceptibility to nicotine dependence: the<br />
Development and Assessment of Nicotine Dependence in Youth 2<br />
study. Pediatrics, 120, e974-983. Retrieved from http://www.cinahl.<br />
com/cgi-bin/refsvc?jid=783&accno=2009688065<br />
Eaton, D., Kann, L., Kinchen, S., Ross, J., Hawkins, J., Harris, W., et al.<br />
(2006). Youth risk behavior surveillance–United States, 2005. Journal<br />
of school health, 76, 353-372.<br />
Elders, M., Perry, C., Eriksen, M., & Giovino, G. (1994). The Report of<br />
the Surgeon General: Preventing tobacco use among young people.<br />
American journal of public health, 84, 543.<br />
Garson, G. D. (2008). Log-linear, logit, and probit models. [Web<br />
page]. <strong>No</strong>rth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. Retrieved from<br />
http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/logit.htm<br />
Family Guide: Keeping Youth Mentally Health and Drug-Free. (2008).<br />
[Web site]. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health<br />
Services Administration. Retrieved from http://family.samhsa.gov/<br />
Gassman, R., Jun, M.K, Samuel, S., Martin, E.V., Agley, J.D., et al. (2007).<br />
Alcohol, tobacco and other drug use in Indiana by Indiana children and<br />
adolescents: 2007 Prevalence statistics main findings. Bloomington,<br />
IN: Institute for Drug Abuse Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.<br />
drugs.indiana.edu/publications/survey/indianaSurvey_2007.pdf<br />
Gassman, R., Jun, M. K., Samuel, S., Martin, E. V., Lee, J., Burmeister,<br />
S. L., et al. (2008). Alcohol, tobacco and other drug use in Indiana<br />
by Indiana children and adolescents: 2008 Prevalence statistics main<br />
findings. Bloomington, IN: Institute for Drug Abuse Prevention.<br />
Retrieved from http://www.drugs.indiana.edu/publications/survey/<br />
indianaSurvey_2008.pdf<br />
volume 5, issue 1 43
Tobacco, the Common Enemy<br />
Hamilton, W., Biener, L., & Brennan, R. (2008). Do local tobacco<br />
regulations influence perceived smoking norms? Evidence from adult<br />
and youth surveys in Massachusetts. Health Education Research, 23,<br />
709-722.<br />
Huang, P., De, A. K, & McCusker, M. E. (2004). Impact of a Smoking<br />
Ban on Restaurant and Bar Revenues --El Paso, Texas, 2002. MMWR:<br />
Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, 53, 150-152.<br />
Hawkins, J., Catalano, R., & Miller, J. (1992). Risk and protective<br />
factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early<br />
adulthood: implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological<br />
Bulletin, 112(1), 64-105.<br />
The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon<br />
General (2004). Department of Health and Human Services, Centers<br />
for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic<br />
Disease Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health. Washington,<br />
DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://www.<br />
surgeongeneral.gov/library/smokingconsequences/<br />
The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke:<br />
A Report of the Surgeon General. (2006). Department of Health and<br />
Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National<br />
Center for Chronic Disease Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health.<br />
Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://<br />
www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/secondhandsmoke/<br />
Helping teens stop smoking. (2008). [Web site]. Boston, MA: Harvard<br />
Medical School Family Health Guide. Retrieved from http://www.<br />
health.harvard.edu/fhg/updates/Helping-teens-stop-smoking.shtml<br />
Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E.<br />
(2006). Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use,<br />
1975-2005. <strong>Volume</strong> I: Secondary school students (NIH Publication<br />
<strong>No</strong>. 06-5883). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.<br />
Kandel, D, & Faust R., (1975). Sequence and stages in patterns of<br />
adolescent drug-use. Archives of general psychiatry, 32, 923-932.<br />
Kandel, D. B. (1975). Stages in adolescent involvement in drug-use.<br />
Science, 190, 912-914.<br />
Kandel, D. B. (2002). Examining the gateway hypothesis: Stages and<br />
pathways of drug involvement. In: D. B. Kandel, (Ed.), Stages and<br />
pathways of drug involvement: Examining the gateway hypothesis (pp.<br />
3-15). New York: Cambridge University Press.<br />
Kandel, D., & Yamaguchi, K. (1992). Stages of progression in drug<br />
involvement from adolescence to adulthood: Further evidence for the<br />
gateway theory. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 53, 447-457.<br />
Kelley, R., Denny, G., & Young, M. (1999). Modified stages of<br />
acquisition of gateway drug use: a primary prevention application of<br />
the Stages of Change Model. Journal of Drug Education, 29, 189-<br />
203.<br />
Lohrmann, D., Alter, R., Greene, R., & Younoszai, T. (2005). Longterm<br />
impact of a district-wide school/community-based substance<br />
abuse prevention initiative on gateway drug use. Journal of drug<br />
education, 35, 233-253. Retrieved from http://www.cinahl.com/cgibin/refsvc?jid=1828&accno=2009240337<br />
Mazzone, P. & Arroliga, A. (2004, December). How many ways can we<br />
say that cigarette smoking is bad for you? Chest, 126, 1717-1718.<br />
doi:10.1378/chest.126.6.1717<br />
National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings 2006.<br />
(2007). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services<br />
Administration. Retrieved from http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/cocoon/<br />
SAMHDA/STUDY/21240.xml<br />
National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP).<br />
(2008). [Web site]. Rockville, M.D.: Substance Abuse and Mental<br />
Health Services Administration. Retrieved from http://www.nrepp.<br />
samhsa.gov/<br />
Proposed IdentiÆcation of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic<br />
Air Contaminant. (2005) Sacramento, CA: California Environmental<br />
Protection Agency; 2005. Retrieved from http://www.arb.ca.gov/<br />
regact/ets2006/ets2006.htm<br />
Sargent, J., Tanski, S. & Gibson, J. (2007). Exposure to movie smoking<br />
among US adolescents aged 10 to 14 years: a population estimate.<br />
Pediatrics, 119, e1167-e1176.<br />
Seo, D., Torabi, M., & Weaver, A. (2008). Factors influencing openness<br />
to future smoking among nonsmoking adolescents. Journal of School<br />
Health, 78, 328-336.<br />
Stewart, S., Cardinez, C., Richardson, L., <strong>No</strong>rman, L., Kaufmann,<br />
R., Pechacek, T., et al. (2008). Surveillance for cancers associated<br />
with tobacco use--United States, 1999-2004. MMWR: Morbidity &<br />
Mortality Weekly Report, 57(SS-8), 1-33.<br />
Stubera, J., Galea, S., & Link, B. G. (2008). Smoking and the emergence<br />
of a stigmatized social status. Social Science & Medicine, 67, 420-<br />
430.<br />
Sustaining state programs for tobacco control: Data highlights. (2006).<br />
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease<br />
Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from http://www.<br />
cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/state_data/data_highlights/2006/pdfs/<br />
dataHighlights06rev.pdf<br />
Tomar S. L. (2003). Is use of smokeless tobacco a risk factor for cigarette<br />
smoking? The U.S. experience. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 5, 561-<br />
569.<br />
Torabi, M., Bailey, W., & Majd-Jabbari, M. (1993). Cigarette smoking as<br />
a predictor of alcohol and other drug use by children and adolescents:<br />
evidence of the "gateway drug effect". Journal of school health, 63,<br />
302-306.<br />
Wakefield, M., Ruel, E., Chaloupka, F., Kaufman, N., Orleans, C., &<br />
Barker, D. (2000). Effect of restrictions on smoking at home, at school,<br />
and in public places on teenage smoking: cross sectional study. BMJ:<br />
British Medical Journal, 321, 333-337.<br />
Warren, C., Jones, N., Peruga, A., Chauvin, J., Baptiste, J., de Silva, V.,<br />
et al. (2008). Global youth tobacco surveillance, 2000-2007. MMWR<br />
Surveillance Summaries, 57(SS-1), 1-28.<br />
WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2008: the MPOWER<br />
package. (2008). Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from<br />
http://www.who.int/tobacco/mpower/package/en/index.html<br />
Zaza S., (Ed.) (2009). Tobacco Use, in The community guide: What works<br />
to promote health. [Web site]. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control<br />
and Prevention, National Center for Health Marketing. Retrieved from<br />
http://www.thecommunityguide.org/tobacco/index.html !<br />
44 Journal of Research
The Health and Wellbeing of Staff Members<br />
at a Tertiary Institution in New Zealand<br />
by Sonja Dreyer, Universal College of Learning, Palmerston <strong>No</strong>rth,<br />
New Zealand; Lukas I. Dreyer, Massey University Manawatu,<br />
Palmerston <strong>No</strong>rth, New Zealand; Dean M. Rankin, Universal<br />
College of Learning, Palmerston <strong>No</strong>rth, New Zealand<br />
Abstract<br />
The purpose of this study was to determine the physical,<br />
psychological and biochemical health status of staff members at a<br />
higher educational institution (Institute of Technology). Relative<br />
large numbers of subjects were identified with hypertension<br />
(18.5%), stress symptoms (32.1%), job stress (36%) and emotional<br />
exhaustion (11.4%). Thirty percent presented with more than three<br />
risk factors, 49% with one or two risk factors while only 21% were<br />
risk free. Cardiovascular fitness showed positive associations with<br />
body fat, body weight, stress, emotional exhaustion and fasting<br />
blood glucose levels. Psychological health correlated significantly<br />
(p"0.05) with measures of coronary risk, health status, body<br />
composition and cardiovascular fitness. Staff assistance programs<br />
focusing on exercise, weight management and job stress could<br />
potentially have a positive impact on overall health of staff at<br />
tertiary institutions.<br />
Key words: Happiness and quality of life<br />
Various researchers from across the globe reflect in scientific<br />
publications on the continuous and disquieting increase in levels<br />
of occupational stress experienced by staff at higher educational<br />
institutions (Dua, 1994; Gillespie, Walsh, Winefields, Dua & Souch,<br />
2001; Houston, Meyer & Paewai, 2006; Tytherleigh, Webb, Cooper<br />
& Ricketts, 2005). Stress might arise from job environmental factors,<br />
like overload, time constraints, lack of promotion, changing job<br />
roles and/or from individual interpretation (cognitive assessment)<br />
of the situation. There is general agreement that chronic job related<br />
stress can impact negatively on psycho-emotional well-being,<br />
physical health, as well as on lifestyle and exercise habits (Lovalla<br />
& Gerin, 2003; Nicholson, Fuhrer & Marmot, 2005; Rosengren et<br />
al., 2004). The impact of occupational stress on the physical and<br />
psychological health of staff at higher educational institutions is as<br />
yet not fully explored. This is surprising as the higher educational<br />
sector has commonly been regarded as a working environment<br />
that has become increasingly more stressful and psychologically<br />
demanding due to multiple triggers for stress-related illnesses<br />
(Kinman, 2001; Winefield & Jarret, 2001). In a national survey of<br />
British working conditions, university lecturers reported the lowest<br />
levels of self-reported psychological health compared to 19 other<br />
occupational groups (Millward-Brown, 1996). In a comprehensive<br />
study by Tytherleigh et al. (2005) examining occupational stress in<br />
higher education institutions, it was concluded that universities no<br />
longer provide the low stress working environment they once did.<br />
Research conducted at a number of academic institutions (United<br />
Kingdom, United States of America, Australia, Netherlands,<br />
New Zealand and South Africa) identified several key stressors<br />
commonly associated with stress among faculty staff. Overload,<br />
time constraints, lack of promotion opportunities, inadequate<br />
recognition, salary, changing job role, inadequate management and/<br />
or participation in management, inadequate resources and funding,<br />
and student interactions were listed as the majors stressors in most<br />
of these studies (Barkhuizen & Rothman, 2008; Taris, Scheurs &<br />
Van Iersel-Van Silfhout, 2001; Tytherleigh et al., 2005; Winefield<br />
& Jarrett, 2001; Winter & Sarros, 2002). Research by Barkhuizen<br />
and Rothman (2008) indicate that the academic environment is<br />
still largely a male dominated occupation and express the opinion<br />
that female academics might therefore experience more stressors<br />
and strains than male academics. Reasons for this may include<br />
the lack of role models, less socialization from women of their<br />
own rank, gender stereotypes and role conflict as they endeavor to<br />
balance roles at work and home. Longer working hours resulting<br />
from trying to balance work and family responsibilities might<br />
make female academics more susceptible to psychological health<br />
and well-being problems (Barkhuizen & Rothman, 2008).<br />
Health is traditionally determined by assessing coronary artery<br />
disease (CAD) risk and includes measures such as: a) family<br />
history, b) body weight, c) smoking status, d) total cholesterol<br />
(TC), e) total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein-ratio (TC/HDLratio),<br />
f) resting blood pressure, g) diabetes, h) gout (which is<br />
defined as elevated uric acid levels associated with pain attacks<br />
in selected joints like the big toe) and i) perceived levels of stress.<br />
Exercise capacity and elevated blood pressure responses during<br />
sub-maximal exercise testing have also been identified as potent<br />
predictors of long-term health (Ashley & Myers, 2003). In addition<br />
certain psycho-emotional constructs (e.g. depression, anxiety)<br />
have emerged lately as significant predictors of long-term health<br />
(Carney, 1998; Lovallo & Gerin, 2003; Nicholson et al. 2005;<br />
Rosengren et al., 2004).<br />
Psychological stress is regarded as a secondary risk factor<br />
for coronary artery disease (CAD) (American College of Sports<br />
Medicine, <strong>2010</strong>) but limited information is available regarding the<br />
association, or clustering, of psycho-emotional constructs with<br />
coronary risk and overall health status of staff at higher educational<br />
institutions. Higher education seems to equate with healthier<br />
lifestyles (Ogden, 2004). Kobasa, Maddi, and Courington (1981)<br />
introduced the concept of the hardy personality, or individuals<br />
that seem to flourish on stress, in essence, indicating that an<br />
individual’s appraisal of the situation (stressor) could impact on the<br />
potential health consequences of a stressor like job environment.<br />
It is therefore quite possible that this type of population (highly<br />
educated individuals working at educational institutions) are better<br />
able to manage stress, or that higher probable levels of participation<br />
in physical exercise in this type of population would negate<br />
potentially positive relationships between psychological distress<br />
and markers of morphological, biochemical and physiological<br />
health.<br />
The aims of this study were:<br />
volume 5, issue 1 45
Health and Wellbeing<br />
1) To report the coronary risk and psycho-emotional health,<br />
physical work capacity and morphological profiles of staff<br />
members at a higher educational institution.<br />
2) To determine if female staff members exhibit more<br />
psychological distress and whether that correlates with<br />
inferior or lesser levels of morphological, physiological and<br />
biochemical health.<br />
3) To study the contribution of various psychological constructs<br />
to the variance of coronary risk and health status of staff<br />
members at a higher educational institution.<br />
4) To determine whether the level of cardiovascular fitness<br />
influences (negate or strengthen) the relationships between<br />
selected measurements of psychological, morphological,<br />
biochemical and physiological health.<br />
Method<br />
Subjects<br />
The subjects (n=81 randomly sampled out of 150 volunteers for<br />
the study) were either teaching (44.3% - n=35) or administrative<br />
(56.7% - n= 46) staff members at a higher educational teaching<br />
institution in New Zealand. This institution currently employs<br />
a total of 350 staff members. A total of 14.8% (n=12) of the 81<br />
staff members participating in this study were in either academic<br />
or administrative managerial positions, the remainder (n=69) were<br />
in general administrative positions and/or lecturing staff. Eighty<br />
(80.2%- n=65) percent of the group were females and 19.8%<br />
(n=16) were males. This study reports baseline data of an exercise/<br />
lifestyle intervention study and subject numbers were dictated by<br />
amount required to obtain statistical power with intervention.<br />
Health Status Questionnaires<br />
All subjects completed two health-screening questionnaires<br />
after providing informed consent. Symptomatology of illness was<br />
measured through the Seriousness of Illness Rating Scale (IRS)<br />
(Wyler, Masuda & Holmes, 1967), a self-reported checklist of<br />
126 commonly recognized physical and mental symptoms and<br />
diseases. In the development of this instrument by the Department<br />
of Psychiatry at the Washington University School of Medicine, a<br />
general severity weighting for each disorder was obtained by asking<br />
a large sample of physicians, interns, residents, and lay persons<br />
to rate each of them as to their relative seriousness. The ratings<br />
reflected prognosis, duration, threat to life, degree of disability,<br />
and degree of discomfort. A highly significant mean rank-order<br />
correlation (r=0.947) was found between the medical and the lay<br />
samples, and a system of weightings was accordingly constructed<br />
by essentially placing a list of 126 diseases in a hierarchical rank<br />
order from 1 to 126, with number 1 being the least troublesome<br />
or serious, and number 126 the one with the largest impact on<br />
health and well-being. This seriousness of illness rating scale<br />
has served as a frequent tool in stress and illness studies (Kobasa<br />
et al., 1981; Schroeder & Costa, 1984) and still reflects most of<br />
the common health problems that could potentially force people<br />
to use medication or visit a general practitioner. Modern diseases<br />
like fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome are not on the list<br />
but are covered by diseases/problems/ symptoms like tiredness,<br />
anxiety, nervousness, depression and a whole range of infectious<br />
problems. The questionnaire was used in this study to complement<br />
46 Journal of Research<br />
other measures of health in order to gain a concrete overall<br />
impression of general health.<br />
Coronary risk was assessed using a Coronary risk index<br />
reflecting the 14 most common or typical risk factors for CAD.<br />
Fourteen risk factors namely a) age, b) family history, c) body<br />
weight, d) exercise, e) tobacco smoking, f) total cholesterol, g)<br />
systolic blood pressure (SBP), h) diastolic blood pressure (DBP),<br />
i) gender, j) perceived stress, k) cardiovascular disease symptoms,<br />
l) personal history of cardiovascular disease, m) diabetes mellitus<br />
and n) gout are included in this index utilising a Likert scale format<br />
based on levels of risk (Bjurstrom & Alexiou, 1978). For example,<br />
females younger than 45, would get a gender risk score of 1, those<br />
older than 45 would get a risk score of 2, while a male would<br />
get a risk score of 4, a bald male a score of 5 and a short bald<br />
stocky male a score of 7. The category score for each of the 14 risk<br />
factors are summed to get an overall risk score for each individual<br />
and the highest probable score that an individual can get with this<br />
Coronary risk index is 114 and the lowest possible score is 5.<br />
Psychological Health<br />
Psychological health was assessed by means of reliable<br />
questionnaires, validated by their respective designers, through<br />
the process of using random controlled samples and by correlating<br />
results with various other accepted and validated questionnaires<br />
measuring similar or opposite psychological constructs. The<br />
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein,<br />
1983) was included as a measure of general life stress. The PSS<br />
measures the degree to which the subject perceives situations in<br />
her/his life as stressful. The PSS consists of 14 items referring to<br />
the general frequency of feelings or thoughts about stress during<br />
the past month. Items are rated on a 5 - point scale from "never"<br />
to "very often". The items are quite general in nature in order to<br />
assess a global level of perceived stress. Internal reliability has<br />
been shown to range from .84 to .86 across a variety of populations<br />
(Cohen et al., 1983). Emotional exhaustion was measured by<br />
the Psychological Burnout questionnaire (Pines, Aronson &<br />
Kafry, 1981) and Happiness, Well-being and Quality of Life by<br />
the Affectometer 2 (Kammann & Flett, 1983). Job Stress was<br />
determined by a questionnaire designed by Dua (1994), which<br />
specifically measures job stress in the academic environment.<br />
Biochemical Measures<br />
Fasting venous blood samples were taken in the week after<br />
which fitness testing was conducted. Total cholesterol (TC),<br />
Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), High density<br />
lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides, glucose and the<br />
total cholesterol/HDL-ratio (TC/HDL-ratio) were assessed using<br />
a registered biochemistry laboratory.<br />
Physiological Variables<br />
The physiological variables included height, weight, body<br />
composition, resting heart rate (RHR), and resting blood pressure<br />
(RBP). Body composition was obtained using the six skinfold<br />
procedure according to the guidelines of the International Society<br />
for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (2001). Resting blood<br />
pressure was taken after subjects had been lying for 5 minutes in<br />
the supine position in a quiet room, and was repeated three times.
Health and Wellbeing<br />
The lowest reading was recorded in cases where the three measures<br />
were within a 4 mmHg range. In cases where differences of larger<br />
than 4 mmHg were found the lower of the two measures that<br />
were within 4 mmHg from each other were used. Resting heart<br />
rate (RHR) was measured after the blood pressure readings, for a<br />
full minute with a stethoscope, and compared with the heart rate<br />
obtained with a polar heart rate monitor. This was repeated (if it<br />
didn’t match 100%) by checking the polar monitor and recounting<br />
heart rate for a full minute until a 100% match was obtained.<br />
All measurements on every subject were completed by the same<br />
person. Pulse Pressure (SBP-DBP) and Mean Arterial Pressure<br />
[DBP+ (PP/3)] were mathematically calculated using systolic<br />
(SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP).<br />
Functional Capacity<br />
Baseline physiological assessments of aerobic fitness were<br />
made using the YMCA cycle ergometer sub maximal test protocol<br />
(ACSM, <strong>2010</strong>). The testing protocol was comprised of a 3-minute<br />
warm-up at 25 Watts followed by 3-minute stages with increments<br />
in power output, depending on the subject’s heart rate and blood<br />
pressure exercise response. The aim was that each individual<br />
reached at least 70% of his/her age predicted maximum heart rate<br />
but blood pressure responses were used to determine symptom<br />
maximums on occasions where blood pressure responded poorly<br />
(systolic raising above 230 mmHg or diastolic increasing by more<br />
than 10 mmHg) during the exercise test. Heart rate was recorded<br />
every minute of each stage manually and with a heart rate monitor,<br />
while exercise blood pressure was manually recorded during the<br />
last minute of each stage. Karvonen’s formula (ACSM, <strong>2010</strong>) was<br />
used to determine 80% of maximum heart rate (220 - age - RHR<br />
x training percentage + RHR). The ACSM’s (<strong>2010</strong>) guidelines<br />
were used for early termination of the test. The ACSM (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />
metabolic and multistage equations were utilized to calculate each<br />
individual’s relative predicted VO 2max<br />
.<br />
Procedure<br />
Following ethics approval (Central Regional Ethics Committee,<br />
New Zealand) the project was advertised using the institutions<br />
website. A request was made for volunteers to join a health promotion<br />
and fitness training program run by the Department of Exercise and<br />
Sport Science. A total of 81 staff members out of 150 volunteers<br />
(from a possible cohort of 350 employees) were randomly selected<br />
for the study. The data in this study represent baseline data (prior<br />
to any lifestyle interventions). Although the population are a selfselected<br />
group it does provide valuable information regarding the<br />
health status of staff at a higher educational institution and on the<br />
interrelationships between baseline physiological, biochemical,<br />
cardiovascular, morphological and psychological variables. Staff<br />
were scheduled for one-hour appointments to perform the fitness<br />
test and complete the questionnaires starting on the first day of the<br />
week. The fitness testing was completed within 5 days (two stations<br />
testing nine people per day). Blood tests were taken between<br />
07h00 and 09h00 on two consecutive week days (Tuesday and<br />
Wednesday) the week after the fitness test was conducted, utilising<br />
a roster system.<br />
An independent t-test was used to assess for statistical differences<br />
between the two genders (male and female) with regard to the<br />
morphological, physiological, biochemical and psychological<br />
variables measured. Statistical analyses were also performed using<br />
correlations, stepwise multiple regression analysis and simple<br />
(one-way) analysis of variance (ANOVA). The Newman-Keuls<br />
post hoc test was used to determine intergroup differences. For<br />
the purpose of the ANOVA the respondents (male and females<br />
separately) were placed in fitness groups based on the VO 2max<br />
group<br />
distribution. Those with VO 2max<br />
scores above the 70th percentile of<br />
the respective gender group distribution curves were placed in the<br />
highly fit groups and those below the 30th percentile in the low<br />
fitness groups. The rest were classified as moderately fit. The exact<br />
VO 2max<br />
fitness grouping cut-off values for males and females can<br />
be found in Table 3 where the results of an ANOVA are reported.<br />
Results<br />
Independent T-test Comparing Gender Groups Regarding<br />
Morphological, Physiological, Biochemical and Psychological<br />
Profiles<br />
Descriptive data (means and standard deviations) for male and<br />
female respondents are reported in Table 1.<br />
Table 1. Independent T-test Comparing Descriptive Data<br />
Of Male and Female Respondents<br />
Males (n=25)<br />
<strong>No</strong>te: N.S. = <strong>No</strong>t statistically significant;<br />
Statistical significance at p
Health and Wellbeing<br />
body fat, height, body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, VO 2max<br />
, Physical<br />
work capacity 1701<br />
, total cholesterol, Triglycerides (Trig), HDLcholesterol,<br />
LDL-cholesterol and the TC/HDL-ratio.<br />
Males and females both had mean BMI scores in the overweight<br />
category (BMI – 25.0-29.9) and Waist-to-Hip circumference ratio<br />
scores that could be classified as moderately high for the age<br />
group 40-49 according to the ASCM (<strong>2010</strong>). The mean percentage<br />
body fat values for both males and females were however within<br />
acceptable ranges (males 13% and females 24% body fat).<br />
Percentage body fat correlated significantly with body weight<br />
(r=0.75), BMI (r=0.76) and WHR (r=0.93).<br />
The VO 2max<br />
(ml.kg.min -1 ) scores of both groups indicated low<br />
levels of cardiorespiratory fitness according to normative data<br />
provided for the age groups 40-49 by the ACSM (<strong>2010</strong>). Females<br />
presented with borderline LDL-cholesterol levels (>2.60 mmol.l -1 )<br />
while males had elevated mean total cholesterol (>5.2 mmol.l -1 ) and<br />
LDL-cholesterol (>2.60 mmol.l -1 ) levels. Mean HDL-cholesterol<br />
level were lower for males and females than the optimal or desired<br />
level of 1.6 mmol.l -1 (ACSM, <strong>2010</strong>).<br />
<strong>No</strong> significant (p>0.05) differences were found between the two<br />
gender groups using the independent t-test, regarding their general<br />
physical and psychological health profiles. Males had an average<br />
emotional health score that can be classed as moderate burnout<br />
(Pines et al. 1981) while the females had a mean Happiness and<br />
Quality of life score that could be regarded as low according to<br />
normative information provided by Kammann and Flett (1983).<br />
The mean job stress scores can be regarded as medium (1.51-<br />
2.00) for both gender groups according to normative information<br />
provided by Dua (1994).<br />
Staff at Risk Based on Classification Cut-offs<br />
The percentage respondents with abnormal physical,<br />
biochemical and psychological profiles are presented in Table 2.<br />
Total cholesterol’s cut-off to indicate high risk was set at >6.3<br />
mmol.l -1 , HDL-cholesterol at 4.2 mmol.l -1 and triglycerides at >2.3 mmol.l -1 (ACSM, <strong>2010</strong>).<br />
Elevated total cholesterol (>6.3 mmol.l -1 ) was prevalent in<br />
8.64% (n=7) of the overall group, while 6.2% (n=5) presented with<br />
elevated triglyceride levels (>2.3 mmol.l -1 ), and 18.52% (n=15)<br />
and 16.05% (n=13) with abnormal resting systolic and diastolic<br />
blood pressure values respectively (see Table 2). Nearly forty<br />
percent (39.5% or n= 32) of the respondents also had a functional<br />
capacity lower than 8 METS.<br />
As indicated (Table 2), 48% (n=38) were categorised as unhappy<br />
and 36% (n=29) reported elevated levels of job stress. Further<br />
analysis indicate that only 21% (n=17) of the overall group were<br />
risk free, while 19% (n=15) exhibited two, and 30% (n=24) three<br />
or more physical, biochemical, morphological or psychological<br />
markers of risk. This indicates that a relatively large percentage<br />
of staff members at this tertiary institution, which volunteered for<br />
this study, may be at risk for CAD and/or exhibit psychological<br />
profiles that could compromise both general health and work<br />
performance.<br />
Results of the ANOVA<br />
Results of a simple (one-way) analysis of variance in which<br />
respondents were grouped into three (3) VO 2max<br />
groups and<br />
48 Journal of Research<br />
Table 2. Percentage Of Respondents With Elevated CAD Risk<br />
And Abnormal Psychological Health Profiles<br />
Total group Males Females<br />
Risk factors (n=81) (n=25) (n=56)<br />
Resting systolic blood pressure (>140 mmHg)<br />
Resting diastolic blood pressure (>90 mmHg)<br />
Percentage body fat (Male >16% & F >26%)<br />
BMI (Obesity class I, II and III)<br />
Waist-Hip ratio (Male >0.94 & Female>0.82)<br />
Functional capacity (< 8.0 Mets)<br />
Physically inactive<br />
Total cholesterol (> 6.3 mmol.l-1)<br />
Triglycerides (> 2.3 mmol.l-1)<br />
Glucose (> 6.0 mmol.l-1)<br />
HDL-cholesterol (< 0.9 mmol.l-1)<br />
LDL-cholesterol (> 4.2 mmol.l-1)<br />
TC/HDL-ratio (> 4.6)<br />
Unhappy (Negative effect < 24)<br />
Emotional exhaustion ( Burnout scores > 4.0)<br />
Stress symptoms (>15)<br />
Job stress (>1.67)<br />
18.52%<br />
16.05%<br />
27.85%<br />
25.90%<br />
23.61%<br />
39.51%<br />
34.57%<br />
8.64%<br />
6.20%<br />
4.94%<br />
1.24%<br />
6.17%<br />
8.64%<br />
48.12%<br />
11.37%<br />
32.10%<br />
36.03%<br />
28%<br />
16%<br />
20%<br />
26%<br />
24%<br />
20%<br />
32%<br />
12%<br />
12%<br />
4.0%<br />
4.0%<br />
28%<br />
24%<br />
60%<br />
12%<br />
20%<br />
40%<br />
14.30%<br />
16.07%<br />
37.50%<br />
26.76%<br />
23.21%<br />
35.71%<br />
35.70%<br />
8.93%<br />
1.79%<br />
5.35%<br />
0.0%<br />
1.79%<br />
1.78%<br />
42.85%<br />
10.71%<br />
42.85%<br />
34.00%<br />
compared regarding morphological, biochemical, physiological<br />
and psychological markers of health and well-being are presented<br />
in Table 3.<br />
As indicated in this table, cardiovascular fitness, or VO 2max<br />
,<br />
showed statistically significant (p"0.05) relationships with a large<br />
number of the dependent variables, with the high fitness groups<br />
presenting with the healthier profiles. Highly fit females presented<br />
with statistically significant (p"0.05) lower resting heart rate<br />
F(2,53)=4.73, body weight F(2,53)=10.68, job stress F(2,53)=4.04,<br />
fasting glucose F(2,53)=4.79 and higher HDL-cholesterol<br />
F(2,53)=2.14 values. Male respondents differed significantly<br />
(p"0.05) regarding stress symptoms F(2,22)=1.57 and emotional<br />
exhaustion F(2,22)=0.64 and in both males and females, the highly<br />
fit groups presented with more favourable (p"0.05) percentage<br />
body fat, physical activity and coronary risk profiles (see F-values<br />
in table 3).<br />
These results are consistent with the scientific literature, namely<br />
that both males and females with higher levels of cardiovascular<br />
fitness present with healthier morphological, biochemical and<br />
physiological profiles. The statistically significant relationships<br />
that cardiovascular fitness shows with psychological constructs like<br />
job stress (females), emotional exhaustion and stress symptoms<br />
(males) are interesting (though not entirely unexpected or out of<br />
line with what is generally reported) and justified further statistical<br />
investigation to explore the relative contribution of psychological<br />
well-being to morphological, biochemical and overall physical<br />
health.<br />
Correlations of Psychological Constructs with Other Risk<br />
Factors<br />
The correlations of the four psychological variables with<br />
the traditional morphological, biochemical and physiological<br />
cardiovascular risk factors as well as with measures of health are<br />
reported in Table 4. Stress symptoms, emotional exhaustion and
Health and Wellbeing<br />
Table 3. Cardiovascular Fitness (VO 2max<br />
) And Morphological, Biochemical, Physiological And Psychological<br />
Well-being As Determined With a One-way ANOVA<br />
VO 2max<br />
groups<br />
Low Fitness (L) Moderate Fitness (M) High Fitness (H) F-value Newman Keuls<br />
F 30.76(n=16) (2, 53) post hoc p"0.05<br />
M 40.10(n=7) (2, 22)<br />
Variable Group Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD<br />
Age F 46.4 12.2 38.4 10.1 45.7 8.9 3.66 N.S.<br />
M 41.6 5.2 39.2 5.6 40.8 7.6 0.32 N.S.<br />
RHR F 76.3 11.5 76.3 13.6 66.0 7.8 4.73* H from L & M<br />
M 74.1 12.6 66.7 10.4 62.6 9.9 2.13 N.S.<br />
SBP F 130.6 9.7 125.7 11.9 123.2 9.8 2.04 N.S.<br />
M 135.4 10.1 133.0 12.6 126.3 10.7 1.35 N.S.<br />
DBP F 81.8 10.3 78.3 7.5 76.2 8.9 1.67 N.S.<br />
M 83.4 9.1 75.8 9.9 79.0 8.1 1.41 N.S.<br />
Pulse F 48.9 9.1 47.3 10.6 47.1 8.3 0.18 N.S.<br />
Pressure M 52.0 12.6 57.2 14.0 47.3 12.3 1.28 N.S.<br />
Body F 27.3 6.4 26.4 7.9 18.1 3.9 10.68* H from L & M<br />
Fat (%) M 14.1 2.9 15.4 3.4 10.8 2.6 9.21* H from L & M<br />
Body F 77.8 16.0 76.0 15.2 62.4 5.3 8.90* H from L & M<br />
Weight M 91.7 11.8 93.3 20.8 79.9 8.4 1.90 N.S.<br />
PAI F 32.6 27.7 53.7 36.9 83.6 42.2 8.27* H from L & M<br />
M 16.3 23.1 67.2 48.4 89.1 29.6 7.46* L from M & H<br />
CRI F 28.3 7.4 22.8 6.9 20.4 5.7 5.93* L from M & H<br />
M 29.1 2.5 27.0 5.8 19.9 4.8 8.16* H from L & M<br />
IRS F 237.3 107.1 233.0 162.6 190.6 112.2 0.65 N.S.<br />
M 279.3 252.2 223.9 106.7 199.9 176.4 0.38 N.S.<br />
Stress F 13.4 8.7 13.0 7.0 13.4 7.8 0.02 N.S.<br />
Symptoms M 16.4 6.8 11.4 5.1 8.8 3.8 1.57* H from L & M<br />
Job F 1.40 0.21 1.55 0.28 1.64 0.35 3.04* H from L<br />
Stress M 1.60 0.35 1.56 0.20 1.69 0.23 0.53 N.S.<br />
Emotional F 3.02 .072 2.78 0.65 2.97 0.96 0.52 N.S.<br />
Exhaustion M 3.38 0.58 3.18 0.56 2.93 0.54 0.64* H from L<br />
Happiness F 21.2 10.0 24.8 10.2 20.8 10.7 0.73 N.S.<br />
M 15.8 10.5 18.2 12.5 17.6 9.5 0.09 N.S.<br />
TC F 4.79 0.68 4.91 0.82 5.14 1.36 0.54 N.S.<br />
M 5.78 1.10 5.46 0.71 5.04 0.77 1.44 N.S.<br />
Fasting F 5.01 1.08 4.45 0.51 4.33 0.31 4.79* L from M & H<br />
Glucose M 4.65 0.38 5.22 1.24 4.46 0.38 1.95 N.S.<br />
Trig F 1.90 0.38 1.12 0.36 1.08 0.59 0.05 N.S.<br />
M 1.64 0.78 1.65 1.09 1.42 0.42 0.19 N.S.<br />
LDL-C F 2.64 0.57 2.71 0.73 2.73 1.14 0.04 N.S.<br />
M 3.63 0.95 3.14 0.70 3.07 0.72 1.15 N.S.<br />
HDL-C F 1.65 0.38 1.69 0.34 1.93 0.35 2.14* L from H<br />
M 1.34 0.32 1.40 0.48 1.56 0.13 1.03 N.S.<br />
TC/HDL- F 3.02 0.69 2.98 0.65 2.78 0.79 0.57 N.S.<br />
Ratio M 4.31 0.72 3.88 0.74 3.84 0.76 0.35 N.S.<br />
<strong>No</strong>te: F=female; N.S.=not statistically significant; M=male; L=low fitness; M=moderate fitness; H=high fitness; *=p"0.05<br />
volume 5, issue 1 49
Health and Wellbeing<br />
the Affectometer2 (happiness and quality of life) had a significant<br />
negative correlation (p"0.05) with the coronary risk index and the<br />
illness rating scale.<br />
Table 4. Correlation Of The Four (4) Psychological Measures<br />
With Markers Of Morphological, Biochemical<br />
And Physiological Health<br />
Health variables<br />
Age in years<br />
Heart rate in rest (RHR)<br />
Systolic blood Pressure (SBP)<br />
Diastolic blood pressure (DBP)<br />
Pulse pressure (PP)<br />
Mean arterial pressure (MAP)<br />
Percentage body fat<br />
Body weight in kg (BW)<br />
Body mass index (BMI)<br />
Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR)<br />
VO 2max<br />
in ml.kg.min-1<br />
Physical work capacity 170<br />
Physical activity index (PAI)<br />
Coronary risk index (CRI)<br />
Illness rating scale (IRS)<br />
Total cholesterol (TC)<br />
Fasting glucose (GLU)<br />
Triglycerides (Trig)<br />
HDL-cholesterol<br />
LDL-cholesterol<br />
TC/HDL-ratio<br />
<strong>No</strong>te: *= p"0.05<br />
Job stress<br />
-0.05<br />
Psychological variables<br />
0.10<br />
0.04<br />
0.08<br />
0.11<br />
0.04<br />
0.19<br />
0.02<br />
-0.08<br />
-0.09<br />
-0.31*<br />
-0.30*<br />
-0.19<br />
0.17<br />
0.10<br />
0.14<br />
-0.06<br />
0.14<br />
-0.06<br />
0.09<br />
0.09<br />
Stress Emotional Happiness<br />
symptoms exhaustion quality of<br />
life<br />
-0.03<br />
0.15<br />
0.02<br />
0.06<br />
0.03<br />
0.06<br />
0.05<br />
0.04<br />
-0.05<br />
-0.03<br />
-0.17<br />
-0.16<br />
-0.12<br />
0.29*<br />
0.54*<br />
0.16<br />
-0.05<br />
0.15<br />
-0.07<br />
0.09<br />
0.08<br />
0.09<br />
0.16<br />
0.18<br />
0.14<br />
0.07<br />
0.18<br />
0.05<br />
0.14<br />
0.10<br />
0.20<br />
-0.10<br />
-0.07<br />
-0.15<br />
0.42*<br />
0.42*<br />
0.13<br />
0.13<br />
0.01<br />
-0.10<br />
0.09<br />
0.12<br />
-0.01<br />
-0.13<br />
-0.16<br />
-0.07<br />
-0.10<br />
-0.12<br />
-0.12<br />
-0.12<br />
-0.08<br />
-0.25*<br />
0.12<br />
0.12<br />
0.09<br />
-0.26*<br />
-0.32*<br />
-0.04<br />
-0.16<br />
-0.02<br />
0.17<br />
-0.03<br />
-0.11<br />
Results of the Stepwise Multiple Regression Analysis<br />
In order to obtain more specific information on the relative<br />
importance of the psychological variables with regard to overall<br />
health, the contribution of all morphological, biochemical and<br />
physiological risk factors and the four psychological variables to<br />
the variance of the coronary risk index and the illness rating scale<br />
was studied using a stepwise multiple regression analysis. The<br />
results of this analysis are reported in Table 5.<br />
A total of 22 factors, including the four psychological measures<br />
(emotional exhaustion, job stress, stress symptoms and happiness<br />
and quality of life), were used in this stepwise multiple regression<br />
analysis (Table 5).<br />
Ten of the 22 variables were listed as contributors (the<br />
contribution of the rest of the variables were very low and as such<br />
are not listed), and their combined contribution to the variance of<br />
the two health status measures (coronary risk index and the illness<br />
rating scale) was 61.4%. Body mass index (24.9%), emotional<br />
burnout (15.6%), glucose (6.3%), physical activity (4.8%) and<br />
the TC/HDL ratio (2.3%) were the only statistically significant<br />
(p"0.05) contributors. All four of the psychological measures<br />
contributed to the variance of overall health. Emotional exhaustion<br />
50 Journal of Research<br />
Table 5. Contribution Of Risk Factors To The Variance Of<br />
Overall Coronary Risk And Health Status Of Staff<br />
Members At a Tertiary Institution<br />
Contributing<br />
variables R R 2 R 2 -change F-value<br />
Body Mass Index (BMI)<br />
Emotional exhaustion<br />
Glucose<br />
Physical activity Index<br />
Happiness<br />
Job Stress<br />
TC/HDL-ratio<br />
Stress symptoms<br />
Systolic blood pressure<br />
Resting Heart rate<br />
<strong>No</strong>te: *= p"0.05<br />
was, however, the only psychological variables which contributed<br />
statistically significantly (p"0.05) to the variance of the two health<br />
status measures.<br />
In order to determine if level of fitness would influence the<br />
contribution of the psychological variables to general health, their<br />
contribution to the two health status variables (Coronary risk index<br />
and illness rating scale) were studied in individuals grouped as<br />
low, moderate and highly fit.<br />
As indicated in Table 6, emotional exhaustion was the primary<br />
contributor to the variance of the coronary risk index and illness<br />
rating scale in the stepwise multiple regression analysis performed<br />
on females. This was the case in all three of the fitness groups. The<br />
overall contribution of the psychological constructs to the variance<br />
of the health status (coronary risk index and illness rating scale)<br />
increased from 23.47% in the low fitness group to 54.32% in the<br />
moderate fitness group, but decreased to 24.04% in the high fitness<br />
group. In the moderately fit group, stress symptoms (18.1%) were<br />
also a statistically significant contributor (p"0.05) to the variance<br />
of overall health.<br />
Table 6. Contribution Of Various Psychological Variables To<br />
The Variance Of Overall Coronary Risk And<br />
Health Status Of Females With Low, Moderate<br />
And High Levels Of Cardiovascular Fitness<br />
Fitness grouping Contributing variables R R 2 R 2 - F-value<br />
change<br />
Low fit Emotional exhaustion 0.4694 0.2123 0.2123 10.24*<br />
(VO 2max<br />
30.75) Job Stress 0.4902 0.2404 0.0315 1.493<br />
<strong>No</strong>te *= p "0.05.<br />
0.499630<br />
0.636654<br />
0.684506<br />
0.718741<br />
0.734081<br />
0.747183<br />
0.762848<br />
0.772049<br />
0.779226<br />
0.783778<br />
0.249631<br />
0.405328<br />
0.468548<br />
0.516589<br />
0.538875<br />
0.558283<br />
0.581936<br />
0.596059<br />
0.607194<br />
0.614308<br />
0.249631<br />
0.155697<br />
0.063221<br />
0.048040<br />
0.022286<br />
0.019409<br />
0.023653<br />
0.014123<br />
0.01135<br />
0.007114<br />
26.28*<br />
20.42*<br />
9.159*<br />
7.553*<br />
3.625<br />
3.251<br />
4.130*<br />
2.517<br />
2.013<br />
0.259<br />
In males, job stress was the only statistically significant (p"0.05)<br />
contributor, and only in those respondents classified as moderately
Health and Wellbeing<br />
fit (Table 7). The psychological variables made no contribution<br />
to the variance of health in the low fitness group, while job stress<br />
and stress symptoms contributed 22.9% (p>0.05) to the variance<br />
of health as measured with the coronary risk index and the Illness<br />
rating scale, in the high fitness group.<br />
Table 7. Contribution Of Various Psychological Variables To<br />
The Variance Of Overall Coronary Risk And<br />
Health Status Of Males With Low, Moderate<br />
And High Levels Of Cardiovascular Fitness<br />
Fitness grouping Contributing variables R R 2 R 2 - F-value<br />
change<br />
Low fit<br />
(VO 2max<br />
40.09) Stress symptoms 0.4791 0.2295 0.0986 1.792<br />
<strong>No</strong>te *= p "0.05.<br />
Measures of psychological health seem to be as potent a marker/<br />
predictor of health in fit and in unfit individuals. The results of<br />
these analyses therefore indicate that the level of fitness does not<br />
seem to negate the contribution of psychological health to overall<br />
health, as measured with a coronary risk index and the illness<br />
rating scale.<br />
Discussion<br />
There is now overwhelming evidence in the scientific literature<br />
attesting to what many academics have believed for years:<br />
academia is a highly stressful occupation. The work environment<br />
has been implicated in various studies as a causal factor of<br />
impaired work performance, decrease in faculty productivity,<br />
increase in absenteeism, propensity to leave, and higher staff<br />
turnover (Kinman, 2001; Taris et al., 2001). The effect of a<br />
stressful work environment on health and well-being is also well<br />
established (Lovallo & Gerrin, 2003; Nicholson et al. 2005) but<br />
very few studies have investigated the impact (or relationship)<br />
of psychological health variables on markers of morphological,<br />
biochemical and physiological health in academia.<br />
Psychological health among academics is, generally speaking,<br />
relatively poor (Kinman, 2001). Academics in Gillespie et al.’s<br />
(2001) study reported feelings of anxiety, depression, burnout,<br />
anger, irritability and helplessness as a direct consequence of<br />
perceived work related stress. The link between psychological<br />
exhaustion/burnout, depression and suicidal tendencies has been<br />
well established and indications of an epidemiological study on<br />
the contribution of occupation and geography to suicide death in<br />
England and Wales conducted by Kelly, Charlton, and Jenkins<br />
(1995) are that academics are at 50 percent greater risk than the<br />
average worker to commit suicide as a direct consequence of work<br />
environment related distress. A survey carried out for the UKbased<br />
Association of University Teachers (AUT, 2003) found that<br />
93% of its members (representing almost 160,000 academic staff)<br />
suffered from work-related stress and 62% from ‘excessive’ strain,<br />
while approximately 27% reported ‘fairly seriously’ considering a<br />
career change, 46% said their morale had worsened in the past two<br />
years, 72% were dissatisfied with pay and 86% felt their workload<br />
was too heavy (Smithers, 2003). The above-mentioned survey<br />
results are matched by other international studies (Barkhuizen &<br />
Rothman, 2008; Forlin, 2001; Gillespie et al., 2001; Kinman, 2001;<br />
Winefield et al., 2003; Winter & Sarros, 2002). Psychological<br />
stress now appears to be a feature of occupational life of university<br />
staff (Fisher, 1994) and working during evenings and weekends is<br />
commonplace (Kinman, 1998).<br />
In this study 48% of the respondents were unhappy as measured<br />
by the Affectometer2 (Kammann & Flett, 1983). The Affectometer2<br />
consists of 20 items concerning the subject's present life situation.<br />
Each item is rated on a 5 - point scale of agreement/disagreement<br />
regarding questions like “my life is on the right track, my future<br />
looks good, I like myself, I have energy to spare” and so forth. A<br />
lower score reflects a more negative orientation and less satisfaction<br />
with life. In terms of whether a person has, in general, a negative or<br />
positive orientation towards life, these questions are as applicable<br />
today as when the questionnaire was developed. People seem to<br />
be less happy today than after the second world war (Persaud,<br />
1998) but it is debatable whether normative scores established<br />
by Kamannn and Flett, 26 years ago, and calibrated using the<br />
academic gravitated population of Dunedin (same country and<br />
same type of population used in this study) should be rejected<br />
based on the fact that the normative scores are 26 years old. The<br />
focus of the present study is more on the impact of psychological<br />
distress on other measures of health and according to this data about<br />
half of the staff participating in this project were in general fairly<br />
unhappy, while 32% exhibited a high amount of stress symptoms<br />
and 36% presented with job stress. The implication is that this<br />
study population provided enough participants with psychological<br />
distress to examine the relationships of the psychological constructs<br />
with other measures of health.<br />
Our study suggests that relatively large numbers of staff at<br />
this tertiary institution may be at risk of cardiovascular disease,<br />
and that a relationship seems to exist between constructs of<br />
psychological health and markers of morphological, biochemical<br />
and physiological health. Firstly, regarding relative risk for<br />
cardiovascular disease, our results indicate that if optimal or<br />
desirable levels were to be considered, 40.7% of volunteering<br />
staff presented with total cholesterol values above the desirable<br />
level of 1.7 mmol.l -1 ) that could be regarded as<br />
being high. In addition, 50.6% presented with abnormal HDLcholesterol<br />
(2.6 mmol.l -1 ) levels.<br />
In a study by Meyers, Prakash, Froelicher, Partington and Atwood<br />
(2002) it was reported that in both healthy and cardiovascular<br />
disease subjects, the peak exercise capacity achieved was a<br />
stronger predictor of overall mortality than hypertension, smoking,<br />
diabetes, obesity, development of arrhythmias during exercise, or<br />
elevated total cholesterol level. The mortality risk from any cause<br />
in participants whose exercise capacity was less than 5 METS<br />
was roughly double that of subjects whose exercise capacity was<br />
more than 8 METS. In this study 39.51% of the respondents had a<br />
functional capacity lower than 8 METS and 2.47% had a functional<br />
volume 5, issue 1 51
Health and Wellbeing<br />
capacity lower than 5 METS.<br />
Secondly, concerning the interrelationship between the physical,<br />
biochemical and psychological measures it is evident that the level<br />
of cardiovascular fitness does not negate or weaken the contribution<br />
of the psychological constructs to overall health.<br />
Lastly, the psychological constructs correlated negatively<br />
with physical activity and VO 2max<br />
. For example job stress, stress<br />
symptoms and emotional burnout showed correlations of r = -0.31,<br />
r = -0.17 and r = -0.10 with VO 2max<br />
and correlations of r = -0.19,<br />
r = -012 and r = -0.15 with participation in physical activity. This<br />
indicates that psychological health can impact in an indirect manner<br />
on health through its negative effect on lifestyle and exercise habits.<br />
It seems therefore that the work environment impacts negatively<br />
on cardiovascular and overall health in both a direct and indirect<br />
manner. The results of this study support the need for intervention<br />
for these lecturers and administrators, especially in areas of stress<br />
management and mental health.<br />
Conclusions<br />
1. High percentages of staff presented with risk factors for CAD as<br />
well as with unfavourable psychological profiles.<br />
2. Female staff members did not exhibit more psychological<br />
distress and/or worse levels of biochemical and overall health<br />
than their male counterparts. As can be expected females do<br />
present with lower levels of cardiovascular fitness and higher<br />
morphological measurements (percentage body fat and waistto-hip<br />
ratio’s). <strong>No</strong>rmatively speaking, both the male and<br />
female BMI and waist-to-hip ratio averages in this study can be<br />
regarded as moderately high.<br />
3. Reported emotional exhaustion seems to be a significant<br />
contributor to the variance of health in both males and females<br />
at this tertiary institution.<br />
4. The level of cardiovascular fitness improves overall health status<br />
but does not negate the relationship of emotional exhaustion with<br />
health. The overall contribution of the psychological constructs<br />
to the variance of health status stayed the same or increased<br />
in male and female respondents classified as respectively low,<br />
moderately or highly fit.<br />
References<br />
American College of Sport Medicine (ACSM). (<strong>2010</strong>). ACSM’s healthrelated<br />
physical fitness assessment manual. Philadelphia: Lippincott<br />
Williams & Wilkins.<br />
Ashley, E. & Myers, J. (2003). New insights into the clinical exercise test.<br />
ACSM’s Certified News, 13(4), 1-5.<br />
Association of University Teachers. (2003). Survey for members. London:<br />
AUT.<br />
Barkhuizen, N. & Rothmann, S. (2008). Occupational stress of academic<br />
staff in South African higher education insitutions. South African<br />
Journal of Psychology, 38(2), 321-336.<br />
Bjurtsrom, L.A. & Alexiou, N.G. (1978). A program of heart disease<br />
intervention for public employees: A five year report. Journal of<br />
Occupational Medicine, 20(8), 521-531.<br />
Carney, R.M. (1998). Psychological risk factors for cardiac events.<br />
Could there be just one? Circulation, 97, 128-129.<br />
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure<br />
of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385<br />
- 396.<br />
Dua, J.K. (1994). Job stressors and their effects on physical health,<br />
emotional health, and job satisfaction in a university. Journal of<br />
Educational Administration, 32(1), 59-78.<br />
Fisher, S. (1994). Stress in academic life: The mental assembly line.<br />
Buckingham: SHRE/Open University Press.<br />
Forlin, C. (2001). Inclusion: Identifying potential stressors for regular<br />
class teachers. Educational Research, 43(3), 235-245.<br />
Gillespie, N.A., Walsh, M., Winefields, A.H., Dua, J. & Souch, C. (2001).<br />
Occupational stress in universities: Staff perceptions of the causes,<br />
consequences and moderators of stress. Work and Stress, 15(1), 53-<br />
72.<br />
Houston, D., Meyer, L.H. & Paewai, S. (2006). Academic staff workloads<br />
and job satisfaction: Expectations and values in academe. Journal of<br />
Higher Education Policy, 28(1), 17-30.<br />
International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (2001).<br />
International standards for anthropometric assessment. National<br />
Library of Australia.<br />
Kammann, R. & Flett, R. (1983). Affectometer 2: A scale to measure<br />
current levels of general happiness. Australian Journal of Psychology,<br />
35(2), 259-265.<br />
Kelly, S., Charlton, J. & Jenkins, R. (1995). Suicide deaths in England<br />
and Wales, 1982-1992: The contribution of occupation and geography.<br />
Population Trends, 80:18-21.<br />
Kinman, G. (1998). Pressure points: A survey into the causes and<br />
consequences of occupational stress in UK academics and related<br />
staff. London: Association of University Teachers.<br />
Kinman, G. (2001). Pressure points: A review of research on stressors and<br />
strains in UK academics. Educational Psychology, 21, 473-492.<br />
Kobasa, S.D., Maddi, S.R. & Courington, S. (1981). Personality and<br />
constitution as mediators in the stress-illness relationship. Journal of<br />
Health and Social Behavior, 22, 368-378.<br />
Lovallo, W.R. & Gerin, W.G. (2003). Psychophysiological reactivity:<br />
Mechanisms and pathways to cardiovascular disease. Psychosomatic<br />
Medicine, 65, 36-45.<br />
Meyers, J., Prakash, M., Froelicher, V., Partington, S. & Atwood, J.E.<br />
(2002). Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for<br />
exercise testing. New England Journal of Medicine, 346(11), 793-<br />
801.<br />
Millward-Brown. (1996). Powerful people: A survey of Britain’s<br />
professional workforce. London: Guardian Publishing.<br />
Nicholson, A., Fuhrer, R. & Marmot, M. (2005). Psychological Distress<br />
as a predictor of CHD events in men: The effect of persistence and<br />
components of risk. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, 522-530.<br />
Ogden, J. (2004). Health psychology: A textbook. 3 rd edition. Berkshire :<br />
Open University Press.<br />
Persaud, R. (1998). Staying sane: How to make your mind work for you.<br />
London: Metro Publishing Ltd.<br />
Pines, A.M., Aronson, E. & Kafry, D. (1981). Burnout: From tedium to<br />
personal growth. New York: Free Press.<br />
Rosengren, A., Hawken, S.O., Sliwa, K., Zubaid, M., Almahmeed, W.A.,<br />
Blackett, K.N., … & Yusuf, S. (2004). Association of psychosocial<br />
risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11119 cases and<br />
13648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Casecontrol<br />
study. The Lancet, 364, 953-364<br />
Schroeder, D.H. & Costa, P.T. (1984). Influence of life event stress on<br />
physical illness: Substantive effects or methodological flaws. Journal<br />
of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 853-863.<br />
Smithers, R. (2003). Third of academics want to quit. Retrieved October<br />
14, 2009 from HYPERLINK "http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/<br />
news/story/%200,9830,911076,00.html"http://education.guardian.<br />
co.uk/higher/news/story/ 0,9830,911076,00.html.<br />
Taris, T.W., Schreurs, P.J.G. & Van Iersel-Van Silfhout, I.J. (2001). Job<br />
stress, job strain, and psychological withdrawal among Dutch university<br />
staff: Towards a dual-process model for the effects of occupational<br />
stress. Work and Stress, 15(4), 283-296.<br />
Tytherleigh, M.Y., Webb, D., Cooper, C.L. & Ricketts, C. (2005).<br />
Occupational stress in UK higher education institutions: A comparative<br />
study of all staff categories. Higher Education Research and<br />
Development, 24(1), 41-61.<br />
Winefield, A.H., Gillespie, N.A., Stough, C., Dua, J., Hapuarachchi, J.,<br />
52 Journal of Research
Health and Wellbeing<br />
& Boyd, C. (2003). Occupational stress in Australian university<br />
staff: Results from a national survey. International Journal of<br />
Stress Management, 10, 51-63.<br />
Winefield, A.H. & Jarrett, R. (2001). Occupational stress in university<br />
staff. International Journal of Stress Management, 8(4), 285-298.<br />
Winter, R. & Sarros, J. (2002). The academic work environment in<br />
Australian universities: A motivating place to work? Higher Education<br />
Research & Development, 21(3), 241-258.<br />
Wyler, A.R., Masuda, M. & Holmes, T.H. (1967). Seriousness of illness<br />
rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 363-374.<br />
1<br />
The physical work capacity 170<br />
is an expression of maximum<br />
exercise capacity in watts divided by body weight at 170 beats<br />
per minute. It is obtained by explorating HR responses during the<br />
three stages of the YMCA Cycle Ergometer test to 170 beats per<br />
minute !<br />
volume 5, issue 1 53
An Examination of Immunity Statutes Regarding<br />
the Liability of Recreational Youth Sport<br />
Organizations for the Pedophilic Actions of<br />
Coaches, Administrators, and Officials<br />
by Thomas A. Baker III, University of Georgia; Daniel P.<br />
Connaughton & James J. Zhang, University of Florida<br />
Abstract<br />
Millions of children in the United States participate in youth<br />
sports. The literature demonstrates that sexual abuse is a problem in<br />
sport. This study examined voluntary immunity statutes for all 50<br />
states and the District of Columbia with the purpose of determining<br />
potential liability for recreational youth sport organizations for the<br />
pedophilic actions of their coaches, administrators, and officials.<br />
Comparisons and differences were drawn between the states<br />
regarding whether voluntary immunity statutes were applicable.<br />
Key words: Statutory protection, sexual abuse<br />
Introduction<br />
Millions of children participate in youth sports. For instance,<br />
in 2008, it is estimated that more than 44 million children played<br />
organized sports and more than 7.3 million adults served as<br />
coaches, administrators, and officials for local, regional, or national<br />
youth sport organizations in the U.S. (National Council of Youth<br />
Sports, 2008). Many of these children are coached by volunteer,<br />
unscreened, adult males (Peterson, 2004). The lack of screening on<br />
the part of many youth sport organizations, the ‘power’ relationship<br />
between adult (coach, administrator, official) and child (youth<br />
sport participant), out-of-town competitions often without parental<br />
supervision, and lack of policies and procedures, combined with<br />
the access that youth sport provides to a large number of children<br />
increase the opportunities for abuse to take place (Brackenridge,<br />
2001; Kirby, Greaves, & Hankivsky, 2000; Nack & Yaeger, 1999;<br />
Zaichkowsky, 2000).<br />
The purpose of this study was to examine volunteer immunity<br />
statutes for all 50 states and the District of Columbia to determine<br />
whether such statutes provide defenses for recreational youth<br />
sport organizations. By examining the law of all 50 states and the<br />
District of Columbia, this study made comparisons between the<br />
states in how volunteer immunity statutes may be applied. Key<br />
legal doctrines, terms, and operational definitions are provided in<br />
Table 1.<br />
It was necessary to conduct an expansive study that included all<br />
50 states and Washington D.C. because negligence is a creation of<br />
state law and the application of negligence theories varies among<br />
the states. Local and regional youth sport organizations (such as<br />
church, park and recreation departments, and municipal programs)<br />
need to understand the law for their specific jurisdiction. However,<br />
national recreational youth sport organizations including but<br />
not limited to Little League Baseball and Softball, Inc., Pony<br />
Baseball/Softball, Inc., U.S. Youth Soccer, American Youth Soccer<br />
Organization, American Youth Football Inc., and Pop Warner<br />
54 Journal of Research<br />
Table 1. Legal Doctrines, Terms, and Operational<br />
Definitions<br />
Term<br />
Tort<br />
Intentional<br />
Tort<br />
Negligence<br />
Scope of<br />
Employment<br />
Respondeat<br />
Superior<br />
Volunteer<br />
Immunity<br />
Recreational<br />
Youth Sport<br />
Organizations<br />
Definition<br />
A tort is a civil wrong for which the law provides a remedy<br />
(Keeton, 1984). A tort can derive from either an intentional<br />
or unintentional act or omission.<br />
A tort committed when the actor desires the consequence, or<br />
the actor knows to a substantial certainty that the consequence<br />
will follow (Restatement (Second) of Torts § 8A, 1965). A<br />
youth sport coach, administrator, or official who sexually abuses<br />
an athlete is subject to civil liability for an intentional tort<br />
because the perpetrator of the tort acted with intent, meaning<br />
that he or she intended to do the tortious act.<br />
The term negligence is given to those unintentional torts<br />
that injure others in person, property or reputation (van der<br />
Smissen, 2007). Negligence can be defined as conduct<br />
involving an unreasonably great risk of causing harm or<br />
damage; conduct that falls below the standard established by<br />
law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of<br />
harm (Restatement (Second) of Torts § 282, 1965).<br />
The doctrine of respondeat superior is often referred to as<br />
vicarious liability because it serves as a method of holding<br />
one person vicariously liable for the wrongs committed<br />
by another (Keeton, 1984). The phrase respondeat superior<br />
means “let the master answer” (Garner, 2004, p. X).<br />
Perhaps the most critical element of respondeat superior is the<br />
requirement that the employee was acting within the scope of<br />
his employment (Keeton, 1984). Acts committed by the<br />
employee that exceed the scope of employment are considered<br />
ultra vires. Employers are generally not vicariously liable for<br />
the ultra vires actions committed by their employees (Cotten,<br />
2007). However, the definition of scope of employment<br />
has extended to include all acts committed in furtherance of the<br />
employer’s business (Keeton, 1984). Jurisdictions that use a<br />
broader definition of scope of employment provide a greater<br />
opportunity for plaintiffs to recover against recreational youth<br />
sport organizations based on respondeat superior<br />
(Weeber, 1992).<br />
A large number of states have passed volunteer immunity<br />
statutes to protect volunteers from being sued for ordinary<br />
negligence (Hurst & Knight, 2003). These statutes grew out of<br />
a fear that people would stop volunteering and the services<br />
provided by these volunteer-dependant agencies would stop<br />
(Smith, 1999). Some states have gone further with their<br />
coverage and have expanded the statutes to cover gross<br />
negligence and even willful, wanton, and reckless conduct<br />
(Smith, 1999). Congress enacted its own volunteer protection<br />
statute in 1997 when it passed the Federal Volunteer Protection<br />
Act (FVPA) (Biedzynski, 1999).<br />
For the purpose of this paper, recreational youth sport<br />
organizations are youth sport programs that exist outside of an<br />
educational/school setting. Examples of recreational youth sport<br />
organizations include Little League Baseball and Softball, Pop<br />
Warner Little Scholars, and community-based (local and<br />
regional) youth sport programs (church, municipal, park and<br />
recreation department programs, etc.).
Immunity Statutes<br />
Little Scholars, Inc. provide programs in most states and need to<br />
understand the variances that may exist among legal jurisdictions.<br />
It is important for recreational youth sport administrators to<br />
understand volunteer immunity statutes and how they may be<br />
applied so that they can better protect their organizations against<br />
the pedophilic actions of coaches, administrators, and officials<br />
within their programs.<br />
Review of Literature<br />
Children in a coach-player relationship tend to be more<br />
susceptible to sexual assault (Peterson, 2004). Young athletes<br />
often spend considerable amounts of time with their coaches.<br />
Coaches often take on a role similar to that of a parent and children<br />
typically consent to activities they would never undertake under<br />
the guidance of a parental figure (Appenzeller, 2000). Children<br />
also look to coaches as role models, heroes, or even as best friends.<br />
Further, children are often told by their parents from the outset of<br />
their athletic involvement to obey the coach and never argue with<br />
the coach (Peterson, 2004). Coaches often become very significant<br />
figures in the lives of such young athletes, and the power that some<br />
of these coaches acquire within such relationships is robust with<br />
the potential for misuse (Gervis & Dunn, 2004).<br />
Opportunity and Prevalence<br />
Unfortunately, youth sports often provide an excellent hunting<br />
ground for pedophiles. It is estimated that one in three girls and<br />
one in seven boys in the United States are sexually molested<br />
before the age of 18 (Earl-Hubbard, 1996). Unfortunately, these<br />
overwhelming numbers do not even represent the true extent of<br />
sexual abuse because it is estimated that only 10 to 35 percent of<br />
incidents involving sexual exploitation are ever reported (Peterson,<br />
2004). Some pedophiles have admitted to molesting 500-600<br />
children before getting caught. Although no one has ever studied<br />
the number of young athletes who have been molested by their<br />
coaches, experts including the Executive Director of the National<br />
Institute for Child Centered Coaching, Stephen Bavolek, believe<br />
that sexual abuse in sports is prevalent (Deak, 1999) and it is not<br />
a problem that is unique to the United States. By coaching youth<br />
sports, pedophiles are given an opportunity to win over parents<br />
and gain the trust of children. Parents and athletes alike put faith in<br />
their coaches and this faith can easily be exploited by coaches who<br />
are sexual abusers (Deak, 1999). The literature and findings from<br />
studies in Canada (Kirby & Greaves, 1996), the U.S. (Gibbons<br />
& Campbell, 2003; Pike-Masteralexis, 1995; Volkwein, Franke,<br />
Schnell, Sherwood, & Livezey, 1997), the United Kingdom<br />
(Brackenridge, 1997), Denmark (Nielson, 2001), and Australia<br />
(Leahy, Pretty, & Tenenbaum, 2002) demonstrate that sexual abuse<br />
is a problem in sport.<br />
In Canada, the Canadian Hockey League has gone as far as to<br />
label the protection of its athletes from pedophilia “a paramount<br />
concern” (Kirk, 1997). A study conducted in Denmark revealed<br />
that 2% of athletes in that country were the survivors of sexual<br />
abuse within sport and 3% of coaches admitted to being intimately<br />
involved with athletes under the age of 18 (Nielson, 2001). In<br />
2004, a survey titled “Citizens of the European Union and Sport”<br />
polled citizens within all 25 European Union members and found<br />
that 29% of those surveyed believe that sexual abuse of children<br />
is the main negative aspect associated with sport (Eurobarometer,<br />
2004).<br />
In 2007, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) addressed<br />
the problem of sexual abuse when it adopted a consensus<br />
statement titled “Sexual Harassment and Abuse in Sport.” The<br />
IOC adopted the statement with the goal of promoting effective<br />
preventive policy and increasing awareness of sexual harassment<br />
and abuse in sport. Through the consensus statement, the IOC<br />
recommended that all sport organizations should: (a) develop<br />
policies and procedures for the prevention of sexual harassment<br />
and abuse; (b) monitor the implementation of these policies and<br />
procedures; (c) evaluate the impact of these policies in identifying<br />
and reducing sexual harassment and abuse; (d) develop an<br />
education and training program on sexual harassment and abuse in<br />
their sport(s); (e) promote and exemplify equitable, respectful and<br />
ethical leadership; (f) foster strong partnerships with parents in the<br />
prevention of sexual harassment and abuse; and (g) promote and<br />
support scientific research on these issues (IOC, 2007).<br />
Imposition of Civil Liability and Volunteer Immunity Statutes<br />
Nations around the globe have recognized both moral and ethical<br />
justifications for preventative measures aimed at preventing sexual<br />
abuse in youth sport. In addition to these justifications, there is<br />
a legal duty on the part of recreational youth sport organizations<br />
to protect their athletes from foreseeable risks (van der Smissen,<br />
1990). It is possible that a youth sport organization could be found<br />
liable if appropriate protective measures are not in place to prevent,<br />
or at least limit the possibility of sexual harassment or abuse. Even<br />
the best protective measures are not foolproof in removing the<br />
threat posed by pedophiles to recreational youth sport participants<br />
and organizations.<br />
Furthermore, it is possible that a youth sport organization<br />
could be found vicariously liable for the actions of its coaches,<br />
administrators, or officials through the doctrine of respondeat<br />
superior. Under this doctrine, liability can attach to a master if the<br />
servant, while acting on the master’s behalf, harms someone to<br />
whom the master owes a duty of care (Mayer, 2005). Accordingly,<br />
if an employee (servant) acts negligently during the course of<br />
employment, then the employer (master) may be held liable for the<br />
employee’s negligence. Simply put, the negligence of the employee<br />
is imputed to the employer. To be successful in a respondeat<br />
superior claim, the plaintiff must establish that the tortfeasor is<br />
liable in tort, the tortfeasor is employed by the defendant, and the<br />
employee was acting within the scope of employment when the<br />
tortious act was committed (27 American Jurisprudence 2nd § 459,<br />
2005).<br />
Thus, it is important that these organizations understand how<br />
they can defend themselves from the imposition of civil liability for<br />
the actions of others. The Federal Volunteer Protection Act protects<br />
youth sport volunteers from civil liability for their negligent acts;<br />
but the statute does not protect youth sport organizations. The<br />
majority of states also have volunteer immunity statutes and these<br />
statutes vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction in the extent of<br />
the protection provided to volunteers. Many states have statutes<br />
specifically tailored for recreational youth sports and some extend<br />
volume 5, issue 1 55
Immunity Statutes<br />
protection to include recreational youth sport organizations. It<br />
is important that these organizations understand how immunity<br />
statutes work and whether they can be used to guard them against<br />
the imposition of civil liability for the actions of pedophiles who<br />
infiltrate their ranks and abuse their athletes.<br />
A review of the literature revealed a substantial void in research<br />
on this issue. <strong>No</strong> single study has ever attempted to provide a<br />
comprehensive review examining the issue immunity statutes<br />
for all 50 states and the District of Columbia regarding the civil<br />
liability of recreational youth sport organizations for the pedophilic<br />
actions of coaches, administrators, and officials. Thus, conducting<br />
the current study was deemed necessary.<br />
Method<br />
The purpose of this study was to determine if volunteer<br />
immunity statutes in the United States provide recreational youth<br />
sport organizations with a defense against lawsuits based on the<br />
pedophilic actions of their coaches, administrators, and officials.<br />
A comprehensive literature review was performed to gather<br />
information on the application of volunteer immunity statutes, as<br />
well as their impact on legal cases, which were derived from a<br />
statutory analysis and literature review. Westlaw’s legal database<br />
was used in conducting a keyword search of all 50 states and the<br />
District of Columbia. Keywords utilized in the search included the<br />
following: volunteer, immunity, recreation, sport, protection, and<br />
liability.<br />
The statutory and case law for each jurisdiction was analyzed<br />
and states were put into groups based on whether the law: (a)<br />
expressly extended statutory protection to volunteer organizations,<br />
(b) limited statutory protection to individual volunteers, or (c)<br />
was ambiguous as to whether statutory protection extended to<br />
volunteer organizations. There was a fourth category of states that<br />
did not have volunteer immunity statutes protecting recreational<br />
youth sport organizations. The next step involved analysis of<br />
the law for states with statutes that either expressly protected<br />
volunteer organizations, or were ambiguous as to whether they<br />
covered volunteer organizations. The second round of analysis<br />
was performed to determine if each statute extended its protection<br />
to cover sexual molestation or abuse on the part of coaches,<br />
administrators, or officials.<br />
This study was limited to volunteer youth sport organizations<br />
and did not include interscholastic or intercollegiate sport<br />
organizations. The theories of liability used to pursue claims<br />
against volunteer youth sport organizations, as well as the defenses<br />
available, are not necessarily the same as those that would be used<br />
in an interscholastic or intercollegiate setting. The protocol for<br />
this study was validated by a panel of experts with qualifications<br />
in legal research and/or research methodology. This protocol was<br />
mainly executed by the primary investigator of this study, who<br />
holds a Juris Doctorate and a terminal research degree in Sport<br />
Management, and has expertise in both quantitative and qualitative<br />
research methodologies. The timeframe for this study was May<br />
2006 - December 2009.<br />
Results<br />
States that had volunteer immunity statutes protecting the<br />
organizations as well as the volunteers included the following<br />
56 Journal of Research<br />
states: Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and<br />
Utah. Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, and Utah include<br />
qualifications in their volunteer immunity statutes that limit the<br />
protection in regards to the type of conduct protected by those<br />
statutes. States where volunteer immunity statutes expressly did<br />
not provide protection for the volunteer organizations include:<br />
Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, District of<br />
Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Missouri,<br />
Montana, <strong>No</strong>rth Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South<br />
Dakota, Texas, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.<br />
The following states have volunteer immunity statutes that<br />
are ambiguous in regards to whether the protection provided<br />
by the statute covers volunteer organizations, or is limited to<br />
volunteers: Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Massachusetts,<br />
<strong>No</strong>rth Dakota, New Mexico, and Rhode Island. All of these states<br />
include language in their statutes that also limits the conduct<br />
protected by their statutes. The following states did not have<br />
volunteer immunity statutes that protected recreational youth sport<br />
organizations: Alaska, California (does have a statute that exempts<br />
directors of nonprofit organizations), Connecticut, Iowa, Kentucky,<br />
Maine, Michigan, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York,<br />
Ohio, Oregon, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, and Wyoming. For<br />
an overview of state protection provided by volunteer immunity<br />
statutes see Table 2.<br />
In brief, of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, 34 states<br />
(66.7%) had volunteer immunity statutes. Of them, 5 states (9.8%)<br />
specified that the statutes would protect youth sport organizations<br />
and their volunteers, 21 states (41.2%) specified that the statutes<br />
would not protect youth sport organizations and their volunteers,<br />
and 8 states (15.7%) were ambiguous about the protection of youth<br />
sport organizations and their volunteers. The remaining 17 states<br />
(33.3%) did not have volunteer immunity statutes (see Table 2).<br />
Extent of Protection Provided by Volunteer Immunity Statutes<br />
Depending on the jurisdiction, a youth sport organization may<br />
seek the protection of a volunteer immunity statute to guard against<br />
a civil lawsuit alleging sexual molestation or abuse on the part of<br />
coaches, administrators, or officials. This study revealed, however,<br />
that a majority of states either had volunteer immunity statutes that<br />
expressly stated that they only protected volunteers and not the<br />
organizations, or did not have statutes that would protect youth<br />
sport organizations. The states that expressly exclude volunteer<br />
organizations are similar to the Federal Volunteer Immunity Act,<br />
which also limits its protection to volunteers.<br />
States that Provide Protection to Volunteer Organizations<br />
Only Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,<br />
and Utah had volunteer immunity statutes that expressly extend<br />
protection from volunteers to the organization. Four out of the<br />
five states offering protection do so with either limitations or<br />
qualifications. For example, in Minnesota volunteers are not<br />
protected from acts committed in a willful and wanton or reckless<br />
manner (Minnesota Statutes Annotated, § 604A.11, 2009).<br />
Volunteers are not protected if they act in violation of federal, local,<br />
or state law. These limitations may also extend to the organization<br />
seeking shelter under the statute and if that is the case, youth<br />
sport organizations would not be protected against cases alleging
Immunity Statutes<br />
Table 2. States and the District of Columbia with and<br />
without Volunteer Immunity Statues<br />
Volunteer Immunity Statues<br />
State With Statues Without<br />
Statues<br />
Organizations <strong>No</strong>t Providing Ambiguous<br />
Included Protection Protection<br />
Alabama #<br />
Alaska #<br />
Arizona #<br />
Arkansas #<br />
California #<br />
Colorado #<br />
Connecticut #<br />
Delaware #<br />
District of<br />
Columbia #<br />
Florida #<br />
Georgia #<br />
Hawaii #<br />
Idaho #<br />
Illinois #<br />
Indiana #<br />
Iowa #<br />
Kansas #<br />
Kentucky #<br />
Louisiana #<br />
Maine #<br />
Maryland #<br />
Massachusetts #<br />
Michigan #<br />
Minnesota #<br />
Mississippi #<br />
Missouri #<br />
Montana #<br />
Nebraska #<br />
Nevada #<br />
New Hampshire #<br />
New Jersey #<br />
New Mexico #<br />
New York #<br />
<strong>No</strong>rth Carolina #<br />
<strong>No</strong>rth Dakota #<br />
Ohio #<br />
Oklahoma #<br />
Oregon #<br />
Pennsylvania #<br />
Rhode Island #<br />
South Carolina #<br />
South Dakota #<br />
Tennessee #<br />
Texas #<br />
Utah #<br />
Vermont #<br />
Virginia #<br />
Washington #<br />
West Virginia #<br />
Wisconsin #<br />
Wyoming #<br />
N (%) 5 (9.8%) 21 (41.2%) 8 (15.7%) 17 (33.3%)<br />
sexual molestation or abuse because those actions extend beyond<br />
willful, wanton, or reckless behavior in that they are intentional.<br />
Further, sexual molestation and abuse violate the state’s criminal<br />
code, where it allows plaintiffs to use the doctrine of respondeat<br />
superior against employers for cases alleging sexual molestation<br />
or abuse on the part of employees (Minnesota Statutes Annotated,<br />
§ 604A.11, 2009).<br />
If respondeat superior is the basis for a plaintiff’s claim against<br />
a recreational youth sport organization, the volunteer immunity<br />
statute will probably not afford protection to the organization<br />
because the organization would stand in the shoes of the employee<br />
in that they are vicariously liable for the employee’s actions.<br />
Because the volunteer employee would not be able to use the<br />
volunteer immunity statute for protection, it is unlikely that the<br />
organization would be able to seek protection under the statute.<br />
However, the statute may provide protection for the organization<br />
if the plaintiff sues the recreational youth sport organization for<br />
its own negligence under a negligent hiring/retention/supervision<br />
theory. The statute does provide protection for ordinary negligence;<br />
therefore, the case will turn on whether the organization was<br />
willful, wanton, or reckless in its selection and/or retention of the<br />
pedophilic employee.<br />
Similarly, New Jersey covers the organization from its own<br />
negligence (New Jersey Statutes Annotated 2A: 53A-7, 2000)<br />
yet, the act also expressly excludes protection of volunteers or<br />
agents who commit acts of sexual misconduct. Thus, the statute<br />
leaves open the question as to whether the organization would<br />
remain protected under the act if it negligently hired, retained, or<br />
supervised the employee who committed the sexual misconduct.<br />
Mississippi’s volunteer immunity statute affords protection to<br />
youth sport organizations, but only protects organizations against<br />
claims based on negligence (Mississippi Code Annotated § 95-<br />
9-1, 1988). Pennsylvania’s statute expressly provides protection<br />
for youth sport organizations unless its’ acts or omissions<br />
fall substantially below the standards generally practiced and<br />
accepted for similar organizations (42 Pennsylvania Code Statutes<br />
Annotated § 8332.1, 2007). Due to a lack of case law interpreting<br />
Pennsylvania’s statute, the extent of protection provided under<br />
the statute is unclear as to what conduct falls below the standards<br />
generally practiced and accepted for recreational youth sport<br />
organizations. However, the statute probably does not extend its<br />
protection to include sexual misconduct as an accepted practice<br />
in recreational youth sports. Utah provides organizations with<br />
protection unless the organization reasonably had, or reasonably<br />
should have had notice of the volunteer’s unfitness (Utah Code<br />
Annotated § 78B-4-103, 1953). Thus, a recreational youth sport<br />
organization’s protection in Utah will turn on whether it knew or<br />
should have known that the volunteer was unfit.<br />
States with Statutes that are Ambiguous in Application<br />
The research revealed that eight states are ambiguous as to<br />
whether they extend protection to cover volunteer organizations<br />
as well as the volunteers. Georgia’s volunteer immunity statute<br />
provides a good example of an ambiguous volunteer immunity<br />
statute. Georgia’s statute is titled the “Liability of nonprofit<br />
associations conducting safety or sports programs” (Georgia Code<br />
Annotated, § 51-1-120, 1988). The title of the statute suggests that<br />
it applies to recreational youth sport organizations. However, the<br />
terms of the statute only provide protection for volunteers for a<br />
sports program, with no mention of whether protection extends to<br />
the program itself (Georgia Code Annotated, § 51-1-120(b), 1988).<br />
volume 5, issue 1 57
Immunity Statutes<br />
Seven other states also have statutes that do not expressly include<br />
or exclude volunteer organizations in regards to the protections<br />
that they afford.<br />
Ambiguity in application is not the only common trait found<br />
in these eight statutes. All eight statutes include qualifications<br />
or limitations that probably preclude recreational youth sport<br />
organizations from relying on their protections. Georgia limits<br />
its’ volunteer immunity protection to acts performed in good faith<br />
and within the scope of assigned duties (Georgia Code Annotated,<br />
§ 51-1-120, 1988). In Georgia, sexual misconduct does not fall<br />
within the scope of employment unless it is later ratified by the<br />
employer (Big Brother/Big Sister of Metro Atlanta, Inc. v. Terrell,<br />
1987). Further, it is unlikely that Georgia courts will find good<br />
faith in pedophilic actions. Similarly, <strong>No</strong>rth Dakota only protects<br />
acts committed in good faith and expressly excludes willful acts<br />
(<strong>No</strong>rth Dakota Century Code § 32-03(a), 2009).<br />
Idaho limits its’ volunteer protection to exclude willful or<br />
wanton activities, but also includes knowing violations of the law.<br />
Sexual misconduct with a minor is a knowing violation of the Idaho<br />
law (Idaho Code § 9-350, 2009). Indiana, Louisiana, and Rhode<br />
Island only protect volunteers for ordinary negligence and exclude<br />
heightened degrees of negligence like willful or wanton acts, or<br />
gross negligence (Indiana Code § 34-30-19-3,1999); Louisiana<br />
Revised Statutes 9:2798, 2009; Rhode Island Annotated § 9-1-48,<br />
1956). These statutes do not expressly preclude intentional acts<br />
(like sexual abuse) from protective coverage, but they do exclude<br />
acts classified as heightened degrees of negligence (like willful or<br />
wanton, and gross negligence). Since these statutes do not protect<br />
acts involving heightened degrees of negligence, it is likely that<br />
they also do not protect acts where the person intends to cause<br />
the harm. Massachusetts’ volunteer immunity statute expressly<br />
excludes intentional acts from protection under the statute<br />
(Massachusetts General Laws Annotated 231 § 85V, 2009).<br />
New Mexico limits its protection to cover only those harms that<br />
are part of the “ordinary give and take common to the particular<br />
sport.” While there are no cases that detail the type of activities<br />
included in the “ordinary give and take common to the particular<br />
sport,” sexual misconduct with minors is not common or accepted<br />
practice in any youth sport in the United States. Thus, it is unlikely<br />
that New Mexico’s volunteer immunity statute affords protection<br />
to recreational youth sport organizations for the pedophilic actions<br />
committed by its volunteers (New Mexico Statutes Annotated §<br />
41-12-1, 1978).<br />
Discussion<br />
The results of this study have implications for local, regional,<br />
and national recreational youth sport organizations in the United<br />
States. Local or regional youth sport organizations can look to the<br />
results to better understand how their specific jurisdiction would<br />
utilize immunity statutes in cases brought against recreational<br />
youth sport organizations for the pedophilic actions of coaches,<br />
administrators, and officials. While this study should not take<br />
the place of legal counsel, it can be used by recreational youth<br />
sport organizations to gain a better understanding of the problem<br />
and the need to develop risk management plans that protect their<br />
organizations from sexual predators and related legal liability.<br />
National youth sport organizations like Little League Baseball<br />
58 Journal of Research<br />
and Softball and Pop Warner Little Scholars provide youth sport<br />
leagues in most states and need to understand the variances that<br />
exist between the legal jurisdictions. It is important for national<br />
youth sport organizations to understand how different jurisdictions<br />
apply these immunity statutes so they can better protect themselves<br />
against the pedophilic actions of coaches, administrators, and<br />
officials within their programs. Thus, the results of this research can<br />
provide recreational youth sport organizations with information on<br />
the protection provided by state volunteer immunity statutes.<br />
Recreational youth sport organizations often rely on volunteers<br />
for coaches, administrators, and officials. Most jurisdictions, as<br />
well as the federal government, provide statutory immunity for<br />
volunteers. However, this study revealed that a vast majority of<br />
volunteer immunity statutes, including the federal statute, provide<br />
no protection for recreational youth sport organizations. Only<br />
Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Utah had<br />
volunteer immunity statutes that extend protection from volunteers<br />
to the organization. The research also revealed that eight states<br />
are ambiguous as to whether they extend volunteer immunity<br />
to include volunteer organizations like recreational youth sport<br />
organizations. There are qualifications on four out of the five<br />
states that expressly provide organizations with protection. All<br />
eight of the states that are ambiguous as to whether they provide<br />
protection to organizations include qualifications and limitations<br />
on the protection they afford. The qualifications and limitations<br />
for each of these 12 statutes likely render their application useless<br />
in cases where a youth sport organization needs to seek statutory<br />
protection against claims of sexual abuse or molestation by one of<br />
the organization’s volunteers. Only Pennsylvania had a statute that<br />
is apparently broad enough to provide protection for recreational<br />
youth sport organizations; yet, organizations should be cautious<br />
in relying on the statute’s protection due to the lack of case law<br />
explaining how courts will interpret the statute in sexual abuse or<br />
molestation cases.<br />
Accordingly, this research revealed that volunteer immunity<br />
statutes do not serve as dependable sources for protection against<br />
the imposition of civil liability for the pedophilic actions of coaches,<br />
administrators and officials. The best defense to the imposition of<br />
liability for the actions of others remains the adoption of reasonable<br />
protective measures (including policies, procedures, background<br />
screening, education, training, and proper supervision) to guard<br />
against the infiltration of youth sport organizations by pedophiles.<br />
Sport/recreation managers and organizations should implement<br />
policies and procedures that have been utilized elsewhere for<br />
identifying and eliminating sexual abuse in sport. Examples<br />
of such include, but are not limited to the Australian Sports<br />
Commission, 2000; European Federation of Sports Psychology,<br />
2002; IOC, 2007; Ontario Ministry of Health and Human Services,<br />
2007; Trocme & Schumaker, 1999; U.S. Department of Health and<br />
Human Services, 2007; and Women’s Sports Foundation, 2007.<br />
Conclusion<br />
By examining immunity statutes for all 50 states and the<br />
District of Columbia, information was derived that can be used to<br />
assist recreational youth sport organizations so that they can better<br />
understand the problem and the possibility that they could be found<br />
liable, for the pedophilic actions of coaches, administrators, and
Immunity Statutes<br />
officials in their jurisdiction. It is important to realize that the law<br />
is constantly changing and prudent sport managers should remain<br />
educated on this topic and the current law in their jurisdiction. This<br />
study does not provide specific legal advice and should not take<br />
the place of legal counsel. Youth sport managers and organizations<br />
should seek the advice of legal counsel when developing related<br />
risk management policies.<br />
This study was merely an initial step on this research topic.<br />
The information gathered from this study can be used as a<br />
foundation for future research. Specifically, information obtained<br />
may be utilized to develop surveys investigating if recreational<br />
youth sport organizations are risking legal exposure through their<br />
actions or inactions in guarding against sexual abuse on the part<br />
of their coaches, administrators, and officials. Additionally, this<br />
study could be replicated in common law jurisdictions such as the<br />
United Kingdom and modified for civil law jurisdictions in other<br />
European countries, or even across the globe. Sexual predators will<br />
continue to target recreational youth sports because they provide<br />
a consistent pool of potential victims. Those who operate these<br />
programs need to understand how to guard against sexual predators<br />
and how to defend themselves from claims brought against them<br />
for the actions of their coaches, administrators, and officials.<br />
References<br />
27 Am. Jur. 2nd Negligent hiring § 459 (2005).<br />
Appenzeller, T. (2000). Youth sport and the law. Durham, NC: Carolina<br />
Academic Press.<br />
Australian Sports Commission. (2000). Harassment-free sport: Protecting<br />
children from abuse in sport. Cabrera, Australia: Pirie.<br />
Biedzynski, K. W. (1999). The federal volunteer protection act: Does<br />
Congress want to play ball? Seton Hall Legislative Journal, 23(2),<br />
319-358.<br />
Big Brother/Big Sister of Metro Atlanta, Inc. v. Terrell, 359 S.E.2d 241<br />
(Ga.App. 1987).<br />
Brackenridge, C. H. (1997). He owned me basically…Women’s experience<br />
of sexual abuse in sport. International Review for the Sociology of<br />
Sport, 32(2), 115-130.<br />
Brackenridge, C. H. (2001). Spoilsport: Understanding and preventing<br />
sexual exploitation in sport. London: Routledge.<br />
Cotten, D. J. (2007). Which parties are liable? In D. J. Cotten & J. T.<br />
Wolohan (Eds.), Law for recreation and sport managers (4th ed.) (pp.<br />
66-77). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.<br />
Deak, D. (1999). Out of bounds: How sexual abuse of athletes at the hands<br />
of their coaches is costing the world of sports millions. Seton Hall<br />
Journal of Sport Law, 9(1), 171-195.<br />
Earl-Hubbard, M. L. (1996). The child sex offender registration laws:<br />
The punishment, liberty deprivation, and unintended results associated<br />
with the scarlet letter laws of the 1990s. <strong>No</strong>rthwestern University Law<br />
Review, 90(2), 788-802.<br />
European Federation of Sports Psychology. (2002). Position statements<br />
– 6. Sexual exploitation in sport. Retrieved from http://www.fepsac.<br />
com/module.asp?page=detail&XModuleId=8243&ProductId=2671<br />
Garner, B. A. (Ed.). (2004). Black’s law dictionary (8th ed.). St. Paul, MN:<br />
Thompson West.<br />
Georgia Code Annotated, § 51-1-120 (1988).<br />
Gervis, M., & Dunn, N. (2004). The emotional abuse of elite child athletes<br />
by their coaches. Child Abuse Review, 13(3), 215-223.<br />
Gibbons, M., & Campbell, D. (2003). Liability of recreation and<br />
competitive sport organizations for sexual assaults on children by<br />
administrators, coaches and volunteers. Journal of Legal Aspects of<br />
Sport, 13(3), 185-229.<br />
Hurst, T. R. & Knight, J. N. (2003). Coaches' liability for athletes' injuries<br />
and deaths. Seton Hall Journal of Sport Law, 13(1), 27-51.<br />
Idaho Code § 9-350 (2009).<br />
Indiana Code § 34-30-19-3 (1999).<br />
International Olympic Committee. (2007, February 8). IOC adopts<br />
consensus statement on sexual harassment & abuse in sport. Retrieved<br />
from http://multimedia.olympic.org/pdf/en_report_1125.pdf<br />
Keeton, W. P. (1984). Prosser and Keeton on the law of torts. St. Paul,<br />
MN: West.<br />
Kirby, S., & Greaves, L. (1996, July). Foul play: Sexual abuse and<br />
harassment in sport. Paper presented to the Pre-Olympic Scientific<br />
Congress, Dallas, TX.<br />
Kirby, S., Greaves, L., & Hankivsky, O. (2000). The dome of silence: Sexual<br />
harassment and abuse in sport. Halifax, <strong>No</strong>va Scotia: Fernwood.<br />
Kirk, G. I. (1997). Canadian Hockey League, players first. Retrieved from<br />
http://www.canoe.ca/PlayersFirst/home.html<br />
Leahy, T., Pretty, G., & Tenenbaum, G. (2002). Prevalence of sexual<br />
abuse in organized competitive sport in Australia, Journal of Sexual<br />
Aggression, 8(2), 16-36.<br />
Massachusetts General Laws Annotated 231 § 85V (2009).<br />
Mayer, M. (2005). Stepping in to step out of liability: the proper standard<br />
of liability for referees in foreseeable judgment-call situations. DePaul<br />
Journal of Sport Law and Contemporary Problems, 3, 54-101.<br />
Minnesota Statutes Annotated, § 604A.11 (2009).<br />
Mississippi Code Annotated § 95-9-1 (1988).<br />
Nack, W., & Yaeger, D. (1999, September 13). Every parent’s nightmare:<br />
The child molester has found a home in the world of youth sports,<br />
where as a coach he can gain the trust and loyalty of our kids-and then<br />
prey on them. Sports Illustrated, 91(10), 40-53.<br />
National Council of Youth Sports. (2008). Reports on trends and<br />
participation in organized youth sports. Retrieved from http://www.<br />
ncys.org/pdf/2008/2008-market-research.pdf<br />
Nielson, J. T. (2001). The forbidden zone: Intimacy, sexual relations<br />
and misconduct in the relationship between coaches and athletes.<br />
International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 36(2), 165-182.<br />
New Jersey Statutes Annotated § 2A: 53A-7 (2000).<br />
New Mexico Statutes Annotated § 41-12-1 (1978).<br />
<strong>No</strong>rth Dakota Century Code § 32-03 (2009).<br />
Pennsylvania Code Statutes Annotated 42 § 8332.1 (2007).<br />
Peterson, J. (2004). Don’t trust me with your child: <strong>No</strong>n-legal precautions<br />
when the law cannot prevent sexual exploitation in youth sports. Texas<br />
Review of Entertainment & Sports Law, 5, 297-323.<br />
Pike-Masteralexis, L. (1995). Sexual harassment and athletics: Legal and<br />
policy implications for athletic departments. Journal of Sport and<br />
Social Issues, 19(2), 141-156.<br />
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 8A (1965).<br />
Rhode Island Annotated § 9-1-48 (1956).<br />
Smith, M. (1999). Tort immunity for volunteers in Ohio: Zivich v. Mentor<br />
Soccer Club, Inc., Akron Law Review, 32(4), 699-722.<br />
Trocme , N., & Schumaker, K. (1999). Reported child sexual abuse<br />
in Canadian schools and recreational facilities: Implications for<br />
developing effective prevention strategies. Children and Youth<br />
Services, 21(8), 621-642.<br />
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2007). Preventing child<br />
sexual abuse within youth-serving organizations: Getting started on<br />
policies and procedures. Atlanta, GA: CDC.<br />
Utah Code Annotated § 78B-4-103 (1953).<br />
van der Smissen, B. (1990). Legal liability and risk management for<br />
public and private entities. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.<br />
van der Smissen, B. (2007). Elements of negligence. In D. J. Cotten & J.<br />
T. Wolohan (Eds.), Law for recreation and sport managers (4th ed.)<br />
(pp. 36-45). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.<br />
Volkwein, K. Franke, I., Schnell, I., Sherwood, D., & Livezey, A. (1997).<br />
Sexual harassment in sport: Perception and experiences of femalestudent<br />
athletes. International Review of Sociology of Sport, 32(3),<br />
283-295.<br />
Weeber, R. R. (1992). Scope of employment redefined: Holding employers<br />
vicariously liable for sexual assaults committed by their employees.<br />
Minnesota Law Review, 76(6), 1513-1541.<br />
Women’s Sports Foundation. (2007). Addressing the issue of verbal,<br />
physical, and psychological abuse of athletes: The foundation position.<br />
Retrieved from http://www.womenspsortsfoundation.org/Home.aspx<br />
Zaichkowsky, L. D. (January, 2000). The dark side of coaching youth<br />
sports: Coaches sexually abusing children - the need for a code of<br />
conduct. USA Today (Society for the Advancement of Education).<br />
Retrieved from http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1272/is_<br />
2656_128/ai_5857658 !<br />
volume 5, issue 1 59
A Brand Loyalty Model Utilitizing Team<br />
Identification and Customer Satisfaction in the<br />
Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />
by Dr. Soonhwan Lee, Indiana University Purdue University<br />
Indianapolis (IUPUI); Dr. Hongbum Shin, Assistant Professor,<br />
Keimyung University, Daegu, S. Korea; Dr. Jung-Jun Park, Pusan<br />
National University, Busan, S. Korea; Dr. Oh-Ryun Kwon, Pusan<br />
National University, Busan, S. Korea<br />
Abstract<br />
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship<br />
among the attitudinal brand loyalty variables (i.e., cognitive,<br />
affective, and conative components), team identification, and<br />
customer satisfaction by developing a structural equation model,<br />
based on Oliver's (1997) attitudinal brand loyalty model. The<br />
results of this study confirmed the study of brand loyalty stages by<br />
Oliver (1997) involving development of a brand loyalty process.<br />
Results supported the finding that consumers' strong beliefs about<br />
brand quality have increased the degree of "liking". In turn,<br />
results indicate a positive intention or commitment to repurchase a<br />
particular item. Therefore, this study emphasizes the importance<br />
of measuring attitudinal brand loyalty to identify attitudinal brand<br />
loyal customers and better understand their repurchasing intentions<br />
in the sports licensed product industry. Furthermore, this study<br />
showed the significant mediating effect of cognitive and affective<br />
brand loyalty in the relationship between customer satisfaction and<br />
conative brand loyalty.<br />
Key words: Conative Behavior, Purchase Intention<br />
The sales of licensed sports merchandise have become an<br />
increasingly important source of revenue for professional sport<br />
franchises (Mullin, Hardy, & Sutton, 2007). However, the popularity<br />
and demand for sport licensed products decreased during the 1990's<br />
and into the new millennium. Several reasons cited for the decline<br />
included poor variety, relatively lower quality products compared<br />
to branded sport products, the Major League Baseball (MLB) strike<br />
in 1994, and the National Basketball Association (NBA) lockout<br />
in 1998 (Howard & Crompton, 2004; Mullin, Hardy, & Sutton,<br />
2007). However, the Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association<br />
(2008) reported a recent trend demonstrating an increase in the<br />
sales of sports licensed products. For example, retail sales of the<br />
licensed sports merchandise in the U.S. and Canada rose 5.8% in<br />
2006 from 2005 to reach $15.1 billion (SGMA, 2008).<br />
Improved business models, new marketable rookies (e.g.,<br />
LeBron James in NBA, etc.), the popularity of retro fashion trends,<br />
new video games, and more sophisticated marketing techniques<br />
have fueled this growth (Gladden & Funk, 2002; Kwon &<br />
Armstrong, 2004; Matsuoka, Chelladurai, & Harada, 2003; Trail,<br />
Fink, & Anderson, 2003). Previous studies have examined the<br />
objectives and advantages of utilizing licensed products which<br />
include sustaining a consumer franchise, maximizing existing<br />
lines' profitability, penetrating new markets, stimulating positive<br />
attributes of the player, team, or league, and increasing the level of<br />
brand awareness (Quelch, 1985; Shank, 2004).<br />
60 Journal of Research<br />
Investigating the relationship between fans and their<br />
consumption behavior by systematically considering attitudinal<br />
approaches to team identification and fans' purchasing decisions<br />
about licensed sports products is important. The conceptual<br />
theory between sport consumer behavior and team identification<br />
has become well established and now extends to brand loyalty<br />
(Gladden & Funk, 2002). Brand loyalty by sport consumers is a<br />
cornerstone of marketing theories as it provides mutual benefits for<br />
sports fans and the licensed product marketers (Gladden & Funk,<br />
2002; McDonald & Milne, 1997; Kwon & Armstrong, 2004).<br />
Although much of the research in sport marketing has<br />
investigated brand loyalty, little attention has yet been given to the<br />
purchasing of licensed sports products in terms of measurements<br />
and antecedents. In addition, sport marketers should be able to<br />
identify a distinct target market and potentially better address<br />
their wants and needs through measuring attitudinal brand loyalty.<br />
The findings of this study also would be able to identify several<br />
marketing and general management implications. For example,<br />
team identification and attitudinal brand loyalty can be the tools<br />
to measure brand loyalty among sport licensed product customers.<br />
Moreover, sport marketers should be able to assess the attitudes of<br />
their customers toward the sport licensed products and to identify<br />
any needs that should be fulfilled. As a result, the sport licensed<br />
product customer loyalty measurement should be used as an<br />
assessment tool in evaluating customer satisfaction. Therefore,<br />
this study investigates the relationship among team identification,<br />
customer satisfaction, and fans' purchasing behavior by considering<br />
attitudinal approaches. Moreover, it examines the antecedents<br />
of purchasing behavior relating to licensed sports products by<br />
developing a structural equation model based on Oliver's (1997)<br />
attitudinal brand loyalty model. Finally, this study suggests<br />
implications for future research as well as marketing strategies for<br />
licensed sport products.<br />
Research Questions<br />
This research was originated to test the following research<br />
questions:<br />
•What is the way to measure brand loyalty to licensed<br />
products?<br />
•Is there any relationship between team identification and<br />
attitudinal purchasing behavior relating to licensed sport<br />
products?<br />
Team Identification<br />
Team identification is one of the basic psychological orientations<br />
influencing the behavior of sport fans (Kwon & Armstrong, 2002).<br />
The concept of team identification with a particular favorite sport<br />
team has been a critical element in the study of the psychology of<br />
sport fans over the last decade (Kwon & Armstrong, 2002; Wann,<br />
1994; Wann, 1996; Wann, Peterson, Cothran, & Dykes, 1999).<br />
Team identification considers the valence of the unit relationship
Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />
between the fan and the team (Madrigal, 1995). For instance, team<br />
identification has a strong relationship with self-esteem and positive<br />
outlook on life, and has been negatively related to depression and<br />
negative affective experiences (Branscombe & Wann, 1991).<br />
Numerous studies on the concept of team identification have been<br />
linked to various behaviors and phenomena that can be observed<br />
in sport settings. For instance, one such variable has been called<br />
basking in reflected glory (BIRGing) in which sport consumers<br />
seek to enhance their self-esteem by displaying a relationship<br />
between their favorite team performance and themselves (Cialdini,<br />
Borden, Thornes, Walker, Freeman, & Sloan, 1976; Kolbe &<br />
James, 2003; Kwon & Armstrong, 2002; Quick, 2000; Wann &<br />
Branscombe, 1990). BIRGing is one's inclination to "share in<br />
the glory of a successful other with whom they are in some way<br />
associated" (Cialdini et al., 1976, p. 366). It allows people to<br />
build self-esteem through the association of successful others. For<br />
example, individuals would experience greater enjoyment if they<br />
were able to BIRG. Logically, those individuals who experienced<br />
positive confirmation had higher levels of BIRGing behavior and<br />
higher levels of enjoyment (Trail, Fink, & Anderson, 2003).<br />
Customer Satisfaction<br />
Achieving customer satisfaction is a major goal of marketing<br />
efforts. These efforts lead to purchase and/or consumption and in<br />
turn result in post-purchase phenomena such as attitude change,<br />
repeat purchase, and brand loyalty. Customer satisfaction is<br />
defined as a positive outcome from a complex evaluation of a<br />
purchasing and consuming experience of a product and/or service<br />
(Churchill & Surprenant, 1982). The literature on customer<br />
satisfaction theory suggests that consumers use opinions about<br />
a product's anticipated performance to determine whether to<br />
make a purchase (Miller, 1977). The product evaluation process<br />
appears to involve a comparison of expectations about product<br />
performance with perceptions of product performance (Barber<br />
& Venkatramen, 1986; Cardozo, 1965; Swan & Trawick, 1979).<br />
When performance exceeds expectation, positive disconfirmation<br />
occurs, leading to satisfaction. When performance falls short,<br />
negative disconfirmation occurs and leads to dissatisfaction (Olson<br />
& Dover, 1977; Richins & Bloch, 1991). This indicates that<br />
customer satisfaction is based largely on how customers perceive<br />
service and/or product performance relative to their expectations.<br />
This causal sequence has also been supported in the sport context.<br />
Satisfaction with the experience of attending sporting events would<br />
be a significant predictor of the likelihood of attending future events<br />
(Madrigal, 1995). For example, successful team performance and<br />
game outcomes lead to customer satisfaction and stimulate further<br />
consumption, whereas poor team performance and game outcomes<br />
lead to dissatisfaction, which in turn results in less consumption<br />
(Greestein & Marcum, 1981; Hansen & Gauthier, 1989; Matsuoka<br />
et al., 2003).<br />
Attitudinal Brand Loyalty<br />
Numerous researchers have examined the attitudinal aspect<br />
of brand loyalty (Bowen & Shoemaker, 1998; Iwasaki & Havitz,<br />
1998; Kwon & Armstrong, 2004; McCleary & Weaver, 1992;<br />
Vallerand & Reid, 1984). According to Oliver (1997), there is a<br />
learning process in consumers' attitudinal purchasing behavior.<br />
Attitudinal brand loyalty is developed in three phases — cognitive,<br />
affective, and conative components. Cognition refers to people's<br />
logical thoughts about the object, including beliefs about facts such<br />
as price and necessity. Affect refers to irrational approaches to<br />
an object such as feelings or emotional responses (Back & Parks,<br />
2003). Quick (2000) found a relationship between the irrational<br />
feeling of team identification and consumption of sport products.<br />
For example, sport fans who identify with a certain team may buy<br />
a championship t-shirt without thinking about price and quality,<br />
when the team wins the championship game. Conative components<br />
include behavioral intentions or willingness to act (Back & Parks,<br />
2003). Bagozzi (1978) stated that the conation dimension is the<br />
active decision to either approach or avoid an object or formulate<br />
some responses.<br />
Attitudinal brand loyalty focuses not only on transactional<br />
strategies, such as frequent-user programs and gifts for repeated<br />
customers, but also on attitudinal variables, such as commitment<br />
and trust. Attitudinal studies have described brand loyalty not<br />
only as the outcome of repeated purchase behavior, but also the<br />
consequence of multidimensional attitudes toward a specific brand<br />
(Back & Parks, 2003; Backman & Crompton, 1991).<br />
In addition, the literature on the relationship between attitudinal<br />
and behavioral aspects of brand loyalty should be addressed to<br />
describe the purchasing behavior of licensed sports products.<br />
Back and Parks (2003) mentioned that many attitudinal factors are<br />
related to consumers' involvement, psychological commitment,<br />
motivation and other cognitive and affective variables that were<br />
based not theoretically, but operationally. On the other hand,<br />
behavioral brand loyalty describes measures that are based on<br />
observation of actual behavior or self-reports of behavior, such<br />
as brand choice sequence, probability of purchase period, and the<br />
proportion of purchases concentrated on a specific brand (Backman<br />
& Crompton, 1991). In addition, numerous researchers have<br />
investigated the relationship between attitudinal and behavioral<br />
intentions of purchasing behavior (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980; Bentler<br />
& Speckart, 1981; Peter & Olson, 1993). Specifically, Ajzen and<br />
Fishbein (1980) noted a relationship between customers' beliefs<br />
and attitudes and their behavioral intentions. Bentler and Speckart<br />
(1981) found that attitudes have causal priority over behaviors.<br />
Similarly, Peter and Olson (1993) found that a negative change<br />
in attitudes caused many customers to switch to other brands,<br />
indicating that change in attitude is a good predictor of purchasing<br />
behavior.<br />
The Effect of Team Identification on Cognitive Brand Loyalty<br />
Many researchers have examined the relationship between team<br />
identification and the purchasing attitude towards licensed sports<br />
products based on the theory of brand loyalty and/or brand equity<br />
(Gladden & Funk, 2002; Kwon & Armstrong, 2004; Matsuoka<br />
et al., 2003; Trail et al., 2003). As the term team identification<br />
has been adapted from the fields of organizational behavior and<br />
sport fan identification (Dutton, Dukerich, & Harquail, 1994;<br />
Milne & McDonald, 1999), many studies have shown that team<br />
identification is more likely a cognitive perception than affective<br />
perception. Foote (1951) and Kagan (1958) suggest that the term<br />
identification is portrayed only by the cognitive perception of<br />
shared experiences and characteristics, not by resultant behavior.<br />
volume 5, issue 1 61
Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />
For example, the purchasing attitudes of sport consumers who<br />
have a psychological attachment to their favorite teams may stem<br />
from team performance and outcomes, quality of product, variety<br />
of choice, and price.<br />
In addition, Gladden and Milne (1999) stated that professional<br />
sport teams are likely to possess brand equity by virtue of the added<br />
meaning that sport consumers attach to the names and logos of their<br />
favorite teams. They modified the framework to include the entire<br />
team sport setting and examined the hypothesized links among<br />
several antecedent variables (i.e., success, star players, coach, and<br />
competitive forces) and the realization of licensed merchandise<br />
sales. Moreover, several researchers have shown a relationship<br />
between team identification and sport consumer behavior<br />
(Mitrano, 1999; Sutton, McDonald, Milne, & Cimperman, 1997).<br />
Specifically, identification is highly correlated with basking in<br />
reflected glory (BIRGing) behavior (Madrigal, 1995; Sloan, 1989)<br />
and consumption of sport products (Wann & Branscombe, 1993).<br />
The Effect of Customer Satisfaction on Cognitive Brand Loyalty<br />
Numerous researchers have investigated the relationship<br />
between customer satisfaction and attitudinal brand loyalty<br />
(Fornell, Johnson, Anderson, Cha, & Bryant, 1996; Gladden &<br />
Funk, 2002; Greenstein & Marcum, 1981; Hansen & Gauthier,<br />
1989; Kwon & Armstrong, 2002; Matsuoka et al., 2003). Many<br />
consumer behavior researchers (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975; Fornell<br />
et al., 1996) have also found that customer satisfaction influences<br />
cognitive, affective, and conative components of attitudinal brand<br />
loyalty, including purchase intentions and post-purchase attitudes.<br />
These positive attitudes were found to revise purchasing decisions<br />
toward the product or brand. Other researchers have shown that<br />
customer satisfaction increases the level of positive belief or belief<br />
confidence (Albarracin & Wyer, 2000), reinforces the level of<br />
positive affect (Oliver, 1993), and enhances repurchase intentions<br />
(Yi, 1990).<br />
Customer satisfaction may have a direct effect on experiential<br />
needs. Park, Jaworski, and MacInnis (1986) suggested that<br />
consumers can be satisfied based on their different types of needs:<br />
functional, symbolic, and experiential. Of these different needs,<br />
experiential needs are °ßdesire for products that provide sensory<br />
pleasure, variety, and/or cognitive stimulation°® (Park, Jaworski,<br />
& MacInnis, 1986, p. 136). For example, sport consumers may<br />
purchase their favorite team t-shirt because of its unique design,<br />
color, or logo. They may also purchase any licensed product due to<br />
the enjoyment that is provided to them and/or their family.<br />
The Effect of Cognitive Purchasing Behavior on Affective Brand<br />
Loyalty<br />
The current study examines the influence of cognitive<br />
antecedents thought to be theoretically related to the affective<br />
reactions of BIRGing. Among the studies that explicitly tested<br />
cognition's possible influence on affective purchasing behavior,<br />
Madrigal (1995) explained cognition's effect on affect using<br />
the theory of expectancy disconfirmation. The expectancy<br />
disconfirmation paradigm refers to two processes consisting<br />
of the formation of pre-consumption normative standards (i.e.,<br />
expectations) and the subsequent confirmation or disconfirmation<br />
of those expectations through performance outcomes. The extent<br />
62 Journal of Research<br />
to which outcomes match expectations determines to a large<br />
extent how information is processed and evaluated. For example,<br />
a greater discrepancy between expectancies and outcomes should<br />
lead to greater cognitive processing and increased satisfaction/<br />
dissatisfaction with outcomes (Cohen & Basu, 1987; Hunt, Smith,<br />
& Kernan, 1989; Madrigal, 1995; Oliver, 1980). Trail et al. (2000)<br />
also indicated that disconfirmation would lead directly to an<br />
affective state. They mentioned that self-esteem responses would<br />
mediate the disconfirmation affective-state relationship. It seems<br />
much more logical to suggest that affective purchasing behavior<br />
precedes intended self-esteem behavior. Trail et al. (2000)<br />
noted that affective state predicts the intentions of future sport<br />
consumption behavior. For example, sport consumers are likely<br />
to consume licensed sport products that validate the connection<br />
between their concept of self and the source of their enhanced selfesteem<br />
(Belk, 1988).<br />
The Effect of Affective Brand Loyalty on Conative Brand Loyalty<br />
In using the general components of attitude, attitudinal brand<br />
loyalty should be considered as a sequential process in which<br />
customers become "loyal first in a cognitive sense, then later in an<br />
affective sense, and still later in a conative manner" (Oliver, 1997,<br />
p. 392). For instance, a customer initially becomes cognitively<br />
loyal based on beliefs about the brand attribute only. Then he or she<br />
may become affectively loyal, with pleasurable fulfillment based<br />
on brand performance. Next, he or she may become conatively<br />
loyal, exhibiting a brand-specific commitment.<br />
Although many researchers have studied consequential<br />
relationships with customer satisfaction and attitudinal brand<br />
loyalty, no empirical study has been undertaken in the licensed<br />
sports products business. Hence, this study tested the relationships<br />
among team identification, customer satisfaction, and attitudinal<br />
purchasing behavior of licensed sport products as listed:<br />
H 1<br />
: Team identification has a positive effect on cognitive brand<br />
loyalty of licensed sport products.<br />
H 2<br />
: Customer satisfaction has a positive effect on cognitive<br />
brand loyalty of licensed sport products.<br />
H 3<br />
: Cognitive brand loyalty has a positive effect on affective<br />
brand loyalty of licensed sport products.<br />
H 4<br />
: Affective brand loyalty has a positive effect on conative<br />
brand loyalty of licensed sport products.<br />
Conceptual Model<br />
Figure 1 displays the conceptual model used in this study. It<br />
shows the relationships among team identification and attitudinal<br />
brand loyalty of licensed sports products, as well as the relationship<br />
between cognitive brand loyalty and customer satisfaction, as based<br />
on Oliver's (1997) brand loyalty stage theory. Team identification<br />
and customer satisfaction are treated as an exogenous variable,<br />
whereas attitudinal (cognitive, affective, and conative) brand<br />
loyalty is considered as endogenous variables.<br />
Method<br />
A questionnaire was developed based on a thorough review of<br />
the literature and a pilot study. Manipulation checks from the pilot<br />
study (n=75) were conducted to ensure the reliability and validity<br />
of scales (Anderson & Gerbing, 1988; Chatterji, 2003; Fornell &
Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />
Results<br />
A reliability test was used to assess the internal homogeneity<br />
among items in this study. As Nunally (1978) suggested, the<br />
coefficient alpha is the most popular measure of reliability<br />
for a multi-item scale. The coefficient alpha estimates for the<br />
variables were as follows: team identification (TI) = .93; customer<br />
satisfaction (CS) = .95; cognitive brand loyalty (CBL) = .86;<br />
affective brand loyalty (ABL) = .82; and conative brand loyalty<br />
(CNBL) = .82. The alpha for all coefficients for the data exceeded<br />
the minimum standard for reliability of 0.7 as recommended by<br />
Nunnally (1978) for basic research. Thus, the results indicated<br />
that these measurements are highly reliable for the measurement<br />
of each construct.<br />
Figure 1. A conceptual model showing relationships among study variables.<br />
Lacker, 1981). In addition, the pilot study was administered to<br />
obtain reliability estimates and to establish the construct validity<br />
of the instrument. An additional goal of the pilot study was to<br />
reduce the number of items to be included in the final instrument<br />
so that data collection would be less time consuming and improve<br />
the consent rate from the survey respondents.<br />
The 5-item, 7-point Likert-type scale, for team identification<br />
(e.g., "It would be difficult to change my belief about my favorite<br />
team.") was modified from Wann & Branscombe (1990). The<br />
3-item, 7-point Likert-type scale, for customer satisfaction (e.g.,<br />
"Overall, I am satisfied with the decision to purchase the licensed<br />
product of my favorite team.") was adapted from Oliver (1980).<br />
Attitudinal brand loyalty was measured by using scales that were<br />
developed by Loken and John (1993), Oliver (1997), and Beatty,<br />
Kahle, and Homer (1988) and included nine items that were 7-<br />
point Likert-type measures (e.g., "The licensed product of my<br />
favorite team provides me superior quality as compared to any<br />
other similar products"; "I intend to continue purchasing my<br />
favorite team's licensed product").<br />
The sample population in this study was composed of baseball<br />
spectators who visited the Triple-A Minor League Baseball stadium<br />
in the northeastern United States. An on-site convenience sampling<br />
method was applied and complimentary tickets were raffled as an<br />
incentive. The questionnaire was distributed to 325 individuals<br />
when they entered into the stadium. Of the 325 distributed<br />
questionnaires, 268 questionnaires were returned. Some of these<br />
responses were eliminated before data coding because they were<br />
returned blank or only partially completed. In addition, the<br />
respondents who did not have any experience in purchasing the<br />
licensed products were excluded. After eliminating the unusable<br />
responses, 201 responses were coded for data analysis, resulting in<br />
a response rate of 62%. Among the respondents, the majority were<br />
male (56%), aged 30 or younger (48%) and Caucasian (87%). The<br />
household income level was normally distributed with a mean of<br />
$37,000.<br />
Construct Validity Test<br />
Construct validity assesses the degree to which a measurement<br />
represents and logically connects, via the underlying theory, the<br />
observed phenomenon to the construct (Fornell & Lacker, 1981).<br />
Following Anderson and Gerbing's (1988) two-step approach, a<br />
measurement model was estimated prior to the structural model.<br />
The results for the measurements of latent variables were very<br />
good ( 2 =228.95, df=114, RMSEA=0.07, CFI=0.98, NNFI=0.98).<br />
All indicator loadings for constructs were significant (p
Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />
Bentler and Bonett's (1980) non-normed fit index (NNFI) were<br />
performed. The results showed a better fit for the five-factor model,<br />
2 (114)=228.95, 2 / df = 2.10, RMSEA = .07, CFI = .98, NNFI<br />
= .98 than the three-factor model, 2 (119)=359.69, 2 / df = 3.10,<br />
RMSEA = .10, CFI = .95, NNFI =.95 with a significant 2 (5) =<br />
149.74, p
Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />
Hypotheses Testing<br />
H 1<br />
: Team identification has a positive effect on cognitive brand<br />
loyalty of licensed sports products.<br />
First, Hypothesis 1 was tested. The relationship between<br />
team identification and cognitive brand loyalty was found to be<br />
significant ( 11<br />
=0.52, t=6.00, p
Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />
other types of sports or geographic locations may have different<br />
strengths of effect on the variables. In addition, the sample<br />
population of this study was not selected randomly. As noted, pure<br />
random sampling is almost impossible in the industry, so including<br />
many different types of sports spectators and geographic segments<br />
would increase external validity. Thus, future studies should<br />
develop a systematic design that better represents the population.<br />
Measuring brand loyalty should be extended to include actual<br />
purchasing behaviors for the future. As Heskett et al. (1997)<br />
stated, only 100% of satisfied customers become truly brand loyal<br />
by having relatively high repurchase rates and strong emotional<br />
attachments with the brand. Including the actual purchasing rates<br />
of the licensed products of the favorite teams would enhance the<br />
quality of the study. In order to develop a more beneficial study,<br />
a longitudinal approach should be considered. By monitoring<br />
the consumers' actual purchasing behaviors and their pre-stated<br />
attitudes over time, the practitioner should be able to identify the<br />
enhancers or barriers between the attitudinal and behavioral brand<br />
loyalties.<br />
Moreover, future studies can include additional variables in the<br />
model to further develop brand loyalty strategies. For instance, by<br />
considering the effect of customers' perceptions of brand image for<br />
their favorite team on their satisfaction and brand loyalty, marketers<br />
should be able to develop selective target market strategies and<br />
enhance the effectiveness of their advertising strategies.<br />
Conclusions<br />
In summary, this study suggests that team identification<br />
enhances the level of customers' experiences of superiority,<br />
positive feelings, and strong commitment toward the brand, and<br />
subsequently greater purchasing frequencies over other brands.<br />
The results of this study also indicate that customer satisfaction<br />
does not guarantee conative brand loyalty. In other words, customer<br />
satisfaction will not automatically increase the repeated purchasing<br />
intention unless customers first build positive beliefs and emotional<br />
attachments with the brand. By using this attitudinal brand loyalty<br />
measurement, sport marketers should be able to identify a distinct<br />
target market and potentially better address their wants and needs.<br />
References<br />
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting<br />
social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.<br />
Albarracin, D., Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2000). The cognitive impact of past<br />
behavior: Influences on beliefs; attitudes, and future behavioral<br />
decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 5-22.<br />
Back, K. J., & Parks, S. (2003). A brand loyalty model involving cognitive,<br />
affective, and conative brand loyalty and customer satisfaction. Journal<br />
of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 27(4), 419-435.<br />
Backman, S. J., & Crompton, J. L. (1991). The usefulness of selected<br />
variables for predicting activity loyalty. Leisure Sciences, 13, 205-<br />
220.<br />
Bagozzi, R. P. (1978). The construct validity of the affective, behavioral,<br />
and cognitive components of attitude by analysis of covariance<br />
structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 13, 9-31.<br />
Barber, M. B., & Venkatramen, M. (1986). The determinants of<br />
satisfaction for a high involvement product. In R. Lutz (Ed.), Advances<br />
in consumer research (pp. 316-320). Provo, VT: Association for<br />
Consumer Research.<br />
Beatty, S. E., Kahle, L. R., & Homer, P. (1988). The involvementcommitment<br />
model: Theory and implications. Journal of Business<br />
Research, 16, 149-167.<br />
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of<br />
Consumer Research, 15, 139-168.<br />
Bentler. P. M., & Speckart, G. (1981). Attitudes "cause" behaviors:<br />
A structural equation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social<br />
Psychology, 40, 226-238.<br />
Bowen, J. T., & Shoemaker, S. (1998). Loyalty: Strategic commitment.<br />
Cornell Hotel & Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 13, 12-25.<br />
Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1991). The positive social and self<br />
concept consequences of sports team identification. Journal of Sport<br />
and Social Issues, 15, 115-127.<br />
Cardozo, R. N. (1965). An experimental study of consumer effort,<br />
expectation, and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 2, 244-<br />
249.<br />
Chartterji, M. (2003). Designing and using tools for educational<br />
assessment. Boston, MA. Pearson Education, Inc.<br />
Churchill, G.A., Jr., & Surprenant, C. (1982). An investigation into the<br />
determinants of customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research,<br />
19(4), 491-504.<br />
Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thornes, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., &<br />
Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field<br />
studies. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 34(3), 366-<br />
375.<br />
Cohen, J., & Basu, K. (1987). Alternative models of categorization:<br />
Toward a contingent processing framework. Journal of Consumer<br />
Research, 13, 455-472.<br />
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational<br />
images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly,<br />
39, 239-263.<br />
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior:<br />
An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-<br />
Wesley.<br />
Foote, N. N. (1951). Identification as the basis for a theory of motivation.<br />
American Sociological Review, 16, 14-22.<br />
Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E.<br />
(1996). The American customer satisfaction index: Nature, purpose,<br />
and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60, 7-18.<br />
Gladden, J. M., & Funk, D. C. (2002). Developing and understanding of<br />
brand associations in team sport: Empirical evidence from consumers<br />
of professional sport. Journal of Sport Management, 16, 54-81.<br />
Gladden, J. M., & Milne, G. R. (1999). Examining the importance of<br />
brand equity in professional sports. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 8(1),<br />
21-29.<br />
Greenstein, T. N., & Marcum, J. P. (1981). Factors affecting attendance<br />
of major league baseball: I. Team performance. Review of Sport and<br />
Leisure, 6(2), 21-34.<br />
Hansen, H., & Gauthier, R. (1989). Factor affecting attendance at<br />
professional sport events. Journal of Sport Management, 3(1), 15-32.<br />
Howard, D. R., & Crompton, J. L. (2004). Financing sport (2 nd ed.).<br />
Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology, Inc.<br />
Hunt, J. M., Smith, M. F., & Kernan, J. B. (1989). Processing effects of<br />
expectancy-discrepant persuasive messages. Psychological Reports,<br />
65, 1359-1376.<br />
Iwasaki, Y., & Havitz, M. E. (1998). A oath analytic model of the<br />
relationships between involvement, psychological commitment, and<br />
loyalty. Journal of Leisure Research, 30, 256-280.<br />
Janis, I. L., & King, B. T. (1954). The influence of role-playing on opinion<br />
change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 211-218<br />
Kagan, J. (1958). The concept of identification. Psychology Review, 65,<br />
296-305.<br />
Kolbe, R. H., & James, J. D. (2003). The internalization process among<br />
team followers: Implications for team loyalty. International Journal of<br />
Sport Management, 4(1), 25-43.<br />
Kwon, H., & Armstrong, K. (2002). Factors influencing impulse buying<br />
of sport team licensed merchandise. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 11(3),<br />
151-163.<br />
Kwon, H., & Armstrong, K. (2004). An exploration of the construct of<br />
psychological attachment to a sport team among college students: A<br />
66 Journal of Research
Licensed Sports Product Industry<br />
multidimensional approach. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 13(2), 94-<br />
103.<br />
Loken, B., & John, D. R. (1993). Diluting brand beliefs: When do brand<br />
extensions have negative impact? Journal of Markleting, 57, 71-84.<br />
Madrigal, R. (1995). Cognitive and affective determinants of fan<br />
satisfaction with sporting event attendance. Journal of Leisure<br />
Research, 27(3), 205-227.<br />
Matsuoka, H., Chelladurai, P., & Harada, M. (2003). Direct and interaction<br />
effects of team identification and satisfaction on intention to attend<br />
games. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12(4), 244-253.<br />
McCleary, K. W., & Weaver, P. A. (1992). Do business travelers who<br />
belong to frequent guest programs differ from those who don't being?<br />
Hospitality Research Journal, 15, 51-61.<br />
McDonald, M. A., & Milne, G. R. (1997). A conceptual framework<br />
for evaluating marketing relationships in professional sport. Sport<br />
Marketing Quarterly, 6(2), 27-32.<br />
Miller, J. A. (1977). Exploring satisfaction, modifying models, eliciting<br />
expectations, posing problems, and making meaningful measurements.<br />
In H. K. Hunt (Ed.), Conceptualization and measurement of consumer<br />
satisfaction (pp. 72-91). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science<br />
Institute.<br />
Milne, G. R., & McDonald, M. A. (1999). Fan identification. In G. R. Milne<br />
& M. A. McDonald (Eds.), Sport marketing: Managing the exchange<br />
process. (pp. 9-20). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.<br />
Mitrano, J. R. (1999). The "sudden death" of hockey in Hartford: Sports<br />
fans and franchise relocation. Sociology of Sport Journal, 16, 134-<br />
154.<br />
Mullin, B. J., Hardy, S., & Sutton, W. A. (2007). Sport marketing (3 rd ed.).<br />
Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.<br />
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences<br />
of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460-<br />
469.<br />
Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the<br />
satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 418-430.<br />
Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the<br />
consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill.<br />
Olson, J. C., & Dover, P. (1977). Effects of expectation creation and<br />
disconfirmation on belief elements of cognitive structures. In B.<br />
Anderson (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 168-175).<br />
Chicago: Association for consumer research.<br />
Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & MacInnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand<br />
concept-image management. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135-145.<br />
Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (1993). Consumer behavior and marketing<br />
strategy (3 rd ed.). Chicago: Irwin.<br />
Quelch, J. A. (1985). How to build a product licensing program. Harvard<br />
Business Review, 63(3), 186-193.<br />
Quick, S. (2000). Contemporary sport consumers: Some implications of<br />
linking fan typology with key spectator variables. Sport Marketing<br />
Quarterly, 9(3), 149-156.<br />
Richins, M. L., & Bloch, P. H. (1991). Post-purchase product satisfaction:<br />
Incorporating the effects of involvement and time. Journal of Business<br />
Research, 23(2), 145-158.<br />
Shank, M. D. (2004). Sport marketing: A strategic perspective (3 rd ed).<br />
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.<br />
Sloan, L. R. (1989). The motives of sports fans. In J. H. Goldstein (Ed.),<br />
Sports, games, and play: Social and Psychological viewpoints (2 nd ed.,<br />
pp. 175-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.<br />
The Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association (2008). Manufacturer<br />
sales by category 2008. Retrieved from http://www.sgma.com/<br />
reports/219_Manufacturer-Sales-by-Category-2008<br />
Sutton, W. A., McDonald, M. A., Milne, G. R., & Cimperman, J. (1997).<br />
Creating and fostering fan identification in professional sports. Sport<br />
Marketing Quarterly, 6(1), 15-22.<br />
Swan, J. E., & Trawick, I. F. (1979). Testing an extended concept of<br />
consumer satisfaction. In R. L. Day & H. K. Hunt (Eds.), New<br />
dimensions of consumer satisfaction and complaining behavior (pp.<br />
55-61). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.<br />
Trail, G. T., Anderson, D. F., & Fink, J. S. (2000). A theoretical model of<br />
sport spectator consumption behavior. International Journal of Sport<br />
Management, 1, 154-180<br />
Trail, G. T., Fink, J. S., & Anderson, D. F. (2003). Sport spectator<br />
consumption behavior. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12(1), 8-17.<br />
Vallerand, R. J., & Reid, R. J. (1984). On the causal effects of perceived<br />
competence on intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive evaluation<br />
theory. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6(1), 94-102.<br />
Wann, D. L. (1994). The "noble" sports fan: The relationships between<br />
team identification, self-esteem, and aggression. Perceptual and Motor<br />
Skills, 78(3), 864-866.<br />
Wann, D. L. (1996). Seasonal changes in spectators° identification and<br />
involvement with and evaluations of college basketball and football<br />
teams. The Psychological Record, 46(1), 201-215.<br />
Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1990). Die-hard and fair-weather<br />
fans: Effects of identification on BIRGing and CORFing tendencies.<br />
Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 14(2), 103-117.<br />
Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1993). Sports fans: Measuring<br />
degree of identification with their team. International Journal of Sport<br />
Psychology, 24, 1-17.<br />
Wann, D. L., Peterson, R. R., Cothran, C., & Dykes, M. (1999). Sport<br />
fan aggression and anonymity: The importance of team identification.<br />
Social Behavior and Personality, 27(6), 597-602.<br />
Yi, Y. (1990). A critical review of consumer satisfaction. In V. A. Zeithaml<br />
(Ed.), Review of marketing (pp. 68-123). Chicago: American Marketing<br />
Association. !<br />
volume 5, issue 1 67
Pre-Activity and Post-Activity Stretching<br />
Perceptions and Practices in NCAA Division I<br />
Volleyball Programs<br />
by Lawrence W. Judge, PhD, CSCS 1 , Kimberly J. Bodey, EdD,<br />
CSCS 2 , David Bellar, PhD, CSCS 3 , Adam Bottone, MS 1 , Elizabeth<br />
Wanless, BS 1.<br />
1<br />
School of Physical Education, Sport, and Exercise Science,<br />
Ball State University, Muncie, IN<br />
2<br />
Department of Recreation and Sport Management,<br />
Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN<br />
3<br />
Department of Kinesiology, University of Louisiana-Lafayette,<br />
Lafayette, LA<br />
Abstract<br />
The purpose of this study was to determine if NCAA Division I<br />
women's volleyball programs were in compliance with suggested<br />
current pre- and post-activity stretching protocols. Questionnaires<br />
were sent to NCAA division I women's volleyball programs in<br />
the United States. Fifty six coaches (23 males & 33 females)<br />
participated in the study. Some results seemed to conflict with<br />
current suggested practices for pre-activity stretching. The results<br />
of this study indicate that certification may not influence how well<br />
research guidelines are followed. Further research is needed to<br />
delineate how these factors affect coaching decisions.<br />
Key words: warm-up, stretching, flexibility<br />
Introduction<br />
To obtain optimal performance collegiate volleyball players<br />
should perform a pre-activity protocol that systematically and<br />
progressively stimulates the musculature athletes will utilize<br />
during training or in competition. The key components are timing,<br />
sequence, and interaction of the training stimuli to allow optimum<br />
adaptive response in pursuit of specific competitive goals (Judge,<br />
2007). Active warm-up, passive warm-up, and stretching are<br />
frequent procedures used by athletes prior to engaging in intense<br />
physical activity. Although the evidence is clear in the sports science<br />
literature; some practitioners continue inappropriate warm-up and<br />
stretching combinations (Beedle, Leydig & Carnucci, 2007). The<br />
study will assess National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)<br />
Division I volleyball coaches' certifications and the relationship to<br />
current pre-activity stretching and post-activity stretching practices<br />
and perceived benefits and the gap that may exist between scientific<br />
principles and actual coaching practices.<br />
Literature Review<br />
In a competitive activity like volleyball which requires<br />
explosive strength, training protocols that influence the mechanical<br />
performance of subsequent muscle contractions should be addressed<br />
(Chiu, 2003). The theoretical goal of the pre-activity warm-up and<br />
stretching is to optimize performance and reduce the incidence of<br />
injury through increased muscle temperature, muscle compliance,<br />
and efficiency of physiological responses. A well-designed preactivity<br />
protocol will bring about various physiological changes<br />
that enhance the training activity or competition.<br />
68 Journal of Research<br />
Types of Stretching<br />
Flexibility as a biomotor quality has been extensively researched<br />
during the last several decades. Various approaches to stretching<br />
have been explored by the coaching, scientific, and physiotherapy<br />
communities. Researchers have assessed the athletic benefits of<br />
performing a general "warm-up" prior to activity (Safran, Garrett,<br />
Seaber, Glisson, & Ribbeck, 1988) and attempted to pinpoint what,<br />
if any, type of stretching should be performed before activity to<br />
maximize performance.<br />
There are essentially two forms of stretching employed on a<br />
regular basis among athletes as part of a complete flexibility<br />
procedure; pre-activity stretching (Behm, Button, & Butt, 2001;<br />
Fry, McLellan, Weiss, & Rosato, 2003; Nelson, Jokkonen, &<br />
Arnall, 2005) and post-activity stretching (Hunter & Marshall,<br />
1992; Kerrigan, Xenopoulus-Oddson, Sullivan, Lelas, & Riley,<br />
2003). Static stretching, ballistic stretching, proprioceptive<br />
neuromuscular facilitation stretching (PNF), and dynamic<br />
stretching are the specific types of stretching predominantly used<br />
by athletes, coaches, and athletic trainers in pre or post activity.<br />
The following section explains each of these types of stretching in<br />
greater detail.<br />
Static Stretching<br />
Static stretching, the most commonly used program among<br />
athletes and coaches, requires the holding of a stretch position with<br />
little or no movement for a length of time (Mann & Whedon, 2001).<br />
When done correctly, the static stretch includes the relaxation and<br />
concurrent elongation of the stretch muscle. If performed properly,<br />
the risk of injury associated with the stretch is reduced (Baechle<br />
& Earle, 2000). Static stretching should not result in excessive<br />
tension on the muscle as this may cause a reduction in the stretch<br />
and injury (Mann & Whedon, 2001).<br />
Several studies have shown that using static stretching as a preactivity<br />
warm-up has either detrimental or no effect on performance.<br />
Static stretching does little to increase the core muscle temperature<br />
(Mann & Whedon, 2001). Nelson, Kokkonen, and Arnall (2005)<br />
found static stretching reduced muscular strength endurance by<br />
28%. Mann and Jones (1999) reported vertical jump performance<br />
decreased 5.6% following static stretching as compared to no<br />
stretching at all. Unick, Kieffer, Cheesman, and Feeney (2005)<br />
found no difference in vertical-jump performance from either static<br />
or ballistic stretching as compared with no stretching. Similarly,<br />
Cramer (2006) found no effect on peak torque of leg extensors<br />
from static stretching.<br />
The current trend shows that static stretching tactics are better<br />
suited following activity, not before it (Anderson, Beauliue,<br />
Cornelius, Dominquez, Prentice, & Wallace, 1984; Egan, Cramer,<br />
Massey, & Marek, 2006; Nelson, & Brandy, 2008; Stone, Ramsey,<br />
O'Bryant, Ayers, & Sands, 2006; Swanson, 2008). Research<br />
supports that gains in range of motion can be achieved if static<br />
stretching is performed consistently post-activity as a part of the
Stretching Perceptions and Practices<br />
cool down (Mann & Whedon, 2001).<br />
Ballistic Stretching<br />
Ballistic stretching involves an active muscular effort and uses<br />
a bouncing-type movement in which the end position of the stretch<br />
is not held (Baechle & Earle, 2000). Due to the bouncing-type<br />
movement, many researchers have concluded that ballistic-type<br />
stretching is counterproductive to warm-up exercises because it<br />
leads to a firing of the muscle spindle which initiates the stretch<br />
reflex, leading to a greater potential for injury (Mann & Whedon,<br />
2001). Because the stretch reflex is activated, the muscle is not<br />
allowed to relax which defeats the purpose of stretching (Baechle<br />
& Earle, 2000). Unlike static stretching, ballistic stretching does<br />
have the potential to increase the muscle's core temperature;<br />
however, the efficacy of its use in the athletic arena is in question<br />
(Mann & Whedon, 2001). This ballistic-style of stretching popular<br />
in the 1960s was slowly replaced in the early 1980s with a focus on<br />
proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching.<br />
Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) Stretching<br />
Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching (PNF)<br />
combines static stretching with isometric contractions of either<br />
the stretched muscle or the muscle's agonist to increase the range<br />
of motion (ROM) attainable during the stretch. PNF stretching<br />
techniques are commonly used in the athletic and clinical<br />
environments to enhance both active and passive range of motion.<br />
PNF is considered the most effective stretching technique when<br />
the aim is to increase the range of motion (Sharman & Cresswell,<br />
2006). Originally developed in the 1950s, PNF stretching was<br />
used as a rehabilitation technique for stroke patients. Today,<br />
athletic trainers and therapists use PNF techniques to increase<br />
range of motion and improve strength although it does not increase<br />
core muscle temperature (Mann & Whedon, 2001). Cornelius<br />
(1984) favored PNF stretching over ballistic stretching citing the<br />
explosive nature of ballistic stretching created a higher risk for<br />
injury and the potential for muscle soreness. While PNF stretching<br />
is a good program for athletes to use for increasing range of motion<br />
and decreasing muscle soreness, it can be a very complicated<br />
procedure and may not be appropriate on the volleyball court<br />
unless the athletes are properly trained to administer the technique<br />
(Mann & Whedon, 2001).<br />
Dynamic Stretching<br />
Dynamic stretching allows for flexibility activity during a<br />
sport-specific movement. It can be argued that to most effectively<br />
prepare strength or power athletes for a specific sport activity<br />
the pre-activity routine should contain exercises that address<br />
the concept of movement pattern specificity. Although similar<br />
to ballistic stretching, dynamic stretching avoids bouncing and<br />
can include movement specific to a sport or movement pattern<br />
(Baechle & Earle, 2000). Dynamic stretching includes continuous<br />
muscle activity to exceed the static range of motion encountered<br />
during the normal full-range-of-motion activities (Yessis, 2006).<br />
This type of pre-activity flexibility is best done prior to the sport<br />
activity as it helps the athlete to prepare for the competition by<br />
allowing him or her to increase sport-specific flexibility and it<br />
increases core muscle temperature (Baechle & Earle, 2000).<br />
Research supports dynamic stretching over other types of preactivity<br />
stretching. Yamaguchi and Ishii (2005) found dynamic<br />
stretching to be better than static stretching or no stretching at<br />
all for leg extension power. In another study, athletes were tested<br />
performing underhand medicine-ball toss, and a five-step jump<br />
test. The results on all the tests were significantly greater when<br />
dynamic stretching was performed prior to the tests than when preactivity<br />
static stretching was performed (Little & Williams, 2006).<br />
Little and Williams (2006) also found agility performance to be<br />
greater following pre-activity dynamic stretching as opposed to<br />
pre-activity static stretching. This research suggests that dynamic<br />
stretching should be included as part of a pre-activity preparation<br />
routine.<br />
Research investigating the usage of pre-activity warm-up and<br />
stretching and post-activity stretching has shown a paradigm<br />
shift from activities such as ballistic-style of stretching to a focus<br />
on static and/or PNF stretching (Anderson, 1980; Anderson,<br />
Beauliue, Cornelius, Dominquez, Prentice, & Wallace, 1984;<br />
Holcomb, 2008; Stone, Ramsey, O'Bryant, Ayers, & Sands, 2006)<br />
and more recently to dynamic stretching (Little and Williams,<br />
2006). Current research indicates that dynamic stretching should<br />
be used prior to activity (Behm, Button, & Butt, 2001; Ce,<br />
Margonato, Casasco, & Veicsteinas, 2008; Egan, Cramer, Massey,<br />
& Marek, 2006; Fredrick, & Szymanski, 2001; Laroche, Lussier,<br />
& Roy, 2008; Mann, & Jones, 1999; Siatras, Mittas, Maneletzi,<br />
& Vamvakoudis, 2008; Torres, Kraemer, Vingren, Volek, Hatfield,<br />
Spiering, Ho, Fragala, Thomas, Anderson, Hakkinen, and Maresh,<br />
2008; Winchester, Nelson, Landin, Young, & Schexnayder, 2008;<br />
Yamaguchi, & Ishii, 2005). Evidence indicates that static-style<br />
stretching should be performed following exercise (Anderson,<br />
Beauliue, Cornelius, Dominquez, Prentice, & Wallace, 1984;<br />
Egan, Cramer, Massey, & Marek, 2006; Nelson, & Brandy, 2008;<br />
Stone, Ramsey, O'Bryant, Ayers, & Sands, 2006; Swanson, 2008).<br />
Researchers continued investigation of the physiological impact<br />
of pre-activity stretching and the effect it can have on performance<br />
has further awakened interest from the coaching community.<br />
The advent of coaches' education and certification programs<br />
for volleyball coaches, strength coaches, and athletic trainers<br />
should give coaches a solid physiological basis for their training<br />
recommendations.<br />
Coaches Certification<br />
The most common type of volleyball specific coaching<br />
certification training is through USA Volleyball (USA Volleyball,<br />
2009). The USA Volleyball Coaching Accreditation Program<br />
(USAV-CAP) provides an opportunity for professional preparation<br />
and advancement for the volleyball coach. The curriculum addresses<br />
the essential topics for the volunteer and the internationally<br />
aspiring coach. The USAV-CAP is a four-level volleyball coaching<br />
education program. Each course level includes a special emphasis<br />
on building the foundation and creation of a well-prepared coach.<br />
The first level, Increased Mastery and Professional Application<br />
of Coaching Theory (IMPACT), is an entry level certification<br />
which provides a general overview of volleyball drill development<br />
and ethical coaching. Next, coaches enroll in the Coaching<br />
Accreditation Program (CAP) which has four levels (i.e., CAP I-<br />
IV). Level I emphasizes teaching the skills of the game. Level<br />
volume 5, issue 1 69
Stretching Perceptions and Practices<br />
II emphasizes organizing and developing team play. Level III<br />
emphasizes taking your team to the next level though advanced<br />
training and conditioning. Level IV is by appointment only and is<br />
usually reserved for those coaches who have coached for official<br />
USA National team or have assisted with a National or Olympic<br />
team.<br />
Division I volleyball programs may also have the added benefit<br />
of working with strength and conditioning coaches. Most strength<br />
coaches and some volleyball coaches are certified through the<br />
National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA). The<br />
NSCA Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist (CSCS)<br />
program was created in 1985 to certify individuals who possess the<br />
knowledge and skills to design and implement safe and effective<br />
strength and conditioning programs (NSCA, 2009). In order to<br />
pass the certification exam individuals must possess knowledge<br />
in the scientific foundations of warm-up, stretching, cool down,<br />
periodization, nutrition and strength and conditioning, and<br />
demonstrate the skills to apply that knowledge. Today, more than<br />
21,000 professionals from a variety of academic and professional<br />
backgrounds hold the CSCS credential (NSCA, 2009). This diverse<br />
group includes strength coaches, sport coaches, athletic trainers,<br />
physical therapists, personal trainers, physicians, chiropractors,<br />
researchers, and educators.<br />
Even with the proliferation of coaches and strength training<br />
professionalsÅf education and certification programs and a greater<br />
emphasis on research in this area it is uncertain if coaches follow<br />
the suggested guidelines. Therefore, the purpose of this study<br />
was to determine if the current pre- and post-activity practices of<br />
college volleyball programs are supported by current research, and<br />
whether or not that is affected by coaching certifications.<br />
Methodology<br />
Sampling Procedure<br />
The purpose of this study was to ascertain coaches' perceptions<br />
and stretching practices conducted in Division I volleyball<br />
programs. To avoid redundancy, only one coach per program, the<br />
head coach, was contacted about the study. The assumption was<br />
the head coach would complete the survey instrument or direct the<br />
staff member responsible for stretching activities to complete the<br />
survey instrument.<br />
Current email addresses for all Division I head volleyball<br />
coaches were obtained from the 2008-2009 NCAA Coaches<br />
Directory. An introductory email explained the purpose of the<br />
study and provided a hyperlink to the institutional review board<br />
approved, web based informed consent and survey instrument.<br />
Data was collected during a four week period in February/March<br />
2009. Early off season was determined to be the best timeframe<br />
to maximize coaches' recall of stretching practices used during<br />
the previous season and coachesÅf participation in the study. A<br />
reminder email was sent to non-respondents two weeks after the<br />
initial email in an effort to increase the overall response rate.<br />
Instrumentation<br />
The survey instrument contained 17 items grouped into four<br />
areas.<br />
Pre-activity stretching practices. Three items were completed<br />
by participants. Respondents indicated the (a) type of pre-activity<br />
70 Journal of Research<br />
group stretching conducted in the warm-up period, (b) whether<br />
athletes performed static stretching following the pre-activity group<br />
stretching but prior to the athletic event, and (c) whether athletes<br />
performed static stretching with assistance of an athletic trainer or<br />
massage therapist following the pre-activity group stretching but<br />
prior to the athletic event.<br />
Post-activity stretching practices. Three items were completed<br />
by participants. Respondents indicated the (a) type of postactivity<br />
group stretching conducted during the cool-down period,<br />
(b) perceived frequency of athletes completing a post-activity<br />
stretching regimen following the athletic event, and (c) perceived<br />
frequency of athletes completing post-activity stretching plus light<br />
jogging following the athletic event.<br />
Perceived benefits of stretching activities. Four items were<br />
completed by participants. Respondents indicated their perception<br />
of whether pre-activity group stretching (a) prevents injury and (b)<br />
improves athletic performance. Similarly, respondents indicated<br />
their perception of whether post-activity group stretching (c)<br />
prevents injury and (d) improves athletic performance.<br />
Demographic information. Five items were completed.<br />
Respondents indicated their (a) title (e.g., head coach, assistant<br />
coach), (b) sex, (c) years of experience, (d) current volleyball<br />
certification(s), and (e) current strength and conditioning<br />
certification(s). Two additional questions related to institution and<br />
conference affiliation were used to make a judgment about sampling<br />
error but were not otherwise included in the data analysis.<br />
Data Analysis<br />
Data analysis was a two step process in this study. Step 1 involved<br />
generation of descriptive statistics for all the variables of interest.<br />
Univariates were used to determine whether Pearson 2 model<br />
assumptions were met. Step 2 involved applying Pearson 2 tests<br />
of independence to the following sets of variables (a) certification<br />
and type of pre-activity group stretching, (b) certification and type<br />
of post-activity group stretching, (c) certification and pre-activity<br />
group stretching — injury prevention benefit, (d) certification and<br />
pre-activity group stretching — improved performance benefit, (e)<br />
certification and post-activity group stretching — injury prevention<br />
benefit, and (f) certification and post-activity group stretching<br />
— improved performance benefit. Alpha was adjusted to .008<br />
with Bonferroni's contrasting procedure to minimize study-wide<br />
Type I error. Cramér's V was calculated to estimate the strength of<br />
relationships.<br />
Results<br />
From the 291 Division I volleyball programs, 56 coaches<br />
returned completed usable surveys. This represents 19.2% of a<br />
finite population. The low response rate may have resulted from<br />
the following factors: (a) spam control software may have sorted<br />
introductory and follow-up emails into a bulk mail folder, (b)<br />
coaches may not have been interested in the topic or may not<br />
have perceived a tangible benefit from study participation, and (c)<br />
coaches may not have had sufficient time to complete the survey<br />
instrument due to the recruiting calendar (e.g., placed on "to<br />
do" list). While the response rate is relatively low by traditional<br />
standards, review of institution and conference affiliation data<br />
suggests the sample is representative of Division I volleyball
Stretching Perceptions and Practices<br />
programs. <strong>No</strong>netheless, caution is warranted as factors may exist<br />
which limit the generalizability of study results.<br />
Demographic Data<br />
In this study, respondents were primarily head coaches<br />
(85.7%), female (58.9%), and possessed an average of 13.8 years<br />
of experience. The head coaches had an average of 14.0 years of<br />
experience compared to 12.0 years of experience for the assistant<br />
coaches. A large number of coaches (44.6%) did not possess a<br />
volleyball coaching certification nor a strength and conditioning<br />
coaching certification.<br />
Table 1. Demographic Profile of Division I Volleyball<br />
Coaches (N=56)<br />
Assistant<br />
Head Coach Coach Missing Total<br />
Gender<br />
Men 19 33.92% 3 5.36% 1 1.79% 23 41.07%<br />
Women 29 51.78% 3 5.36% 1 1.79% 33 58.93%<br />
Experience<br />
Range 2 to 42 yrs 6 to 20 yrs 1 to 10 yrs 1 to 42 yrs<br />
Mean 14.22 (7.57) 12.00 (7.21) 5.50 (6.36) 13.75 (7.58)<br />
Certification<br />
<strong>No</strong>ne 23 41.07% 2 3.57% 0 0% 25 44.64%<br />
Impact 4 7.14% 1 1.79% 0 0% 5 8.93%<br />
CAP I 9 16.07% 1 1.79% 1 1.79% 11 19.64%<br />
CAP II 4 7.14% 0 0% 0 0% 4 7.14%<br />
CAP III 6 10.71% 0 0% 0 0% 6 10.71%<br />
CSCS 1 1.79% 2 3.57% 0 0% 3 5.36%<br />
CSCS + Impact 0 0% 0 0% 1 1.79% 1 1.79%<br />
CSCS + CAP I 1 1.79% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1.79%<br />
Total 48 6 2 56<br />
Pre-Activity Stretching Practices<br />
Coaches typically prescribed a combination of static and<br />
dynamic stretching activities (44.0%) or dynamic stretching<br />
activities (42.0%) prior to the athletic event. To a much lesser<br />
extent coaches exclusively utilized static stretching activities<br />
Table 2. Pre-Activity Group Stretching Practices in<br />
Division I Volleyball Programs (N=50)<br />
Type of Pre-Activity Group Stretching<br />
Static &<br />
Certification Static Ballistic PNF Dynamic Dynamic<br />
<strong>No</strong>ne 5 10.00% 0 0% 0 0% 9 18.00% 10 20.00%<br />
Impact 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 2.0% 3 6.00%<br />
CAP I 2 4.00% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 12.00%<br />
CAP II 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 4 8.00% 0 0%<br />
CAP III 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 6.00% 2 4.00%<br />
CSCS 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 4.00% 1 2.00%<br />
CSCS + Impact 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 2.00% 0 0%<br />
CSCS + CAP I 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 2.00% 0 0%<br />
Total 7 0 0 21 22<br />
Following Pre-Activity Group Stretching, Coach<br />
Allows:<br />
Self Static 1 2.00% 0 0% 0 0% 2 4.00% 2 4.00%<br />
AT/MT Static 1 2.00% 0 0% 0 0% 5 10.00% 3 6.00%<br />
Self & AT/MT Static 4 8.00% 0 0% 0 0% 4 8.00% 10 20.00%<br />
Static <strong>No</strong>t Allowed 1 2.00% 0 0% 0 0% 8 16.00% 5 10.00%<br />
Total 7 0 0 *19 *20<br />
*Missing data.<br />
(14.0%). Interestingly, among coaches who incorporated dynamic<br />
stretching into the group warm-up, 57.9% subsequently allowed<br />
athletes to perform static stretching independently and/or with<br />
assistance from the athletic trainer or the massage therapist. The<br />
Pearson 2 test of independence between certification and preactivity<br />
group stretch type was not significant, 2 (2, N=50) =<br />
1.819, p =.403.<br />
Table 3. Certification and Pre-Activity Group Stretch<br />
Type (N=50)<br />
Stretch Type Certified <strong>No</strong>n-Certified Total<br />
Static 2 5 7<br />
(36.0) (3.4)<br />
Dynamic 12 9 21<br />
(10.9) (10.1)<br />
Static + Dynamic 12 10 22<br />
(11.4) (10.6)<br />
Total 26 24 50<br />
<strong>No</strong>te: Numbers in parenthesis are expected cell frequencies.<br />
2 (2, N=50) = 1.819, p = .403<br />
Post-Activity Stretching Practices<br />
Coaches typically used static stretching activities (71.4%)<br />
following the athletic event. To a much lesser extent, coaches used<br />
a combination of static and dynamic stretching activities (22.4%)<br />
and PNF stretching (6.1%). Coaches indicated athletes either<br />
always or almost always completed a stretching regime (54.0%)<br />
or stretching plus jogging regime (44.0%) after an athletic event.<br />
The Pearson 2 test of independence between certification and<br />
pre-activity group stretch type was not significant, 2 (2, N=50)<br />
= 2.947, p = .229.<br />
Table 4. Post-Activity Group Stretching Practices in<br />
Division I Volleyball Programs (N=49)<br />
Type of Post-Activity Group Stretching<br />
Static &<br />
Certification Static Ballistic PNF Dynamic Dynamic<br />
<strong>No</strong>ne 17 34.69% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 12.24%<br />
Impact 4 8.16% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%<br />
CAP I 5 10.20% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 4 8.16%<br />
CAP II 3 6.12% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%<br />
CAP III 3 6.12% 0 0% 2 4.08% 0 0% 1 2.04%<br />
CSCS 1 2.04% 0 0% 1 2.04% 0 0% 0 0%<br />
CSCS + Impact 1 2.04% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%<br />
CSCS + CAP I 1 2.04% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%<br />
Total 35 0 3 0 11<br />
Table 5. Coaches Perceived Frequency of Athletes Completing<br />
Post Activity Cool Down Activities (N=50)<br />
Almost<br />
Always Always Sometimes Rarely Never<br />
Stretching Regime:<br />
Head Coach 7 14.00% 18 36.00% 13 26.00% 5 10.00% 2 4.00%<br />
Assistant Coach 0 0% 2 4.00% 2 4.00% 1 2.00% 0 0%<br />
Total 7 20 15 6 2<br />
Stretching & Jogging Regime:<br />
Head Coach 7 14.00% 14 28.00% 12 24.00% 6 12.00% 5 10.00%<br />
Assistant Coach 0 0% 1 2.00% 3 6.00% 1 2.00% 0 0%<br />
Total 7 15 15 7 5<br />
volume 5, issue 1 71
Stretching Perceptions and Practices<br />
Table 6. Certification and Post-Activity Group Stretch<br />
Type (N=49)<br />
Stretch Type Certified <strong>No</strong>n-Certified Total<br />
Static 18 17 35<br />
(18.6) (16.4)<br />
PNF 3 0 3<br />
(1.6) (1.4)<br />
Static + Dynamic 5 6 11<br />
(5.8) (5.2)<br />
Total 26 23 49<br />
<strong>No</strong>te: Numbers in parenthesis are expected cell frequencies.<br />
2 (2, N=49) = 2.947, p = .229<br />
Perceived Benefits of Stretching Activities<br />
The majority of coaches indicated pre-activity group stretching<br />
was beneficial in terms of injury prevention (75.0%) and improved<br />
performance (69.1%). Similarly, coaches indicated post-activity<br />
group stretching was beneficial in terms of injury prevention<br />
(87.3%) and improved performance (69.6%). The Pearson 2 tests<br />
of independence did not reveal significant relationships between<br />
the following pairs of variables: (a) certification and pre-activity<br />
group stretching — injury prevention benefit, 2 (2, N=56) = .602,<br />
p = .438; (b) certification and pre-activity group stretching Çú<br />
improved performance benefit, 2 (2, N=55) = .696, p = .404; (c)<br />
certification and post-activity group stretching — injury prevention<br />
benefit, 2 (2, N=55) = .022, p = .883; and (d) certification and<br />
post-activity group stretching — improved performance benefit,<br />
2 (2, N=56) = 2.291, p = .130.<br />
Table 7. Certification and Pre-Activity Group Stretch -<br />
Injury Prevention Benefit (N=56)<br />
72 Journal of Research<br />
Certified <strong>No</strong>n-Certified Total<br />
Benefit 22 20 42<br />
(23.3) (18.8)<br />
<strong>No</strong> Benefit 9 5 15<br />
(7.8) (6.3)<br />
Total 31 25 56<br />
<strong>No</strong>te: Numbers in parenthesis are expected cell frequencies.<br />
2 (2, N=56) = .602, p = .438<br />
Table 8. Certification and Pre-Activity Group Stretch -<br />
Performance Benefit (N=55)<br />
Certified <strong>No</strong>n-Certified Total<br />
Benefit 20 18 38<br />
(21.4) (16.6)<br />
<strong>No</strong> Benefit 11 6 17<br />
(9.6) (7.7)<br />
Total 31 24 55<br />
<strong>No</strong>te: Numbers in parenthesis are expected cell frequencies.<br />
2 (2, N=55) = .696, p = .404<br />
Table 9. Certification and Post-Activity Group Stretch -<br />
Injury Prevention Benefit (N=55)<br />
Certified <strong>No</strong>n-Certified Total<br />
Benefit 26 22 48<br />
(26.2) (21.8)<br />
<strong>No</strong> Benefit 4 3 7<br />
(3.8) (3.2)<br />
Total 30 25 55<br />
<strong>No</strong>te: Numbers in parenthesis are expected cell frequencies.<br />
2 (2, N=55) = .022, p = .883<br />
Table 10. Certification and Post-Activity Group Stretch -<br />
Performance Benefit (N=56)<br />
Certified <strong>No</strong>n-Certified Total<br />
Benefit 19 20 39<br />
(21.6) (17.4)<br />
<strong>No</strong> Benefit 12 5 17<br />
(9.4) (7.6)<br />
Total 31 25 56<br />
<strong>No</strong>te: Numbers in parenthesis are expected cell frequencies.<br />
2 (2, N=56) = 2.291, p = .130<br />
Discussion<br />
Lack of Certifications<br />
The quality of a sports pre-activity preparation session<br />
depends on the competence of the coach. Coaching education and<br />
certification programs encourage a higher level of competence<br />
among practitioners. Surprisingly, a large number of coaches in<br />
the present study (44.6%) do not possess a volleyball coaching<br />
certification nor a strength and conditioning coaching certification.<br />
This may be due to the fact that coaching education programs have<br />
not found much support on a wide-scale effort and have limited<br />
success reaching their intended audience (Gilbert & Trudel,<br />
1999).<br />
A coach is a critical part to an athlete's sport experience<br />
beginning with the pre-activity stretching protocol. An effective<br />
practice begins with proper physical preparation. Mahoney and<br />
Stattin (2000) found the structure and context of the sport activity<br />
was important in determining whether participation led to positive<br />
or negative outcomes. Strean and Garcia-Bengoechea (2003)<br />
found it was the individual's sport experience that determined<br />
whether participation was viewed as positive or negative. The fact<br />
that coaches can readily be trained to provide such an environment<br />
for athletes (Smith & Smoll, 2002) suggests that coach training<br />
can be an important vehicle for improving the benefits of sport<br />
participation for athletes. Well trained sports coaches are better<br />
equipped to create positive sports experiences, which in turn keep<br />
athletes involved in sports. Sports organizations and National<br />
Governing Bodies (NGB's) should provide and market educational<br />
programs for all coaches. Sport organizations need to continue<br />
to extend the academic base by encouraging and supporting<br />
quality research in coaching; translating the research in practical<br />
applications and transmitting that information to coaches in<br />
accessible ways. Education and certification programs for coaches<br />
need additional marketing efforts to increase participation (Gilbert<br />
& Trudel, 1999).
Stretching Perceptions and Practices<br />
Pre-Activity Stretching Practices<br />
Based on the results of the present study, it is clear that not<br />
all of programs are in compliance with suggested current preactivity<br />
stretching practices. Coaches not consistent with literature<br />
undermine warm-up benefits by allowing athletes to do static<br />
stretching. It has been shown that dynamic flexibility stretching<br />
(not static, PNF, or ballistic-type stretches) should be used<br />
prior to activity (Behm, Button, & Butt, 2001; Ce, Margonato,<br />
Casasco, & Veicsteinas, 2008; Egan, Cramer, Massey, & Marek,<br />
2006; Fredrick, & Szymanski, 2001; Laroche, Lussier, & Roy,<br />
2008; Mann, & Jones, 1999; Siatras, Mittas, Maneletzi, &<br />
Vamvakoudis, 2008; Torres, Kraemer, Vingren, Volek, Hatfield,<br />
Spiering, Ho, Fragala, Thomas, Anderson, Hakkinen, and Maresh,<br />
2008; Winchester, Nelson, Landin, Young, & Schexnayder, 2008;<br />
Yamaguchi, & Ishii, 2005). In contradiction, 100% (50 out of<br />
50) of coaches reported that they used some form of pre-activity<br />
stretching, but only 42% (21 out of the 50) of coaches indicated that<br />
they use dynamic flexibility stretching exclusively. Also of interest<br />
were the coaches that allowed athletes to perform static stretching<br />
independently and/or with assistance from the athletic trainer or the<br />
massage therapist. The other coaches (22 out of 50) marked that<br />
they used dynamic flexibility along with a 'combination' of static,<br />
PNF, or ballistic stretching. With current research not supporting<br />
the use of static, PNF, and ballistic stretches before exercise, the<br />
data presented here demonstrates that while coaches have included<br />
pre-activity stretching in their training program they have not<br />
completely halted the use of the exercises that are not supported<br />
by current research (Judge, Craig, Baudentistal & Bodey, 2009).<br />
It should be noted that while most of the studies reviewed did not<br />
support the use of static stretching pre-exercise (Bazett-Jones,<br />
Gibson, & McBride, 2008; Ce, Margonato, Casasco, & Veicsteinas,<br />
2008; Laroche, Lussier, & Roy, 2008; Siatras, Mittas, Maneletzi,<br />
& Vamvakoudis, 2008; Winchester, Nelson, Landin, Young, &<br />
Schexnayder, 2008), one study did support ballistic stretching<br />
(Woolstenhulme, Griffins, Woolstenhulme, & Parcell, 2006). An<br />
interesting finding of the present study is there were no differences<br />
between those who are certified and those who are not in the preactivity<br />
stretching practices. One would expect certified coaches to<br />
be aware of what is in the literature and comply with the research<br />
recommendations. The knowledge of the certified coaches could<br />
be impacted by the age of their certification and whether or not<br />
the coaches kept up to date with CEU's or self study. This calls to<br />
question the efficacy of certification programs. Research further<br />
examining whether certified coaches are staying up to date with<br />
current research should be conducted in order to either improve the<br />
certification process or change/modify the certification process to<br />
ongoing learning requirements.<br />
Post-Activity Stretching Practices<br />
Current research indicates that athletes should perform staticstyle<br />
stretching following exercise (Anderson, Beauliue, Cornelius,<br />
Dominquez, Prentice, & Wallace, 1984; Egan, Cramer, Massey, &<br />
Marek, 2006; Nelson, & Brandy, 2008; Stone, Ramsey, O'Bryant,<br />
Ayers, & Sands, 2006; Swanson, 2008). The results from this<br />
study indicate that 49 of the responders had their athletes perform<br />
post-activity stretching. Of the 49 who did employ post-activity<br />
stretching, 71.4% (35 out of 49) performed static stretching, 8.0%<br />
(4 out of 49) performed PNF stretching, and 20% (10 out of 49)<br />
combined static with dynamic stretching. This indicates that while<br />
the majority of the responders were congruent with research that<br />
suggests post-activity stretching is important, not all follow current<br />
stretching guidelines.<br />
The most interesting finding of the post-stretch data is that<br />
although most coaches are consistent with literature in their postactivity<br />
stretching choice; post-activity stretching and cool down<br />
are not a consistent part of the daily routine. Coaches indicate<br />
athletes either always or almost always completed a stretching<br />
regime (54%) or stretching plus jogging regime (44.9%) after<br />
an athletic event. It can only be speculated why the post activity<br />
stretching and cool down is not completed on a consistent basis.<br />
Perceived Benefits of Stretching Activities<br />
Coaches commonly hold two beliefs concerning stretching.<br />
Acute stretching (part of the warm-up) may increase performance<br />
and will reduce the injury potential and chronic stretching will<br />
increase performance and reduce the injury potential. However,<br />
data exist indicating that these beliefs may not be completely true<br />
(Thacker, et al. 2004). The majority of coaches in the present study<br />
indicated pre-activity group stretching was advantageous in terms<br />
of injury prevention (75.0%) and improved performance (69.1%).<br />
Similarly, coaches indicated post-activity group stretching was<br />
beneficial in terms of injury prevention (87.3%) and improved<br />
performance (69.6%). This indicates that while the majority of<br />
the responders supported stretching as a means to prevent injuries<br />
and improve performance, many coaches may not be aware of the<br />
latest research findings.<br />
Most studies indicate that reduced flexibility shows little<br />
relationship to typical sports injuries. Neither acute (Pope,<br />
2000) nor chronic (Herbert, 2002) stretching appears to effect a<br />
significant reduction in physical activity related injuries. Thacker,<br />
et al. (2004), in an extensive review of the flexibility literature<br />
that included 361 articles dating back into the 1950s, concluded<br />
that there is little relationship between stretching (e.g., increased<br />
ROM) and injury. Thus, there is equivocal evidence that stretching<br />
and enhanced ROM do not result in a lower injury rate.<br />
Most of the performance studies show that pre-activity static<br />
stretching as a part of warm-up reduces maximum strength (force<br />
magnitude) and numerous related variables, such as rate of force<br />
development and power output (Behm, 2001; Godges, 1989; Nelson,<br />
2001; Rosembaum, 1995). Thus, it appears that static stretching as<br />
part of a warm-up can negatively alter force production, power<br />
output, and stretch-shortening cycle characteristics such that<br />
strength and performance, including explosive performances, can<br />
be compromised. Interestingly, among coaches who incorporated<br />
dynamic stretching into the group warm-up, 57.9% of coaches<br />
then allowed athletes to perform static stretching independently<br />
and/or with assistance from the athletic trainer or the massage<br />
therapist. This "extra" stretching may be limiting the explosive<br />
capabilities and may have little or no affect on injury prevention<br />
(Shrier, 1999). Most available data indicates that pre-activity<br />
static stretching can cause acute performance reduction relating<br />
to decreased tissue stiffness or alterations in nervous system<br />
components of the stretch-shortening cycle, such as the myototic<br />
reflex (Stone, Ramsey, O'Bryant, Ayers, & Sands 2006). These<br />
volume 5, issue 1 73
Stretching Perceptions and Practices<br />
alterations in turn can result in a decreased maximum strength and<br />
explosiveness and inferior performances. The literature dealing<br />
with flexibility suggests that athletes should perform some sort<br />
of 'general' warm-up prior to activity (Ce, Margonato, Casasco,<br />
& Veicsteinas 2008; Hedrick 1992; Laroche, Lussier, & Roy<br />
2008; Mann, & Jones 1999; Ninos 1995; Swanson 2008; Torres,<br />
Kraemer, Vingren, Volek, Hatfield, Spiering, Ho, Fragala, Thomas,<br />
Anderson, Hakkinen, & Maresh 2008; Yamaguchi, & Ishii 2005)<br />
a pre-activity stretch (Fredrick, and Szymanski 2001; Holcomb,<br />
2008; Laroche, Lussier, & Roy 2008; Mann & Jones 1999; Nelson<br />
&Brandy 2008), and post-activity stretching (Anderson, 1984;<br />
Nelson & Brandy 2008; Stone, Ramsey, O'Bryant, Ayers, & Sands<br />
2006). The majority of the respondents to this survey indicated<br />
that they use the aforementioned 3 step approach in preparing<br />
athletes, but did vary in how closely they followed research<br />
recommendations (Judge, Craig, Baudentistal, & Bodey, 2009).<br />
Implications for Coaches/Coach Educators<br />
When comparing coaching specific certification to pre-activity<br />
flexibility practices, it is clear that not all coaches are in compliance<br />
with suggested pre-activity flexibility recommendations<br />
(Faigenbaum, et al., 2006; Herda, et al., 2008; Kovacs, 2006;<br />
McMillian, et al., 2006; Samuel, et al., 2008; Yessis, 2006). It<br />
is reasonable to say that coaching certification has little impact<br />
(based on results of this study) on pre-activity flexibility protocols.<br />
Out of the 56 respondents, 29 have a volleyball specific coaching<br />
certification (just slightly over 50%). It can be concluded that if<br />
one has a volleyball specific coaching certification, they are not<br />
more likely to omit static stretching from a pre-activity flexibility<br />
than someone who does not have a volleyball specific coaching<br />
certification. Yet 14 of the 29 certified volleyball coaches still<br />
include some form of pre-activity static stretching. It is evident<br />
that some coaches are unwilling or reluctant to part with traditional<br />
methods of static stretching prior to activity (Bandy & Irion, 1994;<br />
Swanson, 2006). It would be of value for volleyball coaches to<br />
partake in a recertification course that includes current research<br />
trends in a way that positively impacts their coaching. A well<br />
educated coach with an understanding of current research will help<br />
athletes be better prepared for competition and maximize their<br />
volleyball performance. Based on these results it is evident that<br />
there exists a need for a program of accreditation for volleyball<br />
coaches. In addition, all coaches should be strongly encouraged<br />
to receive continuing education units (CEU's) so that they stay<br />
current with pre- and post-activity flexibility protocols as well as<br />
other sport specific practices.<br />
Coach Educators must continue to extend the academic base by<br />
pursuing quality research in coaching; translating the research in<br />
practical applications and transmitting that information in accessible<br />
ways. Organizations like the National Council for Accreditation<br />
of Coaching Education (NCACE) must continue facilitating the<br />
development of quality coaching education programs (college<br />
programs as well as online modular programs) and partnering with<br />
other national associations/NGBs to spread consistent messages<br />
about the importance and/value of coaches in developing research<br />
based training program for athletes. Coach Educators need to<br />
get the word out about proper pre- and post-activity stretching<br />
regimens through trade publications, conferences, and trainings.<br />
74 Journal of Research<br />
The results of this study confirm the need for continued efforts<br />
towards coachÅfs certification including continuing education to<br />
remain current with research. Governing bodies (e.g., USAVB) and<br />
certifying organizations (e.g., NSCA) need to form partnerships in<br />
the development of educational resources.<br />
Conclusion<br />
This study indicates that it is important for volleyball coaches<br />
to re-evaluate their own practices, perhaps cross-checking them<br />
with the practices of their peers and stay current with ongoing<br />
research. Although research supports dynamic warm-up/flexibility<br />
over other types of pre-activity protocols (Little & Williams, 2006;<br />
Stone, Ramsey, O'Bryant, Ayers, & Sands, 2006; Yamaguchi, &<br />
Ishii, 2006), it appears that some volleyball coaches are reluctant<br />
to totally discontinue traditional methods like pre-activity static<br />
stretching. As the knowledge base for stretching and warm-up<br />
strategies continues to evolve, coaches should change with them<br />
to ensure their athletes are being properly prepared for training<br />
and competition. The (USAVB) Coach's Education program as it<br />
exists has reached a large number of coaches, but it appears there<br />
is still work to be done. Another interesting question would be<br />
whether or not there is a CEU requirement for certified coaches in<br />
the present USAVP-CAP program. Volleyball coaches at all levels<br />
could benefit from participating in certification programs like the<br />
USA Volleyball (IMPACT, CAP I-IV) and National Strength and<br />
Conditioning Association's (CSCS) programs to keep up to date<br />
with current practices. Sport at all levels is in need of better and<br />
more thorough coaching education programs and certification<br />
processes.<br />
References<br />
Anderson, B. (1980). Conditioning report: Stretching for football.<br />
National Strength Coaches Association Journal, 2: 14-18.<br />
Anderson, B., Beauliue, J., Cornelius, W., Dominquez, R., Prentice, W., &<br />
Wallace, L.(1984). Roundtable: Flexibility. National Strength Coaches<br />
Association Journal, 10: 71-73.<br />
Baechle, T. & Earle, R.W. (2008). Essentials of strength training and<br />
conditioning, (3rd.). Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics.<br />
Bazett-Jones, D.M., Gibson, M.H., & McBride J.M. (2008).Sprint and<br />
vertical jump performances are not affected by six weeks of static<br />
hamstring stretching. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,<br />
22: 25—31.<br />
Beedle, B., Leydig, S., & Carnucci, J. (2007). <strong>No</strong> difference in preand<br />
post-exercise stretching on flexibility. Journal of Strength &<br />
Conditioning Research, 21(3), 780-783. Retrieved June 20, 2009, from<br />
Academic Search Premier database.<br />
Behm, D,G., Button, D,C., & Butt J,C. (2001). Factors effecting force loss<br />
with prolonged stretching. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology,<br />
26: 262-272.<br />
Bandy, W.D., & Irion, J.M. (1994). The effect of time on static stretch on<br />
flexibility of the hamstring muscles. Physical Therapy.<br />
Ce, E., Margonato, V., Casasco, M., & Veicsteinas, A. (2008). Effects<br />
of stretching on maximal anaerobic power: The roles of active and<br />
passive warm-ups. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research<br />
Pre-print: 1-7.<br />
Chiu L.Z., Fry, A.C., Weiss, L.W., Schilling, B.K., Brown, L. E., & Smith<br />
S.L. (2003). Postactivation potentiation response in athletic and<br />
recreationally trained individuals. Journal of Strength Conditioning<br />
Research, 17:671-677.<br />
Egan, A.D., Cramer, J,T., Massey, L.L., & Marek, S.M. (2006). Acute<br />
effects of static stretching on peak torque and mean power output in<br />
natinal collegiate athletic association division I women's basketball
Stretching Perceptions and Practices<br />
players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 20: 778-782.<br />
Faigenbaum, A., J. Kang, J. McFarland, J.M. Bloom, J. Magnatta, N.A.<br />
Ratamess, & J. Hoffman (2006). Acute effects of different warm-up<br />
protocols on anaerobic performance in teenage athletes. Pediatric<br />
Exercise Science,18(1):64—75.<br />
Fredrick, G., & Szymanski, D. (2001). Baseball (Part I): Dynamic<br />
Flexibility. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 23: 21-30.<br />
Fry, A.C., McLellan, E., Weiss, L.W., & Rosato, E.D. (2003). The effects<br />
of static stretching on power and velocity during the bench press<br />
exercise. Medicine Science Sports and Exercise, 35: S264.<br />
Gilbert, W., & Trudel, P. (1999). An evaluation strategy for coach education<br />
programs. Journal of Sport Behavior, 22, 234-250.<br />
Hedrick, A. (1992). Physiological responses to warm-up. National<br />
Strength Coaches Association Journal, 14: 25-27.<br />
Herbert, R.D., & M. Gabriel. (2002). Effects of stretching before and after<br />
exercising on muscle soreness ands risk of injury: Systematic review.<br />
British Medical Journal, 325:468Çú472.<br />
Herda, T.J., Cramer, J.T., Ryan, E.D., McHugh, M.P., & Stout, J.R. (2008).<br />
Acute effects of static versus dynamic stretching on isometric peak<br />
torque, electromygraphy, and mechanomygraphy of the biceps femoris<br />
muscle. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 22(3), 809-<br />
817.<br />
Holcomb, W.R. (2008). Stretching and warm-up. Champaign, IL: Human<br />
Kinetics, p. 321-342.<br />
Hunter, J.P., & Marshall, R.N. (1992). Effects of power and flexibility<br />
training on vertical jump technique. Medicine, Science, Sports and<br />
Exercise, 34: 478-486.<br />
Judge, L.W., Craig, B., Baudendistal, & Bodey, K. (2009). An examination<br />
of the stretching practices of division I and III college football programs<br />
in the Mid-western United States. Journal of Strength & Conditioning<br />
Research. 23: 1091-1096.<br />
Judge, L.W. (2007). Developing speed strength: In-season training<br />
program for the collegiate thrower. Strength and Conditioning, 29(5),<br />
42-54.<br />
Kerrigan, D.K., Xenopoulus-Oddson, A., Sullivan, M.J., Lelas, J.J., &<br />
Riley, P.O. (2003). Effect of hip flexor-stretching program on gait in<br />
the elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 84:1-6.<br />
Kovacs, M. (2006). The argument against static stretching before sport<br />
and physical activity. Athletic Therapy Today, 11(3), 6-8. Retrieved<br />
January 20, 2009, from Academic Search Premier database.<br />
Laroche, D.P., Lussier, M.V., & Roy, S.J. (2008). Chronic stretching<br />
and voluntary muscle force. Journal of Strength and Conditioning<br />
Research, 22: 589-596.<br />
Little, T., & Williams, A. (2006). Effects of differential stretching protocols<br />
during warm-ups on high-speed motor capacities in professional soccer<br />
players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 20: 203-<br />
207.<br />
Mahoney, J. L., & Stattin, H. (2000). Leisure activities and adolescents<br />
antisocial behavior: The role of structure and social context. Journal<br />
of Adolescence, 23, 113—127.<br />
Mann, D., & Jones, M. (1999). Guidelines to the implementation of a<br />
dynamic stretching program. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 21:<br />
53-55.<br />
Mann, D., & Whedon, C. (2001). Functional stretching: implementing<br />
a dynamic stretching program. Athletic Therapy Today, 6(3), 10-13.<br />
Retrieved January 17, 2009, from Academic Search Premier database.<br />
McMillian, D., Moore, J., Hatler, B., & Taylor, D. (2006). Dynamic<br />
vs. static-stretching warm up: The effects on power and agility<br />
performance. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 20(3),<br />
492-499. Retrieved January 17, 2009, from SPORTDiscus with Full<br />
Text database.<br />
Nelson, A., Jokkonen, J., & Arnall, D. (2005). Acute muscle stretching<br />
inhibits muscle strength endurance performance. Journal of Strength<br />
and Conditioning Research, 19: 338-343.<br />
Nelson, A.G., & Kokkonen, J. (2001). Acute ballistic muscle stretching<br />
inhibits maximal strength performance. Research Quarterly of Exercise<br />
and Sport, 72:415—419.<br />
Nelson RT, & Brandy WD. (2008). An Update on Flexibility. Strength and<br />
Conditioning Journal, 27: 10-16.<br />
Ninos J. (1995). Guidelines for Proper Stretching. Strength and<br />
Conditioning Journal, 17: 44-46.<br />
National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA). (2009). Certified<br />
strength and conditioning specialist program. Retrieved July 8, 2009,<br />
from http://www.nsca-cc.org/cscs/about.html<br />
Pope, R.P., R.D. Herbert, J.D. Kiwan, & Graham, B. J. (2000). A<br />
randomized trial of preexercise stretching for prevention of lower-limb<br />
injury. Medicine, Science, Sports and Exercise, 32:271—277.<br />
Rosenbaum, D. & Henning, E.M. (1995). The influence of stretching and<br />
warm-up exercises on Achilles tendon reflex activity. Journal of Sports<br />
Science, 3:481—490. 1995.<br />
Safran, M.R., Garrett, W.E., Seaber, A.V., Glisson, R.R., & Ribbeck, B.M.<br />
(1988). The role of warmup in muscular injury prevention. American<br />
Journal of Sports Medicine, 16: 123-129.<br />
Samuel, M.N., Holcomb, W.R., Guadagnoli, M.A., Rubley, M.D., &<br />
Wallmann, H. (2008). Acute effects of static and ballistic stretching on<br />
measures of strength and power. Journal of Strength and Conditioning<br />
Research. 00(0), 1-7.<br />
Shrier, I. (1999). Stretching before exercise does not reduce the risk of<br />
local muscle injury: A critical review of the clinical and basic science<br />
literature. Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine, 9: 221-227.<br />
Siatras, T.A., Mittas, V.P., Maneletzi, D.N., & Vamvakoudis, E,A.<br />
(2008). Peak torque production. Journal of Strength and Conditioning<br />
Research, 22: 40-46.<br />
Sharman, M., & Cresswell, A. (2006). Proprioceptive neuromuscular<br />
facilitation stretching: mechanisms and clinical implications. Sports<br />
Medicine, 36(11), 929-939. Retrieved February 11, 2009, from<br />
Academic Search Premier database.<br />
Smith, R. E., & Smoll, F. L. (2002). Youth sport interventions. In J. Van<br />
Raalte and B. Brewer (Eds.), Exploring sport and exercise psychology<br />
(2 nd ed., pp. 341-371). Washington, DC: American Psychological<br />
Association.<br />
Stone, M.H., Ramsey, R.W., O'Bryant, H.S., Ayers, C., & Sands, W.A.<br />
(2006). Stretching: Acute and chronic? The potential consequences.<br />
Strength and Conditioning Journal 28: 66-74.<br />
Strean, W. B., & García-Bengoechea, E. (2003). Beyond technical vs.<br />
tactical: Extending the games teaching debate. In J. Butler, L. Griffin,<br />
B. Lombardo, & R. Nastasi (Eds.), Teaching games for understanding<br />
in physical education and sport: An international perspective (pp.<br />
181-188). Reston, VA: NASPE publications.<br />
Swanson, J.R. (2008). A Functional Approach to Warm-up and Flexibility.<br />
Strength and Conditioning Journal, 28: 30-36.<br />
Thacker, S.B., Gilbert, J., Stroup, D.F., & Kimsey, C.D. (2004). The<br />
impact of stretching on sport injury risk: A systematic review of the<br />
literature. Medicine, Science, Sports and Exercise, 36:371—378.<br />
Torres, E, M., Kraemer, W. J., Vingren, J. L., Volek, J.S., Hatfield, D.L.,<br />
Spiering, B.A. Ho, J.Y., Fragala, M.S., Thomas, G.A.,<br />
Anderson, J.A., Hakkinen, K., & Maresh, C.M. ( 2 0 0 8 ) .<br />
Effects of Stretching on Upper-Body Muscular Performance. Strength<br />
and Conditioning Journal 22: 1279-1285.<br />
Winchester, J.B., Nelson, A.G., Landin, D., Young, M.A., & Schexnayder,<br />
I.C. (2008). Static stretching impairs sprint performance in collegiate<br />
track and field athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research<br />
22: 13-18.<br />
Woolstenhulme, M.T., Griffins, C.M., Woolstenhulme, E.M., & Parcell,<br />
A.C. (2006). Ballistic stretching increases flexibility and acute vertical<br />
jump height when combined with basketball activity. Journal of<br />
Strength and Conditioning Research 20: 799-803.<br />
USA Volleyball. (2009). Coach education program. Retrieved July 8,<br />
2009, from http://www.usavolleyball.org/content/index/404<br />
Yamaguchi, T., & Ishii, K. (2005). Effects of static stretching for 30<br />
seconds and dynamic stretching on leg extension power. Journal of<br />
Strength and Conditioning Research 19: 677-683.<br />
Yessis, M. (2006). Runners need active stretching. AMAA Journal, 18(2),<br />
8-18. Retrieved January 17, 2009, from Academic Search Premier<br />
database. !<br />
volume 5, issue 1 75
THE RULES & REVIEW PROCESS<br />
A. Submission of Manuscripts<br />
(a) Manuscripts must be submitted to ICHPER·SD headquarters<br />
at the following address: 1900 Association Drive, Reston, VA 20191-<br />
1598, USA (for hard copy submissions only); ichper@aahperd.org<br />
(for electronic submissions only).<br />
(b) Each hard copy submission must consist of: i) 2 original<br />
hard copies of the manuscript; ii) 2 computer CD’s – (Microsoft<br />
Word®); and iii) A self-addressed and U.S. stamped envelope<br />
(9“ by 12”) for manuscripts sent from the United States, but for<br />
manuscripts sent from outside the United States – only a selfaddressed<br />
envelope (9” by 12”).<br />
(c) Each electronic submission must consist of three files: i)<br />
cover page including senior author’s contact information (i.e.<br />
name of institution, email, phone number, and mailing address).<br />
ii) abstract and manuscript, and iii) tables, charts, and pictures,<br />
etc. In addition, one computer CD – (Microsoft Word®) consisting<br />
of all three files (i.e. i, ii & iii) must be mailed to ICHPER·SD<br />
headquarters.<br />
B. Manuscript Guidelines for Authors<br />
(a) Manuscripts should be typed, double-spaced, 12-point<br />
font, and include line numbers to facilitate the review process.<br />
Manuscripts should be saved as a WORD document.<br />
(b) Papers should not exceed 28 pages of text, including abstract,<br />
references, tables, and figures.<br />
(c) Author(s) should provide an abstract of no more than 200<br />
words on a separate page and at the bottom include up to four key<br />
words from the manuscript that are not also part of the title, for<br />
indexing purposes.<br />
(d) Manuscripts must conform to the Publication Manual<br />
of the American Psychological Association (APA), 5th edition.<br />
Manuscripts deviating from the recommended format will neither<br />
be reviewed nor returned.<br />
(e) Manuscripts submitted to JR may not be concurrently<br />
submitted to another journal.<br />
(f) Author(s) should consult and abide by the Guidelines for<br />
Contributors published in each issue of the journal and available<br />
on the ICHPER·SD Web site.<br />
(g) For the purposes of blind review, author(s) should i) remove<br />
any author-identifying information from manuscript submissions,<br />
such as location of study, author notes, name of research program,<br />
etc., ii) a separate cover page should include title, first author’s<br />
correspondence information (i.e., name, institution, email, phone<br />
numbers, and mailing address), iii) abstract, iv) manuscript<br />
(i.e., pages must be numbered and line numbering included), v)<br />
reference section at the end of the manuscript, vi) tables, charts,<br />
and photos at the end of the manuscript, vii) use APA style Manual<br />
(latest edition) for proper formatting.<br />
(h) When citing equipment or software used in the study, authors<br />
must include the manufacturer’s name, city, and state (or country)<br />
the first time the equipment is mentioned.<br />
(i) In the Author’s <strong>No</strong>tes, authors must mention grant support<br />
and identify the source of any funding.<br />
(j) Descriptive categories such as those used for gender, race,<br />
ethnicity, culture, special populations, etc., should be labeled with<br />
valid terms that can be documented as accepted, current, and<br />
professional. Publication in JR does not indicate editorial sanction<br />
of construct labels used by authors.<br />
(k) The senior author must be a member of ICHPER·SD.<br />
When there are more than 3 authors of the submitted manuscript,<br />
the senior author plus one author (i.e. at least 2 authors) must be<br />
members.<br />
C. ICHPER·SD Headquarters<br />
(a) Responds with one of the actions below via e-mail to the<br />
senior author who must be a member of ICHPER·SD. When there<br />
are more than 3 authors of the submitted manuscript, the senior<br />
author plus one author (i.e. at least 2 authors) must be members.<br />
•Sends an acknowledgment of receipt if he/she is a member<br />
within 5 working days.<br />
•Sends a notice of membership requirement and membership<br />
application if he/she is not a member and retains the article without<br />
processing until the author(s) complies with the membership<br />
requirement within 30 days from the date of the notice. Headquarters<br />
discards the manuscript and material after 40 days from the<br />
date of notice if the membership requirement is not met.<br />
•Sends a notice of noncompliance if the submitted material is<br />
not in compliance with the material guidelines for authors.<br />
(b) Hard Copy Submission Processing Procedures: Sends the<br />
submitted material — one original hard copy of the manuscript<br />
and a computer CD, large self-addressed envelope (stamped, for<br />
US submitters) and accompanying senior author’s letter — to<br />
the JR Editor-in-Chief via regular 1st class mail only within 7<br />
working days from the date of receipt, and keeps one original hard<br />
copy and one computer CD in the headquarters file.<br />
(c) Electronic Submission Processing Procedures: Sends the<br />
submitted three files (i.e. cover page; abstract & manuscript; tables,<br />
charts, and pictures, etc.) to the JR Editor-in-Chief electronically<br />
within 7 working days. ICHPER·SD headquarters keeps one<br />
original CD – (Microsoft Word®) for its file.<br />
76 Journal of Research
D. Review Process under the Editor-in-Chief<br />
After receiving the manuscripts and materials from ICHPER·SD<br />
headquarters, the Editor-in-Chief determines whether the manuscript<br />
warrants further review (meets APA Style Manual [latest<br />
edition]).<br />
Review of Manuscripts<br />
(a) JR is a peer-reviewed publication; all manuscripts undergo<br />
review prior to acceptance for publication. Three or more external<br />
reviewers and/or section editors, the Associate Editor and the<br />
Editor-in-Chief are part of the review process. The Editor-in-Chief<br />
makes the final decision on manuscript publication.<br />
(b) Manuscript review follows a double-blind review process.<br />
(c) Qualified reviewers in the appropriate sub-disciplines review<br />
manuscripts deemed suitable to the mission of JR. Submitted<br />
manuscripts will be referred to the most appropriate section for<br />
review, and those that blatantly do not fit any section will be<br />
rejected out-of-hand.<br />
(d) Appropriate sub-disciplines include, but are not limited to:<br />
•Biomechanics<br />
•Dance<br />
•Epidemiology<br />
•History and Philosophy<br />
•Martial Arts<br />
•Measurement and Evaluation<br />
•Motor Control and Learning<br />
•Motor Development<br />
•Pedagogy<br />
•Psychology<br />
•Recreation and Leisure Studies<br />
•Recreation and Sport Therapy<br />
•Sociology and Cultural Anthropology<br />
•Sport Finance and Marketing<br />
•Sport History<br />
•Sport Law and Governance<br />
•Sport Management<br />
•Sport Medicine<br />
•Sport Sociology<br />
(e) Author(s) are usually advised of the decision on their<br />
manuscripts within 75-90 days.<br />
(f) <strong>No</strong>rmally no more than two and rarely three versions are<br />
permitted before a manuscript is accepted or rejected.<br />
(g) Author(s) who are invited to revise and resubmit their<br />
manuscript for reconsideration will be permitted a maximum of 60<br />
days to resubmit their manuscript.<br />
E. Ethical Issues<br />
(a) Guidelines for ethics in publishing conform to the<br />
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association<br />
(APA), 5th edition. Authors submitting manuscripts for publication<br />
are expected to know and abide by these guidelines, including<br />
plagiarism, fragmented studies, dual publication, etc.<br />
(b) Author(s) must disclose the potential for a conflict of interest<br />
in their research, which will appear in the journal.<br />
(c) Author(s) indicate whether their manuscript is part of a<br />
larger study and how the current manuscript is distinct from other<br />
papers that are published, under review, or in press. Authors are<br />
encouraged to submit manuscripts that are part of a larger study<br />
for the editor’s evaluation.<br />
(d) Author(s) should take appropriate steps to obtain the<br />
informed consent of human research participants, regardless of the<br />
country’s regulations under which the research was conducted.<br />
(e) The ICHPER·SD Journal of Research Editorial Policy Board<br />
will review violations of ethical guidelines, and an appropriate<br />
penalty or sanction will be imposed.<br />
F. Manuscripts Accepted for Publication<br />
(a) The senior author will receive page proofs for correction<br />
about 4 weeks before publication from the Editor-in-Chief. The<br />
author(s) bear responsibility for proofreading the manuscript and<br />
should, therefore, be extremely thorough.<br />
(b) Author(s) should return page proofs to the Editor-in-Chief<br />
within 7 days of the deadline stated in the cover letter provided<br />
with the page proofs.<br />
G. Permissions for Author(s) and <strong>No</strong>n-Author(s)<br />
(a) All materials contained in this publication are the property of<br />
ICHPER·SD. ICHPER·SD holds the copyright for JR. In keeping<br />
with copyright law (P.L. 94-553) all authors must, whenever<br />
legally possible, assign the copyright of accepted manuscripts<br />
prior to publication to ICHPER·SD so that both the author(s) and<br />
the Council are protected from misuse of copyrighted materials.<br />
(b) On receipt of legitimate written requests, permission is<br />
granted by ICHPER·SD, through the Chair of the ICHPER·SD<br />
Editorial Policy Board, for use of brief quotations (about 500<br />
words) in published works.<br />
(c) Permission is automatically granted to authors to use their<br />
own articles in other published work.<br />
(d) Permission to reprint entire articles, figures, or tables for<br />
inclusion in publications offered for sale, is granted only on<br />
volume 5, issue 1 77
payment of fee to JR payable to “ICHPER·SD” and receipt of<br />
legitimate written requests. In these instances, the Chair of the<br />
Editorial Policy Board requests that permission be obtained from<br />
the senior author as well.<br />
H. Subscriptions<br />
(a) All ICHPER·SD constituent members (i.e., individual and<br />
Life, national and institutional organizations, affiliated international<br />
organizations and libraries) receive a copy of JR on a bi-annual<br />
basis (i.e., <strong>Spring</strong> & <strong>Summer</strong> issue and Fall & Winter issue) and<br />
any special JR issues whenever published.<br />
(b) <strong>No</strong>n-ICHPER·SD members may subscribe to JR for an annual<br />
fee as established by the ICHPER·SD headquarters secretariat with<br />
the approval of the ICHPER·SD Executive Committee.<br />
(c) Senior authors will receive one additional copy (total of 2<br />
copies) when their articles are published.<br />
(d) A complementary copy may be provided to selected<br />
individuals and organizations (e.g., UNESCO, WHO, IOC, NOCs,<br />
IFs) that are in a partnership or are officially and/or directly<br />
associated with the mission of ICHPER·SD.<br />
(e) Members or subscribers should report address changes<br />
at least 8 weeks in advance to ICHPER·SD headquarters in the<br />
United States.<br />
I. Publication Schedules and Glossary of Terms.<br />
(a) The JR spring/summer issue will be published during the<br />
month of May/June and the fall/winter issue will be published<br />
during the month of <strong>No</strong>vember/December. By 2012, JR will<br />
be expanded to a quarterly journal published in March, June,<br />
September, and December. Further, the Journal will be moving to<br />
electronic publication within the next five years.<br />
(b) The ICHPER·SD Journal of Research does not publish a<br />
glossary of terms.<br />
78 Journal of Research
volume 5, issue 1 79
80 Journal of Research