24.01.2014 Views

Ecosystem Approaches in IWRM - International Institute for ...

Ecosystem Approaches in IWRM - International Institute for ...

Ecosystem Approaches in IWRM - International Institute for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Transboundary river bas<strong>in</strong> case studies<br />

Water-Energy-Food Security


Presentation Outl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

• Importance of transboundary bas<strong>in</strong>s<br />

• <strong>IWRM</strong>—Integration<br />

• State of <strong>IWRM</strong> implementation study<br />

• Case studies—ES offers a “benefits shar<strong>in</strong>g”<br />

approach<br />

• Lessons and Framework<br />

• Evolution of <strong>IWRM</strong> <strong>for</strong> W-E-F <strong>in</strong>tegration


Transboundary Watersheds<br />

Source: Revenga et. al. 2003. IUCN, IWMI, Ramsar Convention Bureau and<br />

WRI.


Integrated Water Resources Management<br />

• <strong>IWRM</strong>—Coord<strong>in</strong>ated management of water, land and<br />

related resources to equitably maximize the result<strong>in</strong>g<br />

economic and social welfare without compromis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the susta<strong>in</strong>ability of vital ecosystems.<br />

• Ma<strong>in</strong> Hypotheses:<br />

• <strong>IWRM</strong> is the practical means <strong>for</strong> advanc<strong>in</strong>g large-scale ecosystem<br />

management.<br />

• However, <strong>in</strong>stitutional capacity and <strong>in</strong>struments <strong>for</strong> <strong>IWRM</strong> are weakly<br />

developed and are complex at the transboundary level.<br />

• Communicat<strong>in</strong>g ecosystem service benefits and harness<strong>in</strong>g ecosystem<br />

markets are promis<strong>in</strong>g ways to strengthen <strong>IWRM</strong>.


Integrated Water Resources Management<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples<br />

Economic<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

Social<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance-<br />

Equity<br />

Environmental<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance-<br />

Susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />

Structure<br />

Management<br />

Instruments<br />

• Assessment<br />

• In<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

• Allocation<br />

Enabl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Instruments<br />

• Policy<br />

• Legislation<br />

• Economic<br />

Incentives<br />

Institutional<br />

Framework<br />

• Scale<br />

• River Bas<strong>in</strong><br />

Organization<br />

• Partnerships<br />

and resources<br />

Water <strong>for</strong> livelihood, water as resource, Water as ecosystem<br />

good<br />

Source: Adapted from Global Water Partnership <strong>IWRM</strong> Framework


<strong>IWRM</strong> Commitments and Adoption<br />

Source: UN-Water


Transboundary Case Studies<br />

• Red River Bas<strong>in</strong> (North America)<br />

• Jordan River Bas<strong>in</strong> (West Asia)<br />

• Mekong River Bas<strong>in</strong> (Asia Pacific)<br />

• Danube River Bas<strong>in</strong> (Europe)<br />

• La Plata River Bas<strong>in</strong> (Lat<strong>in</strong><br />

America and the Caribbean)<br />

• Okavango River Bas<strong>in</strong> (Africa)<br />

• Congo River Bas<strong>in</strong> (Africa)


Red River Bas<strong>in</strong> Case Study<br />

• Bas<strong>in</strong> area: 116,550 km 2<br />

• Bas<strong>in</strong> countries: Canada,<br />

United States<br />

• Primary issues <strong>for</strong><br />

management: Floods,<br />

droughts, nutrient<br />

management<br />

Source: Sch<strong>in</strong>delka, R. 1999.<br />

http://www.rrbd<strong>in</strong>.org/data/redriverbas<strong>in</strong>.pdf


Lake<br />

W<strong>in</strong>nipeg<br />

W<strong>in</strong>nipeg<br />

Saskatchewan<br />

Manitoba<br />

Red River and<br />

Bas<strong>in</strong>


Red River Sub-Bas<strong>in</strong> <strong>Ecosystem</strong> Service<br />

Analysis—chang<strong>in</strong>g the discourse<br />

• Pre-settlement to<br />

present comparative<br />

analysis<br />

• Value of ES lost:<br />

CAD$0.2b–<br />

CAD$2.05b/annually<br />

• ~80% climate and<br />

water regulation<br />

• Policy Shift to<br />

Susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

Agriculture and<br />

Wetlands<br />

Protection


Red River Sub-Bas<strong>in</strong> <strong>Ecosystem</strong> Service<br />

Analysis—chang<strong>in</strong>g the discourse<br />

• Pre-settlement to<br />

present comparative<br />

analysis<br />

• Value of ES lost:<br />

CAD$0.2b–<br />

CAD$2.05b/annually<br />

• ~80% climate and<br />

water regulation<br />

• Policy Shift to<br />

Susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

Agriculture and<br />

Wetlands<br />

Protection


Jordan River Bas<strong>in</strong><br />

• Bas<strong>in</strong> area: 18,000 km 2<br />

• Bas<strong>in</strong> countries: Syria, Israel,<br />

Jordan, Palest<strong>in</strong>e and Lebanon<br />

• Primary management issues: Water<br />

quantity, water quality and<br />

equitable shar<strong>in</strong>g of the resource<br />

Source: UNEP/DEWA/GRID~Europe


Jordan River Bas<strong>in</strong><br />

• Long history of political and waterbased<br />

conflict<br />

• No <strong>in</strong>stitutional mechanism <strong>for</strong> bas<strong>in</strong>wide<br />

management<br />

• <strong>IWRM</strong> strengthen<strong>in</strong>g led by Scientific<br />

and NGO communities—notably:<br />

• GLOWA project emphasiz<strong>in</strong>g mgmt<br />

tools, and<br />

• FoEME conservation and trustbuild<strong>in</strong>g<br />

projects among municipal<br />

leaders<br />

• Recommendations <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>corporation of<br />

ecosystem services approach (Al-<br />

Jayyousi and Bergkamp, 2008)<br />

Photographer: Bryan Oborne


Mekong River Bas<strong>in</strong> Case Study<br />

• Bas<strong>in</strong> area: 795,000 km 2<br />

• Bas<strong>in</strong> countries: Ch<strong>in</strong>a,<br />

Myanmar, Lao PDR,<br />

Cambodia, Thailand and<br />

Vietnam<br />

• Primary management<br />

issues: Flood management,<br />

fisheries, agriculture,<br />

navigation, hydropower and<br />

environment<br />

Source: Revenga, et al. 1998, 2-92


Mekong River Bas<strong>in</strong> Case Study:<br />

Key <strong>IWRM</strong> Agency: Mekong River Commission<br />

• Fragmented bas<strong>in</strong> management amongst MRC<br />

and upper riparians—although probably not the<br />

critical management issue<br />

• Economic goals—largely hydropower<br />

development vs. wetland and biodiversity<br />

protection.<br />

• MRC has an <strong>IWRM</strong> agenda, while other<br />

agencies—ASEAN, GMS Economic Cooperation<br />

Program, MWRAS—have hydropower agenda<br />

• <strong>Ecosystem</strong> services framework to potentially<br />

provide common ground <strong>for</strong> bas<strong>in</strong>-wide<br />

management—detailed analysis of the services<br />

associated with the Sonle Tap wetlands of<br />

Cambodia probably most illustrative of synergies<br />

and tradeoffs with other bas<strong>in</strong> development<br />

objectives<br />

Photographer: Dimple Roy


Danube River Bas<strong>in</strong> Case Study<br />

• Bas<strong>in</strong> area: 801,463 km 2<br />

• Bas<strong>in</strong> countries: Austria,<br />

Albania, Bosnia and<br />

Herzegov<strong>in</strong>a, Bulgaria,<br />

Croatia, Czech Republic,<br />

Germany, Hungary, Italy,<br />

Macedonia, Moldova,<br />

Poland, Romania, Serbia<br />

and Montenegro, Slovak<br />

Republic, Slovenia,<br />

Switzerland, and Ukra<strong>in</strong>e<br />

• Primary management<br />

issues: loss of<br />

biodiversity, NPS impacts<br />

from agriculture on water<br />

quality,<br />

Source: Revenga, et al. 1998, 2-38


Danube River Bas<strong>in</strong> Case Study<br />

Key <strong>IWRM</strong> Agency: ICPDR<br />

• WFD provides strong guidance but its<br />

complexity and the EU/non-EU dist<strong>in</strong>ction and<br />

<strong>in</strong>come gradient offer significant challenges to<br />

implementation.<br />

• Loss of ecosystem services <strong>in</strong>clude wetland<br />

losses, <strong>for</strong>est services, decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> water<br />

availability and quality and loss of recreational<br />

and aesthetic value.<br />

• Implementation challenges are magnified by<br />

the lack of agricultural and regional<br />

development representation on ICPDR as<br />

implement<strong>in</strong>g agencies at national level.<br />

• WWF is work<strong>in</strong>g on promot<strong>in</strong>g an ecosystem<br />

services approach <strong>in</strong> the bas<strong>in</strong> from the topdown<br />

(at the EU level) as well as bottom-up<br />

(with regional pilot <strong>in</strong>itiatives).<br />

Photographer: Alec Craw<strong>for</strong>d


La Plata River Bas<strong>in</strong> Case Study<br />

Source: Revenga , et al. 1998, 2-157<br />

• Bas<strong>in</strong> area: 3,100,000 km 2<br />

• Bas<strong>in</strong> countries: Paraguay,<br />

Uruguay, Argent<strong>in</strong>a, Brazil,<br />

Bolivia<br />

• Primary issues <strong>for</strong><br />

management: Water<br />

quality, flood<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

de<strong>for</strong>estation, biodiversity,<br />

<strong>in</strong>vasive species, fish losses,<br />

and climate change, aquifer<br />

depletion and<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ation


La Plata River Bas<strong>in</strong> Case Study<br />

Key <strong>IWRM</strong> Agency: CIC<br />

• Long history of bilateral and trilateral<br />

agreements among riparians generally <strong>for</strong><br />

hydropower and navigation<br />

• <strong>Ecosystem</strong> services approach as a means of<br />

demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g the impacts of development<br />

schemes on upstream wetlands; Pantanal<br />

Wetland—modulates hydrology; reta<strong>in</strong>s<br />

nutrients, extremely biodiverse and threatened<br />

by the Hydrovia project.<br />

• Yacreta hydro project currently constra<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

ecosystem impacts<br />

• Successful protection of Guarani aquifer<br />

demonstrates that co-operative management<br />

can protect key ecological assets.<br />

Photographer: Alec Craw<strong>for</strong>d


Okavango River Bas<strong>in</strong> Case Study<br />

• Bas<strong>in</strong> area: 704,000 km 2<br />

• Bas<strong>in</strong> countries: Angola,<br />

Botswana, Namibia and<br />

Zimbabwe<br />

• Primary issues <strong>for</strong><br />

management: Water<br />

quality, Soil erosion, urban<br />

development, tourism,<br />

biodiversity and the<br />

management of the<br />

Okavango Delta.<br />

Source: Revenga, et al. 1998, 2-26


Okavango River Bas<strong>in</strong> Case Study<br />

Source: Cubango-Okavango River Bas<strong>in</strong> Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis, 2011


Source: Cubango-Okavango River Bas<strong>in</strong> Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis, 2011


Congo River Bas<strong>in</strong> Case Study—extremely biodiverse;<br />

Key <strong>IWRM</strong> Agency: CICOS<br />

• Bas<strong>in</strong> area: 3,680,000<br />

km 2<br />

• Bas<strong>in</strong> countries:<br />

Angola, Cameroon, the<br />

Central African<br />

Republic, the Republic<br />

of Congo, and the<br />

Democratic Republic of<br />

Congo<br />

• Primary management<br />

issues: De<strong>for</strong>estation,<br />

navigation, water<br />

pollution, <strong>in</strong>vasive<br />

species and water<br />

transfers<br />

Source: Revenga, et al. 1998, 2-11


Congo River Bas<strong>in</strong> Case Study<br />

• As usual, <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>for</strong> bas<strong>in</strong>-scale <strong>IWRM</strong> comes from<br />

hydro and navigation—both of which are threatened<br />

by de<strong>for</strong>estation/biodiversity loss (loss of the water<br />

towers).<br />

• CICOS strategic action plan <strong>in</strong> development—refers to<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ks with UNDP/GEF Strategic Program <strong>for</strong> SFM <strong>in</strong><br />

Congo Bas<strong>in</strong> and the Congo Bas<strong>in</strong> Forest Partnership.<br />

• L<strong>in</strong>ks to Carbon and Biodiversity Markets obvious but<br />

undeveloped


Case Studies Synthesis<br />

• <strong>IWRM</strong>—while ma<strong>in</strong>streamed as framework, under-resourced and underm<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> implementation.<br />

• Very early days <strong>for</strong> <strong>Ecosystem</strong> Approach-<strong>IWRM</strong><br />

• <strong>Ecosystem</strong> Management and Climate Adaptation issues are assert<strong>in</strong>g<br />

themselves as high priorities <strong>in</strong> all bas<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

• Only La Plata and Okavango had an ES valuation analysis—protection of<br />

Guarani aquifer and the Okavango Delta play important role.<br />

• Jordan—ES deemed essential <strong>for</strong> progress<br />

• Danube—WWF pilot<strong>in</strong>g PES schemes<br />

• Mekong and Congo – ES analysis would help highlight trade-offs and synergies<br />

between ecosystem protection and conventional development.<br />

• Bas<strong>in</strong>-scale <strong>Ecosystem</strong> Service <strong>in</strong>ventory and trend analysis can help bas<strong>in</strong><br />

analysts understand a whole new class of w<strong>in</strong>-w<strong>in</strong> opportunities.<br />

• Next-generation <strong>IWRM</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutional capacity build<strong>in</strong>g will <strong>in</strong>volve ES analysis<br />

and visualization, ES communication, ES market development.


ES Approach to <strong>IWRM</strong>


BioEconomy as a facilitator of <strong>IWRM</strong><br />

$$ Localized bioenergy production<br />

$$ Habitat and biodiversity<br />

production<br />

$$ Public health benefits of nutrient<br />

and hydrologic management<br />

$$ Recreation<br />

$$ Biomass-based value cha<strong>in</strong>s<br />

$$ Nutrient management and<br />

recycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> fertilizers<br />

$$ Increased food security<br />

$$ Water storage <strong>for</strong> flood and<br />

drought mitigation


Evolution of <strong>IWRM</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g EGS and<br />

Bioeconomy as drivers<br />

Water<br />

Security<br />

Food<br />

Security<br />

Energy<br />

Security<br />

Bioeconomy<br />

benefits and<br />

value cha<strong>in</strong>s<br />

as potential<br />

drivers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!