Digestibility - Department of Animal Sciences

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Marker types External – Chromic oxide – Dysporium – Polyamide Can contaminate forage Internal – Lignin – AIA – ADF – n-alkanes Easier, less labor
Marker issues Difficulty <strong>of</strong> mixing marker with forages – Dose cows instead- ( s handling) Marker migration – Must not affect feed digy External markers may contaminate forage
Page 1 and 2: DIGESTIBILITY
Page 3 and 4: In vivo digestibility methods Direc
Page 5 and 6: In vivo digestibility trials in met
Page 7 and 8: Total collection calculations Diges
Page 9 and 10: 2. Difference method Allows digy ca
Page 11 and 12: DMD (g/kg) Regression method 800 Ba
Page 13 and 14: Marker digestibility trials Particu
Page 15: Marker digestibility Pros - Total f
Page 19 and 20: Ideal in vitro methods should be: -
Page 21 and 22: Prediction of silage OMD in vivo fr
Page 23 and 24: Rumen fluid problems Analytical iss
Page 25 and 26: Rumen fluid technique - problems St
Page 27 and 28: Prediction of DMD in vivo from in v
Page 29 and 30: Relationships between DMD in vivo a
Page 31 and 32: Prediction of in vivo OMD of spring
Page 33 and 34: 14 C-Casein hydrolysis (mg/ml) 0.5
Page 35 and 36: The ANKOM equipment
Page 37 and 38: ANKOM pros & cons Pros - Simplifies
Page 39: Digestibility references Chapters 6

Digestibility - Department of Animal Sciences

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?