Poverty Alleviation in Sri Lanka:
Poverty Alleviation in Sri Lanka:
Poverty Alleviation in Sri Lanka:
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>Alleviation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong>:<br />
with special reference to Samurdhi<br />
(Prosperity) Movement<br />
By<br />
Sunil Jayantha Nawaratne<br />
Professor of Management & E-Commerce<br />
<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong> Institute of Information Technology<br />
Chairman<br />
Centre for Strategic Management
Contents<br />
<strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Global context<br />
<strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>in</strong> the South Asian Region<br />
Back ground of <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />
<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong>n Economic History<br />
<strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />
<strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>Alleviation</strong> Programs <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />
Samurdhi Movement of <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />
Samurdhi movement today<br />
It’s Strengths and Weaknesses<br />
Future of <strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>Alleviation</strong> of <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />
Future of Samurdhi Movement of <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />
Some comments on our Jo<strong>in</strong>t Research Project<br />
F<strong>in</strong>al Comments and Q&A sessions
<strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Global Context<br />
Def<strong>in</strong>ition :<br />
People liv<strong>in</strong>g with an<br />
<strong>in</strong>come of $1 a day –Low<br />
<strong>in</strong>come countries<br />
$2 a day – middle <strong>in</strong>come<br />
National <strong>Poverty</strong> Rate<br />
(NPR): – is the<br />
percentage of the<br />
population liv<strong>in</strong>g below<br />
that national poverty<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Different countries have<br />
different def<strong>in</strong>itions of<br />
poverty.<br />
The commonly used<br />
$1 a day standard,<br />
measured <strong>in</strong> 1985<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational prices<br />
and adjusted to local<br />
currency us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Purchas<strong>in</strong>g Power<br />
Parities (PPP).<br />
There are many<br />
problems related to<br />
this poverty l<strong>in</strong>e
<strong>Poverty</strong> Rates <strong>in</strong> the Regions<br />
Share of people liv<strong>in</strong>g on less than $1 a day (%)<br />
Sub-Saharan Africa 50%<br />
South Asia 36%<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a 20%<br />
East Asia and Pacific 19%<br />
Lat<strong>in</strong> America and Caribbean 12%<br />
Europe and Central Asia 8%<br />
Middle East and North<br />
Africa 5%<br />
(Source: World Development Indicators, Page 1)
<strong>Poverty</strong> In the Global Context<br />
Source: 2004 World Development Indicators, Page 55-56<br />
Country<br />
Algeria (1995)<br />
Bangladesh (1996)<br />
National <strong>Poverty</strong> L<strong>in</strong>e<br />
22.6%<br />
51%<br />
International <strong>Poverty</strong><br />
L<strong>in</strong>e($1)<br />
2% (1995)<br />
36% (2000)<br />
India (1993-94)<br />
Kenya (1994)<br />
Madagascar(97)<br />
Pakistan (1993)<br />
36%<br />
40%<br />
73%<br />
28.6%<br />
34.7% (2000)<br />
23%(1997)<br />
49.1% (1999)<br />
13.4% (1998)<br />
<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong> (1991)<br />
Zimbabwe (1991)<br />
20%<br />
25.8%<br />
6.6% (1996)<br />
36.0% (1991)
Extreme <strong>Poverty</strong><br />
1990 vs. 2001<br />
1990 ($1 a day)<br />
1,219 million people or<br />
28% of the low and<br />
middle-<strong>in</strong>come<br />
countries , lived <strong>in</strong> less<br />
than $1 a day.<br />
2001($1 a day)<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g the next 11 years<br />
GDP of those countries<br />
grew 31%<br />
<strong>Poverty</strong> rate has fallen to<br />
21% or 1,100 million<br />
people <strong>in</strong> extreme<br />
poverty<br />
Population growth of<br />
those countries was 15%<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the period
Other Indicators of <strong>Poverty</strong><br />
Low Income<br />
Hunger<br />
Low education<br />
Gender <strong>in</strong>equality<br />
High child mortality<br />
Poor Maternal Health<br />
Poor Shelter<br />
Poor Infrastructure
Brief Introduction to <strong>Sri</strong><br />
<strong>Lanka</strong><br />
Historical Back Ground<br />
2550 years<br />
1505 – 1948- Portugese / Dutch / British<br />
1948 – 1977 – Closed Economy<br />
1977 – To date – Open Economy<br />
Overall Evaluation of <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong>
<strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>Alleviation</strong> of <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />
History of <strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>Alleviation</strong><br />
Janasaviya (peoples vigor)<br />
Samrudhi (Prosperity) Movement<br />
1994 – 2004<br />
2004 onwards
Reach<strong>in</strong>g MDGs<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />
(MDG=Millennium Development Goal)
Background<br />
In September 2000, all 189 UN member states<br />
adopted millennium declaration: There is wide<br />
spread political support <strong>in</strong> the development<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>stream – <strong>in</strong>ternationally and nationally<br />
People Centered and clear roles for all<br />
development partners (Governments,<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational Organizations, Citizens, CSOs<br />
and private sector): Scope for <strong>in</strong>ternalization<br />
and national capacity build<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(CSO=Community Service Organization)<br />
Results oriented: MDGs are results based &<br />
can make <strong>in</strong>ternational <strong>in</strong>stitutions and<br />
governments more accountable for results.
UN & the MDGs – Core Strategy<br />
The guid<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciples for the overall strategy are<br />
that:<br />
(i) all 8 MDGs<br />
& their 18 targets are equally<br />
important;<br />
(ii) national ownership and participation will be pivotal<br />
to the achievement of the MDGs;<br />
(iii) partnership, with Governments but also with CSOs<br />
and the private sector, will be essential;<br />
(iv) much of the work required to achieve the MDGs is<br />
already underway but demands greater focus &<br />
urgency;<br />
(v) focus on MDGs neither dim<strong>in</strong>ishes nor precludes<br />
the important work of UN system <strong>in</strong> other mandated<br />
areas
8 Goals 18 Targets and 48 Indicators<br />
1<br />
GOAL 1 – Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
GOAL 2 – Achieve universal primary education<br />
GOAL 3 – Promote gender equality and empower<br />
women<br />
GOAL 4 – Reduce child mortality<br />
GOAL 5 – Improve maternal health<br />
GOAL 6 – Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other<br />
diseases<br />
GOAL 7 - Ensure environmental susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />
GOAL 8 – Develop global partnership for<br />
development
8 Goals & 18 targets at a glance<br />
Goal 1 : Extreme <strong>Poverty</strong> & Humber<br />
Half (1) extreme poverty and (2) hunger by 2015<br />
Goal 2 : Universal Primary Education<br />
3. Achieve Universal Primary Education by 2015<br />
Goal 3: Gender Equity<br />
4. Elim<strong>in</strong>ate disparity <strong>in</strong> all levels of education<br />
Goal 4 : Reduce Child Mortality<br />
5. Reduce under 5 and <strong>in</strong>fant mortality rate by 2/3<br />
Goal 5: Improve Maternal Health<br />
6. Reduce MMR by 75%<br />
Goal 6 : Combat HIV/AIDS, Malaria …<br />
7.Halt and reverse spread of HIV/AIDS; 8. Same for<br />
Malaria and other major diseases
Goals, targets & <strong>in</strong>dicators at a Glance<br />
Goal 7 : Ensure environmental susta<strong>in</strong>ability.<br />
9. Integrate “Susta<strong>in</strong>able Development” <strong>in</strong> national<br />
policies & progs & reverse loss of environmental<br />
resources. 10. Halve lack of access to safe dr<strong>in</strong>k water;<br />
11. Improve the situation of slums<br />
Goal 8: Develop a Global Partnership for<br />
development<br />
12. Open, rule-based trad<strong>in</strong>g & f<strong>in</strong>ancial system<br />
13. Address special needs of LDC<br />
14. Address special needs of Land locked Cos<br />
15. Deal with debt problems<br />
16. Dev. & implet. . strategies for youth employment<br />
17. Affordable essential drugs <strong>in</strong> dev. Cos<br />
18. Make available benefits of the new technologies<br />
especially <strong>in</strong>for. . & comm.
Goals, targets & <strong>in</strong>dicators at a glance<br />
Goals (8) & Targets (18)<br />
Goal 1 : Extreme <strong>Poverty</strong> &<br />
Hunger<br />
Halve (1) extreme poverty and (2)<br />
hunger by 2015<br />
Goal 2 : Universal Primary<br />
Education<br />
3. Achieve Universal Primary<br />
Education by 2015<br />
Goal 3: Gender Equity<br />
4. Elim<strong>in</strong>ate disparity <strong>in</strong> all levels of<br />
education<br />
Goal 4 : Reduce Child Mortality<br />
5. Reduce under 5 and <strong>in</strong>fant<br />
mortality rate by two – thirds<br />
Goal 5: Improve Maternal Health<br />
6. Reduce MMR by 75%<br />
Indicator(48)<br />
1. Population < $1;<br />
2. <strong>Poverty</strong> Gap ratio;<br />
3. share of consumption of poorest 20%;<br />
4. % of underweight >5y;<br />
5. % below m<strong>in</strong>. dietary energy consump.<br />
6. Net Primary Enrolment Ratio;<br />
7. % children reach<strong>in</strong>g Grade five;<br />
8. Literacy rate of 15-20<br />
9. Female Gross Primary Enrol Ratio as a %<br />
of male ratio;<br />
10. 15-20 M:F Literacy Ratio.<br />
11. Share of women <strong>in</strong> non agric. wage<br />
employment.<br />
12. % women MPs<br />
13.
Introduction<br />
Samurdhi means – Prosperity.<br />
Started <strong>in</strong> 1994 as the national poverty<br />
reduction program.<br />
It’s just an 11 year old movement but a<br />
strong and steady one.<br />
The orig<strong>in</strong>al concept was designed and<br />
developed by Hon. S.B. Dissanayake, who<br />
was the M<strong>in</strong>ister of Samurdhi, then.
Situation Now<br />
Today, it is a giant organization with a<br />
national network of CBOs as well as public<br />
adm<strong>in</strong>istration network.<br />
(CBO=Community Based Organization.)<br />
At present, nearly 26,000 full-timers are<br />
engaged as “Change Agents” of the<br />
movement. 24,000 SDOs and 2,000<br />
graduate managers.<br />
(SDO=Samurdhi Development Officer)<br />
Nearly 2,000,000 families are covered.
Vision & Mission<br />
Samurdhi movement has a very clear<br />
Vision. Mission, Goals, Objectives,<br />
and Strategies.<br />
We will highlight the Vision and<br />
Mission here.
Vision<br />
Prosperous <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong> with<br />
M<strong>in</strong>imized <strong>Poverty</strong>
Mission<br />
Contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the national development<br />
through empowerment and graduation of<br />
the low-<strong>in</strong>come people out of <strong>Poverty</strong> L<strong>in</strong>e<br />
and reduc<strong>in</strong>g disparity <strong>in</strong> their livelihood <strong>in</strong><br />
the manner of participatory development<br />
through the process of identification and<br />
development of <strong>in</strong>nate abilities of the low<br />
<strong>in</strong>come families <strong>in</strong> the form of effective,<br />
efficient, susta<strong>in</strong>able and pro-poor poor manner.
Our Major Achievements<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g the last 10 years the<br />
movements major achievements are<br />
as follows:
Our Formal & Informal<br />
Organizational Structure<br />
Samurdhi Movement is a comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
of both formal & <strong>in</strong>formal structures.<br />
Formal Structure<br />
M<strong>in</strong>istry, Departments, Authority,<br />
District Secretaries, Divisional<br />
Secretaries, Areas(kalapa), Village<br />
Vasama (Grama Vasama).
Formal Structure<br />
MINISTRY OF SAMURDHI<br />
POOR RELIEF DEPARTMENT<br />
SUBSIDY PROGRAMME<br />
SAMURDHI AUTHORITY<br />
SAMURDHI COMMISIONER'S DEPARTMENT<br />
EMPOWERMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME SOCIAL INSURANCE AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPEMNT
Formal Structure<br />
National Level<br />
Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Level – 9 prov<strong>in</strong>ces (no<br />
office)<br />
District Level – 25 Districts<br />
Divisional Level – 323 Divisions<br />
Grama Vasam – 14,100 vasam<br />
Villages – 52,000 villages<br />
Families – 4,000,000 (total number)
Informal Structure<br />
Family level – 2,000,000<br />
5 member group – 326,000 groups<br />
Samurdhi Society – Village level<br />
Area (kalapa) Society – Area level – 1,000<br />
General union (Maha sangam) level – 179<br />
District level – 25<br />
National level – 1 ( Poor Peoples<br />
Parliament)
Major programs<br />
Programs are divided <strong>in</strong>to six major<br />
areas.<br />
1. Social Welfare (safety net)<br />
2. Social Insurance<br />
3. Infrastructure Development<br />
4. Micro Credit<br />
5. Income Generation<br />
6. Socio-cultural Development
Social Welfare<br />
Implemented by the department of<br />
poor relief.<br />
<strong>Poverty</strong> L<strong>in</strong>e – Rs. 1,500 per<br />
family/per month.<br />
Subsidy scheme – Rs. 1,000, 700,<br />
400, 350, 250, 140<br />
Total subsidy amount Rs.<br />
12,000,000,000.<br />
(US$120,000,000)
Samurdhi Subsidy Program<br />
by year 2005 – No. of Families<br />
9,6<br />
35<br />
mil.<br />
4,7<br />
42,<br />
70<br />
5<br />
2,0<br />
65,<br />
55<br />
4<br />
3<br />
6<br />
8,<br />
2<br />
5<br />
7<br />
2<br />
4<br />
4,<br />
4<br />
5<br />
7<br />
3<br />
6<br />
7,<br />
6<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
6<br />
4,<br />
2<br />
1<br />
8<br />
6<br />
1<br />
3,<br />
7<br />
8<br />
2<br />
7,<br />
8<br />
4<br />
0<br />
All<br />
Am<br />
ou<br />
nt<br />
Tot<br />
al<br />
Fa<br />
mil<br />
y<br />
Nu<br />
mb<br />
er<br />
Rs.<br />
1<br />
4<br />
0<br />
Rs.<br />
2<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Rs.<br />
3<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Rs.<br />
4<br />
0<br />
0<br />
Rs.<br />
6<br />
0<br />
0<br />
Rs.<br />
1<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
Dis<br />
tric<br />
t
Social Insurance Program<br />
Implemented by Samurdhi Commissioners<br />
Department<br />
Rs. 30 deducted from the subsidy and<br />
entitled for follow<strong>in</strong>gs:<br />
Death – Rs. 5,000<br />
Wedd<strong>in</strong>g – Rs. 3,000<br />
Child birth – Rs. 2,000<br />
Hospitalization – Rs. 1,500 (Rs.50 x 30 days)<br />
Educational Scholarship Program for AL<br />
students.<br />
6,000 students are gett<strong>in</strong>g this.
Infrastructure Development<br />
Program<br />
Implemented by Samurdhi Authority<br />
Participatory Development Approach<br />
Basic Material Cost from the<br />
Government and labor contribution<br />
from the beneficiaries.<br />
Up to now progress is as follows:
Rural Development Division<br />
Infrastructure development through<br />
community participation – Rs. 200<br />
million <strong>in</strong> year 2003.<br />
Bank build<strong>in</strong>g network development<br />
Canals, rural roads, steps, culvert,<br />
agro-wells, common amenities<br />
development<br />
One month subsidy donation program<br />
Ratnapura district – Kuruwita example
Micro Credit Program<br />
Samurdhi Bank network has been<br />
developed.<br />
At present 1010 banks are operat<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
(Includ<strong>in</strong>g North-East areas)<br />
Two types of sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
Compulsory sav<strong>in</strong>gs: Rs. 100 from<br />
subsidy<br />
Voluntary sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
Program progress is as follows:
Samurdhi Bank Program<br />
- Compulsory Sav<strong>in</strong>gs - Rs. 6 Billion<br />
- Voluntary Sav<strong>in</strong>gs – Rs. 4 Billion<br />
- Self Employment Loans<br />
- Agricultural Loans<br />
- Consumption Loans<br />
- Recovery Rate<br />
- Bad Debts
Socio-cultural Development<br />
Social Development, Human<br />
Resource Development, Youth &<br />
Cultural Development Programs are<br />
implemented.<br />
Samurdhi Hous<strong>in</strong>g Development<br />
Lottery<br />
Rs. 10 from subsidy<br />
Rs. 150,000 x 100 houses <strong>in</strong> a month.<br />
Up to now progress is as follows:
Social Development<br />
Anti smok<strong>in</strong>g, alcohol, and drug prevention<br />
program.<br />
Reduc<strong>in</strong>g Illiteracy program<br />
Suicide prevention and reduction program<br />
Anti smok<strong>in</strong>g flag day – hous<strong>in</strong>g<br />
development for acute poor ( Rs. 18 mil-<br />
2002) – 2000 houses<br />
Child care and widow mother development<br />
Specially tra<strong>in</strong>ed 450 SDOs are engaged
Youth and Cultural<br />
Development<br />
New division of the authority<br />
Alleviate poverty through youth<br />
development (empowerment)<br />
Vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
Talent identification and development<br />
Organiz<strong>in</strong>g the youth and provide<br />
knowledge, <strong>in</strong>formation, attitude and<br />
skills
Income Generation Programs<br />
Also Implemented by SA.<br />
Agri-Bus<strong>in</strong>ess, Livestock<br />
Development, Small Industry<br />
Development, Market<strong>in</strong>g Network<br />
Development Programs.<br />
Up to now progress is as follows:
Agri- Development Division<br />
Forward contract<strong>in</strong>g – cutt<strong>in</strong>g flower &<br />
leaves, horticulture, organic rice and<br />
vegitable<br />
Export Oriented Agriculture<br />
New Technology – Drip / Spr<strong>in</strong>kler<br />
/Poli-Tunnels / Post-harvest<br />
technology<br />
42,000 families to be empowered <strong>in</strong><br />
2003
Livestock Development<br />
Reduction malnutrition and improve <strong>in</strong>come<br />
generation<br />
Back yard poultry / Goat farm<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Sub-contract<strong>in</strong>g with private sector<br />
Nelana Farm + Samurdhi Program<br />
- cage for 1000 birds by the people<br />
- chicks, food, drugs and extension services<br />
from the company<br />
- after 42 days guaranteed purchase<br />
- average <strong>in</strong>come after 42 days per family –Rs.<br />
25000 – 30,000.<br />
( Nelana = a poultry company)
Small Industry Development<br />
Alleviate poverty through value<br />
addition<br />
Micro and small <strong>in</strong>dustry development<br />
red-clay, coconut fiber pots, garments,<br />
metal crushers, lime process<strong>in</strong>g, rice<br />
mill<strong>in</strong>g and pack<strong>in</strong>g, steel furniture,<br />
decorat<strong>in</strong>g lights, electric and<br />
electronics, wooden furniture for<br />
some examples.
Market<strong>in</strong>g Network<br />
Development<br />
Rural fair development – 300 rural fairs<br />
Home based retail shops<br />
Wholesale suppliers<br />
Door to door distribution (milk, bread, news<br />
paper, vegetables, etc.)<br />
Samurdhi Home Services Ltd.<br />
Ice-cream distribution through three<br />
wheelers – Cargils Magic Ice Cream
Ultimate Objective<br />
Graduation of low <strong>in</strong>come families from the<br />
poverty through total empowerment:<br />
Economic Empowerment<br />
Social Empowerment<br />
Cultural Empowerment<br />
Physical and Psychological Empowerment<br />
Political Empowerment (Leadership)
National Targets - 2003<br />
Contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the national economy more<br />
than the double the cost of the program<br />
Total Cost – Subsidy –Rs. 9 bil.<br />
Adm<strong>in</strong>. - Rs. 3.5 bil.<br />
Total - Rs. 12.5 bil<br />
Estimated total contribution – Rs. 28 bil<br />
In way of Income improvement,<br />
Infrastructure development, Hous<strong>in</strong>g<br />
development, and improved sav<strong>in</strong>gs.
Graduation from poverty<br />
Monthly <strong>in</strong>come has to be improved more<br />
that Rs. 5000<br />
Total families <strong>in</strong> the year 2003 – 200,000<br />
families.<br />
District allocation and divisional allocation<br />
is given to each district and divisional<br />
heads.<br />
Various poverty reduction plans:<br />
NPRP / DPRP/ DivPRP/ KPRP / VPRP
Investments <strong>in</strong><br />
Community Projects<br />
1995–2001 (Rs. mn)<br />
Year<br />
No. of District<br />
Secretariat<br />
No. of<br />
Divisional<br />
Secretary<br />
Divisions<br />
Investment<br />
s<br />
No. of<br />
Projects<br />
1995<br />
18<br />
235<br />
114.06<br />
11,306<br />
1996<br />
18<br />
235<br />
210.52<br />
11,640<br />
1997<br />
18<br />
235<br />
562.54<br />
11,288<br />
1998<br />
21<br />
283<br />
373.50<br />
6,061<br />
1999<br />
21<br />
283<br />
611.90<br />
13,206<br />
2000<br />
21<br />
294<br />
416.65<br />
6,071<br />
2001<br />
21<br />
301<br />
169.67<br />
2,005<br />
Total<br />
21<br />
301<br />
2458.84<br />
61,577
Community Dev. Projects<br />
Project Category<br />
Irrigation<br />
Canals/Dams/Anicuts<br />
Public Wells/Agri<br />
Wells/Small Scale<br />
Water Supply<br />
Schemes<br />
Transport/ Roads/<br />
Bridge / Culverts /<br />
Climb<strong>in</strong>g Steps<br />
Market<strong>in</strong>g Centers /<br />
Collection Centers/<br />
Public Facilities<br />
Total<br />
7,099 x Rs. 10,000<br />
12,428 x Rs. 50,000<br />
28,318 x Rs. 100,000<br />
5,443 x Rs. 10,000<br />
Actual Value<br />
70,990,000<br />
621,400,000<br />
2,831,800,000<br />
54,430,000<br />
( Anicut = a concrete dam <strong>in</strong> a canal)
3. Samurdhi Bank<strong>in</strong>g Program<br />
Sav<strong>in</strong>gs Program<br />
No. of Families<br />
Amount Rs.<br />
Million<br />
Compulsory<br />
886,055<br />
6,367<br />
Voluntary<br />
366,234<br />
(Small Groups)<br />
4,556<br />
Promoted<br />
by<br />
Change<br />
Agents?
Quantum & Value of Loans<br />
given by SBs<br />
Category<br />
Quantity<br />
Percentage<br />
Amount Rs.<br />
Million<br />
Percentage<br />
Agriculture<br />
192,514<br />
22.00<br />
1,084<br />
17.9<br />
Consumer<br />
41,074<br />
4.70<br />
46<br />
.8<br />
Fishery<br />
12,087<br />
1.40<br />
14.8<br />
.24<br />
Distress<br />
14,076<br />
1.60<br />
15.1<br />
.26<br />
Selfemployment<br />
613,595<br />
70.30<br />
4,869<br />
80.80<br />
Recovery %<br />
Default %<br />
Market<br />
Leader<br />
Micro F<strong>in</strong>.<br />
104.0<br />
3.5<br />
4 th <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Market
Labor Intensive People's Projects<br />
(LIPP)<br />
Special feature of this Programme<br />
is the expenditure 65% of the<br />
allocated provision for rural labor<br />
and balance 35% as the Capital.
Projects Constructed Under the Labour<br />
Intensive People's Projects (LIPP)<br />
Particulars<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
Total<br />
Total number of projects<br />
1,385<br />
571<br />
916<br />
2,872<br />
Small Tanks<br />
645<br />
183<br />
209<br />
1,037<br />
M<strong>in</strong>or irrigation<br />
587<br />
348<br />
595<br />
1,530<br />
Agro wells<br />
116<br />
24<br />
101<br />
241<br />
Other<br />
37<br />
16<br />
11<br />
64<br />
No. of beneficiaries<br />
92,005<br />
42,644<br />
83,202<br />
217,851<br />
Extent of land cultivated<br />
27,301<br />
21,254<br />
45,175<br />
93,730<br />
Number of labor units engaged<br />
-<br />
400,154<br />
678,826<br />
1,078,980<br />
Amount of expenditure Rs. million<br />
200<br />
100<br />
140<br />
440
Other Programs<br />
Program<br />
Small Industry Dev.<br />
Agriculture Dev.<br />
Animal Husbandry<br />
Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Development<br />
Social Security<br />
Program<br />
No. of families<br />
5,256<br />
4,326<br />
1,022<br />
8,173<br />
21,142<br />
All Implemented By<br />
the Change Agents<br />
Benefit<br />
Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g &<br />
Employment<br />
Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g & F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Projects<br />
Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g & F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Projects<br />
Weekly fairs, Trade<br />
Centers, Mobile<br />
Stalls<br />
Death/Marriage/Birth<br />
/ Ailments Relief
Budgetary Allocation and Actual Expenditure<br />
for Development Programmes – 1996 to 2002<br />
(Rs. mn)<br />
Year<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
Allocation<br />
400.0<br />
978.7<br />
930.0<br />
942.0<br />
500.0<br />
403.0<br />
50.0<br />
Expenditure<br />
308.5<br />
749.0<br />
991.0<br />
845.0<br />
564.0<br />
406.0<br />
32.4
Cost & Benefit of the Change<br />
Agents?<br />
Total Cost of SDOs & SMs<br />
28,000 x Rs.10,000 = Rs. 280,000,000<br />
If one officer can graduate 10 families out-of<br />
poverty trap by improv<strong>in</strong>g their <strong>in</strong>come up-to<br />
Rs.3,000 a month the Total Benefit will be 26,000<br />
x 10 x Rs. 3,000 = Rs.780,000,000<br />
If 200,000 families <strong>in</strong>come can be improved up-to<br />
Rs. 3,000 per month then = Rs.600,000,000<br />
If 100,000 families <strong>in</strong>come can be improved up-to<br />
Rs. 3,000 per month then = Rs. 300,000,000.
Samurdhi Movement Has Done<br />
a Lot<br />
Through our village based Change Agents<br />
has done a lot to Empower the Poor and<br />
Graduate them out of the <strong>Poverty</strong> Trap.<br />
It has a giant network<br />
Let’s use that network more Effectively and<br />
Efficiently through Pro-poor Approaches for<br />
the benefit of Poor People themselves.
Percentage of poor household by area and<br />
survey period<br />
Area<br />
<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />
2002<br />
Percentage of<br />
poor<br />
households<br />
23.9<br />
Survey Period<br />
1995/96 1990/91<br />
Percentage of<br />
poor<br />
households<br />
26.7<br />
Percentage of<br />
poor<br />
households<br />
30.4<br />
Sector<br />
Urban<br />
7.9<br />
13.4<br />
18.2<br />
Rural<br />
26.4<br />
28.7<br />
34.7<br />
Estate<br />
22.1<br />
26.1<br />
20.5
Per capita <strong>in</strong>come (average monthly) by<br />
area and poverty status of the<br />
household - 2002<br />
Area<br />
Mean per capita <strong>in</strong>come per<br />
month<br />
Non- poor<br />
households<br />
Rs.<br />
Ppoor<br />
households<br />
Rs.<br />
All households<br />
Rs.<br />
<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />
3709<br />
1341<br />
3048<br />
Sector<br />
Urban<br />
5654<br />
1435<br />
5243<br />
Rural<br />
3402<br />
1348<br />
2765<br />
Estate<br />
1928<br />
1135<br />
1707
Electricity, Telephone and LP Gas us<strong>in</strong>g;<br />
households (percentage) by area 2002<br />
Area<br />
<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />
Mean per capita <strong>in</strong>come per<br />
month<br />
Electricity<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
households %<br />
65.7<br />
Telephone<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
households %<br />
22.9<br />
LP Gas<br />
households %<br />
22.9<br />
Sector<br />
Urban<br />
86.8<br />
47.1<br />
57.7<br />
Rural<br />
64.2<br />
19.6<br />
18.8<br />
Estate<br />
37.1<br />
14.6<br />
2.5
We vs. Them<br />
1950 - 2000<br />
Per Capita Income <strong>in</strong> US$<br />
Country<br />
SRI LANKA<br />
JAPAN<br />
SINGAP<br />
1950-$<br />
89<br />
90<br />
30
Japan vs. <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />
Per Capita <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> US $<br />
Country<br />
SRI LANKA<br />
JAPAN<br />
SINGAPOR<br />
E<br />
1950-$<br />
89<br />
90<br />
30<br />
2000-$<br />
840<br />
32,000<br />
28,000
Growth Compared<br />
Country<br />
1950<br />
2000<br />
Growth %<br />
<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />
89<br />
840<br />
9<br />
Japan<br />
90<br />
32,000<br />
355<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gapore<br />
30<br />
28,000<br />
933<br />
Malaysia<br />
30<br />
3,420<br />
114
Why did this happen to us?<br />
1. No Long-term Vision<br />
2. Too much freedom / No discipl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
3. Giv<strong>in</strong>g every th<strong>in</strong>g, everyday, to<br />
everybody free of charge<br />
4. Work<strong>in</strong>g on wrong paradigms and<br />
conflict<strong>in</strong>g policies
Public Debt<br />
Central Bank Report 2002<br />
Year<br />
Total Rs.<br />
Millions<br />
As a<br />
GDP %<br />
As a<br />
GDP %<br />
As a<br />
GDP %<br />
(‘000)<br />
Domestic<br />
Foreign<br />
Total<br />
1950<br />
654<br />
13.7<br />
3.2<br />
16.9<br />
2000<br />
1,218,70<br />
0<br />
53.8<br />
43.1<br />
96.9<br />
2002<br />
1,669,28<br />
4<br />
59.8<br />
45.5<br />
105.3
War Expenditure<br />
Defense Budget 1998 – 2003 –<br />
Rs.Million<br />
Year<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
Rs.<br />
Mill.<br />
42,496<br />
40,071<br />
56,915<br />
54,242<br />
50,212<br />
49,721
Foreign Exchange<br />
Central Bank Report: 2002<br />
Year<br />
US$<br />
UK<br />
Pounds<br />
Japanese<br />
Yen<br />
1950<br />
Rs.4.76<br />
13.33<br />
0.01<br />
2000<br />
Rs.75.78<br />
114.78<br />
0.70
The Way Japanese<br />
Th<strong>in</strong>k<br />
Kuni<br />
Country<br />
Kaisha<br />
Organizatio<br />
n<br />
Kazoku<br />
Family<br />
Boku<br />
Self
Our GNP vs. Global 500<br />
2001 Our GNP was Rs. 1,377.1<br />
US $ Bil. 15.4<br />
2000 GLOBAL 500-World’s Larges Corporations<br />
RAN<br />
K<br />
1<br />
10<br />
20<br />
30<br />
34<br />
40<br />
41<br />
292<br />
CORPORATION<br />
GENERAL<br />
MOTORS<br />
ITOCHU<br />
NISSHO IWAI<br />
SONY<br />
HONDA<br />
FIAT<br />
NESTLE<br />
KAJIMA<br />
REV:$<br />
Bil<br />
176<br />
109<br />
65<br />
60<br />
54<br />
51<br />
49<br />
15 5<br />
EMPLOY<br />
EES<br />
388,000<br />
5,306<br />
18,446<br />
189,700<br />
112,000<br />
221,043<br />
230,929<br />
12 247
Honda’s Growth<br />
Mr Honda also started his company <strong>in</strong><br />
1948<br />
In year 2000 -34 rank /US$54 bil /112,000<br />
employees<br />
In year 2003 -25 rank / US$72 bil/ 131,800<br />
employees.<br />
2000 – 2003 – 33% growth, 9 positions up.<br />
If assumed <strong>in</strong> year 2003 – our GNP is<br />
US$ 20 billion, there are 248 companies<br />
are their bigger than our GNP. 248 th<br />
Company –Aventis (France)
<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong>’s s Largest Companies<br />
2001 GNP was Rs. 1,377.1<br />
1,377.1 (US $ Bil. 15.4)<br />
2000 TOP TEN In <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />
RANK<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
COMPANY NAME<br />
JOHN KEELS<br />
HAYLEYS<br />
HNB<br />
CENTRAL FINANCE<br />
NDB<br />
COMMERCIAL BANK<br />
DISTILLERIES COMPANY<br />
CEYLON TOBACCO COM.<br />
NESTLE<br />
AITKEN SPENCE<br />
REV:$ Bil<br />
0.105<br />
0.089<br />
0.078<br />
0.062<br />
0.046<br />
0.045<br />
0.043<br />
0.041<br />
0.0395<br />
0.0394
2004 Top Ten Companies<br />
Overall Performance<br />
1. Distilleries Company of <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong> (5.940)<br />
2. John Keels Hold<strong>in</strong>gs (5.750)<br />
3. <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong> Telecom (5.075)<br />
4. Hatton National Bank (4.160)<br />
5. Commercial Bank (4.065)<br />
6. Ceylon Tobacco Company (3.800)<br />
7. Aitken Spence & Company (3.565)<br />
8. Hayleys (3.060)<br />
9. DFCC (2.910)<br />
10. Carson Cumberbatch & Co. (2.850) -
Top Ten 2004<br />
Based on Turnover (‘000)<br />
1.<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong> Telecom –Rs.25,553,000<br />
2.John Keels Hold<strong>in</strong>gs – Rs.20,924,520<br />
3. Hayleys – Rs.15,476,576<br />
4. Hatton National Bank –Rs.15,158,444<br />
5. Seylan Bank – Rs.11.110,059<br />
6. Distilleries Co. SL – Rs.10,651,406<br />
7. CIC –Rs.10,018,981<br />
8. Commercial Bank – Rs.9,749,463<br />
9. Aitken Spence – Rs.9,049,244<br />
10. Central Fiance – Rs.8,408,531
Strategic Approach<br />
1995<br />
1990 2000<br />
1985<br />
1980<br />
1975<br />
2005<br />
Strategic<br />
2010<br />
1970
Effectiveness & Efficiency<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Do the right th<strong>in</strong>gs
<strong>Poverty</strong> Indices – District<br />
wise<br />
(Except N/E)<br />
District<br />
<strong>Poverty</strong><br />
Incidence<br />
District<br />
<strong>Poverty</strong><br />
Incidence<br />
Colombo<br />
10<br />
K’negala<br />
34<br />
Gampaha<br />
11<br />
Puttlam<br />
33<br />
Kalutara<br />
26<br />
A’pura<br />
33<br />
Kandy<br />
30<br />
P’naruwa<br />
27<br />
Matale<br />
35<br />
Badulla<br />
30<br />
Nuwaraeliya<br />
21<br />
M’gala<br />
49<br />
Galle<br />
25<br />
R’pura<br />
37<br />
Matara<br />
28<br />
Kegalle<br />
25<br />
H’tota<br />
27<br />
Sources: <strong>Poverty</strong> estimates: Gunawardana 2000;
GDP Shares and Average<br />
Growth (Prov<strong>in</strong>ce)<br />
Prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
Western<br />
North Western<br />
Central<br />
Sabaragamu<br />
wa<br />
Southern<br />
Eastern<br />
Uva<br />
North Central<br />
North<br />
1996<br />
43.5<br />
11.3<br />
10.6<br />
8.9<br />
9.1<br />
4.8<br />
5.0<br />
4.5<br />
2.4<br />
2000<br />
49.4<br />
10.4<br />
9.9<br />
9.3<br />
6.7<br />
4.5<br />
4.0<br />
3.8<br />
2.1<br />
Average<br />
Growth %<br />
3.3<br />
-1.8<br />
-1.6<br />
1.2<br />
-7.1<br />
-1.2<br />
-5.1<br />
-3.6<br />
-2.6
“Tada<br />
ga Ichiban<br />
Takai”–<br />
FREE IS MOST<br />
EXPENSIVE
DEAD MONEY<br />
&<br />
LIVE MONEY<br />
“Sh<strong>in</strong>igane – Ikigane”