15.02.2014 Views

Poverty Alleviation in Sri Lanka:

Poverty Alleviation in Sri Lanka:

Poverty Alleviation in Sri Lanka:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>Alleviation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong>:<br />

with special reference to Samurdhi<br />

(Prosperity) Movement<br />

By<br />

Sunil Jayantha Nawaratne<br />

Professor of Management & E-Commerce<br />

<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong> Institute of Information Technology<br />

Chairman<br />

Centre for Strategic Management


Contents<br />

<strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Global context<br />

<strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>in</strong> the South Asian Region<br />

Back ground of <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />

<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong>n Economic History<br />

<strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />

<strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>Alleviation</strong> Programs <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />

Samurdhi Movement of <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />

Samurdhi movement today<br />

It’s Strengths and Weaknesses<br />

Future of <strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>Alleviation</strong> of <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />

Future of Samurdhi Movement of <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />

Some comments on our Jo<strong>in</strong>t Research Project<br />

F<strong>in</strong>al Comments and Q&A sessions


<strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Global Context<br />

Def<strong>in</strong>ition :<br />

People liv<strong>in</strong>g with an<br />

<strong>in</strong>come of $1 a day –Low<br />

<strong>in</strong>come countries<br />

$2 a day – middle <strong>in</strong>come<br />

National <strong>Poverty</strong> Rate<br />

(NPR): – is the<br />

percentage of the<br />

population liv<strong>in</strong>g below<br />

that national poverty<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Different countries have<br />

different def<strong>in</strong>itions of<br />

poverty.<br />

The commonly used<br />

$1 a day standard,<br />

measured <strong>in</strong> 1985<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational prices<br />

and adjusted to local<br />

currency us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Purchas<strong>in</strong>g Power<br />

Parities (PPP).<br />

There are many<br />

problems related to<br />

this poverty l<strong>in</strong>e


<strong>Poverty</strong> Rates <strong>in</strong> the Regions<br />

Share of people liv<strong>in</strong>g on less than $1 a day (%)<br />

Sub-Saharan Africa 50%<br />

South Asia 36%<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a 20%<br />

East Asia and Pacific 19%<br />

Lat<strong>in</strong> America and Caribbean 12%<br />

Europe and Central Asia 8%<br />

Middle East and North<br />

Africa 5%<br />

(Source: World Development Indicators, Page 1)


<strong>Poverty</strong> In the Global Context<br />

Source: 2004 World Development Indicators, Page 55-56<br />

Country<br />

Algeria (1995)<br />

Bangladesh (1996)<br />

National <strong>Poverty</strong> L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

22.6%<br />

51%<br />

International <strong>Poverty</strong><br />

L<strong>in</strong>e($1)<br />

2% (1995)<br />

36% (2000)<br />

India (1993-94)<br />

Kenya (1994)<br />

Madagascar(97)<br />

Pakistan (1993)<br />

36%<br />

40%<br />

73%<br />

28.6%<br />

34.7% (2000)<br />

23%(1997)<br />

49.1% (1999)<br />

13.4% (1998)<br />

<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong> (1991)<br />

Zimbabwe (1991)<br />

20%<br />

25.8%<br />

6.6% (1996)<br />

36.0% (1991)


Extreme <strong>Poverty</strong><br />

1990 vs. 2001<br />

1990 ($1 a day)<br />

1,219 million people or<br />

28% of the low and<br />

middle-<strong>in</strong>come<br />

countries , lived <strong>in</strong> less<br />

than $1 a day.<br />

2001($1 a day)<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the next 11 years<br />

GDP of those countries<br />

grew 31%<br />

<strong>Poverty</strong> rate has fallen to<br />

21% or 1,100 million<br />

people <strong>in</strong> extreme<br />

poverty<br />

Population growth of<br />

those countries was 15%<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the period


Other Indicators of <strong>Poverty</strong><br />

Low Income<br />

Hunger<br />

Low education<br />

Gender <strong>in</strong>equality<br />

High child mortality<br />

Poor Maternal Health<br />

Poor Shelter<br />

Poor Infrastructure


Brief Introduction to <strong>Sri</strong><br />

<strong>Lanka</strong><br />

Historical Back Ground<br />

2550 years<br />

1505 – 1948- Portugese / Dutch / British<br />

1948 – 1977 – Closed Economy<br />

1977 – To date – Open Economy<br />

Overall Evaluation of <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong>


<strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>Alleviation</strong> of <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />

History of <strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>Alleviation</strong><br />

Janasaviya (peoples vigor)<br />

Samrudhi (Prosperity) Movement<br />

1994 – 2004<br />

2004 onwards


Reach<strong>in</strong>g MDGs<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />

(MDG=Millennium Development Goal)


Background<br />

In September 2000, all 189 UN member states<br />

adopted millennium declaration: There is wide<br />

spread political support <strong>in</strong> the development<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>stream – <strong>in</strong>ternationally and nationally<br />

People Centered and clear roles for all<br />

development partners (Governments,<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational Organizations, Citizens, CSOs<br />

and private sector): Scope for <strong>in</strong>ternalization<br />

and national capacity build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(CSO=Community Service Organization)<br />

Results oriented: MDGs are results based &<br />

can make <strong>in</strong>ternational <strong>in</strong>stitutions and<br />

governments more accountable for results.


UN & the MDGs – Core Strategy<br />

The guid<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciples for the overall strategy are<br />

that:<br />

(i) all 8 MDGs<br />

& their 18 targets are equally<br />

important;<br />

(ii) national ownership and participation will be pivotal<br />

to the achievement of the MDGs;<br />

(iii) partnership, with Governments but also with CSOs<br />

and the private sector, will be essential;<br />

(iv) much of the work required to achieve the MDGs is<br />

already underway but demands greater focus &<br />

urgency;<br />

(v) focus on MDGs neither dim<strong>in</strong>ishes nor precludes<br />

the important work of UN system <strong>in</strong> other mandated<br />

areas


8 Goals 18 Targets and 48 Indicators<br />

1<br />

GOAL 1 – Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

GOAL 2 – Achieve universal primary education<br />

GOAL 3 – Promote gender equality and empower<br />

women<br />

GOAL 4 – Reduce child mortality<br />

GOAL 5 – Improve maternal health<br />

GOAL 6 – Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other<br />

diseases<br />

GOAL 7 - Ensure environmental susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />

GOAL 8 – Develop global partnership for<br />

development


8 Goals & 18 targets at a glance<br />

Goal 1 : Extreme <strong>Poverty</strong> & Humber<br />

Half (1) extreme poverty and (2) hunger by 2015<br />

Goal 2 : Universal Primary Education<br />

3. Achieve Universal Primary Education by 2015<br />

Goal 3: Gender Equity<br />

4. Elim<strong>in</strong>ate disparity <strong>in</strong> all levels of education<br />

Goal 4 : Reduce Child Mortality<br />

5. Reduce under 5 and <strong>in</strong>fant mortality rate by 2/3<br />

Goal 5: Improve Maternal Health<br />

6. Reduce MMR by 75%<br />

Goal 6 : Combat HIV/AIDS, Malaria …<br />

7.Halt and reverse spread of HIV/AIDS; 8. Same for<br />

Malaria and other major diseases


Goals, targets & <strong>in</strong>dicators at a Glance<br />

Goal 7 : Ensure environmental susta<strong>in</strong>ability.<br />

9. Integrate “Susta<strong>in</strong>able Development” <strong>in</strong> national<br />

policies & progs & reverse loss of environmental<br />

resources. 10. Halve lack of access to safe dr<strong>in</strong>k water;<br />

11. Improve the situation of slums<br />

Goal 8: Develop a Global Partnership for<br />

development<br />

12. Open, rule-based trad<strong>in</strong>g & f<strong>in</strong>ancial system<br />

13. Address special needs of LDC<br />

14. Address special needs of Land locked Cos<br />

15. Deal with debt problems<br />

16. Dev. & implet. . strategies for youth employment<br />

17. Affordable essential drugs <strong>in</strong> dev. Cos<br />

18. Make available benefits of the new technologies<br />

especially <strong>in</strong>for. . & comm.


Goals, targets & <strong>in</strong>dicators at a glance<br />

Goals (8) & Targets (18)<br />

Goal 1 : Extreme <strong>Poverty</strong> &<br />

Hunger<br />

Halve (1) extreme poverty and (2)<br />

hunger by 2015<br />

Goal 2 : Universal Primary<br />

Education<br />

3. Achieve Universal Primary<br />

Education by 2015<br />

Goal 3: Gender Equity<br />

4. Elim<strong>in</strong>ate disparity <strong>in</strong> all levels of<br />

education<br />

Goal 4 : Reduce Child Mortality<br />

5. Reduce under 5 and <strong>in</strong>fant<br />

mortality rate by two – thirds<br />

Goal 5: Improve Maternal Health<br />

6. Reduce MMR by 75%<br />

Indicator(48)<br />

1. Population < $1;<br />

2. <strong>Poverty</strong> Gap ratio;<br />

3. share of consumption of poorest 20%;<br />

4. % of underweight >5y;<br />

5. % below m<strong>in</strong>. dietary energy consump.<br />

6. Net Primary Enrolment Ratio;<br />

7. % children reach<strong>in</strong>g Grade five;<br />

8. Literacy rate of 15-20<br />

9. Female Gross Primary Enrol Ratio as a %<br />

of male ratio;<br />

10. 15-20 M:F Literacy Ratio.<br />

11. Share of women <strong>in</strong> non agric. wage<br />

employment.<br />

12. % women MPs<br />

13.


Introduction<br />

Samurdhi means – Prosperity.<br />

Started <strong>in</strong> 1994 as the national poverty<br />

reduction program.<br />

It’s just an 11 year old movement but a<br />

strong and steady one.<br />

The orig<strong>in</strong>al concept was designed and<br />

developed by Hon. S.B. Dissanayake, who<br />

was the M<strong>in</strong>ister of Samurdhi, then.


Situation Now<br />

Today, it is a giant organization with a<br />

national network of CBOs as well as public<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istration network.<br />

(CBO=Community Based Organization.)<br />

At present, nearly 26,000 full-timers are<br />

engaged as “Change Agents” of the<br />

movement. 24,000 SDOs and 2,000<br />

graduate managers.<br />

(SDO=Samurdhi Development Officer)<br />

Nearly 2,000,000 families are covered.


Vision & Mission<br />

Samurdhi movement has a very clear<br />

Vision. Mission, Goals, Objectives,<br />

and Strategies.<br />

We will highlight the Vision and<br />

Mission here.


Vision<br />

Prosperous <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong> with<br />

M<strong>in</strong>imized <strong>Poverty</strong>


Mission<br />

Contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the national development<br />

through empowerment and graduation of<br />

the low-<strong>in</strong>come people out of <strong>Poverty</strong> L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

and reduc<strong>in</strong>g disparity <strong>in</strong> their livelihood <strong>in</strong><br />

the manner of participatory development<br />

through the process of identification and<br />

development of <strong>in</strong>nate abilities of the low<br />

<strong>in</strong>come families <strong>in</strong> the form of effective,<br />

efficient, susta<strong>in</strong>able and pro-poor poor manner.


Our Major Achievements<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the last 10 years the<br />

movements major achievements are<br />

as follows:


Our Formal & Informal<br />

Organizational Structure<br />

Samurdhi Movement is a comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

of both formal & <strong>in</strong>formal structures.<br />

Formal Structure<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry, Departments, Authority,<br />

District Secretaries, Divisional<br />

Secretaries, Areas(kalapa), Village<br />

Vasama (Grama Vasama).


Formal Structure<br />

MINISTRY OF SAMURDHI<br />

POOR RELIEF DEPARTMENT<br />

SUBSIDY PROGRAMME<br />

SAMURDHI AUTHORITY<br />

SAMURDHI COMMISIONER'S DEPARTMENT<br />

EMPOWERMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME SOCIAL INSURANCE AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPEMNT


Formal Structure<br />

National Level<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Level – 9 prov<strong>in</strong>ces (no<br />

office)<br />

District Level – 25 Districts<br />

Divisional Level – 323 Divisions<br />

Grama Vasam – 14,100 vasam<br />

Villages – 52,000 villages<br />

Families – 4,000,000 (total number)


Informal Structure<br />

Family level – 2,000,000<br />

5 member group – 326,000 groups<br />

Samurdhi Society – Village level<br />

Area (kalapa) Society – Area level – 1,000<br />

General union (Maha sangam) level – 179<br />

District level – 25<br />

National level – 1 ( Poor Peoples<br />

Parliament)


Major programs<br />

Programs are divided <strong>in</strong>to six major<br />

areas.<br />

1. Social Welfare (safety net)<br />

2. Social Insurance<br />

3. Infrastructure Development<br />

4. Micro Credit<br />

5. Income Generation<br />

6. Socio-cultural Development


Social Welfare<br />

Implemented by the department of<br />

poor relief.<br />

<strong>Poverty</strong> L<strong>in</strong>e – Rs. 1,500 per<br />

family/per month.<br />

Subsidy scheme – Rs. 1,000, 700,<br />

400, 350, 250, 140<br />

Total subsidy amount Rs.<br />

12,000,000,000.<br />

(US$120,000,000)


Samurdhi Subsidy Program<br />

by year 2005 – No. of Families<br />

9,6<br />

35<br />

mil.<br />

4,7<br />

42,<br />

70<br />

5<br />

2,0<br />

65,<br />

55<br />

4<br />

3<br />

6<br />

8,<br />

2<br />

5<br />

7<br />

2<br />

4<br />

4,<br />

4<br />

5<br />

7<br />

3<br />

6<br />

7,<br />

6<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

6<br />

4,<br />

2<br />

1<br />

8<br />

6<br />

1<br />

3,<br />

7<br />

8<br />

2<br />

7,<br />

8<br />

4<br />

0<br />

All<br />

Am<br />

ou<br />

nt<br />

Tot<br />

al<br />

Fa<br />

mil<br />

y<br />

Nu<br />

mb<br />

er<br />

Rs.<br />

1<br />

4<br />

0<br />

Rs.<br />

2<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Rs.<br />

3<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Rs.<br />

4<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Rs.<br />

6<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Rs.<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Dis<br />

tric<br />

t


Social Insurance Program<br />

Implemented by Samurdhi Commissioners<br />

Department<br />

Rs. 30 deducted from the subsidy and<br />

entitled for follow<strong>in</strong>gs:<br />

Death – Rs. 5,000<br />

Wedd<strong>in</strong>g – Rs. 3,000<br />

Child birth – Rs. 2,000<br />

Hospitalization – Rs. 1,500 (Rs.50 x 30 days)<br />

Educational Scholarship Program for AL<br />

students.<br />

6,000 students are gett<strong>in</strong>g this.


Infrastructure Development<br />

Program<br />

Implemented by Samurdhi Authority<br />

Participatory Development Approach<br />

Basic Material Cost from the<br />

Government and labor contribution<br />

from the beneficiaries.<br />

Up to now progress is as follows:


Rural Development Division<br />

Infrastructure development through<br />

community participation – Rs. 200<br />

million <strong>in</strong> year 2003.<br />

Bank build<strong>in</strong>g network development<br />

Canals, rural roads, steps, culvert,<br />

agro-wells, common amenities<br />

development<br />

One month subsidy donation program<br />

Ratnapura district – Kuruwita example


Micro Credit Program<br />

Samurdhi Bank network has been<br />

developed.<br />

At present 1010 banks are operat<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

(Includ<strong>in</strong>g North-East areas)<br />

Two types of sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Compulsory sav<strong>in</strong>gs: Rs. 100 from<br />

subsidy<br />

Voluntary sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Program progress is as follows:


Samurdhi Bank Program<br />

- Compulsory Sav<strong>in</strong>gs - Rs. 6 Billion<br />

- Voluntary Sav<strong>in</strong>gs – Rs. 4 Billion<br />

- Self Employment Loans<br />

- Agricultural Loans<br />

- Consumption Loans<br />

- Recovery Rate<br />

- Bad Debts


Socio-cultural Development<br />

Social Development, Human<br />

Resource Development, Youth &<br />

Cultural Development Programs are<br />

implemented.<br />

Samurdhi Hous<strong>in</strong>g Development<br />

Lottery<br />

Rs. 10 from subsidy<br />

Rs. 150,000 x 100 houses <strong>in</strong> a month.<br />

Up to now progress is as follows:


Social Development<br />

Anti smok<strong>in</strong>g, alcohol, and drug prevention<br />

program.<br />

Reduc<strong>in</strong>g Illiteracy program<br />

Suicide prevention and reduction program<br />

Anti smok<strong>in</strong>g flag day – hous<strong>in</strong>g<br />

development for acute poor ( Rs. 18 mil-<br />

2002) – 2000 houses<br />

Child care and widow mother development<br />

Specially tra<strong>in</strong>ed 450 SDOs are engaged


Youth and Cultural<br />

Development<br />

New division of the authority<br />

Alleviate poverty through youth<br />

development (empowerment)<br />

Vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Talent identification and development<br />

Organiz<strong>in</strong>g the youth and provide<br />

knowledge, <strong>in</strong>formation, attitude and<br />

skills


Income Generation Programs<br />

Also Implemented by SA.<br />

Agri-Bus<strong>in</strong>ess, Livestock<br />

Development, Small Industry<br />

Development, Market<strong>in</strong>g Network<br />

Development Programs.<br />

Up to now progress is as follows:


Agri- Development Division<br />

Forward contract<strong>in</strong>g – cutt<strong>in</strong>g flower &<br />

leaves, horticulture, organic rice and<br />

vegitable<br />

Export Oriented Agriculture<br />

New Technology – Drip / Spr<strong>in</strong>kler<br />

/Poli-Tunnels / Post-harvest<br />

technology<br />

42,000 families to be empowered <strong>in</strong><br />

2003


Livestock Development<br />

Reduction malnutrition and improve <strong>in</strong>come<br />

generation<br />

Back yard poultry / Goat farm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Sub-contract<strong>in</strong>g with private sector<br />

Nelana Farm + Samurdhi Program<br />

- cage for 1000 birds by the people<br />

- chicks, food, drugs and extension services<br />

from the company<br />

- after 42 days guaranteed purchase<br />

- average <strong>in</strong>come after 42 days per family –Rs.<br />

25000 – 30,000.<br />

( Nelana = a poultry company)


Small Industry Development<br />

Alleviate poverty through value<br />

addition<br />

Micro and small <strong>in</strong>dustry development<br />

red-clay, coconut fiber pots, garments,<br />

metal crushers, lime process<strong>in</strong>g, rice<br />

mill<strong>in</strong>g and pack<strong>in</strong>g, steel furniture,<br />

decorat<strong>in</strong>g lights, electric and<br />

electronics, wooden furniture for<br />

some examples.


Market<strong>in</strong>g Network<br />

Development<br />

Rural fair development – 300 rural fairs<br />

Home based retail shops<br />

Wholesale suppliers<br />

Door to door distribution (milk, bread, news<br />

paper, vegetables, etc.)<br />

Samurdhi Home Services Ltd.<br />

Ice-cream distribution through three<br />

wheelers – Cargils Magic Ice Cream


Ultimate Objective<br />

Graduation of low <strong>in</strong>come families from the<br />

poverty through total empowerment:<br />

Economic Empowerment<br />

Social Empowerment<br />

Cultural Empowerment<br />

Physical and Psychological Empowerment<br />

Political Empowerment (Leadership)


National Targets - 2003<br />

Contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the national economy more<br />

than the double the cost of the program<br />

Total Cost – Subsidy –Rs. 9 bil.<br />

Adm<strong>in</strong>. - Rs. 3.5 bil.<br />

Total - Rs. 12.5 bil<br />

Estimated total contribution – Rs. 28 bil<br />

In way of Income improvement,<br />

Infrastructure development, Hous<strong>in</strong>g<br />

development, and improved sav<strong>in</strong>gs.


Graduation from poverty<br />

Monthly <strong>in</strong>come has to be improved more<br />

that Rs. 5000<br />

Total families <strong>in</strong> the year 2003 – 200,000<br />

families.<br />

District allocation and divisional allocation<br />

is given to each district and divisional<br />

heads.<br />

Various poverty reduction plans:<br />

NPRP / DPRP/ DivPRP/ KPRP / VPRP


Investments <strong>in</strong><br />

Community Projects<br />

1995–2001 (Rs. mn)<br />

Year<br />

No. of District<br />

Secretariat<br />

No. of<br />

Divisional<br />

Secretary<br />

Divisions<br />

Investment<br />

s<br />

No. of<br />

Projects<br />

1995<br />

18<br />

235<br />

114.06<br />

11,306<br />

1996<br />

18<br />

235<br />

210.52<br />

11,640<br />

1997<br />

18<br />

235<br />

562.54<br />

11,288<br />

1998<br />

21<br />

283<br />

373.50<br />

6,061<br />

1999<br />

21<br />

283<br />

611.90<br />

13,206<br />

2000<br />

21<br />

294<br />

416.65<br />

6,071<br />

2001<br />

21<br />

301<br />

169.67<br />

2,005<br />

Total<br />

21<br />

301<br />

2458.84<br />

61,577


Community Dev. Projects<br />

Project Category<br />

Irrigation<br />

Canals/Dams/Anicuts<br />

Public Wells/Agri<br />

Wells/Small Scale<br />

Water Supply<br />

Schemes<br />

Transport/ Roads/<br />

Bridge / Culverts /<br />

Climb<strong>in</strong>g Steps<br />

Market<strong>in</strong>g Centers /<br />

Collection Centers/<br />

Public Facilities<br />

Total<br />

7,099 x Rs. 10,000<br />

12,428 x Rs. 50,000<br />

28,318 x Rs. 100,000<br />

5,443 x Rs. 10,000<br />

Actual Value<br />

70,990,000<br />

621,400,000<br />

2,831,800,000<br />

54,430,000<br />

( Anicut = a concrete dam <strong>in</strong> a canal)


3. Samurdhi Bank<strong>in</strong>g Program<br />

Sav<strong>in</strong>gs Program<br />

No. of Families<br />

Amount Rs.<br />

Million<br />

Compulsory<br />

886,055<br />

6,367<br />

Voluntary<br />

366,234<br />

(Small Groups)<br />

4,556<br />

Promoted<br />

by<br />

Change<br />

Agents?


Quantum & Value of Loans<br />

given by SBs<br />

Category<br />

Quantity<br />

Percentage<br />

Amount Rs.<br />

Million<br />

Percentage<br />

Agriculture<br />

192,514<br />

22.00<br />

1,084<br />

17.9<br />

Consumer<br />

41,074<br />

4.70<br />

46<br />

.8<br />

Fishery<br />

12,087<br />

1.40<br />

14.8<br />

.24<br />

Distress<br />

14,076<br />

1.60<br />

15.1<br />

.26<br />

Selfemployment<br />

613,595<br />

70.30<br />

4,869<br />

80.80<br />

Recovery %<br />

Default %<br />

Market<br />

Leader<br />

Micro F<strong>in</strong>.<br />

104.0<br />

3.5<br />

4 th <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Market


Labor Intensive People's Projects<br />

(LIPP)<br />

Special feature of this Programme<br />

is the expenditure 65% of the<br />

allocated provision for rural labor<br />

and balance 35% as the Capital.


Projects Constructed Under the Labour<br />

Intensive People's Projects (LIPP)<br />

Particulars<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

Total<br />

Total number of projects<br />

1,385<br />

571<br />

916<br />

2,872<br />

Small Tanks<br />

645<br />

183<br />

209<br />

1,037<br />

M<strong>in</strong>or irrigation<br />

587<br />

348<br />

595<br />

1,530<br />

Agro wells<br />

116<br />

24<br />

101<br />

241<br />

Other<br />

37<br />

16<br />

11<br />

64<br />

No. of beneficiaries<br />

92,005<br />

42,644<br />

83,202<br />

217,851<br />

Extent of land cultivated<br />

27,301<br />

21,254<br />

45,175<br />

93,730<br />

Number of labor units engaged<br />

-<br />

400,154<br />

678,826<br />

1,078,980<br />

Amount of expenditure Rs. million<br />

200<br />

100<br />

140<br />

440


Other Programs<br />

Program<br />

Small Industry Dev.<br />

Agriculture Dev.<br />

Animal Husbandry<br />

Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Development<br />

Social Security<br />

Program<br />

No. of families<br />

5,256<br />

4,326<br />

1,022<br />

8,173<br />

21,142<br />

All Implemented By<br />

the Change Agents<br />

Benefit<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g &<br />

Employment<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g & F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Projects<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g & F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Projects<br />

Weekly fairs, Trade<br />

Centers, Mobile<br />

Stalls<br />

Death/Marriage/Birth<br />

/ Ailments Relief


Budgetary Allocation and Actual Expenditure<br />

for Development Programmes – 1996 to 2002<br />

(Rs. mn)<br />

Year<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

Allocation<br />

400.0<br />

978.7<br />

930.0<br />

942.0<br />

500.0<br />

403.0<br />

50.0<br />

Expenditure<br />

308.5<br />

749.0<br />

991.0<br />

845.0<br />

564.0<br />

406.0<br />

32.4


Cost & Benefit of the Change<br />

Agents?<br />

Total Cost of SDOs & SMs<br />

28,000 x Rs.10,000 = Rs. 280,000,000<br />

If one officer can graduate 10 families out-of<br />

poverty trap by improv<strong>in</strong>g their <strong>in</strong>come up-to<br />

Rs.3,000 a month the Total Benefit will be 26,000<br />

x 10 x Rs. 3,000 = Rs.780,000,000<br />

If 200,000 families <strong>in</strong>come can be improved up-to<br />

Rs. 3,000 per month then = Rs.600,000,000<br />

If 100,000 families <strong>in</strong>come can be improved up-to<br />

Rs. 3,000 per month then = Rs. 300,000,000.


Samurdhi Movement Has Done<br />

a Lot<br />

Through our village based Change Agents<br />

has done a lot to Empower the Poor and<br />

Graduate them out of the <strong>Poverty</strong> Trap.<br />

It has a giant network<br />

Let’s use that network more Effectively and<br />

Efficiently through Pro-poor Approaches for<br />

the benefit of Poor People themselves.


Percentage of poor household by area and<br />

survey period<br />

Area<br />

<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />

2002<br />

Percentage of<br />

poor<br />

households<br />

23.9<br />

Survey Period<br />

1995/96 1990/91<br />

Percentage of<br />

poor<br />

households<br />

26.7<br />

Percentage of<br />

poor<br />

households<br />

30.4<br />

Sector<br />

Urban<br />

7.9<br />

13.4<br />

18.2<br />

Rural<br />

26.4<br />

28.7<br />

34.7<br />

Estate<br />

22.1<br />

26.1<br />

20.5


Per capita <strong>in</strong>come (average monthly) by<br />

area and poverty status of the<br />

household - 2002<br />

Area<br />

Mean per capita <strong>in</strong>come per<br />

month<br />

Non- poor<br />

households<br />

Rs.<br />

Ppoor<br />

households<br />

Rs.<br />

All households<br />

Rs.<br />

<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />

3709<br />

1341<br />

3048<br />

Sector<br />

Urban<br />

5654<br />

1435<br />

5243<br />

Rural<br />

3402<br />

1348<br />

2765<br />

Estate<br />

1928<br />

1135<br />

1707


Electricity, Telephone and LP Gas us<strong>in</strong>g;<br />

households (percentage) by area 2002<br />

Area<br />

<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />

Mean per capita <strong>in</strong>come per<br />

month<br />

Electricity<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

households %<br />

65.7<br />

Telephone<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

households %<br />

22.9<br />

LP Gas<br />

households %<br />

22.9<br />

Sector<br />

Urban<br />

86.8<br />

47.1<br />

57.7<br />

Rural<br />

64.2<br />

19.6<br />

18.8<br />

Estate<br />

37.1<br />

14.6<br />

2.5


We vs. Them<br />

1950 - 2000<br />

Per Capita Income <strong>in</strong> US$<br />

Country<br />

SRI LANKA<br />

JAPAN<br />

SINGAP<br />

1950-$<br />

89<br />

90<br />

30


Japan vs. <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />

Per Capita <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> US $<br />

Country<br />

SRI LANKA<br />

JAPAN<br />

SINGAPOR<br />

E<br />

1950-$<br />

89<br />

90<br />

30<br />

2000-$<br />

840<br />

32,000<br />

28,000


Growth Compared<br />

Country<br />

1950<br />

2000<br />

Growth %<br />

<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />

89<br />

840<br />

9<br />

Japan<br />

90<br />

32,000<br />

355<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gapore<br />

30<br />

28,000<br />

933<br />

Malaysia<br />

30<br />

3,420<br />

114


Why did this happen to us?<br />

1. No Long-term Vision<br />

2. Too much freedom / No discipl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

3. Giv<strong>in</strong>g every th<strong>in</strong>g, everyday, to<br />

everybody free of charge<br />

4. Work<strong>in</strong>g on wrong paradigms and<br />

conflict<strong>in</strong>g policies


Public Debt<br />

Central Bank Report 2002<br />

Year<br />

Total Rs.<br />

Millions<br />

As a<br />

GDP %<br />

As a<br />

GDP %<br />

As a<br />

GDP %<br />

(‘000)<br />

Domestic<br />

Foreign<br />

Total<br />

1950<br />

654<br />

13.7<br />

3.2<br />

16.9<br />

2000<br />

1,218,70<br />

0<br />

53.8<br />

43.1<br />

96.9<br />

2002<br />

1,669,28<br />

4<br />

59.8<br />

45.5<br />

105.3


War Expenditure<br />

Defense Budget 1998 – 2003 –<br />

Rs.Million<br />

Year<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

Rs.<br />

Mill.<br />

42,496<br />

40,071<br />

56,915<br />

54,242<br />

50,212<br />

49,721


Foreign Exchange<br />

Central Bank Report: 2002<br />

Year<br />

US$<br />

UK<br />

Pounds<br />

Japanese<br />

Yen<br />

1950<br />

Rs.4.76<br />

13.33<br />

0.01<br />

2000<br />

Rs.75.78<br />

114.78<br />

0.70


The Way Japanese<br />

Th<strong>in</strong>k<br />

Kuni<br />

Country<br />

Kaisha<br />

Organizatio<br />

n<br />

Kazoku<br />

Family<br />

Boku<br />

Self


Our GNP vs. Global 500<br />

2001 Our GNP was Rs. 1,377.1<br />

US $ Bil. 15.4<br />

2000 GLOBAL 500-World’s Larges Corporations<br />

RAN<br />

K<br />

1<br />

10<br />

20<br />

30<br />

34<br />

40<br />

41<br />

292<br />

CORPORATION<br />

GENERAL<br />

MOTORS<br />

ITOCHU<br />

NISSHO IWAI<br />

SONY<br />

HONDA<br />

FIAT<br />

NESTLE<br />

KAJIMA<br />

REV:$<br />

Bil<br />

176<br />

109<br />

65<br />

60<br />

54<br />

51<br />

49<br />

15 5<br />

EMPLOY<br />

EES<br />

388,000<br />

5,306<br />

18,446<br />

189,700<br />

112,000<br />

221,043<br />

230,929<br />

12 247


Honda’s Growth<br />

Mr Honda also started his company <strong>in</strong><br />

1948<br />

In year 2000 -34 rank /US$54 bil /112,000<br />

employees<br />

In year 2003 -25 rank / US$72 bil/ 131,800<br />

employees.<br />

2000 – 2003 – 33% growth, 9 positions up.<br />

If assumed <strong>in</strong> year 2003 – our GNP is<br />

US$ 20 billion, there are 248 companies<br />

are their bigger than our GNP. 248 th<br />

Company –Aventis (France)


<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong>’s s Largest Companies<br />

2001 GNP was Rs. 1,377.1<br />

1,377.1 (US $ Bil. 15.4)<br />

2000 TOP TEN In <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong><br />

RANK<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

COMPANY NAME<br />

JOHN KEELS<br />

HAYLEYS<br />

HNB<br />

CENTRAL FINANCE<br />

NDB<br />

COMMERCIAL BANK<br />

DISTILLERIES COMPANY<br />

CEYLON TOBACCO COM.<br />

NESTLE<br />

AITKEN SPENCE<br />

REV:$ Bil<br />

0.105<br />

0.089<br />

0.078<br />

0.062<br />

0.046<br />

0.045<br />

0.043<br />

0.041<br />

0.0395<br />

0.0394


2004 Top Ten Companies<br />

Overall Performance<br />

1. Distilleries Company of <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong> (5.940)<br />

2. John Keels Hold<strong>in</strong>gs (5.750)<br />

3. <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong> Telecom (5.075)<br />

4. Hatton National Bank (4.160)<br />

5. Commercial Bank (4.065)<br />

6. Ceylon Tobacco Company (3.800)<br />

7. Aitken Spence & Company (3.565)<br />

8. Hayleys (3.060)<br />

9. DFCC (2.910)<br />

10. Carson Cumberbatch & Co. (2.850) -


Top Ten 2004<br />

Based on Turnover (‘000)<br />

1.<strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong> Telecom –Rs.25,553,000<br />

2.John Keels Hold<strong>in</strong>gs – Rs.20,924,520<br />

3. Hayleys – Rs.15,476,576<br />

4. Hatton National Bank –Rs.15,158,444<br />

5. Seylan Bank – Rs.11.110,059<br />

6. Distilleries Co. SL – Rs.10,651,406<br />

7. CIC –Rs.10,018,981<br />

8. Commercial Bank – Rs.9,749,463<br />

9. Aitken Spence – Rs.9,049,244<br />

10. Central Fiance – Rs.8,408,531


Strategic Approach<br />

1995<br />

1990 2000<br />

1985<br />

1980<br />

1975<br />

2005<br />

Strategic<br />

2010<br />

1970


Effectiveness & Efficiency<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Effectiveness<br />

Do the right th<strong>in</strong>gs


<strong>Poverty</strong> Indices – District<br />

wise<br />

(Except N/E)<br />

District<br />

<strong>Poverty</strong><br />

Incidence<br />

District<br />

<strong>Poverty</strong><br />

Incidence<br />

Colombo<br />

10<br />

K’negala<br />

34<br />

Gampaha<br />

11<br />

Puttlam<br />

33<br />

Kalutara<br />

26<br />

A’pura<br />

33<br />

Kandy<br />

30<br />

P’naruwa<br />

27<br />

Matale<br />

35<br />

Badulla<br />

30<br />

Nuwaraeliya<br />

21<br />

M’gala<br />

49<br />

Galle<br />

25<br />

R’pura<br />

37<br />

Matara<br />

28<br />

Kegalle<br />

25<br />

H’tota<br />

27<br />

Sources: <strong>Poverty</strong> estimates: Gunawardana 2000;


GDP Shares and Average<br />

Growth (Prov<strong>in</strong>ce)<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

Western<br />

North Western<br />

Central<br />

Sabaragamu<br />

wa<br />

Southern<br />

Eastern<br />

Uva<br />

North Central<br />

North<br />

1996<br />

43.5<br />

11.3<br />

10.6<br />

8.9<br />

9.1<br />

4.8<br />

5.0<br />

4.5<br />

2.4<br />

2000<br />

49.4<br />

10.4<br />

9.9<br />

9.3<br />

6.7<br />

4.5<br />

4.0<br />

3.8<br />

2.1<br />

Average<br />

Growth %<br />

3.3<br />

-1.8<br />

-1.6<br />

1.2<br />

-7.1<br />

-1.2<br />

-5.1<br />

-3.6<br />

-2.6


“Tada<br />

ga Ichiban<br />

Takai”–<br />

FREE IS MOST<br />

EXPENSIVE


DEAD MONEY<br />

&<br />

LIVE MONEY<br />

“Sh<strong>in</strong>igane – Ikigane”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!