targeting pain in older people in the acute care ... - Keele University
targeting pain in older people in the acute care ... - Keele University
targeting pain in older people in the acute care ... - Keele University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
TARGETING PAIN IN<br />
OLDER PEOPLE IN THE<br />
ACUTE CARE SETTING<br />
Isabel Higg<strong>in</strong>s<br />
Professor of Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Older Person Care,<br />
Collaborat<strong>in</strong>g Centre for Older Person <strong>care</strong>: RCGHA<br />
School of Nurs<strong>in</strong>g and Midwifery, <strong>University</strong> of<br />
Newcastle & CPOD Hunter New England Health
TARGETING PAIN TEAM<br />
‣ Carol<strong>in</strong>e Phelan CNS<br />
‣ Fiona Hodson CNC 3<br />
‣ Peter Summons Senior lecturer TUN<br />
‣ Jeanene Douglas CNS<br />
‣ L<strong>in</strong>da Ritchard CNC 3<br />
‣ Debbie Bruce CNS OPAC<br />
‣ Glody Mabbott RN<br />
‣ Paul<strong>in</strong>e Dobson CNC 3
Fund<strong>in</strong>g support<br />
‣ Nurs<strong>in</strong>g and Midwifery Office NSW Health<br />
‣ Department of Medic<strong>in</strong>e, John Hunter<br />
Hospital, Hunter New England Health,<br />
New South Wales, Australia.
The Campus<br />
‣ Environmental “Bush-Land” campus<br />
‣ Large grounds
The Location<br />
‣City/beach <strong>University</strong>
The location
The location
The location
The location
The problem of <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
‣ Pa<strong>in</strong> is common <strong>in</strong> <strong>older</strong> <strong>people</strong> (Ferrell et al., 1995<br />
Madjar & Higg<strong>in</strong>s, 1996, 2004)<br />
‣ Persistent <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> is common (Ferrell et al., Madjar & Higg<strong>in</strong>s,<br />
1996, 2004)<br />
‣ Multiple sources and types of <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> are common<br />
(Madjar & Higg<strong>in</strong>s, 1996, 2004)<br />
‣ Hospitalised <strong>older</strong> patients experience high<br />
levels of unrelieved <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> (Yates et al., 1998; NICS, 2003)
The problem of <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
‣ There are many barriers to assessment of <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>older</strong> <strong>people</strong><br />
• Older <strong>people</strong> under-report <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
• Fear be<strong>in</strong>g labelled a compla<strong>in</strong>er<br />
• They regard <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> as a part of grow<strong>in</strong>g old<br />
• Fear of addiction<br />
• Perceive that health <strong>care</strong> workers too busy<br />
• No expectation for <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> relief<br />
• Poor knowledge of staff about <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> and <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> relief<br />
• Attitudes of staff towards <strong>older</strong> <strong>people</strong> and <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
(Blomquist et al., 2003; Brockopp et al., 1996; Madjar & Higg<strong>in</strong>s, 1996, 2004)
The problem of <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
‣ Assessment of <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> is rarely documented (Idval et<br />
al., 2002)<br />
‣ Staff often underestimate and under-treat <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>older</strong> person (Idval et al., 2002)<br />
‣ Precipitat<strong>in</strong>g factor for delirium (Inouye, 2001)<br />
‣ Pa<strong>in</strong> may h<strong>in</strong>der recovery and prolong<br />
hospitalization<br />
• associated with depression, anxiety, cognitive<br />
impairment, decreased appetite, weight loss, and<br />
disturbances to sleep, gait, general activity, mood and<br />
relationships with o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>people</strong>.<br />
Strassels, Chen & Carr, 2002
The problem of <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
‣ Organisations do not make <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
management part of <strong>the</strong>ir core bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
‣ Health professionals outside of <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
services do not assess or document <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
NICS, 2003
Sett<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> study<br />
‣ Large 600 bed tertiary referral hospital <strong>in</strong><br />
regional NSW Australia<br />
‣ 32 bed mixed medical and surgical ward<br />
‣ Specialis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> neurosurgical and neuromedical<br />
patients<br />
‣ Incorporat<strong>in</strong>g a stroke unit
Purpose of <strong>the</strong> study<br />
‣ To profile <strong>the</strong> management of <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>older</strong><br />
<strong>people</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>acute</strong> <strong>care</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g
Aims of <strong>the</strong> study<br />
‣ To determ<strong>in</strong>e whe<strong>the</strong>r a multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
education program designed to focus on <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
management <strong>in</strong> <strong>older</strong> <strong>people</strong> improves <strong>the</strong><br />
detection and management of <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> this<br />
group<br />
‣ To evaluate <strong>the</strong> project us<strong>in</strong>g pre and post<br />
audit mechanisms and qualitative <strong>in</strong>terviews<br />
with patients and staff
Study design<br />
‣ Pre post audit evaluation study on one ward<br />
‣ Six phases<br />
• Pre study chart audit (n=20)<br />
• Cl<strong>in</strong>ical guidel<strong>in</strong>e development<br />
• Multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> education program development<br />
• Promotional media development “Target<strong>in</strong>g <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong>”<br />
• Post chart audit (n=20)<br />
• Patient <strong>in</strong>terviews (n=4) & survey (n=10)<br />
• Focus group with staff (n=3)
Education program<br />
‣ Multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
‣ Targeted all discipl<strong>in</strong>e groups<br />
‣ For nurses relied on tra<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tra<strong>in</strong>er<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g 20% target<br />
‣ Focused on <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> assessment and<br />
management<br />
‣ Documentation<br />
‣ Range of assessment tools provided
Pa<strong>in</strong> let me know
Division of Medic<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Division of Medic<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Currently Target<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Currently Target<strong>in</strong>g
Chart audit data<br />
‣ Age<br />
‣ Gender<br />
‣ Relevant medical history<br />
‣ Diagnosis<br />
‣ Pa<strong>in</strong> assessment<br />
‣ Analgesia, nature and type, efficacy<br />
‣ Nurse <strong>in</strong>itiated strategies
Participants<br />
‣ Older adults over 65 years admitted to<br />
neuro medical/surgical ward<br />
‣ Able to give <strong>in</strong>formed consent<br />
‣ Consent<strong>in</strong>g staff:<br />
• Nurses<br />
• Physio<strong>the</strong>rapists<br />
• Speech pathologists<br />
• Medical officers
Data analysis<br />
‣ Descriptive statistics - chart audit data<br />
‣ Content analysis - qualitative data
F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs – chart audit<br />
‣ Increased <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> assessment from pre chart audit<br />
by nurses<br />
‣ Increased documentation <strong>in</strong> progress notes and<br />
observations charts<br />
‣ Increased use <strong>in</strong> analgesics – paracetamol<br />
‣ Efficacy noted<br />
‣ Non pharmacological approaches noted pre or<br />
post audit
Chart audit<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
Pa<strong>in</strong> Assmnt on<br />
Admission<br />
Pa<strong>in</strong> Assmnt<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g Admission<br />
Analgesia given <strong>in</strong><br />
last 24hrs<br />
Documentation of<br />
Efficacy<br />
Multimodal<br />
Analgesia Used<br />
Pre Education Audit<br />
Post Education Audit
Patient survey data<br />
‣ 50% of patients received <strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
management<br />
‣ The average <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> score was 6.4<br />
‣ 40% of patients said <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong>terfered with ADLs<br />
‣ 30% of patients said <strong>the</strong>y did not have to ask for<br />
analgesia<br />
‣ 50% of patients waited less than 10 m<strong>in</strong>utes for<br />
<strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> relief when it was requested.<br />
‣ 70% of patients were satisfied with <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
management
Patient <strong>in</strong>terview<br />
‣ There was a high degree of satisfaction<br />
with <strong>care</strong> and attention to <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
‣ The badges worn by nurs<strong>in</strong>g staff were<br />
noticed by family and staff:<br />
• “it sort of allows you to talk about <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong>”<br />
‣ Patients use a range of strategies at home<br />
to relieve <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g distraction
Focus group <strong>in</strong>terview<br />
‣ The badges were useful because <strong>the</strong>y drew attention to<br />
<strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
‣ Posters were not noticed as readily as <strong>the</strong> badges<br />
‣ Participants suggested self directed learn<strong>in</strong>g packages<br />
allow staff to pace <strong>the</strong>ir own learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />
‣ Case based scenarios were thought to be an appropriate<br />
approach to learn<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
‣ Short <strong>in</strong>-service approaches were not as effective as<br />
extended education programs<br />
‣ A range of strategies are used by nurses to alleviate <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g position<strong>in</strong>g and re position<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> patient
F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs - focus group<br />
‣ I remember <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>-service but…I don’t remember tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
anyth<strong>in</strong>g away from it…I mean you know, we got <strong>the</strong><br />
badge and we were told to be more on <strong>the</strong> lookout for<br />
patient’s <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong>. And that’s what I did.<br />
‣ And that’s what you did. So, was <strong>the</strong>re a presentation<br />
around what sorts of <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> tools to use?<br />
‣ I don’t remember.<br />
‣ It wasn’t someth<strong>in</strong>g that like stuck <strong>in</strong> my m<strong>in</strong>d, and I<br />
thought was really good or really bad, I just…
Discussion<br />
‣ The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of this study show a slight improvement <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> assessment and management of <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>older</strong><br />
<strong>people</strong>.<br />
‣ Us<strong>in</strong>g an educational approach supported by visual<br />
media may be effective. In particular, <strong>the</strong> use of badges<br />
serve to profile <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> as a focus of <strong>care</strong>.<br />
‣ Patient survey data suggest that patients cont<strong>in</strong>ue to<br />
have high levels of <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> despite <strong>the</strong>ir reported<br />
satisfaction.<br />
‣ There may be a range of self <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> relief<br />
strategies used by patients that nurses could facilitate<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g hospitalisation.<br />
‣ Alternative educational approaches/strategies to <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
education were suggested by participants.
Recommendations<br />
‣ The pilot study highlighted several design issues<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> need to;<br />
• ref<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> audit tool to ensure validity of data collected<br />
• engage medical and allied Health staff <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> research process<br />
from <strong>the</strong> outset<br />
• review and re design <strong>the</strong> education program and general<br />
approaches used to <strong>in</strong>clude non pharmacological approaches to<br />
<strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> management, case studies, self directed learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />
supplemented with extended education days.<br />
• encourage use of algorithms<br />
• redesign badges to be more visually appeal<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• explore alternative approaches to placement of <strong>target<strong>in</strong>g</strong> signs<br />
such as computer screen saver.<br />
• develop localised <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>es for <strong>the</strong> management of <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>older</strong> <strong>people</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>acute</strong> <strong>care</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g
References<br />
‣ Blomqvist, K, (2003) Older <strong>people</strong> <strong>in</strong> persistent <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong>: nurs<strong>in</strong>g and paramedical staff perceptions<br />
and <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> management. Journal of Advanced Nurs<strong>in</strong>g,41, 575-584<br />
‣ Brockopp, D., Warden, S., Colclough, G. & Brockopp, G. (1996). Elderly <strong>people</strong>’s knowledge of<br />
and attitudes to <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> management. British Journal of Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 5(9). 556-562.<br />
‣ Chodosh J., Ferrell B., Shekelle M., & Wegner M. (2001. Quality <strong>in</strong>dicators for <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> management<br />
<strong>in</strong> vulnerable elders. Annals of Internal Medic<strong>in</strong>e 135(8): 731-735.<br />
‣ Ferrell, B. A., Ferrell, B. R. & Rivera, L. (1995). Pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> cognitively impaired nurs<strong>in</strong>g home<br />
patients. Journal of Pa<strong>in</strong> and Symptom Management 10(8), 591-598.<br />
‣ Idval, E. & Ehrenberg, A. (2002) Nurs<strong>in</strong>g documentation of postoperative <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> management.<br />
Journal of Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 11, 734-742<br />
‣ Inouye, S., Foreman, M., Mion, L., Katz, K., & Cooney, L. J. 2001. Nurse's recognition of delirium<br />
and its symptoms. Archives of Internal Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 161(Nov 12), 2467-2473.<br />
‣ Higg<strong>in</strong>s, I., Madjar, I., & Walton, J. (2004) Chronic <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> elderly nurs<strong>in</strong>g home residents: The<br />
need for nurs<strong>in</strong>g leadership. Journal of Advanced Nurs<strong>in</strong>g. 12, 167-173.<br />
‣ Madjar, I. & Higg<strong>in</strong>s, I. (1996a, August). The adequacy of <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> relief measures <strong>in</strong> elderly nurs<strong>in</strong>g<br />
home residents. Poster session presented at <strong>the</strong> 8th World Congress on Pa<strong>in</strong>, Vancouver,<br />
Canada.<br />
‣ Potter V., Wiseman C., Dunn S., & Boyle F (2003) Patient barriers to optimal cancer <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong> control.<br />
Psycho-oncology, 12: 153-160.<br />
‣ Strassels, S, Chen, C (2002) Postoperative analgesia: economics, resources use, and patient<br />
satisfaction <strong>in</strong> an urban teach<strong>in</strong>g hospital, Anes<strong>the</strong>tics and Analgesia, 94: 130-137.<br />
‣ Yates P., Edwards H., Fentiman B., Najman J., Nash R et al., (1998). The prevalence of <strong>pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
amongst hospital <strong>in</strong> patients. Journal of Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 7: 521-530.<br />
‣ National Institute of Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Studies (2003), Australia.