20.03.2014 Views

Burma: Census of India 1901 Vol. I - Khamkoo

Burma: Census of India 1901 Vol. I - Khamkoo

Burma: Census of India 1901 Vol. I - Khamkoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

arid<br />

-<br />

policy<br />

REPORT ON THE CENSUS OF BURMA. 139<br />

the total population <strong>of</strong> the province. As in 189 1 the total <strong>of</strong> farm servants was<br />

insignificant. The;, great bulk <strong>of</strong> the agricultural community returned itself as<br />

cultivators pure and simple (le 16k) for which occupation No. 39 (Field labourers)<br />

was thought' the '-nearest equivalent. The total returned under this head was<br />

4,322,1 20. > It must be admitted that the classification <strong>of</strong> agricultural callings adopted<br />

was not specially suited to the requirements <strong>of</strong> the Province. The term<br />

*'<br />

Rent payers " would properly cover the very large class <strong>of</strong> State land workers in<br />

Upper <strong>Burma</strong> who pay rent for their holdings direct to Government, and if it had<br />

been decided to require all agriculturists in Upper <strong>Burma</strong> to state whether the<br />

land they worked was bobabaing or State it might have been possible to secure<br />

fuller returns for occupation number 36 than were actually obtained. An instruction<br />

<strong>of</strong> this nature would, however, have been directly opposed to the <strong>of</strong><br />

:<br />

dissociating the- <strong>Census</strong> as far as possible in the minds <strong>of</strong> the people from<br />

revenue, collection and it has thus been found necessary to sacrifice a certain<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> detail to the susceptibilities <strong>of</strong> the enumerated. _ It is, moreover, a question<br />

whether in a country like <strong>Burma</strong> the duty <strong>of</strong> differentiating nicely between the<br />

various classes <strong>of</strong> agriculturists is one which need be thrown upon the -<strong>Census</strong><br />

^department. One thing seems, in the light <strong>of</strong>. the 1891 enumeration, clear enough,<br />

that is,, that <strong>of</strong> the total <strong>of</strong> 286,182 actual workers returned under the head <strong>of</strong><br />

"Rent receivers " only a portion consisted <strong>of</strong> persons who worked no portion <strong>of</strong><br />

the land -they owned. The total <strong>of</strong> taungya or .jhum. cultivators and, dependents<br />

In ,1891 the taungya cutters were classed with. market gardeners<br />

was 1,416,65-1.;<br />

or ^vegetable growers, and -their- precise total is not now ascertainable. ;It,rnustj<br />

however, have been far below the 190-1 figure. I am led to hold this view because<br />

an examination <strong>of</strong> the district -totals showed me that the abstraction staff had<br />

classified as taungya cutters a number <strong>of</strong> agriculturists who must in reality have<br />

cultivated- millet, sesamum and other ya or upland crops in the dry .districts <strong>of</strong><br />

Upper <strong>Burma</strong>.<br />

210.. Inconsequence <strong>of</strong> the classification <strong>of</strong> taungya cutters adopted in<br />

. _ , . , . i8qi, the total <strong>of</strong> growers <strong>of</strong> special products is far<br />

-'<br />

Growers<strong>of</strong> special -products.<br />

,, ., *? * , .. ,<br />

-<br />

smaller .now than ten years ago. 1 he items under<br />

this head exhibit no features <strong>of</strong> special interest. The record <strong>of</strong> occupations in<br />

the Shan States has resulted in a.large return <strong>of</strong> tea growers. In 1891 the total<br />

<strong>of</strong> -tea planters,>&Ci, was shown with other totals under a head .the bulk <strong>of</strong> which<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> tobacco, growers, and it ;is impossible now. to gauge the extent <strong>of</strong><br />

the "increase, if,any, under tea cultivation. Sub-order 13 now comprises besides<br />

agricultural training and supervision, the figures for Forests, so no pr<strong>of</strong>itable<br />

:<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> the sub-order totals <strong>of</strong> the two enumerations is practicable. The<br />

heading, '•' Directors <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and their, staff " included Superintendents and<br />

Inspectors <strong>of</strong> Land Records. Who the .87 persons returned as agricultural<br />

chemists and experts were is not quite clear. Class B shows a higher percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> dependents than actual workers. The figures are 42*4 for the latter and 57'.^<br />

for .the former. In all 99*8 per cent, <strong>of</strong> the persons represented in this class yvere<br />

country dwellers. and only o'2 per cent, were enumerated in the two cities <strong>of</strong> the<br />

^Province.<br />

-2i*i, The^total <strong>of</strong> persons' partially dependent upon agriculture for {their<br />

living has been returned as 47,524^^ whom 31,648<br />

Partially.a^r^Itunsts.<br />

are mai es and :IS) 8 7<br />

6 females. The majority <strong>of</strong><br />

thdse'partially agriculturists were enumerated in -rural areas, ithe:total for :the.;twp<br />

cities df^RangooWand'Mahdalay being 3,507 malesandj^efemales.only,,,. Sub T<br />

sldiary'TableNoilXBappendedto this chapter, indicates ;what:pro.portion-the.pecsons<br />

erf this kind comprised in each <strong>of</strong> the -eight occupation classes bear -to the>tqtal<br />

trfthe classv Their- distribution over the districts and townships <strong>of</strong> the rPrpyincft<br />

can best be gathered from the Provincial Tables. The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!