19.04.2014 Views

Eco Today - Mar10:ET Master Page 2007 - ASKnLearn

Eco Today - Mar10:ET Master Page 2007 - ASKnLearn

Eco Today - Mar10:ET Master Page 2007 - ASKnLearn

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

trade. Indeed, the WTO (previously<br />

GATT), has spent the past 65 years<br />

encouraging nations to reduce trade<br />

barriers through a series of rounds of<br />

talks. The last US president, George<br />

Bush, pledged that:<br />

of welfare to the country concerned,<br />

might they still be justified in terms of<br />

equity/fairness?<br />

4. Research and evaluate the argu -<br />

ments involved in (a) the ‘Banana<br />

War’, (b) President Obama’s decision<br />

to impose a tariff on the import of<br />

tyres from China.<br />

5. Is it necessarily correct to say that<br />

the imposition of a tariff will improve<br />

the balance of payments on current<br />

account?<br />

❝The United States is ready to<br />

eliminate all tariffs and subsidies<br />

and other barriers to the free flow of<br />

goods and services as other nations<br />

do the same.<br />

On 1 January 2010, China joined South<br />

East Asia to create a free-trade zone with<br />

a population of 1.9 billion people.<br />

Nevertheless, trade disputes abound<br />

and the current round of WTO talks, the<br />

Doha Round which began in 2001, still<br />

has no end in sight. Special circum -<br />

stances continue to provide govern -<br />

ments with grounds for the use of<br />

protectionist policies. For example, in<br />

November 2009, the USA imposed tariffs<br />

on Chinese oil well pipes, citing the antidumping<br />

argument. In your answers, the<br />

examiners will expect you not only to<br />

outline the arguments for and against<br />

free trade and protectionism, but to<br />

evaluate the relative strengths of these<br />

arguments.<br />

Assessing the welfare losses that<br />

result from protectionism is, of course,<br />

far from easy. However, one study has<br />

estimated that a 40% reduction in all<br />

tariffs would result in an annual increase<br />

in global GDP of $70 billion, and that<br />

around 75% of this would accrue to less<br />

developed countries. A US study has<br />

suggested that trade barriers of all kinds<br />

are costing its citizens as much as<br />

$19 billion a year in higher prices.<br />

Another study argues that agricultural<br />

subsidies in the EU, aimed largely at<br />

discouraging imports, cost $360 billion<br />

per year, ‘enough to send all of the<br />

56 million cows in the EU around the<br />

world on a first class airline ticket each<br />

year’.<br />

Questions for discussion<br />

1. What questions might we ask about<br />

the study that suggests that a 40%<br />

cut in tariffs would raise global GDP<br />

by $70 billion per annum?<br />

2. Evaluate, in greater detail, one of the<br />

arguments raised in the article in<br />

favour of protectionism.<br />

3. Although economic theory suggests<br />

that tariffs result in a deadweight loss<br />

Summary of key points<br />

There are overwhelming economic arguments in favour of free<br />

international trade, most notably those based upon specialisation and<br />

the Laws of Absolute and Comparative Advantage.<br />

A country that specialises in the production of products in which it<br />

has a comparative advantage can consume beyond its production<br />

possibility curve, as illustrated by the concept of the consumption<br />

possibility curve.<br />

Arguments in support of protectionist policies such as the infant<br />

industry argument, the industrialisation and diversification argument,<br />

the job protection argument and the anti-dumping argument, although<br />

superficially plausible, are generally flawed in economic terms.<br />

Despite the energies and achievements of the WTO and the increase in<br />

the number and size of Free Trade Areas, trade disputes involving<br />

protectionist policies continue to abound.<br />

There is an ever growing body of evidence to show that significant<br />

increases in global welfare would result from further reductions in<br />

barriers to free trade.<br />

with Chief Examiner,<br />

Robert Nutter<br />

1. The ‘Buy American’ clause in the $800bn (£567bn) economic recovery<br />

package introduced by President Obama in early 2009 caused controversy<br />

in the European Union.<br />

Investigate the details of the clause and why the EU were so opposed to it.<br />

http://news.bbc.co.uk<br />

2. China and the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) established<br />

the world's biggest free trade area in December 2009, covering a market of<br />

1.7 billion consumers.<br />

(i) Investigate the key principles and objectives of ASEAN.<br />

(ii) What are likely to be the economic benefits of China’s agreement with<br />

ASEAN?<br />

http://www.aseansec.org<br />

3. All members of the European Union (EU) are members of the European<br />

<strong>Eco</strong>nomic Area (EEA) but there are some non-EU countries in the EEA.<br />

Research the origins of the EEA and why countries such as Norway are<br />

EEA members but not members of the EU.<br />

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_<strong>Eco</strong>nomic_Area<br />

4. Mercosur was created in 1991 by the Treaty of Asuncion and encompasses<br />

four Latin American countries: Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay.<br />

Investigate the aims and objectives of Mercosur.<br />

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercosur<br />

26 M ARCH 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!