International Journal of Contemporary Business Studies
International Journal of Contemporary Business Studies
International Journal of Contemporary Business Studies
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>International</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Contemporary</strong> <strong>Business</strong> <strong>Studies</strong><br />
Vol: 3, No: 11. November, 2012 ISSN 2156-7506<br />
Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />
12 c Responses regarding the importance <strong>of</strong> job security<br />
Rank No. <strong>of</strong> respondents Percentage<br />
1 99 33.00<br />
2 90 30.00<br />
3 30 10.00<br />
4 36 12.00<br />
5 24 8.00<br />
6 9 3.00<br />
7 12 4.00<br />
8 0 0.00<br />
It can be inferred from the above table that job security was ranked 1st by 33 % <strong>of</strong> the<br />
respondents and .Also approximately 52 % <strong>of</strong> the respondents have given ranks between 2 to 4<br />
for position .So we can infer that job security is a very important factor at this time <strong>of</strong> job<br />
uncertainty because <strong>of</strong> recession.<br />
12 d Responses regarding the importance <strong>of</strong> good relationship with boss<br />
Rank No. <strong>of</strong> respondents Percentage<br />
1 0 0.00<br />
2 12 4.00<br />
3 24 8.00<br />
4 36 12.00<br />
5 18 6.00<br />
6 42 14.00<br />
7 75 25.00<br />
8 93 31.00<br />
It can be inferred that good relationship with boss was not ranked 1 by any <strong>of</strong> the respondents and<br />
it was ranked 2nd by 8 % <strong>of</strong> the respondents. Maximum <strong>of</strong> the Respondents, 70% have ranked it<br />
between 6 to 8, it proves that good relationship with boss might not be a main criteria but it does<br />
make an impact on the employee.<br />
12 e Responses regarding the importance <strong>of</strong> being treated fairly<br />
Rank No. <strong>of</strong> respondents Percentage<br />
1 9 3.00<br />
2 6 2.00<br />
3 18 6.00<br />
4 45 15.00<br />
5 57 19.00<br />
6 69 23.00<br />
7 51 17.00<br />
8 45 15.00<br />
It can be inferred from the above table that being treated fairly was ranked 1 by 3 % <strong>of</strong> the<br />
respondents and rank 2 by 2 % <strong>of</strong> the respondents. The highest percentage <strong>of</strong> the respondents 23<br />
Copyright © 2012. Academy <strong>of</strong> Knowledge Process<br />
28