âNOTICE 80 provides clarity on the investible universeâ - Old Mutual
âNOTICE 80 provides clarity on the investible universeâ - Old Mutual
âNOTICE 80 provides clarity on the investible universeâ - Old Mutual
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
meesha Chagan<br />
New regulati<strong>on</strong>s bring<br />
GREATER TRANSPARENCY<br />
but lower returns from some<br />
m<strong>on</strong>ey market funds<br />
Ameesha Chagan<br />
Portfolio Manager at Futuregrowth Asset Management<br />
13<br />
The latest changes to regulati<strong>on</strong>s governing m<strong>on</strong>ey<br />
market unit trusts — c<strong>on</strong>tained in Notice <str<strong>on</strong>g>80</str<strong>on</strong>g> under<br />
CISCA, which came into effect <strong>on</strong> 1 July 2012 — are<br />
very positive for <strong>the</strong> industry as a whole: They improve<br />
<br />
types and maturity of instruments allowed in m<strong>on</strong>ey<br />
market funds, and ultimately reduce <strong>the</strong> risk involved.<br />
Unfortunately, <strong>the</strong>y are also likely to result in lower<br />
returns from some m<strong>on</strong>ey market funds in <strong>the</strong> future.<br />
Because <strong>the</strong> previous regulati<strong>on</strong>s around <strong>the</strong>se funds<br />
were not comprehensive, asset managers had different<br />
interpretati<strong>on</strong>s of <strong>the</strong> <strong>investible</strong> universe — <strong>the</strong>y were<br />
uncertain as to exactly what types of assets <strong>the</strong>y were<br />
allowed to invest in. This meant that <strong>the</strong> m<strong>on</strong>ey market<br />
funds available from different managers differed<br />
from each o<strong>the</strong>r in terms of risk. Some managers<br />
were strict in <strong>the</strong>ir approach and o<strong>the</strong>rs were less<br />
strict, permitting l<strong>on</strong>ger-dated investments and even<br />
derivative-type securities, and <strong>the</strong>refore introducing<br />
higher risk into <strong>the</strong>ir funds.<br />
CLARITY AND TRANSPARENCY<br />
Notice <str<strong>on</strong>g>80</str<strong>on</strong>g> (N<str<strong>on</strong>g>80</str<strong>on</strong>g>) addresses <strong>the</strong>se issues by providing<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>clarity</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>investible</strong> universe to investment<br />
managers, and more importantly, <str<strong>on</strong>g>provides</str<strong>on</strong>g> transparency<br />
to investors. Investors are now also able to understand<br />
fully <strong>the</strong> risks inherent in a m<strong>on</strong>ey market fund and<br />
choose a product suitable to <strong>the</strong>ir risk appetite.<br />
<br />
from <strong>the</strong> Notice is that <strong>the</strong> name of <strong>the</strong> chapter has<br />
been changed from “M<strong>on</strong>ey Market Portfolio” to<br />
“M<strong>on</strong>ey Market and Short-Term Debt Portfolio”. This is<br />
deliberate in that it aims to highlight to <strong>the</strong> investor<br />
<strong>the</strong> broader investment universe.<br />
“NOTICE <str<strong>on</strong>g>80</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>provides</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>clarity</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>investible</strong><br />
universe”<br />
The previous regulati<strong>on</strong> had <strong>the</strong> following restricti<strong>on</strong>s:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
12 m<strong>on</strong>ths may not be included.<br />
N<str<strong>on</strong>g>80</str<strong>on</strong>g> now states <strong>the</strong> following:<br />
<br />
market instruments included in a m<strong>on</strong>ey market<br />
and short-term debt portfolio, based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> value<br />
of <strong>the</strong> total m<strong>on</strong>ey market and short-term debt<br />
portfolio, may not exceed 120 days.<br />
<br />
instruments included in a m<strong>on</strong>ey market and shortterm<br />
debt portfolio, based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong> total<br />
m<strong>on</strong>ey market and short-term debt portfolio, may<br />
<br />
<br />
and short-term debt portfolio, a m<strong>on</strong>ey market<br />
instrument may not have a residual maturity<br />
exceeding 13 m<strong>on</strong>ths.
New regulati<strong>on</strong>s bring greater<br />
transparency, but lower returns<br />
from some m<strong>on</strong>ey market funds<br />
The best way to illustrate <strong>the</strong>se changes is with an<br />
example of a typical trade:<br />
A 13-m<strong>on</strong>th asset currently trades at a yield of<br />
<br />
<br />
interest rates every three m<strong>on</strong>ths, thus <strong>the</strong>y both have<br />
<strong>the</strong> same interest rate risk. The difference in <strong>the</strong> yield<br />
is <strong>the</strong>refore due to <strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al credit risk from <strong>the</strong><br />
l<strong>on</strong>ger-dated asset. The previous regulati<strong>on</strong> was silent<br />
<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> treatment of a legal maturity versus interest<br />
rate risk, so some m<strong>on</strong>ey market fund managers<br />
<strong>the</strong>refore chose to invest in l<strong>on</strong>ger-dated instruments<br />
<br />
to <strong>the</strong> spirit of <strong>the</strong> regulati<strong>on</strong>s, as <strong>the</strong>se managers used<br />
<strong>the</strong> interest rate reset period (three m<strong>on</strong>ths) as <strong>the</strong><br />
term to maturity.<br />
The new regulati<strong>on</strong>s now take away this discrepancy<br />
— it is clear that all managers can now <strong>on</strong>ly invest<br />
in instruments with a maximum 13-m<strong>on</strong>th term to<br />
maturity. This is why we could see a fall in yields in<br />
certain m<strong>on</strong>ey market portfolios where managers<br />
were investing in l<strong>on</strong>ger-dated (and <strong>the</strong>refore higheryielding)<br />
instruments.<br />
“Credit-linked<br />
notes are now<br />
excluded”<br />
with <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>stant price, and to report this calculati<strong>on</strong><br />
to <strong>the</strong> Registrar within 30 days of performing <strong>the</strong><br />
calculati<strong>on</strong>. M<strong>on</strong>ey market funds are valued <strong>on</strong> an<br />
accrued methodology basis to keep <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>stant R1<br />
price.<br />
Finally, <strong>the</strong> new regulati<strong>on</strong>s encourage managers to<br />
perform <strong>the</strong>ir own credit analysis <strong>on</strong> instruments by<br />
removing <strong>the</strong> obligati<strong>on</strong> to use <strong>the</strong> credit ratings from<br />
external rating agencies.<br />
“Regulati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
encourage managers<br />
to PERFORM THEIR<br />
OWN credit analysis”<br />
M<strong>on</strong>ey market funds are a c<strong>on</strong>servative asset class<br />
by nature and <strong>the</strong> transparency and <str<strong>on</strong>g>clarity</str<strong>on</strong>g> that N<str<strong>on</strong>g>80</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>provides</str<strong>on</strong>g> is surely in <strong>the</strong> best interest of <strong>the</strong> client<br />
invested in <strong>the</strong>se funds. Previously, with certain<br />
managers a client could have unknowingly invested in<br />
a presumably “safe” m<strong>on</strong>ey market fund c<strong>on</strong>taining<br />
derivatives and l<strong>on</strong>g-dated debt instruments. Now<br />
investors know exactly what <strong>the</strong>y are getting and what<br />
risk <strong>the</strong>y are taking.<br />
<br />
linked notes may not be included in m<strong>on</strong>ey market<br />
portfolios, where again <strong>the</strong> previous regulati<strong>on</strong>s were<br />
silent in this regard and <strong>the</strong>refore some m<strong>on</strong>ey market<br />
portfolios included <strong>the</strong>se assets in <strong>the</strong>ir funds. Our<br />
opini<strong>on</strong> has always been that credit-linked notes have<br />
an embedded derivative, and since derivatives are not<br />
allowed in m<strong>on</strong>ey market portfolios <strong>the</strong>se assets do not<br />
fall into <strong>the</strong> scope of m<strong>on</strong>ey market portfolios.<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> Notice also makes express provisi<strong>on</strong><br />
for <strong>the</strong> use and treatment of interest rate swaps in<br />
m<strong>on</strong>ey market portfolios. The previous regulati<strong>on</strong> was<br />
again silent in this regard.<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r noticeable and very positive change is that<br />
m<strong>on</strong>ey market funds are now obligated to perform<br />
a mark-to-market valuati<strong>on</strong> every six m<strong>on</strong>ths to<br />
determine <strong>the</strong> variance of <strong>the</strong> mark-to-market value<br />
14