Toxicological Review for 2-Methylnaphthalene (CAS No. 91-57-6 ...
Toxicological Review for 2-Methylnaphthalene (CAS No. 91-57-6 ...
Toxicological Review for 2-Methylnaphthalene (CAS No. 91-57-6 ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
This document presents background and justification <strong>for</strong> the hazard and dose-response<br />
assessment summaries in EPA’s Integrated Risk In<strong>for</strong>mation System (IRIS). IRIS Summaries may<br />
include an oral reference dose (RfD), inhalation reference concentration (RfC) and a carcinogenicity<br />
assessment.<br />
The RfD and RfC provide quantitative in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> noncancer dose-response assessments.<br />
The RfD is based on the assumption that thresholds exist <strong>for</strong> certain toxic effects such as cellular<br />
necrosis but may not exist <strong>for</strong> other toxic effects such as some carcinogenic responses. It is expressed<br />
in units of mg/kg-day. In general, the RfD is an estimate (with uncertainty spanning perhaps an order of<br />
magnitude) of a daily exposure to the human population (including sensitive subgroups) that is likely to<br />
be without an appreciable risk of deleterious noncancer effects during a lifetime. The inhalation RfC is<br />
analogous to the oral RfD, but provides a continuous inhalation exposure estimate. The inhalation RfC<br />
considers toxic effects <strong>for</strong> both the respiratory system (portal-of-entry) and <strong>for</strong> effects peripheral to the<br />
respiratory system (extrarespiratory or systemic effects). It is generally expressed in units of mg/m 3 .<br />
The carcinogenicity assessment provides in<strong>for</strong>mation on the carcinogenic hazard potential of the<br />
substance in question and quantitative estimates of risk from oral exposure and inhalation exposure.<br />
The in<strong>for</strong>mation includes a weight-of-evidence judgment of the likelihood that the agent is a human<br />
carcinogen and the conditions under which the carcinogenic effects may be expressed. Quantitative<br />
risk estimates are presented in three ways. The slope factor is the result of application of a low-dose<br />
extrapolation procedure and is presented as the risk per mg/kg/day. The unit risk is the quantitative<br />
estimate in terms of either risk per µg/L drinking water or risk per µg/m 3 air breathed. Another <strong>for</strong>m in<br />
which risk is presented is a drinking water or air concentration providing cancer risks of 1 in 10,000; 1<br />
in 100,000; or 1 in 1,000,000.<br />
Development of these hazard identification and dose-response assessments <strong>for</strong> 2-<br />
methylnaphthalene has followed the general guidelines <strong>for</strong> risk assessment as set <strong>for</strong>th by the National<br />
Research Council (1983). EPA guidelines that were used in the development of this assessment may<br />
include the following: Guidelines <strong>for</strong> the Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures (U.S. EPA,<br />
1986a), Guidelines <strong>for</strong> Mutagenicity Risk Assessment (U.S. EPA, 1986b), Guidelines <strong>for</strong><br />
1