The future of the Euro-Mediterannean security dialogue

More documents

Recommendations

Info

XII. Respective roles of the EU and NATO in the Mediterranean 42 Ian Lesser XIII. Developing coordination between the EMP and NATO’s Mediterranean Dialogue 44 Thanos Dokos XIV. Four scenarios for the relationships between the EMP and NATO’s Mediterranean dialogue 48 Carlo Masala XV. Le Maghreb entre l’Union européenne et les Etats-Unis 51 Nicole Grimaud XVI. Le dialogue de l’OTAN sur la Méditerranée et l’institutionalisation de la Charte Jean-François Daguzan 53 XVII. Better coordination of security dialogues in the Mediterranean 61 Stephen C. Calleya XVIII. La coopération euro-méditerranéenne en matière de sécurité : un point de vue syrien 63 Haytham Satayhi XIX. The Euro-Mediterranean Charter and security in the Mediterranean 65 Ambassador Pedro López-Aguirrebengoa XX. Repenser la sécurité en Méditerranée 69 Álvaro de Vasconcelos XXI. Le projet de Charte euro-méditerranéenne pour la Paix et la Stabilité : un point de vue tunisien 72 Ambassadeur Rachid Driss XXII. Main Conclusions 74 Martin Ortega XXIII. Principales conclusions 77 Martin Ortega 4
PREFACE The WEU Institute for Security Studies organised a seminar on ‘The future of the Euro- Mediterranean security dialogue’, on 13-14 January 2000 in Paris. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the possibilities of enhancing the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership’s political and security chapter, including the establishment of a military dialogue within the Barcelona Process. The seminar also tried to assess the contribution that WEU’s Mediterranean dialogue might provide, in the wake of the acquisition of WEU functions by the EU, and the synergies that will have to be found between the EMP’s new security dimension, and NATO’s Mediterranean dialogue. Participation in the seminar was very varied. Senior officials from the Barcelona process, international civil servants from the EU, NATO, OSCE, and WEU, high-ranking military officers, all of them acting in a personal capacity, and academics, from the EuroMeSCo network and elsewhere, were invited to discuss the proposed subjects openly and frankly. Following the usual practice, the Institute tried to strike a balance between officials and academics, and to obtain a wide geographical representation. In the end, participants came from nine WEU or NATO member nations, and from five Mediterranean countries. The programme of the seminar, which follows this preface, gives an idea of the subjects addressed and the contents of the debates; a list of participants is also included. This paper contains the written contributions to the seminar, in their original language and in the order that were presented, as well as some concluding remarks in English and French by the editor. It must be underlined that all contributions represent the authors’ personal points of view, and not necessarily those of any state or organisation. The editor would like to express his sincerest gratitude to all the participants in the seminar, the authors (who keep the copyright), and the Director and staff of the Institute for their support. Special thanks are due to Denise Affonço-Herrmann, who worked conscientiously both in the preparation of the seminar and of this publication. M. O. 5
Page 1 and 2: OCCASIONAL PAPERS 14 THE FUTURE OF
Page 3: THE FUTURE OF THE EURO-MEDITERRANEA
Page 8 and 9: PREFACE L’Institut d’Etudes de
Page 10 and 11: Haytham SATAYHI SESSION VI: Conclus
Page 12 and 13: Affairs, University of Cologne Anto
Page 14 and 15: acquire new capabilities for crisis
Page 16 and 17: • a Euro-Mediterranean network of
Page 18 and 19: I.5 Questions raised by the differe
Page 20 and 21: their intention to encourage with t
Page 22 and 23: Conflict Prevention Centre of the O
Page 24 and 25: note, are based on the Helsinki Fin
Page 26 and 27: III.2 The central role of partnersh
Page 28 and 29: IV. Le dialogue méditerranéen de
Page 30 and 31: prêter à une approche multilatér
Page 32 and 33: V. Quelques commentaires sur l’é
Page 34 and 35: VI. Réflexions sur le développeme
Page 36 and 37: Barcelone, de se réunir chaque ann
Page 38 and 39: VII. The development of the Euro-Me
Page 40 and 41: that should be reviewed periodicall
Page 42 and 43: • crisis management, including pe
Page 44 and 45: working in this way of promoting a
Page 46 and 47: Azerbaijan do. Military-security di
Page 48 and 49: X. How Egypt “thinks Mediterranea
Page 50 and 51: cooperation between countries”. C
Page 52 and 53: XI. Relations between the EMP and N
Page 54 and 55: XII. Respective roles of the EU and
Page 56 and 57:
XIII. Developing coordination betwe
Page 58 and 59:
Concerning the EMP, Euro-Mediterran
Page 60 and 61:
XIV. Four scenarios for the relatio
Page 62 and 63:
should be, one day, able to act aut
Page 64 and 65:
Sur le plan militaire : à mon avis
Page 66 and 67:
XVI.2 Le lancement du dialogue méd
Page 68 and 69:
Euroforce et Euromarforce serait su
Page 70 and 71:
politique 10 . Les experts travaill
Page 72 and 73:
d’échanges qui permettrait de fa
Page 74 and 75:
For instance, a Euro-Mediterranean
Page 76 and 77:
formes diverses : respect des droit
Page 78 and 79:
Declaration and the Working Program
Page 80 and 81:
environmental factors, for example,
Page 82 and 83:
sont des initiatives politiques de
Page 84 and 85:
XXI. Le projet de Charte euro-médi
Page 86 and 87:
XXII. Main conclusions Martin Orteg
Page 88 and 89:
to demonstrate that they have the n
Page 90 and 91:
cette coopération est nécessaire
show all

The future of the Euro-Mediterannean security dialogue

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?