31.05.2014 Views

Strickland v. United States - ProCon.org

Strickland v. United States - ProCon.org

Strickland v. United States - ProCon.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

1 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

(/)<br />

Simple Search (/v1/search)<br />

Advanced Search (/v1/search/advanced)<br />

Boolean Search (/v1/search/boolean)<br />

Enter a case name, citation, or key words and phrases:<br />

About AltLaw (/v1/about)<br />

Case Coverage (/v1/about/coverage)<br />

Browse All Cases (/v1/cases)<br />

Browse U.S. Code (/v1/codes/us)<br />

May 14, 1984<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> Supreme Court<br />

<strong>Strickland</strong><br />

v.<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong><br />

Cite as: hide (#)<br />

(AltLaw cannot guarantee this citation is correct — double check!)<br />

466 U.S. 668<br />

Show full citation (#)<br />

This case cites:<br />

1984<br />

1983<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cronic (/v1/cases/400627)<br />

Autry v. McKaskle (/v1/cases/403865)<br />

Javor v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/444524)<br />

Pulley v. Harris (/v1/cases/393366)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Trapnell (/v1/cases/550424)<br />

Stephens v. Kemp (/v1/cases/386717)<br />

Sullivan v. Wainwright (/v1/cases/399155)<br />

Burger v. Zant (/v1/cases/423401)<br />

Autry v. Estelle (/v1/cases/381166)<br />

Barclay v. Florida (/v1/cases/398003)<br />

Barefoot v. Estelle (/v1/cases/398270)<br />

Zant v. Stephens (/v1/cases/383096)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

2 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

1982<br />

1981<br />

1980<br />

1979<br />

1978<br />

1977<br />

1976<br />

1975<br />

1974<br />

1973<br />

1972<br />

1971<br />

1970<br />

1968<br />

Standard v. Swint (/v1/cases/407607)<br />

Frady v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/381118)<br />

Engle v. Isaac (/v1/cases/391293)<br />

Rose v. Lundy (/v1/cases/396134)<br />

In Eddings v. Oklahoma (/v1/cases/382622)<br />

Bullington v. Missouri (/v1/cases/387991)<br />

U.S. v. Morrison (/v1/cases/391141)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Beck (/v1/cases/384124)<br />

In Cuyler v. Sullivan (/v1/cases/387242)<br />

Green v. Ge<strong>org</strong>ia (/v1/cases/382645)<br />

Rummel v. Estelle (/v1/cases/524461)<br />

Cooper v. Fitzharris (/v1/cases/457267)<br />

Lockett v. Ohio (/v1/cases/407569)<br />

Holloway v. Arkansas (/v1/cases/392983)<br />

Sixth Amendment. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Yelardy (/v1/cases/502004)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Ellison (/v1/cases/478312)<br />

In Gardner v. Florida (/v1/cases/386256)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. DeCoster (/v1/cases/418035)<br />

Woodson v. North Carolina (/v1/cases/389838)<br />

Gregg v. Ge<strong>org</strong>ia (/v1/cases/390010)<br />

Jurek v. Texas (/v1/cases/381881)<br />

Estelle v. Gamble (/v1/cases/393702)<br />

Geders v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/382495)<br />

In Herring v. New York (/v1/cases/380670)<br />

Beasley v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/500521)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. DeCosta (/v1/cases/416085)<br />

Furman v. Ge<strong>org</strong>ia, 1972, (/v1/cases/386947)<br />

Argersinger v. Hamlin, 1972, (/v1/cases/407041)<br />

Brooks v. Tennessee (/v1/cases/399299)<br />

McGautha v. California (/v1/cases/403701)<br />

Moore v. U.S. (/v1/cases/880462)<br />

McMann v. Richardson (/v1/cases/403571)<br />

In Coles v. Peyton (/v1/cases/857731)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

3 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

1967<br />

1963<br />

1961<br />

1955<br />

1946<br />

1942<br />

1938<br />

1932<br />

1904<br />

Chapman v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/394827)<br />

Gideon v. Wainright (/v1/cases/390354)<br />

Townsend v. Sain (/v1/cases/397621)<br />

Ferguson v. Ge<strong>org</strong>ia (/v1/cases/381889)<br />

Michel v. State of Louisiana, 1955, (/v1/cases/392335)<br />

U. S. v. Johnson (/v1/cases/388575)<br />

Adams v. U.S. ex rel. McCann (/v1/cases/381672)<br />

Glasser v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/403886)<br />

Johnson v. Zerbst (/v1/cases/398046)<br />

Powell v. Alabama (/v1/cases/401474)<br />

Fayerweather v. Ritch (/v1/cases/390082)<br />

(Only cases currently available in AltLaw are listed.)<br />

Syllabus<br />

Respondent pleaded guilty in a Florida trial court to an indictment that included three capital murder charges. In the plea<br />

colloquy, respondent told the trial judge that, although he had committed a string of burglaries, he had no significant prior<br />

criminal record and that at the time of his criminal spree he was under extreme stress caused by his inability to support<br />

his family. The trial judge told respondent that he had "a great deal of respect for people who are willing to step forward<br />

and admit their responsibility." In preparing for the sentencing hearing, defense counsel spoke with respondent about his<br />

background, but did not seek out character witnesses or request a psychiatric examination. Counsel's decision not to<br />

present evidence concerning respondent's character and emotional state reflected his judgment that it was advisable to<br />

rely on the plea colloquy for evidence as to such matters, thus preventing the State from cross-examining respondent<br />

and from presenting psychiatric evidence of its own. Counsel did not request a presentence report because it would<br />

have included respondent's criminal history and thereby would have undermined the claim of no significant prior criminal<br />

record. Finding numerous aggravating circumstances and no mitigating circumstance, the trial judge sentenced<br />

respondent to death on each of the murder counts. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed, and respondent then sought<br />

collateral relief in state court on the ground, inter alia, that counsel had rendered ineffective assistance at the sentencing<br />

proceeding in several respects, including his failure to request a psychiatric report, to investigate and present character<br />

witnesses, and to seek a presentence report. The trial court denied relief, and the Florida Supreme Court affirmed.<br />

Respondent then filed a habeas corpus petition in Federal District Court advancing numerous grounds for relief, including<br />

the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. After an evidentiary hearing, the District Court denied relief, concluding that<br />

although counsel made errors in judgment in failing to investigate mitigating evidence further than he did, no prejudice to<br />

respondent's sentence resulted from any such error in judgment. The Court of Appeals ultimately reversed, stating that<br />

the Sixth Amendment accorded criminal defendants a right to counsel rendering "reasonably effective assistance given<br />

the totality of the circumstances." After outlining standards for judging whether a defense counsel fulfilled the duty to<br />

investigate nonstatutory mitigating circumstances and whether counsel's errors were sufficiently prejudicial to justify<br />

reversal, the Court of Appeals remanded the case for application of the standards.


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

4 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Held:<br />

1. The Sixth Amendment right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel, and the benchmark for judging<br />

any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial<br />

process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result. The same principle applies to a capital<br />

sentencing proceeding—such as the one provided by Florida law—that is sufficiently like a trial in its adversarial format<br />

and in the existence of standards for decision that counsel's role in the proceeding is comparable to counsel's role at<br />

trial. Pp. 2063-2064.<br />

2. A convicted defendant's claim that counsel's assistance was so defective as to require reversal of a conviction or<br />

setting aside of a death sentence requires that the defendant show, first, that counsel's performance was deficient and,<br />

second, that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense so as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial. Pp.<br />

2064-2069.<br />

(a) The proper standard for judging attorney performance is that of reasonably effective assistance, considering all the<br />

circumstances. When a convicted defendant complains of the ineffectiveness of counsel's assistance, the defendant<br />

must show that counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. Judicial scrutiny of<br />

counsel's performance must be highly deferential, and a fair assessment of attorney performance requires that every<br />

effort be made to eliminate the distorting effects of hindsight, to reconstruct the circumstances of counsel's challenged<br />

conduct, and to evaluate the conduct from counsel's perspective at the time. A court must indulge a strong presumption<br />

that counsel's conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance. These standards require no<br />

special amplification in order to define counsel's duty to investigate, the duty at issue in this case. Pp. 2064-2067.<br />

(b) With regard to the required showing of prejudice, the proper standard requires the defendant to show that there is a<br />

reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been<br />

different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome. A court hearing an<br />

ineffectiveness claim must consider the totality of the evidence before the judge or jury. Pp. 2067-2069.<br />

3. A number of practical considerations are important for the application of the standards set forth above. The standards<br />

do not establish mechanical rules; the ultimate focus of inquiry must be on the fundamental fairness of the proceeding<br />

whose result is being challenged. A court need not first determine whether counsel's performance was deficient before<br />

examining the prejudice suffered by the defendant as a result of the alleged deficiencies. If it is easier to dispose of an<br />

ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice, that course should be followed. The principles<br />

governing ineffectiveness claims apply in federal collateral proceedings as they do on direct appeal or in motions for a<br />

new trial. And in a federal habeas challenge to a state criminal judgment, a state court conclusion that counsel rendered<br />

effective assistance is not a finding of fact binding on the federal court to the extent stated by 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d), but<br />

is a mixed question of law and fact. Pp. 2069-2070.<br />

4. The facts of this case make it clear that counsel's conduct at and before respondent's sentencing proceeding cannot<br />

be found unreasonable under the above standards. They also make it clear that, even assuming counsel's conduct was<br />

unreasonable, respondent suffered insufficient prejudice to warrant setting aside his death sentence. Pp. 2070-2071.<br />

693 F.2d 1243 (5th Cir.1982), reversed.<br />

Carolyn M. Snurkowski and Calvin L. Fox, Tallahassee, Fla., for petitioners.<br />

Richard E. Shapiro, Trenton, N.J., for respondent.<br />

Justice O'CONNOR delivered the opinion of the Court.<br />

1


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

5 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

This case requires us to consider the proper standards for judging a criminal defendant's contention that the Constitution<br />

requires a conviction or death sentence to be set aside because counsel's assistance at the trial or sentencing was<br />

ineffective.<br />

2<br />

* A.<br />

3<br />

During a 10-day period in September 1976, respondent planned and committed three groups of crimes, which included<br />

three brutal stabbing murders, torture, kidnaping, severe assaults, attempted murders, attempted extortion, and theft.<br />

After his two accomplices were arrested, respondent surrendered to police and voluntarily gave a lengthy statement<br />

confessing to the third of the criminal episodes. The State of Florida indicted respondent for kidnaping and murder and<br />

appointed an experienced criminal lawyer to represent him.<br />

4<br />

Counsel actively pursued pretrial motions and discovery. He cut his efforts short, however, and he experienced a sense<br />

of hopelessness about the case, when he learned that, against his specific advice, respondent had also confessed to the<br />

first two murders. By the date set for trial, respondent was subject to indictment for three counts of first-degree murder<br />

and multiple counts of robbery, kidnaping for ransom, breaking and entering and assault, attempted murder, and<br />

conspiracy to commit robbery. Respondent waived his right to a jury trial, again acting against counsel's advice, and<br />

pleaded guilty to all charges, including the three capital murder charges.<br />

5<br />

In the plea colloquy, respondent told the trial judge that, although he had committed a string of burglaries, he had no<br />

significant prior criminal record and that at the time of his criminal spree he was under extreme stress caused by his<br />

inability to support his family. App. 50-53. He also stated, however, that he accepted responsibility for the crimes. E.g.,<br />

id., at 54, 57. The trial judge told respondent that he had "a great deal of respect for people who are willing to step<br />

forward and admit their responsibility" but that he was making no statement at all about his likely sentencing decision.<br />

Id., at 62.<br />

6<br />

Counsel advised respondent to invoke his right under Florida law to an advisory jury at his capital sentencing hearing.<br />

Respondent rejected the advice and waived the right. He chose instead to be sentenced by the trial judge without a jury<br />

recommendation.<br />

7<br />

In preparing for the sentencing hearing, counsel spoke with respondent about his background. He also spoke on the<br />

telephone with respondent's wife and mother, though he did not follow up on the one unsuccessful effort to meet with<br />

them. He did not otherwise seek out character witnesses for respondent. App. to Pet. for Cert. A265. Nor did he request<br />

a psychiatric examination, since his conversations with his client gave no indication that respondent had psychological<br />

problems. Id., at A266.<br />

8<br />

Counsel decided not to present and hence not to look further for evidence concerning respondent's character and<br />

emotional state. That decision reflected trial counsel's sense of hopelessness about overcoming the evidentiary effect of


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

6 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

respondent's confessions to the gruesome crimes. See id., at A282. It also reflected the judgment that it was advisable<br />

to rely on the plea colloquy for evidence about respondent's background and about his claim of emotional stress: the<br />

plea colloquy communicated sufficient information about these subjects, and by f<strong>org</strong>oing the opportunity to present new<br />

evidence on these subjects, counsel prevented the State from cross-examining respondent on his claim and from putting<br />

on psychiatric evidence of its own. Id., at A223-A225.<br />

9<br />

Counsel also excluded from the sentencing hearing other evidence he thought was potentially damaging. He successfully<br />

moved to exclude respondent's "rap sheet." Id., at A227; App. 311. Because he judged that a presentence report might<br />

prove more detrimental than helpful, as it would have included respondent's criminal history and thereby would have<br />

undermined the claim of no significant history of criminal activity, he did not request that one be prepared. App. to Pet.<br />

for Cert. A227-A228, A265-A266.<br />

10<br />

At the sentencing hearing, counsel's strategy was based primarily on the trial judge's remarks at the plea colloquy as<br />

well as on his reputation as a sentencing judge who thought it important for a convicted defendant to own up to his crime.<br />

Counsel argued that respondent's remorse and acceptance of responsibility justified sparing him from the death penalty.<br />

Id., at A265-A266. Counsel also argued that respondent had no history of criminal activity and that respondent<br />

committed the crimes under extreme mental or emotional disturbance, thus coming within the statutory list of mitigating<br />

circumstances. He further argued that respondent should be spared death because he had surrendered, confessed, and<br />

offered to testify against a codefendant and because respondent was fundamentally a good person who had briefly gone<br />

badly wrong in extremely stressful circumstances. The State put on evidence and witnesses largely for the purpose of<br />

describing the details of the crimes. Counsel did not cross-examine the medical experts who testified about the manner<br />

of death of respondent's victims.<br />

11<br />

The trial judge found several aggravating circumstances with respect to each of the three murders. He found that all<br />

three murders were especially heinous, atrocious, and cruel, all involving repeated stabbings. All three murders were<br />

committed in the course of at least one other dangerous and violent felony, and since all involved robbery, the murders<br />

were for pecuniary gain. All three murders were committed to avoid arrest for the accompanying crimes and to hinder<br />

law enforcement. In the course of one of the murders, respondent knowingly subjected numerous persons to a grave risk<br />

of death by deliberately stabbing and shooting the murder victim's sisters-in-law, who sustained severe in one case,<br />

ultimately fatal—injuries.<br />

12<br />

With respect to mitigating circumstances, the trial judge made the same findings for all three capital murders. First,<br />

although there was no admitted evidence of prior convictions, respondent had stated that he had engaged in a course of<br />

stealing. In any case, even if respondent had no significant history of criminal activity, the aggravating circumstances<br />

"would still clearly far outweigh" that mitigating factor. Second, the judge found that, during all three crimes, respondent<br />

was not suffering from extreme mental or emotional disturbance and could appreciate the criminality of his acts. Third,<br />

none of the victims was a participant in, or consented to, respondent's conduct. Fourth, respondent's participation in the<br />

crimes was neither minor nor the result of duress or domination by an accomplice. Finally, respondent's age (26) could<br />

not be considered a factor in mitigation, especially when viewed in light of respondent's planning of the crimes and<br />

disposition of the proceeds of the various accompanying thefts.<br />

13


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

7 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

In short, the trial judge found numerous aggravating circumstances and no (or a single comparatively insignificant)<br />

mitigating circumstance. With respect to each of the three convictions for capital murder, the trial judge concluded: "A<br />

careful consideration of all matters presented to the court impels the conclusion that there are insufficient mitigating<br />

circumstances . . . to outweigh the aggravating circumstances." See Washington v. State, 362 So.2d 658, 663-664<br />

(Fla.1978), (quoting trial court findings), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 937, 99 S.Ct. 2063, 60 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979). He therefore<br />

sentenced respondent to death on each of the three counts of murder and to prison terms for the other crimes. The<br />

Florida Supreme Court upheld the convictions and sentences on direct appeal.<br />

B<br />

14<br />

Respondent subsequently sought collateral relief in state court on numerous grounds, among them that counsel had<br />

rendered ineffective assistance at the sentencing proceeding. Respondent challenged counsel's assistance in six<br />

respects. He asserted that counsel was ineffective because he failed to move for a continuance to prepare for<br />

sentencing, to request a psychiatric report, to investigate and present character witnesses, to seek a presentence<br />

investigation report, to present meaningful arguments to the sentencing judge, and to investigate the medical examiner's<br />

reports or cross-examine the medical experts. In support of the claim, respondent submitted 14 affidavits from friends,<br />

neighbors, and relatives stating that they would have testified if asked to do so. He also submitted one psychiatric report<br />

and one psychological report stating that respondent, though not under the influence of extreme mental or emotional<br />

disturbance, was "chronically frustrated and depressed because of his economic dilemma" at the time of his crimes.<br />

App. 7; see also id., at 14.<br />

15<br />

The trial court denied relief without an evidentiary hearing, finding that the record evidence conclusively showed that the<br />

ineffectiveness claim was meritless. App. to Pet. for Cert. A206-A243. Four of the assertedly prejudicial errors required<br />

little discussion. First, there were no grounds to request a continuance, so there was no error in not requesting one when<br />

respondent pleaded guilty. Id., at A218-A220. Second, failure to request a presentence investigation was not a serious<br />

error because the trial judge had discretion not to grant such a request and because any presentence investigation would<br />

have resulted in admission of respondent's "rap sheet" and thus would have undermined his assertion of no significant<br />

history of criminal activity. Id., at A226-A228. Third, the argument and memorandum given to the sentencing judge were<br />

"admirable" in light of the overwhelming aggravating circumstances and absence of mitigating circumstances. Id., at<br />

A228. Fourth, there was no error in failure to examine the medical examiner's reports or to cross-examine the medical<br />

witnesses testifying on the manner of death of respondent's victims, since respondent admitted that the victims died in<br />

the ways shown by the unchallenged medical evidence. Id., at A229.<br />

16<br />

The trial court dealt at greater length with the two other bases for the ineffectiveness claim. The court pointed out that a<br />

psychiatric examination of respondent was conducted by state order soon after respondent's initial arraignment. That<br />

report states that there was no indication of major mental illness at the time of the crimes. Moreover, both the reports<br />

submitted in the collateral proceeding state that, although respondent was "chronically frustrated and depressed<br />

because of his economic dilemma," he was not under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance. All three<br />

reports thus directly undermine the contention made at the sentencing hearing that respondent was suffering from<br />

extreme mental or emotional disturbance during his crime spree. Accordingly, counsel could reasonably decide not to<br />

seek psychiatric reports; indeed, by relying solely on the plea colloquy to support the emotional disturbance contention,<br />

counsel denied the State an opportunity to rebut his claim with psychiatric testimony. In any event, the aggravating<br />

circumstances were so overwhelming that no substantial prejudice resulted from the absence at sentencing of the<br />

psychiatric evidence offered in the collateral attack.


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

8 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

17<br />

The court rejected the challenge to counsel's failure to develop and to present character evidence for much the same<br />

reasons. The affidavits submitted in the collateral proceeding showed nothing more than that certain persons would have<br />

testified that respondent was basically a good person who was worried about his family's financial problems.<br />

Respondent himself had already testified along those lines at the plea colloquy. Moreover, respondent's admission of a<br />

course of stealing rebutted many of the factual allegations in the affidavits. For those reasons, and because the<br />

sentencing judge had stated that the death sentence would be appropriate even if respondent had no significant prior<br />

criminal history, no substantial prejudice resulted from the absence at sentencing of the character evidence offered in the<br />

collateral attack.<br />

18<br />

Applying the standard for ineffectiveness claims articulated by the Florida Supreme Court in Knight v. State, 394 So.2d<br />

997 (1981), the trial court concluded that respondent had not shown that counsel's assistance reflected any substantial<br />

and serious deficiency measurably below that of competent counsel that was likely to have affected the outcome of the<br />

sentencing proceeding. The court specifically found: "[A]s a matter of law, the record affirmatively demonstrates beyond<br />

any doubt that even if [counsel] had done each of the . . . things [that respondent alleged counsel had failed to do] at the<br />

time of sentencing, there is not even the remotest chance that the outcome would have been any different. The plain fact<br />

is that the aggravating circumstances proved in this case were completely overwhelming. . . ." App. to Pet. for Cert.<br />

A230.<br />

19<br />

The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the denial of relief. Washington v. State, 397 So.2d 285 (1981). For essentially the<br />

reasons given by the trial court, the State Supreme Court concluded that respondent had failed to make out a prima<br />

facie case of either "substantial deficiency or possible prejudice" and, indeed, had "failed to such a degree that we<br />

believe, to the point of a moral certainty, that he is entitled to no relief. . . ." Id., at 287. Respondent's claims were<br />

"shown conclusively to be without merit so as to obviate the need for an evidentiary hearing." Id., at 286.<br />

C<br />

20<br />

Respondent next filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> District Court for the Southern District of<br />

Florida. He advanced numerous grounds for relief, among them ineffective assistance of counsel based on the same<br />

errors, except for the failure to move for a continuance, as those he had identified in state court. The District Court held<br />

an evidentiary hearing to inquire into trial counsel's efforts to investigate and to present mitigating circumstances.<br />

Respondent offered the affidavits and reports he had submitted in the state collateral proceedings; he also called his trial<br />

counsel to testify. The State of Florida, over respondent's objection, called the trial judge to testify.<br />

21<br />

The District Court disputed none of the state court factual findings concerning trial counsel's assistance and made<br />

findings of its own that are consistent with the state court findings. The account of trial counsel's actions and decisions<br />

given above reflects the combined findings. On the legal issue of ineffectiveness, the District Court concluded that,<br />

although trial counsel made errors in judgment in failing to investigate nonstatutory mitigating evidence further than he<br />

did, no prejudice to respondent's sentence resulted from any such error in judgment. Relying in part on the trial judge's<br />

testimony but also on the same factors that led the state courts to find no prejudice, the District Court concluded that<br />

"there does not appear to be a likelihood, or even a significant possibility," that any errors of trial counsel had affected<br />

the outcome of the sentencing proceeding. App. to Pet. for Cert. A285-A286. The District Court went on to reject all of


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

9 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

respondent's other grounds for relief, including one not exhausted in state court, which the District Court considered<br />

because, among other reasons, the State urged its consideration. Id., at A286-A292. The court accordingly denied the<br />

petition for a writ of habeas corpus.<br />

22<br />

On appeal, a panel of the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed in part, vacated in part, and<br />

remanded with instructions to apply to the particular facts the framework for analyzing ineffectiveness claims that it<br />

developed in its opinion. 673 F.2d 879 (5th Cir.1982). The panel decision was itself vacated when Unit B of the former<br />

Fifth Circuit, now the Eleventh Circuit, decided to rehear the case en banc. 679 F.2d 23 (1982). The full Court of Appeals<br />

developed its own framework for analyzing ineffective assistance claims and reversed the judgment of the District Court<br />

and remanded the case for new factfinding under the newly announced standards. 693 F.2d 1243 (1982).<br />

23<br />

The court noted at the outset that, because respondent had raised an unexhausted claim at his evidentiary hearing in the<br />

District Court, the habeas petition might be characterized as a mixed petition subject to the rule of Rose v. Lundy, 455<br />

U.S. 509, 102 S.Ct. 1198, 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982), requiring dismissal of the entire petition. The court held, however, that<br />

the exhaustion requirement is "a matter of comity rather than a matter of jurisdiction" and hence admitted of exceptions.<br />

The court agreed with the District Court that this case came within an exception to the mixed petition rule. 693 F.2d, at<br />

1248, n. 7.<br />

24<br />

Turning to the merits, the Court of Appeals stated that the Sixth Amendment right to assistance of counsel accorded<br />

criminal defendants a right to "counsel reasonably likely to render and rendering reasonably effective assistance given<br />

the totality of the circumstances." Id., at 1250. The court remarked in passing that no special standard applies in capital<br />

cases such as the one before it: the punishment that a defendant faces is merely one of the circumstances to be<br />

considered in determining whether counsel was reasonably effective. Id., at 1250, n. 12. The court then addressed<br />

respondent's contention that his trial counsel's assistance was not reasonably effective because counsel breached his<br />

duty to investigate nonstatutory mitigating circumstances.<br />

25<br />

The court agreed that the Sixth Amendment imposes on counsel a duty to investigate, because reasonably effective<br />

assistance must be based on professional decisions and informed legal choices can be made only after investigation of<br />

options. The court observed that counsel's investigatory decisions must be assessed in light of the information known at<br />

the time of the decisions, not in hindsight, and that "[t]he amount of pretrial investigation that is reasonable defies precise<br />

measurement." Id., at 1251. Nevertheless, putting guilty-plea cases to one side, the court attempted to classify cases<br />

presenting issues concerning the scope of the duty to investigate before proceeding to trial.<br />

26<br />

If there is only one plausible line of defense, the court concluded, counsel must conduct a "reasonably substantial<br />

investigation" into that line of defense, since there can be no strategic choice that renders such an investigation<br />

unnecessary. Id., at 1252. The same duty exists if counsel relies at trial on only one line of defense, although others are<br />

available. In either case, the investigation need not be exhaustive. It must include " 'an independent examination of the<br />

facts, circumstances, pleadings and laws involved.' " Id., at 1253 (quoting Rummel v. Estelle, 590 F.2d 103, 104 (CA5<br />

1979)). The scope of the duty, however, depends on such facts as the strength of the government's case and the<br />

likelihood that pursuing certain leads may prove more harmful than helpful. 693 F.2d, at 1253, n. 16.


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

10 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

27<br />

If there is more than one plausible line of defense, the court held, counsel should ideally investigate each line<br />

substantially before making a strategic choice about which lines to rely on at trial. If counsel conducts such substantial<br />

investigations, the strategic choices made as a result "will seldom if ever" be found wanting. Because advocacy is an art<br />

and not a science, and because the adversary system requires deference to counsel's informed decisions, strategic<br />

choices must be respected in these circumstances if they are based on professional judgment. Id., at 1254.<br />

28<br />

If counsel does not conduct a substantial investigation into each of several plausible lines of defense, assistance may<br />

nonetheless be effective. Counsel may not exclude certain lines of defense for other than strategic reasons. Id., at<br />

1257-1258. Limitations of time and money, however, may force early strategic choices, often based solely on<br />

conversations with the defendant and a review of the prosecution's evidence. Those strategic choices about which lines<br />

of defense to pursue are owed deference commensurate with the reasonableness of the professional judgments on<br />

which they are based. Thus, "when counsel's assumptions are reasonable given the totality of the circumstances and<br />

when counsel's strategy represents a reasonable choice based upon those assumptions, counsel need not investigate<br />

lines of defense that he has chosen not to employ at trial." Id., at 1255 (footnote omitted). Among the factors relevant to<br />

deciding whether particular strategic choices are reasonable are the experience of the attorney, the inconsistency of<br />

unpursued and pursued lines of defense, and the potential for prejudice from taking an unpursued line of defense. Id., at<br />

1256-1257, n. 23.<br />

29<br />

Having outlined the standards for judging whether defense counsel fulfilled the duty to investigate, the Court of Appeals<br />

turned its attention to the question of the prejudice to the defense that must be shown before counsel's errors justify<br />

reversal of the judgment. The court observed that only in cases of outright denial of counsel, of affirmative government<br />

interference in the representation process, or of inherently prejudicial conflicts of interest had this Court said that no<br />

special showing of prejudice need be made. Id., at 1258-1259. For cases of deficient performance by counsel, where<br />

the government is not directly responsible for the deficiencies and where evidence of deficiency may be more accessible<br />

to the defendant than to the prosecution, the defendant must show that counsel's errors "resulted in actual and<br />

substantial disadvantage to the course of his defense." Id., at 1262. This standard, the Court of Appeals reasoned, is<br />

compatible with the "cause and prejudice" standard for overcoming procedural defaults in federal collateral proceedings<br />

and discourages insubstantial claims by requiring more than a showing, which could virtually always be made, of some<br />

conceivable adverse effect on the defense from counsel's errors. The specified showing of prejudice would result in<br />

reversal of the judgment, the court concluded, unless the prosecution showed that the constitutionally deficient<br />

performance was, in light of all the evidence, harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Id., at 1260-1262.<br />

30<br />

The Court of Appeals thus laid down the tests to be applied in the Eleventh Circuit in challenges to convictions on the<br />

ground of ineffectiveness of counsel. Although some of the judges of the court proposed different approaches to judging<br />

ineffectiveness claims either generally or when raised in federal habeas petitions from state prisoners, id., at 1264-1280<br />

(opinion of Tjoflat, J.); id., at 1280 (opinion of Clark, J.); id., at 1285-1288 (opinion of Roney, J., joined by Fay and Hill,<br />

JJ.); id., at 1288-1291 (opinion of Hill, J.), and although some believed that no remand was necessary in this case, id., at<br />

1281-1285 (opinion of Johnson, J., joined by Anderson, J.); id., at 1285-1288 (opinion of Roney, J., joined by Fay and<br />

Hill, JJ.); id., at 1288-1291 (opinion of Hill, J.), a majority of the judges of the en banc court agreed that the case should<br />

be remanded for application of the newly announced standards. Summarily rejecting respondent's claims other than<br />

ineffectiveness of counsel, the court accordingly reversed the judgment of the District Court and remanded the case. On<br />

remand, the court finally ruled, the state trial judge's testimony, though admissible "to the extent that it contains personal


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

11 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

knowledge of historical facts or expert opinion," was not to be considered admitted into evidence to explain the judge's<br />

mental processes in reaching his sentencing decision. Id., at 1262-1263; see Fayerweather v. Ritch, 195 U.S. 276,<br />

306-307, 25 S.Ct. 58, 67-68, 49 L.Ed. 193 (1904).<br />

D<br />

31<br />

Petitioners, who are officials of the State of Florida, filed a petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of the decision<br />

of the Court of Appeals. The petition presents a type of Sixth Amendment claim that this Court has not previously<br />

considered in any generality. The Court has considered Sixth Amendment claims based on actual or constructive denial<br />

of the assistance of counsel altogether, as well as claims based on state interference with the ability of counsel to<br />

render effective assistance to the accused. E.g., <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 104 S.Ct. 2039, 80 L.Ed.2d<br />

657. With the exception of Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 100 S.Ct. 1708, 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980), however, which<br />

involved a claim that counsel's assistance was rendered ineffective by a conflict of interest, the Court has never directly<br />

and fully addressed a claim of "actual ineffectiveness" of counsel's assistance in a case going to trial. Cf. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong><br />

v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 102, n. 5, 96 S.Ct. 2392, 2397, n. 5, 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976).<br />

32<br />

In assessing attorney performance, all the Federal Courts of Appeals and all but a few state courts have now adopted<br />

the "reasonably effective assistance" standard in one formulation or another. See Trapnell v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>, 725 F.2d<br />

149, 151-152 (CA2 1983); App. B to Brief for <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> in <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cronic, supra, at pp. 3a-6a; Sarno,<br />

Modern Status of Rules and Standards in State Courts as to Adequacy of Defense Counsel's Representation of Criminal<br />

Client, 2 A.L.R. 4th 99-157, §§ 7-10 (1980). Yet this Court has not had occasion squarely to decide whether that is the<br />

proper standard. With respect to the prejudice that a defendant must show from deficient attorney performance, the<br />

lower courts have adopted tests that purport to differ in more than formulation. See App. C to Brief for <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> in<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cronic, supra, 7a-10a; Sarno, supra, at 83-99, § 6. In particular, the Court of Appeals in this case<br />

expressly rejected the prejudice standard articulated by Judge Leventhal in his plurality opinion in <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v.<br />

Decoster, 199 U.S.App.D.C. 359, 371, 374-375, 624 F.2d 196, 208, 211-212 (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 944,<br />

100 S.Ct. 302, 62 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979), and adopted by the State of Florida in Knight v. State, 394 So.2d, at 1001, a<br />

standard that requires a showing that specified deficient conduct of counsel was likely to have affected the outcome of<br />

the proceeding. 693 F.2d, at 1261-1262.<br />

33<br />

For these reasons, we granted certiorari to consider the standards by which to judge a contention that the Constitution<br />

requires that a criminal judgment be overturned because of the actual ineffective assistance of counsel. 462 U.S. 1105,<br />

103 S.Ct. 2451, 77 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1983). We agree with the Court of Appeals that the exhaustion rule requiring<br />

dismissal of mixed petitions, though to be strictly enforced, is not jurisdictional. See Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S., at<br />

515-520, 102 S.Ct., at 1201-04. We therefore address the merits of the constitutional issue.<br />

II<br />

34<br />

In a long line of cases that includes Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 53 S.Ct. 55, 77 L.Ed. 158 (1932), Johnson v.<br />

Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938), and Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9<br />

L.Ed.2d 799 (1963), this Court has recognized that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel exists, and is needed, in order<br />

to protect the fundamental right to a fair trial. The Constitution guarantees a fair trial through the Due Process Clauses,<br />

but it defines the basic elements of a fair trial largely through the several provisions of the Sixth Amendment, including


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

12 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

the Counsel Clause:<br />

35<br />

"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the<br />

State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by<br />

law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to<br />

have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."<br />

36<br />

Thus, a fair trial is one in which evidence subject to adversarial testing is presented to an impartial tribunal for resolution<br />

of issues defined in advance of the proceeding. The right to counsel plays a crucial role in the adversarial system<br />

embodied in the Sixth Amendment, since access to counsel's skill and knowledge is necessary to accord defendants the<br />

"ample opportunity to meet the case of the prosecution" to which they are entitled. Adams v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> ex rel.<br />

McCann, 317 U.S. 269, 275, 276, 63 S.Ct. 236, 240, 87 L.Ed. 268 (1942); see Powell v. Alabama, supra, 287 U.S. at<br />

68-69, 53 S.Ct. 63-64.<br />

37<br />

Because of the vital importance of counsel's assistance, this Court has held that, with certain exceptions, a person<br />

accused of a federal or state crime has the right to have counsel appointed if retained counsel cannot be obtained. See<br />

Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 92 S.Ct. 2006, 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972); Gideon v. Wainwright, supra; Johnson v.<br />

Zerbst, supra. That a person who happens to be a lawyer is present at trial alongside the accused, however, is not<br />

enough to satisfy the constitutional command. The Sixth Amendment recognizes the right to the assistance of counsel<br />

because it envisions counsel's playing a role that is critical to the ability of the adversarial system to produce just results.<br />

An accused is entitled to be assisted by an attorney, whether retained or appointed, who plays the role necessary to<br />

ensure that the trial is fair. For that reason, the Court has recognized that "the right to counsel is the right to the effective<br />

assistance of counsel." McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 771, n. 14, 90 S.Ct. 1441, 1449, n. 14, 25 L.Ed.2d 763<br />

(1970). Government violates the right to effective assistance when it interferes in certain ways with the ability of counsel<br />

to make independent decisions about how to conduct the defense. See, e.g., Geders v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>, 425 U.S. 80, 96<br />

S.Ct. 1330, 47 L.Ed.2d 592 (1976) (bar on attorney-client consultation during overnight recess); Herring v. New York,<br />

422 U.S. 853, 95 S.Ct. 2550, 45 L.Ed.2d 593 (1975) (bar on summation at bench trial); Brooks v. Tennessee, 406 U.S.<br />

605, 612-613, 92 S.Ct. 1891, 1895, 32 L.Ed.2d 358 (1972) (requirement that defendant be first defense witness);<br />

Ferguson v. Ge<strong>org</strong>ia, 365 U.S. 570, 593-596, 81 S.Ct. 756, 768-770, 5 L.Ed.2d 783 (1961) (bar on direct examination<br />

of defendant). Counsel, however, can also deprive a defendant of the right to effective assistance, simply by failing to<br />

render "adequate legal assistance," Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S., at 344, 100 S.Ct., at 1716. Id., at 345-350, 100 S.Ct.,<br />

at 1716-1719 (actual conflict of interest adversely affecting lawyer's performance renders assistance ineffective).<br />

38<br />

The Court has not elaborated on the meaning of the constitutional requirement of effective assistance in the latter class<br />

of cases—that is, those presenting claims of "actual ineffectiveness." In giving meaning to the requirement, however, we<br />

must take its purpose—to ensure a fair trial—as the guide. The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must<br />

be whether counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be<br />

relied on as having produced a just result.<br />

39<br />

The same principle applies to a capital sentencing proceeding such as that provided by Florida law. We need not<br />

consider the role of counsel in an ordinary sentencing, which may involve informal proceedings and standardless


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

13 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

discretion in the sentencer, and hence may require a different approach to the definition of constitutionally effective<br />

assistance. A capital sentencing proceeding like the one involved in this case, however, is sufficiently like a trial in its<br />

adversarial format and in the existence of standards for decision, see Barclay v. Florida, 463 U.S. 939, 952-954, 103<br />

S.Ct. 3418, 3425, 77 L.Ed.2d 1134 (1983); Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270<br />

(1981), that counsel's role in the proceeding is comparable to counsel's role at trial—to ensure that the adversarial<br />

testing process works to produce a just result under the standards governing decision. For purposes of describing<br />

counsel's duties, therefore, Florida's capital sentencing proceeding need not be distinguished from an ordinary trial.<br />

III<br />

40<br />

A convicted defendant's claim that counsel's assistance was so defective as to require reversal of a conviction or death<br />

sentence has two components. First, the defendant must show that counsel's performance was deficient. This requires<br />

showing that counsel made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the "counsel" guaranteed the defendant<br />

by the Sixth Amendment. Second, the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. This<br />

requires showing that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is<br />

reliable. Unless a defendant makes both showings, it cannot be said that the conviction or death sentence resulted from<br />

a breakdown in the adversary process that renders the result unreliable.<br />

A.<br />

41<br />

As all the Federal Courts of Appeals have now held, the proper standard for attorney performance is that of reasonably<br />

effective assistance. See Trapnell v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>, 725 F.2d, at 151-152. The Court indirectly recognized as much when<br />

it stated in McMann v. Richardson, supra, 397 U.S., at 770, 771, 90 S.Ct., at 1448, 1449, that a guilty plea cannot be<br />

attacked as based on inadequate legal advice unless counsel was not "a reasonably competent attorney" and the advice<br />

was not "within the range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases." See also Cuyler v. Sullivan, supra,<br />

446 U.S., at 344, 100 S.Ct., at 1716. When a convicted defendant complains of the ineffectiveness of counsel's<br />

assistance, the defendant must show that counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.<br />

42<br />

More specific guidelines are not appropriate. The Sixth Amendment refers simply to "counsel," not specifying particular<br />

requirements of effective assistance. It relies instead on the legal profession's maintenance of standards sufficient to<br />

justify the law's presumption that counsel will fulfill the role in the adversary process that the Amendment envisions. See<br />

Michel v. Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91, 100-101, 76 S.Ct. 158, 163-164, 100 L.Ed. 83 (1955). The proper measure of<br />

attorney performance remains simply reasonableness under prevailing professional norms.<br />

43<br />

Representation of a criminal defendant entails certain basic duties. Counsel's function is to assist the defendant, and<br />

hence counsel owes the client a duty of loyalty, a duty to avoid conflicts of interest. See Cuyler v. Sullivan, supra, 446<br />

U.S., at 346, 90 S.Ct., at 1717. From counsel's function as assistant to the defendant derive the overarching duty to<br />

advocate the defendant's cause and the more particular duties to consult with the defendant on important decisions and<br />

to keep the defendant informed of important developments in the course of the prosecution. Counsel also has a duty to<br />

bring to bear such skill and knowledge as will render the trial a reliable adversarial testing process. See Powell v.<br />

Alabama, 287 U.S., at 68-69, 53 S.Ct., at 63-64.<br />

44


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

14 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

These basic duties neither exhaustively define the obligations of counsel nor form a checklist for judicial evaluation of<br />

attorney performance. In any case presenting an ineffectiveness claim, the performance inquiry must be whether<br />

counsel's assistance was reasonable considering all the circumstances. Prevailing norms of practice as reflected in<br />

American Bar Association standards and the like, e.g., ABA Standards for Criminal Justice 4-1.1 to 4-8.6 (2d ed. 1980)<br />

("The Defense Function"), are guides to determining what is reasonable, but they are only guides. No particular set of<br />

detailed rules for counsel's conduct can satisfactorily take account of the variety of circumstances faced by defense<br />

counsel or the range of legitimate decisions regarding how best to represent a criminal defendant. Any such set of rules<br />

would interfere with the constitutionally protected independence of counsel and restrict the wide latitude counsel must<br />

have in making tactical decisions. See <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Decoster, 199 U.S.App.D.C., at 371, 624 F.2d, at 208. Indeed,<br />

the existence of detailed guidelines for representation could distract counsel from the overriding mission of vigorous<br />

advocacy of the defendant's cause. Moreover, the purpose of the effective assistance guarantee of the Sixth<br />

Amendment is not to improve the quality of legal representation, although that is a goal of considerable importance to the<br />

legal system. The purpose is simply to ensure that criminal defendants receive a fair trial.<br />

45<br />

Judicial scrutiny of counsel's performance must be highly deferential. It is all too tempting for a defendant to<br />

second-guess counsel's assistance after conviction or adverse sentence, and it is all too easy for a court, examining<br />

counsel's defense after it has proved unsuccessful, to conclude that a particular act or omission of counsel was<br />

unreasonable. Cf. Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107, 133-134, 102 S.Ct. 1558, 1574-1575, 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). A fair<br />

assessment of attorney performance requires that every effort be made to eliminate the distorting effects of hindsight, to<br />

reconstruct the circumstances of counsel's challenged conduct, and to evaluate the conduct from counsel's perspective<br />

at the time. Because of the difficulties inherent in making the evaluation, a court must indulge a strong presumption that<br />

counsel's conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance; that is, the defendant must<br />

overcome the presumption that, under the circumstances, the challenged action "might be considered sound trial<br />

strategy." See Michel v. Louisiana, supra, 350 U.S., at 101, 76 S.Ct., at 164. There are countless ways to provide<br />

effective assistance in any given case. Even the best criminal defense attorneys would not defend a particular client in<br />

the same way. See Goodpaster, The Trial for Life: Effective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases, 58<br />

N.Y.U.L.Rev. 299, 343 (1983).<br />

46<br />

The availability of intrusive post-trial inquiry into attorney performance or of detailed guidelines for its evaluation would<br />

encourage the proliferation of ineffectiveness challenges. Criminal trials resolved unfavorably to the defendant would<br />

increasingly come to be followed by a second trial, this one of counsel's unsuccessful defense. Counsel's performance<br />

and even willingness to serve could be adversely affected. Intensive scrutiny of counsel and rigid requirements for<br />

acceptable assistance could dampen the ardor and impair the independence of defense counsel, discourage the<br />

acceptance of assigned cases, and undermine the trust between attorney and client.<br />

47<br />

Thus, a court deciding an actual ineffectiveness claim must judge the reasonableness of counsel's challenged conduct on<br />

the facts of the particular case, viewed as of the time of counsel's conduct. A convicted defendant making a claim of<br />

ineffective assistance must identify the acts or omissions of counsel that are alleged not to have been the result of<br />

reasonable professional judgment. The court must then determine whether, in light of all the circumstances, the identified<br />

acts or omissions were outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance. In making that determination, the<br />

court should keep in mind that counsel's function, as elaborated in prevailing professional norms, is to make the<br />

adversarial testing process work in the particular case. At the same time, the court should recognize that counsel is<br />

strongly presumed to have rendered adequate assistance and made all significant decisions in the exercise of<br />

reasonable professional judgment.


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

15 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

48<br />

These standards require no special amplification in order to define counsel's duty to investigate, the duty at issue in this<br />

case. As the Court of Appeals concluded, strategic choices made after thorough investigation of law and facts relevant<br />

to plausible options are virtually unchallengeable; and strategic choices made after less than complete investigation are<br />

reasonable precisely to the extent that reasonable professional judgments support the limitations on investigation. In<br />

other words, counsel has a duty to make reasonable investigations or to make a reasonable decision that makes<br />

particular investigations unnecessary. In any ineffectiveness case, a particular decision not to investigate must be directly<br />

assessed for reasonableness in all the circumstances, applying a heavy measure of deference to counsel's judgments.<br />

49<br />

The reasonableness of counsel's actions may be determined or substantially influenced by the defendant's own<br />

statements or actions. Counsel's actions are usually based, quite properly, on informed strategic choices made by the<br />

defendant and on information supplied by the defendant. In particular, what investigation decisions are reasonable<br />

depends critically on such information. For example, when the facts that support a certain potential line of defense are<br />

generally known to counsel because of what the defendant has said, the need for further investigation may be<br />

considerably diminished or eliminated altogether. And when a defendant has given counsel reason to believe that<br />

pursuing certain investigations would be fruitless or even harmful, counsel's failure to pursue those investigations may not<br />

later be challenged as unreasonable. In short, inquiry into counsel's conversations with the defendant may be critical to a<br />

proper assessment of counsel's investigation decisions, just as it may be critical to a proper assessment of counsel's<br />

other litigation decisions. See <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Decoster, supra, at 372-373, 624 F.2d, at 209-210.<br />

B<br />

50<br />

An error by counsel, even if professionally unreasonable, does not warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal<br />

proceeding if the error had no effect on the judgment. Cf. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Morrison, 449 U.S. 361, 364-365, 101 S.Ct.<br />

665, 667-668, 66 L.Ed.2d 564 (1981). The purpose of the Sixth Amendment guarantee of counsel is to ensure that a<br />

defendant has the assistance necessary to justify reliance on the outcome of the proceeding. Accordingly, any<br />

deficiencies in counsel's performance must be prejudicial to the defense in order to constitute ineffective assistance<br />

under the Constitution.<br />

51<br />

In certain Sixth Amendment contexts, prejudice is presumed. Actual or constructive denial of the assistance of counsel<br />

altogether is legally presumed to result in prejudice. So are various kinds of state interference with counsel's assistance.<br />

See <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cronic, 466 U.S., at 659, and n. 25, 104 S.Ct., at 2046-2047, and n. 25. Prejudice in these<br />

circumstances is so likely that case-by-case inquiry into prejudice is not worth the cost. 466 U.S., at 658, 104 S.Ct., at<br />

2046. Moreover, such circumstances involve impairments of the Sixth Amendment right that are easy to identify and, for<br />

that reason and because the prosecution is directly responsible, easy for the government to prevent.<br />

52<br />

One type of actual ineffectiveness claim warrants a similar, though more limited, presumption of prejudice. In Cuyler v.<br />

Sullivan, 446 U.S., at 345-350, 100 S.Ct., at 1716-1719, the Court held that prejudice is presumed when counsel is<br />

burdened by an actual conflict of interest. In those circumstances, counsel breaches the duty of loyalty, perhaps the<br />

most basic of counsel's duties. Moreover, it is difficult to measure the precise effect on the defense of representation<br />

corrupted by conflicting interests. Given the obligation of counsel to avoid conflicts of interest and the ability of trial<br />

courts to make early inquiry in certain situations likely to give rise to conflicts, see, e.g., Fed.Rule Crim.Proc. 44(c), it is


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

16 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

reasonable for the criminal justice system to maintain a fairly rigid rule of presumed prejudice for conflicts of interest.<br />

Even so, the rule is not quite the per se rule of prejudice that exists for the Sixth Amendment claims mentioned above.<br />

Prejudice is presumed only if the defendant demonstrates that counsel "actively represented conflicting interests" and<br />

that "an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyer's performance." Cuyler v. Sullivan, supra, 446 U.S., at<br />

350, 348, 100 S.Ct., at 1719, 1718 (footnote omitted). Conflict of interest claims aside, actual ineffectiveness claims<br />

alleging a deficiency in attorney performance are subject to a general requirement that the defendant affirmatively prove<br />

prejudice. The government is not responsible for, and hence not able to prevent, attorney errors that will result in<br />

reversal of a conviction or sentence. Attorney errors come in an infinite variety and are as likely to be utterly harmless in<br />

a particular case as they are to be prejudicial. They cannot be classified according to likelihood of causing prejudice. Nor<br />

can they be defined with sufficient precision to inform defense attorneys correctly just what conduct to avoid.<br />

Representation is an art, and an act or omission that is unprofessional in one case may be sound or even brilliant in<br />

another. Even if a defendant shows that particular errors of counsel were unreasonable, therefore, the defendant must<br />

show that they actually had an adverse effect on the defense.<br />

53<br />

It is not enough for the defendant to show that the errors had some conceivable effect on the outcome of the<br />

proceeding. Virtually every act or omission of counsel would meet that test, cf. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Valenzuela-Bernal, 458<br />

U.S. 858, 866-867, 102 S.Ct. 3440, 3446-3447, 73 L.Ed.2d 1193 (1982), and not every error that conceivably could<br />

have influenced the outcome undermines the reliability of the result of the proceeding. Respondent suggests requiring a<br />

showing that the errors "impaired the presentation of the defense." Brief for Respondent 58. That standard, however,<br />

provides no workable principle. Since any error, if it is indeed an error, "impairs" the presentation of the defense, the<br />

proposed standard is inadequate because it provides no way of deciding what impairments are sufficiently serious to<br />

warrant setting aside the outcome of the proceeding.<br />

54<br />

On the other hand, we believe that a defendant need not show that counsel's deficient conduct more likely than not<br />

altered the outcome in the case. This outcome-determinative standard has several strengths. It defines the relevant<br />

inquiry in a way familiar to courts, though the inquiry, as is inevitable, is anything but precise. The standard also reflects<br />

the profound importance of finality in criminal proceedings. Moreover, it comports with the widely used standard for<br />

assessing motions for new trial based on newly discovered evidence. See Brief for <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> as Amicus Curiae<br />

19-20, and nn. 10, 11. Nevertheless, the standard is not quite appropriate.<br />

55<br />

Even when the specified attorney error results in the omission of certain evidence, the newly discovered evidence<br />

standard is not an apt source from which to draw a prejudice standard for ineffectiveness claims. The high standard for<br />

newly discovered evidence claims presupposes that all the essential elements of a presumptively accurate and fair<br />

proceeding were present in the proceeding whose result is challenged. Cf. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Johnson, 327 U.S. 106, 112,<br />

66 S.Ct. 464, 466, 90 L.Ed. 562 (1946). An ineffective assistance claim asserts the absence of one of the crucial<br />

assurances that the result of the proceeding is reliable, so finality concerns are somewhat weaker and the appropriate<br />

standard of prejudice should be somewhat lower. The result of a proceeding can be rendered unreliable, and hence the<br />

proceeding itself unfair, even if the errors of counsel cannot be shown by a preponderance of the evidence to have<br />

determined the outcome.<br />

56<br />

Accordingly, the appropriate test for prejudice finds its roots in the test for materiality of exculpatory information not<br />

disclosed to the defense by the prosecution, <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Agurs, 427 U.S., at 104, 112-113, 96 S.Ct., at 2397,


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

17 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

2401-2402, and in the test for materiality of testimony made unavailable to the defense by Government deportation of a<br />

witness, <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Valenzuela-Bernal, supra, 458 U.S., at 872-874, 102 S.Ct., at 3449-3450. The defendant must<br />

show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding<br />

would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.<br />

57<br />

In making the determination whether the specified errors resulted in the required prejudice, a court should presume,<br />

absent challenge to the judgment on grounds of evidentiary insufficiency, that the judge or jury acted according to law.<br />

An assessment of the likelihood of a result more favorable to the defendant must exclude the possibility of arbitrariness,<br />

whimsy, caprice, "nullification," and the like. A defendant has no entitlement to the luck of a lawless decisionmaker, even<br />

if a lawless decision cannot be reviewed. The assessment of prejudice should proceed on the assumption that the<br />

decisionmaker is reasonably, conscientiously, and impartially applying the standards that govern the decision. It should<br />

not depend on the idiosyncracies of the particular decisionmaker, such as unusual propensities toward harshness or<br />

leniency. Although these factors may actually have entered into counsel's selection of strategies and, to that limited<br />

extent, may thus affect the performance inquiry, they are irrelevant to the prejudice inquiry. Thus, evidence about the<br />

actual process of decision, if not part of the record of the proceeding under review, and evidence about, for example, a<br />

particular judge's sentencing practices, should not be considered in the prejudice determination.<br />

58<br />

The governing legal standard plays a critical role in defining the question to be asked in assessing the prejudice from<br />

counsel's errors. When a defendant challenges a conviction, the question is whether there is a reasonable probability<br />

that, absent the errors, the factfinder would have had a reasonable doubt respecting guilt. When a defendant challenges<br />

a death sentence such as the one at issue in this case, the question is whether there is a reasonable probability that,<br />

absent the errors, the sentencer—including an appellate court, to the extent it independently reweighs the evidence<br />

—would have concluded that the balance of aggravating and mitigating circumstances did not warrant death.<br />

59<br />

In making this determination, a court hearing an ineffectiveness claim must consider the totality of the evidence before<br />

the judge or jury. Some of the factual findings will have been unaffected by the errors, and factual findings that were<br />

affected will have been affected in different ways. Some errors will have had a pervasive effect on the inferences to be<br />

drawn from the evidence, altering the entire evidentiary picture, and some will have had an isolated, trivial effect.<br />

Moreover, a verdict or conclusion only weakly supported by the record is more likely to have been affected by errors<br />

than one with overwhelming record support. Taking the unaffected findings as a given, and taking due account of the<br />

effect of the errors on the remaining findings, a court making the prejudice inquiry must ask if the defendant has met the<br />

burden of showing that the decision reached would reasonably likely have been different absent the errors.<br />

IV<br />

60<br />

A number of practical considerations are important for the application of the standards we have outlined. Most important,<br />

in adjudicating a claim of actual ineffectiveness of counsel, a court should keep in mind that the principles we have stated<br />

do not establish mechanical rules. Although those principles should guide the process of decision, the ultimate focus of<br />

inquiry must be on the fundamental fairness of the proceeding whose result is being challenged. In every case the court<br />

should be concerned with whether, despite the strong presumption of reliability, the result of the particular proceeding is<br />

unreliable because of a breakdown in the adversarial process that our system counts on to produce just results.<br />

61


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

18 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

To the extent that this has already been the guiding inquiry in the lower courts, the standards articulated today do not<br />

require reconsideration of ineffectiveness claims rejected under different standards. Cf. Trapnell v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>, 725<br />

F.2d, at 153 (in several years of applying "farce and mockery" standard along with "reasonable competence" standard,<br />

court "never found that the result of a case hinged on the choice of a particular standard"). In particular, the minor<br />

differences in the lower courts' precise formulations of the performance standard are insignificant: the different<br />

formulations are mere variations of the overarching reasonableness standard. With regard to the prejudice inquiry, only<br />

the strict outcome-determinative test, among the standards articulated in the lower courts, imposes a heavier burden on<br />

defendants than the tests laid down today. The difference, however, should alter the merit of an ineffectiveness claim<br />

only in the rarest case.<br />

62<br />

Although we have discussed the performance component of an ineffectiveness claim prior to the prejudice component,<br />

there is no reason for a court deciding an ineffective assistance claim to approach the inquiry in the same order or even<br />

to address both components of the inquiry if the defendant makes an insufficient showing on one. In particular, a court<br />

need not determine whether counsel's performance was deficient before examining the prejudice suffered by the<br />

defendant as a result of the alleged deficiencies. The object of an ineffectiveness claim is not to grade counsel's<br />

performance. If it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice, which we<br />

expect will often be so, that course should be followed. Courts should strive to ensure that ineffectiveness claims not<br />

become so burdensome to defense counsel that the entire criminal justice system suffers as a result.<br />

63<br />

The principles governing ineffectiveness claims should apply in federal collateral proceedings as they do on direct appeal<br />

or in motions for a new trial. As indicated by the "cause and prejudice" test for overcoming procedural waivers of claims<br />

of error, the presumption that a criminal judgment is final is at its strongest in collateral attacks on that judgment. See<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152, 162-169, 102 S.Ct. 1584, 1591-1595, 71 L.Ed.2d 816 (1982); Engle v. Isaac, 456<br />

U.S. 107, 126-129, 102 S.Ct. 1558, 1570-1572, 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982). An ineffectiveness claim, however, as our<br />

articulation of the standards that govern decision of such claims makes clear, is an attack on the fundamental fairness of<br />

the proceeding whose result is challenged. Since fundamental fairness is the central concern of the writ of habeas<br />

corpus, see id., at 126, 102 S.Ct., at 1570, no special standards ought to apply to ineffectiveness claims made in<br />

habeas proceedings.<br />

64<br />

Finally, in a federal habeas challenge to a state criminal judgment, a state court conclusion that counsel rendered<br />

effective assistance is not a finding of fact binding on the federal court to the extent stated by 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d).<br />

Ineffectiveness is not a question of "basic, primary, or historical fac[t]," Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 309, n. 6, 83<br />

S.Ct. 745, 755, n. 6, 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963). Rather, like the question whether multiple representation in a particular case<br />

gave rise to a conflict of interest, it is a mixed question of law and fact. See Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S., at 342, 100<br />

S.Ct., at 1714. Although state court findings of fact made in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim are subject<br />

to the deference requirement of § 2254(d), and although district court findings are subject to the clearly erroneous<br />

standard of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a), both the performance and prejudice components of the<br />

ineffectiveness inquiry are mixed questions of law and fact.<br />

V<br />

65<br />

Having articulated general standards for judging ineffectiveness claims, we think it useful to apply those standards to the<br />

facts of this case in order to illustrate the meaning of the general principles. The record makes it possible to do so.


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

19 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

There are no conflicts between the state and federal courts over findings of fact, and the principles we have articulated<br />

are sufficiently close to the principles applied both in the Florida courts and in the District Court that it is clear that the<br />

factfinding was not affected by erroneous legal principles. See Pullman-Standard v. Swint, 456 U.S. 273, 291-292, 102<br />

S.Ct. 1781, 1791-1792, 72 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982).<br />

66<br />

Application of the governing principles is not difficult in this case. The facts as described above, see supra, at 671-678,<br />

make clear that the conduct of respondent's counsel at and before respondent's sentencing proceeding cannot be found<br />

unreasonable. They also make clear that, even assuming the challenged conduct of counsel was unreasonable,<br />

respondent suffered insufficient prejudice to warrant setting aside his death sentence.<br />

67<br />

With respect to the performance component, the record shows that respondent's counsel made a strategic choice to<br />

argue for the extreme emotional distress mitigating circumstance and to rely as fully as possible on respondent's<br />

acceptance of responsibility for his crimes. Although counsel understandably felt hopeless about respondent's prospects,<br />

see App. 383-384, 400-401, nothing in the record indicates, as one possible reading of the District Court's opinion<br />

suggests, see App. to Pet. for Cert. A282, that counsel's sense of hopelessness distorted his professional judgment.<br />

Counsel's strategy choice was well within the range of professionally reasonable judgments, and the decision not to seek<br />

more character or psychological evidence than was already in hand was likewise reasonable.<br />

68<br />

The trial judge's views on the importance of owning up to one's crimes were well known to counsel. The aggravating<br />

circumstances were utterly overwhelming. Trial counsel could reasonably surmise from his conversations with<br />

respondent that character and psychological evidence would be of little help. Respondent had already been able to<br />

mention at the plea colloquy the substance of what there was to know about his financial and emotional troubles.<br />

Restricting testimony on respondent's character to what had come in at the plea colloquy ensured that contrary<br />

character and psychological evidence and respondent's criminal history, which counsel had successfully moved to<br />

exclude, would not come in. On these facts, there can be little question, even without application of the presumption of<br />

adequate performance, that trial counsel's defense, though unsuccessful, was the result of reasonable professional<br />

judgment.<br />

69<br />

With respect to the prejudice component, the lack of merit of respondent's claim is even more stark. The evidence that<br />

respondent says his trial counsel should have offered at the sentencing hearing would barely have altered the sentencing<br />

profile presented to the sentencing judge. As the state courts and District Court found, at most this evidence shows that<br />

numerous people who knew respondent thought he was generally a good person and that a psychiatrist and a<br />

psychologist believed he was under considerable emotional stress that did not rise to the level of extreme disturbance.<br />

Given the overwhelming aggravating factors, there is no reasonable probability that the omitted evidence would have<br />

changed the conclusion that the aggravating circumstances outweighed the mitigating circumstances and, hence, the<br />

sentence imposed. Indeed, admission of the evidence respondent now offers might even have been harmful to his case:<br />

his "rap sheet" would probably have been admitted into evidence, and the psychological reports would have directly<br />

contradicted respondent's claim that the mitigating circumstance of extreme emotional disturbance applied to his case.<br />

70<br />

Our conclusions on both the prejudice and performance components of the ineffectiveness inquiry do not depend on the<br />

trial judge's testimony at the District Court hearing. We therefore need not consider the general admissibility of that


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

20 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

testimony, although, as noted supra, at 695, that testimony is irrelevant to the prejudice inquiry. Moreover, the prejudice<br />

question is resolvable, and hence the ineffectiveness claim can be rejected, without regard to the evidence presented at<br />

the District Court hearing. The state courts properly concluded that the ineffectiveness claim was meritless without<br />

holding an evidentiary hearing.<br />

71<br />

Failure to make the required showing of either deficient performance or sufficient prejudice defeats the ineffectiveness<br />

claim. Here there is a double failure. More generally, respondent has made no showing that the justice of his sentence<br />

was rendered unreliable by a breakdown in the adversary process caused by deficiencies in counsel's assistance.<br />

Respondent's sentencing proceeding was not fundamentally unfair.<br />

72<br />

We conclude, therefore, that the District Court properly declined to issue a writ of habeas corpus. The judgment of the<br />

Court of Appeals is accordingly<br />

73<br />

Reversed.<br />

74<br />

Justice BRENNAN, concurring in part and dissenting in part.<br />

75<br />

I join the Court's opinion but dissent from its judgment. Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances<br />

cruel and unusual punishment forbidden by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, see Gregg v. Ge<strong>org</strong>ia, 428 U.S.<br />

153, 227, 96 S.Ct. 2909, 2971, 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976) (BRENNAN, J., dissenting), I would vacate respondent's death<br />

sentence and remand the case for further proceedings.1 (#fn1)<br />

76<br />

* This case and <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 104 S.Ct. 2039, 80 L.Ed.2d 657, present our first occasions to<br />

elaborate the appropriate standards for judging claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. In Cronic, the Court<br />

considers such claims in the context of cases "in which the surrounding circumstances [make] it so unlikely that any<br />

lawyer could provide effective assistance that ineffectiveness [is] properly presumed without inquiry into actual<br />

performance at trial," at 661, 104 S.Ct., at 2048. This case, in contrast, concerns claims of ineffective assistance based<br />

on allegations of specific errors by counsel—claims which, by their very nature, require courts to evaluate both the<br />

attorney's performance and the effect of that performance on the reliability and fairness of the proceeding. Accordingly,<br />

a defendant making a claim of this kind must show not only that his lawyer's performance was inadequate but also that<br />

he was prejudiced thereby. See also Cronic, at 659, n. 26, 104 S.Ct., at 2047, n. 26.<br />

77<br />

I join the Court's opinion because I believe that the standards it sets out today will both provide helpful guidance to courts<br />

considering claims of actual ineffectiveness of counsel and also permit those courts to continue their efforts to achieve<br />

progressive development of this area of the law. Like all federal courts and most state courts that have previously<br />

addressed the matter, see ante, at 683-684, the Court concludes that "the proper standard for attorney performance is<br />

that of reasonably effective assistance." Ante, at 687. And, rejecting the strict "outcome-determinative" test employed by<br />

some courts, the Court adopts as the appropriate standard for prejudice a requirement that the defendant "show that


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

21 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have<br />

been different," defining a "reasonable probability" as "a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome."<br />

Ante, at 694. I believe these standards are sufficiently precise to permit meaningful distinctions between those attorney<br />

derelictions that deprive defendants of their constitutional rights and those that do not; at the same time, the standards<br />

are sufficiently flexible to accommodate the wide variety of situations giving rise to claims of this kind.<br />

78<br />

With respect to the performance standard, I agree with the Court's conclusion that a "particular set of detailed rules for<br />

counsel's conduct" would be inappropriate. Ante, at 688. Precisely because the standard of "reasonably effective<br />

assistance" adopted today requires that counsel's performance be measured in light of the particular circumstances of<br />

the case, I do not believe our decision "will stunt the development of constitutional doctrine in this area," post, at 709<br />

(MARSHALL, J., dissenting). Indeed, the Court's suggestion that today's decision is largely consistent with the approach<br />

taken by the lower courts, ante, at 696, simply indicates that those courts may continue to develop governing principles<br />

on a case-by-case basis in the common-law tradition, as they have in the past. Similarly, the prejudice standard<br />

announced today does not erect an insurmountable obstacle to meritorious claims, but rather simply requires courts<br />

carefully to examine trial records in light of both the nature and seriousness of counsel's errors and their effect in the<br />

particular circumstances of the case. Ante, at 695.2 (#fn2)<br />

II<br />

79<br />

Because of their flexibility and the requirement that they be considered in light of the particular circumstances of the<br />

case, the standards announced today can and should be applied with concern for the special considerations that must<br />

attend review of counsel's performance in a capital sentencing proceeding. In contrast to a case in which a finding of<br />

ineffective assistance requires a new trial, a conclusion that counsel was ineffective with respect to only the penalty<br />

phase of a capital trial imposes on the State the far lesser burden of reconsideration of the sentence alone. On the other<br />

hand, the consequences to the defendant of incompetent assistance at a capital sentencing could not, of course, be<br />

greater. Recognizing the unique seriousness of such a proceeding, we have repeatedly emphasized that " 'where<br />

discretion is afforded a sentencing body on a matter so grave as the determination of whether a human life should be<br />

taken or spared, that discretion must be suitably directed and limited so as to minimize the risk of wholly arbitrary and<br />

capricious action.' " Zant v. Stephens, 462 U.S. 862, 874, 103 S.Ct. 2733, 2741, 77 L.Ed.2d 235 (1983) (quoting Gregg<br />

v. Ge<strong>org</strong>ia, 428 U.S., at 188-189, 96 S.Ct., at 2932-2933 (opinion of Stewart, POWELL, and STEVENS, JJ.)).<br />

80<br />

For that reason, we have consistently required that capital proceedings be policed at all stages by an especially vigilant<br />

concern for procedural fairness and for the accuracy of factfinding. As Justice MARSHALL emphasized last Term:<br />

81<br />

"This Court has always insisted that the need for procedural safeguards is particularly great where life is at stake. Long<br />

before the Court established the right to counsel in all felony cases, Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9<br />

L.Ed.2d 799 (1963), it recognized that right in capital cases, Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 71-72, 53 S.Ct. 55, 65, 77<br />

L.Ed. 158 (1932). Time and again the Court has condemned procedures in capital cases that might be completely<br />

acceptable in an ordinary case. See, e.g., Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981);<br />

Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625, 100 S.Ct. 2382, 65 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980); Green v. Ge<strong>org</strong>ia, 442 U.S. 95, 99 S.Ct.<br />

2150, 60 L.Ed.2d 738 (1979) (per curiam); Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 98 S.Ct. 2954, 57 L.Ed.2d 973 (1978);<br />

Gardner v. Florida, 430 U.S. 349, 97 S.Ct. 1197, 51 L.Ed.2d 393 (1977); Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280, 96


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

22 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

S.Ct. 2978, 49 L.Ed.2d 944 (1976). . . .<br />

82<br />

"Because of th[e] basic difference between the death penalty and all other punishments, this Court has consistently<br />

recognized that there is 'a corresponding difference in the need for reliability in the determination that death is the<br />

appropriate punishment in a specific case.' Ibid." Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 913-914, 103 S.Ct. 3383, 3405, 77<br />

L.Ed.2d 1090 (1983) (dissenting opinion).<br />

83<br />

See also id., at 924, 103 S.Ct., at 3405 (BLACKMUN, J., dissenting). In short, this Court has taken special care to<br />

minimize the possibility that death sentences are "imposed out of whim, passion, prejudice, or mistake." Eddings v.<br />

Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 118, 102 S.Ct. 869, 878, 71 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982) (O'CONNOR, J., concurring).<br />

84<br />

In the sentencing phase of a capital case, "[w]hat is essential is that the jury have before it all possible relevant<br />

information about the individual defendant whose fate it must determine." Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262, 276, 96 S.Ct.<br />

2950, 2958, 49 L.Ed.2d 929 (1976) (opinion of Stewart, POWELL, and STEVENS, JJ.). For that reason, we have<br />

repeatedly insisted that "the sentencer in capital cases must be permitted to consider any relevant mitigating factor."<br />

Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S., at 112, 102 S.Ct., at 875. In fact, as Justice O'CONNOR has noted, a sentencing<br />

judge's failure to consider relevant aspects of a defendant's character and background creates such an unacceptable<br />

risk that the death penalty was unconstitutionally imposed that, even in cases where the matter was not raised below,<br />

the "interests of justice" may impose on reviewing courts "a duty to remand [the] case for resentencing." Id., at 117, n.,<br />

and 119, 102 S.Ct., at 877, n., and 878 (O'CONNOR, J., concurring).<br />

85<br />

Of course, "[t]he right to present, and to have the sentencer consider, any and all mitigating evidence means little if<br />

defense counsel fails to look for mitigating evidence or fails to present a case in mitigation at the capital sentencing<br />

hearing." Comment, 83 Colum.L.Rev. 1544, 1549 (1983). See, e.g., Burger v. Zant, 718 F.2d 979 (CA11 1983)<br />

(defendant, 17 years old at time of crime, sentenced to death after counsel failed to present any evidence in mitigation),<br />

stay granted, 466 U.S. 902, 104 S.Ct. 1676, 80 L.Ed.2d 151 (1984). Accordingly, counsel's general duty to investigate,<br />

ante, at 690, takes on supreme importance to a defendant in the context of developing mitigating evidence to present to<br />

a judge or jury considering the sentence of death; claims of ineffective assistance in the performance of that duty should<br />

therefore be considered with commensurate care.<br />

86<br />

That the Court rejects the ineffective-assistance claim in this case should not, of course, be understood to reflect any<br />

diminution in commitment to the principle that " 'the fundamental respect for humanity underlying the Eighth Amendment .<br />

. . requires consideration of the character and record of the individual offender and the circumstances of the particular<br />

offense as a constitutionally indispensable part of the process of inflicting the penalty of death.' " Eddings v. Oklahoma,<br />

supra, 455 U.S., at 112, 102 S.Ct., at 875 (quoting Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280, 304, 96 S.Ct. 2978,<br />

2991, 49 L.Ed.2d 944 (1976) (opinion of Stewart, POWELL, and STEVENS, JJ.)). I am satisfied that the standards<br />

announced today will go far towards assisting lower federal courts and state courts in discharging their constitutional<br />

duty to ensure that every criminal defendant receives the effective assistance of counsel guaranteed by the Sixth<br />

Amendment.<br />

87


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

23 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Justice MARSHALL, dissenting.<br />

88<br />

The Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee a person accused of a crime the right to the aid of a lawyer in<br />

preparing and presenting his defense. It has long been settled that "the right to counsel is the right to the effective<br />

assistance of counsel." McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 771, n. 14, 90 S.Ct. 1441, n. 14, 25 L.Ed.2d 763 (1970).<br />

The state and lower federal courts have developed standards for distinguishing effective from inadequate assistance.1<br />

(#fn1-1) Today, for the first time, this Court attempts to synthesize and clarify those standards. For the most part, the<br />

majority's efforts are unhelpful. Neither of its two principal holdings seems to me likely to improve the adjudication of<br />

Sixth Amendment claims. And, in its zeal to survey comprehensively this field of doctrine, the majority makes many other<br />

generalizations and suggestions that I find unacceptable. Most importantly, the majority fails to take adequate account of<br />

the fact that the locus of this case is a capital sentencing proceeding. Accordingly, I join neither the Court's opinion nor<br />

its judgment.<br />

89<br />

* The opinion of the Court revolves around two holdings. First, the majority ties the constitutional minima of attorney<br />

performance to a simple "standard of reasonableness." Ante, at 688. Second, the majority holds that only an error of<br />

counsel that has sufficient impact on a trial to "undermine confidence in the outcome" is grounds for overturning a<br />

conviction. Ante, at 694. I disagree with both of these rulings.<br />

A.<br />

90<br />

My objection to the performance standard adopted by the Court is that it is so malleable that, in practice, it will either<br />

have no grip at all or will yield excessive variation in the manner in which the Sixth Amendment is interpreted and applied<br />

by different courts. To tell lawyers and the lower courts that counsel for a criminal defendant must behave "reasonably"<br />

and must act like "a reasonably competent attorney," ante, at 687, is to tell them almost nothing. In essence, the<br />

majority has instructed judges called upon to assess claims of ineffective assistance of counsel to advert to their own<br />

intuitions regarding what constitutes "professional" representation, and has discouraged them from trying to develop<br />

more detailed standards governing the performance of defense counsel. In my view, the Court has thereby not only<br />

abdicated its own responsibility to interpret the Constitution, but also impaired the ability of the lower courts to exercise<br />

theirs.<br />

91<br />

The debilitating ambiguity of an "objective standard of reasonableness" in this context is illustrated by the majority's<br />

failure to address important issues concerning the quality of representation mandated by the Constitution. It is an<br />

unfortunate but undeniable fact that a person of means, by selecting a lawyer and paying him enough to ensure he<br />

prepares thoroughly, usually can obtain better representation than that available to an indigent defendant, who must rely<br />

on appointed counsel, who, in turn, has limited time and resources to devote to a given case. Is a "reasonably competent<br />

attorney" a reasonably competent adequately paid retained lawyer or a reasonably competent appointed attorney? It is<br />

also a fact that the quality of representation available to ordinary defendants in different parts of the country varies<br />

significantly. Should the standard of performance mandated by the Sixth Amendment vary by locale?2 (#fn2-1) The<br />

majority offers no clues as to the proper responses to these questions.<br />

92<br />

The majority defends its refusal to adopt more specific standards primarily on the ground that "[n]o particular set of


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

24 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

detailed rules for counsel's conduct can satisfactorily take account of the variety of circumstances faced by defense<br />

counsel or the range of legitimate decisions regarding how best to represent a criminal defendant." Ante, at 688-689. I<br />

agree that counsel must be afforded "wide latitude" when making "tactical decisions" regarding trial strategy, see ante,<br />

at 689; cf. infra, at 712-713, but many aspects of the job of a criminal defense attorney are more amenable to judicial<br />

oversight. For example, much of the work involved in preparing for a trial, applying for bail, conferring with one's client,<br />

making timely objections to significant, arguably erroneous rulings of the trial judge, and filing a notice of appeal if there<br />

are colorable grounds therefor could profitably be made the subject of uniform standards.<br />

93<br />

The opinion of the Court of Appeals in this case represents one sound attempt to develop particularized standards<br />

designed to ensure that all defendants receive effective legal assistance. See 693 F.2d 1243, 1251-1258 (CA5 1982)<br />

(en banc). For other, generally consistent efforts, see <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Decoster, 159 U.S.App.D.C. 326, 333-334, 487<br />

F.2d 1197, 1203-1204 (1973), disapproved on rehearing, 199 U.S.App.D.C. 359, 624 F.2d 196 (en banc), cert. denied,<br />

444 U.S. 944, 100 S.Ct. 302, 62 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979); Coles v. Peyton, 389 F.2d 224, 226 (CA4), cert. denied, 393 U.S.<br />

849, 89 S.Ct. 80, 21 L.Ed.2d 120 (1968); People v. Pope, 23 Cal.3d 412, 424-425, 590 P.2d 859, 866, 152 Cal.Rptr.<br />

732, 739 (1979); State v. Harper, 57 Wis.2d 543, 55-557, 205 N.W.2d 1, 6-9 (1973).3 (#fn3) By refusing to address the<br />

merits of these proposals, and indeed suggesting that no such effort is worthwhile, the opinion of the Court, I fear, will<br />

stunt the development of constitutional doctrine in this area.<br />

B<br />

94<br />

I object to the prejudice standard adopted by the Court for two independent reasons. First, it is often very difficult to tell<br />

whether a defendant convicted after a trial in which he was ineffectively represented would have fared better if his<br />

lawyer had been competent. Seemingly impregnable cases can sometimes be dismantled by good defense counsel. On<br />

the basis of a cold record, it may be impossible for a reviewing court confidently to ascertain how the government's<br />

evidence and arguments would have stood up against rebuttal and cross-examination by a shrewd, well-prepared<br />

lawyer. The difficulties of estimating prejudice after the fact are exacerbated by the possibility that evidence of injury to<br />

the defendant may be missing from the record precisely because of the incompetence of defense counsel.4 (#fn4) In<br />

view of all these impediments to a fair evaluation of the probability that the outcome of a trial was affected by<br />

ineffectiveness of counsel, it seems to me senseless to impose on a defendant whose lawyer has been shown to have<br />

been incompetent the burden of demonstrating prejudice.<br />

95<br />

Second and more fundamentally, the assumption on which the Court's holding rests is that the only purpose of the<br />

constitutional guarantee of effective assistance of counsel is to reduce the chance that innocent persons will be<br />

convicted. In my view, the guarantee also functions to ensure that convictions are obtained only through fundamentally<br />

fair procedures.5 (#fn5) The majority contends that the Sixth Amendment is not violated when a manifestly guilty<br />

defendant is convicted after a trial in which he was represented by a manifestly ineffective attorney. I cannot agree.<br />

Every defendant is entitled to a trial in which his interests are vigorously and conscientiously advocated by an able<br />

lawyer. A proceeding in which the defendant does not receive meaningful assistance in meeting the forces of the State<br />

does not, in my opinion, constitute due process.<br />

96<br />

In Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 23, 87 S.Ct. 824, 827, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967), we acknowledged that certain<br />

constitutional rights are "so basic to a fair trial that their infraction can never be treated as harmless error." Among these


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

25 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

rights is the right to the assistance of counsel at trial. Id., at 23, n. 8, 87 S.Ct., at 827, n. 8; see Gideon v. Wainwright,<br />

372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963).6 (#fn6) In my view, the right to effective assistance of counsel is<br />

entailed by the right to counsel, and abridgment of the former is equivalent to abridgment of the latter.7 (#fn7) I would<br />

thus hold that a showing that the performance of a defendant's lawyer departed from constitutionally prescribed<br />

standards requires a new trial regardless of whether the defendant suffered demonstrable prejudice thereby.<br />

II<br />

97<br />

Even if I were inclined to join the majority's two central holdings, I could not abide the manner in which the majority<br />

elaborates upon its rulings. Particularly regrettable are the majority's discussion of the "presumption" of reasonableness<br />

to be accorded lawyers' decisions and its attempt to prejudge the merits of claims previously rejected by lower courts<br />

using different legal standards.<br />

A.<br />

98<br />

In defining the standard of attorney performance required by the Constitution, the majority appropriately notes that many<br />

problems confronting criminal defense attorneys admit of "a range of legitimate" responses. Ante, at 689. And the<br />

majority properly cautions courts, when reviewing a lawyer's selection amongst a set of options, to avoid the hubris of<br />

hindsight. Ibid. The majority goes on, however, to suggest that reviewing courts should "indulge a strong presumption<br />

that counsel's conduct" was constitutionally acceptable, ibid.; see ante, at 690, 696, and should "appl[y] a heavy<br />

measure of deference to counsel's judgments," ante, at 691.<br />

99<br />

I am not sure what these phrases mean, and I doubt that they will be self-explanatory to lower courts. If they denote<br />

nothing more than that a defendant claiming he was denied effective assistance of counsel has the burden of proof, I<br />

would agree. See <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cronic, 466 U.S., at 658, 104 S.Ct., at 2046. But the adjectives "strong" and "heavy"<br />

might be read as imposing upon defendants an unusually weighty burden of persuasion. If that is the majority's intent, I<br />

must respectfully dissent. The range of acceptable behavior defined by "prevailing professional norms," ante, at 688,<br />

seems to me sufficiently broad to allow defense counsel the flexibility they need in responding to novel problems of trial<br />

strategy. To afford attorneys more latitude, by "strongly presuming" that their behavior will fall within the zone of<br />

reasonableness, is covertly to legitimate convictions and sentences obtained on the basis of incompetent conduct by<br />

defense counsel.<br />

100<br />

The only justification the majority itself provides for its proposed presumption is that undue receptivity to claims of<br />

ineffective assistance of counsel would encourage too many defendants to raise such claims and thereby would clog the<br />

courts with frivolous suits and "dampen the ardor" of defense counsel. See ante, at 690. I have more confidence than the<br />

majority in the ability of state and federal courts expeditiously to dispose of meritless arguments and to ensure that<br />

responsible, innovative lawyering is not inhibited. In my view, little will be gained and much may be lost by instructing the<br />

lower courts to proceed on the assumption that a defendant's challenge to his lawyer's performance will be insubstantial.<br />

B<br />

101<br />

For many years the lower courts have been debating the meaning of "effective" assistance of counsel. Different courts


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

26 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

have developed different standards. On the issue of the level of performance required by the Constitution, some courts<br />

have adopted the f<strong>org</strong>iving "farce-and-mockery" standard,8 (#fn8) while others have adopted various versions of the<br />

"reasonable competence" standard.9 (#fn9) On the issue of the level of prejudice necessary to compel a new trial, the<br />

courts have taken a wide variety of positions, ranging from the stringent "outcome-determinative" test,10 (#fn10) to the<br />

rule that a showing of incompetence on the part of defense counsel automatically requires reversal of the conviction<br />

regardless of the injury to the defendant.11 (#fn11)<br />

102<br />

The Court today substantially resolves these disputes. The majority holds that the Constitution is violated when defense<br />

counsel's representation falls below the level expected of reasonably competent defense counsel, ante, at 687-691, and<br />

so affects the trial that there is a "reasonable probability" that, absent counsel's error, the outcome would have been<br />

different, ante, at 691-696.<br />

103<br />

Curiously, though, the Court discounts the significance of its rulings, suggesting that its choice of standards matters little<br />

and that few if any cases would have been decided differently if the lower courts had always applied the tests<br />

announced today. See ante, at 696-697. Surely the judges in the state and lower federal courts will be surprised to learn<br />

that the distinctions they have so fiercely debated for many years are in fact unimportant.<br />

104<br />

The majority's comments on this point seem to be prompted principally by a reluctance to acknowledge that today's<br />

decision will require a reassessment of many previously rejected ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims. The majority's<br />

unhappiness on this score is understandable, but its efforts to mitigate the perceived problem will be ineffectual. Nothing<br />

the majority says can relieve lower courts that hitherto have been using standards more tolerant of ineffectual advocacy<br />

of their obligation to scrutinize all claims, old as well as new, under the principles laid down today.<br />

III<br />

105<br />

The majority suggests that, "[f]or purposes of describing counsel's duties," a capital sentencing proceeding "need not be<br />

distinguished from an ordinary trial." Ante, at 687. I cannot agree.<br />

106<br />

The Court has repeatedly acknowledged that the Constitution requires stricter adherence to procedural safeguards in a<br />

capital case than in other cases.<br />

107<br />

"[T]he penalty of death is qualitatively different from a sentence of imprisonment, however long. Death, in its finality,<br />

differs more from life imprisonment than a 100-year prison term differs from one of only a year or two. Because of that<br />

qualitative difference, there is a corresponding difference in the need for reliability in the determination that death is the<br />

appropriate punishment in a specific case." Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280, 305, 96 S.Ct. 2978, 2991, 49<br />

L.Ed.2d 944 (1976) (plurality opinion) (footnote omitted).12 (#fn12)<br />

108<br />

The performance of defense counsel is a crucial component of the system of protections designed to ensure that capital


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

27 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

punishment is administered with some degree of rationality. "Reliability" in the imposition of the death sentence can be<br />

approximated only if the sentencer is fully informed of "all possible relevant information about the individual defendant<br />

whose fate it must determine." Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262, 276, 96 S.Ct. 2950, 2958, 49 L.Ed.2d 929 (1976) (opinion<br />

of Stewart, POWELL, and STEVENS, JJ.). The job of amassing that information and presenting it in an <strong>org</strong>anized and<br />

persuasive manner to the sentencer is entrusted principally to the defendant's lawyer. The importance to the process of<br />

counsel's efforts,13 (#fn13) combined with the severity and irrevocability of the sanction at stake, require that the<br />

standards for determining what constitutes "effective assistance" be applied especially stringently in capital sentencing<br />

proceedings.14 (#fn14)<br />

109<br />

It matters little whether strict scrutiny of a claim that ineffectiveness of counsel resulted in a death sentence is achieved<br />

through modification of the Sixth Amendment standards or through especially careful application of those standards.<br />

Justice BRENNAN suggests that the necessary adjustment of the level of performance required of counsel in capital<br />

sentencing proceedings can be effected simply by construing the phrase, "reasonableness under prevailing professional<br />

norms," in a manner that takes into account the nature of the impending penalty. Ante, at 704-706. Though I would prefer<br />

a more specific iteration of counsel's duties in this special context,15 (#fn15) I can accept that proposal. However, when<br />

instructing lower courts regarding the probability of impact upon the outcome that requires a resentencing, I think the<br />

Court would do best explicitly to modify the legal standard itself.16 (#fn16) In my view, a person on death row, whose<br />

counsel's performance fell below constitutionally acceptable levels, should not be compelled to demonstrate a<br />

"reasonable probability" that he would have been given a life sentence if his lawyer had been competent, see ante, at<br />

694; if the defendant can establish a significant chance that the outcome would have been different, he surely should be<br />

entitled to a redetermination of his fate. Cf. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 121-122, 96 S.Ct. 2392, 2405-2406, 49<br />

L.Ed.2d 342 (1976) (MARSHALL, J., dissenting).17 (#fn17)<br />

IV<br />

110<br />

The views expressed in the preceding section oblige me to dissent from the majority's disposition of the case before<br />

us.18 (#fn18) It is undisputed that respondent's trial counsel made virtually no investigation of the possibility of obtaining<br />

testimony from respondent's relatives, friends, or former employers pertaining to respondent's character or background.<br />

Had counsel done so, he would have found several persons willing and able to testify that, in their experience,<br />

respondent was a responsible, non-violent man, devoted to his family, and active in the affairs of his church. See App.<br />

338-365. Respondent contends that his lawyer could have and should have used that testimony to "humanize"<br />

respondent, to counteract the impression conveyed by the trial that he was little more than a cold-blooded killer. Had this<br />

evidence been admitted, respondent argues, his chances of obtaining a life sentence would have been significantly<br />

better.<br />

111<br />

Measured against the standards outlined above, respondent's contentions are substantial. Experienced members of the<br />

death-penalty bar have long recognized the crucial importance of adducing evidence at a sentencing proceeding that<br />

establishes the defendant's social and familial connections. See Goodpaster, The Trial for Life: Effective Assistance of<br />

Counsel in Death Penalty Cases, 58 N.Y.U.L.Rev. 299, 300-303, 334-335 (1983). The State makes a colorable—though<br />

in my view not compelling—argument that defense counsel in this case might have made a reasonable "strategic"<br />

decision not to present such evidence at the sentencing hearing on the assumption that an unadorned acknowledgment<br />

of respondent's responsibility for his crimes would be more likely to appeal to the trial judge, who was reputed to respect<br />

persons who accepted responsibility for their actions.19 (#fn19) But however justifiable such a choice might have been<br />

after counsel had fairly assessed the potential strength of the mitigating evidence available to him, counsel's failure to


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

28 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

make any significant effort to find out what evidence might be garnered from respondent's relatives and acquaintances<br />

surely cannot be described as "reasonable." Counsel's failure to investigate is particularly suspicious in light of his candid<br />

admission that respondent's confessions and conduct in the course of the trial gave him a feeling of "hopelessness"<br />

regarding the possibility of saving respondent's life, see App. 383-384, 400-401.<br />

112<br />

That the aggravating circumstances implicated by respondent's criminal conduct were substantial, see ante, at 700, does<br />

not vitiate respondent's constitutional claim; judges and juries in cases involving behavior at least as egregious have<br />

shown mercy, particularly when afforded an opportunity to see other facets of the defendant's personality and life.20<br />

(#fn20) Nor is respondent's contention defeated by the possibility that the material his counsel turned up might not have<br />

been sufficient to establish a statutory mitigating circumstance under Florida law; Florida sentencing judges and the<br />

Florida Supreme Court sometimes refuse to impose death sentences in cases "in which, even though statutory mitigating<br />

circumstances do not outweigh statutory aggravating circumstances, the addition of nonstatutory mitigating<br />

circumstances tips the scales in favor of life imprisonment." Barclay v. Florida, 463 U.S. 939, 958, 103 S.Ct. 3418, 3431,<br />

77 L.Ed.2d 1134 (1983) (STEVENS, J., concurring in judgment) (emphasis in original).<br />

113<br />

If counsel had investigated the availability of mitigating evidence, he might well have decided to present some such<br />

material at the hearing. If he had done so, there is a significant chance that respondent would have been given a life<br />

sentence. In my view, those possibilities, conjoined with the unreasonableness of counsel's failure to investigate, are<br />

more than sufficient to establish a violation of the Sixth Amendment and to entitle respondent to a new sentencing<br />

proceeding.<br />

114<br />

I respectfully dissent.<br />

1 (#fn1_ref)<br />

The Court's judgment leaves standing another in an increasing number of capital sentences purportedly imposed in<br />

compliance with the procedural standards developed in cases beginning with Gregg v. Ge<strong>org</strong>ia, 428 U.S. 153, 96 S.Ct.<br />

2909, 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976). Earlier this Term, I reiterated my view that these procedural requirements have proven<br />

unequal to the task of eliminating the irrationality that necessarily attends decisions by juries, trial judges, and appellate<br />

courts whether to take or spare human life. Pulley v. Harris, 465 U.S. 37, 59, 104 S.Ct. 871, 886, 79 L.Ed.2d 29 (1984)<br />

(BRENNAN, J., dissenting). The inherent difficulty in imposing the ultimate sanction consistent with the rule of law, see<br />

Furman v. Ge<strong>org</strong>ia, 408 U.S. 238, 274-277, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 2744-2746, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972) (BRENNAN, J.,<br />

concurring); McGautha v. California, 402 U.S. 183, 248-312, 91 S.Ct. 1454, 1487-1520, 28 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971)<br />

(BRENNAN, J., dissenting), is confirmed by the extraordinary pressure put on our own deliberations in recent months by<br />

the growing number of applications to stay executions. See Wainwright v. Adams, 466 U.S. 964, 965, 104 S.Ct. 2183,<br />

2184, 80 L.Ed.2d 809 (1984) (MARSHALL, J., dissenting) (stating that "haste and confusion surrounding . . . decision [to<br />

vacate stay] is itself degrading to our role as judges"); Autry v. McKaskle, 465 U.S. 1085, 104 S.Ct. 1458, 79 L.Ed.2d<br />

906 (1984) (MARSHALL, J., dissenting) (criticizing Court for "dramatically expediting its normal deliberative processes to<br />

clear the way for an impending execution"); Stephens v. Kemp, 464 U.S. 1027, 1032, 104 S.Ct. 562, 565, 78 L.Ed.2d<br />

370 (1983) (POWELL, J., dissenting) (contending that procedures by which stay applications are considered<br />

"undermines public confidence in the courts and in the laws we are required to follow"); Sullivan v. Wainwright, 464 U.S.<br />

109, 112, 104 S.Ct. 450, 465, 78 L.Ed.2d 210 (1983) (BURGER, C.J., concurring) (accusing lawyers seeking review of<br />

their client's death sentences of turning "the administration of justice into [a] sporting contest"); Autry v. Estelle, 464 U.S.<br />

1, 6, 104 S.Ct. 20, 23, 78 L.Ed.2d 1 (1983) (STEVENS, J., dissenting) (suggesting that Court's practice in reviewing


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

29 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

applications in death cases "injects uncertainty and disparity into the review procedure, adds to the burdens of counsel,<br />

distorts the deliberative process within this Court, and increases the risk of error"). It is difficult to believe that the<br />

decision whether to put an individual to death generates any less emotional pressure among juries, trial judges, and<br />

appellate courts than it does among Members of this Court.<br />

2 (#fn2_ref)<br />

Indeed, counsel's incompetence can be so serious that it rises to the level of a constructive denial of counsel which can<br />

constitute constitutional error without any showing of prejudice. See Cronic, 466 U.S., at 659-660, 104 S.Ct., at 2047;<br />

Javor v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>, 724 F.2d 831, 834 (CA9 1984) ("Prejudice is inherent in this case because unconscious or<br />

sleeping counsel is equivalent to no counsel at all").<br />

1 (#fn1-1_ref)<br />

See Note, Identifying and Remedying Ineffective Assistance of Criminal Defense Counsel: A New Look After <strong>United</strong><br />

<strong>States</strong> v. Decoster, 93 Harv.L.Rev. 752, 756-758 (1980); Note, Effective Assistance of Counsel: The Sixth Amendment<br />

and the Fair Trial Guarantee, 50 U.Chi.L.Rev. 1380, 1386-1387, 1399-1401, 1408-1410 (1983).<br />

2 (#fn2-1_ref)<br />

Cf., e.g., Moore v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>, 432 F.2d 730, 736 (CA3 1970) (defining the constitutionally required level of<br />

performance as "the exercise of the customary skill and knowledge which normally prevails at the time and place").<br />

3 (#fn3_ref)<br />

For a review of other decisions attempting to develop guidelines for assessment of ineffective-assistance-of-counsel<br />

claims, see Erickson, Standards of Competency for Defense Counsel in a Criminal Case, 17 Am.Crim.L.Rev. 233,<br />

242-248 (1979). Many of these decisions rely heavily on the standards developed by the American Bar Association. See<br />

ABA Standards for Criminal Justice 4-1.1-4-8.6 (2d ed. 1981).<br />

4 (#fn4_ref)<br />

Cf. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Ellison, 557 F.2d 128, 131 (CA7 1977). In discussing the related problem of measuring injury caused<br />

by joint representation of conflicting interests, we observed:<br />

[T]he evil . . . is in what the advocate finds himself compelled to refrain from doing, not only at trial but also as to<br />

possible pretrial plea negotiations and in the sentencing process. It may be possible in some cases to identify from the<br />

record the prejudice resulting from an attorney's failure to undertake certain trial tasks, but even with a record of the<br />

sentencing hearing available it would be difficult to judge intelligently the impact of a conflict on the attorney's<br />

representation of a client. And to assess the impact of a conflict of interests on the attorney's options, tactics, and<br />

decisions in plea negotiations would be virtually impossible. Thus, an inquiry into a claim of harmless error here would<br />

require, unlike most cases, unguided speculation." Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475, 490-491, 98 S.Ct. 1173,<br />

1181-1182, 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978) (emphasis in original). When defense counsel fails to take certain actions, not<br />

because he is "compelled" to do so, but because he is incompetent, it is often equally difficult to ascertain the prejudice<br />

consequent upon his omissions.<br />

5 (#fn5_ref)<br />

See <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Decoster, 199 U.S.App.D.C. 359, 454-457, 624 F.2d 196, 291-294 (en banc) (Bazelon, J.,<br />

dissenting), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 944, 100 S.Ct. 302, 62 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979); Note, 93 Harv.L.Rev., at 767-770.<br />

6 (#fn6_ref)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

30 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

In cases in which the government acted in a way that prevented defense counsel from functioning effectively, we have<br />

refused to require the defendant, in order to obtain a new trial, to demonstrate that he was injured. In Glasser v. <strong>United</strong><br />

<strong>States</strong>, 315 U.S. 60, 75-76, 62 S.Ct. 457, 467-468, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942), for example, we held:<br />

"To determine the precise degree of prejudice sustained by [a defendant] as a result of the court's appointment of [the<br />

same counsel for two codefendants with conflicting interests] is at once difficult and unnecessary. The right to have the<br />

assistance of counsel is too fundamental and absolute to allow courts to indulge in nice calculations as to the amount of<br />

prejudice arising from its denial."<br />

As the Court today acknowledges, <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cronic, 466 U.S., at 662, n. 31, 104 S.Ct., at 2048, n. 31, whether<br />

the government or counsel himself is to blame for the inadequacy of the legal assistance received by a defendant should<br />

make no difference in deciding whether the defendant must prove prejudice.<br />

7 (#fn7_ref)<br />

See <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Yelardy, 567 F.2d 863, 865, n. 1 (CA6), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 842, 99 S.Ct. 133, 58 L.Ed.2d 140<br />

(1978); Beasley v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>, 491 F.2d 687, 696 (CA6 1974); Commonwealth v. Badger, 482 Pa. 240, 243-244, 393<br />

A.2d 642, 644 (1978).<br />

8 (#fn8_ref)<br />

See, e.g., State v. Pacheco, 121 Ariz. 88, 91, 588 P.2d 830, 833 (1978); Hoover v. State, 270 Ark. 978, 980, 606<br />

S.W.2d 749, 751 (1980); Line v. State, 272 Ind. 353, 354-355, 397 N.E.2d 975, 976 (1979).<br />

9 (#fn9_ref)<br />

See, e.g., Trapnell v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>, 725 F.2d 149, 155 (CA2 1983); Cooper v. Fitzharris, 586 F.2d 1325, 1328-1330<br />

(CA9 1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 974, 99 S.Ct. 1542, 59 L.Ed.2d 793 (1979).<br />

10 (#fn10_ref)<br />

See, e.g., <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Decoster, 199 U.S.App.D.C., at 370, and n. 74, 624 F.2d, at 208, and n. 74 (plurality<br />

opinion); Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997, 1001 (Fla.1981).<br />

11 (#fn11_ref)<br />

See n. 7, supra.<br />

12 (#fn12_ref)<br />

See also Zant v. Stephens, 462 U.S. 862, 884-885, 103 S.Ct. 2733, 2744, 77 L.Ed.2d 235 (1983); Eddings v.<br />

Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 110-112, 102 S.Ct. 869, 873-875, 71 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982); Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 604,<br />

98 S.Ct. 2954, 2964, 57 L.Ed.2d 973 (1978) (plurality opinion).<br />

13 (#fn13_ref)<br />

See Goodpaster, The Trial for Life: Effective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases, 58 N.Y.U.L.Rev. 299, 303<br />

(1983).<br />

14 (#fn14_ref)<br />

As Justice BRENNAN points out, ante, at 704, an additional reason for examining especially carefully a Sixth Amendment<br />

challenge when it pertains to a capital sentencing proceeding is that the result of finding a constitutional violation in that


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

31 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

context is less disruptive than a finding that counsel was incompetent in the liability phase of a trial.<br />

15 (#fn15_ref)<br />

See Part I-A, supra. For a sensible effort to formulate guidelines for the conduct of defense counsel in capital sentencing<br />

proceedings, see Goodpaster, supra, at 343-345, 360-362.<br />

16 (#fn16_ref)<br />

For the purposes of this and the succeeding section, I assume, solely for the sake of argument, that some showing of<br />

prejudice is necessary to state a violation of the Sixth Amendment. But cf. Part I-B, supra.<br />

17 (#fn17_ref)<br />

As I read the opinion of the Court, it does not preclude this kind of adjustment of the legal standard. The majority defines<br />

"reasonable probability" as "a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome." Ante, at 694. In view of the<br />

nature of the sanction at issue, and the difficulty of determining how a sentencer would have responded if presented with<br />

a different set of facts, it could be argued that a lower estimate of the likelihood that the outcome of a capital sentencing<br />

proceeding was influenced by attorney error is sufficient to "undermine confidence" in that outcome than would be true in<br />

an ordinary criminal case.<br />

18 (#fn18_ref)<br />

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is unconstitutional under all circumstances, Gregg v. Ge<strong>org</strong>ia, 428 U.S. 153,<br />

231, 96 S.Ct. 2909, 2973, 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976) (MARSHALL, J., dissenting), I would vote to vacate respondent's<br />

sentence even if he had not presented a substantial Sixth Amendment claim.<br />

19 (#fn19_ref)<br />

Two considerations undercut the State's explanation of counsel's decision. First, it is not apparent why adducement of<br />

evidence pertaining to respondent's character and familial connections would have been inconsistent with respondent's<br />

acknowledgement that he was responsible for his behavior. Second, the Florida Supreme Court possesses—and<br />

frequently exercises—the power to overturn death sentences it deems unwarranted by the facts of a case. See State v.<br />

Dixon, 283 So.2d 1, 10 (Fla.1973). Even if counsel's decision not to try to humanize respondent for the benefit of the trial<br />

judge were deemed reasonable, counsel's failure to create a record for the benefit of the State Supreme Court might<br />

well be deemed unreasonable.<br />

20 (#fn20_ref)<br />

See, e.g., Farmer & Kinard, The Trial of the Penalty Phase (1976), reprinted in 2 California State Public Defender,<br />

California Death Penalty Manual N-33, N-45 (1980).<br />

This case is cited by:<br />

date unknown<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Pflaumer (/v1/cases/543100)<br />

Thomas v. Dugger (/v1/cases/422451)<br />

Creel v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1354997)<br />

Swofford v. Dobucki (/v1/cases/1351208)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. McNamara (/v1/cases/532306)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Da... (/v1/cases/509779)<br />

Untitled (/v1/cases/1414730)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

32 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

2007<br />

Bryan F. JENNINGS, Petitioner-Appellant, Cross-Appe... (/v1/cases/1144182)<br />

John Ruthell HENRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SECRET... (/v1/cases/1144217)<br />

Jeffery Lee WOOD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Nathanie... (/v1/cases/1144300)<br />

Johnny O. CLARK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert WA... (/v1/cases/1144169)<br />

Brent TAYLOR, Appellant v. Marion C. BLAKEY, Admini... (/v1/cases/1144212)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Anthony HARRI... (/v1/cases/1144302)<br />

Charles HEMSTREET, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Charles ... (/v1/cases/1144418)<br />

Patrico RAMONEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mary BERG... (/v1/cases/1144186)<br />

Christopher M. STEVENS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Da... (/v1/cases/1144044)<br />

Jimmy DILL, Petitioner-Appellant v. Richard F. ALLE... (/v1/cases/1143994)<br />

Alex GILBERT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jay M. MERCH... (/v1/cases/1143968)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Jones (/v1/cases/1144070)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Robert WILLIA... (/v1/cases/1143909)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. TRIUMPH CAPI... (/v1/cases/1143849)<br />

Darryl M. DURR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Betty MITC... (/v1/cases/1143749)<br />

Robert Carl FOLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Philip ... (/v1/cases/1143891)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ra... (/v1/cases/1143757)<br />

Steve HENLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ricky BELL, ... (/v1/cases/1143851)<br />

Kevin YOUNG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marty SIRMONS... (/v1/cases/1143616)<br />

Jimmy Ray VALENTINE (04-2116); Kenneth Jerome Valen... (/v1/cases/1143990)<br />

Emilio VASQUEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Kurt JONES... (/v1/cases/1143655)<br />

Todd A. DUNHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STA... (/v1/cases/1143698)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wi... (/v1/cases/1143395)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Da... (/v1/cases/1143361)<br />

Carol EGE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Joan YUKINS, War... (/v1/cases/1143528)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/1143598)<br />

Owens v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1143240)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ju... (/v1/cases/1143327)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Er... (/v1/cases/1143383)<br />

Joe Leonard LAMBRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dor... (/v1/cases/1144181)<br />

Robert RILEY, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Mary BERGHUIS... (/v1/cases/1142891)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Benjamin GWYN... (/v1/cases/1142983)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sh... (/v1/cases/1143265)<br />

John E. BEDNARSKI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ... (/v1/cases/1142995)<br />

Robert Carl FOLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Philip ... (/v1/cases/1142902)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Antoine Micha... (/v1/cases/1142630)<br />

Keith MILLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Walter E. MA... (/v1/cases/1143005)<br />

Carlton Akee TURNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Natha... (/v1/cases/1142975)<br />

Derrick SONNIER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Nathaniel... (/v1/cases/1142988)<br />

Richard Allen DINGLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SECR... (/v1/cases/1142758)<br />

Virgil Euristi MARTINEZ, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Na... (/v1/cases/1142910)<br />

Robert Charles COMER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dora... (/v1/cases/1142819)<br />

Ge<strong>org</strong>e LOPEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dora B. SCHR... (/v1/cases/1144329)<br />

Burley GILLIAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SECRETARY ... (/v1/cases/1142748)<br />

Maxwell HOFFMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arvon J. ... (/v1/cases/1142928)<br />

James Nick HARRISON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John ... (/v1/cases/1142469)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

33 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

2006<br />

Anderson v. Sirmons (/v1/cases/1142178)<br />

Juan ALMONACID, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STA... (/v1/cases/1142190)<br />

Daniels v. Knight (/v1/cases/1142267)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ja... (/v1/cases/1142075)<br />

Carroll v. Renico (/v1/cases/1142014)<br />

John Davis McNEILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marvin... (/v1/cases/1142185)<br />

Stewart v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (/v1/cases/1142193)<br />

Johnny Ray CONNER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Nathanie... (/v1/cases/1142348)<br />

Raygoza v. Hulick (/v1/cases/1141989)<br />

Christopher Scott EMMETT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ... (/v1/cases/1141968)<br />

Derrick SONNIER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Nathaniel... (/v1/cases/1142155)<br />

Van v. Jones (/v1/cases/1142113)<br />

Michael W. BENGE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David JO... (/v1/cases/1141919)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Juan SEGARRA... (/v1/cases/1379744)<br />

Frank LoCASCIO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STA... (/v1/cases/1141776)<br />

Snow v. Sirmons (/v1/cases/1141883)<br />

Ricky Wayne SHORT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ... (/v1/cases/1141589)<br />

Terry Lyn SHORT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marty SIR... (/v1/cases/1141673)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Cr... (/v1/cases/1142678)<br />

Garth v. Davis (/v1/cases/1379623)<br />

Michael L. SCHAWITSCH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jer... (/v1/cases/1144367)<br />

Kenneth PARR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Nathaniel QU... (/v1/cases/1141734)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R... (/v1/cases/1379626)<br />

Charles E. SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Nathanie... (/v1/cases/1141575)<br />

Mosby v. Senkowski (/v1/cases/1141515)<br />

William Earl LYND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William... (/v1/cases/1141472)<br />

Soriba FADIGA, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL USA, ... (/v1/cases/1143984)<br />

Keith Michael ST. AUBIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. N... (/v1/cases/1141520)<br />

Albrecht v. Horn (/v1/cases/1143542)<br />

Alton HIGGINS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Paul RENICO,... (/v1/cases/1141442)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ju... (/v1/cases/1143262)<br />

Gregory Edward WRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Nat... (/v1/cases/1141518)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Theodore (/v1/cases/1141282)<br />

Joseph v. Coyle (/v1/cases/1379577)<br />

Stewart v. Wolfenbarger (/v1/cases/1141304)<br />

Gerald P. BARKELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Brent C... (/v1/cases/1141255)<br />

Alderman v. Terry (/v1/cases/1141211)<br />

Tyson Alan DITCH, Appellant v. James L. GRACE. (/v1/cases/1142647)<br />

In Re: Larry Eugene HUTCHERSON, Petitioner. (/v1/cases/1141249)<br />

Bell v. Attorney General (/v1/cases/1141900)<br />

Cagle v. Norris (/v1/cases/1141907)<br />

Kristopher C. EDWARDS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. A. L... (/v1/cases/1142080)<br />

Mark BOYCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUNDVIEW TECHN... (/v1/cases/1141105)<br />

Skillicorn v. Luebbers (/v1/cases/1142013)<br />

Earl RINGO, Appellant, v. Donald ROPER, Appellee. (/v1/cases/1141760)<br />

Garcia v. Bertsch (/v1/cases/1379649)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

34 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Dando v. Yukins (/v1/cases/1140858)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/1140667)<br />

Williams v. Anderson (/v1/cases/1140746)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lu... (/v1/cases/1140853)<br />

Bell v. Bell (/v1/cases/1140716)<br />

Bethel v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1379247)<br />

Eckstein v. Kingston (/v1/cases/1140748)<br />

Dennis THOMPSON, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Deir... (/v1/cases/1379277)<br />

Robert SIMPSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Deirdre BA... (/v1/cases/1379306)<br />

Henyard v. McDonough (/v1/cases/1140658)<br />

Manuel VALLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SECRETARY FO... (/v1/cases/1140599)<br />

Henderson v. Quarterman (/v1/cases/1379367)<br />

Hallford v. Culliver (/v1/cases/1140622)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Smith (/v1/cases/1140596)<br />

E.g., Hartjes v. Endicott (/v1/cases/1379141)<br />

William L. SULLIVAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James... (/v1/cases/1140660)<br />

Bland v. Sirmons (/v1/cases/1379336)<br />

John Joe AMADOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Nathaniel... (/v1/cases/1379302)<br />

Michael Dean GONZALES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Nat... (/v1/cases/1379193)<br />

Shelton v. Carroll (/v1/cases/1141123)<br />

Outten v. Kearney (/v1/cases/1141159)<br />

James WASHINGTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Paul REN... (/v1/cases/1379053)<br />

Poindexter v. Mitchell (/v1/cases/1140423)<br />

Zakrzewski v. McDonough (/v1/cases/1140498)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Birk (/v1/cases/1140227)<br />

Keith v. Mitchell (/v1/cases/1140512)<br />

Dickerson v. Bagley (/v1/cases/1378947)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hall (/v1/cases/1140549)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Taylor (/v1/cases/1140365)<br />

Adams v. Bertrand (/v1/cases/1378971)<br />

Satterlee v. Wolfenbarger (/v1/cases/1378944)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Luke JONES, ... (/v1/cases/1143120)<br />

Ge<strong>org</strong>e Cale BUCKNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marvi... (/v1/cases/1378943)<br />

Garcia v. Quarterman (/v1/cases/1378987)<br />

Badelle v. Correll (/v1/cases/1140183)<br />

Frank Duane WELCH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marty S... (/v1/cases/1140101)<br />

Schwab v. Crosby (/v1/cases/1140074)<br />

Buchheit v. Norris (/v1/cases/1140611)<br />

Slaughter v. Parker (/v1/cases/1378823)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Reginald Curt... (/v1/cases/1139880)<br />

Winfield v. Roper (/v1/cases/1140737)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Spence (/v1/cases/1139962)<br />

Atwater v. Crosby (/v1/cases/1378873)<br />

Aaron REYNOSO, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Ge<strong>org</strong>e J. GI... (/v1/cases/1140886)<br />

Jessie Earl PURVIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James ... (/v1/cases/1140100)<br />

Frierson v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1141005)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Mejia (/v1/cases/1139769)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

35 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Baugham (/v1/cases/1139844)<br />

Jones v. Hulick (/v1/cases/1139860)<br />

UNITED STATES v. James SHEDRICK, Appellant. (/v1/cases/1142568)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Arbolaez (/v1/cases/1139957)<br />

Guy Richard GAMBLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SECRET... (/v1/cases/1378850)<br />

Shell v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1139753)<br />

Taylor v. Bradley (/v1/cases/1139765)<br />

Moreno v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1378844)<br />

Morales v. Ault (/v1/cases/1142291)<br />

Buster v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1139619)<br />

Dale HELMIG, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross Appellant, v... (/v1/cases/1140786)<br />

Campbell v. Polk (/v1/cases/1139591)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Johan TORRES... (/v1/cases/1139608)<br />

Michael J. NELSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE BOEI... (/v1/cases/1139549)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Orange (/v1/cases/1139679)<br />

Knight v. Spencer (/v1/cases/1378728)<br />

Medina v. Diguglielmo (/v1/cases/1140843)<br />

Robert E. DOUGLAS, Appellant v. * Ronald H. CATHEL,... (/v1/cases/1379164)<br />

Jeffrey J. SPERRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David R... (/v1/cases/1139406)<br />

Samuel HARRINGTON, Appellant v. Frank D. GILLIS; Th... (/v1/cases/1379095)<br />

Fulcher v. Motley (/v1/cases/1139249)<br />

Frank VIRGIL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Doug DRETKE,... (/v1/cases/1139540)<br />

Lenz v. Washington (/v1/cases/1139242)<br />

Carter v. Mitchell (/v1/cases/1378543)<br />

Traci Lynette McCALVIN, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Joa... (/v1/cases/1378596)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Lopez (/v1/cases/1378624)<br />

Pough v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1139125)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Dago (/v1/cases/1138992)<br />

Arnold LYNN, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Dennis BLIDEN,... (/v1/cases/1139201)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Virgil (/v1/cases/1139297)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Stitt (/v1/cases/1138945)<br />

Campusano v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1139126)<br />

Coble v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1139252)<br />

Broom v. Mitchell (/v1/cases/1138993)<br />

James Edward KING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A. LAMA... (/v1/cases/1140534)<br />

Lundgren v. Mitchell (/v1/cases/1138881)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Brooks (/v1/cases/1138638)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. LaVallee (/v1/cases/1378400)<br />

Charlton v. Davis (/v1/cases/1138714)<br />

Andre WRIGHT, Appellant v. Donald T. VAUGHN; the Di... (/v1/cases/1141835)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Greer (/v1/cases/1138862)<br />

Jose Enrique ALBERNI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E.K.... (/v1/cases/1379234)<br />

Raley v. Ylst (/v1/cases/1379641)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Rice (/v1/cases/1139901)<br />

Lynch v. Ficco (/v1/cases/1138619)<br />

Davis v. Grigas (/v1/cases/1139212)<br />

Rolling v. Crosby (/v1/cases/1138646)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

36 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

2005<br />

Van Patten v. Deppisch (/v1/cases/1138142)<br />

Jones v. Campbell (/v1/cases/1378252)<br />

Logan v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1138208)<br />

Bradley S. WHITMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Byran ... (/v1/cases/1138172)<br />

Monica COSBY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mary SIGLER,... (/v1/cases/1138340)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-... (/v1/cases/1138279)<br />

Martin LINK, Appellant, v. Al LUEBBERS, Appellee. (/v1/cases/1141383)<br />

Franklin v. Anderson (/v1/cases/1138146)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/1138016)<br />

Pippin v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1138168)<br />

Rodney COX, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Edward R. DONNE... (/v1/cases/1137926)<br />

Diaz v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1378136)<br />

Vinson v. True (/v1/cases/1378263)<br />

Krishna MAHARAJ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SECRETARY... (/v1/cases/1137956)<br />

Middleton v. Roper (/v1/cases/1140530)<br />

Phillips v. Hust (/v1/cases/1142315)<br />

Frazer v. South Carolina (/v1/cases/1137817)<br />

Maxwell D. WHITE, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bet... (/v1/cases/1378089)<br />

Ronald R. WEAVER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Joan PALM... (/v1/cases/1379022)<br />

Galviz Zapata v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1137900)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Booth (/v1/cases/1137972)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Collins (/v1/cases/1378039)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Alerre (/v1/cases/1378040)<br />

Davis v. Straub (/v1/cases/1137778)<br />

Woods v. McBride (/v1/cases/1378049)<br />

Hoffman v. Arave (/v1/cases/1379028)<br />

Michael v. Crosby (/v1/cases/1378050)<br />

Williams v. Stewart (/v1/cases/1139018)<br />

Rousan v. Roper (/v1/cases/1138382)<br />

Lankford v. Arave (/v1/cases/1141229)<br />

John C. MARQUARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SECRETAR... (/v1/cases/1377979)<br />

Dugas v. Coplan (/v1/cases/1377949)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Medina (/v1/cases/1137471)<br />

Maples v. Stegall (/v1/cases/1137500)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Garza (/v1/cases/1137703)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Best (/v1/cases/1377865)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cohen (/v1/cases/1137443)<br />

Montgomery v. Uchtman (/v1/cases/1137428)<br />

Mark MANCEBO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Derral G. AD... (/v1/cases/1138301)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Kurti (/v1/cases/1377906)<br />

Gersten v. Senkowski (/v1/cases/1137356)<br />

Escamilla v. Jungwirth (/v1/cases/1137394)<br />

Leal v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1377945)<br />

Hodge v. Hurley (/v1/cases/1137393)<br />

Ronald R. SCARBERRY, Appellee, v. STATE of Iowa, Ap... (/v1/cases/1137795)<br />

Johnson v. Luoma (/v1/cases/1137243)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

37 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Poe (/v1/cases/1137627)<br />

Gordon DAVIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles GREI... (/v1/cases/1377941)<br />

Malicoat v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1377884)<br />

Lopez v. Wilson (/v1/cases/1377867)<br />

Balsewicz v. Kingston (/v1/cases/1377854)<br />

Callahan v. Campbell (/v1/cases/1137480)<br />

Moore v. Parker (/v1/cases/1137258)<br />

Clark v. Mitchell (/v1/cases/1137339)<br />

Anderson v. Attorney General of Kansas (/v1/cases/1137299)<br />

Johnson v. Mahoney (/v1/cases/1377801)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Alferahin (/v1/cases/1138069)<br />

Martin v. Grosshans (/v1/cases/1137193)<br />

Thornburg v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1137010)<br />

Ronald E. BURT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alan M. UC... (/v1/cases/1377769)<br />

Smiley v. Maloney (/v1/cases/1136982)<br />

Danta DAVIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dennis STRAUB... (/v1/cases/1136837)<br />

Walker v. Litscher (/v1/cases/1136840)<br />

LeCroy v. Fla. Dept. of Corrs. (/v1/cases/1136811)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. F... (/v1/cases/1377987)<br />

Neville v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1137034)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Magleby (/v1/cases/1136787)<br />

Smith v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1136930)<br />

Robert J. SMOTHERS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Gary R.... (/v1/cases/1377641)<br />

Greiner v. Wells (/v1/cases/1136443)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Wellington (/v1/cases/1136367)<br />

Ronald POST, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Margaret BRAD... (/v1/cases/1377763)<br />

Brown v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1136639)<br />

Harries v. Bell (/v1/cases/1136420)<br />

Boltz v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1377558)<br />

Lonnie Wright RICHIE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Mike ... (/v1/cases/1136427)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Jonathan Jay ... (/v1/cases/1136311)<br />

Payne v. Bell (/v1/cases/1136554)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Franklin (/v1/cases/1136156)<br />

Wilson v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1136033)<br />

In Coble v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1136411)<br />

Belmontes v. Brown (/v1/cases/1136026)<br />

Ricky Lee EARP, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John STOKE... (/v1/cases/1137039)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Silva (/v1/cases/1378037)<br />

McNair v. Campbell (/v1/cases/1136228)<br />

Smith v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1136430)<br />

Fountain v. Kyler (/v1/cases/1136761)<br />

Lave v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1377610)<br />

Jordan v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1136295)<br />

Richard LOVE, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frank M... (/v1/cases/1135902)<br />

Jose HERNANDEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles GR... (/v1/cases/1136038)<br />

UNITED STATES of America v. Felton JONES, Appellant... (/v1/cases/1136487)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Nguyen (/v1/cases/1135878)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

38 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Haines v. Risley (/v1/cases/1135671)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Mandy MARTIN... (/v1/cases/1136618)<br />

James WASHINGTON, Jr., Appellant, v. Steve MOORE; J... (/v1/cases/1377740)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. John WEISSER... (/v1/cases/1135619)<br />

Davis v. Norris (/v1/cases/1137112)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Weisser (/v1/cases/1136382)<br />

Morris v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1135810)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Arteca (/v1/cases/1377457)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Bellamy (/v1/cases/1135644)<br />

Hughes v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1135707)<br />

Sims v. Brown (/v1/cases/1137266)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Thomas (/v1/cases/1136439)<br />

Edwards v. Lamarque (/v1/cases/1378386)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fr... (/v1/cases/1135499)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cieslowski (/v1/cases/1135471)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Luis B. FORN... (/v1/cases/1135196)<br />

Timberlake v. Davis (/v1/cases/1377383)<br />

Henry v. Poole (/v1/cases/1135415)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Henderson (/v1/cases/1135375)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jes ú s Alb... (/v1/cases/1377399)<br />

Comer v. Schriro (/v1/cases/1140977)<br />

Marshall v. Cathel (/v1/cases/1377973)<br />

Bucklew v. Luebbers (/v1/cases/1138388)<br />

Moody v. Polk (/v1/cases/1135178)<br />

White v. Roper (/v1/cases/1136182)<br />

Washington v. Lampert (/v1/cases/1136980)<br />

Harbison v. Bell (/v1/cases/1135190)<br />

Howard v. Bouchard (/v1/cases/1134839)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Harris (/v1/cases/1377352)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Verbitskaya (/v1/cases/1135001)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Banks (/v1/cases/1134895)<br />

Ruimveld v. Birkett (/v1/cases/1134802)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Turcotte (/v1/cases/1134845)<br />

McFall v. Bednar (/v1/cases/1135100)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Rodriguez (/v1/cases/1135058)<br />

Pervaiz v. Gonzales (/v1/cases/1134919)<br />

Munoz v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1134798)<br />

Hayes v. Battaglia (/v1/cases/1134577)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Juan LEDEZMA... (/v1/cases/1137065)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Vaval (/v1/cases/1134813)<br />

Darris YOUNG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David L. RUN... (/v1/cases/1138359)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Luis E. NEGR... (/v1/cases/1134664)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Holmes (/v1/cases/1134992)<br />

Peoples v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1134648)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Garrett (/v1/cases/1377195)<br />

Lovitt v. True (/v1/cases/1134611)<br />

Vasquez v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1134482)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

39 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Nixon v. Epps (/v1/cases/1134867)<br />

William Steve GREENUP, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNI... (/v1/cases/1134390)<br />

De La Rosa v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1134792)<br />

Cardenas v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1134896)<br />

Walker v. True (/v1/cases/1134384)<br />

Id. 15 Miller v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1134787)<br />

Landrigan v. Schriro (/v1/cases/1378478)<br />

Dalton v. Battaglia (/v1/cases/1134474)<br />

Martinez v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1134734)<br />

Summerlin v. Schriro (/v1/cases/1377910)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Infante (/v1/cases/1134736)<br />

BELL, WARDEN v. QUINTERO. (/v1/cases/1413313)<br />

Richardson v. Briley (/v1/cases/1377164)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hughes (/v1/cases/1134443)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jennifer REG... (/v1/cases/1377285)<br />

Angel Nieves DIAZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SECRETA... (/v1/cases/1134480)<br />

Jones v. Polk (/v1/cases/1377171)<br />

Osborne v. Purkett (/v1/cases/1135633)<br />

Eisemann v. Herbert (/v1/cases/1134438)<br />

In re Olopade (/v1/cases/1134642)<br />

Ballard v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1134307)<br />

Knox v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1134333)<br />

Bigby v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1134566)<br />

Hill v. Mitchell (/v1/cases/1134247)<br />

William H. SMITH, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appella... (/v1/cases/1134493)<br />

Humphress v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1133985)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Antonakopoulos (/v1/cases/1134113)<br />

Tinsley v. Million (/v1/cases/1134124)<br />

Fuller v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1377079)<br />

Titsworth v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1134422)<br />

Pfau v. Ault (/v1/cases/1377397)<br />

Barrow v. Uchtman (/v1/cases/1377083)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. McCoy (/v1/cases/1135428)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Rodriguez (/v1/cases/1377068)<br />

Humphries v. Ozmint (/v1/cases/1377056)<br />

Stanley WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jeanne W... (/v1/cases/1133759)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Toms (/v1/cases/1133757)<br />

Sanders v. Cotton (/v1/cases/1134035)<br />

Callahan I. In Herring v. Secretary, Department of ... (/v1/cases/1133932)<br />

Ramirez v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1134053)<br />

Kenneth T. RICHEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Betty M... (/v1/cases/1133651)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Rashad (/v1/cases/1377021)<br />

Myartt v. Frank (/v1/cases/1133665)<br />

Whiting v. Burt (/v1/cases/1133632)<br />

Payne v. Bell (/v1/cases/1134164)<br />

Anderson v. Alameida (/v1/cases/1133890)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Scott (/v1/cases/1133582)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

40 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

2004<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Moore (/v1/cases/1376975)<br />

Honeycutt v. Roper (/v1/cases/1377875)<br />

Ramirez v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1133825)<br />

Robert T. JENKINS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of ... (/v1/cases/1133495)<br />

Towns v. Smith (/v1/cases/1133706)<br />

Thacker v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1133771)<br />

Hunter v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr. (/v1/cases/1133650)<br />

Parker v. Scott (/v1/cases/1133568)<br />

McHone v. Polk (/v1/cases/1133256)<br />

Mungo v. Duncan (/v1/cases/1133370)<br />

Alphonso HUBANKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Matthew ... (/v1/cases/1376924)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Moran (/v1/cases/1376930)<br />

Ralph OYAGUE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Christopher ... (/v1/cases/1133384)<br />

Johnson v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1376981)<br />

Thai v. Mapes (/v1/cases/1135679)<br />

FLORIDA v. NIXON (/v1/cases/1411217)<br />

Deitz v. Money (/v1/cases/1133235)<br />

Charles Jess PALMER, Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE... (/v1/cases/1135244)<br />

Juan H. v. Allen (/v1/cases/1135203)<br />

Horton v. Mayle (/v1/cases/1135205)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Webster (/v1/cases/1133305)<br />

Burton v. Renico (/v1/cases/1133202)<br />

Albino PEREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry ROSARI... (/v1/cases/1379325)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Kwan (/v1/cases/1135113)<br />

Albino PEREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry ROSARI... (/v1/cases/1139888)<br />

Jackson v. Ray (/v1/cases/1133038)<br />

Turrentine v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1133064)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Allen (/v1/cases/1133083)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hilliard (/v1/cases/1133293)<br />

Bieghler v. McBride (/v1/cases/1133006)<br />

Elwaldo R. JAMES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Rickie H... (/v1/cases/1133016)<br />

Lyons v. Luebbers (/v1/cases/1134670)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Davis (/v1/cases/1135024)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Stewart (/v1/cases/1132835)<br />

Dragenice v. Ridge (/v1/cases/1132978)<br />

Richard ALLISON, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Edward F... (/v1/cases/1132910)<br />

Davis v. Lambert (/v1/cases/1132887)<br />

Mapes v. Tate (/v1/cases/1132894)<br />

Lary James PLUMLEE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Franki... (/v1/cases/1137404)<br />

Schardt v. Payne (/v1/cases/1136028)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Fredman (/v1/cases/1133109)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Jones (/v1/cases/1134610)<br />

Stefan Koda WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Kell... (/v1/cases/1377229)<br />

Evicci v. Maloney (/v1/cases/1132764)<br />

Cox v. Donnelly (/v1/cases/1132737)<br />

Gerald Ross PIZZUTO, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. ... (/v1/cases/1132484)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

41 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Owens v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1376762)<br />

Becht v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1134623)<br />

Anderson v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1133410)<br />

Bruce Robert NELSON, Appellant, v. Sheryl Ramstad H... (/v1/cases/1133350)<br />

Obleshchenko v. Ashcroft (/v1/cases/1133312)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. McLaughlin (/v1/cases/1132629)<br />

In <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Thomas (/v1/cases/1132944)<br />

Bourdon v. Loughren (/v1/cases/1376743)<br />

Martin v. Evans (/v1/cases/1132369)<br />

Kandies v. Polk (/v1/cases/1132538)<br />

Miller v. Webb (/v1/cases/1132511)<br />

Rutherford v. Crosby (/v1/cases/1132494)<br />

Munson v. Kapture (/v1/cases/1132432)<br />

Rose v. Palmateer (/v1/cases/1133680)<br />

Green v. Norris (/v1/cases/1376985)<br />

Stuard v. Stewart (/v1/cases/1134401)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Staples (/v1/cases/1135467)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Jeronimo (/v1/cases/1377086)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Wagner (/v1/cases/1376611)<br />

Cannon v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1132232)<br />

Lordi v. Ishee (/v1/cases/1132440)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jaime O. COL... (/v1/cases/1132182)<br />

Luis Carlos GUERRERO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNIT... (/v1/cases/1132339)<br />

Aaron Leigh CYARS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gerald ... (/v1/cases/1132328)<br />

Jefferson v. Fountain (/v1/cases/1132138)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Frampton (/v1/cases/1132213)<br />

Abela v. Martin (/v1/cases/1131914)<br />

Rodriguez v. Chandler (/v1/cases/1132186)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Adil Gasim A... (/v1/cases/1376786)<br />

Sallahdin v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1131908)<br />

Harding v. Sternes (/v1/cases/1131948)<br />

In <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Eli (/v1/cases/1376545)<br />

Raul MORALES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles GREI... (/v1/cases/1132049)<br />

Earls v. McCaughtry (/v1/cases/1131847)<br />

Roberts v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1132048)<br />

Richardson v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1131853)<br />

Williams v. Bagley (/v1/cases/1131998)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Roane (/v1/cases/1131785)<br />

Cooper v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1131772)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/1135334)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Levy (/v1/cases/1131639)<br />

Smith v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1131849)<br />

Matheney v. Anderson (/v1/cases/1131670)<br />

Hicks v. Straub (/v1/cases/1131575)<br />

Richard LONGWORTH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jon E. ... (/v1/cases/1131653)<br />

Kelley v. Sec'y Dep't of Corr. (/v1/cases/1131621)<br />

John W. PEOPLES, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dona... (/v1/cases/1131585)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

42 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Richmond v. Polk (/v1/cases/1131342)<br />

Conner v. McBride (/v1/cases/1131428)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Iy... (/v1/cases/1132855)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Copeland (/v1/cases/1131499)<br />

Millender v. Adams (/v1/cases/1131448)<br />

Boyde v. Brown (/v1/cases/1377251)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Carr (/v1/cases/1131166)<br />

Georcely v. Ashcroft (/v1/cases/1376441)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Wells (/v1/cases/1376970)<br />

Clinkscale v. Carter (/v1/cases/1131358)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Grammas (/v1/cases/1131500)<br />

Dockins v. Hines (/v1/cases/1376401)<br />

Holland v. Jackson (/v1/cases/1407089)<br />

Sowell v. Bradshaw (/v1/cases/1376372)<br />

Thompson v. Bell (/v1/cases/1131181)<br />

Underdahl v. Carlson (/v1/cases/1132039)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Llinas (/v1/cases/1131183)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Thongmy THAM... (/v1/cases/1131762)<br />

Hall v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1130965)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Dominguez Benitez (/v1/cases/1407069)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hall (/v1/cases/1130795)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Harms (/v1/cases/1376317)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Victor PAGAN... (/v1/cases/1131004)<br />

Baze v. Parker (/v1/cases/1130891)<br />

Jacobs v. Horn (/v1/cases/1133702)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Combs (/v1/cases/1130713)<br />

Horton v. Allen (/v1/cases/1376288)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Grammas (/v1/cases/1130962)<br />

Medellin v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1130980)<br />

Allen v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1130606)<br />

Larrea v. Bennett (/v1/cases/1130566)<br />

Daroyce Lamont MOSLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dou... (/v1/cases/1130808)<br />

Odem v. Hopkins (/v1/cases/1132205)<br />

Eric Randall NANCE, Appellant, v. Larry NORRIS, Dir... (/v1/cases/1133309)<br />

In Hemstreet v. Greiner (/v1/cases/1130488)<br />

Bigelow v. Williams (/v1/cases/1130511)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Grace (/v1/cases/1130457)<br />

Butcher v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1130602)<br />

Harris v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1130498)<br />

Affinito v. Hendricks (/v1/cases/1376182)<br />

Priester v. Vaughn (/v1/cases/1132132)<br />

Reinert v. Larkins (/v1/cases/1131854)<br />

Humphries v. Ozmint (/v1/cases/1130329)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Birkin (/v1/cases/1130370)<br />

Dretke v. Haley (/v1/cases/1405951)<br />

Harris v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1376203)<br />

John David STUMPF, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Betty M... (/v1/cases/1130453)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

43 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

DiGuglielmo v. Smith (/v1/cases/1130340)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ra... (/v1/cases/1130349)<br />

Soffar v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1376233)<br />

Conklin v. Schofield (/v1/cases/1130339)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Doe (/v1/cases/1130280)<br />

Campbell v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1130119)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Gaskin (/v1/cases/1376132)<br />

McAdoo v. Elo (/v1/cases/1130242)<br />

Hightower v. Schofield (/v1/cases/1130227)<br />

Lambert v. McBride (/v1/cases/1130230)<br />

Harris v. Cotton (/v1/cases/1130234)<br />

Floyd v. Hanks (/v1/cases/1130133)<br />

Tommy Ray WARREN, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Virginia ... (/v1/cases/1376172)<br />

Sweeney v. Carter (/v1/cases/1129695)<br />

Lewis v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1129465)<br />

A.M. v. Butler (/v1/cases/1129634)<br />

Cone v. Bell (/v1/cases/1129449)<br />

Ronald ROMPILLA v. Martin HORN, Commissioner, Penns... (/v1/cases/1376022)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Williams (/v1/cases/1129317)<br />

Banks v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1404235)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Monzon (/v1/cases/1129528)<br />

Cuyler. 145 In Quince v. Crosby (/v1/cases/1129603)<br />

Broomes v. Ashcroft (/v1/cases/1129432)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Howard (/v1/cases/1132030)<br />

Alidani v. Dooley (/v1/cases/1130200)<br />

Daniels v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1377967)<br />

Emezuo v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1129273)<br />

Hovey v. Ayers (/v1/cases/1379210)<br />

Busby v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1376014)<br />

Benefiel v. Davis (/v1/cases/1129259)<br />

Lofton v. Sec. of Dept. of Children and Family Serv... (/v1/cases/1129354)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Carter (/v1/cases/1129048)<br />

Fountain v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1129194)<br />

McFarland v. Yukins (/v1/cases/1129170)<br />

Peter Sutro WAINE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph ... (/v1/cases/1129140)<br />

Jansen v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1130715)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Aptt (/v1/cases/1128882)<br />

Miller v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1128842)<br />

Chesney v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1130454)<br />

Henderson v. Briley (/v1/cases/1375859)<br />

Covey v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1131593)<br />

Lopez v. Wilson (/v1/cases/1129021)<br />

Evans v. Luebbers (/v1/cases/1130892)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Reinhart (/v1/cases/1375942)<br />

Bockting v. Bayer (/v1/cases/1134152)<br />

Clay Anthony FORD, Appellee, v. Larry NORRIS, Direc... (/v1/cases/1376135)<br />

Torres v. Ashcroft (/v1/cases/1132241)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

44 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

2003<br />

Nooner v. Norris (/v1/cases/1134561)<br />

Young v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1129175)<br />

Roberts v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1129149)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Angel (/v1/cases/1128973)<br />

Riggs v. Fairman (/v1/cases/1134199)<br />

Dennis v. Mitchell (/v1/cases/1128843)<br />

Hamblin v. Mitchell (/v1/cases/1128916)<br />

Lewis v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1129039)<br />

Wilson v. Ozmint (/v1/cases/1128636)<br />

Willis v. Smith (/v1/cases/1128566)<br />

Clemons v. Luebbers (/v1/cases/1132033)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Theodore (/v1/cases/1375861)<br />

Kunkle v. Dretke (/v1/cases/1128629)<br />

Stankewitz v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1130181)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-... (/v1/cases/1128509)<br />

Hudson v. Jones (/v1/cases/1128499)<br />

Galvan v. Alaska Dep't of Corr. (/v1/cases/1133981)<br />

Tucker v. Ozmint (/v1/cases/1128398)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Mutuc (/v1/cases/1128355)<br />

Clay v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1130411)<br />

Caver v. Straub (/v1/cases/1128283)<br />

Reagan v. Norris (/v1/cases/1130228)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Morris (/v1/cases/1128482)<br />

Smith v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1128211)<br />

Sophanthavong v. Palmateer (/v1/cases/1131716)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Conley (/v1/cases/1128293)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Bowman (/v1/cases/1128232)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ge... (/v1/cases/1128125)<br />

Smith v. Mitchell (/v1/cases/1128202)<br />

Moore v. Bryant (/v1/cases/1128196)<br />

Castillo v. Matesanz (/v1/cases/1375708)<br />

Payton v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1375620)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cook (/v1/cases/1129152)<br />

Yarborough v. Gentry (/v1/cases/1403918)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> ex rel. Hampton v. Leibach (/v1/cases/1128083)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Thomas (/v1/cases/1128249)<br />

Robinson v. Ignacio (/v1/cases/1129657)<br />

Riley v. Payne (/v1/cases/1128706)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Ratigan (/v1/cases/1375775)<br />

Grotemeyer v. Hickman (/v1/cases/1133416)<br />

Moore v. Casperson (/v1/cases/1127801)<br />

Silas T. McADOO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frank ELO... (/v1/cases/1127944)<br />

Bowling v. Parker (/v1/cases/1127744)<br />

Tueros v. Greiner (/v1/cases/1127662)<br />

Page v. Frank (/v1/cases/1127648)<br />

Perry v. Kemna (/v1/cases/1129159)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

45 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Johnson v. Bell (/v1/cases/1127718)<br />

UNITED STATES of America v. Dion A. SMACK, a/k/a De... (/v1/cases/1375664)<br />

Alaniz v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1128572)<br />

Armstrong v. Kemna (/v1/cases/1130221)<br />

Frazier v. Huffman (/v1/cases/1127652)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Snitz (/v1/cases/1127464)<br />

Rockwell v. Yukins (/v1/cases/1127372)<br />

Reid v. True (/v1/cases/1128274)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Nishnianidze (/v1/cases/1127522)<br />

Jerry Leon HALIBURTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SEC... (/v1/cases/1127547)<br />

Cotton v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1127595)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hanson (/v1/cases/1375465)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Taylor (/v1/cases/1127120)<br />

Maples v. Stegall (/v1/cases/1375484)<br />

Davis v. Crosby (/v1/cases/1127409)<br />

Schaetzle v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1127576)<br />

Joe Lee GUY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Janie COCKREL... (/v1/cases/1127637)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Rodrigues (/v1/cases/1128016)<br />

Nunes v. Mueller (/v1/cases/1128422)<br />

Spears v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1127677)<br />

Paine v. Massie (/v1/cases/1127102)<br />

Barnes v. Elo (/v1/cases/1375458)<br />

Santo RUIZ, Petitioner, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES... (/v1/cases/1127081)<br />

Joshua v. DeWitt (/v1/cases/1127403)<br />

Ross v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1375461)<br />

Kaminski v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1127122)<br />

Byram v. Ozmint (/v1/cases/1127138)<br />

Hill v. Ozmint (/v1/cases/1127181)<br />

Johnson v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1127240)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gu... (/v1/cases/1127425)<br />

McLuckie v. Abbott (/v1/cases/1126912)<br />

Harris v. Carter (/v1/cases/1375386)<br />

Turner v. Crosby (/v1/cases/1127117)<br />

Bigby v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1127222)<br />

Roberts v. Carter (/v1/cases/1126913)<br />

Steve BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Burl CAIN, Wa... (/v1/cases/1126921)<br />

Bryan v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1126656)<br />

Michael Wayne PICKNEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bur... (/v1/cases/1126929)<br />

Miniel v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1127136)<br />

Riley v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1127176)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Jimenez Recio (/v1/cases/1130887)<br />

Ward v. Sternes (/v1/cases/1126532)<br />

Anderson v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1127018)<br />

Elda San Juanita REGALADO, Petitioner-Appellant, v.... (/v1/cases/1126505)<br />

Clark v. Crosby (/v1/cases/1126585)<br />

Mallett v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1375303)<br />

Wiggins v. Smith (/v1/cases/1400413)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

46 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

KEVIN WIGGINS, PETITIONER v. SEWALL SMITH, WARDEN, ... (/v1/cases/1394480)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Horey (/v1/cases/1126396)<br />

E.g., Murrell v. Frank (/v1/cases/1375226)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hernandez (/v1/cases/1126430)<br />

Upchurch v. Bruce (/v1/cases/1126448)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Feyrer (/v1/cases/1375277)<br />

Bell v. Ozmint (/v1/cases/1126279)<br />

Whitehead v. Dormire (/v1/cases/1127299)<br />

Allen v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1133643)<br />

French v. Jones (/v1/cases/1126252)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. White (/v1/cases/1127429)<br />

Hood v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1127461)<br />

Henderson v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1126471)<br />

Griffin v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1126099)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Cesar Marcel... (/v1/cases/1125991)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Freixas (/v1/cases/1126271)<br />

COA. Hanson v. Mahoney (/v1/cases/1375414)<br />

Dale Michael HANSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mike ... (/v1/cases/1138026)<br />

Epsom v. Hall (/v1/cases/1126010)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Radmen DOWNS... (/v1/cases/1125995)<br />

Parker v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr. (/v1/cases/1126194)<br />

Alonzo WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of Ame... (/v1/cases/1127606)<br />

Jaramillo v. Stewart (/v1/cases/1375482)<br />

Bugh v. Mitchell (/v1/cases/1125904)<br />

Powell v. Collins (/v1/cases/1126244)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ro... (/v1/cases/1126192)<br />

Cockett v. Ray (/v1/cases/1126395)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hall (/v1/cases/1125619)<br />

Lee v. Davis (/v1/cases/1125817)<br />

Rowsey v. Lee (/v1/cases/1125650)<br />

Massaro v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1399109)<br />

Jones v. Luebbers (/v1/cases/1129514)<br />

Sanders v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1127331)<br />

In Williams v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1127289)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Fudge (/v1/cases/1125448)<br />

Mitchell v. Mason (/v1/cases/1125434)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R... (/v1/cases/1125396)<br />

Lin v. Ashcroft (/v1/cases/1129163)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Perez (/v1/cases/1125416)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ju... (/v1/cases/1125323)<br />

Swisher v. True (/v1/cases/1125441)<br />

Bittaker v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1126165)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Salazar (/v1/cases/1125243)<br />

Kohn v. U.S. (/v1/cases/1125178)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Le... (/v1/cases/1125213)<br />

James KOSTE, Appellant, v. Dave DORMIRE, Appellee. (/v1/cases/1127803)<br />

Hopkins v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1374992)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

47 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

2002<br />

Cook v. McKune (/v1/cases/1374935)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Jackson (/v1/cases/1125654)<br />

Charles Lamont LEMON, Sued as Charles L. Lemon, App... (/v1/cases/1375334)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Thornton (/v1/cases/1125666)<br />

Brodit v. Cambra (/v1/cases/1128439)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Griffin (/v1/cases/1125320)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Villarreal (/v1/cases/1125345)<br />

Ewing v. California (/v1/cases/1399198)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Elvy MARTINE... (/v1/cases/1124892)<br />

Sanders v. Ryder (/v1/cases/1127457)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Barnes (/v1/cases/1125339)<br />

Walton v. Angelone (/v1/cases/1125006)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Pittman (/v1/cases/1374823)<br />

Brown v. Lee (/v1/cases/1124718)<br />

Hardamon v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1124652)<br />

Sandoval v. Clarke (/v1/cases/1125181)<br />

Bear Stops v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1127131)<br />

Michael Eugene BLACKWELL, Appellant, v. Leonard GRA... (/v1/cases/1128279)<br />

Eze v. Senkowski (/v1/cases/1124903)<br />

Berkey v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1124603)<br />

Griffey v. Lindsey (/v1/cases/1127814)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Appellee, v. Mack Al Gree... (/v1/cases/1374928)<br />

Matthews v. Abramajtys (/v1/cases/1124739)<br />

Coleman v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1124626)<br />

Mason v. Mitchell (/v1/cases/1124884)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Ridgeway (/v1/cases/1124985)<br />

Alcala v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1375309)<br />

Purdy v. Zeldes (/v1/cases/1126888)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Gurolla (/v1/cases/1126384)<br />

Hardwick v. Crosby (/v1/cases/1124818)<br />

Wickline v. Mitchell (/v1/cases/1124657)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Meskini (/v1/cases/1124742)<br />

Cargle v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1124409)<br />

Hines v. Miller (/v1/cases/1124568)<br />

PRICE v. UNITED STATES. (/v1/cases/1395904)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Galloway (/v1/cases/1124330)<br />

Brown v. Luebbers (/v1/cases/1375580)<br />

Lamar v. Graves (/v1/cases/1125586)<br />

Rick FREEMAN, Appellee, v. Leonard GRAVES, Appellan... (/v1/cases/1124452)<br />

Pham v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1124500)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Tekle (/v1/cases/1125911)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Fry (/v1/cases/1125027)<br />

Daniels v. Lee (/v1/cases/1124382)<br />

Thompson v. Bell (/v1/cases/1124167)<br />

Hubbard v. Haley (/v1/cases/1124427)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Riggs (/v1/cases/1124052)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

48 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Dukagjini (/v1/cases/1125564)<br />

Johnson v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1123959)<br />

Ellis v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1374660)<br />

Galbraith v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1123970)<br />

Hooper v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1124023)<br />

Leonard WELLINGTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michae... (/v1/cases/1124080)<br />

Catalan v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1124199)<br />

Kinnard v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1123980)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Eyman (/v1/cases/1123990)<br />

Dunham v. Travis (/v1/cases/1123899)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Mullins (/v1/cases/1124284)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Holman (/v1/cases/1374676)<br />

Ellis v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1125577)<br />

Ellis v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1374623)<br />

Smith v. Hofbauer (/v1/cases/1374622)<br />

Burgos v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1123922)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Jones (/v1/cases/1126734)<br />

Wemark v. Iowa (/v1/cases/1125124)<br />

Mandacina v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1125867)<br />

Riley Dobi NOEL, Appellant, v. Larry NORRIS, Direct... (/v1/cases/1125040)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Leonti (/v1/cases/1125597)<br />

LanFranco v. Murray (/v1/cases/1123992)<br />

Davis v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1126441)<br />

Davis v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1132423)<br />

Belmontes v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1128428)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Fuller (/v1/cases/1123874)<br />

Le v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1374586)<br />

Young v. Walls (/v1/cases/1123718)<br />

Hayes v. York (/v1/cases/1123753)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Toliver (/v1/cases/1375174)<br />

Jones v. Roper (/v1/cases/1123690)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Couto (/v1/cases/1123685)<br />

Jones v. Cooper (/v1/cases/1123674)<br />

Lattimore v. Dubois (/v1/cases/1123699)<br />

Crawford v. Head (/v1/cases/1123708)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Leasure (/v1/cases/1124682)<br />

Hall v. Luebbers (/v1/cases/1127352)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Lott (/v1/cases/1123600)<br />

Esparza v. Mitchell (/v1/cases/1123562)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Alaimalo (/v1/cases/1374652)<br />

Woodford v. Visciotti (/v1/cases/1393063)<br />

Smith v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1123715)<br />

Taylor v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1125960)<br />

Hall v. Head (/v1/cases/1123534)<br />

Ladd v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1123712)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Waldemar BUR... (/v1/cases/1374549)<br />

Frederick v. Warden, Lewisburg Corr. Facility (/v1/cases/1123311)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

49 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Kevin COOPER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arthur CALDE... (/v1/cases/1123341)<br />

Bell v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1123608)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Bass (/v1/cases/1123619)<br />

Beardslee v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1129351)<br />

Beardslee v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1125728)<br />

Ronald LINDSEY, Sued as Ronald Devon Lindsey, Petit... (/v1/cases/1123550)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Young (/v1/cases/1374713)<br />

Pratt v. Greiner (/v1/cases/1374467)<br />

Alley v. Bell (/v1/cases/1123277)<br />

Perry v. McCaughtry (/v1/cases/1123331)<br />

Johnson v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1374452)<br />

Brownlee v. Haley (/v1/cases/1123142)<br />

Brown v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1123676)<br />

Douglas v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1124291)<br />

Miller v. Dormire (/v1/cases/1123563)<br />

White v. Luebbers (/v1/cases/1123225)<br />

Manning v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1123628)<br />

Scott v. Elo (/v1/cases/1122705)<br />

Chapman v. LeMaster (/v1/cases/1122776)<br />

Brown v. Sternes (/v1/cases/1122939)<br />

Hunter v. Moore (/v1/cases/1122944)<br />

Duckett v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1123189)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Magallanes (/v1/cases/1122642)<br />

Ellis v. Hargett (/v1/cases/1122787)<br />

Williams v. Davis (/v1/cases/1374335)<br />

Hutchison v. Bell (/v1/cases/1374383)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Ceballos (/v1/cases/1122780)<br />

Scott v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1374377)<br />

White v. Godinez (/v1/cases/1122653)<br />

Ramos v. Weber (/v1/cases/1122900)<br />

Holleman v. Cotton (/v1/cases/1374338)<br />

Lyons v. Jackson (/v1/cases/1122395)<br />

Pirtle v. M<strong>org</strong>an (/v1/cases/1123914)<br />

Robinson v. Moore (/v1/cases/1122550)<br />

Miller v. Straub (/v1/cases/1122421)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. R... (/v1/cases/1122404)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Campbell (/v1/cases/1374298)<br />

Johnson v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1122634)<br />

Texas. Collier v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1122554)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Farr (/v1/cases/1374218)<br />

Bullock v. Carver (/v1/cases/1122205)<br />

St. Pierre v. Walls (/v1/cases/1122137)<br />

Sharon May ROCKWELL, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Joan Y... (/v1/cases/1122077)<br />

In Fortenberry v. Haley (/v1/cases/1122222)<br />

Haynes v. Cain (/v1/cases/1374220)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Danielson (/v1/cases/1125491)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Vasquez (/v1/cases/1374250)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

50 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Mello v. DiPaulo (/v1/cases/1121915)<br />

Gentry v. Roe (/v1/cases/1374852)<br />

Henderson v. Walls (/v1/cases/1122013)<br />

Lionel E. GENTRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernie RO... (/v1/cases/1374279)<br />

McClure v. Thompson (/v1/cases/1125169)<br />

Aeid v. Bennett (/v1/cases/1374178)<br />

Hackett v. Price (/v1/cases/1132088)<br />

Stephens v. Hall (/v1/cases/1121853)<br />

Ogan v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1374198)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hylton (/v1/cases/1121758)<br />

Mahaffey v. Schomig (/v1/cases/1121837)<br />

Beltran v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1121811)<br />

Hooker v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1121633)<br />

U.S. v. Mora (/v1/cases/1121665)<br />

Willingham v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1122010)<br />

Ouber v. Guarino (/v1/cases/1121664)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Booze (/v1/cases/1121701)<br />

Knighton v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1121645)<br />

Linda J. HOOK, Appellant, v. State of IOWA, Appelle... (/v1/cases/1123276)<br />

Smith v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1123701)<br />

Foster v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1121714)<br />

Hayes v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1122691)<br />

Galvan v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1121724)<br />

Hayes v. Brown (/v1/cases/1134140)<br />

Fitzgerald v. Withrow (/v1/cases/1121565)<br />

Rubin v. Gee (/v1/cases/1374054)<br />

UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Ramon RAMIREZ-BENITEZ, ... (/v1/cases/1121559)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Crowe (/v1/cases/1121406)<br />

Bell v. Cone (/v1/cases/1390422)<br />

Roche v. Davis (/v1/cases/1121349)<br />

Lorraine v. Coyle (/v1/cases/1121455)<br />

Hunt v. Lee (/v1/cases/1121353)<br />

Rompilla v. Horn (/v1/cases/1129047)<br />

Hawkins v. Mullin (/v1/cases/1121351)<br />

Fullwood v. Lee (/v1/cases/1121312)<br />

Tse v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1121335)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Shwayder (/v1/cases/1123778)<br />

Burton v. Dormire (/v1/cases/1121883)<br />

Roccisano v. Menifee (/v1/cases/1121607)<br />

Hoon v. Iowa (/v1/cases/1123996)<br />

Whitfield v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1374971)<br />

Cofske v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1374012)<br />

Schoenberger v. Russell (/v1/cases/1374001)<br />

Van Poyck v. Fla. Dep't of Corrs. (/v1/cases/1121272)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Traeger (/v1/cases/1121166)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Todd (/v1/cases/1120932)<br />

Basden v. Lee (/v1/cases/1121299)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

51 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Wiggins v. Corcoran (/v1/cases/1121046)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Ryan (/v1/cases/1121161)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Stricklin (/v1/cases/1121277)<br />

Scarbrough v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1374299)<br />

Johnson v. Champion (/v1/cases/1121043)<br />

Wright v. Walls (/v1/cases/1121053)<br />

Berry v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1121600)<br />

Samuel L. LaFRANK, Appellant, v. Larry ROWLEY, Appe... (/v1/cases/1127249)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Robinson (/v1/cases/1122632)<br />

Cooey v. Coyle (/v1/cases/1121207)<br />

Hall v. Luebbers (/v1/cases/1121987)<br />

Moss v. Hofbauer (/v1/cases/1373891)<br />

Rodriguez v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1120810)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Th... (/v1/cases/1127023)<br />

Stevens v. Delaware Corr. Ctr. (/v1/cases/1121973)<br />

Alberto VALDEZ, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Janie COCKR... (/v1/cases/1120876)<br />

Bracy v. Schomig (/v1/cases/1120803)<br />

Norde v. Keane (/v1/cases/1374127)<br />

Mayo v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1373914)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Jones (/v1/cases/1120872)<br />

Mickens v. Taylor (/v1/cases/1389684)<br />

El v. Nuth (/v1/cases/1373959)<br />

Marshall v. Hendricks (/v1/cases/1123280)<br />

Payton v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1122422)<br />

Moon v. Head (/v1/cases/1120694)<br />

Neal v. Puckett (/v1/cases/1373897)<br />

Todd v. Schomig (/v1/cases/1120471)<br />

Revilla v. Gibson (/v1/cases/1120428)<br />

Fisher v. Gibson (/v1/cases/1120313)<br />

Rios v. Rocha (/v1/cases/1374252)<br />

Simmons v. Luebbers (/v1/cases/1122445)<br />

Carter v. Lee (/v1/cases/1120423)<br />

French v. Jones (/v1/cases/1120358)<br />

Sandgathe v. Maass (/v1/cases/1124021)<br />

Evans v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1120738)<br />

Avila v. Galaza (/v1/cases/1122179)<br />

McWee v. Weldon (/v1/cases/1120432)<br />

Franklin v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1121324)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Schwarz (/v1/cases/1120431)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Genao (/v1/cases/1120225)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Weaver (/v1/cases/1373741)<br />

Daniel v. Cockrell (/v1/cases/1120399)<br />

Lam v. Kelchner (/v1/cases/1374404)<br />

Monzo v. Edwards (/v1/cases/1120213)<br />

Hain v. Gibson (/v1/cases/1373918)<br />

Tunstall v. Hopkins (/v1/cases/1374459)<br />

Frasier v. Maschner (/v1/cases/1374398)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

52 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

2001<br />

Luna v. Cambra (/v1/cases/1123146)<br />

Martin v. Mitchell (/v1/cases/1120017)<br />

Gonzales v. McKune (/v1/cases/1119905)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Stubbs (/v1/cases/1119942)<br />

Garcia v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1373664)<br />

Romano v. Gibson (/v1/cases/1119812)<br />

Rastafari v. Anderson (/v1/cases/1119757)<br />

BOBBY JOE FIELDS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GARY L. ... (/v1/cases/1373541)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ri... (/v1/cases/1373462)<br />

SHARIEFF IMANI SALLAHDIN, also known as Michael Pen... (/v1/cases/1373261)<br />

Eugene Alvin BROXTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jani... (/v1/cases/1119818)<br />

ROBERT LEROY BRYAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GARY G... (/v1/cases/1373479)<br />

Arnold Winters, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles M... (/v1/cases/1373097)<br />

RONALD FIELDS, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, v. MARGARET BAG... (/v1/cases/1373357)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. JORGE GUEVARA... (/v1/cases/1373633)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ... (/v1/cases/1373316)<br />

Gray v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1120223)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Granillo (/v1/cases/1121089)<br />

Neill v. Gibson (/v1/cases/1373655)<br />

Community Dental v. Tani (/v1/cases/1120295)<br />

Beaty v. Stewart (/v1/cases/1122835)<br />

Fields v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1374542)<br />

Fields v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1120177)<br />

Visciotti v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1121044)<br />

U.S. v. Cross (/v1/cases/1123317)<br />

Robert A. Buell, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Betty Mit... (/v1/cases/1373070)<br />

HEATH WILLIAM BURCH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. THOMA... (/v1/cases/1372940)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GE... (/v1/cases/1372786)<br />

BRANDON HAYNES, Petitioner-Appellee, v. BURL CAIN, ... (/v1/cases/1372814)<br />

KEVIN L. HOUGH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RONDLE AND... (/v1/cases/1372844)<br />

BRUCE WAYNE MORRIS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. JEANNE... (/v1/cases/1373043)<br />

JAMES WILLIE BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FREDER... (/v1/cases/1372818)<br />

Hubbeling v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1121078)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JO... (/v1/cases/1372956)<br />

California Court of Appeal. In Reese v. Baldwin (/v1/cases/1120254)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. JOHN DOE #1,... (/v1/cases/1372828)<br />

JEFFREY TIMOTHY LANDRIGAN, A.K.A. BILLY PATRICK WAY... (/v1/cases/1372773)<br />

Moormann v. Schriro (/v1/cases/1137377)<br />

Williams v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1132428)<br />

Williams v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1374450)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Day (/v1/cases/1373866)<br />

Benn v. Lambert (/v1/cases/1120385)<br />

Everett v. Beard (/v1/cases/1373994)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ... (/v1/cases/1372690)<br />

BRYAN ANTHONY TOLES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GARY ... (/v1/cases/1372377)<br />

Miranda v. Clark County (/v1/cases/1119990)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

53 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

JOSE SANTELLAN, SR., Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appe... (/v1/cases/1372706)<br />

Mancuso v. Olivarez (/v1/cases/1121574)<br />

Mancuso v. Olivarez (/v1/cases/1120305)<br />

PATRICIA MARIE BOYD, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. STATE... (/v1/cases/1373093)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. ALEJANDRO BU... (/v1/cases/1372293)<br />

CEDRIC EAGLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. LELAND LINA... (/v1/cases/1372235)<br />

Eagle v. Linahan (/v1/cases/1119900)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ju... (/v1/cases/1372510)<br />

James H. Hinkle, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellan... (/v1/cases/1372695)<br />

Henry C. Miller, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Rod Franc... (/v1/cases/1372369)<br />

Alton Coleman, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Betty Mitch... (/v1/cases/1372255)<br />

JERRY LYNN McCRACKEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GARY... (/v1/cases/1372318)<br />

WILLIAM HOWARD PUTMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FRE... (/v1/cases/1372316)<br />

Barrett N. Weinberger, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Uni... (/v1/cases/1372314)<br />

Robert Mitzel, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arthur Tate... (/v1/cases/1372164)<br />

FRANKLIN E. HAGINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED... (/v1/cases/1372186)<br />

Jennings v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1373996)<br />

Pizzuto v. Arave (/v1/cases/1120050)<br />

Carl Dixon, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Donald I. Snyde... (/v1/cases/1371953)<br />

Kevin Stanford, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Phil Parke... (/v1/cases/1371964)<br />

KENNETH KENLEY, APPELLEE, v. MICHAEL BOWERSOX, APPE... (/v1/cases/1373326)<br />

Johnson v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1119801)<br />

Caro v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1120039)<br />

ROY LEE ENGBERG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF ... (/v1/cases/1371866)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MI... (/v1/cases/1372072)<br />

Johnston v. Luebbers (/v1/cases/1121010)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, ex rel. Theodore Bell, Pe... (/v1/cases/1372194)<br />

Earl Ralph Jacobs, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary Mo... (/v1/cases/1371888)<br />

CHARLES NORTHROP, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, v. DAVID TRI... (/v1/cases/1371830)<br />

Ramirez v. Attorney Gen. of New York (/v1/cases/1120015)<br />

Tracy Lee Givens, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Janie Co... (/v1/cases/1371834)<br />

Paul W. Greer, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Betty Mitch... (/v1/cases/1371810)<br />

EDWARD L. MORRIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1371740)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kh... (/v1/cases/1371631)<br />

CHRISTOPHER LOLISCIO, PETITIONER-APPELLANT v. GLENN... (/v1/cases/1371556)<br />

John Whitehead, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roger D. C... (/v1/cases/1371658)<br />

Jerome Henderson, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appella... (/v1/cases/1371543)<br />

Richard Magana, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gerald Hof... (/v1/cases/1371632)<br />

DOUGLAS REGA, PETITIONER-APPELLEE v. UNITED STATES ... (/v1/cases/1371683)<br />

JAY WESLEY NEILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GARY GIB... (/v1/cases/1371605)<br />

Kevin Rittenhouse, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John C.... (/v1/cases/1371671)<br />

Wayne Hunt, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Betty Mitchell... (/v1/cases/1371377)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PA... (/v1/cases/1371339)<br />

JACKIE EUGENE HUMPHREYS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. G... (/v1/cases/1371343)<br />

Hines v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1120359)<br />

ARTHUR DONNELL MILLER, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, v... (/v1/cases/1371436)<br />

JAMES E. DORSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHN CHAPM... (/v1/cases/1371535)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

54 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Caban v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1373763)<br />

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v... (/v1/cases/1371509)<br />

Gregory Lott, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ralph Coyle,... (/v1/cases/1371328)<br />

WALLACE M. FUGATE, III, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FR... (/v1/cases/1371394)<br />

Lewis Williams, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ralph... (/v1/cases/1371163)<br />

ERIC DOMAIN GLOVER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. GERALDI... (/v1/cases/1371419)<br />

RONFORD LEE STYRON, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. G... (/v1/cases/1371522)<br />

CALVIN JEROLD BURDINE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. GARY... (/v1/cases/1371443)<br />

ALFRED BRIAN MITCHELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GAR... (/v1/cases/1371452)<br />

Marshall Jackson, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles ... (/v1/cases/1371225)<br />

RANDALL EUGENE CANNON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GAR... (/v1/cases/1371059)<br />

LEONARDO R. SANTANA-MADERA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v... (/v1/cases/1371148)<br />

Jerome Campbell, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ralph Coy... (/v1/cases/1371286)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ch... (/v1/cases/1371075)<br />

RODNEY L. BOYKO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. AL C. PAR... (/v1/cases/1371128)<br />

Kenneth G. Pavel, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Melvin L... (/v1/cases/1371332)<br />

CHRISTOPHER JAMES BECK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RO... (/v1/cases/1371403)<br />

DARRELL B. GRAYSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. LESLIE... (/v1/cases/1370775)<br />

STEVEN KING AINSWORTH, PETITIONER-APPELLEE-CROSS-AP... (/v1/cases/1372288)<br />

Charlie Lee Mitchell, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Warde... (/v1/cases/1370729)<br />

Gattis v. Snyder (/v1/cases/1119773)<br />

SAMI LEKA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. LEONARD A. PORT... (/v1/cases/1370822)<br />

JUAN VINCENTE CADERNO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UN... (/v1/cases/1370652)<br />

ROBERT J. TEZAK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ST... (/v1/cases/1370604)<br />

ANTHONY KEITH JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ST... (/v1/cases/1370681)<br />

Marshall Dwayne Hughes, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Un... (/v1/cases/1370913)<br />

JAMES W. BRUCE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STA... (/v1/cases/1370675)<br />

STEPHEN MOORE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. RICHARD M... (/v1/cases/1370236)<br />

MICHAEL EUGENE THOMPSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M... (/v1/cases/1370521)<br />

Derrick Quintero, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Ricky Bel... (/v1/cases/1370597)<br />

GARY LEON BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CHARLIE P... (/v1/cases/1370550)<br />

Angela Stroe and Marin Stroe, Petitioners, v. Immig... (/v1/cases/1370625)<br />

JOHNNY JOE MARTINEZ, Petitioner - Appellant v. GARY... (/v1/cases/1370393)<br />

DEMETRIE LADON MAYFIELD, PETITIONER-APPELLANT v. JE... (/v1/cases/1372562)<br />

ALAN L. MATHENEY, Petitioner, v. RONDLE ANDERSON, R... (/v1/cases/1370220)<br />

JANSSEN REYNOLDS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. JOHN CHA... (/v1/cases/1370205)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF - APPELLEE, v. ... (/v1/cases/1370612)<br />

Turner v. Calderon (/v1/cases/1120153)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ... (/v1/cases/1372153)<br />

Reagan v. Norris (/v1/cases/1119953)<br />

Valerio v. Crawford (/v1/cases/1123176)<br />

ROBIN LYNN BAILEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ANTHONY ... (/v1/cases/1371681)<br />

LEMOINE CARTER, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT, v. MICHAE... (/v1/cases/1371817)<br />

JAMES KOSTE, APPELLANT, v. DAVE DORMIRE, APPELLEE. (/v1/cases/1371174)<br />

LINDA SUE BRYSON, APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES OF AM... (/v1/cases/1372218)<br />

SHAWN IAN LAINFIESTA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CHRI... (/v1/cases/1370122)<br />

DAVID APARICIO, Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee... (/v1/cases/1372403)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

55 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

DARRIAL M. HALL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MICHAEL W... (/v1/cases/1370164)<br />

Campbell v. Rice (/v1/cases/1122733)<br />

ANTHONY ALEXANDER CAMPBELL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v... (/v1/cases/1371880)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. CHARLES WIL... (/v1/cases/1369885)<br />

JOSEPH SZUCHON, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT v. JOSEPH ... (/v1/cases/1373003)<br />

HENRIETTA FURNISH, APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES OF A... (/v1/cases/1370007)<br />

ROBERT FREDERICK GARCEAU, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. ... (/v1/cases/1373263)<br />

AHMAD J. HASAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. GEORGE M. ... (/v1/cases/1370328)<br />

MACK AL GREEN, APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERI... (/v1/cases/1371484)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT, v. ALEJANDRO J... (/v1/cases/1371118)<br />

Brian Joseph Kinder, Appellant, v. Michael Bowersox... (/v1/cases/1372838)<br />

KENNETH E. MURRAY, APPELLANT, v. SHERYL RAMSTAD HVA... (/v1/cases/1372433)<br />

MICHAEL CODY, Petitioner, Appellant, v. UNITED STAT... (/v1/cases/1369429)<br />

WILLIAM CHARLES PAYTON, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, v. JEA... (/v1/cases/1370891)<br />

MARK STEVEN VAN BUSKIRK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. G... (/v1/cases/1371891)<br />

PERRY STEVEN MILLER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. RONDL... (/v1/cases/1370469)<br />

Gray v. Klauser (/v1/cases/1120362)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. E... (/v1/cases/1369289)<br />

Whitney v. Horn (/v1/cases/1120085)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MI... (/v1/cases/1369354)<br />

TIMOTHY GONZALES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DAVID MC... (/v1/cases/1369200)<br />

Horacio U. Montenegro, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Uni... (/v1/cases/1369380)<br />

LEONARD BERG, APPELLANT, v. HERBERT MASCHNER, WARDE... (/v1/cases/1371241)<br />

PAUL ANDERSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. MICHAEL BOW... (/v1/cases/1371502)<br />

PATRICIA OUSKA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. LYNN CAHIL... (/v1/cases/1369044)<br />

JOHN C. BURNS, APPELLANT, v. JAMES ANTHONY GAMMON, ... (/v1/cases/1371250)<br />

MICHAEL WAYNE FORD, APPELLANT, v. MICHAEL BOWERSOX,... (/v1/cases/1370562)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. RICHARD PATR... (/v1/cases/1371520)<br />

JOHN HARDY ROSE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. R. C. LEE... (/v1/cases/1370041)<br />

MANUEL GONZ LEZ-SOBERAL, Petitioner, Appellant, v. ... (/v1/cases/1368807)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. TERRY FINLEY... (/v1/cases/1368869)<br />

JULIO SOLIS, Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (/v1/cases/1370031)<br />

KEITH MOUNTJOY, Petitioner, Appellant, v. WARDEN, N... (/v1/cases/1368856)<br />

RICHARD NORMAN ROJEM, Petitioner-Appellee/ Cross-Ap... (/v1/cases/1368999)<br />

AARON D. JAMISON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF A... (/v1/cases/1368683)<br />

LESLIE DALE MARTIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BURL C... (/v1/cases/1369018)<br />

Alton Coleman, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Betty Mitch... (/v1/cases/1368777)<br />

Gary Bradford Cone, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ricky ... (/v1/cases/1368659)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. GURMEET SING... (/v1/cases/1368597)<br />

BYRON ASHLEY PARKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FREDE... (/v1/cases/1368716)<br />

ELIAS WALTER WANATEE, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, v. JOHN ... (/v1/cases/1371065)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DANILO HERNA... (/v1/cases/1368444)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. LUIZ BEN ZVI... (/v1/cases/1368429)<br />

ANTHONY SIERS, APPELLEE, v. DOUGLAS WEBER, WARDEN O... (/v1/cases/1371048)<br />

WALTER MICKENS, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. JOHN ... (/v1/cases/1368074)<br />

JEFFREY EUGENE TUCKER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. GAR... (/v1/cases/1368434)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MIL... (/v1/cases/1370563)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

56 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

2000<br />

TYRONE G. PARKER, APPELLANT, v. MIKE KEMNA, APPELLE... (/v1/cases/1371254)<br />

JOHN JOSEPH ROMANO AND DAVID WAYNE WOODRUFF, PETITI... (/v1/cases/1367999)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DANNY DAVIS,... (/v1/cases/1367909)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AN... (/v1/cases/1368147)<br />

JIM ERIC CHANDLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MICHAEL... (/v1/cases/1368132)<br />

Carlos Antonio Hernandez, Petitioner, Appellant, v.... (/v1/cases/1367828)<br />

Carpenter v. Vaughn (/v1/cases/1122070)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Appellee v. Scott Lee Feu... (/v1/cases/1367545)<br />

TRACY LEE HOUSEL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FREDERIC... (/v1/cases/1367838)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TO... (/v1/cases/1367615)<br />

HOWARD MONTEVILLE NEAL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ST... (/v1/cases/1367895)<br />

JERRY DEAN KING, APPELLANT, v. MIKE KEMNA, SUPERINT... (/v1/cases/1372001)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. HE... (/v1/cases/1371930)<br />

Glover v. U.S. (/v1/cases/1387997)<br />

FREDDY LEON WILDMAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT v. DAN JO... (/v1/cases/1371331)<br />

EDWARD LAMONTE DUNCAN v. WILLIS MORTON, ADMINISTRAT... (/v1/cases/1370685)<br />

JOHN L. WHEAT, Petitioner - Appellant, v. GARY L. J... (/v1/cases/1367771)<br />

GEORGE LINDSTADT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. JOHN P. ... (/v1/cases/1367916)<br />

WANDA JEAN ALLEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEVILLE ... (/v1/cases/1367458)<br />

BILLY RAY BATTENFIELD, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. GAR... (/v1/cases/1367457)<br />

PEDRO L. GOCHICOA, PETITIONER-APPELLEE-CROSS-APPELL... (/v1/cases/1367728)<br />

ERNEST SUTTON BELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MACK J... (/v1/cases/1367514)<br />

Bobby Joe Burton, Petitioner v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of Am... (/v1/cases/1367569)<br />

RONALD WAYNE FRYE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R. C. L... (/v1/cases/1367245)<br />

ANDREW MARK HUDSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J. R. ... (/v1/cases/1367352)<br />

Praxair, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hinshaw & Cu... (/v1/cases/1367225)<br />

LOIS NADEAN SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEVILLE... (/v1/cases/1367267)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ALEX VAZQUEZ, APPELLAN... (/v1/cases/1372645)<br />

DWAYNE ANTHONY ETHERIDGE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. ... (/v1/cases/1368278)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Appellee v. Winston Delan... (/v1/cases/1367131)<br />

CHRISTOPHER L. CARROLL, APPELLANT, v. DORA B. SCHRI... (/v1/cases/1368570)<br />

RICKY L. WILCOX, PETITIONER - APPELLANT, v. FRANK X... (/v1/cases/1369542)<br />

DANNY HENDRICKS, APPELLANT, v. KELLY LOCK, SUPERINT... (/v1/cases/1367738)<br />

ANTHONY ARMIENTI, Petitioner-Appellant, v UNITED ST... (/v1/cases/1367138)<br />

YORIE VON KAHL, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES OF AMER... (/v1/cases/1368503)<br />

MATTHEW GEORGE, Appellant v. J.L. SIVELY, Warden * (/v1/cases/1370283)<br />

ROBERT WILKERSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BURL CA... (/v1/cases/1366913)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ri... (/v1/cases/1367011)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ER... (/v1/cases/1367041)<br />

Fred Marion GILREATH, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v.... (/v1/cases/1367160)<br />

KENNETH P. PHOENIX, Petitioner, Appellant, v. JAMES... (/v1/cases/1366925)<br />

Linroy BOTTOSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael W... (/v1/cases/1367117)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EV... (/v1/cases/1366869)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. HECTOR PENA,... (/v1/cases/1366900)<br />

JOAQUIN OSVALDO GALLO-CHAMORRO, Petitioner-Appellan... (/v1/cases/1366876)<br />

Estevan Gonzales, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frank El... (/v1/cases/1366941)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

57 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Appellee, v. David Dean M... (/v1/cases/1367368)<br />

RONALD MASK, Petitioner-Appellee, v. MICHAEL MCGINN... (/v1/cases/1366987)<br />

ALEXANDER GARRETT, APPELLANT, V. DAVE DORMIRE, APPE... (/v1/cases/1367682)<br />

William R. Jones, Appellant, v. Paul Delo, Superint... (/v1/cases/1370975)<br />

Stewart Barnes, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frank Elo... (/v1/cases/1366569)<br />

Sylvia A. Lipson, Petitioner-Appellant, v. <strong>United</strong> S... (/v1/cases/1367020)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BO... (/v1/cases/1366504)<br />

David Leroy Skaggs, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Phil P... (/v1/cases/1366505)<br />

Eugene Williams Gall, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v.... (/v1/cases/1366649)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FR... (/v1/cases/1366409)<br />

CALVIN JEROLD BURDINE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. GARY... (/v1/cases/1366596)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Da... (/v1/cases/1369262)<br />

JOHN CHANG, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES ... (/v1/cases/1369614)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Je... (/v1/cases/1366413)<br />

Tommy L. Rutledge, Petitioner-Appellant, v. <strong>United</strong> ... (/v1/cases/1366423)<br />

Jermaine Dana Saunders, also known as "Chatter," Ap... (/v1/cases/1367533)<br />

JOSEPH AMRINE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. MICHAEL BOW... (/v1/cases/1367762)<br />

ANTHONY LESLIE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHE... (/v1/cases/1366501)<br />

DENNIS THURL DOWTHITT Petitioner - Appellant v. GAR... (/v1/cases/1366400)<br />

CARL DANIEL LOCKETT, Petitioner - Appellee-Cross-Ap... (/v1/cases/1366503)<br />

Silva v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1119981)<br />

Timothy Cossel, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles Mi... (/v1/cases/1366261)<br />

JACK DALE WALKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GARY G... (/v1/cases/1366150)<br />

Summerlin v. Stewart (/v1/cases/1127376)<br />

Rufus Washington, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gerald H... (/v1/cases/1366199)<br />

Jerry McMeans, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Anthony J. ... (/v1/cases/1366219)<br />

MARTIN DANIEL APPEL, v. MARTIN HORN, COMMISSIONER P... (/v1/cases/1369621)<br />

VANCE BRIDGEMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ST... (/v1/cases/1366265)<br />

EDDIE LEE FRYER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. UNITED ST... (/v1/cases/1368557)<br />

ALVIE JAMES HALE, also known as Alvin J. Hale, Peti... (/v1/cases/1366076)<br />

JERRY DEAN KING, APPELLANT, v. MIKE KEMNA, SUPERINT... (/v1/cases/1365919)<br />

STEVEN ANDERSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ROGER D. ... (/v1/cases/1366081)<br />

JOHN THOMAS DRAYDEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. THEO... (/v1/cases/1366809)<br />

Jesse Montoya, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Gary L. John... (/v1/cases/1365879)<br />

RUBEN HERRERA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. TIM LEMASTE... (/v1/cases/1365741)<br />

Isiah Kitchen, Petitioner-Appellant, v. <strong>United</strong> Stat... (/v1/cases/1366089)<br />

WALTER MICKENS, JR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. JOHN ... (/v1/cases/1365993)<br />

Michael McRoberts, Appellant, v. Michael Bowersox, ... (/v1/cases/1367070)<br />

RICHARD SHAWN WILCOX, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. MICH... (/v1/cases/1368329)<br />

WILLIAM FRANK LOEBLEIN, APPELLANT, v. DAVE DORMIRE,... (/v1/cases/1366346)<br />

MICHAEL OWSLEY, APPELLANT, V. MICHAEL BOWERSOX, APP... (/v1/cases/1367065)<br />

STANLEY PRUITT, APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES OF AMER... (/v1/cases/1366908)<br />

ELIZABETH DIANE DOWNS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SON... (/v1/cases/1366823)<br />

Abu-Ali Abdur'Rahman, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-App... (/v1/cases/1365900)<br />

JAMES LEE CLARK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GARY JOHN... (/v1/cases/1365983)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ho... (/v1/cases/1366398)<br />

DERRICK JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BURL CAIN, ... (/v1/cases/1365999)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

58 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

ROBERT BACON, JR., Petitioner-Appellee, v. R. C. LE... (/v1/cases/1365752)<br />

RAOUL A. HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. EDGAR C. ... (/v1/cases/1365834)<br />

JIM LOWERY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RONDLE ANDERSO... (/v1/cases/1365724)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. WAYNE CHIN, ... (/v1/cases/1365513)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JULIO AMEZQU... (/v1/cases/1366313)<br />

JESUS GARCIA DELGADO, Petitioner-Appellee, v. GAIL ... (/v1/cases/1365428)<br />

Sherman Howard, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard Gr... (/v1/cases/1365757)<br />

Andre Olden, Petitioner-Appellant, v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>... (/v1/cases/1365656)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RA... (/v1/cases/1365770)<br />

JAMES ROY KNOX, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GARY L JOH... (/v1/cases/1365664)<br />

HENRY LEE DENNIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DAYTON P... (/v1/cases/1365226)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fr... (/v1/cases/1365409)<br />

ROBERT DOUGLAS SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. TERR... (/v1/cases/1368264)<br />

ALVIN URIAL GOODWIN III Petitioner - Appellant v. G... (/v1/cases/1365639)<br />

JOE LEONARD LAMBRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. TER... (/v1/cases/1368237)<br />

FREDRIC JERMYN, Appellant v. MARTIN HORN, PENNSYLVA... (/v1/cases/1371974)<br />

Beverly A. Seymour, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Diane ... (/v1/cases/1365598)<br />

WILLIAM LEE SHACKLEFORD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S... (/v1/cases/1367182)<br />

BENNIE SCOTT LOVELAND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SHE... (/v1/cases/1366586)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CH... (/v1/cases/1366244)<br />

FRANCIS S., Petitioner-Appellant, v. JAMES C. STONE... (/v1/cases/1365059)<br />

Johnny WILLIAMSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael... (/v1/cases/1365162)<br />

ANTONIO BARRIENTES Petitioner - Appellee-Cross-Appe... (/v1/cases/1365159)<br />

KERBY KEANE KELLER, Appellant v. DAVID LARKINS, SUP... (/v1/cases/1369870)<br />

BILLY KEITH MCGREGOR, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. GARY... (/v1/cases/1364809)<br />

GERARDO VALDEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RON WARD, ... (/v1/cases/1364816)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J... (/v1/cases/1364618)<br />

David Ronald CHANDLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNI... (/v1/cases/1364604)<br />

Sanders v. Freeman (/v1/cases/1111158)<br />

WESLEY EUGENE BAKER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. THOMA... (/v1/cases/1365024)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RI... (/v1/cases/1365104)<br />

SIMEON HUGHES, Petitioner-Appellee, v. WALTER BOOKE... (/v1/cases/1365031)<br />

STEVEN H. OKEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. THOMAS COR... (/v1/cases/1364932)<br />

DARRELL LYNN THOMAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GARY ... (/v1/cases/1364671)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. SCOTT IAN MO... (/v1/cases/1365004)<br />

VERNON LEE EVANS, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. WIL... (/v1/cases/1365027)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ro... (/v1/cases/1364605)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Fausto DeJes... (/v1/cases/1364821)<br />

David CABBERIZA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael W... (/v1/cases/1364425)<br />

Edward Spreitzer, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James M.... (/v1/cases/1364764)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross... (/v1/cases/1364590)<br />

James David Carter, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ricky ... (/v1/cases/1364564)<br />

Vonaire T. Washington, Petitioner-Appellee, v. J... (/v1/cases/1364844)<br />

Douglas Ray MEEKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael... (/v1/cases/1364350)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Appellee v. Michael McCoy... (/v1/cases/1364216)<br />

WILLIE ERVIN FISHER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R. C.... (/v1/cases/1364115)<br />

WILLIAM HANES, APPELLANT, v. DAVID DORMIRE, SUPERIN... (/v1/cases/1368163)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

59 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

RAFAEL FLORES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph Dems... (/v1/cases/1364101)<br />

WILLIAM JAMES NIMS, JR., APPELLANT, v. WARDEN JOHN ... (/v1/cases/1369912)<br />

SPENCER ROBINSON, APPELLANT, v. GOTHRIEL LAFLEUR, A... (/v1/cases/1365780)<br />

RICHARD ANTHONY TUCKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WI... (/v1/cases/1365056)<br />

BIGLER JOBE STOUFFER, II, Petitioner-Appellee, v. D... (/v1/cases/1363955)<br />

FRANK SACCO, Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-appellant, v... (/v1/cases/1364068)<br />

STEPHEN WAYNE ANDERSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. AR... (/v1/cases/1366820)<br />

MICHAEL FARRINGTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DANIEL... (/v1/cases/1364033)<br />

DEREK ROCCO BARNABEI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RONA... (/v1/cases/1363936)<br />

PAUL CLARK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. JAMES STINSON,... (/v1/cases/1363982)<br />

James T. Foster, Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-App... (/v1/cases/1365441)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Do... (/v1/cases/1363578)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.... (/v1/cases/1363678)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, V. JAMES BEST, ... (/v1/cases/1364783)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. MICHAEL JAME... (/v1/cases/1364999)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. HERBERT DERM... (/v1/cases/1363530)<br />

WILLIAM RAYMOND MAYES, Petitioner-Appellant v. GARY... (/v1/cases/1363310)<br />

WILLIAM J. JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M.L. SMI... (/v1/cases/1366678)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF- APPELLEE, v. A... (/v1/cases/1363568)<br />

TERRANCE A. JAMES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GARY GI... (/v1/cases/1363541)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.... (/v1/cases/1363556)<br />

SCOTT A. FOUNTAIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED... (/v1/cases/1363502)<br />

CRAIG F. WEIGHALL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIANE M... (/v1/cases/1364180)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PA... (/v1/cases/1365293)<br />

Edwards v. Carpenter (/v1/cases/1387954)<br />

MICHAEL MAURINO, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. RICHARD J... (/v1/cases/1363329)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V. JOHN BAIRD, APPELLANT (/v1/cases/1364634)<br />

Glenn William HOLLADAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mi... (/v1/cases/1363102)<br />

JAY D. SCOTT, PETITIONER-APPELLEE/ CROSS-APPELLANT,... (/v1/cases/1363209)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ... (/v1/cases/1363287)<br />

Charles L. Witherspoon, Appellant, v. James D. Purk... (/v1/cases/1363304)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.... (/v1/cases/1363175)<br />

WILLIAM R. RIGGS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1363163)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CU... (/v1/cases/1363069)<br />

JOHN W. BYRD, JR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. TERRY L... (/v1/cases/1363098)<br />

MICHAEL D. CLAGETT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RONALD... (/v1/cases/1363127)<br />

ERNEST P. MCCARVER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. R. C. ... (/v1/cases/1365126)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, V. VI... (/v1/cases/1362906)<br />

Ronald Keith SPIVEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frede... (/v1/cases/1362872)<br />

JOHN M. PURDY, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED... (/v1/cases/1362928)<br />

RUSSEL WILLIAM BURKET, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RON... (/v1/cases/1362958)<br />

DAVID DEWAYNE JOHNSON, APPELLANT, V. LARRY NORRIS, ... (/v1/cases/1362846)<br />

JOHN A. CUOCO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STAT... (/v1/cases/1363004)<br />

WAYNE DALE SCHELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. LARRY W... (/v1/cases/1364715)<br />

RICHARD LOUIS ARNOLD PHILLIPS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT... (/v1/cases/1372130)<br />

Tuhran A. Lear, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roger D... (/v1/cases/1364965)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. CHRISTOPHER ... (/v1/cases/1364574)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

60 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Terry Michael MINCEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Fred... (/v1/cases/1362651)<br />

JUAN SORIA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GARY L. JOHNSO... (/v1/cases/1362768)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. Wa... (/v1/cases/1362865)<br />

REMON LEE, APPELLANT, v. MIKE KEMNA, SUPERINTENDENT... (/v1/cases/1363895)<br />

JERRY BARTLETT JONES, JR.,Petitioner-Appellee-Cross... (/v1/cases/1362767)<br />

LESLIE DALE MARTIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BURL C... (/v1/cases/1362600)<br />

STEVEN EDWARD MANNING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. PHI... (/v1/cases/1365505)<br />

DARRIN LYNN PICKENS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GARY ... (/v1/cases/1362692)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FR... (/v1/cases/1370851)<br />

EDWARD R. COSS, JR., Appellant v. LACHINE COUNTY D... (/v1/cases/1362366)<br />

TRACY PETROCELLI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RON ANGE... (/v1/cases/1369338)<br />

CRAIG THOMAS RODGERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WYOM... (/v1/cases/1362561)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. PEDRO NELSON... (/v1/cases/1362283)<br />

DARIUS MORGAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FLOYD BENNE... (/v1/cases/1362255)<br />

TYRONE K. HARRIS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1362340)<br />

SIMEON HUGHES, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, v. WALTER BOOKE... (/v1/cases/1362084)<br />

RONALD DEAN COMBS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. RALPH C... (/v1/cases/1362503)<br />

Roe v. Flores Ortega (/v1/cases/1387937)<br />

Terrance David Burkhalter, Appellant, v. <strong>United</strong> Sta... (/v1/cases/1362192)<br />

DORSIE LESLIE JONES, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. ... (/v1/cases/1362698)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ru... (/v1/cases/1127168)<br />

KENNETH PAUL DOWS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. TANA WO... (/v1/cases/1363552)<br />

ROCKY DEAN LABOA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ARTHUR C... (/v1/cases/1365514)<br />

Merrill Arnes Jacobs, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dave... (/v1/cases/1362174)<br />

JOSE M. HERNANDEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ... (/v1/cases/1361997)<br />

Ge<strong>org</strong>e L. Fuller, Appellant, v. Michael Bowersox an... (/v1/cases/1361935)<br />

Frederick White, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James Sch... (/v1/cases/1361881)<br />

DWAYNE WEEKS, APPELLANT V. ROBERT SNYDER, WARDEN; A... (/v1/cases/1364843)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. M... (/v1/cases/1362660)<br />

UNITED STATES, APPELLEE, v. GERALDO GONZALEZ, DEFEN... (/v1/cases/1361965)<br />

BUFORD ANTHONY DUPUY,Petitioner-Appellant, v. BURL ... (/v1/cases/1361915)<br />

KEVIN COOPER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. ARTHUR CALDE... (/v1/cases/1370409)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. St... (/v1/cases/1361618)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.... (/v1/cases/1361822)<br />

Smith v. Robbins (/v1/cases/1387945)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. CAROL BAYLES... (/v1/cases/1361773)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MAN... (/v1/cases/1363415)<br />

ANTHONY MCREYNOLDS, APPELLANT, v. MIKE KEMNA, APPEL... (/v1/cases/1363001)<br />

TROYNELL THOMAS, APPELLANT, v. MICHAEL BOWERSOX, AP... (/v1/cases/1362994)<br />

RICKY E. FERDINAND, APPELLANT, v. DAVE DORMIRE, SUP... (/v1/cases/1363717)<br />

MARK E. GRAHAM, APPELLANT, v. DAVE DORMIRE, SUPERIN... (/v1/cases/1363693)<br />

MICHAEL COLLINS, PETITIONER - APPELLANT, v. DAVE DO... (/v1/cases/1368119)<br />

GREG MARVIN MATTHEW Petitioner - Appellant v. GARY ... (/v1/cases/1361800)<br />

DEAN NATHAN CAMPBELL, Appellant v. DONALD T. VAUGHN... (/v1/cases/1363193)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ARCHIE JOYNE... (/v1/cases/1361770)<br />

BILLY RAY FOX, Petitioner - Appellant, v. RON WARD,... (/v1/cases/1361624)<br />

BRUCE KELLY EVANS, APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES OF A... (/v1/cases/1361661)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

61 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

1999<br />

MICHAEL S. MENZER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNIT... (/v1/cases/1361632)<br />

MARK ANDREW FOWLER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. RON ... (/v1/cases/1361634)<br />

GARRY DEAN MILLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GARY L.... (/v1/cases/1361684)<br />

Ramiro Hernandez, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roger D.... (/v1/cases/1361709)<br />

ROBERT WILLIAM CLAYTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. G... (/v1/cases/1361469)<br />

STANLEY PROU, Petitioner, Appellant, v. UNITED STAT... (/v1/cases/1361539)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee, v. S... (/v1/cases/1361114)<br />

Karis v. Calderon (/v1/cases/1120476)<br />

TYRONE WERTS, Appellant v. DONALD T. VAUGHN; THE DI... (/v1/cases/1366175)<br />

Timothy FULLER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. ATTORNEY GE... (/v1/cases/1361075)<br />

ERNEST SUTTON BELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MACK J... (/v1/cases/1361342)<br />

AMOS LEE KING, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. MICHAEL W. ... (/v1/cases/1360934)<br />

JAMES WILLIAM RILEY, APPELLANT v. STANLEY W. TAYLOR... (/v1/cases/1373648)<br />

PHILLIP DEWITT SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GARY... (/v1/cases/1361073)<br />

SAMSON DUBRIA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. G.A. SMITH,... (/v1/cases/1361131)<br />

DONNA BARGER, APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERIC... (/v1/cases/1362297)<br />

EDDIE LEROY TRICE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RON WAR... (/v1/cases/1360912)<br />

MICHAEL J. ARMSTRONG, APPELLANT, v. JAMES A. GAMMON... (/v1/cases/1360702)<br />

ROBERT DEWEY GLOCK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MICHAE... (/v1/cases/1360781)<br />

JOE WILLIE REED, APPELLANT, v. LARRY NORRIS, DIRECT... (/v1/cases/1360697)<br />

Ervin J. Robinson, Petitioner-Appellant, v. <strong>United</strong> ... (/v1/cases/1360976)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Br... (/v1/cases/1360455)<br />

Judith Perlman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant... (/v1/cases/1360793)<br />

DAVID L. MURTISHAW, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. JEANNE... (/v1/cases/1370447)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. IGNAZIO ANTONINO MANNI... (/v1/cases/1363623)<br />

Wayne TOMPKINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael W.... (/v1/cases/1360476)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WI... (/v1/cases/1360946)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>, Appellee v. Eddie Brown Appellant (/v1/cases/1360095)<br />

OMIL ARROYO, Petitioner, Appellant, v. UNITED STATE... (/v1/cases/1360807)<br />

VINCENT EDWARD FIELDS, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES ... (/v1/cases/1361776)<br />

BERNARD CULLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STAT... (/v1/cases/1360580)<br />

Sherman White, Appellant, v. James Helling, Acting ... (/v1/cases/1360604)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. MARK E. HUDD... (/v1/cases/1360671)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ... (/v1/cases/1360623)<br />

BRADY GEORGE SPICER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. ROXBUR... (/v1/cases/1360633)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. To... (/v1/cases/1360645)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AB... (/v1/cases/1361245)<br />

DENNIS MARK LA CROSSE,Petitioner-Appellant, v. PEGG... (/v1/cases/1368774)<br />

DENNIS MARK LA CROSSE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. PEG... (/v1/cases/1363497)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JACOB PLITMA... (/v1/cases/1360544)<br />

DEWEY GEORGE MOORE, Petitioner-Appellant and Cross-... (/v1/cases/1360757)<br />

WILLIAM JOSEPH KITCHENS, Pe... (/v1/cases/1359964)<br />

Marlon Simmons, Appellant, v. Lynda Taylor; Jeremia... (/v1/cases/1360724)<br />

LAMONT E. OWENS, APPELLANT, v. DAVE DORMIRE; JEREMI... (/v1/cases/1361307)<br />

ANTHONY WILSON KINGSBERRY, APPELLANT, v. UNITED STA... (/v1/cases/1361973)<br />

James Eric Mansfield, Appellant, v. David Dormire, ... (/v1/cases/1361923)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

62 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

TUAN VAN TRAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GARY LINDSE... (/v1/cases/1363730)<br />

Terrance E. Jackson, Appellant, v. James A. Gammon,... (/v1/cases/1360836)<br />

JEFFREY TOKAR, APPELLANT, v. MICHAEL BOWERSOX, APPE... (/v1/cases/1361253)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hu... (/v1/cases/1360208)<br />

GEORGE KENT WALLACE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RON W... (/v1/cases/1360187)<br />

DION A. SMALLWOOD, Petitioner - Appellant, v. GARY ... (/v1/cases/1360218)<br />

HECTOR REUBEN SANCHEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. JER... (/v1/cases/1359822)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JABRIL SHARE... (/v1/cases/1359963)<br />

JOE CLARENCE SMITH, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. T... (/v1/cases/1359788)<br />

Alexander E. WILLIAMS, IV, Petitioner-Appellant, v.... (/v1/cases/1359168)<br />

Henry Towns, Petitioner-Appellant, v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>... (/v1/cases/1360014)<br />

PAUL W. SCHAFF, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DONALD SNY... (/v1/cases/1360009)<br />

KENNETH P. PHOENIX, Petitioner, Appellant, v. JAMES... (/v1/cases/1359813)<br />

William Franklin, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jerry D.... (/v1/cases/1359706)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. TE... (/v1/cases/1358916)<br />

THOMAS LEE ROYAL, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. JOH... (/v1/cases/1359744)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. OMAR AHMAD A... (/v1/cases/1359913)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Appellee v. Marc K. Weath... (/v1/cases/1359367)<br />

Juan Xavier Hurel Guerrero, Petitioner-Appellant, ... (/v1/cases/1359437)<br />

DANA DREW HAWKINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ROBERT ... (/v1/cases/1359268)<br />

BOBBY LEE RAMDASS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. RONALD J... (/v1/cases/1359560)<br />

JACKIE G. WILSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. I.C. HAU... (/v1/cases/1359198)<br />

DARRYL GENE SCOGGIN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. STEVE... (/v1/cases/1359308)<br />

KENNY L. SMITH, APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES OF AMER... (/v1/cases/1358767)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M... (/v1/cases/1359378)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Da... (/v1/cases/1359232)<br />

CHARLES VIEUX, Petitioner, Appellant, v. PETER A. P... (/v1/cases/1359099)<br />

VICTOR WAYNE HOOKS , Petitioner-Appellant , v. RON... (/v1/cases/1358993)<br />

UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL SHORT... (/v1/cases/1358634)<br />

Edward Howard, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William D. ... (/v1/cases/1359243)<br />

MICHAEL RENE SHERRILL, PETITIONER -APPELLANT, v. ST... (/v1/cases/1359046)<br />

LARRY GENE HULL, Appellant v. KENNETH KYLER, Superi... (/v1/cases/1359931)<br />

THOMAS BAJA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. KENNETH DUCHA... (/v1/cases/1359605)<br />

JASON MATTHEW JOSEPH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RONA... (/v1/cases/1359101)<br />

Larry Joe WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary L. J... (/v1/cases/1104564)<br />

CHARLES ADRIAN FOSTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RON... (/v1/cases/1358682)<br />

Felder v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1104562)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ST... (/v1/cases/1358679)<br />

Anthony DeSilva, Albert DeSilva, Anthony J. LoBue, ... (/v1/cases/1358551)<br />

BLAIR JUSTIN GREIMAN, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT, v. ... (/v1/cases/1358516)<br />

Nos. 97-1936, 97-1978. (/v1/cases/1358492)<br />

Lamb v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1104144)<br />

Lewis J. Atley, a/k/a Gary J. Semeniuk, Appellee, v... (/v1/cases/1360162)<br />

Tucker v. Chrysler Credit Corp. (/v1/cases/1387912)<br />

LOYD W. LAFEVERS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. GARY E. ... (/v1/cases/1358729)<br />

Tomas G. Ervin, Appellant, v. Paul K. Delo, Superin... (/v1/cases/1360596)<br />

Robert W. Odem, Appellee, v. Frank X. Hopkins, Ward... (/v1/cases/1360243)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

63 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

David Tucker, Petitioner-Appellee, v. John Prelesni... (/v1/cases/1358591)<br />

James Tenner, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jerry Gilmor... (/v1/cases/1359037)<br />

Alvin Wayne CRANE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary L.... (/v1/cases/1103948)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Arena (/v1/cases/1104324)<br />

Lucas v. O'Dea (/v1/cases/1104141)<br />

Restrepo v. Kelly (/v1/cases/1103863)<br />

Jones v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1103777)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Arrendondo (/v1/cases/1103780)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Gomes (/v1/cases/1103529)<br />

Beathard v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1103663)<br />

Hill v. Moore (/v1/cases/1102709)<br />

Baker v. Barbo (/v1/cases/1103684)<br />

Lingar v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1103280)<br />

JONATHAN FULLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ERNIE ROE... (/v1/cases/1358691)<br />

James Walter MORELAND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Way... (/v1/cases/1102740)<br />

Kellogg v. Skon (/v1/cases/1103321)<br />

Roach v. Angelone (/v1/cases/1103178)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Diaz (/v1/cases/1103384)<br />

Babbitt v. Woodford (/v1/cases/1103522)<br />

Allen v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1102880)<br />

No. 982015. (/v1/cases/1358220)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. White (/v1/cases/1102660)<br />

Bailey v. Nagle (/v1/cases/1101733)<br />

Roll v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1103461)<br />

Stephen K. Johns, Appellant, v. Michael Bowersox, S... (/v1/cases/1362098)<br />

Steffano James, Petitioner - Appellant, v. Michael ... (/v1/cases/1359534)<br />

Barnett v. Hargett (/v1/cases/1102567)<br />

Rogers v. Gibson (/v1/cases/1102240)<br />

Burns v. Gammon (/v1/cases/1102250)<br />

Mingo v. Artuz (/v1/cases/1102432)<br />

McHale v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1102889)<br />

MICHAEL M. FURMAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. TANA WO... (/v1/cases/1359970)<br />

99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2281, 1999 Daily Journal D.... (/v1/cases/1100985)<br />

Collier v. Turpin (/v1/cases/1103511)<br />

Smith v. Singletary (/v1/cases/1101165)<br />

Mapes v. Coyle (/v1/cases/1101383)<br />

Matteo v. Superintendent (/v1/cases/1101495)<br />

Hunter v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1101941)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Leopard (/v1/cases/1101017)<br />

Thomas v. Taylor (/v1/cases/1101002)<br />

Bui v. DiPaolo (/v1/cases/1101241)<br />

Mayabb v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1100758)<br />

Craig Eugene SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Rusty ... (/v1/cases/1101477)<br />

Wright v. Hopper (/v1/cases/1100974)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Anthony (/v1/cases/1356411)<br />

No. 98-2854. (/v1/cases/1358215)<br />

Steinkuehler v. Meschner (/v1/cases/1103359)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

64 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

1998<br />

In Ramos v. Rogers (/v1/cases/1101159)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Ademaj (/v1/cases/1101113)<br />

EVERETT LEE MUELLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RONAL... (/v1/cases/1358632)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Martinez (/v1/cases/1100971)<br />

Nevers v. Killinger (/v1/cases/1100858)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Williams (/v1/cases/1102953)<br />

Dunn v. Singletary (/v1/cases/1100625)<br />

99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1349, 1999 Daily Journal D.... (/v1/cases/1100552)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Payton (/v1/cases/1100414)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Kramer (/v1/cases/1100691)<br />

DEMETRIE LADON MAYFIELD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A... (/v1/cases/1366348)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Harfst (/v1/cases/1100523)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Wilkinson (/v1/cases/1100967)<br />

Boyd v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1100326)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Kimler (/v1/cases/1100115)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Izydore (/v1/cases/1100356)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. MARLON GARTH, Appellan... (/v1/cases/1359661)<br />

Hart v. Gomez (/v1/cases/1102578)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JO... (/v1/cases/1360805)<br />

Ashford v. Gilmore (/v1/cases/1100325)<br />

SAMSON DUBRIA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. G.A. SMITH,... (/v1/cases/1365511)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Craycraft (/v1/cases/1100093)<br />

Brown v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1100230)<br />

McKee v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1100259)<br />

99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4385, 1999 Daily Journal D.... (/v1/cases/1103660)<br />

WAYNE DALE SCHELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. LARRY W... (/v1/cases/1358501)<br />

Bruce Wayne MARTIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Leroy ... (/v1/cases/1099396)<br />

Vansickel v. White (/v1/cases/1099966)<br />

Davis v. Kramer (/v1/cases/1100219)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Berkovich (/v1/cases/1100394)<br />

Freund v. Butterworth (/v1/cases/1098992)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Iasiello (/v1/cases/1355858)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Sanders (/v1/cases/1099211)<br />

Buehl v. Vaughn (/v1/cases/1099720)<br />

Stouffer v. Reynolds (/v1/cases/1100505)<br />

David REDWINE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. H.N. "Sonny... (/v1/cases/1099408)<br />

GEORGE B. HARRIS, APPELLANT, v. MICHAEL BOWERSOX; S... (/v1/cases/1359050)<br />

Clemmons v. Delo (/v1/cases/1103542)<br />

Jahn Henri Parker, Appellant, v. Michael Bowersox, ... (/v1/cases/1359679)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. We... (/v1/cases/1099673)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Calderon (/v1/cases/1098259)<br />

Yeatts v. Angelone (/v1/cases/1099316)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Mack (/v1/cases/1098631)<br />

Christopher BIVENS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steve ... (/v1/cases/1099842)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Torres (/v1/cases/1098510)<br />

JOSE LUIS SARROCA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ... (/v1/cases/1369703)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

65 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Taylor v. Reno (/v1/cases/1098715)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Kole (/v1/cases/1098593)<br />

Sexton v. French (/v1/cases/1098408)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/1099828)<br />

UNITED STATES OF America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ti... (/v1/cases/1099346)<br />

Ludwig v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1098126)<br />

Williams v. Taylor (/v1/cases/1098472)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fl... (/v1/cases/1099579)<br />

Carpenter v. Mohr (/v1/cases/1098383)<br />

Jones v. Jones (/v1/cases/1098527)<br />

James Arthur BYRNS, Jr., Petitioner--Appellant, v. ... (/v1/cases/1100037)<br />

Kennedy DENETCLAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1099977)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. W... (/v1/cases/1100017)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. P... (/v1/cases/1099925)<br />

Bean v. Calderon (/v1/cases/1098417)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ca... (/v1/cases/1099513)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. El... (/v1/cases/1099958)<br />

McGurk v. Stenberg (/v1/cases/1098531)<br />

Little v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1097878)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. DeTemple (/v1/cases/1098032)<br />

Fisher v. Angelone (/v1/cases/1098586)<br />

Johnston v. Singletary (/v1/cases/1098242)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KA... (/v1/cases/1359948)<br />

Keel v. French (/v1/cases/1098190)<br />

Quesinberry v. Taylor (/v1/cases/1098085)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Haese (/v1/cases/1097815)<br />

Delgado v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1097897)<br />

Blaik v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1097338)<br />

In Young v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1097313)<br />

Jackson v. Leonardo (/v1/cases/1097744)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Leggett (/v1/cases/1097756)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Torres (/v1/cases/1098029)<br />

Bloomer v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1097667)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Th... (/v1/cases/1099332)<br />

Mills v. Singletary (/v1/cases/1097380)<br />

Jones v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1097376)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Abdullah (/v1/cases/1098146)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Le... (/v1/cases/1099371)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Da... (/v1/cases/1099352)<br />

Duren v. Hopper (/v1/cases/1097311)<br />

BRIAN KEITH LORD,Petitioner-Appellee, v. TANA WOOD,... (/v1/cases/1359023)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. KEVIN ROBERSON, Appell... (/v1/cases/1360607)<br />

Hunter v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1097004)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Walker (/v1/cases/1097115)<br />

Consoro v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1097036)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dw... (/v1/cases/1099412)<br />

Coe v. Bell (/v1/cases/1097416)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

66 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Green v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1097065)<br />

MICHAEL JACKSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ARTHUR C... (/v1/cases/1363428)<br />

Ortega v. Roe (/v1/cases/1096952)<br />

Philip R. WORKMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ricky B... (/v1/cases/1096991)<br />

Roe v. Delo (/v1/cases/1097120)<br />

Paters v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1096791)<br />

Thompson v. Cain (/v1/cases/1097528)<br />

Fuller v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1096255)<br />

Caro v. Calderon (/v1/cases/1099083)<br />

Hickman v. Spears (/v1/cases/1097105)<br />

KEVIN WRIGHT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATE... (/v1/cases/1358795)<br />

TODD ELLERBY, Petitioner-Defendant-Appellant, v. UN... (/v1/cases/1359500)<br />

Davis v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1096394)<br />

Tyson v. Keane (/v1/cases/1096633)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Luciano (/v1/cases/1096267)<br />

Newsted v. Gibson (/v1/cases/1096233)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Lindsay (/v1/cases/1095796)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Burch (/v1/cases/1095681)<br />

PATRICK HARTEY, APPELLANT v. DONALD VAUGHN, THE DIS... (/v1/cases/1359431)<br />

Turner v. Duncan (/v1/cases/1096342)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lu... (/v1/cases/1097561)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wa... (/v1/cases/1354685)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Blankenship (/v1/cases/1096786)<br />

Dennis Lloyd BURTON, Petitioner--Appellant, v. Tom ... (/v1/cases/1097245)<br />

Carl Eugene HOWARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michae... (/v1/cases/1354712)<br />

JESUS GARCIA DELGADO, Petitioner-Appellee, v. GAIL ... (/v1/cases/1358534)<br />

Parkus v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1096008)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Payton (/v1/cases/1096831)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ra... (/v1/cases/1097867)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1098930)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Moore (/v1/cases/1096909)<br />

Chambers v. Armontrout (/v1/cases/1096034)<br />

Sims v. Singletary (/v1/cases/1353475)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Gordon (/v1/cases/1095414)<br />

larry A. BRYAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna WHITE... (/v1/cases/1354726)<br />

Collier v. Turpin (/v1/cases/1095196)<br />

Rodney E. THOMAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert G... (/v1/cases/1096563)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Victor Medina Diaz (/v1/cases/1354717)<br />

Holleman v. Duckworth (/v1/cases/1353485)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Franklyn (/v1/cases/1096043)<br />

E.g., Jenkins v. Nelson (/v1/cases/1096113)<br />

Bey v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1095530)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1099205)<br />

Baldwin v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1353281)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Allen (/v1/cases/1095786)<br />

Wilson v. Greene (/v1/cases/1095220)<br />

White v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1094683)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

67 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Harris v. Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary (/v1/cases/1094374)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Boigegrain (/v1/cases/1095124)<br />

Bounds v. Delo (/v1/cases/1094165)<br />

Jackson v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1093716)<br />

Peter NINEMIRE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Attorney G... (/v1/cases/1095504)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Martinez (/v1/cases/1094235)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. J... (/v1/cases/1095725)<br />

Canales v. Roe (/v1/cases/1093885)<br />

Lewis E. ASHKER, Appellant, v. Joseph CLASS, Warden... (/v1/cases/1094418)<br />

Frey v. Schuetzle (/v1/cases/1094179)<br />

Robison v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1094237)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. J... (/v1/cases/1095437)<br />

Cardwell v. Greene (/v1/cases/1094535)<br />

Corrao v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1094357)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Jones (/v1/cases/1094399)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. An... (/v1/cases/1093846)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Da... (/v1/cases/1095784)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ja... (/v1/cases/1095422)<br />

98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6182, 98 Daily Journal D.A.... (/v1/cases/1094748)<br />

Mahaffey v. Page (/v1/cases/1094003)<br />

Provenzano v. Singletary (/v1/cases/1092440)<br />

Walls v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1094162)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Kimler (/v1/cases/1093844)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ro... (/v1/cases/1094593)<br />

Parrish v. Fulcomer (/v1/cases/1093743)<br />

Vega v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1093198)<br />

Babbitt v. Calderon (/v1/cases/1094253)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mi... (/v1/cases/1094830)<br />

O'Rourke v. Endell (/v1/cases/1094711)<br />

Coleman v. Calderon (/v1/cases/1093633)<br />

Seidel v. Merkle (/v1/cases/1092058)<br />

Fernandez v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1091939)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1094111)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wi... (/v1/cases/1094559)<br />

Wright v. Angelone (/v1/cases/1094096)<br />

James E. FLEMING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steve HA... (/v1/cases/1094643)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Oplinger (/v1/cases/1093841)<br />

Ronnie J. DUNFORD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steve H... (/v1/cases/1094787)<br />

Fitzgerald v. Greene (/v1/cases/1093622)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Warren (/v1/cases/1092680)<br />

Moore v. Reynolds (/v1/cases/1094565)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. C... (/v1/cases/1094616)<br />

Alphonso Dwane FRAZIER, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant, ... (/v1/cases/1094600)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Standiford (/v1/cases/1092481)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1094108)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Madoch (/v1/cases/1093399)<br />

Genius v. Pepe (/v1/cases/1092372)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

68 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Ortiz v. Stewart (/v1/cases/1093079)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Ramirez (/v1/cases/1091669)<br />

Angel Jaime MONGE, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA. (/v1/cases/1387852)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1093926)<br />

98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4841, 98 Daily Journal D.A.... (/v1/cases/1092306)<br />

Leon Edward ASBERRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steve... (/v1/cases/1093539)<br />

Marty Lynn CAMPBELL, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. L... (/v1/cases/1092131)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bu... (/v1/cases/1093292)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1094124)<br />

Moawad v. Anderson (/v1/cases/1090809)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1093445)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Ortiz (/v1/cases/1092094)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. An... (/v1/cases/1092175)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Je... (/v1/cases/1090674)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Stevens (/v1/cases/1092939)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cl... (/v1/cases/1093063)<br />

Dobbs v. Turpin (/v1/cases/1090277)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. A... (/v1/cases/1093558)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bo... (/v1/cases/1092892)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/1093516)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. L... (/v1/cases/1094572)<br />

O'Brien v. Dubois (/v1/cases/1091889)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. We... (/v1/cases/1091439)<br />

Kory BIAMI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ... (/v1/cases/1091078)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Kincaid (/v1/cases/1091834)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1091436)<br />

Crandell v. Bunnell (/v1/cases/1091081)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1091780)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1091588)<br />

Oats v. Singletary (/v1/cases/1089424)<br />

Williams v. French (/v1/cases/1091954)<br />

Michael BANKERT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John SHAN... (/v1/cases/1093523)<br />

Thomas v. Gilmore (/v1/cases/1091170)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Welbeck (/v1/cases/1091508)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1094219)<br />

Dahler v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1090850)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1351893)<br />

Green v. French (/v1/cases/1090866)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1091628)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1091797)<br />

Neal v. Cain (/v1/cases/1090029)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mi... (/v1/cases/1091383)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1091340)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ch... (/v1/cases/1091550)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1091463)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1351770)<br />

Jackson v. Shanks (/v1/cases/1090681)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

69 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Morales v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1090741)<br />

James E. RODDEN, Appellant, v. Paul DELO; William ... (/v1/cases/1090808)<br />

Truesdale v. Moore (/v1/cases/1090409)<br />

Rowe v. Schreiber (/v1/cases/1089229)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Alvarez (/v1/cases/1090370)<br />

Calderon v. Thompson (/v1/cases/1387796)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1090471)<br />

Pisciotti v. Washington (/v1/cases/1090671)<br />

Jerome WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Salvador A. ... (/v1/cases/1090740)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1090408)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1091595)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1090469)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1091415)<br />

Meyers v. Gillis (/v1/cases/1090593)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1091803)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1091653)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1091289)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1090287)<br />

Brown v. Kuhlmann (/v1/cases/1090644)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1351746)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Da... (/v1/cases/1088968)<br />

Tejeda v. Dubois (/v1/cases/1090519)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1090520)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ed... (/v1/cases/1099712)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hill (/v1/cases/1090419)<br />

Moody v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1089197)<br />

Wong v. Money (/v1/cases/1090367)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ne... (/v1/cases/1091728)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Gwiazdzinski (/v1/cases/1089914)<br />

Meanes v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1088601)<br />

Joseph Edmond De YONGHE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. H... (/v1/cases/1089961)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Yack (/v1/cases/1088760)<br />

Pitsonbarger v. Gramley (/v1/cases/1089753)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Taylor (/v1/cases/1089036)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Scheffer (/v1/cases/1387815)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1351717)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ma... (/v1/cases/1089635)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1090600)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1351721)<br />

Eaton v. Angelone (/v1/cases/1089061)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1089552)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1089846)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1089447)<br />

Wright v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1089027)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1351834)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1089865)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1089620)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

70 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Long v. Krenke (/v1/cases/1088433)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. La... (/v1/cases/1089870)<br />

Ainsworth v. Calderon (/v1/cases/1088469)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1089638)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Gantt (/v1/cases/1089370)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ed... (/v1/cases/1089731)<br />

Totten v. Merkle (/v1/cases/1088025)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1351709)<br />

Correll v. Stewart (/v1/cases/1088101)<br />

Brown v. Meyers (/v1/cases/1088135)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1090084)<br />

Smith v. Moore (/v1/cases/1088178)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ja... (/v1/cases/1088795)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jose R. TREJ... (/v1/cases/1087644)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Alvarez (/v1/cases/1087897)<br />

Castro v. Ward (/v1/cases/1088278)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Toms (/v1/cases/1087736)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1089260)<br />

Malone v. Vasquez (/v1/cases/1088509)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1088861)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Ortiz (/v1/cases/1087577)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1088952)<br />

Wise v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1087623)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1089200)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1089263)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1088905)<br />

Randy Glen PENSE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John SHA... (/v1/cases/1089086)<br />

Darrell FERGUSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David WI... (/v1/cases/1088912)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1351645)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1088882)<br />

Hess v. Mazurkiewicz (/v1/cases/1087482)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lu... (/v1/cases/1088652)<br />

Sellers v. Ward (/v1/cases/1087207)<br />

Cannon v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1086635)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ga... (/v1/cases/1086846)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ja... (/v1/cases/1086554)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1086995)<br />

Holsomback v. White (/v1/cases/1086317)<br />

McLain v. Calderon (/v1/cases/1086898)<br />

Gilbert v. Moore (/v1/cases/1087008)<br />

Alverez v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1087097)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1086658)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1085962)<br />

Lester Wayne FAULK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John S... (/v1/cases/1085874)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1086349)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1086520)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1086463)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

71 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

1997<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1086742)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1087061)<br />

Craig L. TAYLOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steve HAR... (/v1/cases/1086112)<br />

Cory Dean LUMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald DOR... (/v1/cases/1086339)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1086623)<br />

Lucas v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1085762)<br />

Patterson v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1086156)<br />

Siripongs v. Calderon (/v1/cases/1085865)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1086605)<br />

E.g., Earhart v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1085030)<br />

Lucero v. Kerby (/v1/cases/1085901)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1085977)<br />

Noland v. French (/v1/cases/1086954)<br />

Fretwell v. Norris (/v1/cases/1086361)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wi... (/v1/cases/1085748)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Soto (/v1/cases/1085711)<br />

Frey v. Fulcomer (/v1/cases/1085735)<br />

Cox v. Norris (/v1/cases/1086342)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ga... (/v1/cases/1085271)<br />

Goodwin v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1085000)<br />

Alfonso THOMAS, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steve... (/v1/cases/1085232)<br />

Dale H. HYLOK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RONALD WARD... (/v1/cases/1085690)<br />

Arturo B. DELGADO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lawrenc... (/v1/cases/1085004)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1085066)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1085320)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1086013)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. St... (/v1/cases/1085244)<br />

Mackall v. Angelone (/v1/cases/1084536)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1085814)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1086059)<br />

Carriger v. Stewart (/v1/cases/1085174)<br />

Kokoraleis v. Gilmore (/v1/cases/1084585)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Carter (/v1/cases/1084165)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1085318)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1085590)<br />

Chicago v. International College of Surgeons (/v1/cases/1387782)<br />

Billy Ray GASSAWAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R. Mic... (/v1/cases/1085791)<br />

Carter v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1084419)<br />

Hogue v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1084920)<br />

Joseph Robert SAAVEDRA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/1085031)<br />

Lawrence J. ESPINOSA, Petitioner--Appellant, v. Joe... (/v1/cases/1085108)<br />

John E. DOWELL, Petitioner--Appellant, v. David R. ... (/v1/cases/1085036)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1085414)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1085309)<br />

Howard v. Moore (/v1/cases/1084362)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1085737)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

72 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1085705)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wi... (/v1/cases/1084753)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1350086)<br />

Teddy Lee MOORE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bobby BOO... (/v1/cases/1085101)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1084617)<br />

Terry Leo TRAYNOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FEDERAL... (/v1/cases/1084430)<br />

Demarest v. Price (/v1/cases/1084123)<br />

Williams v. Parke (/v1/cases/1086046)<br />

Rickman v. Bell (/v1/cases/1084842)<br />

Groseclose v. Bell (/v1/cases/1084272)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1085558)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1084512)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1085305)<br />

Plath v. Moore (/v1/cases/1084232)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/1084761)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1084455)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1084902)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1084714)<br />

Paradis v. Arave (/v1/cases/1084333)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1084677)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1084953)<br />

Grisby v. Blodgett (/v1/cases/1084115)<br />

Winsett v. Washington (/v1/cases/1084282)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Torres (/v1/cases/1083178)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1084399)<br />

Burris v. Parke (/v1/cases/1084230)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Calderon (/v1/cases/1082738)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1084744)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Perez (/v1/cases/1083513)<br />

Nguyen v. Reynolds (/v1/cases/1084810)<br />

John T. BOOZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John SHANKS ... (/v1/cases/1083458)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1349816)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1083531)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1085114)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1349804)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1083706)<br />

Gerlaugh v. Stewart (/v1/cases/1083231)<br />

Amrine v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1082835)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1083828)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1083841)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1083124)<br />

Michael SMOUSE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Donald A. ... (/v1/cases/1083180)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1083522)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Monigan (/v1/cases/1082901)<br />

Nobles v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1082426)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Taylor (/v1/cases/1082808)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1082312)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

73 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1083359)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1082370)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1082269)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1082171)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1349286)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1082250)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1082764)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1082400)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1082238)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1083579)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wy... (/v1/cases/1083222)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1083543)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1083619)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1084025)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1083830)<br />

Daniel J. MACIE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. H.N. "Son... (/v1/cases/1082374)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1084443)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1084352)<br />

Ransom v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1081980)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1083230)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1082499)<br />

Andrew Nelson NEEDHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joh... (/v1/cases/1082210)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1083602)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1083532)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Blackwell (/v1/cases/1082735)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1081831)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Da... (/v1/cases/1081787)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cu... (/v1/cases/1081562)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ke... (/v1/cases/1081647)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Je... (/v1/cases/1081711)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/1081689)<br />

Williams v. Cain (/v1/cases/1081580)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1348896)<br />

Austin v. Bell (/v1/cases/1081982)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ib... (/v1/cases/1348903)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Br... (/v1/cases/1081721)<br />

Jones v. Vacco (/v1/cases/1081966)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Kunzman (/v1/cases/1081695)<br />

Bethea v. Artuz (/v1/cases/1348937)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1348282)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1081818)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1348860)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1081505)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1348805)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1081544)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1348849)<br />

In <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Canady (/v1/cases/1081958)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

74 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1348884)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ro... (/v1/cases/1348601)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Tabb (/v1/cases/1081578)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1348929)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1086442)<br />

Aguilar v. Alexander (/v1/cases/1081676)<br />

Pitts v. Anderson (/v1/cases/1348026)<br />

Satcher v. Pruett (/v1/cases/1082066)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Arnold (/v1/cases/1081975)<br />

Wright v. Gramley (/v1/cases/1081756)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1081235)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1083333)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1080656)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1348342)<br />

Holman v. Gilmore (/v1/cases/1082065)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1348607)<br />

Emery v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1088892)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Brooks (/v1/cases/1081842)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1080844)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1081268)<br />

Bruce KILGORE, Appellant, v. Michael BOWERSOX and J... (/v1/cases/1080972)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1348338)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1079773)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1080066)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1080009)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1079933)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1080170)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1079649)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1080113)<br />

Neuman v. Rivers (/v1/cases/1081669)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1079843)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ge... (/v1/cases/1080730)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1079959)<br />

Thomas W. SPINDLE, Petitioner, v. N/F/N TILLERY, Co... (/v1/cases/1348578)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wi... (/v1/cases/1080775)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1081302)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1081397)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1079953)<br />

Grubbs v. Singletary (/v1/cases/1078977)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1079870)<br />

Michael Lee SWANSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronal... (/v1/cases/1348458)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Caccia (/v1/cases/1079880)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Aguwa (/v1/cases/1080234)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1080472)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1080944)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Downs (/v1/cases/1080325)<br />

Rector v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1079011)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

75 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Woolley (/v1/cases/1080347)<br />

Mu'min v. Pruett (/v1/cases/1081691)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ro... (/v1/cases/1348630)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1080871)<br />

Richmond v. Embry (/v1/cases/1080149)<br />

Reece v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1078308)<br />

Brown v. Artuz (/v1/cases/1081320)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1080921)<br />

Patrasso v. Nelson (/v1/cases/1079488)<br />

Thompson v. Calderon (/v1/cases/1078986)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Jones (/v1/cases/1079453)<br />

Thompson v. Nagle (/v1/cases/1078107)<br />

Cockrum v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1078301)<br />

Pollard v. White (/v1/cases/1078575)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ga... (/v1/cases/1078845)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1078798)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1080826)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1078796)<br />

Blaik v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1077438)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1079083)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1079117)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1079680)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Medina (/v1/cases/1347170)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1078492)<br />

Reddick v. Haws (/v1/cases/1079180)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1078528)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1078591)<br />

Blankenship v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1078070)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1078815)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Oliver (/v1/cases/1078102)<br />

Christopher James WILSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ... (/v1/cases/1077418)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1078907)<br />

Freund v. Butterworth (/v1/cases/1077363)<br />

Cornell v. Nix (/v1/cases/1078359)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. M<strong>org</strong>an (/v1/cases/1077708)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1080576)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1078928)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1078506)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. F... (/v1/cases/1077702)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GA... (/v1/cases/1077385)<br />

Henderson v. Norris (/v1/cases/1077956)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wi... (/v1/cases/1077409)<br />

Paul D. HOLMES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WYOMING DE... (/v1/cases/1076755)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Prows (/v1/cases/1078124)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Gaviria (/v1/cases/1076122)<br />

Green v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1077332)<br />

Joseph Blaz SANCHEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Duane... (/v1/cases/1076676)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

76 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Lackey v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1076805)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Lewis (/v1/cases/1077675)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Vest (/v1/cases/1076207)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1076678)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Depoister (/v1/cases/1076542)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Torres (/v1/cases/1076005)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1076844)<br />

U.S. v. Perez (/v1/cases/1076728)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. El... (/v1/cases/1076679)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. La... (/v1/cases/1076634)<br />

Burris v. Parke (/v1/cases/1077135)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Rice (/v1/cases/1076958)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. O'Neil (/v1/cases/1078184)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Je... (/v1/cases/1077010)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1077649)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Do... (/v1/cases/1346372)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1076961)<br />

Jones v. Woods (/v1/cases/1075156)<br />

Neal v. Acevedo (/v1/cases/1075541)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1076249)<br />

Christy v. Horn (/v1/cases/1075980)<br />

McKinley MAHAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steve HARG... (/v1/cases/1074486)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. F... (/v1/cases/1074988)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1076960)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Thomas (/v1/cases/1075708)<br />

Tucker v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1075960)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ro... (/v1/cases/1074887)<br />

Spreitzer v. Peters (/v1/cases/1075277)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1075632)<br />

Johnson v. Baldwin (/v1/cases/1075117)<br />

Pope v. Netherland (/v1/cases/1074801)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1075099)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1075302)<br />

Todd Edward MATTHEWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITE... (/v1/cases/1075581)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1075529)<br />

Nguyen v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1075364)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1075311)<br />

Jose Juarez AGUIRRE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Donal... (/v1/cases/1075010)<br />

Arnold v. Evatt (/v1/cases/1074921)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1074948)<br />

Seymour I. SCHLAGER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Odie ... (/v1/cases/1075069)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1074835)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1074485)<br />

Barnickel v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1074985)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1074641)<br />

Moffat v. Gilmore (/v1/cases/1074505)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1075440)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

77 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1075248)<br />

Lowell COCHRELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James PUR... (/v1/cases/1074529)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1074493)<br />

Dyer v. Calderon (/v1/cases/1074630)<br />

Dyer v. Calderon (/v1/cases/1079620)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Alston (/v1/cases/1074302)<br />

Reginald L. POWELL, Appellant, v. Michael S. BOWERS... (/v1/cases/1074187)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Trzaska (/v1/cases/1073532)<br />

Gretzler v. Stewart (/v1/cases/1074020)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. A... (/v1/cases/1074821)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1074300)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1074109)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1074446)<br />

Porter v. Gramley (/v1/cases/1074215)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1074312)<br />

Anthony PORTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard B.... (/v1/cases/1079594)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1074283)<br />

Hooper v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1074441)<br />

Smith v. Angelone (/v1/cases/1073715)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1073800)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ge... (/v1/cases/1073548)<br />

Antonio Miguel CHAVEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joh... (/v1/cases/1073679)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee. v. Do... (/v1/cases/1073638)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Amlani (/v1/cases/1073512)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Miguel (/v1/cases/1073339)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Simmonds (/v1/cases/1073860)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1077750)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Carter (/v1/cases/1073615)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Rector (/v1/cases/1073664)<br />

Villafuerte v. Stewart (/v1/cases/1073785)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1073851)<br />

Williamson v. Ward (/v1/cases/1073062)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1073426)<br />

Carter v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1072789)<br />

Dorsey v. Kelly (/v1/cases/1074167)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cooke (/v1/cases/1072760)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1072581)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1345770)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1073811)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1073549)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Rocha (/v1/cases/1072137)<br />

Christobal (Libby) VIGIL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ... (/v1/cases/1072543)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1073899)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Prince (/v1/cases/1073009)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1073585)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Workman (/v1/cases/1073096)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1073089)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

78 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1073247)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1073537)<br />

Jim LUMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ron CHAMPION, i... (/v1/cases/1070966)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1073255)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Kauffman (/v1/cases/1072484)<br />

Griffin v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1072347)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1072971)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1073227)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1073002)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1073307)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1073264)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1072916)<br />

Mitchell v. Kemna (/v1/cases/1072048)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1072703)<br />

Stoia v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1072349)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1072519)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1072549)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1071300)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1073174)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1071149)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1071869)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1071034)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1070771)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1072020)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1071707)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1071539)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1071634)<br />

Kenneth Leon BURRELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stev... (/v1/cases/1069766)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1071158)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1071465)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1071315)<br />

Hernandez v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1071734)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1071055)<br />

Hoxsie v. Kerby (/v1/cases/1071384)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. St... (/v1/cases/1069663)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Gallegos (/v1/cases/1070709)<br />

Miles v. Stainer (/v1/cases/1071432)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1070947)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Madoch (/v1/cases/1071338)<br />

Beeman v. Iowa (/v1/cases/1071726)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1070854)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1071857)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1070084)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1070036)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1071120)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1071349)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1074025)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

79 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Prior (/v1/cases/1070592)<br />

Livingston v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1070237)<br />

Houchin v. Zavaras (/v1/cases/1344402)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1069324)<br />

McDowell v. Calderon (/v1/cases/1070543)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1069753)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1070357)<br />

Arthur M. ARMSTRONG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DUANE... (/v1/cases/1070582)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1070465)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1070246)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1072009)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ty... (/v1/cases/1344697)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1071925)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1071891)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1345021)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1071197)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1071298)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1077266)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1070551)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Williams (/v1/cases/1069162)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1069724)<br />

Liegakos v. Cooke (/v1/cases/1068752)<br />

Jones v. Toombs (/v1/cases/1081660)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1069808)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1070959)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Williams (/v1/cases/1069105)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1071067)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ge... (/v1/cases/1070368)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1069448)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1070332)<br />

William Ray CAWLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Donald... (/v1/cases/1070189)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1071931)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1071175)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1069561)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1070080)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1070698)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1069708)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1069304)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1070442)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1070544)<br />

Anderson v. Groose (/v1/cases/1068211)<br />

Mararri v. WCI Steel, Inc. (/v1/cases/1069758)<br />

Murray v. Groose (/v1/cases/1068034)<br />

Charlie EDWARDS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John THOM... (/v1/cases/1070312)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1069458)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1069876)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1069489)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

80 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1069935)<br />

Hall v. Washington (/v1/cases/1068229)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1069739)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1344253)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1069993)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1069888)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1068375)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1070115)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1069807)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1069264)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1068889)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1069473)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1067999)<br />

Matthews v. Evatt (/v1/cases/1067313)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ti... (/v1/cases/1068430)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1069385)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1069809)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1070247)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1068723)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1068347)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1068095)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1069128)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1068574)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1068592)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1068374)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1069089)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1068283)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1068253)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Harris (/v1/cases/1066580)<br />

AEDPA. Brown v. Cain (/v1/cases/1066681)<br />

Turk v. White (/v1/cases/1076956)<br />

Turk v. White (/v1/cases/1067262)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Riddick (/v1/cases/1066181)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Schmidt (/v1/cases/1067920)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Triplett (/v1/cases/1066817)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1071679)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1067967)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1067509)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1070243)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Monem (/v1/cases/480575)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1067785)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1067666)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1067595)<br />

Childress v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1065572)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1068433)<br />

Lockhart v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1066639)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1070670)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

81 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

1996<br />

Pryor v. Norris (/v1/cases/1065995)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1070123)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1068172)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Leslie (/v1/cases/1065750)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ch... (/v1/cases/1067943)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Moore (/v1/cases/1343312)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1067684)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1067529)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1068188)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1069046)<br />

James W. WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephen... (/v1/cases/1067116)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1069207)<br />

Pelzer v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1067350)<br />

Buchanan v. Angelone (/v1/cases/1065871)<br />

US v. Jackson (/v1/cases/481048)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cocivera (/v1/cases/1066576)<br />

96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9368, 96 Daily Journal D.A.... (/v1/cases/1064703)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1068633)<br />

Langford v. Day (/v1/cases/1073195)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1066667)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Le... (/v1/cases/1066195)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1066476)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1066888)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1067978)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1066177)<br />

Wilson v. Gomez (/v1/cases/1067670)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1067894)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1067428)<br />

Pitsonbarger v. Gramley (/v1/cases/488975)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1066707)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1067796)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1066761)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Golden (/v1/cases/489604)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1070800)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1066364)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1071191)<br />

Tommy Lee CLEATON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steve H... (/v1/cases/1065951)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1070703)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1065120)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1066613)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1065058)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1066547)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1069831)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ri... (/v1/cases/1065336)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1067366)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1067506)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

82 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1067354)<br />

Terry Wayne HOWELL, Petitioner--Appellant, v. H.N. ... (/v1/cases/1064907)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1067325)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1066436)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1065645)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1066637)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1067520)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1065503)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1065047)<br />

Swofford v. DeTella (/v1/cases/486094)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1065611)<br />

Moore v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1063789)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1065083)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1065050)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1066021)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1065407)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1065558)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Lutz (/v1/cases/1064927)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Ciak (/v1/cases/1064665)<br />

Martin v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1072199)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1065760)<br />

Holman. Holman v. Page (/v1/cases/1064582)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1065932)<br />

McDonald v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1063885)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1066192)<br />

City of Toledo v. Beazer East, Inc. (/v1/cases/1065711)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1065791)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1065846)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1065790)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> of America, Appellee v. Ronald Michae... (/v1/cases/1063272)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1065591)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1065444)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1065925)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1065097)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1065801)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1065534)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1065851)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1066889)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1063670)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1063589)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1064291)<br />

Berryman v. Morton (/v1/cases/1063214)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1063900)<br />

Preston v. Delo (/v1/cases/1063188)<br />

Mathenia v. Delo (/v1/cases/1062998)<br />

Davis v. Executive Director of Dep't of Corrections... (/v1/cases/1063249)<br />

Easter v. Norris (/v1/cases/1063198)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

83 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

James v. State of Iowa (/v1/cases/1063212)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1066142)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Payne (/v1/cases/1062242)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1066008)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1064969)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1064938)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Lopez (/v1/cases/1063268)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Ruth (/v1/cases/1063271)<br />

Howard v. Caspari (/v1/cases/1062419)<br />

McQueen v. Scroggy (/v1/cases/1062634)<br />

Meadows v. Delo (/v1/cases/1062247)<br />

Martin v. Maxey (/v1/cases/1061972)<br />

Fern v. Gramley (/v1/cases/481477)<br />

Siddiqi v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1061930)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1343443)<br />

Bucuvalas v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1062028)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1063987)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1069368)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. McMullen (/v1/cases/1061388)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1341964)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ch... (/v1/cases/1062935)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1062844)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1062926)<br />

Booker T. RICHARDSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edwa... (/v1/cases/1342147)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Morrison (/v1/cases/1061592)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1062836)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1062857)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1062900)<br />

Santana v. U.S. (/v1/cases/1061527)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1062181)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1341980)<br />

Joseph Angelo DICESARE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ja... (/v1/cases/1342171)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1062901)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Gonda (/v1/cases/1062613)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Catlett (/v1/cases/1060489)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1062100)<br />

Hadley v. Groose (/v1/cases/1060950)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1061716)<br />

Bey v. Delo (/v1/cases/1061314)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/1063063)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1061781)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1341772)<br />

Eldin Bert PYLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary STAR... (/v1/cases/1061577)<br />

Ceja v. Stewart (/v1/cases/1061118)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1062826)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1061697)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Apfel (/v1/cases/1060928)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

84 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1061480)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Glover (/v1/cases/1060663)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1061468)<br />

Salazar v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1059847)<br />

Bousley v. Brooks (/v1/cases/1060883)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1341616)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1061672)<br />

Nickel v. Hannigan (/v1/cases/1341451)<br />

Hogan v. Carter (/v1/cases/482340)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1343450)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1062289)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1341389)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1341255)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1341424)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1341167)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1341438)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1341182)<br />

Besser v. Wilkinson (/v1/cases/1341290)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1341483)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1341386)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1341385)<br />

Hill v. Norris (/v1/cases/1060140)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1061288)<br />

Woratzeck v. Stewart (/v1/cases/1061056)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1343439)<br />

Napolean JAMES, Petitioner--Appellant, v. R. Michae... (/v1/cases/1341471)<br />

Boliek v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1060316)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1340641)<br />

Huynh v. King (/v1/cases/1058769)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vo... (/v1/cases/1341326)<br />

Sistrunk v. Vaughn (/v1/cases/1059801)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1059940)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1340526)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1060608)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1060849)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1341398)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1060378)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1341349)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1341283)<br />

Reed v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1068440)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1341135)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1341250)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Palmer (/v1/cases/1060941)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1341054)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1341206)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Baramdyka (/v1/cases/1058588)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hunter (/v1/cases/1058969)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

85 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Phea v. Benson (/v1/cases/1340260)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1341072)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1340476)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1340507)<br />

Baylor v. Estelle (/v1/cases/1057934)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1058651)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1063432)<br />

Freeman v. Class (/v1/cases/1058843)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Sardone (/v1/cases/1058169)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1060148)<br />

Smullen v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1058216)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1060441)<br />

Holman v. Page (/v1/cases/492131)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1340420)<br />

Mason v. Hanks (/v1/cases/490440)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Moreno (/v1/cases/1058495)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1059471)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1059577)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1059677)<br />

Parker v. Bowersox (/v1/cases/1058476)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1059700)<br />

Eddmonds v. Peters (/v1/cases/488630)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1058278)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1057977)<br />

Beaver v. Thompson (/v1/cases/1057830)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hernandez (/v1/cases/1058192)<br />

Dean v. Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facili... (/v1/cases/1057804)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Breckenridge (/v1/cases/1057890)<br />

Bennett v. Angelone (/v1/cases/1056864)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1058214)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1059387)<br />

West v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1057131)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1058076)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1057964)<br />

Boyle v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1057782)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1058383)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1058372)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1057924)<br />

Rupe v. Wood (/v1/cases/1057828)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Jackson (/v1/cases/485041)<br />

Johnson v. McCaughtry (/v1/cases/494020)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1058010)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1058488)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1057933)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1058206)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1058037)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Graham (/v1/cases/1056737)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

86 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1058069)<br />

Carter v. Hopkins (/v1/cases/1056834)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1058469)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1057799)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1058004)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Jaroszenko (/v1/cases/489966)<br />

Stewart v. Duckworth (/v1/cases/480422)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1057553)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1057381)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1057323)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1057613)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1339146)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1056838)<br />

Emerson v. Gramley (/v1/cases/484636)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Bruce (/v1/cases/1054750)<br />

Chateloin v. Singletary (/v1/cases/1054892)<br />

Rogers v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1056110)<br />

Washington v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1055212)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1057201)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1056206)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Syverson (/v1/cases/493341)<br />

Watkins v. Kassulke (/v1/cases/1055382)<br />

Boria v. Keane (/v1/cases/1055243)<br />

Nagi v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1055208)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1055946)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1055814)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1056297)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1055933)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1055723)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Askew (/v1/cases/1054018)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Patasnik (/v1/cases/1054572)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cedelle (/v1/cases/1055002)<br />

Chester Ray ROLLAND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ron C... (/v1/cases/1056162)<br />

Lasiter v. Thomas (/v1/cases/1054759)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Eltayib (/v1/cases/1054132)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1055345)<br />

Fast Horse v. Class (/v1/cases/1053215)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1055355)<br />

Vogt v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1053985)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1055604)<br />

O'Guinn v. Dutton (/v1/cases/1054090)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1064377)<br />

Willis v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1053470)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Throckmorton (/v1/cases/1053533)<br />

Paul MAZZELL, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Parker EVATT,... (/v1/cases/1054009)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1054825)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1063676)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

87 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Flynn (/v1/cases/1053446)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1055707)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1056311)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1056577)<br />

William Henry JAMERSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Da... (/v1/cases/1054891)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1056342)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1056180)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1056234)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1055368)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1063580)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1055042)<br />

Gravley v. Mills (/v1/cases/1053785)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1055167)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1055062)<br />

Williams v. Turpin (/v1/cases/1053300)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Williams (/v1/cases/1052523)<br />

James M. EDENS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert D. ... (/v1/cases/1053887)<br />

Thompson v. Calderon (/v1/cases/1072242)<br />

Thompson v. Calderon (/v1/cases/1052655)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1053394)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1053559)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1053410)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1053871)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1054398)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1054535)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1054404)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1054554)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1061027)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1338711)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1054923)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Isom (/v1/cases/1051561)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1055343)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Marks (/v1/cases/1051611)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1064222)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1054637)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1054695)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1054899)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1054732)<br />

Hays v. State of Alabama (/v1/cases/1051217)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Co... (/v1/cases/1054288)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. La... (/v1/cases/1054503)<br />

Ulyssess ADAIR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R. Michael... (/v1/cases/1054183)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1054729)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1064152)<br />

Schneider v. Delo (/v1/cases/1051498)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1052969)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1063601)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

88 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1052920)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1052411)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1338223)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1052868)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1052689)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1052941)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1052600)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1052884)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1064103)<br />

Griffin v. McVicar (/v1/cases/491543)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Barnes (/v1/cases/486991)<br />

David CARTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John THOMAS;... (/v1/cases/1051840)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1052845)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1051359)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1063729)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1051322)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1052156)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Stantini (/v1/cases/1051769)<br />

Westley v. Johnson (/v1/cases/1050631)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1052112)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1051481)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1051515)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1051276)<br />

Brumley v. Detella (/v1/cases/489658)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1051551)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1051417)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1054250)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1052027)<br />

Boria v. Keane (/v1/cases/1050222)<br />

Boria v. Keane (/v1/cases/1062864)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cox (/v1/cases/1050684)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1054242)<br />

Prewitt v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/487289)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mi... (/v1/cases/1050720)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1054266)<br />

Robert Earl HEATH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R. Mich... (/v1/cases/1050204)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1051516)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Ortiz (/v1/cases/416785)<br />

Savino v. Murray (/v1/cases/1049724)<br />

U.S. v. Gaudet (/v1/cases/519592)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1063836)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1337938)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1054325)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1051802)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1050449)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1050168)<br />

Martin v. Norris (/v1/cases/477206)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

89 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1050547)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1050737)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Brooks (/v1/cases/1049625)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wi... (/v1/cases/1050781)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee, v. B... (/v1/cases/1050420)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1050472)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee, v. R... (/v1/cases/1049952)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1049710)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1050034)<br />

Sandoval v. Gomez (/v1/cases/451784)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1049466)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1049581)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Leggett (/v1/cases/420736)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1050439)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1050723)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1050092)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1049962)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1049512)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1049675)<br />

Harris v. Johnson (/v1/cases/526768)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1049955)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1064220)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Duarte (/v1/cases/492904)<br />

J<strong>org</strong>e M. HERRERA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEW MEXI... (/v1/cases/1049459)<br />

Faulder v. Johnson (/v1/cases/519742)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1049424)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1049768)<br />

Hill v. Jones (/v1/cases/425977)<br />

Selsor v. Kaiser (/v1/cases/1049010)<br />

Wainwright v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/461377)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1048532)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1049552)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1049594)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Wicker (/v1/cases/464746)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1048798)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1048739)<br />

Jenner v. Class (/v1/cases/477870)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1063881)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1048876)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Ward (/v1/cases/1048570)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Brown (/v1/cases/488648)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1049264)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1049208)<br />

Luchenburg v. Smith (/v1/cases/535718)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1048596)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1049121)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Workman (/v1/cases/1336405)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

90 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1049196)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1048443)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Carr (/v1/cases/1048396)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1048931)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1049058)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1049100)<br />

Perillo v. Johnson (/v1/cases/511609)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1048712)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1048858)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ra... (/v1/cases/1047995)<br />

Argencourt v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/563051)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1047902)<br />

Danny Ray BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ron CHAMP... (/v1/cases/1048128)<br />

Nathan Lee HOGAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dan McBR... (/v1/cases/487323)<br />

Government of Virgin Islands v. Weatherwax (/v1/cases/545182)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Ricardo (/v1/cases/444573)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Bradford (/v1/cases/478904)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Mays (/v1/cases/495062)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1048337)<br />

Garrett v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/469607)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1047496)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1064177)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1064276)<br />

Galowski v. Berge (/v1/cases/483061)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1064475)<br />

Tippins v. Walker (/v1/cases/549075)<br />

U.S. v. Acty (/v1/cases/465880)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1047634)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1047704)<br />

Frey v. Schuetzle (/v1/cases/468816)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1047649)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1047126)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1047300)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1047407)<br />

Hugh HENRY, a/k/a Hugh Harold Henry, Petitioner-App... (/v1/cases/554057)<br />

Payne v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/473581)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. D... (/v1/cases/1047275)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1051812)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1047330)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1047452)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1047348)<br />

Bond v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/492795)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1047695)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1047677)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1047273)<br />

Richard S. ZEITVOGEL, Appellant, v. Paul DELO, Appe... (/v1/cases/474080)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1047710)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

91 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Ruff v. Armontrout (/v1/cases/473365)<br />

Waldrop v. Jones (/v1/cases/424015)<br />

Henry Raymond TAFOYA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Fran... (/v1/cases/1046116)<br />

GREGG ALAN WOOLDRIDGE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. H.N... (/v1/cases/1046748)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1051582)<br />

Raymond Leroy JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R. ... (/v1/cases/1046922)<br />

Weekley v. Jones (/v1/cases/464449)<br />

Montanye v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/466573)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1046921)<br />

Bob O. PARRIS, Petitioner--Appellant, v. UNITED STA... (/v1/cases/1047002)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1046495)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1335662)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Coffin (/v1/cases/555253)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1046689)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1046463)<br />

DeLuca v. Lord (/v1/cases/554893)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1047834)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Adams (/v1/cases/426098)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1046992)<br />

Steven K. HATCH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dan REYNO... (/v1/cases/1045978)<br />

Yohn v. Love (/v1/cases/537865)<br />

E.g., Jones v. Page (/v1/cases/491522)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1046343)<br />

Woods v. Johnson (/v1/cases/524474)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1045684)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1045559)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1045689)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1045677)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. McCullah (/v1/cases/432542)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Span (/v1/cases/456654)<br />

McCleese v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/490131)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Bauer (/v1/cases/461205)<br />

Diaz v. Senkowski (/v1/cases/546189)<br />

Michael Robert FRENCH, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ... (/v1/cases/1045568)<br />

Schneider v. Day (/v1/cases/516790)<br />

Moore v. Carlton (/v1/cases/497352)<br />

Nichols v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/488414)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1045964)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1045520)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1045975)<br />

Buenoano v. Singletary (/v1/cases/428790)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1045233)<br />

Ables v. Scott (/v1/cases/507306)<br />

Joubert v. Hopkins (/v1/cases/475180)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1045603)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. C... (/v1/cases/1045237)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1048081)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

92 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

1995<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1045515)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1045348)<br />

Chadwick Robert MATLOCK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M... (/v1/cases/1045283)<br />

Randy S. KAILEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gale NORT... (/v1/cases/1045070)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1045499)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1045895)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1045839)<br />

Hogan v. McBride (/v1/cases/492083)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1045265)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1045592)<br />

Kavanagh v. Berge (/v1/cases/491923)<br />

West v. Seabold (/v1/cases/500296)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ve... (/v1/cases/1335098)<br />

Stewart v. Gramley (/v1/cases/491231)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1046708)<br />

Crotts v. Smith (/v1/cases/460404)<br />

Thomas Edward BRUCE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ellis... (/v1/cases/1044318)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Je... (/v1/cases/1045655)<br />

Grant v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/495206)<br />

Lambrix v. Singletary (/v1/cases/430568)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1044616)<br />

Terry W. EVANS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William L.... (/v1/cases/1045299)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/1044491)<br />

Jimmy DUVALL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Al PARKE, Re... (/v1/cases/1044119)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1062548)<br />

Ralph Ausba WYNN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of Am... (/v1/cases/1044522)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Farley (/v1/cases/417370)<br />

Michael P. McCORMACK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Manf... (/v1/cases/1044321)<br />

Glenn v. Tate (/v1/cases/502158)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1043672)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1045064)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mi... (/v1/cases/1044496)<br />

Craig T. AGRELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ST... (/v1/cases/1044088)<br />

Christopher L. BELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITE... (/v1/cases/1044201)<br />

Carlton R. LOGAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1044484)<br />

Bell v. Evatt (/v1/cases/533761)<br />

Kenny SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Craig A. HANK... (/v1/cases/1044109)<br />

Marvin Wayne HAEBERLIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Em... (/v1/cases/1044179)<br />

Roy JEFFERY WHITEHEAD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. K. ... (/v1/cases/1043436)<br />

Steven R. PICKLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael ... (/v1/cases/1043855)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ed... (/v1/cases/1044421)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Brown (/v1/cases/492361)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1043806)<br />

Seehan v. Iowa (/v1/cases/468226)<br />

Kim Venard CALLOWAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tom C... (/v1/cases/1043548)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1063118)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

93 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

William Tyson HORTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Larr... (/v1/cases/1043786)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1062190)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1043912)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1062248)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1062284)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1043929)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oj... (/v1/cases/1044147)<br />

Dino HOWARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES... (/v1/cases/1044528)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. An... (/v1/cases/1043827)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Re... (/v1/cases/435112)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1045811)<br />

Woodall v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/469615)<br />

Anthony KIRKSEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ST... (/v1/cases/1043542)<br />

Gerald D. CASTOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1043785)<br />

Jerry M. BAGNOLI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1043510)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Streater (/v1/cases/420206)<br />

James R. TRIM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R. Michael ... (/v1/cases/1043531)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Hakeem Olayi... (/v1/cases/555357)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1062193)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1063121)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1043921)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1043617)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1062645)<br />

David Scott DOUCET, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert... (/v1/cases/1043933)<br />

James P. CRAVEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ST... (/v1/cases/1043462)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Labonte (/v1/cases/559503)<br />

Walter James HART, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. UN... (/v1/cases/1043551)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1042943)<br />

Medina v. Barnes (/v1/cases/432657)<br />

Driscoll v. Delo (/v1/cases/470406)<br />

Lucy KILLEBREW, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Penny BERN... (/v1/cases/1043505)<br />

Gary Neil NUNLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1043879)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1042499)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1055127)<br />

Thompson v. Keohane (/v1/cases/1387599)<br />

Carriger v. Stewart (/v1/cases/1059049)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Adam (/v1/cases/531487)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1042175)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1042222)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ma... (/v1/cases/1043509)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1042541)<br />

Burris v. Parke (/v1/cases/481458)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1043668)<br />

Weston v. Ieyoub (/v1/cases/516843)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1042601)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1042641)<br />

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PREC... (/v1/cases/1054274)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

94 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Nichols v. Scott (/v1/cases/511408)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1042224)<br />

Shillinger v. Haworth (/v1/cases/431612)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ma... (/v1/cases/1042029)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1042552)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1041828)<br />

Enoch v. Gramley (/v1/cases/489517)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1042212)<br />

Sherron v. Norris (/v1/cases/471447)<br />

Nazarenus v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/471273)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Stedman (/v1/cases/526338)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wi... (/v1/cases/525412)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1041808)<br />

Hernandez v. Starbuck (/v1/cases/436957)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hansel (/v1/cases/555827)<br />

Larry R. ROLLINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ron CHAM... (/v1/cases/1042870)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Kissick (/v1/cases/439043)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1042295)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1042218)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1042345)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ja... (/v1/cases/1042756)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1041654)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1041425)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1041395)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1041670)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1041244)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1041380)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1041216)<br />

Finch v. Vaughn (/v1/cases/429896)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Foster (/v1/cases/535083)<br />

Bunkley v. Meachum (/v1/cases/551238)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Seyfert (/v1/cases/505228)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1041441)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1041464)<br />

Dillon v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1041445)<br />

Gerald Dwight FONVILLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UN... (/v1/cases/1044226)<br />

Charron v. Gammon (/v1/cases/474598)<br />

Gaston v. Whitley (/v1/cases/507224)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1041365)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. To... (/v1/cases/1041172)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1040984)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1040547)<br />

Guam v. Torre (/v1/cases/451206)<br />

Flamer v. Delaware (/v1/cases/540442)<br />

Mangum v. Hargett (/v1/cases/515095)<br />

Flamer v. State of Delaware (/v1/cases/538573)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1040817)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

95 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1042325)<br />

Scrivner v. Tansy (/v1/cases/432488)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1042626)<br />

Johnson v. Scott (/v1/cases/506591)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1040982)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1040606)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1040552)<br />

Engelen v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/462841)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1040514)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Stearns (/v1/cases/456927)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1040468)<br />

Belyeu v. Scott (/v1/cases/520596)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1041187)<br />

Mark E. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIFIED SCHO... (/v1/cases/1332631)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1332524)<br />

Auman v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/462587)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1039892)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1040036)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1332285)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1332679)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1332509)<br />

Kornahrens v. Evatt (/v1/cases/531647)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1040249)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1332389)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1040021)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Reid (/v1/cases/1039806)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1040171)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1332308)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1040376)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1332605)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1332658)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1332581)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1040368)<br />

Robert Earl GLASPER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. TULSA... (/v1/cases/1332386)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1332683)<br />

Jose Javier PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1040347)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1332469)<br />

Beets v. Scott (/v1/cases/524523)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1332132)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1331592)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1332540)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1331461)<br />

Green v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/503903)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1331741)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1332074)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1039762)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1332659)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

96 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1038874)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1038734)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Blum (/v1/cases/462318)<br />

McKenna v. McDaniel (/v1/cases/447038)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1042648)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1332054)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ca... (/v1/cases/431939)<br />

Bergmann v. McCaughtry (/v1/cases/491216)<br />

Harris v. Wood (/v1/cases/441262)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1332072)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Jackson (/v1/cases/484166)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1038898)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1331100)<br />

Clabourne v. Lewis (/v1/cases/445036)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1038834)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1332118)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fl... (/v1/cases/1038416)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1038438)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1039052)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1038545)<br />

Hendricks v. Calderon (/v1/cases/456869)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1038914)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Pennycooke (/v1/cases/542059)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ro... (/v1/cases/1038106)<br />

Edgar Roy ELLIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ST... (/v1/cases/1038643)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. La... (/v1/cases/1038095)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1038288)<br />

Bobby GONZALES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert J. ... (/v1/cases/1331240)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1331341)<br />

Correll v. Thompson (/v1/cases/531847)<br />

Mellott v. Purkett (/v1/cases/464490)<br />

Johnson v. Sublett (/v1/cases/441053)<br />

Wajda v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/467167)<br />

Barry, 864 F.2d 294, Humanik, 871 F.2d 432, and Van... (/v1/cases/538725)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1038177)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1038286)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1038156)<br />

Parry v. Rosemeyer (/v1/cases/541742)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Smith (/v1/cases/536851)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1037976)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Pierce (/v1/cases/502642)<br />

Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 43,587 NOTICE: Sixth Ci... (/v1/cases/1037829)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1037991)<br />

Vuong v. Scott (/v1/cases/514950)<br />

Teague v. Scott (/v1/cases/529508)<br />

Mills v. Singletary (/v1/cases/424758)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1037559)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

97 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Marek v. Singletary (/v1/cases/428106)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1038013)<br />

U.S. v. Tolliver (/v1/cases/519276)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ar... (/v1/cases/1037678)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Smith (/v1/cases/472806)<br />

Rodabaugh v. Cont'l Cas. Co. (/v1/cases/1036936)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1037896)<br />

U.S. v. Benlian (/v1/cases/455763)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1037874)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Malpiedi (/v1/cases/557407)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1036878)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1036740)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1037328)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ri... (/v1/cases/1037382)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1037240)<br />

Nave v. Delo (/v1/cases/471738)<br />

Amos v. Scott (/v1/cases/524932)<br />

Whitmore v. Avery (/v1/cases/475825)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1036800)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1036980)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Allender (/v1/cases/490932)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that... (/v1/cases/1037332)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Martin (/v1/cases/465457)<br />

Taylor v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1037290)<br />

McGrath v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/554707)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1036762)<br />

Miles v. Dorsey (/v1/cases/436822)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Boone (/v1/cases/432076)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pa... (/v1/cases/1036371)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Samuels (/v1/cases/522850)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1036695)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Anderson (/v1/cases/492540)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1036545)<br />

Fred E. MASSINGALE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R. Mic... (/v1/cases/1036409)<br />

Coulter v. Herring (/v1/cases/424091)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Carolina (/v1/cases/1036295)<br />

Thompson v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/473802)<br />

Zinzer v. Iowa (/v1/cases/472981)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1037411)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Collins (/v1/cases/557599)<br />

Irving v. Hargett (/v1/cases/508132)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1036168)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1036361)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1036278)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1036343)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Trevino (/v1/cases/486363)<br />

Stan T. FENSKE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John THALA... (/v1/cases/477748)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

98 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Valdivia (/v1/cases/453851)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1037004)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mi... (/v1/cases/1035698)<br />

Bryan R. RAMER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John THOMA... (/v1/cases/1036596)<br />

Stewart v. Lane (/v1/cases/492277)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1036135)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1038385)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Childress (/v1/cases/418696)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Reddeck (/v1/cases/1041729)<br />

Williams v. Washington (/v1/cases/482174)<br />

Nielsen v. Hopkins (/v1/cases/467858)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1036522)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1036487)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1036495)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1036246)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1036101)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Mitchell (/v1/cases/484155)<br />

Peter Michael BERGNE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Will... (/v1/cases/1035969)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wi... (/v1/cases/1036038)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1036149)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Allison (/v1/cases/482956)<br />

Stafford v. Ward (/v1/cases/435395)<br />

Barnes v. Thompson (/v1/cases/530336)<br />

Bonin v. Calderon (/v1/cases/461041)<br />

Goeders v. Hundley (/v1/cases/463878)<br />

Hunt v. Nuth (/v1/cases/532875)<br />

Bruce A. BREDESON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James H... (/v1/cases/1035055)<br />

Paul Ross INGRAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Chase RI... (/v1/cases/1035153)<br />

Jerry Dean MONTGOMERY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNI... (/v1/cases/1034817)<br />

Obbie FRANKLIN, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Rober... (/v1/cases/1035131)<br />

Brant v. Nix (/v1/cases/467056)<br />

James NANCE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. Michael A. ... (/v1/cases/1035290)<br />

James v. Cain (/v1/cases/519099)<br />

David Lawrence GRUBB, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNIT... (/v1/cases/1035138)<br />

Todd A. D'ANTONI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1034789)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. LaPlante (/v1/cases/555781)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wi... (/v1/cases/1034260)<br />

Johnny MUKES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATE... (/v1/cases/1034117)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fl... (/v1/cases/1034480)<br />

Walter A. TOLLIVER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. William... (/v1/cases/1034135)<br />

Gregory LeMAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Donald GUDM... (/v1/cases/1034895)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/446081)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. QuinteroBarraza (/v1/cases/453234)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pa... (/v1/cases/1329363)<br />

Hatch v. Oklahoma (/v1/cases/434482)<br />

Robert Alan PHILLIPS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Scot... (/v1/cases/1034353)<br />

Phyle v. Leapley (/v1/cases/464827)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

99 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

U.S. v. Foster (/v1/cases/448695)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Boyles (/v1/cases/482119)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Re... (/v1/cases/1034511)<br />

Jack E. WRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STA... (/v1/cases/1034438)<br />

Partington v. Bugliosi (/v1/cases/454010)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Nagib (/v1/cases/484064)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Gibson (/v1/cases/526157)<br />

Fahim AL-QAADIR, aka LeJohn Reese, Petitioner-Appel... (/v1/cases/1033628)<br />

Kieser v. New York (/v1/cases/553511)<br />

James Lee BULLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John P. ... (/v1/cases/510783)<br />

Ge<strong>org</strong>e ALBERT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STAT... (/v1/cases/1034528)<br />

Frank Jefferson SNYDER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. He... (/v1/cases/1034142)<br />

Weekley v. Jones (/v1/cases/472632)<br />

Dan COVERT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael O'DEA,... (/v1/cases/1034485)<br />

Jones v. Delo (/v1/cases/462026)<br />

David WEBB, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tom CAMPBELL, ... (/v1/cases/1034304)<br />

Dorsey v. Irvin (/v1/cases/549535)<br />

Kenneth David JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITE... (/v1/cases/1033341)<br />

John Robert STEVENS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITE... (/v1/cases/1033322)<br />

William CROSSTY, III, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Anth... (/v1/cases/1033795)<br />

U.S. v. Galloway (/v1/cases/438046)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. He... (/v1/cases/1033738)<br />

Allen v. Nix (/v1/cases/462814)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ... (/v1/cases/1033775)<br />

Ciak v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/553378)<br />

Jann R. OSLUND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Manfred MA... (/v1/cases/1033542)<br />

Olmstead v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/483961)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pe... (/v1/cases/1033688)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Jones (/v1/cases/427722)<br />

Jerry Jerome VINES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED... (/v1/cases/1032737)<br />

Dennis J. SITTMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ... (/v1/cases/1033778)<br />

Jose A. ORTIZ-CASANOVA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. UN... (/v1/cases/1032952)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Kirsch (/v1/cases/547729)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. McKinney (/v1/cases/520716)<br />

Sloan v. Delo (/v1/cases/470860)<br />

Joseph D. HARRIS, aka Sonny Joe Harris, Petitioner-... (/v1/cases/1032816)<br />

John Charles SELINSKI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ric... (/v1/cases/1032903)<br />

Antwine v. Delo (/v1/cases/475710)<br />

John Mackenzie TAYLOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Rob... (/v1/cases/1032986)<br />

Daisy Helen WARTH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ... (/v1/cases/1032721)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. John S. ROLE... (/v1/cases/1033287)<br />

Kevin Eddy BUMGARNER, Petitioner, v. John MIDDLETON... (/v1/cases/1032776)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ca... (/v1/cases/1032517)<br />

Hensley v. Crist (/v1/cases/451491)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mi... (/v1/cases/1031757)<br />

Felker v. Turpin (/v1/cases/423515)<br />

Matthews v. Rakiey (/v1/cases/560364)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

100 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Woody (/v1/cases/487715)<br />

Sixth Circuit, McInnes v. John Hancock Mut. Life In... (/v1/cases/1032132)<br />

Michael KRESE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STAT... (/v1/cases/1032208)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Fennell (/v1/cases/418736)<br />

James W. WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephen... (/v1/cases/1031867)<br />

Darrell R. BRIGGS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael... (/v1/cases/1032271)<br />

Roy C. TURNER, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Robert FARL... (/v1/cases/1032046)<br />

Toni A. HAMPTON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of Ame... (/v1/cases/1031979)<br />

Crisanto TREVINO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1032053)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ja... (/v1/cases/1032394)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Rodriguez (/v1/cases/489363)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1033154)<br />

Richard A. BUTTERFIELD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ST... (/v1/cases/1031875)<br />

Gordon HENRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATE... (/v1/cases/1032244)<br />

William Charles COLLINGWOOD, Petitioner-Appellant, ... (/v1/cases/1032185)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/1032389)<br />

Banks v. Reynolds (/v1/cases/438052)<br />

Hector L. ROSA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STA... (/v1/cases/1032060)<br />

Pedro YORDAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATE... (/v1/cases/1031437)<br />

Donald Allen LUNSFORD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ger... (/v1/cases/1031346)<br />

Richard WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert L... (/v1/cases/1030849)<br />

Kelly CORNEJO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ... (/v1/cases/1032015)<br />

Kyles v. Whitley (/v1/cases/1387519)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Shark (/v1/cases/415047)<br />

Daniels v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/483228)<br />

Miles v. Burris (/v1/cases/493030)<br />

John Thomas KUIKEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Randy ... (/v1/cases/1031745)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ja... (/v1/cases/1031006)<br />

U.S. v. Williamson (/v1/cases/431044)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ja... (/v1/cases/1032326)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Pratt (/v1/cases/491780)<br />

Robert C. BEAUCHAMP, Petitioner, v. Paul MURPHY, Su... (/v1/cases/1031120)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Romero (/v1/cases/553571)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Messina (/v1/cases/487798)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Wilson (/v1/cases/1031003)<br />

John Henry LYLES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1031411)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Ornelas (/v1/cases/1030883)<br />

Zeitvogel v. Delo (/v1/cases/1050846)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1031205)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1030276)<br />

Williams v. Calderon (/v1/cases/447457)<br />

Phyllis McCLENDON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ... (/v1/cases/1030880)<br />

Eddie Lee FAIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R.G. BORG,... (/v1/cases/1030760)<br />

Brewer v. Reynolds (/v1/cases/435427)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1030675)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1030615)<br />

Juan F. TORRES, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of Amer... (/v1/cases/1031118)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

101 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1030532)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1030350)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1029848)<br />

Porter v. Singletary (/v1/cases/428965)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1030442)<br />

Forest v. Delo (/v1/cases/469764)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1029872)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1030087)<br />

Burris v. Farley (/v1/cases/491407)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1030681)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1030634)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1030561)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1030086)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1029307)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1029180)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1029256)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1029499)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1029726)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1029337)<br />

Granada v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/489069)<br />

Carey v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/561641)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1030596)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1030068)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1030656)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1030460)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1030676)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1029205)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1029831)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1029578)<br />

Johnny L. HARDEMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bobby ... (/v1/cases/1030500)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Sanchez (/v1/cases/439928)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1029155)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. Mi... (/v1/cases/1030502)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1029760)<br />

Robert Tyrone LENON Appellant, v. Orville B. PUNG, ... (/v1/cases/1036027)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1029546)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1029352)<br />

Hagan v. Caspari (/v1/cases/470831)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1029526)<br />

Kight v. Singletary (/v1/cases/427545)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1029203)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1029700)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1029147)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1029645)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1029386)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1029857)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1029676)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

102 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1029518)<br />

Floyd NELSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J. Ronald HA... (/v1/cases/1028906)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Al... (/v1/cases/1028098)<br />

Smith v. Secretary of N.M. Dep't of Corrections (/v1/cases/433931)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ma... (/v1/cases/1028862)<br />

Grabowski v. Jackson County Public Defenders Office... (/v1/cases/513685)<br />

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Simon Green, Petit... (/v1/cases/1027994)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cook (/v1/cases/431161)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1028116)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1327256)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. A.... (/v1/cases/1028002)<br />

Dodd v. Nix (/v1/cases/471051)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Do... (/v1/cases/1028212)<br />

Robert Dennis LOREE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pat JU... (/v1/cases/1028638)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Snow (/v1/cases/502588)<br />

Waters v. Thomas (/v1/cases/422356)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1027060)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1027126)<br />

Heffernan v. Norris (/v1/cases/469757)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Da... (/v1/cases/1028816)<br />

Benson A. UNANKA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1028834)<br />

Charles Paul BLEVINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Samu... (/v1/cases/1028152)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1027273)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1027670)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hurtado (/v1/cases/554050)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1027740)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cl... (/v1/cases/1026970)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1027224)<br />

Baxter v. Thomas (/v1/cases/424232)<br />

Lane v. Singletary (/v1/cases/430419)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1026353)<br />

Mason v. Godinez (/v1/cases/493103)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1025945)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1026211)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1026845)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1026502)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1325555)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1026799)<br />

Wesley Allen DORROUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIT... (/v1/cases/1026024)<br />

Horsley v. State of Ala. (/v1/cases/430412)<br />

Romero v. Tansy (/v1/cases/439582)<br />

Alfred E. GRIZZELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Billy ... (/v1/cases/1028349)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Wilks (/v1/cases/482202)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1026179)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1026401)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1027064)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1026962)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

103 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

1994<br />

Sumlin v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/461295)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1027804)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1027848)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1026917)<br />

Feltrop v. Delo (/v1/cases/461622)<br />

Sidebottom v. Delo (/v1/cases/462494)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1026903)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1027241)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1026199)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1026175)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1026952)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1026616)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1026109)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1027196)<br />

Schlup v. Delo (/v1/cases/1387504)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1026720)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Holmes (/v1/cases/546233)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cook (/v1/cases/433466)<br />

Fredericks v. Wright (/v1/cases/1026196)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1026675)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1026912)<br />

Esslinger v. Davis (/v1/cases/424995)<br />

Bey v. Nix (/v1/cases/463531)<br />

Klein v. Neal (/v1/cases/437838)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1027936)<br />

Krimmel v. Hopkins (/v1/cases/476240)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Nagib (/v1/cases/485755)<br />

Albert W. KOUBA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of Ame... (/v1/cases/1028883)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1026529)<br />

LaRette v. Delo (/v1/cases/462434)<br />

Anderson v. Goeke (/v1/cases/472546)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1027118)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/1025917)<br />

Jackson v. Herring (/v1/cases/423805)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Goad (/v1/cases/485740)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1027238)<br />

O'Neal v. Delo (/v1/cases/473788)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1027204)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gr... (/v1/cases/1026022)<br />

Banuelos v. McFarland (/v1/cases/517684)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Patten (/v1/cases/521358)<br />

Bobby MALLORY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William OVE... (/v1/cases/1025894)<br />

A1.3. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Goudy (/v1/cases/1025769)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1325660)<br />

Noble DEBAMAKA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STA... (/v1/cases/1025913)<br />

Dean ASHWORTH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eddie R. MY... (/v1/cases/1025646)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

104 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Darrell Wade SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED... (/v1/cases/1025556)<br />

Anthony R. JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert G... (/v1/cases/1025613)<br />

William Lockett MARKLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R... (/v1/cases/1025921)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1026174)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1026770)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1025983)<br />

Mann v. Scott (/v1/cases/518383)<br />

Antonio RAMIREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bill PRIC... (/v1/cases/1024852)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cl... (/v1/cases/1024807)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1025370)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Kellum (/v1/cases/480811)<br />

Carl Wayne CRISS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jim DENN... (/v1/cases/1024915)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1024520)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1024765)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1023901)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Camacho (/v1/cases/428094)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1024911)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1025172)<br />

Jerrold POE, Appellant, v. Bill M. ARMONTROUT, Appe... (/v1/cases/467620)<br />

Barnhill v. Flannigan (/v1/cases/478929)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1024283)<br />

Whitmill v. Armontrout (/v1/cases/478056)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1024981)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1024733)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1025346)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1024816)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1024457)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1023411)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1023442)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Raineri (/v1/cases/562340)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1023893)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1023457)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1023846)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1024829)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1023401)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1024015)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1325100)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1024099)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1023825)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1023963)<br />

Joseph R. CHAVEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert TA... (/v1/cases/1023685)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1023702)<br />

Paul SANDOVAL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE of Ne... (/v1/cases/1023177)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1323530)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1024199)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1023043)<br />

Christian v. Rhode (/v1/cases/447079)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

105 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1024134)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1024253)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1023342)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1022984)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1023647)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1023163)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1024189)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1026023)<br />

Moran v. Godinez (/v1/cases/451990)<br />

Lebron v. Mann (/v1/cases/551357)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1023754)<br />

Griffin v. Camp (/v1/cases/488756)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Segler (/v1/cases/508049)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1023156)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1023368)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1022990)<br />

Steven Randall THOMPSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J... (/v1/cases/1022064)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1324055)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1324015)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1021956)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1021981)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1022000)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1021918)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Willis (/v1/cases/519653)<br />

Foster v. Delo (/v1/cases/467617)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Gallegos (/v1/cases/439272)<br />

Armstead v. Scott (/v1/cases/509441)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1323466)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mi... (/v1/cases/1022225)<br />

Bennett v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/464821)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1021942)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1021975)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1022200)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mi... (/v1/cases/1021992)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1022186)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1022665)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1021510)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1021658)<br />

Earnest Eugene PADILLOW, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R... (/v1/cases/1021614)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Harris (/v1/cases/555996)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1022046)<br />

Herman GARDNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James GOME... (/v1/cases/1021211)<br />

Davis v. Zant (/v1/cases/428742)<br />

Knight v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/559024)<br />

Bruce Donnell THOMPSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ro... (/v1/cases/1023183)<br />

Peter N. GEORGACARAKOS, Petitioner, Appellant, v. U... (/v1/cases/1020614)<br />

Scarpa v. Dubois (/v1/cases/561120)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

106 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Carl GREEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ... (/v1/cases/1021249)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. La... (/v1/cases/1020831)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wa... (/v1/cases/1021415)<br />

Richard SENAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Al C. PARKE... (/v1/cases/1021241)<br />

Thomas WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATE... (/v1/cases/1021438)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fe... (/v1/cases/1021004)<br />

Brecheen v. Reynolds (/v1/cases/436338)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. M<strong>org</strong>ano (/v1/cases/492936)<br />

Kelly WATTS, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Walt CHA... (/v1/cases/1021451)<br />

John Henry FARR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert BO... (/v1/cases/1020227)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1026957)<br />

Richard E. SHUMATE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry ... (/v1/cases/1021274)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1023950)<br />

Leon EARLY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ... (/v1/cases/1021167)<br />

Dever v. Kansas State Penitentiary (/v1/cases/436664)<br />

Gerald DUVAL, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ... (/v1/cases/1021137)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1021282)<br />

In Spaziano v. Singletary (/v1/cases/422840)<br />

Jordan v. Hargett (/v1/cases/518309)<br />

Robert CONLEE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STAT... (/v1/cases/1322070)<br />

Alvin Dale BARNER, Petitioner Appellant, v. WARDEN,... (/v1/cases/1020343)<br />

Doug Wayne HOOD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Samuel LE... (/v1/cases/1020555)<br />

Nolan Charles MUNIZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WYOMI... (/v1/cases/1321720)<br />

Cacoperdo v. Demosthenes (/v1/cases/447816)<br />

Seehan v. Iowa (/v1/cases/467960)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Co... (/v1/cases/1322169)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1026814)<br />

William C. MARSHALL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE... (/v1/cases/1322209)<br />

El v. Nix (/v1/cases/478110)<br />

Clifford EATON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STA... (/v1/cases/1322130)<br />

Eugene Emmanuel BATES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Wal... (/v1/cases/1322164)<br />

Andrew DUNCAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STAT... (/v1/cases/1322257)<br />

Maurice Michelle DAVIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UN... (/v1/cases/1020699)<br />

Williams v. Scott (/v1/cases/513302)<br />

U.S. v. Davis (/v1/cases/441775)<br />

John Dale STAUFFER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ari ZA... (/v1/cases/1020500)<br />

Clarence Emery WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, ... (/v1/cases/1020602)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1019564)<br />

Jacek Jerzy GABRYELSKI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ve... (/v1/cases/1020567)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1321633)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1321574)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Soto (/v1/cases/485455)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1019575)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1321572)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1020097)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Caswell (/v1/cases/482225)<br />

Maiden v. Bunnell (/v1/cases/460415)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

107 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Routly v. Singletary (/v1/cases/423607)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Li... (/v1/cases/1321512)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1019112)<br />

Kinnamon v. Scott (/v1/cases/524412)<br />

Turner v. Williams (/v1/cases/530576)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Garcia (/v1/cases/483820)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1019197)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1321370)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1019221)<br />

Stafford v. Saffle (/v1/cases/437761)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1022614)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1018916)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1019022)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Jackson (/v1/cases/486215)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Fish (/v1/cases/487610)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1321342)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pe... (/v1/cases/1018528)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1017960)<br />

Quintero v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/460810)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/488917)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Zarnes (/v1/cases/491243)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1018532)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1018510)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hanoum (/v1/cases/439926)<br />

Parkus v. Delo (/v1/cases/468542)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. De Alba Pagan (/v1/cases/561810)<br />

Boyd v. Biggers (/v1/cases/504754)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1018125)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1019117)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1018837)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1018762)<br />

Griffin v. Delo (/v1/cases/473693)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1017907)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1018018)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1018371)<br />

Bryant v. Scott (/v1/cases/514616)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Small (/v1/cases/1018908)<br />

Vines v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/425919)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1017913)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1018931)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1018921)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1018138)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1017881)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Pruitt (/v1/cases/450660)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1018341)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1018613)<br />

Gonzalez v. U.S. (/v1/cases/449508)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

108 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1018217)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1017993)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Palomba (/v1/cases/449149)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1018161)<br />

Stewart v. Nix (/v1/cases/472047)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1018537)<br />

Dawan v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/464242)<br />

Adams v. Leapley (/v1/cases/467088)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1017917)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1017675)<br />

Bussard v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/473111)<br />

Albert HAMBURG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ATTORNEY G... (/v1/cases/1018515)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1017345)<br />

Holmes v. Norris (/v1/cases/476279)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1321307)<br />

Kenneth C. VOSBERG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Honora... (/v1/cases/1016721)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Partee (/v1/cases/481111)<br />

Danny Lee KIRKPATRICK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gar... (/v1/cases/1017335)<br />

Lawrence v. Armontrout (/v1/cases/463233)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1016960)<br />

Peter J. McMAHON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary D. ... (/v1/cases/1018509)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1016946)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1016863)<br />

Wilson v. Whitley (/v1/cases/513725)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Nicolapolous (/v1/cases/555208)<br />

Tomlin v. Myers (/v1/cases/457471)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1017064)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1016724)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1017729)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1017868)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1017697)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1017701)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Martini (/v1/cases/460337)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1016285)<br />

Minner v. Kerby (/v1/cases/438329)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1016570)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. He... (/v1/cases/527283)<br />

Bartling v. Fruehauf Corp. (/v1/cases/497671)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1016315)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1016041)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1015368)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1015811)<br />

Gomez v. Ahitow (/v1/cases/486349)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1017190)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Durman (/v1/cases/490201)<br />

Clisby v. Alabama (/v1/cases/425623)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Castro (/v1/cases/506719)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

109 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1016214)<br />

Weeks v. Jones (/v1/cases/427605)<br />

Simmons v. State (/v1/cases/473726)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Thompson (/v1/cases/416960)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1015868)<br />

Pollard v. Delo (/v1/cases/471928)<br />

Richard Doren COLLINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lou... (/v1/cases/1017099)<br />

Wells v. Maass (/v1/cases/455364)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1015972)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1016167)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1016359)<br />

Hill v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/473024)<br />

Mitchell v. Ahitow (/v1/cases/1015213)<br />

Siripongs v. Calderon (/v1/cases/446486)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1015674)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1016074)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1016228)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1016714)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Kleinbart (/v1/cases/421807)<br />

Bivens v. Groose (/v1/cases/473670)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1015031)<br />

White v. Ieyoub (/v1/cases/506979)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1015756)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1015279)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1017369)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1016029)<br />

McBride v. Sharpe (/v1/cases/426881)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1015766)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1016144)<br />

Burden v. Zant (/v1/cases/425686)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Da... (/v1/cases/1013766)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1014792)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1014766)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1014624)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1015472)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Vegas (/v1/cases/550258)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Nolley (/v1/cases/533631)<br />

Castellanos v. U.S. (/v1/cases/480906)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1015753)<br />

Singleton v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/560687)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1014849)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Stockstill (/v1/cases/537462)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1014787)<br />

Thomas v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/477246)<br />

Litho RANGE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES... (/v1/cases/1013931)<br />

Robinson v. Leapley (/v1/cases/472973)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1014756)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

110 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1015886)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1015958)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Goodchild (/v1/cases/563675)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1015375)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1014616)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Andrews (/v1/cases/522996)<br />

Whitmore v. Avery (/v1/cases/467573)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1014496)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Do... (/v1/cases/1013731)<br />

John F. BOYLE, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Anthon... (/v1/cases/1013749)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1014769)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Se... (/v1/cases/1014059)<br />

Paul F. RATHER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William S.... (/v1/cases/1013942)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1014401)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Saro (/v1/cases/421664)<br />

DeVille v. Whitley (/v1/cases/519169)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1015168)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1013171)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1014443)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1014494)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1014816)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michael Greg... (/v1/cases/470585)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ju... (/v1/cases/478679)<br />

Millard K. BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1014111)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1014557)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1014806)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ph... (/v1/cases/1013082)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1015816)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1015711)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sa... (/v1/cases/1013734)<br />

Zoltan Attila BIRO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED... (/v1/cases/1013412)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mi... (/v1/cases/1013888)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1014895)<br />

Irving SEALS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATE... (/v1/cases/1014194)<br />

O'Hara v. Wigginton (/v1/cases/497896)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee, v. T... (/v1/cases/1013605)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Ba... (/v1/cases/1013966)<br />

Craig Daniel GONZALES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNI... (/v1/cases/1013189)<br />

Earl SAND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edward W. MURRA... (/v1/cases/1013099)<br />

Jimmy Dean RODGERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED... (/v1/cases/1013693)<br />

Ward v. Whitley (/v1/cases/517164)<br />

Thomas James SAVOCA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITE... (/v1/cases/1014319)<br />

Shaw v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/473250)<br />

Wade v. Calderon (/v1/cases/455592)<br />

Andrews v. Collins (/v1/cases/525064)<br />

Oscar WILLIAMS, Jr., Petitioner/Appellant, v. Salva... (/v1/cases/1013161)<br />

Smith v. Farley (/v1/cases/483635)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

111 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

M<strong>org</strong>an v. Bunnell (/v1/cases/460330)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1015165)<br />

James v. B<strong>org</strong> (/v1/cases/453011)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. An... (/v1/cases/1013222)<br />

Billy Joe HUDSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Samuel L... (/v1/cases/1013481)<br />

Ernest R. WASHINGTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Elli... (/v1/cases/1012774)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Br... (/v1/cases/1013417)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. La... (/v1/cases/1012843)<br />

Kenneth A. BIANCHI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James ... (/v1/cases/1013326)<br />

Precin v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/492071)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ri... (/v1/cases/1013871)<br />

Robert CONLEY, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Jerry D. GI... (/v1/cases/1013941)<br />

Anthony J. LOLAKIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED... (/v1/cases/1012822)<br />

Brian Morton FREEMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roge... (/v1/cases/1013389)<br />

Michael KINNARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ST... (/v1/cases/1012689)<br />

Sheikh Mohammed BEY, The Moor, also known as Randy ... (/v1/cases/1012651)<br />

Michael DEVAUGHN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1013488)<br />

Norman Ray FREELOVE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITE... (/v1/cases/1013548)<br />

Michael W. KING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Col. Larr... (/v1/cases/1013756)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Montgomery (/v1/cases/482762)<br />

Selsor v. Kaiser (/v1/cases/435929)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Jernigan (/v1/cases/513358)<br />

Starr v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/467622)<br />

Stoia v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/483503)<br />

Theodore RHODE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Henry GRAY... (/v1/cases/1012981)<br />

Harvey Mack LEONARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eddie... (/v1/cases/1013331)<br />

Jerry O'Keith WALKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNIT... (/v1/cases/1012792)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ed... (/v1/cases/1013265)<br />

William E. CROSS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R. Micha... (/v1/cases/1014197)<br />

T.J. THOMPSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STAT... (/v1/cases/1012940)<br />

U.S. v. Hubbard (/v1/cases/491716)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. McKinley (/v1/cases/492007)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Garcia (/v1/cases/504494)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pe... (/v1/cases/1013536)<br />

Joe Ray LITTLETON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ... (/v1/cases/1012748)<br />

James Franklin BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Duan... (/v1/cases/1011363)<br />

Moran v. Godinez (/v1/cases/442437)<br />

Nave v. Delo (/v1/cases/476208)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1011152)<br />

Debra NOLAND, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of Americ... (/v1/cases/1318049)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1011584)<br />

Carl GREEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ... (/v1/cases/1012878)<br />

Milone v. Camp (/v1/cases/483646)<br />

Robert Jewell WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UN... (/v1/cases/1012768)<br />

Orlando Rene MONIE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of ... (/v1/cases/1318075)<br />

Theodore STREATER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bill DU... (/v1/cases/1013267)<br />

Dennis BIEHLE, also known as Richard W. Smith, Peti... (/v1/cases/1013869)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

112 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1011637)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1011650)<br />

Melvin Kenneth LESTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joh... (/v1/cases/1012828)<br />

Phillip Morris PUGH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edwar... (/v1/cases/1011778)<br />

Keith Lamar ORANGE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R. Mic... (/v1/cases/1011502)<br />

U.S. v. Malave (/v1/cases/492175)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. De... (/v1/cases/1013563)<br />

Calvin Lee HOLLOWAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A. OL... (/v1/cases/1013206)<br />

Jameson v. Coughlin (/v1/cases/546179)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1011636)<br />

Kramer v. Kemna (/v1/cases/465424)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Rimell (/v1/cases/467206)<br />

Lowry v. Lewis (/v1/cases/456491)<br />

Theriot v. Whitley (/v1/cases/513629)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1009861)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1011877)<br />

Richard GRIFFITHS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Kenneth... (/v1/cases/1012699)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/1011946)<br />

4UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. A... (/v1/cases/1011699)<br />

Bland v. California Dep't. of Corrections (/v1/cases/443363)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1011742)<br />

Sanders v. Ratelle (/v1/cases/445877)<br />

U.S. v. Young (/v1/cases/483188)<br />

Motley v. Collins (/v1/cases/521309)<br />

Joshua Michael SAMSON, a/k/a Michael S. Edwards, Pe... (/v1/cases/1011751)<br />

Jones v. Jerrison (/v1/cases/475277)<br />

Anderson v. Collins (/v1/cases/518393)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1011396)<br />

Government of Virgin Islands v. Weatherwax (/v1/cases/544377)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1011801)<br />

Ronald Edmond WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UN... (/v1/cases/1011753)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pe... (/v1/cases/1010676)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1011145)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1009444)<br />

E.g., Battle v. Delo (/v1/cases/462211)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1011425)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1011390)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1010660)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1011452)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1010184)<br />

Patel v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/491757)<br />

Waste Conversion, Inc. v. Kelley (/v1/cases/1009328)<br />

Brewer v. State of Iowa (/v1/cases/475797)<br />

Paradis v. Arave (/v1/cases/454125)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1010345)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1009377)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee; v. Jo... (/v1/cases/1011709)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

113 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1009959)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1009592)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1012417)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1318046)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Sanders (/v1/cases/435893)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1010611)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1009787)<br />

Bolender v. Singletary (/v1/cases/422720)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1010673)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1011243)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1010313)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1010292)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1009798)<br />

Frazier v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/446237)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1009246)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1009874)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1009340)<br />

Dugan v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/481488)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1009593)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1010656)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1010504)<br />

Williams v. Collins (/v1/cases/508749)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. White (/v1/cases/1009601)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Do... (/v1/cases/1010646)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1009281)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Pointer (/v1/cases/489152)<br />

In Deputy v. Taylor (/v1/cases/542594)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1010195)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1009941)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1009624)<br />

Shannon HARTFIELD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R. Mich... (/v1/cases/1009078)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No... (/v1/cases/1008774)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1010323)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1009314)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1010502)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1009641)<br />

Darrell B. McNARY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert ... (/v1/cases/1007983)<br />

Lawson v. Dixon, Warden. (/v1/cases/1383109)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1010134)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1009315)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1318089)<br />

Clark v. Groose (/v1/cases/473978)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1010467)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Loscalzo (/v1/cases/488905)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1009925)<br />

Caspari v. Bohlen (/v1/cases/1385900)<br />

Rust v. Zent (/v1/cases/503630)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

114 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ma... (/v1/cases/464299)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Kozinski (/v1/cases/492856)<br />

Kerry THOMPSON, Petitioner/Appellant, v. UNITED STA... (/v1/cases/1008038)<br />

Dana Ray EDMONDS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Charles E... (/v1/cases/1008986)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hubbard (/v1/cases/499783)<br />

Dennis David SAMUELS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNIT... (/v1/cases/1008254)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1010061)<br />

Flieger v. Delo (/v1/cases/473205)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1009671)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ja... (/v1/cases/1007503)<br />

Vernon Lee BRANHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED... (/v1/cases/1009116)<br />

Gillette v. Tansy (/v1/cases/430933)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee v. To... (/v1/cases/1009084)<br />

Dennis Leroy HASKINS, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Robe... (/v1/cases/1008074)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. El... (/v1/cases/1009133)<br />

Pollard v. Armontrout (/v1/cases/465776)<br />

Donnie R. PREWITT, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appell... (/v1/cases/1008207)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1008970)<br />

Campbell v. Blodgett (/v1/cases/458676)<br />

Ray Darris THOMPSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Neil ... (/v1/cases/1007776)<br />

Mason v. Scully (/v1/cases/545893)<br />

Holdren v. Legursky (/v1/cases/532014)<br />

Schone v. Purkett (/v1/cases/472562)<br />

Douglas R. ORVILLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED... (/v1/cases/1008451)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Davis (/v1/cases/453480)<br />

Mark Anthony THORNTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STA... (/v1/cases/1007444)<br />

Alex BONILLA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eddie YLST, ... (/v1/cases/1006791)<br />

Mario Orlando LEWIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITE... (/v1/cases/1007453)<br />

Spencer v. Murray (/v1/cases/532047)<br />

Hamilton v. Vasquez (/v1/cases/442926)<br />

U.S. v. Figueroa (/v1/cases/480454)<br />

Porter v. Singletary (/v1/cases/428318)<br />

Richard Leon LOWERY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John ... (/v1/cases/1007844)<br />

Virgil Trenell McKINNEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U... (/v1/cases/1007968)<br />

Bobby Stearling CONN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. H. G... (/v1/cases/1007848)<br />

Wilkerson v. Whitley (/v1/cases/505011)<br />

Larry GIVENS, EF153536, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cal... (/v1/cases/428546)<br />

Snell v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/476594)<br />

Charles H. LOPEZ, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cha... (/v1/cases/1007478)<br />

Harris v. Champion (/v1/cases/432052)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fr... (/v1/cases/1006740)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ju... (/v1/cases/1007065)<br />

Levert K. GRIFFIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arthur ... (/v1/cases/1007906)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Isaacs (/v1/cases/564541)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Starnes (/v1/cases/493727)<br />

Allen WASHINGTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M. PICKE... (/v1/cases/1007236)<br />

Donald M. GEORGEOFF, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITE... (/v1/cases/1007998)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

115 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

1993<br />

Drake v. Clark (/v1/cases/484907)<br />

Larry Noal WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1008013)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1010030)<br />

Smith v. Dixon (/v1/cases/534349)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hon (/v1/cases/552131)<br />

Rogers v. Zant (/v1/cases/423698)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Lloyd (/v1/cases/433428)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee (93-10... (/v1/cases/1007761)<br />

UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vin... (/v1/cases/1007341)<br />

Ambriz v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/483520)<br />

U.S. v. Blaylock (/v1/cases/455172)<br />

Ronald Duke KELLY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ... (/v1/cases/1006973)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Melvin WILLI... (/v1/cases/1007663)<br />

Davis v. Greer (/v1/cases/492134)<br />

Dennis E. BEACH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Daniel Mc... (/v1/cases/1315905)<br />

Asad E. MUJIHADEEN, a/k/a Ronald Turks, Petitioner-... (/v1/cases/1316475)<br />

Howard Dennis WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James... (/v1/cases/1007261)<br />

Agan v. Singletary (/v1/cases/424774)<br />

Marquez v. Collins (/v1/cases/510844)<br />

Gilbert SPEARS, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITE... (/v1/cases/1007714)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1008892)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1008931)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1009143)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1009074)<br />

Walker v. Jones (/v1/cases/427993)<br />

Wilson v. Kemna (/v1/cases/462084)<br />

Hanson v. Passer (/v1/cases/463215)<br />

Mayo v. Henderson (/v1/cases/551637)<br />

Juan C. OVALLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STA... (/v1/cases/1315665)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1006241)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1314779)<br />

Robert FLIEGER, Appellant, v. Paul K. DELO, Superin... (/v1/cases/471351)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vi... (/v1/cases/1316484)<br />

Lance Edward FLEMING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robe... (/v1/cases/1007119)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pa... (/v1/cases/1006836)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vi... (/v1/cases/1006874)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/1008455)<br />

Ted DRENNON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ... (/v1/cases/1006964)<br />

Ge<strong>org</strong>e W. CHESTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bobby B... (/v1/cases/1006030)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bo... (/v1/cases/1006103)<br />

UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Car... (/v1/cases/1007221)<br />

Robert L. ECHOLS, Petitioner/Appellant, v. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1315439)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ke... (/v1/cases/1006097)<br />

Manuel ZURITA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Page TRUE, ... (/v1/cases/1315716)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ch... (/v1/cases/1315700)<br />

Danny Franklin WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A... (/v1/cases/1315198)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

116 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ro... (/v1/cases/1006119)<br />

Lewis v. Alexander (/v1/cases/494429)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cs... (/v1/cases/1007211)<br />

Jack W. SOUTHARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED S... (/v1/cases/1315856)<br />

Charles E. COLLIER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michae... (/v1/cases/1006177)<br />

Arnold Ray HEIGHTLAND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNI... (/v1/cases/1315670)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1005611)<br />

Foster v. Delo (/v1/cases/462867)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1007056)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gu... (/v1/cases/1008342)<br />

Myron NEWSOME, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dennis BAKE... (/v1/cases/1314984)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1006495)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Haddock (/v1/cases/435470)<br />

Robert EARTHMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ST... (/v1/cases/1315814)<br />

David JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael J. ... (/v1/cases/1315875)<br />

Jim L. KENNEDY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STA... (/v1/cases/1315697)<br />

Dwayne E. HEAD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STA... (/v1/cases/1315598)<br />

Harvey v. McCaughtry (/v1/cases/486324)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ke... (/v1/cases/1315646)<br />

Jaime GIRALDO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STAT... (/v1/cases/1315504)<br />

Ritchie v. Eberhart (/v1/cases/495594)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hu... (/v1/cases/1013592)<br />

Marvin LOVEJOY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. The UNITED... (/v1/cases/1315001)<br />

Tossie BENNETT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert G. ... (/v1/cases/1006821)<br />

Gary P. BARQUET, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Manfred M... (/v1/cases/1006782)<br />

Burger v. Zant, Warden. No. A-471. (/v1/cases/1383489)<br />

Larry Darnell JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Raymo... (/v1/cases/1007809)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. McCaskey (/v1/cases/505425)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hoard (/v1/cases/1005814)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1005168)<br />

Sullivan v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/496954)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Tarricone (/v1/cases/545944)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1005676)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1005741)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Pedigo (/v1/cases/484803)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Smith (/v1/cases/431628)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1005642)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1005838)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1005618)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. McGill (/v1/cases/562687)<br />

Hughes v. Lee County Dist. Ct. (/v1/cases/465357)<br />

Andre Latrelle HAWKINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. St... (/v1/cases/1006149)<br />

Parnell RILEY, Sr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of ... (/v1/cases/1011609)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1005958)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1005601)<br />

Foster v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/467469)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1005875)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

117 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1005315)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1005808)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1005928)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1005181)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1005523)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1005220)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1005551)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1005728)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/1007418)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fr... (/v1/cases/514186)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Vasquez (/v1/cases/523802)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ju... (/v1/cases/516446)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1003941)<br />

Meis v. Wyoming Dep't of Corrections (/v1/cases/476071)<br />

Schlup v. Delo (/v1/cases/461925)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1003890)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1004505)<br />

Billy Ray GASSAWAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michae... (/v1/cases/1004652)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. DeRewal (/v1/cases/540795)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1004666)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1004345)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1004403)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1003247)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1004197)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1003307)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1004319)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1004443)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1003685)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1003831)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1003846)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1314375)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1004254)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Mala (/v1/cases/558833)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1004594)<br />

Antonio Inman RANKIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Raym... (/v1/cases/1004193)<br />

Ebbole v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/481276)<br />

Lucero v. Kerby (/v1/cases/437487)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1004282)<br />

Eko v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/556020)<br />

Whitmore v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/469569)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1003453)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1004353)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1003588)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1004191)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Kenyon (/v1/cases/472704)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1003414)<br />

Jouett Edgar ARNEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Raymon... (/v1/cases/1003737)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

118 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Kines v. Godinez (/v1/cases/486424)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1002808)<br />

Gray v. Lynn (/v1/cases/505458)<br />

Kenneth JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ron CHAMP... (/v1/cases/1003865)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1003461)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1004095)<br />

Jennings v. Purkett (/v1/cases/467964)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1314312)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1003520)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1314352)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1313782)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1313365)<br />

Winkler v. Keane (/v1/cases/548456)<br />

Barker v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/493002)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1002334)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1003660)<br />

Kyles v. Whitley (/v1/cases/522972)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1002721)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1002472)<br />

Degaglia v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/483986)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1004107)<br />

Cuppett v. Duckworth (/v1/cases/484329)<br />

Jose L. GONZALES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephen ... (/v1/cases/1313192)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1313413)<br />

Swan v. Peterson (/v1/cases/459820)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Stevenson (/v1/cases/483095)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant. v. L... (/v1/cases/1002627)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1005537)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Zackson (/v1/cases/549987)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1002274)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1314795)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1313788)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1003384)<br />

Ralph Carlton FISHER, also known as Kevin McCarley,... (/v1/cases/1002058)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1003315)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Guinan (/v1/cases/482658)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1003121)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1002110)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1313234)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1002328)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1002588)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1003212)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1002309)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Mena Robles (/v1/cases/558659)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Levine (/v1/cases/482130)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1002564)<br />

Bannister v. Armontrout (/v1/cases/462425)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

119 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1002491)<br />

Devier v. Zant (/v1/cases/424691)<br />

U.S. v. Flores (/v1/cases/491173)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Fulton (/v1/cases/1000821)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Je... (/v1/cases/1000920)<br />

John Ellis HUBER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert B... (/v1/cases/1001663)<br />

Motley v. Collins (/v1/cases/515603)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Gordon (/v1/cases/436455)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/1002241)<br />

Washington v. Murray (/v1/cases/532103)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Benish (/v1/cases/543085)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1313805)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wi... (/v1/cases/457497)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1313778)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1313169)<br />

Randy E. WEST, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl ZENON,... (/v1/cases/1001351)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1002577)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ro... (/v1/cases/1000857)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1000396)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1002312)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Banda (/v1/cases/517449)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Durrive (/v1/cases/484876)<br />

John L. PARGO, Appellant, v. Crispus C. NIX, Appell... (/v1/cases/1001675)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Je... (/v1/cases/1312670)<br />

Leroy L. WOODS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Sam LEWIS,... (/v1/cases/1001314)<br />

Novak v. Purkett (/v1/cases/465786)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vi... (/v1/cases/1000982)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Ar... (/v1/cases/1001619)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1000510)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mi... (/v1/cases/1000906)<br />

Jose L. Admiral ROSSELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J... (/v1/cases/1000768)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Daniel (/v1/cases/533169)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/1000155)<br />

Robert L. CHANEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. O.M. McC... (/v1/cases/1312593)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Er... (/v1/cases/1312678)<br />

James Lee WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bob GOLDS... (/v1/cases/1001294)<br />

Tomas VEGA-ALVAREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED... (/v1/cases/1001273)<br />

King v. Puckett (/v1/cases/524158)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1003398)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Resko (/v1/cases/543161)<br />

James Dale COATES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jack MC... (/v1/cases/1000905)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/999641)<br />

Leo Newton MAXWELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ge<strong>org</strong>e... (/v1/cases/1312737)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. $3... (/v1/cases/459981)<br />

Brown v. Doe (/v1/cases/556195)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1000266)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/999707)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

120 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ja... (/v1/cases/1001133)<br />

Robert ORTIZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Wayne ESTELL... (/v1/cases/1312703)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1000443)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1000390)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/999868)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/999958)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/999860)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/999241)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Sustaita (/v1/cases/448949)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/999785)<br />

Callins v. Collins (/v1/cases/511864)<br />

Bond v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/485662)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AL... (/v1/cases/488025)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/999747)<br />

Rogers v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/473705)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/999644)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/999754)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/999880)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Dixon (/v1/cases/438096)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/999505)<br />

Ratliff v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/495056)<br />

Boyd v. Delo (/v1/cases/463316)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/685278)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Nielsen (/v1/cases/448057)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/685635)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Bradshaw (/v1/cases/535700)<br />

McAleese v. Mazurkiewicz (/v1/cases/538718)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Vaquero (/v1/cases/521542)<br />

Hockett v. Duckworth (/v1/cases/490423)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Candido ORTI... (/v1/cases/475307)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/684936)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/999159)<br />

Flores. Biggerstaff v. Clark (/v1/cases/482932)<br />

Norris R. WAUQUA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jack COW... (/v1/cases/999513)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Moore (/v1/cases/513875)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/685266)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Logan (/v1/cases/417062)<br />

Joseph A. CARBELLO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED... (/v1/cases/999352)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/684883)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/684986)<br />

Lucille Marie YARBROUGH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U... (/v1/cases/999172)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/684900)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/685012)<br />

Kevin COE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry KINCHELOE,... (/v1/cases/1312660)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/685698)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/685119)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/684831)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

121 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/999813)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/685135)<br />

Osborn v. Shillinger (/v1/cases/438026)<br />

Nelson v. Nagle (/v1/cases/422138)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Penass (/v1/cases/481669)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/999938)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/999797)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/685592)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/685169)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/684774)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/684841)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/685107)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/686465)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/686383)<br />

Jefferson L. DAVIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert... (/v1/cases/685130)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/685799)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/686683)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/685825)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1310905)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/686443)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/686581)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/685829)<br />

Michael A. EVANS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Duane SH... (/v1/cases/685137)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/686015)<br />

Tabech v. Hopkins (/v1/cases/477060)<br />

John Bernard GRANT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephe... (/v1/cases/685037)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/686252)<br />

Bryce FINLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dareld L. KE... (/v1/cases/686775)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Tarricone (/v1/cases/547378)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/686890)<br />

Jerry Lewis THOMAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jack C... (/v1/cases/686068)<br />

Small v. Endicott (/v1/cases/490361)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Santiago (/v1/cases/511256)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/686780)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/686612)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/686404)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1310946)<br />

Jones v. White (/v1/cases/1309481)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/686537)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/686551)<br />

Spriggs v. Collins (/v1/cases/522801)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dy... (/v1/cases/1311693)<br />

In re Holloway (/v1/cases/419873)<br />

Smith v. Dixon (/v1/cases/532844)<br />

Wilson v. Lindler (/v1/cases/537633)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Gutierrez (/v1/cases/447331)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Garcia (/v1/cases/457510)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

122 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gu... (/v1/cases/686486)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/687122)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/687611)<br />

U.S. v. Borders (/v1/cases/514767)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/687319)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/688113)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/687014)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/688618)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. McIntyre (/v1/cases/435009)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ab... (/v1/cases/508675)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/686918)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/687423)<br />

Gary Wayne MOORE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephen ... (/v1/cases/686751)<br />

West v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/464187)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/687731)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/687039)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/686491)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1309944)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1310040)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/687317)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/687144)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Williams (/v1/cases/474133)<br />

Pruett v. Thompson (/v1/cases/536229)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/687829)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/686138)<br />

Bruce Donnell THOMPSON, Petitioner-Appellant v. Ron... (/v1/cases/686161)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Boothe (/v1/cases/556130)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Horodner (/v1/cases/447371)<br />

NLRB v. Tecmec, Inc. (/v1/cases/689153)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/688172)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/688471)<br />

Irey v. Sullivan (/v1/cases/687913)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cl... (/v1/cases/689407)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/688623)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/688432)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/688738)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gr... (/v1/cases/688750)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/688330)<br />

Dokes v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/475430)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/688999)<br />

Risher v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/442761)<br />

Sinaloa Lake Owners Ass'n v. California Division of... (/v1/cases/687948)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/688300)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/688657)<br />

U.S. v. Pofahl (/v1/cases/526351)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/688161)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/689362)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

123 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Brocksmith (/v1/cases/481136)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/689065)<br />

Nelson v. Hargett (/v1/cases/523486)<br />

Williams v. Collins (/v1/cases/506552)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/688778)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Thomas (/v1/cases/476264)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/687878)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/688391)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/689452)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/689231)<br />

Yarrington v. Davies (/v1/cases/431067)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Brown (/v1/cases/541899)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/688719)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Holland (/v1/cases/492471)<br />

Ward v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/498663)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/688633)<br />

Jackson v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/473382)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/688315)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Olano (/v1/cases/1382434)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/689966)<br />

Kenneth C. VOSBERG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richar... (/v1/cases/689201)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wi... (/v1/cases/689481)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Garcia (/v1/cases/462201)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Harley (/v1/cases/418291)<br />

William R. KOEHLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John T... (/v1/cases/689475)<br />

Hull v. Freeman (/v1/cases/541247)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/690182)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/690126)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Peak (/v1/cases/537266)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/689688)<br />

Jose Daniel ESQUIVEL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jack... (/v1/cases/689823)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/690756)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/689641)<br />

Clark v. Lewis (/v1/cases/450185)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/690445)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/690430)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/689654)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/689972)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/690173)<br />

Linnen v. Armainis (/v1/cases/544048)<br />

Poyner v. Iowa (/v1/cases/464927)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/689648)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/690274)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/690106)<br />

Farmer v. Haas (/v1/cases/492306)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/689663)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/689665)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

124 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/689528)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/690490)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Ge<strong>org</strong>acarakos (/v1/cases/560885)<br />

Bush v. Singletary (/v1/cases/428689)<br />

Prichard v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/463014)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/691421)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/691106)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/690517)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/691375)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/690158)<br />

Sawyers v. Collins (/v1/cases/518967)<br />

Custis v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/534748)<br />

U.S. v. Anderson (/v1/cases/524823)<br />

Peter H. RANSOM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Raymond R... (/v1/cases/691182)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Horne (/v1/cases/420632)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Burns (/v1/cases/534848)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pe... (/v1/cases/691353)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/690832)<br />

Olen KENNEDY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steve HARGET... (/v1/cases/690957)<br />

Beets v. Collins (/v1/cases/516706)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/690208)<br />

Jimmie Dean STOHLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steve... (/v1/cases/691345)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/689888)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/690054)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/690447)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/691087)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Goines (/v1/cases/484724)<br />

Lilly v. Gilmore (/v1/cases/490725)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/690844)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/690152)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Springs (/v1/cases/481205)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/690787)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/691457)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/691447)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/691227)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/691978)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/691966)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/691587)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/691716)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/691730)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Baldwin (/v1/cases/448830)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/691533)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Price (/v1/cases/484203)<br />

Yeck v. Goodwin (/v1/cases/423385)<br />

Yohey v. Collins (/v1/cases/521116)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/691238)<br />

Hollenback v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/486479)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

125 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

U.S. v. Gipson (/v1/cases/510525)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Garfield (/v1/cases/455464)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/692228)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1307929)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/691895)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cashin (/v1/cases/689491)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Merida (/v1/cases/508646)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/692083)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/691532)<br />

Schmidt v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/462404)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/692604)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/691712)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/692137)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/691911)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/692169)<br />

Jeffries v. Blodgett (/v1/cases/439824)<br />

Lema v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/560787)<br />

Laird v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/475981)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/691624)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/692528)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/692658)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/691667)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/691556)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/692891)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/691981)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ha... (/v1/cases/692897)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/692438)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/692149)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/692108)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/690838)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Necoechea (/v1/cases/448022)<br />

Charles R. GLAZE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steve HA... (/v1/cases/692759)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/692225)<br />

Jose ROJAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Raymond ROBERT... (/v1/cases/692677)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ja... (/v1/cases/692634)<br />

Alexander v. Armontrout (/v1/cases/468623)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Cochrane (/v1/cases/442898)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/692222)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/692084)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/691555)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/691744)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/691374)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/692154)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/693941)<br />

Burnett v. Collins (/v1/cases/522240)<br />

Marshall E. MASSENGILL, Petitioner, v. Donald A. DO... (/v1/cases/692993)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/694004)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

126 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

1992<br />

U.S. v. Davenport (/v1/cases/485883)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/694062)<br />

Guy Hansell STARNES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Darel... (/v1/cases/692746)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Marshall (/v1/cases/493519)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/693308)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/693276)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/693444)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/693969)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/693815)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hager (/v1/cases/469211)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/693463)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/693441)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/693471)<br />

Taylor v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/499817)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/693432)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Le... (/v1/cases/693178)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. La... (/v1/cases/692955)<br />

Lockhart v. Fretwell (/v1/cases/1382400)<br />

Herrera v. Collins (/v1/cases/1382401)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/694021)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1307186)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/695239)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Badger (/v1/cases/484888)<br />

Rust v. Hopkins (/v1/cases/471373)<br />

U.S. v. Mojica (/v1/cases/486485)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1307202)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/694364)<br />

McDowell v. Leapley (/v1/cases/464372)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/695050)<br />

Ford v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/469475)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/694843)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/693362)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/692522)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Sanchez (/v1/cases/487586)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/695180)<br />

Houston v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/469608)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/695027)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/694303)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/695151)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/694463)<br />

Hance v. Zant (/v1/cases/424302)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/694482)<br />

U.S. v. Jackson (/v1/cases/483776)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Walling (/v1/cases/431881)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/695156)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/693173)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

127 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/694762)<br />

Claudio v. Scully (/v1/cases/553527)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/695703)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/695594)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. August (/v1/cases/504100)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/695620)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/695962)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/695200)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. St... (/v1/cases/693221)<br />

Tower v. Phillips (/v1/cases/424099)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/694751)<br />

Billy Ray DOLPH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James L. ... (/v1/cases/695416)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/694502)<br />

Jernigan v. Collins (/v1/cases/516263)<br />

Maynard v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/478198)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Roccio (/v1/cases/564129)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/695730)<br />

Cates v. Superintendent (/v1/cases/482996)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/696090)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Windsor (/v1/cases/492525)<br />

Waters v. Zant (/v1/cases/424882)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/695723)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Booker (/v1/cases/493446)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/695863)<br />

In Footman v. Singletary (/v1/cases/424825)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/695386)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/696045)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. St... (/v1/cases/695440)<br />

Morrison v. Estelle (/v1/cases/448661)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/696415)<br />

Dawan v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/476952)<br />

McCoy v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/462497)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/696282)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/696572)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/696022)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/696427)<br />

Smith v. Collins (/v1/cases/514869)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/696092)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/697098)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/697012)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/696934)<br />

Wilcher v. Hargett (/v1/cases/507524)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/696782)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/697357)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/697279)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/696909)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/696712)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

128 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/696882)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/697228)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/696985)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/696689)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/696695)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/697973)<br />

John Eswood AKRAWI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John J... (/v1/cases/497492)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/698212)<br />

Michael T. BOLANDER, Appellee, v. STATE OF IOWA, Ap... (/v1/cases/465932)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/697981)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/697819)<br />

Jackson v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/429638)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/697484)<br />

Prewitt v. Goeke (/v1/cases/468377)<br />

Loyd v. Whitley (/v1/cases/508292)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Evans (/v1/cases/443979)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/697844)<br />

In <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. HarrisonPhilpot (/v1/cases/458419)<br />

U.S. v. Pace (/v1/cases/437866)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Donaldson (/v1/cases/488218)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Zillges (/v1/cases/480792)<br />

J<strong>org</strong>e M. HERRERA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephen ... (/v1/cases/697898)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Meza (/v1/cases/698054)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Stevens (/v1/cases/439003)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Johnson (/v1/cases/472719)<br />

McChristion v. Duckworth (/v1/cases/698308)<br />

Everette M. RICHARDSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ro... (/v1/cases/697681)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/698780)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1304935)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/697469)<br />

Leroy WILLIAMS, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steph... (/v1/cases/698031)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1304985)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/698889)<br />

Kelly v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/1305018)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/697631)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/697859)<br />

Blalock v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/468000)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/698854)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1305025)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/699071)<br />

Mathis v. Zant (/v1/cases/429963)<br />

Roehl v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/483639)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1304971)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1305026)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/699138)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/699336)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Villasenor (/v1/cases/487395)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

129 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

U.S. v. Morrow (/v1/cases/501541)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Whalen (/v1/cases/436416)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/698458)<br />

Parker v. Singletary (/v1/cases/422144)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/698729)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Bartholomew (/v1/cases/1303891)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/698267)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/698817)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/698667)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/698503)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/699024)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/699279)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee, v. F... (/v1/cases/698391)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/699263)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Aquilla (/v1/cases/481456)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/699144)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/698852)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/699736)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/698575)<br />

Larry K. RAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jack COWLEY;... (/v1/cases/698931)<br />

Jamison v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/462634)<br />

Van Russell v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/489897)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1304389)<br />

John MILLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Duane SHILLIN... (/v1/cases/1304605)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/699672)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. En... (/v1/cases/1304565)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1304749)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/699402)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/699765)<br />

Blair v. Armontrout (/v1/cases/464554)<br />

Smith v. Collins (/v1/cases/522083)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Swartz (/v1/cases/532434)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/699670)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Gallegos (/v1/cases/434417)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/1304564)<br />

Neal v. Grammer (/v1/cases/471359)<br />

NLRB v. Omnix Intern. Corp. (/v1/cases/700329)<br />

Jones v. Caspari (/v1/cases/465090)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/699344)<br />

Mathenia v. Delo (/v1/cases/472032)<br />

Jeffries v. Blodgett (/v1/cases/460272)<br />

U.S. v. Pina (/v1/cases/431965)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/700560)<br />

Gregory LAHAY, Appellant, v. Bill ARMONTROUT, Appel... (/v1/cases/468507)<br />

Bellamy v. Cogdell (/v1/cases/548440)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Royal (/v1/cases/524307)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/700448)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

130 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

White v. Singletary (/v1/cases/423673)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Simpson (/v1/cases/487756)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/700615)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Lambey (/v1/cases/533108)<br />

Hendricks v. Vasquez (/v1/cases/449649)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/1304122)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/700634)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/701591)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/701124)<br />

Tinsley v. Kuhlmann (/v1/cases/557526)<br />

Cave v. Singletary (/v1/cases/426288)<br />

Tucker v. Day (/v1/cases/526147)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/702027)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/700891)<br />

McCann v. Armontrout (/v1/cases/466668)<br />

Keith Wayne BRUNS, Appellant, v. John A. THALACKER,... (/v1/cases/472579)<br />

Hamilton v. Ford (/v1/cases/426374)<br />

Frey v. Fulcomer (/v1/cases/542296)<br />

Nolan v. Armontrout (/v1/cases/466324)<br />

Laaman v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/556832)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/701999)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/701022)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Eisen (/v1/cases/547080)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/701712)<br />

Velarde v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/486271)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/700966)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Magini (/v1/cases/534857)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/699958)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Shetterly (/v1/cases/482507)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/701173)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/700991)<br />

Ronald Ray REID, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephen K... (/v1/cases/701531)<br />

Gonzalez v. Abbott (/v1/cases/430376)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/701007)<br />

Sims v. Livesay (/v1/cases/499143)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/701909)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/701044)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/701822)<br />

Stevens v. Zant (/v1/cases/426027)<br />

Gary B. CONE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael DUTT... (/v1/cases/701195)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. A.... (/v1/cases/702013)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. O'Neal (/v1/cases/485710)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/701777)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/701269)<br />

Carriger v. Lewis (/v1/cases/454573)<br />

Griffin v. Warden (/v1/cases/536086)<br />

Nickerson v. Lee (/v1/cases/529931)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

131 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Greig (/v1/cases/527490)<br />

NLRB v. Alaska Pulp Corp. (/v1/cases/701113)<br />

Cantu v. Collins (/v1/cases/524676)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/703009)<br />

Wiley v. Puckett (/v1/cases/528553)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/701364)<br />

Cox v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/475202)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/701274)<br />

Mak v. Blodgett (/v1/cases/459639)<br />

Duest v. Singletary (/v1/cases/430440)<br />

Linda Joyce HODGE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mary LI... (/v1/cases/703269)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/703081)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/703388)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Davis (/v1/cases/540002)<br />

Mustread v. Gilmore (/v1/cases/480707)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Underwood (/v1/cases/532060)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Sands (/v1/cases/431425)<br />

Harry Burke FRINK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. The STA... (/v1/cases/470018)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/703774)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Bluske (/v1/cases/462549)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/703640)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/703923)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/703870)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Chrismon (/v1/cases/490851)<br />

Atkins v. Singletary (/v1/cases/425188)<br />

E.g., Resnover v. Pearson (/v1/cases/480364)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/703466)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/703938)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/704653)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/703053)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/704229)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/700993)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Sayan (/v1/cases/415828)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/703705)<br />

Johnson v. Collins (/v1/cases/506765)<br />

Donald RICKERSON, Petitioner-Appellant Cross-Appell... (/v1/cases/702926)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/701047)<br />

Sawyer v. Whitley (/v1/cases/1382380)<br />

Wright v. West (/v1/cases/1382377)<br />

Drew v. Collins (/v1/cases/519926)<br />

UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Paul DESMARAIS, Defenda... (/v1/cases/559965)<br />

White v. Keane (/v1/cases/556168)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/703834)<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ro... (/v1/cases/526350)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/703818)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/703861)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Kamel (/v1/cases/480845)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

132 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/703827)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Clonts (/v1/cases/438818)<br />

Robert Lynn LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael ... (/v1/cases/702895)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/703895)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/703666)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/1302480)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/695393)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/701959)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Hawkins (/v1/cases/494407)<br />

Barrett v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/563805)<br />

Baxter v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/473171)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/704616)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/703497)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/703572)<br />

Buenoano v. Singletary (/v1/cases/426866)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/703939)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/703120)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/703606)<br />

Insurance Co. of N.Am. v. Bath (/v1/cases/702883)<br />

In Meeks v. Singletary (/v1/cases/427253)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Maxwell (/v1/cases/432466)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/703586)<br />

U.S. v. Martin (/v1/cases/437663)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/705183)<br />

Moss v. Collins (/v1/cases/523212)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/704899)<br />

Black v. Collins (/v1/cases/524918)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/704877)<br />

Lozada v. Deeds (/v1/cases/460511)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Kladouris (/v1/cases/489502)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Morales (/v1/cases/482680)<br />

Adams v. Aiken (/v1/cases/533235)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Winfield (/v1/cases/429082)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/705185)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/705307)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hi... (/v1/cases/432834)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Th... (/v1/cases/705320)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Parker (/v1/cases/514617)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/706347)<br />

Raymond CLARK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert J. T... (/v1/cases/705370)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jo... (/v1/cases/705363)<br />

Jeffries v. Blodgett (/v1/cases/444908)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/705743)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/705680)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/705470)<br />

Schiro v. Clark (/v1/cases/493267)<br />

Poyner v. Murray (/v1/cases/531593)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

133 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Lorenzo W. LAWSON, Appellant, v. Paul D. CASPARI, A... (/v1/cases/471725)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. St... (/v1/cases/705643)<br />

Cecil Charles EVANS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ed EV... (/v1/cases/705446)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/706219)<br />

Ronald E. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. John J. DAHM, App... (/v1/cases/468496)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/705572)<br />

Freeman v. Lane (/v1/cases/493000)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/705732)<br />

Tate v. Wood (/v1/cases/555591)<br />

In Spann v. Martin (/v1/cases/536041)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/705463)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Langer (/v1/cases/482284)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/706439)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/706529)<br />

Wilson v. Armontrout (/v1/cases/462159)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/706492)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gi... (/v1/cases/706133)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/706065)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/705573)<br />

Oliver v. U.S. (/v1/cases/481307)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ju... (/v1/cases/706045)<br />

Hayward Curtis LAWSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tom... (/v1/cases/705972)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/706825)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/701430)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/706974)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/690915)<br />

Presnell v. Zant (/v1/cases/430240)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Trussel (/v1/cases/478672)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/707434)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/706884)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/706817)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/707580)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/707149)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/706707)<br />

Johnson v. Armontrout (/v1/cases/464343)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/707003)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/707405)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/707150)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/707495)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/707355)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/707157)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Miskinis (/v1/cases/451660)<br />

Lincecum v. Collins (/v1/cases/507439)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/707291)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/707240)<br />

Pittman v. Warden, Pontiac Correctional Center (/v1/cases/480629)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/707229)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

134 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

Peter H. JOE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATE... (/v1/cases/706589)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Sanchez (/v1/cases/503578)<br />

Bonneau v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/562544)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Javino (/v1/cases/547123)<br />

Barnard v. Collins (/v1/cases/523831)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Br... (/v1/cases/707071)<br />

Lawrence v. Armontrout (/v1/cases/463383)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/707114)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/707631)<br />

Coogan v. McCaughtry (/v1/cases/491174)<br />

Harris v. State (/v1/cases/471912)<br />

Campbell v. Blodgett (/v1/cases/444993)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/707195)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/707647)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/707131)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/707513)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/707573)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/708119)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/707740)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/707859)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/708090)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/707980)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Valencia (/v1/cases/509737)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Litchfield (/v1/cases/436813)<br />

Green v. Groose (/v1/cases/464636)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/707971)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/707888)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/708175)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Yizar (/v1/cases/424455)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/708186)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/707761)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/707923)<br />

Sheley v. Singletary (/v1/cases/429491)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Drobny (/v1/cases/527699)<br />

Glass v. Higgins (/v1/cases/463143)<br />

Williams v. Dixon (/v1/cases/537248)<br />

Holloway v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> (/v1/cases/466626)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/705712)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/708965)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/707906)<br />

Houston v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/470339)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/709152)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/708994)<br />

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citatio... (/v1/cases/701402)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/708810)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/708638)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/708651)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

135 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/708450)<br />

Lashley v. Armontrout (/v1/cases/471996)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/708545)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/709163)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/708851)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/708715)<br />

Duhamel v. Collins (/v1/cases/519037)<br />

Leslie Lorn ELLIFRITS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stev... (/v1/cases/708958)<br />

Huls v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/475836)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/708951)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/709033)<br />

Clark v. Collins (/v1/cases/524417)<br />

Fields v. Attorney General (/v1/cases/535227)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/708451)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/708733)<br />

Nichols v. Butler (/v1/cases/422797)<br />

Ventura v. Meachum (/v1/cases/545972)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Teague (/v1/cases/427267)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/709423)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/709320)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/706803)<br />

Bradford v. Whitley (/v1/cases/526425)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/708820)<br />

Wilkins v. Iowa (/v1/cases/470717)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/709378)<br />

U.S. v. Andrews (/v1/cases/428970)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/709228)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/709491)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/709053)<br />

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that cita... (/v1/cases/1300186)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/709264)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/709685)<br />

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states un... (/v1/cases/707009)<br />

Matney v. Armontrout (/v1/cases/464085)<br />

Swartz v. Hurt (/v1/cases/709623)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Baldwin (/v1/cases/491960)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. DaSilva (/v1/cases/710172)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/709909)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/710434)<br />

McCoy v. Newsome (/v1/cases/426833)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/710162)<br />

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citati... (/v1/cases/709866)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/709842)<br />

Denham v. Deeds (/v1/cases/447716)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/710038)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ca... (/v1/cases/492549)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/709868)


<strong>Strickland</strong> v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> - AltLaw<br />

http://www.altlaw.<strong>org</strong>/v1/cases/408964<br />

136 of 169 8/29/2008 8:34 AM<br />

1991<br />

Ronald Dean LANCASTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eld... (/v1/cases/710030)<br />

Paradis v. Arave (/v1/cases/455155)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/710811)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. McKinney (/v1/cases/482974)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/711163)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/710018)<br />

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Da... (/v1/cases/710873)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/709985)<br />

Danny BOOMERSHINE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephen... (/v1/cases/711003)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/711153)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/710830)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/711102)<br />

MacDougall v. McCaughtry (/v1/cases/484271)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/710599)<br />

Wilkerson v. Collins (/v1/cases/528233)<br />

Lake County Commissioner. In <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Stodo... (/v1/cases/483468)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/712080)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/711370)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Worstell (/v1/cases/711978)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Echols (/v1/cases/712068)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Bailey (/v1/cases/431588)<br />

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that u... (/v1/cases/712274)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/711232)<br />

Vick v. Lockhart (/v1/cases/477966)<br />

Randolph v. Delo (/v1/cases/469327)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/711665)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/711971)<br />

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpubl... (/v1/cases/711178)<br />

Burkett v. Fulcomer (/v1/cases/538883)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/711832)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/711278)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1299161)<br />

Washington v. Murray (/v1/cases/535594)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/712033)<br />

Robert Rome SCHIEBERT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jac... (/v1/cases/711465)<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> v. Christoffel (/v1/cases/459026)<br />

Love v. Butler (/v1/cases/560120)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1299204)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/711880)<br />

Bellamy v. Cogdell (/v1/cases/547638)<br />

Alan Irving RAZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED ST... (/v1/cases/711524)<br />

Robert K. WALL, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dan M... (/v1/cases/711722)<br />

Melvin THOMAS, Appellant, v. Michael GROOSE, Appell... (/v1/cases/466333)<br />

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispo... (/v1/cases/1299583)<br />