02.06.2014 Views

Safety Management Systems - Hong Kong MTR Network

Safety Management Systems - Hong Kong MTR Network

Safety Management Systems - Hong Kong MTR Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

<strong>Systems</strong> –<br />

<strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong> <strong>MTR</strong> <strong>Network</strong><br />

George Lee<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> & Quality Manager<br />

17 October 2007<br />

Information contained in this presentation should not be divulged to non-<strong>MTR</strong><br />

personnel except with the written authority of <strong>Safety</strong> & Quality Manager<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 19/03/2007 Page 1


Outline of Presentation<br />

1. Development of <strong>MTR</strong> : 1979 - 2006<br />

2. Development of <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Management</strong> & Key<br />

Drivers for Change<br />

3. Integration of <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Management</strong> with<br />

Corporate <strong>Systems</strong><br />

4. <strong>Safety</strong> Performance<br />

5. Conclusions<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 2


1. Development of <strong>MTR</strong> : 1979 - 2006<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 3


Overview of <strong>MTR</strong> Establishment<br />

• <strong>MTR</strong> Provisional Authority<br />

• Mass Transit Railway Corporation<br />

(1975)<br />

(1977)<br />

• Statutory Body<br />

-100% owned by <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong><br />

Government<br />

• Operating under<br />

“prudent commercial principles”<br />

• Privatization / Public Listing<br />

(2000)<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 4


Development of Railway – MIS<br />

(opened in Oct 1979)<br />

Route Km<br />

15.6<br />

Daily Patronage<br />

950,809<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 5


Development of Railway – TWE<br />

(opened in May 1982)<br />

Route Km<br />

10.5<br />

Daily Patronage<br />

717,623<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 6


Development of Railway – ISL Route Km<br />

(opened in May 1985)<br />

12.5 791,623<br />

Daily Patronage<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 7


Development of Railway – EHC Route Km<br />

(opened in Aug 1989)<br />

4.6<br />

87,751<br />

Daily Patronage<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 8


Development of Railway – LAR Route Km<br />

(opened in Jun 1998)<br />

TCL – 30.8 308,326<br />

AIR – 34.8<br />

Daily Patronage<br />

243,870<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 9


Development of Railway – TKE Route Km<br />

(opened in Aug 2002)<br />

12.5 314,362<br />

Daily Patronage<br />

Route Km<br />

Daily Patronage<br />

97,752<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 10


Development of Railway – DRL Route Km<br />

(opened in Sept 2005)<br />

3.4<br />

97,752<br />

Daily Patronage<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 11


<strong>MTR</strong> Railway <strong>Systems</strong> & Equipment<br />

• A railway network of 91 km route<br />

• 1500 volt d.c. overhead power supply<br />

• EMU<br />

‣ 8-car train (length of each Urban Line train : 182<br />

metres)<br />

‣ 2,500 passengers / train<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 12


<strong>MTR</strong> Railway <strong>Systems</strong> & Equipment,<br />

continued<br />

• Tunnel ventilation<br />

• Platform screen doors<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 13


<strong>MTR</strong> Railway <strong>Systems</strong> & Equipment,<br />

continued<br />

• To ensure maximum safety &<br />

reliability, trains are operated with<br />

automatic control & protection<br />

systems (i.e. ATP, ATO, ATR)<br />

which<br />

‣ Regulate the distance between<br />

trains<br />

‣ Determine the optimal rates of<br />

acceleration & braking as well<br />

as the coasting speeds on<br />

different sections of the track<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 14


Current <strong>MTR</strong> <strong>Network</strong><br />

7 7 lines; 91 91 km km route route length; length; 53 53<br />

stations<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Providing 19 19 hours hours of of passenger<br />

passenger service daily service from daily 6 a.m. from to 61<br />

a.m. a.m. to 1 a.m.<br />

During<br />

During<br />

morning<br />

morning<br />

peak<br />

peak<br />

hours,<br />

hours,<br />

trains running at 2-minute<br />

trains running at 2-minute<br />

intervals<br />

intervals<br />

<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> keeps 2.5 million people on the move<br />

every weekday<br />

Operations Control Centre<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 15


<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Today<br />

• No. of staff : 6,639<br />

• Asset value : US$15,439 M<br />

• 2006 P & L<br />

Turnover<br />

Profit<br />

: US$1,223 M<br />

: US$995 M<br />

• No. of properties<br />

developed : 25<br />

• No. of flats : 58,876<br />

• No. of retail malls : 6<br />

• Commercial &<br />

office space : 582,073m 2<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 16


2. Development of <strong>Safety</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> & Key Drivers for Change<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 17


The initial stages of safety management<br />

development focused on our railway<br />

operations<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 18


Overview of <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Development in <strong>MTR</strong><br />

Date<br />

1979 - 1989<br />

Stage 1<br />

1990 - 1994 1995 - 2003 2004 - 2006<br />

Stage 2 Stage 3<br />

Stage 4<br />

System<br />

• Rule Book<br />

• Compliance Based<br />

• Expatriate Focus<br />

• Engineering<br />

Standards<br />

• <strong>Safety</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

System<br />

• Risk Based<br />

Approach<br />

• <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Communication<br />

• <strong>Safety</strong> Culture<br />

• Integrated<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

System<br />

• System Assurance<br />

• Whole Project Life<br />

Risk<br />

• Enterprise Risk<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

• Human Factors<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

• Corporate <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Governance<br />

• Business<br />

Excellence Models<br />

Drivers<br />

‣ Lack of HK<br />

Experience<br />

‣ Lack of National<br />

Standards<br />

‣ Low Social<br />

Expectation …<br />

‣ King’s Cross<br />

‣ Clapham<br />

‣ External<br />

Benchmarking<br />

‣ External <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Mgt Review …<br />

‣ Development of<br />

Other Mgt <strong>Systems</strong><br />

‣ TQM & National<br />

Quality Awards<br />

‣ Cyber Info Mgt<br />

‣ Public Listing<br />

‣ Growth Strategy<br />

‣ Need for<br />

Breakthrough<br />

Business<br />

Performance …<br />

Culture of <strong>Safety</strong> Awareness<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 19


Stage 1 – Development of <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

• Based on LUL / BR Rule Book<br />

• Strong reliance on discipline<br />

• “Top-down” communication<br />

• Reliance on key individuals –<br />

many of them expatriates with<br />

consequential communication<br />

problems<br />

• Significant improvement on<br />

existing public transport (i.e.<br />

buses, trams, KCR)<br />

System<br />

Drivers<br />

1979 - 1989<br />

Stage 1<br />

• Rule Book<br />

• Compliance Based<br />

• Expatriate Focus<br />

• Engineering<br />

Standards<br />

‣ Lack of HK<br />

Experience<br />

‣ Lack of National<br />

Standards<br />

‣ Low Social<br />

Expectation …<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 20


Stage 2 – Development of <strong>Safety</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

• Process of arriving at <strong>Safety</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> System based on<br />

recommendation of Arthur D Little<br />

Review Report in 1992<br />

• Formulation of <strong>Safety</strong> Policy & <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Tasks and development of <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Responsibilities<br />

• Establishment of a <strong>Safety</strong> Services<br />

Dept with expertise in Risk<br />

<strong>Management</strong>, <strong>Safety</strong> Audit, <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Advice, <strong>Safety</strong> Training & Promotion<br />

and Occupational Health<br />

• Definition of “<strong>Safety</strong>” functions as line<br />

management’s responsibility<br />

System<br />

Drivers<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 21<br />

1990 - 1994<br />

Stage 2<br />

• <strong>Safety</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

System<br />

• Risk Based<br />

Approach<br />

• <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Communication<br />

• <strong>Safety</strong> Culture<br />

‣ King’s Cross<br />

‣ Clapham<br />

‣ External<br />

Benchmarking<br />

‣ External <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Mgt Review …


Stage 3 – Development of <strong>Safety</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

• Different management systems<br />

on safety, quality, environmental,<br />

security & asset management<br />

requirements running separately<br />

could undermine our<br />

organizational efficiency, costeffectiveness<br />

and sustainability<br />

• A world-class enterprise like <strong>MTR</strong><br />

should apply TQM principles &<br />

criteria of other National Quality<br />

Awards<br />

System<br />

Drivers<br />

1995 - 2003<br />

Stage 3<br />

• Integrated<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

System<br />

• System Assurance<br />

• Whole Project Life<br />

Risk<br />

‣ Development of<br />

Other Mgt <strong>Systems</strong><br />

‣ TQM & National<br />

Quality Awards<br />

‣ Cyber Info Mgt<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 22


Stage 3 – Development of <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Management</strong>,<br />

cont’d<br />

• With the help of intranet hyperlink<br />

technology and cyber information &<br />

documentation management tools,<br />

online single-page Procedures &<br />

Work Instructions were made<br />

possible<br />

System<br />

1995 - 2003<br />

Stage 3<br />

• Integrated<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

System<br />

• System Assurance<br />

• Whole Project Life<br />

Risk<br />

• An Integrated <strong>Management</strong> System<br />

covering safety, quality,<br />

environmental and security<br />

management requirements was<br />

developed and implemented in the<br />

Operations Division of <strong>MTR</strong> in 2000<br />

Drivers<br />

‣ Development of<br />

Other Mgt <strong>Systems</strong><br />

‣ TQM & National<br />

Quality Awards<br />

‣ Cyber Info Mgt<br />

• Development of system assurance<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 23


Stage 4 – Development of <strong>Safety</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

• Through Enterprise Risk<br />

<strong>Management</strong>, the key risks in<br />

<strong>MTR</strong>’s business were identified<br />

and addressed<br />

• In line with growth business,<br />

adequate controls are put in place<br />

to strengthen Corporate <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Governance<br />

• Need for breakthrough<br />

improvement in quality & business<br />

performance via Six Sigma<br />

methodology<br />

System<br />

Drivers<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 24<br />

2004 - 2006<br />

Stage 4<br />

• Enterprise Risk<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

• Human Factors<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

• Corporate <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Governance<br />

• Business<br />

Excellence Models<br />

‣ Public Listing<br />

‣ Growth Strategy<br />

‣ Need for<br />

Breakthrough<br />

Business<br />

Performance …


<strong>MTR</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Management</strong> System (SMS) -<br />

Purpose<br />

• The purpose of the <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Management</strong> System is to<br />

provide a workable framework for managing safety in<br />

a systematic, proactive and consistent manner, so<br />

that the <strong>Safety</strong> Policy can be effectively implemented<br />

• It allows management to manage safety<br />

systematically like all other critical aspects of the<br />

business<br />

• It reduces the need for “safety experts” as safety<br />

management then becomes line management’s<br />

responsibility<br />

• All staff involved can talk on safety using the same<br />

language<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 25


<strong>Safety</strong> Policy<br />

<br />

CLIMATE OF SAFETY AWARENESS<br />

<br />

GOAL SETTING approach for<br />

continuous improvement<br />

<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> demands ACTIVE involvement by<br />

all<br />

<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> management is<br />

LINE MANAGEMENT’S<br />

RESPONSIBILITY<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 26


SMS – Key Components<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> Policy<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> Tasks<br />

and <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Modules<br />

<strong>Safety</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

Process<br />

Staff Consultation<br />

SMS<br />

<strong>Safety</strong><br />

Responsibility<br />

Statements /<br />

Cards<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> Audit<br />

System<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> Committees<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> Critical<br />

Items /<br />

<strong>Systems</strong><br />

Risk Control<br />

System<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 27


Strategic approach to achieving a climate of safety<br />

awareness<br />

• Demonstrating commitment through leadership<br />

• Assigning safety responsibility to individuals and<br />

ensuring their effective discharge<br />

• Managing the competence of staff, contractors and<br />

other business partners to ensure they deliver safety in<br />

all activities<br />

• Maintaining safety communication with stakeholders<br />

and at all levels of each business<br />

• Promoting a progressive safety culture and involving<br />

staff in safety improvements<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 28


Strategic approach to achieving continuous<br />

improvement in safety performance<br />

• Using recognized modern practices and processes<br />

appropriate to each business<br />

• Establishing and operating a risk management system<br />

appropriate to each business<br />

• Implementing management systems to reduce risk to<br />

reasonably low level<br />

• Measuring and communicating safety performance<br />

• Maintaining an inspection and audit programme<br />

• Providing the necessary funding and resources<br />

• Continuously reviewing our approach to managing<br />

safety<br />

• Learning from incidents in other organizations in the<br />

relevant sectors to improve our own safety<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> management<br />

Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 29


Risk Assessment & <strong>Management</strong><br />

• <strong>MTR</strong> Risk Matrix<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> criticality R1 to R4<br />

to quantify the risk level of<br />

the identified risk<br />

• RCPI<br />

(Risk Control<br />

Performance Index) to<br />

keep track of risk profile<br />

of the railway<br />

No. of R1/R2 Hazarads<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Trend of Risk Control Performance Index and<br />

no. of R1/R2 hazards<br />

Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

RCPI value<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

No. of R1 Hazards No. of R2 Hazards RCPI<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 30


<strong>Safety</strong> Responsibilities of the Executive<br />

• Provide leadership and exercise corporate governance<br />

in safety and health<br />

• Ensure all Executive decisions reflect the intent and<br />

spirit of the Corporate <strong>Safety</strong> Policy<br />

• Establish a Corporate <strong>Safety</strong> Committee to lead the<br />

dissemination and implementation of the Corporate<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> Policy and Strategy<br />

• Review and approve the annual Corporate <strong>Safety</strong> Plan<br />

• Ensure the necessary organization and other<br />

arrangements are in place to support the achievement<br />

of the Corporate <strong>Safety</strong> Plan and related goals<br />

• Monitor safety performance and risk profiles<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 31


<strong>Safety</strong> Responsibilities of Staff<br />

• All Staff<br />

‣ Understand and fully discharge the safety and health<br />

responsibilities pertaining to their job<br />

‣ Observe the provision of safety rules and regulations,<br />

act safely and report hazards and dangerous<br />

occurrences<br />

• Managers and Supervisors<br />

‣ Managing safety is line management’s responsibility<br />

‣ Must proactively ensure the systems, people,<br />

processes, materials and environments within their<br />

jurisdiction are managed in a systematic and effective<br />

manner to reduce safety risks to reasonably low level<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 32


Managing <strong>Safety</strong> – from Committee to the<br />

individual<br />

• Operations <strong>Safety</strong> Committee sets policy & strategy<br />

• Five sub-committees<br />

• Line management is directly responsible for safety<br />

• <strong>Safety</strong> & Quality Department provides advice and support,<br />

facilitates and carries out audits<br />

• At least one item in the individual’s Key Objectives should<br />

be safety-related<br />

• <strong>Safety</strong> Responsibility Statement / Card for everybody<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 33


<strong>Safety</strong> Communication & Promotion<br />

• <strong>Safety</strong> is a standing agenda item in line management<br />

meetings at all levels<br />

• Regular safety briefings and pre-work safety talks are<br />

held for different work teams<br />

• <strong>Safety</strong> topics are discussed regularly at Divisional level<br />

communications<br />

• Compulsory agenda item for Staff Consultative Council<br />

(SCC) and Joint Consultative Committees (JCCs)<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 34


3. Integration of <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Management</strong> with<br />

Corporate <strong>Systems</strong><br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 35


Operations Division<br />

Integrated<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

System<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> Security<br />

Environment<br />

Quality Asset<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 36


SMS – A Critical Part of the Integrated<br />

<strong>Management</strong> System<br />

Driver System Measure Goal<br />

Leadership<br />

System <strong>Management</strong><br />

• Integrated <strong>Management</strong> Review<br />

• Integrated Audit<br />

Policy<br />

Manual<br />

• Mission<br />

• Vision<br />

• Policy<br />

• Objectives<br />

System<br />

Integration<br />

System <strong>Management</strong><br />

Manual<br />

• Quality<br />

• <strong>Safety</strong><br />

• Environmental<br />

•TQM<br />

• Asset <strong>Management</strong><br />

• Project <strong>Management</strong>,<br />

etc.<br />

System<br />

Implementation<br />

Cyber<br />

Information<br />

• Integrated<br />

Procedures<br />

• Work Instructions<br />

• Support<br />

Documents<br />

• Information Mall<br />

Business<br />

Goal<br />

Balanced<br />

Scorecard<br />

Total<br />

Customer<br />

Satisfaction<br />

Customer<br />

Service<br />

Standards<br />

Strategic<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

<strong>Systems</strong><br />

Team-driven Organization<br />

• <strong>Management</strong> Committee<br />

• Champion-led Teams<br />

• Continuous Improvement Teams<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 37


Project Life Cycle <strong>Safety</strong> Tasks<br />

Budget<br />

Approval<br />

Particular<br />

Specification<br />

Contract<br />

Award<br />

Release<br />

Certificate<br />

Completion<br />

of Contract<br />

Concept<br />

Definition/<br />

Specification<br />

Tendering<br />

Design,<br />

Development &<br />

Manufacturing<br />

Commissioning/<br />

Warranty<br />

Operation/<br />

Maintenance<br />

Renewal/<br />

Disposal<br />

Initial Risk<br />

Appraisal<br />

Pre-Contract Award Hazard<br />

Identification, Control and<br />

Monitoring<br />

Post-Contract Award Hazard<br />

Identification, Control and<br />

Monitoring<br />

Operations Risk Control<br />

Review of Existing Hazards (if any)<br />

HAZOP/PHA<br />

Project Hazard Log<br />

(high level)<br />

HAZOP/PHA<br />

Project Hazard Log<br />

Residual Hazards<br />

Hazard Review & Audit<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> Report<br />

Hazard Close out<br />

Operations Hazard Log<br />

Consultant / Project Team<br />

Consultant / Contractor<br />

/ Project Team<br />

Operator<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 38


Asset <strong>Management</strong> System in Relation to <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Risk management for<br />

effective asset<br />

management<br />

• Asset service<br />

criticality ranking<br />

• <strong>Safety</strong> risk<br />

management<br />

• Project risk<br />

management<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 39


5. Conclusions<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 40


Conclusions<br />

• <strong>MTR</strong> had, as its foundations, a rule-based safety<br />

system imported from U.K.<br />

• As the railway and the business developed, this<br />

approach was seen to be inadequate<br />

• The <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Management</strong> System which was<br />

developed was derived from best practices in other<br />

industries and was underpinned by the need to<br />

develop a strong safety awareness & culture across<br />

railway operations<br />

• The current <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Management</strong> System is<br />

comprehensive, practical and company-wide<br />

(including contractors & suppliers) is fully integrated<br />

with other company management systems and has<br />

delivered excellent results<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 41


Conclusions, continued<br />

• The approach to safety management has been used<br />

as the model for the development of other<br />

management systems, culminating in the Enterprise<br />

Risk <strong>Management</strong> System<br />

• A fundamental strength of the system is the wide<br />

and deep participation of all layers of staff<br />

• The growth of the company outside <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong> and<br />

merger with KCRC present significant challenges to<br />

the evolution of safety management system<br />

<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 42


<strong>MTR</strong> Corporation Limited 17/10/2007 Page 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!