04.06.2014 Views

here - United Kingdom Parliament

here - United Kingdom Parliament

here - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

921 National Policy Statements 1 DECEMBER 2010 National Policy Statements 922<br />

As my hon. Friend the Member for Wansbeck (Ian<br />

Lavery) said in an intervention, it is also important that<br />

gas forms part of future carbon capture and storage<br />

projects. I have heard the Minister refer to that, but I<br />

would be grateful if he reaffirmed it and gave further<br />

information. Otherwise, we will miss out on technology<br />

that can be developed, tested and used in this country,<br />

which goes back to my earlier point about some of the<br />

jobs and skills that can be nurtured in this country but<br />

exported elsew<strong>here</strong>. When the Prime Minister and others<br />

go off to China, India and other parts of the world<br />

evangelising for UK manufacturing industry, t<strong>here</strong> is<br />

potential for jobs to be created in the whole of the UK,<br />

not only in one part. That can help to join up the parts<br />

of the policy agenda.<br />

I want to touch on some of the issues of electricity<br />

market reform. I know that I am getting a reputation<br />

for being able to bore on about transmission charging<br />

for ever, but I have about two minutes, so I will bore on<br />

about it briefly. As the Minister will be aware, t<strong>here</strong> is<br />

considerable concern in some parts of the industry that<br />

investment decisions are being limited by the current<br />

transmission charging regime. Although the Ofgem review<br />

is being conducted—I welcome Ofgem’s recent change<br />

in stance—we have to be absolutely clear that as the<br />

electricity markets are reformed the transmission charging<br />

regime changes too. It was designed primarily for the<br />

pre-renewables world and is not serving our interests in<br />

achieving our overall targets for reducing carbon. T<strong>here</strong><br />

is potential for that industry to develop, partly, but not<br />

entirely, in Scotland, w<strong>here</strong> investors could be put off<br />

making a number of decisions on projects as a result of<br />

the current transmission charging regime.<br />

T<strong>here</strong> has been a lot of talk about the importance of<br />

the green investment bank. The idea originated under<br />

the previous Government and has been carried forward<br />

under this Government. It is crucial that we get the<br />

model right. It has to be about levering in green investment<br />

on a certain scale if it is to have any positive impact.<br />

I use my last few seconds to reiterate my plea to the<br />

Secretary of State for Scotland—which he seemed to<br />

begin to agree with—that the green investment bank be<br />

based in Scotland, given the industry and the expertise<br />

that is t<strong>here</strong>.<br />

6.32 pm<br />

Sarah Newton (Truro and Falmouth) (Con): I am<br />

pleased to be called to speak in this important debate.<br />

Like many MPs, I believe that the first responsibility of<br />

any Government is the security of its citizens, and I take<br />

that responsibility very seriously. Securing our energy<br />

supplies is vital for the well-being and prosperity of the<br />

people who sent us <strong>here</strong> to represent them. The failure<br />

of the previous Government to invest, despite the so-called<br />

boom years and their great appetite for spending other<br />

people’s money, has led to our being far too dependent<br />

on imports to supply our national energy needs. Why?<br />

As we are discovering from so many other areas of<br />

policy that we have inherited, the reason is the previous<br />

Government’s failure to fix the roof while the sun was<br />

shining. T<strong>here</strong> has been a lack of co<strong>here</strong>nt and consistent<br />

policy to enable the UK to have a secure energy supply.<br />

Like any industry, the providers of energy need a<br />

clear and timely planning process, and the national<br />

policy statements are a step in the right direction. Along<br />

with proposals that we anticipate in the localism Bill,<br />

they will create the right processes that will enable the<br />

development of sustainable and secure energy supplies<br />

for the UK. I believe that the new policies should<br />

provide an efficient and democratically accountable<br />

system, and a fast-track process for major infrastructure<br />

projects. T<strong>here</strong> is no doubt that t<strong>here</strong> is an urgent need<br />

for a new energy structure in the UK. In developing that<br />

structure, the right balance must be struck between<br />

consenting to and building new energy infrastructure<br />

and the importance of protecting our environment and<br />

the quality of life for those who live in the communities<br />

w<strong>here</strong> that important infrastructure is located.<br />

Jacob Rees-Mogg (North East Somerset) (Con): I<br />

wonder whether my hon. Friend might also emphasise<br />

the great importance of ensuring that energy is affordable<br />

for the poorest people in the country. T<strong>here</strong> are some<br />

high-falutin’ ideas that seem to add cost for consumers,<br />

and they should be opposed.<br />

Sarah Newton: I very much agree. Far too many<br />

people in constituencies such as my hon. Friend’s and<br />

mine, especially in rural areas, are living in real fuel<br />

poverty and enduring the hardship associated with high<br />

energy bills.<br />

In establishing the right balance between environmental<br />

protection and the need to build new infrastructure, my<br />

hon. Friend the Minister must take very seriously the<br />

points my hon. Friend the Member for Folkestone and<br />

Hythe (Damian Collins) made about Natural England.<br />

Many of us up and down the country face the problems<br />

he described.<br />

I welcome in the draft statement the recognition of<br />

the important role that local authorities will play in the<br />

development and consideration of proposed major energy<br />

projects. The extent to which local authorities wish to<br />

be involved in the planning process has always been,<br />

and will continue to be, up to them, but the new regime<br />

is a significant improvement, giving local government<br />

statutory rights in the process and ensuring that its<br />

views are adequately taken into consideration. In addition,<br />

rather than imposing additional costs, t<strong>here</strong> are potential<br />

savings for local government from the new regime, as<br />

shorter hearings and quicker decisions should ensure<br />

that in future local authorities do not incur the costs<br />

incurred now.<br />

As hon. Members will be aware, I represent a constituency<br />

in Cornwall, w<strong>here</strong> we aspire to be world leaders in the<br />

new low carbon industrial revolution. As a result I have<br />

a particular interest in how the relevant parts of the<br />

NPS support the development of renewable energy. We<br />

are blessed with an abundance of natural resources that<br />

make us ideally situated to develop significant quantities<br />

of low carbon electricity to feed into the national grid.<br />

In the universities of Exeter and Plymouth and the<br />

Camborne school of mines, we have a world-leading<br />

knowledge base in renewable and sustainable energy. In<br />

local companies such as GeoScience and Kensa<br />

Engineering, we have pioneering and highly skilled<br />

engineering companies. The wave hub off Cornwall’s<br />

north coast is the first of its kind in Europe and it<br />

enables the testing of prototype wave and tide devices.<br />

We have great light for photovoltaics, an abundance of<br />

onshore wind and the hottest rocks in the UK. What we<br />

do not have is a national grid infrastructure able to take

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!