04.06.2014 Views

Thin capitalisation: eroding asset values and increasing debt ... - PwC

Thin capitalisation: eroding asset values and increasing debt ... - PwC

Thin capitalisation: eroding asset values and increasing debt ... - PwC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TaxTalk – Electronic Bulletin of Australian Tax Developments<br />

• BAS agents will not be required<br />

to demonstrate the same degree<br />

of formal education <strong>and</strong> relevant<br />

experience as ‘tax agents’. This<br />

reflects the narrower scope of<br />

services that they may provide.<br />

• In the case of partnerships <strong>and</strong><br />

companies seeking registration,<br />

compliance with the requirements<br />

will be demonstrated by sufficient<br />

organisational qualifications<br />

<strong>and</strong> experience.<br />

• Entities that specialise in a particular<br />

area of the taxation laws or that only<br />

provide a type of tax agent service<br />

(for example, tax compliance work or<br />

advice rather than both) will be eligible<br />

to register, with scope to operate in<br />

their specialty.<br />

• Because BAS agents are not currently<br />

regulated, a significant transitional<br />

period for their registration is proposed<br />

to allow sufficient time for applicants<br />

to meet the requirements.<br />

• Tax agents <strong>and</strong> BAS agents will<br />

be governed by a legislated Code<br />

of Professional Conduct. There<br />

will be a broad range of sanctions<br />

that the Board may impose for<br />

non‐compliance with the Code.<br />

• New civil penalty provisions (including<br />

substantial monetary penalties)<br />

will apply where the conduct being<br />

sanctioned is not serious enough<br />

to warrant a criminal conviction or<br />

imprisonment. Situations where<br />

these will apply include where a<br />

registered agent makes a false or<br />

misleading statement, employs or<br />

uses the services of an entity whose<br />

registration has been terminated due<br />

to misconduct, or signs a declaration<br />

in relation to a document prepared<br />

by an entity that is not qualified to<br />

prepare that document <strong>and</strong> was not<br />

appropriately supervised.<br />

• The Board may also apply to the<br />

Federal Court of Australia for an<br />

injunction to prevent or compel<br />

certain conduct.<br />

The Assistant Treasurer noted that a<br />

major direct benefit for taxpayers will be<br />

the introduction of two ‘safe harbours’<br />

for taxpayers who engage a tax agent<br />

or BAS agent. The safe harbours will<br />

exempt taxpayers from liability for an<br />

‘administrative penalty’ imposed by<br />

the Commissioner where:<br />

• having made a false <strong>and</strong> misleading<br />

statement to the Commissioner (which<br />

would result in an administrative<br />

penalty applying), the taxpayer can<br />

demonstrate that they had taken<br />

reasonable care by engaging a<br />

tax agent or BAS agent <strong>and</strong> gave<br />

all relevant taxation information<br />

to the agent<br />

• having failed to lodge a document on<br />

time <strong>and</strong> in the approved form (which<br />

failure would result in an administrative<br />

penalty), the taxpayer can show<br />

that they had engaged a tax agent<br />

or BAS agent <strong>and</strong> had provided all<br />

necessary information to the agent to<br />

enable them to provide the document<br />

to the Commissioner on time <strong>and</strong><br />

in the approved form, but the agent<br />

carelessly failed to do so.<br />

The safe harbours will not apply where<br />

either the taxpayer or the agent has<br />

intentionally disregarded a taxation law<br />

or been reckless as to the operation<br />

of a taxation law.<br />

Other revenue legislation<br />

Tax Laws Amendment (2008 Measures<br />

No 5) Bill 2008, introduced into the<br />

House of Representatives on 25<br />

September 2008, was referred to<br />

the Senate Economics Committee<br />

for review. In its final report, that<br />

Committee recommended that the<br />

Senate pass the Bill. The Bill proposes<br />

to make amendments to give effect to a<br />

number of taxation measures, namely:<br />

• amendments to the goods <strong>and</strong><br />

services tax (GST) law to maintain<br />

the integrity of the GST tax base by<br />

ensuring that the interaction between<br />

the ‘margin scheme’ provisions <strong>and</strong><br />

the ‘going concern’, ‘farml<strong>and</strong>’ <strong>and</strong><br />

‘associate’ provisions does not allow<br />

property sales to be structured in a<br />

way that results in GST not applying<br />

to the value added to real property<br />

on or after 1 July 2000 by an entity<br />

PricewaterhouseCoopers : 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!