13.06.2014 Views

Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures

Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures

Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 153 -<br />

<strong>of</strong> the resulting predictions with the experimental data <strong>of</strong><br />

Kupfer (1973) has previously been demonstrated, cf. fig. 2.2-6.<br />

In this figure, the value D = 0 was used instead <strong>of</strong> D = 0.6,<br />

but this affects the post-failure behaviour, only. In general,<br />

the weaker the concrete the more ductile is its post-failure<br />

behaviour, cf. for instance, Hognestad et al. (1955). This<br />

suggests the use <strong>of</strong> D = 0.6 instead <strong>of</strong> D = 0 as is apparent<br />

from fig. 4, where the normalized stress-strain curves using<br />

these two D-values are shown. The predicted failure load using<br />

the above concrete parameters underestimates the actual failure<br />

load by only 3%, and is plotted in fig. 8. Therefore, the calculations<br />

are in agreement with the experimental evidence showing<br />

that within the considered variation <strong>of</strong> the a -values, a<br />

linear relation exists between pull-out force and compressive<br />

strength.<br />

It is remarkable that the prolongation <strong>of</strong> the experimental line<br />

in fig. 8 intersects the ordinate axis at some distance from<br />

the origin. However, two aspects <strong>of</strong> concrete behaviour are<br />

dependent on compressive strength namely the ductility and the<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> tensile strength to compressive strength. As has<br />

already been touched upon, the post-failure behaviour is more<br />

ductile the weaker the concrete. To investigate the influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> minor variations in the post-failure behaviour <strong>of</strong> the concrete,<br />

a calculation was performed using again the concrete having a<br />

strength <strong>of</strong> 18.7 MPa, but now having lesser ductility. Therefore<br />

the value D = 0 was used instead <strong>of</strong> the more realistic one D =<br />

0.6, cf. fig. 4. This in fact decreases the predicted failure<br />

load by 5% as shown in fig. 8. That the failure load depends<br />

on the particular s<strong>of</strong>tening behaviour <strong>of</strong> the concrete is indeed<br />

to be expected considering previous remarks in relation to fig.<br />

7. However, comparison in fig. 4 <strong>of</strong> the concrete having a =<br />

18.7 MPa and D = 0 with the concrete having a = 31.8 MPa and<br />

D = 0.2 shows an almost similar normalized behaviour. Moreover,<br />

the a /a -ratios are identical for these concretes. Using<br />

dimensional analysis, the failure loads should therefore be<br />

almost proportional to the a -value and this is in fact also<br />

observed for the two predicted failure loads, cf. fig. 8.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!