13.06.2014 Views

Annual Report 2006 - Rheinland Pfalz Bank

Annual Report 2006 - Rheinland Pfalz Bank

Annual Report 2006 - Rheinland Pfalz Bank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

22 LRP <strong>2006</strong><br />

18,000<br />

16,000<br />

14,000<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

4,000<br />

2,000<br />

0<br />

A.0 A.1 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 B.1 B.2 B.3 B.4 B.5 C.1 C.2 C.3 C.4 C.5 D.1 D.2 D.3 D.4 D.5<br />

Distribution of individual risks into rating categories (LRP Group)<br />

Commitments in 1 billion (total: 1 84.2 billion)<br />

The classification of individual borrowers, groups or,<br />

possibly, transactions is performed using LRP’s internal<br />

rating systems. Ratings are determined on the basis<br />

of a number of historical and forward-looking factors.<br />

Apart from the probabilities of default, expected loss<br />

ratios and recovery ratios are derived from the rating<br />

systems with the help of additional information on the<br />

structure of the exposure.<br />

The weighting of the individual rating factors in the rating<br />

process is based on historical data and expert<br />

knowledge. For all internal rating procedures we use<br />

the same master scale with 21 non-default classes and<br />

one default class which distinguishes between different<br />

default reasons. The definitions of default and recovery<br />

of debtors have been harmonized with those of<br />

LBBW; a process ensuring an efficient Group-wide exchange<br />

of information between LRP and LBBW, especially<br />

with regard to default information and a harmonized<br />

risk management approach, has been implemented.<br />

Internal ratings serve to support decisions on the extension<br />

of loans and serve as the basis for numerous<br />

controlling tools. By taking exposure-specific components<br />

into account in the rating process, we pursue<br />

several objectives: a rating-oriented competence hierarchy,<br />

a consistent basis for the definition of upper<br />

credit limits, a pricing policy geared to collateral and<br />

portfolio risks as well as transaction-specific pre/postcalculation.<br />

Moreover, the ratings serve as yardsticks<br />

for the specific processes in intensive monitoring, reorganization<br />

and liquidation cases.<br />

Limits for individual customers, groups and country<br />

limits are dependent on the respective ratings. The use<br />

of these limits as well as the use of the individual lines<br />

is determined automatically on a daily basis by aggregating<br />

the individual exposures from the different operational<br />

systems.<br />

Risk classification of individual borrowers is reviewed<br />

at least once per year and updated whenever there are<br />

indications of material changes at the borrower or in<br />

his immediate environment which affect the borrower’s<br />

credit standing. Internal Auditing regularly reviews<br />

the proper allocation and monitoring of ratings.<br />

Any change in the rating will have a direct effect on the<br />

volume of new business as well as on margins.<br />

All essential rating information taken into account in<br />

the rating algorithm is electronically stored so that we<br />

can draw on a sufficiently long historical observation<br />

period in case of future modifications to the rating procedures.<br />

We pool our data with other banks with a view<br />

to putting the ongoing validation and updating of the<br />

rating procedures on a broader basis.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!