14.06.2014 Views

Simultaneous Estimation of Cefixime and Ofloxacin in Bulk and ...

Simultaneous Estimation of Cefixime and Ofloxacin in Bulk and ...

Simultaneous Estimation of Cefixime and Ofloxacin in Bulk and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2011; Vol. 1: Issue 2, Pg 36-38<br />

[AJPAna.]<br />

ISSN- 2231–5667 (Pr<strong>in</strong>t)<br />

ISSN- 2231–5675 (Onl<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

www.asianpharmaonl<strong>in</strong>e.org<br />

RESEARCH ARTICLE<br />

<strong>Simultaneous</strong> <strong>Estimation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cefixime</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Bulk</strong> <strong>and</strong> Tablet<br />

Dosage Form<br />

Rajendran S.S.*, Santhi N., Kumar Nallasivan P., Sam Solomon W.D., Venkata Narayanan R.<br />

RVS College <strong>of</strong> Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sulur, Coimbatore<br />

*Correspond<strong>in</strong>g Author E-mail: ss.rajendra00@gmail.com<br />

ABSTRACT:<br />

Two simple, rapid, accurate <strong>and</strong> price spectrophotometric methods have been developed for simultaneous estimation<br />

<strong>of</strong> cefixime <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>loxac<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> bulk <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> tablet dosage form. Method A <strong>in</strong>volves simultaneous equations at 290.4 nm<br />

(max <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cefixime</strong>) <strong>and</strong> 297.4nm (max <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong>). Method B <strong>in</strong>volves Absorbance ratio method at 282.0 nm (isoabsorptive<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t) <strong>and</strong> 297.4 nm (max <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong>) us<strong>in</strong>g ethanol as a solvent. The l<strong>in</strong>earity was observed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

concentration range <strong>of</strong> 5-25 g/ml for <strong>Cefixime</strong> <strong>and</strong> 2-10 g/ml for <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong>. The results <strong>of</strong> analysis have been<br />

validated statically <strong>and</strong> by recover studies <strong>and</strong> were found satisfactory.<br />

KEYWORDS: <strong>Cefixime</strong>; <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong>; <strong>Simultaneous</strong> equations; Absorbance ratio method.<br />

INTRODUCTION:<br />

<strong>Cefixime</strong> (CEFI) (6R, 7R)-7-[2-(2-am<strong>in</strong>o-4- thiazolyl)<br />

glyoxylamido]-8-oxo-3-v<strong>in</strong>yl-5-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-<br />

ene-2-carboxylicacid,7-9z)-[o-carboxymethyl)-oxime]<br />

trihydrates is third generation cephalospor<strong>in</strong> antibiotic 1 .<br />

<strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong> (OFLO)chemically 9-fluoro-2,3-dihydro-3-<br />

methyl-10-(4-methyl-piperaz<strong>in</strong>yl)-7-oxo-7H-pyrido(1,2,3-<br />

di)-1,4-benzoxaz<strong>in</strong>e carboxylic acid used as an antibacterial<br />

<strong>and</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ically used <strong>in</strong> the treatment <strong>of</strong> susceptible <strong>in</strong>fections<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g gonorrhea, otitis media, bronchitis, ur<strong>in</strong>ary tract<br />

<strong>in</strong>fections 2 . Literature survey reveals cefixime <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>loxac<strong>in</strong><br />

estimated by high performance liquid chromatographic<br />

(HPLC) <strong>in</strong> tablet dosage form 3,5 . Spectrophotometric<br />

method for simultaneous estimation <strong>of</strong> cefixime with other<br />

drugs also reported 6 . spectrophotometric method for<br />

simultaneous estimation <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>loxac<strong>in</strong> with other drugs also<br />

reported 7 . No report was found for the simultaneous<br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> cefixime <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>loxac<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> bulk <strong>and</strong> tablet<br />

dosage form by spectrophotometric method. Present work<br />

describes a simple, accurate, rapid <strong>and</strong> economical methods<br />

for simultaneous estimation <strong>of</strong> cefixime <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>loxac<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

bulk <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed tablet dosage forms.<br />

Received on 29.06.2011 Accepted on 30.06.2011<br />

© Asian Pharma Press All Right Reserved<br />

Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 1(2): April-June 2011; Page 36-38<br />

36<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS:<br />

Reagents <strong>and</strong> Chemicals:<br />

Ethanol (AR Grade) was used as solvent, procured from<br />

Universal Laboratories private limited, Mumbai. Pure<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard gift sample <strong>of</strong> cefixime provided by Glen mark<br />

pharmaceutical Ltd, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong> by Aristo<br />

Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai. Comb<strong>in</strong>ed dose <strong>of</strong><br />

cefixime <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>loxac<strong>in</strong> tablets (label claim 200mg) were<br />

purchased from local market.<br />

Instrumentation:<br />

A double-beam Elico UV-visible spectrophotometer, with<br />

spectral b<strong>and</strong>width <strong>of</strong> 0.2nm, wavelength accuracy ± 0.1<br />

nm <strong>and</strong> a pair <strong>of</strong> 1 cm matched quarts cells were used to<br />

measure absorbance <strong>of</strong> the result<strong>in</strong>g solution.<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard stock solution:<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard stock solutions <strong>of</strong> cefixime (100g/ml) <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>loxac<strong>in</strong> (40µg/ml) were prepared <strong>in</strong> ethanol <strong>and</strong> used for<br />

the analysis.<br />

Methods:<br />

Method A: <strong>Simultaneous</strong> Equation Method<br />

<strong>Simultaneous</strong> equations method based on measurements at<br />

two wavelengths. Two dissimilar chromophores must<br />

necessary have different powers <strong>of</strong> light absorption at some<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts or <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ear absorption.<br />

A set <strong>of</strong> two simultaneous equations obta<strong>in</strong>ed by us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mean absorptivity values are given below<br />

A 2 ay 1 -A 1 ay 2<br />

C X = --------------------- -------------------- (1)<br />

ax 2 ay 1 -ax 1 ay 2


Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2011; Vol. 1: Issue 2, Pg 36-38<br />

A 2 ay 1 -A 1 ay 2<br />

C Y = --------------------- ---------------------- (2)<br />

ax 2 ay 1 -ax 1 ay 2<br />

Where, A1 <strong>and</strong> A2 are absorbance <strong>of</strong> the sample at 290.4nm<br />

<strong>and</strong> 297.4 nm respectively, ax 2, ax 1 = denote absorptivities<br />

<strong>of</strong> X at 290.4 nm <strong>and</strong> 297.4nm respectively, ay 1 ,ay 2 =<br />

denote absorptivities <strong>of</strong> Y at 290.4 nm <strong>and</strong> 297.4nm<br />

respectively, CX = concentration <strong>of</strong> cefexime; CY =<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>loxac<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Method B. Absorbance Ratio Method:<br />

It depends on the property that, for a substance which obey<br />

Beers law at all wavelengths is constant value <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

<strong>of</strong> concentration or path length.<br />

From the follow<strong>in</strong>g set <strong>of</strong> equations the concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

each component <strong>in</strong> sample can be alculated.<br />

For <strong>Cefixime</strong>:<br />

Qm – Qy<br />

A1<br />

Cx = -------------- X ----- ---------------------- (3)<br />

Q x – Qy a<br />

For <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong>:<br />

Qm – Qx A1<br />

CY= ------------- X ------ ---------------------- (4)<br />

Qy – Qx a<br />

Where, Cx = Concentration <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cefixime</strong>, CY =<br />

Concentration <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong>, A1 = Absobance <strong>of</strong> sample at<br />

iso-absorptive wavelength 282.0 nm, a = Mean absorptivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> CEFI <strong>and</strong> OFLO at iso-absorptive 282.0 nm,<br />

Absorbance <strong>of</strong> sample solution at290.4nm<br />

Qm = ____________________________________<br />

Absorbance <strong>of</strong> sample solution at 282.0 nm<br />

Absorptivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cefixime</strong> at290.4 nm<br />

Qx = ____________________________________<br />

Absorptivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cefixime</strong> at 282.0 nm<br />

Absorptivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong> at 297.4 nm<br />

Qy = ____________________________________<br />

Absorptivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong> at 282.0 nm<br />

Spectral characteristics <strong>of</strong> CEFI <strong>and</strong> OFLO:<br />

Solutions <strong>of</strong> CEFI <strong>and</strong> OFLO (10 g/ml, each), were<br />

prepared separately by appropriate dilution <strong>of</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

stock solution. Both the solutions were scanned <strong>in</strong> the<br />

spectrum mode from 400 nm to 200 nm. Overlay absorption<br />

spectra were recorded (Fig. 1).<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> calibration curves<br />

Appropriate dilutions <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard stock solution were<br />

done separately to get 5,10,15,20, <strong>and</strong> 25 g/ml <strong>of</strong> CEFI<br />

<strong>and</strong> 2, 4, 6, 8, <strong>and</strong> 10g/ml <strong>of</strong> OFLO. The absorption<br />

[AJPAna.]<br />

spectra <strong>of</strong> all solutions were recorded between 200-400 nm.<br />

The absorbances were measured at 290.4 nm (max <strong>of</strong><br />

CEFI) 297.4 nm (max <strong>of</strong> OFLO) <strong>and</strong> 282.0 nm (isoabsorptive<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t).Beer’s lamberts range for CEFI <strong>and</strong><br />

OFLO were selected <strong>and</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g calibration curves <strong>of</strong> both<br />

the drugs were plotted separately.<br />

Determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> Absorptivity Value <strong>of</strong> CEFI <strong>and</strong><br />

OFLO:<br />

Appropriate dilutions <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard stock solution were<br />

done to get 10 g/ml <strong>of</strong> each CEFI <strong>and</strong> OFLO, respectively.<br />

The absorbances were measured for CEFI <strong>and</strong> OFLO at<br />

290.4 nm (max <strong>of</strong> CEFI), 297.4 nm (max <strong>of</strong> OFLO) <strong>and</strong><br />

282.0 nm (iso-absorptive po<strong>in</strong>t). The absorptivity values <strong>of</strong><br />

the drugs were determ<strong>in</strong>ed at the selected wavelengths.<br />

Assay <strong>of</strong> tablet formulation:<br />

Twenty tablets were weighed <strong>and</strong> average weight was<br />

calculated. The tablets were crushed to obta<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>e powder.<br />

Tablet powder equivalent to 100 mg <strong>of</strong> CEFI was<br />

transferred to 100.0 ml volumetric flask, ethanol added,<br />

ultrasonicated for 10 m<strong>in</strong>utes <strong>and</strong> volume was made-up to<br />

the mark with ethanol. The solution was then filtered<br />

through a Whatman filter paper (No. 41). The filtrate was<br />

further diluted with ethanol to obta<strong>in</strong> 10 g/ml <strong>of</strong> CEFI <strong>and</strong><br />

10 g/ml <strong>of</strong> OFLO. The concentration <strong>of</strong> both CEFI <strong>and</strong><br />

OFLO were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by measur<strong>in</strong>g the absorbance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sample at 290.4 nm, 297.4 nm Calculated us<strong>in</strong>g (method A,<br />

simultaneous equation method) <strong>and</strong> (method B, absorbance<br />

ratio method). Concentration <strong>of</strong> sample solution was<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed by us<strong>in</strong>g above equations1, 2,3 <strong>and</strong> 4.The<br />

results are reported <strong>in</strong> the Table 1.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:<br />

The present method could be provided a convenient <strong>and</strong><br />

accurate method for simultaneous analysis <strong>of</strong> CEFI <strong>and</strong><br />

OFLO. In simultaneous equation method, wavelengths<br />

selected for analysis were 290.4nm (max <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cefixime</strong>) <strong>and</strong><br />

297.4 nm (max <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong>). In both the methods<br />

l<strong>in</strong>earity for detector response was observed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

concentration range <strong>of</strong> 5-25 g/ml for CEFI <strong>and</strong> 2-10 g/ml<br />

for OFLO. Absorptivity coefficient were calculated for both<br />

the drugs at selected wavelengths <strong>and</strong> substituted <strong>in</strong><br />

equations for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g concentration <strong>of</strong> CEFI <strong>and</strong> OFLO<br />

<strong>in</strong> tablet sample solution. Percent label claim for CEF <strong>and</strong><br />

OFLO <strong>in</strong> tablet analysis, by both the method was found <strong>in</strong><br />

the range <strong>of</strong> 98.54 % to 100.5%. St<strong>and</strong>ard deviation <strong>and</strong><br />

coefficient <strong>of</strong> variance for six determ<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>of</strong> tablet<br />

sample, by both the methods, was found to be less than ±<br />

2.0 <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the precision <strong>of</strong> both the methods. Accuracy<br />

<strong>of</strong> proposed methods was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by recovery studies.<br />

The percent recovery for CEFI <strong>and</strong> OFLO, the methods was<br />

found <strong>in</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> 98.19 % – 100.45 %. The developed<br />

method could be employed for rout<strong>in</strong>e analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cefixime</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed dose tablet formulation.<br />

37


Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2011; Vol. 1: Issue 2, Pg 36-38<br />

[AJPAna.]<br />

Table 1: Tablet Analysis <strong>and</strong> Recovery Studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cefixime</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

Method Label Claim (mg/tab) Amount Found (%) St<strong>and</strong>ard Deviation % Recovery<br />

CEFI OFLO CEFI OFLO CEFI OFLO CEFI OFLO<br />

A 200 200 100.5 94.8 ±0.33419 ±0.2494 100.9±0.1647 95.2±0.1452<br />

B 200 200 98.4 95.8 ±0.2487 ±0.1984 99.8±.6428 97.7±0.1587<br />

Fig.-1: Overla<strong>in</strong> Spectra <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cefixime</strong> (CEFI) <strong>and</strong> <strong>Ofloxac<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

(OFLO)<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:<br />

The authors are grateful to RVS College <strong>of</strong> Pharmaceutical<br />

Sciences, Coimbatore for provid<strong>in</strong>g necessary facilities.<br />

REFERENCES:<br />

1. WWW.Wikipedia.org/Wiki/<strong>Cefixime</strong><br />

2. Sweet man S.C., Mart<strong>in</strong>dale. The complete Drug Reference. 32nd<br />

Edn. Pharmaceutical press.<br />

3. WWW.Wikipedia.org/Wiki/<strong>of</strong>loxac<strong>in</strong><br />

4. Zendelovska D.,Stafilov T., Milosevski P.“High performance<br />

liquid chromatographic method for determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> cefixime <strong>and</strong><br />

cefotaxime <strong>in</strong> human plasma”. Bullet<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> the chemists <strong>and</strong><br />

Technologists <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.2003;22: 39-45.<br />

5. Rath<strong>in</strong>avel G., Mukherjee P. B., Valarmathy J., Samueljoshua<br />

L., Sivakumar T. “A Validated RP – HPLC method for<br />

simultaneous estimation <strong>of</strong> cefixime <strong>and</strong> cloxacill<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> tablets”<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> chemistry.2008; 5: 648-651.<br />

6. Jovanovic E. S., Agbaba D. ZivanovStakic S. “HPTLC<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> csftriaxone;cefixime <strong>and</strong> cefotaxime <strong>in</strong> dosage<br />

forms” J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1998; 18: 893898.<br />

7. Senthilraja M. “<strong>Simultaneous</strong> UV spectrophotometric method for<br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> nitazoxanide <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>loxac<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed dosage<br />

form”. Int. J. Pharm. Tech. 2008; 1: 469-471.<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!