18.06.2014 Views

IWMP-3 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

IWMP-3 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

IWMP-3 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report<br />

Cluster-<strong>IWMP</strong>: III (Panchavda)<br />

(Kharachiya (Jam), Panchavda, Jangvad, Jasapar)<br />

( Ha. 4239.30, Cost Rs. 635.90 Lac )<br />

Year :- 2009-10<br />

PIA : D. W. D. U. – Rajkot<br />

D.L.N.A. : District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit – Rajkot<br />

(S.L.N.A. – G.S.W.M.A. – Gandhinagar)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 1


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table <strong>of</strong> Contents<br />

Chapter 1 Project Background 11<br />

1.1 Project Background 12<br />

Table no. 1: Basic project information 12<br />

1.2 Need <strong>of</strong> Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Programme 13<br />

Table no. 2: Weightage <strong>of</strong> the Project 13<br />

Table No.2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection <strong>of</strong> watershed 14 to 15<br />

Table no. 3: Watershed information 15<br />

1.3 Other projects/scheme running in the project villages 16<br />

Table no.4: <strong>Development</strong>al programmes running in the project area: 17 to 18<br />

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programme in the project area: 19<br />

Chapter 2 Project Implementing Agency 20<br />

2.1 Project Implementing Agency 21<br />

2.2 About District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Rajkot. 21<br />

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives: 21<br />

2.2.2 Programmes/projects running in the distric 22<br />

2.3 SWOT Analysis <strong>of</strong> the DWDU 23<br />

Table no. 6: PIA: 24<br />

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: 24<br />

Chapter 3 Basic Information <strong>of</strong> the Project Area 25<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 2


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology 26<br />

3.1.1 Land use pattern: 26<br />

Table no. 8: Land use pattern: 26<br />

3.1.2 Soil and topography 26<br />

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography 27<br />

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition 27<br />

Table no. 11: Soil Erosion 28<br />

Table no. 11.1: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) 28<br />

Table: 12. Climatic Conditions(Last six years annual rainfall, maximum and minimum temperature <strong>of</strong> Jasdan taluk 28<br />

3.1.3 Slope 29<br />

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief 29<br />

3.2 Land and Agriculture 30<br />

Table no. 14: Land ownership details 30<br />

Table no. 15: Agriculture 30<br />

3.2.1 Irrigation 31<br />

Table no. 16: Irrigation 31<br />

Table no. 17: Crop details 32 to 33<br />

3.3 Livestock 33<br />

Table no. 18: Livestock 34<br />

Table no. 19: Drinking water 34<br />

Table no. 20: Details <strong>of</strong> Common Property Resources 35<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 3


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

3.5 Socio-Economic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile 35<br />

3.5.1 Demographic Status 35<br />

Table no. 21: Demographic information 36<br />

Table no. 22: Literacy rate 36<br />

3.5.2 Migration Pattern 36<br />

Table no. 23: Migration details 37<br />

Table no. 24: Poverty 37<br />

3.5.3 Infrastructure facilities 37<br />

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure 38<br />

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets 38<br />

3.5.4 Livelihood pattern 38<br />

Table no. 27: Per capita Income 39<br />

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR 39<br />

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) 39<br />

Chapter 4 Watershed Activities 40<br />

Watershed Activities 41<br />

4.1. Scientific Planning 41 to 47<br />

Table no. 30: Details <strong>of</strong> Scientific Planning and Inputs in <strong>IWMP</strong> projects 48 to 49<br />

4.2. Institution Building 49<br />

Table no. 31.1: Watershed Committee details (Kharachiya Jam ) 50<br />

Table no. 31.2: Watershed Committee details (Panchvada) 51<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 4


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 31.3: Watershed Committee details (Jagavad) 52<br />

Table no. 31.4: Watershed Committee details (Jasapar) 53<br />

ii) Self Help Group 54<br />

Table no. 32: SHG detail 54<br />

iii) User Group: 55<br />

Table No. 33: The following types <strong>of</strong> groups were planned to be formed 55<br />

Table no. 33.1 : UG detail (Kharchiya Jam) 56<br />

Table no. 33.2: UG detail (Panchavada) 56<br />

Table no. 33.3 : UG detail (Jangavad) 57<br />

Table no. 33. 4: UG detail (Jasapar) 57<br />

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 58<br />

Table No. 34: Entry Point Activities (EPA): Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Kharachiya Jam are: 58<br />

Table No. 34.1: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Panchavda are: 59<br />

Table No. 34.2: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Jangvad are: 60<br />

Table No. 34.3: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Jasapar are: 61<br />

Table no.35: Details <strong>of</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) 62<br />

4.3.2. Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Works: 62<br />

4.3.2.1 Ridge Area Treatment Plans 62<br />

1. Contour Bunds/Trench 63<br />

2. Boulder Checks /Loose Boulder checks 63<br />

3. Gabions 64<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 5


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

4.3.2.2 Drainage line Treatment and water harvesting for land development: 65<br />

1. Check dams 65<br />

2. Waste weirs 65<br />

4.3.2.3 Plains or Flat level/Field level: 66<br />

1) Farm Pond: 66<br />

2) Irrigation/Percolation tank 66 to 67<br />

3) Farm bund 67<br />

4. Afforestation 67<br />

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in Kharachiya Jam (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 68<br />

Table no.36.1: Activities related to Surface water resources in Panchavda (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 68<br />

Table no.36.2: Activities related to Surface water resources in Jangavad (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 69<br />

Table no.36.3: Activities related to Surface water resources in Jasapar (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 69<br />

Table no.36.4: Activities related to Surface water resources in cluster <strong>IWMP</strong>-III (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 70<br />

Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh 71<br />

Rs.)<br />

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas 72 to 73<br />

Table no. 39: Other activities <strong>of</strong> watershed works phase – Proposed target 74<br />

Table no.40: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Kharachiya (Jam) 74<br />

Table no. 40.i: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Panchavada 75<br />

Table no. 40.ii: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Jangvad 76<br />

Table no. 40.iii: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Jasapar 77<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 6


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No 40.1: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Earthen Contour Bund/Trench 78<br />

Table No 40.2: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Boulder checks 78 to 80<br />

Table No 40.3: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Gabion structures 81 to 82<br />

Table No 40.4: Technical Details/Estimates <strong>of</strong> Farm Bund 83<br />

Table No 40.5. Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Excavation <strong>of</strong> Trench and raising embankment 84<br />

Table no 40.5.i, Quantity Calculation <strong>of</strong> trench and refilling 84<br />

Table No 40.6 Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Farm Pond 84<br />

Table no 40.7. Technical details <strong>of</strong> Percolation Tank 85<br />

Table no 40.8. Technical details <strong>of</strong> Check dam 86 to 87<br />

Table no 40.9. Technical details <strong>of</strong> Check dam 88 to 89<br />

Table no.41: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Kharachiya Jam 90<br />

Table no.41.1: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Panchavda 91<br />

Table no.41.2: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Jangvad 92<br />

Table no.41.3: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Jasapar 93<br />

Table No, 41.i, Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Afforestation Activities 94<br />

Table No, 41.ii , Cost Estimation for afforestation activity 94 to 95<br />

Table No, 41.iii: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Bio-gas 96 to 101<br />

Table no.42: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities: Kharachiya Jam 102<br />

Table no.42.1: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities:Panchvda 103 to 104<br />

Table no.42.2: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities: Jangvad 105<br />

Table no.42.3: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities: Jasapar 106<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 7


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Livelihood Intervention 107 to 109<br />

Production System-1: Papad production units 109<br />

Introduction 109 to 114<br />

Production System-2: Dairy Buffalo Farming 114 to 117<br />

Production System-3: Fodder bank for Watershed villages 117 to 119<br />

Table 42.i .Primary Model for A Fodder Bank 120<br />

Table no: 42.ii: Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation for fodder production 121<br />

Table No. 42.iii, Revenue and return Details 121 to 125<br />

Table: 42.iv Model <strong>of</strong> a Vermi-compost Unit for 40 beds <strong>of</strong> Dimension (10mt*1mt*0.3mt) 126<br />

Table No-42.v: Returns from vermicomposting 127 to 128<br />

Production System – 6 Khadi based industries 128 to 130<br />

Production System – 7: Turmeric Cultivation 131<br />

Table No-42.vi: Economics <strong>of</strong> turmeric cultivation in 1ha. Area 131 to 132<br />

Production System – 7: Floriculture 133<br />

Table No-42.vii: Economics <strong>of</strong> Marigold cultivation 134 to 137<br />

Table No-42.viii Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Sunflower Plantation Activities 138 to 141<br />

Table No-42.ix: Economic <strong>of</strong> Rose cultivation in 1 Hectare 141<br />

Table no.43: Details <strong>of</strong> activities in the CPRs in the project areas 142 to 143<br />

4.4 Capacity building and Institutional collaboration 143<br />

Table no. 44: Institutes Identified for Capacity Building 144<br />

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan 145<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 8


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities 145<br />

Chapter 5 Budgeting 146<br />

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance 147<br />

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under <strong>IWMP</strong> 148<br />

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement 148<br />

Table no.50: Details <strong>of</strong> Convergence <strong>of</strong> <strong>IWMP</strong> with other Schemes 149<br />

Chapter 6 Expected Outcome 150<br />

6.1.1 Employment 151<br />

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area 151<br />

6.1.2 Migration 151<br />

Table no. 53: Details <strong>of</strong> seasonal migration from Project area 152<br />

6.1.3 Ground water table 152<br />

Table no. 54: Details <strong>of</strong> average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) 152<br />

6.1.4: Drinking water 153<br />

Table no. 55: Status <strong>of</strong> Drinking water 153<br />

6.1. 5: Crops 153<br />

Table no. 56: Details <strong>of</strong> crop area and yield in the project areas 154<br />

6.1.6 Horticulture 154<br />

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture 154<br />

6.1.7 Vegetative cover 155<br />

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover 155<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 9


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

6.1.8 Livestock 155<br />

Table no. 59: Details <strong>of</strong> livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, solids in kg and income in 155<br />

Rs.)<br />

Linkages 156<br />

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages 156 to 157<br />

Logical Framework Analysis 158 to 162<br />

Chapter 7 Quality and Sustainability Lssus 163<br />

Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation 164<br />

Vigilance and Monitoring Committees 165<br />

Research support in watershed management 165<br />

Farmer organization and empowerment 165 to 166<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> traditional institutions and indigenous knowledge 166<br />

Plans For Project management: 167<br />

Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Fund: 167<br />

Table No. 60. Details <strong>of</strong> Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Fund(WDF) 167<br />

User Charges: 168<br />

Chapter 8 Mapping 169<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 10


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

CHAPTER - 1<br />

PROJECT BACKGROUND<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 11


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

1.1 Project Background<br />

The milliwatershed consists <strong>of</strong> four villages namely, Kharachiya jam, Panchavda, Jangavad and Jasapar under <strong>IWMP</strong>-III<br />

cluster which are located in Jasdan Taluka <strong>of</strong> Rajkot District in <strong>Gujarat</strong> state. The project is a cluster <strong>of</strong> 13 micro watersheds with<br />

5G1B9c1e, 5G1B9c1d, 5G1B9c1f, 5G1B9c2a, 5G1B9d3a, 5G1B9d2b, 5G1B9d3c, 5G1B9d3b, 5G1B9d3d, 5G1B9d3e, 5G1B9c1g,<br />

5G1B9c1b, 5G1B9c1c as micro watershed codes. The total project area <strong>of</strong> the watershed is about 6739.30 ha, out <strong>of</strong> which 4239.30 ha is<br />

proposed to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (<strong>IWMP</strong>).<br />

The nearest town is Jasdan which is about 20 km from the project area and well connected by pucca road. In the watershed villages<br />

Patel, Darbar, Rabari, Koli, Bharvad, Muslims and Harijan communities are the primary inhabitants <strong>of</strong> the village. The villagers mainly<br />

depend upon agriculture or working in diamond polishing shops, Handicraft and thresher industries in Jasdan town. The Rabari and<br />

Bharvad community mainly depends upon dairying. Agriculture is totally dependent on rain. There are 1432 Well and 546 Bore wells, Out<br />

<strong>of</strong> them 571 well and 213 Bore wells found totally dry and 841 wells and 333 Bore wells are used for partially irrigation in the project area.<br />

Drinking water mainly comes from the Narmda Pipeline and other wells/ borewells. Horticultural plants and afforestation plants planted<br />

under hariyali project and by organization BAIF increase the beauty <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> villages. The visible trees in the farmlands are Neem,<br />

Babool, Bor, Pipar, Pipal, Lemon and Vad.<br />

Table no. 1: Basic project information<br />

Sl.<br />

No<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

Villages<br />

the project Name Census<br />

code<br />

Gram<br />

Panchayats<br />

Taluka District Area <strong>of</strong><br />

the<br />

project<br />

Area<br />

proposed<br />

to be<br />

treated<br />

Total<br />

project<br />

cost (Rs.<br />

in lakh)<br />

1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-III Kharachiya(Jam) 00675400 Kharachiya(Jam) Jasdan Rajkot 1036.40 536.40 80.46<br />

2 Panchavda 00677200 Panchavda 2090.10 1090.10 163.52<br />

3 Jangavad 00677100 Jangavad 1988.20 1488.20 223.23<br />

4 Jasapar 00677300 Jasapar 1624.60 1124.60 168.69<br />

Total<br />

6739.30 4239.30 635.90<br />

PIA<br />

DWDU<br />

Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 12


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

1.2 Need <strong>of</strong> Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Programme<br />

Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Programme is selected on the basis <strong>of</strong> thirteen parameter namely Poverty Index, Percentage <strong>of</strong> SC/ST,<br />

Actual wages, Percentage <strong>of</strong> small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rain fed agriculture, Drinking<br />

water situation in the area, Percentage <strong>of</strong> degraded land, Productivity potential <strong>of</strong> land, Continuity <strong>of</strong> another watershed that has already<br />

developed/treated, Cluster Approach for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameter a composite ranking has been given to the<br />

watershed project as given in Table no. 3.<br />

The total number <strong>of</strong> families under BPL is 72, which is less than 24 per cent <strong>of</strong> total households <strong>of</strong> the village. Hence a score <strong>of</strong> 5 is<br />

allotted. The percentage <strong>of</strong> schedule castes in the cluster villages are less than 20 per cent to the total population; hence a score <strong>of</strong> 3 is<br />

allotted. Rain fed agriculture forms the primary occupation <strong>of</strong> the village due to the fact that ground water is saline and hence unfit for<br />

usage. Less than 50 per cent <strong>of</strong> the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour is less than the<br />

minimum wages hence a composite rank <strong>of</strong> 5, 3 and. 5 are allotted respectively.<br />

Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under DDP block. Drinking<br />

water is problematic in the village as low percolation into soil. Majority <strong>of</strong> land is degraded due to uneven level <strong>of</strong> land low percolation<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> water inside the soil The soil is very permeable and production <strong>of</strong> the land can be significantly enriched with the availability <strong>of</strong><br />

timely irrigation. The 13 watersheds in the project cover a total area <strong>of</strong> 4239.30 Ha. Thus a cumulative score <strong>of</strong> 104.All the parameters<br />

were taken together to give a cumulative score <strong>of</strong> 104 to the watershed.<br />

Table no. 2: Weightage <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

Project name Project<br />

Weightage<br />

type<br />

i ii iii iv V vi vii viii ix X xi xii Xiii<br />

<strong>IWMP</strong>-III Desert 5 3 5 3 3 15 15 5 10 10 10 15 5<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 13


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No.2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection <strong>of</strong> watershed<br />

S.<br />

No<br />

Criteria<br />

Maxi<br />

mum<br />

Ranges & scores<br />

score<br />

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20<br />

% (2.5)<br />

i Poverty index (% <strong>of</strong> poor<br />

to population)<br />

ii % <strong>of</strong> SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3)<br />

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are<br />

Actual wages are<br />

significantly lower than equal to or higher<br />

minimum wages (5) than minimum wages<br />

(0)<br />

iv % <strong>of</strong> small and marginal 10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)<br />

farmers<br />

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)<br />

vi Moisture index/<br />

DPAP/ DDP Block<br />

15 -66.7 & below (15)<br />

DDP Block<br />

-33.3 to -66.6 (10)<br />

DPAP Block<br />

0 to -33.2 (0)<br />

Non DPAP/ DDP Block<br />

vii Area under rain-fed<br />

agriculture<br />

15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70<br />

%<br />

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village<br />

(7.5)<br />

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 %<br />

(10)<br />

x Productivity potential <strong>of</strong><br />

the land<br />

xi<br />

Contiguity to another<br />

watershed that has already<br />

15 Lands with low production<br />

& where productivity can be<br />

significantly enhanced with<br />

reasonable efforts (15)<br />

10 Contiguous to previously<br />

treated watershed &<br />

Lands with moderate<br />

production & where<br />

productivity can be<br />

enhanced with<br />

reasonable efforts (10)<br />

Contiguity within the<br />

microwatersheds in<br />

Partially covered (5)<br />

Low- less than 10 % <strong>of</strong><br />

TGA (5)<br />

Lands with high<br />

production & where<br />

productivity can be<br />

marginally enhanced<br />

with reasonable efforts<br />

(5)<br />

Neither contiguous to<br />

previously treated<br />

(Reject)<br />

Fully<br />

covered<br />

(0)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 14


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

been developed/ treated<br />

xii Cluster approach in the<br />

plains (more than one<br />

contiguous microwatersheds<br />

in the project)<br />

xiii Cluster approach in the<br />

hills (more than one<br />

contiguous microwatersheds<br />

in the project)<br />

contiguity within the<br />

microwatersheds in the<br />

project (10)<br />

15 Above 6 micro-watersheds<br />

in cluster (15)<br />

15 Above 5 micro-watersheds<br />

in cluster (15)<br />

the project but non<br />

contiguous to<br />

previously treated<br />

watershed (5)<br />

4 to 6<br />

microwatersheds in<br />

cluster (10)<br />

3 to 5<br />

microwatersheds in<br />

cluster (10)<br />

watershed nor<br />

contiguity within the<br />

microwatersheds in the<br />

project (0)<br />

2 to 4 microwatersheds<br />

in cluster (5)<br />

2 to 3 microwatersheds<br />

in cluster (5)<br />

Total 150 150 90 41 2.5<br />

Table no. 3: Watershed information<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the project No. <strong>of</strong> watersheds<br />

Watershed code<br />

Watershed regime/type/order<br />

to be treated<br />

Kharachiya(Jam) 4 5G1B9c1e, 5G1B9c1d, 5G1B9c1f, 5G1B9c2a Milli watershed<br />

Panchavda 5 5G1B9d3a, 5G1B9d2b, 5G1B9d3c, 5G1B9c1e,<br />

Milli watershed<br />

5G1B9c1d<br />

Jangavad 4 5G1B9d3b, 5G1B9d3d, 5G1B9d3e, 5G1B9d3c Milli watershed<br />

Jasapar 6 5G1B9c1g, 5G1B9c1b, 5G1B9c1c, 5G1B9c1d,<br />

5G1B9d3a, 5G1B9d2b<br />

Milli watershed<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 15


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

1.3 Other projects/scheme running in the project villages<br />

(1) MGNREGS: Pond deepening and widening <strong>of</strong> road works completed in Kharachiya Jam, desilting <strong>of</strong> percolation tank in<br />

Panchavda, construction <strong>of</strong> road and desilting <strong>of</strong> thee check dams with a cost <strong>of</strong> 7.6 lakh and in Jasapar desilting <strong>of</strong> percolation tank<br />

with cost <strong>of</strong> 2.10 lakha has been completed till date.<br />

(2) Prehariyali/ Hariyali watershed programme: Under the EAS and DDP project, total area <strong>of</strong> 2500 ha in total project area have<br />

been treated where all activities related to soil and water conservation measures have been taken care. Two solar street-lamps<br />

installed so far under DDP to promote non conventional source <strong>of</strong> energy in each village.<br />

(3) Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): 360 individual toilets in the project villages and two public toilets in Kharachiya and Jangvad<br />

,has been constructed under TSC programme in the project area. All the remaining house hold will be covered under this scheme.<br />

(4) Indira Awas Yojana: Total 113 house has been constructed in the four villages (13 in Kharachiya Jam, 23 in Pachavda, 31 in<br />

Jangvad and 46 in Jasapar ) under IAY.<br />

(5) SAY: 6 nos <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries have been benefitted with a house under Sardar Awas yojana.<br />

(6) WASMO/Sector reform: In the project villages 75 % <strong>of</strong> the houses get water by tap connection under WASMO programme.<br />

(7) GGY: All the villagers have been benefitted under this programme where new rooms in school, cement concrete road in market,<br />

community hall and renovation <strong>of</strong> bus stop work has been taken.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 16


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.4: <strong>Development</strong>al programmes running in the project area:<br />

Kharachiya Jam<br />

SI<br />

no<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme/scheme<br />

Sponsoring<br />

agency<br />

Objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme/scheme<br />

Year <strong>of</strong><br />

commencement<br />

Villages<br />

covered<br />

Estimated<br />

number <strong>of</strong><br />

beneficiaries<br />

1 Sector reform/WASMO Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> Water tank, Havada Bore Well<br />

2001-02 1 238<br />

- Pipe-line<br />

2 MGNREGS CRD Employment 2009-10 1 650<br />

3 IAY CRD Housing 2003-04 1 13<br />

4 EAS Central Govt. Desert Area <strong>Development</strong> 1995-96 1 322<br />

5 GGY Govt. Of <strong>Gujarat</strong><br />

Primary School Room Model -<br />

Sanitation<br />

2001-10 1<br />

6 TSC Govt <strong>of</strong> India Sanitation 2004-05 1 99<br />

All the<br />

villagers<br />

Panchvada<br />

SI<br />

no<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme/scheme<br />

Sponsoring<br />

agency<br />

Objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme/scheme<br />

Year <strong>of</strong><br />

commencement<br />

Villages<br />

covered<br />

Estimated<br />

number <strong>of</strong><br />

beneficiaries<br />

1 WASMO Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> Water tank-2, Pipe-line, Sump 2004-05 1 422<br />

2 MNNREGS CRD Employment 2009-10 1 360<br />

3 IAY CRD Housing 2004-05 1 23<br />

4 SAY Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> Housing 2006-07 1 1<br />

6 DDP-4,11 Central Govt. Desert Area <strong>Development</strong> 1999-2004 2 614<br />

7 GGY Govt. Of <strong>Gujarat</strong> School - Room 2003-04 1<br />

All the<br />

villagers<br />

8 TSC Govt <strong>of</strong> India Sanitation 2004-05 1 119<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 17


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Jangvad<br />

SI<br />

no<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme/scheme<br />

Sponsoring<br />

agency<br />

Objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme/scheme<br />

Year <strong>of</strong><br />

commencement<br />

Villages<br />

covered<br />

Estimated<br />

number <strong>of</strong><br />

beneficiaries<br />

1 WASMO Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> Water tank-2, Pipe-line, Sump 2004-05 1 568<br />

2 MGNREGS CRD Employment 2009/10 1 1289<br />

3 IAY CRD Housing 2004-05 1 31<br />

4 SAY Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> Housing 2009-10 1 4<br />

5 DDP-10 Central Govt. Desert Area <strong>Development</strong> 2004-2005 1 365<br />

6<br />

GGY Govt. Of <strong>Gujarat</strong> C.C. Road, Community Hall 2004-05 1 All villagers<br />

7 TSC Govt <strong>of</strong> India Sanitation 2005-06 1 61<br />

Jasapar<br />

SI<br />

no<br />

1<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme/scheme<br />

WASMO<br />

Sponsoring<br />

agency<br />

Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong><br />

Objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme/scheme<br />

Year <strong>of</strong><br />

commencement<br />

Villages<br />

covered<br />

Estimated<br />

number <strong>of</strong><br />

beneficiaries<br />

Pipe-line, Sump 2009-10 1 319<br />

2 NREGS CRD Employment 2009-10 1 470<br />

3 IAY CRD Housing 2009-2010 1 46<br />

4 DDP-5 Central Govt. Desert Area <strong>Development</strong> 1999-2006 1 297<br />

Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> School-Room, CC Road,<br />

All the<br />

5 GGY<br />

2004-05 2<br />

Community Hall, Bus Stand<br />

villagers<br />

6 TSC Govt <strong>of</strong> India Sanitation 2005-06 1 79<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 18


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programme in the project area:<br />

SI<br />

n o<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

1 Pre-<br />

Haryal<br />

il<br />

(EAS)<br />

2 DDP-<br />

IV<br />

5 Pre-<br />

Hariyal<br />

i(DDP-<br />

V)<br />

Year<br />

started<br />

1995-<br />

1996<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

villages<br />

Kharachi<br />

ya (Jam)<br />

1995-96 Panchavd<br />

a<br />

3 Hariyal<br />

i(DDP-<br />

XI)<br />

4 Hariyal<br />

i(DDP-<br />

X)<br />

2005-<br />

2006<br />

2004-<br />

2005<br />

1999-<br />

2000<br />

Panchavd<br />

a<br />

No. Of Watershed<br />

micro codes<br />

watersh<br />

ed<br />

4 5G1B9c1d<br />

5G1B9c1d<br />

5G1B9c1f(4)<br />

5G1B9c2a<br />

5 5G1B9d3a<br />

5G!B9d2d<br />

5G!B9c1d<br />

5G!B9c1e<br />

5G!B9d3c<br />

Area<br />

under<br />

treatm<br />

ent<br />

(ha)<br />

Funding<br />

source<br />

Nodal<br />

agency<br />

500 GOI DWD U<br />

Rajkot<br />

500 GOI DWD U<br />

Rajkot<br />

1 5G1B9c1c 500 Govt. DWD U<br />

Rajkot<br />

Jangavad 4 5G1B9d3b<br />

5G1B9d3c<br />

5G1B9d3d<br />

5G1B9d3e<br />

Jasapar 6 5G1B9c1g<br />

5G1B9c1b<br />

5G1B9c1c<br />

5G1B9c1d<br />

5G1B9d3a<br />

5G1B9d2b<br />

500 GOI DWD U<br />

Rajkot<br />

500 GOI DWD U<br />

Rajkot<br />

PIA<br />

Total<br />

cost<br />

Expenditure<br />

incurred up<br />

to start <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>IWMP</strong><br />

% financial<br />

completion % physical<br />

completion<br />

Grisave 22.50 22.50 100 100<br />

Grisave 22.50 22.50 100 100<br />

Taluka<br />

panch.<br />

Taluka<br />

panch.<br />

30.00 30.00 100 100<br />

30.00 30.00 100 100<br />

Grisave 22.50 22.50 100 100<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 19


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

CHAPTER - 2<br />

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 20


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

2.1 Project Implementing Agency<br />

The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by <strong>State</strong> Level Nodal Agency (SLNA). PIAs<br />

would be responsible for implementation <strong>of</strong> watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous<br />

organizations under <strong>State</strong>/ Central Governments, Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary<br />

Organizations (VOs).The PIA <strong>of</strong> <strong>IWMP</strong>-III watershed Project is District watershed development Unit, Rajkot.<br />

2.2 About District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Rajkot.<br />

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives:<br />

The District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit (DWDU), Rajkot is a district level nodal agency and was established on 12th June 2008 under<br />

constitution <strong>of</strong> Para 30 <strong>of</strong> new guideline, to oversee for the smooth implementation <strong>of</strong> watershed projects in the district. The District<br />

<strong>Development</strong> Officer (DDO) is the chairman <strong>of</strong> the DWDU. The DWDU have dedicated and experience staffs comprising one Project<br />

Manager (deputation from <strong>Gujarat</strong> Forest Department), a technical expert (on contract basis) and multidisciplinary team <strong>of</strong> civil engineer,<br />

agriculture expert, community mobilization expert and computer operator. The remaining staff i.e. MIS coordinator, system analyst,<br />

Livestock specialist will be recruited very soon. The DWDU Rajkot has its own rented <strong>of</strong>fice near Junction plot 5, Prakash Niketan.<br />

The functions <strong>of</strong> DWDU:<br />

a) Take up the over all responsibility <strong>of</strong> facilitating preparation <strong>of</strong> strategic and annual action plans for watershed development projects in<br />

the district.<br />

b) Providing pr<strong>of</strong>essional and technical support to Project Implementing Agencies (PIAs) in planning and execution <strong>of</strong> watershed<br />

development projects.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 21


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

c) Develop action plans for capacity building with close involvement <strong>of</strong> resource organizations to execute the capacity building action<br />

plans.<br />

d) Carry out regular monitoring, evaluation and learning.<br />

e) Ensure smooth flow <strong>of</strong> funds to watershed development projects.<br />

f) Ensure timely submission <strong>of</strong> required documents to SLNA/Nodel Agency <strong>of</strong> the Department at central level.<br />

g) Facilitate and co-ordination with relevant programmes <strong>of</strong> agriculture, horticulture, rural development, animal husbandry, etc with<br />

watershed development and convergence plans for enhancement <strong>of</strong> productivity and livelihoods interventions for asset less persons.<br />

h) Integrate and co-ordinate watershed development projects/plans into district plans <strong>of</strong> the district planning committees.<br />

i) Establish and maintain the District Level Date Cell and link it to the <strong>State</strong> Level and National Level Data Centre.<br />

Moreover, the DWDU, Rajkot is working as a PIA for three <strong>IWMP</strong> projects.<br />

2.2.2 Programmes/projects running in the district<br />

At present nine <strong>IWMP</strong> projects have been sanctioned by Government <strong>of</strong> India for the Rajkot district. The entry point activities <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

nine <strong>IWMP</strong> projects have identified by the respective PIAs in the district. Rajkot Normal Forest Division as PIA for the four projects<br />

(<strong>IWMP</strong>-IV, V, VII & VIII), Rajkot Social Forest division as PIA for two (<strong>IWMP</strong>-I & VI) projects and DWDU-self is as PIA for the three<br />

projects (<strong>IWMP</strong>-II, III & IX).<br />

Apart from running nine <strong>IWMP</strong> projects, total 748 pre-Hariyali & Hariyali projects (DDP & IWDP) has been sanctioned and out <strong>of</strong> that<br />

348 projects are completed and 400 projects are still running in the district. DWDU Rajkot is also monitoring a central government<br />

sponsored scheme on "Artificial Recharge <strong>of</strong> Groundwater through Dug wells" in the district which is spread over nine talukas.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 22


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

2.3 SWOT Analysis <strong>of</strong> the DWDU<br />

Strength:<br />

(1) Dedicated and experience staffs and multidisciplinary team<br />

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency.<br />

(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, Sourastra University, KVK and NGOs for capacity<br />

building and technical guidance<br />

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help <strong>of</strong> BISAG, Gandhinagar<br />

(5) District level monitoring, coordination Committee<br />

(6) Well establishment <strong>of</strong> PRIs for social audits for transparency and accountability.<br />

Weakness:<br />

(1) Insufficient funds to complete watershed projects per hectare.<br />

(2) Permanent staff is less in numbers.<br />

(3) No permanent <strong>of</strong>fice building.<br />

Opportunities:<br />

(1) Sustainable livelihood generation for landless and asset less persons.<br />

(2) Improvement <strong>of</strong> socio-economic status <strong>of</strong> poor.<br />

(3) Awareness generation among the beneficiaries through information, education and communication activities.<br />

(4) Reduction in migration rate.<br />

(5) Usage <strong>of</strong> new technologies <strong>of</strong> watershed modeling and GPS for monitoring <strong>of</strong> watershed activities.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 23


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Threats:<br />

(1) Shallow soil depth that make difficult for horticultural plants in fields.<br />

(2) Lack <strong>of</strong> sustainable agricultural development package.<br />

(3) Lack <strong>of</strong> voluntary contribution and cooperation from local peoples.<br />

(4) One <strong>of</strong> the foreseen challenges was "to overcome vested interests (including party politics, village factions) at village level and to reach<br />

out to the poorest in the watersheds"<br />

Table no. 6: PIA:<br />

SI. No. Name <strong>of</strong> project Details <strong>of</strong> PIA<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> organization<br />

District Level Nodal Agency<br />

1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-III<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> Organisation<br />

DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Designation and Address<br />

Project Manager.DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Telephone 0281-2454682<br />

Fax 0281-2453684<br />

E-mail<br />

rajdwdu@gmail.com<br />

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:<br />

SI Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly<br />

no<br />

remuneration<br />

1 Mr. B.M RABARI 55 M Project Manager GFS 28 Project<br />

Management<br />

50000<br />

2 Mr. S.PRDAHAN 26 M Technical expert M.Tech.(SWCE) 3 Monitoring 25000<br />

3 Mr. D.R PARMAR 34 M MDT (Engg.) Diploma(Civil) 9 Engineering works 14000<br />

4 Mr. A.H. JOSHI 29 M MDT(Agri.) B.Tech (Ag.Engg) 4.5 Agriculture 12000<br />

5 Mrs. S.M PATEL 32 F MDT( CO) MSW 4.5 Community 12000<br />

6 Mr.V KANZARIYA 26 M MDT(Accountant) M.Com 2.5 Accounts 8000<br />

7 Mr. C.K. METALIYA 45 M WDT (Engg.) Diploma(Civil) 5 Engineering works 10000<br />

8 Mr. C.D KUKADIYA 26 M WDT (Agri.) B.R.S, B. Ed 1.5 Agriculture 8000<br />

9 Ms. RATHOD VANITA 21 F WDT (CO) B.R.S 2.2 Community 8000<br />

10 Mr A.B.KARELIYA 23 M Surveyor I.T.I (Surveyor) 2 Surveying 6000<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 24


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

CHAPTER - 3<br />

Basic Information <strong>of</strong> Project Area<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 25


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology<br />

3.1.1 Land use pattern:<br />

The net geographical area <strong>of</strong> cluster watershed is about 6739.30 ha out <strong>of</strong> which 0.23% is forest area, which is about 15.90 ha. About<br />

6739.30 ha or 89 % <strong>of</strong> land is under agriculture out <strong>of</strong> which 5391.44 ha is rain fed, mainly a Kharif crop is taken. About 8.74 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

land is cultivable wasteland and 1.6 percent is non cultivable wasteland. The wasteland consists <strong>of</strong> ubiquitous babul and shrubs.<br />

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:<br />

S. No.<br />

Names <strong>of</strong><br />

villages<br />

Geographical<br />

Area <strong>of</strong> the village<br />

(ha)<br />

Forest Area<br />

(ha)<br />

Land under<br />

agricultural use<br />

Rainfed<br />

area<br />

(ha)<br />

Permanent<br />

Pastures<br />

Wasteland<br />

Cultivable Non-cultivable<br />

1 Kharachiya(Jam) 1036.40 0 869.30 829.12 21 128.30 17.80<br />

2 Panchavda 2090.10 0 1864.90 1672.08 65 90.50 69.70<br />

3 Jangavad 1988.20 0 1923.90 1590.56 27 33.90 3.40<br />

4 Jasapar 1624.60 15.90 1370.50 1299.68 46 177.40 14.80<br />

5 Total 6739.30 15.90 6028.60 5391.44 159 430.10 105.70<br />

3.1.2 Soil and topography<br />

Nearly 84 % <strong>of</strong> the geographical are is comprised <strong>of</strong> shallow to medium deep black cotton soils having depth upto 0.6-0.75 mt top soil.<br />

Rest 16 % is either sandy loam or moorum soil. The soil is slightly reddish to very brown in surface colour. By large soils are well<br />

drained with moderate water holding capacity. From sustainable development perspectives, what is alarming the steady decline in the<br />

soil quality due to sheet erosion. There has a considerable reduction in the application <strong>of</strong> farm yard manure resulting in reduced in moisture<br />

retention capacity and porosity in the soils. Generally the organic carbon content too is very low. Lack <strong>of</strong> water conservation measures at<br />

the field and at the community level has led to the acceleration <strong>of</strong> environmental degradation. The increasing dependency on external input<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 26


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

has increased the vulnerability <strong>of</strong> agriculture such that even small stresses and fluctuations in the environment lead to instability and<br />

threatens farming livelihoods. The topography <strong>of</strong> the area is moderate ranging from 0-10 % slope.<br />

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography<br />

S. No. Name <strong>of</strong> the Agro-climatic Area in ha Name <strong>of</strong> village Major soil types Topography<br />

a)Type b] Area in ha<br />

North Saurashtra<br />

1036.40 Kharachiya (Jam) Black cotton and<br />

1<br />

red murrom<br />

2 2090.10 Panchavda Black cotton, red<br />

murrom and sandy<br />

clayloam<br />

3 1988.20 Jangavad Black cotton and<br />

red murrom,<br />

997.60 Flat to moderate<br />

slope<br />

1929.90 Flat to moderate<br />

slope<br />

1890 Flat to moderate<br />

slope<br />

4<br />

1624.60 Jasapar Black cotton and<br />

sandy loam, sandy<br />

clay loam<br />

1547.90 Flat to moderate<br />

slope<br />

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition<br />

SI no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) Nil Once in 3 Years<br />

2 Panchavda Once in 2 years Once in 4 Years<br />

3 Jangavad Once in 3 years Once in 3 Years<br />

4 Jasapar Once in 1 years Once in 4 Years<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 27


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 11: Soil Erosion<br />

Cause Type <strong>of</strong> erosion Area affected (ha) Run <strong>of</strong>f (mm/ year] Average soil loss (Tonnes/<br />

ha/ year)<br />

Water erosion<br />

A Sheet 3697.87 1848.94<br />

B Rill 1680.85 475 588.29<br />

C Gully 1344.68 201.70<br />

D Ravenous - -<br />

Sub-Total 6723.40 2638.94<br />

Wind erosion - -<br />

Total 13446.80 5277.87<br />

Table no. 11.1: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the Village Survey Number Soil pH<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> Salinity<br />

(Inherent/Ingress)<br />

Kharachiya (Jam) Around 1.5 % <strong>of</strong> land 7.5 Ingress<br />

Panchavda Around 1 % <strong>of</strong> land 7.5 Ingress<br />

Jangavad Around 1 % <strong>of</strong> land 7.6 Ingress<br />

Jasapar Around 2 % <strong>of</strong> land 7.4 Ingress<br />

Table: 12. Climatic Conditions (Last six years annual rainfall, maximum and minimum temperature <strong>of</strong> Jasdan taluka )<br />

SI. No. Year Rainfall (in mm)<br />

Temperature (°C)<br />

Max.<br />

Min.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

403<br />

624<br />

44.<br />

43<br />

8<br />

7<br />

3<br />

4<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

896<br />

900<br />

45<br />

44<br />

6.5<br />

7.5<br />

5 2008 698 43 7.5<br />

6 2009 354 46 6<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 28


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

The project area is completely dependent on rainfall. The rainfall is scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon <strong>of</strong> drought two to<br />

three years. The average rainfall <strong>of</strong> this area is about 750 mm. The area faces continual crop failure that comes on whenever there is a<br />

shortfall in the total quantum <strong>of</strong> rain. However, even more serious are the gaps in rain even in years when the total rainfall is considered<br />

normal. These gaps at crucial periods in the crop growth cycle can prove fatal for the crop. However, through careful water harvesting, insitu<br />

moisture conservation and a drought-pro<strong>of</strong>ing strategy <strong>of</strong> dryland agriculture, these gaps can easily be plugged and the crops saved.<br />

3.1.3 Slope<br />

The slope <strong>of</strong> the watershed was calculated based on topographic elevation (contours and spot height) from satellite maps and provided by<br />

BISAG, Gandhinagar. These maps will help in recommendation/implementation <strong>of</strong> suitable land management practices in association <strong>of</strong><br />

other thematic information.<br />

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief<br />

Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams<br />

Kharachiya (Jam) 0-15 meters 0-10% Dudhalo,Baval wali, Baldoki wokla,<br />

Padardi,Khari and Dadwa wali,Virnagari<br />

Panchavda 0-10 meters 0-12% Bhadar, Geldi, Hadio, Budhan pari,<br />

Dudhalo, Kharachiya wokla,Bhad<br />

Jangavad 0-12 meters 0-15% Wanki wokli, Sidhpari, Bhadar, Kanpari<br />

Melan, Dhar wali, Bhad<br />

Jasapar 0-10 meters 0-10% Dudalo, Bhadar, Motu talab, Khari, Dhar<br />

Karanuki ,Kharo, Dadwa road, Malwa<br />

and Nihalio<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 29


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

3.2 Land and Agriculture<br />

The average land holding is about 6.9 ha. The total net sown area is 5224.24 ha where in more than 223.24 ha, 2 times farming is done in<br />

the watershed villages. The main crops under agriculture are cotton, groundnut, wheat, cumin, maize and fodder grass. Some <strong>of</strong> the farmers<br />

take up rainfed castor if the rains are good. Now a days farmers has started growing vegetables on small patches <strong>of</strong> lands in Jangvad<br />

(Rabi) season for which water is fetched either from thecheckdams..<br />

The land conservation measures such as earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will help them to take up a rabi crop <strong>of</strong> gram or cumin in<br />

the residual moisture. Since last 3-4 yrs Bt. cotton farming taking place at a higher rate.<br />

Table no. 14: Land ownership details<br />

Sl<br />

Total owned land<br />

HHs giving HHs taking<br />

Village<br />

no<br />

Gen OBC SC ST land on lease land on lease<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) 290 7 3 0 0 0<br />

2 Panchavda 288 20 10 0 0 0<br />

3 Jangavad 314 52 2 0 0 0<br />

4 Jasapar 270 26 6 0 0 0<br />

Total 1162 105 21 0 0 0<br />

Table no. 15: Agriculture<br />

Sl no Village Net sown area (ha)<br />

One time Two times Three times<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) 829.08 36.04 7.84<br />

2 Panchavda 1603.34 69.96 19.60<br />

3 Jangavad 1516.36 74.20 15.35<br />

4 Jasapar 1275.76 43.04 13.80<br />

Total 5224.54 223.24 56.59<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 30


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

3.2.1 Irrigation<br />

The irrigated area is 538 ha, which is 17 % <strong>of</strong> the total agricultural area <strong>of</strong> the village. Main source <strong>of</strong> irrigation is from previously<br />

constructed pond, check dams ponds or wells/tubes. A few farmers <strong>of</strong> Panchvada get irrigation to their field by check dams and from<br />

earthen dams which were previously constructed by different departments. Some farmers <strong>of</strong> Panchavda and Jasapar get water for irrigation<br />

from the main dugout pond cum earthen dam, which is situated on the north side <strong>of</strong> the village.<br />

Table no. 16: Irrigation<br />

SI Village<br />

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Pond/Earthen dam Source 3 : Check dam<br />

no<br />

Availability Net area Gross area Availability Net area Gross area Availability Net area Gross area<br />

months<br />

months (Ha) (Ha) months (Ha) (Ha)<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) - - - 5 160 185 3 84 97<br />

2 Panchavda - - - 6 168 190 4 230 250<br />

3 Jangavad - - - 5.5 75 90 3 125 140<br />

4 Jasapar - - - 6 135 150 4 120 135<br />

3 Total - - - 538 615 559 622<br />

Crop details and Productivity: The productivity is low not because that the land is unproductive or the farmer's lack the skills to<br />

managing their crop but it is due lack <strong>of</strong> source <strong>of</strong> irrigation, salty water and scarcity <strong>of</strong> rain.<br />

The cluster villages come under draught prone zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall they<br />

generally grow high value crops as discussed above. In case <strong>of</strong> low rainfall they go for cotton, castor, pearl millet. So we can say that monsoon<br />

decides cropping patterns <strong>of</strong> the project villages.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 31


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 17: Crop details<br />

Sl<br />

no<br />

Village<br />

Kharif (Monsoon)<br />

Crop 1 Cotton Kg/Ha Crop 2 Groundnut Crop 3 Fodder Kg/Ha<br />

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity<br />

1<br />

Kharachiya<br />

(Jam)<br />

521.08 776335 1489.91 288 323536 1123.39 20 18580 929.01<br />

2 Panchavda 892.32 1274130 1427.88 668.30 738965 1105.73 42.72 39750 930.47<br />

3 Jangavad 902.68 1264675 1401.02 599.84 766970 1278.62 13.84 12880 930.63<br />

4 Jasapar 748.32 1008430 1347.59 496.80 621100 1250.20 30.64 28500 930.15<br />

Sl<br />

no<br />

Village<br />

Rabi (Winter)<br />

Crop 1 Wheat Crop 2 Jiru Q/Ha Crop 3 Chana<br />

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity<br />

1<br />

Kharachiya<br />

(Jam)<br />

18.99 41880 2205.37 7.85 7850 1000 9.20 11310 1229.34<br />

2 Panchavda 47.20 104310 2209.95 22.06 22355 982.20 0.70 860 1228.57<br />

3 Jangavad 44.30 97550 2202.03 28.30 27735 980.03 1.60 2500 1562.50<br />

4 Jasapar 34.06 60465 1775.24 7.68 14510 1889.32 1.30 1850 1423.07<br />

Reasons <strong>of</strong> Low productivity <strong>of</strong> various crops<br />

Over a period <strong>of</strong> time by continuous usage <strong>of</strong> fertilizers, pesticides and insecticides, there is deterioration in the quality <strong>of</strong> soil<br />

particularly reduction <strong>of</strong> carbon content and increase <strong>of</strong> salinity. One <strong>of</strong> the reasons ascribed to low response <strong>of</strong> bio-fertilizers in dry<br />

lands is their low status <strong>of</strong> soil organic matter. Rejuvenation <strong>of</strong> soil characteristics is an important area to tackle, with specific emphasis<br />

on recovery <strong>of</strong> its nutritional value. More thrust need to be given on adopting methods such as multi-cropping, rotation <strong>of</strong> crops and<br />

organic farming. Organic farming, nutrient management continues to be a focal issue in dry lands as the fertilizer use is not likely to<br />

pick up significantly unless water supply is assured. Soil fertility in dry lands can be sustained only through maintenance <strong>of</strong> organic<br />

matter and achieving better fertilizer-use efficiency through integration <strong>of</strong> moisture-conservation practices along with soil-fertility<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 32


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

management.<br />

Quality <strong>of</strong> Seeds: Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use <strong>of</strong> good quality leads to<br />

higher land productivity. In project villages, however, there are two limitations in the use <strong>of</strong> fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most<br />

useful in irrigated condition. The agricultural land <strong>of</strong> the cluster villages however totally depend on rainfall. In villages mostly farmers<br />

use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea. This has resulted in disproportionate use <strong>of</strong> fertilizer depleting the quality <strong>of</strong> land.<br />

Traditional farming methods: This is the factor that leads low productivity. There is lot <strong>of</strong> ignorance about the use <strong>of</strong> new farming<br />

methods and technologies such as multiple cropping.<br />

Erratic/Low rainfall: The Villagers mainly depend on monsoon. Without monsoon they cannot get any crop because irrigation water is salty<br />

<br />

.Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence <strong>of</strong> proper irrigation facility, 100% <strong>of</strong> the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain<br />

monsoon. Therefore the success or failure <strong>of</strong> the monsoon determines the success or failure <strong>of</strong> agriculture production. The rains, as a<br />

source <strong>of</strong> irrigation, are unreliable due to two factors;<br />

Untimely Rainfall: The rains are sometimes received when the crops are ready for harvesting. The ready crop may be ruined due to<br />

untimely rain.<br />

Inadequate Rainfall: The dependence on the uncertain rainfall is a factor that contributes to low productivity <strong>of</strong> land.<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> Credit: Farmers face so many problems for rural credit and it leads to low agricultural productivity. Farmers need credit<br />

mainly for the purchase <strong>of</strong> various inputs such as seed, fertilizers, and pesticides and for repair <strong>of</strong> implements. They use long term<br />

credit for buying land, and for investment to improve the quality <strong>of</strong> land, buying the new implements and improving irrigation facilities.<br />

3.3 Livestock<br />

The cluster villages have total <strong>of</strong> 1162 cows and 1372 number <strong>of</strong> buffaloes out <strong>of</strong> which majority are <strong>of</strong> local breed, there are 1645<br />

bullock, 375 goats 459 sheep and 1160 animals in others category. Due saline water at a shallow depth and surface water has reduced<br />

the fodder and pasture area for their animals. This leads to heavy migration to other parts <strong>of</strong> the state with their herds <strong>of</strong> goats and sheep.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 33


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 18: Livestock<br />

SI Village Buffalo Cow Total Milk Goat<br />

no<br />

(Buffalo+Cow<br />

Sheep Bullock Hen Others<br />

No Milk No Milk No Milk<br />

1 Kharachiya 276 12705 267 10395 23100 82 40 65 328 - 281<br />

2 Panchavda 411 25863 267 10745 36608 96 45 81 503 12 260<br />

3 Jangavad 355 23536 241 9650 33186 93 43 174 410 8 262<br />

4 Jasapar 330 24789 407 13402 38191 104 49 139 404 5 357<br />

Total 1372 86963 1162 44192 131085 375 177 459 1645 25 1160<br />

Table no. 19: Drinking water<br />

SI no Village Ground water table (mt) Source <strong>of</strong> drinking water Availability in months Quality<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) 13.00mt. SSNL Pipe connection 12 (once in 3 Days) Good<br />

2 Panchavda 12.50 mt SSNL Pipe connection 12 (once in 3 Days) Good<br />

3 Jangavad 13.50 mt SSNL Pipe connection 12 (once in 3 Days) Good<br />

4 Jasapar 12.00 mt SSNL Pipe connection 12 (once in 3 Days) Good<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 34


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 20: Details <strong>of</strong> Common Property Resources<br />

Total Area (ha)<br />

Names<br />

Area owned/ In possession <strong>of</strong><br />

S.<br />

CPR<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

Govt.<br />

Any other<br />

No.<br />

Particulars<br />

project<br />

Pvt. persons (specify PRI (Pl.<br />

1<br />

<strong>IWMP</strong>-<br />

III<br />

Pvt.<br />

persons<br />

Area available for treatment (ha)<br />

Govt.<br />

(specify<br />

deptt.)<br />

deptt.)<br />

Specify)<br />

Wasteland/ degraded land 430.1 105.7 125 30<br />

Pastures 159 19<br />

Orchards 4 45 1 5<br />

Forest 15.90 4.5<br />

Village Ponds 2 19<br />

Check dams 95<br />

Canal -<br />

Community Buildings 6 4<br />

Weekly Markets<br />

Permanent markets -<br />

Temples/ Places <strong>of</strong><br />

worship<br />

3.5 Socio-Economic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

22<br />

PRI<br />

Any other<br />

(Pl.<br />

Specify)<br />

3.5.1 Demographic Status: Cluster villages have total family <strong>of</strong> 1967 numbers. There are 10885 persons in the project villages (From the<br />

door to door survey report), out <strong>of</strong> which 5594 male and 5271 female members. The sex ratio is 942 females to 1000 males. The average<br />

family size is 5.6 percent. Four major caste systems prevail in the village namely: Patel, Darbar, Rabari and Harijans. Around 9.5 % <strong>of</strong> the<br />

population <strong>of</strong> the cluster villges belong to SC families. Majority <strong>of</strong> population is involved in agriculture and animal husbandry.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 35


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 21: Demographic information<br />

SI no Village Population SC ST<br />

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %<br />

1 Kharachiya 2199 1146 1053 134 69 65 6 0 - - -<br />

2 Panchavda 2689 1361 1328 303 157 146 11 0 - - -<br />

3 Jangavad 3378 1752 1626 174 89 85 5 0<br />

4 Jasapar 2619 1335 1264 426 224 202 8 0 - - -<br />

5 Total 10885 5594 5271 1037 539 498 7 0 - - -<br />

Table no. 22: Literacy rate<br />

SI no Village<br />

Literacy<br />

Literacy % above Literacy %<br />

Total % Male % Female % age 14<br />

below age 14<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) 1568 71.31 871 39 697 31 55 16<br />

2 Panchavda 1932 71 1076 40 856 32 54.48 17.37<br />

3 Jangavad 2340 69.27 1316 38 1024 30 53.08 16.19<br />

4 Jasapar 1898 72.47 1044 39 854 33 53.07 19.40<br />

5 Total 7738 71 4307 39 3431 31.5 54 17<br />

3.5.2 Migration Pattern: The declining yield and product, steady erosion <strong>of</strong> soil fertility and diminishing returns to the farmers and<br />

almost zero investment on land development has set in motion a dynamic problem <strong>of</strong> degradation. Many small and marginal seek<br />

alternate livelihood means and work as wage labour in nearby areas. Low rainfall results in very little fodder availability in the locality.<br />

On account <strong>of</strong> agriculture and animal husbandry providing only part time employment for some part <strong>of</strong> the year, the people migrate for<br />

a better half <strong>of</strong> the year for wage labour. Migrate to nearby cities like Morbi, Maliya miyana and parts <strong>of</strong> Suarashtra as daily wages<br />

agricultural labours and factory workers. Lack <strong>of</strong> fodder availability and grazing land for smaller ruminant also forces these farmers to<br />

migrate to other places.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 36


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 23: Migration details<br />

SI no Village Total Migration<br />

Migration by months<br />

population Total Male Female Up to 3 3-6 months More than 6<br />

months<br />

months<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) 2199 128 94 34 - 128 -<br />

2 Panchavda 2689 162 112 50 - 162 -<br />

3 Jangavad 3378 214 154 60 - 214 -<br />

4 Jasapar 2619 156 98 58 - 156 -<br />

Total 10885 660 458 202 - 660 -<br />

Main reason<br />

for migration<br />

Discussed<br />

above<br />

Income during<br />

migration /<br />

month<br />

Rs 4500 /month<br />

Table no. 24: Poverty<br />

SI no Village Total Household<br />

BPL<br />

%<strong>of</strong> BPLHH Total Land less HH % <strong>of</strong> land less HH<br />

0-16 16-20 Total<br />

1 Kharachiya 404 14 107 121 29 104 25<br />

2 Panchavda 472 43 68 111 23 154 32<br />

3 Jangavad 599 11 92 103 17 231 38<br />

4 Jasapar 492 21 123 144 29 190 38<br />

Total 1967 89 390 479 24 679 33<br />

3.5.3 Infrastructure facilities<br />

All watershed villages are well connected with Jasdan taluka with pucca roads. Each village has electricity connectivity under Jyotigram<br />

Yojana <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong> Government. Nearly 90 per cent <strong>of</strong> households in the villages have their personal electric meters. The villages have<br />

primary school with all facilities like two personal computers. For middle and higher secondary education, the students have to go to<br />

Jasapar and Atkot village which is about 5 kilometres away from Kharachiya, Jangvad and Panchavda. The villagers depend upon Atkot<br />

primary health centre for health problems. Each village comes under their individual Gram Panchayat with Panchayat <strong>of</strong>fice at their own<br />

village.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 37


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure<br />

SI Village Pucca Schools<br />

Colleges Post Office Banks<br />

no<br />

road to LP UP HS (Number) (Distance) (Number) Distance Milk Milk Other Any other<br />

from collection cooperative cooperatives institution<br />

the<br />

nearest centre (Number) /CBIs<br />

village<br />

(Y/N)<br />

market<br />

yard<br />

(Number)<br />

(Number)<br />

1 Kharachiya Y Y N N N 0.5KM 5 KM 13 km 1 1 0 N<br />

2 Panchavda Y Y Y N N 0.25 KM 5 KM 13 km 2 2 1 N<br />

3 Jangavad Y Y Y N N 0.25 KM 4 KM 12 km 3 1 1 N<br />

4 Jasapar Y Y Y Y N 0.25 KM 4 KM 18 km 2 1 1 Y<br />

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets<br />

SI<br />

no<br />

Village<br />

HHs with<br />

electricity<br />

HHs with<br />

safety<br />

latrines<br />

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle<br />

Landline Mobile 2 -wheeler 4- wheeler<br />

HHs with<br />

TV set<br />

HHs with HHs with<br />

cooking gas Drinking<br />

water<br />

1 Kharachiya 394 67 18 494 274 9 259 76 375 180<br />

2 Panchavda 472 53 32 442 259 17 260 98 469 170<br />

3 Jangavad 564 136 51 701 368 17 351 86 438 242<br />

4 Jasapar 473 152 32 499 274 9 259 67 319 198<br />

Total 1903 408 133 2136 1175 43 1129 327 1601 790<br />

HHs with<br />

freedge<br />

3.5.4 Livelihood pattern: The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture, and during lean seasons they go as<br />

daily wage labourers in thresher industries, diamond polishing and in handicraft unit at Jasdan taluka. Another major occupation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

people is business and service and working in ginning & oil mills and diamond polishing industries.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 38


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 27: Per capita Income<br />

SI no Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others(Services Total<br />

& Business)<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) 39703161 463800 2150000 3285450 45602411<br />

2 Panchavda 55713917 1411180 2814500 3109500 63049097<br />

3 Jangavad 53849232 676230 5150200 2053800 61729462<br />

4 Jasapar 16507103 2112000 2713000 2273000 23605103<br />

Total 165773413 4663210 12827700 10721750 193986073<br />

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR<br />

Benefit type<br />

Benefit type 1 Benefit type 2<br />

Sl no Village<br />

2<br />

% sells Income % sells Income % sells Income<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) NA<br />

2 Panchavda NA<br />

3 Jangavad NA<br />

4 Jasapar NA<br />

Total<br />

income<br />

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)<br />

Animal<br />

Sl<br />

Total<br />

Village<br />

Agriculture husbandry<br />

no<br />

workforce<br />

(AH)<br />

Kharachiya<br />

1<br />

(Jam)<br />

Agriculture<br />

+ AH<br />

Agriculture/<br />

Casual<br />

labour<br />

Services<br />

Handicraft/<br />

Business<br />

404 267 10 34 28 4 28 33<br />

2 Panchavda 472 280 13 38 5 7 40 89<br />

3 Jangavad 599 337 3 33 21 11 91 103<br />

4 Jasapar 492 271 12 31 31 5 48 94<br />

Total 1967 1155 38 136 85 27 207 319<br />

Others<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 39


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

CHAPTER - 4<br />

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 40


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Watershed Activities<br />

Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government <strong>of</strong> India especially in the rainfed regions <strong>of</strong> semi-arid<br />

tropics. These regions are characterized by low and undepependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, comparatively<br />

low literacy and medium incidence <strong>of</strong> migration. The inheritant low fertility <strong>of</strong> crops results in lower productivity <strong>of</strong> crops which have a very<br />

low biological efficiency.<br />

Several studies have identified that there is a dire need <strong>of</strong> a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The<br />

common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.<br />

4.1. Scientific Planning:<br />

i) Cluster Approach<br />

This envisages a broader vision <strong>of</strong> Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster <strong>of</strong> micro-watershed. The project consists <strong>of</strong><br />

thirteen micro-watersheds namely 5G1B9c1e, 5G1B9c1d, 5G1B9c1f, 5G1B9c2a, 5G1B9d3a, 5G1B9d2b, 5G1B9d3c, 5G1B9d3b,<br />

5G1B9d3d, 5G1B9d3e, 5G1B9c1g, 5G1B9c1b, 5G1B9c1c as their respective codes.<br />

ii) Base line Survey<br />

a) Door to Door Survey<br />

The primary data was generated through questionnaire surveys in all the villages. The questionnaire was structured so as to derive the<br />

information related to the objectives set forth. Mostly talked to<br />

• Head <strong>of</strong> the families<br />

• Mostly females (between 65% and 70%)<br />

• Mostly younger adults (Age group : 25 – 44)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 41


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

• High School education<br />

• Sarpanch and Talati <strong>of</strong> respective Gram Panchayats.<br />

• Farmers, Agricultural labours, Diamond polishing workers, handicraft unit workers,electric drum making units and workers <strong>of</strong><br />

thresher units.<br />

• Cattle Breeders<br />

• Landless labour<br />

The questionnaire was divided into nine modules through which information is extracted pertaining to<br />

1. Village details<br />

2. Population details<br />

3. Water supply details<br />

4. Water source details<br />

5. Questions about community engagement<br />

6. Questions about Livelihood<br />

7. Awareness about Specific programme: Watershed<br />

8. Desire to do more activities related to occupation<br />

9. Productivity <strong>of</strong> farms<br />

The secondary data was obtained through Census reports (2001). Data pertaining to social pr<strong>of</strong>ile is also collected through Census reports.<br />

Secondary data related to different kinds <strong>of</strong> capital assets were collected from different departments <strong>of</strong> Government agencies such as<br />

Revenue Office, Primary Health Center, District <strong>Rural</strong> development Agency initiative-SGSY Programme <strong>of</strong>fice, working on poverty<br />

alleviation, Village Panchyat, other NGOs and development societies etc.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 42


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

b) Field to field Survey: Field to field survey was also carried out in the farms, community land, pasture land and land under Gram<br />

Panchayat. It also includes the soil pr<strong>of</strong>iles, no <strong>of</strong> wells in the area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> irrigation in the field. The details <strong>of</strong> agriculture as well as pasture lands <strong>of</strong> the village where the existing condition and structures<br />

to be proposed, were written down. Almost all the farmers <strong>of</strong> the village were there to support the survey team. The purpose <strong>of</strong> the survey<br />

was also to understand water availability, patterns <strong>of</strong> water use and peoples’ understanding & perceptions about both surface and<br />

groundwater resources in this area. Village agreements will be done on the basis <strong>of</strong> such detailed work. This also survey looked at the<br />

pattern <strong>of</strong> surface and groundwater use and the basic understanding <strong>of</strong> farmers regarding groundwater recharge and discharge. This<br />

understanding was expected to help in improved planning for any watershed programme and to develop longer-term protocols <strong>of</strong><br />

groundwater management in respective areas.<br />

c) Demand survey: To know about the livelihood pattern <strong>of</strong> the village and the present status and practice capacities required are<br />

discussed. Quantitative involved also on possible micro enterprise development for sustainable development <strong>of</strong> village extensively for<br />

SC/ST and landless/migrated poor people.<br />

iii) Participatory <strong>Rural</strong> Appraisal (PRA)<br />

In order to understand the social, economic and political aspect <strong>of</strong> all the villages <strong>of</strong> the cluster, we conducted Participatory <strong>Rural</strong><br />

Appraisal (PRA) exercise with the help <strong>of</strong> the villagers on 11 th February 2010 in Panchavda, 18 th August in Kharachiya, 23 rd in both<br />

Jasapar and Jangvad . It was really a useful tool to appreciate the village in its totality. We had the opportunity to interact with more than<br />

600 numbers <strong>of</strong> people in Panchavda village. To reach a concrete conclusion we requested a few villagers for focussed discussion and it<br />

was entertained. As per their convenience we conducted focussed group discussion at the Community hall and Panchayat Bhavan ground.<br />

In majority <strong>of</strong> the discussion, we listened to them carefully and tried to appreciate the discussion. Output generated through these exercise<br />

is placed below.<br />

(i) Resource Map: - Through resource map we came to know about all the residential pattern <strong>of</strong> village, community pasture land, farm<br />

areas, about the river etc. It also gave us a fair idea about the pasture land, other land distribution pattern and different resources <strong>of</strong> the<br />

village.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 43


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

(ii) Social Map: - After this exercise we came to know the approximate location <strong>of</strong> different institution <strong>of</strong> the village. During this<br />

exercise we also had informal discussions with the participants about the importance <strong>of</strong> these institutions. Important location pointed out<br />

during this exercise was Community Centre, Panchayat Bhavan, temple, Primary School etc. We cross checked all the location.<br />

(iii) Seasonal Diagram:- With this exercise we came to know about the major engagements <strong>of</strong> villagers across the twelve months <strong>of</strong><br />

the year. We found that rainfed agriculture and animal husbandry keep them busy at least for seven to eight months <strong>of</strong> the year. About<br />

drinking water they informed that, situation in the month <strong>of</strong> March to June is really difficult as they get water once in three days.<br />

(iv) Tree matrix:- We came to know about different trees <strong>of</strong> the villages and their respective utilities as fruit, fuel, fodder, medicine ,<br />

timber etc. Major trees pointed out by villagers under this exercise were Pipal, Neem, Bor, Lemon, Banyan and Pipara etc. Taking into<br />

consideration all the utilities it was found that the tree having maximum utility is Chiku and lemon.<br />

(v) Crop Pattern:- Agriculture is the primary source <strong>of</strong> liveihood for more than 70% household . After this exercise we came to know<br />

that there are two major cropping pattern Kharif and partially in Rabbi. Under Kharif cotton,ground nut and fodder crops and in rabi, major<br />

crops grown are wheat, cumin, gram and vegetables.<br />

(vi) Income-Expenditure Pot: - Under this exercise we came to know about the different sources <strong>of</strong> income <strong>of</strong> villagers and how the<br />

money earned by the villagers is being spent under different heads. It was found that major source <strong>of</strong> earning among villagers are farming,<br />

dairy, service etc. Major expenditure component were food, fuel, fodder, schooling <strong>of</strong> children, medicines, festivals, relatives, and paan etc.<br />

One focussed group discussion was organised to understand the status <strong>of</strong> different Self help Group operating in the village. This<br />

discussion concentrated around the activities <strong>of</strong> SHG, terms and conditions <strong>of</strong> membership, working pattern <strong>of</strong> different SHG and their role<br />

in the development <strong>of</strong> society etc<br />

Another curiosity in our mind was about the political institution <strong>of</strong> the village. Apart from different institution discussion was<br />

concentrated about gram panchayat issue. Here the major discussion point was participation <strong>of</strong> women and deprived section <strong>of</strong> the society<br />

in the decision making process, their representation in the panchayat. How the panchayat facilitates the process <strong>of</strong> development and<br />

poverty alleviation. In this process its relation with different institution <strong>of</strong> village like dispensary, Aanganwari Kendra, Primary School and<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 44


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

High school was also discussed.<br />

The whole purpose was to identify the employment opportunities available during the different seasons in a year, income, expenditure,<br />

crisis management, daily activities and time allotted to each activity, the leisure time <strong>of</strong> men and women, and market network for<br />

agricultural produce etc. In the gender analysis, an attempt was made to find out the gendered division <strong>of</strong> labour, the status <strong>of</strong> women in<br />

relation to the right to use, to own and sell different household properties, the means <strong>of</strong> production <strong>of</strong> the household, and the role and<br />

participation <strong>of</strong> women in decision-making at intra household and community levels.<br />

To identify different problems faced by villagers a separate focussed discussion was carried out. The villagers were grouped in to different<br />

types as shown below to know all the details <strong>of</strong> the village in a stipulated time.<br />

• Small and marginal farmers<br />

• Large farmers<br />

• Landless farmers<br />

• Women<br />

• Gram Panchayat members<br />

• Cattle grazing population<br />

• Business man and women<br />

Problems Identification<br />

After analysis the information collected during PRA exercise, the main problems identified as<br />

• Poor fertility <strong>of</strong> soil and low agricultural productivity<br />

• Soil Erosion from farm land<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 45


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

• Improper Crop Rotation<br />

• Less use <strong>of</strong> bio-fertilizers<br />

• Almost negligible cultivation <strong>of</strong> arid fruits<br />

• Less cultivation <strong>of</strong> vegetables<br />

• Low milk production and rearing <strong>of</strong> non descript breeds<br />

• No use <strong>of</strong> vermi compost<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong> value addition practices<br />

• Drinking Water<br />

• Less availability <strong>of</strong> fodder<br />

• Market (No nearby)<br />

• Migration<br />

• Sanitation Problems<br />

• Less Nutritional Level<br />

• Malnutrition in few farm families<br />

iv) Use <strong>of</strong> GIS and Remote sensing for planning<br />

Remote sensing and GIS plays an important role in the study <strong>of</strong> natural resources and helps in planning water resources development. One<br />

<strong>of</strong> the greatest advantages <strong>of</strong> using remote sensing data for hydrological investigations and monitoring is its ability to generate information<br />

in spatial and temporal domain, which is very crucial for successful analysis, prediction and validation Use <strong>of</strong> various high science tools has<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 46


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

been promoted at various stages <strong>of</strong> watershed development.<br />

a) Prioritization<br />

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geomorphological,<br />

Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation and slope percent. These were all<br />

given proper weightage according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization <strong>of</strong> various watershed areas.<br />

b) Planning<br />

A action plan matrix has been formulated by <strong>State</strong> Level Nodal Agency(SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent,<br />

soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land.<br />

Global positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This will<br />

be used to create a map. Contour Map <strong>of</strong> vertical interval <strong>of</strong> 1 meter at a scale <strong>of</strong> 1:8000 was used for identifying various location specific for<br />

soil and water conservation structures.<br />

c) Hydrological modelling<br />

Hydrology modelling technique has been used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, and flow accumulation. This<br />

model overlaid over cadastral map hel to calculate the catchment area <strong>of</strong> each structures like the check dam with the help <strong>of</strong> contour map<br />

provided by BISAG and physical survey on site. This has helped to remove the human error which generally occurring while calculating the<br />

catchment area <strong>of</strong> a check dam.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 47


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 30: Details <strong>of</strong> Scientific Planning and Inputs in <strong>IWMP</strong> projects<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Scientific criteria/ inputs used<br />

Whether scientific criteria was<br />

used<br />

(A) Planning<br />

Cluster approach<br />

Yes<br />

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name <strong>of</strong><br />

the Institute<br />

Yes<br />

Baseline survey<br />

Yes<br />

Hydro-geological survey<br />

Yes<br />

Contour mapping<br />

Yes<br />

Participatory Net Planning (PNP)<br />

Yes<br />

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-<strong>of</strong>f cover<br />

Yes<br />

Ridge to Valley treatment<br />

Yes<br />

Online IT connectivity between<br />

Yes<br />

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes<br />

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes<br />

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes<br />

Availability <strong>of</strong> GIS layers<br />

Yes<br />

1. Cadastral map Yes<br />

2. Village boundaries Yes<br />

3. Drainage Yes<br />

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes<br />

5. Land use Yes<br />

6. Ground water status Yes<br />

7. Watershed boundaries Yes<br />

8. Activity Yes<br />

Crop simulation models #<br />

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high<br />

speed soil nutrient analysis<br />

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)#<br />

Weather Station<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 48


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Yes<br />

(B) Inputs<br />

Yes<br />

1. Bio-pesticides Yes<br />

2. Organic manures Yes<br />

3. Vermicompost Yes<br />

4. Bio-fertilizer Yes<br />

5. Water saving devices Yes<br />

6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes<br />

7. Bio-fencing Yes<br />

8. Nutrient budgeting<br />

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers<br />

4.2. Institution Building<br />

i)Watershed Committee (WC)<br />

This is the general body <strong>of</strong> the residents constituted by Gram sabha <strong>of</strong> the watershed as well as farmers who own land within the watershed<br />

area registered under society Registration Act 1860. The first gram sabha meeting was held on 4 th February 2010 in Kharachiya Jam, 11 th<br />

Jan in Panchvda, 15 th February in Jangvad and 14 th April 2010 in Jasapar, where the watershed committee was formed taking in to account<br />

all caste, women representation and Gram panchayat members .Both President and Secretary <strong>of</strong> WC were selected after the first Watershed<br />

Committee meeting was held. The secretary will be a paid functionary <strong>of</strong> the watershed committee.The Watershed Committee with the<br />

help <strong>of</strong> the Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Team (WDT) shall facilitate resource-use agreements among the user groups based on the principle <strong>of</strong><br />

equity and sustainability. Capacity building training to the watershed committee will be provided by WDT member. The watershed committee<br />

has a pivotal during various processes like the PRA and overall planning <strong>of</strong> various points.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 49


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 31.1: Watershed Committee details (Kharachiya Jam )<br />

Sl<br />

.<br />

N<br />

o.<br />

1<br />

Names <strong>of</strong><br />

WC<br />

Watershed<br />

committee<br />

Kharachiya<br />

Jam<br />

Date <strong>of</strong><br />

Registra<br />

tion as<br />

a<br />

Society<br />

(dd/mm/<br />

yyyy)<br />

Under<br />

progress<br />

Name<br />

Designat<br />

ion<br />

M/<br />

F<br />

S<br />

C<br />

ST<br />

SF<br />

M<br />

F<br />

L<br />

F<br />

Land<br />

-less<br />

U<br />

G<br />

SH<br />

G<br />

G<br />

P<br />

Educational<br />

qualifi<br />

-cation<br />

Function/<br />

s<br />

assigned#<br />

Devshibhai G.Chovatiya President M Y Y 7 D<br />

Rajeshbhai M.<br />

Chovatiya<br />

Secretary M Y Y 12 C<br />

Paremjibhai Mavajibhai<br />

Dhameliya<br />

Member M Y Y 11 A<br />

Jaysukha A.Chovatiya Member M Y Y 7 B<br />

Nirmalaben G. Rrivedi Member F Y Y 11 I<br />

Bhavanaben K.<br />

Chovatiya<br />

Member F Y Y 5 I-G<br />

Manjulaben B.Jadav Member F Y Y Y 0 I<br />

Parmaben B. Ratdiya Member F Y Y 1 F-B-E<br />

Bachubahi G. Chovatiya Member M Y Y 7 B-H<br />

Vallbhbhai L.<br />

Chovatiya<br />

Member M Y Y 5 E-G<br />

Sureshbhai A. Karpada Member M Y Y B.com B<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 50


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 31.2: Watershed Committee details (Panchvada)<br />

Sl<br />

.<br />

N<br />

o.<br />

1<br />

Names <strong>of</strong><br />

WC<br />

Watershed<br />

committee,<br />

Panchvada<br />

Date <strong>of</strong><br />

Registra<br />

tion as<br />

a<br />

Society<br />

(dd/mm/<br />

yyyy)<br />

Under<br />

progress<br />

Name<br />

Designat<br />

ion<br />

M/<br />

F<br />

S<br />

C<br />

ST<br />

SF<br />

M<br />

F<br />

L<br />

F<br />

Land<br />

-less<br />

U<br />

G<br />

SH<br />

G<br />

G<br />

P<br />

Educational<br />

qualifi<br />

-cation<br />

Function/<br />

s<br />

assigned#<br />

Niranjan N. Viyas President M Y Y BA D<br />

Ashok L. Tadhani Secretary M Y BA C<br />

Lilaben S. Mesuriya Member F Y Y 0 A<br />

Parshotam B. Tadhani Member M Y 7 B<br />

Haribhai D.Makvana Member M Y Y Y Y 5 I<br />

Jayaben H. Tadhani Member F Y Y 8 I-G<br />

Gelaben U. Labariya Member F Y Y 1 I<br />

Jayaben M. Tadhani Member F Y Y 5 F-B-E<br />

Jeshigbhai M. Dav Member M Y Y 7 B-H<br />

Kantaben R.Jalu Member F Y Y 0 E-G<br />

Gopalbhai N. Tadhani Member M Y Y 7 B<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 51


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 31.3: Watershed Committee details (Jangavad)<br />

Sl<br />

.<br />

N<br />

o.<br />

1<br />

Names <strong>of</strong><br />

WC<br />

Watershed<br />

committee,<br />

Jangvad<br />

Date <strong>of</strong><br />

Registra<br />

tion as<br />

a<br />

Society<br />

(dd/mm/<br />

yyyy)<br />

Under<br />

progress<br />

Name<br />

Designat<br />

ion<br />

M/<br />

F<br />

S<br />

C<br />

ST<br />

SF<br />

M<br />

F<br />

L<br />

F<br />

Land<br />

-less<br />

U<br />

G<br />

SH<br />

G<br />

G<br />

P<br />

Educational<br />

qualifi<br />

-cation<br />

Function/<br />

s<br />

assigned#<br />

Hasrajbhai J. Rangani President M Y 10 D<br />

Mukesbhai B. Khisriya Secretary M Y Y BCA C<br />

Manhardas V.<br />

Mesavaniya<br />

Member M Y Y Y 7 A<br />

Kanchanben S.<br />

Makavana<br />

Member F Y Y 2 B<br />

Raniben M. Nabhoya Member F Y 3 I<br />

Gitaben P. Shidhdhpra Member F Y 3 I-G<br />

Sonalben J. Paramar Member F Y Y 5 I<br />

Lakhamanbhai R.<br />

Kapdiya<br />

Member F Y Y 5 F-B-E<br />

Sardaben P. Hirpara Member F Y Y 5 B-H<br />

Asok L. Rangani Member M Y Y 12 E-G<br />

Minaben D. Pandiya Member F Y Y 10 B<br />

Savitaben H. Rangani Member F Y Y Y 7 A<br />

Manubhai H.Kuvadiya Member M Y Y 12 J<br />

Gelabhai V. Bohriya Member M Y 4 A<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 52


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 31.4: Watershed Committee details (Jasapar)<br />

Sl<br />

.<br />

N<br />

o.<br />

Names <strong>of</strong><br />

WC<br />

Watershed<br />

committee,<br />

Jasapar<br />

Date <strong>of</strong><br />

Registr<br />

ation<br />

as a<br />

Society<br />

(dd/mm<br />

/ yyyy)<br />

Under<br />

progres<br />

s<br />

Name<br />

Designatio<br />

n<br />

M/<br />

F<br />

S<br />

C<br />

ST<br />

SF<br />

M<br />

F<br />

L<br />

F<br />

Lan<br />

d-<br />

less<br />

U<br />

G<br />

SH<br />

G<br />

G<br />

P<br />

Educa<br />

-<br />

tional<br />

qualif<br />

i-<br />

cation<br />

Function<br />

/s<br />

assigned<br />

#<br />

Govindbhai B.<br />

Bhayani<br />

President M Y Y 5 D<br />

Kishorbhai H. Bhbhti Secretary M Y 10 C<br />

Khodabhai N.<br />

Mudhva<br />

Member M Y Y 4 A<br />

Vasanben J. Bhayani Member F Y Y 12 B<br />

Rohitbhai P. Vasani Member M Y Y 10 I<br />

Yogeshbhai L.<br />

Damsiya<br />

Member M Y Y BA I-G<br />

Daksaben B.Chothani Member F Y Y 5 I<br />

Ranabhai R. Parmar Member M Y Y Y 5 F-B-E<br />

Madhuben M.<br />

Dholariya<br />

Member F Y Y 4 B-H<br />

Manjulaben G. Gosai Member F Y Y 7 E-G<br />

Bhanuben P. Gohel Member F Y Y 4 B<br />

# Functions Assigned, as below<br />

A. PNP and PRA B. Planning<br />

C. Maintenance <strong>of</strong> Accounts D. Signing <strong>of</strong> cheques and making payments<br />

E. Supervision <strong>of</strong> construction activities F. Cost Estimation<br />

G. Verification & Measurement H. Record <strong>of</strong> labour employed<br />

I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 53


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

ii) Self Help Group<br />

We believe that the full potential <strong>of</strong> our watershed work can only be raised if it is supplemented by a micr<strong>of</strong>inance<br />

programme. This is essential if we are to ensure long-term livelihood security to the poor. We are also convinced that no<br />

micr<strong>of</strong>inance programme can be successful until it is tied up with livelihood programmes such as agriculture, dairying,<br />

marketing and enterprise development etc. Thus micr<strong>of</strong>inance and livelihood programmes are complementary to each<br />

other and their simultaneous implementation is the key to poverty alleviation. Incomes raised through livelihood<br />

initiatives need to be saved. Of these women are the best custodians. Self Help Group are motivated, Small homogenous group<br />

organized together through highly successful <strong>of</strong> credit and thrift activities. These savings must be reinvested in livelihood options<br />

that in turn raise incomes, setting up various cycles. Generally self help group includes landless and marginal sized farm women,<br />

BPL household, SC/ST women.<br />

SHG initiative in watershed villages is being organized by having a focused group discussion between various homogenous<br />

communities <strong>of</strong> women based on their livelihood separately. With a view point <strong>of</strong> different problems related to rural credit, it was<br />

planned to organize these women into a group consisting <strong>of</strong> 10 to 13 in each groups and it was also proposed to have groups.<br />

Table no. 32: SHG detail<br />

S. No. With<br />

only<br />

Men<br />

Total no. <strong>of</strong> registered SHGs<br />

With only<br />

Women<br />

With<br />

both<br />

1 12 21 5 32<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> members<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each<br />

category<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in<br />

each category<br />

Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />

(i) Landless 43 57 110 25 65 90<br />

(ii) SF 15 10 25 15 10 25<br />

(iii) MF 71 63 134<br />

(iv) LF<br />

Total 12 21 5 32 114 120 244 40 75 115 15 10 25<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 54


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

iii) User Group:<br />

These are homogeneous groups <strong>of</strong> persons having landholding within the watershed area. They are normally formed to manage an<br />

activity or asset on a long term basis. The user group collects user charges from their members. Some <strong>of</strong> the points which were<br />

considered while forming a user group were:<br />

1) In case <strong>of</strong> a check dam all the beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> the individual check dam were involved as user group members.<br />

2) In case <strong>of</strong> Fodder bank all the individual beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> animal husbandry are considered as potential members.<br />

3) Khadi based cottage industry, Papad making user groups for micro enterprise activities<br />

4) Membership was on voluntary and democratic.<br />

Focused group discussion was conducted to between the user groups to discuss the above conditions and to select potential members. It<br />

was advocated that each group to formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling <strong>of</strong> ownership with community spirit.<br />

Table No. 33: The following types <strong>of</strong> groups were planned to be formed<br />

S. No Name <strong>of</strong> User Group (land based) Major Task<br />

1 Fuel and fodder Group <strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pasture land<br />

2 Farm pond/Percolation tank user Group Equitable sharing <strong>of</strong> resources<br />

3 Farm bund and Check Dam Group Equitable sharing <strong>of</strong> resources<br />

4 Fodder bank Group<br />

5 Nursery Group<br />

Ensure fodder security in village<br />

<strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> community land for fodder development<br />

Timely supply <strong>of</strong> enriched fodder at a affordable price.<br />

Maintenance <strong>of</strong> nursery plot<br />

Ensure Timely supply <strong>of</strong> seedling for afforestation.<br />

S. No Name <strong>of</strong> other Groups (except land based) Major Task<br />

1 Micro-enterprise developing group Ensuring livelihood opportunities, reducing distress migration<br />

2 Animal Husbandry Group Bringing <strong>of</strong> new AH technology, Management <strong>of</strong> New Cattle and their<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 55


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 33. 1: UG detail (Kharchiya Jam)<br />

S. No,<br />

Total no. <strong>of</strong> UGs No. <strong>of</strong> members No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each<br />

category<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />

category<br />

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />

(i) Landless 17 23 40 7 6 13 11 4 15<br />

1 27 3 4 34<br />

(ii) SF 51 3 54 2 0 2 3 - 3<br />

(iii) MF 48 4 52 5 1 6 - - -<br />

(iv) LF 10 1 11 - - - - - -<br />

Total 27 3 4 34 126 31 157 14 7 21 14 4 18<br />

Table no. 33.2: UG detail (Panchavada)<br />

S. No,<br />

Total no. <strong>of</strong> UGs No. <strong>of</strong> members No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each<br />

category<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />

category<br />

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />

(i) Landless 26 28 54 15 6 21 17 16 33<br />

1<br />

32 4 9 45<br />

(ii) SF 134 21 155 11 4 15 4 3 7<br />

(iii) MF 119 8 127 2 - 2 - - -<br />

(iv) LF 16 2 18 1 - 1 - - -<br />

Total 32 4 9 45 295 59 354 29 10 39 21 19 40<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 56


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 33. 3 : UG detail (Jangavad)<br />

S. No,<br />

Total no. <strong>of</strong> UGs No. <strong>of</strong> members No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each<br />

category<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />

category<br />

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />

(i) Landless 27 22 49 22 18 40 13 18 31<br />

1<br />

34 4 15 53<br />

(ii) SF 169 19 188 4 1 5 - - -<br />

(iii) MF 113 21 134 3 2 5 4 3 7<br />

(iv) LF 31 4 35 1 0 1 - - -<br />

Total 34 5 15 53 340 66 406 30 21 51 17 21 38<br />

Table no. 33. 4: UG detail (Jasapar)<br />

S. No,<br />

Total no. <strong>of</strong> UGs No. <strong>of</strong> members No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each<br />

category<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />

category<br />

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />

(i) Landless 24 21 45 18 16 34 23 22 45<br />

1<br />

27 5 9 41<br />

(ii) SF 148 18 166 7 4 11 17 19 36<br />

(iii) MF 131 23 154 3 1 4 - - -<br />

(iv) LF 16 3 19 1 1 - - -<br />

Total 27 5 9 41 319 65 384 29 21 50 40 41 81<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 57


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under <strong>IWMP</strong>-III<br />

EPA activities are certain important works which are in urgent demand <strong>of</strong> the local community. This helps in establishment <strong>of</strong> credibility <strong>of</strong><br />

watershed <strong>Development</strong> Team (WDT). It also acts as a rapport building activity <strong>of</strong> the village community. A group Discussion was<br />

conducted with watershed <strong>Development</strong> Committee regarding the EPA activity, it was conveyed to the amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3.22 lakh in<br />

Kharachiya, 6.54 lakh in Panchavda, 8.93 lakh in Jangvad and 6.75 lakh in Jasapar lakh was allotted for EPA activity, which was 4 per<br />

cent <strong>of</strong> total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was<br />

conveyed to them that only those activities can taken, which revive the common natural resources and common benefits . It was also taken<br />

into priority and convergences with different departments were also proposed, which will result in sustainability <strong>of</strong> activities.<br />

Table No. 34: Entry Point Activities (EPA): Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Kharachiya Jam are:<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

Villages<br />

Kharachiya<br />

jam<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> activity Amount earmarked for EPA Estimated Cost ( In<br />

lakhs)<br />

Plantation with tree guard (100 nos) 3.22 Lakhs<br />

0.70<br />

Solar light inside the Smasan (2 nos) 0.49<br />

Repair <strong>of</strong> open wells and Deepening 0.82<br />

Books for Library in School 0.09<br />

Purifier/ Reverse osmosis Aqaguard in School (2 nos) 0.40<br />

Demonstration for Agricultural / Animal Husbandry<br />

Productivity Enhancement<br />

0.20<br />

Animal water trough (Havada) 0.20<br />

Drainage line correction (To prevent flooding Gramtal) 0.32<br />

Plantatio/ Horticulture Convergence With Forest Dept. 0.12<br />

Total<br />

3.34<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 58


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No. 34.1: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Panchavda are:<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

Villages<br />

Panchavda<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> activity Amount earmarked for EPA Estimated Cost ( In<br />

lakhs)<br />

Platation with tree guard on Road side 6.54 Lakhs<br />

0.70<br />

Dead animal carrying cart 0.10<br />

Purifier/ Reverse osmosis Aqaguard in School (2 nos) 0.40<br />

<strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> Drinking water facility 1.11<br />

Bio-gas plant for demonstration 0.14<br />

Books for Library in School 0.10<br />

Grassland/Gauchar <strong>Development</strong> 0.60<br />

Ro<strong>of</strong> water harvesting 0.45<br />

Wind energy development 0.70<br />

Desilting <strong>of</strong> Pond (Left bank <strong>of</strong> Bhadar river) 0.53<br />

Demonstration for Agricultural / Animal Husbandry<br />

Productivity Enhancement<br />

Storage tank/Sump for drinking water 1.10<br />

Sanitation facilities/Sewerage 0.35<br />

Desilting <strong>of</strong> Check dam at Kharachiya Road NREGA 0.25<br />

Total<br />

6.79<br />

0.26<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 59


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No. 34.2: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Jangvad are:<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

Villages<br />

Jangvad<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> activity Amount earmarked for EPA Estimated Cost ( In<br />

lakhs)<br />

Platation with tree guard on Road side (78 nos) 8.93 Lakhs<br />

0.55<br />

Solar lights inside the Samsan (2 nos) 0.49<br />

Books for Library in School 0.09<br />

Purifier/ Reverse osmosis Aqaguard in School (1 nos) 0.20<br />

Drinking water facility dev.(Digging <strong>of</strong> Well 4x4x30 mt<br />

for drinking water, Tank repairing, pipe line laying)<br />

6.70<br />

Demonstration for Agricultural / Animal Husbandry<br />

Productivity Enhancement<br />

Wind energy development 0.70<br />

Afforestation (Convergence With Forest Dept.) 0.55<br />

Pond deepening (Convergence with NREGA) 0.20<br />

Total<br />

9.68<br />

0.20<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 60


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No. 34.3: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Jasapar are:<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

Villages<br />

Jasapar<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> activity Amount earmarked for EPA Estimated Cost ( In<br />

lakhs)<br />

Platation with tree guard on Road side (150 nos)<br />

6.75 Lakhs<br />

1.05<br />

Solar lights inside the Samsan & way (2 nos) 0.49<br />

Dead animal carrying cart 0.10<br />

Medicinal Plantation 0.06<br />

Drinking water facility 0.71<br />

Check Dam Repairing near Ashram 2.11<br />

Computer Training to youth/ School Children 0.15<br />

Purifier/ Reverse osmosis Aquaguard in School 0.20<br />

Facilities for Sewerage line Near Old Village 0.35<br />

Ro<strong>of</strong>top Water Harvesting in School 0.45<br />

Demonstration for Agricultural / Animal Husbandry<br />

Productivity Enhancement<br />

0.14<br />

Flood Protection wall (SC farmer) 0.94<br />

Afforestation 0.5 ha (convergence with Forest dept.) 0.55<br />

Total<br />

7.3<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 61


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.35: Details <strong>of</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> villages<br />

Initiation <strong>of</strong><br />

village level<br />

institution<br />

Capacity<br />

building<br />

IEC<br />

activities<br />

Baseline<br />

survey<br />

Hydrogeological<br />

survey<br />

Identifying<br />

technical<br />

support<br />

agencies<br />

Printing<br />

DPR and<br />

Mapping<br />

Estimated<br />

Cost (Rs. in<br />

lakh)<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) 0.48 2.39 0.97 0.29 0.10 0.48 0.12 4.83<br />

2 Panchavda 0.98 4.86 1.96 0.59 0.20 0.98 0.25 9.81<br />

3 Jangavad 1.34 6.63 2.68 0.80 0.27 1.34 0.33 13.39<br />

4 Jasapar 1.01 5.01 2.02 0.61 0.20 1.01 0.25 10.12<br />

Total 3.82 18.89 7.63 2.29 0.76 3.82 0.95 38.15<br />

4.3.2. Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Works:<br />

Watershed development works is to be done during implementation phase <strong>of</strong> watershed. Treatments begin from the highest point <strong>of</strong> the<br />

watershed and move progressively downwards (ridge to valley), starting with the smallest stream and culminating in the main river <strong>of</strong> the<br />

watershed. Work is location-specific, varying according to slope and geology as also the size <strong>of</strong> the stream being treated. The aim is to weave<br />

interventions into the contours <strong>of</strong> nature, not to seek mastery over it. A net budget <strong>of</strong> 50 percent is allotted for this work.<br />

4.3.2.1 Ridge Area Treatment Plans<br />

In a watershed, the slopes falling from the ridge to the beginning <strong>of</strong> the plains are called ridge area. It is very important to treat the higher<br />

reaches <strong>of</strong> the ridge has this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly highly and forest region in the watershed.<br />

Various watershed managing structures should be build to arrest the erosion and degradation <strong>of</strong> forest with grasses in upper ridges.<br />

1. Contour Bund/trench<br />

2. Boulder Checks<br />

3. Gabions 4. Grass seedling/planatation<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 62


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

1. Contour Bunds/Trench<br />

Contour bund/trenches are a simple, low-cost method <strong>of</strong> checking the velocity <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f in the ridge area <strong>of</strong> any watershed. A contour<br />

trench is a trench dug along a contour line. A contour line is an imaginary line that joins together points <strong>of</strong> the same elevation. Digging a<br />

trench along a line that is at the same level increases the chances <strong>of</strong> containing run<strong>of</strong>f for a longer period <strong>of</strong> time within the trench. If<br />

bunds/trenches were not to follow a contour, such digging could actually increase the possibility <strong>of</strong> soil erosion because there would be a<br />

rise in the velocity <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f following upon an increase in the slope <strong>of</strong> the land. In the ridge area <strong>of</strong> a watershed a contour bund/trench is a<br />

simple and inexpensive solution to slowing down surface run<strong>of</strong>f and reducing soil erosion.<br />

Objectives<br />

1) Slowing down the velocity <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f<br />

2) Checking soil erosion<br />

3) Improving local soil moisture pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

Contour bunds/trenches are constructed in the ridge area <strong>of</strong> a watershed. Rainwater, which falls in this area flow unchecked carrying with it<br />

eroded soil into the flatter portion <strong>of</strong> the watershed - the "valley". This silt gets deposited into reservoirs and ponds, reducing their life.<br />

Thus, any water harvesting work undertaken in the valley will become meaningless unless appropriate measures such as contour trenching<br />

are undertaken to control run<strong>of</strong>f and soil erosion in the ridge. Contour trenches collect the rainwater that falls in the ridge area. This way<br />

the soil moisture pr<strong>of</strong>ile in the area adjacent to the trench is improved.<br />

2. Boulder Checks /Loose Boulder checks<br />

Boulder checks or gully plugs are loose rock dams made on small drainage lines or seasonal streams which have a catchment area <strong>of</strong> less<br />

than 50 ha. It is adopted where the water velocity is high and where basically stone available with in radius <strong>of</strong> 100-150 m from the site. The main<br />

aim <strong>of</strong> constructing loose boulder checks is to reduce the velocity <strong>of</strong> water flowing through the drainage line. By reducing the velocity <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f,<br />

boulder checks help in:<br />

1. Reducing soil erosion;<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 63


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

2. Trapping silt which slows the rate <strong>of</strong> siltation in water harvesting structures in the lower reaches <strong>of</strong> the watershed.<br />

3. Creating a hydraulic head locally which enhances infiltration <strong>of</strong> surface run<strong>of</strong>f into the groundwater system; and<br />

4. Increasing the duration <strong>of</strong> flow in the drainage line. Therefore, the capacity <strong>of</strong> the water harvesting structures created downstream on the drainage<br />

line is utilized more fully as they get many more refills.<br />

3. Gabions<br />

Gabion structures are rock and wire dams constructed across drainage lines with a catchment area <strong>of</strong> 50-500 ha. They are also constructed to<br />

reinforce highly erodible stream embankments. The main aim <strong>of</strong> constructing gabion structures is to reduce the velocity <strong>of</strong> water flowing through<br />

the drainage line. By reducing the velocity <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f, gabion structures help in<br />

1. Reduction in soil erosion<br />

2. Trapping silt, which reduces the rate <strong>of</strong> siltation in water harvesting structures in the lower reaches <strong>of</strong> the watershed.<br />

3. Increasing recharge <strong>of</strong> groundwater and<br />

4. Increasing the duration <strong>of</strong> flow in the drainage line. Therefore, the capacity <strong>of</strong> the water harvesting structures created downstream on the<br />

drainage line is utilized more fully as they get many more refills.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 64


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

4.3.2.2 Drainage line Treatment and water harvesting for land development:<br />

The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally agricultural land or waste lands. These are generally water conservation<br />

or surface water storage structures. These being highly labour intensive will involve more <strong>of</strong> manual labour so schemes like National <strong>Rural</strong><br />

Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) can be taken. Following structures has been proposed in the project villages.<br />

1. Check dams/Causeway cum check dams<br />

2. Waste Weir<br />

1. Check dams<br />

Check dams are constructed across small streams having slope the selected should have sufficient thickness <strong>of</strong> permeable bed or<br />

weathered formation to facilitate recharge <strong>of</strong> stored water within short span <strong>of</strong> time. The water stored in these structures is mostly<br />

confined to stream course and the height is normally less than 2m and excess water is allowed to flow over the wall in order to avoid<br />

scouring from excess run<strong>of</strong>f water cushions are provided at downstream side. To harness the maximum run <strong>of</strong>f in the stream series <strong>of</strong> such<br />

check dams are to be constructed to have recharge on regional scale in project villages.<br />

2. Waste weirs<br />

These are constructed for giving a safe passage to the excess run<strong>of</strong>f from the field and also store some amount <strong>of</strong> water in the field. The<br />

water stored in these structures is mostly confined in field and height is normally less than 0. 5 mt. and excess water is allowed to flow<br />

over the wall.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 65


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

4.3.2.3 Plains or Flat level/Field level:<br />

1. Farm pond<br />

2. Irrigation/Percolation tank<br />

3. Farm bund<br />

4. Afforestation<br />

1) Farm Pond:<br />

There is very little qualitative difference between a pond/ tank, which usually serves the population <strong>of</strong> a village, and farm pond, which<br />

serves an individual agricultural field. Farms ponds greatly vary in size depending upon the rainfall. These have only a few meters <strong>of</strong><br />

length and width and are built across the flow path <strong>of</strong> natural drainage channels. Surplus water from one pond spills over to a lower pond.<br />

In some cases a series <strong>of</strong> farm ponds are built on one single stream. Each pond caters to the irrigation needs <strong>of</strong> one farm and also augments<br />

ground water recharge. Percolation Dam: Percolation dams are constructed for recharging groundwater. Such structures are usually made<br />

on the upper part <strong>of</strong> the catchment area. Water stored here percolates to wells and tubewells located in the lower part <strong>of</strong> the catchment.<br />

Such dams can also be made in the immediate upstream portion <strong>of</strong> wells and tubewells. Depending on the capacity <strong>of</strong> the dam and duration<br />

<strong>of</strong> water storage, the dam can have secondary benefits (such as pisciculture) that are vital for the livelihood security <strong>of</strong> marginal farmers<br />

and landless labourers.<br />

2) Irrigation/Percolation tank<br />

a) Irrigation Dam: Such dams can be constructed to meet two different kinds <strong>of</strong> demands.<br />

• <strong>of</strong> storing water during the rainy season to be used for irrigation in the post-monsoon period.<br />

• <strong>of</strong> providing protective irrigation during dry spells within the rainy season. Most parts <strong>of</strong> India typically receive rainfall<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 66


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

between June and September, very intensely within a few hours and a few days. The number <strong>of</strong> rainy days does not average<br />

more than 40-50. Moreover, rains are extremely erratic, <strong>of</strong>ten characterised by late onset and early withdrawal. Prolonged<br />

dry spells during the rainy season, resulting in agricultural droughts, are also frequent. Hence, the kharif crop needs to be<br />

drought-pro<strong>of</strong>ed through 'protective' irrigation, applied to overcome accumulated soil moisture deficits within the rainy<br />

season. Such structures are especially important in areas which are poor in groundwater resources and which do not have<br />

access to canal irrigation. Such areas form about half <strong>of</strong> India's agricultural area.<br />

b). Percolation Tank: Percolation dams are constructed for recharging groundwater. Such structures are usually made on the upper part <strong>of</strong><br />

the catchment area. Water stored here percolates to wells and tube wells located in the lower part <strong>of</strong> the catchment. Such dams can also be<br />

made in the immediate upstream portion <strong>of</strong> wells and tube wells. Depending on the capacity <strong>of</strong> the dam and duration <strong>of</strong> water storage, the<br />

dam can have secondary benefits (such as pisciculture) that are vital for the livelihood security <strong>of</strong> marginal farmers and landless labourers.<br />

3) Farm bund<br />

Farm bunds are constructed on agricultural land with the aim <strong>of</strong> arresting soil erosion and improving the soil moisture pr<strong>of</strong>ile. Ideally, bunds<br />

on farms should be made on the contour line. But this creates several problems for farmers. Contour bunds divide the field into irregular<br />

sections. In such a situation, it becomes inconvenient to maneuver bullocks for operations such as ploughing and line-sowing. Due to these<br />

4. Afforestation<br />

Emphasis is placed on maximizing the use <strong>of</strong> available land and resources with high yield tree species. Trees can either be <strong>of</strong> similar<br />

species or mixed in a manner that will result in a stand or forest. Depending on the climate, geographical layout <strong>of</strong> the area and the soil<br />

conditions, trees that have the greatest growth potential are selected like Babool, Neem, Sesame and Ailanthus.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 67


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in Kharachiya Jam (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />

Proposed target<br />

Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Village<br />

name<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> structures<br />

No.<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

structures<br />

Storage<br />

capacity<br />

(Cumec)<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Lac)<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> new structures<br />

No.<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Storage<br />

Estimated<br />

capacity<br />

cost<br />

(Cumec)<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Total target<br />

Storage<br />

capacity<br />

(m 3 )<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Lac)<br />

(i) Farm Pond 5 7.50 1341 0.55 5 7.50 1350 0.55 15.00 2691 1.10<br />

(ii)Irrigation/Percolation<br />

1 Kharachiya Tank<br />

3 21.29 54000 0.82 25.29 54000 0.82<br />

(iii) Check dam &<br />

Causeway cum check 5 34.54 39000 4.28 18 217.99 105000 19.04 262.53 144000 23.32<br />

dam<br />

Total 13 63.33 94341 5.65 23 225.49 106350 19.59 302.82 200691 25.24<br />

Table no.36.1: Activities related to Surface water resources in Panchavda (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />

S. Village<br />

No. name<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> structures<br />

Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

structures<br />

Area to<br />

Storage Estimated<br />

be<br />

No. capacity cost<br />

irrigated<br />

(Cumec) (Lac)<br />

(ha)<br />

Proposed target<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> new structures<br />

No.<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Storage<br />

Estimated<br />

capacity<br />

cost<br />

(Cumec)<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Total target<br />

Storage<br />

capacity<br />

(m 3 )<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Lac)<br />

(i) Farm Pond 4 6.22 1200 0.44 11 18.86 2970 1.21 25.08 2950 1.65<br />

(ii)Percolation Tank 4 67.87 11000 2.54 1 11.20 5756 2.36 99.07 12800 4.90<br />

1 Panchavda (iii) Check dam &<br />

Causeway cum 5 91.62 51500 7.46 21 287.20 125000 28.40 378.82 246500 35.86<br />

check dam<br />

Total 13 165.71 63700 10.44 33 337.26 133726 31.97 502.97 262250 42.41<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 68


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.36.2: Activities related to Surface water resources in Jangavad (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />

Village<br />

Proposed target<br />

S.<br />

name<br />

Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

No.<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> new structures<br />

structures<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> structures<br />

No.<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Storage<br />

capacity<br />

(Cumec)<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Lac)<br />

No.<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Storage<br />

Estimated<br />

capacity<br />

cost<br />

(Cumec)<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Total target<br />

Storage<br />

capacity<br />

(m 3 )<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Lac)<br />

(i) Farm Pond 3 5.35 900 0.33 12 18.86 3240 1.32 24.21 4140 1.65<br />

(ii)Percolation Tank 3 76.42 10500 2.90 1 32.20 12100 4.96 108.62 22600 7.96<br />

1 Jangavad (iii) Check dam &<br />

Causeway cum 11 95.32 66500 8.01 32 224.32 140700 54.46 789.64 207200 62.47<br />

check dam<br />

Total 17 177.09 77900 11.24 45 275.38 156040 60.74 922.47 233940 72.08<br />

Table no.36.3: Activities related to Surface water resources in Jasapar (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />

S. Village<br />

No. name<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> structures<br />

Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

structures<br />

Area to<br />

Storage Estimated<br />

be<br />

No. capacity cost<br />

irrigated<br />

(Cumec) (Lac)<br />

(ha)<br />

Proposed target<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> new structures<br />

No.<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Storage<br />

Estimated<br />

capacity<br />

cost<br />

(Cumec)<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Total target<br />

Storage<br />

capacity<br />

(m 3 )<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Lac)<br />

(i) Farm Pond 2 10.08 1100 0.22 15 16.30 4050 1.65 23.38 5150 1.87<br />

1 Jasapar<br />

(ii)Irrigation/Percolation<br />

2<br />

Tank<br />

59.32 9500 2.36 1 29.36 3950 3.01 88.68 11650 5.37<br />

(iii) Check dam &<br />

Causeway cum check 5 149.54 7500 3.96 24 378.35 22800 38.90 727.89 30300 42.86<br />

dam<br />

Total 9 218.94 18100 6.54 40 422.01 25750 43.56 839.95 47100 50.10<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 69


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.36.4: Activities related to Surface water resources in cluster <strong>IWMP</strong>-III (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />

S. Village<br />

No. name<br />

1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-III<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> structures<br />

Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

structures<br />

Area to<br />

Storage Estimated<br />

be<br />

No. capacity cost<br />

irrigated<br />

(Cumec) (Lac)<br />

(ha)<br />

Proposed target<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> new structures<br />

No.<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Storage<br />

Estimated<br />

capacity<br />

cost<br />

(Cumec)<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Total target<br />

Storage<br />

capacity<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Lac)<br />

(i) Farm Pond 14 26.57 4700 1.54 43 56.52 5100 4.73 85.67 9800 6.27<br />

(ii)<br />

(ii)Irrigation/Percolation 12 228.90 85000 13.54 2 92.76 7250 10.82 321.66 92250 24.36<br />

Tank<br />

(iii) Check dam<br />

/Causeway cum check<br />

dam<br />

26 441.02 164500 23.71 95 1717.86 73350 140.80 2158.88 898000 161.50<br />

Total 52 696.49 254200 38.79 140 1867.14 85700 153.34 2566.21 1000050 192.13<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 70


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />

Proposed target<br />

Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong> Construction <strong>of</strong> new<br />

Total target<br />

S.<br />

existing recharging structures recharging structures<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> Villages Type <strong>of</strong> structures<br />

No.<br />

Area to be<br />

Area to be<br />

Area to be<br />

Estimated<br />

Estimated<br />

Estimated<br />

No. irrigated<br />

No. irrigated<br />

irrigated<br />

cost<br />

cost<br />

cost<br />

(ha)<br />

(ha)<br />

(ha)<br />

1 Kharachiya Jam Open wells 1 0.5 0.09 1 0.5 0.11 1.05 0.22<br />

(i)Open wells 2 1 0.18 8 10 0.88 11 1.06<br />

2 Panchavda (ii)Bore wells 1 2 0.15 2 0.15<br />

Total for the village 2 1 0.18 9 12 1.03 13 1.21<br />

(i)Open wells 8 10 0.85 10 0.85<br />

3 Jangvad<br />

(ii)Bore wells 2 1.7 0.30 1.7 0.30<br />

(iii) Dyke 1 0.5 0.75 0.5 0.75<br />

Total for the village 11 12.5 1.9 12.5 1.9<br />

(i)Open wells 8 10 0.85 10 0.85<br />

4 Jasapar (ii)Bore wells 2 2.5 0.30 2.5 0.30<br />

Total for the<br />

Project<br />

Total for the village 10 12.5 1.15 12.5 1.15<br />

3 1.5 0.27 31 37.5 4.19 39.05 4.48<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 71


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas<br />

S. No.<br />

Names <strong>of</strong><br />

Villages<br />

1 Kharachiya Jam<br />

2<br />

Panchavda<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />

Major activities <strong>of</strong> the SHGs<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> SHGs<br />

involved<br />

Average annual income from<br />

activity per SHG (In Rs. Approx)<br />

Vermi composting 1 76800<br />

Nursery raising 1 10000<br />

Handicraft/Charkha Udyog 5 100000<br />

Bharat Guntha unit making 1 110000<br />

Fodder/date palm 2 26000<br />

Dairy Unit 2 114950<br />

Floriculture 1 89675<br />

Lemon Plot 1 84896<br />

Turmeric Plot 1 74700<br />

Vermi composting 4 109000<br />

Nursery raising 5 50000<br />

Handicraft/Charkha Udyog 5 100000<br />

Papad unit making 2 197100<br />

Fodder Bank 1 75830<br />

Dairy Unit 1 160300<br />

Floriculture 2 188000<br />

Lemon Plot 2 169792<br />

Cumin spices, turmeric packaging 1 45000<br />

Mandap services 1 125000<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 72


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

3 Jangavad<br />

4 Jasapar<br />

Vermi composting 5 240000<br />

Nursery raising 1 50000<br />

Handicraft/Immitation 3 90000<br />

Papad/Pickle unit making 3 146400<br />

Centering/Masoning instruments 3 175000<br />

Fodder Bank 4 227500<br />

Dairy Unit 2 22900<br />

Milk products 2 90000<br />

Floriculture 1 89675<br />

Lemon Plot 1 84896<br />

Vermi composting 4 109000<br />

Nursery raising 6 65000<br />

Handicraft/Charkha Udyog 1 90000<br />

Papad unit making 2 146400<br />

Fodder Bank 4 227500<br />

Dairy Unit 3 35000<br />

Floriculture 1 89675<br />

Lemon Plot 1 84896<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 73


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 39: Other activities <strong>of</strong> watershed works phase – Proposed target<br />

S. No.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

villages<br />

Nonconventional<br />

Well<br />

Any other<br />

Ridge area Drainage line Nursery Land Crop Pasture<br />

Total<br />

treatment treatment raising development demonstrations development<br />

Estimated cost<br />

energy Recharge<br />

(Rs. In lakhs)<br />

(ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh) (no) (lakh) (ha) (lakh)<br />

1 Kharachiya 21 3.49 252.6 27.01 - - 780 10.34 - - - - 1 0.22 41.06<br />

(Jam)<br />

2 Panchavda 15 7.65 393.82 40.56 147 31.04 - - 1.5 1.45 - - 13 1.21 81.91<br />

3 Jangavad 8 9.04 799 64.25 137 37.25 - - - - 12.5 1.9 112.44<br />

4 Jasapar 19 7.4 733.03 48 564.06 25.92 - - 2.4 3.36 - - 12.5 1.15 85.83<br />

Table no.40: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Kharachiya (Jam)<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> structures (i) Ridge<br />

area (R)<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

(ii)<br />

Drainage<br />

line<br />

(D)<br />

(iii)<br />

Land dev<br />

(L)<br />

(i)<br />

Private<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

(ii)<br />

Communit<br />

y<br />

(iii)<br />

Others<br />

(pl.<br />

specify)<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

(ii)SHG<br />

(iii) WC<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 74<br />

Target<br />

Expected<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> units Estimated cost (Rs.<br />

(No./ cu.m./ in lakh)<br />

month & year<br />

<strong>of</strong> completion<br />

rmt)<br />

M W O T (mm/yyyy)<br />

Continuous<br />

ContourBund/Trench<br />

R C WC 91 0.04 Apr-2011<br />

Boulder checks R C WC 115 3.45 May 2011<br />

Gabion structure D C WC 2 1.74 May 2012<br />

Waste weir L P C UG/WC 30 2.75 Jan 2011<br />

Farm bunding L P UG/WC 12000 4.84 May-2012-13<br />

Farm bunding Con<br />

L P UG/WC 1930 0.83 May-2013<br />

(NREGA)<br />

Nala Plug D P UG/WC 3 1.49 Dec-2013<br />

Gully plug D P C UG/WC 2 0.46 Dec-2013<br />

Total: 15.6


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 40.i: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Panchavada<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> structures (iii) (i) (ii)<br />

(i) UG<br />

(i) Ridge Drainage<br />

Others<br />

Land dev Private<br />

y<br />

(iii) WC<br />

Communit (ii)SHG<br />

area (R) line<br />

(pl.<br />

(L)<br />

(D)<br />

specify)<br />

Boulder checks R P C WC 253 7.59 May 2011<br />

Continuous CT R C WC 150 0.06 Jay-2011<br />

Gabion structures D C WC 4 3.39 May 2012<br />

Waste weir L P UG/WC 50 4.57 Jan 2012<br />

Farm bunding L P UG/WC 47043 19.77 May-2012-13<br />

Farm bunding<br />

Target<br />

Estimated cost (Rs.<br />

Expected<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> units<br />

(No./ in lakh)<br />

month & year<br />

<strong>of</strong> completion<br />

cu.m./ rmt) M W O T (mm/yyyy)<br />

L P UG/WC 357 0.15 Jan-2012-13<br />

NREGA<br />

Nala Plug D P C UG/WC 2 1.05 Feb-2013<br />

Gully Plug D UG/WC 1 0.26 Jun-2011<br />

Afforestation/Planta<br />

tion/Demonstaration<br />

C Pasture WC 1 ha 1.45 May 2011<br />

Total: 38.29<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 75


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 40.ii: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Jangvad<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> structures (i) Ridge<br />

area (R)<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

(ii)<br />

Drainage<br />

line<br />

(D)<br />

(iii)<br />

Land dev<br />

(L)<br />

(i)<br />

Private<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

(ii)<br />

Communit<br />

y<br />

(iii)<br />

Others<br />

(pl.<br />

specify)<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

(ii)SHG<br />

(iii) WC<br />

Target<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> units Estimated cost<br />

(No./ cu.m./ (Rs. in lakh)<br />

rmt)<br />

MW O T<br />

Expected<br />

month & year<br />

<strong>of</strong> completion<br />

(mm/yyyy)<br />

Continuous Contour<br />

Bund<br />

R C WC 91 0.04 May 2011<br />

Boulder checks R C WC 250 7.50 Jay-2011<br />

Gabion structures R D C WC 2 1.50 May 2012<br />

Waste weir L P UG/WC 50 4.58 Jan 2012<br />

Farm bunding L P C UG/WC 55000 22.83 May-2012-13<br />

Farm bunding<br />

L P C UG/WC 1000 0.23 Jan-2012-13<br />

Conv. with NREGA<br />

Nala Plug D UG/WC 3 1.34 Feb-2013<br />

Gully Plug D UG/WC 5 0.44 Jun-2011<br />

Total: 38.46<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 76


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 40.iii: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Jasapar<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> treatment Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

Target<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

Estimated cost<br />

Expected<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> structures (iii) (i) (ii)<br />

(i) UG No. <strong>of</strong> units<br />

(i) Ridge Drainage<br />

Others<br />

Land dev Private<br />

y<br />

(iii) WC rmt)<br />

Communit<br />

(Rs. in lakh)<br />

month & year<br />

(ii)SHG (No./ cu.m./<br />

area (R) line<br />

(pl.<br />

<strong>of</strong> completion<br />

(L)<br />

(D)<br />

specify)<br />

MW O T (mm/yyyy)<br />

Continuous CB R P C WC 454 0.20 May-2011<br />

Boulder checks R C WC 190 5.80 May 2011<br />

Gabion structures D P C WC 3 2.95 Jay-2011<br />

Waste weir L P UG/WC 50 4.58 May 2012<br />

Farm bunding L P UG/WC 30750 12.60 Jan 2012<br />

Nala Plug D P UG/WC 3 1.31 May-2012-13<br />

Gully plug D UG/WC 2 0.88 Jan-2012-13<br />

Flood Protection<br />

wall (SC farmer)<br />

L P C UG/WC 150 1.5 Feb-2013<br />

Affforestation L Pasture WC/UG 2.4ha 3.36 Jun-2011<br />

Affforestation<br />

(Convergence with R L C PIA/WC 1 ha 1.4 May 2011<br />

Forest dept.)<br />

Total: 34.58<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 77


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No 40.1: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Earthen Contour Bund/Trench<br />

Earthen Contour Bund/Trench<br />

Particulars Unit Value<br />

Top width 0.3<br />

U/S Slope 1: 1.5<br />

D/S Slope 1: 1.5<br />

Max. height 0.75<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> contour Bund/Trench per ha. per row 100<br />

Spacing <strong>of</strong> two Contour Bunds 10<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Rows per Ha. 1000.0<br />

Area <strong>of</strong> cross section <strong>of</strong> Contour Bund 1.06875<br />

Qty. <strong>of</strong> earthwork in contour bund 1068.75<br />

Rate For E/W in S<strong>of</strong>t soil 41.00<br />

Total cost <strong>of</strong> contour bund per meter. 44<br />

Table No 40.2: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Boulder checks<br />

Chainage Height Area <strong>of</strong> X-Section<br />

Average .area <strong>of</strong> x-<br />

Section Length Quantity<br />

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2 0.65 1.49 0.74 2 1.49<br />

4 0.84 2.36 1.92 2 3.85<br />

5 1.00 3.25 2.81 1 2.81<br />

6.5 0.83 2.31 2.78 2 4.17<br />

7 0.00 0.00 1.15 1 0.58<br />

Total 7 12.89<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 78


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Cost Estimate For Boulder Check<br />

Particulars Unit Value Rate<br />

Total Length Mt 7<br />

Max. height Mt 1<br />

U/S Slope 1: 2.5<br />

D/S Slope 1: 3<br />

Top Width Mt 0.5<br />

Quantity <strong>of</strong> Boulder Check Cum 12.89<br />

Add15% for Keying & Exit weir Cum 1.93<br />

Total quantity <strong>of</strong> Boulder Cum 14.82 600<br />

Unit Cost <strong>of</strong> Boulder Check Rs 8892<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 79


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

L -Section <strong>of</strong> Boulder Check-2<br />

Height<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

-0.2<br />

-0.4<br />

-0.6<br />

-0.8<br />

-1<br />

-1.2<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0 2 4 6 8<br />

Series1<br />

-0.65<br />

Series2<br />

-0.84<br />

-0.83<br />

-1<br />

Distance<br />

Distances<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

-2<br />

-3<br />

-4<br />

1.875<br />

Plan <strong>of</strong> Boulder check-2<br />

0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25<br />

-0.25<br />

-0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

-2.2<br />

-2.77<br />

-2.74<br />

-3.25<br />

2.35<br />

Chainage<br />

2.75<br />

2.325<br />

Cross Section <strong>of</strong> Boulder Check<br />

Height<br />

1.2<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

U/S<br />

1:1<br />

D/S 1:3<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Distance<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 80


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No 40.3: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Gabion structures<br />

Dimension for Construction & Costing <strong>of</strong> Gabion Structure<br />

S.<br />

no Particulars Measurement Unit<br />

1 Length <strong>of</strong> Head Wall 6.0 Meter<br />

2 Height <strong>of</strong> Head Wall 1.0 Meter<br />

3 Top Width <strong>of</strong> Head Wall 1.0 Meter<br />

4 Bottom Width <strong>of</strong> Head Wall 2.0 Meter<br />

5 Width <strong>of</strong> Apron 2.0 Meter<br />

6 Thickness <strong>of</strong> Apron 0.6 Meter<br />

7 Length <strong>of</strong> Side Wall 4.0 Meter<br />

8 Height <strong>of</strong> Side Wall 2.0 Meter<br />

9 Thickness <strong>of</strong> Side Wall 1.0 Meter<br />

10 Length <strong>of</strong> Key Wall 6.0 Meter<br />

11 Total Length <strong>of</strong> Structure 20.0 Meter<br />

12 Steps (V:H) 0.5 :1<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 81


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Quantity & Cost Estimation <strong>of</strong> Gabion Structure<br />

S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit Rate Amount<br />

1 Excavation<br />

1.1<br />

Below head wall and for Apron in<br />

H.S. 1 8.0 4.0 0.6 19.2<br />

1.2 For Key in H.S. 2 6.0 1.0 1.25 15.0<br />

Total Excavation 34.2 Cum. 41.00 1402.2<br />

2 Construction<br />

2.1 Head Wall 1 6.0 1.5 1.0 9<br />

2.2<br />

Below head wall and for Apron in<br />

H.S. 1 8 4.0 0.6 19.2<br />

2.3 Key Wall 2 6.0 1.0 1.25 15.0<br />

2.4 Side Wall 2 4.0 1 1.5 12<br />

55.2 Cum. 1225.00 67620<br />

Total Cost 69022<br />

Grand Total 69069.35<br />

Cost Estimation say 69100.00<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 82


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No 40.4: Technical Details/Estimates <strong>of</strong> Farm Bund<br />

Estimate <strong>of</strong> cost : Farm Bunding<br />

Particulars Value Unit<br />

Top width 0.6 Mt<br />

U/S Slope 1: 1<br />

D/S Slope 1: 1<br />

Max. height 0.75 Mt<br />

Bottom Width 2.1 Mt.<br />

Area <strong>of</strong> cross section <strong>of</strong> Farm Bund 1.0125 Sq mt<br />

Qty. <strong>of</strong> earthwork <strong>of</strong> Farm bund /Meter 1.0125 Cumec<br />

Rate /cumec 41.00 Rs.<br />

Total cost <strong>of</strong> Farmbunding per mt. 41.41 RS<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 83


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No 40.5. Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Nalla/ Gully Plug<br />

Sr.No. Item Qty. Rate Unit Amount (Rs.)<br />

1 Excavation for Foundation 16.07 41.00 Cu.m. 658.67<br />

2 P.C.C (1:4:8) 2.30 1460.00 Cu.m. 3350.70<br />

3 U.C.R in C.M (1:5) 22.83 1330.00 Cu.m. 30363.90<br />

4 C.C (1:2:4) Coping 1.53 2420.00 Cu.m. 3702.60<br />

5 Cement Plaster 12mm. Th.(1:3) 31.30 74.00 Sq.m. 2316.20<br />

6 Earthen Work 176.72 41.00 Cu.m. 7245.32<br />

TOTAL Rs. : 47,637<br />

Table No 40.6 Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Farm Pond<br />

Particulars Value Unit<br />

Pond Length 15.00 Mt.<br />

Pond Width 10.00 Mt.<br />

Pond Depth 1.80 Mt.<br />

Side Slope 2 : 1<br />

Pond Top Area 204 Sq. mt<br />

Pond bottom area 104 Sq mt.<br />

Quantity 270 Cum<br />

Cost/cum in s<strong>of</strong>t soil 41 Rs<br />

Total cost 11070 Rs<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 84


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no 40.7. Technical details <strong>of</strong> Percolation Tank<br />

Particulars Value<br />

Structure Length 50 Mt.<br />

Structure Breadth 50 Mt.<br />

Structure Height 2.00 Mt.<br />

Top Cross sectional area 2500 Sq Mt.<br />

Tank bottom cross sectional area 2500 Sq Mt.<br />

Excavation in s<strong>of</strong>t soil 5000 Cumec<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> Excavation 41 Rs.<br />

Total cost <strong>of</strong> tank according to dimension 205000 Rs<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 85


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no 40.8. Technical details <strong>of</strong> Check dam<br />

Quantity & Cost Estimation <strong>of</strong> Check dam<br />

S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit Rate Amount<br />

1 Excavation<br />

1.1 Body wall 1 20.0 1.46 1.4 40.88 Cu.mt.<br />

1.2 Appron 1 20.00 1.80 1.40 50.40<br />

1.3 Side wall 2 5.00 0.60 1.40 8.40<br />

1.4 Abutment 2 2.50 1.00 1.40 7.00<br />

1.5 Wing wall 2 2.26 0.60 1.40 3.80<br />

2 1:4:8<br />

Total Excavation 110.47 Cum. 41.00 4529.55<br />

2.1 Body wall 1 20.00 1.46 0.15 4.38<br />

2.2 Appron 1 20.00 1.80 0.15 5.40<br />

2.3 Side wall 2 5.00 0.60 0.15 0.90<br />

2.4 Abutment 2 2.50 1.00 0.15 0.75<br />

2.5 Wing wall 2 2.26 0.60 0.15 0.41<br />

3 U C R Masonary 11.837 Cum. 1460 17281.73<br />

3.1 Body wall 1 20.00 1.46 1.25 36.50<br />

3.2 Body Wall s/s 1 20.00 1.13 0.90 20.34<br />

3.3 Appron 1 20.00 1.80 1.15 41.40<br />

3.4 Side wall 2 5.00 0.60 2.65 15.90<br />

3.5 Abutment 2 2.50 1.00 3.45 17.25<br />

3.6 Wing wall 2 2.26 0.60 4.43 12.00<br />

143.391 Cum. 1330.00 190709.50<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 86


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

4 1:2:4<br />

4.1 Body wall 1 20.00 0.80 0.10 1.60<br />

4.2 Appron 1 20.00 1.80 0.10 3.60<br />

4.3 Side wall 2 5.00 0.60 0.10 0.60<br />

4.4 Abutment 2 2.50 1.00 0.10 0.50<br />

4.5 Wing wall 2 2.26 0.60 0.10 0.27<br />

4.6 End sill 1 20.00 0.30 0.30 1.80<br />

5 Plastering<br />

Body wall S/S 1 20 1.00 20.00<br />

Body wall D/S 1 20.0 1.45 29.00<br />

Abutment 4 2.00 1.9 15.2<br />

CC 8.371 Cum. 2420.00 20258.3<br />

Wing wall 4 2.3 1.45 13.34 Sq.Mt.<br />

77.54 74.00 5737.96<br />

5 Earthen work<br />

5.1 R – Bank 1 15.0 2.20 1.20 39.60<br />

5.2 L – Bank 1 16.0 2.20 1.20 42.24<br />

15% Shrinkage Minus 12.28<br />

81.84<br />

69.564 Cum. 2852.12<br />

Cum. 241369.2<br />

Total Cost Say 241370.00<br />

Grand Total 241370.00<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 87


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no 40.9. Technical details & Cost Estimation <strong>of</strong> Waste weir<br />

Quantity & Cost Estimation <strong>of</strong> waste weir<br />

S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit Rate Amount<br />

1 Excavation<br />

1.1<br />

1.2<br />

1.3<br />

2.1<br />

2.2<br />

2.3<br />

2.4<br />

2.5<br />

2 U C R Masonary<br />

3 1:2:4<br />

3.1<br />

3.2<br />

4 Plaster<br />

Body Wall 1 4.00 0.45 0.45 0.81<br />

Appron 1 4.00 1.00 0.45 1.80<br />

Abutment 2 2.00 0.45 0.45 0.81<br />

Bodywall 1 4.00 0.45 0.45 0.81<br />

Appon 1 4.00 1.00 0.45 1.80<br />

Abutment 2 2.00 0.45 0.45 0.81<br />

Body Wall 1 4.00 0.45 0.45 0.81<br />

Abutment 2 2.00 0.45 0.75 1.35<br />

Total Excavation 3.42 Cum. 41.00 140.22<br />

Total U C R masonary 5.58 Cum. 1330.00 7441.40<br />

L.S. 1.00 4.00 0.45 0.10 0.18<br />

R.S. 2.00 2.00 0.45 0.10 0.18<br />

4.1<br />

1.00 4.00 0.40 1.60<br />

4.2<br />

1.00 4.00 0.40 1.60<br />

4.3<br />

1 4.00 0.45 1.80<br />

4.4 1.00 4.00 0.45<br />

1.80<br />

4.5<br />

4.00 1.00 0.60 2.40<br />

4.6<br />

2 0.45 0.60 0.54<br />

Pipe 4 .45 1.8<br />

0.36 Cum. 2420.00 871.20<br />

9.73<br />

Sq.mt. 74.00 720.02<br />

Rmt<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 88


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

1.8 50.00 90.00<br />

Total Cost<br />

Grand Total 9152.84<br />

Cost Estimation say 9152.00<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 89


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.41: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Kharachiya Jam<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

S.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> Name <strong>of</strong> (i) (ii) (iii)<br />

(iii) (ii)SHG<br />

No<br />

village structure/ work Ridge Drainage Land (i) (ii) Others (iii)<br />

.<br />

area line dev. Private Community (pl. Others<br />

(R) (D) (L)<br />

specify) (pl.<br />

specify)<br />

1<br />

Kharachiya<br />

Jam<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

No.<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

plants<br />

Target<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Rs. in<br />

lakh)<br />

Afforestation L C PIA/WC 0.85 2049 0.82<br />

Jatropha L C WC/SHG 1 2500 0.34<br />

Fodder R L C UG/SHG 2 1.90<br />

Horticulture R D L P UG 1.67 186 0.65<br />

Nursery raising D L P C SHG 2 10000 0.20<br />

Crop<br />

demonstration<br />

L D L P UG/WC 3 1.69<br />

Lemon L WC/SHG 0.9 400 1.05<br />

Floriculture L P UG/SHG 1 17500 0.93<br />

Total 12.42 32635 7.58<br />

Expected<br />

month &<br />

year <strong>of</strong><br />

completio<br />

n (mm/<br />

yyyy)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 90


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.41.1: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Panchavda<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

S.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> Name <strong>of</strong> (i) (ii) (iii)<br />

(iii) (ii)SHG<br />

No<br />

village structure/ work Ridge Drainage Land (i) (ii) Others (iii)<br />

.<br />

area line dev. Private Community (pl. Others<br />

(R) (D) (L)<br />

specify) (pl.<br />

specify)<br />

1 Panchavda<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

No.<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

plants<br />

Target<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Rs. in<br />

lakh)<br />

Afforestation R D L C WC 1 2100 1.45<br />

Jatropha R L P C WC/SHG 2 2500 0.65<br />

Agro-forestry D L P C WC/SHG 6 8300 2.90<br />

Fodder R L C UG/SHG 5 2.81<br />

Horticulture R L P UG 1.67 7400 2.6<br />

Nursery raising D L P UG/SHG 5 25000 0.50<br />

Peasture Land<br />

L P C SHG 5.00 5 0.26<br />

Demostration<br />

Grassland<br />

development<br />

R D C WC/SHG 3 0.60<br />

Crop<br />

demonstration<br />

L P UG/WC 2.5 10 1.80<br />

Turmeric Plot L UG/SHG 2 1.51<br />

Lemon plot C UG/SHG 1 400 1.35<br />

Floriculture L P UG/SHG 2 35000 1.88<br />

Total 36.17 80715 18.31<br />

Expected<br />

month &<br />

year <strong>of</strong><br />

completio<br />

n (mm/<br />

yyyy)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 91


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.41.2: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Jangvad<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

S.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> Name <strong>of</strong> (i) (ii) (iii)<br />

(iii) (ii)SHG<br />

No<br />

village structure/ work Ridge Drainage Land (i) (ii) Others (iii)<br />

.<br />

area line dev. Private Community (pl. Others<br />

(R) (D) (L)<br />

specify) (pl.<br />

specify)<br />

1 Jangvad<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

No.<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

plants<br />

Target<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Rs. in<br />

lakh)<br />

Afforestation R D L C WC 0.5 1000 0.55<br />

Jatropha R L P C WC/SHG 2 2500 0.65<br />

Agro-forestry D L P C WC/SHG 0.25 78 0.55<br />

Fodder R L C UG/SHG 7 1.35<br />

Horticulture R L P UG 1.67 7400<br />

Nursery raising D L P UG/SHG 5 25000 0.50<br />

Peasture Land<br />

L P C SHG 5.00 5 0.26<br />

Demostration<br />

Grassland<br />

development<br />

R D C WC/SHG 5 1.52<br />

Crop<br />

demonstration<br />

L P UG/WC 8 2.23<br />

Turmeric Plot L UG/SHG 2 1.51<br />

Lemon plot C UG/SHG 1 400 1.35<br />

Floriculture L P UG/SHG 2 48000 3.75<br />

Total 39.42 84383 14.22<br />

Expected<br />

month &<br />

year <strong>of</strong><br />

completio<br />

n (mm/<br />

yyyy)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 92


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.41.3: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Jasapar<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

S.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> Name <strong>of</strong> (i) (ii) (iii)<br />

(iii) (ii)SHG<br />

No<br />

village structure/ work Ridge Drainage Land (i) (ii) Others (iii)<br />

.<br />

area line dev. Private Community (pl. Others<br />

(R) (D) (L)<br />

specify) (pl.<br />

specify)<br />

1 Jasapar<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

No.<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

plants<br />

Target<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Rs. in<br />

lakh)<br />

Afforestation R D L P C PIA/WC 4.00 4000 5.31<br />

Jatropha R L P C WC/SHG 4 10000 1.30<br />

Agro-forestry D L P C PIA/WC 0.25 150 1.05<br />

Fodder/Phoenix R L C UG/SHG 7 1.35<br />

Nursery raising D L P UG/SHG 5 30000 0.60<br />

Peasture Land<br />

L P C SHG 5.00 5 0.26<br />

Demostration<br />

Grassland<br />

development<br />

R D C WC/SHG 4 1.52<br />

Crop<br />

demonstration<br />

L P UG/WC 4.5 2.56<br />

Turmeric Plot L UG/SHG 2 1.52<br />

Lemon plot P C UG/SHG 1 400 1.35<br />

Floriculture L P UG/SHG 2 48000 1.88<br />

Total 38.75 92555 18.7<br />

Expected<br />

month &<br />

year <strong>of</strong><br />

completio<br />

n (mm/<br />

yyyy)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 93


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No, 41.i, Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Afforestation Activities<br />

Particulars Value Unit<br />

Crop Name Ailanthus<br />

Plant To Plant Spacing 8.00 Mt<br />

Row to Row Spacing 8.00 Mt<br />

Pit Length 1.00 Mt<br />

Pit Width 1.00 Mt<br />

Pit Depth 1.00 Mt<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Plants 156 Nos.<br />

Plantation Area 10.00 Ha.<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Plants for ha 1,560 Nos.<br />

Gap Filling 20 %<br />

Table No, 41. ii , Cost Estimation for afforestation activity<br />

S. No. Description No. Lengt Width Depth Unit Quantity Rate Amount<br />

h(m.) (m.) (m.)<br />

1 Digging <strong>of</strong> pits for plants in Ordinary murum 1,560 1 1 1 Cum 1,560.00 10 15600<br />

2 Plants saplings for plantation in Govt. pasture area, sapling<br />

not less than 30 cm. height<br />

1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 10 15600<br />

3 Transportation <strong>of</strong> plants from nursery to camp site upto 5Km 1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 1 1560<br />

4 Loading and unloading <strong>of</strong> plants 1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 1 1560<br />

5 Rehandling <strong>of</strong> plants from camp site to actual planting site 1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 1 1560<br />

upto 20Omt.<br />

6 Cost <strong>of</strong> fertiliser & insecticides incl. application 1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 10 15600<br />

7 Weeding and Hoeing two times (Twice in year] 1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 2 3120<br />

Total 54600<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 94


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Bio-Gas<br />

The idea is to use cattle dung and kitchen s<strong>of</strong>t waste and waste water to produce bio gas in a bio reactor. The unmanaged cattle dung can be<br />

managed properly if fed into a bio reactor. The reactor produces bio gas which is about 60% methane and 40 % carbon dioxide along with<br />

traces <strong>of</strong> other gases. This is used as cooking fuel and for lighting in some cases in place <strong>of</strong> traditional inefficient wood and kerosene stove.<br />

Biogas is a clean and efficient fuel. Because <strong>of</strong> the biogas the need for collecting firewood is avoided. The cooking is speeded up and time<br />

on cooking is reduced. Women have spare time to take care <strong>of</strong> their children and their education. A portion <strong>of</strong> their spare time is spent on<br />

sustainable income generating activities.<br />

Impact on natural resources<br />

· Reduction <strong>of</strong> pressure on the forest, as the families will use less wood (or no wood at all) to cook. There is an important deforestation in<br />

the district, and villagers, who went 2km from the village to collect wood.<br />

· Restoration <strong>of</strong> soil fertility<br />

The chemical fertilizers are damaging the soil fertility, and the annual crop yields are decreasing. Studies have shown that when vermincompost<br />

is used, the crops increased <strong>of</strong> 13%.<br />

· Control <strong>of</strong> local water contamination<br />

Leaching <strong>of</strong> organic wastes and chemical fertilizers can occur when they are not managed. It will manage organic wastes and reduces the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers these risks are lessened.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 95


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No, 41.iii: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Bio-gas<br />

Detailed Cost Estimate for a 3 Cum Capacity Bio-gas<br />

S<br />

No Particulars Unit No L W H/D Qty Rate Amount<br />

1 Excavation <strong>of</strong> pit for main Tank ( Digester) Cum 1 22/7X2X2X1.5 18.84<br />

i Extra Excavation for round shape <strong>of</strong> Digester Tank Cum 1 4/3X22/7X2X2X.5 8.37<br />

ii Excavation <strong>of</strong> foundation for Fedder Tank Cum 1 22/7X0.8X0.8X0.5 1.00<br />

iii Excavation <strong>of</strong> foundation for slurry Tank Cum 1 2.5 1.5 0.5 1.88<br />

30.09 41 1233.82<br />

2 PCC in 1:2:4 cement Concrete<br />

i In bottom <strong>of</strong> the main Digester Tank 3" thick Cum 1 22/7X2X2X0.075 1.88<br />

ii In bottom <strong>of</strong> the Feeder Tank 3" thick Cum 1 22/7X0.8X0.8X0.075 0.15<br />

iii In bottom <strong>of</strong> the slurry tank 3" thick Cum 1 2.5 1.5 0.075 0.28<br />

2.32 2420 5604.65<br />

3 Brick Work in 1:5 cement mortar<br />

i for construction <strong>of</strong> digester tank dom Cum 1 0.63<br />

ii for construction <strong>of</strong> feeder tank Cum 1 0.20<br />

iii for construction <strong>of</strong> slurry tank Cum 1 0.88<br />

4 Plastering <strong>of</strong> the surface in 1:4 cement mortar 1.71 2280 3896.43<br />

i Digester from Inside and outside Sqm 1 3/2X22/7X1X1 4.71<br />

ii Feeder tank from inside and out side Sqm 1 5.02<br />

iii Slurry tank from inside and outside Sqm 1 17.6<br />

27.33 74 2022.72<br />

Fixing <strong>of</strong> GI pipe nipple 1" dia and 20cm long on top <strong>of</strong><br />

5 digester dome Job 1 1 150 150<br />

6<br />

Providing <strong>of</strong> gas burner+ HDPE pipe 1/4" +1/2" gate<br />

valve+Hose Nipple, Hose Clamp unit 1 1 1860 1860<br />

Total Constructional Cost in Rs. 14767.61<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 96


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Feeder Tank<br />

610mm<br />

LINE DIAGRAM OF BIOGAS PLANT MODEL<br />

Outlet Gas Pipe M<br />

S O<br />

Out Let tank<br />

Initial Slurry Level K<br />

R1 R2<br />

150 mm dia Acc Pipe F Initial Slurry Level<br />

O Opening 600<br />

mm<br />

Digester Tank A 12mm thick Plaster<br />

500 mm<br />

T thickness <strong>of</strong><br />

Masonry Centre<br />

B<br />

600 I<br />

P and C Thickness <strong>of</strong> Concrete at bottom<br />

D<br />

SECTIONAL ELEVATION<br />

L<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 97


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Agriculural Improvement programme<br />

Our understanding is that without addressing the crucial area <strong>of</strong> end-use regulation, no amount <strong>of</strong> rainwater harvesting is going to work.<br />

For this the most important requirement is the working out <strong>of</strong> a sustainable package <strong>of</strong> practices for dryland agriculture. This is moreover<br />

an alternative to the Green Revolution, which largely bypassed the drylands or is completely inappropriate for them. It is believed that the<br />

economy must be viewed as a sub-system <strong>of</strong> the larger eco-system, which comprises not merely human beings but also natural resources<br />

and non-human species.<br />

The watershed village area has seen penetration <strong>of</strong> Green Revolution (GR) inputs in agriculture, which is the main occupation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

people. Cotton that was the main crop <strong>of</strong> the area is becoming completely unviable because <strong>of</strong> high pesticide costs. Despite excessive use<br />

<strong>of</strong> pesticides, pestilence remains an intractable problem. The inputs available to them are <strong>of</strong>ten sub-quality. For example, local dealers<br />

dispose <strong>of</strong> expired pesticides to illiterate farmers. Farmers are in general suffering because <strong>of</strong> high input costs. However, their problem is<br />

that they perceive no alternative to the GR package. What is worse, the catchment areas have suffered severe denudation <strong>of</strong> forest cover in<br />

recent years. This has raised the rate <strong>of</strong> soil erosion and surface run<strong>of</strong>f. Biodiversity has also been adversely affected. There is a fodder and<br />

fuel crisis in the area. In the recent 3-year drought, the worst impact was on cattle. Within this context, our attempt (see Figure below) is to<br />

forge several new links within the elements <strong>of</strong> the natural resource base <strong>of</strong> the area (climate, rainfed agriculture, wastelands, forests, and<br />

crop residues, animal and human wastes and decentralized energy sources). With soil and water conservation technologies, surface run<strong>of</strong>f<br />

is minimised which improves the level <strong>of</strong> soil moisture. Loss <strong>of</strong> essential soil nutrients is also reduced. And harvested run<strong>of</strong>f is recycled to<br />

agricultural land through water harvesting structures. The utilisation <strong>of</strong> soil moisture through vegetative systems strengthens the flows <strong>of</strong><br />

fodder, firewood. Non-woody biomass from the regenerated forests and commons, as well as part <strong>of</strong> the crop residues, is returned to the<br />

soil through microbial decomposition. Revegetation <strong>of</strong> the commons also provides material for direct incorporation into soil as green<br />

manure. Animal wastes are directed to biogas plants, from which bio-energy is supplied either to the households for cooking. The organic<br />

residue from the biogas plant (digested slurry) goes to enrich the soil as a nitrogen- rich fertiliser.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 98


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

These are the major components in the agricultural programme to be carried out in the Programme:<br />

• Seed distribution<br />

• Seed multiplication<br />

• Screening <strong>of</strong> new varieties<br />

• Popularisation <strong>of</strong> a package <strong>of</strong> agricultural practices<br />

• Floriculture<br />

• Horticultural plantation<br />

• Non Pesticide Management<br />

• Vermicomposting<br />

• Phoenix/date-palm plantation along the stream banks on farm bunds<br />

• Jatropha plantation along fencing and on wastelands<br />

• Afforestation<br />

Our effort has been to introduce a complete alternative to hybrid seeds and the Green Revolution package and practices as listed above. As<br />

a trial <strong>of</strong> the recommended practice <strong>of</strong> intercropping <strong>of</strong> different crops, farmers <strong>of</strong> the project area were chosen for Front Line<br />

Demonstrations (FLDs). These demonstrations attempt to make certain type <strong>of</strong> crop varieties popular again by showing the possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

intercropping with a cash crop. The model, thus, attempts to show the households the possibility <strong>of</strong> getting some extra cash income while<br />

ensuring food security. In collaboration with ICRISAT, Hyderabad, Junagarh Agricultural University, KVK-Targharia and Kutch, Rajkot,<br />

we will carry out trials <strong>of</strong> composite varieties <strong>of</strong> different crops as trail or demonstration plot. Seeds <strong>of</strong> varieties identified as suitable to the<br />

area will be disseminated to more than 100 farmers in watershed villages.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 99


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

The Livestock <strong>Development</strong> Programme<br />

Many new initiatives in the field <strong>of</strong> veterinary care, fodder development, training programmes will be taken up that will bring the<br />

two villages in the diary map. Many <strong>of</strong> theses initiatives yielded results much beyond what we had hoped to achieve, however the year was<br />

also one <strong>of</strong> introspection in terms <strong>of</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> a the leap in dairy development that we were expecting from the old routes.<br />

Loans to SHG members/UG groups<br />

The special loans for purchase <strong>of</strong> cattle will be made available to members in the location. Members will be given loans before the<br />

summer season. Members have to procure good quality animals. Veterinary support services will be provided by the veterinary hospitals<br />

and in animal husbandry camps. Accordingly members will be selected by the criteria fixed by the group. Breeds suitable for the area will<br />

be brought.<br />

Creation <strong>of</strong> a Risk Fund<br />

The livestock development programme will set up a risk fund to take care <strong>of</strong> an accidental death <strong>of</strong> the animals. Members who avail<br />

<strong>of</strong> cattle loans will contribute some amount towards a risk fund. In the event <strong>of</strong> death <strong>of</strong> the animal during the loan repayment period,<br />

money pooled in the risk fund can be used to help the member repay the loan outstanding.<br />

Veterinary Services<br />

Veterinary services will be provided in the cluster villages. The cluster was chosen for the reason that most families in the area are<br />

landless or near-landless. They are highly dependent on small ruminants like cows, buffaloes and other cattle. Vaccination camps will be<br />

conducted time to time against chronic diseases in the larger animals. The location also will be provided with successful Artificial<br />

insemination (AI) services, relying on the supplies provided by the government veterinary hospital in Jasdan.<br />

The pregnant cow care programme was a concept borrowed from the Vasudhara Dairy, Valsad, <strong>Gujarat</strong>. This will be launched with<br />

the primary aim <strong>of</strong> demonstrating that the productivity <strong>of</strong> the local cows could be increased with appropriate feeding practices. Within this<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 100


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

programme, veterinary pr<strong>of</strong>essionals would first identify local cows which are pregnant and have around two more months to go before<br />

parturation. Once the animals were identified and if the owner was willing the animals were put on an intensive feeding and care<br />

programme for a three month period, from the start <strong>of</strong> the programme to one month after parturition. The cost per animal works out to Rs.<br />

3700.The farmer would contribute the dry fodder and green fodder, in kind. Towards the costs <strong>of</strong> inputs procured from the market (works<br />

out to Rs. 1350), the costs were borne in the ratio 60:40 between WCs and the farmer. Farmers from the project villages will be motivated<br />

to participate in the programme.<br />

Training and Exposure visits<br />

A large group <strong>of</strong> people, consisting mainly <strong>of</strong> women dairy farmers who will take loans for purchase <strong>of</strong> cattle, will visit the<br />

successful dairy cooperatives under the Vasudhara dairy, Valsad and the Panchmahal dairy, Godhra. These cooperatives were chosen<br />

mainly for the reason that many <strong>of</strong> the successful dairy farmers in these areas are small farmers belonging to various tribal communities.<br />

These dairies had also built up their business on the hard work <strong>of</strong> women farmers who had taken loans from the SHGs run by the<br />

cooperative union to buy cattle. The interaction will be helpful as dairy co-operative members in other district will make them to<br />

understand how those women, with a similar background, had been able to build up a good livelihood option revolving around the dairy.<br />

Training addressing the issue <strong>of</strong> infertility in animals will be provided to beneficiary group. Three day training cum exposure visit will be<br />

organized for the team and some farmers to the BAIF organization. The visit will provide a first hand view <strong>of</strong> the options open to dryland<br />

farmers to ensure the availability <strong>of</strong> good quality fodder. The farmers who had adopted such practices demonstrated how it could help in<br />

cutting down the cost <strong>of</strong> feed concentrates.<br />

One day training on azolla cultivation, as a means <strong>of</strong> providing high protein feed to livestock, will be organized by KVK. Scientist<br />

from the KVK, will demonstrate the simple method by which azolla could be grown in the backyard <strong>of</strong> farmers. Demonstration pits are<br />

expected to set up in the demonstration plot <strong>of</strong> farmers.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 101


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.42: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities: Kharachiya Jam<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> village<br />

Kharachiya<br />

Jam<br />

Kharachiya<br />

Jam<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />

(i) Private<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

(ii)<br />

Community<br />

(iii)<br />

Others<br />

(pl.<br />

specify)<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

(ii)SHG<br />

(iii) WC<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Rs. in lakh)<br />

Target<br />

Expected<br />

month & year<br />

<strong>of</strong> completion<br />

(mm/yyyy)<br />

Livelihood Intervention<br />

Small ruminants Private 0.40 Apr-2011-12<br />

Animal Husbandary/Dairy unit Private UG/SHG 1.25 Feb-2011-12<br />

Animal Camp (5 times) Community 0.50<br />

Oct,Nev-<br />

2011-12-13<br />

Kitchen garden Kits (96 units) Private SHG 0.82 Oct-2011<br />

Business/Training/Charkhi Private UG/SHG 4.00 Mar-2012<br />

Jatropha (bio-fuel) in 1 ha Community WC/UG 0.34 Jul-2012-13<br />

Vermi Composting-8 unit Community UG 0.80 Nov-2012<br />

Biogas 1 unit (convergence with<br />

GEDA)<br />

Community 8.74 Apr-2012<br />

Total <strong>of</strong> Livelihood Intervention:16.85, but 8.74 lakh will be contributed by GEDA<br />

Production System and Microenterprise <strong>Development</strong><br />

Fodder grass/Phoenix Private Community 1.90 Jun-2011-12<br />

Crop demo./Organic Agriculture Private UG/SHG 1.67 May-11<br />

Nursery raising (2 units) Community SHG 0.2 Jan-2011-12<br />

Floriculture (1 ha) Private Community SHG 0.93 Sep-2012<br />

Turmeric Plot (0.5 ha) Private SHG 0.37 Oct-2012<br />

Veterinary Kits ( 100 units) Private SHG 1.15 Aug-2012<br />

Handi craft/Bharat Gunthan Community UG/SHG 1.19 Oct-2012<br />

SHG revolving fund/Training Community SHG 1.1 Nov-2012<br />

Drip kits Private Community SHG 0.25 Dec-2011<br />

Lemon/Guava Plantation (1 ha) Private Community UG/WC 1.05 Jun-2011<br />

Plantation <strong>of</strong> Horticulture(1861no) Private 0.65 Jun-2011<br />

Total <strong>of</strong> Microenterprise and Production systems: 10.46 lakhs<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 102


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.42.1: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities:Panchvda<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

village<br />

1 Panchvda<br />

2 Panchvda<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />

(i) Private<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

(ii)<br />

Community<br />

(iii)<br />

Others<br />

(pl.<br />

specify)<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

(ii)SHG<br />

(iii) WC<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Rs. in<br />

lakh)<br />

Target<br />

Expected<br />

month &<br />

year <strong>of</strong><br />

completion<br />

(mm/yyyy)<br />

Livelihood Intervention<br />

Small ruminants/Honey bee Private 2.25 Apr-2011-12<br />

Animal Husbandary/Dairy unit Private UG/SHG 2.70 Feb-2011-12<br />

AnimalCamp/Ag demonstration Community 2.00<br />

Oct,Nev-<br />

2011-12-13<br />

Mandap services/Craftman ship 1.54 Oct-2011<br />

Business/Training/Shop/Others Private UG/SHG 3.5 Mar-2012<br />

Jatropha (bio-fuel) 2 ha Community WC/UG 0.65 Jul-2012-13<br />

Fodder/Date palm 0.90 Nov-2012<br />

Vermi Composting (1 units) Community UG 2.81 Apr-2012<br />

Total <strong>of</strong> Livelihood Intervention: 16.35<br />

Production System and Microenterprise <strong>Development</strong><br />

Crop demonstration Private Community WC/UG 1.80 Jun-2011-12<br />

Horticultural/Medicinal<br />

Private Community UG 2.6 May-11<br />

Plantation/Grafted Bor/Sitaphal<br />

Organic Agriculture (1 ha) Private PIA/UG/SHG 0.89 Jan-2011-12<br />

Nursery raising (5 unit) Community SHG 0.50 Sep-2012<br />

Kitchen garden Kit (219 units) Private PIA/SHG 1.86 Oct-2012<br />

Floriculture (2 ha) Private Community SHG 1.88 Aug-2012<br />

Turmeric plot (2 ha) Private UG/SHG 1.51 Mar-2012<br />

Cumin, Spices and turmeric<br />

flouring and packaging<br />

Private SHG 0.90 Oct-2012<br />

Veterinary Kits (90 units) Private SHG 0.71 Nov-2012<br />

Papad making unit (3) Community UG/SHG 1.08 Dec-2011<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 103


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Handi craft/Charkha Udyog UG/SHG 0.67 Jun-2011-12<br />

SHG revolving fund Community SHG 2.2 May-11<br />

Dripkits/Machinaries<br />

demonstration/new seed Private Community UG/SHG 1.45 Jan-2011-12<br />

varieties demonstration<br />

Lemon Plantation Community UG/WC 1.35 Sep-2012<br />

Fodder unit (5 ha) Community UG 1.91 Oct-2012<br />

Total: 21.43<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 104


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.42.2: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities: Jangvad<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> village<br />

1 Jangvad<br />

2 Jangvad<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />

(i) Private<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

(ii)<br />

Community<br />

(iii) Others<br />

(pl.<br />

specify)<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

(ii)SHG<br />

(iii) WC<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Rs. in<br />

lakh)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 105<br />

Target<br />

Expected<br />

month & year<br />

<strong>of</strong> completion<br />

(mm/yyyy)<br />

Livelihood Intervention<br />

Small ruminants Private 1.5 Apr-2011-12<br />

Animal Husbandary/Dairy unit Private UG/SHG 2.5 Feb-2011-12<br />

Animal Camp/AI/Exposure (12) Community PIA 2.5 Oct 2012-13<br />

Kitchen garden Kits (124 units) Private PIA/SHG 0.98 Oct-2011<br />

Fodder grass/Date palm Private UG/WC 1.35 Mar-2012<br />

Business/Training/Others Private UG/SHG 10.95 Jul-2012-13<br />

Jatropha (bio-fuel) 2 ha Community WC/UG 0.65 Nov-2012<br />

Moti para instruments UG/SHG 1.90 Apr-2012<br />

Total <strong>of</strong> Livelihood Intervention: 22.33<br />

Production System and Microenterprise <strong>Development</strong><br />

Vermi Composting (2 units) Community UG 2.5 Jun-2011-12<br />

Crop demonstration Private Community PIA/WC/UG 2.23 May-11<br />

Organic Agriculture (3 ha) Private UG/SHG 2.67 Jan-2011-12<br />

Nursery raising (5 unit) Community SHG 0.50 Sep-2012<br />

Floriculture (4 ha) Private Community SHG 3.75 Oct-2012<br />

Turmeric plot (2 ha) Community UG/SHG 1.51 Aug-2012<br />

Cumin, Spices and turmeric<br />

flouring and packaging/Milk<br />

production unit<br />

Private Community SHG 2.83 Mar-2012<br />

Veterinary Kits (120 units) Private SHG 0.94 Oct-2012<br />

Papad making/Pickle unit Community UG/SHG 2.8 Nov-2012<br />

Handicraft/ /Immitation/Centering Private UG/SHG 2.52 Dec-2011<br />

SHG revolving fund Community SHG 3.00 Jun-2011-12<br />

Drip kits Private Community SHG 0.90 May-11<br />

Lemon Plantation Community UG/WC 1.35 Jan-2011-12<br />

Fodder unit (4) Community UG 1.52 Jan-2011-12<br />

Total: 29.02


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.42.3: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities: Jasapar<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> village<br />

Jasapar<br />

Jasapar<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />

(i) Private<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

(ii)<br />

Community<br />

(iii) Others<br />

(pl. specify)<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

(ii)SHG<br />

(iii) WC<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Rs. in lakh)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 106<br />

Target<br />

Expected<br />

month & year<br />

<strong>of</strong> completion<br />

(mm/yyyy)<br />

Livelihood Intervention<br />

Small ruminants Private 1.8 Apr-2011-12<br />

Animal Husbandary/Dairy unit Private UG/SHG 3.3 Feb-2011-12<br />

Animal Camp/AI/Exposure (12) Community PIA 2.25 Oct12-13<br />

Kitchen garden Kits (185 units) Private PIA/SHG 1.57 Oct-2011<br />

Fodder grass/Date palm Private UG/WC 1.35 Mar-2012<br />

Business/Training/shop/Others Private UG/SHG 4.40 Jul-2012-13<br />

Jatropha (bio-fuel) 4 ha Community WC/UG 1.3 Nov-2012<br />

Mandap services/Craftman ship UG/SHG 0.90 Apr-2012<br />

Community Bio-gas<br />

(Convergence with GEDA)<br />

Community GEDA PIA/WC 8.74 Apr-2011-12<br />

Total <strong>of</strong> Livelihood Intervention: 25.61, (8.74 lac, GEDA)<br />

Production System and Microenterprise <strong>Development</strong><br />

Vermi Composting (1 units) Community UG 2.81 Jun-2011-12<br />

Crop demonstration Private Community PIA/WC/UG 2.56 May-11<br />

Organic Agriculture (3 ha) Private UG/SHG 2.67 Jan-2011-12<br />

Nursery raising (6 unit) Community SHG 0.60 Sep-2012<br />

Floriculture (2 ha) Private Community SHG 1.88 Oct-2012<br />

Turmeric plot (2 ha) Community UG/SHG 1.52 Aug-2012<br />

Cumin, Spices and turmeric<br />

Private SHG 0.90 Mar-2012<br />

flouring and packaging<br />

Veterinary Kits (40 units) Private SHG 0.31 Oct-2012<br />

Papad making unit (4 unit) Community UG/SHG 1.28 Dec-2011<br />

Handi craft/Charkha Udyog Private UG/SHG 1.33 Jun-2011-12<br />

SHG revolving fund Community SHG 2.3 May-11<br />

Drip kits Private Community SHG 0.90 Jan-2011-12<br />

Lemon Plantation Community UG/WC 1.35 July 2011<br />

Fodder unit (4 ha) Community UG 1.52<br />

Total: 21.93


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Livelihood Intervention<br />

Promotion <strong>of</strong> micro-enterprises and various income generation activities is an important aspect <strong>of</strong> empowerment. Although it is extremely<br />

difficult to find remunerative self employment, there are enormous untapped opportunities in the rural sector. These include both on-farm<br />

and <strong>of</strong>f-farm opportunities. Typically families living below poverty line, SC, ST and landless in a cluster <strong>of</strong> villages are motivated to take<br />

part in holistic development through livelihood opportunities through multidisciplinary interventions.<br />

Advantages <strong>of</strong> Agro-Based Activities: While promoting various income generation activities, agro-based activities have advantages<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the following reasons:<br />

1. Target groups are acquainted with most <strong>of</strong> the basic skills.<br />

2. Easy access to inputs.<br />

3. No problems <strong>of</strong> marketing, as most <strong>of</strong> the outputs are locally consumed as food.<br />

4. As over 50-60 % <strong>of</strong> the rural families own land and livestock, income generation activities can be initiated immediately without heavy<br />

capital investment.<br />

5. Risk <strong>of</strong> failure due to improper technology, poor quality, low demand and poor price recovery are very low. Hence, the chances <strong>of</strong><br />

success are high.<br />

6. Infrastructure required for promotion <strong>of</strong> on-farm activities has been very well established. Hence, the entrepreneurs can progress even in<br />

backward regions, which are deprived <strong>of</strong> regular power supply and electronic information connectivity. It is therefore advantageous to tap<br />

all the opportunities to promote various on-farm activities. The experience has confirmed that the best strategy to promote income<br />

generation activities through SHGs is to analyze the on-going agro-based activities undertaken by the members and introduce suitable<br />

interventions to enhance the production. There are also excellent opportunities to improve post production management <strong>of</strong> the produce<br />

through grading, storage, processing and marketing.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 107


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Various micro-enterprises activities through UG and Self Help Groups will be promoted. The list <strong>of</strong> micro-enterprises taken up by various<br />

SHGs is presented below. Among these activities, agriculture followed by animal husbandry, Khadi making units and food processing.<br />

However, over a period <strong>of</strong> time, agriculture, animal husbandry and food processing supercede the trade as many individuals participate in<br />

enhancing their production at the family level and try to organize themselves to market them collectively. Other activities such as<br />

production <strong>of</strong> utility items, construction related activities, handicrafts and Moti work find it difficult to sustain due to poor marketing<br />

infrastructure, lack market and competition from other sources.<br />

Support Needed for Promotion <strong>of</strong> Micro-enterprises<br />

Following support is needed to promote micro-enterprises through women SHGs.<br />

1. Motivation <strong>of</strong> the target communities, particularly women and landless farmers<br />

2. Formation <strong>of</strong> Self Help Groups and their Federations<br />

3. Gender sensitization<br />

4. Training and capacity building<br />

5. Micro-finance. Provision <strong>of</strong> credit facilities and linkage with banks<br />

6. <strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> infrastructure, particularly through the SHG Federations to provide necessary support services and marketing<br />

7. Trade networking and establishment <strong>of</strong> market outlets<br />

8. Village level Information Centre: The multi-disciplinary team interacted with the SHGs and User groups to explore the potentials for<br />

development <strong>of</strong> various enterprises and extend necessary support for dissemination <strong>of</strong> technologies, procurement <strong>of</strong> inputs, training <strong>of</strong><br />

members and establishment <strong>of</strong> linkage with the market. There should be some agency to provide guidance to the entrepreneurs as and when<br />

needed.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 108


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

The selected production activities for the watershed villages follow the above-mentioned process, and are selected in such a way that they<br />

should be:<br />

• economically viable<br />

• environmentally sustainable<br />

• socially equitable<br />

• energy efficient<br />

• employment generation<br />

Production System-1: Papad production units<br />

For women to become a successful entrepreneur, she needs access to capital, technical and managerial know-how and market. The essence<br />

to empower rural women lies in catalyzing appropriate economic activities at the grass root level and creating new opportunities for them<br />

to earn higher income in order ton improve their standard <strong>of</strong> living. This objective could be accomplished by establishing enterprises that<br />

are based on the locally available resources and preferably indigenous knowledge. Self Help Groups (SHG), each with 10-20 members,<br />

will be motivated and proper training will be provided for each micro enterprise activity which will improve the quality <strong>of</strong> their own lives<br />

as well as the lives <strong>of</strong> those around them.<br />

Introduction<br />

Papad is delicious snack. It is consumed at homes, restaurants, hotels, etc. Papad is a traditional item consumed in all functions.<br />

Traditionally this activity was confined to household papad making but in view <strong>of</strong> increasing demand and availability <strong>of</strong> machinery<br />

(mechanisation) it has now been developed in cottage and small scale sector. Enterprise can be started by 2 family members and optimum<br />

machinery.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 109


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Market<br />

Field survey findings indicated that papad industry has good potential in big centers in cities like Morbi and Maliya miyana <strong>of</strong><br />

Rajkot areas. There is a good demand for papads because it is a food product and commonly consumed commodity in all households and<br />

hotels. Women entrepreneurs can gainfully take up this papad unit in their houses but proper packing and distribution network is necessary<br />

to sell in bulk quantities.<br />

Manufacturing Process<br />

Generally weighed quantity <strong>of</strong> floor is taken in a mixer. A solution <strong>of</strong> common salt and carbonates is added in requisite quantity <strong>of</strong><br />

water and the contents are kneaded at maximum speed to get a homogenous lump <strong>of</strong> the dough. After resting the dough for 30 minutes, it is<br />

divided into balls. These are pressed into circular discs. Corn starch can be used as dusting material to prevent stickiness. The papads are<br />

usually dried. After drying, it is packed in various size packing. Lot <strong>of</strong> 25 or 50 papads is then packed in polythene bags. Papad can be<br />

manufactured from different varieties <strong>of</strong> pulses or there could be a combination <strong>of</strong> pulses as well. Ingredients required for Papad making<br />

are Black gram, oil, sodium carbonate, flour <strong>of</strong> Arhar dal.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 110


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Process flow chart <strong>of</strong> Papad making<br />

Dough formation from various ingredients<br />

Making small balls from dough<br />

Pressing<br />

Sun Drying<br />

Sealing and Packing<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 111


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Production Capacity<br />

Monthly approximately 250 kg papad can be produced.<br />

Static Capital Investments:<br />

A) Land/Infrastructure :<br />

A person can start his activity in his own house by using Approx. 150 Sq. Ft. carpet area.<br />

B) Plant/Machinery/Instruments etc.<br />

Sr.<br />

Particular Nos. Price (Rs.)<br />

No.<br />

B) Plant/Machinery/Instruments etc.<br />

1 Flour Mill with electric motor 1 17000.00<br />

2 Set for Papad making 1000.00<br />

3 Other instruments 1000.00<br />

4 Installation, foundation etc. 3000.00<br />

Total : - 22000.00<br />

C) Office Furniture etc.<br />

1 Cup board 3000.00<br />

D) Capital Investment<br />

Raw Material and wages <strong>of</strong> labour 3000.00<br />

Grand Total :- 28000.00<br />

Production Cost (Monthly)<br />

1 Raw Material 3500.00<br />

2 Power fuel charge 200.00<br />

3 Packing 100.00<br />

4 Depreciation Cost 200.00<br />

5 Repair, Storage etc. 100.00<br />

6 House Rent 250.00<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 112


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

7 Others 100.00<br />

Total : - 4450.00<br />

Total Production (Monthly)<br />

1. Papad 250 Kg X Rs. 32/Kg 8000<br />

Cost Benefit Ratio (Monthly)<br />

Monthly Selling income 8000<br />

Production Cost 4450<br />

------------<br />

Total monthly income will be Rs. 3550 3550<br />

The unit can be taken up by landless, small farmer and land with limited farm labour, thus making it most suitable to the project villages,<br />

and the scheme will be taken up in such a manner that there should be no marketing problem, as they will be consumed directly by the near<br />

by villages or cities. Training will be provided to the beneficiaries and the content is shown below<br />

Training Content<br />

A. Theoretical<br />

• Introduction to different types <strong>of</strong> papads.<br />

• Tools and Equipments used in papad making.<br />

• Dough making - variations in shapes, size, and flavour.<br />

• The processes involved in papads making.<br />

• The hygiene aspects associated with food products.<br />

• Market development.<br />

• Addresses <strong>of</strong> the suppliers <strong>of</strong> raw materials, & packaging materials.<br />

B. Practical<br />

• Raw materials for papad making – the quality and variety.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 113


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

• Introduction to the machinery and equipments used.<br />

• Dough making and the value addition in the form <strong>of</strong> flavour.<br />

• Bringing about variations in shapes and sizes.<br />

• Papad & Chips making – Practical<br />

• Drying and preservation<br />

• Cost considerations and waste reduction.<br />

• Pricing & packaging<br />

Production System-2: Dairy Buffalo Farming<br />

Estimated Project cost for Dairy Buffalo farming <strong>of</strong> one unit<br />

Farming is a complex, multi-component, interactive process that is dependant in land, animal, human and natural resources as well as<br />

capital investment. Sustainable agriculture embraces all such aspects <strong>of</strong> farming system. Small and marginal land holders can reap the<br />

benefit. In this context live stock is an important component.<br />

Dairy farming scheme can be taken up in the semi-urban, village and near highway villages, for the sake on transportation, breeding and<br />

marketing facilities. Since milk is an easily perishable item, it is to be immediately consumed or sold, so the farms needs to be located in<br />

the consuming centre itself. The scheme provides for purchase <strong>of</strong> one milch animal, construction <strong>of</strong> byre, feeding equipments and water<br />

tank. Cost <strong>of</strong> feed for one year and the insurance premium for the first year has also been capitalised. The recurring expenditures include<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> feed and medicines, water and electricity charges and insurance fees. The concentrated feeds will be supplemented with green<br />

grasses and fodder tree leaves.<br />

A. Non – Recurring Expenditure:<br />

1. Construction <strong>of</strong> Byre (Cowshed) and feed Godown @ 50 Sq.ft. floor / Buffalo @ Rs. 100 per Sq.ft : Rs. 10000.00<br />

2. Cost <strong>of</strong> Water Storage Tank L.S.: Rs. 2,000.00<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 114


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

3. Cost <strong>of</strong> equipments i.e. watering trough, milk can, Basin etc. @ Rs. 1125/- per animal<br />

---------------------------------------------------------<br />

Total: Rs. 13125.00<br />

---------------------------------------------------------<br />

B. CAPITALISED EXPENDITURE:<br />

1. Cost <strong>of</strong> one dairy buffalo @ Rs. 35,000/- (including transportation)<br />

2. Veterinary Aids, Medicines, Vaccination, Breeding charge etc. @ Rs. 500/- per animal per year<br />

3. Cost <strong>of</strong> Feed for one year @ Rs.8 Kg/ buffalo/ day, @ Rs. 10/- per Kg. conc.: Rs. 29,200.00<br />

4. Insurance premium @ 6.5% <strong>of</strong> original cost for 1 Nos. <strong>of</strong> Buffalo. : Rs. 1,950.00<br />

5. Water & Electricity charges @ Rs. 30 per buffalo per month: Rs. 360.00<br />

---------------------------------------------<br />

Total: Rs. 67,010.00<br />

---------------------------------------------<br />

C. Total Investment Cost:<br />

i.e. A + B = Rs. 13125.00 + Rs. 67,010.00 = Rs. 80135.00<br />

D. Gross Income (for the first one year):<br />

1. Sale <strong>of</strong> 2700 lits. <strong>of</strong> milk average 10 lits./ animal / day for 270 days @ Rs. 20 per lit. <strong>of</strong> milk: Rs. 54000.00<br />

2. Sale <strong>of</strong> manure (dung) @ Rs. 550 per cow per year<br />

3. Sale <strong>of</strong> empty Gunny bags: Rs. 450.00<br />

----------------------------------------------<br />

Total: Rs. 55000.00<br />

----------------------------------------------<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 115


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

E. Cost <strong>of</strong> expenditure for one year: (to be continued by the beneficiary)<br />

1) Cost <strong>of</strong> concentrated feed @ 8 Kg/ cow/ day @ Rs. 10/ per Kg. for 365 days: Rs 29,200.00<br />

2) Cost <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Aids, medicines, etc. @ Rs. 500/- per animal per year<br />

3) Water & Electricity charge @ Rs. 30 per animal per month: Rs. 360.00<br />

4) Insurance premium @ 6.5 % <strong>of</strong> original Cost: Rs. 1950.00<br />

-----------------------------------------------------<br />

Total: Rs. 32,010.00<br />

-----------------------------------------------------<br />

F. Net Income (for first one year)<br />

i.e. D – E = Rs. 55000.00 - Rs. 32010.00 = Rs. 22,990.00<br />

Note: Assuming the farmer maintaining the same strength <strong>of</strong> the herd or may add one more animal and at the same production trend, the<br />

account statement <strong>of</strong> 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th year will be more.<br />

Assumption and Technical norms<br />

1. Cost <strong>of</strong> one Dairy Buffalo: Rs. 35,000.00<br />

2. Floor space: 50 sq.ft. per cow.<br />

3. Feed consumption: 8 Kg. concentrate 25 Kg. fodder per day<br />

4. Feed price : Rs. 10/- per Kg. ( concentrate feed )<br />

5. Selling Price <strong>of</strong> milk : Rs. 20 per litre.<br />

6. Manure Production : 5 tonnes per animal per year.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 116


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

7. Sale <strong>of</strong> Manure : Rs. 550<br />

8. Lactation period : 270 days per year.<br />

9. Average dry period : 95 days.<br />

10. Land : Considered available free <strong>of</strong> cost.<br />

Production System-3: Fodder bank for Watershed villages<br />

Introduction:<br />

"The fodder bank technology is a farming practice whereby leguminous shrubs and grass species are grown on a farm to provide<br />

fodder for livestock sector." It provides a wide range <strong>of</strong> animal products that are rich in high quality proteins and have the potential as good<br />

and sustainable sources <strong>of</strong> income in many areas. Through the dairy cooperative societies, farmers will be supplied with seeds <strong>of</strong> bajra,<br />

multi-cut jowar and cowpea for the summer season; multi cut bajra, multi cut jowar and maize for the kharif season and bajra and berseem<br />

for the rabi season. The demand for fodder seeds was the highest for the rabi season. Farmers cite the availability <strong>of</strong> green grass in<br />

abundance during the rains as a reason for their not devoting acreage solely for fodder during the kharif season. The accent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme during the year was to get across the message <strong>of</strong> growing a mixture <strong>of</strong> fodder crops providing complete nutrition for the<br />

animals. The success <strong>of</strong> the programme lay in making available quality fodder seeds to farmers. One aspect where we could have done<br />

better was in getting farmers to try out a mix <strong>of</strong> fodder crops and devote needed acreage to growing fodder for their animals. The fodder<br />

bank ensures fodder availability which in turn reduces the distressed migration <strong>of</strong> the people resulting in sustainable livelihood<br />

opportunities and enhances natural resource security in the project area.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 117


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Objective <strong>of</strong> a fodder bank:<br />

1. Build a local fodder bank and organize the distribution <strong>of</strong> fodder during drought and scarce situation. .<br />

2. Establish and maintain village fodder farm in the community grazing area, and allocate the community land for fodder production, in<br />

association with dairy co-operatives.<br />

3. Control regulates and charge in the community grazing and pastures lands.<br />

4. Undertake the distribution <strong>of</strong> fodder seeds and slips in the village.<br />

Primary problem <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

In Panchavada cluster\s villages come under 80% rainfed agriculture and soil is very suitable for fodder crop mainly<br />

Jowar,Bajara,Mainge and sorghum. So fodder bank play an important role to improve fodder for cattles to solve this problem. Majority <strong>of</strong><br />

farmers own more than 3 ha <strong>of</strong> land for food and fodder production but lack <strong>of</strong> sufficient irrigation water has made these lands<br />

unproductive. The concept <strong>of</strong> fodder bank can overcome the problem <strong>of</strong> seasonal feed shortage, migration and poor animal performance.<br />

It is the milch animal, which is the worst affected during these periods <strong>of</strong> drought, due to lack <strong>of</strong> productivity <strong>of</strong> sufficient fodder and<br />

water. As a result, the poor are forced to let go with their animals in search <strong>of</strong> fodder and green pastures to other parts <strong>of</strong> the state. This<br />

eventually leads to colossal loss <strong>of</strong> income generating assets, poor demographic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> village and low education level <strong>of</strong> their<br />

children.<br />

Even in good years, during harvesting season, the poor tend to sell their crop residue or fodder to earn cash. At such time when supply is<br />

higher than demand, they are not able to sell fodder at remunerative prices. The same fodder is bought back by them, mostly at higher prices<br />

during the months <strong>of</strong> scarcity.<br />

To meet the critical needs <strong>of</strong> fodder, especially for the poor families and protect them from inordinately high prices during the summer<br />

months, fodder banks are proposed to be setup at both the village level.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 118


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Fodder Bank:<br />

A detailed survey and Focused Group Discussion was conducted in Kharachiya,Panchavada,Jangvad and Jasapar watershed area.<br />

The number and type <strong>of</strong> cattle as well as the fodder production capacity <strong>of</strong> the village was collected during door to door survey. In focused<br />

group discussion several factors like the various types <strong>of</strong> fodder available locally, the quantity <strong>of</strong> fodder to be stored in the fodder bank, the<br />

size <strong>of</strong> fodder bank, the amount <strong>of</strong> finances required to operate a fodder bank etc were discussed with the farmers, User group and<br />

Watershed committee. The fodder bank should be sustainable and towards that, the sale price <strong>of</strong> fodder should cover operating costs and<br />

losses in storage. All these decisions were taken jointly with the member <strong>of</strong> operating fodder bank.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 119


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table 42.i .Primary Model for A Fodder Bank<br />

A<br />

Total Dairy farmers 39<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> adult animals<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Cattle to be catered by one fodder bank.<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> calves<br />

299 36<br />

Total 335<br />

Fodder requirement per day (10kg dry fodder for adult<br />

and 5 kg for calf).<br />

Fodder requirement for 180 days.<br />

Fodder available from lands/farms/pasture land (60%)<br />

Fodder expected from community land<br />

5025 Kg<br />

9045 quintal<br />

5427 quintal<br />

20 hac *150=3000 quintal<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation for fodder production (See Table:2) 105000 Rs<br />

3618-3000=618 quintal<br />

Remaining requirement for 120 days Total Cost Avg.<br />

procurement rate in harvesting season, Rs.500 per Qt.<br />

500*618= Rs.309000/-<br />

including transportation *.Net Cost <strong>of</strong> Fodder Production<br />

"K' (cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation + Cost <strong>of</strong> procurement)<br />

B. Area development for fodder bank Land required Approx. Rs 12000<br />

3500 m 2 (preferably land will be allotted by Gram<br />

Panchayat @ Rs.600 per month)<br />

C. Cl. Fencing + Weighing machine + Small shed + Other tools. Rs.70,000/-<br />

D.<br />

Total Cost for Fodder bank (A+B)<br />

Rs. 3,91,000/-<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 120


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no: 42.ii: Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation for fodder production<br />

Cost Detail<br />

Unit cost<br />

1. Cost for tillage 4.5 hour*20 hec*400 Rs 36000<br />

2. Cost for seed 12 kg seed *20 hec *100 Rs 24000<br />

3. Cost for fertilizer Rs 20,000<br />

4. Cost for irrigation<br />

Rs 15,000<br />

R5. Depreciation cost Rs 10,000<br />

Total cost for 20 hec Rs. 105,000<br />

Table No. 42.iii, Revenue and return Details.<br />

S. No Return Details Cost (in Rs.)<br />

1 Cost <strong>of</strong> fodder Per Kg<br />

= 3,91,100/309000<br />

1.26 Rs/kg<br />

2. Selling Price <strong>of</strong> Fodder Rs 2 /Kg<br />

3. Net selling Price Rs. 723600/-<br />

4. Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it Rs 227500/-<br />

Production <strong>of</strong> Fodder:<br />

We will produce 3000 quintal fodder from community land <strong>of</strong> Gram Panchayat and for remaining requirement we can fulfill by two<br />

ways first one buy the fodder at the time <strong>of</strong> harvesting and second we can take land on lease agreement from some other government as<br />

well as private agency.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 121


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Technical Support/Assistance:<br />

To ensure proper technical support for fodder bank and smooth functioning <strong>of</strong> activities the required technical assistance may be taken from<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVS), Dept. <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Dairy and DWDU.<br />

Advantages:<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> a fodder bank can be well understood. The fodder banks will provide much needed relief and self-reliance to poor in the<br />

village especially in drought condition. Specifically, the advantages are:-<br />

> It will reduce migration during drought condition.<br />

> Farmers can purchase and sale <strong>of</strong> fodder at village level, thus doing away with costs incurred by them to carry out these transactions<br />

at the city market.<br />

> It can reduce in overall market prices <strong>of</strong> fodder during the lean season.<br />

> Ensure availability <strong>of</strong> fodder during the lean season at affordable and reasonable prices.<br />

> Reduced distress sale <strong>of</strong> cattle due to non -availability and / or non-affordability <strong>of</strong> fodder.<br />

> Higher incomes for the poor as cattle will have enough fodder even during the lean season<br />

> Increase employment opportunities at the village level associated with the sale, purchase and storage <strong>of</strong> fodder.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 122


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Production System - 5: Vermi composting unit for Project villages<br />

Introduction:<br />

The wide spread problems <strong>of</strong> soil degradation and desertification are threatening agricultural sustainability. Throughout the project village<br />

large populations <strong>of</strong> domestic animals producing large amounts <strong>of</strong> organic wastes. These organic residues, or ‘waste materials’, can be<br />

transformed more quickly and into a more useful vermi-compost, available for urban and land application. Nutrients within vermicomposted<br />

material are readily available to plants, and can be added to agricultural land to improve soil structure and fertility or used as<br />

good quality and marketable additive to potting soil or plant growth media. The process <strong>of</strong> composting crop residues using earthworms<br />

comprise spreading the agricultural wastes and cow dung in layers as 1 m wide and 0.3 m high beds <strong>of</strong> required length. Earthworms are<br />

introduced in between the layers @ 350 worms per m 3 <strong>of</strong> bed volume. The beds are maintained at about 40 - 50% moisture content and a<br />

temperature <strong>of</strong> 20 - 30° C by sprinkling water over the beds. The earthworms being voracious eaters consume the biodegradable matter and<br />

give out a part <strong>of</strong> the matter as excreta or vermi-castings. The vermi-casting containing nutrients are rich manure for the plants.<br />

Objectives<br />

• To train farmers / SHGs in organic farming and vermi-culture.<br />

• To promote production <strong>of</strong> vermi-castings as a viable small business venture<br />

About The Worms<br />

Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavatius are some <strong>of</strong> the species for rearing to convert organic wastes into manure. The<br />

worms feed on any biodegradable matter ranging from coir waste to kitchen garbage and Vermi-composting units are ideally suited to<br />

locations / units with generation <strong>of</strong> considerable quantities <strong>of</strong> organic wastes. One earthworm reaching reproductive age <strong>of</strong> about six weeks<br />

lays one egg capsule (containing 7 embryos) every 7 - 10 days. Three to seven worms emerge out <strong>of</strong> each capsule. Thus, the multiplication<br />

<strong>of</strong> worms under optimum growth conditions is very fast. The worms live for about 2 years. Fully grown worms could be separated and<br />

dried in an oven to make 'worm meal' which is a rich source <strong>of</strong> protein (70%) for use in animal feed.<br />

Location<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 123


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Kharachiya, Panchavada, Jangvad and Jasapar villages have lots <strong>of</strong> animal so it can become good composting center as well as good source<br />

<strong>of</strong> livelihood. Vermicompost is very suitable for fruit, flower and vegetable as well as cereal crops. It increases quality and quantity <strong>of</strong><br />

product in per unit area.<br />

Market/Use<br />

Vermi compost is a valuable input for sustainable agriculture and wasteland development. This also can be used widely in pot culture and<br />

in home gardens. Several farmers are successfully using vermi-comost. Vermi compost has more nutrient compare to other manures and<br />

fertilizer so by the use <strong>of</strong> compost we can reduce the use <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizer. Vermi compost not only supply nutrient but also improve<br />

quantity <strong>of</strong> hormones for plant growth, improves the soil structure leading to increase in water and nutrient holding capacities <strong>of</strong> soil.<br />

Components <strong>of</strong> A Commercial Unit<br />

Sheds<br />

Shed is necessary as the temperature in summer is high. We can make it by the use <strong>of</strong> concrete pillars because this will act as a source <strong>of</strong><br />

income for those in the village who produce pillars. It will prevent wetting <strong>of</strong> beds due to rain on a windy day. While designing the sheds adequate<br />

room has to be left around the beds for easy movement <strong>of</strong> the labour attending to fill and harvest the beds.<br />

Vermi-beds<br />

Scientific bed size proposed here is 10mt by 1 mt by 0.3 mt. The whole bed area should be above the ground. The bed should have a uniform<br />

height over the entire width to the extent possible to avoid low production owing to low bed volumes. The proper bed width should not be more<br />

that 1.5 m to allow easy access to the centre <strong>of</strong> the bed.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 124


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Land<br />

About 750 square meter <strong>of</strong> land is required to set up a vermi compost production unit in each village. It should have at least one super<br />

structure to cover the 40 beds. It should have an arrangement for watering and other equipments as required because moisture is very<br />

essential for compost production. Land can be taken from Gram panchayat on lease <strong>of</strong> at least 10-15 years.<br />

Seed Stock<br />

This is very important thing because worms multiply at the rate <strong>of</strong> 350 worms per m 3 <strong>of</strong> bed space over a period <strong>of</strong> 6 month to a year.<br />

Fencing<br />

The entire area has to be fenced to prevent the stray animals and other unwanted elements. These could be estimated based on the length<br />

<strong>of</strong> the periphery <strong>of</strong> the farm.<br />

Water Supply System<br />

We have to maintain always 50% moisture content, there is need to plan for a water source, lifting mechanism and a system <strong>of</strong> conveying<br />

and applying the water to vermi-beds. Drippers with round the clock flow arrangement would be quite handy for continuous supply and<br />

saving on water. Such a water supply/application system requiring considerable initial investment, however, reduces the operational costs<br />

on hand watering and proves economical in the long run. The cost <strong>of</strong> these items depends on the capacity <strong>of</strong> the unit and the type <strong>of</strong> water<br />

supply chosen.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 125


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Machinery<br />

Farm machinery and implements are required for cutting the raw material in small pieces, conveying shredded raw material to the vermisheds,<br />

loading, unloading, collection <strong>of</strong> compost, loosening <strong>of</strong> beds for aeration, shifting <strong>of</strong> the compost. Costs <strong>of</strong> providing necessary<br />

implements and the machinery have to be included in the project cost.<br />

Table: 42.iv Model <strong>of</strong> a Vermi-compost Unit for 40 beds <strong>of</strong> Dimension (10mt*1mt*0.3mt)<br />

S. No Particulars Quantity Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.)<br />

1 Super Structure construction with truss with fencing 128750<br />

2 Shade net for covering the ro<strong>of</strong> 750 sqrt mt. 25 18750<br />

3 Binding wire for tying 200 Kg 50 10000<br />

4 Labour charges for erection <strong>of</strong> sheds 100 100 10000<br />

5 Shovels, spades, crowbars, iron baskets etc 15000<br />

6 Weighing scale (100 kg capacity) 1 2500 2500<br />

7 Cow dung @ 80kg/m3 96 qtl 250 24000<br />

8 Worms 200 kg 70 14000<br />

9 Formation <strong>of</strong> vermin bed with agro-waste, cow dung and worms 50000<br />

10 Miscellaneous - - 3000<br />

11 Training 5000<br />

12 Total cost - - Rs. 281000<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 126


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No-42.v: Returns from vermicomposting<br />

Benefits<br />

1. Sale <strong>of</strong> vermin compost <strong>of</strong> 120 tones @ Rs.3000/- per ton 120*3000=360,000 Rs<br />

2. Sale <strong>of</strong> worms @ 5 kg per ton <strong>of</strong> compost and Rs. 50 per kg 600*50=30,000 Rs<br />

3.Total<br />

3,90,000 Rs/-<br />

Net benefit<br />

1,09,000 Rs/-<br />

Training will be provided to all the stakeholders by KVK and VVK, Rajkot which can be divided in to two categories and shown below.<br />

A. Theoretical<br />

• Introduction to Organic Farming<br />

• Need and the importance <strong>of</strong> Organic farming<br />

• Introduction to Composting methods<br />

• Vermi-culture<br />

• Earth Worms, nature, identification and selection<br />

• Vermi-castings<br />

• Vermi-compost<br />

• Marketing Avenues<br />

• Application <strong>of</strong> vermicomposting<br />

• Addresses <strong>of</strong> the suppliers <strong>of</strong> worms.<br />

B. Practical<br />

• Production Methods<br />

• Raw Materials<br />

• Site and the type <strong>of</strong> Infrastructure<br />

• Tank<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 127


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

• Vermi-bed<br />

• Harvest<br />

• Quality Analysis<br />

• Storage & Packaging<br />

• Dos and Don’ts<br />

Production System – 6 Khadi based industries<br />

Collaboration with Udyog Bharti<br />

Demands for cotton textile and readymade garments are on the rise in the state. Incentive Plan was envisaged to step up measures<br />

like charting upgraded designs, supplying looms and ancillary inputs, building up centres complete with facilities conducive to the trade,<br />

assistance in advertisement and marketing etc.<br />

To empower and create opportunities for empowerment in the project villages by creating a new skill, we have a collaboration with<br />

Udyog Bharti, which mainly is a Khadi based Industry situated in Gondal Taluka, Rajkot.<br />

Udyog Bharti is a statutory organisation engaged in promoting and developing Khadi and village industries for providing<br />

employment opportunities in the rural areas, thereby strengthening the rural economy <strong>of</strong> the distict. It undertakes activities like skill<br />

improvement, transfer <strong>of</strong> technology, research & development, marketing, etc., in the process <strong>of</strong> generating employment/self-employment<br />

opportunities in rural areas. Training will be provided by Udyog Bharti to around 150 women from the project villages for Khadi<br />

products/stitching and patch work products for 3 months.<br />

Training Content<br />

1. Simple Charkha Operation<br />

2. Twisting <strong>of</strong> yarn <strong>of</strong> different count<br />

3. Repair and maintenance and general operation <strong>of</strong> the machine.<br />

4. Training to keep them updated with latest trends as per changes in design<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 128


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

5. Productions<br />

6. Account handling<br />

Expected Impact, Outcome and Outputs: The impact <strong>of</strong> such activities is to increase the participation <strong>of</strong> woman, SC, BPL and young<br />

people in economic activities. The outcome <strong>of</strong> the model is to develop micro enterprise development program based on proven models<br />

which can be implemented through the clusters project villages. The outputs included: (i) establishment <strong>of</strong> pilot micro enterprises in<br />

producing khadi based design and providing services, (ii) establishment <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> good practices in women micro enterprise development<br />

(iii) trained and well informed women beneficiaries on micro enterprise development, and (iv) an implementation plan for further rollout <strong>of</strong><br />

micro enterprises.<br />

In order to provide insurance cover to Khadi artisans, a scheme <strong>of</strong> group insurance in the name <strong>of</strong> Khadi Karigar will be provided with a<br />

premium <strong>of</strong> just Rs 100.The premium will be shared as Rs. 50 central government social security fund, Rs. 25/- by Khadi Institution and<br />

Rs. 12.50/- each by Khadi artisan and KVIC. The compensation payable under this scheme, Rs. 30,000/- in case <strong>of</strong> natural death, Rs.<br />

75,000/- in case <strong>of</strong> accidental death, Rs. 75,000/- in case <strong>of</strong> full permanent disability due to accident, and Rs.37,500/- in case <strong>of</strong> part<br />

permanent disability due to accident.<br />

The strategy <strong>of</strong> reducing poverty by focusing on development <strong>of</strong> rural micro enterprise is innovative. The project will introduce changes<br />

and innovations <strong>of</strong> demonstrated effectiveness in approach, organization and processes, which today constitute a proven strategy for<br />

supporting rural micro enterprise.<br />

In particular, empowering micro entrepreneurs to set their own priorities and identify their own needs is an innovation that <strong>of</strong>fers<br />

significant strategic potential and lays the foundation for an inclusive, participatory and dynamic process <strong>of</strong> rural development.<br />

Governance<br />

• Monthly meeting<br />

• Accent to co-operatives account to members<br />

• For any policy or resolution to be passed<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 129


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

• Enhanced control due to<br />

-Self management<br />

-Democratic member control<br />

-One member one vote<br />

Membership criteria<br />

1) The Charkha (machine) will be provided by Udyog Bharti after registration <strong>of</strong> the member and paying the minimum contribution<br />

amount (Different subsidy for different group)<br />

2) Minimum age for a member should be 18 years.<br />

3) Ready to work in 7-8 hours in a day and complete the given task fortnightly.<br />

4) The Charkha will be handed over to next member if found unsatisfactory work, to the next member paying the contribution amount<br />

By-laws <strong>of</strong> SHGs groups will be valid.<br />

Capital Requirement and Finance<br />

Ambar Charkha (will be provided by Khadi Udyog): 9400 x 50 members = 470000<br />

Training and Administration: 10000 x 4 months = 40000<br />

Room Rent: 700 per month = 2800<br />

Training and Exposure: = 24000<br />

Total: 66800<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 130


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Production System – 7: Turmeric Cultivation<br />

Turmeric (Curcuma longa) is used as spice, dye and in cosmetic industry. It is an erect, perennial herb grown as an annual crop. Turmeric<br />

will be grown in the cluster villages as a rainfed crop depending on location. It comes up well under sparse shade also and can be grown as<br />

an intercrop. The Agro climatic condition <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> is ideal for cultivation <strong>of</strong> turmeric. As small cottage industries are on the increase<br />

where drying, processing and grinding <strong>of</strong> turmeric can be done, there is tremendous scope in increasing the area under turmeric further. It<br />

is therefore, proposed to cover an area <strong>of</strong> 2 Ha. @ Rs. 75,600/- per Ha. totaling a sum <strong>of</strong> Rs.1.52 lakhs during the project period in two<br />

villages namely Panchavada and Jasapar. Details <strong>of</strong> cost estimate and year wise physical and financial break-up is given below.<br />

Table No-42.vi: Economics <strong>of</strong> turmeric cultivation in 1ha. Area<br />

1 Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation Rs 75600/-<br />

2 Production 15 MT<br />

3 Minimum sale rate Rs. 15/- per Kg<br />

4 Gross income ( 2x3) Rs. 2,25,000/-<br />

5 Net pr<strong>of</strong>it (4-1) Rs. 149400/-<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 131


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

SI No. Particulars Qnty Rate Amount<br />

A-1 Turmeric Seed rhizomes 15 Qtls. Rs.4000/- Rs 60000/-<br />

2 Organic Manure 6 Qtls. Rs.1200/- Rs.7,200/-<br />

3 Tools & Implements - - Rs.500/-<br />

4 Transportation <strong>of</strong> seed rhizomes organic - - Rs.400/-<br />

SUB – TOTAL Rs.68100/-<br />

B-1 Land Preparation<br />

2 Layout 5 MD Rs.100/- Rs.500/-<br />

3 Pulverization <strong>of</strong> Soil 10 MD Rs.100/- Rs.1000/-<br />

4 Mixing <strong>of</strong> organic manure & soil 5 MD Rs.100/ Rs.500/-<br />

5 Furrowing 5 MD Rs.100/ Rs.500/-<br />

6 Cutting <strong>of</strong> seed rhizomes & sowing 10 MD Rs.100/ Rs.1000/-<br />

7 Intercultural Operation 10 MD Rs.100/ Rs.1000/<br />

(I) First weeding & earthing up (May-June) 10 MD Rs.100/ Rs.1000/<br />

(II) Second weeding & earthing up (July-Aug.) 10 MD Rs.100/ Rs.1000/<br />

(II) Third weeding & earthing up (Oct-Nov.) 10 MD Rs.100/ Rs.1000/<br />

SUB – TOTAL Rs.7,500/-<br />

Total Rs. 75600/-<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> turmeric the harvest from the 1st year can be planted insitu in the 2nd year thus minimising the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation and increasing<br />

the pr<strong>of</strong>it in 2nd year onwards.<br />

Strategy for Implementation:<br />

The Schemes will be fully implemented in a phased manner in a span <strong>of</strong> three years. The implementation will be done in such a way that a<br />

selected beneficiary will be given the full benefit at a time so that the chosen unit has a good chance <strong>of</strong> being financially feasible and will<br />

earn income for the beneficiary to purchase the necessary food grains.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 132


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Production System – 7: Floriculture<br />

Floriculture industry a lucrative business comprising traditional flowers , cut flowers, pot plants, dry floral crafts and planting materials,<br />

besides value added products like bouquets, garlands, floral baskets, floral concretes, pot-pour and oils. It has proved to be a highly<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itable agro-business generating maximum returns per unit area. Flowers like Rose, Marigold can be pr<strong>of</strong>itably cultivated. Rose and<br />

marigold fetch very high prices in the local market. This can be a good alternative and economic crop for the small stakeholders. The<br />

package <strong>of</strong> practices for commercial cultivation <strong>of</strong> these crops has been standardized and technology has been transferred.<br />

a) Marigold<br />

Marigold gained popularity amongst farmer and flower dealers on account <strong>of</strong> its easy culture, wide adaptability, attractive colour, shape,<br />

size and good keeping quality. Marigold is valued loose flower for making garlands. Besides, it is used as trap crop in the borders to attract<br />

insects attacking the main crop. Three weeks old seedlings are planted which grows upto a height <strong>of</strong> 75-90 cm at maturity with deep orange<br />

or lemon yellow flowers. It is propagated through seeds and cuttings. For better growth and improvement, application <strong>of</strong> NPK<br />

@80:40:80kg/ha is recommended. Flowers are plucked when they have attained the full size and it should be done in cool hours <strong>of</strong> the day<br />

either in the evening or morning. Good varieties <strong>of</strong> marigold are Namdhari marigold, First Lady and Pusa Narangi. Pinching <strong>of</strong> terminal<br />

leaves was found to significantly increase growth and yield in Pusa Basanti and Pusa Narangi gaindha. Pusa Narangi is mostly preferred<br />

due to higher flower production.<br />

Sowing time<br />

Transplanting<br />

time<br />

Flowering time<br />

Harvesting time<br />

Mid June Mid July Late rain<br />

Mid Sept. Mid October Winter<br />

Jan- Feb. Feb.- March Summer<br />

Input required<br />

Picked once in 3<br />

days; 60 days<br />

after planting<br />

Good quality seedlings, nursery to raise seedlings, manpower, manures and fertilizers.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 133


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No-42.vii: Economics <strong>of</strong> Marigold cultivation<br />

Economics <strong>of</strong> Marigold cultivation in 1 Hectare<br />

S.No Particulars Expenditure (Rs.) Income<br />

1 Land Preparation 7500 -<br />

2 Seedlings (40000 nos) 20000 -<br />

3 Sowing/watering etc 15000 -<br />

4 Farm Yard Manure 15000 -<br />

5 Application <strong>of</strong> Fertiliser cost 3125<br />

6 Ploughing 7000 -<br />

7 Labour cost for weeding/soil bed 15000 -<br />

8 Plucking <strong>of</strong> flowers 7600<br />

9 Miscellaneous 2000<br />

Total Expenditure: 84625<br />

10 Production (Kg/Ha) Rate/Kg Income (Rs)<br />

11 2500 50 125000<br />

12 Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it 40375<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 134


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Activity Flow Chart - Marigold<br />

Climate (20-32 0 C)<br />

Sandy Loam<br />

Propagation<br />

Seed<br />

Stem Cutting<br />

Raising seedlings in open field<br />

Transplanting (1 month old)<br />

Spacing (50Cm × 50Cm)<br />

N:P:K (80:40:80kg/ha) + FYM 15<br />

tonnes/ha<br />

Irrigation (once in 4-5 days during dry period)<br />

Weeding<br />

Pinching after 40 days <strong>of</strong> transplanting<br />

Harvesting<br />

For Local market packed in cloth, poly<br />

bags and basket<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 135


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

b) Sunflower<br />

Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is an important oilseed crop in India popularly known as “Surajmukhi.” It is one <strong>of</strong> the fastest growing<br />

oilseed crops in India. Sunflower being a short duration and day neutral plant is quite suitable to fit in our existing cropping system.<br />

Sunflower is a major source <strong>of</strong> vegetable oil in the world. It is used for a variety <strong>of</strong> cooking purposes. Sunflower seed contains about 48 –<br />

53 percent edible oil. It is used as nutritious meal for birds and animals. Sunflower has one <strong>of</strong> the shortest growing seasons <strong>of</strong> the major<br />

cash crops. Plants are drought-resistant and grow well in soils ranging in texture from sand to clay. Soils should have good drainage for<br />

sunflower production.<br />

Like most field crops, sunflower requires the kind <strong>of</strong> good seed-bed which results from carrying out a second ploughing if the field is<br />

planted on a fallow/barren land. By ploughing, only once on already cultivatable land, however, a farmer can reduce his variable costs <strong>of</strong><br />

production. By and large farmers have now adopted improved methods <strong>of</strong> planting. The crop was initially broadcast done before sunflower<br />

gained popularity from various institutions. Line planting, however, is now dominant with recommended spacing <strong>of</strong> 75cm by 50cm and 2<br />

seeds per hole. An application <strong>of</strong> P 2 0 5 fertilizer before planting and 60kg/ha <strong>of</strong> Nitrogen at thinning are recommended. Lower plant<br />

populations are recommended in areas where rainfall is limited (on average 33,000-45,000 plants per ha in semi-arid areas). However, the<br />

highest yields and oil percentages are obtained by planting early. Seed can be planted to a maximum depth <strong>of</strong> 10cm if necessary to reach<br />

moisture.<br />

Sunflower harvesting<br />

Sunflower harvesting, by hand or machine, takes place when the upper leaves have started to dry and the flowers are faded.<br />

In some cases, especially when the fields are small, it is preferable to harvest the crop before maturity. This decreases the risk <strong>of</strong> losses<br />

from attacks by birds and other pests.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 136


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Hand harvesting<br />

Manual harvesting is done by cutting <strong>of</strong>f heads with a knife or clippers.<br />

If, at harvest time, the moisture content <strong>of</strong> the seeds is higher than 15 percent, the heads should be pre-dried before threshing.<br />

Mechanized harvest<br />

Mechanized harvesting <strong>of</strong> sunflowers is generally done with combine harvesters designed for wheat, but modified and equipped with a<br />

sunflower-picker head.<br />

The work capacity <strong>of</strong> these machines is about 0.9 h/ha.<br />

Seed Type<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the hybrids<br />

KBSH-1, Jwalamukhi, Sungene-85, PAC-36, PAC-<br />

1091, MLSFH-47<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the varieties<br />

GAUSUF-15, Morden TNAUSUF-7<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 137


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No-42.viii Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Sunflower Plantation Activities<br />

Particulars Value<br />

Crop Name Sunflower<br />

Plant To Plant Spacing 0.50 mt<br />

Row to Row Spacing 0.75 mt<br />

Seed Required 32 Kg Kg<br />

No. or rows 133 No.<br />

Cultivation Area(100 X 100) Mt 10000 Sq. Mt<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Plants 3000 Nos.<br />

Plantation Area 1.00 Ha.<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Plants for 1.00 ha 30000 Nos.<br />

Gap Filling 20 %<br />

S. No. Description No. Lengt Width Depth Unit Quantity Rate Amount<br />

h(m.) (m.) (m.)<br />

1 Cultivation cost before sowing 100 100 Ha 10000 4850<br />

2 Providing sunflower seeds(Incl. transportation, loading and 32 Kg 32 225 7200<br />

unloading<br />

3 Sowing <strong>of</strong> sunflower seeds 3200<br />

4 Irrigation and other miscalleneous cost 35000<br />

5 Application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers and fugicides, watering, weeding cost and other<br />

25000<br />

treatment etc complete<br />

6 Threshing and collection <strong>of</strong> sunflowers 4500<br />

7 Contigency . 6500<br />

Total 86250<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 138


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Cost Benefit ratio <strong>of</strong> sunflower plantation<br />

Total cost <strong>of</strong> 1 Hactare plantation : Rs.86250<br />

Total benefit obtained from the sunflower plantation :<br />

Total Yield from 1 hactare : 980 Kg<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> sunflower seeds in the market : Rs. 117 per Kg<br />

So, total amount obtained from the sunflower plantation is Rs. 115250<br />

So, Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it will be Rs. 115250-86250 = Rs.29000 per Hactare<br />

c) Rose Plantation<br />

Commercial Farming <strong>of</strong> Rose in <strong>Gujarat</strong>: The main districts which are having commercial farming <strong>of</strong> rose are Ahmedabad, Baroda,<br />

Anand, Surat, Navsari and Valsad. Nowadays Saurashtra farmers have also been motivated for rose farming through watershed activities.<br />

Varieties <strong>of</strong> Rose : There are approx. 2000 varieties <strong>of</strong> roses are available. Some <strong>of</strong> them are as under.<br />

1) Miniature (Vaman) Rose : Plants are short, Leaves are small, Planted in buckets(kundas) or around the garden.<br />

Varities in this types are Baby gold star, Pipilov, Scarlet Jem, Nartaki<br />

2) Floribanda : big size flowers, flowers are in bunch.<br />

Varieties :<br />

White : Iceburg, Summer s now, Hemangini<br />

Pink : Queen Elisabeth, Junius miss, Delhi prince, Bon bon, Narmada, Rupal<br />

Orange :Anabel , Flemeko, Zenina, Sunfire, Dipak, Dipika<br />

Red : Europeana, Marlena, Zizi, Devdaji, Jantar-mantar<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 139


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Yellow : Circus, Golden Rain, Mahadev<br />

Lovender : Mahuva, Milambari, Sushma<br />

3) Hybrid-Tee : Most adoptable variety in India, big and attractive flowers.<br />

White : Virgo, Paskali, White masterpiece, Tushar, John <strong>of</strong> Kienedy, Vite van, Garden party<br />

Pink : Confidence, Marita Flash, Michel Miland, Pitar Fenkrenfold, First Prize<br />

Yellow : Garga, Golden giant, Landora, Mubela, Bikaner<br />

Orange : Arizona, Kolit flame, Just Joy, Super Star, Montezuma<br />

Red : Papa Miland, Red master piece, krimson Glory, Red devil, S<strong>of</strong>ia loren, happiness Gladiator<br />

4) Mixd Colour : Criss <strong>of</strong> fire, careless love, Granda,American hemirtes<br />

Poly entha : short plants, long time seed germination<br />

Velia Gulab : like Velas, Varieties : Casino, Koktel delhi white, purl, lemark tempo, Royal gold<br />

Climate: Cold and dry atmosphere is best suited for rose planting. Rose can be planted in hot and moist enviroment also but requires more<br />

scope <strong>of</strong> disease.<br />

Soil: Soil with good drain, fertile and medium black soil is suited to rose planting. It can be sown in sandy soil also, but required more<br />

compost manure.<br />

Sometimes due to poor drain capacity <strong>of</strong> black soil, water logging damages rose plants. By improving soil drain capacity, rose<br />

plants can be sown in heavy black soil also. Rose plants require more sunlight. so it should be sown in place which is open to sunlight.<br />

Sowing: Digging pits <strong>of</strong> size 60x60x60 cm in size and it should be open to sunlight upto 10 to 15 days. In the dig soil 6 to 8 kg cow dung<br />

manure should be mixed. Moreover, 50gm Urea, 100 Gram super phosphate and 50 gram Murate <strong>of</strong> potash should be mixed. If fungi is<br />

there, 3 to 5 gm BHC should also be mixed.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 140


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Time <strong>of</strong> sowing: Roses can be sown throughout the year. But it should not be sown in heavy rainfall season like July-August and also not<br />

in April-May.<br />

Table No-42.ix: Economic <strong>of</strong> Rose cultivation in 1 Hectare<br />

Economic <strong>of</strong> Rose cultivation in 1 Hectare<br />

S.No Particulars Expenditure (Rs.) Income<br />

1 Land Preparation 7500<br />

2 Seedlings (5000 nos), Rs. 6 per plant 30000 -<br />

3 Sowing/watering etc 12500 -<br />

4 Farm Yard Manure 12000 -<br />

5 Application <strong>of</strong> Fertiliser cost 2800<br />

6 Ploughing 7000 -<br />

7 Labour cost for weeding/soil bed 18000 -<br />

8 Plucking <strong>of</strong> flowers(Considering 58 Mandays) 8900<br />

9 Miscellaneous 2000<br />

Total Expenditure: 100700<br />

10 Production (Kg/Ha) Rate Income<br />

11 1250 120 150000<br />

Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it : 49300<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 141


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.43: Details <strong>of</strong> activities in the CPRs in the project areas<br />

S. No.<br />

Name(s) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

villages<br />

CPR particulars Activity proposed Target area under the<br />

activity (ha)<br />

Target<br />

Estimated expenditure<br />

(Rs.)<br />

Expected no. <strong>of</strong><br />

beneficiaries<br />

Kharachiya<br />

(Jam)<br />

Panchavda<br />

Jangavad<br />

Jasapar<br />

Waste land Fodder/Phoenix 8.5 1.90 45<br />

Community<br />

Pasture land<br />

Plantation 0.25 0.12 15<br />

Waste land Jatropha 1 0.34 12<br />

Waste land<br />

Lemon/Guava<br />

Plantaion<br />

1 1.05 18<br />

Total for Village 10.75 3.41 90<br />

Waste land<br />

Grassland/Gauchar<br />

development<br />

2 0.60 35<br />

Community<br />

Pasture land<br />

Fodder 5 1.91 42<br />

Waste land Jatropha 2 0.65 15<br />

Community Lemon plot 1 1.35 18<br />

Total for Village 10 4.51 110<br />

Waste land Afforestation 0.5 0.55 22<br />

Waste land Fodder/Phoenix 7.6 1.35 28<br />

Waste land Jatropha 2 0.65 12<br />

Community<br />

Pasture land<br />

Fodder Plot 5.4 1.52 35<br />

Cultivable waste<br />

land<br />

Lemon Plot 1 1.35 15<br />

Total for Village 16.5 5.42 112<br />

Community<br />

Pasture land<br />

Fodder Plot 5.4 1.52 48<br />

Cultivable waste<br />

land<br />

Lemon plot 1 1.35 20<br />

Waste land Jatropha 4 1.3 15<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 142


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Waste<br />

land/Pasture<br />

Fodder/Phoenix 6.8 1.35 35<br />

Cultivable waste<br />

land<br />

Afforestation 0.5 0.55 16<br />

Total for Village 17.7 6.07 134<br />

Total for<br />

project<br />

54.95 19.41 446<br />

4.4 Capacity building and Institutional collaboration<br />

Watershed management and development requires the collaboration <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> farmers’ organizations as well as extension<br />

and research institutions at various levels. This gives implementers access a wider technical resource base, creates better information flows<br />

and encourages mutual learning. Watersheds serve as a confluence between lands and communities, providing ample opportunities for<br />

members to share complementary expertise. A watershed contains producers (farmers), possibly actors that add value to produce, traders<br />

and consumers information, and education institutions to test their joint efforts to make a difference. Watersheds can be also a good ground<br />

for learning and demonstration <strong>of</strong> expertise.<br />

Scope <strong>of</strong> capacity building at Project Villages<br />

• Income Generation Activities<br />

o Stiching<br />

o Food Processing<br />

o Post Harvest management practices Fodder development and Management<br />

• Crop Information<br />

• Meteorological Information<br />

• Alternative Land Use Plan<br />

• Improved and Scientific agriculture practices<br />

• Scientific planning <strong>of</strong> Soil and Moisture conservation<br />

• Information dissemination on Audio/Video<br />

• Dairy <strong>Development</strong> and Management<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 143


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 44: Institutes Identified for Capacity Building<br />

S.No Organisation Training Modules<br />

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Targharia and Kutch Rajkot Training in modern and scientific agriculture practices<br />

2 Farmers training center, Rajkot Better agriculture practices and Organic farming to UGs.<br />

3 Junagarh Agril. University, Junagarh Training in modern and better agriculture practices<br />

4 Sadguru Foundation, Dahod Community Mobilization, Geology and Engg structures<br />

details<br />

5 BAIF, ANARDE foundation , Rajkot SMC works, Livelihood activities and Animal Husbandry<br />

development Programmes, SHG and federation level<br />

training and accounting<br />

6 Udyog Bharti, Gondal, Rajkot Microenterprise development activities<br />

7 District industrial center, Rajkot Mechanical training and support training to stakeholders<br />

8 Forest research center, Rajkot Afforestation and Vermicomposting and agro forestry<br />

9 SPIPA, Ahmedabad Participatory approach and Engineering aspects in<br />

watershed<br />

10 BISAG Space application and Different maps preparation<br />

Early and ongoing stakeholder collaboration and communication in capacity building is also important from the point viewpoint <strong>of</strong><br />

“leveling the playing field” in anticipation <strong>of</strong> disputes that may arise. Filling strategic skills/capacity gaps supports Integrated Water<br />

resources Management, facilitates dispute resolution, and builds practical understanding <strong>of</strong> the scope <strong>of</strong> sustainable natural resource<br />

development challenges and opportunities.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 144


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan<br />

S. No. Village Project Stakeholders<br />

Total no. <strong>of</strong> No. <strong>of</strong> persons to be No. <strong>of</strong> training<br />

persons<br />

trained<br />

programmes<br />

Estimated cost<br />

PIA 5 5 4 35000<br />

WDTs 3 3 4 20500<br />

1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-III<br />

UGs 678 272 10 408000<br />

SHGs 1220 244 5 183000<br />

WCs 44 44 10 36000<br />

GPs 20 10 1 3000<br />

Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities<br />

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.)<br />

1 Street plays Local drama group 1.526<br />

2 Video shows DWDU, Rajkot 1.526<br />

3<br />

Wall paintings/ Focussed DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Group discussion<br />

1.526<br />

4 Pamphlets and posters DWDU, Rajkot 1.908<br />

5 Banners and hoardings DWDU, Rajkot 1.145<br />

Total: 7.63<br />

Outcome<br />

Awareness generation and<br />

making beneficiaries<br />

accountable for sustainable<br />

development<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 145


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

CHAPTER - 5<br />

BUDGETING<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 146


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Budgeting<br />

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance<br />

Budget Component % <strong>of</strong> the Budget Rs in Lacs<br />

Net Project Cost 100 635.90<br />

-Administrative Costs 10 63.59<br />

-Monitoring 1 6.36<br />

-Evaluation 1 6.36<br />

Preparatory phase: 0<br />

-Entry point activities 4 25.44<br />

-Institution and capacity building 5 31.80<br />

-Detailed Project Report (DPR) 1 6.36<br />

Watershed Works Phase:<br />

-Watershed <strong>Development</strong> works, 50 317.95<br />

-Livelihood activities for the asset less persons, 10 63.59<br />

-Production system and micro enterprises 13 82.67<br />

Consolidation Phase 5 31.80<br />

Total 100 635.90<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 147


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under <strong>IWMP</strong><br />

Sl<br />

no<br />

Village<br />

EPA<br />

Institution<br />

and CB<br />

DPR<br />

Watershed<br />

development<br />

Work<br />

Activity<br />

Livelihood<br />

for asset less<br />

Production<br />

system and<br />

Microenterprises<br />

Consolidation<br />

1 Kharachiya 3.218 4.023 0.804 40.23 8.046 10.459 4.023 80.46<br />

Jam<br />

2 Panchvada 6.540 8.175 1.635 81.755 16.351 21.256 8.175 163.515<br />

3 Jangvad 8.929 11.161 2.232 111.61 22.323 29.019 11.161 223.23<br />

4 Jasapar 6.747 8.434 1.686 84.345 16.869 21.929 8.434 168.69<br />

5 Total 25.434 31.793 6.357 317.94 63.589 82.663 31.793 635.90<br />

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement<br />

Sl No Village Total cost requirement Total funds available<br />

under <strong>IWMP</strong><br />

Gap in funds<br />

requirement<br />

1 Kharchiya Jam 94.90 80.46 14.44<br />

2 Panchavda 168.67 163.52 5.15<br />

3 Jangavad 233.71 223.23 10.48<br />

4 Jasapar 188.88 168.69 20.19<br />

5 Total 686.16 635.9 50.26<br />

Total<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 148


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.50: Details <strong>of</strong> Convergence <strong>of</strong> <strong>IWMP</strong> with other Schemes<br />

S. No. Village Activity to be carried out<br />

1 Kharchiya Jam<br />

2 Panchavda<br />

3 Jangavad<br />

4 Jasapar<br />

Fund made available<br />

to <strong>IWMP</strong> due to<br />

convergence (Rs. in<br />

lakh)<br />

Reference no. <strong>of</strong> activity/<br />

task/ structure in DPR<br />

Level at which<br />

decision for<br />

convergence<br />

was taken<br />

Horticultural plantation 0.12 Forest Department Dist level<br />

Farm bunding 0.83 MGREGA Dist level<br />

Community Bio gas 8.74 GEDA Dist level<br />

Charkha Udyog/Handicraft 4.75 Udyog bharti/SGSY PIA level<br />

Total 14.44<br />

Desilting <strong>of</strong> Check dam 0.25 MGREGA Dist level<br />

Charkha Udyog/Handicraft 4.75 Udyog bharti/DIC PIA level<br />

Farm bunding 0.15 MGREGA<br />

Total 5.15<br />

Afforestation 0.55 Forest department Dist level<br />

Pond deepening 0.20 MGREGA Dist level<br />

Farm bunding 0.23 MGREGA Dist level<br />

Charkha Udyog/Handicraft 9.5 Udyog bharti/DIC PIA level<br />

Total 10.48<br />

Afforestation 0.55 Forest department Dist level<br />

Afforestation 1.40 Forest department Dist level<br />

Community Bio gas 8.74 GEDA Dist level<br />

Charkha Udyog/Handicraft 9.5 Udyog Bharti/DIC PIA level<br />

Total 20.19<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 149


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

CHAPTER - 6<br />

EXPECTED OUTCOMES<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 150


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

6.1 Expected Outcomes<br />

6.1.1 Employment<br />

This programme also aims simultaneously to improve the living conditions <strong>of</strong> the abuttant user communities. Employment opportunities<br />

will be created to the people living in the watershed through different soil and water conservation activities and livelihood activities. Self<br />

employment would be created by providing the people with cash support in the form <strong>of</strong> direct livelihood activities like agriculture, animal<br />

husbandry and micro-enterprise development.<br />

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area<br />

s. Names <strong>of</strong> Wage employment Employment Self employment<br />

NO.<br />

Villages No. <strong>of</strong> mandays No. <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries No. <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries<br />

SC ST Others Wome Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total<br />

1 Kharachiya 375 28125 17265 34905 90 0 375 230 465 19 0 75 47 94<br />

(Jam)<br />

2 Panchavda 8124 0 19500 13812 27624 108 0 260 184 368 22 0 52 37 74<br />

3 Jangavad 10677 0 4125 7401 15402 142 0 63 99 205 28 0 14 21 42<br />

4 Jasapar 8253 0 35700 21526 43953 104 0 482 287 586 25 0 96 60 121<br />

5 Total 27429 87450 60004 121884 444 0 1180 800 1624 94 0 237 165 331<br />

6.1.2 Migration<br />

WSD can open up new opportunities for households to both intensify and extensify production, for example through:<br />

• Increasing the frequency <strong>of</strong> cultivation – new water harvesting structures <strong>of</strong>ten permits cultivation <strong>of</strong> a second crop, or ‘life-saving’<br />

irrigation <strong>of</strong> a main crop.<br />

• Adopting new technologies, such as improved varieties <strong>of</strong> staple crops, higher levels <strong>of</strong> input use and higher yields; shifts to the<br />

cultivation <strong>of</strong> higher value crops in the project areas expected.<br />

• Expansion <strong>of</strong> cultivated areas – soil and water conservation interventions can bring new land into production.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 151


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

All <strong>of</strong> the above tend to generate increased demands for labour. These may be provided initially from farm family sources and<br />

subsequently by hired labour. Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal migration<br />

from the area.<br />

Table no. 53: Details <strong>of</strong> seasonal migration from Project area<br />

SI. No. Names <strong>of</strong> villages No. <strong>of</strong> persons migrating No. <strong>of</strong> days per year <strong>of</strong> migration<br />

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) 128 102 > 90-120 60<br />

2. Panchavda 162 130 > 90-120 60<br />

3 Jangavad 214 171 > 90-120 60<br />

4 Jasapar 156 125 > 90-120 60<br />

6.1.3 Ground water table<br />

As demand for groundwater has gone up, rapid urbanization and land use changes have decreased drastically the already low infiltration rates <strong>of</strong><br />

rainfall into the soil and have diminished the natural recharging <strong>of</strong> aquifers. The ground water table thus has depleted over the years.<br />

Substantial opportunities exist for groundwater recharge and water harvesting to supplement water supplies in the Kharachiya, Panchvada,<br />

Jangvad and Jasapar village. In order to improve the ground water situation it is necessary to artificially recharge the depleted ground water<br />

aquifers. The available techniques are easy, cost-effective and sustainable in the long term. Many <strong>of</strong> these can be adopted by the<br />

individuals and village communities with locally available materials and manpower. Proper water harvesting structures and percolation-tanks<br />

will be constructed to increase ground water table from 10-12 mt to 6-8 mt in the post project period.<br />

Table no. 54: Details <strong>of</strong> average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)<br />

S.No. Names <strong>of</strong> Villages Sources Pre-Project level Expected Increase/ decrease (Post-<br />

Project)<br />

1 Kharachiya Jam, Open wells 10-12 mt. 6-8 mt<br />

Panchavda, Jangavad and<br />

Jasapar<br />

Borewells 80-100 mt 50-70 mt<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 152


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

6.1.4: Drinking water<br />

The two villages in the project area totally depend upon Narmada water supply for drinking and other domestic activities as the groundwater<br />

table is deep. WASMO/Sector Reform has constructed tanks to store water in all the villages. As a result <strong>of</strong> the watershed activities, it is expected<br />

that the quantity and quality <strong>of</strong> drinking water would improve and will be available to villagers from well constructed downstream <strong>of</strong> checkdams.<br />

Table no. 55: Status <strong>of</strong> Drinking water<br />

Sl. No.<br />

Names <strong>of</strong><br />

Villages<br />

Availability <strong>of</strong> drinking water (no. <strong>of</strong> months in a year)<br />

Quality <strong>of</strong> drinking water<br />

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project<br />

Comments<br />

1 Kharachiya jam Narmada Pipe line Water available from Well,<br />

Check dams, PT and Narmda<br />

2 Panchvada Narmada and Panchayat Water available from Well,<br />

Well<br />

Check dams, PT, Bore Well<br />

and then Narmda Pipe line<br />

3 Jangavad Narmada and Panchayat Water available from Well,<br />

Well<br />

Check dams, PT, Bore Well<br />

4 Jasapar Narmada and Panchayat<br />

Well<br />

Water available from Well,<br />

Check dams, PT, Bore Well<br />

Slightly saline Potable<br />

Low Potable Potable<br />

Low Potable Potable<br />

Low Potable Potable<br />

6.1. 5: Crops<br />

Due to additional availability <strong>of</strong> water in new structures, farmers will be able to grow vegetable crops during non rainy seasons. Even<br />

after taking rainy season and post rainy season crops into consideration, they will get a good price for vegetables in summer also.<br />

Mostly farmers with large families will prefer to grow vegetables, as the crops need timely availability <strong>of</strong> human labor to harvest and<br />

encash the market potential. The planned earthen bunds and salinity reducing trenches would partially prevent the saline water from the<br />

sea to mix with the sweet rain water and also help to percolate water underground, and preserve some moisture in the soil. Also the<br />

proposed soil and water conservation activities will bring more areas under cultivation. New agricultural practices, new technology,<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 153


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

organic farming etc will be demonstrated in the villages. This will help in additional area coming under cultivation and increasing<br />

productivity too. The farmers can take more than one season <strong>of</strong> crops. Different varieties <strong>of</strong> crops can be taken.<br />

Table no. 56: Details <strong>of</strong> crop area and yield in the project areas<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> village<br />

Kharachiya Jam,<br />

Panchavda,<br />

Jangavad, Jasapar<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> crops<br />

Pre-project<br />

Expected Post-project<br />

Khariff Area (ha) Average Yield (Qtl) per ha. Area (ha) Average Yield per ha<br />

(Qtl)<br />

Cotton 3064.4 14.17 3090.42 15.87<br />

Groundnut 2052.94 11.89 2190.90 12.96<br />

Fodder 107.2 9.30 109.056 12.09<br />

Kharachiya Jam,<br />

Panchavda,<br />

Jangavad &<br />

Jasapar<br />

Rabi<br />

Wheat 144.55 20.98 230.32 24.80<br />

Jiru 65.89 12.13 65.10 12.96<br />

Gram 12.8 13.60 12.25 14.32<br />

Project total 5447.78 5698.06<br />

6.1.6 Horticulture<br />

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture<br />

S.No. Name <strong>of</strong> Village Existing area under horticulture (Ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be<br />

covered through <strong>IWMP</strong>(Ha)<br />

1 Kharachiya jam 1.21 4.32<br />

2 Panchvada 3.24 6.85<br />

3 Jangavad 3.02 6.74<br />

4 Jasapar 1.84 5.21<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 154


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

6.1.7 Vegetative cover<br />

There is negligible area under tree cover. The village has a forest area <strong>of</strong> 15.9 ha in the cluster area which consists <strong>of</strong> only Juliflora Prosopis (ganda<br />

babool) and other forest trees. Trees like Neem and Lemon are seen on few farm boundaries. It is planned that 40 ha land to be covered under new<br />

plantation in both villages.<br />

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover<br />

S.No. Name <strong>of</strong> Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed<br />

1 Kharachiya Jam 11 12.42<br />

2 Panchvada 20 36.17<br />

3 Jangavad 19 39.42<br />

4 Jasapar 16 38.75<br />

6.1.8 Livestock<br />

The village has quite a good <strong>of</strong> livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats, sheep. The interventions like provision<br />

<strong>of</strong> good quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment <strong>of</strong> a fodder bank and other such related activities would spur up the dairy<br />

development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and yield<br />

from them.<br />

Table no. 59: Details <strong>of</strong> livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, solids in kg and income in Rs.)<br />

S.No. Name <strong>of</strong> Village Type <strong>of</strong> Animal<br />

Pre-Project<br />

Expected Post-project<br />

Remarks<br />

1 Kharachiya Jam,<br />

Panchavda,<br />

Jangavad,<br />

Jasapar<br />

No Yield Income No. Yield Income<br />

Milch-animals<br />

Cow (per animal/day) 1177 2 24 1201 3.25 32<br />

Buffalo(per animal/day) 1372 2.5 37 1398 3.5 40<br />

Goat(Meat:Rs/kg) 375 5 120 512 6.25 180<br />

Sheep(Meat:Rs/kg) 459 5 90 604 7.15 125<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 155


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Linkages<br />

The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver the<br />

desired results. These linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc.<br />

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages<br />

S. No. Project Type <strong>of</strong> Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)<br />

1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-III<br />

Backward linkages<br />

Seed certification<br />

Seed supply system 1 1<br />

Fertilizer supply system 1 2<br />

Pesticide supply system<br />

l_ Credit institutions - Bank-1 Bank-2<br />

Water supply SSNL Well/Tube well Well/Tube well<br />

Extension services KVK/ Govt Org KVK/Govt Org.<br />

Nurseries - 16 21<br />

Kits/Tools/Machinery suppliers - 974 (Kitchen garden &<br />

Veterinary kits)<br />

Price Support system<br />

Labour<br />

Any other (please specify)<br />

Forward linkages<br />

Harvesting/threshing machinery<br />

Storage (including cold storage)<br />

Transport facilities<br />

Markets / Mandis Collective marketing<br />

system<br />

Collective marketing<br />

system<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 156


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Agro and other Industries Papad industries-20 unit<br />

Packaging-3 unit<br />

2<br />

Milk and other collection centres 6 3 9<br />

Labour<br />

Any other (please specify) Fodder bank-3 1<br />

Vermi-compost unit-4 3<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 157


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Logical Framework Analysis<br />

Narrative Summary Indicators Source <strong>of</strong> verification Assumptions<br />

Goal:<br />

Sustainable <strong>Development</strong> and<br />

conservation <strong>of</strong> natural resources with<br />

the help <strong>of</strong> Peoples Participation<br />

Increased Agricultural Production<br />

and overall development<br />

Increase in contribution <strong>of</strong><br />

agricultural income to the<br />

household income<br />

Objective 1<br />

Increase soil moisture content 1.1 Less Uncertainty in<br />

Agricultural Production<br />

1.2 Farmers take two<br />

crops in a year<br />

Output<br />

Soil moisture content will increase<br />

Activities<br />

1.1 Farm bunding<br />

1-2 Crop demonstration/rotation<br />

1-3 Organic farming/Mulching<br />

1.1 Clear growth <strong>of</strong> vegetation<br />

cover<br />

1.2 Certainty in Khariff ,Rabi crop<br />

1.1 397.37 Ha- Rs 61.25<br />

1.2 6.76 Ha Rs 8.26<br />

1.3 7.10 Ha Rs 5.79<br />

1.1 Discussion with<br />

Villagers/Farmers<br />

1.2 Soil testing<br />

1.3 Physical verification<br />

Discussion with<br />

Villagers/Farmers<br />

1.1 Physical verificatiSon<br />

1.2 Records in asset register<br />

1.3 Interferences from GIS<br />

maps at different times<br />

Repair and Maintenance and<br />

taking care <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

structures<br />

Time to time take care <strong>of</strong><br />

structures<br />

1.1 Money spent on right<br />

time<br />

1.2 Proper scientific methods<br />

used<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 158


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

1.4 Measurement Book 1-3 Workers are ready<br />

1.4 Fields are free from crops<br />

Objective 2<br />

Increase irrigation potential<br />

2.1 Increased irrigated area<br />

2.2 Increase in L3333333and value<br />

2.3 More uncultivable lands to be<br />

brought under agriculture and new<br />

2.1 Revenue records<br />

2.2 Patwari map<br />

2.3 Maps from GIS<br />

2.1 Judicious use <strong>of</strong> water<br />

2.2 Accessibility to common<br />

and forest lands increased<br />

with removal <strong>of</strong><br />

plantations<br />

encroachments and resolution<br />

<strong>of</strong> conflicts.<br />

Output<br />

Increased irrigation water<br />

2.1 Increased water table in wells<br />

2.1 Physical verification<br />

2.2 Structures full to its<br />

2.2 Increase in flow period <strong>of</strong><br />

2.2 Records in asset register<br />

capacity<br />

streams<br />

2.3 Interferences from GIS<br />

2.3 Good amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall<br />

maps at different times<br />

received<br />

2.4 Promotion <strong>of</strong> better<br />

Irrigation practices like drip<br />

irrigation<br />

Activities<br />

2.1 Nalla/Gully plug<br />

2-1 21 Nos.<br />

2.1 Physical verification<br />

2.1 Good amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall<br />

2.2 Percolation tank<br />

2.2 14 Nos<br />

2.2 Records in asset register<br />

2.1 Size according to<br />

2.3 Farm ponds<br />

2.3 57Nos<br />

2.3 Interferences from GIS<br />

catchment and storage volume<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 159


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

2.4 Repair <strong>of</strong> old Check dams<br />

2.4 26 nos<br />

maps at different times<br />

calculation<br />

2.5 Check dams<br />

2.5 95 nos<br />

2.3 No seepage from structure<br />

Objective 3<br />

To improve Soil Quality<br />

3.1 Agriculture based livelihood<br />

income generation activities<br />

3.2 Promotion <strong>of</strong> organic farming<br />

Practices<br />

3.1 Physical verification 3.1 Availability <strong>of</strong><br />

waste/mulching material<br />

Output<br />

Quality <strong>of</strong> Soil improved<br />

3.1 Agriculture production will<br />

3.1 Physical verification<br />

3.1 Composting material used<br />

Increase<br />

3.2 Market Survey<br />

and refilled according to farm<br />

3.2 Plantation <strong>of</strong> fruits and forest<br />

3.3 Soil testing<br />

requirement<br />

species<br />

3.2 Use it in right time<br />

Activities<br />

3.1 Composting<br />

3.1 4 Nos.<br />

Physical verification<br />

3.1 People ready for voluntary<br />

3.2 Application <strong>of</strong> Farm yard manure<br />

3.2 2.1 lakh<br />

contribution for Biogas<br />

3.3 Use <strong>of</strong> FYM enriched with Route<br />

3.3 1.25 lakh<br />

Structure<br />

Phosphate and Bio-Fertilizers<br />

3.2 Available <strong>of</strong> cow dung at<br />

right time<br />

3.3 Proper maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />

structures<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 160


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Objective 4<br />

To increase fodder availability<br />

4.1 Increase in the proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

4.1 Survey(Pre and<br />

4.1 Quality <strong>of</strong> management <strong>of</strong><br />

households having more security <strong>of</strong><br />

Post)<br />

common property resources<br />

fodder<br />

4.2 Proper distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

4.2 Reduction in drudgery <strong>of</strong> fodder<br />

seedling and take care.<br />

collection especially women<br />

Out put<br />

Increased fodder availability<br />

4.1 Health <strong>of</strong> live stock improved<br />

4.1 Expenditure on<br />

4.1 Proper seedling<br />

4.2 Expected increase in cattle<br />

seedling from register<br />

4.2 Proper care and<br />

population<br />

4.2 List <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries<br />

maintenance<br />

4.3 promotion <strong>of</strong> dairy<br />

from the register<br />

development among communities<br />

Activities<br />

4.1 Pasture land and grassland will be<br />

4.1 Rs. 9.87 Spent on fodder<br />

4.1 WC's Reports<br />

4.1 Peoples participating<br />

developed.<br />

4.2 Verification on farmbunds<br />

4.2 Expenditure Register<br />

4.2 Proper variety Selection<br />

4.2 On farm bunds selected local<br />

4.3 Resolution in WC's<br />

4.3 Social fencing<br />

species and fodder crops<br />

4.4 Physical verification<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 161


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Objective 5<br />

5.1 People's participation/women's<br />

5.1 Women participation enhanced<br />

Project to be implemented and<br />

socio-political and economic<br />

in decision-making <strong>of</strong> GVCs.<br />

managed in a democratic and<br />

empowerment in watershed for<br />

participatory way ensuring<br />

income generation activities<br />

equity.<br />

Output<br />

5.1 Maintenance <strong>of</strong> assets and<br />

5.1 Frequent meetings<br />

5.1 Proper training provided<br />

5.1 Community Mobilised<br />

records by the villagers<br />

5.2 Training register<br />

5.2 No biasness in villages<br />

5.2 Community Trained<br />

themselves.<br />

5.3 Increased<br />

5.3 Better standard <strong>of</strong> living<br />

participation<br />

Activities<br />

5.1 Formation and strengthening <strong>of</strong><br />

5.1 Increased awareness amongst<br />

5.1 Farmable socio-cultural<br />

5.1 No influence <strong>of</strong> any<br />

village institutions like women's SHG<br />

groups/WC/UGs and WCs through<br />

awareness programmes<br />

5.2 Formation <strong>of</strong> fodder banks to<br />

increase fodder security and promote<br />

dung development<br />

5.3 Capapcity building <strong>of</strong> SHG leaders<br />

and accounts members<br />

/farmers/UGs/WCs through<br />

workshop/meetings<br />

5.4 Income generation activities.<br />

women about village resources.<br />

5.2 Women participation enhanced<br />

in decision-making <strong>of</strong> GVCs.<br />

5.3 Farmers adopt organic farming<br />

practices<br />

5.4 Increased household income<br />

5.5 Improved access to credit to<br />

livelihood purposes.<br />

5.6 Gender sensitization <strong>of</strong> UGs<br />

and WCs to increase inclusiveness<br />

conditions at the village<br />

5.2 Checking registers <strong>of</strong><br />

SHGs<br />

5.3 Checking passbook <strong>of</strong><br />

groups<br />

5.4 Physical verification <strong>of</strong><br />

income generation activities<br />

5.5 Posters/banners/meeting<br />

register<br />

external agency<br />

5.2 Smooth flow <strong>of</strong> funds<br />

5.3 Access to appropriate<br />

technology<br />

5.4 People's Participation and<br />

positive perception towards<br />

the programme<br />

5.5 Awareness campaign<br />

<strong>of</strong> group decision making.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 162


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

CHAPTER - 7<br />

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 163


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation<br />

Quality and Sustainability Issues<br />

A Web-based CIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases.<br />

The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders <strong>of</strong> the project. The system shows the<br />

entire state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> and all <strong>of</strong> those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular<br />

project. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number<br />

wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users <strong>of</strong> the system. This system is being used<br />

for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form <strong>of</strong> a database which will<br />

help the stakeholders know areas <strong>of</strong> importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment<br />

etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries <strong>of</strong> various years from the project inception<br />

stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the treatment and thereby plan corrective<br />

measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project.<br />

Yet another component <strong>of</strong> the Web-based CIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the<br />

ground staff alias WDTs (Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any<br />

higher-up <strong>of</strong>ficial in charge <strong>of</strong> the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means <strong>of</strong> an SMS.<br />

The system works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information <strong>of</strong><br />

various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any<br />

progress in the treatment area is reported to the server by means <strong>of</strong> an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal <strong>of</strong>ficer or higher-up<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial can view the progress in a project by means <strong>of</strong> summarized reports generated over frequent periods <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 164


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Vigilance and Monitoring Committees<br />

1. For every work sanctioned under the Scheme, there should be a local vigilance and monitoring committee, composed <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

locality or village where the work is undertaken, to monitor the progress and quality <strong>of</strong> work while it is in progress. The Gram Sabha will<br />

elect the members <strong>of</strong> this committee and ensure that SC/STs and women are represented on it.<br />

2. The Implementing Agency should apprise this committee <strong>of</strong> estimates regarding the work, time frame and quality parameters. The final<br />

report <strong>of</strong> the committee should be attached along with the Completion Certificate <strong>of</strong> the work, and should also be placed at the next<br />

meeting <strong>of</strong> the Gram Sabha in the Panchayat where work has been executed.<br />

3. Local beneficiary committees may also be constituted for effective articulation <strong>of</strong> their entitlements and their access to them. The PIA<br />

members will be responsible for ensuring that local monitoring committees/beneficiary committees are constituted.<br />

Research support in watershed management<br />

Watershed management requires the support <strong>of</strong> research. Watershed projects will be used as on-farm sites for research designed and<br />

implemented with significant involvement <strong>of</strong> farmers and extension workers to produce site-specific technological solutions. This leads to<br />

problems in adoption and up-scaling <strong>of</strong> research findings within specific watersheds. There is also the question <strong>of</strong> up-scaling technologies<br />

and approaches beyond a designated watershed. At the same time, researchers will be able to relate research activities to the real problems<br />

facing farmers or to capture the locally developed or modified technologies. Yet there is a need to give technologies appropriate technical<br />

and scientific definition and to disseminate them widely.<br />

Farmer organization and empowerment<br />

The management <strong>of</strong> natural resources requires strong and effective farmer organizations. Such organizations empower farmers and<br />

create a good foundation for the transfer, adoption and use <strong>of</strong> information on new technologies. They also help in negotiating for inputs at<br />

favorable prices.<br />

Strong farmers’ organizations can be a conduit for services that meet felt needs. These needs include information to improve<br />

production and marketing, credit, and demand driven approaches that ensure ownership and sustainability <strong>of</strong> interventions.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 165


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Farmers’ organization allows the use <strong>of</strong> participatory approaches that recognize local capacity and indigenous knowledge. It<br />

incorporates the aspirations and perceptions that influence decision-making, while giving farmers an important role in planning and<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> watershed management activities. Such participation is important for the success, continuity and sustainability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

resource management programmes.<br />

Often a successful watershed knits together many aspects <strong>of</strong> the people’s lives apart from purely technical issues. Many<br />

conservation and basic group production initiatives have widened into a social movement dealing with matters such as weddings, funerals,<br />

care for the elderly and the disadvantaged, and other issues in the community.<br />

The initial natural resources focus also widens into a set <strong>of</strong> integrated activities such as the improvement <strong>of</strong> houses, provision <strong>of</strong><br />

water and electricity, acquisition <strong>of</strong> improved tools, seeds and livestock, all in the name <strong>of</strong> watershed management.<br />

Empowerment <strong>of</strong> farmers therefore allows farmers to demand services and to ensure the continued role <strong>of</strong> the state in supporting<br />

watershed development.<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> traditional institutions and indigenous knowledge<br />

Experience has shown that to effectively reach the farmers and to create viable watershed management options, it is important to<br />

respect indigenous knowledge and combine it with the formal modern science and technology. Local traditional institutions should be part<br />

and parcel <strong>of</strong> the process. For instance, there is a lot <strong>of</strong> under-used indigenous knowledge about climate, soils, biodiversity and other<br />

production conditions that confront farmers. A lot <strong>of</strong> research findings are abstract to extension providers and farmers alike. Such findings<br />

need to be married with indigenous knowledge and disseminated in a language that farmers and members <strong>of</strong> traditional institutions can<br />

understand.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 166


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Plans For Project management:<br />

The Project management <strong>of</strong> any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organization and<br />

the village level institutes. In both Kumbhariya and Khakhrechi, watershed committee and various user groups have been formulated for<br />

post project operation and maintenance <strong>of</strong> assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit<br />

<strong>of</strong> the project even after implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity<br />

building organization. They will act as a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.<br />

Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Fund:<br />

Such contributions will promote feeling <strong>of</strong> “ownership” <strong>of</strong> the programme among stakeholders. This will contribute to sustainable<br />

outcomes in the long-term. The voluntary contributions are saved in the Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Fund (WDF) that is to be used for repair,<br />

maintenance and use <strong>of</strong> assets created on common land. The contribution <strong>of</strong> it will comes mainly fund the following:<br />

Table No. 60. Details <strong>of</strong> Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Fund(WDF)<br />

Sl. No Financial Details Percent Contribution<br />

1 Natural Resource Management<br />

For General 10%<br />

For SC/ST 5%<br />

2 For Intensive Agriculture, Horticulture and animal Husbandry<br />

For General 40%<br />

For SC/ST 20%<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 167


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

It is planned that for SC/ST, BPL population the contribution will be taken in form <strong>of</strong> voluntary labour and the fund for labour will be<br />

diverted to the WDF.<br />

User Charges:<br />

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed<br />

during the formation <strong>of</strong> user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary <strong>of</strong><br />

watershed committee (WC) shall maintain the records <strong>of</strong> the following.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 168


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

CHAPTER - 8<br />

MAPS<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 169


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 170


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 171


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 172


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 173


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 174


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 175


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 176


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 177


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 178


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 179


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!