ASSESSMENT SCALE for WRITING - Schule.at

VOCABULARY
Range and choice of words
Accuracy
Spelling
Comprehensibility
GRAMMAR
Accuracy/
Errors
Comprehensibility, Variety
Readiness to use new/complex structures
ASSESSMENT SCALE for WRITING
TASK FULFILMENT 1
Content and variety
Subject knowledge
Relevancy
Text format, length and register
ORGANIZATION
Structure
Paragraphing and legibility
Cohesion and coherence
Editing and punctuation
6
5
4
3
2
1
• Wide range of vocabulary; very good choice of
words
• accurate form and usage;
• hardly any spelling mistakes;
• meaning clear.
• Good range of vocabulary; good choice of
words,
• mostly accurate form and usage;
• few spelling mistakes;
• meaning mostly clear.
• Adequate range of vocabulary and choice of
words;
• some errors of form and usage;
• some spelling mistakes;
• meaning not always clear.
• Sufficient range of vocabulary and choice of
words;
• considerable number of errors of form and
usage;
• considerable number of spelling mistakes;
• meaning sometimes not clear.
• Limited range of vocabulary and choice of
words;
• frequent errors of form and usage;
• frequent spelling mistakes;
• meaning often not clear.
• Poor range of vocabulary and choice of words
; repetitive
• numerous errors of form and usage;
• numerous spelling mistakes;
• meaning very often not clear
• mainly translation from mother tongue.
6
5
4
3
2
1
• Accurate use of grammar and structures;
• hardly any errors of agreement, tense, word
order, articles, pronouns, etc.;
• meaning clear;
• great variety of structures
• big readiness to use complex structures
• Mostly accurate use of grammar and
structures;
• few errors of agreement, etc.;
• meaning mostly clear;
• good variety of structures
• readiness to use complex structures.
• Adequate use of grammar and structures;
• some errors of agreement, etc.;
• meaning not always clear;
• adequate variety of structures
• some readiness to use complex structures.
• Sufficient use of grammar and structures;
• considerable number of errors of agreement,
etc.;
• meaning sometimes not clear;
• sufficient variety of structures
• sufficient readiness to use complex structures.
• Limited use of grammar and structures;
• frequent errors of agreement, etc.;
• meaning often not clear;
• limited variety of structures
• limited readiness to use complex structures
• Poor use of grammar and structures;
• numerous errors of agreement, etc.;
• meaning very often not clear;
• poor variety of structures.
0 not enough to evaluate
6/
3
5/
2,5
4/
2
3/
1,5
2/
1
1/
0,5
• Task fully achieved;
• great variety of ideas and arguments;
• very good knowledge of subject;
• text entirely relevant to the topic;
• appropriate format, length and register.
• Task almost fully achieved;
• good variety of ideas and arguments;
• good knowledge of subject;
• text mostly relevant to the topic;
• mostly appropriate format, length and register.
• Task adequately achieved;
• adequate variety of ideas and arguments;
• adequate knowledge of subject;
• some gaps or redundant information;
• acceptable format, length and register.
• Task sufficiently achieved;
• sufficient variety of ideas and arguments;
• sufficient knowledge of subject;
• considerable number of gaps or redundant
information;
• acceptable format, length and register.
• Task achieved only in a limited sense;
• limited variety of ideas and arguments;
• limited knowledge of subject;
• frequent gaps or redundant information;
• often inadequate format, length and register.
• Task poorly achieved
• poor variety of ideas and arguments;
• poor knowledge of subject;
• major gaps or pointless repetition;
• inadequate format, length and register.
6/
3
5/
2,5
4/
2
3/
1,5
2/
1
1/
0,5
• Clear overall structure;
• meaningful paragraphing and legible;
• very good use of connectives;
• no editing mistakes, conventions of punctuation
observed.
• Mostly clear overall structured;
• good paragraphing and legible;
• good use of connectives;
• hardly any editing mistakes, conventions of
punctuation mostly observed.
• Adequately structured, not always wellorganized;
• paragraphing misleading/missing at times,
intelligible on the whole
• adequate and correct use of connectives;
• some editing and punctuation errors.
• Sufficiently structured, sometimes
disorganized;
• paragraphing often misleading/ missing, often
not intelligible
• sufficient and mostly correct use of
connectives;
• considerable number of editing and punctuation
errors.
• Limited overall structuring;
• frequent mistakes in paragraphing, difficult to
read
• limited use of connectives;
• frequent editing and punctuation errors.
• Poor overall structuring;
• no meaningful paragraphing, nearly impossible
to read;
• poor use of connectives;
• numerous editing and punctuation errors.
1 Veto category: If the candidate gets 0 points in this category, all other categories are 0 points too.
Writing_(6_bands)_E.doc

d) Notenverteilung:
NOTE 24 Punkte 18Punkte
Sehr gut 22-24 17-18
Gut 19-21 15-16
Befriedigend 15-18 12-14
Genügend 12-14 9-11
Nicht genügend 0 - 11 0 – 8
Es müsste sein:
d) Notenverteilung:
NOTE 24 Punkte 18Punkte
Sehr gut 22-24 17-18
Gut 19-21 15-16
Befriedigend 16-18 12-14
Genügend 12-15 9-11
Nicht genügend 0 - 11 0 – 8
Writing_(6_bands)_E.doc