01.07.2014 Views

1 - The Black Vault

1 - The Black Vault

1 - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Loose Minute<br />

D/Sec(AS)/64/3<br />

20 July 2000<br />

AD/E&MGOMD<br />

Copy to:<br />

DRl<br />

CODE REQUEST- PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE<br />

1. We spoke this morning about a letter we have received from a member of the<br />

public who is seelcing access to 'UFO' files from 1969. I attach a copy of the letter<br />

and our proposed response.<br />

2. We have found Dr Clarke to be tenacious when corresponding on other 'UFO'­<br />

related issues and I have some concerns about how he might respond to a refusal to<br />

grant his request. What might we say if he replies that he is prepared to give an<br />

undertaking that he would not record or use any personal details contained in the<br />

files? He could claim that he was only interested in aggregating the data and<br />

therefore the personal confidentiality argument would not arise.<br />

3. If a decision was to be made now or in future to grant access without the material<br />

being sanitised, how might this be done so as to ensure personal information was not<br />

extracted? It is likely that agreement to Dr Clarke's requests would prompt others<br />

(ufologists with 'UFO' research-related interests and/or the media) to seek similar<br />

access and a strategy would need to be developed for dealing for dealing with this. I<br />

am copying this note and attachments to--for any advice he might have on<br />

these aspects.<br />

4. We have acknowledged Dr Clarke's letter and advised him that we will provide a<br />

substantive response shortly.<br />

Sec(AS)2<br />

MB8247 -<br />

,rtTe/~3- .._<br />

__<br />

1~~~~----- 1<br />

~{~ 1 . . ]_

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!