You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Scenario 1<br />
The freight forwarder reports their HBOL cargo report <strong>to</strong> the ICS before the shipping company reports their OBOL cargo report <strong>to</strong><br />
the ICS. There are no Cus<strong>to</strong>ms or AQIS interventions.<br />
Description of Business Scenario<br />
• Freight forwarder reports a House Bill of Lading (HBOL) for an<br />
FCL container <strong>to</strong> the ICS using an OBOL number different <strong>to</strong><br />
that issued by the shipping company<br />
.<br />
• Shipping company reports the OBOL sea cargo report <strong>to</strong> the<br />
ICS using their OBOL number<br />
• There is no underbond move as the container is delivered<br />
form the wharf<br />
When the ocean bill number reported in the freight forwarder cargo report<br />
does not match with the ocean bill number reported in the shipping<br />
company ocean bill.<br />
The current system behaviour and<br />
result is:<br />
• The shipping company OBOL<br />
sea cargo report is rejected,<br />
because it is identified as a<br />
duplicate of the freight forwarder<br />
HBOL sea cargo report by the<br />
ICS;<br />
• The freight forwarder must<br />
withdraw and resubmit their sea<br />
cargo report with the correct<br />
OBOL number;<br />
• The shipping company must<br />
resubmit their sea cargo report<br />
The changed system behaviour and<br />
result is:<br />
• The freight forwarder HBOL sea<br />
cargo report is accepted by the<br />
ICS;<br />
• The shipping sompany OBOL<br />
sea cargo report is accepted by<br />
the ICS, and the derived OBOL<br />
for the freight forwarder HBOL<br />
sea cargo report is updated