22.07.2014 Views

Higher aspirations: an agenda for reforming European universities

Higher aspirations: an agenda for reforming European universities

Higher aspirations: an agenda for reforming European universities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES A EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION SPACE<br />

2.2.3 The matching of students to institutions<br />

Fiscal jurisdictions <strong>an</strong>d the geographical perimeter of mobility<br />

Institutions of higher education in Europe are driven by public funding. Yet there is<br />

not one single fiscal jurisdiction. Each state (or, in some cases, sub-state entities)<br />

funds its own higher education system.<br />

Within the EU, states may not exclude students from other fiscal jurisdictions. And,<br />

indeed, there is some, albeit modest, degree of mobility of students across EU<br />

countries (see Figure 3), which goes some way towards preventing the Europe<strong>an</strong><br />

Space of <strong>Higher</strong> Education from being simply a juxtaposition of isolated national (or<br />

sub-national) systems.<br />

In theory, the lack of concord<strong>an</strong>ce between the fiscal jurisdiction (typically the<br />

nation state, at times the regions) <strong>an</strong>d the space of permissible mobility of students<br />

(the Europe<strong>an</strong> Union) risks generating problems of the free riding or fiscal competition-type.<br />

So far, however, these problems have been small at the undergraduate level<br />

because, especially if we exclude short-term, Erasmus-like exch<strong>an</strong>ges, mobility at<br />

this level remains very limited in Europe 7 .<br />

In fact, the low level of mobility at undergraduate level should not be viewed as <strong>an</strong><br />

<strong>an</strong>omaly. Even in the United States, mobility of undergraduate students is relatively<br />

low.<br />

Limited mobility is likely to persist even after the Bologna process is fully implemented.<br />

For one thing, countrywide specialisation in undergraduate curricula is not likely<br />

to emerge, since there is no prospect of increasing returns to encourage it. On the<br />

other h<strong>an</strong>d, Bologna could in principle result in <strong>an</strong> increase in student mobility across<br />

countries if it induces <strong>an</strong> increase in qualitative differences. However, a more likely<br />

scenario is that the creation of the ESHE will result in convergence of the quality of<br />

undergraduate education among countries. In a more tr<strong>an</strong>sparent l<strong>an</strong>dscape, where<br />

good practice <strong>an</strong>d per<strong>for</strong>m<strong>an</strong>ce become more visible, public opinion is more likely to<br />

dem<strong>an</strong>d better public policy.<br />

7. There have been highly-publicised specific exceptions linked to the limitation of access to some degrees (eg in<br />

medicine <strong>an</strong>d related fields) in some countries (namely, Fr<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>d Germ<strong>an</strong>y), with students then flocking to<br />

countries without such limitation (namely, Belgium <strong>an</strong>d Austria). For <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>alysis of this issue, see Gérard<br />

(2007).<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!