22.07.2014 Views

Higher aspirations: an agenda for reforming European universities

Higher aspirations: an agenda for reforming European universities

Higher aspirations: an agenda for reforming European universities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES A EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION SPACE<br />

<strong>an</strong>d imitation among institutions. As we have argued in the previous section, the<br />

extent of this phenomenon is likely to be limited at the undergraduate level, but that<br />

this is not in itself alarming. Yet it would be a very signific<strong>an</strong>t failure if it did not materialise<br />

at the graduate level.<br />

The central role of the second level of higher education, the Master level, is a major<br />

trait of the Bologna process. It has some parallels in the US system of professional<br />

schools (law, medicine, business, etc.), but no exact <strong>an</strong>alogue that is as comprehensive.<br />

It thus provides <strong>an</strong> opportunity to develop something characteristically<br />

Europe<strong>an</strong>. It seems clear that the typology of Masters will sp<strong>an</strong> a wide r<strong>an</strong>ge with, at<br />

one end of the spectrum, strictly professional, practice-oriented degrees, perhaps<br />

offered in association with enterprises <strong>an</strong>d, at the other end, research-oriented<br />

degrees which open the way to a PhD. But the field is evolving <strong>an</strong>d m<strong>an</strong>y intermediate<br />

cases will emerge. It is still too early <strong>for</strong> a final model to have crystallised. This is<br />

a domain where a bottom-up approach is the appropriate strategy: experimentation<br />

<strong>an</strong>d institutional risk-taking are fully justified <strong>an</strong>d should be encouraged.<br />

The student access policies discussed <strong>for</strong> the Bachelor level should now be qualified<br />

in two ways <strong>for</strong> the Master level.<br />

First, Master degrees typically represent a commitment of student time of one or two<br />

academic years 12 . It would not make much sense to devote a subst<strong>an</strong>tial fraction of<br />

this time to selection. There<strong>for</strong>e the matching system which leaves the selection of<br />

admitted students to the institutions themselves will now come into its own. Since<br />

we are contemplating the emergence of fierce competition, this should not have a<br />

negative impact on efficiency, rather the contrary. It should be added, however, that<br />

the matching task would be much aided by the development of Europe-wide st<strong>an</strong>dardised<br />

voluntary tests.<br />

Second, while the principle of the right of access should be strictly maintained <strong>an</strong>d<br />

actively promoted, the argument in favour of fees embodying a subst<strong>an</strong>tial subsidy<br />

is now somewhat weaker. A policy of scholarships <strong>an</strong>d of income-contingent lo<strong>an</strong>s<br />

may suffice <strong>for</strong> guar<strong>an</strong>teeing the equity objectives. The specific policy may, of<br />

course, depend on the nature of the Master. A research Master leading to a Doctoral<br />

degree should not be treated in the same way as a professional Master comm<strong>an</strong>ding<br />

a more immediate market return. For example, the University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia at<br />

12. Both lengths are currently present, even within the same country, <strong>an</strong>d the expectation is that they will continue<br />

to coexist.<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!