QUAESTIO - Social Sciences Division - UCLA
QUAESTIO - Social Sciences Division - UCLA
QUAESTIO - Social Sciences Division - UCLA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Quaestio<br />
missionary activity “in its completest and widest sense,” and<br />
obligated the company to provide for the revival and<br />
encouragement of education among the Indian natives. 21 In<br />
addition, the EIC’s trade monopoly was abolished, thus opening<br />
India to new traders who lacked the EIC’s experience and<br />
refined approach towards Indian affairs.<br />
At the same time, attention began to shift towards<br />
reforming “Indian character.” Oriental literature, it was soon<br />
learned, inevitably carried with it the religious biases of the<br />
Indian faiths – something which was unacceptable in the British<br />
campaign to uplift the Indians morally and intellectually.<br />
Missionaries and private traders, who had gained more<br />
prominence following the Charter Act of 1813, were especially<br />
forceful in arguing for Western education along English lines.<br />
The vague wording of the 1813 Charter Act regarding “revival”<br />
further opened the door to furious debates and opposing<br />
interpretations. Was “revival” to mean a revival of Indian<br />
literature, as the Orientalists insisted? Charles Trevelyan (1807-<br />
1886), one of the most vocal opponents of Orientalism, declared<br />
that the Oriental project had only served to produce “a revival,<br />
not of sound learning, but of antiquated and pernicious errors.” 22<br />
He, like his brother-in-law Lord Macaulay, fiercely supported<br />
21 J.A. Richter, pp. 150-1, quoted in J. P. Naik and Nurullah Syed, A Students'<br />
History of Education in India, 48.<br />
22 Charles Trevelyan, On the Education of the People of India (London:<br />
Longman, Orme, Brown, Green & Longmans, 1838), 89.<br />
12