28.07.2014 Views

Developing GIS indicators and metrics - Colorado State University

Developing GIS indicators and metrics - Colorado State University

Developing GIS indicators and metrics - Colorado State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eveloping <strong>GIS</strong> <strong>indicators</strong> <strong>and</strong> metric<br />

avid Theobald<br />

atural Resource Ecology Lab<br />

olorado <strong>State</strong> <strong>University</strong>


FUNDING SOURCE<br />

This presentation was developed under the STAR<br />

Research Assistance Agreement CR-829095<br />

awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection<br />

Agency (EPA) to <strong>Colorado</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>University</strong>. This<br />

report have not been formally reviewed by EPA.<br />

The views expressed here are solely those of its<br />

author <strong>and</strong> the STARMAP Program. EPA does<br />

not endorse any products or commercial services<br />

mentioned in this presentation.


Goals of indicator development<br />

Develop <strong>and</strong> evaluate l<strong>and</strong>scape-level<br />

<strong>indicators</strong> suitable for spatial <strong>and</strong><br />

temporal analyses of EMAP data<br />

Investigate limitations of currentlyavailable<br />

data <strong>and</strong> offer new, robust<br />

methodologies


Current effort<br />

• Linkage between watershed <strong>and</strong><br />

hydrologic networks<br />

• Refine surrogates with direct<br />

measures of area <strong>and</strong> discharge<br />

• <strong>GIS</strong>-based tools<br />

• RWTools for ArcView<br />

• Catchment delineation & discharge in<br />

Arc<strong>GIS</strong>


1. Watershed–hydrological<br />

network linkage<br />

• “…in every respect, the valley rules<br />

the stream.” – Hynes 1975<br />

• Indirect measures based on<br />

hydrological properties (e.g.,<br />

Strahler order, drainage density,<br />

etc.)


Distance:<br />

As the crow flies<br />

(Euclidean)


Distance:<br />

As the crow flies<br />

As the seed floats<br />

(downstream)


Distance:<br />

As the crow flies<br />

As the seed floats<br />

As the fish swims<br />

(down & up stream)


Distance:<br />

As the crow flies<br />

As the seed floats<br />

As the fish swims<br />

(down & up stream)<br />

Upstream length<br />

- mainstem (2)<br />

- arbolate (1+2+3+4)


Distance:<br />

As the crow flies<br />

As the seed floats<br />

As the fish swims<br />

Upstream length<br />

Network (dams,<br />

fragmentation)


What <strong>indicators</strong> measure<br />

watershed-stream linkage?<br />

• Length of stream line<br />

– Dam alteration of flow at a downstream<br />

gauge?<br />

• RWTools extension (ArcView v3.2)


Upstream<br />

66 km<br />

Mainstem<br />

Upstream<br />

37 km<br />

Downstream<br />

298 km<br />

Network<br />

16 km (do<br />

6 km (up)


2. Direct measures of discharge<br />

• Surrogates developed, e.g. Strahler<br />

order:<br />

The usefulness of stream order assumes,<br />

with a sufficiently large sample, that order is<br />

proportional to stream discharge<br />

– Strahler 1957<br />

• Alternatives:<br />

- basin area<br />

- discharge


Delineate reach catchments<br />

• Robust method (no pre-processing)<br />

• 1 to 1 relationship NHD reach <strong>and</strong><br />

catchment<br />

• “Grow” watershed from reach line<br />

based on flow direction iteratively


Stream discharge<br />

Precipitation<br />

D = C * P


8 acft<br />

20 acft<br />

10 acft


R 2 =0.7282<br />

P-value=3.407e-006


Stream discharge<br />

• Encouraging preliminary results<br />

• Additional factors (Infiltration, E.T.):<br />

– Geology<br />

– L<strong>and</strong> cover<br />

– Exposure<br />

D = f(C, G, L, E)


3. <strong>GIS</strong>-based tools<br />

• Interactive query <strong>and</strong> analysis of<br />

watersheds (RWTools) (ArcView<br />

v3.2)<br />

• Arc<strong>GIS</strong> Geometric network


Plans for next year<br />

• Initial release of <strong>GIS</strong> tools:<br />

– RWTools for Arc<strong>GIS</strong><br />

– Functional-based spatial weights


Spatial weights<br />

11<br />

2<br />

W =<br />

0 0 0 0 0<br />

0 0 0 0 0<br />

0 0 0 0 0<br />

1 0 1 0 0<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

0 1 0 1 0


Functional weighting<br />

W =<br />

0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

1<br />

0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

4<br />

1<br />

5<br />

2 3<br />

6 7<br />

0 0 0 0.7 0 0 0<br />

0.2 0.8 0 0.2 0.8 0 0<br />

0.1 0.2 1.0 0.1 0.2 1.0 0<br />

E.g., downstream hydrology


Functional weighting<br />

W =<br />

0 1 0 0 0 0 0<br />

1 0 0 0 1 1 0<br />

0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

1<br />

0 0 0 0 1 0 0<br />

4<br />

1<br />

5<br />

2 3<br />

6 7<br />

0 1 0 1 0 1 0<br />

0 1 0 0 1 0 1<br />

0 0 0 0 0 1 0<br />

E.g., macroinvertebrates


Plans for next year<br />

• Initial release of <strong>GIS</strong> tools:<br />

• Perennial/intermittent frame<br />

problem in western US<br />

• Development of network<br />

fragmentation indices

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!