29.07.2014 Views

Measuring the Economic Output of the Education Sector in the ...

Measuring the Economic Output of the Education Sector in the ...

Measuring the Economic Output of the Education Sector in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

74). The five education levels are def<strong>in</strong>ed as follows: 0−8 years <strong>of</strong> school<strong>in</strong>g; some or<br />

completed high school; some or completed postsecondary school below bachelor’s degree;<br />

bachelor’s degree; and master’s degree or above. For <strong>the</strong> cost-based approach, enrolments are<br />

disaggregated <strong>in</strong>to three education levels (primary and secondary, college, and university) as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> data on education expenditures. 6<br />

While <strong>the</strong> two approaches yield similar estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>in</strong> real education output, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

produce very different estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> education output (Chart 6). The <strong>in</strong>come-based<br />

estimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nom<strong>in</strong>al value <strong>of</strong> education services was about 6.8 times as large as <strong>the</strong> costbased<br />

estimate <strong>in</strong> 2005.<br />

Chart 6<br />

Ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come-based to cost-based estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nom<strong>in</strong>al value <strong>of</strong><br />

education services <strong>in</strong> Canada<br />

ratio<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004<br />

Ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> education to costs <strong>of</strong> education<br />

Source: Statistics Canada, authors' calculations.<br />

The relative levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two estimates <strong>of</strong> education output <strong>in</strong> Chart 6 can be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as <strong>the</strong><br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economic benefits <strong>of</strong> education to <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> education. That ratio decl<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />

1976 to <strong>the</strong> mid-1980s. It rema<strong>in</strong>ed virtually unchanged from <strong>the</strong> mid-1980s to 2000, and<br />

decl<strong>in</strong>ed aga<strong>in</strong> after 2000. This suggests that <strong>the</strong> return to education decl<strong>in</strong>ed from 1976 to <strong>the</strong><br />

mid-1980s; it decl<strong>in</strong>ed aga<strong>in</strong> post 2000, follow<strong>in</strong>g a period <strong>of</strong> little change from <strong>the</strong> mid-1980s to<br />

2000. This is consistent with <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs on <strong>the</strong> trends <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> return to education <strong>in</strong><br />

Canada (Emery 2004). Emery exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> return to undergraduate university<br />

education for <strong>the</strong> period from 1960 to 2000 and observed reductions <strong>in</strong> returns to university<br />

education <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> late 1970s and early 1980s; by 1985, <strong>the</strong> returns to education had resumed <strong>the</strong><br />

levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1960s and early 1970s.<br />

6. The difference between weighted and un-weighted school enrolment estimates reflects <strong>the</strong> compositional shift<br />

between types <strong>of</strong> students. As <strong>the</strong> un-weighted school enrolment decl<strong>in</strong>ed at 0.6% per year from 1976 to 1986,<br />

<strong>the</strong> composition shift was an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong> 0.6% per year for <strong>the</strong> cost-based output estimate and it was an <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1.2% per year for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>come-based estimate for that period. The larger composition shift <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>come-based<br />

estimate reflects <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> large decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> enrolment <strong>in</strong> primary education <strong>in</strong> that period that is captured <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>come-based estimate, but not <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost-based estimate that does not have primary education as a separate<br />

education category,<br />

<strong>Economic</strong> Analysis Research Paper Series - 26 - Statistics Canada – Catalogue no.11F0027M, no. 080

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!