31.07.2014 Views

AMSOIL P.i. - A Study in Performance (G2543) - Synthetic Motor Oil

AMSOIL P.i. - A Study in Performance (G2543) - Synthetic Motor Oil

AMSOIL P.i. - A Study in Performance (G2543) - Synthetic Motor Oil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Picture B - Injector spray pattern before P.i. treatment<br />

Picture C - Injector spray pattern after P.i. treatment<br />

By measur<strong>in</strong>g oxygen, the oxygen sensor <strong>in</strong> the exhaust stream is able to calculate how much<br />

gasol<strong>in</strong>e the <strong>in</strong>jectors are spray<strong>in</strong>g, as well as the air/fuel ratio. Although vehicles are usually<br />

equipped with many fuel <strong>in</strong>jectors (one per cyl<strong>in</strong>der), only one oxygen sensor monitors them<br />

all. Through the oxygen sensor, the computer is able to determ<strong>in</strong>e if the eng<strong>in</strong>e is receiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the right amount of fuel. Deposit build-up on the <strong>in</strong>jectors reduces the fuel flow. When the<br />

computer determ<strong>in</strong>es that the eng<strong>in</strong>e is not receiv<strong>in</strong>g enough fuel, it <strong>in</strong>creases fuel flow from<br />

all the <strong>in</strong>jectors <strong>in</strong> the fuel system. Although this solution would work well if all the <strong>in</strong>jectors<br />

lost fuel flow at the same rate, <strong>in</strong>jectors almost always plug at different rates based upon their<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g temperatures (<strong>in</strong>board cyl<strong>in</strong>ders typically run hotter) and <strong>in</strong>dividual manufactur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

tolerances.<br />

Port fuel <strong>in</strong>jector deposits have a significant impact on fuel economy and emissions because<br />

they plug <strong>in</strong>jectors at uneven rates, and the eng<strong>in</strong>e cannot compensate for <strong>in</strong>dividual cyl<strong>in</strong>ders.<br />

For example, a four-cyl<strong>in</strong>der eng<strong>in</strong>e could have two plugged <strong>in</strong>jectors, while the other two may<br />

only be mildly plugged or not plugged at all. The oxygen sensor <strong>in</strong>dicates to the computer that<br />

the eng<strong>in</strong>e is not receiv<strong>in</strong>g enough fuel, so it <strong>in</strong>creases the fuel supply to all four cyl<strong>in</strong>ders.<br />

Now the two <strong>in</strong>jectors that were plugged are provid<strong>in</strong>g more fuel, but it still may not be enough,<br />

while the two <strong>in</strong>jectors that weren’t plugged are provid<strong>in</strong>g more fuel than necessary. As a<br />

result, it creates a situation where two cyl<strong>in</strong>ders are runn<strong>in</strong>g rich and the other two are runn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

lean. Remov<strong>in</strong>g port fuel <strong>in</strong>jector deposits allows the eng<strong>in</strong>e to operate as it was designed,<br />

improv<strong>in</strong>g fuel economy, lower<strong>in</strong>g emissions and contribut<strong>in</strong>g to improved drivability (reduced<br />

stumbl<strong>in</strong>g, stall<strong>in</strong>g, hesitation and rough idle) and <strong>in</strong>creased power.<br />

As more holes are<br />

added to director<br />

plate designs, they<br />

must be made<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly smaller<br />

<strong>in</strong> order to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><br />

the pressure drop.<br />

Injector Deposit<br />

Clean-Up Test<br />

The ASTM D5598 Injector Clean-<br />

Up PFI Test was performed to test<br />

the fuel <strong>in</strong>jector clean<strong>in</strong>g power of<br />

<strong>AMSOIL</strong> P.i. <strong>Performance</strong> Improver.<br />

Start<strong>in</strong>g with a new, clean fourcyl<strong>in</strong>der<br />

2.2L Chrysler eng<strong>in</strong>e<br />

with new fuel <strong>in</strong>jectors (an eng<strong>in</strong>e<br />

particularly sensitive to <strong>in</strong>jector<br />

deposits), the car was driven and<br />

allowed to build up deposits for<br />

2,728 miles on normal gasol<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Afterwards, deposit levels and<br />

<strong>in</strong>jector flow rates were measured.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>jectors did not develop<br />

deposits at the same rate, as two<br />

of the <strong>in</strong>jectors were fouled >15%,<br />

one was fouled >10% and one was<br />

% Flow<br />

105<br />

95<br />

85<br />

75<br />

Injector 1<br />

Injector 2<br />

Injector 3<br />

Injector 4<br />

Test Method: CARB<br />

Build-up<br />

1000 2000 3000<br />

Total Test Miles<br />

Graph A<br />

Pass<br />

Clean-up<br />

with P.i.<br />

Two of the four dirty <strong>in</strong>jectors tested were fouled >15% and<br />

another was fouled >10%. After one tank of operation on<br />

<strong>AMSOIL</strong> P.i., all <strong>in</strong>jectors returned to >95% fl ow.<br />

almost perfectly clean. After the measurements were recorded, the <strong>in</strong>jectors were placed back<br />

<strong>in</strong> the car and the car was filled with a tank of gas treated with P.i. As seen <strong>in</strong> Graph A, all<br />

<strong>in</strong>jectors returned to >95% flow after one tank of operation on P.i.<br />

<strong>AMSOIL</strong> P.i.: A <strong>Study</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!